WEBVTT - Will Biden’s IRA Spark a New Era in Clean-Tech Supply?

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Dana Perkins and you're listening to Switched on

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the B and EF podcast. Today we welcome back to

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the show the head of Trade and Supply Chains at BNAF,

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Antoine Wagner Jones. Last year, Antoine came on the show

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to discuss the complex world of global supply chains and

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>how the then newly introduced Inflation Reduction Act was impacting them. Well,

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in a few months that have passed, the IRA has

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>indeed caused a shift in clean tech production alignment in

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the US and in response, other countries, regions and trading

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 1>blocks have been making moves of their own. So what

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>is the current state of play, both in and outside

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of the US and what policies are countries introducing to

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>ensure that they keep pace with their own clean energy transitions. Well,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to come to that, and on today's show

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>we discuss with Antoine a range of topics. We talk

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>about the potential fracturing of these traditional supply chains as

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>countries attempt to onboard their clean tech production and the

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>risks that this may pose for the global net zero targets.

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Also how countries and areas like the EU have reacted

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>to the inflation reduction Act and then lastly, really can

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>anyone challenge China's production capacity. If you like this podcast,

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>make sure to subscribe on whatever player you're listening to

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it on today to receive updates on future episodes, and

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>consider giving us a review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>We've included several links to BNF research notes on supply

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>chains in today's show notes, and BNF subscribers can access

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>them at BNF on the Bloomberg terminal, at BNF dot com,

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>or on our mobile app. As a reminder, bn EF

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>does not provide investment or strategy advice, and our full

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>disclaimer is at the end of the show. But right

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 1>now I get to speak with Antoine about supply chains. Antwin,

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining us today.

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Dana, great to be here.

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So we're here, We're back. We're talking about supply chains

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>with you on the show, and this is actually a

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>really great time. No, we scheduled this before we knew

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>what was going to happen at the G seven, But

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>at the G seven supply chains featured quite prominently. Can

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>you tell us a little bit about what transpired?

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 2>That's right, there was a convening of the G seven

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 2>in Hiroshima in Japan, and three days ago on the

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.120
<v Speaker 2>twentieth of May, they issued a communicate, which means that

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 2>it's a document that outlines their priorities. And what was

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 2>striking was maybe two things. One was the extent to

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 2>which supply chains featured and the importance of building out

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>clean energy manufacturing. And that's something that we've seen piecemeal

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 2>emerge across these big economies across the world since August

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 2>of last year with the Inflation Reduction Act being passed

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 2>by the US, and we also saw a desire to

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.839
<v Speaker 2>sort of reframe what's being seen as strategic based off

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 2>with China and not talking about decoupling, but talking about

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 2>de risking. And that's very important as well, because a

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 2>lot of these moves towards reshaping clean energy supply chains

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 2>are shaped in relationship with China, which dominates the production

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 2>of clean energies today.

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And certainly we're here to talk about clean energy supply chains,

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>but was it all supply chains or specifically clean energy

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>supply chains that were discussed at the G seven.

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 2>So energy featured in about a court of the total

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 2>points that were put out in the various documents that

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 2>were issued after the convening. And what's interesting is when

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 2>they've talked about supply chains, when that was mentioned, it

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 2>really was mentioned overwhelmingly with relation to either making supply

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 2>chains more sustainable, so accounting for emissions as part of

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 2>supply chains, or talking about the on shoring of clean

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 2>energy supply chains that's implicitly things like batteries, things like

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>solar panels, things like electorallyzers for making hydrogen.

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>For a very long time, China has dominated in this

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>clean energy equipment manufacturing space and has really driven a

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of the cast of clients in certain industries. And

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>let's use solar as an example. Even though this conversation

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>really has started to shift towards having more local supply

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>chains around the world, is China still the dominant player.

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 2>So China still dominates dominates in various areas, and that

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 2>really ranges from the production of various pieces of equipment,

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 2>so of solar modules, of the end piece of equipment

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 2>like battery cells, but it also goes upstream from there,

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 2>and that dominance is even more accentuated in sort of

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 2>midstream building blocks to making solar modules for example, like

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 2>ingots and wafers. And when it comes to batteries, anodes

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 2>and cathodes, and then if you go even further up,

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 2>there's also a lot of refining that's done for things

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>like lithium, for things like cobalts, so metals that are

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 2>used for making batteries in sort of the mainstream battery

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>chemistries that we're seeing today, and those two are mostly

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 2>located in China. And what we've been doing recently at

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 2>BNF over the last few months is starting to track

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 2>investments and starting to look at the amounts that's sort

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 2>of represented that's flowing into new factories that are being

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>brought online across the different sectors that we're looking at.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>And actually there's this dominance today of manufacturing concentrated within China,

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 2>but when we look at new facilities new factories that

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 2>are being brought online, that's equally striking. And actually what

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing in things like for SOL for example, upwards

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 2>of ninety five percent of new capacity that's coming online

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 2>that came online last year did so in China. When

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 2>we look at the battery supply chain too, it was

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 2>upwards of ninety percent of everything new that came online

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 2>in terms of capacity came online in China. So that's

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 2>not just a snapshot in time. It's not just a

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 2>picture that we're seeing. Over the last few years, China's dominated,

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 2>but that's starting to change. Even though we've got all

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 2>of this talk of shifting supply chains and on shoring

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 2>things to various countries and friendshuring and near suring, what

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 2>we're not seeing is that translate into factories coming online

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 2>just yet to really challenge that dominance of all that

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 2>concentration of capacity in one country.

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>And that conversation around enshuring near shoring moving. The supply

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>change largely has to do with the West and then

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Australia and the beginning you reference the G seven transpiring.

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>At the same time as the G seven, China had

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a meeting with a number of other countries in Asia,

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>which also serve as an excellent block of countries that

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:03.360
<v Speaker 1>are also so installing renewable energy. Is the domestic market,

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>both in China and then within the rest of the

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.640
<v Speaker 1>continent going to essentially grow to the point that even

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 1>with the onshoring and near shoring taking place in other

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world, perhaps it doesn't wind down business

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>activities within Asia.

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 2>So definitely, domestic markets are really important when it comes

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 2>to industrial strategy, and that's something that we're sort of

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 2>seeing from a number of different angles. One of the

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 2>reasons why China has been able to scale up the

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing of things like batteries, of things like soda, having

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 2>these really efficient integrated value chains located within its borders

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 2>is due to having this massive booming local market and

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 2>then having that be the basis for developing this manufacturing

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 2>base and then being able to export from that has

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 2>been really key to to what we've seen play out

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 2>over the last couple of decades. And then the presence

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 2>of countries near China that are also seeing an increase

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 2>in an uptake of renewable energy of storage of electric vehicles,

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 2>whether they be two three wheelers or passenger vehicles, is

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 2>also a big part of the picture, and that's something

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 2>that we'll see manufacturing emerge in those countries too, and

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 2>we are already seeing that. But is also a boon

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 2>to sort of China being able to leverage its proximity

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 2>to those markets in continuing to remain one of the

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 2>big sources of exports in the region.

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So you noted that some of the projects haven't really

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 1>started yet and that we haven't seen these manufacturing facilities

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>really at the scale that they're being talked about, or

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps are intended in the future. But certainly there are

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:28.200
<v Speaker 1>movements in various countries and parts of the world from

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a policy standpoint, that do very intentionally create an environment

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>where we expect to see this happen in the future.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's start with the US. Can you remind us

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>briefly what it is that the Inflation Reduction Act is

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>designed to do in reference to supply chains and manufacturing.

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, when we talk about a lack of investment in

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 2>new facilities, that's really in the West, in countries that

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 2>profess to have this real emphasis on reshowing, on onshoring, manufacturing,

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 2>supply chains for clean energy, and we haven't seen that

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 2>translate into commissionings yet into being brought online at scale

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere near the scale that we're seeing in China.

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>And we're continuing to see there. That might change, and

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 2>that might change just because of what you mentioned just now,

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 2>which is because of policies like the Inflation Reduction Act,

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 2>which are all about deploying speeding the energy transition within

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 2>the US, but are also framed and this is really

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.960
<v Speaker 2>important as an economic tool as a job creation bill,

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 2>and as something that really doubles down on localizing the

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 2>value add and having that accrue as part of the

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 2>energy transition, having that value add a crew to the

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>US to the domestic market. So what's resulted is this

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 2>policy which not just subsidizes through the form of tax credits,

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 2>the deployment of things like evs, of things like the

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 2>production of hydrogen of ccs, but also is very keen

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 2>on providing that same support to manufacturing facilities. So you've

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 2>got tax credits again that are available for manufacturers not

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 2>just of critical minerals for batteries, but also of various

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 2>components for whether it's onshore or offshore wind, solar battery

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 2>making itself really across the board, and it's very compar

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 2>have been doing so. And then you've got some additional

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 2>tools which are very much linked to this, such as

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 2>with some of the investment tax credits which are available

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 2>for deploying renewable energy projects. Ten percent for examples, is

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 2>typically what it's set at. Additional subsidies which are provided

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 2>when various domestic manufacturing requirements are met. So there's a

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 2>whole suite of tools that are deployed as part of

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 2>not just the Inflation Reduction Act, but also piece of

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 2>legislation that are linked to it, such as the Infrastructure

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 2>Bill that was passed earlier by the Biden administration. And

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 2>that's a pretty powerful arsenal when it comes to really

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 2>channelling investments into the US, and we've seen a pretty

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 2>marked response as a result of that. What we're doing

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 2>is tracking new EV new battery factory projects. We're doing

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 2>so in other areas too, but just when we look

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 2>at EV's and batteries, we see about sixty plus billion

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 2>dollars of new announcements that have been made since August

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 2>last year, and really directly as a result of the

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Inflation Reduction Act. So the IRA has really proven that

0:09:55.559 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 2>it's managed to convince developers, investors finances to double their

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 2>efforts towards funding facilities in the US for manufacturing clean

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 2>energy technologies. And that's something that's really speeding up.

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>And certainly this will drive this onshoring move in the

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>United States. But what about the near shoring aspects? Does

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the array have a benefit for nearby countries and specifically

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about Mexico, which has started to emerge as

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a nearby manufacturing hub.

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 2>So there are various bits of the IRA that do

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 2>allow for near shoring. I think what's important to note

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 2>is that this is actually quite limited when we talk

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 2>about the IRA as a whole. There's a number of

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 2>different production tax credits, investment tax credits that fund clean

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 2>energy technologies, but there's only really one where this whole

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 2>near shoring aspect is that relevant, and that's the Electric

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Vehicle Tax Credit. So that's five hundred dollars that you're

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 2>ultimately eligible if you meet both criteria that are set

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 2>for accessing this tax credit, and part of that can

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 2>be met via sourcing critical materials from a number of geographies,

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 2>including countries with which the US is a free trade

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 2>agreement and that does include North America to Canada and Mexico.

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 2>And the other is to assemble manufacture electric vehicles in

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 2>North America, and that includes Mexico and Canada, and that

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 2>does represent opportunities not just for free trade agreement countries,

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 2>but also for of course the countries that are closest

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 2>and that are most enmeshed in the vehicle supply chains

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 2>that we have today in the US, and Mexico really

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 2>has pride of place there as somewhere where it's actually

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 2>quite cheap to manufacture. Labor costs are now cheaper than

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 2>in China, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, the Mexican President, is

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 2>very keen to make good on this. And even though

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.440
<v Speaker 2>he isn't very keen on building out renewable energy locally

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 2>within his country, he is keen on building on these

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of opportunities available as a result of near shoring

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 2>and the IRA having those provisions, So that changes things somewhat.

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 2>And what we've also spotted as a trend that's emerged

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 2>after the IRA is the fact that we've had a

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 2>number of different governments, a number of different countries come

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 2>to the US and ask to be included in various

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:58.079
<v Speaker 2>bits of this EV tax credit. So, for example, I

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 2>mentioned that critical material require for materials that are mined

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 2>or refined in a given region being used for an

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 2>EV sold in the US, thereby making it eligible for

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 2>about half of that tax credit. Well, that's a requirement

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 2>that's been lobbied for by various regions, such as countries

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 2>like Japan. So Japan successfully asked to sign a form

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 2>of free trade agreement that allows for its raw materials

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to be considered as part of that tax credit Europe,

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 2>the EU, the European Commission is quite keen to do

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>something similar, but as a whole, that's only one small

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 2>part of the overall package. And when it comes to

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of those subsidies available for domestic manufacturers in

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the US, those are really focused just on the domestic market.

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 2>They're not available to other countries, and a real focus

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 2>of that's part of this policy, which is bringing manufacturing

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 2>to the US as part of this energy transition that

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 2>we expect to accelerate as a result of the IRA Well.

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>So you reference that there are some very limited instances

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 1>where countries are able to take advantage of the tax credits,

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>but largely this is a domestic conversation, which then leads

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>need who then ask what is the reaction on the

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>part of other countries that perhaps were depending upon trade

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>or even on another side of it in the EU

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>where they were looking to become manufacturing homes of some

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>of these industries. What has the reaction been over in Europe.

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 2>So I feel like we're entering a bit of a

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 2>new phase with the energy transition, where before it was

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 2>all about carbon budgets domestically quantified you try and hit

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 2>your goals, you'd clean up your power sector. The spillover

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 2>effects would be pretty negligible. Besides providing opportunities for countries

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 2>like China to emerge as exporters of clean technology, what

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing now is something very different, and we've entered

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 2>a sort of era of policy competition where there's this

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 2>perceived need to respond to things like the IRA, which

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 2>a seemingly proven extremely attractive when we look at announced

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 2>projects and the investment that's flowing to the US right now,

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 2>and there are concerns by countries like the member states

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 2>of the European Union, for example, that they might be

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 2>left by the wayside. So the EU has targets for

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 2>building out battery making. It's for the last few years

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.679
<v Speaker 2>formed big sort of sourcier and alliances and different projects

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 2>of common European interests, for example, to promote battery making

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:08.480
<v Speaker 2>within its borders. But what the IRA provided was this

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 2>extremely streamlined system of tax credits, which have no sort

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 2>of federal budgetary limits to how they can be accessed,

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 2>are extremely generous and basically blow anything that the European

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 2>Union is offering out of the water. And that's something

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 2>that's been really that's been a real concern and has

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 2>been a point that a lot of clean energy lobby

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 2>groups lobby the EU sort of change and revise. So

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 2>what came of that was the Net Zero Industry Act,

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 2>and that's a few weeks ago we saw the release

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 2>of this plan, which really has as a central purpose

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 2>to respond to the IRA and prove that EU means business,

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 2>that it's serious, that it has the tools to encourage

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 2>the onshoring of manufacturing for clean energy technologies. It does

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 2>a few things, and unlike the IRA, it actually goes

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 2>a bit further and sets actual targets that are quantifiable

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 2>in many cases for building out the manufacture of things

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 2>like heat pumps, solar technologies, win turbines, batteries. All of

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 2>those different things have different targets that are set. So

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 2>for batteries that U wants to meet eighty five percent

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 2>of domestic demand by twenty thirty, that's about five hundred

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 2>and fifty gigg what hours of capacity. That's quite a lot.

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 2>And having its sight set on that is very clear

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 2>and sets the direction of travel. Now, whether you fall

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 2>short is by not really having the same system of

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 2>subsidies that the US has We've mentioned how streamlined the

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>tax credits are. Even though there's all this guidance coming

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 2>out from the US Treasury about how to interpret various

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 2>bits of them, they're generally there's really good awareness of

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 2>how they can be accessed and the process for doing so.

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 2>It's relatively simple. Now when it comes to the EU,

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 2>what you've got is pretty comparable levels of available funding

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 2>across the board for clean energy, but a lot of

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 2>that isn't going to manufacturing. It's going to things like

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 2>R and D. It's going to things like deploying technologies,

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 2>and that's a bit of a weakness. Now the U

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 2>wants to sort of rejig some of those pots of

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 2>money and have them flow towards manufacturing. But again there's

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 2>this issue, which is when the US try to do

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 2>this in the past, it's struggled with the level of

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 2>administrative complexity of some of these schemes. So there's the

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Innovation Fund, which is one of the main funding schemes

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 2>that's available for the energy transition writ large, that's something

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 2>that's funded by carbon credit revenues levied across the EU,

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 2>and it's actually incredibly difficult and competitive to access that.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Lots of money. So we saw a success rate of

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 2>about two percent for one of the funding rounds for

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 2>large projects under the Innovation Fund. That's a lot of

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 2>time that's wasted by companies putting together proposals applying for

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>that funding. So what you've got in the EU is

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 2>a really broken up system of various funds, of various

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 2>pots of money. There's not a great deal of awareness

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 2>about how to access them. A lot of them aren't

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>funding manufacturing and doing so. When you do figure out

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 2>where the money is and how to access it is

0:16:42.320 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 2>very competitive. So it is not the sort of basis

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 2>for giving US a vote of confidence in European industry

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 2>and seeing it as a real competitor with the IRA.

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 2>And we've continued to see post this Net Zero Industry Acts,

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 2>which again sets those impressive targets, is still a proposal,

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 2>will be enacted over the next couple of is. We've

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 2>seen a response, some enthusiasm, but still there's this general

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 2>narrative that when it comes to competing on these subsidies,

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 2>the US is far ahead, and a number of different

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 2>European battery makers such as North Vault, Freyer, even Tesla

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 2>has said that they'll pivot towards the US, which they

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.159
<v Speaker 2>see as far more attractive in terms of the incentives

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.120
<v Speaker 2>that are being offered and away from the EU, and

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 2>that's a trend that we might receive speed up over

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the next few months.

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's rewind a little bit and let's just go

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 1>back to those targets that you mentioned in the EU specifically,

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And the reason I want to focus on that is

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>one that the space that we work in has no

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>shortage of targets, but certainly the underpinning mechanisms are something

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that need to be figured out. These parts of money,

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this complexity around how to actually go about accessing them.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>In the EU, are there dedicated funds that are against

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>each of these targets or is it still yet to

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>be determined how those targets will be met? And the

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>targets just create a statement of intention.

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a statement of intention. There's a number of funds

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 2>that are available, the Modernization Fund, the innovation fund I mentioned,

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 2>there's this mooted creation of a sovereignty fund that's to

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 2>speed things. But again, many of those funds are not

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 2>focusing on manufacturing, and some of them aren't even just

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 2>focused on the energy transition. So there's this new fund

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 2>that will be created that will be coming up with

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 2>the words sovereignty slap to its title, and what that'll

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 2>be funding is not just keen energy, but things like semiconductors,

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 2>which are also incredibly capital intensive when it comes to

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 2>building out factories for making advanced chips. So there's there's

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 2>a lack of clarity of purpose, there's an opacity of

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 2>available schemes, and that means that the EU just seems

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 2>less nimble, it seems less reactive, it seems less attractive

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 2>when you're a manufacturer that has a bit of a

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 2>global footprint and some flexibility about where it can set

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 2>up shop.

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's continue moving around the world. One of our

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>recent shows focused on India, which is now the most

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>populous country, and there is a conversation to be had

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>regarding whether or not they are going to emerge also

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>as a manufacturing center for some of these industries. So

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:59.680
<v Speaker 1>how has the IRA impacted India's strategy and even more

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>broad how do you see India fitting into this renewable energy,

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.159
<v Speaker 1>clean energy manufacturing space.

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 2>So India's sort of pursuing its own strategy and it's

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 2>been doing so unlike many other countries pretty consistently for

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of years. There's been this stated ambition

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 2>to build out with a real focus on solar manufacturing,

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:22.600
<v Speaker 2>local PV technology production, and there's been a number of

0:19:22.640 --> 0:19:25.400
<v Speaker 2>tools that have been developed doing so what's really interesting

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 2>is seeing how that's playing out. So there's this various

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 2>prongs to this Indian strategy to building out domestic clean

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 2>tech manufacturing. One of them is by limiting manufacturers and

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 2>really barring a whole number of example Chinese solar product

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 2>manufacturers from being able to compete in auctions where a

0:19:42.800 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of the subsidy pots of money are available. There's

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 2>also a pretty hefty tariff for around forty percent that's

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 2>also levied on various solar product imports. There are also

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 2>various local content requirements in different subsidy schemes. There are

0:19:56.920 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 2>a number of different measures. But what's happened as a

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 2>result that is pushing up the costs of building out

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 2>solo projects in India at a time when the government

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 2>is implementing an incredibly ambitious plan to speed up a

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 2>new energy deployment and a shortage of domestically available modules.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of these measures were coming in manufacturers

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 2>were aware of it. They stockpiled a lot of equipment

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 2>in preparation for this coming, but right now there is

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 2>a lack of available modules, which again is having this

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 2>inflationary impact on project costs, so is not going terribly well.

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 2>It is a very determined bid to build out manufacturing

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 2>in a country that has growing demand, but it does

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 2>show that when you're really going for broke, it can

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 2>be difficult to pull off this on shoring play. And

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 2>it's interesting because it sort of stands in contrast with

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 2>the EU, where the EU, in terms of what's proposed

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 2>now and that may change and become more ambitious, we're

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.399
<v Speaker 2>not seeing an awful lot of conviction behind those measures

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.400
<v Speaker 2>and those targets and what's backing them, whereas in India

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 2>we may have seen policymakers go somewhat too far and

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 2>actually suffer the consequences of that, which are in free

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 2>project costs and actually having those different policies present a

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 2>barrier to getting the energy transition right. And there's a

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 2>lesson to be drawn there, and that's finding an equilibrium

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.640
<v Speaker 2>between trying to head your bets against concentration of manufacturing

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 2>capacity globally, making sure that value from the energy transition,

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:21.239
<v Speaker 2>accrus locally, having political buy in, creating jobs. All of

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 2>those things need to be balanced with this real need,

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 2>which is to keep things economically attractive. And when we're

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 2>scaling the energy transition at a rapid pace right now,

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 2>adding additional cost as a result of trying to do

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.920
<v Speaker 2>things locally of making things less efficient is something that

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 2>should be taken really seriously and quantified. And that's part

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 2>of what we're trying to do at BNF is to

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 2>work out the impact of various levels of local content,

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:48.880
<v Speaker 2>of various onshoing policies to undeployment, but also on overall

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 2>costs when we look at the energy transition as a whole.

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So with India, it seems like it's both regarding manufacturing

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>but also regarding supplying their domestic market. So then let's

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>pivot to a country that is looking to manufacture with

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the intention to export, and that would be batteries and

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Indonesia they have been looking at this as a space

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that they could potentially be going into in that value chain.

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>What are your views regarding Indonesia or potentially other countries

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that are emerging as battery manufacturing hubs.

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of middle or low income countries are

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 2>really conscious of this shift and of the opportunity that

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 2>it holds. So we've seen not just India, but many

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 2>other countries, and Indonesia is really one of them. And

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Indonesia is interesting because a lot of the battery grade

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 2>nickel that's produced, that's used for a lot of the

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 2>mainstream NMC batteries that have made up a large share

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.640
<v Speaker 2>of lithiumind batteries deployed in electric vehicles over the last

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 2>few years. A lot of that is mined in Indonesia.

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 2>So initially the government tried to do a few things.

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 2>It restricted exports. What it wanted was for more of

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 2>that nickel to be refined to be processed within its borders.

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.000
<v Speaker 2>That's one move, but there's also real focus on trying

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 2>to attract battery makers to set up facilities for various

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 2>parts of the battery value chain, but notably battery cell facilities.

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:07.880
<v Speaker 2>For again, having those big capital intensive projects built within Indonesia,

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 2>hiring Indonesians and producing value locally. That's difficult to pull

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.479
<v Speaker 2>off because of a number of different factors, and one

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 2>of them is low local demand. So Indonesia is a

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 2>market where we do see two to three wheelers electrifying

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:23.199
<v Speaker 2>quite rapidly in the shortter, midterm, but in terms of

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 2>overall having that local demand to scale that manufacturing base

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 2>is maybe not the best suited in terms of locations.

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 2>The cost of finance is a bit higher than elsewhere,

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 2>and what we're not seeing is a massive amount of

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 2>interest comparable to what we've seen in the US, for

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 2>example post diarray. So there's some real hurdles. What's interesting

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 2>is that when you see countries like the US, regions

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 2>like the EU recognizing that there's this tension, that there's

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 2>these policies that could be seen as distortive in terms

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 2>of subsidies being provided not just by the US but

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 2>by other rich countries too, and that might mean that

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 2>many of these poorer countries lose out. So trying to

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 2>sort of where that circle can be done in a

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 2>number of different ways, and what the US is doing,

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 2>for example, the Biden administration has been very vocal about

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 2>trying to help and support countries to move up the

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 2>value chain and to build out, for example, smelting facilities

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 2>or refineries for battery metals across regions like Southeast Asia

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 2>sub Saharan Africa, and that's a very important move of

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 2>some real value when it comes to sort of convincing

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the world that this isn't just about building out local jobs,

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 2>which it is to some extent, but also about spreading

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 2>the benefits as widely as possible. And maybe we should

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 2>be seeing a bit more emphasis on that in many

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 2>of the policies that are being announced today.

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Other than the countries that I've brought up, are there

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>other countries of note that you're watching closely well.

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 2>We're looking at countries that have a potential to scale

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 2>things up quite rapidly and to make a difference. Japan

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 2>is one. It has a battery industry strategy where it's

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 2>aiming to build out one hundred and fifty hours of

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 2>battery cell manufacturing by twenty thirty. There's subsidies being deployed there.

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 2>South Korea is dispersing billions of dollars in support to

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:00.479
<v Speaker 2>various battery manufacturers locally and within its borders. Canada is

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 2>finalizing its twenty twenty three budgets, and part of that

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 2>is going to replicate, to some extent tax incentives that

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 2>you have as part of the IRA providing a thirty

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.800
<v Speaker 2>percent manufacturing tax credit to clean energy manufacturers, which is

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 2>really consequential and quite big. And you've got a lot

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 2>of smaller countries like the UK, for example, where we're

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 2>recording from actually being a bit lost and having an

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 2>advantage in areas like offshore wind and maybe in ccs

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 2>certain niches, but really struggling to convince when it comes

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 2>to putting the money on the table and competing with

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 2>the likes of the US. And there is some clarity

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 2>from leaders, whether it's in Canada or the UK, that

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 2>those incentives are going to be available, but they're not

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 2>going to be matching what's available in the US, and

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 2>that's something that's already been made quite clear by several

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 2>governments and is quite interesting to see. Even as this

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 2>competition heats up, there is a degree of realism that

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 2>not everyone's pockets are as deep as the United States.

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Now other bottlenecks that we need to think of, and

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm specifically thinking the example of battery metals and how

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this is truly no matter where you manage action them,

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>they're reliant on global supply chains. So are there really

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>tight markets that we need to keep an eye on,

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>such as copper in the battery space that are ones

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to watch when we think about how we're changing supply chains.

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 2>So absolutely there's a number of metals that are what

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 2>transition metals you could call them, that are going to

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 2>be really important as scaling things, decarbonizing the economy. Copper

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 2>is very important making cables among other things. We're going

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 2>to be needing vast quantities of that through twenty fifty,

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 2>and about a third of actual spending on transition metals

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 2>is going to be concentrated within copper, and we expect

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 2>that to be a tight market over the next decade plus.

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 2>We also expect the sort of the deficit when we

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 2>look at announced mining facilities. When we look at other

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 2>metals that are key to making batteries, lithium and cobalt

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 2>feature heavily, and those are also metals where when we

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 2>look at what's been announced in terms of production facilities,

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 2>or when we look at what's been announced in terms

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 2>of mines, we do actually see a deficit emerging over

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the next couple of decades. So there's tightness in different markets,

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 2>and we'll see whether the booming demand for those different

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:04.400
<v Speaker 2>medals could change things, whether the changes in battery chemistries

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 2>could adapt as well, that's something that we've seen happen

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 2>quite rapidly with various lithium ion batteries that don't use nickel,

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 2>that don't use cobalts, that are ferrist based in their chemistries,

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 2>that have emerged and seen uptake incredibly rapidly and far

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 2>beyond what was expected. But there's also this additional question,

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 2>which is when the US says, for example, that it

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 2>wants to focus on sourcing critical minerals from a number

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.719
<v Speaker 2>of limited number of countries with which it has a

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 2>pre trade agreement, for example, that narrows the pull down

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 2>and meeting those critical materials requirements could be quite difficult

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 2>in an inner global scenario where supply demand balances are

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 2>quite tight.

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Is there enough labor, in skilled labor, specifically in various

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world to actually work in all of

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>these on shore near shored manufacturing locations.

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 2>The skilled shortage is one that's brought up a lot,

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's a real barrier towards for the energy transition

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 2>from a number of perspectives, whether it's installing heat pumps

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 2>or rooftop solar, but manufacturing is really area where we're

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 2>not seeing the skills base in places like the US,

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 2>where a lot of the focus in terms of vocational

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 2>training or of the educational system has not been in

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 2>those hard manufacturing skills. So there is a real concern

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>that there's a need to train up the skill force

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 2>very quickly to match the number of facilities that are

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 2>coming online. And for example, right now we're seeing lots

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 2>of investments in the US by East Asian battery manufacturers

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of them are relying to some extent

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 2>on engineering expertise from Korea, and that leads to another question,

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 2>which is openness towards investments from various geographies and the

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 2>exchange of that know how and the US has made

0:28:34.680 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 2>it quite difficult for Chinese manufacturers to set up shop

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 2>where we've seen some scrutiny applied to joint venture between

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Ford and CAATL for taking advantage of some of those

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 2>EV battery tax credits in the US. That project saw

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 2>scrutiny far beyond what we've seen for other projects that

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 2>don't involve Chinese manufacturers. There are concerns around foreign Entities

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 2>of concern list, which is something that again might limit

0:28:57.640 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 2>the availability of subsidies provided to manufacturers from countries such

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 2>as China. So that lack of openness, those concerns around

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 2>what investments will qualify for various subsidies is a bit

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 2>of a question mark and could impleade the flow of

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 2>information from where knowledge about battery making is that is

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 2>most sophisticated, that being in many cases in China. Same

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.719
<v Speaker 2>goes for solar technologies, for example, two regions that are

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 2>trying to catch up. Europe is adopting a bit of

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 2>a different perspective, a bit of a different strategy with this,

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 2>and is comparatively quite open towards receiving a lot of

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 2>those investments. Last year, the biggest battery self facility coming

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 2>online in the EU was Chinese. It was c ATL,

0:29:36.640 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the world's biggest battery maker. So there's some differences there

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 2>that are really worth highlighting. Labor shortages are a problem

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 2>across the world, across the geographies where we're seeing clean

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 2>energy manufacturing be aerial focus. But there's this flow of

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 2>knowledge and know how which also needs to happen and

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 2>could be impeded if openness isn't prioritized.

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And so we've talked about upstream, so we've talked about commodities,

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and we've talked onstream and the manufacturing end of things.

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>But how about midstream, how about all of the different components.

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Where does that fall. Is it being seen as one

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of the industries that are actually also being near shored

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>or on short or is that going to be largely

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>unchanged And we're really thinking about just downstream manufacturing and assembly.

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of the focus investments has been in

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 2>downstream segments like solar modules, battery cell factories, or we

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 2>haven't seen as much of in announced projects and even

0:30:29.600 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 2>far less in projects that are coming online across the West,

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.719
<v Speaker 2>for example, is in that midstream segment, and what that

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 2>means is looking at the really important building blocks for

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 2>building a solar module, which include things like ingots and wafers.

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to batteries, that includes things like cathodes

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 2>and anodes. And those are segments where manufacturing is even

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 2>more concentrated in China and where we're really not seeing

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 2>the same level of investment and announcements for building out

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 2>that capacity in regions like Europe. In regions like North America,

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 2>that's been recognized as a bit of a vulnerability, and

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 2>that's also something where we've seen a number of trade

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 2>barriers be erected for things like the use or trade

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 2>of US semiconductors and personnel in China, for example. But

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 2>that midstream is an area where China can react, and

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 2>we've seen suggestions from Chinese ministries that there might be

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 2>restrictions on the exports of various piece of equipment for

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing some of those midstream components, most notably solar ingots

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 2>and wafers. So there's been a real focus on the downstream.

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 2>What we haven't seen as an approach that aims to

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 2>build out the value chain in a really comprehensive way

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 2>and attributing equal weight to all those different segments. And

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 2>it can make sense to start with the end product

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 2>and work your way up, But given the speed at

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 2>which these manufacturing bases are being built out at it

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 2>seems like some degree of focus of refocusing and taking

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 2>a bit more of a comprehensive approach towards building out

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 2>supply chains might be worth considering now.

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Certainly, the cost declines that we've seen in a number

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of these industries, and solar is a perfect example, have

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>come from doing this at scale and having these manufacturing

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>hubs that have created cheaper and cheaper products. Are we

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>now seeing one a lack of transfer of technology and

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>really learning rates across countries as this becomes more fragmented.

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>And then the follow on question I'm going to add

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to that is what does this do for us in

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of reaching net zero targets?

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 2>So what could happen is if the US, Canada, You're

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 2>all the various regions India are successful in building out

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 2>keen energy manufacturing, then you do see a fragmentation. You

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 2>see a regionalization of supply chains, you see a doubling

0:32:34.000 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 2>up of investments in a way in which is less

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 2>efficient than what otherwise would be the case. One of

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the things that has allowed for China to be so

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 2>effective in bringing down the cost of producing technologies is

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 2>learning by doing. It's dense pools of labor, it's a

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 2>low cost of finance, but it's also scale. And when

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 2>we look at various segments of the solar value chain,

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 2>it's typical that Chinese facilities factories are about four times

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 2>bigger in terms of their yearly production capacity than outside

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 2>of China. That has a really big impact on cost.

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 2>And when you're breaking things up and you're just looking

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 2>at things from that scale angle, then things become less

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 2>efficient and you're adding cost even if you aren't doing

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:11.320
<v Speaker 2>things in parts of the world where it's going to

0:33:11.360 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 2>be far more expensive, like Europe, for example. So that's

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 2>a big question is how to balance these different priorities

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 2>and how to recognize that building things out is good

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 2>from a political perspective when it comes to selling the

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 2>energy transition and its co benefits. What is less good

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 2>at is for maximizing economic efficiency and minimizing the overall bill.

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 2>And we're looking at an energy transition that's running into

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 2>where we saw a trillion of investment last year across

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 2>the energy transition. If we want to be getting on

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 2>tracked net zero, we need to be seeing an average of

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:43.240
<v Speaker 2>about four trillion every year going towards twenty thirty. Now

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 2>that figure could be inflated quite a bit if we're

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.840
<v Speaker 2>starting to break things up and we're manufacturing more closer

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 2>to demand centers. So trying to strike that balance is

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 2>really important, and we're not seeing a real mature discussion

0:33:56.480 --> 0:34:00.760
<v Speaker 2>about taking those costs into account, factoring them in, passing

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 2>them through in various ways to end consumers or developers,

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 2>and really optimizing things to make things work and diversifying

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 2>those supply chains. Which really is a focus with all

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 2>of these industrial strategies that are coming out in recent months.

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that you brought up really early on,

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and this is my final question, essentially, it has to

0:34:19.520 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>do with the when. So you reference the fact that

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we have seen a lot of intention and movement towards

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>changing these supply chains, but we haven't seen a lot

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of installation as if yet and that makes a lot

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of sense because these new projects are not going to

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>happen over a quarter or even half a year. They're

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 1>going to take a while to get online. So that

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 1>then brings me to you know, we love to talk

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>about goals and certain years stand out as benchmarks. So

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>do we think twenty thirty, twenty thirty five, twenty forty,

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:47.759
<v Speaker 1>when are we going to start to see essentially a

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:53.080
<v Speaker 1>material change in terms of supply chains and where they exist?

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And now when are we going to know really where

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the new hubs are.

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 2>So it does take a few years to set up

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 2>manufacturing facilities. Right now, there's a shortage of equipment for

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 2>battery making facilities that's slowing things down. There's a tight

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 2>labor market that we mentioned. There are various reasons why

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 2>permitting things in countries that want to speed things up,

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:14.479
<v Speaker 2>like Europe or the US, takes a bit of time,

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 2>So that means that you're looking at may sometimes a

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 2>couple of years for setting up a battery manufacturing facility,

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:23.120
<v Speaker 2>for example. And we've seen a slew of announcements and

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:25.799
<v Speaker 2>we continue to see that number grow. But as I said,

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 2>we're also seeing the same thing happen in China with

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 2>a vast volume of new facilities that are still coming online.

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I think twenty thirty is a good point to stop

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.480
<v Speaker 2>and see where we're at. A lot of the manufacturing

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 2>incentives under the IRA expire or start to phase out

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 2>in twenty thirty and expire in twenty thirty two. When

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the EU, that's when it's set a

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of its manufacturing targets for It's a year where

0:35:45.280 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 2>we should be hitting our stride when it comes to

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 2>investments for the energy transition, and things would have scaled

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 2>up if things are going right, dramatically beyond what we're

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 2>at today in terms of investment, and it would be

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 2>a good time to look at trade flows, to look

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:01.120
<v Speaker 2>at where manufacturing capacity is. And what I'd expect is

0:36:01.160 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 2>we'd see several percentage points increase in the share of

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 2>that's represented by Europe that's represented by the US when

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 2>it comes to total manufacturing capacity for things like batteries,

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 2>for things like solar But I still expect APAX share

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 2>and China share more specificty to remain dominant. But it's

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 2>not about replacing that overnight. It's about maybe hedging your

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.640
<v Speaker 2>bets and diversifying things somewhat. It's about creating that political

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 2>buy and by attracting some investments, and that in of

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 2>itself is really important. So I don't see a dramatic

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 2>shift in the picture, but I think twenty thirty will

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.839
<v Speaker 2>be a time to see whether these industrial strategies, whether

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 2>these different policies are having their effect, whether there's been

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 2>any success in setting up domestic manufacturing without needing to

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 2>keep them alive via vast subsidies, and whether or not

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 2>this is a course of action to double down on,

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 2>or whether given the geopolitical scenarios we could imagine in

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 2>the future, which are numerous, but whether at that time

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.919
<v Speaker 2>it might be advisable to scale that back and try

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 2>to maximize the energy transitions over all efficiency to minimize costs.

0:36:57.800 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 2>So I see the next few years leading up to

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty a really important time in which to sort of

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 2>gauge the impact of these strategies and to take measure

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 2>of how successful they are.

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So we'll keep watching the companies and certainly the policies

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that are dramatically changing global supply chains. Thank you for

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>joining us today.

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Dana. It's great to be here again.

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg NEF is a service provided by Bloomberg Finance LP

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and its affiliates. This recording does not constitute, nor should

0:37:31.600 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it be construed, as investment advice, investment recommendations, or a

0:37:35.680 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 1>recommendation as to an investment or other strategy. Bloomberg n

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 1>EF should not be considered as information sufficient upon which

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to base an investment decision. Neither Bloomberg Finance LP nor

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>any of its affiliates makes any representation or warranty as

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>this recording, and any liability as a result of this

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>recording is expressly disclaimed.