1
00:00:03,520 --> 00:00:07,040
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every

2
00:00:07,120 --> 00:00:09,680
Speaker 1: day we bring you inside an analysis into the most

3
00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:12,200
Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more

4
00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:16,120
Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud

5
00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:20,200
Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. The Solicitor General

6
00:00:20,280 --> 00:00:22,959
Speaker 1: is referred to as the tenth Justice because of the

7
00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:26,880
Speaker 1: special role as the federal government's top lawyer at the U. S.

8
00:00:26,880 --> 00:00:31,320
Speaker 1: Supreme Court. That informal title maybe truer today than it's

9
00:00:31,360 --> 00:00:37,080
Speaker 1: ever been. Joining me is Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson, Bloomberg Law Editor. So, Kimberly,

10
00:00:37,360 --> 00:00:41,400
Speaker 1: no Francisco is the current Solicitor General. Start by explaining

11
00:00:41,400 --> 00:00:44,920
Speaker 1: a little about the role of the s G, especially

12
00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:48,480
Speaker 1: with regard to what's called c v s g S

13
00:00:48,479 --> 00:00:52,519
Speaker 1: short for Call for the Views of the Solicitor General. Right. Well,

14
00:00:52,600 --> 00:00:56,240
Speaker 1: as you mentioned Noel Francisco is the current Solicitor General,

15
00:00:56,280 --> 00:00:59,040
Speaker 1: that he's a former partner at the big law firm

16
00:00:59,120 --> 00:01:02,400
Speaker 1: of Jones Day, where a lot of Trump administration officials

17
00:01:02,520 --> 00:01:05,520
Speaker 1: have come from. And as you said, they're really the

18
00:01:05,560 --> 00:01:08,480
Speaker 1: administration's top lawyer at the U. S. Supreme Court, and

19
00:01:08,520 --> 00:01:11,959
Speaker 1: they oversee other litigation um as it's working its way

20
00:01:12,000 --> 00:01:14,959
Speaker 1: through the federal courts, and it has the relationship of

21
00:01:15,080 --> 00:01:17,800
Speaker 1: trust with the Supreme Court. And one of the ways

22
00:01:17,800 --> 00:01:20,720
Speaker 1: that we see this relationship play out is through these

23
00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:23,280
Speaker 1: cvs g s or calls for the views of the

24
00:01:23,319 --> 00:01:26,200
Speaker 1: Solicitor General. And what will happen in these cases if

25
00:01:26,319 --> 00:01:30,000
Speaker 1: the justices will ask the Solicitor General and his office

26
00:01:30,360 --> 00:01:32,600
Speaker 1: to weigh in on whether or not a court should

27
00:01:32,600 --> 00:01:34,680
Speaker 1: take up a case or whether or not it should

28
00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:38,600
Speaker 1: let it pass, and we see some remarkable agreement between

29
00:01:38,600 --> 00:01:41,520
Speaker 1: the justices and the solicitor generals. This term um when

30
00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:44,840
Speaker 1: it comes to those suggestions, you write that the office

31
00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:47,840
Speaker 1: of the Solicitor General has an almost perfect record this

32
00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:50,960
Speaker 1: term when it comes to these recommendations. Tell us about

33
00:01:51,040 --> 00:01:54,960
Speaker 1: the numbers and how that compares to the prior administration. Right, Well,

34
00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:57,640
Speaker 1: we're seeing an increase in these cvs g s, meaning

35
00:01:58,000 --> 00:02:01,120
Speaker 1: presumably that the court is relying or on the office

36
00:02:01,160 --> 00:02:03,960
Speaker 1: than it has in previous decades. And so now we

37
00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:07,400
Speaker 1: get cbs g's about two dozen times a term. A

38
00:02:07,400 --> 00:02:09,120
Speaker 1: lot of them stack up at the end of the term,

39
00:02:09,200 --> 00:02:13,639
Speaker 1: so about half of the Solicitor General's recommendations are still outstanding.

40
00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:17,320
Speaker 1: But in ten of eleven recommendations that the Office has

41
00:02:17,320 --> 00:02:20,119
Speaker 1: made so far this term, the Supreme Court has agreed.

42
00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:23,040
Speaker 1: We'll see as the Court approaches the end of this

43
00:02:23,160 --> 00:02:25,639
Speaker 1: term if that will stick. But overall, in the three

44
00:02:25,720 --> 00:02:29,560
Speaker 1: years that the administration has been replying to these cvs g's,

45
00:02:29,600 --> 00:02:31,640
Speaker 1: the administration has been doing very well. It's somewhere in

46
00:02:31,720 --> 00:02:36,320
Speaker 1: nine where it's historically it's been closer to and under

47
00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:39,400
Speaker 1: Obama it reaches as low as sixty five percent. If

48
00:02:39,400 --> 00:02:42,640
Speaker 1: you get sixty of a windstrink in the Supreme Court,

49
00:02:42,680 --> 00:02:45,440
Speaker 1: that's a pretty good day. But as I mentioned, it

50
00:02:45,480 --> 00:02:48,440
Speaker 1: has been higher in other administrations that it was under Obama.

51
00:02:49,080 --> 00:02:52,800
Speaker 1: In general, has the s G been recommending taking cases

52
00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:58,600
Speaker 1: with controversial issues or turning them away? Mostly turning them away,

53
00:02:58,600 --> 00:03:02,000
Speaker 1: And that's historically the practice of the Solicitor General is

54
00:03:02,040 --> 00:03:05,160
Speaker 1: to be more risk averse and not suggests that the

55
00:03:05,160 --> 00:03:07,720
Speaker 1: Supreme Court spend a lot of its time on certain cases.

56
00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:11,799
Speaker 1: I would note one particular CBSG that the Court is

57
00:03:11,800 --> 00:03:15,760
Speaker 1: still considering has to do with Sudan and terrorism and

58
00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:18,840
Speaker 1: what damages individuals can get, and that will be an

59
00:03:18,840 --> 00:03:22,000
Speaker 1: interesting one that the Solicitor General has recommended that the

60
00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:26,040
Speaker 1: Justices do take up during their next term. So why

61
00:03:26,120 --> 00:03:32,720
Speaker 1: this deference to the Solicitor General with this particular court. Well,

62
00:03:32,760 --> 00:03:36,200
Speaker 1: of course, all of this is happening through briefs at

63
00:03:36,200 --> 00:03:38,600
Speaker 1: the Court and no one's actually sitting down and really

64
00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:41,640
Speaker 1: having in conversations, So we just have to speculate. But

65
00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:44,200
Speaker 1: we have a some good idea that it may have

66
00:03:44,280 --> 00:03:47,960
Speaker 1: to do with the converging ideologies. Not only is the

67
00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:51,000
Speaker 1: Solicitor General's office getting more conservative, but so are the

68
00:03:51,080 --> 00:03:54,280
Speaker 1: Justices and that may indicate that, you know, they see

69
00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:57,240
Speaker 1: eye to eye with the Solicitor General on what kinds

70
00:03:57,280 --> 00:03:59,840
Speaker 1: of cases and what kinds of issues the Supreme Court

71
00:04:00,040 --> 00:04:03,080
Speaker 1: be tackling right now. Is that winning streak of the

72
00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:06,720
Speaker 1: Solicitor General any indication of how the Court will rule

73
00:04:06,760 --> 00:04:10,440
Speaker 1: in those cases? Well, it can and it can't be. Um,

74
00:04:10,520 --> 00:04:13,320
Speaker 1: you know, looking at these CDs g's is just one

75
00:04:13,400 --> 00:04:17,520
Speaker 1: measure of how much the Justices are relying on the

76
00:04:17,560 --> 00:04:21,400
Speaker 1: Solicitor General and the Trump administration. But even by other measures,

77
00:04:21,400 --> 00:04:24,279
Speaker 1: we see the Trump administration doing very well. And so

78
00:04:24,360 --> 00:04:27,320
Speaker 1: I mentioned that the Obama administration didn't do very well

79
00:04:27,320 --> 00:04:29,640
Speaker 1: in CBS g's but they didn't actually do very well

80
00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:32,880
Speaker 1: in straight wins and losses, although they want a lot

81
00:04:32,880 --> 00:04:36,360
Speaker 1: of high profile cases. But the Trump administration is doing

82
00:04:36,400 --> 00:04:39,400
Speaker 1: much better. Indeed, already for this term, they've got a

83
00:04:39,440 --> 00:04:41,919
Speaker 1: seventy win streak, and that's that's pretty good at the

84
00:04:41,960 --> 00:04:45,720
Speaker 1: U s. Supreme Court, I would say so. Now, the

85
00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:49,560
Speaker 1: Solicitor General has also tried to circumvent the rules a

86
00:04:49,560 --> 00:04:53,480
Speaker 1: little and get the Supreme Court to fast track several cases.

87
00:04:53,800 --> 00:04:57,200
Speaker 1: How successful has that been, Well, that's been more of

88
00:04:57,240 --> 00:04:59,880
Speaker 1: a mixed bag, and that seems somewhat contrary to what

89
00:05:00,040 --> 00:05:03,200
Speaker 1: we've been talking about with the Justices really relying on

90
00:05:03,320 --> 00:05:06,599
Speaker 1: the Solicitor General's office. But one court watcher that I

91
00:05:06,640 --> 00:05:09,840
Speaker 1: talked to pointed out that the Trump administration is doing

92
00:05:09,880 --> 00:05:13,080
Speaker 1: things a little bit more unusually than other administrations. And

93
00:05:13,120 --> 00:05:15,520
Speaker 1: so while they've been turned away a lot by the

94
00:05:15,560 --> 00:05:18,440
Speaker 1: Supreme Court in these requests to kind of skip over

95
00:05:18,480 --> 00:05:21,680
Speaker 1: the lower courts, they've also had a lot more granted

96
00:05:21,720 --> 00:05:24,480
Speaker 1: in their favor. You say that the Justices are going

97
00:05:24,520 --> 00:05:28,000
Speaker 1: to be considering more of the recommendations before the term

98
00:05:28,040 --> 00:05:32,120
Speaker 1: wraps up. Tell us about a yet unscheduled mop up conference.

99
00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:35,120
Speaker 1: Because I love that idea. A mop up conference at

100
00:05:35,160 --> 00:05:38,360
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court. Right, Well, if you were to look

101
00:05:38,360 --> 00:05:40,720
Speaker 1: at the Supreme Court schedule, you would think that there

102
00:05:40,760 --> 00:05:42,960
Speaker 1: are only two more days where the Court is going

103
00:05:43,040 --> 00:05:45,720
Speaker 1: to hand down opinions and only one more day where

104
00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:48,720
Speaker 1: they're going to meet in a private conference and chat

105
00:05:48,760 --> 00:05:51,359
Speaker 1: about what cases they should take up for next term.

106
00:05:51,400 --> 00:05:54,279
Speaker 1: But actually it's a little bit more secretive than that.

107
00:05:54,600 --> 00:05:57,440
Speaker 1: The court watchers know that the Court typically adds an

108
00:05:57,440 --> 00:06:00,640
Speaker 1: extra conference day right at the very end of their

109
00:06:00,800 --> 00:06:04,680
Speaker 1: term so that they can clean up any outstanding cases

110
00:06:04,720 --> 00:06:06,960
Speaker 1: that they want to get going before they take a

111
00:06:07,000 --> 00:06:10,200
Speaker 1: break for the summertime and get briefing off and rolling

112
00:06:10,279 --> 00:06:12,040
Speaker 1: so they're ready for the next term when it comes

113
00:06:12,040 --> 00:06:16,359
Speaker 1: around in October. The Solicitor of General does he argue

114
00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:20,039
Speaker 1: all the cases that the Supreme Court hears that the

115
00:06:20,120 --> 00:06:25,320
Speaker 1: administration has a part in. Well. The Solicitor General's office

116
00:06:25,440 --> 00:06:28,599
Speaker 1: is made up of a number of career attorneys as

117
00:06:28,600 --> 00:06:32,719
Speaker 1: well as some political appointees, and individuals from that office

118
00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:36,440
Speaker 1: will argue not only in cases where the administration is

119
00:06:36,440 --> 00:06:39,479
Speaker 1: a party, but also where they're acting as a friend

120
00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:41,880
Speaker 1: of the court. That is where they'll pick one party

121
00:06:42,240 --> 00:06:45,440
Speaker 1: and they'll argue on their behalf in support of their

122
00:06:45,480 --> 00:06:48,839
Speaker 1: side of the case. And so the Solicitor General usually

123
00:06:49,160 --> 00:06:52,440
Speaker 1: argues some of the most important and consequential cases, but

124
00:06:52,560 --> 00:06:55,719
Speaker 1: his office is involved in many, many cases at the court.

125
00:06:55,960 --> 00:06:58,840
Speaker 1: I think this term it's well over thirty cases that

126
00:06:58,880 --> 00:07:02,279
Speaker 1: have already been decided that his office has participated in

127
00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:05,760
Speaker 1: and only ted where they weren't involved at all. And

128
00:07:05,800 --> 00:07:07,880
Speaker 1: we're coming up to the end of the term, so

129
00:07:07,920 --> 00:07:10,520
Speaker 1: we're gonna be hearing about a lot of the controversial

130
00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:13,560
Speaker 1: cases as well that this listener General has been involved in.

131
00:07:13,560 --> 00:07:18,000
Speaker 1: Thanks so much, Kimberly, very interesting article. That's Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson,

132
00:07:18,040 --> 00:07:23,600
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Law Editor. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Law Podcast.

133
00:07:23,960 --> 00:07:27,200
Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to the show on Apple Podcasts,

134
00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:32,000
Speaker 1: SoundCloud and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso.

135
00:07:32,440 --> 00:07:33,760
Speaker 1: This is Bloomberg