WEBVTT - Top 5 Gene Hackman Scenes, Madness ‘25 (Sweet 16)

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>What kind of a show you guys putting.

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 2>On here today?

0:00:06.480 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 1>You're not interested in armed Now we look, we're going

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>to do this thing. We're going to have a conversation

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>from Chicago. This is Film Spotting celebrating our twentieth year.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Larson and I'm Adam Kempinar. Listen.

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 3>If there's one surefire rule that I have learned in

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 3>this business is that I don't know anything about human nature.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anything about curiosity.

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 2>That's not part of what I do.

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>What I this is my business.

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 2>And when I'm sorry to cut you off there, mister Hackman,

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 2>but I think you actually might know a thing or

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>two about curiosity in human nature.

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>That is the late great Gene Hackman in nineteen seventy

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>fours the Conversation. This week our top five Hackman scenes.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Plus the film Spotting Madness, Best of the twenty first

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 2>century so far, Sweet sixteen and more. It's all ahead.

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Can we just call him Pappy?

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 2>On Film Spotting?

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Mama tell the roll out of it that she ran

0:00:57.240 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to the body station.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 4>When if Paba found out he began a shout, he

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 4>started the investigation. It agives them.

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Peloton break through

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 5>the busiest time of year With the brand new Peloton

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 5>Cross Training tread Plus powered by Peloton Iq. With real

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 5>time guidance and endless ways to move, you can personalize

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 5>your workouts and train with confidence, helping you reach your

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.919
<v Speaker 5>goals in less time. Let yourself run, lift, sculpt, push

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 5>and go. Explore the new Peloton Cross Training Treadplus at

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Oneploton dot Com.

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to film Spotting. Later in the show, film Spotting

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Madness Best of the twenty first century so far, Josh,

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 2>we started with sixty four. We are now down to sixteen.

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 2>We will have Round two results and those sweet sixteen matchups.

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Voting is live right now as we speak at film

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 2>spotting dot Net slash Madness. We're faced with matchups like

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Mad Max Fury Road versus Zodiac, So this round should

0:01:57.040 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 2>be really easy. Again that's film Spotting dot Net slash Madness.

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Also later in the show, Josh, you have thoughts on

0:02:03.800 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 2>a few new releases, including Michael Shannon's directing debut and

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Nicole Kidman in Holland not the country but the city

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 2>in Michigan, which is a little town you know quite well.

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I thought I did, but apparently there's all

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>sorts of nefarious stuff going on at them. I'm a

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>bit concerned now.

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 2>But first, Gene Hackman, the two time Oscar winner, died

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 2>last month at ninety five. We knew immediately we owed

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 2>Hackman a top five. It's been a few weeks. We've

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 2>been doing some prep, some homework that paid off, I'd

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 2>say for both of us.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Josh, yeah, we knew immediately. And then how quickly were

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>you daunted by the proact? Just knowing We did put

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.239
<v Speaker 1>this off for a little bit to do that homework.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>But still, you look at the filmography, you'd have to

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>take a year to properly assess his entire career. But

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>I feel good about the work we did. To your point,

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we saw some films for the first time, including one

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to that you and I both loved, watched

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a few things, and so I think we did our

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>due diligence, and I think we will do Hackman's legacy

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>justice with this.

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 2>Let's hope. Let's go ahead and make that attempt. Now,

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 2>how did you approach your Gene Hackman top five? And

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and tell us, when ready what your number five?

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Gene Hackman scene is.

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>So started, you know, just doing the basic bio research.

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 1>In one place I usually turn is Ephraim Katz's film

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Encyclopedia when a legend passes, and I love what he

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>had there, just the first line character star of Hollywood films,

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>not character actor, character star, and I thought, okay, that's perfect, right,

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Just that's Hackman right there. And so I had that

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>in my mind and then thought, you know more, Okay,

0:03:52.400 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>what does make him that distinction not just a character

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>actor we love, not just your traditional star, but what

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>combines those two qualities. And I really did come to

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:10.839
<v Speaker 1>what I feel is the quintessential Hackman character after doing

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this work, Adam, and to me, it

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is the self deluded cock of the walk. So in

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>many of his movies, Hackman's roosters they can back it up, right.

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one thing we love about him

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is he barks and he bites. That's entertaining. But I

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 1>think in his best performances, Hackman wears a shit eating

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>grin and he has to actually eat the shit. That

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is what is fascinating about him and how he can

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>play that line. And obviously he has ranged beyond this.

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>There's definitely a heroic side to him as well. I

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>do want to note over on my Facebook page heard

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 1>from a former newspaper colleague, Niki Roller, and she shared

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>this Gene has been a cinematic rock for me in

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>his movies that probably lacked critical acclaim. I can and

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>do appreciate his less mainstream efforts, but for me, I

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>will remember him as an actor who taught leadership and sacrifice.

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I miss him already, and so I wanted to note

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that because I think that's true and a very good

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>point about a lot of the roles he took. It's

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>not where my list leaned, however, and I could have

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>sprinkled some of that in. I could have gone for

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the Pope Prix represent his range route and one of

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>my picks does that to a degree. But for me,

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>most of them are variations on this Hackman rooster who

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>gets called out for his crowing. That's kind of where

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>I landed after reassessing things. So I'm going to start

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in a place like that with my number five pick,

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and it comes from that decade we associate most with Hackman.

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>It's the seventies. This is Night Moves nineteen seventy five.

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Adam I was assigned this film in the only film

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>appreciation class that my college offered, so of course I

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>took the class, and that's where I first encountered it.

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe something of a curious choice, especially if this is

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the only offering you have for all of cinema. But

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Night Moves is one we considered. I didn't remember all

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>that much about it, some of the images, but I

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>thought I got to give this one another look, you know,

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>just the fact that my professor chose it to be

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>so representative, and wow, is it a key text in

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>this Hackman rooster theory. He plays Harry Moseby here, a

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 1>former football star turned la private eye, and at the

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:30.839
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the movie he's hired by this aging movie

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>actress to track down her promiscuous teen daughter played by

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Melanie Griffith, who, you know, talking seventies is kind of

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>uncomfortably was uncomfortably on the edge of legality when this

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>movie was made, So so take that aspect of it

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>with a grain of salt. Now, Night Moves also, when

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at its time and its context, came out

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a year after Chinatown, and it's definitely in a similar

0:06:55.680 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>noir mold. You have Harry here the Hackman character as

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 1>a Jake Gettis type. I think this cocky detective who

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>has a bit of a haughty side to him that

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>ends up blinding him to what's really going on. And

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like Chinatown, Night Moves is partly about Harry coming to

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that self realization. So we get a hint of this.

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>My favorite hint of this is in my pick my

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>actual scene. This is a very quiet mid movie moment

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>between Harry and Griffith's deli. This is after he's caught

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>up with her in Florida. He's kind of assessed the

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>situation of what's going on with her there, and he

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>has convinced her to come home. He's rebuffed her advances.

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So they're having this quiet conversation and she offers him

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>this compliment.

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I think people, you okay.

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Em an ace? Yeah, yeah, I'm an ace. I mean

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the line delivery alone tells you he doesn't fully believe it,

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>but he's trying to sell it. His face though, if

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you can watch this scene, Hackman's face betrays that he

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really think of himself as okay, let alone anything

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>like the good guy, you know, the heroic detective in

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>this scenario. So I do think that that tension is

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>where happens. Best characters lived between what they're selling to

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>others into themselves what they actually are, and then how

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>aware they are of the gap between the two. So

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm an ace from Night Moves is my number five.

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Night Moves was a film I didn't see for the

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 2>first time, and I have only seen it once. I

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 2>saw finally in twenty twenty that first month of COVID.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 2>You may recall, Josh that I was just trying to

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 2>use some of that newfound free time to catch up

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 2>with some blind spots, some films that I didn't really

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 2>have a good explanation for why I had never seen.

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 2>And it started with Dirty Harry, a film I'd seen

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 2>many moments from multiple times but never actually watch the

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 2>whole film from start to finish. And then I watch Lenny,

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the Bob Fosse movie. I realized I was watching films

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 2>that had all been shot by Bruce Surtiz, and that

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:12.679
<v Speaker 2>then took me to Night Moves, which had always been

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 2>on my radar as an Arthur Penn film and a

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Hackman film that I needed to see. But it was

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 2>that accidental Sirtees marathon that finally forced me to watch it.

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.080
<v Speaker 2>This is what I wrote on letterboxed about it, and

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I just noticed this now as you were referencing your pick, Josh.

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 2>The more I think about how utterly incapable of connection

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 2>everyone in the movie is and how it disappoints as

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 2>a noir, the more I recognize how such disillusionment and

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 2>dissatisfaction is precisely the point also, Colin Gene Hackman, incapable

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 2>of connection, disillusionment, dissatisfaction. These ideas may come up again

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 2>throughout my list. Looking it over. The challenge for me,

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>besides just having to consider, as you said, so many

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 2>good scenes, so many good performances, characters, movies, the challenge

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 2>was between the best scenes featuring Gene Hackman and the

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 2>best Gene Hackman scenes right, because there are so many

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 2>iconic examples to consider, And I started piecing together how

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 2>the same characteristics that make Hackman such a commanding presence

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 2>to watch as a good guy very often, they're the

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 2>same traits that make him such a good villain or

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 2>a good anti hero. There is a practicality to his

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.720
<v Speaker 2>characters often and a persistence to them. It can be

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 2>admirable at times, but in other cases his characters are

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 2>driven by an end justifies the means kind of philosophy

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 2>that gets him into a little bit of trouble or

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe gets him into trouble with us as viewers. And

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 2>to your point about his confidence, there is often that

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 2>quiet confidence that can occasionally cross over into full blown

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 2>arrogance where we are happy to see him get a

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 2>bit of come uppance. And it's not just the the

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Hackman chuckle that can be merry or menacing, Josh, it's

0:11:04.559 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 2>even just the twinkle in his eyes. So many scenes

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I realized I was considering, we're completely nonverbal, yeah, Hackman.

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a tough thing about this list and thinking about

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>doing this show right is we're gonna share scenes, and

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm realizing for so many of these we're missing fifty

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>percent of the magic.

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 2>That's it. The magic is in his watching, his listening,

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 2>his withholding, in his subtle reacting. Sometimes he's just perhaps

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 2>playing an instrument I don't know, like a saxophone. The

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 2>end of the conversation is a perfect example of this

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:44.319
<v Speaker 2>dilemma right all time great end scene extremely memorable. Is

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.040
<v Speaker 2>it a great Gene Hackman scene or is it a

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 2>great scene featuring Gene Hackman. What about the car chase

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 2>in The French Connection, maybe the greatest car chase in cinema,

0:11:56.280 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 2>and Hackman's purely physical performance is part of why it's great.

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 2>I'll say that, but is it the number one reason?

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Is it even the number two reason why it's great?

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I'd entertain the argument, but it is a discussion

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 2>that we'd have to have. I did try to strike

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 2>a balance where I was representing his most iconic characters

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 2>and moments, but also reflecting his dramatic range and that

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 2>judicious balance of calmness and quiet with those occasional explosions

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 2>of anger or violence that we get with Gene Hackman.

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 2>My number five is from The French Connection, and it's

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 2>the end scene, and it's this line reading, in particular,

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Josh I saw him. I'm going to get him. I

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 2>may not have the car chase here, but it felt

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 2>wrong to have a top five Hackman list without Popeye

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Doyle on it.

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Popeyes here, if your hand on your heads.

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 6>Get off the barn, get on the wall, Come on,

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 6>move move.

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 2>I rewatched this just a few days ago, and look,

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>it's William Friedkin's film The Big Swings, like the car

0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Chase the pure propulsive energy of it. It is by

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 2>no means an actor's showcase. Fernando Ray is kind of

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>fun as the bad guy I dig Roy Scheider, but

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.680
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing really memorable about his performance or his character Cloudy.

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 2>If you took all of Hackman's lines in The French

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Connection and combine them, it probably wouldn't fill more than

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>three to four pages of the screenplay. And yet try

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 2>to imagine that movie working half as well as it

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 2>does without the depth of Hackman's characterization. How Hackman renders

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 2>and Friedkin captures behavior. Popeye Doyle doesn't say much, and

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 2>he never says anything really about himself. He doesn't express

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 2>his inner longings and emotions, but we know exactly who

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Popeye Doyle is and that propulsive energy that's driven by

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Popeye's obsession. Do we want to see the bad guys

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 2>get busted because it's a crime thriller and we want

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 2>that kind of resolution, Probably, but we really want that

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 2>resolution because of Popeye's relentless and occasionally reckless pursuit, his

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 2>absolute tunnel vision, which all culminates in that end scene,

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 2>and freedkin staging of it is so great that final

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 2>shootout in the old building, the emptiness of it, the

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 2>eeriness of Don Ellis's score. It somehow feels like a

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 2>manifestation of Popeye's deranged psyche and i'll use your word,

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 2>delusional psyche. But the wonder of that scene is that

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 2>final line, and Hackman's line reading he has just mistakenly

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 2>shot an FBI agent trying to chase down the same

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 2>drug dealer that he is, and when confronted with this fact,

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 2>he's unfazed. He's undeterred, aldered, you shot muldered.

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Some of it is here. I saw it.

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna get him.

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 2>What I think is so incredible about that line, Josh,

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 2>and what Hackman does with it is despite what I

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 2>said before being true, he's completely deranged in this moment.

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 2>He is manic, but he doesn't yell, he doesn't even

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 2>really raise his voice. He somehow brings just a hint

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 2>of humanity and even vulnerability to pop Eye to such

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 2>an extent that you almost feel sorry for him in

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 2>that moment rather than feeling potentially repulsed by it.

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, it's because there's a crack of self awareness,

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps for the first time in the movie. And yeah,

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I rewatched this as well for this list, just because

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it is one of those Hackman titles that comes up

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>first and I wanted to find that scene. Spoiler, it's

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>an honorable mention for me. Didn't make the top five,

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>but I would have gone exactly where you went. Really,

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the moment. I thought about the busting up

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the bar scene earlier, but that's like the pure Hackman blood.

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 1>That's like what we love to see, right, because you

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>can't believe he's walking in and just immediately owning that

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>place that he really shouldn't even be in. So I

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>thought about that one, but you nailed why. This is

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the scene from the French Connection, and it is his

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>glassy eyed non response to shooting the other agent that

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is terrifying. But I think you're right. Also allows us

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a peek into Popeye realizing for just a split second

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>who he really is. And then again to your point,

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like he plows ahead anyway, he's not going to like

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>pause and reassess and really consider the depths of his humanity.

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>But there's that little glimmer that Hackman, even in this wild,

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, action driven movie, is able to carve out

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>some space for.

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I just think a lesser actor would have delivered

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 2>that line as if it was being driven more by adrenaline,

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 2>the adrenaline of the character in that scene and having

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 2>to reckon with what he's just done. I think that

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 2>reckoning is there. I think we are seeing the crack

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 2>starting to come through, but he plays it so subtly,

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 2>he plays it as if he really is processing it

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>in that moment, and then yes, he does proceed.

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>On all right. Number four. This is my Unforgiven pick,

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and I wasn't quite sure if this was going to

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>make my list, you know, because I read we did

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a Sacred Cow review. I think Adam of Unforgiven a

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>handful of years ago, so it was fairly fresh for me.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I read what I originally wrote about the film, and

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Hackman didn't come up a lot. So I

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>was thinking to myself, Okay, why didn't I make a point?

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>And maybe he did in our conversation. I didn't re

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>listen to that, But why didn't he Why doesn't he

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>stick in in my mind more than just the villain?

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So I did go through and watch basically every scene

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of his in the movie because they're all available online.

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Because this is one of those Hackman roles and Yeah,

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>there is obviously so many layers there beyond the big

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:07.719
<v Speaker 1>bad guy of Unforgiven. That is, he lingers in our

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 1>memory that way, because this is a movie full of tough,

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>violent men, and Hackman's merciless sheriff little Bill here is

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe the scariest one, right, and there are so many

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>intimidating scenes that attest to that. So that's what we

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>have in our memory. But Steve Emily, writing on my

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Facebook page, he called out the slightly different scene that

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go with, and this is little Bill's

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>final moments after he's been shot by Clint Eastwood's William Money,

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and basically he's staring down the barrel of Money's gun here, I'll.

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Have to serve this.

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>To die like this, I was filling the huff deserves,

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>got nothing to do with it.

0:18:55.359 --> 0:19:00.120
<v Speaker 2>I'll see you in hell, Money.

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Steve Emily again nailed exactly what makes this moment so

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>key for me. He wrote, a man finally realizing that

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.719
<v Speaker 1>he's not the hero, and I love that because there

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is a version of Unforgiven where little Bill is the hero.

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Of course, and he certainly sees himself that way.

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>That's it, that is it. He's trying to preserve the

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>peace in this small town. Right, He's only implying employing

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>violence because that's the world he lives in. This is

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the world of the movie. Certainly that's the version playing

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in little Bill's head. Because how about the phrase we

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>get here, I was building a house. I mean to

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>insert that there, great screenwriting, but also to be able

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to move from that to who little Bill really is.

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've seen his vindictiveness, his cruelty, his arbitrary

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>application of the law, so we know differently. But this

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is a glimpse into his head, that one line, and

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>then to switch this is the hackman's subtlety to switch

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>from that openness. It's the same openness you were just

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.239
<v Speaker 1>talking about at the end of the French connection, that

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>little crack, that little glimmer. Then he switches to I'll

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.679
<v Speaker 1>see you in Hell, and his face changing to match.

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>That's when little Bill faces that truth when he makes

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that shift. So so yeah, so many good choices from Unforgiven,

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>but I'll see You in Hell is going to be

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>number four on my list.

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm realizing with that line, and that is the line

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.840
<v Speaker 2>of that scene, I was building a house. We could

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 2>just do top five Gene Hackman line readings. That's what

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 2>it really could be, this list instead of scenes, because

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 2>there are so many good ones to choose from, and

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 2>it says so much just by being so concise, this

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.719
<v Speaker 2>idea of building a house, as if he's trying to

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>suggest to the world that I really am a good person.

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 2>But also I'm not really this person like William Money is.

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm someone who is settled down. I've eschewed the outlaw

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:57.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of life. I'm listening to the citizen, the right

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of life. That's it and it doesn't matter. And

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:04.479
<v Speaker 2>as William Money says, deserve has nothing to do with it.

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 2>It's so good. My number four is one where I'm

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>going to pick up the vulnerability theme again. Long time

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 2>since I've seen the movie The Conversation. I'll thank Joshua

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 2>t ruth Over on the film spotting facebook page for

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 2>reminding me of this scene where Hackman's Harry Call is

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 2>talking to a woman he has met at a party.

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 2>It's Meredith, played by Elizabeth McCrae. They're sharing what seems

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 2>to be a very intimate moment together. They're alone in

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:39.320
<v Speaker 2>this big space, the space where he works effectively his office,

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 2>but they're alone, They're up against a pillar, there is

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 2>no space between them. She's certainly expressing romantic interest in him,

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 2>and probably thinks that he's expressing romantic interest in her.

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 2>Though what we realize is that he's completely hung up

0:21:55.400 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 2>on Terry Gar's and Harry trusts no one. He confides

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 2>in no one. He's unwilling to betray anything about who

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 2>he really is. And yet in this moment, he he

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 2>does feel at least safe enough to open up a

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 2>little bits.

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>You never really know when he was going to come

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to see.

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 3>He just lived in a room alone and you knew

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 3>nothing about him. And if you loved him, you're a

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 3>patient with him. And even though he didn't dare ever

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 3>tell you anything about himself personally, even though he may

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 3>have want you, would you qut you would you go

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 3>back to.

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 2>How I know?

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>How do you think it out? In't have no wife,

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>not anyone.

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Here's one of those moments, joshuare. What you can't see

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 2>just listening to the audio of that clip is the

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 2>way Harry almost mutters before he says anything. It's like

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.359
<v Speaker 2>he's so uncomfortable and he's so reticent to speak that

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 2>he has to almost test his lips out before he

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 2>makes an actual sound, and that bravado certainly the bravado

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 2>we associate with Little Bill and many other Hackman characters,

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 2>it's completely stripped away with Harry Call. There is a

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 2>cautiousness to the way he talks, There's a cautiousness to

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 2>the way he holds himself. He not only doesn't fully

0:23:56.440 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 2>trust her, he doesn't trust himself in mos like this,

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 2>And the line here is you'd have no way of

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 2>knowing his answer to her question, which actually doesn't really

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 2>feel like an answer to her question. He doesn't say

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 2>it matter of factly. He doesn't say it like he

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 2>is answering her. There's enough disappointment in himself and self

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 2>contempt that seeps in. It's as if he's saying, right,

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 2>of course, how could you go back to him when

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 2>you could never know he loved you. Hackman is just

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 2>too understated to show us the light bulb going off,

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 2>But that's effectively what's happening there. He Harry Call, is

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 2>realizing something through this exchange, and he's realizing something profoundly sad.

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's all in the pauses, the nonverbal gestures that

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you're describing in this scene, and that is a great

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>line too. That's a moment almost it's almost like he's

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:58.479
<v Speaker 1>come to this observation about humanity, humanity that applies to

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:02.159
<v Speaker 1>this situation. But that's what hitting him right there, but

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't deliver it that way. You know. It's it's

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>like this, this just little a side of despair, resignation Hackman. Resignation.

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, a good word, but it's it's resignation and

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 2>it's a realization of unfortunately hopelessness. There's there's a hopelessness

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 2>with this character. This is something he is never going

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 2>to be able to get over.

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, which is, you know, a fitting theme for that film.

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I do have conversation as an honorable mention for me,

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a different moment, but maybe we'll get to that when

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>we get to honorable mentions. My number three comes from

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi Burning Story about my daddy. This one was my homework.

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Actually it was a first time watch for me. Even

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>though this was a nineteen eighty eight Oscar nominee. I

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>remember it at that time when I would have been

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>so into what was going on with the Oscars and

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>somehow would have been in middle school and still didn't

0:25:55.600 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>see this, but yeah. Hackman Best Actor nomination for this

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>one as well. He plays an FBI agent alongside partner

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Willem Dafoe, assigned to investigate the disappearance of three civil

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>rights activists in rural Mississippi. Is set in nineteen sixty four,

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and they're a bit of an odd couple. Dafoe is

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>this younger, naive, hard charging idealist. Hackman's character, we learn,

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>used to be a sheriff in the South, so he

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>has a much better understanding of what they're actually up

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>against here. And there's this point when Dafoe sort of

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>rhetorically wonders where all this hatred he's encountering comes from,

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and then Hackman meanders into a story from his childhood

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>about his father having poisoned a black neighbor's mule because

0:26:41.240 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the neighbor's farm was doing better than his father's.

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 7>One time, we were driving down the road and we passed

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.240
<v Speaker 7>Monroe's place and we saw it was empty. He just

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 7>packed up and the laft I guess gone up north

0:26:52.119 --> 0:27:01.439
<v Speaker 7>or something. I looked over in my daddy's face, and

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 7>I knew he'd done it.

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>He saw that. I knew he's shame. I guess he

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>was shamed.

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 7>He looked at me and he said, if you any

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 7>better than your son, who are you better than?

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an excuse. No, it's not an excuse

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>to this story about Mandandy. Think of what Hackman is

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>accomplishing here in just one folksy little yarn. The first thing,

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and you know the screen play has a lot to

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>do with this, But the first thing, he's painting a

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>sociological portrait of the racial and economic realities of the

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>American South in the early twentieth century. Okay, so we're

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>getting that in this indelible image and little story. He's

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>also telling us everything we need to know about how

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>his character came to be who he is and retains

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>what attitudes he has that we've already picked up on.

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Then he's hinting at the self reflective qualities. Anderson also

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>has right that he is not just eating up his

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>family's history, but thinking about it and what that says

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.359
<v Speaker 1>about his own place in the dynamics of this case

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that they're investigating. So he's basically here sharing both where

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 1>he came from, how he understands that he's not exactly

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.199
<v Speaker 1>part of that past, but still kind of is you know,

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:29.959
<v Speaker 1>he's not refuting this to the foe and totally like

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>saying you're right and all these people are morons. He's trying,

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to wrestle with this reality in real time

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>here and over on Blue Sky. Stephen Kotch put it

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this way. This scene is not only a thesis for

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the film, but Hackman delivers the story perfectly. An old

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>man who was just so full of hate he didn't

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 1>know being poor is what was killing him. That remains

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>depressingly pression. So over all, I would say I was

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a little disappointed in Mississippi Burning, not just because it's

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it has sort of the oscary stuff I expected,

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>but this does in the way that the French connection

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>keeps a bit of a distance from Popeye's vigilanteism, this

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Mississippi Burning kind of endorses that by the end, and

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it's all largely enacted by Hackman's character in the climax,

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's just this kind of bitterly ironic thing for

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a movie about civil rights and protecting civil rights, that

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to my mind, it ends up endorsing. You know, if

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you're on the right side of history, you can do it.

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So that was a little disturbing, but you know, Hackman overall,

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I will say, keeps the movie on its toes because

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>here he is playing another character who's simmering in this

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of moral unease. Yeah.

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 2>I do love that exchange. And this is a nod

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 2>not just to Hackman, but to the editor of this scene.

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 2>That moment when Defoe kind of challenges him back and says, oh,

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 2>so that's the excuse, and he immediately responds and says, no,

0:29:57.440 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 2>this is just a story about my daddy. Yeah, And

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 2>it's as if he's acknowledging that I'm telling you this parable,

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 2>because like a good parable, there is some larger meaning

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 2>and depth to it. But let's not read into it

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 2>too much. It is ultimately a story just about my daddy.

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 2>And that's that little Hackman twinkle that comes through in

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 2>that moment. Here's my unforgiven pick at number three. I'm

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 2>going with the scene where we see the sadistic side

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 2>of Little Bill really come out beating up Richard Harris's

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 2>English Bob outside the barber shop. We've got to get

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 2>some Hackman swagger in here. I've been talking about sadness

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and vulnerability, that devilish grin. We never see it with

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Harry Call, we barely see it with Popeye Doyle. But

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Little Bill is a devil who is sure enjoying his authority.

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 2>And English Bob and his biographer arrive in town. They

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 2>initially forego giving up their firearms when asked by one

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 2>of Little Bill's deputies. That leads to this confrontation outside

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 2>the barbershop, with a Little Bill holding court in front

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 2>of the entire town, and that quiet confidence. Hackman plays

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 2>him almost the whole time, with his hand on his hip,

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 2>standing with a certain posture as if he's he's a

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 2>little laid back about the whole thing. But we see

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 2>how focused he is. We know that he's ready to

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 2>strike if he has to. We certainly know that he's

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 2>ready to draw his gun if he needs to. But

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 2>he's steady, he's unflappable. He never raises his voice at

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 2>all until.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess you think I'm kicking you, Bob.

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 6>So what I'm doing is, yeah, I'm pugging all of

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 6>films down there in Candace, and I'm plugging all of

0:31:48.640 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 6>films in Massaiah.

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Not a shame, I'm telling the right now, Horse Golf.

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 2>We get an explosion of violence from him. That's similar

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 2>to the showdown in Crimson Tide with Denzel Washington that

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people wrote in suggesting that he should

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 2>consider for this list. Of course, that's strictly verbal, but

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 2>it's another moment where a Hackman character finally just abandons

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 2>professional courtesy. And how about that line as he's beating him,

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess you think I'm kicking you, Bob, And I said,

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 2>he's holding court. He is. He's using English Bob and

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 2>his loathing for English Bob, which is legitimate because of

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 2>their past, to send a larger message to others who

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 2>may be deciding to come to town. And my favorite

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 2>touch one of those touches that you want to give

0:32:56.960 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 2>the actor credit for that you feel like you have

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 2>to assume it was something the act or chose to do,

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 2>but of course it might have been in the script,

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 2>it might have been something that Eastwood himself suggested. But

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 2>after all that punching and kicking English Bob, Bloody Hackman

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 2>just finally is so mad he throws his cowboy hat

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 2>at him, and that act shows how little respect he

0:33:20.920 --> 0:33:24.480
<v Speaker 2>has for him, but also shows that he's not quite

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.880
<v Speaker 2>as unflappable as he makes himself out to be. That's

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:31.720
<v Speaker 2>where we see that little sadistic street to little Bill

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 2>come out. There is a look in his eye as

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 2>he's yelling at the townspeople to leave that has that

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 2>same hint of madness that we see in Popeye Doyle

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the French Connection. We're all looking

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.239
<v Speaker 2>at go Long, get out here. Who.

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that throwing the hat makes it personal too,

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>like he wouldn't do that if they didn't have that history.

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>So it's a gesture that speaks to the character's past,

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>which is so brilliant. But yeah, mostly this scene, it

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>is that really frightening boiling over and also the smugness

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that's attendant to it. The beginning of the scene has

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that you were describing, has such a smugness, which I

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>think is also a quality shared by so many of

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Hackman's great characters.

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it helps when you're probably fairly confident in your

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 2>abilities as a sheriff and as a gun slinger, but

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 2>when you also have like eight deputies around all the goods, right,

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 2>it's really easy to be in confident. Right, more Hackman

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 2>coming later in the show.

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, listening to us is the number one thing you

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>can do to support an independently produced show like Film Spotting,

0:34:40.080 --> 0:34:42.359
<v Speaker 1>But there are a couple of other things. If you'd

0:34:42.400 --> 0:34:43.800
<v Speaker 1>like to help us out, you could take a minute

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to give us a rating or review on Apple Podcasts

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>or Spotify. Doesn't matter if you're a first time listener

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.279
<v Speaker 1>or if you've been listening for twenty years. Every new

0:34:52.320 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>review helps us reach new listeners. You could also support

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.239
<v Speaker 1>us by joining the Film Spotting Family. You can do

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it right over there at Film Spotting Family. We want

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 1>to welcome new family plus member Darren in Connecticut. I've

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>been following Darren for a while on letterbox as j

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Gunn five. The number five all one word. So welcome Darren.

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Good to see you join the family.

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Been a longtime listener. Familiar name certainly to me. Darren writes,

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:20.879
<v Speaker 2>when I saw The Wolf of Wall Street, I needed

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 2>some help processing it, and boy did you too process it?

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Is that what we did. I was instantly hooked on

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 2>how well you both reasoned through your arguments. I ultimately

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 2>sided with Josh on this one. By the way, Now

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 2>that was a parenthetical, and sometimes maybe parentheticals should just

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:37.360
<v Speaker 2>be left out. I don't know, and I read.

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.839
<v Speaker 1>It one thing we know is Darren did not vote

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>for Wolf of Wall Street in Film spot Madness.

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:46.319
<v Speaker 2>He didn't favorite review or segment Top five things We've

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 2>learned podcasting about the movies. That was a milestone celebration

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 2>some year six p. Ninety four was the episode with

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 2>our friend Dave Chen. What review we got wrong? It's

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of a cop out, but I'll say that you

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 2>got both Come On, Come On, especially Twentieth Century Women

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 2>wrong by failing to give either of them a featured review. Josh,

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 2>this reminds me that we need to pencil in. We

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:10.799
<v Speaker 2>need to add to our list of top five suggestions

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 2>for the future, top five movies that we didn't give

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 2>a proper review to because they came out in that

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 2>bizarre end of year limbo period when we're catching up

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 2>with everything for awards. Maybe some films are not giving

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 2>quite as much attention as we should because we're trying

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 2>to fit in so much, and we take some time

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 2>off around Thanksgiving and then we have the Top ten

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:34.760
<v Speaker 2>show and we just don't have all those normal reviews.

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 2>What I'm saying, Darren is you're absolutely right. We did

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 2>not give Come On, Come On or Twentieth Century Women

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:42.440
<v Speaker 2>their due, even though I liked both of those films.

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I loved come On, come On, and

0:36:44.440 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I think Sam is maybe the biggest fan. Do I

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>have this right of twenty second three fair women that

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:50.319
<v Speaker 1>I know? So?

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? His letterbox top four, Josh, this is unassailable. He

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 2>says they change periodically. Currently it's focusing on four favorites

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 2>celebrating their twentieth, fortieth, sixtieth, and eightieth anniversaries. Okay, so

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 2>there's a method to his letterbox Madness, Eternal Sunshine of

0:37:07.760 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 2>the Spotless Mind, Paris, Texas. And then as if he

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:14.480
<v Speaker 2>is trying to make both of us happy for siding

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 2>with you on the Wolf of Wall Street, the Umbrellas

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 2>of Sherboor, and my beloved Double Indemnity.

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Great group, but I love this method. I love giving

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>yourself a way to rotate and not just an excuse

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to those an excuse. Yeah, let's just call it excuse.

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 2>A favorite movie he revisited recently searching for Bobby Fisher

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 2>ridiculously underrated. I can name a dozen top five lists

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 2>this should be featured on. I like searching for Bobby Fisher.

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:41.560
<v Speaker 2>But I'm one of those people who I suppose ridiculously

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 2>underrates it. It's fine, you've never seen it. Okay, a

0:37:46.600 --> 0:37:49.719
<v Speaker 2>random film or filmmaker that Darren loves smooth Talk. This

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 2>absolutely would have been the Golden Brick winner of nineteen

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 2>eighty five. Will smooth Talk take your word for it,

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 2>because clearly neither of us have seen it, he credits.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I gotta just because this is in our this is

0:38:02.000 --> 0:38:05.560
<v Speaker 1>our we're you know, eighties kids. Essentially, I gotta, Oh

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, smooth Talk have no recollection of the movie,

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>but I know this VHS cover. It's treat Williams and

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Laura Dern hot pink eighties fine, right, purple around the edges.

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:20.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Here here's the plot. A free spirited fifteen year old

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>girl flirts with a dangerous stranger in the northern California

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>suburbs and must prepare herself for the frightening and traumatic consequences.

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Directed by Joyce Chapra.

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I definitely saw that box in my local video

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 2>store many times as well, Josh. I don't think I

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 2>ever truly considered renting it, though.

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean this this. We might have to start a

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 1>new series for titles like This Time Time Machine Reviews

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:54.920
<v Speaker 1>or something like once it just got lost, but we

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:58.160
<v Speaker 1>have some vague remembrance of let's finally watch them.

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, here's one we both have seen and love, a

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.040
<v Speaker 2>movie he credits with becoming a cinephile of Spike Lee's

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Do the Right Thing and his favorite book about movies

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:10.359
<v Speaker 2>or movie making. Darren says, before I discovered letterbox lists

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 2>and film Spotting Madness, Ebert's The Great Movies gave me

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 2>my cinematic homework. Thank you, Darren for joining the family

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 2>and for all those years of listening. In addition to

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:21.800
<v Speaker 2>keeping us doing what we're doing, your support comes with perks.

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 2>You get to listen early in ED Free, You get

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 2>our weekly newsletter. You get exclusive opportunities and access to

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 2>things like the Film Spotting Family Discord. You also get

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 2>our monthly bonus shows we have. Now as people are

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 2>hearing this, Josh dropped into our feed the March edition

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:40.680
<v Speaker 2>of Trivia Spotting and coming up in April, our Madness

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.319
<v Speaker 2>bracket winner will get to decide a topic that we

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 2>will have to draft with that listener.

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Now, am I throwing a wrinkle into this? I mean,

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>last time we assessed our brackets, I was close to

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>winning the whole damn thing.

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 2>So I win it?

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Then do I just pick the topic?

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's gonna be a concer Josh, we'll

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 2>get to that later. Things have changed, Oh, things have

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 2>changed a little bit.

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Film Spottingfamily dot com is where you can learn more.

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 4>Hey, it's Brooklyn Adams and I'm partnering with Abercommedy to

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 4>tell you about the newest drop from their Active brand,

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Your Personal Best YPB luggings are made with buttery soft

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 4>fabrics that hug you in all the right places and

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 4>common Abercomy's viral curve love fit designed to eliminate waste gap,

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 4>paired with sports bras and super soft sweatshirts. It's active

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 4>word that supports every part of my busy lifestyle and

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 4>gives me my best but ever heading to the new

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 4>year feeling your personal best? Shop Active by Abercrombie in

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:40.359
<v Speaker 4>the app, online and in stores. You have a.

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Neurological disorder preventing you from remembering exactly what happened in mine?

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Is that right?

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 7>I've been recording these tapes for my daughter that helps

0:40:47.719 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 7>keep me from zoning out. This condition of yours will

0:40:51.120 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 7>slowly eat away at your cognitive capabilities.

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 2>In addition to catching up with some Gene Hackman blind spots. Josh,

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 2>you've been busy watching some other new releases of First Gazer.

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 2>You just heard a little bit of a clip from

0:41:05.719 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 2>that trailer. It's currently playing in limited release. It's the

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:12.880
<v Speaker 2>directing debut of Ryan J. Sloane, which might make it

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 2>a good candidate for the Golden Brick Award. Here on

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 2>film spotting neurological disorder a system for recording memories crime thriller,

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 2>mister Sloane doesn't seem to be going out of his

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 2>way to avoid comparisons to Memento, a film I adore,

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 2>might I adore Gazer.

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I like to think you'll appreciate it. I mean, there's

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:35.880
<v Speaker 1>no doubt that it is leaning heavily on Memento. It

0:41:36.080 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>is the touchstone. I do want to give it a

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>nod and consideration for Golden Brick because even beyond that,

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 1>it has enough of its own vision. It definitely has

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 1>enough of its own atmosphere to create something that's you know,

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 1>it's an unnerving lo fi neo noir that that I

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 1>did appreciate. The screenplay written by the star Ariela Mestriami,

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:02.360
<v Speaker 1>who plays this mother who's basically suffering from this condition,

0:42:02.440 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and then yeah, it gets wrapped up in a missing

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:08.440
<v Speaker 1>person case, so everything becomes more complicated for her. There

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 1>nods even you know, brief nods to the Shining, brief

0:42:11.920 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>nods to the Exorcist, brief nods to Coronaberg's video drome.

0:42:15.040 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 1>It kind of goes a lot of places, but I

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>especially appreciated the locations here. This is set in New Jersey,

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but kind of like the off ramp New Jersey from

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the Expressway, a lot of warehouses and you know, convenience

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>stores things like that. The sound design is very interesting

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 1>as it's trying to put us in the headspace of Frankie,

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this main character. And I also liked the score, which

0:42:40.040 --> 0:42:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to connect with our top five, the Hackman Top five.

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:45.560
<v Speaker 1>It's very heavy on the horns and made me think

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of a seventies detective movie, something like Night Moves actually,

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:52.839
<v Speaker 1>but then what's going on here also projects it into

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this grungy future. So yeah, I think Gayser is worthy

0:42:57.160 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of Golden Brick consideration and if it's playing near you

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>folks should check it out.

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 2>You also saw a film that I have wanted to

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 2>see since hearing about it when it played the Chicago

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Film Festival back in October. It's the directing debut of

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Michael Shannon and stars Judy Greer, Tracy Letts, Alison Pill

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:19.319
<v Speaker 2>Alexander Scarsguard. Great cast. It's based on a play by

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Chicago playwright Brett Neveau, who, like Shannon, is an ensemble

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:27.280
<v Speaker 2>member of Chicago's Red Orchid Theater Company. Greer and scars

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Guard played the parents of a school shooter. Seems like

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.839
<v Speaker 2>harrowing stuff, Josh. It's new to theaters, but not new,

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:36.640
<v Speaker 2>as I said. Played at the Chicago Film Festival last year,

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 2>premiered at Tribeca back in twenty twenty three. What did

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 2>you make of it?

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was lucky because it's playing at the Gene

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Sisco Film Center and so they had a preview screening.

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Shannon was there for a Q and A afterwards, and

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 1>it is herowing, but it's really focused on the experience

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of these parents, and Greer gives a very commanding performance

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 1>and quiet way. She's excellent in it. Skysguard has a

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 1>part that's a little could aved or into caricature. Basically,

0:44:07.960 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 1>this dorkey midwesterner, you know, against type very much. So

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>who throws himself into a prayer group at this new

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 1>church to kind of, you know, just escape all of

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the awfulness of their situation. But he finds enough notes

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of conviction to keep them from being a caricature. So

0:44:25.600 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I think those two performances are very strong. And then

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 1>also their son, he does show up at the end

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of the film, so it's not a spoiler to say that,

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's the first time you see him. He's played

0:44:39.040 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 1>by Nation Hendrickson, you know, a new actor who is

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:48.280
<v Speaker 1>just incredible in this very long scene. So I'm definitely

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>going to keep an eye out for Nation Hendrickson in

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>future films, but this one, particularly for the performances Eric LaRue,

0:44:57.200 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is worth checking out as well.

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 2>Two films, two recommendations. Let's see if we can continue

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 2>the streak up. Next is Holland, directed by Mimi Cave,

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 2>who made twenty twenty two's Fresh Nicole Kidman Stars. You know,

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 2>anytime you read about a character having a seemingly perfect life,

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 2>you know something is gonna go terribly wrong. She lives

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 2>in Holland, Michigan. She's a teacher, and she stumbles onto

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 2>a troubling secret about her husband, who's played by Matthew McFadden.

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:27.319
<v Speaker 2>She and coworker Gail Garcia Bernal investigate. You know, I

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:30.479
<v Speaker 2>already have a bias against this movie because the other

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 2>town in the Midwest, I don't know, maybe the only

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 2>other town in the entire country that is known for

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 2>its unique dutchness. Josh is in Iowa. Pella, Iowa. Grew

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:46.799
<v Speaker 2>up just down the road from Pella. Used to love

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 2>visiting my favorite spot in the world, Yarsma's Bakery. I

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know if there's a Yarsma's in Holland. Is there

0:45:53.040 --> 0:45:55.040
<v Speaker 2>a good movie made about Holland?

0:45:55.640 --> 0:46:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Pela Dowledge to Bulat, that's all. This is rough, unfortunately,

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I know, you know, I've been to Holland

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 1>countless times and have friends and you know, colleagues there.

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:13.840
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't matter at all. Oftentimes I will say accent

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:16.080
<v Speaker 1>work doesn't matter. I don't care. But I just have

0:46:16.160 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>to note because I know I know Dutch Canadians who

0:46:20.480 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of sound vaguely like the people in this movie.

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of characters in the Coen Brothers

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Fargo who sound like the people in this movie. I

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>know no one in Alen, Michigan who sounds like this,

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So that's you know, neither here nor there, but was amusing. Ultimately,

0:46:37.160 --> 0:46:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that this is a very lazy blue

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>velvet riff, and it also is nowhere near interesting to

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 1>your point, near as interesting as other Nicole Kidman interrogations

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of perfection, and poor Matthew McFadyen, who I love, you know,

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>from Succession and so many other things. He's just he's

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the latest guy unable to satisfy Nicole Kidney two disastrous

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:07.279
<v Speaker 1>results for the characters and for the movie. I would

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 1>say so, unless you're familiar with Holland and want to

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>watch this as a curiosity, a definite skip.

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay. I say this with no offense to Matthew McFadden,

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 2>but somehow I believe that more than I believed it

0:47:21.360 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 2>with Antonio banderis fair enough. Gazer and Eric LaRue are

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:30.480
<v Speaker 2>currently out in limited release. Holland is available exclusively on

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Prime Video. If you agree or disagree with Josh's takes,

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 2>or maybe if you know people or you grew up

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 2>yourself around Holland, Michigan and you want to vouch for

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 2>the ax at work, please you gotta leave us a voicemail,

0:47:42.640 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 2>though you got to send us an audio note with

0:47:44.719 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 2>that accent. You can do that feedback at film spotting

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:51.359
<v Speaker 2>dot Net. Next week on the show, it's your turn

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 2>to skip town. Josh. You will be in Boulder, Colorado

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 2>for a return to Ebert interrupt Us and I think

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 2>to secure housing for Sundance twenty twenty seven. Good luck

0:48:02.760 --> 0:48:03.879
<v Speaker 2>with that, you joke.

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:07.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, with Sundance moving to Boulder, I may have

0:48:07.880 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a few things in the works. Actually, Adam, thanks to

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 1>thanks to knowing some folks from the last number of years,

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>going to Boulder for Ebert interrupt Us, but it is

0:48:16.760 --> 0:48:19.920
<v Speaker 1>right around the corner. April seven through ten, we are

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 1>doing the Wizard of Oz, not only because it's a

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>great movie, but because Cynthia Arrivo is going to give

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the keynote for the Conference on World Affairs, which is

0:48:31.120 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>what Ebert interrupt Us is a part of. So would

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>love to see film Spotting listeners there. We're gonna watch

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Wizard of Oz day one, then spend three days working

0:48:40.080 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 1>through it. We're also having a film spotting meet up

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday, April ten. They're in Boulder. It's going to

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:49.040
<v Speaker 1>be at a new location, Boulder Social and you'll get

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:53.080
<v Speaker 1>all the details. You can also RSVP via the link

0:48:53.320 --> 0:48:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in the show notes. If you are a film Spotting

0:48:55.880 --> 0:48:59.840
<v Speaker 1>family member, just check that meetups channel in our discord

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 1>and you'll find details there as well.

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait to hear all about how it goes.

0:49:05.239 --> 0:49:07.440
<v Speaker 2>I know that you've been doing some homework for this,

0:49:07.640 --> 0:49:09.840
<v Speaker 2>reading the book that The Wizard of Oz is based on,

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:10.800
<v Speaker 2>which is wonderful.

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I got to say, I don't know why I never

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>read it, especially because I appreciate children's literature a lot,

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 1>but this has been a delightful read. And yeah, part

0:49:20.120 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of the last minute cramming I'm doing for next week.

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Joining me next week filling in for Josh will be

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:30.439
<v Speaker 2>the one, the only Michael Phillips. And before I get

0:49:30.480 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 2>to our programming, I want to take this opportunity to

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:38.600
<v Speaker 2>say thank you to our longtime production assistant Veronica Phillips.

0:49:38.600 --> 0:49:40.359
<v Speaker 2>You have heard her name at the end of our

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:43.440
<v Speaker 2>show for over two years, and it really is one

0:49:43.480 --> 0:49:46.759
<v Speaker 2>of those time as of flat circle things where with

0:49:46.800 --> 0:49:49.440
<v Speaker 2>our pas, we typically try to have them on board

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:51.960
<v Speaker 2>for a year or so and then we cut them

0:49:51.960 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 2>loose and we try to get some new blood in there.

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 2>And I went back and looked at the calendar. At

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:00.080
<v Speaker 2>some point I was like, Veronica has been doing this

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:03.760
<v Speaker 2>for two years and she she never raised a fuss,

0:50:04.120 --> 0:50:07.279
<v Speaker 2>always gave us great ideas for top fives and suggestions

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 2>when we asked her to start forming lists for us

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 2>or come up with ideas, and she was responsible for

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:17.920
<v Speaker 2>keeping the website updated. And we have finally said, Veronica,

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 2>you can you can depart. You can go out into

0:50:20.600 --> 0:50:22.720
<v Speaker 2>the world and do other film related work.

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean, you know, if it isn't broke, go

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 1>fix it. Isn't that? Is that what they say? So

0:50:26.840 --> 0:50:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Veronica just kept doing great work and we were happy

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:32.759
<v Speaker 1>to have her, but yeah, probably time to let her

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:36.279
<v Speaker 1>pursue other things. But thank you so much, Veronica for

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>everything you did all this time.

0:50:37.880 --> 0:50:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Indeed, thank you, and we want to welcome our new

0:50:41.440 --> 0:50:43.799
<v Speaker 2>production assistant. Let me see if I can get this right,

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Sophie kempin Ower Kempinar, Sophie Kempinar, Josh.

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Are you sure it's not pronounced empirepentire? I have heard

0:50:53.560 --> 0:50:55.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of to get that one right. I know

0:50:55.840 --> 0:50:56.479
<v Speaker 1>I've heard a lot.

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Of butcherings over the years, but I think I can

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 2>say it correctly. Yeah, NEPO baby, Sophie kempenar and she

0:51:03.560 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 2>calls herself that so she won't take too much offense.

0:51:07.080 --> 0:51:09.839
<v Speaker 2>She is now on board as the film spotting pa

0:51:09.960 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 2>and Josh it's already paying off. I'm gonna say she's

0:51:12.520 --> 0:51:14.319
<v Speaker 2>done good work through a couple of weeks, not only

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:17.560
<v Speaker 2>with the website. Without her updating the Madness pages, Josh,

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:20.319
<v Speaker 2>it would not have been starting. Each round, would have

0:51:20.360 --> 0:51:23.400
<v Speaker 2>been behind by hours. Let me just say that really.

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Unfair of you to throw her in.

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 2>I know, during the.

0:51:26.040 --> 0:51:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Weeks of Madness.

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:29.400
<v Speaker 2>That's right, that's what she started. She starts in March

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:34.399
<v Speaker 2>when film Spotting Madness is hitting its apex. And when

0:51:34.480 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 2>we were on our vacation just a few weeks ago,

0:51:38.920 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 2>my wife and I and Sophie, we met her. She's

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 2>studying abroad. We were sitting at a cafe or something

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:47.759
<v Speaker 2>or at dinner and I said, you know, Michael's going

0:51:47.800 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 2>to be filling in, and we don't really have a

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:51.400
<v Speaker 2>topic for this show. It seems like a good sacred

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:56.160
<v Speaker 2>cow option week. I throughout the idea of pride and Prejudice,

0:51:56.760 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 2>knowing that she would be fully on board and want

0:51:58.800 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 2>us to do that because she loves that film. If

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:05.720
<v Speaker 2>it's not in her letterbox top four, it's number five. Okay,

0:52:05.920 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 2>that's how much she loves this film. And she gives

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:10.760
<v Speaker 2>me grief for the fact that when it was reviewed

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 2>on Film Spotting back in two thousand and five when

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 2>it was called Cinecast, Sam adored it and gave it

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:20.160
<v Speaker 2>five stars. I gave it a pass at three stars,

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:22.439
<v Speaker 2>even though Joe Wright would come along a few years

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:24.919
<v Speaker 2>later with Atonement and I would swoon for that film.

0:52:24.960 --> 0:52:27.680
<v Speaker 2>So I've long felt like I owed Pride and Prejudice

0:52:27.960 --> 0:52:32.560
<v Speaker 2>five a revisit, and since it is five, it's its

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:35.839
<v Speaker 2>twentieth anniversary. So I said, why not, let's do it.

0:52:36.320 --> 0:52:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about Pride and Prejudice. And I said, Sophie,

0:52:39.200 --> 0:52:41.920
<v Speaker 2>what's a good You've seen this film a million times.

0:52:41.960 --> 0:52:44.319
<v Speaker 2>What's a good top five for Michael Knight to do

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:46.439
<v Speaker 2>with it? And right off the tip of her tongue,

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 2>she said, rain scenes. And it's kind of a miracle.

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:53.480
<v Speaker 2>We've never done rain scenes in the twenty year history

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:56.000
<v Speaker 2>of this show. But I don't think we have love it.

0:52:56.040 --> 0:52:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I love specific top five, so that will be a

0:52:59.040 --> 0:53:02.160
<v Speaker 1>good one. I do hope you have had this conversation

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:04.640
<v Speaker 1>with her Adam though that not every Top five can

0:53:04.640 --> 0:53:08.000
<v Speaker 1>connect to pride and prejudice or before Sunrise right.

0:53:08.280 --> 0:53:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I'm not sure she's aware of that. Okay, that'll

0:53:11.560 --> 0:53:14.799
<v Speaker 2>be a tough conversation to have with our new PA.

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Also next week, finally, I know a few people out

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:20.760
<v Speaker 2>there have been waiting for it some ethys talk because

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:24.359
<v Speaker 2>I have seen that Baseball movie Michael I know has

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:27.080
<v Speaker 2>as well and has recommended it in the Chicago Tribune.

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:29.839
<v Speaker 2>And yes, it will be the film Spotting Madness Elite eight.

0:53:29.960 --> 0:53:32.600
<v Speaker 2>So a lot to get to next week on the

0:53:32.640 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Show with Michael Phillips. If you'd like to keep up

0:53:35.120 --> 0:53:38.520
<v Speaker 2>to date on future show plans, visit Filmspotting dot Net

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:39.880
<v Speaker 2>slash episodes.

0:53:40.160 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Quick note about our sister podcast, The Next Picture Show,

0:53:43.120 --> 0:53:46.319
<v Speaker 1>looking at Cinema's present via its past. They have a

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 1>new pairing out Steven Soderberg's Wonderful Black Bag. They're looking

0:53:50.920 --> 0:53:53.799
<v Speaker 1>at in the context of nineteen thirty four's The Thin

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Man with William Powell and Myrna Lloyd, and this per

0:53:58.480 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 1>perfect timing for me. I think it was just in

0:54:01.160 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the last year or so that I watched The Thin

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Man for the first time and have sense. Watched the

0:54:07.440 --> 0:54:10.759
<v Speaker 1>second film in that series, of course, absolutely loved it,

0:54:10.840 --> 0:54:14.680
<v Speaker 1>so I am primed. I'm actually midway through their conversation

0:54:15.080 --> 0:54:16.880
<v Speaker 1>about the Thin Man. When I saw it roll in,

0:54:17.040 --> 0:54:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I knew I had to dive in right away, So

0:54:19.360 --> 0:54:21.479
<v Speaker 1>it didn't come to mind when I was watching Black

0:54:21.520 --> 0:54:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Bag about that series. But makes a ton of sense

0:54:25.520 --> 0:54:26.359
<v Speaker 1>to pair these two.

0:54:26.800 --> 0:54:29.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm so disappointed because it does seem like such an

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:31.640
<v Speaker 2>inspired pairing that I'd love to listen to. But I

0:54:31.719 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 2>still haven't had a chance to see Black Bag.

0:54:34.480 --> 0:54:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Come on, man, you gotta get on it killing me.

0:54:37.280 --> 0:54:40.120
<v Speaker 1>New episodes of the Next Picture Show drop every Tuesday

0:54:40.480 --> 0:54:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can find them wherever you get your podcasts.

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:48.360
<v Speaker 1>This lasting, This is madness. This is absolute madness.

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:51.880
<v Speaker 6>This is madness, madness, madness.

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But this is absolute madness. I'm massisson.

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Why should you build such a thing?

0:54:57.560 --> 0:55:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Mad news?

0:55:00.440 --> 0:55:07.839
<v Speaker 2>Us spot off and this is film spotting Madness. Our

0:55:07.920 --> 0:55:12.839
<v Speaker 2>annual bracket style movie elimination tournament. Sixty four movies. Only

0:55:12.880 --> 0:55:16.160
<v Speaker 2>one survives. This year. We are covering the best films

0:55:16.200 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 2>of the twenty first century. So far, we have your

0:55:19.080 --> 0:55:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Round two results and the Sweet sixteen matchups. A reminder

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 2>the Sweet sixteen. Polls are open right now. Vote before

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:29.200
<v Speaker 2>you forget. Open it on your phone, open it on

0:55:29.239 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 2>your computer, however you're listening. Vote at filmspotting dot net

0:55:33.480 --> 0:55:38.759
<v Speaker 2>slash Madness Round two. Josh meant thirty two films sixteen contests.

0:55:38.760 --> 0:55:40.560
<v Speaker 2>We will not go through them all, but we did

0:55:40.600 --> 0:55:43.600
<v Speaker 2>want to highlight a few close ones, a few upsets,

0:55:43.640 --> 0:55:46.480
<v Speaker 2>maybe a few surprises along the way. Here are the

0:55:46.520 --> 0:55:49.719
<v Speaker 2>ones that weren't close. I'll read these off to you, Josh,

0:55:49.760 --> 0:55:52.720
<v Speaker 2>and then you can get into the upsets, the movies

0:55:52.760 --> 0:55:55.319
<v Speaker 2>that had a pretty wide margin of victory, and the

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 2>films that hit at least seventy percent or more of

0:55:59.280 --> 0:56:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the vote total, winning seventy six percent to twenty four percent,

0:56:03.520 --> 0:56:06.200
<v Speaker 2>it was not tough for mad Max's Fury Road to

0:56:06.239 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 2>take down. Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless

0:56:10.200 --> 0:56:14.320
<v Speaker 2>Mind also easily defeated Edgar Wright's Shot of the Dead

0:56:14.760 --> 0:56:18.280
<v Speaker 2>by that margin, seventy four percent to twenty six percent.

0:56:18.760 --> 0:56:22.760
<v Speaker 2>No Country for Old Men beats Guillermo del Toro's Pans Labyrinth,

0:56:23.600 --> 0:56:27.719
<v Speaker 2>and there goes your beloved Phantom thread Pta out of

0:56:27.760 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 2>the tournament, officially at the hands of Parasite. These three

0:56:33.560 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 2>all were seventy one to twenty nine percent victories. There

0:56:38.000 --> 0:56:40.800
<v Speaker 2>will be Blood the number one overall seed over Denis

0:56:40.880 --> 0:56:45.720
<v Speaker 2>Villeneuve's Arrival, David Lynch and Mulholland Drive still Alive, beating

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:48.759
<v Speaker 2>Celine Siama's Portrait of Lady on Fire. I thought that

0:56:48.800 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 2>one might be tough to predict, might be pretty close.

0:56:52.239 --> 0:56:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I was wrong, like I fear I have been or

0:56:55.480 --> 0:56:57.839
<v Speaker 2>will be for much of this year's addition to film

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:03.760
<v Speaker 2>spotting Madness. And how about this, Christopher Nolan also out

0:57:04.040 --> 0:57:09.080
<v Speaker 2>of the tournament, Fellowship of the Ring crushed in her stuff.

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Wow? Yeah, really, cow, that's that's a shocker to me.

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 1>All Right, we have some upsets generally here, Royal Tenenbaums

0:57:18.680 --> 0:57:22.160
<v Speaker 1>over Lost in Translation, and that's I mean, these were

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 1>ranked pretty closely right.

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:26.760
<v Speaker 2>In the sixteen Yeah, and if you had asked, I'll say,

0:57:27.000 --> 0:57:28.680
<v Speaker 2>of course, it's easy for me to say now. But

0:57:28.720 --> 0:57:30.920
<v Speaker 2>if you asked myself and Sam, I'm pretty sure we

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:34.160
<v Speaker 2>both predicted Royal ten and Bumps to beat Lost in Translation.

0:57:34.320 --> 0:57:37.000
<v Speaker 2>So we knew this one was close technically an upset,

0:57:37.040 --> 0:57:40.640
<v Speaker 2>but we had a feeling Wes Anderson might advance.

0:57:40.360 --> 0:57:42.840
<v Speaker 1>And the percentages here sixty four percent for ten and

0:57:42.880 --> 0:57:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Baums thirty six percent for lost in translation. How about

0:57:46.440 --> 0:57:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Alfonso Quran's Children of Men versus Nolan's The Dark Knight. Now,

0:57:51.360 --> 0:57:54.760
<v Speaker 1>these both had decisive first round wins. Children of Men

0:57:55.240 --> 0:57:58.560
<v Speaker 1>one over Jonathan Glazers under the Skin and Dark Knight

0:57:58.640 --> 0:58:02.240
<v Speaker 1>beat What We Do in the Shadows. This one was

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty close, fifty two percent to forty eight percent, and

0:58:06.760 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it was Children of Men beating The Dark Knight. So,

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:15.360
<v Speaker 1>as you said, Adam Nolan's out. He started with four

0:58:15.480 --> 0:58:19.400
<v Speaker 1>films in this tournament. All four made it to the

0:58:19.440 --> 0:58:24.680
<v Speaker 1>second round, so he had interstellar Memento Oppenheimer, The Dark Knight,

0:58:24.760 --> 0:58:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and now all four are out.

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, and it was close. Children of Men's in

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:32.360
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seed Dark Knight was the fourteenth seed. So again

0:58:32.400 --> 0:58:35.760
<v Speaker 2>technically an upset, but not a shock that Children of

0:58:35.800 --> 0:58:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Men won, as you noted, very close. But here we are.

0:58:38.720 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 2>There's been some discussions amongst the selection committee about whether

0:58:42.160 --> 0:58:45.280
<v Speaker 2>or not we did Christopher Nolan wrong. It's hard to

0:58:45.280 --> 0:58:48.880
<v Speaker 2>say we did when he had four films in the tournament.

0:58:49.480 --> 0:58:52.320
<v Speaker 2>But here we are after the second round, Josh, and

0:58:52.800 --> 0:58:54.040
<v Speaker 2>none of these films are alive.

0:58:54.240 --> 0:58:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean if he had four shots at it, right,

0:58:56.680 --> 0:58:59.360
<v Speaker 1>think that's pretty pretty generous.

0:59:00.480 --> 0:59:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of close victories, here Inglorious Bastards and Spirited Away

0:59:06.240 --> 0:59:09.000
<v Speaker 2>that was only fifty six percent to forty four percent.

0:59:09.040 --> 0:59:12.440
<v Speaker 2>But Miyazaki the twelve seed does defeat Quentin Tarantino and

0:59:12.520 --> 0:59:16.240
<v Speaker 2>his twenty first seeded film. Oh, this one hurts, and

0:59:16.360 --> 0:59:20.439
<v Speaker 2>it hurt to vote in Before Sunset, Richard Linklater's Before

0:59:20.560 --> 0:59:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Sunset versus The Grand Budapest Hotel. Link Later was the

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:28.160
<v Speaker 2>eighteen seed. Wes Anderson's film was the fifteenth seed, and

0:59:28.560 --> 0:59:31.720
<v Speaker 2>looking at this vote total, Josh over the course of

0:59:31.760 --> 0:59:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the past week, Sunset it was very tight, but Sunset

0:59:35.080 --> 0:59:37.960
<v Speaker 2>was in the lead, and at the end Wes Anderson

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:40.320
<v Speaker 2>took it fifty three to forty seven percent.

0:59:40.560 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a close one.

0:59:42.000 --> 0:59:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Wes Anderson is one of two directors with two films

0:59:45.400 --> 0:59:48.120
<v Speaker 2>in the Sweet sixteen. There's no Christopher Nolan, but there

0:59:48.160 --> 0:59:52.520
<v Speaker 2>are two Anderson's, and there are two David Fincher's Zodiac

0:59:52.880 --> 0:59:56.480
<v Speaker 2>and The Social Network. And here it is Moonlight versus

0:59:56.480 --> 1:00:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Ex Makina. Two directing breakthroughs. Barry Jenkins Best Picture winner,

1:00:02.440 --> 1:00:07.439
<v Speaker 2>Alex Garland's directing debut Our Cinderella, or now we call

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:12.480
<v Speaker 2>it Cindereva, because she's got the Glass Slipper and she's advancing.

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:15.640
<v Speaker 2>And if we know anything about Ava, we know that

1:00:15.680 --> 1:00:20.120
<v Speaker 2>she will do anything to win. She's going to survive.

1:00:20.160 --> 1:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>And it she took out Moonlight.

1:00:21.640 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 2>She took Light out Moonlight Josh by something like twenty

1:00:27.440 --> 1:00:30.560
<v Speaker 2>eight votes. It was that close.

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>She's scarier than I even thought.

1:00:32.920 --> 1:00:38.120
<v Speaker 2>But she's terrifying and she advances that film from Alex

1:00:38.160 --> 1:00:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Garland moves on. It is truly our Cinderella, the forty

1:00:41.560 --> 1:00:44.840
<v Speaker 2>first seed moving on into the Sweet sixteen.

1:00:44.880 --> 1:00:45.240
<v Speaker 5>So wow.

1:00:45.720 --> 1:00:49.760
<v Speaker 2>We always look back at this point, the selection committee,

1:00:49.800 --> 1:00:52.840
<v Speaker 2>myself Sam, we wonder what we might have done differently,

1:00:52.880 --> 1:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>how we're doing so far. Of course, the seeding can

1:00:55.960 --> 1:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>influence results, because the higher the seed, thequote unquote easier

1:01:01.080 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 2>it should be for them to advance. But you also

1:01:03.880 --> 1:01:09.080
<v Speaker 2>wonder if how things proceed validates your predictions, validates how

1:01:09.120 --> 1:01:10.800
<v Speaker 2>you thought it would play out. And if you look

1:01:10.800 --> 1:01:14.520
<v Speaker 2>at the Sweet sixteen, it is comprised of fourteen films

1:01:15.360 --> 1:01:19.320
<v Speaker 2>that were among the Top sixteen, and the top thirteen

1:01:19.440 --> 1:01:23.840
<v Speaker 2>seeds all advanced to the Sweet sixteen. So I think

1:01:23.960 --> 1:01:28.840
<v Speaker 2>fourteen and fifteen are out and eighteen and nineteen are in.

1:01:29.760 --> 1:01:33.000
<v Speaker 2>So good on the selection committee, or did we I

1:01:33.080 --> 1:01:36.240
<v Speaker 2>suppose rig it in favor of those films, depends on

1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:40.040
<v Speaker 2>your perspective. We are at the Sweet sixteen though. That

1:01:40.040 --> 1:01:43.400
<v Speaker 2>means there's only eight matchups, Josh, and that means we

1:01:43.480 --> 1:01:45.840
<v Speaker 2>can take them one by one. So let's do our

1:01:45.960 --> 1:01:49.080
<v Speaker 2>usual routine. Give me, as I give you the title,

1:01:49.120 --> 1:01:51.280
<v Speaker 2>tell me is it an easy one for you? Is

1:01:51.320 --> 1:01:53.200
<v Speaker 2>it a tough one for you? Or is it a

1:01:53.240 --> 1:01:58.280
<v Speaker 2>tough one to predict? Okay, first up, there will be blood.

1:01:58.920 --> 1:02:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I think I said Paul Thomas A. Anderson was out.

1:02:00.600 --> 1:02:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Paul Thomas Anderson is not out. Phantom Thread is out,

1:02:03.880 --> 1:02:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the Master is out. There will be blood very much alive.

1:02:07.040 --> 1:02:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Is the number one seed PT Anderson versus Wes Anderson

1:02:12.000 --> 1:02:14.320
<v Speaker 2>the Royal Tenant bombs.

1:02:14.760 --> 1:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Not easy, But I'm also not going to lose a

1:02:19.560 --> 1:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>ton of sleep over it, and I'm going ten and

1:02:23.560 --> 1:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>bombs personally me. I, you know, I like Phantom Thread

1:02:28.400 --> 1:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is the one I was, my heart was attached to,

1:02:31.280 --> 1:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and now that that's been ripped out, I'm gonna go

1:02:35.040 --> 1:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>with my west heart and follow him, so it's fun.

1:02:38.400 --> 1:02:42.360
<v Speaker 2>This one is definitely tough. If you asked me to

1:02:42.480 --> 1:02:45.440
<v Speaker 2>rank these two filmmakers, I think I would tend to

1:02:45.480 --> 1:02:48.040
<v Speaker 2>say I'm more of a Paul Thomas Anderson fan than

1:02:48.080 --> 1:02:51.240
<v Speaker 2>I am a Wes Anderson fan. And yet, maybe because

1:02:51.280 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 2>of the preparation for this show and rewatching some scenes

1:02:54.680 --> 1:02:57.760
<v Speaker 2>with Gene Hackman, The Royal Tenibombs is just a movie

1:02:57.800 --> 1:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>that means.

1:02:58.320 --> 1:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>More to me, just definitely recent and see bias coming

1:03:00.880 --> 1:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>into play.

1:03:03.040 --> 1:03:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I love the Royal, I love there will be blood,

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:08.040
<v Speaker 2>but I really love The Royal ten and Bombs. It's

1:03:08.080 --> 1:03:12.560
<v Speaker 2>my number one Anderson and for that reason, Wes Anderson

1:03:12.560 --> 1:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I should specify. Of course, that's why I have it advancing.

1:03:15.720 --> 1:03:18.760
<v Speaker 2>But it was really, really, really hard.

1:03:18.840 --> 1:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll Master, You're number one pta the Master.

1:03:22.440 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 2>It might actually be there will be blood. If I

1:03:25.120 --> 1:03:29.520
<v Speaker 2>am being honest, I might have that lot. It's between

1:03:29.560 --> 1:03:32.120
<v Speaker 2>the Master and there will be blood. That top spot

1:03:32.200 --> 1:03:35.480
<v Speaker 2>so very difficult. Don't feel good about it, but I'm

1:03:35.520 --> 1:03:37.240
<v Speaker 2>going with ten and Bombs as well. I think this

1:03:37.280 --> 1:03:41.280
<v Speaker 2>one is incredibly hard. Two films about the dangers of

1:03:41.400 --> 1:03:47.200
<v Speaker 2>technology Josh in The Sweet Sixteen, The Social Network versus

1:03:47.560 --> 1:03:54.160
<v Speaker 2>our Cinderella two Robots Zuckerberg Zuckerberg versus Ava. How are

1:03:54.160 --> 1:03:55.480
<v Speaker 2>you feeling about this one?

1:03:55.880 --> 1:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, now that I'm doubly terrified of Ava, I will

1:03:58.600 --> 1:04:01.919
<v Speaker 1>never vote against her again, right, But I also will

1:04:02.000 --> 1:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>vote for Xmokana because solely because I need I owe

1:04:05.920 --> 1:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Social network a revisit. I don't think i've seen it

1:04:09.680 --> 1:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>since it came out, and my reservation at the time,

1:04:13.000 --> 1:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>though I was positive on it very much so for

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>many reasons, but I remember being disappointed because, you know,

1:04:20.240 --> 1:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I felt like it didn't have that much to say

1:04:21.880 --> 1:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>about social networking, and I wonder if I just missed

1:04:27.120 --> 1:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>what it had to say about it, and if a

1:04:30.040 --> 1:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>revisit might make me reconsider, But especially when it's paired

1:04:33.560 --> 1:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>up against something as prescient and you know, on topic

1:04:38.760 --> 1:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in a way that I was hoping for, and that

1:04:40.240 --> 1:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>it pulled it through. On that end, I think I

1:04:42.760 --> 1:04:44.160
<v Speaker 1>will still go with Xmokana.

1:04:44.680 --> 1:04:47.160
<v Speaker 2>I know that you like to decide these matchups sometimes

1:04:47.200 --> 1:04:50.480
<v Speaker 2>based on were they head to head previously or did

1:04:50.480 --> 1:04:52.360
<v Speaker 2>you have to consider them for other lists, and which

1:04:52.400 --> 1:04:55.360
<v Speaker 2>one did you rank higher. And it turns out that

1:04:55.760 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 2>back in twenty twenty, when we did our top five,

1:04:59.240 --> 1:05:02.480
<v Speaker 2>or maybe it was actually our top twenty films of

1:05:03.240 --> 1:05:07.040
<v Speaker 2>the past decade. So from twenty ten to twenty nineteen,

1:05:07.720 --> 1:05:10.240
<v Speaker 2>I did not put X Machina in my top twenty,

1:05:10.480 --> 1:05:14.240
<v Speaker 2>even though I could see it fitting there. I could

1:05:14.240 --> 1:05:16.600
<v Speaker 2>definitely see it fitting there. I did have the Social

1:05:16.640 --> 1:05:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Network on that top twenty, and that was based on

1:05:19.080 --> 1:05:22.120
<v Speaker 2>my rewatch of that film, Like you really liked it

1:05:22.120 --> 1:05:24.080
<v Speaker 2>the first time, gave it a very positive review on

1:05:24.120 --> 1:05:28.000
<v Speaker 2>the show. The second time, I felt even more. Why

1:05:28.080 --> 1:05:31.680
<v Speaker 2>it's a movie, people kind of go crazy for that.

1:05:31.760 --> 1:05:35.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a film people revere and I love Fincher as well,

1:05:35.040 --> 1:05:38.280
<v Speaker 2>So even though it's really tough in recency bias here

1:05:38.320 --> 1:05:42.720
<v Speaker 2>would put X Machina as the more likely candidate for me,

1:05:43.120 --> 1:05:45.440
<v Speaker 2>I am going to default to what I ranked back

1:05:45.480 --> 1:05:47.880
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty and give it to the Social.

1:05:47.640 --> 1:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Network, all right, look out for EVA.

1:05:49.560 --> 1:05:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I know, I'm scared mad Max Fury Road versus here's

1:05:54.000 --> 1:05:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Fincher again, Zodiac.

1:05:56.520 --> 1:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, another Fincher. I need to revisit, even though I

1:05:58.840 --> 1:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>like this even more than Social Network at the time,

1:06:01.880 --> 1:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>but come on, it's mad Max furyre Out.

1:06:05.040 --> 1:06:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I know, and as much as I love Fincher and Zodiac,

1:06:08.440 --> 1:06:11.400
<v Speaker 2>which I think I have is my number three Fincher

1:06:11.560 --> 1:06:15.480
<v Speaker 2>and I do love Fincher, so three is very very high.

1:06:16.160 --> 1:06:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm going mad Max. No Country for Old

1:06:18.920 --> 1:06:22.040
<v Speaker 2>Men versus Spirited Away. This one for me is easy.

1:06:23.280 --> 1:06:27.240
<v Speaker 2>As much as I appreciate Miyazaki and that film, I'm

1:06:27.280 --> 1:06:31.560
<v Speaker 2>not going against another serial killer, not the Zodiac killer,

1:06:31.600 --> 1:06:36.200
<v Speaker 2>but the killer played by Anton Shagor in that great film.

1:06:36.880 --> 1:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So this was my hardest when I looked at what

1:06:40.440 --> 1:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the pairings were, what the matchups were, and I have

1:06:44.000 --> 1:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at your filmmaker rankings, it

1:06:47.480 --> 1:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>is my number five Miyazaki versus my number two Cohens.

1:06:51.960 --> 1:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But this did make me ask think of something I

1:06:55.040 --> 1:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you, And maybe I've asked this in

1:06:56.880 --> 1:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>previous Madness tournaments. But films that are not in the

1:07:00.640 --> 1:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>tournament okay, didn't make selection, committee didn't include them, but

1:07:04.640 --> 1:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they're eligible, could have been in. Have they all been

1:07:09.120 --> 1:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>sent to the incinerator?

1:07:11.080 --> 1:07:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Because let's not think about it.

1:07:13.440 --> 1:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>If not, I'm going to vote No Country and then

1:07:16.880 --> 1:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>console myself by watching twenty twenty three's The Boy and

1:07:20.160 --> 1:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the Heron, which I actually like better. So just tell me,

1:07:23.240 --> 1:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I can do that. You can do that, okay, can

1:07:25.680 --> 1:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm voting No Country.

1:07:27.960 --> 1:07:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Mulholland Drive, David Lynch's two thousand and one film versus

1:07:32.520 --> 1:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the other Wes Anderson movie, the Grand Budapest Hotel. Is

1:07:36.720 --> 1:07:39.360
<v Speaker 2>this an obvious one you're going with Wes Anderson.

1:07:39.280 --> 1:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it is, say the caveat in you know, just

1:07:43.040 --> 1:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>rewatching Twin Peaks for the first time, the first run

1:07:45.800 --> 1:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of the series, and you know, reading more about Lynch

1:07:49.240 --> 1:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and thinking more about Lynch, I am positive, again similar

1:07:54.200 --> 1:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to Zodiac, similar to Social Network. I appreciated Mohan Drive

1:07:57.880 --> 1:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>when it came out. I am positive I would get

1:08:00.320 --> 1:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>so much more out of it if I watch it now.

1:08:02.560 --> 1:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So the essential question is would I get enough out

1:08:06.080 --> 1:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of it to vote against the Grand Budapest Hotel. And

1:08:09.680 --> 1:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't just think, yeah it is, But I also think,

1:08:13.840 --> 1:08:16.479
<v Speaker 1>as much as my appreciation for Lynch has grown, it's

1:08:16.520 --> 1:08:20.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of more the It's more an appreciation for others,

1:08:21.320 --> 1:08:27.439
<v Speaker 1>deep emotional attachment and appreciation. It's like I get it,

1:08:27.680 --> 1:08:31.839
<v Speaker 1>and I get what they're getting, whereas Grand Budapest Wes Anderson,

1:08:32.600 --> 1:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I just get it. And so you know, it would

1:08:36.320 --> 1:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>be a bad faith vote to jump for Mulholland on

1:08:40.120 --> 1:08:42.559
<v Speaker 1>my part at this point over Grand Budapest Hotel.

1:08:43.240 --> 1:08:46.160
<v Speaker 2>So it took me a little while to fully get

1:08:46.320 --> 1:08:49.000
<v Speaker 2>the Grand Budapest Hotel. But now that I do, I

1:08:49.080 --> 1:08:51.200
<v Speaker 2>love it and it doesn't make me feel good at

1:08:51.200 --> 1:08:55.160
<v Speaker 2>all to say I still love Mulholland Drive so much

1:08:56.000 --> 1:08:59.840
<v Speaker 2>that it wasn't an incredibly tough choice for me. But

1:09:00.320 --> 1:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm disappointed. I've disappointed that I had to vote against

1:09:03.160 --> 1:09:06.040
<v Speaker 2>a film that I truly have come to really love

1:09:06.120 --> 1:09:09.439
<v Speaker 2>now in that Wes Anderson movie. So I'm still going

1:09:09.600 --> 1:09:12.479
<v Speaker 2>mull Holland Drive, and that might also be wishful thinking

1:09:12.479 --> 1:09:17.160
<v Speaker 2>on my part because my bracket challenge depends wholly on

1:09:17.240 --> 1:09:20.240
<v Speaker 2>mulhalland Drive still advancing. I think this is the only

1:09:20.240 --> 1:09:24.519
<v Speaker 2>one for me that is truly hard to predict. As well, Josh,

1:09:24.760 --> 1:09:28.559
<v Speaker 2>I think the Grand Budapest really has a shot. I

1:09:28.600 --> 1:09:32.599
<v Speaker 2>think it could beat mulhalland Drive despite mulhalland Drive being

1:09:33.280 --> 1:09:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the number three overall seed. I think in the tournament.

1:09:36.920 --> 1:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, it seems like it's it's gathering steam.

1:09:40.800 --> 1:09:41.559
<v Speaker 1>It's doing well.

1:09:41.640 --> 1:09:46.000
<v Speaker 2>So get Out is up against the higher seeded in

1:09:46.120 --> 1:09:48.680
<v Speaker 2>the mood for Love, And you've used the logic so

1:09:48.760 --> 1:09:51.080
<v Speaker 2>far throughout this tournament that in the Mood for Love

1:09:51.160 --> 1:09:54.120
<v Speaker 2>is gonna get your vote until it's up against another

1:09:54.200 --> 1:09:56.559
<v Speaker 2>movie that you put in your top ten of all

1:09:56.600 --> 1:09:59.320
<v Speaker 2>time back in twenty twenty two. Get Out, I don't

1:09:59.320 --> 1:10:01.760
<v Speaker 2>think is on the so I'm assuming you're voting for

1:10:01.800 --> 1:10:02.679
<v Speaker 2>wankar Wi.

1:10:02.720 --> 1:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>It is, But let me make a case for get

1:10:04.400 --> 1:10:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Out for those people who are, you know, torn here

1:10:08.040 --> 1:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>in a way, get Out is the right title for

1:10:11.960 --> 1:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>this particular tournament. So again, this was where we talk

1:10:15.840 --> 1:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>about are we looking for movies that represent an era?

1:10:19.320 --> 1:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>You reference that list we did in twenty twenty about,

1:10:22.080 --> 1:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the best films of the last ten years

1:10:23.840 --> 1:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>or whatever it was. I know I weighed mine more

1:10:26.280 --> 1:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>towards titles that represented what happened in those ten years,

1:10:29.000 --> 1:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>because we live those ten years, and this is somewhat similar.

1:10:32.320 --> 1:10:34.400
<v Speaker 1>So you could make an argument for get Out being

1:10:34.439 --> 1:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a movie that better represents this century so far. But

1:10:39.439 --> 1:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know what, for me, in the Mood for Love

1:10:41.320 --> 1:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>represents all the centuries we've ever had. So that's my vote.

1:10:45.560 --> 1:10:48.479
<v Speaker 2>I think that's well said. I did just glance at

1:10:48.479 --> 1:10:50.840
<v Speaker 2>the voting as we're recording this. We're only a couple

1:10:50.920 --> 1:10:53.639
<v Speaker 2>hours into voting, so maybe one hundred or so votes

1:10:53.680 --> 1:10:56.560
<v Speaker 2>in so far, and the one I thought would be

1:10:56.600 --> 1:11:00.200
<v Speaker 2>the toughest to predict, the Grand Budafest Hotel versus Ball

1:11:00.200 --> 1:11:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Hall and Drive, that's separated by two votes. Josh, and

1:11:03.320 --> 1:11:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the others are within ten. So again very early. But

1:11:06.680 --> 1:11:08.120
<v Speaker 2>some of these, like in the Mood for Love and

1:11:08.160 --> 1:11:10.880
<v Speaker 2>Get Out, are close right now. Two more to share

1:11:10.880 --> 1:11:14.280
<v Speaker 2>with you, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind versus Children

1:11:14.320 --> 1:11:17.800
<v Speaker 2>of Men. I love children men, but a relatively easy

1:11:17.800 --> 1:11:19.520
<v Speaker 2>pick for me to go. Eternal Sunshine.

1:11:20.000 --> 1:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's where my heart wants to go. But here

1:11:21.920 --> 1:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to air on the side of timeliness. As

1:11:24.400 --> 1:11:26.599
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about, like this is such a relevant movie

1:11:26.680 --> 1:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>right now.

1:11:27.920 --> 1:11:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Just isn't timeless? Love and heartbreak aren't timeless, Josh. That's

1:11:31.360 --> 1:11:33.160
<v Speaker 2>what in the Mood for Love was for. So I'm

1:11:33.160 --> 1:11:36.839
<v Speaker 2>taking care of that need now. I'm going with Children

1:11:36.840 --> 1:11:43.320
<v Speaker 2>of Men. Speaking of timeliness, parasite, oh gosh, and the

1:11:43.560 --> 1:11:48.080
<v Speaker 2>enduring saga that is lived throughout decades and will surely

1:11:48.600 --> 1:11:51.519
<v Speaker 2>go on for centuries. Josh and the Lord of the Rings,

1:11:51.960 --> 1:11:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the Fellowship of the Ring easy choice for me, and

1:11:55.200 --> 1:11:57.120
<v Speaker 2>I do really like the Fellowship of the Ring, but

1:11:57.160 --> 1:11:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I like Parasite better.

1:11:58.520 --> 1:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is can we start calling these the

1:12:01.320 --> 1:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>nonsense matchup? I'm still trying to think of a term

1:12:04.240 --> 1:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>where it's such different movies you can't conceive of why

1:12:08.880 --> 1:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>they're paired against each other. This is our nonsense matchup,

1:12:12.360 --> 1:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and I get the other according to your logic, I

1:12:17.360 --> 1:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>get the other Lord of the Rings films the other two.

1:12:21.200 --> 1:12:23.599
<v Speaker 1>So because I don't think they made the tournament, right,

1:12:23.640 --> 1:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been knocked out. You guys went with Fellowship.

1:12:26.920 --> 1:12:29.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they weren't voted out. We just chose to because

1:12:29.920 --> 1:12:33.280
<v Speaker 2>we knew, based on previous Madness voting that that would

1:12:33.280 --> 1:12:34.639
<v Speaker 2>be the winner between three.

1:12:34.760 --> 1:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, then I'm going Parasite because I'll just watch two

1:12:38.360 --> 1:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Towers in return.

1:12:39.120 --> 1:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>Again, all of your arbitrary reasoning. I love it. You

1:12:42.240 --> 1:12:45.280
<v Speaker 2>can vote in those Madness sweet sixteen poles now Folls

1:12:45.320 --> 1:12:49.599
<v Speaker 2>closed Tuesday April eighth. Tuesday April eighth at five pm

1:12:50.200 --> 1:12:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Central time. All you need to know is that you

1:12:53.680 --> 1:12:57.479
<v Speaker 2>should visit filmspotting dot net slash madness And for those

1:12:57.479 --> 1:13:01.160
<v Speaker 2>of you who submitted brackets in our prediction challenge. You

1:13:01.240 --> 1:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>can go there to view the bracket and see how

1:13:04.920 --> 1:13:08.679
<v Speaker 2>you're doing. Over eight hundred and twenty brackets, the most

1:13:08.720 --> 1:13:12.080
<v Speaker 2>we've ever received as part of a film spotting Madness

1:13:12.080 --> 1:13:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Prediction Challenge and at the top of the leader board. Josh,

1:13:15.000 --> 1:13:17.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm just going to say this. If Ricky Kendall in

1:13:17.720 --> 1:13:21.960
<v Speaker 2>the UK wins for the second year in a row,

1:13:22.320 --> 1:13:26.680
<v Speaker 2>the selection committee will be conducting a proper investigation. So

1:13:26.680 --> 1:13:29.519
<v Speaker 2>we will be heading across the pond and we will

1:13:29.520 --> 1:13:33.519
<v Speaker 2>be looking into whatever is going on here. Because Ricky,

1:13:33.800 --> 1:13:37.160
<v Speaker 2>he has this bracket name Uneasy Lies the head that

1:13:37.200 --> 1:13:40.120
<v Speaker 2>wears the crown. He was the winner of last year's

1:13:40.160 --> 1:13:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Madness Best of the nineteen fifties. He told us on

1:13:43.040 --> 1:13:46.320
<v Speaker 2>the show he drafted with us that he had no strategy,

1:13:46.560 --> 1:13:48.720
<v Speaker 2>he was kind of just winging it, and yet here

1:13:48.760 --> 1:13:50.360
<v Speaker 2>he is in first place.

1:13:50.520 --> 1:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think this is top priority forget top five

1:13:53.360 --> 1:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>ideas forget updating the website. You send Pa Sophie, who's

1:13:59.520 --> 1:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>over there.

1:14:00.080 --> 1:14:01.120
<v Speaker 2>She's actually in the UK.

1:14:01.880 --> 1:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>She is boots on the ground and she needs to

1:14:05.400 --> 1:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>get to the bottom of this.

1:14:06.760 --> 1:14:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, So Ricky right now is in first place

1:14:10.320 --> 1:14:13.680
<v Speaker 2>with a score of sixty two and points go up

1:14:13.760 --> 1:14:17.040
<v Speaker 2>each round, so that score will get bigger as we

1:14:17.080 --> 1:14:20.160
<v Speaker 2>get deeper into the tournament picks potential. The reason why

1:14:20.280 --> 1:14:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Ricky's in first place is he has the potential in

1:14:23.160 --> 1:14:25.240
<v Speaker 2>terms of the films that are still alive to get

1:14:25.320 --> 1:14:29.360
<v Speaker 2>sixty two of the choices correct. That's why he's in

1:14:29.400 --> 1:14:32.080
<v Speaker 2>first place, just ahead of how about this film spotting

1:14:32.080 --> 1:14:36.679
<v Speaker 2>family member Ross Bratton, Oh, come country for old Ross

1:14:36.720 --> 1:14:40.320
<v Speaker 2>is the bracket sixty two is the score for Ross

1:14:40.640 --> 1:14:45.200
<v Speaker 2>picks potential, though slightly behind at sixty one, but can

1:14:45.240 --> 1:14:49.120
<v Speaker 2>absolutely want this thing. And then another familiar name mentioned

1:14:49.200 --> 1:14:53.480
<v Speaker 2>him last week, still in that top three, Oscary Vaneo

1:14:54.200 --> 1:14:57.679
<v Speaker 2>in Finland. My predictions are going to make me almost famous.

1:14:57.760 --> 1:15:01.759
<v Speaker 2>They might, They might. Oscary undred and eighty eight points

1:15:02.200 --> 1:15:08.080
<v Speaker 2>and a sixty one picks potential number, so twenty eight points.

1:15:08.160 --> 1:15:11.519
<v Speaker 2>That means fourteen of sixteen correct for Oscary in round

1:15:11.600 --> 1:15:15.000
<v Speaker 2>two after getting all of the picks correct in round one.

1:15:15.520 --> 1:15:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of all the picks correct, Ross was the only

1:15:19.200 --> 1:15:21.840
<v Speaker 2>one of those three, Josh, and maybe the only one

1:15:22.080 --> 1:15:25.639
<v Speaker 2>out of the entire tournament. I didn't thoroughly look who

1:15:25.640 --> 1:15:30.439
<v Speaker 2>got all sixteen Round two matchups right, Wow, called them all. Yeah,

1:15:30.560 --> 1:15:31.519
<v Speaker 2>Ricky got fifteen.

1:15:32.000 --> 1:15:36.439
<v Speaker 1>I fully endorse out of the top three that two

1:15:36.439 --> 1:15:38.759
<v Speaker 1>of them are non Americans. I think we're doing something

1:15:38.880 --> 1:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>yes here with film Spotty Madness.

1:15:40.760 --> 1:15:43.360
<v Speaker 2>And that's if we're trying to do something for international

1:15:43.360 --> 1:15:48.240
<v Speaker 2>relations here representing the United States. Congrats to all of

1:15:48.280 --> 1:15:51.800
<v Speaker 2>our top finishers so far. We will see how it

1:15:51.880 --> 1:15:55.360
<v Speaker 2>plays out. We'll see who gets that limited edition Film

1:15:55.400 --> 1:16:00.200
<v Speaker 2>spotting Fest poster signed by Coganata and Ryan Johnson, and

1:16:00.479 --> 1:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>who gets to draft with us, the topic being the

1:16:04.960 --> 1:16:09.360
<v Speaker 2>film related subject of their choice. Okay, do we have

1:16:09.439 --> 1:16:10.919
<v Speaker 2>to talk about the internal bracket?

1:16:11.000 --> 1:16:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Well, I didn't hear my name, so I'm a little

1:16:14.520 --> 1:16:16.519
<v Speaker 1>confused here among the top three.

1:16:17.040 --> 1:16:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's see how it comes out. Josh I remain

1:16:21.360 --> 1:16:23.559
<v Speaker 2>in last place. I thought I was doing so well.

1:16:23.960 --> 1:16:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm up from one hundred and forty fifth to being

1:16:26.800 --> 1:16:30.360
<v Speaker 2>tied for ninety seventh. I got thirteen of sixteen right.

1:16:30.439 --> 1:16:33.360
<v Speaker 2>In round two, I incorrectly picked The Dark Knight over

1:16:33.439 --> 1:16:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Children of Men. I incorrectly picked tarantinover Miyazaki, and I

1:16:37.360 --> 1:16:41.000
<v Speaker 2>incorrectly picked Moonlight over her not X Makta. I thought

1:16:41.080 --> 1:16:43.880
<v Speaker 2>X Makota would already be out by now, so I'm

1:16:43.960 --> 1:16:48.080
<v Speaker 2>up to ninety seventh, but I'm still decidedly in last place. Josh,

1:16:48.560 --> 1:16:50.639
<v Speaker 2>you took a little bit of a tumble again eight

1:16:50.680 --> 1:16:53.200
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty five brackets, so we should probably feel

1:16:53.240 --> 1:16:56.120
<v Speaker 2>pretty good. But you are now tied for fifty fifth.

1:16:56.960 --> 1:16:59.479
<v Speaker 1>Oh, after being what second? I was second? Right?

1:17:00.400 --> 1:17:03.400
<v Speaker 2>Maybe because the second or fourth overall you were doing

1:17:03.560 --> 1:17:05.439
<v Speaker 2>very well, but you are now tied for fifty fifth.

1:17:05.640 --> 1:17:08.280
<v Speaker 2>You only got twelve of the sixteen, right.

1:17:08.360 --> 1:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as you were reading those results, I was well,

1:17:11.360 --> 1:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I expressed my surprise at a handful of them, which

1:17:15.320 --> 1:17:17.519
<v Speaker 1>spoke to my prediction bracket, I think.

1:17:17.640 --> 1:17:20.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you also incorrectly picked the Dark Knight over Children

1:17:20.600 --> 1:17:23.719
<v Speaker 2>of Men. You also thought Moonlight would beat ex Machina.

1:17:24.240 --> 1:17:27.360
<v Speaker 2>The Tree of Life did not defeat Zodiac, nor did

1:17:27.439 --> 1:17:30.200
<v Speaker 2>inside Lewin Davis take down in the mood for love

1:17:30.280 --> 1:17:31.240
<v Speaker 2>that one could hurt you.

1:17:31.320 --> 1:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Josh. Yeah, see, and that's was the Adam pick. I

1:17:35.040 --> 1:17:36.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of learned my I kind of learned my lesson

1:17:37.360 --> 1:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the Tree and the Tree of Door. Me, why did

1:17:40.200 --> 1:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I pick the Tree of Life? That was a heart pick? That? Wow? Yeah?

1:17:45.560 --> 1:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, picking up strategy each year. One of these years,

1:17:49.080 --> 1:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll learn by one.

1:17:49.800 --> 1:17:54.880
<v Speaker 2>Of these years. Okay, Mike Marrigan, he's in second place

1:17:54.960 --> 1:17:59.559
<v Speaker 2>the film Spotting Madness Godfather thirteen of sixteen, right, he's

1:17:59.560 --> 1:18:04.719
<v Speaker 2>in six teenth place. Not bad, did incorrectly pick Inglorious

1:18:04.760 --> 1:18:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Bastards over Spirited Away before Sunset over Grand Budapest and

1:18:08.080 --> 1:18:12.640
<v Speaker 2>The Dark Knight over Children of Men. But Josh supplanting you,

1:18:12.920 --> 1:18:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and he was already high on the list to begin with,

1:18:15.080 --> 1:18:17.439
<v Speaker 2>maybe even tied with you. I can't remember where we

1:18:17.479 --> 1:18:19.800
<v Speaker 2>stood last week, but Sam was doing very well, and

1:18:19.880 --> 1:18:23.599
<v Speaker 2>Sam continues to do very well fifteen of sixteen.

1:18:23.680 --> 1:18:23.880
<v Speaker 4>Right.

1:18:23.960 --> 1:18:28.559
<v Speaker 2>In round two, Sam is tied for fourth.

1:18:29.000 --> 1:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Holy wow. Forth overall, that's the best showing among the

1:18:34.240 --> 1:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>three of us this far into the tournament.

1:18:36.479 --> 1:18:40.519
<v Speaker 2>Ever, Yeah, his only misstep in round two was picking

1:18:40.640 --> 1:18:45.759
<v Speaker 2>her not ex Makna, but her over Moonlight. So Sam

1:18:45.920 --> 1:18:49.320
<v Speaker 2>also has a chance to contend. And we encourage you

1:18:49.520 --> 1:18:52.479
<v Speaker 2>one more time to go look at the round two

1:18:52.840 --> 1:18:56.960
<v Speaker 2>full results and devote in the Sweet sixteen polls over

1:18:57.040 --> 1:19:00.439
<v Speaker 2>at filmspotting dot net slash Madness.

1:19:03.280 --> 1:19:07.120
<v Speaker 8>I'll tell you one thing, though, you got more grit,

1:19:08.120 --> 1:19:11.080
<v Speaker 8>fire and guts than any woman I've ever met.

1:19:12.760 --> 1:19:17.559
<v Speaker 1>What? What are you smiling about? Nothing? What's the funny? Nothing?

1:19:18.360 --> 1:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>These little expressions of yours.

1:19:21.800 --> 1:19:23.479
<v Speaker 8>I don't know what you're talking about, but I'll take

1:19:23.479 --> 1:19:24.280
<v Speaker 8>it as a compliment.

1:19:27.640 --> 1:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>You're true blue, Ethyl, you really are.

1:19:32.160 --> 1:19:34.839
<v Speaker 2>We get back into our top five Gene Hackman scenes

1:19:34.920 --> 1:19:39.200
<v Speaker 2>with that clip from The Royal Tenebaum's Hackman's Royal with

1:19:39.320 --> 1:19:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Angelica Houston's ethel. We have made six picks so far,

1:19:44.760 --> 1:19:47.800
<v Speaker 2>three each, Josh, we have two more left. The Royal

1:19:47.840 --> 1:19:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Tenebombs has not come up until now. Surely we didn't

1:19:53.160 --> 1:19:56.800
<v Speaker 2>overlook this film in this performance when considering our top

1:19:56.800 --> 1:19:57.920
<v Speaker 2>five Gene Hackman scenes.

1:19:57.960 --> 1:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, of course not. It's at number two, actually not

1:20:02.160 --> 1:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>number one. And okay, this was a journey for me,

1:20:06.080 --> 1:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>so bear with me. Bear with me, Adam, even though

1:20:09.680 --> 1:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>it's in the number two slot, and this is the

1:20:11.479 --> 1:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>pick I agonized over the most. It's the one I

1:20:14.080 --> 1:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>saved for last when putting my notes together, and I

1:20:19.040 --> 1:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>almost went with over when I logged Royal Tenenbaums on

1:20:23.680 --> 1:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>LETTERBROCKX my recent rewatch for this list. Eddie Allen chimed

1:20:26.920 --> 1:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>in with a comment and basically said, time for a

1:20:29.400 --> 1:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>cheat it's every time Hackman is on screen. Yeah right,

1:20:33.120 --> 1:20:36.720
<v Speaker 1>It's so true. Every line reading he gets in this

1:20:36.760 --> 1:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>movie is a gem. And trying to whittle my options down,

1:20:42.479 --> 1:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>the only thing I could do was again this was

1:20:45.000 --> 1:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>later in all my homework, all my watching, all I

1:20:47.600 --> 1:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>could do was watch Royal Tenenbaums again through this Hackman

1:20:50.640 --> 1:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Rooster lens and think about what scenes captured this quality.

1:20:54.920 --> 1:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And it really struck me that ten in Boums written

1:20:57.920 --> 1:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>by Wes Anderson and Owen Wilson. From that title all

1:21:02.240 --> 1:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the way down, you could see this movie as a

1:21:04.760 --> 1:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>tribute to Hackman's career of cocksure, self deluded, self inflated characters.

1:21:12.160 --> 1:21:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Royal tenenbaum Is. He's a gentler little Bill

1:21:16.320 --> 1:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>In some ways, he's a more refined Harry Moseby. He's

1:21:20.280 --> 1:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>very much a variation on my number one pick, which

1:21:24.000 --> 1:21:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna spoil here. So watching ten and Bounds

1:21:27.160 --> 1:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>through this lens, I narrowed it down to three three saints,

1:21:30.400 --> 1:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just gonna give you a line for my

1:21:32.880 --> 1:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>two runners up so we can move along here. Call

1:21:35.160 --> 1:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>me Pappy. I know I'm gonna be the bad guy

1:21:38.080 --> 1:21:41.479
<v Speaker 1>on this one. Those were my runners up could have

1:21:41.520 --> 1:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>easily gone with either one, but instead I went with

1:21:43.720 --> 1:21:51.519
<v Speaker 1>another scene with Angelica Houston's Ethelene and it's Royals cancer confession. Yeah,

1:21:51.760 --> 1:21:54.880
<v Speaker 1>in a ploy to move back into their home?

1:22:01.479 --> 1:22:02.519
<v Speaker 2>Where is the doctor?

1:22:03.520 --> 1:22:08.559
<v Speaker 8>Just wait a second now, Okay, listen, I'm not dying,

1:22:11.200 --> 1:22:14.879
<v Speaker 8>but I need some time a month or so. Okay,

1:22:15.320 --> 1:22:17.400
<v Speaker 8>I want to I want us to.

1:22:19.960 --> 1:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Damn ethol, are you crazy? Maybe I am dying. So

1:22:27.240 --> 1:22:30.479
<v Speaker 1>we've mentioned a couple of times doing this. List Adam

1:22:30.640 --> 1:22:33.719
<v Speaker 1>about you know. The audio is good, the line delivery

1:22:33.760 --> 1:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is good, but the physicality the gestures are equally important.

1:22:37.880 --> 1:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>So track down the scene and watch it beyond listening

1:22:41.439 --> 1:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to it, because there are two bits of physical performance here.

1:22:44.400 --> 1:22:48.599
<v Speaker 1>One is when Ethlene turns around after he says he's

1:22:48.720 --> 1:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>dying and approaches him to demand what are you talking about?

1:22:53.240 --> 1:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>He flinches, he like, he steps back, like she's gonna

1:22:56.960 --> 1:22:59.120
<v Speaker 1>throw a punch at him. And the genius of it

1:22:59.160 --> 1:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>is not that she's being aggressive. It speaks more to

1:23:01.960 --> 1:23:05.839
<v Speaker 1>her to his guilt than her aggression. Right, he already

1:23:05.880 --> 1:23:09.599
<v Speaker 1>knows he's he's deserving of whatever is coming. Right then,

1:23:09.680 --> 1:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>after she breaks down in tears about it, I love

1:23:12.920 --> 1:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>how Royal looks around to see if anyone is watching why,

1:23:18.080 --> 1:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>because he's committing a crime. He's guilty, and he's got like,

1:23:22.040 --> 1:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>who's are there? Cops? Are the emotional cops around? Are

1:23:25.320 --> 1:23:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the psychological cops seeing this? At the same time, there

1:23:29.240 --> 1:23:32.600
<v Speaker 1>is so much tenderness to that little moment there on

1:23:32.760 --> 1:23:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Royal's part. He's genuinely taken aback by her reaction, by

1:23:37.640 --> 1:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the love that she's still expressing for him. He's sorry

1:23:41.200 --> 1:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>for her. And yet again, I mean, Hackman is just

1:23:45.400 --> 1:23:48.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing so many backflips in these scenes. Yet again,

1:23:49.000 --> 1:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>this is where he could have committed to the lie,

1:23:53.240 --> 1:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>but he retracts it right and he decides, Okay, I'm

1:23:56.840 --> 1:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>going to drop this, and then another backflip lunging back

1:24:00.680 --> 1:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in because what he still hasn't gotten what he wanted,

1:24:03.360 --> 1:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>so he's going to have to play that card again.

1:24:05.800 --> 1:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So Royal Ton of Baums, you know, going back to

1:24:10.400 --> 1:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Anderson and Wilson thinking about this in terms of Hackman's career,

1:24:14.000 --> 1:24:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it is one of Wes Anderson's restoration comedies, so it's

1:24:16.720 --> 1:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be different than his Hackman's Disillusion seventies work

1:24:20.439 --> 1:24:23.719
<v Speaker 1>where these roosters almost always pay a price. Royal manages,

1:24:23.840 --> 1:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>despite himself, despite his self delusion, to find his way

1:24:27.120 --> 1:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>back into his family's life by the movie's end, and

1:24:30.280 --> 1:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>so I love this film. I'm almost talking to myself

1:24:33.120 --> 1:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>into moving it back up into the number one because

1:24:35.680 --> 1:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the redemption of the Gene Hackman rooster. That is

1:24:39.120 --> 1:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>what Royal Tenant of Bombs is. Probably should be my

1:24:43.320 --> 1:24:45.559
<v Speaker 1>number one, But I've got to hear at number two.

1:24:46.200 --> 1:24:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Rewatching that scene today, I'm willing to maybe give you,

1:24:50.320 --> 1:24:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Josh that that's the best Gene Hackman scene in the film,

1:24:54.120 --> 1:24:58.160
<v Speaker 2>that's the best performance scene in the film. But I

1:24:58.200 --> 1:25:01.320
<v Speaker 2>did go in a different direction and I saved it

1:25:01.360 --> 1:25:03.840
<v Speaker 2>for number one. I had to put it at number one.

1:25:03.880 --> 1:25:06.840
<v Speaker 2>So we'll see you're stand how we do here with

1:25:06.920 --> 1:25:10.040
<v Speaker 2>these final two choices. I think we're going to overlap

1:25:10.080 --> 1:25:13.360
<v Speaker 2>in terms of film titles, just in a different order.

1:25:14.200 --> 1:25:18.160
<v Speaker 2>And I'm going to go back to a vulnerable Gene Hackman.

1:25:19.280 --> 1:25:21.799
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to go to a scene where he is fighting,

1:25:21.840 --> 1:25:25.719
<v Speaker 2>as he often is, fighting against that vulnerability and where

1:25:25.800 --> 1:25:29.920
<v Speaker 2>some real, real emotion ultimately does come through. It is

1:25:29.960 --> 1:25:32.880
<v Speaker 2>from the pen ultimate scene in the movie that was

1:25:33.760 --> 1:25:36.040
<v Speaker 2>homework for both of us to prepare for this list.

1:25:36.080 --> 1:25:38.360
<v Speaker 2>It was the biggest blind spot for me on the list.

1:25:38.360 --> 1:25:41.960
<v Speaker 2>A movie I've always wanted to see, Jerry Schatzburg's nineteen

1:25:42.040 --> 1:25:46.519
<v Speaker 2>seventy three film Scarecrow, starring Hackman and al Pacino. The

1:25:46.560 --> 1:25:49.599
<v Speaker 2>penultimate scene. We are going to spoil this movie if

1:25:49.640 --> 1:25:52.280
<v Speaker 2>you haven't seen it and you really want to see it,

1:25:52.560 --> 1:25:54.559
<v Speaker 2>especially after you are going to hear both of us

1:25:54.560 --> 1:25:57.240
<v Speaker 2>praise it, or maybe you won't because you're going to

1:25:57.640 --> 1:26:02.120
<v Speaker 2>fast forward. That's fine, We are okay with that, but

1:26:02.240 --> 1:26:08.240
<v Speaker 2>we cannot avoid talking about the ending of this film.

1:26:08.760 --> 1:26:11.000
<v Speaker 2>And to go back to Tenenbaumbs for a second, I

1:26:11.040 --> 1:26:13.840
<v Speaker 2>didn't put I know you have Chassy on my list.

1:26:13.920 --> 1:26:17.080
<v Speaker 2>It's an honorable mention. I've got another Tenenbom's choice at

1:26:17.120 --> 1:26:19.519
<v Speaker 2>number one, as I alluded to. But the only Hackman

1:26:19.600 --> 1:26:22.559
<v Speaker 2>scene that really does break my heart more than that

1:26:22.640 --> 1:26:26.439
<v Speaker 2>one is this scene. This movie is about this unlikely

1:26:26.439 --> 1:26:31.920
<v Speaker 2>friendship that develops between Hackman's Max and Pacino's Lion. Lion is.

1:26:32.600 --> 1:26:37.960
<v Speaker 2>He's goofy, he's naive, he's sentimental, all things that Max isn't.

1:26:38.200 --> 1:26:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Max is a hardnecks con he's quick tempered. He is

1:26:42.720 --> 1:26:47.639
<v Speaker 2>someone who never backs down from anyone and never really

1:26:47.800 --> 1:26:51.720
<v Speaker 2>seems For most of this film's running time, Josh never

1:26:51.760 --> 1:26:57.280
<v Speaker 2>seems afraid of anything. But late in the film, there's

1:26:57.320 --> 1:27:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a beating that occurs. Lion is hurt really badly and

1:27:02.160 --> 1:27:05.559
<v Speaker 2>it traumatizes him, and that's followed by a conversation with

1:27:05.680 --> 1:27:08.840
<v Speaker 2>the mother of the child that he's never met that

1:27:08.960 --> 1:27:14.680
<v Speaker 2>compounds that trauma and Lion ends up hospitalized and catatonic

1:27:15.120 --> 1:27:19.599
<v Speaker 2>on a gurney in a hallway. And this is where

1:27:19.640 --> 1:27:24.799
<v Speaker 2>we see Max really crack. He cannot process that Lion

1:27:25.360 --> 1:27:28.519
<v Speaker 2>won't be going with him to Pittsburgh, following through on

1:27:28.600 --> 1:27:32.120
<v Speaker 2>all the plans that they have made on their journeys together.

1:27:32.640 --> 1:27:36.439
<v Speaker 2>He can't process that Lion likely will never be the

1:27:36.479 --> 1:27:39.880
<v Speaker 2>same again, that they may never actually interact with each

1:27:39.920 --> 1:27:43.240
<v Speaker 2>other or engage with each other at all like they

1:27:43.280 --> 1:27:47.719
<v Speaker 2>previously did. And he is fully initially in this denial stage,

1:27:48.280 --> 1:27:51.240
<v Speaker 2>you hear him say to no one really at this point,

1:27:51.320 --> 1:27:54.519
<v Speaker 2>he's talking to himself, he's talking to the room, he's

1:27:54.560 --> 1:27:57.160
<v Speaker 2>talking to the cosmos. He says, he's just fooling around.

1:27:57.640 --> 1:28:01.200
<v Speaker 2>He's just fooling around, as if Lyon is playing another gag.

1:28:01.520 --> 1:28:04.840
<v Speaker 2>It's a joke, and he's trying to convince himself that

1:28:04.880 --> 1:28:09.320
<v Speaker 2>it's true that he's going to snap out of this somehow,

1:28:09.439 --> 1:28:11.960
<v Speaker 2>or he is play acting. But then you see it.

1:28:12.000 --> 1:28:15.360
<v Speaker 2>You see it in Hackman's face as the camera tracks

1:28:15.400 --> 1:28:20.000
<v Speaker 2>with him from talking to the doctor over to the bed.

1:28:20.280 --> 1:28:22.439
<v Speaker 2>You see the recognition. And Josh, it's so funny. You

1:28:22.520 --> 1:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>mentioned in that tenembomb scene, how when there is that

1:28:27.600 --> 1:28:30.559
<v Speaker 2>burst of emotion from Angelica Houston, how he looks around

1:28:30.600 --> 1:28:34.160
<v Speaker 2>a little bit like like is anyone noticing this? And

1:28:34.560 --> 1:28:38.479
<v Speaker 2>it's almost like, I wonder if it's a psychological gesture

1:28:38.520 --> 1:28:41.240
<v Speaker 2>on the part of Hackman, because he does something similar

1:28:41.360 --> 1:28:45.200
<v Speaker 2>in this scene, where as it's dawning on him what

1:28:45.240 --> 1:28:47.799
<v Speaker 2>the reality is and what it's going to be moving forward,

1:28:47.800 --> 1:28:52.519
<v Speaker 2>the closer he gets to Lion on that journey, he stops.

1:28:52.560 --> 1:28:54.280
<v Speaker 2>He takes a moment, and he stops, and he looks

1:28:54.320 --> 1:28:56.479
<v Speaker 2>back at the nurses station, and no one's paying attention

1:28:56.520 --> 1:28:58.240
<v Speaker 2>to him, but he stops and looks at the nurses

1:28:58.280 --> 1:29:01.920
<v Speaker 2>station almost like he's he's laying having to fully face

1:29:02.560 --> 1:29:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the truth, or someone's gonna stop him, or something will happen,

1:29:06.600 --> 1:29:09.200
<v Speaker 2>and he is this big presence. A lot is made

1:29:09.200 --> 1:29:12.320
<v Speaker 2>of Hackman in his size as Max throughout the entire film,

1:29:12.320 --> 1:29:14.479
<v Speaker 2>and of course his stature is so much greater than

1:29:14.600 --> 1:29:19.280
<v Speaker 2>lions than Pacino's, but that just amplifies why it's then

1:29:19.400 --> 1:29:23.639
<v Speaker 2>so crushing when Max finally does break down.

1:29:27.040 --> 1:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Him.

1:29:27.360 --> 1:29:31.080
<v Speaker 7>We would think a lot the way would think a lot.

1:29:31.160 --> 1:29:34.360
<v Speaker 8>Right, we can make it work. An we.

1:29:36.640 --> 1:29:44.360
<v Speaker 7>Can, we make it work. I just can't make it

1:29:44.400 --> 1:29:45.280
<v Speaker 7>a little anymore.

1:29:45.400 --> 1:29:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Come on, thank God.

1:29:51.520 --> 1:29:54.160
<v Speaker 2>The way he shakes him, the way he tries to

1:29:54.280 --> 1:29:58.200
<v Speaker 2>rouse him, just refusing to accept again that denial, refusing

1:29:58.240 --> 1:30:00.920
<v Speaker 2>to accept that his friend is now like this and

1:30:00.960 --> 1:30:04.040
<v Speaker 2>probably is going to stay this way. How he admonishes

1:30:04.080 --> 1:30:06.639
<v Speaker 2>the skinny little bastard as he calls him to wake up.

1:30:06.680 --> 1:30:11.680
<v Speaker 2>That denial then moves into anger, and then he goes

1:30:11.720 --> 1:30:14.200
<v Speaker 2>through all the stages, then moves into depression. And then

1:30:14.240 --> 1:30:17.880
<v Speaker 2>we have Hackman just intermingling all of those emotions. And

1:30:17.920 --> 1:30:20.519
<v Speaker 2>here's the line, because again we've had so many great

1:30:20.560 --> 1:30:24.639
<v Speaker 2>examples throughout this list of lines, I just can't make

1:30:24.680 --> 1:30:28.759
<v Speaker 2>it alone anymore. When he admits to himself in the world,

1:30:29.720 --> 1:30:32.599
<v Speaker 2>this character who has always been on his own now

1:30:32.920 --> 1:30:37.400
<v Speaker 2>can't make it without Lyon and Shatsburgh even stretches out

1:30:37.479 --> 1:30:40.720
<v Speaker 2>the journey down the hallway. He makes it seem like

1:30:40.760 --> 1:30:43.080
<v Speaker 2>it takes him forever to get down the hallway. It's

1:30:43.240 --> 1:30:46.639
<v Speaker 2>like the long emotional journey that Max's is going through,

1:30:46.680 --> 1:30:49.519
<v Speaker 2>and we see the full range of hackman emotion, but

1:30:49.600 --> 1:30:52.920
<v Speaker 2>we still see that restraint. I just think Hackman might

1:30:53.000 --> 1:30:55.200
<v Speaker 2>be Josh and this scene really cements it for me.

1:30:55.439 --> 1:30:59.440
<v Speaker 2>He might be the consummate film actor. He knows exactly

1:31:00.040 --> 1:31:02.720
<v Speaker 2>how to pitch a performance for the camera. He is

1:31:02.840 --> 1:31:06.760
<v Speaker 2>never too big, he is never too small. He's never

1:31:06.920 --> 1:31:11.600
<v Speaker 2>anything but completely honest. And that scene just devastated me

1:31:11.800 --> 1:31:12.680
<v Speaker 2>watching Scarecrow.

1:31:13.120 --> 1:31:16.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's incredible. It's the it's the cracking open of Max,

1:31:16.880 --> 1:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>which you know is something he's resisted the entire film long.

1:31:19.840 --> 1:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>There's also a little line in there where he references,

1:31:23.320 --> 1:31:26.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go back to that payphone and find

1:31:26.640 --> 1:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>out what find out what she said? What I love

1:31:29.040 --> 1:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>about that? And maybe Hackman just brought that in on

1:31:31.880 --> 1:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>his own. Maybe it's it was part of the script

1:31:34.400 --> 1:31:38.639
<v Speaker 1>by Gary Michael White, but it reveals, you know, we're

1:31:38.680 --> 1:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>getting into the details here, which might be difficult for

1:31:40.800 --> 1:31:43.439
<v Speaker 1>people who haven't seen this, but that scene is played

1:31:43.479 --> 1:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>at the payphone where Pacino's character denies the reality of

1:31:47.640 --> 1:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>what he heard and lies to Max and tries to

1:31:50.880 --> 1:31:53.719
<v Speaker 1>paint a rosy picture, and in the moment Max pretty

1:31:53.760 --> 1:31:55.559
<v Speaker 1>much buys it right so he can get along with

1:31:55.600 --> 1:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>what he wants. But calling it back in the scene

1:31:59.160 --> 1:32:02.639
<v Speaker 1>you've picked shows that Max knew what was happening then,

1:32:03.160 --> 1:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and he's blaming himself for not confronting it then because

1:32:07.360 --> 1:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it might have in some way prevented where they're at now.

1:32:09.640 --> 1:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just all of these layers again going on that

1:32:12.360 --> 1:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>he's able to play in a single scene. So yeah,

1:32:16.000 --> 1:32:19.879
<v Speaker 1>great pick Scarecrow. I mean, man, this was the discovery,

1:32:19.960 --> 1:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>right this is doing this list was worth it for

1:32:22.720 --> 1:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Scarecrow because yeah, I knew about it as well and

1:32:27.400 --> 1:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>had hoped at some point to get to it. But

1:32:29.600 --> 1:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not really discussed among the masterpieces of the nineteen seventies, right,

1:32:34.800 --> 1:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>but it is. It's hard now that I've seen it

1:32:36.960 --> 1:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>to imagine that decade without a movie like Scarecrow. It's

1:32:40.200 --> 1:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>just a time when there was studio in security and

1:32:43.680 --> 1:32:48.559
<v Speaker 1>there was you know, openness to idiosyncratic storytelling, unconventional leading men.

1:32:48.760 --> 1:32:52.519
<v Speaker 1>We're getting here. It's such a seventies movie in that way.

1:32:53.160 --> 1:32:58.519
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time, watching Max struck me as

1:32:58.560 --> 1:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate embody of this quintessential Hackman character. He's a cajoler,

1:33:04.360 --> 1:33:08.559
<v Speaker 1>he's a storyteller, big talker with big plans here, you know,

1:33:08.640 --> 1:33:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to open that car wash in Pittsburgh. But you know

1:33:12.280 --> 1:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it's all upfront, we know it in the audience. Think

1:33:15.200 --> 1:33:18.360
<v Speaker 1>about the way he ostentatiously chomps on I don't know

1:33:18.400 --> 1:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>if it's a full cigar or it's something like that

1:33:21.360 --> 1:33:24.479
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Also, notice how often he has trouble

1:33:24.560 --> 1:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>lighting it. He can hardly ever get the thing. Let

1:33:27.200 --> 1:33:30.439
<v Speaker 1>how about his ratty notebook that contains his business plans.

1:33:30.680 --> 1:33:33.679
<v Speaker 1>These are all expressions of self delusion, right, He's another

1:33:33.720 --> 1:33:37.200
<v Speaker 1>self deluded cock of the walk here. And I'm gonna

1:33:37.320 --> 1:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>spoil even more. I'm gonna go all the way to

1:33:39.120 --> 1:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the end for my pick, Adam. And I think this

1:33:43.720 --> 1:33:48.439
<v Speaker 1>scene captures from what I saw previously and doing this homework,

1:33:48.640 --> 1:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>this capture is better than anything else the quintessential Hackman.

1:33:53.120 --> 1:33:55.479
<v Speaker 1>To your point, if you haven't seen Scarcrow, you don't

1:33:55.520 --> 1:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>want the union spoiled skip ahead. It's not really a

1:33:57.760 --> 1:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>plot spoiler, but really you should get to experience and

1:34:00.760 --> 1:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>this within the flow of the film for the first time.

1:34:03.200 --> 1:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>But basically, at this point, because of the scene we

1:34:05.320 --> 1:34:09.599
<v Speaker 1>just discussed, Pacino's character Lion has been tragically left behind.

1:34:10.160 --> 1:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Max is still trying to get to Pittsburgh right pursue

1:34:12.400 --> 1:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>this dream. So Max is at the ticket counter at

1:34:14.920 --> 1:34:17.479
<v Speaker 1>this train station and he's counting out the twenty seven

1:34:17.560 --> 1:34:20.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars and ninety five cents he needs for the fair

1:34:21.280 --> 1:34:23.800
<v Speaker 1>one bill at a time, basically, and of course he

1:34:23.880 --> 1:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>falls short. And what does he do. He just starts

1:34:26.040 --> 1:34:29.120
<v Speaker 1>counting again, because you know, he's Max. He can will

1:34:29.520 --> 1:34:33.519
<v Speaker 1>those extra bills into existence, and it's not working. So

1:34:33.600 --> 1:34:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the teller asks him to step aside for the next customer,

1:34:37.240 --> 1:34:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and we see him in the side of the frame

1:34:39.720 --> 1:34:42.400
<v Speaker 1>while this woman's buying her ticket. He pulls off his boot,

1:34:43.000 --> 1:34:45.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of cuts open the heel, pulls out this ten

1:34:45.640 --> 1:34:49.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars bill and what does he do hands it to

1:34:49.280 --> 1:34:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the woman at the counter with that shit eating grin.

1:34:52.360 --> 1:34:55.960
<v Speaker 1>He has hit rock bottom. He's literally down to his

1:34:56.080 --> 1:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>last time. But you know what, Max thinks He's won

1:35:00.160 --> 1:35:03.759
<v Speaker 1>that moment he thinks he's won, and it's this tragic

1:35:03.880 --> 1:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>ending because of that, and I think, you know, we

1:35:06.000 --> 1:35:08.479
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of it because after she gives him

1:35:08.520 --> 1:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the ticket, or he's waiting for it to process, he

1:35:10.400 --> 1:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>starts smacking his boot on the counter kind of to

1:35:12.960 --> 1:35:15.240
<v Speaker 1>get my senses to get the heel back in place.

1:35:15.320 --> 1:35:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm not entirely sure.

1:35:17.320 --> 1:35:17.840
<v Speaker 2>No, that's it.

1:35:17.960 --> 1:35:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, it's like it's just emphasizing his desperation,

1:35:22.560 --> 1:35:27.679
<v Speaker 1>and yet Hackman brilliantly plays this as a triumphant moment

1:35:28.200 --> 1:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for Max. So when I think when I think of

1:35:30.720 --> 1:35:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Gene Hackman from now on, this scene might be the

1:35:33.760 --> 1:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>one that comes to mind first. So that's why I

1:35:36.000 --> 1:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>had to put it at number one.

1:35:37.280 --> 1:35:40.439
<v Speaker 2>It's that desperation. It also just so matches that character

1:35:40.479 --> 1:35:44.000
<v Speaker 2>that even in that moment, this moment ultimately of tragedy

1:35:44.040 --> 1:35:48.840
<v Speaker 2>and of some sadness, he he's still going to be himself.

1:35:49.040 --> 1:35:52.040
<v Speaker 2>He cannot be anything but who he is, and his

1:35:52.240 --> 1:35:54.640
<v Speaker 2>nature is going to come through, and he does not

1:35:54.800 --> 1:35:59.240
<v Speaker 2>care how uncouth that may appear, how distracting that might

1:35:59.320 --> 1:36:01.959
<v Speaker 2>be to the tell, how much it might bother anybody

1:36:01.960 --> 1:36:04.720
<v Speaker 2>else nearby. He's got to get that heel back on.

1:36:04.920 --> 1:36:06.960
<v Speaker 2>He's going to do whatever he needs to do. That's

1:36:06.960 --> 1:36:10.560
<v Speaker 2>who Max is. And that's such a great articulation of

1:36:11.280 --> 1:36:14.519
<v Speaker 2>that seed and that grin in particular, seeing that that

1:36:14.560 --> 1:36:17.720
<v Speaker 2>grin from Hackman there, from that character Max in that

1:36:17.800 --> 1:36:21.160
<v Speaker 2>moment after the scene I just described at least sends

1:36:21.200 --> 1:36:24.719
<v Speaker 2>you out, I suppose, on the only ray of hope

1:36:24.760 --> 1:36:25.840
<v Speaker 2>that you can possibly have.

1:36:26.000 --> 1:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe, I mean yeah, I mean he's got to keep

1:36:28.840 --> 1:36:29.479
<v Speaker 1>moving forward.

1:36:29.520 --> 1:36:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess right, right, Okay, so Royal Tenant Bombs is

1:36:33.800 --> 1:36:36.880
<v Speaker 2>at number one for me. The question is what scene

1:36:36.920 --> 1:36:40.760
<v Speaker 2>is it going to be? And Sam should just go

1:36:40.760 --> 1:36:43.559
<v Speaker 2>ahead and start queuing up me and Julio. I'm not

1:36:43.560 --> 1:36:45.040
<v Speaker 2>talking about dance lessons.

1:36:45.600 --> 1:36:49.120
<v Speaker 7>I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.

1:36:49.120 --> 1:36:52.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about taking it out and chopping it up.

1:36:53.920 --> 1:36:55.000
<v Speaker 5>What do you mean?

1:36:58.120 --> 1:37:01.680
<v Speaker 2>A mostly physical scene from Hackman right, little to no

1:37:01.840 --> 1:37:06.200
<v Speaker 2>dialogue throughout this entire sequence, and it's just one of

1:37:06.240 --> 1:37:11.200
<v Speaker 2>my favorite movie montages ever where you realize that as

1:37:11.280 --> 1:37:15.599
<v Speaker 2>much of a scoundrel as Royal is, unlike his children

1:37:16.160 --> 1:37:19.000
<v Speaker 2>and his grandchildren, he knows how to have a good

1:37:19.040 --> 1:37:23.640
<v Speaker 2>time and he genuinely wants to give his grandsons a

1:37:23.720 --> 1:37:27.519
<v Speaker 2>day where they can forget about the rough year that

1:37:27.560 --> 1:37:28.200
<v Speaker 2>they have had.

1:37:28.680 --> 1:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It.

1:37:29.520 --> 1:37:34.439
<v Speaker 2>Maybe, no, it is inappropriate. The activities they engage in

1:37:34.479 --> 1:37:39.000
<v Speaker 2>are inappropriate on so many levels. But it's the only

1:37:39.080 --> 1:37:42.040
<v Speaker 2>way talk about being true to your nature. It is

1:37:42.120 --> 1:37:45.679
<v Speaker 2>the only way Royal knows how to express his love.

1:37:45.920 --> 1:37:48.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's what he does with them. That's what he does.

1:37:48.479 --> 1:37:51.000
<v Speaker 2>And it's not an explosion of anger or violence, but

1:37:51.040 --> 1:37:54.880
<v Speaker 2>an explosion of joy that yell as they run toward

1:37:54.920 --> 1:37:58.000
<v Speaker 2>the swimming pool together and jump in the exuberance of

1:37:58.040 --> 1:38:03.719
<v Speaker 2>that the pure child behavior. It's impossible for me anyway

1:38:04.240 --> 1:38:07.400
<v Speaker 2>to watch that sequence and not have the same huge

1:38:07.439 --> 1:38:11.240
<v Speaker 2>smile on my face the entire time that Hackman wears

1:38:11.360 --> 1:38:14.000
<v Speaker 2>throughout the scene. And I'll extend it beyond me and

1:38:14.080 --> 1:38:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Julio to when the music stops and Stiller's Chaz takes

1:38:17.960 --> 1:38:20.920
<v Speaker 2>him into the closet, the gaming closet, to reprimand him

1:38:21.120 --> 1:38:25.200
<v Speaker 2>for the inappropriateness of the day. You stay away from

1:38:25.240 --> 1:38:26.559
<v Speaker 2>my children, Do you understand?

1:38:26.800 --> 1:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>My god it i haven't been in here for years.

1:38:28.800 --> 1:38:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Hey are you listening to me?

1:38:30.800 --> 1:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

1:38:31.160 --> 1:38:31.519
<v Speaker 6>I am.

1:38:32.640 --> 1:38:34.360
<v Speaker 2>I think you're having a nervous breakdown.

1:38:35.720 --> 1:38:37.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you recovered from Rachel's death.

1:38:42.560 --> 1:38:46.040
<v Speaker 2>This is a different kind of shouting from Hackman, one

1:38:46.120 --> 1:38:50.439
<v Speaker 2>that isn't about putting Chaz in his place. He actually

1:38:50.960 --> 1:38:55.080
<v Speaker 2>finally plays a bit of the parent. He is trying

1:38:55.080 --> 1:38:58.280
<v Speaker 2>to get through to his son. Despite his selfishness that

1:38:58.360 --> 1:39:01.400
<v Speaker 2>you can't deny, despite his lack of responsibility and his

1:39:01.479 --> 1:39:05.840
<v Speaker 2>lack of accountability, he does see something true in his son.

1:39:05.960 --> 1:39:09.360
<v Speaker 2>He is correct to note that Chaz will not face

1:39:09.960 --> 1:39:13.160
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he hasn't fully processed his wife's death,

1:39:13.600 --> 1:39:15.559
<v Speaker 2>and he calls him out on it in that moment.

1:39:15.640 --> 1:39:20.840
<v Speaker 2>And just to have that be the closing of that scene, Josh,

1:39:20.880 --> 1:39:24.879
<v Speaker 2>this scene that is that childlike joy that has you smiling,

1:39:24.920 --> 1:39:29.120
<v Speaker 2>and then have such an honest emotional moment between those

1:39:29.120 --> 1:39:32.200
<v Speaker 2>two characters. That's that's part of the wonder of the film.

1:39:32.240 --> 1:39:33.440
<v Speaker 2>The Royal Tenet moms.

1:39:33.200 --> 1:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>For me, well you get you get one of the

1:39:34.600 --> 1:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>great Hackman chuckles at the end of the closets too.

1:39:37.080 --> 1:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it makes you wonder. You know, neither of

1:39:39.720 --> 1:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>us are at that point yet with grandchildren. But is

1:39:42.840 --> 1:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that when you like actually start to be a good parent,

1:39:46.600 --> 1:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe when you see what your kids are doing wrong

1:39:49.000 --> 1:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>with their kids. That's right, Like, oh, oh, this is

1:39:51.640 --> 1:39:54.960
<v Speaker 1>what I should have done it. I'm gonna tell you. Yeah,

1:39:55.000 --> 1:39:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, what you're describing is how pleasurable it

1:39:59.880 --> 1:40:02.280
<v Speaker 1>is to watch Gene Hackman on screen. And I don't

1:40:02.320 --> 1:40:05.400
<v Speaker 1>know how many of our picks have delved necessarily into that,

1:40:06.800 --> 1:40:10.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'm glad we've ended up here because whether he

1:40:10.360 --> 1:40:15.400
<v Speaker 1>was being scary or insecure, there was still a certain

1:40:15.439 --> 1:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>pleasure in watching him. It's a great point, and maybe

1:40:18.160 --> 1:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>never more so than Here's. This is just where the

1:40:20.160 --> 1:40:23.280
<v Speaker 1>pleasure comes out front and foremost.

1:40:23.600 --> 1:40:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Those are our top five Gene Heckman scenes. We've already

1:40:27.240 --> 1:40:29.760
<v Speaker 2>said how hard this was to whittle it down. You've

1:40:29.800 --> 1:40:33.000
<v Speaker 2>referenced a few honorable mentions. I'm pretty sure I have

1:40:33.040 --> 1:40:35.639
<v Speaker 2>at least five. I want to highlight here, Josh, which

1:40:36.280 --> 1:40:39.519
<v Speaker 2>picks do you want to maybe highlight again? Which ones

1:40:39.520 --> 1:40:40.439
<v Speaker 2>haven't come up yet?

1:40:40.680 --> 1:40:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let me go back to the conversation, because I

1:40:42.720 --> 1:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want to give that film, that great Copla masterpiece,

1:40:46.560 --> 1:40:50.679
<v Speaker 1>a short shrift, but it is for me, the honorable

1:40:50.680 --> 1:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>mention pick would be the finale tearing up the apartment.

1:40:53.160 --> 1:40:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Then sitting in the mess. And you know, there's some

1:40:56.000 --> 1:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>very good conversation about this in the discord for film

1:40:59.200 --> 1:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>spotting family members when people were talking about some good

1:41:03.000 --> 1:41:06.080
<v Speaker 1>conversation about exactly what you were talking about, Adam, like,

1:41:06.280 --> 1:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is this what makes this a good Hackman?

1:41:08.200 --> 1:41:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Why is it still a good hacking?

1:41:09.920 --> 1:41:12.559
<v Speaker 1>And you know, for those who listened to a couple

1:41:12.520 --> 1:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of shows Ago and Roxanna Hadadi guest hosted alongside me,

1:41:17.040 --> 1:41:19.320
<v Speaker 1>she had a great story about watching the conversation with

1:41:19.360 --> 1:41:24.040
<v Speaker 1>her dad and how that ending didn't immediately work for him,

1:41:24.040 --> 1:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>but then he found his way to it through Hackman's performance.

1:41:27.400 --> 1:41:30.360
<v Speaker 1>So go back and listen to that if you haven't

1:41:30.360 --> 1:41:33.519
<v Speaker 1>heard that yet. And also one more note here on

1:41:33.880 --> 1:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>this scene from the conversation comes from the friend of

1:41:37.000 --> 1:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the show, fellow critic Aaron Newarth on My Larson on

1:41:39.920 --> 1:41:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Film facebook page. He wrote this about it. Outmatched, outwitted, frustrated, alone,

1:41:45.240 --> 1:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>defeated with only one last resort, Jazz going from the

1:41:49.680 --> 1:41:52.800
<v Speaker 1>paranoia fuel destruction of his home to sitting in his

1:41:52.880 --> 1:41:55.720
<v Speaker 1>mess as he plays his sex. Harry coll knows that

1:41:55.760 --> 1:41:59.160
<v Speaker 1>despite his efforts, he's failed again. The final scene is

1:41:59.200 --> 1:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>tremendous Ackman's best performance the conversation so strong case there

1:42:04.880 --> 1:42:07.880
<v Speaker 1>from Aaron A couple more real quick here mentioned the

1:42:07.880 --> 1:42:10.080
<v Speaker 1>French connection. My pick would have been the one you

1:42:10.120 --> 1:42:14.800
<v Speaker 1>went with Adam in the climactic action sequence. I did

1:42:14.840 --> 1:42:16.720
<v Speaker 1>watch as part of homework just because I've always wanted

1:42:16.720 --> 1:42:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to see it. Sam Raimi's The Quick and the Dead.

1:42:19.560 --> 1:42:22.120
<v Speaker 1>He's doing more of a stock villain here, kind of

1:42:22.120 --> 1:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a riff on the richer role he had in Unforgiven,

1:42:25.680 --> 1:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, he gets a great chuckle off

1:42:29.000 --> 1:42:32.519
<v Speaker 1>with Keith David that is worth watching The Quick and

1:42:32.640 --> 1:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the Dead alone. And then so many people mentioned young Frankenstein.

1:42:36.720 --> 1:42:39.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that and his lex Luthor in the Superman

1:42:39.960 --> 1:42:42.280
<v Speaker 1>films just showed it was a great reminder of his

1:42:42.280 --> 1:42:44.519
<v Speaker 1>ability to do straight comedy, so I wanted to give

1:42:44.520 --> 1:42:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a nod to those performances as well well.

1:42:47.880 --> 1:42:51.920
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of comedy, here's three movies, three scenes that haven't

1:42:51.920 --> 1:42:55.080
<v Speaker 2>come up yet, Josh. That really pained me to leave out.

1:42:55.320 --> 1:42:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Another bit of homework for me was finally catching up

1:42:58.240 --> 1:43:03.439
<v Speaker 2>with Mike Nichols the bird Cage and Nice. The scene

1:43:03.479 --> 1:43:06.320
<v Speaker 2>that I love the most with Hackman is the one

1:43:06.320 --> 1:43:08.840
<v Speaker 2>that allows me to live in this fantasy world, Josh,

1:43:08.880 --> 1:43:16.080
<v Speaker 2>where ultra conservative, nightmare Republican senators can also reveal empathy

1:43:17.040 --> 1:43:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and show that they actually have a human side to them.

1:43:20.680 --> 1:43:25.880
<v Speaker 2>It's when they're sitting before dinner, I think, having some champagne,

1:43:26.000 --> 1:43:28.160
<v Speaker 2>sitting across from each other, getting to know each other,

1:43:28.760 --> 1:43:31.519
<v Speaker 2>and someone asks how was the trip, because they drove

1:43:31.960 --> 1:43:36.160
<v Speaker 2>down from Ohio I believe, down to South Florida, to

1:43:36.200 --> 1:43:40.720
<v Speaker 2>South Beach so they could meet the family of the

1:43:40.920 --> 1:43:44.080
<v Speaker 2>man that their daughter is going to marry. And someone says,

1:43:44.080 --> 1:43:46.200
<v Speaker 2>how's the trip, and he says, nice trip, very nice,

1:43:46.320 --> 1:43:53.360
<v Speaker 2>And then Hackman delivers this beautiful monologue that highlights all

1:43:53.439 --> 1:43:58.439
<v Speaker 2>of the differences between the states and the multitude of

1:43:58.520 --> 1:44:03.240
<v Speaker 2>colors that he experienced. And the irony should not be

1:44:03.400 --> 1:44:06.559
<v Speaker 2>lost on any viewer that this man who seems so

1:44:06.800 --> 1:44:11.440
<v Speaker 2>rigid in his thinking and seems so oblivious or willfully

1:44:11.600 --> 1:44:17.200
<v Speaker 2>oblivious to the differences that actually make America so great,

1:44:18.080 --> 1:44:22.920
<v Speaker 2>is articulating it there as if it is something that

1:44:22.960 --> 1:44:26.240
<v Speaker 2>he feels so deep in his heart. And Hackman here again,

1:44:26.560 --> 1:44:28.679
<v Speaker 2>he just does it at the right pitch, Josh, where

1:44:28.920 --> 1:44:33.160
<v Speaker 2>there's no music swelling underneath. He doesn't play it like

1:44:33.200 --> 1:44:37.080
<v Speaker 2>there's music swelling underneath. He's not delivering some sermon. He's

1:44:37.120 --> 1:44:39.840
<v Speaker 2>not winking at us and saying, oh, look, he's not

1:44:39.880 --> 1:44:43.760
<v Speaker 2>such a bad guy after all. He just is evoking

1:44:43.800 --> 1:44:49.000
<v Speaker 2>this memory of the trip and what struck him as

1:44:49.040 --> 1:44:51.840
<v Speaker 2>he drove, and it's surprising to us. And I think

1:44:51.880 --> 1:44:54.360
<v Speaker 2>it's a beautiful moment in the bird cage that Hackman

1:44:54.760 --> 1:44:55.439
<v Speaker 2>makes special.

1:44:55.640 --> 1:44:59.280
<v Speaker 8>We decided to drive down to see the seasons change.

1:45:00.040 --> 1:45:02.400
<v Speaker 8>But it's just so magical to me to come from

1:45:02.400 --> 1:45:05.640
<v Speaker 8>the north where it's cold.

1:45:05.360 --> 1:45:07.960
<v Speaker 2>To the south where it's warm.

1:45:08.439 --> 1:45:12.960
<v Speaker 8>See the tremendous differences from region to region in this

1:45:13.040 --> 1:45:16.639
<v Speaker 8>incredible country of ours, the.

1:45:16.640 --> 1:45:25.920
<v Speaker 6>Hills, the mountains, talk about your purple mountains, majesty, just fantastic.

1:45:27.080 --> 1:45:30.679
<v Speaker 1>He's a great storyteller when movies give him the chance

1:45:30.760 --> 1:45:32.960
<v Speaker 1>to just kind of spin a yarn or an experience

1:45:33.040 --> 1:45:33.240
<v Speaker 1>like that.

1:45:33.479 --> 1:45:37.559
<v Speaker 2>Right, how about his lex Luthor? So many options from

1:45:37.600 --> 1:45:40.599
<v Speaker 2>Superman and Superman two. I'm gonna go with Superman two.

1:45:41.240 --> 1:45:44.120
<v Speaker 2>In the White House, when he plops his feet up

1:45:44.160 --> 1:45:49.040
<v Speaker 2>on the desk with the cigar, claims to want Australia.

1:45:49.280 --> 1:45:55.080
<v Speaker 2>He starts out the scene being subservient and obsequious, towards

1:45:55.080 --> 1:45:57.679
<v Speaker 2>General Zod and by the end it's as if Lex

1:45:57.720 --> 1:46:01.439
<v Speaker 2>has been in charge the entire time. Pure Hackman charm,

1:46:01.720 --> 1:46:05.120
<v Speaker 2>actually a devious charm. In that moment, I wish we

1:46:05.160 --> 1:46:10.200
<v Speaker 2>had lessure for president. I know, hoosiers hoosiers, I play

1:46:10.360 --> 1:46:13.559
<v Speaker 2>coach stays. I love that line. It's one of the

1:46:13.560 --> 1:46:17.080
<v Speaker 2>more iconic scenes. Yeah, I'm not going with the pregame speech.

1:46:17.960 --> 1:46:20.760
<v Speaker 2>This is the rewatch in the moment, Josh, where I

1:46:20.880 --> 1:46:25.479
<v Speaker 2>was really cued into how many great scenes Hackman has,

1:46:25.640 --> 1:46:29.120
<v Speaker 2>as we noted, where he doesn't say a word. Watch

1:46:29.240 --> 1:46:32.439
<v Speaker 2>the journey Norman Dale goes on. Over the course of

1:46:32.439 --> 1:46:35.240
<v Speaker 2>that entire sequence where the town is trying to vote

1:46:35.280 --> 1:46:38.360
<v Speaker 2>him out, he has a really hard time expressing himself.

1:46:38.400 --> 1:46:41.240
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't make a very eloquent speech. He certainly doesn't

1:46:41.280 --> 1:46:43.439
<v Speaker 2>ask for forgiveness, and in fact he does the opposite.

1:46:43.479 --> 1:46:46.559
<v Speaker 2>He says, I apologize for nothing, and he sits down

1:46:46.680 --> 1:46:48.680
<v Speaker 2>and he knows what his fate is going to be.

1:46:49.240 --> 1:46:51.760
<v Speaker 2>And the rest of that scene, for the next three

1:46:51.800 --> 1:46:54.360
<v Speaker 2>four five minutes, Jimmy Chitwood shows up, different people go

1:46:54.400 --> 1:46:56.759
<v Speaker 2>up and speak. It all plays out just in reaction

1:46:56.880 --> 1:47:00.000
<v Speaker 2>shots on Hackman's face and you can see the entire

1:47:00.880 --> 1:47:05.160
<v Speaker 2>arc of a character in that scene just by watching

1:47:05.200 --> 1:47:07.320
<v Speaker 2>his facial reactions. Love it so.

1:47:07.360 --> 1:47:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Glad you called out Hoosier's I've not seen it since

1:47:09.880 --> 1:47:12.479
<v Speaker 1>it came out, which would have been I realized just

1:47:12.600 --> 1:47:16.080
<v Speaker 1>doing research and looking at dates and stuff. Hoosiers came

1:47:16.080 --> 1:47:18.680
<v Speaker 1>out I think the same year I played on my

1:47:18.720 --> 1:47:22.040
<v Speaker 1>first official school basketball team. Really, so it would have

1:47:22.160 --> 1:47:25.280
<v Speaker 1>like set my expectations for what this experience.

1:47:24.840 --> 1:47:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Would be like. Of course I did invoke it earlier.

1:47:30.080 --> 1:47:31.680
<v Speaker 2>I've had a rough year. Dad. I know you have

1:47:31.760 --> 1:47:35.759
<v Speaker 2>Chassy from the Royal Tenebombs Mississippi Burning talk about scenes

1:47:35.760 --> 1:47:38.920
<v Speaker 2>that are dark, where there's that little bit of sadistic

1:47:39.000 --> 1:47:42.160
<v Speaker 2>thrust to them, but you noted this where you also

1:47:42.800 --> 1:47:46.080
<v Speaker 2>liked that the character you're having fun with the characters

1:47:46.439 --> 1:47:50.840
<v Speaker 2>righteousness and vindictiveness because he's taking it out on Ku

1:47:50.920 --> 1:47:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Klux Klan members. The razor interrogation scene with Brad Dorf's

1:47:55.400 --> 1:47:59.280
<v Speaker 2>character is a fun, a fung gene Hackman scene, despite

1:47:59.320 --> 1:48:02.120
<v Speaker 2>how violent and intimidating it is. And I know there

1:48:02.120 --> 1:48:03.880
<v Speaker 2>are so many more we could mention, but maybe as

1:48:03.880 --> 1:48:07.760
<v Speaker 2>a nod to producer Sam who loves get Shorty as

1:48:07.840 --> 1:48:10.280
<v Speaker 2>much as any person on the planet. Now, I don't

1:48:10.320 --> 1:48:13.200
<v Speaker 2>know he didn't lobby for any scenes, and I don't

1:48:13.200 --> 1:48:17.840
<v Speaker 2>know if any of Hackman's scenes as Harry's in are

1:48:17.880 --> 1:48:20.760
<v Speaker 2>among Sam's favorite in the movie. But I rewatched a

1:48:20.760 --> 1:48:25.360
<v Speaker 2>few today and the phone call scene with Dennis Farina's

1:48:25.439 --> 1:48:28.439
<v Speaker 2>Ray Bones where he tells him to use his ething

1:48:28.520 --> 1:48:31.960
<v Speaker 2>imagination and he starts taking on the personality and persona

1:48:32.240 --> 1:48:36.400
<v Speaker 2>of Travolta's Chili Palmer. That that is a fun Gene Hackman.

1:48:36.439 --> 1:48:38.679
<v Speaker 2>See that entire performance is fun. That movie is great.

1:48:38.840 --> 1:48:40.559
<v Speaker 2>So I wanted to give a nod to get.

1:48:40.360 --> 1:48:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Shorty, Where's Chili Palmer? Where's Leo de Vau? Where's my money? Ray?

1:48:46.920 --> 1:48:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Look at me? What? Look at me? Ray? Did you

1:48:53.960 --> 1:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>just say look at you? Look at me? Ray? I'll

1:48:57.360 --> 1:48:59.840
<v Speaker 1>tell you what, Harry, why don't you take him?

1:49:00.280 --> 1:49:04.519
<v Speaker 2>Look at this again? Those are our top five Gene

1:49:04.520 --> 1:49:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Hackman or ten Gene Hackman scenes. We would love to

1:49:08.080 --> 1:49:10.439
<v Speaker 2>hear your picks or any other comments about the show,

1:49:10.479 --> 1:49:12.160
<v Speaker 2>and I'll just go ahead and say it. Yes, we

1:49:12.240 --> 1:49:14.800
<v Speaker 2>have both seen and enjoyed Bonnie and Clyde. You can

1:49:14.840 --> 1:49:16.960
<v Speaker 2>email us feedback at Filmspotting dot net.

1:49:17.160 --> 1:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>If you want to connect with us on social media,

1:49:19.120 --> 1:49:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you can find Adam and the show on Instagram and Facebook.

1:49:22.439 --> 1:49:24.840
<v Speaker 1>He's at film Spotting. You can also find me at

1:49:24.960 --> 1:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Larson on film. We are independently produced and listener supported.

1:49:29.600 --> 1:49:31.839
<v Speaker 1>You can support the show by joining the film Spotting

1:49:31.920 --> 1:49:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Family at film Spotting family dot com. You can listen

1:49:35.200 --> 1:49:37.800
<v Speaker 1>early and ad free. You also get a weekly newsletter,

1:49:37.880 --> 1:49:42.200
<v Speaker 1>monthly bonus shows, and access to the entire show archive.

1:49:42.640 --> 1:49:47.200
<v Speaker 1>For show t shirts or even better film Spotting festposters,

1:49:47.600 --> 1:49:50.760
<v Speaker 1>go to film spotting dot net slash shop.

1:49:51.000 --> 1:49:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Some more Hackman talk in those film Spotting archives. We

1:49:53.840 --> 1:49:56.840
<v Speaker 2>talked about the Royal Tenebombs for its fifteenth anniversary back

1:49:56.880 --> 1:49:59.640
<v Speaker 2>on episode five eighty nine. Wow, that was a long

1:49:59.640 --> 1:50:02.880
<v Speaker 2>time ag Young Frankenstein in memory of Gene Wilder. We

1:50:02.920 --> 1:50:05.320
<v Speaker 2>talked about that on episode six oh two and going

1:50:05.400 --> 1:50:08.680
<v Speaker 2>way back even pre Josh Larsen part of our New

1:50:08.680 --> 1:50:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Hollywood Marathon, we talked about Bonnie and Clyde. I don't

1:50:11.439 --> 1:50:14.040
<v Speaker 2>know how much time we devoted to Gene Hackman. That

1:50:14.120 --> 1:50:18.559
<v Speaker 2>was episode two fifty three out Knew this weekend in

1:50:18.600 --> 1:50:22.720
<v Speaker 2>limited release. Eric LaRue, directed by Michael Shannon, recommended by

1:50:22.800 --> 1:50:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Josh earlier in the show The Friend, starring Naomi Watts

1:50:26.800 --> 1:50:30.120
<v Speaker 2>and Bill Murray, also Anne Dowd and Constant Swoo. That's

1:50:30.120 --> 1:50:33.040
<v Speaker 2>from directors David Siegel and Scott McGhee, who made What

1:50:33.160 --> 1:50:36.759
<v Speaker 2>Mazie Knew and The Deep End. The Ballad of Wallace Island,

1:50:36.840 --> 1:50:38.800
<v Speaker 2>a movie I really want to catch up with. A

1:50:38.800 --> 1:50:41.639
<v Speaker 2>movie about an eccentric lottery winner who hires his favorite

1:50:41.720 --> 1:50:45.240
<v Speaker 2>musician to perform a private gig, also invited the musician's

1:50:45.280 --> 1:50:48.599
<v Speaker 2>ex bandmate and ex girlfriend played by Kerrie Mulligan. That's

1:50:48.640 --> 1:50:51.320
<v Speaker 2>based on an award winning short film from two thousand

1:50:51.360 --> 1:50:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and seven, Freaky Tales. Josh, did you know that Anna

1:50:54.120 --> 1:50:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Boden and Ryan Fleck have a new film?

1:50:56.520 --> 1:50:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I only know because producer Sam highlighted this.

1:51:00.160 --> 1:51:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, Four interconnected tales set in Oakland, California, circa

1:51:04.400 --> 1:51:07.080
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty seven, featuring punks and skinheads, a rat battle,

1:51:07.120 --> 1:51:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and an NBA All Star. The Luckiest Man in America

1:51:10.840 --> 1:51:13.719
<v Speaker 2>is out. This stars Paul Walter Hauser as Michael Larson,

1:51:13.720 --> 1:51:16.400
<v Speaker 2>an unemployed ice cream truck driver who, in nineteen eighty

1:51:16.400 --> 1:51:18.880
<v Speaker 2>four true story, went on the game show Pressed Your

1:51:18.960 --> 1:51:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Luck and could not Lose. Walter Goggins and David Strathern

1:51:23.080 --> 1:51:26.439
<v Speaker 2>co star A Nice Indian Boy, the story of Navine

1:51:26.439 --> 1:51:29.639
<v Speaker 2>who brings his fiance Jay played by Jonathan groth Holme,

1:51:29.680 --> 1:51:32.800
<v Speaker 2>to his traditional Indian family. VI It and Mom is

1:51:32.840 --> 1:51:35.160
<v Speaker 2>also playing at the Gene Sisco Film Center in Chicago,

1:51:35.200 --> 1:51:38.080
<v Speaker 2>a queer love story largely set in a coal mine.

1:51:38.120 --> 1:51:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Our friends Robert Daniels and Mariah Gates were positive. Robert

1:51:42.000 --> 1:51:45.840
<v Speaker 2>called it hypnotic. Mariah Gates called it ethereal and hunting. Okay,

1:51:45.880 --> 1:51:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm sold out wide. Josh taking anybody to a Minecraft

1:51:50.200 --> 1:51:52.320
<v Speaker 2>movie and he nieces or nephews. I've got a couple

1:51:52.320 --> 1:51:53.280
<v Speaker 2>of kids who want to see it.

1:51:53.800 --> 1:51:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and you should do that. Unfortunately, I'll be out

1:51:56.200 --> 1:51:56.599
<v Speaker 1>of town.

1:51:57.200 --> 1:52:01.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Unfortunately. I know you're really bummed. Jack Black, Jason Momoa,

1:52:01.720 --> 1:52:05.080
<v Speaker 2>and Oscar nominee Danielle Brooks star directed by Jared Hess,

1:52:05.120 --> 1:52:09.000
<v Speaker 2>who made Napoleon, Dynamite and Nacho Leebray. Next week on

1:52:09.040 --> 1:52:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the show, it is Joe Wright's Pride and Prejudice at

1:52:12.120 --> 1:52:15.799
<v Speaker 2>twenty with Michael Phillips. We'll share our top five rain scenes.

1:52:15.880 --> 1:52:18.639
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk a little bit about ephus, and we will

1:52:18.800 --> 1:52:22.280
<v Speaker 2>share the Film Spotting Madness Elite eight matchups.

1:52:22.520 --> 1:52:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is produced by Golden Joe Disso and Sam

1:52:25.240 --> 1:52:28.479
<v Speaker 1>van Holgren. Without Sam and Golden Joe, this show wouldn't go.

1:52:28.880 --> 1:52:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Our production assistant is Sophie Kempenar and special thanks to

1:52:32.320 --> 1:52:36.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone at wb eazy Chicago. More information is available at

1:52:36.280 --> 1:52:40.200
<v Speaker 1>wbeazy dot org. For film Spotting, I'm Josh Larson.

1:52:40.080 --> 1:52:42.120
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Adam Kempinar. Thanks for listening.

1:52:42.280 --> 1:52:45.240
<v Speaker 4>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

1:52:46.120 --> 1:53:05.400
<v Speaker 2>The Barn film Spotting is listeners supported. Join the film

1:53:05.400 --> 1:53:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Spotting Family at Filmspottingfamily dot com and get access to

1:53:08.840 --> 1:53:12.360
<v Speaker 2>ad free episodes, monthly bonus shows, our weekly newsletter, and,

1:53:12.439 --> 1:53:14.719
<v Speaker 2>for the first time, all in one place, the entire

1:53:15.000 --> 1:53:17.439
<v Speaker 2>film Spotting archive going back to two thousand and five.

1:53:17.760 --> 1:53:23.160
<v Speaker 2>That's a Film Spotting Family dot com panicly