WEBVTT - Tesla Layoffs, Iran Attack

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:10.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. You're listening to the

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple Cardplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>A couple pieces of news. One, you have the senior

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>VP resigns, So that's Drew, but Baglino, that's one part

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>of the story. The other part of the story is

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 2>at the carmaker slashing headcount by about ten percent. So

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 2>put those two things together and what does that tell

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 2>us about where Tesla is right now? So joining us

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>is Steve Man, Bloomberg Intelligence Global Autos and Industrial Research analyst.

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 2>This is a great example of why Bloomberg Intelligence Radio

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:49.559
<v Speaker 2>can bring you the best analyst from all of our

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 2>guys all around the world, and Steve is definitely one

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 2>of them. What has been your take over the last

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 2>few hours on management shakeups as well as headcount at Tesla?

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Wow, it's actually worse than I thought I thought. You know,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 3>the first quarter sales drop was you know, hopefully close

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 3>to the end, but you know, there's seems to be

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 3>the light at the end of the tunnel is not

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 3>really here yet, and it looks like, you know, it's running.

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Their plants are running just pretty much well below capacity

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 3>at the moment, and there's still a lot of cost

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 3>headwinds facing them. They're trying to balance a lot of

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 3>things in terms of deliveries production. They're raising prices. I

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.839
<v Speaker 3>don't know how long that's gonna last. So execution is risk.

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Execution is key for the company in the next you know,

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>six to nine months.

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 4>So Steve, where are we now or where is the

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 4>market when you talk to investors in terms of getting

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 4>a sense of where EV demand is in the US

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 4>and then maybe globally.

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, EV demand is is waning. I think the interest

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 3>rate is not helping, you know, it's uh they're looking

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 3>to you know, as you know, the FED is probably

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 3>not going to cut rates anytime soon in the next

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 3>couple of months, next quarter or so, so that's going

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 3>to condude away on big purchases like automobiles. We're seeing

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 3>that across the board in the US as well as

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 3>in China. Trying is a little bit worse for Tesla

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 3>because there's so much new competition there. But you know,

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 3>sales is slowing for GM, sales is slowing for Ford

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 3>for just had to cut production of their lightning recently

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 3>announced about a couple of weeks ago.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 5>So I think this year will be tough for the industry.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Now, you know, we probably won't see any improvement until

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.360
<v Speaker 3>as far as I'm concerned in twenty twenty six.

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:49.919
<v Speaker 2>Oh wow, Okay, well that pushes it a way out.

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Here was interesting headline too, Paul. To your point is

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 2>that Reuters is reporting that BP is cutting over one

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 2>hundred jobs and it's electric vehicle charging unit. And we

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:01.519
<v Speaker 2>all talk about how we really need chargers to deal

0:03:01.560 --> 0:03:03.280
<v Speaker 2>with the range anxiety, and now you have a big

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 2>player here studding some jobs in this EV charging unit. Steve,

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>why twenty twenty six? Why is it going to take

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 2>that long?

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah? I think.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 3>I think what the market, the EV market is facing

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 3>today is that we had early adopters, especially on the

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 3>high end, they're you know, they're pretty much tapped out.

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, they they can buy only so many The

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 3>market is relatively small, smaller than the mass market. I'm

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 3>looking at twenty twenty six because if you look at

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 3>the Inflation Reduction Act, it's bringing in on shoring a

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of the EV battery production in the US, hopefully

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 3>it will cut costs. And at the same time, in

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six, where we're looking at more affordable evs

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 3>coming into the market, that's going to expand the addressable

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 3>market for EV's and that's why we're we're thinking, you know,

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six will probably be a better time for

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the EV market than it is today.

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 4>So how about profitability in that scenario, Steve, It's tough

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 4>to make an argument that, you know, these evs can

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 4>be profitably manufactured at a higher price point.

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 6>How are they going to adjust their cost structure to get.

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Be profitable with maybe have a lower price point, I

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 4>don't know, thirty thousand dollars or something like that.

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 5>That's a good question.

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 3>I think if you look at the EV startups in

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 3>the US, you know that the only one that's really

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 3>still profitable is Tesla. You saw Fisker being delisted. There's

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 3>risk of them filing bankruptcy. Both Lucid and Rivian will need,

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, billions of dollars just to get them through

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.520
<v Speaker 3>the next couple of years. We're not sure if they're

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 3>gonna get that money. Given the slowdown and the EV market.

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 3>But on a bright side, I think Tesla is still

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 3>generating cash. You know, they're making some of the cuts today,

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 3>I think really to maintain cash generation so they can

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 3>continue it in vests for the long term, you know.

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 3>For them, I think what's really important for them is

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 3>the AI, the FSD, the full self driving systems that

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 3>they're trying to build out. That that's going to be

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 3>the future of the automotive industry. It's really those software

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 3>based subscriptions that's going to drive revenue, not so much

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 3>of the automaking. So if they're trying to get there,

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 3>trying to maintain cash, maintain some level of profitability, profitability

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 3>to make those investments to get them there.

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, I was thinking about self driving as I was

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 2>coming up the Taconic, oring down the Taconic yesterday, and

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I was like, would I want to be in a

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 2>self driving car right now? In the Taconic. I don't

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 2>need the answer to that. I was driving and I

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 2>was like, I don't know, man, I think I want

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 2>to trust myself behind the wheel. Anyway, before we let

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 2>you go, Steve, let's go to the SVP departing, So

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Drew Baglino. He leaving the company. As I mentioned senior

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 2>vice president, who is he? Do we care? Like how

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 2>big a deal he was in Tesla? What did he

0:05:58.560 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>do walk us through it?

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we do care.

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 3>He's he's you know, I think he's the face to

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.559
<v Speaker 3>he's also the face of Tesla. Seems to be looks

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 3>like to be the right hand person for Elon Musk.

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 3>So it's a big loss for the company, no doubt

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 3>about it. But you know, he's a he's a powertrain

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 3>engineer for the most part, energy engineer, so he's you know,

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 3>he's really involved in the battery if you saw him

0:06:23.360 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 3>on battery day. I think, you know, if you look

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 3>at Tesla and what Elon Musk have been saying about

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 3>Tesla's future, which is on AI, which is on full

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 3>self driving.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 5>Is it a big loss?

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you can you can argue that, hey, you know,

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Tesla's moving on to the next phase. It's not about

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 3>building the motor, is not about building the batteries. They've

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 3>gone through that process over the past fifteen eighteen years.

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think, you know, looking forward, they probably

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 3>need somebody more people around. You know, AI, you know,

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 3>developed them algorithms for the future of the car.

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 4>All right, Steve Man, thanks so much for joining us.

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 4>As always, Steve Mann, he covers the global auto industry

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 4>for Bloomberg Intelligence base down there in Princeton, New Jersey.

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 4>It's got to be tough, I think, to be like

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 4>a Kathy would be so invested in this company, you know,

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 4>not only financially, but kind of reputationally, and to have

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 4>that to deal with a CEO like Elon Musk is

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 4>so mercurial.

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 6>I guess it is maybe the right term.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 4>And one of the you know, the results of that

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 4>is you know, executive turnover, and that's got to be

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 4>really challenging for investors.

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but you know what's interesting with her view is

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 2>that it's so long term that I wonder if these

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 2>things become just blips to her, you know.

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 7>Yep.

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 4>On the other side of it, Yeah, she's very you know,

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 4>obviously had great success with this disruption kind of theory.

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 4>But boy, got to ride with Elon Musk and his foibles.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 2>It's true. Yeah, No, that'd be really hard. Would you

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>do self driving? By the way, I really yeah, okay, good,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 2>so we're on the same page, But well.

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 6>Can drive me around? I mean, you know, I trust him?

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's his second job makes sense.

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple card Play and

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Let's pivot to the geopolitical front, because another busy weekend

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 4>in the Middle East with the Iranian attack on Israel. Response,

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 4>Doctor Aeriel Cohen joins us. He's a senior fellow at

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.559
<v Speaker 4>the Atlantic Council. Doctor Cohen, thanks so much for joining

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 4>us here. How would you characterize the I guess the

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 4>Iranian back attack on Israel over the weekend?

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 6>How would you characterize it?

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 8>First of all, it's an avert act of war. Israel

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 8>was attacked with three hundred missiles, ballistic missiles, cruise missiles,

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 8>and owns. The systems worked very well. Both in sentcam

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 8>US Central Command that Israel was joined several years ago.

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 8>That was the right decision to integrate Israel was its

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 8>Arab neighbors, and the US, UK, France, Saudi Jordan and

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 8>apparently UAE all participated in shooting down the Iranian missiles.

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 7>But this is just a first try.

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 8>By the Iranians, and a successful try, the largest drone

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 8>and missile attack of the twenty first century. Both the

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 8>Americans and Israelis and the Iranians, the Russians and the

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 8>Chinese are going to learn do lessons learn from this,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 8>and probably moved to program to plan bigger and worse.

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 7>Strikes against each other.

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 8>We saw many, many, many drone attacks in Ukraine, and

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 8>one of the lessons learned is the massive drone type

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 8>of swarms of drones as we saw can be counted.

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 7>So that's a good news.

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 8>The bad news is the Iranian regime is dead set

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 8>on destroying Israel. The chant every Friday in Tehran is

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 8>death to America, death to Israel, and they will continue

0:10:24.160 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 8>on their merry way.

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 2>So, doctor Cohen, the question yesterday was is this the

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 2>start of a direct war between Iran and Israel and

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 2>its allies or was Iran's attack calibrated and telegraphed retaliation.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like you're in the former camp of that.

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 8>The direct war all Iran against the US and Israel

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 8>is going on since the days of the founder of

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 8>the Islamic Republic.

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 7>The Ayatolla Komani. You remember the.

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 8>American ci A station chief was kidnapped and tortured and

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 8>then murdered in Lebanon in nineteen eighty three, Colonel Buckley,

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 8>And one way or another I was covering a studying

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 8>these events now for forty years. So it's an ongoing war.

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 8>But this was an escalatory operation, and this is the

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 8>Middle East. Israelis sooner or later will have to retaliate,

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 8>even as President Biden is telling them to step down

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 8>and take a win. When you have three hundred missiles

0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 8>lobbed against your country, this is not going to stop there.

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 4>So, doctor Cole, what do you think Israel's response will

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 4>be and or should be.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 8>I think that as Israel has ongoing business of Gaza

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 8>in the northern border against Gizabala in Lebanon, they will.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 7>Not be able to.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 8>Launch a large scale attack against around They shouldn't not

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 8>right now.

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 7>But they have other tools.

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 8>They have cyber They were very successful with cyber attacks

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 8>against the Iranian nuclear program, and they have other means

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 8>to disrupt the Iranian military establishment and the Iranian economy.

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Will this side step in many ways containment of Russia.

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 2>So I follow the oil markets. And there is an

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 2>narrative out there that if you wind up moving deeper

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 2>into sanctioned territory or even enforcing the sanctions that are

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 2>there on Iran, that opens up an avenue for Russia

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>to sell more oil and make more money. How does

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 2>the US weigh these two events?

0:12:48.080 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 8>Well, let me connect this to something that Biden administration

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 8>just recently did, the foot of freeze on our LNG

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 8>development going forward. And I think when we have malign

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 8>actors like Russia, like Iran who are oil exporters, we

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 8>the United States, Canada and others need to produce more,

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 8>not less oil and natural gas for the market.

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:19.839
<v Speaker 4>All right, doctor Cohen, So I guess one of the

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.440
<v Speaker 4>questions here is we think about next steps is the

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 4>positions of mister net Nyahu within Israel itself.

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 6>How is his gripple on power?

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 4>How is his ability to continue to move forward with

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 4>this conflict?

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 8>Well, I was in Israel during the attack. The morale

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.439
<v Speaker 8>is high, but people are sick and tired of NATANIAO.

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 8>If the elections took place today, he would lose and

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:51.960
<v Speaker 8>his credibility is shot, both because of the criminal investigation

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 8>that predate.

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 7>The Hamas attack, of October seventh.

0:13:55.800 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 8>And because of the huge, unprecedented failure of the Israeli

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 8>intelligence and the military on Netanyao's watch. So he may

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 8>be trying to distract the attention to move on towards

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 8>the Iranian confrontation. I do not want to speculate, but

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 8>I think sooner or later Israel will do the right thing.

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 7>There'll be a judiciary commission of inquiry like there.

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 8>Was after the Young People War of nineteen seventy three,

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 8>when Israel also got a huge to teach a surprise

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 8>fifty years ago to the day of the attack of

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 8>October seventh, And after that commission of inquiry there will

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 8>be consequences can etaniao after including criminal proceedings. I don't

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 8>want to speculate right now, but he is politically living

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 8>corpse walking.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Doctor thanks a lot. We really appreciate Doctor Ala Cohen,

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 2>senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council, has had extensive experience

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty years. He served at a senior research fellow in

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 2>Russia and Eurasian Studies and International Energy Policy at the

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Heritage Foundation. Wonderful to get his perspective. I think what's

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>interesting Paul for the markets is how do you hedge

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the unthinkable, like going into Friday. It's like, okay, you

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 2>don't want to take risk into the weekend. You want

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 2>to take some safety. But now, now, how do you

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 2>do that? Do you sell puts? Like you know, I

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, some folks are some folks are selling oil here

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 4>Brent Crue down now about one point seven percent still,

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 4>you know, up around eighty nine dollars per barrel. But

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 4>maybe a little bit of a breathe of sigh relief a.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 6>Little bit there.

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh, absolutely, And also there's a seminary about there, like

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 2>why would Iron want to hurt themselves even more on

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 2>the oil front. Anyway, we'll discuss.

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>then broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:00.600
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube.

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Let's get the Ben Emmetts Senior portfolio manager and had

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 4>to fixed income, new age wealth, the joints here in

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 4>our Bloomberg Interactive Brooker Studio Ben A million ways to

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 4>go here. Let's start with some of the economic data

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 4>we got today. Some retail sales came in really strong. Here.

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 6>The consumer seems to be in pretty good shape. I

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 6>guess it.

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Still is BOM.

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 9>I think that the employment reporters start to have an

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 9>effect here, you know, because this was actually the numbers

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 9>that were weak in generary ferry as we talked about earlier,

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 9>and as I looked through these reports that you're seeing,

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 9>you know, basically items that are going to be feeding

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 9>directly into GDP that were up as well.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 5>As those non star sales.

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 9>So I think what the market is doing today is

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 9>to say, you know, GDP's once again accelerating. This brings

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 9>us actually back to the summer of last year we

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 9>had a similar phase of having higher bond yields started

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 9>indicating that having a stronger economy, and this report then

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 9>confirms it. So I think it's a yeah, this just shows.

0:16:57.760 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 5>Once again like we just cannot be knocked off course

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 5>no matter what guest is. The prices are doing, these

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:02.640
<v Speaker 5>sales are.

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Up to I mean I'm looking at the tenure, I

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 4>mean rates are higher. Alex and I've been talking about

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 4>this all day. Rach are up another twelve basis points

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 4>on the tenure. The four point sixty five percent here,

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.560
<v Speaker 4>the two year run a five percent watch here. So

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 4>the bond market is telling you, I don't know, rach

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 4>are higher for longer.

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 5>I guess higher for longer.

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 9>And if you, if you, if this continues, then the

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 9>tenure is going to drift towards where the fat fund's

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 9>rate is, maybe not exactly but not too far off.

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 9>That would, I think be a really interesting moment for

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 9>Marcus because that means that if you're getting a ten

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 9>fet funds rate about equal, it puts all should puts

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 9>a lot of pressure on the economy. So but I

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 9>think for now, and this is our view, that we're

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 9>going to probably move into this four seventy five to

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 9>five percent zone. You know, if this type of data

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 9>shows that the GDP is going to be upgraded and

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 9>the PC is going to be higher, we're going to

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 9>have to expect that it's also going to be continued

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 9>to reflect better growth.

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.400
<v Speaker 5>On top of the supply.

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 9>We're going to continue a half it was very substantial

0:17:58.720 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 9>terasury supply.

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 2>So Ben that definitely means like a biotech thing because

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>like they have the growth, they have the cash flow,

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to be subject to any of the

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:10.480
<v Speaker 2>refinancing et cetera. But I'm wondering if this scenario just

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 2>dens the rotation that we've seen. Right, this I'm sure

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 2>is bad for small caps. What does it do the

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 2>cickle goals space.

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you could think of that that anything interest rates

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 9>sensitive as in the small cap space typically underperforms. With

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 9>the view though that that we think the rotation, you know,

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 9>the financial energy rotations really happens that that's not so

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 9>much deriilty one it shows today with golden sacks like

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 9>it's just you know, good trading environments. The energy market's

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 9>obviously in play with because of the geopolitics. So I

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 9>think that part of rotation is we think is working.

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 9>But you're right about tech like that you gotta let

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 9>your winners ride as Cameras said too, like we really

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 9>have to not trade them but basically invest in them

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 9>and stay with them because that is that is where

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 9>it's happening in the economy. I think this is part

0:18:59.920 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 9>of an impact to once again from all the infrastructure

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 9>spending that starts to show up in the economists, making

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 9>it each time stronger. Right, So why getting so much

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 9>strength of unemployment rate? Unemployment and it feits to spending

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 9>so I think concluding tech remains in play here even

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.399
<v Speaker 9>though the tay yield may go to five percent.

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 4>So I mean, oh, your head of fix thing comes,

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 4>let me ask you, I can sit into your treasury

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 4>at four point ninety five percent.

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 6>Should I do that?

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 4>Or should I go out on the credit curve a

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 4>little bit and maybe look at some corporate bonds, whether

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 4>it's an investment grade or high yield.

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 6>How are you guys positioning?

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 9>So I put a little note out on Friday for

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 9>New Edge that was I was sort of coming to

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 9>the point of looking at the very short of the

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 9>ye curve where anything that's floating rate, investment grade, or treasury.

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 9>So even someone to extent howgh yield, it's just performing

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 9>like so incredibly stable because you're getting all this interest.

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 5>Right, So the spread of floating rate.

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 9>Bonds over the treasury are anywhere but to two hundred

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 9>three hundred basis points depending which area.

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 5>In, that's pretty attractive.

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 9>You keep collecting that interest and if you think about

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 9>what's going on with the ten year yields. So on

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 9>Friday we rally a lot. On geopolitics, we come in

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.479
<v Speaker 9>today we have a completely opposite picture. That's a lot

0:20:15.520 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 9>of volatility. So I think from our point of view,

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 9>you want to be a little bit more positioned down

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 9>on the shorter end of yel curved because the yuka

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 9>is not going to normalize much as fats on holds.

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.680
<v Speaker 9>You collect all that interest and give you very stable

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 9>performance and sort of wait it down until we get

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 9>higher yields in the low end that at some point

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 9>is going to start slowing down the economy. We do

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 9>think though, that the by zone for the ten year

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 9>will probably be in that for the four seventy five

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.959
<v Speaker 9>five percent range, that we would think that a lot

0:20:41.960 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 9>of people will start looking at it and buying.

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 5>We probably do.

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you think we get to five percent on the tenure?

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 9>I think it's fairly likely, and that's not just because

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 9>of just today's number. But one thing with bonds Kurrny

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 9>is that if you look at term premium as we

0:20:58.000 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 9>call it a little like wonky term. But if you

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 9>take what's expect from the fatter the next couple of

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 9>years and where inflation is, you take that out of

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 9>the ten year, there's almost no yield there.

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 5>There's very little compensation.

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 9>And if I then judge the way this geopolitical event

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 9>is played out against an economy that doesn't get off thrown.

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 9>Of course, it stays above trend. The volatility of bonds

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 9>long end bounds will stay higher and should likely drive

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 9>it a little bit up towards that five percent. Lastly,

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 9>this refunding announcement that we're going to get believes that

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 9>on April twenty ninth. There's something really interesting, Alex about

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 9>the t bag the advisory community that put presentation out

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 9>a few weeks ago, they actually made it forecast the

0:21:38.480 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 9>tee will supprit you decline, but the long end supplies

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 9>to stay the same. If the Treasury follows through on

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 9>that advice, that should be refracted into the U curve.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 5>And that isn't right now, not enough. I think there's

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 5>a low term premium.

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 9>So I think for all these reasons throwing the fat

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 9>to that the fat's gonna got's going to be more

0:21:56.600 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 9>more priced out. You're gonna get to five percent, you

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 9>believe the technical analysis from prefinancial CRISI up with the

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 9>now you look at retracements, you could go even as

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 9>high as five point three, which is where the fet

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 9>funds rates. That will be pretty extreme, I think, and

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 9>it will be a real buying opportunity. We think the

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 9>zone comes into four seventy five five percent.

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 4>So the Fed, what's your call for twenty twenty four?

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 4>Will they cut in twenty twenty four?

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.199
<v Speaker 9>So I was listening to Williams today who were with

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 9>Mike McKee, a good interview. He still stays very confident

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 9>that they can do it. But and he's important to

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 9>listen to because he's actually the person that put out

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 9>the framework and how they want to do it. Meaning

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 9>if inflation continues to get on track down to two percent,

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 9>even though it's slower now, that fat that fat Fund's

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.680
<v Speaker 9>rate that's restrictive can be at some point cut down

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 9>to take the restriction out. He thinks that's that they're

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 9>still on course with that. I do think that the

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 9>markets are probably more rational about earlier this year and

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 9>saying yeah, it was not seven cuts, that's probably one

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 9>of the two cuts. The windows obviously narrowed a lot, right,

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 9>because as much Bowle said in the interview, I think

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 9>it was also Mike Cue anyone else. The election didn't

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 9>matter for them to make this great decision started in

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 9>seeing you.

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:10.840
<v Speaker 5>Probably they are going to keep that in mind.

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>The windows I'm giving Ben a look of like, yeah,

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 2>all right, Ben Emmons, Yep, you go, yeah.

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 6>Ben, Thanks so much for joining us.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 4>Ben Emmonds, Senior portfolio Manager, head of fixed Income at

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 4>New Edge. Well joining us live here in our Bloomberg

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 4>Interactive Brokers Studio.

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business. You can also listen

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Intelligence Radio. Happy Monday, Happy Tax Day.

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Alex the alongside Paul Sweeney. We're live from Interactive

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:53.159
<v Speaker 2>Broker Studio right here in Midtown Manhattan. Looking at the

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 2>crud market. Here, you're looking at Brent down by about

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 2>almost two percent, same for WTI, so you're now at

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 2>eighty eight for Brent, about eighty four for WTI. So

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of what's next. Ellen Walld is president of Transversal Consulting,

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 2>and she's a great person to talk to on the

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 2>price and fundamentals as well as the geopolitical risk. Just

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 2>a handful of guys who do that really, really well Ellen,

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>It's great to get your perspective. I've gotten so many

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 2>notes for Strategist this morning on sort of what they're

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 2>what's baked in now to the oil price? What's your

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 2>call what geopolitical premium is in? How much should be in?

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 10>I think there's definitely some geopolitical premium that is baked

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 10>into oil prices, but I think it's been that way

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:36.199
<v Speaker 10>for some time now. I think that because this attack

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:40.719
<v Speaker 10>happened over the weekend, the price action was really really muted,

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 10>even more than it would have been, you know, it

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 10>was otherwise considering that there was no oil supply that

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 10>was involved or threatened in any way, and so we

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 10>didn't even see any you know, potential ups and downs

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 10>or brief spikes just because there was no trading going on.

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 10>I think the question really is, now that prices are

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 10>kind of backing down, what's the next step. Where are

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 10>things going? And if there are any indications that Israel

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 10>is going to launch further attacks against Iran or there

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 10>could be more retaliatory attacks from Iran, I think that

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 10>could definitely cause oil prices to go up, maybe another

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 10>dollar or so, but we'd have to get some really

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 10>strong indications that something incredibly major or explosive would happen

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 10>in order, I think for oil prices to really spike

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 10>higher and stay higher for longer.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 6>Ellen talk to us about the demand side of the equation.

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 4>Before October seventh, that seemed to be the driver here

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 4>of global oil prices, you know, the ups and downs

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 4>of global demand.

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 6>What are you seeing in terms of demand these days.

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, what we're looking at is, you know, we did

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 10>see some pretty strong demand in the United States. Gasoline

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 10>demand is not quite as strong this week is maybe

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 10>it was in previous weeks. But when we go, you know,

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 10>looking forwards the summer, I think we're expecting to see

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 10>pretty strong gasoline demand over the summer in the US.

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 10>And also what's going on with Asia, especially with China,

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 10>because they're big drivers of demand as well. And I

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 10>think we're seeing some reluctance in Asian buyers to buy

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 10>oil or to order cargoes more cargoes from the Middle

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 10>East because there's a concern about whether it we'll get there.

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 10>And that's actually fueling demand for American oil, which could

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 10>actually either push up the price of WTI or keep

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 10>it a bit more elevated as opposed to coming back

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 10>down as the geopolitical premium goes down. So I think

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 10>that it's kind of a complicated picture and does depend

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 10>obviously on the economic situation globally. If we see some

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.639
<v Speaker 10>kind of more recession, we could see demand falter. But

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 10>right now it looks pretty strong heading into the summer.

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.959
<v Speaker 2>Which brings us back to the supply picture. Ellen. So

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 2>when you were talking about stronger action from Iran, the

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 2>elephant in the room is closing the straight or Her

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 2>moves where a lot of oil passes through, and that

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:11.400
<v Speaker 2>would be a huge line in the sand for oil

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 2>and would cause unbelievable spikes in the oil price. What

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 2>is Iran's capacity to actually do that because they've gotten

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of a good gig under President Biden in terms

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 2>of you know, their exports are up, right, their oil

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 2>exports are up. Do they really want to mess with that?

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 10>Exactly? And I think the only case in which Iran

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 10>takes any kind of action to shut the streets of

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 10>hor Moos to shipping. And so remember what we're talking

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 10>about is this is a small passage and Iran, you know,

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 10>could do this in number of ways. It could either

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 10>block it with ships or it could fire missiles off

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:50.440
<v Speaker 10>of nearby land. That could make it impossible for ships

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 10>to traverse this area. But for them to really take

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 10>that action means that Iran has nothing to lose, because

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 10>if Iran cuts off other ships abilities to go through that,

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:03.880
<v Speaker 10>then you're going to see the US Navy cutting off

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 10>Iranian ship's ability to come through the streets of Horror

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 10>moves as well. So Iran really has to have nothing

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 10>to lose, and right now it's got a lot to lose.

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 10>It's got a very thriving contraband oil industry going on.

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 10>It's making a lot of money, and as oil prices

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 10>go higher, even though Iran has to sell its oil

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 10>added discount, it's going to make more money, so it

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 10>doesn't want to mess with that. In fact, it probably

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 10>wants to sell more oil to you know, to its

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 10>buyers as opposed to less. So if Biden starts to

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 10>mess with that by enforcing sanctions harder, then that could

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 10>kind of stir things up and make things more tense.

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:47.840
<v Speaker 10>But right now, you know, unless Iran's oil industry is

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 10>shut down, it's to say, if it's oil industry was destroyed,

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 10>then it might have the motive to do that because

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 10>it's got nothing to lose, but it's.

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Definitely not yet. I mean just from perspective, Like in March,

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 2>I runing oil output hit a five year high, about

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 2>three point two five million barrels of oil a day.

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 2>And the conversation we were having earlier with doctor Ariel

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Cohen was if sanctions are lined up heavier on Iran

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 2>so they can't export that much, that opens the door

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 2>for Russia to start selling a little bit more as well.

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 2>So talk to me about how you balance, as someone

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 2>in the Biden administration, how do you balance those two

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 2>where how do you do that?

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 10>I think the Biden administration also has to come to

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 10>terms with the fact that it's price cap policy on

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 10>Russia is basically a failure. It's not really stopping Russia

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 10>from making oil on it from making money on its

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 10>oil industry. So yes, if Iran has less to offer,

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 10>then Russia can fill in those gaps. But I think

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:49.479
<v Speaker 10>there's also the issue of Russia's participation in the OPEP

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:53.239
<v Speaker 10>plus output cuts, and if come June oil prices are

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 10>still in the nineties, then there's gonna be a lot

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 10>of practic on OPEK to raise its output and Russia's

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 10>part of that, and Russia would love to sell more

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 10>oil obviously, so this whole whole thing is a very

0:30:06.480 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 10>complicated dance. Meanwhile, the Biden administration wants it's going to

0:30:09.880 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 10>want more oil on the market because it doesn't want

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 10>high gasoline prices going into an election year. So they

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 10>both want Russian oil on the market. They just don't

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 10>want Russia to make a lot of money off of

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 10>that oil. But it seems like they can't really have

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 10>both of those things.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Torsten Slock over to Pola Management put out a chart

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 4>today that for me, who's not a oil expert, was

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 4>really illuminating what you're saying.

0:30:33.040 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 6>The US is the biggest.

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 4>Oil producer in the world, with about twelve point nine

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 4>million barrels per day. Why don't our friends in Texas

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 4>and Oklahoma just start pumping out more oil?

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:42.719
<v Speaker 7>Here?

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 10>Great question, and the answer is that this is not

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.560
<v Speaker 10>the same oil industry as it was in twenty fifteen,

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 10>twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen, where it was all pump pump, pump, drill, drill, drill,

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 10>put out as much as you can, don't think about,

0:30:58.600 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 10>you know what, you're selling it for the return arns.

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 10>It's just growth, growth, growth. That's not the oil industry. Now,

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 10>there've been a lot of consolidations. Oil companies are running

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 10>very lean games. They really cut out a lot of

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 10>of you know, fat during the pandemic, and they're at

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 10>a point where they don't have to produce producers, they

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 10>don't have to grow in order to satisfy you know,

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 10>their uh, you know, their their shareholders. They're they're sitting

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 10>very well. Sometimes, you know, they may drill more wells,

0:31:30.440 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 10>but it's become much more expensive inflation. We all think

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 10>about oil prices causing inflation, but what we don't often

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 10>think about is how inflation acts on oil production. And

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 10>so everything costs more to drill now, and so they

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 10>may see a benefit in not expanding drilling so much.

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 10>They are increasing production by getting more out of every well,

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 10>but there isn't necessarily a benefit to drill, drill, drill

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 10>when uh, you know, they've got a good thing going

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 10>right now, and it's becoming more difficult to drill more

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 10>in terms of the prices, the supplies and all of that.

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 10>So uh, and there's there's less incentive for them to

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 10>do that at the moment.

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 2>You're all oil learn on you, Paul, Right, okay, all

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 2>oil nerd for you. The US produces a different type

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 2>of oil than the oil you're going to get in

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 2>the Middle East.

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 6>Sweet cruit.

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, John Tucker, we were just talking about you yet.

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 5>Just real quick boil b O.

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I l great function all.

0:32:32.880 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 5>The different types of oil. It's like sixty different types

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 5>of oil, and.

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 2>All of them have different qualities and you can use

0:32:38.160 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 2>them to refine into different kind of products. Uh So,

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.480
<v Speaker 2>even if the US was producing like forty million barrels

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 2>of oil day, which obviously is like not possible, it

0:32:46.840 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't make up for the loss that you'd see in

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 2>some of the Middle Eastern countries because they have the

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 2>heavier stuff, which is really good for other products. So

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.000
<v Speaker 2>that is your Alex Laine of the morning. You are

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.560
<v Speaker 2>so welcome, Ellen, Thank you very much. Ellen Walld a

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 2>president of Transversal Consulting joining us there. There was also

0:33:02.960 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 2>an interesting article, I think it was in a journal

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 2>that US oil executives finally have a direct line to

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.720
<v Speaker 2>the White House that like now their calls won't be

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 2>rejected and they actually can go and talk to the

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration.

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 6>So I that's why it's interesting.

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, Like a few years ago, when first time

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 2>gasoline prices went to five dollars. I asked a CEO

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 2>of a major oil company in the US, has the

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Biden administration called you. He's like, not even tried. Wow, yeah,

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 2>but now that may be changing a little bit.

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 6>So yeah, I would think. So we get star oil

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 6>and gas industry as long as well as we need

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 6>the green stuff.

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.520
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Play and

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:56.840 --> 0:33:56.959
<v Speaker 7>Here.

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 4>When we get back to geopolitics, front and send yet again,

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Aaron David Miller joins his senior fellow at the Carnegie

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 4>Endowment for International Peace, joining us in Washington, DC via

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 4>that thing called Zoom. Aaron, talk to us about kind

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 4>of how you view the Iranian response the Israeli defense.

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 6>Over the weekend. Here where do we go from here?

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 11>No, I think it's a story. Thanks for having me.

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 11>What I would describe as the good, the bad, and

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 11>the ugly. I mean, the good is easy at Israel's

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 11>technical mastery of air defense backstop by the United States,

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 11>it's military aircraft and air defenses by the Europeans, the

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 11>French and the Brids. And not surprisingly, but I think

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 11>in an unprecedented fashioned by kiirg states who participated in

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 11>this Middle East air defense alignment of radars and intelligence,

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 11>which is in precedent. There's never been a Middleast war

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:59.320
<v Speaker 11>where the at least the Israelis received that kind of support,

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.799
<v Speaker 11>including oak and so word from the Jordanians who downed

0:35:01.800 --> 0:35:05.240
<v Speaker 11>a number of drums. That's the good news. The bad

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 11>and potentially ugly news is number one in a real war,

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 11>and I think the Iranians actually telegraph this and calculating

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 11>and calibrated it so that they wouldn't prompt a massive

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:24.760
<v Speaker 11>Israeli response. In a real war, the Iranians would probably

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 11>launched thousands of missiles and drone drones. That's number one.

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 11>Number two, you have new rules established now. I mean

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 11>it was thirty three years, been thirty three years since

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 11>any Arab state attacked Israel directly. That was Saddam Hussein

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 11>in ninety one, who launched forty three scud missiles. Then

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 11>Prime Minister Shamir was persuaded by the Bush first Bush

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.280
<v Speaker 11>administration not to respond. But you now have new rules

0:35:53.080 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 11>between Iran and Israel, established an a rivalry and for

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 11>which there's no solution. So we're now forced to deal

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 11>with the cruel realities that we're best going to be

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 11>managing this and trying to contain it. The Israelis have

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 11>made it unmistakably clear. I think that they intend to respond.

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 11>The timing and the scale of that response, I think

0:36:18.320 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 11>is still very much up in the air. Maybe they'll

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 11>look for a calibrated response that reinforces what has clearly

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:33.800
<v Speaker 11>been obvious, which is Israel's technical mastery and superiority over Iran.

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 11>But there's no guarantee, of course, once you go up

0:36:36.520 --> 0:36:40.239
<v Speaker 11>the escalatory ladder that Iron won't respond. Then then you

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 11>raise the issue Balla. You know, that's kilometers away, that's

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 11>not hours away. There's Balla lunch, missus will It's not

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 11>gonna take hours to get Israel and they got a

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 11>lot of them.

0:36:51.560 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Aaron, this is a pretty grim picture that you're painting

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 2>at this point. What are the chances that that's how

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.720
<v Speaker 2>it's going to play out or is there real ability

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 2>for President to President Biden to diffuse this.

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 11>You know, diffusing would mean meeting Iran's and Israel's core requirements.

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 11>I'm not predicting regional war, which would lead to dramatic

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:21.480
<v Speaker 11>spike in oil prices and probably plunging financial markets, and

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 11>a degree of instability in the Middle East has never

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 11>experienced before. It's a matter of managing and containing, that's

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 11>the question, because there's no solution to deal with the

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 11>fact reality that Iran is a nuclear weapons threshold state.

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 11>There's no real solution to deal with Iran's proxies. That's

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 11>always been management issue, whether these are shelling international shipping

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 11>or seeing shippers to go around the Cave of Good Hope,

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:52.800
<v Speaker 11>which is additional thirty five hundred miles, which raises rates

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 11>and interferes with the global supply chain. There are no determinative,

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 11>comprehensive answers to any of this, and if we need

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.560
<v Speaker 11>to complicate it even more, you have an Israeli Amas war.

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.879
<v Speaker 11>Although the Israelis seem to have scaled down their ground

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 11>campaign in Gaza, that carries so many uncertainties, including the

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.120
<v Speaker 11>fate of one hundred and thirty four hostages, thirty of

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 11>whom Israelis believed were either killed in captivity or died

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 11>on October seventh. Their body's taken to Gaza to trade

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 11>for Palestinian prisoners. So, you know, I wish I could

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 11>make it happy. But again, I'm not predicting we're going

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 11>to a major regional war. But I guess my takeaway

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 11>here is it's going to require a degree of restraint

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 11>from Iran and Israel, and to a certain degree, some

0:38:46.080 --> 0:38:50.280
<v Speaker 11>diplomacy from the Biden administration, particularly with Ralis Aaron.

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 4>Do we have any clearer picture today than we did

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 4>on October eighth? What really the end goals are for

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:00.360
<v Speaker 4>Israel here? What would be a victory.

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 11>A victory, I guess would be three things. Number One,

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 11>Hamas would be not as a political force, but as

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 11>a military force, would be undermined and destroyed, so it

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:19.400
<v Speaker 11>would not be in a position to pull off another

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 11>October seven. Israel would kill the senior leadership responsible for

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 11>the October seven attacks, and the redemption of the hostages.

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 11>If those three things were accomplished, that would be I

0:39:33.239 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 11>think you could put that in the victory category. Although

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 11>the price of victory, the price of victory is something

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 11>that needs to be factored into this, particularly when it

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 11>involves the exponential rise of Palestinian deaths and the humanitarian catastrophe,

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:56.920
<v Speaker 11>catastrophic starvation. Samantha Power, the AID Administrator, even used the

0:39:57.000 --> 0:39:58.240
<v Speaker 11>words several days ago.

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 7>Famine.

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:05.439
<v Speaker 11>So I'm not sure the Israelis can accomplish those three

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 11>things right now, six months.

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:08.319
<v Speaker 7>Into the war.

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:13.320
<v Speaker 11>There's no indication, right they have not killed the senior leadership.

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 11>You've got a truly tragic situation with respect to hostages,

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 11>particularly the women hostages. And you have a situation where Hamas,

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 11>probably out of their thirty thousand fighters, have at least

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:33.720
<v Speaker 11>ten thousand fighters that remain. So I think we're talking

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 11>here again about a lot of uncertainties, and I just

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 11>don't see a sort of determinative ending where Gaza becomes

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 11>secure and stable, the Israelis in the Saudis normalized, in

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 11>the Middle East remains as converted into a happy conflict place,

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 11>or everybody's getting along with one another, all.

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, erin thanks Lott, we really appreciate it. Aaron David Miller,

0:40:59.160 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Senior Fellow at Carnie Endowment for International Peace, is standing

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 2>by and then or thank you for joining us. I

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 2>have to wonder then, you know, as an investor, how

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 2>do you It just means we're going to be very

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 2>sensitive to any kind of headline that's going to cross,

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 2>which is maybe what we're seeing in the market sort

0:41:14.800 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 2>of right now, and it's going to make the overall

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 2>data that we see. I wonder how much more relevant

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:22.960
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be when these headlines can be very effective.

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:26.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it seems like, you know, just to date, the

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 4>market is kind of powered through all of this Middle

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:36.040
<v Speaker 4>East tension, much as it has the European geoconflict in Ukraine,

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 4>seems to just generally bypass it and focusing on, you know,

0:41:40.440 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 4>maybe a little bit more local issues, I eat, central

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 4>bank policy, corporate earnings, so maybe a day to day

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 4>basis that might be totally from this. But if you

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:51.239
<v Speaker 4>look at this market really since October, which is you know,

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 4>kind of the low of this market, you know, s

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:56.400
<v Speaker 4>and p up about twenty five percent during that time here,

0:41:56.520 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 4>So despite all the geopolitical tensions around the world, much

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:02.919
<v Speaker 4>much hotter than I think anybody would like to see,

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 4>this market is moving higher.

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apples, Spotify,

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:42:14.040 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, be

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal