WEBVTT - 50-Plus Lessons From Smart People

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovik. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Things are opening up in

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:33.559
<v Speaker 1>some parts of the world. We're certainly seeing it in

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Uh UK Prime Minister Borg Johnson says

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he remains confident that England's lockdown will end on June

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. We're seeing things move forward. We know that

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>there are still, though some tough situations in some of

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the emerging parts of the world. Yeah. According to Bloomberg

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Vaccine Tracker, at this rate of vaccination is going to

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>take more than a year to get the entire world

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to a place that would be a comfortable level to immunologists.

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot immunity, all right, so let's get to it.

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Dr i los Bata Black with back with us. He's

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>our clinical professor of medicine and why you land gown.

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>He is on the phone in New York City. Dr

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>lsbad are nice to have you here. We were thinking, God,

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>there's so many things we want to ask you. But

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>our David Weston caught up with Dr Anthony Fauci this

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>week at the Bloomberg Business Week Live event and he's

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>like kind of questioning whether or not we're going to

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>need a booster. Hi, guys, Happy Friday. So just to

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>clarify in terms of vaccines, because I certainly you know

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 1>in the hospitals, we do have our little sticker that

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>says we're vaccinated, so that's not a totally crazy idea.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And just again to clarify if you're vaccinated, if you're

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>with other people who are vaccinated. CDC says no mask

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>requirement needed. Insider outside, there still are some businesses who

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>will say you should wear a mask. Hospitals, healthcare facilities,

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>so you know, respect where you're going, because people were

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>individual businesses and facilities may say even with a vaccine

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.559
<v Speaker 1>we want you to wear a mask if you're vaccinated,

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're with someone who is not vaccinated, you know,

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the risk is lobano zero would be kind to our mask.

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Think of the Yankees, right, they were vaccinated as several

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>players and administrators, yet they recovered virus from their nose

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and screening, so low risk but not zero. And certainly

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're not vaccinated, yes, please wear a mask and

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly think about getting vaccinated. Um In terms of boosters, Uh, yeah,

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we measure antibodies and and certainly for six

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>months or so, those antibodies are high, but they do

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>seem to drop down, and we're not totally confident about

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>T cell immunity, so it is likely at some point,

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe in the fall, we will need booster shots. And

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of course the question is will we need booster shots

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that are designed for some of the new variants that

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>are coming out. Are you guys planning for boosters at

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>n y Landown? No? No, at this point, we really are.

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Vaccines are distributed to us as everyone by the state.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Those usually come in through the federal government, so they're

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>distributed to the states and then given out to the

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>individual facilities. Uh, will you go back and explain T

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>cell immunity versus antibodies, because I don't think the late

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>person has has a grasp of what that means. And

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I certainly don't mean Grol knows because you asked questions

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 1>about this, so you know, for just in terms of

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>booster shots, we have many vaccines. We give out mumps,

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Musles rebell a to kids, hepatitis, influenzas, shingles. You know,

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>we we do. Over time can lose antibodies and therefore

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>potentially be susceptible, so we do. We do give booster shots.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>T cells are a little harder to measure. T cells

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>are the memory cells. They're the ones that when the

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>B cells that make antibodies, and those antibodies, for example,

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>like in the moderna vaccine or fights or you know,

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the messenge our name makes the spike protein to body says, hey,

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the spike protein we don't recognize. You form antibodies, and

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>so when the real covid comes in, your body fights

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it off right away. Now, those antibodies are around for

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>at least six months, we think, both with infection uh

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and and the vaccine, but over time they drop. We

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>do think other cells called T cells or memory cells

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>still will be able to UM call up those antibodies

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>with a little bit of a delay. The actual memory cells,

0:04:29.839 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>those T cells to say, the spike protein or covid

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>are harder to measure. We do have some tests for that,

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not widely available UM and I think most people

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you know would say that's good, but we want to

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>give a booster to make sure the antibody levels remain high.

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the most secure way. But I think we're learning

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>that even if your antibodies drop, you'll probably be okay.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>We're all going to go to at some point like

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of the antibody tests, like to get an idea

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of kind of where we are, which that data collection

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>help us in understanding more about the COVID vaccine. So

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not widely doing that now, that's you know, not inexpenses.

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>People who have had a shot of antibodies. You can

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:14.559
<v Speaker 1>order a antibody to spike protein. I mean, if someone

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>really they have some immune issue, they're not sure they

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>really formed antibodies. We're not doing that because that's another

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>layer of costs on top of things. When you do

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>order a routine I g G. Covid antibody. It's usually

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>for people who have had an infection, and those usually

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>stay positive for six or eight months, but often they

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>do drop down and patients are like frustrated, Oh my gosh,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I went through COVID and now I don't have antibodies.

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>They probably still have some protection the T cells, but

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we do encourage them to get vaccinated. Dr les better.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>What's a realistic way for us to think about, just

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>in the last thirty seconds, how this is going to

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to play out over the next couple of years. Is

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it going to be just a yearly shot like we

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>get with the flu shot and then that's that's it.

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna We're gonna do that. It may be. I

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>think we have to see what happens in India and

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world Brazil, if there are widespread

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>infections as there are in low vaccination reach, much higher

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>risk of mutant variants, and we may need to develop

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccines every year to those mutants if they can escape

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>our normal vaccine. I think we have to wait and

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. But unfortunately it's a possibility. So why

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.279
<v Speaker 1>some people say there's really no going back to normal

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 1>because the world has changed, Because of the virus. Doesn't

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>mean things won't reopen up, but it's going to be different.

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we can just get it with the blue shot.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, I can. I can work with that. Dr

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and Les Pater have a good and safe weekend. He's

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>clinical professor of Medicine at n y U Lango Medical Center.

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>On the phone in New York City. This is Bloomberg

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. What a great week, a busy one.

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Another great new issue of the magazine, something Business Week

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>has done before. The how To issue is back, bigger

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and better than before, because along with it the actual

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>issue is a Bloomberg Live event called appropriately so the

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Bomberg Business Week, five days of virtual life programming, bringing

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the magazine to life a different vertical every day. Here

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>with the recap Bloomberg Business weekend. To Joie Webber in

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio, You've had a really killer week.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>It was great, and you know, we tried to when

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 1>we were thinking about this, we wanted to pair it

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>with the magazine and basically bring the magazine to life

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in a way that we had never attempted to do before.

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>So we took the sections of the magazine and basically

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>um them days around them, and then there were little

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>things like the back page, which we call the last

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>thing became a thing that we did every day, and

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>so it was just a fun experiment. And UM, We've

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of great guests. We had so much

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.800
<v Speaker 1>great content in the issue from UM, from the newsroom

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and outside of the newsroom even UM to do all

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>these how two stories, So I'm very satisfied with how

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it all came together. Well, let's stick on the live

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>event for for one second, because there was so much

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>great stuff from that this week, Sol and I'm wondering

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>when you think about the names who you want involved,

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>how you come to those conclusions, how you design it,

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and how you think about those themes. Well, it really

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>starts with the themes of the day, right. So we

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>started with a business and industries day and we really

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted to delete into companies there, and then we we

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>did tech and innovation. It was like, who would you

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>want to talk to on a tech and innovation day? Well,

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Kathy would would be a great place to start, right,

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>So UM, so we ended up having you know, all

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of these things kind of come together perfectly, and you know,

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just starts with us making a lot of asks

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of people. And you know, the other thing that that

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I think really made the event be especially special, can

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I say that especial? Is that it with this combination

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of live things, some of which were making news, with

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>things that we had put prior energies into um and

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of a reflection of what we do in

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the magazine every week. We have the news stories and

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>we have other things that we put that are still

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna make news, but they required some some future planning,

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and so you get this little marriage of the two.

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And I really liked how how that came together in

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a fent. I thought that that was specially and unique

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and uniquely business Week. Yeah, those some of those pieces

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>were just so much fun. Whether it's making a movie

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>franchise right, or making the best chicken parmi on or

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it was just they were and you know, just to

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 1>give you a sense of how Justin lynn Win is

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>what you mentioned there, and he's the director of The

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Forthcoming Fast and The Furious uh nine and he's directed

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>more than a couple other ones. And that started Brett began,

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>who is the story of the editor, who is the

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>mastermind of the issue. He and I several months ago

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 1>started having just weekly video calls with one another to

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 1>kick ideas around, and we're talking like that wasn't like

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>January or February we started this and I had just

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up watching um Star Wars stuff, I think, And

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I said, what would it be like to do how

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to make a franchise that doesn't suck? Right? Like that

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars stuff right now is so good, but we

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>all can b that the movies were not as good.

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And I said, you know, let's go to Disney and

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>let's ask them how do you make Star Wars not suck?

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.839
<v Speaker 1>And Disney politely declined in that last a couple of

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of other asks, um and look fast and

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>furious that it has such a cult following. I think

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that cult following thing is a thing that we infused

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>throughout the issue as well. There's several other ideas that

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>hit on that note, and it speaks to like, you

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you get a rabid fan base and you get to

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>make that movie as long as you want to make

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that movie. Yeah, exactly, I love it. Joel, what were

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:35.719
<v Speaker 1>what were some of your favorite how twos in here?

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Like what did you come away with that that you're

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>going to do differently? So there's there's an art to

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>all the how two articles and that you want to

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>surprise people and give them something actionable that they that

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't have otherwise thought of. Um. And so there's

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>there's some charming ones in here, um, how to build

0:10:56.520 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a business online business? You know, only fans. I'm not

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be starting a business, not only fans. But it's

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>most surprising thing was that people are starting businesses that

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to do with what you would think it

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>would be about. A woman's basically has a whole new

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>lease on life and she's transitioned out of personal training

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in person to do it all there. And so I

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:20.840
<v Speaker 1>just think that for all the bad stuff in the

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>world right now, and we've all been through plenty, there's

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>this sense of optimism that I think some of these

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 1>are rooted in of like can you make aspects of

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>your life better? So I know that's a roundabout answer

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>for you, um, but you know, it's all it's all there.

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean one of the ones that I personally did,

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed somebody at NAZDAC and I said, you know what,

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>what's made you a better manager? And she said, well,

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>outside of my job, I have this personal board and

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I have different archetypes on this personal board, and I

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>meet with these people one on one and I've had

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this kind of structure in my work professional life for

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>years and it's brought you know, it's it's brought success

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to my life, my work life. And I just thought

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that was so phenomenal that you could, you know, outside

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of what you're doing during your day job, that you

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>can put a structure on on on yourself that helps

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>improve your how you look at work and career. I

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like certainly the Arc of the Week and also

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>every magazine, what I think is so great is you've

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.839
<v Speaker 1>got serious stuff that's on the economy markets, but then

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>you can go and there can be something on you know,

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>an alcohol or making the best burger, or there could

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 1>be somebody like Deep October who's teaching you about kind

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of how to deal with how to meditate. Yeah. So,

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know I should also mention that, you know,

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>we had all this live programming through the week multiple times.

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser was a mixologist and mixing cocktails. So she

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>got some good she got some good kids. You know,

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty embarrassing at it. I hope that you know

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>her cocktail game for if anybody's going to Carol Master's

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 1>house this summer, like, I hope that there's some mean

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>cocktails coming. Enjoy. Enjoy. Yeah, there are a couple of

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:06.160
<v Speaker 1>times where she left, you know, she had to leave

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the show early to go and you know, quote unquote work.

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>So there's a surprise and delight element. And I think

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that's what we try and do in the magazine always

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is give you stuff, news that your you need. We

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we want to take you in on big stories that

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you're only going to get from Bloomberg, but we also

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>want to surprise and delight you with some other content

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to follow this stroll. I have no idea, but I

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>leave it. I leave it to you all. But you know,

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a new issue next week, right. We always do,

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're often planning things way out into

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the future, and this was sort of the embodiment of that.

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean to see what we did online. If you

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen it, go to business week dot com uh

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to see all the videos. Follow us on social you

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>can see all those like It took months to pull

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this off, and huge kudos to everybody involved that at

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg for helping it all come together. When do you

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>started planning the next one to? Oh? Now, yeah, I

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>think we'll do a little odd. Yeah, I mean I

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>love your two dollar bill. So that one just so

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 1>everybody can hear because it might be relevant on Friday.

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 1>This dates back to when I was younger, slightly younger,

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>not that much younger, but slightly younger. Go to the

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>bank on a Friday, Uh, buy them out of two

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>dollar bills and that's what you're going to tip your

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>bartender with and it will be twice as much as

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the person next. But it's already got me thinking about

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>what I'm going to submit for you for next year. Okay, alright,

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>pressures on. Well, you can p good one after here

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see that way you're not on the spot. Well,

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the cocktails that I'll be making at my desk afterwards,

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>you do not have to tip me. I'm just gonna

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>say this time, I haven't gotten to get into two

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar bills, so you're you're gonna be light on a tip.

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>So have a great weekend. It's a good week, Bloomberg

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Business Week nditor Joe Webber. Go to Bloomberg business Week

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com check out all the amazing content and the

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>new how to issue. You're listening to Bloomberg. This is

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the Big Take, the best Boomberg's in depth original reporting

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>from around the globe. Well, we actually make sure we do.

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>As the Economy covers is what kut. The data kind

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>of broken down a bit. It's fun to becoming more

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and more expensively, to be looking at the shifting billion

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars for their own entry levels. There's been ways of

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>immigration that have faced a lot of resistance, a lot

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of color behind the scenes, and a great untold story.

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>How did Bezos really come out on top? As the

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>cover says Jeff wins, he always seems to win the

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Big Take on Bloomberg Radio. Well, the Big Take definitely

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>caught our attention today. It's also one of our most

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>read stories on the Bloomberg about how world dominating super firms.

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>To him, they are getting bigger tech here and more Chinese.

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Tom or like his chief economist at Bloomberg Economics, and

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>he joins us on the phone from Washington, d C. Tom,

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 1>first of all, this is chock full of data. Charts

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is an interactive experience. I encourage everybody to check it

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>out at Bloomberg dot com. Take us through how you

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>put it together, the analysis that you did to come

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to these findings. So what we've tried to do to

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is take a kind of grand sweep through thirty years

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of corporate history. We targeted the top fifty listed firms

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and then we pulled data on their

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>financials and their market cap from the Bloomberg terminal and

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>ran a bunch of analysis. And when you crunch the numbers,

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>it tells you a number of stories. So there's a

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>story about a transition from West to East, the rise

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Chinese mega firm. There's a story about UM,

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the fall of big oil and the rise of big

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>tech UM. And of course there's a sort of a

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>bigger story about the big getting bigger. Go back to

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and the top fifty firms in the world, where they

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>had a market cap of about five percent of global GDP.

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>If you look at that number now it's close to thirty.

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a big change. And listen, we talked about inequities

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in our world at general. In general, you know, time

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>between individuals by we're seeing it also happening within the

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>corporate community. You just laid it out with that stat Yeah,

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and of course the too a related, right. I mean,

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>if you think about, um, we think about the biggest

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.400
<v Speaker 1>firms getting bigger, we also think about the entrepreneurs who

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 1>created those firms getting richer. And so the dynamic between

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the big getting bigger in the corporate sector and the

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>rich getting richer in society at large, these two trends

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>are intimately connected. Well. And it's interesting you guys write

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to the advantage of superstar firms and joy became all

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the more glaring during the pandemic, and it's it's why

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we saw an Amazon just take off like a rocket

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. Yeah, I mean the pandemic, Carol, I mean,

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>as you know, it was the disaster for the mom

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and pop store, right, the corner store, which relies on

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>foot traffic to drive revenue. They had a terrible time

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in America and around the world. But the biggest firms

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 1>in the world, the Amazon's, the Google's, the Netflix, the facebooks,

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>they will almost they have a business model which is

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>almost tailor made for the pandemic. Right, Um, so the

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>pandemic gave them sort of kind of compounded their advantage.

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Where do taxes come into this, because there's a striking

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>graphical representation in here that shows the median effective tax

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>rate of dwindled to only seventeen percent last year, at

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 1>the same time profit margins heading in the opposite direction,

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>staring from seven percent to over that same period of time. Yeah,

0:18:35.560 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think when we think about it, Tim,

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>there's been this kind of this grand sort of theme

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in the global economy over the last forty years, starting

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Reagan Revolution, which has really tipped the balance

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in favor of corporations. Tax rates have been cut, and

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>multinationals have become better kind of shifting their profits around

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>some times in sort of fairly dubious ways to kind

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of maximize the benefit of low tax regimes. Um. And

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I guess, I guess the question which comes out of

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this research and some of the news flow from Washington,

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.679
<v Speaker 1>d C. And Beijing, is well, are we now at

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>another moment for the global economy? Is the kind of

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the Reagan Revolution which tipped the balance from workers to corporations?

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Has that now when its course? And were we at

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of a new period where tax rates rise,

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>where minimum wages why rise, and the balance starts tipping

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more towards workers. What's also interesting, and

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>we kind of said that coming in or in the

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>introduction Tom about the rise or the China rising. You know,

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we continue to see that and that is not just

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their you know, impact on manufacturing globally,

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's just the companies they are creating are behemoths. Yeah.

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>So we've got um Ali Baba, the kind of the

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Amazon. UM, we've got ten cents the Chinese Internet giants, UM,

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a number of Chinese firms which have kind of muscled

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>into the to the top ranks. UM. And of course

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 1>there's an interesting dynamic UM there as well, because the

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 1>people who say we need to regulate firms more, right,

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>corporations have become too powerful, we need to regulate them more. Well,

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 1>because of the dynamic between the chat between China and

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States, UM, the giant firms have a pushback

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>against that argument. Right now. We're already starting to hear

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the the US superstar firms say, well, if

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you tax us more, if you regulate us more, if

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you kind of impede our dynamism, then that's going to

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>make it harder for us to face off against these

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>new Chinese humans. Tom, I want to end with just

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 1>very briefly, something that that you talked about a little

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.439
<v Speaker 1>earlier on Quick Take Today, and it was capex and

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>capex spending as as a portion of a company's spending

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>and as as it relates to how many employees it

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>actually has to hire and what that means for human capital. Yeah,

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So if we go back to the to the ninety nineties, Tim,

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>and we think about the dominant firms, then it's industrial

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>firms like General Electric, its energy companies like x On,

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and they do a lot of capital spending and they

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>hire a lot of workers. But if you fast forward

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to and you think about the dominant firms, it's tech

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>platforms like Alphabet or Facebook, which can really scale without

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 1>adding a lot of workers and without doing a lot

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>of capital spending. And that's a really important shift in

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the way the economy works, and something also central banks

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and tax authorities need to keep in mind. It's a

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>really good point, important point to finish one. Hey, Tom,

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. It is the Bloomberg Big Take.

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>Check it out at Bloomberg dot Com tom or Like.

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>He's Chief Economs of Bloomberg Economics from Washington, d C.

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm road Marco journal now. But you let me drive? No,

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:16.400
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, dru home honey please, I'll do the riding

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 1>drivel lets me. I want to drive, Just drive baby,

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the question. Try. This is the drive to the Globe Community. Thanks.

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll drying us down on Bloomberg Radio this Indeed, everyone

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>just about ten and a half minutes until the closing

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>bell on this Friday, so let's get to it. And

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us with a check on the Drive to the

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Close is Katerina Simonetti. She is senior vice president and

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>private wealth advisor at Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management, and

0:22:57.680 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>she's back with us. She joins us today on the

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>phone from Philadelphia. Katerina, how are you good, Carol, Thank

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you for having me on the show. Well, it's nice

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to have you here. Uh. We were kind of laughing,

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>not laughing, funny, not funny about what a crazy week

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been. I mean, listen, the markets have just been

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of all over the place, volatility, We've had inflation

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>concerns this week, in particular that we had a big

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>media deal on Monday, we all had to wrap our

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>head around remembering that it was just Monday that it

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>was announced, and then you had crypto plunging on Wednesday

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>bouncing back. It's under pressure again today, retail earnings. There's

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 1>just a lot being thrown at investors, and it does

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>feel like we're taking a little bit of a breather today,

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.479
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of lighter volume. How do you see it,

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>What is really driving the trade, particularly among equities? Well,

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Carol certainly had crazy week, and I would you know,

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>even expand on it and say, you know that we've

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:58.440
<v Speaker 1>had you know, crazy six months. And naturally, when you

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of just take the whole market performance into consideration,

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>from the performance of your you know, the your your

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>average investor, the optic that we have seen, you know,

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.959
<v Speaker 1>has been happening so quickly and to such scale um

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that we've been calling for some type of a correction,

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>for some type of a pool bag in the market

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time. And we started seeing these poolbags,

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, as early as February March. We first saw

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the ritation out of the expensive areas and then you know,

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>eventually out of small caps, you know, and it seems

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to be like that this type of market that there's

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be hidening volatility. But at the same time,

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>all of this is happening within the larger context of

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>economic recovery and this bool market that we believe that

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we find ourselves in, so in a bull market, but

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>also ready for a correction. I mean, when you're thinking

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 1>about a correction here, what are we what are you

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>actually expecting? So tim bull markets tend to last for

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a while, Like we have to number that boom markets

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>lost for years and the one that lasted post financial crisis. Well,

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that's right, that that's that's exactly right. That's a perfect example.

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>And in any given year over the last you know,

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>several decades, the average provement, the average correction, you know,

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>has been around fourteen per set. So we think that

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>it is absolutely reasonable that we will have, you know,

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>some type of a correction that could be anywhere from

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, let's they tend to fifteen percent. But we

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>also don't believe that it's going to be long lived.

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're not looking at the recession, we're looking

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>at the volatility. We're looking at market correcting itself. Teach

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>is extremely healthy. You know, at this point in time,

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, but it also comes with buying opportunities, you know,

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for investors. I mean, this is a great opportunity to

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>rebalance portfolio and to take advantage of you know, two

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of um, you know, some of this great positioning in

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>this market. So where are the problem pockets of the

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>market in your view? Well, really the problem packets are

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the overpriced securities. You know, this is kind of something

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>that is very easy to recognize in this market when

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>we look at the evaluations, when we look at multiples,

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>when you know, we look at the expected earnings, you know,

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we see those trouble children, you know, we we we

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:21.400
<v Speaker 1>know that when when a stock or a certain sector

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 1>went up, you know so much in the short time

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>frame that it is reasonable to you know, to expect

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>some type of a sell up. And we're seeing a

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of rotation. We seem that this type of rotation,

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, is the theme going on. Right you know,

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 1>what we see right now is you know, opportunities and

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like rotation almost back into reopening themes, right

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>something like retail, consumer discretionary or you know, semiconductors or

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>syntag um. So you know, we just have to be

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, conscious of this overpriced market areas and specifically

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 1>from the portfolio, what does that mean or sitting tight?

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:00.800
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean? Well? I and to pare back,

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, so when we're looking within the portfolio design, right,

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we're looking at certain sectors of our

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>portfolios that have been so inflated because you know, particular errors.

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's be technology for example, right, you know, if your

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>normal allocation to technology is act, you know, and all

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden is twice that, you know because of

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.320
<v Speaker 1>such big appreciation. Now would be a good time to

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>rebalance and also really carefully evaluate that that portfolio. Because

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>not all sex is created equal. You know, if we

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>take that sector for example, you know, if we have

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>to look at earnings and we have to look at

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>forward looking projections, this is very much a stock picker's

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>market in my opinion. I got to ask you about

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin because it is down again more than ten percent today.

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 1>It has been a wild week for the cryptocurrency decline

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week and one day of more than before

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.719
<v Speaker 1>it bounced back. How do you watch bitcoin as an

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>asset in terms of how it could the risk off

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>trade from that could actually go into equity markets well

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>like Kim. It's certainly is a difficult area to address

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>because there have been so much volatility, and I think

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that in a large scheme of things, the fact that

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>we recently just recently started as really recognizing, you know

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that that part of the market as an asset clause

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, in itself, is a really big development um.

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think investors going into you know, specif investments

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>have to expect higher volatility. That's just a reality. So

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>favorite investment right now, I would say that going forward,

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>favorite areas are banks, materials absolutely, because you know, when

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, the one area that is not

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be a surprise for anyone are going to

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>be higher rates. And maybe not right now because absolutely,

0:28:49.000 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we all know it's not a surprise that

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve first and foremost is committed to seeing this

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:58.600
<v Speaker 1>economy all the way through recovery. But higher rates are coming.

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is just atrel We just don't know,

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, how long it will take us to get there.

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And banks and you know sin set, you know, it's

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>also you know, kind of just an area correstitude. They're

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>positively quarrelate that you know, with a higher rate environment,

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the same with materials. Uh. The other area

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of the market that would really like you know, quite early,

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>any high quality, reasonably priced areas like healthcare. Healthcare is

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a perfect example. You know. We see a lot of

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>exciting opportunities. So if a client comes to you right

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>now and and wants to get into the markets um

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and and move over to you, and they have a

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>large amount of money, how do you advise them timing wise? Exactly, tim,

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that that we just we have to take

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>into consideration consideration where we are um and with this

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>boom market right but at the same time, with this

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>great degree of volatility, we would advise them to dollar

0:29:56.840 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>cost average into this market like over the a year

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>over I just even shorter time frame. Let's say you

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>take a shorter tram time from like six months, because

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to miss this bloom market either. We

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>don't want to take such a long time to get

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in that we're missing all of those appreciation opportunities. But

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>with expected volatility, I think that the ty here is

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to be very selective when it comes to security selection

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and extremely disciplined, you know, with going into this high

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>quality areas and kind of you know, nice high quality,

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>well balance for value will do the trick. All right.

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna leave it on that now, Katerina, thank you

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>so much of a great week in Katerina Seminetti. She

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>is Senior vice president Private Wealth Advisor at Morgan Stanley

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Private Wealth Management. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com,

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News