WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - April 29th, 2022

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news as it happened. Bloomberg

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messier and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Hi, everyone, welcome to the weekend

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week. Big tech earnings abound over

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the last few days. It was a busy week. We

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>had Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta, Apple, Amazon, and oh yeah, Twitter,

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that one too, although that one kind of boring.

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I gotta be honest, Who cares? Who cares? Who cares?

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Elon Musk making it official his forty four

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar bid for the social media platform, it was accepted,

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>though there are still lingering questions about the deal's financing,

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>who will ultimately take over a CEO, the political implications

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>for the company, and what it means for Twitter's user base.

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what we cared about when it comes to Twitter,

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>not the earnings, but this whole big deal. We'll have

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>more in just a moment. Plus a pair of iconic

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>retail brands going in opposite directions. We're going to talk

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to Mattel CEO on a possible sale of the company,

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and then profile a former Levis executive who stands on

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>pandemic related policies. Well, it led to a very public

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>departure and this week's cover story on China's COVID zero trap.

0:01:14.360 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>We start this week with the man and the story

0:01:16.680 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that just keep on giving. We're talking about Elon Musk

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and his forty four billion dollar deal to take Twitter private.

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Every day there are multiple stories on this now his

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>claim on the future of the First Amendment and content

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>moderation on the platform. That's the story we want to

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>get into, and that's exactly what Bloomberg Business Week editor

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Joel Webber and Features editor Max Chafkin talk to us about.

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>There's free speech, which you know, I think I think

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>most most people, especially most Americans kind of can kind

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 1>of have some idea on and agree on. And then

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.279
<v Speaker 1>there's this kind of like political notion of free speech

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>where um Republicans have started using that phrase and the

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>right started using that phrase to complain like about a

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>very specific and maybe narrower set of issues than one

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that like a constitutional scholar will be you know, inter

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>sit in, and that is what Elon Musk has gravitated

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>towards and that is why he's currently being celebrated, you know,

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>on the right. If you if you turn on UM,

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, conservative talk radio or consertive television or whatever,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is front and center. They are celebrating this.

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>They're presenting this as you know, uh, Trump and his

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>allies are going to be back on you know, back

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.239
<v Speaker 1>on social media. And it's like, you know, the resurgence

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of Trump is UM and Musk, I think, is embracing

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that and is trying to take advantage of it, both

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>as a potential business strategy for Twitter, you know where

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 1>where just just like you know, Fox News came along

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and presented itself as kind of like a right wing

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>news network to CNNs, Like, I think that's kind of

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>what Musk is going for here. It also has potential

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>business implications for Tesla, which of course is UM you know,

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>has a huge valuation and is trying to reach a

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>different sector of consumer. Right now, let's talk about trucks,

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>because uh, Elon's got a few that he might need

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to sell to some people who might lean a little

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>bit more seen they well, right, so you know, we

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we had that on the cover of last week. You know,

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>there is another cyber truck coming that. Now I think

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>this is like a pretty savvy move. It's unclear it

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>will work. And of course Tesla stock went you know

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>down at the end of yesterday. But um, but I

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>do think so. So Teslas sold a lot of cars

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to kind of wealthy environmentalists, right, there's there's sort of

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a limit to that market. And Americans buy a lot

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>of trucks. And of course trucks are are much bigger

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in kind of red states they are in blue states.

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen Musk. This is not a new strategy

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>for Musk. We saw him, you know, moving Tesla's operations

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>from California to the Austin area and and talking about

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that in ideological terms. And of course they launched the

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the cyber truck, you know, at an event um a

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:51.279
<v Speaker 1>few weeks back in Austin cyber rodeo. Very much embracing

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of Texas culture. And I think that's

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the jury is out on whether this will work.

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, Ford of course has a very strong, uh

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>track record, you know, selling trucks that the f one fifty,

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>as we wrote in our story, is you know, it's

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>like one of the most successful consumer products of all time.

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>But but I think musk is trying to take advantage

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of these political dynamics to find a niche well, and

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>so are you. So is it basically right now? You know,

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>his businesses, I think you write about his business interests

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>influencing his political ideology. Is that what we're seeing right now? Yeah?

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I think with Musk, um, those two things are very

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>closely connected. This is somebody who who has founded a

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>series of companies that do business with the government. When

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you do business with the government, you know, primarily SpaceX,

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but of course Tesla got got a huge amount of

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>government loan lending from uh in two thousand nine after

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the automotive crisis to benefits from these v credits. And

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>when you do that, when you're in that business, you're

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:44.359
<v Speaker 1>you have to be political. So during the you know,

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the Obama era, must kind of cut this figure as

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this you know, stakeholder capitalist, this kind of green technocrat. Um.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, during the Trump era he shifted a little

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>bit back to the to the MAGA. You know, it's

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.279
<v Speaker 1>a little more MAGA friendly and now um, you know,

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>with the right kind of research, it with it looks

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>like in the in the United States, of course, U

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are likely to take you know, one, if not both,

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>houses of Congress. I think he's he's making a political calculation,

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's also happening against a backdrop of an really

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 1>important market to Tesla, which is China, and the company

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>successfully built its factory in Shanghai. A couple of nights ago,

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>we saw tweet from none other than Jeff Bezos, which

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>I think surprised a lot of people because Jeff Bezos

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:24.679
<v Speaker 1>is pretty quiet when it comes to Twitter and this stuff.

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>He uh implied that this could be perceived as a

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 1>conflict of interest, as you right, when Musk's Twitter has

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to decide how to treat Chinese back to disinformation, how

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is this being played in Republican circles? When Republicans in

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the past have gone really hard after Disney for its

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>presence in China, Nike, the NBA, and more, Musk has

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>been pretty much teflon on this issue, despite um, you know,

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>China critics having having plenty to criticize here. Um. I

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>think for one thing, I think a couple of things

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>going on. One is, look, he's a successful you know

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>industrialist and and people like that. And and as a result, UM,

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>people are more forgiving of some of these um, you know,

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>connections or hypocrisies or potential vulnerabilities politically. UM. I also

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, conservatives have been very eager to

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of embrace this like made in America thing. You know. Musk,

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.119
<v Speaker 1>despite having a huge factory in China, also employs, um

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, lots of people in the United States. So

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's it's it's a little bit complicated.

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I also want to say, you know, on the tweet

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>from Bezos, of course he's got his own political agenda, right,

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.239
<v Speaker 1>He's competing with Musk also for government contracts. He owns

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this rocket company, so it's totally in his interest to

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, slime you know, competitor on Twitter, um,

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, as part of that. And we should probably

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>also say that that he sort of immediately backed off.

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>That was Bloomberg Business Week features editor Max Chafkin and

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the editor of the magazine, Joe Weber, coming up from

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a technological innovator to a financial one. We dive into

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a new book on Wall Street Legend. We're talking about

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the late Great Jack Bogel, you're listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:06:53.440 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovik from Bloomberg Radio.

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I was never in this business to build a colossus,

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 1>because I told people many times I was too stupid

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to realize that if we gave investors the best deal

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I would ever get, I'd be building a colossus. And

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>so here we are on the way to market share

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of mutual fund assets, something that no one has ever

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>achieved anything like before. There are legendary investors and financial

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>innovators that, over the decades still stand out. Warren Buffett,

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, on value investing, fidelities, Peter Lynch amid the

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>rise of the mutual fund industry. And then there's the

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>man whose voice you just heard, the late Jack Bogel.

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>That from a Bloomberg interview back in. Bogel's idea of

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>index investing was not only well ahead of its time,

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it was considered radical when he introduced the strategy at

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>his then f jeling Vanguard Investment Group back in the

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies. Hard to think of Vanguard's fledgeling, but back

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:08.239
<v Speaker 1>then it was different. Bogel's life and his lasting impact

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>on investing and the financial industry are explored in a

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>new book that's excerpted in the latest issue of Bloomberg

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Bloomberg Intelligence Senior et F analyst Eric Beltunus

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is here to break down the Bogel Effect, how John

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Bogel and Vanguard turned Wall Street inside out and saved

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>investors trillions, and why it took so long for the

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>concept of indexing to catch on. This is why where

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the story has a little more drama than

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>people think. You know, a lot of Wall Street books

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>are about the rise in the fall, and let's Bogel.

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like he just kept, you know, slowly rising.

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>But this guy lived in oblivion for about five years.

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And the reason it took so long, given what people

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>today think is an obvious trade, why not Why wouldn't

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I own the whole market? For three basis points is

0:08:52.600 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that he operated outside of the system. He just did

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the Vanguard refused to pay brokers, and at that time

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it just there were no r i as it was

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>just brokers, and so if you did not give them

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>money or loads or commissions or kickbacks. Um, they were

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to sell your funds, So he had to

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>get people to leave that system. He also had to

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>try to explain to people that an index fund was

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>not average. It sounded average. He had a lot of

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>people trying to position it that way, so he had

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to go above and beyond to try to explain, hey,

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 1>this is not average. So those two things made it

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>take a long time. Also, the barguard mutual ownership structure,

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>which lowers fees the more assets it gets, took a

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>while to lower fees because the assets weren't quite there yet.

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So as the assets started to come in the nineties

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand's, that's when the fees really started to

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>dip down. And once they got below twenty fifteen basis points,

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>it was a done deal. And that's part of the

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>point of making the book. Also is the index fund

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>was a kind of a lucky byproduct. The real core

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>nucleus of all the things we're seeing today that we're

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>from Bogel and Vanguard are the mutual ownership structure, UH

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and the structure of Bogel home self. I must say

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 1>he was a different kind of guy, and so I

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>think those two things really are what I explore the

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>most in the book. I think I've I've talked with

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:09.599
<v Speaker 1>you about this before, but I remember one of my

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>first shows that I did in financial television and financial broadcast,

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was a mutual fund show, and we would

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>always be like, Okay, you gotta have a Vanguard fund

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>on because it was a low cost, no cost option.

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>And our host was like, why would you pay fees

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>when you can go to Vanguard and get the same

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>strategy and pay no fees. I mean, he really was

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 1>iconic in terms of his impact on this industry. Yeah, absolutely,

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know it is it is just a

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>modern miracle that you can just get the whole stock market,

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole bond market, and at this point international stocks

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>for under six seven basis points a six before you

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 1>now can be gotten for three or four basis points,

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>basically frictionalist exposure. And that's a big theme in the book.

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I had this well, is that I think, you know,

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Bogel's called the father of the index fund, but honestly

0:10:57.160 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like you should be called either the father of

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>low cost investing or I like this phrase addition by subtraction.

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>What he did over forty five years was just remove

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff that kind of gets in the way,

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>be it management, fees, brokers, turnover, trading costs, human emotion.

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, taking all that out and you get the

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>total market with its almost frictionalist exposure. And that's why

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a smash it. And it's not just Vanguard, which

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>takes in a billion a day. The rest of the

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>money goes to Vanguard esque index funds, even from Fidelity, right,

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>the fierce rival of Vanguard. That's how fidelities flows come now,

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>just through those low costs inex funds. I mean he totally.

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>The whole industry now basically is governed by Vanguard's mutual

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>ownership structure, which nobody copied, but yet they have to

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>copy it in a way. Eric, when I was reading this,

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:45.959
<v Speaker 1>I thought back to this article I read in The

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic about a year ago by Annie Lowry. It's entitled

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>could index funds be quote worse than Marxism? And it's

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 1>actually a quote from analyst at Bernstein. They're called passive

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>investing worse than Marxism. I see you on the zoom

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>laughing right now about this. What do you make of

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>criticism of passive investing or index funds such as this. Yeah,

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and most of it's laughable, I mean the Marxism. Somebody

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>else said that they're worse than the misuse of antibiotics.

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're I've heard, I've heard it compared to

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the Salem which trials people go crazy with this stuff. Look,

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, all people have done is

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>moved from closet indexing. If you look at the Fidelion Magellan,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>it largely owns Apple, Amazon, Google, right, and they've moved

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 1>to actual indexing and saved about seventy basis points in

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the process. Everybody owned the same stocks, they just now

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>own it in a different format. And indexing isn't really

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily totally passive. Russell want thousand's different than the SMP.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>The SMP, by the way, is run by a human committee,

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>has some rules. It's just more rules based active. So

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I try to get rid of that, that line between

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>active and passive. What really is going on is low cost.

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And I promise in the book that let's say indexing

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a thing, and Vanguard had their mutual ownership structure

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and only active mutual funds. In my opinion, they would

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>be the biggest active fund manager six times over because

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>they would have been bringing a gun to a knife

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>fight over and over. It's the low costs, that's the thing.

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think anybody who writes these articles would

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>really have too much for a problem. The one thing

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we got to watch for is voting power. Vanguarded Blackrock

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>now own about seven eight percent of all stocks, and

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>so we have to wonder how are they going to

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they don't vote in a way that

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is different than their shareholders or misuse that power. So far,

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they're fine, but we have to watch that.

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>That's probably the one thing I would think about watching.

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>What about Bogel Deman, I'm surprised to hear about how

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>spiritually was um just interesting? Yeah? Look, uh, I asked

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>everybody interviewed this question, why is has nobody copered banguards

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>much to ownership structure? They said, well, because people go

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to Wall Street to get rich. They don't want to

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>drive a Volvo. And then the other question, I said,

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>well then why did Bogel do it? And they're like,

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Good questions. So a whole chapter is

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>called Explaining Vogel, where I try to explain the ingredients

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that went in to create this very unusual person. I

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>almost feel he was miscast uh in this industry, but

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe the industry needed a miscast in this era to

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of bring it to a more fiduciary place. So

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>he was perfectly cast in away but definitely not your

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>average Wall Street titan. And again I explore that in

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a whole chapter, uh to try to explain to you

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>how he happened. That was Bloomberg Intelligence senior et F

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>analyst Eric Bolchune is his new book. It's out. It's

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>called The Bogel Effect. How John Bogel and Vanguard turned

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to Wall Street inside out and saved investors trillions. It's

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>out now still ahead on Bloomberg Business Week, Why a

0:14:33.120 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>successful retail executive chose to speak out against a series

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of COVID related health policies and how it ended up

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>costing her a lucrative role in the c suite of

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a six billion dollar company. This is Bloomberg broadcasting from

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the financial capital of the world, Bloomberg eleven Frio in

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>New York to Washington, d C. Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>one O six one does San Francisco, Bloomberg nine sixty

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to the country, Sirius XM jendal one nineteen and around

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the globe the Bloomberg Business app and Bloomberg Radio dot com.

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. Well before she quit in February,

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Say was a brand president at Levi. She had

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>risen to the rank of chief marketing Officer after more

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>than two decades with the Danna maker, and she was

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>seen as a potential CEO candidate. Then along came COVID

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen with more. We turned to Bloomberg Business Week senior

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>writer Claire Suteth Claire, good to have you with us,

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>A really great profile of somebody who I think wasn't

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>a household name until she made such a big splash

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>leaving Levi's what happened to Jennifer Say, Yeah, well, you're right.

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So Jennifer Say was not a hostle name, but she

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>was very high up that le. She'd been at the

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>company since, worked her way up to chief marketing Officer,

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>which is what she held at the start of the pandemic,

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and then during the pandemic she was actually promoted to

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it's called brand president, which took her basically right below

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the CEO in line to maybe one day become CEO UM.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And so she's sort of the person that Levi's who

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>has for years been crafting the brand image reputation. So

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever you think of what do you think of Levi Jeans,

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Levi Jeens, that's what she does for a living. UM.

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Some of that was, you know, inserting Levi's into the culture,

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>holding parties at Clichella, that sort of stuffs to make

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it cool, and another part of it was really helping

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>be you know, she's part of the executive team that

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>crafted Levi's response to social issues. This company was very

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>progressive for a very long time, actually, dating all the

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>way back to I think in like n it was

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the first company to make genes for women, back when

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>women really weren't supposed to even wear pants in public

0:16:55.400 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>right now different you would not UM. It racially integrated

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.239
<v Speaker 1>its factories in the forties, like long before there were

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>anyone's requiring it UM. And then it was actually the

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>first Fortune hundred company that extended benefits to employees name

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>sex partners. UM. So it has this really long history

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and legacy of these progressive chances UM in the past,

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I would say, like decade or so, it became a

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more public about them. It has you know, come

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>out in favor of marriage equality, transgender right. Um, it's

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>very publicly UM sort of promoting UM, you know, fun

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>control for the parks and school shooting and and say

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it was actually part of the team that came up

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>with all of this, um, and then came the pandemic. So,

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so tell us what happened, because right it sounds like

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>every company has a line in the sand when it

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 1>comes to what they're willing to talk about publicly, especially

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:58.719
<v Speaker 1>when it's UM some some major issues, and you know,

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>some things are comfortable. It's some things they're not. What

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>happened and it wasn't just her, it was her and

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>also her husband. Yeah, so you know, I think Levy's

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a really thorny issue. UM. And

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, this has been a two year long

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>internal struggle between Advised that only became public when she

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>quit in a very dramatic fashion and gave a bunch

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of television interviews about it. UM. But basically what happened

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is during the pandemic, UM to say and her husband

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>living at the time, they lived in San Francisco UM,

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>and she became I would say, very upset about a

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>number of different UM safety precautions that was put in place,

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>both at the sort of San Francisco city level, California

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 1>level UM and and just what was happening at the

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>country at large. So we're talking about lockdowns masks her.

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>The topic that she talked about most frequently and was

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the most passionate about was UM school reopening, getting kids

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>back in the classroom UM. And I think now in hindsight,

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>nearly everyone recognizes that schools were shut down consists considerably, like,

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, way too long in certain parts of the country.

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>There were many European countries that opened quite early. UM.

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>She was advocating for this in like March, when no

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>one knew what was going on in the depth of

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. This is a great week. And I have

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>to say, once I started reading the story, I couldn't

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>put it down. We we've run out of time, so

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna recommend everybody check out the story online. But Claire,

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like, it's incredible how it plays out. And I

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like this gets to where a lot in your

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.159
<v Speaker 1>story about you know, when a company can deploy its

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>political muscle really hard to get it right. We're seeing

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a play out with Disney and some other companies. Tim

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it also goes through says political transformation. I mean, this

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 1>is a woman who had posters of Obama hanging in

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>her dining room and supported the candidacy of Elizabeth Warren,

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a fan of Trump, and now she's on Fox News. Yeah,

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an incredible story, Claire, and you really get

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>into all the d tale. So as we said, we

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend people check it out in the magazine online

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>or on the Bloomberg terminal. That was Bloomberg Business Week,

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Senior writer Claire Suddeth, you're listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:13.159
<v Speaker 1>Up next, another quarter, another earnings beat for the toymaker Mattel.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>But that's not the only reason the stock got to

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>bump this past week. That's right up next, we're going

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to be hearing from CEO Inn Cries about reports of

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a possible private equity buyout. This is Bloomberg. You're listening

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes.

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovy from Bloomberg Radio. But Tell America's second largest

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>toymaker is in preliminary buyout talks with at least two

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 1>private equity First, we got that news this week. Yeah,

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that news emerging ahead of the company reporting first quarter

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>results that beat Wall Street estimates once again, the retailer

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>buoyed by Barbie and hot Wheel cells that defied the

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 1>usual seasonal slowdown. All right, to break down the firm's

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>latest results and find out more about that potential for

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.919
<v Speaker 1>a multibillion dollar sale, we caught up once again with

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Mattel's chairman and CEO in non cries. This was the

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>highest first quarter we have on record, both revenue and profitability.

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Our momentum continued across the business with double digit growth

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in Bobbie, Hotwoods and Fisher Price. We have started the

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>second quarter with strong consumer demand. The Follier outlook is

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>also strong and we expect to grow market here. So

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>all in all, an excellent start of the year and

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 1>we're firmly in growth mode. And I think we highlighted yesterday.

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you guys have been on a tear if

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I look at you know, the share price in terms

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of the moves that you guys have been doing specifically, Um,

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>some would say and I'm going to push a little

0:21:47.800 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>bit that you're setting it up for a sale. Are

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you talking with people? Are there conversations going on? But

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't comment on the speculation. But we've been consistently

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>growing the company, UH, and this has happened over the

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.479
<v Speaker 1>last four years. You followed the story, so you know

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that we took our adjusted IBIDA from a hundred six

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>million dollars in two thousand and seventeen two over a billion,

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and guided for yet another growth this year with higher

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>goals for three So this is not a one quarter situation.

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>This has been consistent delivery and execution on a on

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a clear strategy and a clear roadmap with Tracking Whale,

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and we are in a great position to continue to

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>grow the company. And I will point out that from

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the end of the stock is up almost so investors

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>have certainly noticed that performance in those changes. On one

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>element that you've had to UH deal with just not

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>just over the last year, but over the last few quarters,

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to our inflationary prefer pressures on the supply chain. We've

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>spoken to you in the company in past quarters about

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>moves that you've made to try to make sure that

0:22:57.560 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>your supply chain remains intact what you've being do ahead

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>of time, but it doesn't mean you've been immune to

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>higher prices. Talk to us about the pricing power that

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you've had and how much you've had to raise prices

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:10.439
<v Speaker 1>and how consumers are being affected by that. Yeah, we

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:15.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, given the anticipated inflation, implementing pricing action UM

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>is one of the things we consider at times of

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of of inflationary pressures. Uh. We're not the only ones,

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 1>and it's not unique to the toy industry. Uh. And

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 1>this is something that we've done, like in the second

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>half of last year, and we expect to do that

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>again uh in the second half of this year. It's

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>important to say that when raising prices, we always keep

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>the consumer in mind, and we're being very thoughtful and

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>very strategic and remain strategic committed to maintaining the right

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>balance between quality and value for our consumers. Well, you

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>know what's really great is I mean, you guys have

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>some old iconic brands. We've talked about it with you before,

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Barbie, whether it's Hot Wheels. I mean, it's

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>just one brand after another. But then you have folded

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:04.960
<v Speaker 1>into the mix and embrace of all that is new

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>through alliances and partnerships. What is it that really drives

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>growth for you guys, What is it that you say, Okay,

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>this is top of mind, you know. In terms of

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the performance for the company overall, well, we've been growing

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>on the toy side of the company very strongly. We

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>expect further growth this year. We expect growth in the

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 1>second quarter and growth for the full year. We expect

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>our power brands to continue to grow this year, Barbie,

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Hotwells and Fisher Price, as well as American Girl, and

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 1>we expect to see strong growth in the challenging categories.

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 1>This is where we're not a global leader, but we're

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing tremendous momentum and growth in categories like action figures

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and building sets. So we are in a great position

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to grow in the toy side of the company. And

0:24:51.119 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 1>in addition to that, we're also seeing great momentum on

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the I P strategy. This is film, television content in general,

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>consumer products, digital experiences. And this week alone, we had

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.840
<v Speaker 1>two very exciting news to share. One is that we

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>partnered with J. J Abrams to produce the Hot Wheels

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:14.879
<v Speaker 1>movie that we're developing with Warner Brothers. JJ is one

0:25:14.920 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of the most prolific, respected producers of this generation filmmakers

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in general, is also a director and we're very excited

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to have him partnered with us on Hot Wheels. And

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in addition, we also announced or Warner Brothers announced at

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>CinemaCon the release date of The Barbie Movie, which will

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>be July one, three, And this film is shaping up

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>really well to be an iconic cultural event. We could

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>not be more excited with the creative, execution and vision

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of Great Gelwig, who is also one of the most

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 1>respected and prolific creative filmmakers of this generation. And an

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>all star cast with Margot Robbie, Ryan Gosling, Will Farrell Simulo,

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>America Ferra and many other you know, very strong talent

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and exciting cast. So expect something very special, uh from

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the Barbie Movie as well as Hot Wheels, and as

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>well as other twelve films that we have in development,

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I want to go back to something

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that you said about challenger categories areas where you're not

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>actually the top of the category. Um, do you think

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you can become the leader of the pack in those categories?

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>In action figures, for example? What will it take? We

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing tremendous growth and momentum. In the first quarter,

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:43.239
<v Speaker 1>we grew by fort in the core and this is

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>on top of six six percent in the same quarter

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>last year, so we're lapping a very strong year with

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>forty in in the first quarter. Within that action figures

0:26:54.920 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>actually grew by sev so uh shoes momentum even by

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>our own properties such as Masters of the Universe, as

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>well as third party franchises that we manage on the

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>toy sides such as Jurassic World, Minions and Light Year three,

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>big theatrical releases that are coming up in the second

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>quarter and will further amplify growth in this category in

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>addition to what we do already. So this is an

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>area where we see an opportunity to position Mattel as

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a partner of choice for the major entertainment companies and

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:38.640
<v Speaker 1>owners of big important franchises to leverage our platform, our

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>capabilities on the design side, supply and supply chain, and

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>commercial execution and really grow these franchises and manage them

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>as evergreen properties that are not just dependent on the

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>movie launch. But this is where we can bring out

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:59.879
<v Speaker 1>capabilities and manage franchises as evergreen I P. And continue

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>great value for our partners. Well, you know, I think

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>about what you said about IP strategy film TV. You

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>guys are already do with the Barbie movie. You're gonna

0:28:07.040 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>do it, as you said, with Hot Wheels, And I

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>do think about, um, what's the best way for you

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.439
<v Speaker 1>to leverage all of that? Is it by doing it

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>as a standalone and just partnering and you know, creating

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>alliances with media and entertainment companies, or is there some

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, going back to our first question,

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>some kind of more significant link up with a specific

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>media house Disney for the matter, you know, that would

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>make sense and really create some incredible leverage. Our approach

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>has been capitalized in that we don't take capital risk

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in investing in movies um, and that capitale approach applies

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>also to our manufacturing strategy. What we do do on

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the content side is with partner with the best the

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>best in their respective field. So we're partnered with the

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>best distributor as a major studio and the best creative

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>talent per genre, per project. And that gives us the

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>ability to do that at scale and develop multiple projects

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>at the same time and not be limited to UH

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>one or two movie movies coming out every one or

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>two or three years. So we can do it at scale,

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>work with the best people, per genre, per opportunity across

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 1>across the industry, and have multiple shots on goal with

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>incredible brands and incredible incredible franchises and still find the

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>right economic balance in terms of risk and reward for matail.

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Where our currency, our contribution is the I P the

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>franchises that we know, our expertise and know how of

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>those of those franchises, and making sure that we collaborate

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and and and bring our understanding and the nuance knowledge

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>of these franchises to the table and create something very

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>excited for exciting for insumers all over the world. All right,

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I'm I'm a little persistent, as you

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>might know, having re talked a few times. So go,

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>So you are firing at all cylinders. Mattel is firing

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>at all cylinders. And you guys have had what three

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:17.959
<v Speaker 1>consecutive years of dynamic certainly equity growth. Uh And like

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I said, investors are noticing. So some would say that

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>is a reason the top perhaps or at a prime

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>moment to sell the company. Others would say it's you know,

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you are talking about more avenues for growth. What would

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>it take to do a deal that makes sense? Obviously

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>shareholders of the board have to agree. But you know,

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is it just about price or is it about strategy. Well,

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>we're here to create shareholder value. We've been very consistent

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>about executing our strategy and always have our shareholders interests

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>as a north star. We have been doing it consistently.

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>We see a lot of runway for the company to

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:59.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow and to create more shareholder value. That's

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>our job, that's how focus, that's what we've been doing,

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and this is what we are looking to do going forward.

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a non christ chairman and CEO of Mattel. And

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that wraps up our first hour of the weekend edition

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. I'm Carol Masser

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Stovik. Ahead in our next hour, our cover

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>story on how China's campaign to wipe out COVID is

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>crushing its economy, plus the chief technology officer of Chipotle

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:27.240
<v Speaker 1>on strong earnings amid rising costs, and then our pursuits

0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>team reveals the secrets behind some of the world's most

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>expensive wedding bashes. We're talking millions and millions of dollars,

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>tens of millions dollars. This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Business Week inside from the reporters and editors who bring

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>you America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business, finance

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and tech news as it happens. Bloomberg Business Week with

0:31:56.680 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes, Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Plenty ahead in our second hour of the weekend edition

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week, including Chipotle's chief technology officer on

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the company's response to inflation, plus how to spend it

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty five million bucks in one weekend. It's actually not

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>as hard as you think. That's, of course, if you

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>have the right wedding planner and if you have the

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>million alright. First up this hour, this week's cover story

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the rising cost of China's COVID zero policy, and the

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>entire economics section of the magazine breaking down the ripple

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>effects and also questioning credibility of the country's coronavirus statistics.

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week Economics editor Christina Lynn Blad overseeing the coverage.

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>She and Business Week editor Joel Webber help with the

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>damage to China's economy and its people into perspective, Joel,

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with you, uh, take us into

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of the idea for the cover here and why

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to make China and its response to COVID

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>more than two years into the crisis. The focus well

0:32:57.040 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>China throughout the pandemic has to a COVID zero policy

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>where borders are closed and whenever there is a uh,

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, an uptick in cases, they meet that with

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a lockdown. That has basically not had to happen for

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>two years since Wuhan in the early days of the pandemic,

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but we've seen within the last couple of months o

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>macron driven cases have started to surge throughout the country.

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Really this came to a head in Shanghai, where all

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden the whole city was basically brought to

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>its knees uh. And what China has done since then

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is basically become even more more proactive and shutting down

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>cities and regions whenever cases start to tick up, and

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that will have profound impacts on the global economy um

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in addition to to China. And that's when we started

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to see this unfold and talk to our colleagues in Shanghai.

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>We realized that this is a much bigger story with

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>way bigger globe implications than than anything that we've really

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>seen in the China conversation over the last two years.

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 1>And that's when Christina's pulled all this up and we

0:34:08.320 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>started running with a bunch of stories. And Christina, you

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:15.720
<v Speaker 1>know what stuck out to you as we started spooling

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>up this coverage, um and and trying to kind of

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>like wrap it all together. What were the elements that

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to really focus on. Well, for me, a

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of it was the contrast of the fact that

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 1>when we were all stuck working from home waiting for

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:33.840
<v Speaker 1>vaccines to arrive, Chinese people, because they had been so um,

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, committed to stamping out the virus in the

0:34:36.520 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>initial phase, We're going to the movies, we're going to restaurants.

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Life had returned to normal in China in you know,

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>by the by the end of the beginning. And then

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>when I was looking now, I was saying, my god,

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:52.399
<v Speaker 1>it's this country is going through now what we all

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>already went through, because um it is committed to not

0:34:57.040 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>transitioning to a living with the virus phase because it can't,

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>partly because it has less effective vaccines that you know.

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think a lot of the world is

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:11.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of looking at China and can't understand the commitment

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to this policy. But I think we have to acknowledge

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the human cost would be really, really

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>large to try and to do a quick transition. And

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons is that China um has six

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.520
<v Speaker 1>m R and A vaccines in development, but not a

0:35:27.560 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 1>single one will reach the market this year, and they

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>are committed to not allowing foreign made ones UH to

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, use commercially. So that when you think about that,

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>this this staggering human cost that that China would face

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>if it if it did sort of open up and

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 1>start to live with the virus, it really reveals what

0:35:48.600 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a conundrum President g has there. And keep in mind

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>this is a Congress year. There there will be a

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>big gathering later in the year, and when we talk

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to our colleagues that it is all about stability, so

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>there will be no change of policy. They have to

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>stay the course because to do anything other than that

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>would to look like you made their own call. That's right.

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.319
<v Speaker 1>The political imperative is sticking with the policy. This is

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>all playing out on social media in a really fascinating

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>way in China right now. Traditionally social media has been

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 1>censored in the country, and a lot of that censorship

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 1>has actually come from the companies themselves. What's happening right

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>now in social media in terms of uh, this the

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>people of China pushing back against the government narratives. Well,

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>there's been this huge outpouring of resentment um about the

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>way the policy is being enforced. And also the fact

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:46.719
<v Speaker 1>that unlike most Western countries, China has not um done

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 1>stimulus to households, only to businesses so um. And also

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:55.360
<v Speaker 1>people are getting much more creative about avoiding sensors, human

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 1>sensors and censorships software. So one of the things we've seen,

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.879
<v Speaker 1>for example, is that these government hashtags that are used

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>to sort of you know, make pronouncements, well people are

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>hijacking them and actually using them to to sound off,

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, on government policies and have sometimes like ironic

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>messages like oh, it would be so terrible to live

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, you know, and people know when

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>people are saying things like that, what they mean. Another

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that we saw recently, which is really interesting was

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:31.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a six minute video that somebody made about

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.760
<v Speaker 1>life in Shanghai during the lockdown. They just pieced together

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:39.080
<v Speaker 1>all these sort of it's very moving um and UM

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and the sensors UM were quick to to find it

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and take it down. But people did things like they

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>loaded it back upside down, They loaded up mirrored versions

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of the video that because the software wasn't picking up

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>that this was the same clip, you know, and uh.

0:37:57.560 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And by the end of that same day they were like,

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.319
<v Speaker 1>ow many more versions of that video we're in on

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the internet. You know. Well, it's an incredible package of coverage,

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 1>including looking at Shanghai and ex pats and people may

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>be rethinking, um, their exposure to that part of the world. Christina,

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Bloomberg Business Week economicseditor Christina Limbled

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 1>and of course Joel Weber, the editor of the magazine

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to, Bloomberg Business Week. Coming up, Chipotle seeing

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:25.439
<v Speaker 1>robust growth with diners undeterred by price hikes. You gotta

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>get your burrito right too, and avocado. We'll break down

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the first quarter earnings with the company's chief technology officer.

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 1>That's coming up next, and this is Bloomberg. This is

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovik from Bloomberg Radio. Chipotle Mexican Grill's latest menu

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>price increases help boost comparable sales beyond analyst estimates. That

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>key measure rose nine in the company's latest quarter. Chipoli

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>still wants to expand its brick and mortar footprint as

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.760
<v Speaker 1>well as its digital reach. For more on the company's

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>earnings in its path forward, it is the threat of

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>COVID waynes here in the US. Carol spoke with Chief

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Technology Officer Kurt Garner. Our digital business wouldn't be strong

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>if it wasn't for the great culinary teams at Chipotle. Certainly,

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the launch of new Pliosada was very, very popular as

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.879
<v Speaker 1>our most popular protein that we've ever introduced, and there's

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of excitement now for people to come back

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and eat in restaurants and come to Chipole. You guys

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>have been able to You are one of the few companies.

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, as we go through this earning season once again,

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 1>there are some companies who can raise prices and keep

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 1>customers still coming back, and there's some that cannot. You

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>guys have been able to push through price increases to

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 1>combat hire food prices, hired labor costs. That helped her

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 1>out about this last quarter as well. Can you continue

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to do that though if needed? We're completely real ingredient company,

0:39:57.840 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 1>very much farm to table and are very affordable in

0:40:01.400 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of what we provide. Certainly, we hope we don't

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 1>have to continue to do this and that inflation and

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the other other pressures in the marketplace moderate or subside.

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:14.239
<v Speaker 1>But we're very happy with where we are right now,

0:40:14.280 --> 0:40:17.399
<v Speaker 1>and we'll continue to take a look at what's going

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 1>on across the business and across the landscape frankly of

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>our supplier network as we get through the rest of

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the year. So current is it's safe to say fair

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to say though that raising prices. Continuing to raise prices

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.479
<v Speaker 1>is always on the table if need be well. Again,

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 1>we're going to continue to investigate and look at what's

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>going on. I would never say that anything's on or

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 1>off the table permanently. We're a company operated organizations, so

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>we can move quickly as new data becomes available to us.

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And again we're hopeful that we're past most of the

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 1>acceleration that we've seen in terms of commodity prices. But

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to continue to be wise and how we

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.320
<v Speaker 1>run the business and how we consume that data. Recently

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>caught up with Jack Cartown. We talked about labor, we

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 1>talked about supply chains. What's the toughest nut to crack

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:08.800
<v Speaker 1>right now? I think for us, it's about continuing to

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to provide access to our customers, and when we do

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:15.959
<v Speaker 1>that and do that really well, we provide growth opportunities

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>for our teams. Um Certainly the last couple of years,

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 1>there have been a lot of challenges that we've all

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>had to face, uh and frankly adapt our business too.

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:29.080
<v Speaker 1>At the same time. Finding great real estate, continuing to

0:41:29.120 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>develop our people, innovating and food and technology are all

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the things that we're focused on right now as we

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to be an extraordinary growth company in this environment.

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 1>How's the supply chain doing. Our teams have done a

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>great job working with our suppliers. Certainly their stressed within

0:41:46.640 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the network. A lot of our relationships are very long standing.

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:53.080
<v Speaker 1>We've been partners for a very long time, and we

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>look at it in a partnership model of how we

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>can work collaboratively with all of our suppliers and vendors

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that they're okay as we're going through this,

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and make sure that we're okay and and stock and

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>able to provide the experience that we need to to

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>provide to our customers. But you know, we all like

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:12.959
<v Speaker 1>to mention it like there's some stress points, right, whether

0:42:12.960 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it's avocados or some different things. I mean, is it

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>getting more difficult, is it easy? Is it easing a

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit, or is it just kind of more the

0:42:20.440 --> 0:42:22.320
<v Speaker 1>same of what we've seen over the last couple of months.

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>It seems like we're getting to a point where it's stabilizing,

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>But uh, it's hard to tell what the next challenge

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>or shock to the system will be. Certainly the avocado

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>issue was more of a political one than it was

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a pure supply chain or agricultural challenge. Our suppliers are

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>continuing to face challenges with we all ingredients and with labor,

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:47.360
<v Speaker 1>so there are a lot of different things that go

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>on to that or go into that. But again, Carol,

0:42:50.239 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it seems like at this point we're starting to hit

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>more of a place where it's moderating, but we're going

0:42:56.160 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to continue to again be wise and sure that We're

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 1>agile and able to react to an even challenges that

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:05.280
<v Speaker 1>might come up. You know, Kurt, all of your management

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:07.560
<v Speaker 1>team always talks about the culture at the company, and

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 1>key to that culture is the employees. Those that in particular,

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 1>we see front and center center As customers talked to

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>us about the labor market, is that also moderating? Is

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that plateauing in terms of the stresses there and the

0:43:19.160 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 1>difficulty to find workers or pay up for those workers.

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We're really really excited that our labor situation right now

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 1>is the best that it's been in several years. And

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that's a result of the fact that we're a growth

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>company that's investing heavily within our teams. Of our general

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:40.120
<v Speaker 1>managers were internal promotions last year. UH, and that's some

0:43:40.200 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 1>power that we have as a company operated growth company. UM.

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Within three years, you can go from being a crew

0:43:47.080 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>member to running a Chipotle UH. And we just promoted

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a regional vice president who runs several hundred restaurants that

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>have started as a crew member. So that strong career

0:43:58.600 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>path and the opportunity that provide we, we think is

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a big part of why our staffing levels frankly, are

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:08.000
<v Speaker 1>in really good shape right now, Hey, one thing I

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:10.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask you, and and the Bloomberg Green Summit

0:44:10.840 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 1>is going on, and I caught up with the founder

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and head of Daily Harvest and they are big on

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:20.840
<v Speaker 1>organic farming and regenerated farming and really speaks to what

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>so many of the initiatives you guys are doing over Chippola.

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me about Cultivate Next because this is your

0:44:25.520 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to invest in those companies that align with your mission. Yeah,

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:33.359
<v Speaker 1>we're really excited about Cultivate Next UM and I've I've

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>said it earlier. We're a company operated, restaurant chained, so

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>when we find a new idea, we can be agile

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and pivot very quickly. We've got a very strong balance sheet,

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and we've got a great technology foundation. It makes us

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the ideal sandbox to be an accelerator for new technologies

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and new ideas. Since the announcement of the fun UH,

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 1>our expectations have been certainly surpassed in terms of the

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>interest that we're seeing the amount of a number and diversity, frankly,

0:45:02.400 --> 0:45:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of companies that have reached out to us to become

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 1>part of this UH. And and we're looking at this

0:45:08.120 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>across the business as ways to improve the experience of

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:14.520
<v Speaker 1>working within the Chipole That proved the experience as a

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>guest of Chipotle certainly down into the supply chain and

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:21.480
<v Speaker 1>our mission of cultivating a better world. We think there's

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good ideas out there looking for a

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:28.320
<v Speaker 1>space to show what they can do, and we believe

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that we're again a great platform for that type of ideation. Yeah,

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to hear the conversations around this. Certainly, moving forward,

0:45:36.800 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like more broadly out in the world. Hey,

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:42.479
<v Speaker 1>one last question, Kurt Um, you guys feel confident enough

0:45:42.640 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of your cap spend, your increase of stores,

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:49.840
<v Speaker 1>all of your missions at this point or do you

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like the outlook is a little murky and you

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:56.160
<v Speaker 1>might have to hold back. We're extremely optimistic. We're continuing

0:45:56.239 --> 0:45:59.959
<v Speaker 1>to grow. We're accelerating our new restaurant account this year.

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:03.880
<v Speaker 1>We're not even halfway to our goal of seven thousand

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:07.959
<v Speaker 1>restaurants in North America, and we're not at our goal

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:11.319
<v Speaker 1>of what we believe our average unit volumes will be yet.

0:46:11.400 --> 0:46:15.520
<v Speaker 1>So all of our growth strategies are intact. Certainly, our

0:46:15.560 --> 0:46:19.320
<v Speaker 1>staff in situation gives us a lot of comfitt confidence

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and optimist optimism that we're going to have the leaders

0:46:23.400 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of the future to help us run the company as

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:29.040
<v Speaker 1>we grow, so it's full steam ahead. That was Kurt Garner.

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:32.520
<v Speaker 1>He's chief technology officer at Chipotle Mexican. Grow still to

0:46:32.560 --> 0:46:36.320
<v Speaker 1>come on Bloomberg Business Week and organic food maker setting

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:40.239
<v Speaker 1>its sites even higher after achieving Unicorn status. This is

0:46:40.239 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg broadcasting from the financial capital of the world Bloomberg

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 1>eleven Frio in New York to Washington, d C. Bloomberg

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to Boston, Bloomberg one oh six one does San Francisco,

0:46:58.400 --> 0:47:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg nine sixty to the country Serious XM Chado one

0:47:01.920 --> 0:47:04.879
<v Speaker 1>nine team and around the globe the Bloomberg Business app

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business Week.

0:47:10.360 --> 0:47:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Green Summit took place this past week. It's where

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:16.320
<v Speaker 1>we check in on investors, companies, individuals who are paving

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the way for more sustainable and climate conscious future. That

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>includes the start up Daily Harvest. It counts Serena Williams,

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Flay, and Gwyneth Paltrow among its investors. It's a

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>direct to consumer organic produced vendor, and its latest funding

0:47:29.160 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 1>round pushed it past a billion dollar valuation and into

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Unicorn territory. I sat down with the CEO and founder

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Rachel Drury and chief supply chain officer Ricky Silver. We

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about with the government and companies can do to

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 1>help the organic farming space. People can vote with their dollars,

0:47:46.000 --> 0:47:49.840
<v Speaker 1>people can can put their their money where their mouth is. Um.

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:52.280
<v Speaker 1>But these problems have to be solved at the corporate

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and systemic level. Um. There's so much research that needs

0:47:56.760 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to be done on regenerative agriculture and um, you know,

0:48:01.520 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>agriculture and climate change that the government needs to invest in.

0:48:06.040 --> 0:48:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think about farm subsidies where um,

0:48:10.160 --> 0:48:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, soy wheat corn are where the government is

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:16.800
<v Speaker 1>still putting their money after all these years, and the

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 1>downstream effects of those investments, where if we took that

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 1>money and put it towards investment and research and regenerative agriculture,

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we would be in a whole different place. I'd also

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:29.560
<v Speaker 1>love to say there's some basic oversight and sort of

0:48:29.680 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 1>action of the systems within government that we can uh

0:48:33.719 --> 0:48:36.280
<v Speaker 1>push for. So for example, we were down an organic

0:48:36.320 --> 0:48:38.759
<v Speaker 1>week a couple of weeks back, um, and there's a

0:48:38.760 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>bill that right now is being pushed called the Continuous

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Improvement and Accountability Act for Organic that would basically just

0:48:45.080 --> 0:48:48.560
<v Speaker 1>ensure a twenty year backlog of recommendations and changes to

0:48:48.600 --> 0:48:52.720
<v Speaker 1>how organic is managed and overseen uh go into effect

0:48:52.800 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 1>or at least get reviewed. And that type of a

0:48:55.200 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 1>backlog is exactly why I think the farming community, the

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:01.280
<v Speaker 1>AG space hasn't been able to make more progress because

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>government isn't stepping up and even doing the fundamentals, let

0:49:04.600 --> 0:49:06.799
<v Speaker 1>alone the investments. At Rachel's talk, so you're saying there's

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:09.839
<v Speaker 1>a backlog of farmers who want to produce organically and

0:49:10.080 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 1>they just need to be signed off unimproved. More so,

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the oversight of the organic certification process

0:49:16.120 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>something that means a lot to consumers, right, you need

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to have trust in that. So there's a backlog of

0:49:20.640 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 1>recommendations that would make the oversight and the process of

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:27.319
<v Speaker 1>becoming organic certified or maintaining it. This is the Green Summit, right,

0:49:27.360 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 1>And so we're thinking about things that impact the environment.

0:49:29.719 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Why is organic farming? Why is regenerative farming? Which is

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>what you guys are focusing on. Why is this so important?

0:49:36.040 --> 0:49:39.239
<v Speaker 1>And part of understanding this is understanding exactly what regenerative

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>farming is about versus conventional farming. Absolutely, I mean, regenerative

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 1>agriculture just a level set is bringing our soil back

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 1>to a place where, you know, mother nature can do

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>what mother nature does. It takes a lot of hubris

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>for us as a society to to say like, oh,

0:49:55.040 --> 0:49:57.759
<v Speaker 1>we can do better than mother nature. We can you know,

0:49:57.880 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>use you know, fungicides and pesticides and fertilizers to do

0:50:02.320 --> 0:50:05.640
<v Speaker 1>something better. So it's kind of bringing agriculture, bringing our

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>soil back to a place where it can sustain human

0:50:09.080 --> 0:50:12.359
<v Speaker 1>life on this planet for future generations. Yeah. I would

0:50:12.400 --> 0:50:13.920
<v Speaker 1>just say the other thing that's really important to know

0:50:14.040 --> 0:50:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is that this is not new, right. Regenerative agriculture is

0:50:17.800 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 1>certainly kind of what farmers did wait way back when. Yeah,

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:23.239
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's about a holistic approach to as Rachel said,

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 1>both soil management and the farm management right, the people

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 1>on the on the land as well. Can we scale

0:50:29.120 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 1>it up? I mean, just looking at some statistics in

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:34.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of agriculture and what it you know, the contribution

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:37.399
<v Speaker 1>to the economy, but so much is done conventionally. Can

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:40.279
<v Speaker 1>we scale it up? Yes? I think that there's a

0:50:40.320 --> 0:50:44.280
<v Speaker 1>big misnomer that says, you know, organic agriculture and regenerative

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:46.880
<v Speaker 1>agriculture can't be scaled. But the truth is many farmers

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:49.520
<v Speaker 1>are doing this already, and so it's not to say

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:51.399
<v Speaker 1>that it can't be scaled. But why aren't more then

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 1>because the organic is what was the statistic you shared

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:56.959
<v Speaker 1>with me, So food that we act, that we eat

0:50:57.280 --> 0:50:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is one percent of US agriculture, only one percent of

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:02.439
<v Speaker 1>that is organic, so a really small amount. So why

0:51:02.520 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>can't So why aren't were doing it? It's expensive and unproven,

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and so you think about what the farming community is

0:51:07.440 --> 0:51:09.400
<v Speaker 1>looking for, right, we we do go out of our

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:11.279
<v Speaker 1>way to make sure we listen first. Right, We're not

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:13.320
<v Speaker 1>going to tell people what they should do. We're gonna listen.

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:16.000
<v Speaker 1>And what's amazing to see is in a more regional,

0:51:16.080 --> 0:51:19.280
<v Speaker 1>local way there are farmers that are building community around

0:51:19.320 --> 0:51:23.239
<v Speaker 1>applying these regenerative practices, improving to themselves that it makes

0:51:23.239 --> 0:51:25.279
<v Speaker 1>a difference. Right, And so how do you go to

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the farming community that is you know, Razor thin Margins

0:51:28.920 --> 0:51:30.880
<v Speaker 1>already and said we need you to spend more to

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:33.920
<v Speaker 1>invest This might take five ten years to you know,

0:51:34.000 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 1>get to the outposts you need. That's where businesses and

0:51:36.719 --> 0:51:40.080
<v Speaker 1>government needs to step in and incentivize that transition, and

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that's really where we play a role. Right. So we

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 1>have a belief that if everybody eats more fruits and

0:51:45.120 --> 0:51:48.279
<v Speaker 1>vegetables every single day, that this is something that is

0:51:48.320 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 1>objectively good for humans and objectively good for the planet.

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 1>But not all fruits and vegetables are grown the same way,

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and they have to be grown in a way that

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:57.560
<v Speaker 1>gives back to the soil that that puts us all

0:51:57.600 --> 0:52:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in a in a better position. Um So, giving those

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:05.000
<v Speaker 1>farmers a hand and saying that we will help support

0:52:05.000 --> 0:52:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you through the three year transition from conventional two organic.

0:52:08.920 --> 0:52:12.240
<v Speaker 1>That was Daily Harvest founder and CEO Rachel Dorry, along

0:52:12.280 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 1>with Chief Supply chain Officer Ricky Silver at the Bloomberg

0:52:15.440 --> 0:52:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Green Summit. Check out the full conversation that Carol had

0:52:18.120 --> 0:52:20.440
<v Speaker 1>You can do that at Bloomberg Live dot com and

0:52:20.520 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>one other note. Daily Harvest also launching its own version

0:52:23.120 --> 0:52:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of plant based meat, Rachel revealing that touring our discussion,

0:52:26.400 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>we made some news. You know what's different about it

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:31.520
<v Speaker 1>what it's grown from the ground, not in a lab

0:52:31.680 --> 0:52:36.560
<v Speaker 1>on a meat tree. Plants, you're just gonna have to listen.

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:38.719
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have to go and check out the full conversation.

0:52:39.280 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week coming up, behind the

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:44.800
<v Speaker 1>scenes of the most lavish weddings money can buy. This

0:52:45.000 --> 0:52:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:52:58.280 --> 0:53:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg. Quick to Tim Stinovik from Bloomberg Radio.

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Planning a wedding weather for yourself or your kid or

0:53:06.840 --> 0:53:08.680
<v Speaker 1>anyone else. You can kind to say, it's among the

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:11.759
<v Speaker 1>most stressful social activities on the planet. But what if

0:53:11.800 --> 0:53:14.479
<v Speaker 1>your reward or job for doing so was, let's say

0:53:14.600 --> 0:53:17.879
<v Speaker 1>a six or perhaps a seven figure page check, would

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that kind of help take the edge off? Probably be? Probably,

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:24.399
<v Speaker 1>it's still a very stressful job. Well, Bloomberg Pursuits team

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:26.600
<v Speaker 1>has the right person to help us find out. Brandon

0:53:26.640 --> 0:53:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Presser has already been undercover as a go between for

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Vegas high Rollers a decade on super Yachts even you'll

0:53:32.960 --> 0:53:35.440
<v Speaker 1>recall not so long ago as a cast member at

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Disney World. Now he's taken us behind the scenes at

0:53:38.680 --> 0:53:42.320
<v Speaker 1>some ultra opulent weddings. I mean we're talking ultra opulent,

0:53:42.440 --> 0:53:45.240
<v Speaker 1>like tens of millions of dollars like crazy amount. Brandon

0:53:45.280 --> 0:53:46.919
<v Speaker 1>spent a week working with some of the top event

0:53:46.960 --> 0:53:50.040
<v Speaker 1>planners in the world and discovered all the unromantic work

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that goes into achieving nuptial bliss. He and Bloomberg Pursuits

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:55.359
<v Speaker 1>editor Chris Royles are joining us now with a look

0:53:55.400 --> 0:53:57.960
<v Speaker 1>at the lead story in this week's Pursuit section. Because

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:00.279
<v Speaker 1>let me just set you and Brandon of on each

0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 1>other for a while. You've done a lot of these ventures.

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say that Disney one was a favor of mine.

0:54:04.960 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So tell me about, Like, how did you suggest this

0:54:07.640 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to Brandon? Brandon? Did Brandon come to you with this idea?

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Brandon came to us with this idea. So we sometimes, um,

0:54:13.719 --> 0:54:16.880
<v Speaker 1>when we're daydreaming about where to send the amazing Brandon undercover,

0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:20.279
<v Speaker 1>we'll think, Okay, what's a like a crazy sort of

0:54:20.760 --> 0:54:23.359
<v Speaker 1>ultra luxury experience that we want to know more about,

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:25.719
<v Speaker 1>like you know, being a ski Instarcter at Aspen or

0:54:25.760 --> 0:54:28.440
<v Speaker 1>being a waiter at nobu Um. And then Brandon, through

0:54:28.440 --> 0:54:30.320
<v Speaker 1>this process actually gets to know a lot of the

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:32.840
<v Speaker 1>people who work in the in service in these industries,

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and he can sometimes say, like you know, I haven't

0:54:36.200 --> 0:54:37.839
<v Speaker 1>in at this place where like I think we can

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:41.880
<v Speaker 1>do this. So we he did um like ultra luxury

0:54:41.960 --> 0:54:44.600
<v Speaker 1>vacations like honeymoon planning, and that kind of led him

0:54:44.640 --> 0:54:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to this. We started think Brandon with with Colin Cowie.

0:54:47.280 --> 0:54:49.719
<v Speaker 1>That's a good place to start because he is the

0:54:49.800 --> 0:54:52.839
<v Speaker 1>party planner to the stars. Who is he and why

0:54:52.880 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 1>do you need at least a million bucks for him

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to even pay attention to you? Well, I think Colin

0:54:57.360 --> 0:55:01.200
<v Speaker 1>has cultivated a celebrity status in his own right, and

0:55:01.239 --> 0:55:04.920
<v Speaker 1>he sort of created a brand around himself long before

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the idea of branding oneself was a thing. Back about

0:55:10.360 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. He started working with Oprah and Oprah

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:16.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of dubbed him the event center to the Star,

0:55:16.920 --> 0:55:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So then everyone came running um and then so you know,

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:23.880
<v Speaker 1>he's planned events and weddings for everyone from John Travolta

0:55:23.920 --> 0:55:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to Bruce Willis, Tryan Seacrest to um Mariah carry uh

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and and and so the brand has solved him around

0:55:32.120 --> 0:55:35.279
<v Speaker 1>and people who want that sort of star studded experience

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:39.600
<v Speaker 1>seek him out, and he can command a million dollars

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to produce, you know, a sort of entry level wedding

0:55:42.400 --> 0:55:44.440
<v Speaker 1>in his in his world? What is he like a

0:55:44.440 --> 0:55:46.279
<v Speaker 1>supermodel from the nineties. I don't get out of bed

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:50.040
<v Speaker 1>for a for a million dollars. That's funny thing you

0:55:50.080 --> 0:55:52.480
<v Speaker 1>say that, because when I was writing this story, actually

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:56.360
<v Speaker 1>was toying with trying to do like a Linda Linda

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Evandelista lead for the story, and it just totally ended

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I think a bit of a metaphor, but I was

0:56:01.719 --> 0:56:04.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that the whole time. So, Chris, what was

0:56:04.400 --> 0:56:06.919
<v Speaker 1>it that you wanted to know top of mind from Brandon? Well,

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I a lot of times what's interesting about

0:56:09.080 --> 0:56:12.720
<v Speaker 1>these undercover stories is a that the people who work

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that Brandon works with are incredibly talented and they are

0:56:16.600 --> 0:56:20.839
<v Speaker 1>able to accomplish like superhuman feats of um, you know,

0:56:20.880 --> 0:56:23.839
<v Speaker 1>making amazing things happen and dealing with insane requests and

0:56:23.840 --> 0:56:27.200
<v Speaker 1>then be the second most interesting thing is usually the

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:30.960
<v Speaker 1>bad behavior or the wild requests of the people who

0:56:31.040 --> 0:56:33.319
<v Speaker 1>are indulging in the service. So I wanted to know

0:56:33.640 --> 0:56:38.080
<v Speaker 1>how crazy the brides and grooms were, and you know,

0:56:38.120 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Brandon actually learned that, you know, the whole sort of

0:56:41.120 --> 0:56:45.400
<v Speaker 1>bride zilla groom zilla thing isn't really as much of

0:56:45.400 --> 0:56:47.719
<v Speaker 1>a thing at this tier. When people are spending one

0:56:47.800 --> 0:56:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to eleven million dollars on a wedding, they're getting everything

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:55.279
<v Speaker 1>they want, But what about mom Zilla or Dad's right,

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 1>So the people the zilla's are the people around the

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:01.960
<v Speaker 1>bride and groom. And Brandon saw some some bad behavior

0:57:02.040 --> 0:57:05.600
<v Speaker 1>on the parts of families of celebrities. So I don't know, Brandon,

0:57:05.600 --> 0:57:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you want to tell them about some of the family

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:11.520
<v Speaker 1>bad behavior you saw? Yeah? No, absolutely, Yeah. Going into this,

0:57:11.600 --> 0:57:13.799
<v Speaker 1>I was really excited to mind, you know, some of

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the more classic breend Bill the stories, and it was

0:57:15.880 --> 0:57:17.600
<v Speaker 1>told to me right from the start. You know, when

0:57:17.640 --> 0:57:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you're getting everything you want for your wedding, you're the

0:57:21.840 --> 0:57:24.120
<v Speaker 1>latitude doesn't come out. But then the mom's that like

0:57:24.160 --> 0:57:30.400
<v Speaker 1>treaks out, especially amongst um new moneyed individuals, because likely

0:57:30.480 --> 0:57:32.640
<v Speaker 1>when they were, you know, in their twenties or early

0:57:32.680 --> 0:57:35.600
<v Speaker 1>threes having their wedding, Um, they didn't get to have

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the nine million dollar wedding. So um. Some of the

0:57:39.120 --> 0:57:41.680
<v Speaker 1>funny things that I was hearing about was that a

0:57:41.800 --> 0:57:48.600
<v Speaker 1>mom would wear white um to the wedding. In college Champagne,

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:52.919
<v Speaker 1>there was there was a mom who had the videographer

0:57:53.280 --> 0:57:57.280
<v Speaker 1>completely re edit the wedding video. Because she didn't star

0:57:57.600 --> 0:57:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in it enough. By the way, who goes back and

0:57:59.640 --> 0:58:05.400
<v Speaker 1>watch of those things anyway? Yeah, well it's interesting too,

0:58:05.400 --> 0:58:07.240
<v Speaker 1>So tell us about some of the other things that

0:58:07.280 --> 0:58:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you came about came across I mean, open bars being

0:58:10.960 --> 0:58:13.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of the devil. There's a great story I'm gonna

0:58:14.040 --> 0:58:17.360
<v Speaker 1>go there about someone who got so drunk. What happened?

0:58:18.000 --> 0:58:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, um? So at one oneting, you know, it's

0:58:23.320 --> 0:58:26.680
<v Speaker 1>really hard to control alcohol consumption. UM. At a wedding,

0:58:26.800 --> 0:58:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you bought out the whole resort. Um. You know, you

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:32.440
<v Speaker 1>have all the service that you can ever need, um,

0:58:32.480 --> 0:58:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and you can't water down the drinks because you need

0:58:34.520 --> 0:58:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to keep everything, you know, at a certain standard. Um.

0:58:37.720 --> 0:58:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So people just get absolutely shattered. And one woman actually

0:58:42.040 --> 0:58:44.680
<v Speaker 1>was so drunk she fell over onto her wineglass and

0:58:44.680 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it popped her silicone bread. So that is why Colin

0:58:48.160 --> 0:58:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Cowy always has an ambulance at every event at the

0:58:51.200 --> 0:58:55.680
<v Speaker 1>um that he throws popped os or not. Okay, well,

0:58:55.720 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this perhaps could be the perfect segue to

0:58:58.160 --> 0:59:03.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about once catering a Game of Thrones themed wedding

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:08.240
<v Speaker 1>at a private estate. There was body paint involved, but

0:59:08.560 --> 0:59:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you take it away well, I should say

0:59:11.040 --> 0:59:14.200
<v Speaker 1>so Colin Cowie, that does predate himself with inventing the

0:59:14.280 --> 0:59:17.800
<v Speaker 1>human food tray. And that's not like the like a

0:59:17.840 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 1>regular Thomas. I mean someone had to do it, um

0:59:27.360 --> 0:59:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and uh. And so he creates these architectural pieces that

0:59:31.440 --> 0:59:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he can have his servers go around and

0:59:34.120 --> 0:59:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you can pick food off of their dress or different

0:59:36.280 --> 0:59:38.240
<v Speaker 1>things like that. And then you know other people have

0:59:38.360 --> 0:59:42.440
<v Speaker 1>mimicked that. Um. And so there's an individual um who

0:59:42.880 --> 0:59:46.400
<v Speaker 1>through a wedding UM that the groom was an art

0:59:46.480 --> 0:59:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and game of thrones span and he wanted all of

0:59:49.480 --> 0:59:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that sort of sexiness from you know, medieval sexiness imbued

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:56.720
<v Speaker 1>in the festivities. Um. And he doesn't have to have

0:59:56.760 --> 0:59:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a b DSM dungeon in his house regular I mean

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>basically all right. I mean you know, if you live

1:00:03.320 --> 1:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in the burbs, why not and and uh and they

1:00:07.040 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>made fully they made full use of it because it

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>was thrown at his private states. I'm speechless. You get that,

1:00:12.760 --> 1:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you get the wedding. You aren't when you're paying uh

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that level of money. Brandon, what are the some of

1:00:16.880 --> 1:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the fun or funny things that you had to do?

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Like uh, I remember you were telling us that there

1:00:24.040 --> 1:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>was some some sneaking of snacks across borders. Yeah. So

1:00:29.640 --> 1:00:33.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the big things, um is the welcome amenity. Right,

1:00:33.640 --> 1:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you're doing a destination wedding, you want to curate,

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a very special personalized welcome amenity, and that

1:00:41.280 --> 1:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>usually is a snass box or something like that. And UM,

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>at the wedding that I was working out in Mexico, UM,

1:00:48.680 --> 1:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the Brandon groom really loved Freedo's and the very specific

1:00:54.600 --> 1:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>type of freedom that you can't get in Mexico. So

1:00:57.720 --> 1:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I was responsible for actually stuffing two duffle bag full

1:01:02.080 --> 1:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of these barbecued flavor twists and kind of having to

1:01:05.960 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>smuggle them across the border, Otherwise it would have looked

1:01:10.240 --> 1:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>like I was trying to sell them in Kanon. Or

1:01:13.360 --> 1:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>when I think multimillion dollars weddings, I think barbecue flavor

1:01:16.760 --> 1:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>twist Freedo's for sure first thing that comes to mind. Well,

1:01:21.320 --> 1:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I speaking of smuggling and just logist

1:01:24.080 --> 1:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>logistics of this, getting everything to a destination where the

1:01:28.400 --> 1:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>wedding is is a big part of this. And one

1:01:30.360 --> 1:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that you wrote about was the use of private

1:01:32.600 --> 1:01:39.400
<v Speaker 1>aircraft or cargo containers to actually get furniture, food, why meat,

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>The list goes on, uh in the in the realm

1:01:42.880 --> 1:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of the millions of dollars. Yeah, and and the planning

1:01:45.520 --> 1:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>starts so early. So for example, at the wedding that

1:01:47.960 --> 1:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I was working at, UM, they it was a kacher wedding,

1:01:51.160 --> 1:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>so they wanted particular meats to be brought down from

1:01:54.280 --> 1:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the United States. And UM there was actually of an

1:01:58.280 --> 1:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>overland like a large semi truck that left New York

1:02:03.440 --> 1:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>City ten weeks before the wedding to make sure that

1:02:08.480 --> 1:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>certain materials arrived to set up a kosher kitchen in Mexico.

1:02:13.160 --> 1:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>With all this spending and all this planning, UM, it

1:02:16.720 --> 1:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always actually I'll go the way you expect. In

1:02:19.280 --> 1:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>other words, it doesn't always happen right, because prenups kind

1:02:22.120 --> 1:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of get in the way sometimes, you know. Yeah, UM,

1:02:27.400 --> 1:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the prenup is the ultimate UM weapon UM

1:02:31.880 --> 1:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that is wielded at the last minute. If someone wants

1:02:34.760 --> 1:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to get more money UM in the prenup, they'll wait

1:02:39.320 --> 1:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and sign right before the wedding. And you know, with

1:02:41.920 --> 1:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the threat of cancelation UM and Colin has this incredible

1:02:46.000 --> 1:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>ability to befriend a lot of his clients, and sometimes

1:02:50.520 --> 1:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>he gets rolled into the prenup drama. A big thank

1:02:55.440 --> 1:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you to Bloomberg contributor Brandon press Or, of course, also

1:02:58.640 --> 1:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Pursuits editor Is Rouser. Another great undercover tail. Yeah,

1:03:03.880 --> 1:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a pretty stressful job apparently a wedding planner. That wraps

1:03:06.640 --> 1:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>up the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio.

1:03:09.320 --> 1:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for joining us. I'm Carol Masser and

1:03:11.440 --> 1:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tim Stanovik. Be sure to tune into Bloomberg Business

1:03:14.120 --> 1:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Week Monday through Friday. It starts at two pm Wall

1:03:16.160 --> 1:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Street Time on Bloomberg Radio. You can also watch our

1:03:18.440 --> 1:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>daily broadcast on YouTube. Just search Bloomberg Global News and

1:03:21.760 --> 1:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>check out our Bloomberg Business Week podcast. You can find

1:03:24.080 --> 1:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>it at Bloomberg dot com, Apple, or wherever you get

1:03:26.320 --> 1:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>your podcast. Bloomberg Business Week is available on newstands, now,

1:03:29.120 --> 1:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com, at business week dot com, and

1:03:31.440 --> 1:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal. You can also see me

1:03:33.880 --> 1:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Quick Take, available at Bloomberg dot com, slash qt,

1:03:37.400 --> 1:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and streaming platforms like Roku, Apple TV, Samsung TV, and more.

1:03:41.360 --> 1:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Have a great weekend, everyone. Did you have a pre nup?

1:03:43.400 --> 1:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Did your wife had a pre up? First of all,

1:03:45.960 --> 1:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a personal question. Okay, did you know? I'll be

1:03:49.640 --> 1:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>fully there was no prenups, but there was also did

1:03:52.440 --> 1:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you see that? You know it's not too late. You

1:03:53.920 --> 1:03:55.919
<v Speaker 1>can do postnups too. Do you know in that story

1:03:56.000 --> 1:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the average wedding I think for most America exactly. Big difference,

1:04:00.000 --> 1:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>big difference. All right, everybody, have a good and safe weekend.

1:04:02.520 --> 1:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. H