WEBVTT - Harbaugh to Giants, Tomlin & Steelers SPLIT, Caleb Williams STEALING Stafford’s crown? | Nick Wright NFL

0:00:02.279 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in. We'll driving the great Episode four fifteen. This

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>episode has always is presented to you by our great

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>friends at boost Mobile. We are on the precipice of

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>my favorite sports weekend of the year, NFL Divisional Round weekend,

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:27.640
<v Speaker 1>typically four absolutely unbelievable games. Usually you have at least

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>six of the best eight teams in the league over

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the course of the season playing this weekend. This year,

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>one could argue you have all eight of the eight

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>best teams in the league playing this weekend, with the

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>one exception being my Jags not making it. But I

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know who you'd put them over, the Bills who

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.279
<v Speaker 1>just beat them, the Texans, maybe the Niners in their

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>current form. Whatever it is. Basically, all the right teams

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>are playing and I can't wait to get to it.

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>We also have coaching news from overnight and from since

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we last talk, so let's get right to it. We'll

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>go to straight the voicemail brought to you by our

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>friends at boost Mobile. Anthony Davis evidently out weeks and

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>not months with a hand injury, not gonna have surgery.

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>Yanna's booed by the Bucks fans, and then greats back

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that you're saying the fans.

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Are ungrateful, grateful.

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, here's here's the thing on that quickly, I don't

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 1>I know Yannis took it as if they were booing him.

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they were booing him. I think they

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>were booing the twenty twenty six Milwaukee Bucks. And I

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>think that part of their frustration is that that team

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:47.199
<v Speaker 1>can be that bad despite having Yannis. But it sure

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>seems like that relationship has run or is, you know,

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>run its course, and that it could be the best

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>for all parties to move on. But that was a

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't like any of that. Yan looked really sad

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, and then afterwards he was like, I

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>always boo when I get booed, but those are road games,

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know. Also, just now, Jonathan Kaminga demanded

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>a trade. That's he's never been happy there. And the

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 1>really cool one point Slam sixty four person tennis tournament

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>winner gets a million bucks. They played one point each

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>game and an amateur ended up winning the whole thing.

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>He beat Center in the round of sixteen because Center faulted,

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and then beat a young lady when she hit it

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>out on in the championship. He won a million bucks.

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I actually watched that. It was pretty sick. Demons, how are.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>You, Cinema. I'm good. I'm doing pretty good this morning.

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>No complaints right after you, either on the air or

0:02:54.800 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>off the air. Last recording mentioned some stupid Twitter meme

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>about like four pictures one picture or whatever, and all

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of us were like, we don't We weren't really familiar

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 1>with what you were talking about. And you said, well,

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe this I'm showing my own immaturity or something. This

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is my algorithm. Yeah, the White House did one, so

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Man, We're just living in the dumbest timeline. Reminder,

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>everybody like rate, subscribe review to the show again, the

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>thumbs up, the hitting the bells on YouTube is helpful,

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>get leaving us a nice review. We appreciate that. But

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>what literally pays the bills are the subscriptions. And the

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>cool thing about the subscriptions to this is it's totally free.

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you would subscribe on YouTube, it would be

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciated. Subscribe on iTunes or Spotify, it would be

0:03:55.880 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciated. All right, let's get to the overnight news

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of John Harball going to the Giants.

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.520
<v Speaker 2>John Harbaugh agreed to go to the Giants last night,

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 2>and a little bit before that, and shortly after our

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 2>last show, Tomlin had stepped down as the Steelers coach.

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about that in a little moment, But what

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 2>do you think about Harble going over to the Giants.

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I I don't say this often, but I totally agree

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>with Dan Orlovsky. This is the best thing to happen

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Giants since they won the Super Bowl. They

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:42.839
<v Speaker 1>sincerely there are There are two things now. There are

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>three things that really matter in the NFL to being

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>a perennial contender and avoiding being a perennial laughing stock.

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>The first one is avoid having atrocious ownership. So the

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Giant Stadium mates the Jets, they just have atrocious ownership

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that will always be in their way. I think the

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Browns have atrocious ownership that will always be in their way.

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>The Giants have had one of those three kind of

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>benchmarks down and they have good to very good ownership

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in the Maras. The second thing you need is a legitimate,

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>true professional head coach. They now have that for the

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>first time since Tom Coughlin. Obviously the third leg of

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that stool. If you will is the quarterback. I don't

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>think they have that, but maybe they do, and if not,

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll see how you can paper it together while you

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>try to find the quarterback. But if ownership will stay

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the way and you have a legitimate head coach,

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>once you have the quarterback in place, you can instantly contend.

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>The Bears and Patriots are showing you that right now.

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>That and I've said this before, I will say it again.

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>If you have the right coach and the right quarterback,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>the rebuild is somewhat instant. And if you have had

0:06:39.240 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the same coaching quarterback for two years, not four years,

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>not six years, two years, and the team is not

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>competing at the very least where playoffs are the expectation,

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>then you don't have the right coach or you don't

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>have the right quarterback. There are no instances of awesome coach,

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>awesome quarterback, but it took us four years to get

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it together. That flatly doesn't happen. And so the Giants

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>got the best coach that was truly available. And I

0:07:18.000 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>say that because I don't think Tomlin is truly available.

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Tomlin's going to take a year off and

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>survey the landscape because none of these jobs are great jobs.

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I ranked him on the TV show yesterday, but nine

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to one the way I had it. Let me pull

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>up my exact list. Number nine was the Browns because

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of that ownership problem, because of the cap issues created

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>by the Watson contract, and because they don't have a quarterback.

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Number eight is the Titans. To me, now, if you

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>love cam Ward, then that job moves up the list.

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>But even if you love cam Ward, they only have

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>one other player on the roster you could love in

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Simmons. And ever since Amy Adams Strunk took over,

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>they have just been a revolving door of front offices.

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>They move off for abel that it's been a disaster.

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Number seven's the Dolphins, again no quarterback. They have not

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>had a head coach there since Don Shula, lasts longer

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>than four years, and they're in a rough cap position.

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>The Cardinals I put it six because I think it's

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a very tough division and they don't have the quarterback.

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>The Falcons are an interesting one, super soft division have

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>won seven or eight games each of the last in

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>seven of the eight last years. They do have some talent,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think Blank's a terrible owner, so that

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you know it makes that a decent job. I put

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the Giants at four. They've got money, They've got a

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>D line, they might have a quarterback. I'm skeptical, but

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that also is a I think not the hardest division.

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders. I put a three purely because I think

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>if you believe in Mendoza, that number one pick plus

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, uh, you have a ton of money

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to spend makes that somewhat attractive. But that to me

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>feels like a better job for a young, offensive minded

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:07.200
<v Speaker 1>guy that wants to grow with Mendoza than sixty two

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>year old John Harbaugh. Now the flip side of that is, well,

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders don't mind paying coaches. The Raiders since Art Shell,

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>which was nineteen ninety four. In the last thirty years,

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they have had two head coaches get more than three

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>get at least three years, Jack del Rio and John

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Gruden twice, and they have had a dozen other coaches

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>get less than three years. So they will that Hamster

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>will will spin. And then the Steelers two Ravens one.

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Obviously Harball wasn't going to the Ravens. The Steelers, I

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>think that they were not going to hire a coach

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>his age, and because they want that coach to be

0:10:56.120 --> 0:11:00.040
<v Speaker 1>there for fifteen some years ideally, And so I I

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>think Giants are a great job for him. I don't

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 1>expect a snap contention, but I do think that all

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, the Giants could be a five hundred

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>ish team next year. I think that's a legitimate possibility.

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And I want to see what Jackson Dart looks like.

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't love Scataboo and Neighbors both coming off major injuries.

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>But this is a great day for Giants fans. Flatly,

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>this is probably the happiest you've been since the Boat

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Party playoff game against the Packers with Odell and Eli

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>at the end of ELI. And it's the best day

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>for your franchise since you won a Super Bowl. All right,

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little Tomlin here, Demonsey.

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so Reid is now the longest tenured coach over

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 2>there in camp the city. Do you think that Tomland's

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 2>potentially waiting to take over Kansas City?

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So here's I don't think that necessarily, but I also

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:19.199
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's crazy. So the last head coach of

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers was Bill Kauer. Bill Kwer left after fifteen years,

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>went to CBS and for about five consecutive coaching cycles.

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Demonsey Bill Kauer was the number one candidate, and he

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>never left the job. He's still doing TV on CBS.

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>He just stayed there. I do think it's on the

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>board that Tomlin goes and does TV and never stops.

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, I can make I'm not making coaching

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>money doing this. I mean, he was making twenty five

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year reportedly from the Steelers, but I'm

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>making millions and millions of dollars for two percent of

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the work. I love it. So I think it's on

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the board. It wouldn't be my bet, but I think

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.839
<v Speaker 1>it's on the board that Tomlin does not coach again.

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's possible, okay, And because he's going to

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have such a great job, he can be and because

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>he's young enough, he can be very choosy. So for

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike Tomlin, my if I had to bet on the

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>next job for Mike Tomlin, my bet would be the

0:13:52.840 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles a year from now. I think that the

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is a job that will come open in the next

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>few years, and that Tomlin that's a that's a great job,

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>so when we're thinking of it. So the reason I

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Chiefs thing is a ludicrous idea is

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>because at some point during Patrick's career, Andy's going to retire,

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and the moment that happens, that becomes one of the

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>greatest job openings of all time. Again, assuming Patrick comes back, well,

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean Andy's older than you think, and so I

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>mean Andy is in two months he turned sixty eight.

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So you know, again, the reason I think it's not

0:14:55.240 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>far fetched is because or not insane, is because I

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>could see Tomlin staying in TV for more than one year.

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Sean Payton stayed for one year and then the Broncos

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>traded a pick to the Saints to get him. If

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Tomlin comes back in the next two years, his team

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>would have to trade do some type of compensation with

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers. I don't think the Steelers, they would throw

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>up too many roadblocks, but I could see. You just

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>got to think about what are great jobs that realistically

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>could come open. The Packers are a very good job,

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like Lafleoor's, you know, a little tenuous

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. The Eagles I expect to come open

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bills at some point, let's see, let's see how

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>this year goes. And like the though, like McDermott is.

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Is Baltimore, Like I know, we don't have a coach

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 2>right now, maybe we get a coach.

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Does well, that's the thing. So I mean, I think

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore is insane because it's open now. No, I just

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>think because it's open now and he's not Taeo. He's

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>not going there right right now. And so the what

0:16:14.640 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I was saying about McDermott is McDermott's kind of on

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the perma warm seat, and he could end that this

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>year they win the Super Bowl, he'll be the coach

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>there for probably the rest of Allen's career. Zach Taylor

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Bengals. The problem there is, I don't know

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that that's a good job, even though Joe Burrow is

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>awesome because of ownership and so you just you look around.

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>But my money would be that Mike Tomlin is going

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to be the coach of the Philadelphia Eagles in a year.

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>That's where I that's where I would put my money.

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think. I also, I think there is

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a chance that in three years he's still doing TV

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 1>and he come and what pulls him away from that

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is Andy Reid retiring. I think that's possible, all right,

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>I know you got one more follow up.

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 2>Do you think this eliminates any chance of Rogers coming

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 2>back or at least at the start of the season

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 2>for next year.

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>He's definitely certainly eliminates any chance of him coming back

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Steelers, certain And I don't think Roger's gonna

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>be a Week one starter for anybody next year. I

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>still think he might play again, but it would be,

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, a mid season edition after an injury. All Right,

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to my favorite sports week end of

0:17:46.840 --> 0:17:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the year, today's show is brought to you by our

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bet. Miami's made the National Championship.

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Hard Rock Stadium is gonna be rocking, And if you're

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>going to the game, hard Rock Bet is giving you

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a ten dollar bonus bet to get in on the action.

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>If you're watching the game out in Miami, head to

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the hard Rock Cafe, Miami, Duffies, North Miami Beach, American

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Social Miami or Batch Brickle. Hard Rock Bet is dropping

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars bonus bets there too. You can turn that

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>free ten dollars bonus bet into a big win by

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>placing a same game parlay, or even if you're just

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 1>watching the game at home. Soon no better place to

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 1>bet the National Championship than hard Rock Bet because it's

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Florida's sportsbook and they're going crazy with promos for this one.

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you're late to kickoff, don't worry. Hard Rock

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Bet is live in game betting, so you're never too

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>late to the action. Find a winner, live bet between

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>snaps and just fuse he taps. If you haven't tried

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.480
<v Speaker 1>your first bet on hard rock Bet, there's still time

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for you to get one hundred fifty dollars in bonus

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.399
<v Speaker 1>bets if you win. Just place a five dollar bet

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:53.479
<v Speaker 1>and if it hits, you get not only your winnings,

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>but also an extra one hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets.

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Even if your team is out of the playoffs, that

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you have to see on the sidelines between

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>same game barlay's live betting. Can't miss welcome off for

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>a new promos dropping every day. Hard Rock Bet has

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you covered all postseason along hard Rock Bet, Download the

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>hard rock Bet app and make your first deposit today.

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Payable and bonus bets, not a cash offer offered by

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the Seminole Tribe of Florida. In Florida offered by Seminal

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Hard Rock Digital LLC and all other states, must be

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty one plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:35.400
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia. To play. Terms and

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concerned about gambling in Florida, call one eight

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>three three play wise In Indiana. If you or someone

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>you know is a gambling problem wants help, call one

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:50.120
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and nine with it. Gambling problem Call one

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred Gambler Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia.

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk Rams. Bears, Demons.

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:03.719
<v Speaker 2>See your MVP Matthew Stafford escaped Carolina last week and

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 2>now they get to go and play the Spicy Bears

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:08.879
<v Speaker 2>who keep getting these improbable wins. Do you think the

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 2>last week's game was too emotional of a too emotional

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 2>of output for Chicago Bears and the fans this week

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 2>to overcome I'm sorry.

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>No, You're fine. I mean I do think there is

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:31.360
<v Speaker 1>an element of that game validated their season, and there

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>was such a catharsis from that stadium to come back

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the way they did, to do it against that team,

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the hated rival, And I don't I thought the state.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought the Bears crowd played a real factor in

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the comeback, and I just don't know that I expect

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the crowd to be a twelve out of ten again.

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I also think that the Bears injuries during that game,

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a banged up defense, losing another linebacker and the left

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>tackle being out, maybe for next year as well, but

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly the rest of this postseason. With a blown ACL,

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they were already behind the eight ball here and now

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I listen. I think people know how much I like

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bears, how much I like Caleb, and how impressed

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I've been with Caleb's late game heroics. But I feel

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>like they're going up against the best team in the NFL,

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and I I think, Demonse, they are going to need

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to score forty to win this game. I think the

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Rams are going to be able to move the ball

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 1>at will against this Bears defense. I think what you

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:09.360
<v Speaker 1>saw Green Bay doing in the first half against the Bears,

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are going to be able to do the

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>entirety of the game, and I think Davante Adams now

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>knock some of the rust off in the last game,

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>he will be a bigger factor. Puka is simply unguardable,

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and if I'm a Bears fan, I am just worried

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that it is. There are going to be guys running

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>wide open all throughout the game. And like what we

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:45.479
<v Speaker 1>saw in that game for the Packers, even in the

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>second half when who was the number six, oh, Kyler

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Gordon was getting picked on repeatedly. I think that Sean

0:22:55.960 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>McVeigh is going to a big red circle around Kyler

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Gordon and hunt him. They probably can. The Rams have

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>enough weapons they can stay away from Jail and Johnson.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that the Bear's pass rush is going

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>to be able to disturb Stafford that much because Stafford

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>was Stafford was you know, pretty somewhere from pretty good

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>to super exceptional in almost any scenario, but he was

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>unbeatable if you didn't get pressure on him. I don't

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.239
<v Speaker 1>know if they're gonna get pressure on him. And I

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>think this is a really tough game for Chicago. It

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>would be remarkable if they win it. If they win it.

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>They either are then hosting the Niners in a rematch

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of the forty two thirty eight classic that we saw

0:23:55.840 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in Week seventeen, except this one's in Chicago, or they're

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>going to Seattle feeling like we've got the better quarterback.

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what the hell happens.

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 2>But if Carolina could score thirty one, they could score forty. Huh.

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't think so. I think the Panthers game

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>was misleading on the overall quality of that Rams defense.

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>And I also still don't totally understand how the Panthers

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>scored all the points they did. I the I mean,

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Bryce threw for two sixty, but they only ran for eighty,

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and it it was just good.

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 2>They scored that, literally, that exact same amount of point.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 2>It's the last time they played them, so I mean

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 2>there's something.

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And the Rams. The Rams defense, after starting the year

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>off great, gave up thirty one to the Panthers, twenty

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to the Cardinals, twenty seven of the Falcons, thirty eight,

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and overtime to the Seahawks, thirty four to the Lions.

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned, thirty one a couple weeks before that

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Panthers. The first time I think the Rams

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>pass rush is going to have more of an impact

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>in this game with that injury to the Bears starting

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>left tackle again, I think kalab will play well. But

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and again we'll do our pick show tomorrow, but this

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>feels like forty two to twenty seven to me.

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Like I I know, I mean, I do believe the

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 2>offense is gonna be having for the Rams. I don't

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 2>think there are too many problems.

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I just yeah, I just don't. I don't know how

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bears shut him is slow him down? Forget shut

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>him down, slowhim down. This would be a to me,

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a remarkably impressive win. And the only way the Bears

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>win that I can see is if Caleb plays the

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>best game he's played as a prop. If you get

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>late game Caleb for the entirety of the game, And

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that's just hard. It's a hard ask.

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 2>So you hinted at if Stafford retired out of the

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 2>NFC this this year, that Caleb would be the best

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.439
<v Speaker 2>quarterback in the NFC. How important is this head to

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 2>add matchup in that theory.

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think that if he were to win this game,

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>some folks would argue he doesn't need Stafford to retire.

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 1>He's just going into next year the best quarterback. But

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I and I don't think Stafford's retiring, to be clear,

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>But I right now would rather have Caleb than Dak

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>or Jaden or Jalen Hurts or Jordan Love or Jared

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Goff or Baker or Purty or Donald. The only guy

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 1>in the conference that I would rather have as my

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback is Stafford. And I think that the only hole

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in Caleb's game right now is accuracy on easy throws,

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Like that's the one part of his game that is

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>below average at this point. And I'm gonna give him

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:58.920
<v Speaker 1>credit that from year one to year two, the biggest

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>thing he needed to improve on was not taking awful sacks,

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and he fixed it. And then during from the beginning

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:10.439
<v Speaker 1>of year two to the end of year two, the

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest thing he needed to improve on was the pre

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 1>snap operation, getting out of the huddle on time, not

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 1>having these procedural penalties, and he fixed it. So now

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing he needs to improve is that the

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>accuracy on what I would call simple passes. So I'm

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 1>going to give him credit that he'll be able to

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>fix that. So I I, you know, I am as

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>bullish as one can be on Caleb, and I think

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>he's just scratching the surface on who he can be.

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about the next game.

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Uh, Niners and Seahawks face off of the third time

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 2>this year with the NFC Championship game on the line.

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 2>We know San Francisco has been played with injuries and

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Darnold's teams to tense up in the bright lights. Which

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 2>one do you think is a bigger liability in this game?

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the Niners injuries because I just I

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>don't think Donald is going to need to have a

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>huge game. I mean, these two teams have played twice,

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.479
<v Speaker 1>once in Week one, once in Week eighteen, and the

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 1>final scores were seventeen thirteen Niners in Week one and

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>thirteen to three Seahawks in Week eighteen. No George Kittle,

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>poor Christian McCaffrey just being run into the ground usage wise,

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>pardon me that Niners defense so incredibly banged up. I

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>think Seattle, as long as Donald doesn't truly melt down.

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>The rest edge is also so substantial for Seattle that

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting having the buye versus the Niners playing

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Sunday a Sunday war into a Saturday game. This has

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>been a ten out of ten brilliant coaching season for

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Shanahan. But I feel like the end of the

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>road is this weekend and it would them in back

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 1>to back weeks, both games essentially without George Kittle. We'll

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>see about Pearce all this week, but last week they

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:46.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't have him. Going to the defending champion Eagles and

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>then going to Seattle and getting two wins would be

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 1>all time stuff for an underman team. And I think

0:30:55.120 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Seattle has earned our respect. On their resume is they

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>beat the Jags, they beat the Texans, they beat the Rams,

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they beat the Panthers, they beat the Niners. Their losses

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>are a two point loss to the Rams, a three

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>point loss to the Bucks, and a four point loss

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in Week one to the Niners. So two of their

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>three losses they played that team again later in the

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 1>year and beat them. That Rams loss, Darnold had five

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>turnovers and they were still right there. Or four turnovers,

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure. And I just think that Seattle is

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>too well rounded of a team, too healthy and too

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>rested to lose this game. All right, What are your

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>follow ups here?

0:32:02.760 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Did the committee hesitate or struggle at all to put

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 2>a team with a shaky quarterback atop the tiers? Yeah?

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, listen, Seattle has earned the right to be

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>considered the best team in football.

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but if.

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>They play the Rams, I'll pick the Rams, and if

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>they play the Bills, I'll pick the Bills. I mean, so,

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I see Seattle has earned the respect that they get

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that that spot atop you know, everybody's power rankings. But

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>when push comes to shove, I'm not gonna there is

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a level of trust I'm just not gonna be able

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to have in a Donald Stafford playoff matchup or a

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Donald Josh Allen Super Bowl matchup? What else you got here?

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.960
<v Speaker 2>So, Party, it sounds like you've kind of been changing

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 2>your tone a little bit on your thoughts on him.

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 2>If he goes and balls out against his defense, are

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 2>you officially ready to give him a new conversation?

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, I the games and how you play in

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the games have to matter. And even though Party had

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>those you know, one really bad and one kind of

0:33:17.560 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>bad pick against Philly, I thought, all things considered, that

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>was an impressive, gutsy performance by him. If he follows

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that up and plays well and they beat the Seahawks,

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>then of course then I have to I mean, I

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:34.479
<v Speaker 1>can't have.

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Where is he like top five?

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>He would I don't know. I don't know, but I

0:33:47.640 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>do know that I have been impressed impressed with how

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>he played that Seahawks game, not at the end of

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the season, notwithstanding down the stretch of the season that

0:34:01.040 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks game, it was a rough one for him in

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen or twenty seven for a buck twenty five and

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>through the pick at the end, But I really liked

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>his overall performance in that Eagles game, even though that

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>pick near the end was really really bad. I thought

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the pastor McCaffrey was awesome. I thought his escapability and

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>scrambles were really important. I was impressed by him in

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>that spot. Like the games, particularly playoff games, weigh very

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>heavily in how I feel, and doing it shorthanded and

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>undermanned is wildly impressive. All right, let's talk about the AFC, A.

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Team that you have not believed in whatsoever playing a

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 2>team that you have believed in through and through throughout

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:55.280
<v Speaker 2>the season, the Bills and the Broncos. Are you putting

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos on fraud watching this game.

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Broncos are frauds. I do think, however,

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>that if they lose this game, there will be a

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of looking through their season with a fine toothed

0:35:19.840 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>comb and the question being asked, how good were they really?

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that'll be fair. They are playing a

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:33.760
<v Speaker 1>shorthanded Bills team, they are at home, they are healthy,

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>they had the bye, and this Broncos team that they

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>had moments of wildly impressive play, but they also down

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the stretch of the season, they had one excellent game,

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the Packers game. They got blown out at home by

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the Jags. They're tied thirteen thirteen against what was left

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Chiefs. They are a two point conversion from

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Johnson away or was it Marioda, I don't remember

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>in that game who it was from losing to the Commanders.

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:20.719
<v Speaker 1>They beat the Raiders ten to seven. They beat the

0:36:20.760 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Texans eighteen fifteen in a game they knocked out CJ.

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Stroud Jets. Game came down to a potential field goal

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 1>at the end. They they their holy shit. Look at

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos moments this year were the twenty one straight

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:44.399
<v Speaker 1>points to come back against Philly back in early October

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>beaten the Cowboys forty four to twenty four. And that

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Packer game when bow Nicks played out of his mind

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and they beat the Packers thirty four to twenty six

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 1>with you know, a late touchdown to ice the game

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>when it was twenty seven to twenty six. It's not

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that that's not nothing, and the fact that they found

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>ways to win matters. But if they lose to buff

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Last year they played Buffalo in the playoffs, they started

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the game up seven nothing, they lost the game thirty

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>one to seven. The Bills, you now have a banged

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 1>up Bills team. If you are the team, your fans

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and your coach more on him in a second, have

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>sworn you are all year, you'll win this game. I

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>have major doubts about it. And if they don't win

0:37:50.719 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>this game, win there. I had this U Sorry, let

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>me pull it up real quick. When you add the

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>one seed and you add all of these things kind

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of working for you and next year, demonse. The Denver

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Broncos play in no particular order, the Bills, the Rams,

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks obviously, the Chiefs twice, the Chargers twice, the Niners,

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the Jags, the Panthers, the which I get are a

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>playoff team, not a great team. Of the playoff team.

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>The Steelers, I'm leaving some. I left out one of

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:50.760
<v Speaker 1>their tough games.

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I mean I think that.

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Life can come like, yeah, life can come at you fast.

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Now the and oh the oh I left The Patriots

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>are another one, and so big difference in how we'll

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>view the Broncos if they win this game and losing

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the conference championship game, Sir, obviously, anything past that make

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the super Bowl, win the super Bowl. It's a thirty

0:39:24.960 --> 0:39:28.319
<v Speaker 1>out of ten great season, but just winning the one

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>playoff game, getting that the getting that monkey off your

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>back is so important. And Sean Payton's been writing checks

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>all year and up to an including this week when

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.120
<v Speaker 1>he was a total jerk to that reporter for asking

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:59.840
<v Speaker 1>about dra Greenlaw coming back for no reason whatsoever. I don't.

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a reporter asked him about dra Greenlaw attacking

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Downhill in the run game, and Trumpeton's like, what do

0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you know about attacking downhill in the run game? You

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:14.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know anything about that. He's just when he feels

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:18.040
<v Speaker 1>like he's in the catbird seat, he doesn't appear to

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:22.719
<v Speaker 1>treat people that well and you win this game. You've

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 1>been talking all year about this team being a super

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Bowl caliber. Last year you said, had you not gotten

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 1>curb stomped by the Bills, you thought you were gonna

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>beat the Chiefs, the team that then went to the

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. You now have them in your building and

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you're rested, and the Bills have three receivers left. So

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll see again the Pick show tomorrow, but I'm leaning

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 1>strongly Buffalo, and we'll talk more about the Bills side

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of things in tomorrow's show. Are you thinking about upgrading

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to the all new iPhone seventeen pro design to be

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the most powerful iPhone ever, but you're also thinking about

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 1>traffic on your way to the store, transferring all your data,

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the hassle of all that. Good news. When you order

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a new phone online with boost Mobile, they'll send an

0:41:08.239 --> 0:41:10.719
<v Speaker 1>expert to your homer work to deliver your brand new

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 1>iPhone seventeen Pro and get you all set up on

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>boost Mobile within minutes, no hassled. Visit boostmobile dot com

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:21.799
<v Speaker 1>to get started. Delivery available for select devices purchased at

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>boostmobile dot Com. Terms do apply, all right, last game

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>demand before we play game the producers put together and

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:33.879
<v Speaker 1>get some of the questions from earlier in the week

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>go ahead.

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh. Yeah, So we saw Drake May struggle a little

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 2>bit against the charges of the big thing on them

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 2>was their strength to schedule, and they haven't played anybody,

0:41:41.560 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 2>and they played somebody, they struggle a little bit. So

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 2>the challenge gets a little bit harder this week in Houston,

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 2>and they have that hilatious defense coming at them. So

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 2>how are you feeling about New England going up against

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Houston this weekend?

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I think that Houston defense has a chance to

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 1>carry them all the way to the Super Bowl.

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but.

0:42:05.040 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>That Houston offense is so inconsistent it allows eat as

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 1>bad as the Steelers offense was on Monday Night. That

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:23.839
<v Speaker 1>game seven to six entering the fourth quarter, It's ten

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to six before the strip sack touchdown. The Houston earlier

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this year forced Josh Allen into one of the worst

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>games of his career and dominated the Bills. And despite that,

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 1>with let me twenty five seconds left or with you

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>no more than that, with I'm looking at it right now,

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>with forty seconds left, the Bills have the ball at

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Houston's down four points, meaning even though the Texans played

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 1>basically as well as you can play defensively, the Bills

0:43:08.760 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>had a chance to steal the game. It's just such

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a hard way to do business when your path to

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:24.359
<v Speaker 1>winning these games is our defense is going to carry us.

0:43:25.120 --> 0:43:33.799
<v Speaker 1>And while we have seen teams do it, I the

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>games feel like they are gonna consistently be in the

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:41.239
<v Speaker 1>balance at the end the face.

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:45.879
<v Speaker 1>The most famous example of a team's defense in the

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:49.759
<v Speaker 1>modern Ish era carrying them to the Super Bowls the

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:55.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand Ravens. That two thousand Ravens team allowed twenty

0:43:55.320 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 1>three points total in four playoff games. They won their

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>four playoff games twenty one to three, twenty four to ten,

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:11.800
<v Speaker 1>sixteen to three, and the Super Bowl thirty four to seven, Demons.

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 1>And that seven, by the way, was a kick return.

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:25.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's not even it's it's not even that. So

0:44:25.440 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I said they allowed twenty three, they really allowed sixteen,

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 1>And so the what are the other instances that I'm

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna pull it up right now? The two thousand and

0:44:35.640 --> 0:44:40.719
<v Speaker 1>two Bucks would be the other another instance of a

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>team's defense just dominating. That Bucks team allowed six points

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:51.319
<v Speaker 1>in Round one, ten points in Round two, and then

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:55.439
<v Speaker 1>in the Super Bowl they won forty eight to twenty one,

0:44:56.000 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 1>but there were multiple UH defensive so the defense, so

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that that Bucks defense that allowed twenty one points. Also

0:45:10.239 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Demanse had three pick sixes to score twenty one itself

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:21.799
<v Speaker 1>in the supermow Wow, and so, and the one other

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>example would be, oh sorry, hold on, just real quick.

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>The one other example would be the twenty The twenty

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 1>fifteen Broncos UH defense was dominant, but they had Peyton

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:43.800
<v Speaker 1>at the helm, and even though Peyton was not really

0:45:43.840 --> 0:45:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Peyton that year, it was still Peyton manning and it

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:50.960
<v Speaker 1>felt like he could at least put the offense in

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>good positions. The twenty thirteen Seahawks are a team that

0:45:56.600 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind, and they might be a better example

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:05.879
<v Speaker 1>of kind of what I'm worried about for Houston, that

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen Seahawks team. They're twenty thirteen as dominant as

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that defense was. The Niners have the ball down six

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:25.359
<v Speaker 1>inside the ten yard line in the final moments of

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the game, and that's when we got You try to

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>test me with a sorry receiver like Crabtree. That's what

0:46:34.719 --> 0:46:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you get from Richard Sherman. They were still one pass away.

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just a hard way to do business. And so

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I also think the Pats, on the other hand, are

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 1>so much more dangerous now that Drake May got those

0:46:51.520 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 1>first playoff game. Jitters kind of out out of the

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>way because you saw him play better in the second half.

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>What was your I interrupted you. What was your question?

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:05.479
<v Speaker 2>Oh? No, I was saying, were you arguing that those

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:09.720
<v Speaker 2>defense were more dominant than this Houston's this Houston Texans defense,

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 2>because I mean it sounds like those scores are pretty crazy.

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, the two thousand Ravens most dominant defense

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:19.239
<v Speaker 1>in forty years, right, I mean that's a that they're

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in a separate category entirely. So with us described it,

0:47:25.520 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be on par with the Legion

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of Boom defense. And but the Legion of Boom at

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:40.760
<v Speaker 1>least had good Russell Wilson and Marshawn Lynch and CJ.

0:47:40.840 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Stroud's just been so bad.

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Do you think he's still a franchise quarterback or and

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:47.919
<v Speaker 2>he just lost his wide receiver? One? Is Nico even

0:47:47.960 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 2>playing right?

0:47:49.080 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Nico's probably I would be shocked off Nico place.

0:47:55.320 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>It's weird because Stroud and Josh Allen are the only

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks to both win. They're the only quarterbacks in the

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>league to have won a playoff game each the last

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 1>three years. But Stroud was bad Monday night. Yeah, his

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:13.440
<v Speaker 1>previous playoff victories, he hadn't been bad. He was bad

0:48:13.480 --> 0:48:14.040
<v Speaker 1>in that one.

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:17.439
<v Speaker 2>What do you think is on the board with Drake

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 2>May and a good performance against his defense?

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean that would vault him if Drake is I

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>think there are ways for New England to win without

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Drake being really good, because I think the Texans defense

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>is so shaky or Texans offense, part of me is

0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 1>so shaky. But if Drake lights up this defense, that'll

0:48:39.120 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 1>be the performance of the postseason so far. We'll give

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you our picks on the Picks Show, which comes out tomorrow.

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:53.279
<v Speaker 1>But evidently there was a the Olympic ticket draw for

0:48:53.480 --> 0:48:57.880
<v Speaker 1>LA residents yesterday. To Monsey, explain this to how this worked,

0:48:58.040 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll do this before you get to the

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 1>listener questions.

0:49:01.080 --> 0:49:03.799
<v Speaker 2>So yesterday LA residents were able to enter into the

0:49:03.800 --> 0:49:06.319
<v Speaker 2>ticket raffle for the twenty the ticket draw for the

0:49:06.320 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty eight Olympics. If you get drawn in March

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 2>in April, you get a you get a shot at

0:49:11.040 --> 0:49:14.840
<v Speaker 2>buying first tickets. Yeah, you're able to pick from five sports.

0:49:14.960 --> 0:49:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I picked four sports. You're gonna guess what my sports were,

0:49:19.960 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 2>and then you'll take it. And then you'll you'll tell

0:49:23.680 --> 0:49:26.279
<v Speaker 2>me what I should pick fill my final spot with.

0:49:26.600 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 2>And then lastly you'll tell us what you're looking most

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:32.400
<v Speaker 2>forward to in the twenty twenty twenty eight Olympics.

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, you definitely your four two were obvious.

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 1>You definitely picked basketball, bear, You definitely picked track and field.

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Am I wrong?

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:51.759
<v Speaker 2>I did not?

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:56.600
<v Speaker 1>You didn't Track and field should have been the number one? Okay, Well,

0:49:56.640 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 1>then that has to be your fifth pick. That's the

0:49:59.000 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 1>single best ticket.

0:50:00.719 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 2>I like tracker field. I just when I was going

0:50:03.080 --> 0:50:05.320
<v Speaker 2>through and seeing all on the list, there were somems

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 2>that popped out more to me than others. But but yeah,

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 2>I did not pick track in the field.

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, that one that has to be your fifth.

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you might have picked flag football. I did, Okay,

0:50:19.200 --> 0:50:24.839
<v Speaker 1>I thought you might say flag football. I think you

0:50:24.960 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>might have picked boxing.

0:50:27.520 --> 0:50:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I thought about that one pretty heavy. I did not

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 2>pick that one, but yes I would have.

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, did you pick three on three basketball? No, I

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:42.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't either. I think that's smart. This is interesting.

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:47.480
<v Speaker 2>They got flag football, basketball, and then there's two more.

0:50:49.800 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Beach volleyball.

0:50:52.880 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 2>No. I thought about that one too.

0:50:57.800 --> 0:50:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Did you pick any combat sport?

0:51:01.000 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:51:01.719 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 1>No, I thought you might have gone taekwondo or judo, skateboarding. No,

0:51:09.840 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm not gonna get closer to home than

0:51:12.040 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 1>what did you pick? One of them was diving. I

0:51:17.040 --> 0:51:20.000
<v Speaker 1>like diving, and I just think it's so hard and

0:51:20.160 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 1>just seeing them pull that type of stuff off. And

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:26.160
<v Speaker 1>then lastly, lastly, we got tennis.

0:51:27.800 --> 0:51:28.839
<v Speaker 2>They got tennis.

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:30.200
<v Speaker 1>No, I love tennis.

0:51:30.320 --> 0:51:32.359
<v Speaker 2>You know all the talk about it throughout the show,

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:36.879
<v Speaker 2>I've I've gained a liking to it, you know mevv Djokovic.

0:51:41.719 --> 0:51:44.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, mine, here's what I would not have picked

0:51:44.880 --> 0:51:47.520
<v Speaker 1>tennis because I can see tennis elsewhere.

0:51:48.280 --> 0:51:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, this is the Olympics. It's not the not the

0:51:51.640 --> 0:51:52.240
<v Speaker 2>best guy.

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean yeah, but the best guys playing all

0:51:55.560 --> 0:51:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the majors. So I if I could, if so, here's

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 1>what I would have picked. Track and fields my number

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:05.160
<v Speaker 1>one pick with a bullet.

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, because isn't that just like a large umbrella

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:10.520
<v Speaker 2>of a bunch of a bunch of stuff. I'm gonna

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:10.839
<v Speaker 2>eat there.

0:52:11.120 --> 0:52:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's all the Yeah, but that's the The field

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff is not as fun, but just the track one

0:52:18.040 --> 0:52:21.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred meter, the four by four, all of it. So

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:25.919
<v Speaker 1>i'd pick track and field. I think I would pick

0:52:26.040 --> 0:52:36.759
<v Speaker 1>water polo, okay, which is awesome. I would pick gymnastics.

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>The two hottest tickets are going to be track and

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:42.160
<v Speaker 1>field and gymnastics every time, no doubt about it.

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:52:45.640 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And I would pick swimming.

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can't that one. I can't get on the

0:52:50.960 --> 0:52:53.879
<v Speaker 2>other ones. I do find exciting watching as well.

0:52:54.760 --> 0:53:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Diving not really, but maybe it's because I can't do

0:53:02.480 --> 0:53:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a regular dive, so I'm not as the impressed by

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it as you are. But I like stuff that I'm

0:53:10.120 --> 0:53:12.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to watch elsewhere. So like

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I would consider rugby boxing is interesting because it's so

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 1>much purer than than regular boxing. Lacrosse is a great sport,

0:53:26.680 --> 0:53:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but I can watch that elsewhere. But if you get

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:34.719
<v Speaker 1>these tickets to Monsey, I'll buy them, Like if you

0:53:34.800 --> 0:53:37.759
<v Speaker 1>get selected, but you have to put track and.

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Field crazy, But yeah, no, I'm down for track and field.

0:53:42.360 --> 0:53:44.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, to be clear, I didn't mean I'll buy him

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and give them to you. But I mean him saying

0:53:46.719 --> 0:53:51.239
<v Speaker 1>if you get well, maybe maybe I don't know what

0:53:51.280 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll do, but I'm saying, if you get selected, don't

0:53:55.239 --> 0:54:00.760
<v Speaker 1>say oh no, I can't afford them. We'll figure it out. Okay,

0:54:00.840 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's get to some of the listener questions

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 1>from this the it was from Tuesday and then Thursday.

0:54:10.120 --> 0:54:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, uh, Anaki says, one question from a fan in Spain.

0:54:13.960 --> 0:54:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you think the Bills could beat Denver or Houston

0:54:16.360 --> 0:54:19.279
<v Speaker 2>with the type of methodical drives they had in Jacksonville?

0:54:19.400 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 2>I can't see Shakir with sixty one yards after catch.

0:54:23.000 --> 0:54:28.360
<v Speaker 1>No, I think that against either of those defenses, Josh

0:54:28.520 --> 0:54:30.480
<v Speaker 1>is gonna have to run a little more. But I

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:33.520
<v Speaker 1>also think they wouldn't need twenty seven points to beat

0:54:33.560 --> 0:54:34.799
<v Speaker 1>either of these defenses.

0:54:36.160 --> 0:54:41.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, Next, Acuity says, if anyone not named Stafford

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:44.239
<v Speaker 2>or Allen win the Super Bowl, can we avoid the

0:54:44.280 --> 0:54:47.960
<v Speaker 2>whole Hurts is the top five quarterback thing again just

0:54:48.000 --> 0:54:49.320
<v Speaker 2>because he wins the Super Bowl?

0:54:50.560 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I think the I think that Jalen Hurts had

0:54:57.000 --> 0:54:59.600
<v Speaker 1>legitimately had a claim after last year Super Bowl was

0:54:59.640 --> 0:55:02.280
<v Speaker 1>top five quarterback. He is a couple of years removed

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:06.000
<v Speaker 1>from finishing top three and MVP voting. He was unbelievable

0:55:06.560 --> 0:55:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in the final two weeks of the playoffs. Last year

0:55:08.520 --> 0:55:12.120
<v Speaker 1>they won the Super Bowl, like that was Mahomes Allen

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Burrow. Hurts was a fine opinion to hold. He

0:55:16.880 --> 0:55:23.600
<v Speaker 1>then fell some this year obviously, so the like he's

0:55:27.640 --> 0:55:30.479
<v Speaker 1>you are not like if Bo Nicks wins the Super Bowl,

0:55:30.520 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think or Sam Darnold. I don't think people

0:55:32.640 --> 0:55:35.680
<v Speaker 1>are gonna say that guy defended that guy's top five quarterback.

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Hurts had a bigger body of work, including a previous

0:55:38.640 --> 0:55:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl appearance. Yeah. Absolutely.

0:55:44.080 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Khalil asked do you think Houston is scarier now since

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:51.880
<v Speaker 2>they won? Like that was CJ playing bad.

0:55:52.719 --> 0:55:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I would feel that way if they if I thought

0:55:59.320 --> 0:56:02.120
<v Speaker 1>CJ was a about to start playing well. But I

0:56:02.200 --> 0:56:04.400
<v Speaker 1>just think that's what CJ is going to be doing.

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Like so no, I don't think they're scarier, all right.

0:56:07.320 --> 0:56:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Next, the lilte Man asked question for Demons when healthy,

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:14.359
<v Speaker 2>based on the playoff runs you've seen this far, who's

0:56:14.400 --> 0:56:17.120
<v Speaker 2>having the more magical year Caleb Williams this year or

0:56:17.239 --> 0:56:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Jaden Daniels last year? And I'd had to say Jayden

0:56:20.640 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Daniels last year.

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Jayden last year was more impressive up to

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:32.360
<v Speaker 1>this point. And what Caleb's done, what Caleb's doing feels

0:56:32.400 --> 0:56:37.919
<v Speaker 1>sturdier for me than Jayden. And you know, we'll see

0:56:38.560 --> 0:56:40.319
<v Speaker 1>and we'll see how much of this for Jaden was

0:56:40.400 --> 0:56:42.640
<v Speaker 1>just injuries and whether or not he's going to be

0:56:42.680 --> 0:56:45.359
<v Speaker 1>able to fade those injuries moving forward. All right, let's

0:56:45.360 --> 0:56:46.760
<v Speaker 1>go to some of the questions from today.

0:56:47.640 --> 0:56:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Curtis asked, out of the remaining playoff teams, who is

0:56:50.400 --> 0:56:53.040
<v Speaker 2>most likely to miss the playoffs next year? And who

0:56:53.120 --> 0:56:55.120
<v Speaker 2>do you think could get even better next year?

0:56:56.719 --> 0:57:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Out of the remaining playoff teams. Out of the remaining

0:57:01.960 --> 0:57:06.120
<v Speaker 1>playoff teams, the team I think is most likely to

0:57:06.160 --> 0:57:12.040
<v Speaker 1>miss the playoffs next year is Denver. Is that schedule

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that I just laid out to you. Yeah? And the

0:57:14.600 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 1>team that I think get better next year is the Bears.

0:57:17.680 --> 0:57:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I definitely.

0:57:22.000 --> 0:57:28.840
<v Speaker 1>The Yeah, though the Niners should be healthier, but I

0:57:28.840 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 1>don't you know, they won twelve games anyway, and so

0:57:31.400 --> 0:57:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much better they'll be, all right,

0:57:34.240 --> 0:57:34.720
<v Speaker 1>last one?

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:39.600
<v Speaker 2>And then Scott asked Nick, who goes after Malik Willis Cleveland,

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh or do you see him elsewhere.

0:57:46.520 --> 0:57:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Not Cleveland. I think Pittsburgh's a possibility. I think Arizona

0:57:54.400 --> 0:57:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is a possibility. I think that Miami is a possibility.

0:57:59.600 --> 0:58:04.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Jets are probably the favorites for

0:58:05.000 --> 0:58:08.200
<v Speaker 1>him because now that Dante More is going back to school,

0:58:08.200 --> 0:58:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they're gonna do. All right, Demanse

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:14.640
<v Speaker 1>beat me in picks last week. He has been the

0:58:14.680 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 1>gambling stage of the show this year. There is teasers crushed,

0:58:20.600 --> 0:58:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and then in his picks against the spread he went

0:58:22.800 --> 0:58:25.880
<v Speaker 1>four and two. We will get to our picks from

0:58:25.960 --> 0:58:30.920
<v Speaker 1>last week and our four picks for my favorite sports

0:58:30.920 --> 0:58:34.440
<v Speaker 1>weekend of the year in tomorrow's show, which we're about

0:58:34.480 --> 0:58:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to do right now, So we appreciate everybody listening. Check

0:58:38.720 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 1>out the feeds, YouTube, Spotify, iTunes for the pod that

0:58:43.240 --> 0:58:47.760
<v Speaker 1>will drop tomorrow morning with our divisional weekend picks. Huge.

0:58:47.800 --> 0:58:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to Volume and to hard Rock and of

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 1>course our great spot. I'm sorry Volume in Blue Duck

0:58:52.360 --> 0:58:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and our great sponsors hard Rock and Boost. Talk to

0:58:55.240 --> 0:58:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you guys tomorrow for our divisional round pick show. See

0:58:58.240 --> 0:58:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you then we'll try