1 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:09,600 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. A ban on TikTok 2 00:00:09,720 --> 00:00:12,520 Speaker 1: passed by Congress last April is set to take effect 3 00:00:12,720 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 1: this coming Sunday. 4 00:00:14,240 --> 00:00:17,440 Speaker 2: They call it a divest or ban measure, so basically, 5 00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 2: the measure calls upon byte Dance to sell TikTok before 6 00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:25,560 Speaker 2: January nineteenth or face a ban. 7 00:00:26,040 --> 00:00:29,280 Speaker 1: Sarah Forden runs Bloomberg's legal team, which has been covering 8 00:00:29,360 --> 00:00:32,040 Speaker 1: a challenge to that law filed by TikTok and some 9 00:00:32,159 --> 00:00:36,080 Speaker 1: of its users last year. At issue is TikTok's ownership. 10 00:00:36,520 --> 00:00:39,800 Speaker 1: Even though the hugely popular social media app is technically 11 00:00:39,880 --> 00:00:43,280 Speaker 1: run by an American company, it's owned by byte Dance, 12 00:00:43,600 --> 00:00:46,920 Speaker 1: which is a Chinese tech giant, and the nature of 13 00:00:46,960 --> 00:00:50,280 Speaker 1: the relationship between byte Dance and the Chinese government has 14 00:00:50,400 --> 00:00:54,800 Speaker 1: raised national security concerns for US intelligence officials and US 15 00:00:54,920 --> 00:00:59,000 Speaker 1: lawmakers for years. One worry is that the app could 16 00:00:59,040 --> 00:01:03,520 Speaker 1: give China acts to American phones and American data. Another 17 00:01:03,680 --> 00:01:06,080 Speaker 1: is about whether the apps algorithm could be used to 18 00:01:06,120 --> 00:01:11,319 Speaker 1: influence politics or spread disinformation. TikTok has been adamant that 19 00:01:11,400 --> 00:01:14,960 Speaker 1: these concerns are unfounded, and their lawsuit has made it 20 00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:17,959 Speaker 1: all the way to the US Supreme Court, So this. 21 00:01:18,040 --> 00:01:22,399 Speaker 2: Case really picks national security interests against free speech. 22 00:01:22,959 --> 00:01:26,080 Speaker 1: On Friday, the Court indicated it's likely to uphold the 23 00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:29,640 Speaker 1: divest or ban law, bringing months of debate to a head. 24 00:01:30,319 --> 00:01:33,600 Speaker 1: That means if ByteDance doesn't sell, the ban could go 25 00:01:33,640 --> 00:01:36,400 Speaker 1: into effect in just a few days. 26 00:01:36,080 --> 00:01:38,919 Speaker 2: So they still have time. You know, obviously the clock 27 00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:39,480 Speaker 2: is ticking. 28 00:01:39,840 --> 00:01:44,840 Speaker 1: But there's another major player complicating this case, President elect 29 00:01:45,080 --> 00:01:48,600 Speaker 1: Donald Trump. He said he opposes the ban and wants 30 00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:52,640 Speaker 1: to negotiate a deal himself. And the day after TikTok's 31 00:01:52,720 --> 00:02:00,400 Speaker 1: January nineteenth deadline is inauguration day. This is the take 32 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:04,360 Speaker 1: from Bloomberg News. I'm Sarah Holder today on the show. 33 00:02:04,560 --> 00:02:07,360 Speaker 1: The TikTok case could get decided by the Supreme Court 34 00:02:07,560 --> 00:02:10,960 Speaker 1: any moment now. If the ban goes into effect, what 35 00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:13,240 Speaker 1: would that mean for the apps one hundred and seventy 36 00:02:13,280 --> 00:02:18,120 Speaker 1: million users, for competitor tech platforms, and for US China relations. 37 00:02:18,760 --> 00:02:28,280 Speaker 1: And how could Trump's imminent inauguration call the decision into question? Sarah, 38 00:02:28,320 --> 00:02:31,400 Speaker 1: It seems like it's actually getting closer to happening. The 39 00:02:31,440 --> 00:02:34,160 Speaker 1: Supreme Court indicated last week that it is likely to 40 00:02:34,360 --> 00:02:38,120 Speaker 1: uphold a US law banning TikTok if it's Chinese parent 41 00:02:38,160 --> 00:02:42,840 Speaker 1: company ByteDance doesn't sell to an American firm by January nineteenth, 42 00:02:43,480 --> 00:02:46,320 Speaker 1: walk us through how we got here. When did Washington 43 00:02:46,360 --> 00:02:49,680 Speaker 1: first start raising these concerns about TikTok's ownership. 44 00:02:50,040 --> 00:02:54,040 Speaker 2: Mean, there have been concerns about TikTok's ownership floating around 45 00:02:54,080 --> 00:02:57,960 Speaker 2: Washington for years. And if you go back even to 46 00:02:58,040 --> 00:03:02,280 Speaker 2: the first Trump administration, he himself was proposing a ban 47 00:03:02,440 --> 00:03:06,280 Speaker 2: in past, an executive order banning TikTok, which then got 48 00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:10,639 Speaker 2: hung up in the courts. So intelligence circles, national security 49 00:03:10,639 --> 00:03:14,440 Speaker 2: circles have been expressing concerns that TikTok could provide a 50 00:03:14,520 --> 00:03:18,200 Speaker 2: tool for the Chinese government to both a spy on 51 00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:22,200 Speaker 2: and collect data on American citizens, but also use the platform, 52 00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:27,360 Speaker 2: which is highly wildly popular, use it to influence people, 53 00:03:27,800 --> 00:03:31,960 Speaker 2: feed them, you know, surreptitious information with goals of creating 54 00:03:32,120 --> 00:03:34,320 Speaker 2: unrest and divisiveness in this country. 55 00:03:35,120 --> 00:03:37,920 Speaker 1: What do we know about the extent of the relationship 56 00:03:37,920 --> 00:03:41,760 Speaker 1: between the Chinese government and ByteDance. Is there evidence that 57 00:03:41,880 --> 00:03:45,440 Speaker 1: China could use TikTok to spy on people in the US? 58 00:03:45,720 --> 00:03:49,200 Speaker 2: You know, TikTok's leadership in the US is adamant that 59 00:03:49,240 --> 00:03:53,160 Speaker 2: there is a wall between the company and the Chinese 60 00:03:53,240 --> 00:03:56,760 Speaker 2: government that they don't share any data. But the fact 61 00:03:56,840 --> 00:04:00,440 Speaker 2: is this is an autocratic regime and companies would have 62 00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:04,360 Speaker 2: to comply if the government said it wanted certain information 63 00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:07,240 Speaker 2: or to use the platform in a certain way. So 64 00:04:07,960 --> 00:04:13,440 Speaker 2: no lawmakers or government officials have provided broad evidence of this. 65 00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:17,720 Speaker 2: But last year there were intelligence briefings on the Hill 66 00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:22,039 Speaker 2: that led to Congress. You know this incredibly, like divided 67 00:04:22,120 --> 00:04:26,520 Speaker 2: Congress came together in a flash to pass this law 68 00:04:26,600 --> 00:04:30,360 Speaker 2: banning TikTok. So whatever material they got in those briefings 69 00:04:30,480 --> 00:04:32,880 Speaker 2: was compelling enough to prompt them to act. 70 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:37,039 Speaker 1: So that law passed in April. Why wasn't TikTok just 71 00:04:37,480 --> 00:04:41,000 Speaker 1: immediately sold? Were there any American companies who are jumping 72 00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:42,400 Speaker 1: at the chance to own TikTok? 73 00:04:42,600 --> 00:04:45,960 Speaker 2: I mean, there was a deal proposed, again going back 74 00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:50,000 Speaker 2: to the first Trump administration. He was working with Microsoft 75 00:04:50,200 --> 00:04:53,680 Speaker 2: and with Oracle, and the idea was that Oracle would 76 00:04:53,720 --> 00:04:57,240 Speaker 2: host the platform, and that deal fell apart. It never 77 00:04:57,320 --> 00:05:00,520 Speaker 2: came to fruition. There are several American is this men 78 00:05:00,560 --> 00:05:02,760 Speaker 2: who have just in the past few days come forward 79 00:05:02,800 --> 00:05:05,839 Speaker 2: and saying they want to buy TikTok Frank McCourt and 80 00:05:06,440 --> 00:05:10,040 Speaker 2: Kevin O'Leary. Kevin O'Leary was just reportedly in mar Lago 81 00:05:10,760 --> 00:05:12,120 Speaker 2: talking about this transaction. 82 00:05:12,560 --> 00:05:15,240 Speaker 1: Frank McCourt is a real estate mogul and former owner 83 00:05:15,279 --> 00:05:18,280 Speaker 1: of the Los Angeles Dodgers, and Kevin O'Leary is an 84 00:05:18,320 --> 00:05:19,640 Speaker 1: investor on Shark Tank. 85 00:05:19,960 --> 00:05:23,560 Speaker 2: The other important distinction in this latest deal that Kevin 86 00:05:23,600 --> 00:05:26,960 Speaker 2: O'Leary and McCord are talking about apparently, again according to reports, 87 00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:31,160 Speaker 2: they're not interested in buying the algorithm. Well, the algorithm 88 00:05:31,240 --> 00:05:34,000 Speaker 2: is really the crown jewel of the platform, and that's 89 00:05:34,040 --> 00:05:36,960 Speaker 2: also where all the data is stored and processed. So 90 00:05:37,839 --> 00:05:41,599 Speaker 2: raises the question of would a sale actually achieve the 91 00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:46,400 Speaker 2: goals of this law if the algorithm isn't included. But 92 00:05:47,080 --> 00:05:49,800 Speaker 2: all of this really still begs the question of whether 93 00:05:49,920 --> 00:05:53,240 Speaker 2: Byte Dance would approve a sale, and we haven't seen 94 00:05:53,279 --> 00:05:55,560 Speaker 2: an indication that they would be open to this. 95 00:05:55,920 --> 00:05:59,120 Speaker 1: So Bite Dance is resistant to a sale. TikTok filed 96 00:05:59,120 --> 00:06:01,120 Speaker 1: this lawsuit and now the case is up at the 97 00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:04,960 Speaker 1: Supreme Court. What are the key arguments for and against 98 00:06:05,200 --> 00:06:06,440 Speaker 1: this TikTok ban. 99 00:06:06,920 --> 00:06:11,080 Speaker 2: TikTok is arguing that this law is unconstitutional and that 100 00:06:11,160 --> 00:06:14,279 Speaker 2: it violates the free speech rights both of the company 101 00:06:14,400 --> 00:06:18,240 Speaker 2: and of the users on the platform. And so as 102 00:06:18,320 --> 00:06:21,880 Speaker 2: the arguments unfolded, there were a lot of questions about 103 00:06:22,400 --> 00:06:26,200 Speaker 2: whose speech is being violated here and who has the 104 00:06:26,279 --> 00:06:29,080 Speaker 2: right to free speech in the US. So, for example, 105 00:06:29,279 --> 00:06:32,960 Speaker 2: some of the justices observed that foreign entities don't have 106 00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:37,039 Speaker 2: the same free speech protections as US citizens. So while 107 00:06:37,080 --> 00:06:39,400 Speaker 2: TikTok is a US company, it is owned by a 108 00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:42,000 Speaker 2: Chinese company. So there was a lot of discussion around that, 109 00:06:42,520 --> 00:06:45,080 Speaker 2: What about the speech rights of the one hundred and 110 00:06:45,080 --> 00:06:48,919 Speaker 2: seventy million users of the platform? Are they protected in 111 00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:52,159 Speaker 2: this case? But then, you know, the Solicitor General, arguing 112 00:06:52,200 --> 00:06:55,480 Speaker 2: for the US Justice Department, pointed out that this really 113 00:06:55,600 --> 00:06:59,720 Speaker 2: isn't about the speech rights of the users of the platform. 114 00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:04,320 Speaker 2: This is about a ban against this you know, streaming 115 00:07:04,440 --> 00:07:09,000 Speaker 2: platform and the national security interest that it raises. So 116 00:07:09,040 --> 00:07:11,480 Speaker 2: they're arguing kind of across each other. 117 00:07:11,880 --> 00:07:14,680 Speaker 1: What was the upshot of these oral arguments. 118 00:07:15,080 --> 00:07:18,000 Speaker 2: So they didn't issue a decision, but they could rule 119 00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:21,960 Speaker 2: soon as this week. Our expectation is that they will 120 00:07:22,000 --> 00:07:25,600 Speaker 2: probably uphold the band judging from you know, the commentary 121 00:07:25,680 --> 00:07:29,680 Speaker 2: that that we heard. But again, nothing is nothing is sure, 122 00:07:29,800 --> 00:07:30,720 Speaker 2: nothing is set yet. 123 00:07:31,240 --> 00:07:34,760 Speaker 1: Has ByteDance indicated any openness to selling off TikTok to 124 00:07:34,840 --> 00:07:36,680 Speaker 1: avoid losing its American user base. 125 00:07:36,960 --> 00:07:40,720 Speaker 2: Byte Dance has absolutely said it's not going to sell TikTok. 126 00:07:40,800 --> 00:07:44,280 Speaker 2: It has no desire and it doesn't have any compunction 127 00:07:44,440 --> 00:07:47,480 Speaker 2: to sell TikTok. So, you know, this could lead to 128 00:07:47,520 --> 00:07:51,040 Speaker 2: a real flare up in US China relations in addition 129 00:07:51,160 --> 00:07:53,400 Speaker 2: to to the business situation. 130 00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:58,440 Speaker 1: After the break, we look at how a TikTok band 131 00:07:58,480 --> 00:08:02,160 Speaker 1: could actually play out and how Trump's return to office 132 00:08:02,520 --> 00:08:15,080 Speaker 1: could change everything. The Supreme Court's decision on the lawsuit 133 00:08:15,160 --> 00:08:18,960 Speaker 1: challenging Congress's TikTok ban is expected to come down this week. 134 00:08:19,520 --> 00:08:22,679 Speaker 1: Bloomberg's legal editor Sarah Forden, has been following the court 135 00:08:22,720 --> 00:08:27,120 Speaker 1: case closely for months and looking into the possible outcomes 136 00:08:28,040 --> 00:08:31,960 Speaker 1: if a ban is upheld by the Supreme Court, what 137 00:08:32,120 --> 00:08:32,920 Speaker 1: happens next. 138 00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:36,959 Speaker 2: One of the requests was to try to postpone this 139 00:08:37,080 --> 00:08:40,120 Speaker 2: law going into effect, to delay it until Trump gets 140 00:08:40,160 --> 00:08:43,560 Speaker 2: into office, because now he has flip flopped and said 141 00:08:43,559 --> 00:08:47,839 Speaker 2: he has warm feelings about TikTok, and he's the great negotiator, 142 00:08:47,960 --> 00:08:50,160 Speaker 2: and you know he should be able to get into 143 00:08:50,160 --> 00:08:54,400 Speaker 2: office and help them negotiate a deal. So one possibility 144 00:08:54,440 --> 00:08:56,880 Speaker 2: that the Supreme Court has is to delay the ban 145 00:08:57,000 --> 00:09:00,720 Speaker 2: until he gets into office, and then you sort of 146 00:09:00,760 --> 00:09:05,680 Speaker 2: what happens next. I mean, technically, the Justice Department is 147 00:09:05,800 --> 00:09:09,320 Speaker 2: responsible for enforcing the ban, but if Trump is in 148 00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:12,080 Speaker 2: office and he could tell his Attorney general not to 149 00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:15,000 Speaker 2: enforce it, for example, and there are other scenarios that 150 00:09:15,280 --> 00:09:18,640 Speaker 2: could play out, he could go back to Congress and 151 00:09:18,800 --> 00:09:22,839 Speaker 2: ask them to revise the law. So it's really still 152 00:09:22,880 --> 00:09:27,200 Speaker 2: a very fluid situation with not a clear solution or 153 00:09:27,240 --> 00:09:28,200 Speaker 2: resolution in sight. 154 00:09:28,280 --> 00:09:32,240 Speaker 1: Yet how likely are those scenarios? What has Trump said 155 00:09:32,360 --> 00:09:33,920 Speaker 1: about his stance on the ban and how do you 156 00:09:33,960 --> 00:09:38,400 Speaker 1: explain his position towards keeping TikTok running in the US? 157 00:09:38,720 --> 00:09:42,520 Speaker 2: Well, so, the TikTok community was really critical in his 158 00:09:42,679 --> 00:09:46,720 Speaker 2: winning the election, so he's very mindful, you know that 159 00:09:46,760 --> 00:09:50,360 Speaker 2: he owes them a favor, and so he's come back 160 00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:52,320 Speaker 2: and said that he doesn't think it should be banned, 161 00:09:52,720 --> 00:09:55,240 Speaker 2: that it should be sold to a US company, and 162 00:09:55,360 --> 00:09:58,480 Speaker 2: that he's in a great position to make that happen. 163 00:09:58,840 --> 00:10:01,559 Speaker 1: So let's say bye Dance. It doesn't sell, it doesn't 164 00:10:01,559 --> 00:10:03,480 Speaker 1: find an American buyer, it doesn't want to find an 165 00:10:03,480 --> 00:10:06,640 Speaker 1: American buyer. Trump doesn't weigh in in time, and the 166 00:10:06,679 --> 00:10:10,840 Speaker 1: ban is upheld. What actually happens on January nineteenth? How 167 00:10:10,880 --> 00:10:13,880 Speaker 1: do you actually get TikTok off American phones? 168 00:10:14,480 --> 00:10:16,800 Speaker 2: Yeah, so this came up in the Supreme Court arguments 169 00:10:16,800 --> 00:10:19,600 Speaker 2: and the lawyer for TikTok was arguing that, you know, 170 00:10:19,720 --> 00:10:22,760 Speaker 2: basically the whole platform would go dark, you know, on 171 00:10:22,880 --> 00:10:27,400 Speaker 2: January twentieth. That actually isn't the case as far as 172 00:10:27,400 --> 00:10:31,240 Speaker 2: we can see, because what would happen is that the 173 00:10:31,480 --> 00:10:35,440 Speaker 2: app stores, so Google an Apple would be required to 174 00:10:35,559 --> 00:10:38,240 Speaker 2: remove the app from the app store, so you can't 175 00:10:38,840 --> 00:10:42,240 Speaker 2: sign up anymore. But the people who already have TikTok 176 00:10:42,280 --> 00:10:45,200 Speaker 2: on their phones could keep using it. But then the 177 00:10:45,280 --> 00:10:48,239 Speaker 2: idea is that they wouldn't be able to get updates, 178 00:10:48,320 --> 00:10:51,360 Speaker 2: you know, TikTok wouldn't be able to continue, you know, 179 00:10:51,440 --> 00:10:55,200 Speaker 2: offering the service, and so gradually those apps on those 180 00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:57,000 Speaker 2: phones would become dysfunctional. 181 00:10:57,400 --> 00:11:01,560 Speaker 1: How are competitor apps like metas Real performing? Are we 182 00:11:01,600 --> 00:11:06,120 Speaker 1: seeing TikTokers preemptively head to other platforms. These other platforms 183 00:11:06,200 --> 00:11:09,560 Speaker 1: kind of courting these TikTokers. Where does that stand? 184 00:11:10,120 --> 00:11:13,439 Speaker 2: Well, surely it's a very competitive atmosphere, and the people 185 00:11:13,520 --> 00:11:16,880 Speaker 2: who oppose a TikTok band also say that it would actually, 186 00:11:17,240 --> 00:11:19,960 Speaker 2: you know, just basically be sort of giving that, you know, 187 00:11:20,160 --> 00:11:23,360 Speaker 2: swath of the market to meta to the others. At 188 00:11:23,400 --> 00:11:26,840 Speaker 2: the same time, the TikTok creators themselves are starting to 189 00:11:27,000 --> 00:11:31,079 Speaker 2: think about what possible workarounds do they have. Could they 190 00:11:31,200 --> 00:11:35,240 Speaker 2: use VPNs to access the platform to make it look 191 00:11:35,320 --> 00:11:38,720 Speaker 2: like they're not in the United States. So the content 192 00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:41,960 Speaker 2: creators are on the one hand trying to protect their 193 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:44,880 Speaker 2: assets on the platform, but at the same time trying 194 00:11:44,880 --> 00:11:46,640 Speaker 2: to get ready to jump if they have to. 195 00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:50,040 Speaker 1: Right now, the app is full of users trying to 196 00:11:50,080 --> 00:11:51,440 Speaker 1: game out their next moves. 197 00:11:51,840 --> 00:11:53,880 Speaker 2: I am in a full state of denial that this 198 00:11:53,920 --> 00:11:56,640 Speaker 2: is the last Sunday I'll be able to doom scroll TikTok. 199 00:11:56,920 --> 00:11:59,680 Speaker 2: What are we doing? Where we're going? Just try scrolling 200 00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:00,480 Speaker 2: for Instagram. 201 00:12:00,480 --> 00:12:03,559 Speaker 1: I didn't laugh one time. And some TikTok creators are 202 00:12:03,600 --> 00:12:06,040 Speaker 1: actually involved in this case, right. 203 00:12:06,280 --> 00:12:09,560 Speaker 2: So we had three parties arguing we had TikTok, we 204 00:12:09,679 --> 00:12:13,839 Speaker 2: had lawyers for the content creators themselves who are arguing 205 00:12:13,840 --> 00:12:16,679 Speaker 2: that this is really going to hurt their livelihood and 206 00:12:16,720 --> 00:12:20,080 Speaker 2: their free expression. So they're being very vocal that they 207 00:12:20,559 --> 00:12:23,240 Speaker 2: want to have a say here and they're really standing 208 00:12:23,320 --> 00:12:26,040 Speaker 2: up for their right to continue to use this platform. 209 00:12:26,320 --> 00:12:27,960 Speaker 1: At the end of the day, what would this mean 210 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:31,760 Speaker 1: for the TikTok economy? All of these influencers we've talked 211 00:12:31,800 --> 00:12:34,760 Speaker 1: about and small business owners who sell goods and services 212 00:12:34,800 --> 00:12:37,920 Speaker 1: through TikTok brands who partner with influencers to get their 213 00:12:37,960 --> 00:12:42,360 Speaker 1: products out there. Could this cause like a huge ripple 214 00:12:42,400 --> 00:12:43,840 Speaker 1: effect on the economy. 215 00:12:44,200 --> 00:12:46,560 Speaker 2: Well, clearly there's a big chunk of the economy tied 216 00:12:46,640 --> 00:12:49,040 Speaker 2: up in here, and that's one of the reasons why 217 00:12:49,080 --> 00:12:52,520 Speaker 2: this case has gone as far as it has. At 218 00:12:52,520 --> 00:12:55,440 Speaker 2: the same time, though, I mean, the tech market is 219 00:12:56,000 --> 00:12:59,680 Speaker 2: highly disruptive and use to disruptions, and people can jump 220 00:12:59,800 --> 00:13:04,040 Speaker 2: quick and new platforms can come into effects. So I think, yes, 221 00:13:04,080 --> 00:13:06,960 Speaker 2: a big chunk of business would go away, and that's 222 00:13:07,160 --> 00:13:10,720 Speaker 2: why the influencers are so concerned. But at the same time, 223 00:13:10,920 --> 00:13:12,959 Speaker 2: there are other opportunities out there. 224 00:13:13,920 --> 00:13:16,840 Speaker 1: We'll be following this story as it unfolds this week 225 00:13:17,160 --> 00:13:20,640 Speaker 1: for more reporting and updates on TikTok. Go to Bloomberg 226 00:13:20,679 --> 00:13:27,160 Speaker 1: dot com. This is the Big Take from Bloomberg News. 227 00:13:27,280 --> 00:13:30,840 Speaker 1: I'm Sarah Holder. This episode was produced by Julia Press. 228 00:13:30,960 --> 00:13:33,600 Speaker 1: It was edited by Michael Sheppard and our senior producer 229 00:13:33,760 --> 00:13:37,240 Speaker 1: Naomi Shaven. It was mixed and sound designed by Alex Huguiera. 230 00:13:37,679 --> 00:13:41,040 Speaker 1: It was fact checked by Adrianna Tapia. Our senior editor 231 00:13:41,120 --> 00:13:44,800 Speaker 1: is Elizabeth Ponso. Our executive producer is Nicole Beemster. Bor 232 00:13:45,320 --> 00:13:48,680 Speaker 1: Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts. If you liked 233 00:13:48,720 --> 00:13:51,320 Speaker 1: this episode, make sure to subscribe and review The Big 234 00:13:51,360 --> 00:13:54,360 Speaker 1: Take wherever you listen to podcasts. It helps people find 235 00:13:54,400 --> 00:14:02,800 Speaker 1: the show. Thanks for listening. We'll be back tomorrow, he say,