WEBVTT - Strongly Worded Letters

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.000 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 2>How about them? Nixt Yeah, Michael R. Bloomberg photographed next

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>to Timothy Shallamy and Kylie Jenner. That was a highlight

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.920
<v Speaker 2>for me. Taylor Switch was also there. Paul Tudor Jones

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 2>was behind her. What an interesting cast of characters on

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Celebrity Row.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>It's funny. I feel like I've seen a number of

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>articles about who was there on Celebrity Around. None of

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>them mentioned Paul Tudor Jones.

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 2>He was there.

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the kind of insight you need to come to

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg for.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 2>I went to bed at halftime and the vibes were

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 2>that of a funeral. Yeah, it was so bad.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Then they changed.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh my goodness did they change. I woke up at

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 2>like one in the morning, and uh, I couldn't believe it.

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Can I tell you something cute? My kids love sports,

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and my I guess then loves basketball. But like he is,

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he is particularly enamored of half court shots, and he

0:00:59.680 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is like got it in his head that like a

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>half court shot is the best thing in basketball. And

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>so when like, you know, they go to bed before

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the next games, but like they could come down sturds

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 1>in the morning, We're like the nixt one one, O seven,

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the six was a huge comeback, and he's like,

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>were there any half court shots?

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Otherwise I'm not interested.

0:01:18.959 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty like one day in like the previous Spurs series.

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I cou'd be like, yes, Wemby made a half court

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>shot at the first half.

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 2>We don't speak his names.

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Hello, and welcome to the Money Stuff Podcast. I'm

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Matt Levin and I heard the Money Stuff calm with.

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Then we're Companion, and I'm Katie Greifeld, a reporter for

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News and an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, like two weeks ago you were talking

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>about how we were going to be recording this like

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a crucial time for the space x Ipo because we're

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>recording this at like two in the afternoon on thirteen

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to thirteen on Thursday, and it'll come out, you know,

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in the morning ish on Friday, and between now and then,

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the SpaceX IPI will have priced and maybe even started

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>trading all that kind of dobt that and what will

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.639
<v Speaker 1>we do? What will we do? I read about it

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>today a little bit. Yeah, time today was about why

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we're podcasting today. I kind of was like, there's no,

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>there's not a pricing today, Like I understand that the

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>IPI is pricing today, but actually priced a week ago

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>because they went out at a fixed price and a

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>fixed number of shares. They're like, the price is one

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty five per sure, take it or leave it? All

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>accounts are that people took it?

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a lot of people.

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like Blombers. Last reporting I think was that it

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>was four times over subscribe, but that's like the institutional

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>there's also like a hundred billion of retailer ITER's like

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it's significantly over subscribed, and so it would be interesting

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 1>if it prices tonight at like one hundred and forty

0:02:57.600 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars or share, but I don't think they can even

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>do that. I think they're in a price at the

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>price they've said they're going to price to that, and

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>then so we know the space, like if your price

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>which is one hundred and thirty five dollars per share,

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we're going to beat this if if if I'm wrong.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 2>This makes my job on television today a lot easier

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 2>because we're awaiting the pricing.

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Waiting pricing, and then like it's one hundred thirty five.

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And then of course the question is where it all

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:23.960
<v Speaker 1>open tomorrow, whichill probably happen after we published this episode.

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 2>But theoretically, yeah.

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 1>No, not theoretically, I mean, like you know, the stock

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>exchange opens at nine thirty in the morning.

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like, but I feel like you get first trades.

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>They're like two in the after Yeah, it's all right,

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So it could open because they're going out at a

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:42.120
<v Speaker 1>fixed price that is, like Elon Musk's arbitrary decision. It

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>could open wildly up or wildly down. Yeah, But I

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>mean the thing that I read about today is like

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>there's there's like market prices, right, so there's like the

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>secondary private company secondaries like the five and forge inequities

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>on which like I don't know how real those prices are,

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much trades. And then yeah, but

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>there's also like pretty robust gambling markets. Yes it's not

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>just like polymarket, but also like finance and hyper liquid,

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like big crypto exchanges run essentially cash settled derivatives markets,

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>right where you can just bet on the price of

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>baseix luck, and then like you know, it eventually morphs

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>into connecting to the actual public price of the stuck

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and those are training it like you know, up, you know,

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent from the IPO price, which is kind of

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>what you want in an IPO. Yeah, I don't know.

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>The market is kind of saying like you've done it perfectly.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Elon Muss, you got it right on the first try. Yeah.

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I was actually having a conversation around like betting markets

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 2>and this particular IPO, how they seem particularly relevant for

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.599
<v Speaker 2>this offering since there's just so much demand and it

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 2>seems hard to get your little hands on it.

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Right. I feel like I spent a lot of time

0:04:51.839 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>complaining about the betting markets. Yeah, for two reasons. One

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>like mostly their sports bets and that's annoying, and then

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>secondly today extent their stock market bets, like that's just illegal,

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and like all of these things are offshore like polymarket

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and Binance and hyper liquid other spaceix stock price bets

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>are not open to US customers because like it's just

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>clearly forbidden by US securities law and kind of for

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 1>good reason. But also like the argument like they provide

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>truth function and price seek and you know, and and

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>price discovery is kind of real, right yeah, maybe right,

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Like if the stock opens at like four hundred tomorrow

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>or like forty then whoops, never mind, But like for now,

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>these things are like yeah, you got it perfectly right,

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, to the point like are you only talking about

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 2>individual stocks? Can I bet on the future movement of

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 2>the S and P five hundred in the next fifteen minutes?

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Some more complicated question, but like I think the short

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>answer is like yeah, you kind of can, because like

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>for some reason index features the regulator regime is so weird.

0:05:54.440 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>But basically, prediction markets are commodities exchanges, and for boring

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>historical reasons, index futures are traded on commodities exchanges and

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>so like cals, she can list them, and single stock

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>futures are SEC regulated and so can't list them. And

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it's like.

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Marked it than that, but feel like we're getting into

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 2>dangerous territory. Well also with our we're going to talk

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 2>a little bit about the regular regime, but I want

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 2>to talk about SpaceX a little bit more. Oh SMP

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 2>came out.

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we haven't talked about this.

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 2>I know, which is crazy because it feels like so

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 2>long ago, because every day it feels like a year.

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, everyone was like all the indexes are changing their

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>rules to let SpaceX enter their index as fast as possible,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and shocker SNP like put out a consultation being like,

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to waive our profitability requirements and let them

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>in in six months, and then they're like, Nope, we

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>did the consultation and we decided we're not going to

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>do that.

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>So now we're talking about potentially a year before well.

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 1>The minimum is a year. But then like they also

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>have to be profitable, you know, I think I think

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the SMP rules you have to be probable for like

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.559
<v Speaker 1>four quarters basically, yeah, which is that's true twenty forty

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you know.

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>So you're maybe a little bit optimistic. This was a

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 2>shakra though. I remember chatting about it with my ETF

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 2>friends over at Bloomberg Intelligence and they were replacing like

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 2>seventy five percent odds that the S and P five

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 2>hundred or the S and P rather would do what

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 2>all the other index providers did, And what an interesting

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 2>world this is going to create, right, It's kind of

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 2>ugly for the other index providers.

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>All of it is ugly for all index providers in

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the sense that if you think that you are a

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>passive investor by buying, you know, an undifferent like whatever

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>index you happen to buy, then it's a little annoying

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to be like, no, these are like active decisions made

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>by committees after consultations in round numbers. Is the S

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred the same thing as the CRISP

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Total Stock Market index that underlies the big Vanguard fund

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>like kind of right, but for the next year or

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>two or five, they're going to have wildly divergent performance

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>because one of them will have the three big as

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>STACs basically and one of them won't, right, Yeah, and

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a big difference in index performance.

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And pere like, wow, some passive investment, you know. It's

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>just like it's like such an active decision that has

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>such an economic invit By the way, you're like, oh,

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's bad for the other index providers, Like I

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know, it depends if they go up optically.

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm just talking about the optics.

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Someone everyone says, like I understand that, like the sort

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of like house view everywhere is that these index providers

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>are evil for changing their rules to accommodate Elon Musk.

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's true. I think it's like they're

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.200
<v Speaker 1>like look, you know, our job is to provide exposure

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to the stock the stock market.

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 2>I am sympathetic to that view. I mean, you think

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 2>about the mission of a lot of these indexes, the

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Nasdaq one hundred. They want to have the one hundred

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 2>largest companies that are listed on Nasdaq. It makes sense.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 2>But definitely have seen SMP presented as like their decision,

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 2>they're the adult in the room here.

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>There's vocal support for what SMP did. I think there's

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>vocal like, yeah, I got an email from one reader

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>who's like, look, I don't buy the SMP to buy

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>all like the five hundred biggest companies. I buy the

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>SMP for its rules that you have to be profitable

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and liquid and you know, seasoned public company. And he

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>might be the only one. I don't really believe that.

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>That's how most like retirement savers are like, oh, you

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>know what I really care about is SMP's rules. You know,

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>so clearly that guy exists. But also, like I think

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people like when this problem is presented

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to them, when they were like reminded of the fact

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that SMP has rules and it's thinking about waving them

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:38.959
<v Speaker 1>for SpaceX. A lot of people are like, no, those

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>rules are good and we don't like this, but will

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>they change their minds in two weeks if SpaceX.

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.719
<v Speaker 2>Doubles and I don't know how would look terrible for them.

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 2>I feel like for who S and P?

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the thing is like S and P. Actually, in

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 1>some ways it's not that big a problem for S

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and P because S and P was never considering, like,

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going to put SpaceX in the index in two weeks,

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>which would like a lot of the other index of it.

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And one reason they didn't do that is you just

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>could not physically fit the S and P demand at

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this space because like the SMP devat is like any

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I'm going to say the run number,

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it's probably like ten plus percent of yeah companies stocks,

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and so faceax is going public with like four percent

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of its stock, Like you can't you can't fit the SMP.

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>So like yeah, you know, they were like, should we

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>do this in six months or should we do it

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>in three years? Right? Yeah, So whatever happens in the

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>next six months wouldn't have mattered anyway what their decision was.

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I have to say, I think this is the most

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 2>interesting outcome, the fact that you had all the other

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 2>index providers make this decision, S and P standing firm.

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 2>And part of the reason I'm so interested is because

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 2>I have to imagine there's a whole bunch of active

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 2>managers out there who are absolutely psyched that SpaceX isn't

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 2>going into the S and P Oh yeah, it's just

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.479
<v Speaker 2>been impossible to beat that benchmark, and now you potentially

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 2>have a chance to.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Right. Also, you're not forced to make a decision. Yeah,

0:10:57.960 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in the same way, like if you're like a quote

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 1>unk active manager whose job is to track the index

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and beat it a little bit, or it might be

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>how some active managers see themselves, then putting SpaceX in

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 1>the index made you like either have to own it

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>or have to really confident that you that you're not

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>like missing out on performance. Having SpaceX in the index

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>means that if you do not own SpaceX for your career,

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 1>it's equivalent to being short SpaceX. And like you might

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>not like an Elon Musk company, but you you don't

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>like Tesla, you wouldn't necessarily short it because it's terrifying, right, yeah,

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And like you know, the same dynamic exists if you're

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>like a long only manager benchmark to the index, and

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>it's like, if I don't buy SpaceX and then it doubles,

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna look like an idiot. So you get the

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>thodds that pullet a little bit, and if you like SpaceX,

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you can buy it and not perform.

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Something we were talking about last week was ESG considerations

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 2>around SpaceX. The governance super hard here and UH.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Is the worst, like Mark Levine that relation the like

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Comptroller of New York put out his statement being like,

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>we're going to try to stop them. They can't be

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:08.359
<v Speaker 1>allowed to disempowers.

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 2>They're going to try to stop SpaceX. They're going to

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 2>try to stop Elon Musk. Who are they trying to stop?

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna write a strongly worded letter. Wow, the governance

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of SpaceX is such that you cannot complain about the

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>governance of SpaceX. You can't like buy shares and like

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.440
<v Speaker 1>sue or like run a proxy fight, like those are

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>all closed off to you. So there's nothing you can do.

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Either buy the shares and just trust Elon, or you

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>don't buy the shares, or the third option is you

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>write strongly worded letters saying they should really have different governance.

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.599
<v Speaker 1>But it doesn't matter. Yeah, the governance is bad. I

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know what they e.

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't really know. I don't know how to make

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 2>head or.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Sort of like it's like sort of orthogonal to all

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>previous esg like environmental conversations. It's like, Wow, we're going

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to put a lot of data centers in space. Is

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that good for the environment?

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 2>Do the polluting in space versus.

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of solar energy his data centers?

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I really like the Bloomberg story. He was yesterday

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe today? Whatever about like all the retail investors quoting them,

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>saying it's like they tried to borrow money from a

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.839
<v Speaker 1>bank or for their sister to buy more SpaceX stock

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.560
<v Speaker 1>or uh so. One woman says there's no such thing

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>as too much when it comes to investing in one

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>of the most ambitious companies that ever existed, and another

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>guy says, I'm willing to overpay for it just to

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>say I'm part of the thing, which is like an

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>amazing I don't think about it, Like, what what is

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a meme stock? Yeah, it's hard to get like like

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it's easy for like you to look at like game

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Stop and be like, oh, this is a company that

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>trades above its fundamental value because retail investors like it.

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:42.559
<v Speaker 1>But like then you go on like you know, Reddit

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and like people are making fundamental cases for

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 1>game Stop. You can't necessarily like tell a meme stock

0:13:49.200 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>by what people say about it, right, You have to

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of like be like this enthusiasm is like it's

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>my aesthetic judgment that some of these stocks are meme stocks.

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>But then this guy is like, I know, I'm a

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>were paying I don't think this company is worth that much,

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>but I want to be part of this thing.

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 2>I want to participate in the culture. That's exactly think

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of beautiful. I like how candid he is

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 2>and like true to his own intentions. He is right

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 2>you know something I did think was interesting and we've

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 2>probably have to move along. But I just think the

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 2>conversations that we're having around SpaceX anthropic open AI. I

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 2>think back to the conversations we were having on this

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 2>podcast probably a year ago talking about how Private Forever

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 2>is the new mantra and like the dearth of IPOs,

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 2>and it is pretty amazing to think about where we

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 2>are at this moment where SpaceX is about to go public.

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 2>We have s ones in some form from anthropic and

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 2>open AI. It's just like a total total one to eighty.

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 2>It feels like in some ways to the conversations that

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of defines my twenty twenty five.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's interesting. I was thinking I think a lot

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>about like Uber was part of a wave of like

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>very similar conversations where it was like I think I

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>started writing private markets or the new public markets. Yeah,

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>when Uber was private, and there's this like real sense

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of like companies could stay private forever, Like all the

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>technology for like tender offers and like fundraising in private

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>markets and all that stuff like was being developed, and

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>there is this real sense that companies didn't want to

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>go public anymore, and all the big companies that stay

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>private and then like they all kind of went public.

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, there's another wave of it this year basically,

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, some of it is just like all

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of those stories are always overblown and eventually every company,

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>every you know, big tech setup is going to go public.

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But some of it is just like the very specific

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>AI story of like you need a gajillion dollars of

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>CAPEX for data centers, and so you have to tap

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>every possible financing source and being a public company helps

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you do them.

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's hard to say how much you can extrapolated out.

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 2>I did think to this point though, the language in

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 2>Open AI, the company coming out and saying that they

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 2>basically just want to give themselves the option to go public,

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 2>that there is this pressure to go public and they

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 2>aren't kind of an orace with anthropic But the company

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 2>said that they haven't decided on timing for an IPO yet.

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 2>It may be a while because there are things we

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 2>want to do that are likely easier as a private company,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 2>but it's a complicated set of trade offs, and this

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 2>gives us the option to go public sooner if that

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 2>ends up being the best. Which was pretty candid.

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, people who complain about the governance of space acts

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>like they're not wrong. It is a real see change

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>from how public companies are run. And basically it's like

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk can do whatever he wants. Is se we're

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>verutting stock, he controls the board. You can't sue him.

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a real way to sue for pre chef duties.

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>The company can do whatever they wants, and obviously that

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is informed by Elon Musk's own particular history with public

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>market lawsuits, but I don't know. Open Eye is like

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>there are things we can do as a private company

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that are easier for a private Like some of those

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>things will be easier if you copy the SpaceX governance

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>structure and public right some of them were not, like

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>some of like not having disclosure is useful or whatever,

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>but like SpaceX will not be as constrained by public

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>company rule as any previous public company. And you know,

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if Open Aye and Anthropic, which are not

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>run by Elon Musk but which have similar like idiosyncratic interests,

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>like maybe they'll do the same thing and be like

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Cheryler's just gotta trust whatever.

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 2>We say, take it or leave it. We'll see. I

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 2>will be firmly on attorney leave when those companies go public.

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, and this podcast will have already come out

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 1>when that SpaceX officially public. Sports. Yeah, one thing I

0:17:57.880 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>have been saying for a while now is that like

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>now there is federal sports gambling. Yeah, And like one

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>thing I said is like there's like now like federally

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>regulated sports gambling where Calshi runs a sports betting operation

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that is regulated by the CFTC and it says, because

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it's regulated by the CFTC, it can't be regulated by

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>state gaming regulators, and it has mostly won that argument

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 1>in court. Mostly courts have said, yep, that's right. The

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>CFTC regulation preemp state regulation. And so because you're a

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>CFTC regulated sports book, you don't have to follow state laws. So,

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>for instance, you can offer bats in states that forbid

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>sports gampling. You can offer sports gambling to eighteen year olds,

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>whereas most states restricted to twenty one year olds. All

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 1>these things, and one thing that I said is like,

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a weird situation for many reasons, but one

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>reason is that the CFTC does not actually regulate sportscampling.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>There's no rules that the TC has ever published about

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>sports betting until this week. Yeah, I published a big

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>set of proposed rules. They're not finally out, they have

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to go through notice in common, but like they propose

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>rules for how to federal sports betting, which I just

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:04.879
<v Speaker 1>found just as a concept are very funny.

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I enjoyed your column on this, the CFTC confronting

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 2>questions that no regulator has had to contemplate before.

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Like plenty of state gaming regulators.

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure, not necessarily the markets regulators. No, and

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I do love you know when talking about pre collegiate sports,

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:26.159
<v Speaker 2>I went to high school, Like that's where my brain went.

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 2>You just went straight to the little league.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean for that have children high school. I

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>have one of them. Is it's an accomplished little leaguer.

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 2>I thought you were going to say I have a

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 2>side hustle, and it's no.

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>But like I will tell you, Katie, I am like

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>the least athletic or sports knowligible person. But like I

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>go to these little league games and I'm like, yeah,

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>they need assistant coaches. That could be the third least coach.

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm going to be a little league

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:51.400
<v Speaker 1>coach within the next two years.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I thought you were contemplating basketball as well.

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh, my daughter is like a competitive basketball and softball player,

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:01.719
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like I'm more suited to little league.

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say either little league it seems

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 2>like slower paced than basketball, but then I realize I'm

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 2>thinking about the NBA Finals, which is super fast, and probably.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Basketball is just faster paced than Yes, it's fair yeah anyway, yes,

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>so you can't bet on it. I wrote that the

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>CFTC in it's like one hundred page role making about prediction.

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Markets did have to confront the question should there be

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>federally regulated betting on Little league? Right? Technically what they

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>say is pre collegiate sports or sports below the collegiate level,

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>so that include high school sports and also include little league,

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And they come out on the side of no, you

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>can't have betting on little league because essentially these are

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>market integrity questions, right, Like, like you do not want

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>to allow really regulated betting slash swap contract trading on

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff where you can't be like pretty confident that the

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>result is one like determinable who won a little league game?

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>There's no like official records, right yeah, and then two

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>not manipulable, right, Like you don't want you want someone

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to throw a little league game to win a bat,

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 1>That's true, whereas like, what are the chances of someone

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>throwing an NBA game to win a bet? They're not zero,

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>but like there's a lot of constraints on that, Yeah,

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>fewer constraints on little league.

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 2>In some ways, it's a shame because I feel like

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.200
<v Speaker 2>you could have a real edge, you know, if.

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>You well that's the point. Yeah, Yeah, the point is that.

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Like the point is that, like prediction markets are meant

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to like be truth seeking functions, and like you want

0:21:32.960 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>to incentivize people to to like find public information find

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>difficult to get, but like you know, legally accessible information

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to build models to try to predict the future. This

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>is mostly economically relevant for like nonsports prediction markets. It's like, ooh, well,

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 1>like you know there's a prediction market and what the

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>FED will do and like people who predict that, well,

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, add information to the world, whereas like people

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>who predict the next game, well, will win a sports bet. Yeah,

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but the CFTC is agnostic. It's like sports are economically important,

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>so we're going to have lots of betting on sports,

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:12.359
<v Speaker 1>but we want to encourage people to like do work

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that is informative rather than just like bribe or wrath.

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>They want to ban injury contracts because like those are like,

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the person who knows whether a player is

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>going to come back from an injury is kind of

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>like the player and his doctor and like his team,

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>his camp, and like those are going to be insider

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>traded contracts.

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 2>And you don't want to encourage Tonya harding and have

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 2>right right.

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>They also they also they also want to ban contracts

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>on fights, not like boxing, but like you know, I'm

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>like will fight, well, bral break out at a baseball game.

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:48.000
<v Speaker 1>One reason for that is to protect like so you

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>don't like bet on a brawl and then start a

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>brawl and people get hurt. But then they also say,

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>even if the probability that any athlete or market participant

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>acts on such incentive is low, the effect of a

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>market in physical altercation contract on the culture of athletic

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>competition is inconsistent with the public interest, which is like true, yes,

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>but imagine if I had told you five years ago

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 1>that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission was like, well, you know,

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the integrity of the game requires us not to take

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>bets on fights and games. It's like, why is that

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a commodity?

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 2>It's amazing any of this happening.

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It's so like weird and path dependent.

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 2>I do applaud them for, you know, putting out this report.

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I read it skeptically and they did a good job. Yeah,

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>good job.

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And it's you know, the way it's written, it's

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 2>like very sober, it's with a straight face, it's.

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Thoughtful about like a lot of these questions.

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was pretty cool.

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I will say there's one very weird one.

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's not sports. Go on, did we.

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Talk about the Supreme Leader of Iran out of office?

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:46.959
<v Speaker 2>We must have.

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.119
<v Speaker 1>We must There's this controversy where like cal had a

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>market on like well al KAMENI be out out of

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 1>office as Supreme Leader of Iran and then he was

0:23:56.960 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 1>out of office because he was killed for sure, and

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>Calsh she was like, we don't want this to be

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 1>an assassination market, so we're not gonna pay it out.

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna pay out. Yes, we're gonna like refund

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone in their money basically, And people got really mad

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>about that. Yeah, but that is like consistent with like

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the CFTC even before this rulemaking, like the CFTC has

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:19.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of had a rule against assassination markets. So like,

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously a market in like will a world leader be

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>assassinated is obviously not okay, But what about like will

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a world leader leave office by the end of the year,

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 1>If like the world leader resigns or loses an election,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that's fine, You're allowed to have a market on that.

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>And like election markets are a big part of it.

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>But if he's assassinated, then that's bad. And you might say, well,

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's just done, will he leave office? It's not

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a bet on assassination, So that's fine. But in fact,

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>what the CFTC says they talk about Nicholas Mudoro, which

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is like the example days, they say, an event contract

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that settles on whether Maduro is out of office by

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>a certain date without further specification of the qualifying mechanisms

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>involves assassination within the meaning of the rule, because assassination

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>is among the pathways by which the settlement condition can

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be satisfied. That is, if you have like a world

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>leader out contract, that is illegal. And so there's a

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of stuff like that. They're like, you know, around

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>shutdown oil facilities. Contact is illegal if like one way

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>they could shut them down is getting them bombed, which

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 1>is very strange. Yea, like any event could happen or

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 1>not happen because of like a murder. You know they

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>have war. Yeah, so they have bets on like what

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:29.760
<v Speaker 1>state will Taylor Swift get married in?

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I thought you said date, Well, yeah they.

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Have they have I think they have date, but they

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly have location contracts. And it's like she will not

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>get married in New York if she's murdered. But like,

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that can't be it can't be illegal to list that

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>contract because there's some way for it to resolve no

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>due to a war assassination. So it's very that's like

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they haven't thought that one through.

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 2>How does that get resolved? Well, there's just a bunch

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 2>of complaining about it.

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, probably, or there's not, and like I'm the only

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>one complaining and they just blunder along.

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It seems like a slippery soap.

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>It is, because like the the Kamani contract was like

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>probably everyone thought it was fine until he got killed

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, yeah, wait, that was in hindsight an

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.239
<v Speaker 1>assassination contract. Right. There'll probably be other things like that,

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>where like things that are not obviously assassination contracts will

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>turn out to be in hindsight assassination contracts.

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 2>And I really like, what if you die of natural causes?

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I actually think it's okay, but it's a little it's

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a little gray area. I don't think I think they

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 1>probably would discourage bats on people dying. It's limited to

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>dying of natural causes. Yeah, well, who knows, Maybe it'll

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>turn into an insurance market. Let's talk real quickly about

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Friend of the Show. Former guest lost a big case

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court Tooay.

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The headline on the Bloomberg terminal is that the

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court shields investment funds from shareholder suits. Specifically, the

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 2>justices blocked activist investors from suing eleven closed end funds,

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 2>and the suing investors were led by hedge fund manager

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Baulas Weinstein's SABA Capital Master Fund.

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a weird case. So basically, the Investment Company Act,

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 1>which is like the federal law that regulates closed end funds,

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>investment funds, mutual funds, says that if you issue shares

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of a mutual fund or closed end fund, you have

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>to have one vote per share. They'll have to be

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>equal voting shares, no super voting whatever. A lot of

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>these funds are incorporated in Maryland. Maryland law that says

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you can have you can opt into a provision where

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 1>if a shareholder gets more than ten percent of the stock,

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>they can't vote their extra shares. They can only vote

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>ten percent. They don't get to vote their entire holding.

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>To prevent basically activists from influencing funds right, it's like

0:27:56.359 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>an anti activist pro management provision. So all these funds

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>are in Maryland and have that provision. And so boas

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think, owns more than ten percent of any

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of these funds. But he sued to be like, you

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>can't have that provision because that's like a way to

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>block activism. And he said you can't have it because

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the investment company says really clearly one vote per share,

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and this would be taking away votes from shares. And

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:22.719
<v Speaker 1>so he won in court because that's true. And then

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in the Supreme Court you got reversed because the Supreme

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Court said didn't even address his argument. They're just like,

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a right to sue under this statute.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Like this statute that says you have to have one

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>vote per share, there's no right to sue if you

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>violate it. The only way to enforce it is the

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>SEC has to enforce it. If the SEC doesn't enforce it,

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>tough luck. So Bo has lost on a technicality.

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and his firm did provide a statement basically saying

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 2>that this decision puts the burden squarely on the SEC.

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with them, et.

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Cetera, et cetera. Closing with the SEC has no excuse

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 2>not to act.

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>He does have which go on, which is everyone has

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:12.280
<v Speaker 1>turned off this podcast by now. Many people are not

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>as interested in the injustices of closed end fund management

0:29:17.360 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>as bo As. I'm saying is Katie is like gesturing

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>like I'm interested. But you know who's not Paul Adkins

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in the SEC.

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's probably a little busy.

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh, he's busy.

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 2>He has to answer a letter from Elizabeth Warren asking

0:29:30.080 --> 0:29:32.560
<v Speaker 2>him to basically delay the SpaceX.

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>IPO because it's because it's overpriced. Yeah, that's really good.

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>He's also we're not gonna have time talking about this,

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but like today they put out a really major revision

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to equity market microstructure rules. Oh god, getting rid of

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the trade through rule, which is like ten of my

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>readers like their heads exploited. But I'll just I'll just

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 1>leave that here.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 2>We have like minutes, We have minutes left. What does

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 2>this mean for the entire industry of closed un fund arbitrage?

0:29:58.200 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Though?

0:29:58.400 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Does this essentially mecap it?

0:30:01.400 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>No, because as the funds that Boaz didn't earn ten

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>percent of any of these funds. Okay, he's the dictorism.

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>We just can't quote above ten percent of the funds.

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Also, like I can continue to write strongly worded letters

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to the SEC being like you guys got to do

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>something about this. Yeah, maybe they'll read the letters.

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, who knows. I might.

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And that was the Money Stuff Podcast.

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levin and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I can find my work by subscribe to The Money

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>stuffnew Letter at Bloomberg dot com.

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 2>And you can find me on Bloomberg TV every day

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 2>on the Clothes between three and five pm Eastern.

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>email to money Pod at Bloomberg dot net, ask us

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a questions and we might answer it on the air.

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 2>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 2>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 2>people find the show.

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anam Azarakus Moses

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Onam and Alexis HoTT Our.

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Theme music was composed by Blake.

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Maples Amy Keen as our executive producer. Thanks for listening

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be back next week

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>with more stuff.