WEBVTT - More Job Cuts at Meta and Big Equity Firms Circle SVB Assets

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>From Mark Hard. We're Innovation, Money and Power Colne in

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBR. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hide

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and Ed loved Love. I'm Caroline Hide of Bloomberg's World

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>headquarters in New York and am Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology and a banking crisis to layoffs

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>keeps the tech sector in focus. Caroline, Yeah, from crisis

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to fundamentals. We talk jobs, we talk inflation. Coming up,

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>let's talk exactly that more job cuts at Metro in

0:00:41.560 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>particular the company planning to slash ten thousand rolls head

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and five thousand vacant positions. Or on the company's restructuring ahead,

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have the latest on the collapse of Silicon

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank and the big three private equity firms looking

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to snap up the bank's assets. And sticking with SVB,

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk take a deeper die into the state of

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>venture capital and talk executive leadership. The tray Stevens are

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>founders Fund and former IBM CEO Jinny Rametti. But again

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>day two of our new time of the show, and

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we look at the market repercussions. What a difference a

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>day makes as we drive higher on the NASTAP, but

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>this time we see bonnials actually rising. After we saw

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 1>yesterday the collapse in borrowing costs, we anticipated the Federal

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Reserve that just had to pull back in the face

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of a banking crisis. Today we look at inflation data

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and we note that CPI is still running hot. It

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>means the Federal Reserve is likely still to have to

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>hike thirty five basis points and moves higher on the

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>two year. We also see the KBW Bank index really

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>take a sigh of relief. We're just starting to digest

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the repercussions of SVB the crisis, and now we're dialing

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 1>back our anxiety. We're up almost five percent on this

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>particular bank index. Flip it on tell me where we're

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>also up for a second straight day. Bitcoin the reprieve

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>is relentless. We are up another seven percent. We are

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>now trading the highest on Bitcoin. The og of crypto

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>ed well since June twenty twenty two. Look at the CPI,

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a real driver in the market. Most of the tech

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>names in the NASA one hundred a really policy sensitive

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>index higher Nvidia and Apple the biggest points. Moves to

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the upside interesting to track the ride share is Uber

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and Lyft, both higher after the California Appeals Court reaffirms

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that a gig worker is an independent contractor, not an employee.

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Flip up the board's meta. Ten thousand more staff to

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>be cut, Mark Zuckerberg, citing the economy shares up six

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent. We knew this was coming, but

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in Sarah Fryer from Bloomberg News to talk

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>about this, because Sarah, ten thousand a big number. What

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.800
<v Speaker 1>else have we learned about the specifics of this latest

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>round of layoffs. Well, this is the second big round

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>for MATA in the last six months. So I think

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>what we're really hearing from most of our sources is

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>just that the morale is hitting a low point at

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the company and workers have had a lot of anxiety

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>about what might come next. And of course MATTA is

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>saying that it is still working to continue to restructure

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the company, including by flattening the organization. They want to

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>make sure that managers aren't you having just a couple

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 1>direct reports. They want to make sure that that engineers

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to managers ratio is a little healthier. In Zuckerberg's eyes,

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in giving them more ability to release products faster, to

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>be more efficient. They think that reducing the number of

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>middle managers will really help them get there. But this

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is really about the Zuckerberg's Year of efficiency. He's all

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>about efficiency. That is what is driving the stock, and

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>whilst you seem to like it, they do still seem

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to like it, even though many those working at the

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>company still don't know whether they'll be keeping their jobs

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>by a proliff. You're on the tech groups, it's going

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to be if you're more on the business line, not

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>finding out till may. From a morale perspective. Therefore, moving

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>more to I thought the buzzwords were interesting the fact

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that he's still saying we're going to be investing in

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence. It didn't feel like he was really doubling

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>down on metavers even though that is still their big focus. Yeah,

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's been interesting for us too. We've really heard

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that Zuckerberg's focus on AI has been prominent in these

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks and months, which which has some employees

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>wondering whether that metaverse mission is as all encompassing as

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>he previously made it sound. Of course, Oculus sales are

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they are he says they're strong, but certainly they had

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to reduce the price recently. There are some indications that

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it just really isn't catching on among consumers at the

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>rate that they expected. So I think that going all

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 1>in on AI is his next move here and and

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>really relates also to the business. I mean, they have

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to use AI to improve their algorithm, they have to

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>use AI to make up for the deficiencies and their

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>advertising work. Because of the changes that Apple made to tracking,

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>shares up more than six percent, biggest jump in around

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>six weeks, Sarah, As you and I have reported, By contrast,

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>morale is pretty much rock bottom with inside Meta. Remind

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:03.160
<v Speaker 1>us why this is happening now. We had some reporting

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>about the urgency to get these job cuts done about

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg in particularly and what he's about to do well.

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>He wants to make sure that they could meet some

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>lower expense schools. They really want to make sure that

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>they can be a more efficient organization as revenue growth slows. Now,

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the context here is that these platforms that they've created, Facebook, Instagram,

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>these giants are really not growing as fast as they

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>used to. They're trying to grow the attention, but the

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>user base is already very saturated around the world, so

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they have to come up with other ways to get

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>their profits in line with what walshrit expects to keep

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that growth going. And this is how they're doing it.

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that Meta really saw an opportunity.

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not that they have to or else will there

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>will be some dire hostel pusiness for their business, but

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>they saw an opportunity in this moment where a lot

0:05:57.720 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of companies are doing this, to say listen, we can

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>do it and it won't reflect badly on us, and

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in fact, it will make us look smart. And a

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>time of course emergency when there's an addition to his

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>own family as well as his Meta family with the

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg household at the moment about to go and parental

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>leaf serify, We thank you so much for digging in

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Meta news now. Of course, Meta job cuts

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>makes us think about fundamentals inflation, in particularly the CPI

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>print keeping pressure. It would seem on the Federal Reserve

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the most critic up to you got more on it, Yeah, Caroline,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it does feel like the focus has kind of shifted,

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe just a little bit away from the banking fall

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>back into the idea of CPI. This highly awaited report

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>from the Federal feeds me from the Bureau of Economics,

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>and this is really important because you are seeing a

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>deceleration inflation. This is good news for the Federal Reserve

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>for the first time in about a year. Economists we're

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>banging on estimates zero four point four percent rise month

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>over month, on a yearly basis, a six percent rise.

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But if the components that matter here, because services inflation

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is still rising, goods inflation is coming down. You're seeing

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>those shelter costs in particular decelerating. The housing market has

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>been in focus for a while, but commodity pressures are

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of coming back up. You're seeing that in gas prices,

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in food prices, and that's what the Federal Reserve is

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>going to see as the danger. And that really factors

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>into the repricing that you're seeing into the markets. Because

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>after the SVB fallout, Caroline and ed who did see

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.559
<v Speaker 1>the market reprice from a five point eight percent terminal

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>rate over the summer all the way down to five

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>five point one percent again over the summer, essentially saying

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that look, this tightening cycle is over. In the just

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>really the last twenty four hours. Especially with the CPI report,

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you are now seeing that terminal rate come back higher

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and higher. Wall Street now split. You have calls from

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>likes of City, for example, a fifty basis point hight

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to really keep the pressure on inflation all the way

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to the other side of the spectrum, Nomura perhaps talking

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>about a rate cut and even at the end of

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>quantitative tightening, something that would bode well for a lot

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of the technology names. And that's why I was saying

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that now's not having its best day since February twenty

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>trying three of the CIA pretty great revoting. Thank you.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Let stick on valuations at stick on fundamentals with CPI

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>with jobs as talk to the Wee family officers CEO

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Lago Messino and Advice refirm everything. Get this, more than

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>fourteen billion dollars in assets and I just melt reassert

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>your focus here when we're trying to work out the

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>direction of interest rates. What does it mean from your

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>perspective on tech valuations, Well, I think that obviously tech

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>valuations are likely to increase, particularly over a longer period

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of time, So you know, I'm a tech ball over

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the next five to ten years, I think a lot

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of the issues we're dealing with, like involation, are going

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to be solved through increased productivity. And the answer the

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>productivity are all these tech companies and tech processes that

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>are really going to help us become a lot more productive.

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think when interest rates were zero, people were

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>willing to pay everything for growth. As interest rates have

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>come up, the valuations came down. But now you're actually saying,

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we're getting towards the end of a cycle,

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 1>so I expect that the valuations will increase, particularly because

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you have so many tail wins with a lot of

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>these tech strategies. So you know, whether we're talking about AI,

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>or we're talking about electric vehicles or we're talking about

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a farm mine, you start to see the activity that's

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>going on in the space. I continue to be a

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>tech bull, but I'm a tech bull over time. So

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.959
<v Speaker 1>I think if you think about the next three five years,

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have much higher valuations for these companies. Okay,

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>so you're liking perhaps an Nvidia that has exposure both

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to the autosector but also the AI focus. Who where

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>are the companies? Where are the opportunities that you think

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to allocate money now you should be fine, Well,

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.599
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot more opportunity actually in the

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>private space than in the public space. And I think

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>when you think about the public space, we have five

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand companies, right when you think about the private space,

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you have a million companies. And I think the opportunity

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 1>in the public space is going to be because the

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>public companies are buying these private companies to actually be

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>able to have access to these technologies. And so when

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you look at Adviser buying Siegen, or you think about

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 1>Google's investments or Microsoft's investments in AIM, I think that

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that's where you're going to see the growth. But obviously

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the opportunity is much greater in the private space.

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Mel we think about inflation, we think about the FED,

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>but I'm looking at some of the movers in the market.

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>In earnings is still such a big driver of individual

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>share moves, particularly in the technology sector. There's a discussion

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to be had around how the rest of the year

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>looks to tech and whether they're recalibrating the strength of

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.559
<v Speaker 1>the economy. You saw Mark Zuckerberg's site the sort of

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>longevity of headwinds that his company faces in the economy.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we need to again when it comes

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to earnings expectations? Yes, because and I think that's why

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing the layoffs and the tech companies, because a

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of the growth had to do with number of

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>subscribers for new customers, new markets that were opening up,

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and because I think a lot of these companies actually

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.719
<v Speaker 1>have huge market share. The name of the game is

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to be how many new subscribers or how

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>many new clients. It's going to be how can you

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>actually change your business model to create more profitability. So,

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>whether you're looking at a Facebook or you're looking at

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>any of the media companies, I think the name of

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the game has changed. I think what people are really

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>looking for is profits and higher margins. Now you're the

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>former CEO of JP Morgan's private bank. What have you

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.680
<v Speaker 1>made the last five days in the banking sector particularly

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.439
<v Speaker 1>and how it's hit tech. Well, I mean, obviously, I

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>think from the perspective of JP Morgan, it's been like

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>a birthday party because everybody has tried to take their

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>money out of the banks, out of the other banks

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>and put them primarily in JP Morgan. So I think

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.079
<v Speaker 1>that's good news for JP Morgan. In terms of the

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>tech sector, I think when it comes, for example, to

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the venture space, I think we're going to I think

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see maybe lower evaluations, which is actually

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 1>a great opportunity for venture investors. I think what's so

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting in particularly Caroline, is how we're threading what's happening

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>with SVB to what's happening in the global economy. The

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.720
<v Speaker 1>commonality appears to be that tech companies all sizes are

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>under duress. Yeah, largely because interest rates are having to

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>go up. They're having to think about costs, and that

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>means people and mel it also means people who are

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>managing these businesses. You're someone who not only was a

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>very senior at JP Morgan and now running around money

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in this respect for family offices, but also someone who's

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>on the border Cocacola and Disney. What do you make

0:12:55.480 --> 0:13:00.079
<v Speaker 1>of executive oversight here and board oversight? I think I

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 1>think board oversight has never has never been more important.

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that especially usuals like cybersecurity, for example,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.599
<v Speaker 1>are more important than ever. And I think that the

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of credentials that you need to be able to

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.439
<v Speaker 1>have and the kind of work that you need to

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>be able to do to serve on these boards has

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>increased dramatically. We family officers, CEO mel la A Messino,

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.160
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Which can breaking headlines on the

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal. Caroline AMC Entertainment shareholders have approved a common

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 1>share increase, issuing new equity the shares responding inevitably to

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>those headlines. A crossing the Bloomberg will bring you more

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>as we have it. Of course, we'll continue to watch

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the fallout of Silicon Valley banks sudden collapse and that

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>as we understand that Apollo Kko Blackstone showing interest in

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>spb's loan book for example here to cover all of

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it origin Nati Bassak and we now sought to understand

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>where many feel value actually lies. We are and when

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at it, we have the loan book that

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.839
<v Speaker 1>is worth more than seven billion, seventy billion dollars, so

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's quite large. The question is will Apollo Kker blacksone

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>will they start to bid on parts of it or

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>all of it? More likely you'll see them bid on

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>parts of it. Because the idea here and this is

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>great analysis by Bloomberg Intelligence as well. Here this is

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a loan book that has not lost a lot of money.

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of questions and concerns about the quality

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of the loans underpinning given that Silicon Valley Bank was

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>so aggressive encoding Silicon Valley and the tech entrepreneurs and

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>sometimes unprofitable companies. But the idea here is Apollo Kiker

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>blacks on their credit their experts here their credit experts.

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is that if they take on these

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>loan books, they take on these clients and they feel

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that they could do a better job at managing these loans.

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>But with that said, there are other assets as well,

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>including the venture on the asset manager, if you will,

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and the investment bank that worked on about ninety nine

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars with deals last year. And what's so interesting

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is we still to try and think about where the

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>value is A Shinali outlines. Sali, we were just talking

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to mel over at we Family Offices and she was

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about board oversight and the need for that at

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the moment. There's real due diligence going in what executives

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>were and we're not doing at this time. Yeah, Look,

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the FDIC came in an appointed new leadership at Silicon

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Valley Bank, but inevitably, Shinali, there is a post mortem

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>going on and what happened and the action that executives took.

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>What have we reported in the last hour. There are

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a few things to keep an eyron here ed, and

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>that is both the investigation that is happening when it

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>comes to Silicon Valley Bank, it's executives actions taken before.

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>There are so many critics in the market that say, listen,

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>some of these issues we have known about when it

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>comes to their balance sheet management. But even beyond that,

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the stock sales from the manager is particularly the CEO,

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Greg Becker, leading into a lot of the disclosures of

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the information that we had seen before the collapse of

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank. In addition to that, I would also remember,

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>while you have the DJ and the SEC forming investigations

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>around the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and the management

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of it, you also have the Federal Reserve doing its

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>own investigation of how itself has handled the situation. So

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>really questions all around the board here. The reason we're

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>tracking both threads of the story is even twenty four

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>hours ago, we had a key bench catalyst on this

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>program saying we want Silicon Valley Bank to survive in

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>some form because we've always done business with them and

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we want to continue carrow. Yeah. And I think also

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>people juxtaposing the decisions that were made in the US

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>for the regulators versus the UK UK very swiftly getting

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>a buyer, I mean at a very rock bottom price

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that has to be said, I mean one pound for

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>svb ucastionally. But what have you made of the difference?

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that a huge differences And remember it is a

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>smaller arm when you're looking at the UK arm. There's

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of questions on Friday morning when we

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>all woke up. There's a question about half of Wall

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Streets circling these assets. If you take a look to

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the point that ED had made, there has been drips

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and drabs of plans announced on restructuring, but there has

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 1>been no bank ruptcy filing. That's an important differentiation here

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>because had there been one, then it would be up

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to kind of the jurisdiction of a judge in that

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of a situation. But now that you have these

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>assets slowly coming up for sale, it makes it a

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>little easier for different parts of Wall Street to absorb

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>these things, particularly in a way that's compliant with regulations

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and could help them avoid a lot of the two

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight era liabilities that cost firms like JP

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Morgan a lot of money coming out of the post

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight investigations. Wool Street is debating moral hazard,

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>as we've been discussing on air all day. Just very quickly, Shannali,

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>how do the banks look this Tuesday? I mean, there's

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>still concerned about the sector, right there's certainly self concerned

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 1>about the sector. But there was a lot of acknowledgment

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that silk On Valley Bank was an outlier in terms

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>of the way that it's deposit based looked and the

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>way they manage their assets ed. We have to look

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>at other sectors now also as we weigh the lagged

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>impact of interest rates commercial real estate that is maybe

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>not as front and center and emotional Silicon Valley Bank is,

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>but certainly it's a slower leading problem, and so we

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>are certainly not out of the woods. Though it is

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a big relief to the market to see the regional

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>bank stops hop back up, particularly with the likes of

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a First Republic and some of the banks on the

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>West coast like Western Alliance and Pac West that some

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of the market was concerned about yesterday. Shnani, how many

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>cups of coffee on today? I won't disclose that on air.

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot, folks, It's a lot Shani Bassak always there

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>with their caffeinated hies. We thank us so much. Ed Yeah,

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>coming up, we'll continue the conversation. The UK's Communications Regulators

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>says the BBC has to change. We'll tell you why

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>next in Talking Tech and as we look at some

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>other movers out there in the market, Arc Innovation ets

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>OR it's biggest inflows since twenty twenty one, that ETF

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>around up around two and a half percent. In this session,

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll dig into the specifics. That's next. This is bloomberg

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 1>time for Talking Tech. The BBC has got to change,

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>says Melanie Dawes, the head of the UK's Communications Regulators,

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>saying that the public broadcaster should let freelancers who are

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>not involved in news reporting have more freedom of expression

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>on social media. This comes after a high profile row

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 1>between BBC management and popular football show host Gary Lineker

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.920
<v Speaker 1>over his tweet commenting on the UK government's new immigration

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 1>bill and whether that tweet breached the broadcasters commitment to impartiality. Meanwhile,

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>Blackstone agreed to buy c Then for eight dollars fifty

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>cents per share and the enterprise value of about four

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>point six billion dollars for the event management software company.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Blackstone has received a fully committed one billion dollar credit

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>facility as part of the financing of this transaction, which

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 1>expects to close mid year. And finally, Kathy Wood's Ark

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Innovation ETF is getting a strong vote of investor confidence.

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>The ETF attracted close to four hundred million dollars of

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>inflows on Friday, according to overnight data compiled by Bloomberg,

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the largest influx since April twenty twenty one, a time

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>when the fun hit it's all time high during the

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>cheap money era. Caroline money is still going somewhere and

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this current volatility. Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology and

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hyde in New York. And let's keep ourselves up

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>to date with US authorities currently examining the collapse of

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley Bank for misconduct by officers, including whether stock

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>sales for examples, by executives actually violated trading rules. It's

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 1>all according to a source. We want to bring in

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a big name from Silicon Valley for her take on

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>all of this, Jania Metti. She's a former CEO and

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 1>chairman of IBM, board member of JP Morgan, and she's

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>out with a new book on leadership called Good Power,

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Needing Positive Change in our lives, work and world. Boy, Jenny,

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>do we need some positive change? What do you make

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of the focus in particular of oversight of board membership

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of executive management at this moment. Well, look, I think

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>something I've learned over a long time and working with boards,

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's never been more important and the importance to have

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>on your board people with all different disciplines. So you

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>just had Melon earlier talking about the importance of cybersecurity

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 1>or those that have regulatory experience, etc. So it just

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>goes to show it is a job that everyone really

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>does need to take seriously. You sit on the board

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of JP Morgan, of course, one of the only big

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>bank with still the same CEO from the crisis era

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>with still that management oversight, And I'm interested is what

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you'll take is from a banking perspective of these three

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>almost overnight collapses and what this means for the sector

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>in general. Well, you guys have been reporting on it,

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think there'll be you know, there'll be many

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacking events taking place after that, and certainly from a

0:21:53.800 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>regulatory side, obviously two hundred billion and what changes as

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a result of that bank that's size versus the systemically

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>important banks management decisions you just alluded to that, And

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>then I think it'll be interesting the discussion about the

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>role technology played and whether it was in the quick

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 1>dispersion of facts and things that were not true some

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of the same technology that really Silicon Value Bank brought

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to life. And then I think at the end of

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the day, it says a lot about really what we

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>all have to do now with the venture cap community.

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's going to make difficult for some

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>parts of VC world that it was already difficult for,

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 1>like women backed vcs right, which was it's only maybe

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>two to three percent of the whole community. Now it's

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>even less. And what this will mean is more conservative

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and people then tend to do business with who they know,

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 1>and so networks typically then have less women in them.

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think there'll be unintended consequences like that to

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>come to. It's interesting to bring that up. Twenty four

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>hours ago, we had someone on saying that, but also

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>pointing out that for many founders, diverse founders from minority groups, women,

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it was Lincoln Valley Bank. They would often write the

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>first check you had a story career, IBM, you know

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the world of technology. Do you have any experience of

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>working with SVB and what their role was in the Valley? Well,

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.959
<v Speaker 1>certainly worked with many in botmany companies right that they

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>had certainly helped launch. And by the way, there are

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>other VC firms. I mean another one, a great one, rethink,

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is one that invests in just women, the largest woman

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>owned VC firm in this country and women only investments.

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think you know, my experience has been positive

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and that there have been many, many good companies that

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>we acquired. It appears the world of technologies under duress

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. There aren't many positive headlines. Do you

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 1>share that assessment? Well, look, I just I think when

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you say it's under duress, I think to paint it

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>all in one brush is probably not exactly right, okay.

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>And I talk a lot about it in the book

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and that everybody eventually has to have a chapter two.

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's what you see happening with a

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies we've had chapter two, three, four or

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>five six. Yes, so I certainly learned that point of

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>reinvention and learned out that balance of growth and efficiency

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that has to happen. And so to me, this is

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just this chapter two. And you know, it can be

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>very dangerous when somebody attacks your profit pool as an example,

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>but this is a bit of growing pain, and I

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's what you see happening in parts of the market. Jenny.

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>There was one opinion piece that I saw that caught

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>my attention for more reasons than one, and I wanted

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to get your perspective on some of the criticism that

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>has been leveled at so called diversity well destruction on

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the board of SVB. What do you make of that

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>as someone who basically thinks a lot about diversity on

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>boards and inexecutive management teams. Yeah. Look, you know in

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the book Good Powers you saw with its name was,

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>which I actually named in retrospect, actually have a whole

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>chapter I dedicated to something called good Tech, which on

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>one hand talks about assuring new technologies in safely like

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>AI like you've had a lot of discussion about chat GPT,

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and on the other side of it is this point

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>about I don't even use the word diversity, as to me,

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>diversities a number. Inclusion is a choice. And I always

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>said I lived exactly at the intersection of society and business.

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I need a good workforce. I authentically believe a diverse

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>workforce is the best workforce that gives you the best products.

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't view this as anything other than

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.360
<v Speaker 1>doing what is you know, yes, right for society, right

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for a community, but right for my company and for

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the products and the customers. So I think it's a

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>shame to misplace that focus on it. To me, it

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>is all about having a better company, and it's about culture.

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And at the moment we look at the headlines coming

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.200
<v Speaker 1>from Meta having to lay off another ten thousand, talk

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit about your experience and having

0:25:40.280 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>to pivot business models having to lay off people. What

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think can be done by mocksluck about Look, first,

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I would say whenever you have to lay off people,

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 1>it is a very hard thing. So put that point aside,

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>because these are real people, real families that you impact.

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>No one likes to do it. But I think the

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>other thing, when you know I just mentioned about this

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is act two. For many companies. People often think about

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>what they do. The how they do their work. I

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.159
<v Speaker 1>read a lot about this in the book is just

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>as important how they do it. So in other words,

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to be more efficient, you have to do

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>things faster or consumerism, But then also how you do

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it with the workforce, I think is probably the most

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>important thing. So how tough things are done. And again

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I almost think that's a subtitle of the book, which

0:26:23.359 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>is about doing hard things, but doing them in a

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>good way doesn't mean you don't do it. I mean, Caroline,

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>what jumps out at me is how quickly conversations change.

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Ten days ago we're fixated on artificial intelligence SVB happens

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.480
<v Speaker 1>no one utters those words and the health of the

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>tech sects to get it's called into question what do you,

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, where do we go with this? Carrot? I

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>know the focus has to return on ultimately business models.

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>On a time where interest rates go higher, you have

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to do more with less. Do you pivoted IBM to

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>focus in on artificial intelligence? On the rebirth of cloud?

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of this fascination with chat and

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the hype cycle that was around it. Yeah, look, I

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>think what it calls this is not going to be

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a technology issue. This is going to be a trust issue.

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So I feel like I've learned so much over the

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>last fifteen years. They're trying to bring AI into the world,

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and there's all different kinds of AI, and I'm a

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>little bit afraid this gets all brushed with one brush

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of chat GPT, because while it can do some wonderful things,

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>as I think we all already know, you can get

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 1>things that are faction correct, but they sound authoritatively correct.

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So to me, what I'd love to see now, it's

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>wonderful that everyone's thinking about AI, because I think it

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>can do so many good things. I just don't want

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the downside now to push it aside, which tells me

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that anybody both using it, anybody or building it to

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>think about the up and the down at the same time,

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>versus let's look at all the good things and a

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>bad things to take care of. This would be different

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>now bring it in thinking about both at once. And

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>so you know, there was such an uproar on education

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 1>around chat GPT. As an example, kids can cheat on

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>their tests. I would have loved even a small thing

0:27:58.160 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>at the same time to have come out, which was

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>an app. I said, you know this might have been

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 1>created by chet CHPT. Now people are building those now

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>and there's discussion of watermarking. But the point is that

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>people understand what it's good for, what it's not, how

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's trained. I mean, look, it's trained by the good

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and bad of humanity. Now there's other kinds of AI

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that you can train very carefully, so they're such good

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and so this is now about my view building trust

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in that technology so we really get its benefit. We

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>brought the discussion back Caroline our special intelligence just for

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a minute. Jinni remedi former CEO and chairman of IBM,

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for your time and coming in

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and make sure check out Jenny's new book on leadership

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>called Good Power, Leading Positive Change in our lives, work

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and world. Now coming up more on Silicon Valley Bank,

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the fallout from a major player in the tech startup world,

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and how vcs are dealing with what to do next.

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Tray Stevens from the Founders Fund joins us here in

0:28:54.000 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 1>SF this is bloom book. Over the weekend, all the firms,

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>including US, we had put together plans to lend capital

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>from our balance sheets to help these companies make pierol.

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that would have at least over

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the crisis for a couple of weeks, while the right

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, solutions were in place. That was General Catalyst

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>CEO hem On teenager. They're talking about his firm's plans

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to provide funding to portfolio companies over the weekend and beyond,

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and as the Silicon Valley Bank meltdown was unraveling, other

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>VC firms were also quick to react to protect themselves

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and protect their portfolio companies. For example, Founders Fund and

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm delighted to say Founders Fund that partner traced EVENS

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is here with me on set. Let's go back to

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>base six S. When did you realize something was wrong

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially with Silicon Valley Bank and take action. Well, I

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>think it goes back for you know, over a month

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>where some of the news started coming out about a

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>potential issue with the balance sheet at SPB. Wednesday night,

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously there was the announcement about additional funding, and coming

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>into Thursday morning, I think there was this recognition that,

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, things were going to move very quickly, and

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really hard to overstate just how quickly things

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>moved in those first few hours of Thursday morning. So

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg had reported that found his fund had pulled its

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>own operational cash I suppose from Silicon Valley Bank, and

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>then days the consideration around what port photo companies should do.

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>What was the decision there the course of action that

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>found his fun fault best. Well, the first consideration is

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the fiduciary duty to our LPs. You know, we wanted

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to be in a good position with our with our cash,

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>so we were doing the right thing for those those investors,

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and then also doing as much as we could on

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the portfolio side of things to shore that up and

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>communicate that we thought there was some risk that they

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>should be looking into the communication trade. It's such a

0:31:10.480 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>difficult balancing act when Silicon Valley is ultimately a very

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>small space. What do you make of the criticism and

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the warry around social media and the amplification of the

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 1>fear come Wednesday Thursday? Sure, I mean, I think obviously

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of as you say, communication risk that

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>you take in, you know, making sure that your portfolio

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>companies are aware of what's going on, that they have

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the information they need to make the best decision possible.

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, certainly, even on our end, it was about

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>prioritizing the stack of our portfolio, like how do we

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>communicate with as many of them as possible to give

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:50.040
<v Speaker 1>them a fighting chance. And I think our biggest regret

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in the whole situation is that we weren't able to

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>talk to all of them before the situation and kind

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of already unraveled by the time the SBB CEO gave

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>his pressference at twelve thirty on that day. Any regret

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>around just how SVB was seen in that moment, you know,

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think any of this was about

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>like a judgment of SVB. Obviously, they've been a great

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>partner in Silicon Valley for a long time, and we

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>have close relationships with many people at the bank, and

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:23.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think for us it was about being

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>intellectually honest and having a conversation about, you know, what

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:29.479
<v Speaker 1>we needed to do to do the right thing, as

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I said, for our LPs and for our portfolio companies

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of by the amount of exposure that they had

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to this as well. And you know, these people aren't

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>responsible for, uh, you know, what happened at SVB and

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:43.959
<v Speaker 1>they just had to do the right thing to make

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>sure that they can make payroll. As Hayman said in

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the video that you guys played at the outset, Yeah,

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting him on he's one of the collective event castlests

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that hope they can continue to do business specific and

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Valdy Bank and its reincarnated form to just found a

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:03.120
<v Speaker 1>share that hope. I think we're certainly open to continuing

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a relationship with whoever ends up being the right player

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and partner in Silicon Valley moving forward. Obviously, the biggest

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>concern at this point is that it seems like there's

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>been a sort of a bifurcation that's happened as a

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>result of the response of the federal government, where you know,

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>there's like regional banks on one side and you have

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the big banks on the other side.

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:26.240
<v Speaker 1>And making sure that our companies are diversified to the

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>extent that they're going to have a good treasury plan

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that protects the deposits. Let's go back to what you're

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>focused on. In some sense, defense and defense related technology.

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Is all of the energy in that subset to just

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>stop now? Or do you continue writing checks? Do you

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to see rounds in that space and to take

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it up. I don't really perceive that there's going to

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>be any shift in the way that we as the

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>fund to think about making investments. Certainly there's macroeconomic headwinds

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that we've been facing for the last eighteen months or so,

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>but the government continues to be a customer the you know,

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the world must go on. And I think for the

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 1>sectors that I'm personally most interested in, kind of these,

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>the intersection of technology and strategic industry, these things are

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>going to continue largely as they as they have been

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. Of course, your execution chairman co

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:20.919
<v Speaker 1>founded and Jewel Industries. You're also on the board of Flexport,

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.600
<v Speaker 1>these critical infrastructure plays as well. I'm just interested in

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>your experience with government. I mean, your career was started

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>with a congressman. How do you think government has reacted.

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Are you specifically asking about SVB or to the changes

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in the tech ecosystem a better both ultimately to come

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 1>in and support the situation, whether it be from the

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>positives perspective and indeed just ultimately the view of government

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>and technology at large. Yeah, well, I think the most

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>inconvenient thing about the situation last week was actually the

0:34:52.080 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 1>name of the bank. You know, it got instantly politicized.

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this was political at all. I think

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the government did what they need to do to protect

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 1>and shore up these smaller regional banks and to ensure

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.959
<v Speaker 1>that there weren't any further runs. And so it seems

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like they acted quickly, they did the right thing, and

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>hopefully that stability is going to play itself out in

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the coming weeks. Because it's your your area of focus.

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>What is stopping the public sector the military from adopting

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the best in technology, the best in class technology from

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley in the other areas you look at. Sure,

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I don't necessarily think it's about geography. I

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 1>would say most of the best technology companies working with

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the government are not based in San Francisco. But you know,

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the primary thing that's been problematic is not policy. It's

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>not the authorities and the procurement system. It's just culture.

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>The government hasn't been as forward leaning and understanding that

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they need access to the best talent possible to build

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 1>things that are relevant to the fight in the future.

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>And these are largely software problems, and I think most

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.080
<v Speaker 1>top talent software engineers are likely to be optimizing ads

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>um and not sitting in concrete basements building you know

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the future of the DoD well. Here's to building the future,

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 1>even in this current scenario. We want to thank you

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>so much spending time with us. Found as fun partner,

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Tray Stevens. Uber left, another gig economy company scored a

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>victory after a California appeals court upheld the current law

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>classifying gig workers as independent contractors instead of employees. Bloom

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>They Joel's Rolls and Black covered the case. Joel explained

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the appeals court decision. Yeah, the appeals court decision is

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>actually it's complicated, but it's the upshot is that the

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:52.919
<v Speaker 1>voter approved initiative, that the Right Healing Company's bank roll

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:58.479
<v Speaker 1>in twenty and twenty is voter approved, and there's there's nothing,

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing to do about that. That's that's that's the

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:05.479
<v Speaker 1>ruling in the nutshell. Okay, Ultimately, is there any further

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.120
<v Speaker 1>argument to be had, any further changes that need to

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.760
<v Speaker 1>be made by Uber and Lift or is business model

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>free to run? The business model is they're arguing, and

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the ruling says that that's free to run. There will

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>be other challenges there have been in other states and worldwide,

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>including in London. So it's not it's not just over

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 1>but in the state this is a this is a

0:37:28.320 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>significant ruling. I haven't heard back from the AG yet,

0:37:31.400 --> 0:37:36.959
<v Speaker 1>the Attorney General who has sued Uber over this and lift.

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not unclear if they're going to appeal to the

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>State Supreme Court yet. They may be to God. But

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to clarify job, that is an avenue open to them. Technically,

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.239
<v Speaker 1>that is that's opening to them. I think it's a

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 1>voter approved initiative. Just to step back for one very

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>brief moment, the Ryan hailing companies paid two hundred million

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>dollars in the ad campaign to initiate this proposition to

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>do an end run around state lot and they got.

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>With all that money, they got the initiative passed. Right,

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I vote the initiative and there's not much to do

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>about that. I thinkally goal you jure great to have

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>your analysis. We thank you. Joe Rosenblatt, is he waits

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>for that call from the AG meanwhile, that does it

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>From this day two edition of Bloemberg Technology at twelve

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 1>ET nine AMPT. Yeah, and you can recap day two

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast iHeart Apple, Spotify, Bloomberg, wherever you get

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>your podcast Carrot, and let's just check in on these markets,

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 1>because once again we are ripping higher. This is a

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>story of even though inflation runs hot head, the SMP,

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the NASDAC on the highest side too to nes track it. Inflation,

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fed all impacting the technology sector. This is Bloomberg