WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - May 23rd, 2025

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business finance

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Daily Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Hi everyone, Welcome to the Bloomberg Business Week Weekend Podcast.

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>This week, Cooper Tino Apple has an AI problem. Plus

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the world is actually a wash in those not so

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>rare earth minerals, especially China. But don't count the US out.

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>As you will hear from the CEO of MP Materials.

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 3>And the language app due Lingo is talking up its

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 3>growth and investors are noticing. The CFO featured in the

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 3>latest episode of The Chief Future Officer stops by.

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Also, Elon Musk speaks a lot on Tesla sales, being CEO,

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>plans for future political contributions, and his massive pay package

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>gets tense at sometimes that's coming up in our next hour.

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 3>All that to come. We begin, though with one of

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 3>the week's most read stories. It features exclusive interviews with

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Apple insiders about how Apple has been falling short when

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 3>it comes to cracking AI.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>This is a crisis. That's how one senior member of

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Apple's AI team put it to our team. For all

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>the details, we caught up with our in house Apple expert,

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Mark German. He's the Bloomberg News Managing editor for Global

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Consumer Tech.

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 4>Mark.

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 3>I was struck by this. You know, just at the

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 3>beginning of your piece, there's a picture of Phil Schiller

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 3>introducing Siri back in twenty eleven, and there are these

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 3>thought bubbles and it says will it rain? And Cooper Tino,

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 3>what's the weather like today? Do I need an umbrella today?

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 3>I was shocked to look at the small print and

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 3>see that was from twenty eleven, because in my view,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of what Siri still does.

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 5>Uh yeah, that's the problem.

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 6>That is a problem. Serie was revolutionary fifteen years ago.

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 6>It was amazing for its first couple of years because

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 6>we let's.

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 5>See, how do I want to say this.

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 6>It wasn't great, but it was still amazing and futuristic

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.119
<v Speaker 6>and sci fi and better than everything else. Then Amazon

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 6>came around, Google came around, Microsoft came around, and they

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 6>just blew Apple out of the water. The technology is

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 6>just all legacy technology that they've been using for a

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 6>long while now for all intents and purposes, we're not

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 6>talking about a serie that's based on the same large

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 6>language models and foundation model technology that you're seeing from

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 6>open AI and Gemini from Google and you know, in

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 6>thropic you name it, and so yeah, they have fallen

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 6>way to the way south.

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, speaking of Google, there was a big hire there

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 3>from twenty eighteen who was supposed to be the guy

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 3>who did AI at Apple.

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 6>He was supposed to be the guy who did AI

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 6>at Apple, and he's still the guy who does AI

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 6>at Apple. That's John gen Andrea. Biggest miss was generative AI.

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 6>They seem to have not seen this coming, and if

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 6>they did see it coming, they did little to nothing

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 6>about it. They really, i'm told, started on the generative

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 6>aipath after Craig Fedderigi, the head of software engineering, used

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 6>chat GPT to finish some code for a personal project

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 6>he was working on over the holiday break. Did they

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 6>take this little one week break at the end of December.

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 6>He was working on some personal software, as one does,

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.519
<v Speaker 6>and he figured out the power, Yeah, figured out figured

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 6>out the power of chat GPT and then immediately they

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 6>set iOS eighteen for twenty twenty four. This is gonna

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 6>be the big AI release for Apple. From a marketing standpoint,

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 6>it was. They marketed it really well, AI for the

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 6>rest of us, just like the computer for the rest

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 6>of us forty years ago. And you know, okay, we're

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 6>good that. Yes, other than the other than the marketing,

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 6>you know what.

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 5>Let's take a step back in the robotics world.

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 6>In the humanoid robotics world, the fundamental thing that a

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 6>humanoid robot has to do is go to your kitchen,

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 6>pick up a glass of water, and bring it to

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 6>you without dropping it. Okay, Tim almost dropped his water

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 6>all over him. So that's where I got the idea

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 6>to mention this. The problem isn't so much the iPhone

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 6>and the AI capabilities on today's devices. The problem is

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 6>is can Apple make AI that's good enough to power

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 6>a robot that's not going to spill their water like

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 6>Tim right there? It is, And so the worry is

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 6>not necessarily about the technology today, but it's the technology

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 6>of tomorrow in a decade from now, and so the iPhone,

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, its rain is going to be over at

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.599
<v Speaker 6>some point but that's not really what matters here. I

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 6>think that's that's not big picture enough. The big picture

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 6>is the next set of stuff. We've seen AI already

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 6>lead to the car cancelation in part. There were many

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 6>other factors. But if Apple was able to get an

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 6>L five car with tiptop AI and great safety features

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 6>level five, yep, they would have brought it to market.

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 6>So you know, we've already seen AI cost them one

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 6>big category. They were supposed to have a big smart

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 6>home push this year. It's been delayed. It was supposed

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 6>to happen in March. Now it probably won't happen till

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 6>the end of this year or next year. The AI

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 6>not working cost that. Now they're already having trouble coming

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 6>up with use cases for AirPods and watches with camera

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 6>and smart glasses with cameras because you need real good

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 6>AI to use that. So the iPhone doesn't matter, it's

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 6>everything that comes after it.

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>So why can't they get this right? Is it personnel?

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it culture?

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 5>Is it?

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:26.679
<v Speaker 1>What is it both?

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 6>It's personnel mismanagement, it's culture. Apple's wired in a very

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 6>specific way. I get into it in the story. They're

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 6>wired to they sit down, they map out what they

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 6>want to do, and then they make the investment to

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 6>get there. AI sort of works the opposite. You don't

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 6>know exactly where you're going to land. It's a little

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 6>bit messier, you have to run a little bit faster,

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 6>it's a little bit you know, more expensive to pull off.

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 6>And so it's just a philosophical product development question, right,

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 6>And so Apple has to change.

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 2>AI moves so fast.

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 6>You know, there's a new AI provider or a major

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 6>new AI technology on a weekly basis at this point,

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 6>even more frequently. But Apple's wired to release one major

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 6>software upgrade every year and a smaller software upgrade in

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.760
<v Speaker 6>the spring. So they're going to need to move away

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 6>from that idea as well if they really want to

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 6>stay at pace with the rest of the technology industry.

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 6>So AI and Apple, it's just so interesting. It's like

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 6>putting two magnets next to each other. They're just going

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 6>to push away, right, And so Apple's going to have

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 6>to change at a very core level to really be

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 6>able to make meaningful change and to have a meaningful

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 6>improvement in their GENAI world.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm thinking about this and they're mark when

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 3>when you talk about Apple and you know this better

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 3>than anyone else. People a common refrain, and I don't

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 3>think this is true, but it's that Apple stopped innovating

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 3>after Steve Jobs. And you can go and kind of

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 3>look at Apple's share price in what has happened with

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.799
<v Speaker 3>investors in the way that Tim Cook has led the company.

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 3>The concern that I potentially would have in a situation

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 3>like this as an observer, is, is this Tim Cook's

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 3>legacy here missing?

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 4>AI?

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 6>First of all, I don't agree with the idea that

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 6>Apple stopped innovating since Steve Jobs.

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 5>I agree with that. I agree with you.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 6>No, no, I know you agree.

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 5>If you think about it.

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:20.679
<v Speaker 6>They basically haven't innovated or done something wholly new since

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 6>the iPhone. Right now, are we really expecting that? I

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 6>think yes to some extent, But like you look at it,

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 6>and like the iPad to the iPhone was like the

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 6>vision pro to the iPhone, right, they're both different reincarnations

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 6>of that same operating system. You put the Apple Watch

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 6>in that category as well, So you have sort of

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 6>the central product of the iPhone and you just kept

0:07:42.120 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 6>building and building around it and building it up into

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 6>new form factors. And they haven't really done an entirely

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 6>new product experience from the ground up, and so you know,

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 6>at some point they'll get there, but right now it's

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 6>about new form factors. And honestly, I'm not sure Tim Cook,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 6>sure anyone would have done a better job than Tinkcook

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 6>over the last fifteen years or so since.

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 5>Steve Jaw has passed away.

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 6>So certainly could have they done a lot better, yes,

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 6>but they've also could have done much, much, much worse.

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>You I want to ask you, does any of this

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>matter because you write in the story being late to

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a potentially world changing advance isn't necessarily catastrophic for Apple,

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>but there are risks of being late too.

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's not catastrophic for Apple because being late implies

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 6>that they're going to get there, and so you know,

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 6>as long as they're late, it's not catastrophic. But they're

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 6>going to need to get there because, like I said,

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 6>they're going to miss so many upcoming technological waves if

0:08:35.640 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 6>they don't master this. I said this to someone I

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 6>was on the radio with earlier, and they were a

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 6>little surprised. But think about it for a minute. You're

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 6>going to agree with me. AI is as core of

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 6>a technology as the touch screen, right, that's a big

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.760
<v Speaker 6>bowl claim, right. So Apple is known for taking core

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 6>technologies and pushing them to new form factors. And so

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 6>multi touch touch screen, that's the type of touch being

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 6>that to do multiple gestures at once. Let's you do

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 6>the pinch and the swipe.

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 4>That's called multi touch.

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 6>That was a core technology that allowed them to build

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:11.559
<v Speaker 6>the iPhone and the iPad, all their macs and iPads

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 6>and whatever they're releasing these days. The core technology at

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 6>the heart of that are their chips, their in house

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 6>process or design AI is the core technology that's going

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 6>to enable robots the glasses to maybe'll look at cars

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 6>again in the future. Who knows, It's not something they're

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 6>looking at right now, to be clear. And so they

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 6>need to master that court technology to get to the next.

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Era of hardware. Apple's a hardware.

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 6>Company, right, and if they want to continue making the

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.319
<v Speaker 6>money they're making, they're going to need to do new hardware.

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 6>And the way to do new hardware is to come

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 6>up with new core technologies.

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But they hired this guy.

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 7>You even printed it out.

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 4>I love it, Are you kidding?

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>But they hired this guy back in twenty eighteen. Yes,

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it's almost a decade, but getting close.

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.480
<v Speaker 6>You're right, and that's that's unbelievable. But yeah, yeah, we're

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 6>close to a decade since he's been there.

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 5>You're right, all right.

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So from someone who knows this company so well, I mean,

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>how are you thinking about or who are you watching

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>or what are you watching? Internally? I mean the company?

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, obviously listen to you.

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>They listen to others, have conversations saying where are you Apple?

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to AI John.

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 6>G Andrea Jgs, he goes by, I don't think he's

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 6>long for Apple.

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 8>I is that good.

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 6>I'm not going to opine on whether it's good enough

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 6>for a person to no longer be at a company,

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 6>but I'll put it this way. They've already stripped him

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 6>of all products related responsibility. They removed Siri from him, right,

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 6>they remove robotics from him. They're going to probably remove

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 6>some more things from him. They want to squish him

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 6>down to a role that's entirely focused on large language

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 6>model and courts AI technology research, which he's really good at.

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 6>And so I mean, if they're taking away seventy five

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 6>percent of your remit, you know you may decide that

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 6>the writing's on the wall. It's time to get out

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 6>of here. I don't think it's going to happen imminently.

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 6>I don't think he wants it to happen. But I

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 6>think at some point a change will be made, whether

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 6>it's because he decided or Apple forces hand. But I

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:04.439
<v Speaker 6>don't expect them to fire him. Apple doesn't do that

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 6>for senior executives of that level unless you really do

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 6>something bad and for all intentsive purposes. JG's a great guy.

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 6>He's very well liked, he's very respected in the machine

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 6>learning and AI can can.

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 1>He get them to where they need to be?

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 2>He can be a piece of that puzzle.

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 6>Don't forget Apple is constructed by a functional model. So

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 6>you have design teams, you have hardwer engineering teams, you

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 6>have software engineering teams that bring together the product at

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 6>the end of the day. If you dilute JG to

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 6>only focus on AI research, but you have other people

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 6>in charge of like AI product development, I think it's

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 6>possible that that's a winning formula, but clearly him running

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 6>all of AI was not a good formula.

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 3>We only have thirty seconds left. Could Apple acquire its

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 3>way out of this? They've partnered with chat GPT Opening Eye.

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.559
<v Speaker 6>Well, first of all, yes, they need to acquire as

0:11:55.640 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 6>much AI talent as possible, but that's also another culture

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.839
<v Speaker 6>issue where they have this cultural allergy to integrate large

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 6>scale companies. The Beats acquisition internally disaster, the Intel Modem

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 6>acquisition for a billion and twenty nineteen disaster. They just

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 6>have a terrible track record of taking these humongous companies

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 6>and pulling them into Apple. So you know, it's a

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 6>cultural thing through and through that they need to make

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 6>some shifts on.

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 3>That was Mark German, Bloomberg News, Managing editor for Global

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Consumer Tech.

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Coming up the races

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on for rare earth minerals.

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 3>We'll hear about what's already happening in the US with

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 3>the CEO of MP Materials. This is Bloomberg.

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Well on Wednesday this past week, Russia's largest oil producer

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>bought a giant Siberian rare earth deposit, which may become

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>an area of cooperation with the United States.

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Russia, encouraged by President Trump's talk of economic deals that

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 3>could follow a peace agreement with Ukraine, has been working

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 3>on a list of projects and assets that officials hope

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 3>might interest the US.

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>This comes as appetite grows in the US for new

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sources of critical minerals following China's decision to curb exports

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>of rare earth materials.

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 3>For more, we went to the experts. This next company

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 3>knows all about extraction, refining, manufacturing when it comes to

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 3>rare earth minerals from A to Z, and it's happening

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 3>right here in the US.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Jim Latinski is co founder, chairman, and CEO of the

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>three point three billion dollar rare earth mining company MP Materials.

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>He joined us along with Bloomberg News Metal Mining Heavy

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>machinery reporter Jode.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 3>We started by asking about the boom in the rare

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 3>earth mineral industry.

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.839
<v Speaker 9>It's certainly a very exciting time for us as you

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 9>as you mentioned, you know, we're the only company in

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 9>the world, and that includes Chinese industry, that has the

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 9>expertise from the resource all the way through to the magnet.

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 9>And what I stress again and again when we think

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 9>about rare earths, because it's very topical. A lot of

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 9>times people talk about extraction. You know, you hear Ukraine,

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 9>Greenland deep sea mining, or even with the President of

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 9>South Africa getting you know, a stern dress down in

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 9>the Oval Office talking about how he has rare oaths too.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 9>We could have all the rarests in the world, but

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 9>if you can't refine them and turn them into magnets,

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 9>you don't have a solution for the issue.

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 3>So, Jim, do you have that solution right now? Because

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 3>we spoke with Joe a little earlier this year, he

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 3>reminded us that it kind of doesn't matter if you

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 3>can extract it here in the US. You got to

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 3>be able to refine it. And in some cases, with

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 3>some of these elements, ninety percent of that is happening

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 3>in China. What exactly can you do on the refining

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 3>level here in the US, so great question.

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 9>There are two places in the world that you can

0:14:57.680 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 9>refine at scale, the Chinese of influence predominantly China, a

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.239
<v Speaker 9>little bit Malaysia, and then in California in Mount Pass, California,

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 9>which is our site. We actually I think some people

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 9>would be surprised by this, but we refine today more

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 9>than half of the concentrate that we produce. So we

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 9>are refining at scale as we speak, and expanding that rapidly.

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 9>So we have brought this capability back to the United

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 9>States of America, and we're the second largest producer of

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 9>rare materials in the world today.

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So one thing I just want to follow, because I

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>think you guys know this world so well, Jim Into,

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>But I mean when you say refine at scale, what

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly are you talking about. I'm just saying that people

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>are listening like, okay, what does that mean?

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 5>You know?

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 9>A simple analogy, Carol would be think of oil and gasoline. Right,

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 9>You could get oil out of the ground, but you

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 9>can't put it in your car until it's in the

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 9>form of gasoline.

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Right, you refine it.

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 9>In this case, you basically take an ore out of

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 9>the ground, you concentrate it so it's a highly concentrated

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 9>ore with the rareth in it. But then to get

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 9>the separated rare earth that you would then turn into

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 9>a magnet, refine that concentrated or into an oxide, and

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 9>then not to lose the audience. But you take that

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 9>ox side, you turn it into a metal and alloy

0:16:09.240 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 9>and then a magnet and so and just last point

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 9>on that that I think is really critical. At Mountain

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 9>Pass today we not only mine and refine, but we

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 9>now send that or to a magnet factory that we

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 9>built from scratch at Greenfield in Fort Worth, Texas.

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm actually talking.

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 9>To you from our factory and it's on a street

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 9>called Independence, So we called Independence, but we are making

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 9>auto grade magnets here at our factory in Independence in Texas,

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 9>with material that we mine and refine in California. And

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 9>we're in the process of scaling up this facility. We

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 9>have a foundational contract with General Motors, and so we

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 9>will be providing General Motors with magnets at scale at

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 9>the end of the year, with material that is mined

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 9>and refined in California.

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 7>Jim, I want to kind of get away from the

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 7>nerdy science. I know you and I can talk about

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 7>that all day, but I do want to talk about

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 7>what does matter to the average person here in the USA,

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 7>which is you can't do all of this on your own.

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 7>You cannot. While you might have the full supply chain,

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 7>you cannot be the sole supplier of critical materials, specifically

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 7>rare earths and the magnets. You've said that to me

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 7>for years. One of the things you said to me

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 7>years ago was listen, the point is not overnight being

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 7>the sole provider to yourself domestically. It is slowly pulling

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 7>market share away from China. What are the kind of

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 7>conversations you're having right now on this front, on the

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 7>staatecraft front, and maybe you could tell us a little

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 7>bit about THEMU You signed with Madden, the Saudi Aribbian

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 7>mining company just last week on this front.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.439
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, sure, thanks, Joe. Well, it's a great question.

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 9>We've said all along our mission is to restore the

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 9>full supply chain to the United States. We've obviously done

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 9>that in small scale and we're scaling that up, but

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 9>we really want to be part of a broader solution

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 9>to eliminate the single point of failure. As you mentioned,

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 9>I was in Riad last week as part of the

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 9>delegation of business leaders from the United States with the

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 9>President and in the presence of the President and Crown

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 9>Prince MBS, we signed an MoU with Modern, which is

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 9>the Saudi mining company, to explore the process of essentially

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 9>building a vertically integrated rare earth magnetics business in Saudi Arabia.

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 9>And so what that would mean is we would mine, refine,

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 9>and make magnets in the Kingdom. And I think from

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 9>from their standpoint, it's a really exciting opportunity to be

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 9>to create a mid East hub that could receive feedstock

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 9>from from there certainly, but also Africa and some other

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 9>places and really position them well geopolitically. But more importantly,

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 9>I would also say that, you know, it really solidifies

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 9>what we've been saying we are and I think, you know,

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 9>each step of the way are showing is that we

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 9>are America's national champion. We're the only company in the

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 9>world that can provide a solution in house to mine, refine,

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 9>and make magnets. And so I think the vertically integrated

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 9>approach that we've had is starting to be recognized by

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 9>the world as you know, something pretty extraordinary that we've

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 9>built inside MP And so it was nice that the

0:19:10.600 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 9>President and the Crown Prince recognized that.

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 5>So, yeah, you know, we'll run that.

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I mean it's interesting you're very much saying

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 7>it's partners, we don't go it alone. It's not just

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 7>the United States figuring it out. We'll work with the

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 7>trade partners to figure it out. I think another question

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 7>I have as you came out of the gates guns

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 7>a blazing on your earnings call recently with investors, and

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.439
<v Speaker 7>you pointed out, listen, it is very important that we

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 7>work at the administration to figure out the solutions to

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 7>basically getting a hold of these rarers and these permanent

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 7>magnets that are domestically or friendshored produced.

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 5>Can you tell us a little.

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 7>Bit about the kind of conversations you're having with the

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.400
<v Speaker 7>administration or even the Defense Department.

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 9>Sure, so, a really important just background context, if we

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 9>go back about a month ago to Switzerland with the

0:19:57.080 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 9>trade talks with China.

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 5>At that point, we were and a lot.

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 9>Of people don't know this or maybe don't appreciate this

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 9>because you know, we're they're not in necessarily the rare

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 9>with magnetics niche, but we were weeks away, in my opinion,

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 9>from a shutdowns across our economy in aerospace and in

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 9>auto because the Chinese had essentially stopped shipping rare with

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 9>magnets and our supply chains were really starting to break down,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 9>and so Obviously, Fortunately we came away with a deal

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 9>there and we're not gonna see those kinds of shutdowns.

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 9>But we were really close, and that is a leverage

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 9>point that the Chinese have in any negotiation. And again,

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 9>whatever your view is on the relationship with China, whether

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 9>it's you know, sort of going to be a collaborative

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 9>relationship moving forward that gets reset or something much worse,

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 9>we need to take this leverage point off the table,

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 9>you know. That's that's our view at MP. That's what

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 9>our mission has been. We've been at this for years.

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 9>Is let's make sure that the United States of America

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 9>can produce our own rare with magnetics. And the reason Joe,

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 9>that that is so important and you mentioned DD is

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.879
<v Speaker 9>because as we've seen around the world, physical AI is

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 9>the future of warfare. We're talking robotics and drones, and

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 9>I think we see that from whether it's Elon Musk

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 9>or Jensen Wong talking about the scale of robotics and

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 9>how large that industry is going to be. It is

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 9>not acceptable for American companies downstream. We're talking about trillions

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 9>of dollars of enterprise value. Our great leading companies as

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 9>well as our Department of Defense to be relying on

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 9>a single point of failure in the Chinese supply chain,

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:31.720
<v Speaker 9>and so we serve a critical role in alleviating that risk.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, So it sounds like you're making the argument

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>for why the US government should be involved, But is

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.719
<v Speaker 1>the government US government? Is there appetite for the US

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>government to be a partner in rare earth projects and

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>doing it from A to Z, from mining to processing

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to permanent magnet production.

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 9>There is no question that the United States government recognizes this.

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 9>And I think that these things take time, but there's

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 9>no question that they recognize. And Joe was referencing our

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 9>perspective on the earnings call, which is this is actually

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 9>very doable. We are, you know, in a very short

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.919
<v Speaker 9>period of time away from solving this challenge in a

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 9>large scale, and frankly, MP can lead that effort. And

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 9>what we said is that MP, you know, we've been

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 9>at this for a number of years. We've invested over

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 9>a billion dollars of private capital, and you know, since

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:22.959
<v Speaker 9>we went public and then prior to that, we we

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 9>had the good fortune, I guess of taking control of

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.919
<v Speaker 9>several billion dollars of previously invested capital. So we have

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 9>billions of dollars of invested capital, and what we've said

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.439
<v Speaker 9>is we'll lead this solution, but it's not fair on

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 9>our shareholders to expect them to take the risk. We're

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:39.919
<v Speaker 9>going to need to do this in a capital light

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 9>way for MP it should be very rewarding for our

0:22:43.160 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 9>shareholders for being in this position. So, so the to

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 9>answer your question, you know there will be movement forward.

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 9>In my opinion, I think it's a question of getting

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 9>these solutions don't happen overnight, but there's no question that

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 9>there are a lot of conversations happening with government and

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 9>industry and we're leading those.

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so it sounds like government's involved, they're listening and

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we should maybe stay tuned for news. What kind of

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:08.919
<v Speaker 1>money is needed to be committed to do the proper

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>buildout in your view, whether it's public private partnership, and

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:13.920
<v Speaker 1>just about thirty seconds on that.

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, the really simple answer is we're talking single digit billions.

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 9>This is a really simple problem to solve. Actually, I

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 9>jokingly say for the coffee budget on the F thirty five,

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 9>we probably could have solved the rarer issue.

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 5>This is really small.

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 9>Wow, And so I do think that the United States

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 9>government is going to step up. I think you're going

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 9>to see industry players step up as well, because this

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 9>is just it's an issue that affects our national security

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 9>and trillions of dollars of enterprise value, and it's actually

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 9>a small problem.

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned that we could do this in a short

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 3>period of time, give us years or some sort of

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 3>timeline that we could actually move away from a single

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 3>point of failure when it comes to this problem.

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 9>Well, we're bringing that online now in Texas. So where

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.840
<v Speaker 9>I'm sitting is a factory. You all are welcome to

0:24:02.840 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 9>come see it, and so we'll be making magnets at

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.479
<v Speaker 9>scale here at the end of the year. And then

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 9>the question is what percentage of the industry do we

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 9>need to satisfy to remove this single point of failure risk,

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 9>Because we don't need to solve one hundred percent, but

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 9>we need to do a material percentage. And so I

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 9>think the next step would be for us to lead

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 9>a solution where we're building something significantly larger and then rinse,

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 9>repeat to add a number of facilities both here and

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 9>as we announced with the MoU, potentially in the Saudi

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 9>Arabia and other places. So it really is not a

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 9>huge issue. It's just an issue that requires capital and execution.

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 7>Right, And I think on that point, like it's not

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 7>just going to be you, it does still require a

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 7>lot of other actors to come into the space. And

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 7>I guess the quick follow up again is what are

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 7>we going to see from the government this year in

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 7>terms of commitments to help this space, your company and

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 7>others build out the supply chain on rare earths and

0:24:58.560 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 7>permanent magnets.

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 9>Well, just to be crystal clear, as we all know,

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 9>the capital markets can satisfy this problem if the existential

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.439
<v Speaker 9>issue of the industry is off the table, and the

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 9>existential issue is Chinese mercantilism, right, is pricing. We've got

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 9>to get proper functioning economics, proper functioning market economics for

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 9>the price of these materials and the price of the

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 9>downstream products. And so those are a variety of ways

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 9>that the government can can force that solution. You've heard

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:30.040
<v Speaker 9>a lot of them in the news, and certainly we're

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 9>working on them. I think you'll see a variety of

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 9>things across investments, tariffs, tax credits, and so there isn't

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 9>you know, sort of one fits all solution it's really

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 9>going to be a question of, you know, the preferences

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 9>of government, and certainly you'd have to get some of

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 9>them on here to ask them directly or stay tuned

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 9>for you know, a solution that you see us present

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 9>one day. But I do think we're going to see

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 9>something you know, sooner than later, because we've got to

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:57.160
<v Speaker 9>solve this problem.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 3>That was Jim Litinski, co founder, chairman, and CEO of

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 3>the three point three billion dollar market cap rareth mining company.

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 3>It's called MP Materials. He joined us along with a

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg News metal mining heavy machinery reporter Jo Dell and just.

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>To say I'll go to when it comes to rare

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>earth minerals and so much more. All right, Still head

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Business Week, how learning a new language translates

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>into a growing business big time over a dual lingo.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.920
<v Speaker 3>We hear from CFO Matthew Scarupa, the subject of the

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.919
<v Speaker 3>latest episode of Bloomberg's Chief Future Officer. This is Bloomberg.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Applecarplay and

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the Android Auto With the Bloomberg Business app. You can

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:43.880
<v Speaker 2>York station, Just Say Alexa Play.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven thirty Dual Lingo plans to use artificial intelligence

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to significantly expand its course offerings beyond languages and reach

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>more learners globally. All according to its Chief financial Officer,

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Matt Scarupa. He's featured on the current episode of Chief

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Future Officers on Bloomberg Television, which you can get on

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal and on Bloomberg dot com as well.

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And Tim you hosted the episode You like you will

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>get into this company and the CFO, Yeah, we did.

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 3>We talked to AI. We also talked how Dulingo is

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 3>betting heavily on global markets. They've got this particular focus

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 3>on China, all about the opportunity of teaching people English

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 3>as a second language. We also had Matt on Business

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Week Daily this week. We started by asking him about

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 3>the growth of the language learning company.

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 10>You know, we've done a great job of growing this year.

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 10>Our Q one performance was strong top to bottom. We

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 10>saw a really strong user growth. That user growth translated

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 10>into a really strong top line and bookings and revenue,

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 10>and we were able to keep control of costs like

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 10>we historically have been able to to expand margins, and

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 10>it wasn't just a Q one story. As we guided

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 10>on our last earnings call. We believe we're in a

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 10>really strong position for the rest of the year. We

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 10>feel good about Q two and the rest of the year,

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 10>and it's going to continue to come from the same sources.

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 10>We're a company that grows primarily organically by word of mouth,

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:07.719
<v Speaker 10>and we expect that to continue.

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Matt, good to have you join us. Thanks for

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 3>doing this today, and thanks again for participating with us

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 3>for the CFO Show. Ten point three million paid subscribers

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 3>as of the end of the first quarter of twenty

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty five, it's growth of forty percent year over year.

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 3>How much can how long can you continue that growth?

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, when we're talking the growth at that percentage,

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 3>like that's pretty substantial.

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 10>No, I appreciate it was great to do the show

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 10>with you, and I look forward to seeing that. In

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 10>terms of growth, we've done it for several years. I mean,

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 10>we went public in twenty twenty one, and if you

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 10>look back from then to now, we've grown the top

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 10>line really nicely. So i'd say that you know, you

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 10>look back and you think that we have a strong

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 10>path going forward as well. I'd also just call out

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 10>that the ten point three million sub ubs is great.

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.719
<v Speaker 10>We're excited about that. We feel really good about that growth.

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 10>But we're also seeing really nice diversification of subscribers. So

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 10>we have continued strength in our Family Plan, which is

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 10>a subscription where multiple friends and family can join, and

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 10>as of the last quarter, seven percent of our subs

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 10>we're on our Max tier, which is our highest tier service,

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 10>which has features like video call with Lily, and it's

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 10>doing really well. So it's a great story not just

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 10>on the overall top line numbers, but on how we're

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 10>growing the subscribers.

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's wild, almost fifty percent year every year growth. Matt,

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I am curious, who are these people that are signing up?

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>How long do they stay with you? And what's the

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>cost to acquire an individual user?

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So one of our core business model advantages is

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 10>that when we acquire a user, we acquire them mainly

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 10>for free. We do spend on performance marketing and some

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 10>brand spend, but it's relatively small as a percentage of revenue,

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 10>and so most of our growth comes from people telling

0:30:07.720 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 10>their friends and family that they've had a great and

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 10>engaging experience with our app. That's why Luis is so

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 10>focused on engagement as a core driver of growth for us,

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 10>is that if you have this wonderful, joyful experience, you're

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 10>going to tell people about it and they're going to

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 10>try it. And then the other way is we have

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:31.239
<v Speaker 10>a really amazing social first marketing strategy where we you know,

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 10>insert ourselves into viral moments on online TikTok, Instagram, other platforms,

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 10>and users create their own content which goes viral, and

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 10>so on any given day, a.

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Lot of what people are talking.

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 10>About on dual Engo isn't generated by us, It's generated

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 10>by our you know, beloved fan base.

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 10>When you have that type of viser acquisition and it

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 10>is global, we're seeing strong user growth around the world.

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 10>We get a lot of opportunities to then convert folks

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 10>from free subscribe to paid or from free user to

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 10>paid subscriber, and they stick around on the platform and

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 10>they come back frequently, and so we get multiple chances

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 10>to convert them. And while we're doing, while time is progressing,

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 10>we're making the subscription product even better and better so

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 10>that's how we grow the subscriber base.

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, we'll talk a little bit in a minute about

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.280
<v Speaker 3>the social first marketing, because something kind of wacky seems

0:31:24.320 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 3>to be happening right now if you look at the

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 3>social channels for dou a Lingo. But I'm wondering specifically

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 3>mad about growth and about you know, at the end

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:38.239
<v Speaker 3>of the day, the efficacy of the product. And I'm

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.719
<v Speaker 3>wondering how you measure to what extent the product actually

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 3>resonates and works for people who are trying to learn

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 3>English as a second language, for example, to be able

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 3>to do business in the US, or to be able

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 3>to do business in English. How do you measure that?

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well it is core to our mission.

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 10>So our mission is to you know, build the best

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 10>education in the world and make it universally available. And

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 10>so to do that, we need to prove to our

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 10>users and to ourselves that we're teaching really well. We've

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 10>had some studies done that show just how efficacious we are.

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 10>So you know, if you compare us to learning a

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.479
<v Speaker 10>language in a university, we are on par with that.

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 4>You can probably do it faster on dual lingo.

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 10>And you know, there's plenty of evidence we've put on

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 10>our website that shows those studies in detail. I think

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 10>the bigger evidence is that we're continuing to add features

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 10>that just really address some of the core desires of

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 10>particularly English learners like you reference they want to practice conversation,

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 10>and so what we've done over the past you know

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 10>several quarters, is add this feature called video Call with Lily,

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 10>where you can practice your conversation with one of our.

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Characters, Lily. She's a bit passive aggressive, she's not impressed.

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 10>I've yet to impress her with my Spanish, and I

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 10>don't think I'm going to, but I'm going to keep trying.

0:32:58.720 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, she's the.

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Thing, and yeah, I just want to say, she's over

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 3>your right Well, we're looking at pictures of her on

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 3>the screen right now. There's also a next she's next

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 3>to duo over your right shoulder. So that's the Carol.

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 3>That's Lily, who's not impressed you. By the way, in

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 3>the last couple of months, has unfortunately become a member

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 3>of my family.

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 5>It seems like with doing this with that.

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Acual love, it's passive aggressive.

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, Lily is not impressed with me, and so that

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 10>kind of practice, though, is really helpful for folks.

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Who are trying to learn English. They're trying to.

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 10>Learn how to speak it, and that's what we've been

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 10>able to do over the past little bit.

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 3>So you use AI in a few different ways. Lily

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 3>is certainly one of them. When you think about the

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 3>cost associated with this. You're not using AI that a

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 3>platform that you developed actually at dual Lingo, you're outsourcing

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 3>the technology. How do you keep those costs in control

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 3>because that's pretty expensive tech, Matt, and you know you're

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 3>watching the bottom line and you're watching margins here.

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, And you know it comes down to the fact

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 10>that we have been using forms of AI, machine learning

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 10>and what not for a long time.

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 4>In our company. The lesson you get served up, you.

0:34:06.320 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 10>Know, has for many many years been based on a

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:13.479
<v Speaker 10>machine learning algorithm. And now with generative AI, with video

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 10>call with Lily and in some of our content creation,

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 10>we are seeing that there's an amazing advancement in this

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:24.320
<v Speaker 10>technology that helps us do these things much quicker and

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 10>more even producing more content that we thought was possible.

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 10>For example, you know, it took us about ten years

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 10>to create the first hundred courses and then in less

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 10>than a year with this new technology, we created more

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 10>than one hundred more and so this technology is really powerful.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 10>The good news about it is that the costs are

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 10>coming down naturally. You know, we don't have to do

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 10>much internally, although we are still doing things to optimize

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 10>the costs. But just by the nature of this technology,

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 10>we're seeing rapid declines in the cost and we don't

0:34:57.760 --> 0:34:59.760
<v Speaker 10>know for sure that that's going to continue. But if

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 10>it does, you know, I think that you know, the

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 10>use of this will go up and margins will be

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 10>will be good.

0:35:06.560 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I just want to know. I'm one hundred percent Slovak,

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and I just want to know how long would it

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 1>take me to learn a language with you guys? I

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 1>know a few keywords, you know, your parents, your grandparents

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>teach it, the squear words and all that good stuff. But

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>how long does it take for someone to learn certain languages?

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 10>Sure, well, you know, I don't know that I've ever

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 10>met anyone else or talked to them live on air.

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:31.919
<v Speaker 10>But I am also Slovakian, which is which is quite

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:36.839
<v Speaker 10>the coincidence, But I think, yeah, that's that's a very

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 10>nice coincidence. It turns out more will depend on your

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.520
<v Speaker 10>ability to put in the time. You're learning a language

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 10>takes practice, and that's why we're so focused on engagement.

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 10>We want you to enjoy our app and come back

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 10>every day because it's going to take time to learn.

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 10>So if you're really committed and you want to learn

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 10>any language on du or Lingo, and you put in

0:35:57.800 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 10>a bunch of time, you're going to learn it much faster.

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 10>And that what the research shows, and so it's really

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 10>motivation dependent. What we find is that the hardest thing

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 10>about learning a language isn't verb conjugation or grammar or speaking.

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:14.520
<v Speaker 4>It's your motivation to keep practicing and keep learning.

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 10>And that's why most of our company is geared around

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:21.280
<v Speaker 10>bringing you back every day and making sure you're engaged

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 10>in the product, because if you're engaged in the product,

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 10>you have a chance to continue to learn.

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the gamification, the alerts, the emails like the friends Streak,

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 3>all the stuff that brings you back into the program. Matt,

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 3>I promise that we would go to this unhinged marketing

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 3>and social media strategy because you got to shed some

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 3>light on what exactly is happening across duelingos social channels

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.240
<v Speaker 3>right now. I checked in on it yesterday and this morning,

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 3>and it looks like Duo has been taken hostage. There's

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 3>like some sort of hostage video. Everything else has been wiped.

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 10>What can you tell us, Well, I can only tell

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 10>you that our owl is truly unhinged.

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 4>You can never predict what that guy is going to do.

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 1>I was like my co host, I'm just gonna tell you, Matt,

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:04.280
<v Speaker 1>never know what he's gonna do. Anyway, go ahead.

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:09.319
<v Speaker 10>I've only spent a little bit of time with him,

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 10>but you know, I kind of can see it. Love

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 10>O our AWL mascot earlier this year, right after the

0:37:15.120 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 10>Super Bowl, decided that he was going to fake his

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 10>own death and then you know, return and so like,

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 10>you just never can predict it. I would just encourage

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 10>everyone who's watching and listening to check in again tomorrow.

0:37:26.920 --> 0:37:29.480
<v Speaker 4>You'll you'll get some interesting insight.

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 3>That's Matt Scarupa, the chief financial officer of Dua Lingo Carol.

0:37:34.000 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting about this company? It's a tech company. Yeah, Hi,

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 3>margins Ai first not based in Silicon Valley. They are

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 3>in Pittsburgh. They've got this DNA with Carnegie Mellon University,

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Luis van On. That's where he came from. He's been

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:54.880
<v Speaker 3>working with AI for decades. He won a Genius Award

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:56.880
<v Speaker 3>the MacArthur Foundation.

0:37:56.560 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Genius Aqua with those low achiever types, right.

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, back in like the early two thousands and two

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 3>thousands for his work on AI.

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>What struck you about this company? Because you've been talking

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 1>about it a lot since you talked to them, the CFO,

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the CEO, and did the profile for chief Future Officer,

0:38:11.600 --> 0:38:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and you even played around with it big time.

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I mean I'm now actually hooked. I mean

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 3>yeah totally. We language are learning well, learning Spanish with

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 3>my son. We do it together every night. And then

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 3>we also are using doing chess on the program too.

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:28.760
<v Speaker 3>So they do chess, they do music, they do math.

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:30.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, everybody. That wraps up our first hour of

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg radio Head.

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:35.399
<v Speaker 1>In our next hour, he's easily one of the most

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:37.719
<v Speaker 1>talked about individuals of our time, whether he is sending

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:40.640
<v Speaker 1>rockets into space are bringing stranded astronauts home.

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 3>He also drills tunnels, he sends satellites into space. He

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:49.919
<v Speaker 3>disrupted the auto industry. He's even implanted computer interfaces into

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 3>a couple brains and yes, he was once known as

0:38:53.719 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 3>President Trump's first buddy.

0:38:55.080 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, indeed, folks, we are talking about the one and

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>only the world's richest individual, Elon Musk, who spoke with

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 1>our own Michelle Hussein at the Qatar Economic Forum in

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Doha this past week. That forum program by Bloomberg News.

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:09.280
<v Speaker 3>That full conversation up next.

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast. Catch us

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:39:26.680 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Plenty ahead in our second hour of the weekend edition

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg Business Week, a holiday weekend edition. I should

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>say so this is something special, and by that when

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>we say plenty, we really do mean plenty and plenty

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 1>from Elon Musk. This past week, he gave a wide

0:39:41.520 --> 0:39:45.320
<v Speaker 1>ranging interview to Bloomberg's Michelle Husain at the Qatar Economic Forum,

0:39:45.480 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 1>which was programmed by Bloomberg News.

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 3>They spoke for about forty minutes and really touched on

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 3>everything from his political spending, the Department of Government efficiency,

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 3>and his relationship with President Trump.

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 1>And of course Michelle started the interview where else, but

0:39:58.320 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>on Tesla.

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 8>The company is offered in recent months what you've called blowback.

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:07.440
<v Speaker 8>So what is your plan for turning that around? The

0:40:07.480 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 8>declining sales picture? And by what stage do you think

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 8>you're going to be able to turn it around?

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 5>Oh, it's already turned around.

0:40:15.320 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 8>Give me some evidence for that. I've just been looking

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 8>at the sales figures for Europe in April, which show

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 8>very significant declines in the big markets.

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:28.839
<v Speaker 5>Europe is our weakness market. We're stronger everywhere else. So

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 5>now our sales are doing well at this point, we

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 5>anticipate any any meaningful sales shortfall and the you know

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 5>the obviously the stock market recognizes that since we're now

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 5>back over a trillion dollars in market cap, so really

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 5>the market is aware of the situation. So it's already

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:50.720
<v Speaker 5>turned around.

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:53.319
<v Speaker 8>But sales still down compared to this time last year

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 8>in Europe.

0:40:55.280 --> 0:41:01.240
<v Speaker 5>In Europe, okay, and yes, that's that's true of all manufacturers,

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 5>there's no exceptions.

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 8>Does that mean that you're not going to be able?

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 5>Does that mean you're quite weak?

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 8>Okay? But you would acknowledg wouldn't you that what you

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 8>are facing? Okay, let's just take it as your What

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 8>you are facing is a significant problem. This Tesla is

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 8>an incredibly aspirational brand. People identified with it, it saw it,

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:22.239
<v Speaker 8>They saw it as being at the forefront of the

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 8>climate crisis. And now people are driving around with stickers

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 8>in their cars saying I bought this before we knew

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 8>Elon was crazy.

0:41:29.320 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 5>And there are also people who are by buying it

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 5>because Elon's crazy, or however they may view it. So, yes,

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 5>we've lost some sales perths on the left, but we've

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 5>gained them on the right. The sales numbers at this

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 5>point are strong and we've seen no problem with them

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 5>had So what I mean? You can just look at

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:53.760
<v Speaker 5>the stock price if you want the best inside information.

0:41:54.320 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 5>The stock market analysts have that and us it wouldn't

0:42:00.680 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 5>be trading near all time highest if it was not,

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 5>if things weren't in good Jake, They're fine, don't worry

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:08.160
<v Speaker 5>about it.

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 8>Okay, I was citing sales figures rather than share price. Well,

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 8>tell me then, how committed you are to Tesla. Do

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:17.839
<v Speaker 8>you see yourself and are you committed to still being

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 8>the chief executive of Tesla in five years time? Yes,

0:42:23.000 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 8>no doubt about that at all.

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, no, I might die.

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:31.280
<v Speaker 8>Okay, sure to that.

0:42:31.800 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 5>Let me see you if I'm dead. So slight mode.

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 8>Does that mean that the value of your pay doesn't

0:42:38.880 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 8>have any bearing on your decision?

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:46.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's not really sort discussion in this forum. The

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 5>I think, obviously there should be a conversation for if

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:57.120
<v Speaker 5>there's something incredible is done, that compensations should match that

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 5>something incredible was done. But I'm confident that whatever the

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:08.680
<v Speaker 5>whatever some activist posing as a judge in Delaware happens

0:43:08.719 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 5>to do will not affect the future compensation.

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 8>This is the judge who twice struck down the fifty

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:18.920
<v Speaker 8>six billion dollar pay package that was awarded to you.

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 8>I think the value on the basis on the current

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:22.760
<v Speaker 8>value of stock options.

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, not a judge, Not a judge, the activist who

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:28.880
<v Speaker 5>is cars playing a judge in a Halloween costume.

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 8>Okay, that's your characterization. I think the on the current

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 8>value of stock options. I think the.

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:40.280
<v Speaker 5>Actual justice according to the law, on the current.

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 8>Value of stock options. I think the value of that

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 8>pay package stands at about one hundred billion dollars. Are

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 8>you saying you are relaxed about the value of your

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 8>future pay package? Your decision to be committed to Tesla

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 8>for the next five years as long as you are

0:43:55.600 --> 0:44:00.359
<v Speaker 8>still with us on this planet is completely independent of pay. No,

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 8>it's not independent, So pay is a relevant factor then

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:04.800
<v Speaker 8>to your commitment to Tesla.

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 5>A sufficient voting control such that I cannot be ousted

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 5>by activists investors is what matters to me. And I've

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 5>said this publicly many times, but let's not have this

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 5>whole thing be a discussion of my list pay. It's

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 5>not a money thing. It's a reasonable control thing over

0:44:22.520 --> 0:44:25.800
<v Speaker 5>the future of the company, especially for building millions, potentially

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 5>billions of humanoid robots. I can't be sitting there and

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 5>one're going to get tossed out by for political reasons

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 5>by activists. That would be unacceptable. That's all that matters. Now,

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 5>let's move on.

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:45.120
<v Speaker 8>Okay, Well just one question, well one question before we

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 8>move on to other companies, which is that I wonder

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 8>if some of what you've has happened to Tesla in

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 8>the last few months, did you take it personally?

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 5>Yes?

0:44:56.520 --> 0:44:59.359
<v Speaker 8>And did it make you regret any of you all

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 8>think twice about your political endeavors.

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 5>It is I did what needed to be done.

0:45:05.520 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 8>Uh.

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 5>The violent antibody reaction and I'm not someone who's ever

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:17.320
<v Speaker 5>committed violence, and yet massive violence was committed against my companies,

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 5>massive violence was threatened against me. Who are these people?

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 5>Why would they do that? How wrong can they be?

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:30.320
<v Speaker 5>They're on the wrong on the wrong side of history,

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:32.680
<v Speaker 5>and that's an evil thing to do, to go and

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 5>damage some pointocent person's car, to threaten to kill me.

0:45:40.120 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 5>What's wrong with these people? I have not harmed anyone,

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 5>so something needs to be done about them. And a

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:51.879
<v Speaker 5>number of them are going to prison and they deserve it.

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:58.239
<v Speaker 8>You're well, you're referring to the attacks on Tesla showrooms,

0:45:58.840 --> 0:45:59.239
<v Speaker 8>but I.

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 5>Think, well, it's into showrooms and burning down cars unacceptable.

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 5>Those people will go to prison, and the people that

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:09.320
<v Speaker 5>funded them and organized them will also go to prison.

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 11>Don't worry, wouldn't you coming from you, wouldn't you, hm,

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 11>wouldn't wouldn't you acknowledge that some of the people who

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 11>turned against Tesla in Europe were were upset.

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 8>At your politics, and very few of them would have

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 8>been violent in any way. They just objected to what

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 8>they saw you say or do politically.

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:38.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's certainly fine to object to political things, but

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:41.880
<v Speaker 5>it's not it's not fine to resort to violence and

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 5>hanging someone in effigy and death threats, that's obviously not

0:46:45.719 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 5>okayh you know, that's absurd. That is in no way

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 5>justifiable at all in any way, shape or form. And

0:46:56.840 --> 0:46:59.319
<v Speaker 5>some of the the legacy media and nonetheless have sort

0:46:59.360 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 5>of justified which is unconscionable. Shame on them.

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:05.280
<v Speaker 8>Let's talk about your other companies then, in other business

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:08.040
<v Speaker 8>areas SpaceX. I saw that you said in a speech

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 8>at the West Point Military Academy recently that the future

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 8>of warfare is AI and drones, And obviously defense is

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 8>an increasingly booming sector with the state of the world

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:25.760
<v Speaker 8>at the moment, do you see SpaceX moving into weaponized drones?

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:34.520
<v Speaker 5>You certainly ask interesting questions that are impossible to answer.

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:42.880
<v Speaker 5>So SpaceX is is the space launch leader. So SpaceX

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:50.360
<v Speaker 5>doesn't do drones. SpaceX builds rockets, satellites, and Internet terminals.

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 5>So SpaceX has a a very dominant position in space launch.

0:47:57.120 --> 0:48:01.680
<v Speaker 5>So of the mass launch to orbit the year, SpaceX

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:08.240
<v Speaker 5>will probably do ninety percent, China will do the half

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 5>of the remaining amounts, so of five percent, and the

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 5>rest of the world, including the rest of the US,

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 5>will do about five percent, so SpaceX will do about

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:15.760
<v Speaker 5>ten times as much as the rest of the world combined,

0:48:15.800 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 5>or twenty times as much as China, which is in

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:20.840
<v Speaker 5>China is doing actually a very impressive job. The reason

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:23.440
<v Speaker 5>for this is that we're putting it into orbit. The

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 5>largest satellite constellation the walls I've seen by far, so

0:48:27.680 --> 0:48:32.400
<v Speaker 5>I think at this point about maybe approaching eighty percent

0:48:32.440 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 5>of all active satellites in orbit are SpaceX and they're

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:40.680
<v Speaker 5>providing high vand with global connectivity throughout the world. In fact,

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 5>this connection is on a SpaceX connection. So I think

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:47.520
<v Speaker 5>this is a very good thing because it means that

0:48:47.560 --> 0:48:51.560
<v Speaker 5>we can provide low cost my bandwidth Internet to pots

0:48:51.560 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 5>the world that don't have it or it's very expensive.

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:56.359
<v Speaker 5>And I think the single biggest thing you can do

0:48:56.440 --> 0:48:59.400
<v Speaker 5>to lift people out of poverty and help them is

0:48:59.440 --> 0:49:03.080
<v Speaker 5>giving them an Internet connection, because once you have the

0:49:03.120 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 5>Internet connection, you can learn anything for free on the Internet,

0:49:06.320 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 5>and you can also sell your goods and services to

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 5>the global market. And once you have knowledge by the

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:20.279
<v Speaker 5>Internet and the ability to engage in commerce, that this

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:23.919
<v Speaker 5>is going to greatly improve quality of life from people

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 5>throughout the world. And it has, and i'd just like

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:29.279
<v Speaker 5>to think anyone in the audience who may have been

0:49:29.280 --> 0:49:33.799
<v Speaker 5>helpful and you know, with starlink and getting it to

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 5>approved in their country. And I think it's doing a

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:37.560
<v Speaker 5>lot of good in the countries that have approved it,

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 5>which is I think this point one hundred and thirty

0:49:39.200 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 5>countries are very happy with it. I don't currently into

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 5>spaceally getting into the weapons business. That's certainly that's not

0:49:47.120 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 5>an aspiration. Were frequent, we're frequently asked to do weapons programs,

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 5>but we have does a lot of client.

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:59.600
<v Speaker 8>Do you envisage SpaceX or indeed, starlink is a separate

0:49:59.840 --> 0:50:04.040
<v Speaker 8>end city publicly listing in the near future or at all.

0:50:05.400 --> 0:50:09.160
<v Speaker 5>It's possible that starlink may go public at some point

0:50:09.160 --> 0:50:09.720
<v Speaker 5>in the future.

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:13.320
<v Speaker 8>And what would be the what would be the time frame,

0:50:15.480 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 8>what kind of time frame you consider?

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean no rush, I mean no rush to your public.

0:50:19.960 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 5>The public is I guess a way to you know,

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:28.640
<v Speaker 5>potentially make more money, but at the expense of a

0:50:28.680 --> 0:50:33.359
<v Speaker 5>lot of public company overhead and inevitably a whole bunch

0:50:33.360 --> 0:50:36.879
<v Speaker 5>of lawsuits which are very annoying. So there's really something

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:39.600
<v Speaker 5>needs to be done about the share shareholder shareholder derovative

0:50:39.640 --> 0:50:46.800
<v Speaker 5>lawsuits in the US because it allows plaintiffs law firms

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 5>who don't represent the shareholders to pretend that they represent

0:50:50.200 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 5>the shareholders by getting a puppet plaintiff for a few

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:56.279
<v Speaker 5>shares to initiate a massive lawsuit against the company, and

0:50:56.360 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 5>the irony being that extreme irony that even if the

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:04.120
<v Speaker 5>class they purport to represent were to vote that they

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:07.400
<v Speaker 5>don't want the lawsuit, the lawsuit will still continue. So

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:10.560
<v Speaker 5>how can it be a class action representing a class

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 5>if the class what against it? And that's the bizarre

0:51:13.480 --> 0:51:15.880
<v Speaker 5>situation we've got in the US that needs into a

0:51:15.960 --> 0:51:20.399
<v Speaker 5>dire need for form. As anyone's running public company, you've

0:51:20.400 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 5>experienced this, it's an absurd situation that needs to change,

0:51:23.719 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 5>will be really helped with frivolous lawsuits.

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 3>That was Elon Musk with Bloomberg's Michelle Hussain at the

0:51:29.239 --> 0:51:30.399
<v Speaker 3>Katar Economic Forum.

0:51:30.480 --> 0:51:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg business Week. Coming up more from

0:51:33.000 --> 0:51:36.560
<v Speaker 1>our Elon Musk interview, focusing on things like artificial intelligence

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:38.799
<v Speaker 1>and yes, his battle with open AI.

0:51:39.320 --> 0:51:41.280
<v Speaker 3>That's next. This is Bloomberg.

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:46.640
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast. Listen live

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:49.640
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Play and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:51:52.640 --> 0:51:55.400
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:59.560
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station, Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:02.880
<v Speaker 1>We bring you more now from our interview with the

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:06.399
<v Speaker 1>world's richest man, Elon Musk. This past week, Elon spoke

0:52:06.480 --> 0:52:09.440
<v Speaker 1>remotely at the Qatar Economic Forum, which was programmed by

0:52:09.440 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News.

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 3>We pick up with Elon addressing his lawsuit against open

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Ai after the company announced plans to restructure as a

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 3>for profit business. He was part of the conversation with

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Michelle Is saying.

0:52:20.600 --> 0:52:22.839
<v Speaker 5>Look, I came up with the name open ai as

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 5>an open source and as a nonprofit, and I funded

0:52:26.840 --> 0:52:31.200
<v Speaker 5>AI OPENINGI for the first roughly fifty million dollars. And

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:35.680
<v Speaker 5>it was intended to be a nonprofit, open source company,

0:52:35.840 --> 0:52:38.400
<v Speaker 5>and now is they're trying to change that for their

0:52:38.440 --> 0:52:43.160
<v Speaker 5>own financial benefit into a for profit company that is

0:52:43.239 --> 0:52:46.160
<v Speaker 5>closed source. So this would be like, let's say you

0:52:46.880 --> 0:52:50.880
<v Speaker 5>funded a nonprofit to help preserve the Amazon rainforest, but

0:52:51.120 --> 0:52:53.919
<v Speaker 5>instead of doing that, they became a lumber company, chopped

0:52:53.920 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 5>down the forest and sold the word. He'd be like

0:52:56.280 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 5>wait a second, that's not what I funded. That's open AI.

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:02.319
<v Speaker 8>They've made some to their corporate instructure, though, haven't they

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 8>since in recognition of of what you've said?

0:53:06.280 --> 0:53:08.520
<v Speaker 5>And now that's just what they told the media.

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:15.879
<v Speaker 8>Okay, part they have part they have partly walked back

0:53:16.000 --> 0:53:19.759
<v Speaker 8>their plan to restructure the business. I guess that's made

0:53:19.880 --> 0:53:21.640
<v Speaker 8>no difference to how you feel about it. So you

0:53:21.760 --> 0:53:25.719
<v Speaker 8>determined to see them in court of course. Okay, Well

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:28.000
<v Speaker 8>that's certainly going to be one to watch. I also

0:53:28.080 --> 0:53:30.600
<v Speaker 8>wanted to ask you about AI and regulation because when

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:33.440
<v Speaker 8>you were here last talking to John Micklethwaite, you had

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 8>some pretty strong words about the risk that AI poses

0:53:38.200 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 8>and you said that you really felt what the US

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 8>was missing was a federal AI regulator, that you know,

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 8>something along lines of the Food and Drug Administration or

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 8>the Federal Aviation Administration. Now you're clearly now in a

0:53:51.680 --> 0:53:55.239
<v Speaker 8>zone where you're more on the cutting regulation side than

0:53:55.280 --> 0:53:58.480
<v Speaker 8>wanting new regulators. So has your view changed on the

0:53:58.560 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 8>need for an AI regulator?

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:03.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, something, I don't think there should be regulators. You

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:05.960
<v Speaker 5>think of regulators like referees on the on the field

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 5>in sports. There should be some number of referees, but

0:54:09.719 --> 0:54:11.879
<v Speaker 5>that you shouldn't have so many referees that you can't

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:15.080
<v Speaker 5>kick the ball without hitting one. In many in most

0:54:17.200 --> 0:54:20.319
<v Speaker 5>fields in the US, the regulatory burden has grown over

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:23.920
<v Speaker 5>time to the point where it's like having more referees

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:27.200
<v Speaker 5>than players on the field. And this is a natural

0:54:27.280 --> 0:54:30.080
<v Speaker 5>consequence of an extended period of prosperity. It's very important

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:34.399
<v Speaker 5>to appropriate appreciate this. This has happened throughout history. When

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:37.279
<v Speaker 5>you have an extended period of prosperity with no existential war,

0:54:37.680 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 5>there's no there's no cleansing function for the for unnecessary

0:54:44.520 --> 0:54:47.560
<v Speaker 5>laws and regulations. So what happens is that every year

0:54:48.160 --> 0:54:51.759
<v Speaker 5>more laws and more regulations are pasted, because you know,

0:54:52.000 --> 0:54:54.760
<v Speaker 5>legislators are going to legislate, regulators are going to regulate,

0:54:55.680 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 5>and you will get the steady pile of more and

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:03.360
<v Speaker 5>more laws and regulations over time until everything is illegal.

0:55:03.800 --> 0:55:05.879
<v Speaker 5>And let me give you an example of a truly

0:55:05.920 --> 0:55:12.040
<v Speaker 5>absurd situation. Under the Biden administration, SpaceX was sued for

0:55:12.280 --> 0:55:16.440
<v Speaker 5>not hiring asylum seekers in the US. Now, the problem

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:20.279
<v Speaker 5>is it's actually illegal for SpaceX under itard in National

0:55:20.320 --> 0:55:23.480
<v Speaker 5>Traffic and Arms regulations to hire anyone who is not

0:55:23.600 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 5>a permanent resident of the United States, because the premise

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:29.680
<v Speaker 5>being that they will take advanced rocket technology and return

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:31.720
<v Speaker 5>to their home country if they're not a permanent resident.

0:55:32.280 --> 0:55:36.520
<v Speaker 5>So we're simultaneously in a situation where it's illegal to

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:41.760
<v Speaker 5>hire slum SEUs and is also illegal to hire asylum seekers,

0:55:42.320 --> 0:55:45.560
<v Speaker 5>and the Biden's partner of justice chose to prosecute us

0:55:45.920 --> 0:55:49.480
<v Speaker 5>despite both paths being illegal. Down if you do, down

0:55:49.560 --> 0:55:50.040
<v Speaker 5>if you don't.

0:55:50.200 --> 0:55:53.760
<v Speaker 8>Well, my question was specifically about a regulator for AI,

0:55:54.200 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 8>which you said three years ago was needed, and you

0:55:57.120 --> 0:56:00.080
<v Speaker 8>said we need to be proactive on the regulation of

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:03.360
<v Speaker 8>AI rather than reactive. Have you changed your mind on.

0:56:03.440 --> 0:56:06.080
<v Speaker 5>That, No, of course not. What I'm saying is that

0:56:06.400 --> 0:56:10.800
<v Speaker 5>there should be some referees on the field, a few referees,

0:56:10.960 --> 0:56:13.719
<v Speaker 5>but you shouldn't have a field jam packed with referees

0:56:14.840 --> 0:56:16.480
<v Speaker 5>such that you could not kick a ball in any

0:56:16.520 --> 0:56:20.160
<v Speaker 5>direction without hitting one. So the fields that have been

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 5>around for a long time, such as automotive aerospace, if

0:56:26.120 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 5>the sort of food and drug industries are overregulated, but

0:56:30.719 --> 0:56:35.439
<v Speaker 5>the new fields like artificial intelligence are underregulated. In fact,

0:56:35.480 --> 0:56:37.960
<v Speaker 5>there is no regulator at all, so they should be

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 5>Do you still think that yes, I'm simply saying, which

0:56:41.600 --> 0:56:44.440
<v Speaker 5>I think is just basic common sense, that you want

0:56:44.480 --> 0:56:46.640
<v Speaker 5>to have at least you want to have a few

0:56:46.680 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 5>referees in the field. You don't want to have an

0:56:48.400 --> 0:56:51.160
<v Speaker 5>army of referees, but you want to have a few

0:56:51.200 --> 0:56:54.279
<v Speaker 5>referees on any given field, in any given sport or

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:59.280
<v Speaker 5>any given arena, industrial arena, to ensure help that public

0:56:59.360 --> 0:57:04.480
<v Speaker 5>safety is taken care of. But your already have, so

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:08.359
<v Speaker 5>there's there's a proper number of referees. Like I said,

0:57:08.360 --> 0:57:11.360
<v Speaker 5>it's actually very easy to visualize this when compared to sports.

0:57:11.719 --> 0:57:14.919
<v Speaker 5>If the whole field is packed with referees, that would

0:57:14.920 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 5>look absurd. But if there were no referees at all,

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:19.760
<v Speaker 5>your game is not going to be as good.

0:57:20.840 --> 0:57:25.000
<v Speaker 8>Okay, So let's then talk about your new world, your

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:28.800
<v Speaker 8>your role advising government. You are in this unique and

0:57:29.400 --> 0:57:33.760
<v Speaker 8>unprecedented position of having billions of dollars worth of contracts

0:57:33.800 --> 0:57:37.360
<v Speaker 8>with the federal government yourself, mostly through SpaceX, and also

0:57:37.480 --> 0:57:41.280
<v Speaker 8>now an insider's knowledge of it because of Dot. Can

0:57:41.360 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 8>you see that there is a conflict of interest or

0:57:45.720 --> 0:57:48.440
<v Speaker 8>a potential conflict of interest in broad terms, just through

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:51.080
<v Speaker 8>that very fact, I don't think so.

0:57:51.280 --> 0:57:55.640
<v Speaker 5>Actually, there have been many advisors throughout history and the

0:57:55.960 --> 0:57:59.880
<v Speaker 5>US government and others who have had economic interests, And

0:58:00.520 --> 0:58:04.320
<v Speaker 5>I absolutely an advisor. I don't have a formal power,

0:58:05.360 --> 0:58:09.400
<v Speaker 5>and that's a president can choose to accept my advice

0:58:09.520 --> 0:58:12.919
<v Speaker 5>or not, and that's that's how it goes. If there's

0:58:12.920 --> 0:58:15.840
<v Speaker 5>a single contract that any of my companies that have

0:58:15.960 --> 0:58:21.760
<v Speaker 5>received that people think is somehow not was awarded improperly,

0:58:22.640 --> 0:58:26.439
<v Speaker 5>it would immediately be front page news, to say the least.

0:58:27.720 --> 0:58:30.640
<v Speaker 5>And if if I hadn't mentioned it, certainly my competitors would.

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:33.240
<v Speaker 5>So if you're not seeing that, then the clearly is

0:58:33.280 --> 0:58:34.560
<v Speaker 5>not a conflict to interest.

0:58:35.760 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 8>The Yeah, there's another way though to look at it.

0:58:39.200 --> 0:58:42.960
<v Speaker 8>That For example, you have many competitors, whether it's companies

0:58:43.080 --> 0:58:45.080
<v Speaker 8>like Boeing or companies who would like to do more

0:58:45.240 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 8>of the kind of work you do for NASA Blue

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:52.400
<v Speaker 8>Origin Rocket Lab. And because DOGE is in every federal

0:58:52.720 --> 0:58:58.320
<v Speaker 8>government department, you or people who work for DOGE and

0:58:58.880 --> 0:59:02.040
<v Speaker 8>you are the driving force behind it, have an insight

0:59:02.400 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 8>into those companies' affairs and those companies' relationships with the

0:59:06.360 --> 0:59:07.040
<v Speaker 8>federal government.

0:59:07.920 --> 0:59:12.720
<v Speaker 5>Now, all we do is we review the organization to

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:18.480
<v Speaker 5>see if the organization has departments that are no longer relevant.

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:23.800
<v Speaker 5>And then are the contracts that are being awarded good

0:59:23.880 --> 0:59:26.000
<v Speaker 5>value for money? In fact, frankly, the bar is not

0:59:26.080 --> 0:59:28.720
<v Speaker 5>particularly high. Is there any value money in a contract?

0:59:29.640 --> 0:59:32.600
<v Speaker 5>And if there's if there isn't, then we make recommendations

0:59:32.640 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 5>to the secretary. The secretary can choose to take those

0:59:36.640 --> 0:59:39.160
<v Speaker 5>actions or not take those actions, and that's it. And

0:59:39.200 --> 0:59:42.760
<v Speaker 5>then any action that that is as a function of

0:59:42.840 --> 0:59:45.760
<v Speaker 5>DOGE is posted to the DOGE website and to the

0:59:45.840 --> 0:59:49.840
<v Speaker 5>DOGE dog govt at dog handle on the x platform.

0:59:50.320 --> 0:59:54.120
<v Speaker 5>So it's it's complete transparency. And I have not seen

0:59:54.200 --> 0:59:58.640
<v Speaker 5>any case where the best min not has even been

0:59:58.640 --> 1:00:03.120
<v Speaker 5>an accusation of conflict because it is completely and utterly transparent.

1:00:04.680 --> 1:00:04.960
<v Speaker 5>That's it.

1:00:05.240 --> 1:00:09.120
<v Speaker 8>And what about the international dimension. Now, let's think about Starlink.

1:00:09.160 --> 1:00:12.600
<v Speaker 8>Starlink is obviously a very very good internet service. It's

1:00:12.640 --> 1:00:15.240
<v Speaker 8>sought after all over the world. It's critical to the

1:00:15.320 --> 1:00:19.880
<v Speaker 8>frontline in Ukraine. It has also had more contracts coming

1:00:20.000 --> 1:00:22.800
<v Speaker 8>its way, and there is some evidence that companies are

1:00:22.800 --> 1:00:26.560
<v Speaker 8>allowing access to it because they want to be close

1:00:26.680 --> 1:00:29.000
<v Speaker 8>to the Trump administration and send the right signal. So

1:00:29.360 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 8>Bloomberg broke news today that the South African government is

1:00:32.280 --> 1:00:35.280
<v Speaker 8>working around the rules on black ownership in order to

1:00:35.480 --> 1:00:38.360
<v Speaker 8>allow starlinkin and that is being done on the eve

1:00:38.960 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 8>of the visit the President Ramaposa is going to make

1:00:41.800 --> 1:00:44.440
<v Speaker 8>to the White House. Do you recognize that as a

1:00:44.480 --> 1:00:45.320
<v Speaker 8>conflict of interest?

1:00:46.160 --> 1:00:48.720
<v Speaker 5>Now? Of course, first of all, you should be questioning

1:00:49.000 --> 1:00:51.040
<v Speaker 5>why is there why the racist laws in South Africa.

1:00:51.120 --> 1:00:53.680
<v Speaker 5>That's the first problem. That's what you should be attacking.

1:00:54.680 --> 1:00:57.960
<v Speaker 5>It's improper for the racist laws in South Africa. The

1:00:58.040 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 5>whole idea with what Nelson Madella, who was a great man,

1:01:01.360 --> 1:01:03.919
<v Speaker 5>proposed was that all races should be on an equal

1:01:03.960 --> 1:01:06.200
<v Speaker 5>footing in South Africa. That's the right thing to do,

1:01:06.600 --> 1:01:08.720
<v Speaker 5>not to replace one set of racist laws with another

1:01:08.760 --> 1:01:11.520
<v Speaker 5>set of racist laws, which is utterly wrong and improver.

1:01:12.800 --> 1:01:16.680
<v Speaker 5>So that's that's the deal, that all races should be

1:01:16.680 --> 1:01:19.720
<v Speaker 5>tweet equally and there should be no preference given to

1:01:19.760 --> 1:01:22.640
<v Speaker 5>one or the other, whereas there are now one hundred

1:01:22.640 --> 1:01:26.400
<v Speaker 5>and forty laws in South Africa that give that basically

1:01:29.240 --> 1:01:32.120
<v Speaker 5>give strong preference to you if you're black South African

1:01:32.520 --> 1:01:35.640
<v Speaker 5>and not otherwise. And so now I'm in the subsided

1:01:35.680 --> 1:01:37.560
<v Speaker 5>situation where I was born in South Africa but cannot

1:01:37.560 --> 1:01:41.040
<v Speaker 5>get a license to operates in starlink because I'm not black.

1:01:41.120 --> 1:01:43.800
<v Speaker 8>Well, it looks like that's about It looks looks like

1:01:43.880 --> 1:01:46.040
<v Speaker 8>that right, It looks like that's about to change.

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:49.640
<v Speaker 5>I just asked you a question. Please answer. Does that

1:01:49.720 --> 1:01:51.080
<v Speaker 5>seem right to you? Well?

1:01:51.120 --> 1:01:55.720
<v Speaker 8>Those rules were designed to bring Those rules were designed

1:01:55.800 --> 1:01:58.760
<v Speaker 8>to bring about an era of more economic equality in

1:01:58.880 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 8>South Africa, and it looks like the government has found

1:02:02.040 --> 1:02:03.320
<v Speaker 8>a way around those rules for you.

1:02:04.280 --> 1:02:04.959
<v Speaker 5>Ask your question?

1:02:06.600 --> 1:02:07.720
<v Speaker 8>Is this is your interview?

1:02:07.760 --> 1:02:10.320
<v Speaker 5>Everyone wants to hear from your question, yes or no?

1:02:10.920 --> 1:02:14.240
<v Speaker 8>Not for me to answer. I have got a question

1:02:14.400 --> 1:02:17.920
<v Speaker 8>for you about about your government works and the amount

1:02:17.960 --> 1:02:18.600
<v Speaker 8>of savings.

1:02:19.160 --> 1:02:20.240
<v Speaker 5>Do you like raceless loves?

1:02:22.120 --> 1:02:24.880
<v Speaker 8>This is not for me to answer. Come on now,

1:02:24.920 --> 1:02:27.000
<v Speaker 8>you wouldn't be trying to dodge a question.

1:02:27.520 --> 1:02:31.120
<v Speaker 5>Do you have to answer this question? Answer you answer mine?

1:02:31.240 --> 1:02:33.560
<v Speaker 8>I say, I think if you I'm sure you can

1:02:33.640 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 8>have that conversation directly with the South African government if

1:02:36.000 --> 1:02:37.760
<v Speaker 8>you want to. I want to ask you about the

1:02:38.040 --> 1:02:41.800
<v Speaker 8>total believe. I want to ask you about the total allound.

1:02:43.400 --> 1:02:45.080
<v Speaker 8>I want to ask you about the total amount that

1:02:45.200 --> 1:02:48.920
<v Speaker 8>you're planning to save through Doge's work before the election,

1:02:49.080 --> 1:02:51.480
<v Speaker 8>you said it was going to be at least two trillion.

1:02:51.840 --> 1:02:55.840
<v Speaker 8>The number currently on doze dog gov is one hundred

1:02:55.880 --> 1:02:59.760
<v Speaker 8>and seventy billion dollars. That's a big change. What happened

1:02:59.760 --> 1:03:00.360
<v Speaker 8>to the two.

1:03:00.280 --> 1:03:02.760
<v Speaker 5>Trillion or do you expect it to happen immediately?

1:03:03.480 --> 1:03:05.920
<v Speaker 8>Well? Is it going to happen because those is supposed

1:03:05.920 --> 1:03:07.160
<v Speaker 8>to run till next July.

1:03:08.200 --> 1:03:11.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean your question is episode in this fundamental premise?

1:03:11.640 --> 1:03:14.280
<v Speaker 5>Are you assuming that on day you know, within a

1:03:14.320 --> 1:03:16.480
<v Speaker 5>few months this an instant two trillion saved?

1:03:17.040 --> 1:03:18.480
<v Speaker 8>No, I'm not sure. I'm just asking you, is that

1:03:18.600 --> 1:03:19.200
<v Speaker 8>still your aim?

1:03:19.320 --> 1:03:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Then?

1:03:19.840 --> 1:03:22.000
<v Speaker 8>Is it still your aim to get the amount of time?

1:03:22.680 --> 1:03:24.640
<v Speaker 5>Have we not made good progress given the amount of time?

1:03:25.240 --> 1:03:27.520
<v Speaker 8>That's exactly what I'm asking. So, is it's still your

1:03:27.600 --> 1:03:29.960
<v Speaker 8>aim to go from one hundred and seventy billion to

1:03:30.080 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 8>two trillion?

1:03:32.000 --> 1:03:35.600
<v Speaker 5>The ability of those to operate is this function of

1:03:36.000 --> 1:03:41.760
<v Speaker 5>whether the government and this includes the Congress, is willing

1:03:41.800 --> 1:03:45.000
<v Speaker 5>to take our advice. We're not the dictators of the government.

1:03:45.040 --> 1:03:48.680
<v Speaker 5>We are the advisors, and so we can advise. And

1:03:48.760 --> 1:03:50.960
<v Speaker 5>the progress who made thus far I think is incredible.

1:03:51.080 --> 1:03:56.280
<v Speaker 5>Those team has done incredible work. But the magnitude of

1:03:57.360 --> 1:04:00.200
<v Speaker 5>the savings is proportionate to the support we get from

1:04:00.240 --> 1:04:05.840
<v Speaker 5>Congress and from the executive branch of the government in general.

1:04:07.400 --> 1:04:12.160
<v Speaker 5>So we're not the dictators. We are the advisors. But

1:04:12.280 --> 1:04:16.640
<v Speaker 5>thus far for advisors with the George team, to their credit,

1:04:18.280 --> 1:04:20.360
<v Speaker 5>has made incredible progress.

1:04:20.680 --> 1:04:23.120
<v Speaker 3>That was Elon Musk with Bloomberg's Michelle Lusain at the

1:04:23.120 --> 1:04:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Guitar Economic Forum. The full conversation is on the Bloomberg

1:04:25.880 --> 1:04:30.320
<v Speaker 3>podcast page on YouTube. Also check out the annotated transcript. Yeah,

1:04:30.560 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 3>it's really really cool. It has really good contexts. You

1:04:33.400 --> 1:04:35.480
<v Speaker 3>can get it at Bloomberg dot com and also on

1:04:35.520 --> 1:04:36.400
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg terminal.

1:04:36.480 --> 1:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week coming up even more

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>from our Elon Musk interview, focusing on Elon's plans to

1:04:42.480 --> 1:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>listen up everyone pull back on his political spending.

1:04:46.200 --> 1:04:49.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we'll see TV with the Brain of Salt.

1:04:49.400 --> 1:04:49.840
<v Speaker 4>That's next.

1:04:50.120 --> 1:04:51.080
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg.

1:04:56.600 --> 1:05:00.600
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

1:05:00.680 --> 1:05:04.080
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

1:05:04.160 --> 1:05:06.880
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg

1:05:06.960 --> 1:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to our interview with the world's richest man,

1:05:13.040 --> 1:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk this past week. As we've been noting, he

1:05:16.120 --> 1:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>spoke remotely at the Guitar Economic Form, which was programmed

1:05:19.520 --> 1:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>by Bloomberg News.

1:05:20.600 --> 1:05:22.640
<v Speaker 3>We pick up with Elon addressing his recent time in

1:05:22.800 --> 1:05:25.720
<v Speaker 3>Washington and putting together the Department of Government Efficiency. Here's

1:05:25.720 --> 1:05:28.920
<v Speaker 3>part of the conversation with Bloomberg's Mishalie Saint Dosh.

1:05:29.040 --> 1:05:31.680
<v Speaker 5>Is an advisory group. We are doing the best we

1:05:31.800 --> 1:05:35.320
<v Speaker 5>can as an advisory group. The progress made thus far

1:05:35.400 --> 1:05:38.080
<v Speaker 5>as an advisory group is excellent. I don't think any

1:05:38.080 --> 1:05:40.240
<v Speaker 5>advisory group has done better in the history of advisory

1:05:40.280 --> 1:05:43.800
<v Speaker 5>groups of the government. But we do not make the laws,

1:05:44.120 --> 1:05:47.800
<v Speaker 5>nor do we control the judiciary, nor do we control

1:05:47.920 --> 1:05:51.960
<v Speaker 5>the executive branch. We are simply advisors. In that context,

1:05:52.040 --> 1:05:56.200
<v Speaker 5>we are doing very well. Beyond that, we cannot we

1:05:56.280 --> 1:05:59.240
<v Speaker 5>cannot take action beyond that because we are not some

1:05:59.320 --> 1:06:01.600
<v Speaker 5>sort of imperial dictator of the government. There are three

1:06:01.640 --> 1:06:05.120
<v Speaker 5>branches of government that art some degree opposed to that

1:06:05.280 --> 1:06:11.560
<v Speaker 5>level of cost savings. Unless let's not criticize whether there's

1:06:12.320 --> 1:06:15.880
<v Speaker 5>four trillion. Instead look at the fact that that our

1:06:16.120 --> 1:06:18.680
<v Speaker 5>sixty billion has been saved and more we save two.

1:06:19.000 --> 1:06:21.280
<v Speaker 8>And as I said, I think everyone can agree that

1:06:21.520 --> 1:06:25.560
<v Speaker 8>cutting waste and indeed fraud in any government and being

1:06:25.920 --> 1:06:30.280
<v Speaker 8>responsible with taxpayers money is a very good thing. Finally, political,

1:06:30.920 --> 1:06:35.600
<v Speaker 8>your political influence. I wondered whether you have decided yet

1:06:35.720 --> 1:06:39.960
<v Speaker 8>how much you're going to spend on the upcoming mid terms.

1:06:40.920 --> 1:06:43.040
<v Speaker 8>You spent a lot more money on the last US

1:06:43.120 --> 1:06:46.080
<v Speaker 8>election than you envisaged when you were speaking here three

1:06:46.200 --> 1:06:49.440
<v Speaker 8>years ago. Are you going to continue to spend at

1:06:49.480 --> 1:06:51.280
<v Speaker 8>that kind of level on future elections?

1:06:52.640 --> 1:06:56.440
<v Speaker 5>I think in terms of political spending, I'm going to

1:06:56.520 --> 1:06:57.720
<v Speaker 5>do a lot less in the future.

1:06:58.400 --> 1:06:59.040
<v Speaker 8>And why is that?

1:07:00.240 --> 1:07:01.080
<v Speaker 5>I think I've done enough?

1:07:04.400 --> 1:07:06.200
<v Speaker 8>Is it? Is it because of blowback?

1:07:07.600 --> 1:07:10.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, if I see a reason to do political spending

1:07:10.240 --> 1:07:12.240
<v Speaker 5>in the future, I will do it. I don't currently

1:07:12.240 --> 1:07:12.760
<v Speaker 5>see reason.

1:07:14.080 --> 1:07:17.800
<v Speaker 8>What about political influence beyond the US? How often do

1:07:17.840 --> 1:07:19.280
<v Speaker 8>you speak to President Putin?

1:07:20.080 --> 1:07:21.320
<v Speaker 5>I don't speak to President Putin.

1:07:23.040 --> 1:07:24.640
<v Speaker 8>You've never spoken to President Putin.

1:07:26.040 --> 1:07:27.720
<v Speaker 5>I was on a video caller with him once about

1:07:27.760 --> 1:07:31.040
<v Speaker 5>five years ago. That's the only that's the only speak

1:07:31.160 --> 1:07:34.360
<v Speaker 5>president President Putin. Oh, you must I get it.

1:07:35.240 --> 1:07:37.800
<v Speaker 8>Speak. Actually, I've heard you. I've heard you speak about it,

1:07:37.960 --> 1:07:40.200
<v Speaker 8>for example, in your West Point speech. You said, oh,

1:07:40.240 --> 1:07:44.080
<v Speaker 8>I challenged President Putin to uh to was it an

1:07:44.160 --> 1:07:46.040
<v Speaker 8>arm wrestle? And I know the Wall Street Journal has

1:07:46.160 --> 1:07:49.880
<v Speaker 8>reported your reported conversations. If you're if you're saying they

1:07:49.960 --> 1:07:52.080
<v Speaker 8>haven't happened other than once, I'll take that as red.

1:07:53.240 --> 1:07:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Is there a worse publication on the face of the

1:07:55.600 --> 1:07:57.760
<v Speaker 5>earth than the Wall Street Journal. I wouldn't use that

1:07:57.840 --> 1:08:03.400
<v Speaker 5>tolign up my cage for character things that that newspaper

1:08:03.600 --> 1:08:06.680
<v Speaker 5>is the worst newspaper in the world. You know, if

1:08:06.720 --> 1:08:09.400
<v Speaker 5>there's one newspaper that should be pro capitalist, it's the

1:08:09.440 --> 1:08:11.919
<v Speaker 5>one with Wall Street in the name. But it isn't.

1:08:12.440 --> 1:08:15.160
<v Speaker 5>So I have the very lowest opinion of the Wall

1:08:15.200 --> 1:08:18.479
<v Speaker 5>Street Journal. Absolute answers, and you clearly have believed the

1:08:18.560 --> 1:08:21.120
<v Speaker 5>tripe that you've written. That you've written in those papers.

1:08:21.040 --> 1:08:24.000
<v Speaker 8>I read, I read very widely, and I'm putting these

1:08:24.120 --> 1:08:26.040
<v Speaker 8>questions to you so that you have an opportunity to

1:08:26.120 --> 1:08:29.120
<v Speaker 8>respond to them, which you are and for which we're

1:08:29.120 --> 1:08:30.520
<v Speaker 8>all grateful to hear your responses.

1:08:31.400 --> 1:08:34.360
<v Speaker 5>You mentioned to be challenging. I did so on the

1:08:34.600 --> 1:08:39.040
<v Speaker 5>X platform. I challenged Vladimir Putin to single, but I

1:08:39.080 --> 1:08:41.320
<v Speaker 5>didn't talk to him. That was a post on the

1:08:41.479 --> 1:08:42.880
<v Speaker 5>X platform. That's why.

1:08:43.120 --> 1:08:45.480
<v Speaker 8>That's why I asked you, and you've and you've clarified

1:08:45.520 --> 1:08:47.960
<v Speaker 8>and explained, thank you. That's that's why I was asking

1:08:48.000 --> 1:08:52.519
<v Speaker 8>whether you have had reported conversations, and you've said you have.

1:08:52.560 --> 1:08:56.160
<v Speaker 5>Ad okay, legacy media lize.

1:08:57.000 --> 1:08:59.400
<v Speaker 8>Okay, listen. I actually thought I might give Grock the

1:08:59.520 --> 1:09:03.040
<v Speaker 8>last word, because when I ask Rock what your hardest

1:09:03.160 --> 1:09:07.320
<v Speaker 8>challenge is, it said the strain of managing multiple high

1:09:07.400 --> 1:09:13.040
<v Speaker 8>stake ventures made financial, regulatory and public relations crises. And

1:09:13.200 --> 1:09:17.640
<v Speaker 8>I wondered whether you recognize that characterization and whether you

1:09:17.760 --> 1:09:21.400
<v Speaker 8>do think that this is a pivotal year in your life.

1:09:22.000 --> 1:09:25.120
<v Speaker 5>Well, every has been somewhat pivotal, and this one's no different.

1:09:25.680 --> 1:09:28.599
<v Speaker 5>I mean in terms of interesting things that hopefully our

1:09:28.720 --> 1:09:35.360
<v Speaker 5>coverers this year, the getting Starship to be fully reusable,

1:09:36.000 --> 1:09:39.439
<v Speaker 5>so that we catch both the booster and the ship,

1:09:39.840 --> 1:09:42.519
<v Speaker 5>which will be the first fully reusable orbital rocket ever

1:09:42.600 --> 1:09:46.120
<v Speaker 5>in history, which is the essential breakthrough necessarily to make

1:09:46.200 --> 1:09:50.240
<v Speaker 5>life multiplanetary and ultimately become a space faring civilization. We've

1:09:50.280 --> 1:09:55.559
<v Speaker 5>got neural link which is now helped by patients restore

1:09:56.040 --> 1:09:59.400
<v Speaker 5>capability using the telefty implant, where they're able to control

1:09:59.439 --> 1:10:04.519
<v Speaker 5>the computers by thinking, we'll be doing our first patient

1:10:04.720 --> 1:10:08.759
<v Speaker 5>to restore bland resource site with our blind site implant,

1:10:08.840 --> 1:10:10.320
<v Speaker 5>which is the at the end of the show early

1:10:10.439 --> 1:10:14.160
<v Speaker 5>next In fact, that that first patient might be in UEE,

1:10:14.560 --> 1:10:16.879
<v Speaker 5>since we have a relationship with YOUE and the Cleveland

1:10:16.880 --> 1:10:19.759
<v Speaker 5>CMIC there. I think what's running on the AI front,

1:10:20.040 --> 1:10:24.120
<v Speaker 5>we are close to what you might call AGI or

1:10:24.240 --> 1:10:28.000
<v Speaker 5>digital superintelligence. We are seeing an explosion of digital super intelligence.

1:10:28.000 --> 1:10:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Here was Elon Musk talking about pulling back on political

1:10:31.160 --> 1:10:34.639
<v Speaker 3>spending with Bloomberg's Michelle Assan at the Qatar Economic Forum.

1:10:34.680 --> 1:10:37.000
<v Speaker 3>We've got Max Chafkin with us. He's the co host

1:10:37.560 --> 1:10:40.760
<v Speaker 3>of the new Bloomberg podcast, Everybody's Business. He's also the

1:10:40.800 --> 1:10:43.599
<v Speaker 3>co host of the not so new podcast but still

1:10:43.640 --> 1:10:46.479
<v Speaker 3>pretty great podcast. It's called Elon Egg. I'm glad that's

1:10:46.479 --> 1:10:49.519
<v Speaker 3>what we played because that's getting a lot of attention

1:10:49.640 --> 1:10:53.000
<v Speaker 3>right now. And I heard that, and I went back

1:10:53.000 --> 1:10:56.000
<v Speaker 3>to Elon's Twitter from March of twenty twenty four, and

1:10:56.160 --> 1:11:00.720
<v Speaker 3>that's when he posted on X this is overgo. I

1:11:00.800 --> 1:11:04.439
<v Speaker 3>will not contribute to either political candidate. And we all

1:11:04.520 --> 1:11:07.200
<v Speaker 3>saw what happened. A few months later, My point is

1:11:08.160 --> 1:11:11.040
<v Speaker 3>he says stuff and doesn't necessarily commit to it.

1:11:11.400 --> 1:11:13.960
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, and even here he's building himself an out Right,

1:11:14.040 --> 1:11:18.960
<v Speaker 12>he's saying less money, which you'd kind of expect anyway, Right,

1:11:19.080 --> 1:11:23.560
<v Speaker 12>midterms are not as expensive as presidential years, So like,

1:11:23.720 --> 1:11:27.080
<v Speaker 12>it would be very surprising if he dropped another three

1:11:27.160 --> 1:11:29.960
<v Speaker 12>hundred million dollars, which is roughly what he spent in

1:11:30.000 --> 1:11:33.000
<v Speaker 12>twenty twenty four, on twenty twenty six. And he's also saying,

1:11:33.000 --> 1:11:35.639
<v Speaker 12>you know, I would It's I don't see a reason now,

1:11:35.760 --> 1:11:37.280
<v Speaker 12>but if I did see a reason in the future,

1:11:37.320 --> 1:11:41.320
<v Speaker 12>I could I see this as a public negotiation. Right,

1:11:41.439 --> 1:11:44.679
<v Speaker 12>this is the audience here, well, aren't There are several

1:11:44.720 --> 1:11:49.280
<v Speaker 12>different audiences. One of course is Tesla shareholders trying to say, like, look,

1:11:49.360 --> 1:11:51.960
<v Speaker 12>I'm I'm focused on the company. I'm not getting sucked

1:11:51.960 --> 1:11:54.360
<v Speaker 12>into Washington, going to try to deal with some of

1:11:54.400 --> 1:11:57.439
<v Speaker 12>the brand damage that my political presidence has caused. But

1:11:57.600 --> 1:12:00.880
<v Speaker 12>of course the other audience is Republicans. Right, He's putting

1:12:00.920 --> 1:12:03.639
<v Speaker 12>it out there that if they want money from him,

1:12:03.880 --> 1:12:06.000
<v Speaker 12>they're going to have to do stuff. And you know,

1:12:06.280 --> 1:12:09.559
<v Speaker 12>there's lots of stuff that has happened in Washington since

1:12:09.600 --> 1:12:11.720
<v Speaker 12>Donald Trump took office. That I think has made Elon

1:12:11.840 --> 1:12:14.160
<v Speaker 12>Musk really happy. But Elon Musk is a very long

1:12:14.240 --> 1:12:16.680
<v Speaker 12>list and not all those things have happened. There are

1:12:16.720 --> 1:12:20.120
<v Speaker 12>lots of opportunities for him to get contracts. You know,

1:12:20.200 --> 1:12:23.759
<v Speaker 12>the Golden Dome as you're discussing like that's a potential

1:12:24.680 --> 1:12:28.040
<v Speaker 12>revenue source for SpaceX. There are lots of areas that

1:12:28.160 --> 1:12:31.400
<v Speaker 12>Elon Musk stands to benefit. You also have this in

1:12:31.560 --> 1:12:36.200
<v Speaker 12>the bill right now, like they're plan cutting these EV subsidies. Now,

1:12:36.280 --> 1:12:38.400
<v Speaker 12>we will see where that ends up. But if those

1:12:38.439 --> 1:12:41.880
<v Speaker 12>EV subsidies are cut completely, that could really hurt Tesla.

1:12:42.040 --> 1:12:45.320
<v Speaker 12>So I think I think it's to his advantage to say, hey,

1:12:45.520 --> 1:12:48.719
<v Speaker 12>I'm you know, I'm not a gimme for twenty twenty six.

1:12:48.760 --> 1:12:49.839
<v Speaker 4>You have to win my support.

1:12:49.920 --> 1:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about robotaxis. Elon told CNBC that Tesla

1:12:53.240 --> 1:12:55.559
<v Speaker 1>plans to begin operating a fleet of about ten self

1:12:55.680 --> 1:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>driving robotaxis in Austin next month, before growing to one

1:12:59.360 --> 1:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand VA within a few months. His words, sending the

1:13:03.000 --> 1:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>company stock story.

1:13:04.200 --> 1:13:07.639
<v Speaker 12>So the robotaxi thing, I think part of the challenge.

1:13:07.640 --> 1:13:11.200
<v Speaker 12>One of the challenges for Tesla is there's so much

1:13:11.640 --> 1:13:14.920
<v Speaker 12>sort of assumed in the stock. The Tesla bulls basically

1:13:15.040 --> 1:13:18.240
<v Speaker 12>believe that almost overnight they're going to be able to

1:13:18.360 --> 1:13:23.320
<v Speaker 12>turn this thing into a massive, massive business. And I

1:13:23.400 --> 1:13:26.960
<v Speaker 12>think everything we know from the history of other companies

1:13:27.000 --> 1:13:29.879
<v Speaker 12>trying to launch these robotaxi things, and I'm thinking particularly

1:13:30.040 --> 1:13:33.640
<v Speaker 12>of Waimo, Google's driverless car division, which has been doing

1:13:33.720 --> 1:13:36.800
<v Speaker 12>this for like ten years and has really struggled to commercialize,

1:13:37.120 --> 1:13:38.479
<v Speaker 12>is that it's going to take a long time. And

1:13:38.520 --> 1:13:40.560
<v Speaker 12>when you look closely at what Musk is saying is

1:13:40.600 --> 1:13:42.479
<v Speaker 12>going to happen in Austin, if you are not paying

1:13:42.520 --> 1:13:45.080
<v Speaker 12>that close attention, if you're just sort of buying this,

1:13:45.400 --> 1:13:47.760
<v Speaker 12>like on robin Hood, you hear Elon must say, you know,

1:13:47.880 --> 1:13:50.160
<v Speaker 12>robotax going to heal over the world. You think they're

1:13:50.160 --> 1:13:52.280
<v Speaker 12>going to turn this on they're going to be huge fleets.

1:13:52.439 --> 1:13:53.920
<v Speaker 12>It's going to be very small.

1:13:54.280 --> 1:13:54.439
<v Speaker 5>You know.

1:13:54.560 --> 1:13:56.680
<v Speaker 12>On the during the earnings call, we learned something like

1:13:56.840 --> 1:14:00.759
<v Speaker 12>ten to twenty robotaxis with tel operation. So that's people,

1:14:01.160 --> 1:14:03.639
<v Speaker 12>you know, sitting in command centers making sure the cars

1:14:03.640 --> 1:14:04.360
<v Speaker 12>don't hit anybody.

1:14:04.520 --> 1:14:06.720
<v Speaker 3>That's going to be curely. What Weimo does by any

1:14:06.800 --> 1:14:08.519
<v Speaker 3>means no, it's it's.

1:14:08.479 --> 1:14:11.519
<v Speaker 12>Closer to it's maybe what weimo did you know years ago,

1:14:11.960 --> 1:14:13.600
<v Speaker 12>and it's just it's a realization.

1:14:13.760 --> 1:14:15.720
<v Speaker 5>I think that this is going to take a long time.

1:14:15.840 --> 1:14:18.400
<v Speaker 12>So I don't know. Elon Musk has this kind of

1:14:18.479 --> 1:14:21.680
<v Speaker 12>amazing ability to spin stories about the future to get

1:14:21.800 --> 1:14:23.480
<v Speaker 12>people excited about the future.

1:14:23.320 --> 1:14:24.560
<v Speaker 7>And he may be able to do that.

1:14:24.680 --> 1:14:27.120
<v Speaker 12>But like Tesla stock has gone up a lot in

1:14:27.280 --> 1:14:29.200
<v Speaker 12>recent weeks, you know, I know some of that has

1:14:29.240 --> 1:14:32.040
<v Speaker 12>to do with you know, terriff expectations and so on,

1:14:32.720 --> 1:14:35.120
<v Speaker 12>but this is a very valuable company relative to the

1:14:35.240 --> 1:14:36.160
<v Speaker 12>number of cars it sales.

1:14:36.960 --> 1:14:39.519
<v Speaker 3>Max in the interview that he gave to our team

1:14:39.760 --> 1:14:43.280
<v Speaker 3>at the Guitar Economic Form, he was asked about protesters

1:14:43.439 --> 1:14:46.320
<v Speaker 3>or the Tesla brand damage, and what he answered was

1:14:47.280 --> 1:14:49.639
<v Speaker 3>he said, quote, they're on the wrong side of history

1:14:49.680 --> 1:14:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and that's an evil thing to do. That's referring to

1:14:52.080 --> 1:14:54.720
<v Speaker 3>people damaging Tesla cars and showrooms. Something needs to be

1:14:54.800 --> 1:14:56.960
<v Speaker 3>done about them, and a number of them are going

1:14:57.000 --> 1:15:00.320
<v Speaker 3>to prison and they deserve it. It seems like he's

1:15:00.880 --> 1:15:04.320
<v Speaker 3>certainly there were reports of damage to Tesla vehicles and

1:15:04.400 --> 1:15:06.720
<v Speaker 3>damage to test Tesla' shrooms, but there have also been

1:15:06.760 --> 1:15:09.960
<v Speaker 3>these protests that have been happening at Tesla showrooms all

1:15:10.040 --> 1:15:13.519
<v Speaker 3>over the country, especially during his work with Doge, that

1:15:13.720 --> 1:15:16.719
<v Speaker 3>we're not violent. Yeah, it seems like he's He's also

1:15:16.800 --> 1:15:19.320
<v Speaker 3>in the past talked about these people being part of

1:15:19.400 --> 1:15:23.559
<v Speaker 3>some bigger movement. He's referred to them online as being paid.

1:15:23.920 --> 1:15:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Have we seen any evidence of that.

1:15:25.720 --> 1:15:28.880
<v Speaker 12>No, there's no evidence, no good evidence that the people

1:15:28.920 --> 1:15:31.280
<v Speaker 12>who are showing up at these Tesla protests are paid.

1:15:32.640 --> 1:15:35.639
<v Speaker 12>You know, I would say that there's a he's conflating

1:15:35.680 --> 1:15:38.040
<v Speaker 12>a couple of different things. But you know, and having talked,

1:15:38.080 --> 1:15:41.000
<v Speaker 12>we did a podcast episode on Eline a week and

1:15:41.040 --> 1:15:44.160
<v Speaker 12>a half ago with a former Tesla sales manager, and

1:15:44.200 --> 1:15:47.200
<v Speaker 12>who he's talking about is like, the real danger is

1:15:47.280 --> 1:15:49.919
<v Speaker 12>not these protesters, not somebody's showing up to a protest.

1:15:50.360 --> 1:15:53.080
<v Speaker 12>It's just somebody not buying. And and like that is

1:15:53.160 --> 1:15:55.439
<v Speaker 12>a thing that even if you remove the protests, the

1:15:55.479 --> 1:15:57.519
<v Speaker 12>protests are of course not good for the brand. They're

1:15:57.520 --> 1:16:01.400
<v Speaker 12>an expression of unhappiness and so on. It doesn't lead

1:16:01.439 --> 1:16:05.400
<v Speaker 12>to good headlines. Obviously protests can sometimes get out of hand.

1:16:05.880 --> 1:16:08.439
<v Speaker 12>But also it's just a lot of people, I think

1:16:08.680 --> 1:16:11.519
<v Speaker 12>do not want to be associated associate their car with

1:16:11.600 --> 1:16:14.439
<v Speaker 12>something this controversial. And what he was saying is that

1:16:14.560 --> 1:16:17.280
<v Speaker 12>when Musk started, what this Tesla manager was saying is

1:16:17.320 --> 1:16:19.800
<v Speaker 12>that when must started getting involved in politics a couple

1:16:19.840 --> 1:16:21.840
<v Speaker 12>of years ago, they had people come into the Tesla

1:16:21.920 --> 1:16:25.680
<v Speaker 12>stores and argue and say, you know, I like the car,

1:16:25.800 --> 1:16:28.040
<v Speaker 12>but I don't like this. You know, still very engaged.

1:16:28.040 --> 1:16:30.439
<v Speaker 12>And what he said what changed as Musk became more

1:16:30.479 --> 1:16:33.400
<v Speaker 12>and more engaged is they just stopped coming. They just decided,

1:16:33.479 --> 1:16:35.800
<v Speaker 12>you know, screw this, Like I don't want to be

1:16:35.840 --> 1:16:38.320
<v Speaker 12>associated with something this controversial. And when you look at

1:16:38.320 --> 1:16:40.439
<v Speaker 12>what's happening in the sales, like that's what's showing up.

1:16:40.520 --> 1:16:43.559
<v Speaker 12>It's not the protesters, it's just the people not buying.

1:16:43.960 --> 1:16:45.439
<v Speaker 12>And that's the thing that's going to be hard to

1:16:45.479 --> 1:16:46.360
<v Speaker 12>turn around, I think.

1:16:46.640 --> 1:16:48.439
<v Speaker 3>Our thanks to Max Chafkin, co host of the new

1:16:48.479 --> 1:16:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg podcast Everybody's Business of corresponding for Bloomberg Business we Can,

1:16:52.840 --> 1:16:54.479
<v Speaker 3>co host of the Elon Inc.

1:16:54.520 --> 1:16:54.920
<v Speaker 5>Podcast.

1:16:55.000 --> 1:16:57.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a busy dude, but he is definitely a go

1:16:57.280 --> 1:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>to when it comes to Elon Musk. And that wraps

1:16:59.400 --> 1:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>up the weekend. A Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio.

1:17:02.120 --> 1:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much everyone for joining us.

1:17:04.280 --> 1:17:06.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tim Stenerbeck and I'm Carol Masser.

1:17:06.320 --> 1:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Have a good and safe weekend.

1:17:08.400 --> 1:17:13.720
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

1:17:13.880 --> 1:17:17.599
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

1:17:17.640 --> 1:17:21.360
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

1:17:21.680 --> 1:17:25.559
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

1:17:25.840 --> 1:17:28.599
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

1:17:28.840 --> 1:17:30.960
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal