WEBVTT - Around The World

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Boomberg Opinion. I'm Vanny Quinn. This week Stephen

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Mim on the Bahamas behn and maybe more senses than one,

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and in less the geopolitics changes, and then the reliability

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>of Kazakhstan as a source for most of the world's

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>uranium is going to be contest or David Fickling on

0:00:19.760 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>how the uranium supply chain is a little too dependent

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>on one nation for comfort. And later we'll speak with

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Juli Ran and China system of taxation, But first to

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the markets, and John alters this cautionary tale this week.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Essentially he says, but where the barrage of predictions for

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>three flooding or inbox right now? And John joins us. Now, John,

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:39.879
<v Speaker 1>we come to the Roman calendar year end with a

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>bunch of assumptions, including that there's often a so called

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Santa Claus rally and so on. So let's first ask

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>what does actually happen in terms of things like position

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>squaring or profit taking or loss harvesting that we should

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>be aware of in the run up to December thirty one. Well,

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's often known in Britain as bed and breakfasting,

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the idea of taking losses to give yourself an allowance

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to maximize your ability to offset capital games. There's a

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:04.479
<v Speaker 1>lot of people have taken a lot of losses this year.

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>You might well find that there's some confusing activity when

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that happens, and there's window addressing when people want to

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>end the year with portfolios that make it look like

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:17.680
<v Speaker 1>they've been smart buying into stocks that have done well,

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.479
<v Speaker 1>even though it's almost exactly what they shouldn't be doing.

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>It's difficult to work through exactly what that's going to

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.119
<v Speaker 1>imply for this year, when frankly, there was almost nothing

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you could have been in that would make you look smart,

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and it would be a great idea to prove that

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you were in cash at the beginning of the year.

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:37.479
<v Speaker 1>You don't really want to be in that position now.

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>So it is going to be a strange final months

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of the year. And next week we have the final

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation numbers, followed immediately after by the f O m C.

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I suspect that's still overshadows absolutely everything else and wild

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in the foreseeable future, I imagine that will trump any

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of the excitement that would come with the end of

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the candy right, and we're actually almost lucky that there

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>are still catalyst or it will be quite the long December.

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>But something else that happens from early December usually as

0:02:05.880 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>we get analyst predictions, huge long research notes outlining cell

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>side assumptions for your head and predictions. One of the

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 1>wilder predictions that did catch by. I don't know how

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>many I've been through, but yeah, this is the time

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of year when you get a lot of predictions that

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>The good side of this is that it's a very

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>good discipline to force yourself to sit down as a

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>piece of paper within a spreadsheet and come up with

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a clear prediction. There's no question that that's a good discipline.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Just like a college, it's a good idea to actually

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>have to write an essay or whatever. Actually publishing what

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you're expecting and what your assumptions are is a good idea,

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the research that people produce at

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>this time of year is pretty interesting. It's worth finding

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a way that says there's almost no point taking any

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>notice at all of what they say for their final numbers,

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly for the stock market, because the stock markets on

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a year year basis is incredibly difficult to predict, and

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it tends you know the stock market rises by an

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>average of seven or eight percent a year over time.

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>It's very rarely rises by seven or eight percent in

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>any one year. Tends to be up in double figures

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>or very occasionally take a big ball, but it's unusual

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to get a year when it just gains about seven

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>or eight percent, even though on average over the very

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>long term that's what you can expect to get. But

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>there is some usefulness to your head prognostications though, right

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>even if it's only to knock people out of habitual thinking.

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I certainly agree that it's worth thinking through what you

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>really believe. It would probably be more useful to try

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to come up with predictions five or ten years hence,

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>which are impossible obviously so many unknowns. Once you've begin

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to go out further into the future, but you then

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>have a much clearer scenario analysis, and you have much

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>more of a grasp of what you see, both the

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:01.839
<v Speaker 1>risks and the opportunities. Being the long view move into

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the future. It's a cliche, but it is true that

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the more likely that the stock market is going to

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>do well for you, but you still need to work

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>out what criteria will determine exactly how well it does. Meanwhile,

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the fascinating thing wrote up with some research from Jannis

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Henderson is that analyst the pretty good at predicting how

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>much of companies will earn, what their profits will be,

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and for one year that is almost useless. So this

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>year was all about a fall in pe ratios, which

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>almost nobody predicted, and earnings growth has been fine and

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>almost exactly an a lot of people predicted. Doesn't help

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>at all explain what's happened on the market this year

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>or predict what was going to happen in the right

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's a real question. Has this year been an

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 1>exception in terms of sharks or black swan events or

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>our so called longer term trends still intact. My best

0:04:55.400 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>guess is that it's probably a regime change year. I mean,

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the regime that started to change in It was obvious

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that something was going to give, and we've finally seen

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that this year because inflation really is back and the

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.599
<v Speaker 1>correlation between bonds and stocks is breaking down. So a

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of those assumptions finally got shaken this year, and

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that is one of the interesting things about looking at

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>all the research. Incidentally, there is more dispersion than there

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>usually is, meaning that you know, there's greater uncertainty and

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>people are admitting to greater ansepty because a lot of

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>reliable models for the last twenty years aren't working. On

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>top of that, we had one very major bona fide shock,

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>which of course the invasion of Krane, and frankly a

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>shock that wasn't so much less in economic terms, which

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>as zero COVID in China, that when everybody thought the

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>pandemic was pretty much over, China suddenly started seeing it's

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>ekond of be being far more affected by it than

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it had been before. So those are very major shocks

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>at the point when the regime appears to be changing anyway.

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So this has been a very unusual year. We do

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>seem to be having many of these unusual years and

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in the most recent decade. But John, even if you

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>knew what was coming for sure, even if you're absolutely

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed that something was going to happen, would guarantee us

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>a better return. It's not necessarily the case, isn't. No.

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you've already discounted the good news ahead

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of time, then just as well that the good news

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>finally materializes. But it doesn't particularly help you at that point.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Even if you know what's coming, if the market is

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>wildly overpriced is predicting what's coming, you could still come

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a cropper. You not only need to know what's coming,

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.919
<v Speaker 1>you also need to work out how well the market

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>disposition for it, and if things are bad, you also

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>need to understand what the systemic might be. So many

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>of the other very interesting example this year, it's not

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a true Black Swan event because I don't think crypto

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>big enough, but some of the horrors in crypto were

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>very major, significant deals. And obviously because it's crypto, which

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>has only been around a little bit more than a decade,

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lack of precedents for it. Luckily, would appear

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that crypto isn't linked enough with trag fi as we

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>have the traditional finance that it's going to cause a

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>systemic events in itself. So John, given that the new

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Year that that we know and love or hate is

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>not the new year in every geography or market, how

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>do other markets do over US holidays? That's an interesting one.

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgipping can create some very weird dynamics in the rest

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of them because there's no real holiday at all, and

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it's complete shutdown here in the States Christmas. It's interesting

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>almost the other way that Europe really does just go

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>into complete hibernation for a whole week, and the US,

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>despite being a more religious country in many ways, doesn't

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>take Christmas so seriously. Yes, so you do get some

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>very strange effects that way. In general, anything that's happened

0:08:02.040 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the last two weeks of the year, though, is

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>so likely to be driven by load liquidity that it

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>can really alter perceptions in a way it shouldn't. And

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>also the fact that you mentioned China earlier, we have

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 1>another New Year coming up in a couple of months. Times, well,

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese New Year really messes things around. You have

0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:21.559
<v Speaker 1>to any Chinese daity, you have to start applying moving

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>averages to and stuff, or otherwise you just can't quite

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>see what's happening because of the big shift caused by

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the moving lunar new year. Yes, you mentioned how Jannis

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Anderson had talked about the dispersion in predictions this year.

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>One prediction you point out that seems to be almost

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>a universal article of faith, and that's a quote from

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>your column, is that the US will fall into a recession.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>But you point out the amount of vocabulary being used

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is hilarious, you know, playing villain a garden variety soft dish.

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>But one phrase stood out to you, and that's rolling recession.

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 1>It sounds very ominous. Explain what it is. I'm not

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that this is from ms and Saunders

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>some ways almost moderately positive in the ideas that there's

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>been a succession of different sectors that have felt the

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>problems in turn and others that have done relatively wellness

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and results. That's in part because the initial pandemic had

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>such differential effects, much bigger impact on some parts of

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the economy than those oil prices. The last pay checks

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>are now actually down for the year, incredibly. It's possible

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that energy, which has been one of the factors that

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>has kept everybody else the loft, is now going to

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>be under performing and that that will help other factors.

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the notion of the Roding recession is that following

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the very unusual circumstances of pandemic, it will be an

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>unusual recession which it's particular parts of the economy particularly

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>badly at different times, but spares others at different times.

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>So all we have to do is make sure we

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>pick the right parts of the economy to exactly at

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>any one time. Yes, Bloomberg Opinions, John Authors, stay tuned.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Stephen mim next on the outlaw status of the Bahamas

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>HQ two fd X in a long line of opaque enterprises.

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Opinion. You're listening to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Vonnie Quinn the Bahamas. Who wouldn't want to be headquartered there?

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Work there, commute to and from that beautiful island nation.

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>And yet well, let's pause for a moment and bring

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in Bloomberg Opinion columnist and the University of Georgia professor

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Stephen mim So. Stephen, Obviously, the reason we're talking about

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bahamas is it hosted the headquarters of Crypto Exchange

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>f t X, which obviously imploded in recent weeks. We

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>don't even know the extent of the damage caused by

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>ft X and the associated Alameda. You say, though, that

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the first red flag came long before things like opaque

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>balance sheets and oddline items. It was actually the fact

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that the HQ was the Bahamas. Why is that? Well,

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Bahamas have this longstanding reputation which is

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>arguably quite deserved of being somewhat loose place legally, a

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>place that really likes to tolerate. It has for decades

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:54.319
<v Speaker 1>tolerated so fairly shadowy banking operations and also very kind

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>of fly by night financial operations. It has regulation, but

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>they are not capably ministered at least haven't been. That's

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>gotten a very bad reputation. Now is this something that

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a particular administration has guided the island towards or is

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>this something that's been true of the Mohammas since the

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>founding of the island nation. Well, you know, in a way,

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that geography is destiny on some level

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the Bahamas, because it's incredibly close

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to the United States, so it's very convenient, but it's

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>also operating completely outside of its legal shadow So um

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:33.079
<v Speaker 1>long ago, centuries ago, it was a center for piracy

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and people sort of operated there with community, even though

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a British colony basically kind of run by warlords

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Um. But later it became place to run guns

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>during the Civil War and then during Prohibition. That's really

0:11:46.000 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>when it's story really takes off. The white former kind

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of planter class got into rum bootlegging and shipping run

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and that seems to have created a kind of ethos

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 1>on the island among the white ruling class that tolerated well,

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in that case, illegal operation. But that continued decade after decade.

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the nineteen thirties, as provision ended, it

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>went into tax evasion. It became the go to place

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>for evading high income taxes in the United States. And

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that's just kind of percolated. No, you say geography, but

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>also I guess it's just out of the reach of

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>other regulators. Can other kinds of authorities be involved when

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to something like crime or shadowy behavior? I mean,

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>could somebody be extradited from the Bahamas for example, Yes,

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>there are tradition treaties. The bigger problem is the sharing

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of financial information and the Bahamas selective refusal to do

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>so with other nations in a kind of reciprocal way.

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's gotten a lot of attention, negative attention,

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>or being a place where you can have offshore bank

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>accounts that are unregulated and untaxed, and you know, they've

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:57.119
<v Speaker 1>gotten a lot of pressure to comply with international regulation,

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>especially after the year two thousand and because they were

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>put on a blacklist. Basically that made it clear that

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't do business with them. And so since that

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:09.839
<v Speaker 1>time they've sort of grudgingly cooperated, but they've done so

0:13:10.160 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>through this rather clever way of saying, yes, we agree

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>to share information. However we're only going to share information,

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>say with the Cayman Islands, We're not going to share

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>information with the EU or what have you. So it's like,

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>basically they're cooperating with other tax havens, but not with

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>core economic centers at the global financial system. Well that's fascinating.

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is there competition between tax havens? Then yes,

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>there is. Actually it's kind of you know, it's like

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a race to the bottom. You know, remember the Panama papers.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, Panamas is a place that Switzerland is obviously

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>has a very different reputation. But then you have a

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of these other typically former colonial possessions now independent

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>nations manual out to other South Pacific uh, small nations

0:13:56.480 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>that have become places for this sort of offshore banking.

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>What will change it? Because you know, we think of

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the Bahamas is this beautiful island nation. I'd love to

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>work there, you know, you'd love to work from there.

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 1>It'd be an easy commute. Would the Bahamas ever want

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to become sort of on the up and up as

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 1>opposed to a place known for the fact that it

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>has a little bit of an outlaw status. Well, you know,

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there's obviously a downside to the crypto implosion

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>taking place within the Bombas and this doesn't give them

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of credibility. And but it would be a

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>very hard habit to shake, and historically has a lot

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to do with the relationship between a ruling class that

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>has had a lot of involvement in very clandestine or

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>shadowy things, and that's probably a very hard habit to break.

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>It's changed a lot, obviously since independence in the nineteen seventies,

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of the original players they're known as

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bay Street Boys, which makes it sound like they're

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>like a K pop band or something, but they're is

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the easy exactly. But these are like people of British

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>descent who ran the islands for decades and cut all

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>sorts of corrupt deals with organized crime and the like.

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of that still carries over

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and probably paved the way for when Crypto made its appearance.

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, here's a new kind of financial speculative

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>entity that's unregulated. It's like, let's, you know, someone in

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bahamas, and they did. They really made a push

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for this, like let's bring crypto to the Bahamas, and

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>they succeeded. Unfortunately, that's still very much in play of

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of like do you need a charter? You know,

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like and also conversely, interestingly enough, historically denying people charters

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>people who come in and like someone else's Meyer Landsky

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>mob figures like you're not letting them in and they

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>can't build the I mean, the casino stuff is the

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>whole awesome side of this. There was a great story

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>this air to the Amp Fortune went in and tried

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to build a casino and keep built it on an

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>island off of NASA, and then the Bay Street boys

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>were like, now, like, you're not going to be allowed

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>to take a boat out basically, I mean, it's bad

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>for him. He got Bahamas blocked, Yes, Bahamas blocked exactly. Yeah.

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have a column out that details some

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of these stories, and some of them are incredible and

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>very fascinating, the type of thing that you know, we

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>all love to read. But at the same time, often

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>these things end very badly for a lot of people,

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>as the ft X history is going to for a

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of people as well. What's the future for the Mohammas.

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the fact that a company is headquartered to

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the Mohammas. Is that enough to suggest that there should

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>be a red flag or there plenty of companies that

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>are completely transparent and operating completely in the open that

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>are based there. There are legitimate companies that are based

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Bahamas, for sure, absolutely. What's troubling though is

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the number that are not so legitimate and have been

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you know historically this is I think less of a

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>problem now, but in the nine seventies, for example, the

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.439
<v Speaker 1>late seventies, there were three hundred banks of the Bahamas.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>There were more banks than bars in the Bahamas, and

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of them what are called like suitcase corporations.

0:17:16.840 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>They were effectively a post office box and nothing more,

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>but they were obtained a kind of bogus charter. So

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that while there are very legitimate businesses

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Bahamas, I have no doubt the damage that

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.719
<v Speaker 1>it does to those businesses to be in the same

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>place as these other businesses is really unfortunate and I

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 1>think then that goes to your question actually about like

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>what is the future Bahamas, because it's like guilt by association,

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>which may well be unfair, but that probably then has

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>an unfortunate consequence on future development. I mean to some extent,

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I guess I or anybody wouldn't want to judge the

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>island nation given that it needs tourism. Absolutely, I suppose

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the easy way to ask it, can we blame the Bahamas? No?

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And this is really what I've written in Certainly the

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>reporting on there's the Bahamas really should not be blamed

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>so much as Sam Bankman freed his associates and f

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>t X, which were clearly operating in ways. You know.

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>The The interesting thing though is for outside investors, the

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>decision will locate there. You know, it should have been

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>something that might have might have indicated that there could

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>have been something because they since there is this history

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.959
<v Speaker 1>of not really asking to question when someone sets up

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>financial operations in the island nation, and as it turns out,

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 1>those fears would have been entirely justified about f t X.

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>If someone is coming too who says, you can't see

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 1>our balance sheet. We're based at the pomise like it's like,

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>good Lord, you know, maybe you want to look into that.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion columnist and University of Georgia professor Stephen Mim

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to Boomberg opinion. I'm Vonnie Quinn. Kazakhstan reelected

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>its incumbent president last month for the next seven years.

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>President Okayev will run the two hundred billion dollar economy

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and the world's largest uranium producer. Now. Kazakhstan chair is

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the second largest border in the world with Russia, after

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Canada border, and this is where things

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>get complicated. Relations have been a little strained, to say

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the least, since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which TOKAIV does

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>not support. Bloomberg Opinions. Savid Fickling has been examining how

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 1>countries who need uranium on their way to zero carbon

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>power need to start figuring out their supply chain now

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>or uranium might be the next critical mineral crisis. He

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>joined us for a conversation. When we talk about uranium,

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess most of us immediately think about nuclear power,

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly after the experience of war in Ukraine. Though atomic

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>energy is now not destined for extinction, so explained to

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>us who were depending on for uranium and also uranium oxide,

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the material that's needed for nuclear power. Yeah, so I

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>mean uranium oxide is the hided material that is produced

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>by mind and events have further refined and produced the

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>nuclear field that's actually put into nuclear path plants. Let's

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 1>bear about about three quarters of nuclear generation happens essentially

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>in our E C D countries Europe, North American developed ASA.

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>That will shift a little bit to as we see

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>more nuclear plants switched on in places like China, India,

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>But essentially three quarters of nuclear generation is in the

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 1>rich countries. But those countries there are allies, only provide

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>about of the uranium that's actually needed to fuel those

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>reactors you need each year about seventy five thousand tons

0:20:15.640 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>of uranium side roughly two thirds comes from China, the

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>former Soviet Union, around and Pakistan, essentially countries that are

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>not well aligned with those rich countries. And as we

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the problems in twenty two of being dependent

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for fuel on a country with which you're not aligned geopolitically,

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to think pretty hard about the fact that

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the same situation prevails with uranium, and particularly a huge

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 1>proportion of the world's uranium comes from just one country, Kazakhstan,

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and Kazakhstan's diplomatic position is quite an interesting one. It's

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>become more interesting in twenty two They seem to have

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>been wanting to be rather more independent of Russia than

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 1>they have been historically. But if you just look at

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the position of Kazakhstan on the map, it is very

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:56.959
<v Speaker 1>hard for them to carve out a policy that's truly

0:20:57.000 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>independent of Russia and China together, because they are sand

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 1>much in those countries. David, how far out is uranium

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>traded and how is it even traded as a contract.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not an established and liquid futures market, and even

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:13.479
<v Speaker 1>pricing for uranium tends to be from sort of private sources.

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>There are no widespread futures contracts in uranium. Having said that,

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>there is a very clear idea of long term costs,

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and this is actually one of the reasons that you

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 1>see Kazakhstan has become so dominant as a producer of uranium.

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Thirty dollars a pound is a sort of benchmark price

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>for viability outside of Kazakhstan. Most production costs considerably more

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 1>than that, and of course, if you think Back in

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the history of this in the two thousands, it was

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 1>not expected that wind and solar would take off the

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>way they did, so uranium was seen as a future

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of investment went into places like Kazakhstan.

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And then eleven you have the for Kushima disaster. Atomic

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>generation plummets and prospects of atomic generation plummet even more

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of that investment was basically burnt, and

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>what was left behind was Kazakhstan is the cheapest producer

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>in the market. There are a lot of other projects

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>out there that have been mapped over the last thirty

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty years. People know the uranium resources that are there,

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>but it is not economic to mind that uranium. I

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>was speaking to a produced a rare earth in Australia

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>here and they have a project called Nolans in Australia

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>which is a rare earth project. Rare Us often occur

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in combination with uranium. Back in the two thousands, they said, well,

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>we can produce rare us and we can produce uranium.

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>We can make money from each thing. Now that uranium

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>is seen as a waste material, and in terms of

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>when they're making their pictures to investors, The questions are

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>not how much money can you make from this uranium?

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>It's how do you deal with the cost of this

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>worthless uranium. It's essentially there because there is so much

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>low cost production coming out of Kazakhstan that more marginal

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>projects elsewhere in the world are just not viable. But

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>let's just have a think about this in combination with

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in twenty two. Of course, we're now all saying, gosh,

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>Europe made a big mistake in the eighties and in

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.479
<v Speaker 1>the nineties two thousands by becoming so dependent on Russian

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>gas just because Russian gas the cheapest source of energy.

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Were really seem to be making the same mistake here

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 1>with uranium. There's an unreliable supply chain there for uranium.

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>If we actually want to unlock a more reliable supply chain,

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>we need to have higher incentive prices, and that's going

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to mean we need more development of nuclear power plants

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to increase demand in the market. Tell me a little

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 1>bit about storage. Can you store uranium for the long term? Well,

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously, an overarching issue we've had since the

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>start of atomic energy is how do you deal with

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>nuclear waste? Of course, but in terms of nuclear fuel storage,

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:33.919
<v Speaker 1>you can store it a bit and most nuclear plants,

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>well all nuclear plants will have a storage facility on

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>site for nuclear fuel that's not yet being loaded into

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the reactor. You reload the fuel like a cold plant,

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>where you're putting it in all the time with newclear fuel.

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Every eighteen months or so, you replace about a quarter

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>of the fuel that's in the reactor. And the fuel

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:51.719
<v Speaker 1>comes in the forms of these fuel assemblies, which are

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a series of rods which are kept in a very

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 1>secure facility on site. They're moved from that fatility into

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the reactor and that's a process that goes on continually.

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a a very slow refueling process, but it is

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>essentially a reviewing process. The organing credits to the Simpsons. Yeah,

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly exactly. But obviously you can't keep unlimited quantities of

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that fuel on site. You have only sort of limited capacity.

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of things that need to be

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>done at a nuclear power plant, so there's a limited

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>space for that. And of course anywhere we are handling

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>nuclear material there is a perforation risk. So it's not

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>like nuclear plants can stock up for the next three decades.

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>With all of the uranium they're going to need, there's

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>always going to need to be a supply chain going

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>from minds to nuclear power plants to waste facilities. Yeah,

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a bit of a conondrum. I mean, on

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, you have political factions in many developed

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>countries fighting against atomic power, for example the Green Party

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>in Germany which didn't want an extension to Germany's nuclear

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>operating licenses. On the other hand, you've countries such as

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>frans and raising nuclear completely and even Japan after for Kushima.

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the expectations should be particularly in Asia,

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these plants have been set up with

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in the last ten years, so they will operate for

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>likely fIF the years without problems. In developed countries where

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 1>the fleet and nuclear plants is a lot older, I

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>think that question is still up for debate. You know,

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the real factor that's actually dealt a blow to atomic

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>energy over the past fifteen years. Certainly a green politics

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:15.479
<v Speaker 1>in Europe plays a part in this, but I think

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the biggest factor is the extreme difficulty of building nuclear plants.

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Billions have been spent on plants that have never been developed,

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 1>and particularly we saw sort of further blow dealt to

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that by for Kushima. Now the thing that gets talked

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>about on in this space is small modular reactors. This

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>is the idea that you could build much smaller plants,

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>much more of them, the sort of factory building production

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>line type benefits. So what happens to geopolitical alignment? As

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>you say, I mean, how should countries think about this

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>going forward? Yeah, Well, I said earlier that the diplomatic

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>existion of Kavakstani is a very interesting one, and I

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>think you know, we're seeing everywhere in the former Soviet

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Union and outside of Russia. There are some interesting developments

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>happening in that periphery in terms of governments being much

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>less willing to do Moscow's bidding. But I think if

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you think of really long term geopolitics, you think of geography,

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and Kazakhstan, as I say, is landlocked. It's landlocked on

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:07.920
<v Speaker 1>most sides by China and Russia. On the other side

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>by Iran and by Afghanistan, and there's a small order

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>through Turkmenistan and aster by jan In terms of getting

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>nuclear material out of Kazakhstan, if you do it by

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>road or by rail, it has to go through one

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of those countries. Even if you do it by air,

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>generally it's not flown by air because of course there's

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>greater risk around. Carrying things like that by air technically

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>would be possible, but of course even as air space

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 1>is circumscribed by those countries, so in less the geopolitics changes,

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>then the reliability of Kazakhstan as a source for most

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of the world's uranium is going to be contestal. And

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that's why, you know, I think if you go back

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to the era of the Cold War, if you go

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>back to the seventies and eighties, something like the US,

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it was actually self sufficient in uranium. A vast amount

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of effort was put into ways of producing uranium from

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>domestic fosse fate reserves and things like that. Really there

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>is no domestic US production of uranium. Now there's a

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>little bit of sort of reprocessing and things, but of

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>fresh mind uranium, there is none of it. That is

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the sort of thing that if you were talking about

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a future of real geopolitical cultural style grade power attention,

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, if you're a military planner, that

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is the sort of thing that you are thinking about.

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>After the events of two then you really have to

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about, well, how do we have resources Australia,

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Canada in those nations more reliable allies, Yeah and so

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>on that then, David, what price would uranium need to

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>go to in order for there to be more production?

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if there was a doubling advice, would that

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 1>cause problems worldwide? Or it wouldn't really cause a problem

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>for nuclear power plants the atomic energy sector as a whole,

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>because essentially all the cost of running a nuclip plant

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is actually building the plant. Prices above fifty dollars a pound,

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and especially long term prices about fifty dollars a plan,

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>they would start to change this picture quite significantly. Plenty

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of miners are sitting on uranium resources which they regard

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>as waste because they can't get a good enough market

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>price for it. Prices significantly above fifty dollars a pound

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>would really start to have people going back to their

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 1>spreadsheets and their mining essays and working out what they

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>could do with that. But it has to be not

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>what we'veing At the moment. We see a clear sign

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of short term prices spiking well above flat level. The

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>thing that's going to make a minor sit up and

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>take notice. Is long term pricing, which is different and

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>frankly is hard to calculate with a fairly i liquid

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>commodity like uranium. And it would really come down to

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.879
<v Speaker 1>if you're an offered a nuclear power plants, do you

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>actually go a little bit like we see Hesler going

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to someone who operates a cobalt resource and saying, I

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>want to buy your cobalt. It would similarly, I think

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>require atomic energy utilities going to uranium minders and saying

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to buy uranium and I'll unlock it at

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 1>this price. It's such a small or any liquid market

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that it really needs that producer to consumer contact. Were

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>unlikely to have a sort of liquid futures market that

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>would actually represent that numeral opinions. David Fickling to China

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>now and its fiscal position, COVID zero was obviously drained

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>public confers. The deficit in the budgets for all levels

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of government in fact is nearly triple what it was

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>this time last year. Incomes her down due to tax

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>breaks for business and land sales have slumped to spending,

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, has also spiked to pay for lockdowns and

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>COVID testing policy. Banks, apport and bond issues. Will they

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>haven't filled the funding gap. I spoke with Boomberg Opinions

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Shuli ran about how China approaches taxation. Surely, how do

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>you see China developing its system of taxation over the

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>next year or so? Will new taxes be created in

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>order to deal with the fiscal problem? Actually, just explain

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>how taxes are designed and collected now in China. I

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>would say China's physical system is very cool. The government

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>is not good at collecting taxes, unlike the U, S, I,

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>R S. So like, for instance, China don't having Rican text,

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>hardly has any property tax. There is definitely no wealth tax,

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>even like a corporate tax. Companies are quite good as

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>using accounting gimmicks to avoid corporate tax. Yes, there has

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of speculation of Chinese government implementing inheritance

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or wealth tax, but I think that actual implementation would

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:58.959
<v Speaker 1>be very difficult because they have to somehow find people

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>who know how to calculate They then near wealth, right.

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they're better off just lasting onto those big

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>tech companies JD dot Com, n or Ali Baba and

0:30:08.080 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>say you provide employment, you provide social benefits for your

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>employees for the local governments where you do business, because

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that's just easier than like tracking down individuals and high

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>network families. How scared are the ultra rich in China?

0:30:23.560 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned in your column that after the Party Congress

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and President Chies and things speech, the rich got a

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>little nervous. And China does have a system where you

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>can renounce your citizenship. Obviously, if you can get citizenship elsewhere,

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>would they have to pay an ex attack so to speak. Yeah,

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>there is this speculation right now. The speculation is that

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 1>China is going to follow the US system in that

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Chinese citizens at taxed worldwide. Right, so even in Hong Kong,

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I know it's business. They Hong Kong's global investment banks,

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>they have been asking their employees of Chinese origin if

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>they have the Chinese possible because they have to do

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the tax it holding, So they are quite nervous. And

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>then the idea is that maybe when they China will

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>also install an exces tax. And that explains why Singapore

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is so hot these days. If you go to Singapore,

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.280
<v Speaker 1>there will be a lot of which Chinese because Singapore

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any inheritance tax, didn't have any wealth tax,

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and then it's been kind of culturally close to the

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Chinese society and a lot of very wealthy Chinese have

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>moved there. Do you have any numbers on how many

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>billionaires are in China and what kind of percentage in

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>tax they do pay to their local municipalities and elsewhere.

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the bilitaires don't pay very much tax, just

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>like the U S tax billionaires. They don't pay much tax, right,

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>They don't pay themselves any salaries. They basically use their

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>shares as collaterals to take her margin loans and I

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's a very similar system in China. So in

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that sense, they don't really pay tax because they don't

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>really have income shuty. You mentioned that she pivots fast

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>from week to week. We saw presidentcy make a huge

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>pivot in terms of the COVID controls. Does that mean

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the president she is watching the markets as closely as

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we all are. I don't think he watches market, but

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>he says watched his own fiscal conference. He watches his

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>own wallet. And then what we have seen with the

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>UK and what happened to the guilt market is that

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>globally all governments start to have to worry about their

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>fiscal responsibility and discipline. Right, and then like, because of

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>this COVID control and the very stringent developer and tech crackdown,

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 1>China is running its biggest ciscal deficits in decades and

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it has used up all its physical power. So going

0:32:35.880 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 1>into three, he will have to reopen the economy and

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>have to get along with big tech because otherwise that

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>means that the China will have to raise his best feeling.

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And who is going to buy Chinese government bout or

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.479
<v Speaker 1>like you know, investment grade popery board because a lot

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of the issuers are government affiliates Bloomberg Opinions Shu Ran

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't for this week's Bloomberg Opinion. Do get in

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>touch with us that we love to hear yoursels in opinions.

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm at Vequinn at Bloomberg dot Net. Don't forget. We're

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>also available as a podcast on Apple, Spotify or your

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>favorite podcast platform. We're produced by Eric mollow Till next

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>time on Knoberg Opinion