WEBVTT - Goblin Hours: 24/7, FTC, Gold

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to the Money Stuff Podcast. You're a

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 2>weekly podcast where we talk about stuff related to money.

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Matt Levian, I write the Money Stuff column for

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion.

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Katie Greifeld. I'm a reporter for Bloomberg News

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and an anchor for Bloomberg Television.

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Katie, what do you got today?

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>We have a meaty show. We're going to talk about, oh,

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a twenty four to seven stock trading potentially what

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that world might look like. Then we're going to talk

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>about the FTC and non competes, the FTC continuing to

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive on a multitude of topics. Then we're going

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about gold bars, which I'm quite excited about,

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>and the arbitrage opportunities that don't exist.

0:00:52.800 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>My readers love in arbitrave twenty four seven stock trading.

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, there's twenty four to seven, and then there's the

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>possibility that there's around the clock trading just on weekdays, which.

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 2>Is a little more humane.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly, I was actually exactly going to say humane,

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.919
<v Speaker 1>but maybe we should set the scene that this comes

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>from a Financial Times article that Nise took a survey.

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>They're like, hey, if we had twenty four seven trading,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 2>would you trade twenty four seven or twenty four five.

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:27.759
<v Speaker 2>I think the survey had a bunch of options. Yeah,

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 2>it's like twenty four hours a day, seven days a week.

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 2>Both neither and.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that we have the results of that survey,

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>which feel key.

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's not a public survey, it's for their

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:39.960
<v Speaker 2>own information. But the reason they're doing it is because

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>there is pressure on it. Right. Someone started to think

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 2>called the twenty four exchange, that's meant to be a

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty four hour I think it's actually twenty three hours

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 2>a day, And all the retail brokerages are moving to

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 2>offer extended hour overnight trading because a lot of robin

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Hood customers would really like to be able to trade

0:01:58.240 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>stocks at three am.

0:01:59.520 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 2>So Nice sees where the market is going and is

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 2>asking its customers about it.

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I guess that kind of answers the question

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 1>of who would this before, and it would be for

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>pajame traders, retail folks.

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it would be for a lot of pajama

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>trating retail folks. The crypto market has been twenty four

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 2>to seven. Part of what's causing this is like crypto

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 2>is twenty four to seven, and people like, oh yeah,

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty four seven trading can work. And you look at crypto, right,

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 2>they're like peaks when Asian markets wake up and when

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 2>European markets wake up. So I think some of this

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 2>might be for like news happens in Asia in like

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 2>the US overnight and people can go and trade American stocks.

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 2>A lot of it is for pajama traders.

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, and who am I, But I

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like the crypto market is that where we should

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>be taking our cues from in terms of twenty four

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to seven trading.

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm not sure that crypto has necessarily provided

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 2>great lessons for like real financial markets. Real financial markets

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 2>have patterns that come from technology of two hundred years ago,

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes it takes a sort of brand new market

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 2>to cast aside that technology and say, wait a minute,

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 2>we have the computers to trade twenty four seven, so

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 2>let's just do it.

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Thinking about the effects that this could have. Again, in

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>this hypothetical scenario where there's twenty four to five or

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four to seven trading, what the effects on liquidity

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>might be are really interesting because in normal market hours

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US, it's the open and the close is

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>when you get the most volume. But if there's not

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>an open and there's not a close, where are the

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>liquidity clusters?

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 2>I suspect the answer is the open and the close.

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 2>I suspect, By the way, like Nicey and Ethic exchanges

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 2>offer extended hour trading, and it starts structural, but it's

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 2>in part just like tradition, like people know that nine

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 2>thirty and four are the times when everyone trades, and

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 2>so there are auctions then, and that's when liquidity clusters,

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 2>and you can trade ten minutes before the opening auction

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 2>or ten minutes after what the opening auction does collect liquidity.

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>I suspect that it won't be a crypto exchange where

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>it's we just turn it on and it goes forever. Yeah,

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 2>it'll be like Nicey, where there's a nine to thirty

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>auction and a four o'clock auction and trading during the

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 2>day and then after hour there's some other thing that's

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>like the overnight session, but it's like a little deprecated

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 2>so people understand where the main sources of liquidity are.

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I root for chaos in general. I'm interested to see

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>what three am would look like on a twenty four

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to five exchange, what shenanigans would happen around that time.

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 2>Presumably it's mostly pajama trading, retail traders interacting with one

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 2>or two very nervous electronic market makers. And then, like

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 2>every so often, the catastrophe happens overnight and like big

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 2>traders rushed to sell and the stock crashes because there's

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 2>no deep liquidity provision. Yeah, you'll see a lot more

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 2>flash crashes because like fewer people are going to be

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 2>putting in quotes at three am, so.

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>The charts will get super fun, even.

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 2>Like one big retail trader could crash the slack. Although

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 2>you say that the charts like even now, if you

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 2>look at like the Bloomberg charts, they are the nine

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 2>thirty to four o'clock session. There's trading after hours, but

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 2>everyone kind of understands that it doesn't count. You root

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 2>for chaos. I've been advocating for years that the stock

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 2>market should move to half an hour a day. The

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 2>large bulk professional trading occurs at the opening in the close.

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 2>If you don't have any like particular reason, right if

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 2>you're just like if you're a mutual fund with outflows

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 2>or whatever, Like you did try to get the closing

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 2>print right. You're looking to trade where there's the most

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 2>liquidity if you don't have any special information, and if

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 2>you concentrate all the liquidity at one time, you get

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 2>more efficient prices. If you've spread the liquidity over twenty

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 2>four hours, it like all gets worse. One thing I

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 2>was thinking about is if you do go to twenty

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 2>four hour trading, that probably moves some liquidity away from

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 2>like two pm right right, and so then it has

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the effect of possibly concentrating even more trading at the

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 2>open end close, because people are like, oh, there's twenty

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 2>four hours of trading in the day, there's two real events,

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 2>and everything else is like a ghost town. So I

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 2>might as well only trade at the open up the close.

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>That would be a fun effect if it worked out

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>that way.

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 2>It would be even from a reader suggesting that there

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 2>should just be one auction a day. Everyone could put

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 2>in their bids in the auction and like you'd clear

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 2>the stock at whatever the clearing price of the auction was,

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 2>and then you'd try it again tomorrow.

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Beautiful.

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>That is very appealing to me because it would give

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 2>people up free time, right, you wouldn't have to trade

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 2>all the time. The other advantage of that is it

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 2>cuts down on the cost of intermediation. I'm not sure,

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 2>but I think that if you go to twenty four

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 2>hour trading, then the high frequency trading firms of the

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 2>world are going to make more money because they're going

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 2>to be trading with retail traders at three am, and

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 2>in the aggregate that'll be noise trading, but liquidity will

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 2>be very thin, and they'll charge a lot for spreads, right,

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like the point of a high frequency trader

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 2>is that there are a lot of people want to

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 2>buy stock. There a lot of people want to sell stock.

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 2>They don't come to the market at exactly the same time,

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and so some electronic market maker is buying from the

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 2>people who want to sell, holding the stock for a

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 2>second or a minute or an hour, and then selling

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:42.479
<v Speaker 2>it to people who want to buy. If you spread

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 2>out the trading, there's just more of that. There's like

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 2>more people coming in at different times, and more money

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 2>for high frequency traders to make because they are doing

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 2>more of that intermediaty trades in time, whereas if you

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 2>put all of the trading in one auction, then all

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the people want to buy, all of the people want

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 2>to sell meat at that one second, and you don't

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 2>have any need for like electronic and mediation.

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>There are your two extremes.

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 2>Those are your two extremes. And like the modern like

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 2>retail stock trading boom, the like meme stock boom. Yeah,

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 2>people are so mad at the Citadel Securities of the world.

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 2>They're so mad at the hyper concy traders, but they

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>also want to trade stock at three. Yeah. The memestock

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 2>boom has been great for those hyper concut traders, right

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 2>because they're getting all this order flow to trade with,

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>while all these retail traders are so mad at at

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Ceditel Securities. This is the same thing where it's like

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 2>this thing that caters to retail traders, I think will

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 2>be very good for the electronic market makers.

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So they need each other.

0:07:31.280 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think some of the memestock traders have a

0:07:34.680 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 2>somewhat faulty understanding of how Citital Securities makes money. I

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 2>think that if you have twenty four hour trading, it's

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna be really good for those guys. And if you

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>don't like those Guys, if you think that it's bad

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 2>that these intermediaries make so much money trading stocks, which

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't really think but like a lot of people do,

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 2>then collapsing it to one single point of trading would

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 2>be good for making traders.

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Then what would the financial television anchors talk about all day?

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say maybe the same thing, but

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 2>of course.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I just talk about it market more.

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, Bomberker could do it to one auction a day.

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Corporate earnings.

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it raises the question. I mean you think about

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>what happened with what was it left last earnings cycle

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>with the typo in their release and things went crazy,

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>but it was after hours, so the charts were still clean.

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, it's like a really traveling possibility about

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty four seven trading is like if you had real

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty four seven trading where I was like, oh, it's

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 2>like fake and deprecated, but it's like the market is

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 2>just open all the time. Then like when would companies

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 2>put out news?

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the government too.

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:38.439
<v Speaker 2>Right now, there's this norm of like six and a

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 2>half hours of market hours, and during market hours you

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 2>try not to put out market moving news because one

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.080
<v Speaker 2>if you get it wrong. The stakes are horrible or

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 2>really high. But like two, if you put out news

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 2>at ten am, someone's going to see it first. Someone's

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 2>going to trade on it ahead of someone else. And

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 2>like the person who sees at first is going to

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 2>be someone who is paying for like the fastest data

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 2>connections to the exchanges. It's systematically going to be not

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 2>the retail trader.

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Right. I have an idea, Well, companies should release their

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 1>earnings at three am, and if you really care, you're

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be up and we can still have normal

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>ish hours. Agree that it'll still be nine thirty and

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>four pm is when most of the trading happens. But

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>then you have goblin hours.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 2>But if you're like a hedge fund, you're you're awake

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 2>in goblin hours and like someone's winning and someone's losing.

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>That's great, not for them, I know, but no, you

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>have goblin hours, and it'll be subverted where you have

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>all the professionals, all the hedge funds, they're trading in

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the overnight session, and then the normal session will just

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>be kind of boring in retail.

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 2>Look, I mean, news happens right now and some people

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 2>react to and the it is faster than others. But

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 2>it is not the case that there's a race to

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 2>react to every piece of corporate earnings news, right or

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 2>every economic data point, because most of those things come

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 2>out outside of market hours, and you can't really have

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 2>that race, right if you have true market hours twenty

0:09:58.200 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 2>four hours a day, then like you do have that

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 2>race every time news comes out, and it's a socially

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 2>wasteful race, right. If you ask hedge funds like, what

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>socially valuable thing do you do, They're like, oh, we

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 2>make prices more efficient. It's like, yeah, understanding earnings news

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 2>and buying stocks that are undervalued is like a good thing,

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 2>but racing to do that at three am, one second

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 2>ahead of another hedge fund is like you should just

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 2>go to bed and wake up at nine thirty and

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 2>do it.

0:10:19.040 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I wish that I had the Financial Times article pulled up,

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>because wasn't it one of the questions that was asked

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in the survey was would the time you spend thinking

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>about overnight trading be better spent thinking about trading during

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>normal hours or yeah?

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 2>I think it was like I think it was something

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>like should we stop asking you about this?

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 2>It was like with the time that nicey spends thinking

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 2>about overnight try to be better spent on something else.

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 2>If trading was one second to day, hedge funds would

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 2>still have incentives to understand companies and understand what might

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 2>move their prices and incorporate all the information into their

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 2>one trade a day. But at twenty four to seven trading,

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 2>it's like you're spending a lot of time optimizing, Like

0:10:57.760 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 2>when you're waking up, you're thinking about things other than

0:10:59.640 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the fund.

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Mental Again, I root for chaos, but I feel like

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>at least this conversation has talked me into maybe we

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>should just stick to normal hours, or maybe we should

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>just be open for half an hour a day.

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I haven't adequately emphasized the main benefit

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 2>of half an hour day, which is like everyone would

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 2>get to relax more and spend more time with their families.

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>We like watch financial TV.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean when I say everyone, I include financial

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 2>news anchors, and that you would also.

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Have less to do in a nice Yeah, maybe non competes.

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 2>So we talked about last week about how I did

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 2>not take full advantage of my gardening.

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>And now maybe you never will ever again.

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Now, maybe no one will ever get gardening leave again.

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>God. Yeah. The FTC. Interesting move here about basically erratic

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>non competes. Yes, except for senior executives only barely.

0:12:05.160 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Basically, the FTC voted this week to ban all

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 2>non competes forever. If you're a senior executive you currently

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 2>have a non compete, it's enforceable. But otherwise they voted

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 2>to get rid of non competes. One important thing here

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 2>is it's a good chance this doesn't ever happen. Right,

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 2>the FDC voted to do it. It goes into effect

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 2>in about six months, but there are already like multiple

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 2>lawsuits against it, and even the FTC. There are five

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 2>FTC commissioners. Two of them voted against it, and they

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 2>both said in their votes against that this is not

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 2>going to pass muster with the courts, and we can

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 2>talk about the FDC's authority for it.

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I am interested in that because my first

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>reaction was like why, and also why the FTC and

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>why is the FTC focusing on this? Shouldn't they be

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like trying to stop Tapestry from buying Capri and other things.

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 2>The FTC was in the business of stopping unfair methods

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 2>of competition. Right, Like, we mostly think of it as

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 2>anti trust, right, but it's also like false advertising and

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 2>like other kinds of fraud. And they think that non

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>competes are an unfair method of competition, and you can

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 2>see why, right. I mean, like one thing that they

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 2>talk about in the rule and in the public statements

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 2>is non competes can stop people from leaving a company

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 2>to start a new business. So it's like a very

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 2>direct way for a company to prevent new businesses coming

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 2>out to compete with them.

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 2>The rule really mentions doctors a lot, Like doctors are

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 2>an important case. Doctors will often have non competes, and

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 2>if you're a doctor and you leave your practice, you

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 2>have to like sometimes move to a different state to

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 2>continue practicing medicine, and like to the extent the FTC

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>is in the business of protecting consumer choice and lowering

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 2>consumer prices. That seems like it would be bad for

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 2>consumers that they can't get a doctor because the doctor

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 2>had to move away, So it makes sense that it's

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 2>the FTC. Yeah, the FDC, this is not something they've

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 2>done before, and their authority for it is a little unclear,

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 2>and their ability to make rules about it is unclear. Yeah,

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 2>and you know, we live in a judicial climate where

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 2>when agencies are like, we're going to make new rules

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 2>to regulate things we've never regulated before, it's hard to

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 2>imagine the current Supreme Court saying Okay, great, sounds good.

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 2>It just feels like that's the sort of thing that

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 2>modern courts don't like.

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>So some pretty big question marks over authority here. And

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe this won't even happen, But I mean, this was

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>a good reminder that at least I almost exclusively think

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>about non competes in the context of the financial industry.

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>But if you take a look at some of the

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.479
<v Speaker 1>examples that the FDC used. You wrote about the powerwasher

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>who said, all I know is powerwashing. These business owners

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>all want me to sign a non compete clause. They

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>also cited someone who works in the asphalt industry, a bartender,

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and as you were saying, a physician in rural underserved Appalasia.

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, that was a nice reminder.

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 2>They've been like media reports about non competes in the

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 2>fast food industry. It's really it is pretty widespread.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the FTC had some numbers there too that nearly

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent of workers are subject to non competes today,

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and their estimate is that it would increase US earnings

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>by at least four hundred billion dollars over the next

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>ten years to abolish non competes. A lot of readers

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>emailed in about PE non competes, PE purchase non competes.

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 2>I got like a couple of emails from readers being like,

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 2>I work in private equity and we buy companies, and

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the companies that private equity buyers are like,

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 2>it's like asset lights, some guy operating in business, right,

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 2>And so when you buy that business, you're sort of

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 2>buying the person. And if you pay that person twenty

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 2>million dollars to take over his business and then he

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 2>leaves and sets up another business, he'll probably take all

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.200
<v Speaker 2>the customers with him, because it's like it's just him, yeah,

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 2>and you're out twenty million dollars for nothing. And so

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 2>seeing the headline of like FTC bands on competes, people

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 2>got really worried that would make it impossible to buy

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 2>and sell sort of one person small businesses. But there

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 2>is an exception for that, like the if you're signing

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 2>a non compete in connection with the sale of a business,

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 2>then that's enforceable.

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>So rest easy.

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>And you don't even have to be the owner of

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the business. You know, if you have like a twenty

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 2>person company, like all the people in the company can

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 2>sign a non compete and it's still unforceable because you know,

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 2>what you're selling is the people in the business. So

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 2>there you go. Rest easy. I want to say one other.

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Thing, yeah, and you should.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 2>So the way it works is like they banned future

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 2>non competes, but they also say all current non competes

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 2>don't work, they're not enforceable. And so one thing in

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 2>the rule is that if you're a company that has

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 2>non competes, you have to send a notice to all

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 2>of your workers saying your non competes are no longer enforceable,

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 2>and like they actually have like language and the rule

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 2>of like this is what you have to put in

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 2>the email. My impression is that there are a lot

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 2>of non competes that are already illegal. In most states,

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 2>non competes are allowed, but they have to be reasonable,

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of people sign unreasonable non competes. And

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 2>my impression is that companies write these illegal non competes

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 2>because they figure everyone sees this contract, and they're scared

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 2>and they're not going to go work for a competitor

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 2>because they don't want to get sued, and they don't

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 2>know enough about the law. They don't know if that

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the non compete is illegal, And so you can get

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:06.479
<v Speaker 2>a lot of mileage out of a non compete as

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 2>a company by just writing it down and like never

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 2>trying to enforce it. Even if it's not enforceable. You

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 2>can just say you can't compete, and then most people won't.

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 2>So the FDC wants to solve that problem by saying

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 2>you have to send all of your employees a letter

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 2>saying your non compute is unenforceable. Go ahead and compete,

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 2>but garden leave.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I know that you had a bad experience. That also

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>sounds really nice.

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people in normal jobs think non competes

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 2>are bad because they just restrict their ability to get

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 2>a new job. But in finance you're like, oh, no,

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I have to spend six months not working and getting

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 2>paid for me I can Finance people are like, I

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of like the I like the noncompete status quo.

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to figure out what happens to that.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 2>In finance, it's like what tools do you have as

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 2>a financial firm to prevent people from competing. So one

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 2>is like you have a noncompete, which is maybe now illegal,

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 2>but I think the way that things normally work currently

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 2>is that like you have gardening leave, which is normally structured.

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I think as you continue to be employed at the firm,

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 2>and they pay you your base salary, and you stay

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 2>there for some period, not going into work, not having

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 2>access to like the email system, getting pay your base salary,

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 2>and then eventually you leave. There's a litt unclear how

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 2>you would actually force that because I think that the

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 2>way finance works is that you have a non compete,

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 2>and so when you quit, you say I'm quitting, and

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 2>they're like, stay for your six month notice period and

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 2>will pay you. And if you say no, I don't

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 2>want to do that, they say, we have a non compete.

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 2>So you can't actually leave at the other firm anyway.

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 2>So it's like both like the employment terms and the

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 2>non compute. If the non compete goes away, it's not

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 2>totally clear to me that you could enforce the gardening

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 2>leave because you can be like, oh, you need to

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 2>provide six months notice to quit, and then someone is like,

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I quit, I have at will employment in New York.

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm quitting with no notice. And it's not clear how

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 2>much they can force you to stick to your six

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 2>month notice period if you don't want to get paid,

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 2>if you want to go to your new firm, which

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 2>if that became the norm, your new firm would insist

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 2>on it, then you wouldn't be able to get your

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 2>gardening leaf. Yeah, so I think you can do it.

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 2>I think you can write employment contracts. Let's say you

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 2>have to give six month notice. But it's a little

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 2>trickier than having the non compete as well.

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting to hear because I mean, reading your column

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>and the description of notice period, I was like, oh, well,

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>then we'll just do that.

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I think that might be where it shakes that,

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not totally sure. I think it might be

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 2>harder to enforce that if people really want to leave

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.200
<v Speaker 2>without their gardening leave. Now you can imagine everyone having

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 2>this sort of gentleman's agreement of we're all going to

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 2>take our gardening leaf. The real hard chargers don't always

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 2>want to take the gardening leave.

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, it sort of reminds me this discussion very loosely

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>about like the eternity leave. Maybe we can cut this.

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>But like, if you can get some alpha by not

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>taking your paternity leave and like showing how hardcore and

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>dedicated you are, maybe the gardening leave will kind of

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>turn into that I'm so dedicated and I'm so eager

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to just get going, I'm not going to take gardening leave.

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Will become a thing.

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Nobody says to their new employer, I'm taking gardening leave.

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 2>I'll see you in six months. Everyone always conveys the

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 2>impression that they're so sorry about the gardening leave and

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 2>they'd really like to get started right away, and then

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 2>they like go home and you know, sit on the

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 2>couch and are happy. But I think if it became

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 2>possible to not take the gardening leave, then I think

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 2>that would become the requirement. Yes, this ties into the

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 2>twenty four seven trading, right. You need a certain amount

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 2>of rests from your financial job. Gardening, believe is a

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 2>nice way.

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>To get that. Like life is just hurtling towards relentlessly

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 1>just being on all the time.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 2>I think that that is certainly the message of twenty

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 2>four seven trading. And like my impression is that there

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 2>are a minority of people in finance who've gotten really

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 2>good at optimizing for gardening leave. You like, quit your job,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.240
<v Speaker 2>spend six months on gardening leave, you start your new job,

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 2>you're like, ah, I gotta go back to that other job.

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 2>Quit After a month, you get like nine months of

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 2>gardening leave.

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>It can be like so good. I mean you linked

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to that tweet about LinkedIn profile. The guy did that

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and his descriptions were so funny. It was winter while

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>he was gardening leaving, so he just saw on his

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>couch and read books which came from trees, so it

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was still a form of gardening.

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 2>It's a nice benefit of the financial career. You get

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the occasional sabbatical in the form of gardening leave, and

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 2>it would be sad I think for a lot of

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 2>people if it went away.

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Not The only way to get a lot of time

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>off is to have a child.

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Spoken like someone just not a children. I don't think

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 2>most people think of ford to leave us time off.

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Maybe, did you know Accornable's fargo costco shoppers spend

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million dollars a month on gold. That is crazy.

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Some of that must be because they want.

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>To go Yeah, right. Some of it also, gold has

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>gone a lot more expensive, yeah, right.

0:22:03.920 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 2>Some of it is like gold hoarding for whatever reason.

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.400
<v Speaker 2>Some of it is correct financial speculation should just.

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Be buying ETFs.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 2>But you know something something about holding an actual gold.

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Bar instead of.

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 2>If you want like gold, you want gold, you don't

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 2>want ants, you're.

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Actually tapping into like a very real tension.

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, yeah, absolutely.

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like it's attention you're familiar with.

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I've I've encountered people who want to buy gold,

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 2>but some people who buy gold from Costco are doing

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 2>it for credit card.

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Reward points and we're trying.

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Or trying they're doing it for credit card reward points.

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 2>But I wrote about this because the Most Journal had

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.479
<v Speaker 2>an article about Costco gold and it started with this

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 2>guy who bought a lot of gold from Costco for

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 2>credit card points and then he tried to resell it

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 2>and he got less than he paid for it, and

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 2>I hate he was like, oh my Margins. You know,

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 2>he was very sad, And I wrote in general, the

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 2>great consumer financial arbitrage is like if you can buy

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 2>a thing that you can resell for the same price

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 2>you paid for it, and if you can put it

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.199
<v Speaker 2>on your credit card, then like you can get your

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 2>credit card points, and you know, you have a sort

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 2>of a perpetual motion machine where you can like manufacture

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 2>credit card points without spending any money. And I said

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 2>something like this is the great consumer financial arbitrage. But

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to do because credit card companies are aware

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 2>of this, right, and they try to crack down on it.

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 2>And of course, my readers, is that something like a

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.479
<v Speaker 2>shudder to think of all the creddits that must all

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 2>the subreddits that must exist about buying costco cold for

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 2>credit card points. I got so many emails people are like,

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 2>people like, this is how I manufacture credit card points.

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 2>Like a lot of people pointed out that in like

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty ten, the US Mint really wanted people to start

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 2>using dollar coins because the dollar coin is like more

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 2>cost effactor for the Mint than the dollar bill, and

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 2>so they were like, we're going to be like Europe

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 2>and transition to the dollar coin. And so they were

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 2>like trying to encourage people to get and use dollar coins.

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 2>And one way they did that was they let you

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 2>buy dollar coins like sacks of dollar coins for a

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 2>dollar each with free shipping, which is they're heavy and

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 2>you could do it on your credit card, and so

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 2>people are like, I'm gonna buy one thousand dollar coins

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 2>on my credit card. I'm gonna get ten dollars or

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty dollars of credit card rewards. They're gonna arrive at

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 2>my house. I'm gonna put them directly in the card,

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 2>drive them to the bank to positive in the bank,

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 2>paying my credit card bill with that. And so the

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 2>US Mint did not get what it wanted, which was

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.840
<v Speaker 2>like circulating use of the dollar coins, because everyone was

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 2>just taking them to the bank to pay their credit

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 2>card bills. People got a lot of airline miles out

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 2>of it. Eventually they shut it down.

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you know, and I.

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Think the Mint was like losing money on each transaction.

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Right because they I would imagine that they were.

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 2>The way credit card rewards work is that the seller

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 2>pays a fee of one and a half percent to

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 2>the credit card company. And so here the MINT is

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 2>paying one and a half percent to the credit card company,

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:54.239
<v Speaker 2>which is giving it back to you in the form

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 2>of airline models, and the Mint is losing one and

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 2>a half cents on every dollar coin. Yeah, so eventually

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 2>they shut that.

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I will say, like reading the Wall Street Journal, article

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and then your column. I was thinking, I don't know,

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe these people just trying to flip it too fast.

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean gold prices, well, right.

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 2>With gold, you're not buying a dollar quint. Right with gold,

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 2>you're buying a thing that could go up.

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's been going up quite a bit over the

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>past few months. But then I read there was an

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>anecdote in the Wall Street Journal article about Luke Gribe.

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I hope I'm pronouncing his name right. He's of Southeast Michigan.

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>He waited almost a decade to make a profit on

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>his gold bar. He sold his one ounce credit sweet

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>bar for twenty three hundred and fifty dollars in April.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Not bad. That's after he paid fifteen hundred dollars for

0:25:38.480 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty fifteen. Was it worth it?

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 2>I feel like if you bought the smp'd have done.

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, the cold bar.

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a lot of thinking. I would just buy

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:51.959
<v Speaker 1>an ETF with a credit card. I don't know.

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 2>I do want to mention another credit card awards story, which,

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 2>as you should somewhere you reminded of this. I actually

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 2>wrote about it in the past. There's this I who's

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 2>a experimental physicist and who was like, how can I

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 2>build a perpetual motion machine? So he hit an Amex

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 2>ames a lot of these credit cards. The way it

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 2>works is like they pay like one percent cash back,

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 2>but they give you like extra bonuses on certain categories

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 2>of spending to like encourage you to use their card more.

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 2>And so Amex was giving him five percent cash back

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 2>at grocery stores. So he'd get a grocery stores. He

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 2>would buy gift card like Visa prepaid gift cards at

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 2>the grocery stores, and he would get his five percent

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 2>cash back on these Visa prepaid gift cards. He would

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 2>take the gift cards and buy money orders. He would

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.880
<v Speaker 2>take the money orders and deposit them in his bank.

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 2>He use the money in the bank to pay his

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 2>credit card bills. So it was just like a sort

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 2>of like closed loop of exchanging money for money for

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 2>money beautiful. And he got five percent on the credit

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 2>card transactions. He had to pay a little bit for

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the gift card, he had to pay a little bit

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 2>for the money orders, but all in all he made

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 2>like three percent millions and millions and millions of dollars

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 2>worth of prepaid gift cards. Like every time he went

0:26:57.960 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to the grocery store, he bought like all their gift cards.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 2>He made I think three hundred thousand dollars of profit

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 2>three hundred three hundred ten thousand dollars of profit. And

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 2>then we know about this because the IRS wanted him

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 2>to pay taxes in his games for this trade. And

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 2>he was like, no, long standing IRS rules are that

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 2>credit card cash back or just the discount. They're not income,

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:24.800
<v Speaker 2>they're just like reducing your expenses, and so you don't

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 2>have to pay taxes on them. And he actually won

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 2>in tax card. So he had this like three hundred

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars of arbitrage income that he didn't have to

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 2>pay taxes on.

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>See that sounds more worth it than less than a

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars over ten years.

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Sure, cold is in some way and an efficient way

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 2>to do it, because it's heavy, right. Gift cards are lighter, right,

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 2>And so a lot of people find ways to buy

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 2>cash equivalents on credit cards and then max that out

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 2>as much as possible before the credit card company shuts

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 2>it down.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I have two points here specifically on gold, not on

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 1>credit cards. Okay, you make the point that gold is heavy,

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and it is heavy and actually in one of the articles,

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>according to j M bullion, shipping fees can be as

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>much as forty dollars for an ounce of gold, so

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>it is expensive to ship it around, and then insurance

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>on the shipping that's another forty dollars.

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Gold is heavy, but an ounce of gold I think

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 2>weighs an ounce.

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know, but if you're shipping more than one

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>ounce of gold, it's going to add up there.

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Sure.

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>The other point is that we were talking about ETFs

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>and gold ETFs. The largest gold etf is GLD, and

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>it's been shipping fees, no shipping fees for gold ETFs.

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.719
<v Speaker 1>But the gold is in a vault underground in London,

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>which I'm fascinated by. I would like to go to

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the vault, but you can't go to the vault as

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a journalist.

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, interesting, Yeah, but.

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot I remember. Actually how we got

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>there was because GLD skyrocketed and assets at one point

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. Everyone wanted it and it just grew

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>so much, and there were a ton of conspiracy theories

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>out there, probably on Reddit too, about whether they actually

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>had the gold to back it up. Sure, but it's

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in London. Underground. But you can't go to the vault.

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>None of us can go to the vault.

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 2>You here, how suspicious this ound. I know white people

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 2>are buying gold bars at Costco rather than GLD.

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense.

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Then you have it.

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you trust State Street? Apparently a lot of people didn't.

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I do, because my life is integrated into the modern

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 2>financial system. If I didn't trust the modern financial system

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and I wanted to own gold instead, I wouldn't want

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 2>to own gold through State Street in a vault that,

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 2>like crack reporter Katie Graefel couldn't even get into.

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I did ask a stupid question at the time because

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>assets in the CTF were going crazy, so they were

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>having to buy a lot of gold. Well, I said,

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is there enough room in the vault? We're like, yes,

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, Like gold.

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Is right, gold bar right.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>So there's plenty of room in this spot.

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.000
<v Speaker 2>It's like it's like a room this size, and it's

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 2>just like a little pile on the corner.

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I just always thought of greenots, and that's what I

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>had in my mind.

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 2>That was the Money Stuff podcast.

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Levin and I'm Katie Greifeld.

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 2>You can find my work by subscribing to The Money

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Stuff newsletter on Bloomberg dot.

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Com, and you can find me on Bloomberg TV every

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 1>day between ten and eleven am Eastern.

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 2>We'd love to hear from you. You can send an

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 2>email to Moneypod at Bloomberg dot net, ask us a

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 2>question and we might answer it on air.

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also subscribe to our show wherever you're listening

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>right now and leave us a review. It helps more

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 1>people find the show.

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 2>The Money Stuff Podcast is produced by Anamsarakus and Moses

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 2>and am.

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Our theme music was composed by Blake Maples.

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Francis Nannim is our executive producer, and.

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of Podcasts.

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to The Money Stuff Podcast. We'll be

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>back next week with more stuff.