WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: Social Media and You

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production of I Heart Radios.

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. He there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio and I love all things tech and

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>today is Friday. That means it's time for a classic

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>episode of tech Stuff. This episode originally published on January

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine, two thousand thirteen. It is titled Social Media

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and You, and it features Lauren Vogelbaum as my co host.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Lauren had done a couple of episodes before this one

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that you're about to hear. I did not include those

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>because they were particularly early ones. You can go back

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>into the archive at tech stuff podcast dot com and

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>find them. But I found that this one I think

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>was a good starting point for the Lauren era of

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff and hope you guys. And really there's a

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:02.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of fear out there, I think in a lot

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of news stories that are kind of

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>amping up that fear. And there's been several studies that

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that talk with this doom and gloom about like about like, oh, no,

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>social media is so big that we're not going to

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>talk to each other in person anymore. Um, total communication breakdown,

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Captain Dogg's looking together that that kind of thing. Um,

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and uh, it's this is not pop stuff, but I

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>like to just yes anyway, Yeah, no, no no, no, we

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>quote documentaries all the time here on tech stuff. It's

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>perfectly fine. And I agree entirely, Lauren. I mean, from

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>an armchair psychology perspective, if I were to just look

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>at the whole idea of social media and human interaction

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in general, uh, part of me would think, hey, social

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>media is replacing that face to face human interaction that

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we tend to think of as being really important as

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>part of our development as a person, right, or that

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>seems to be really important for a very long time. Yeah,

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's it's part of socialization. And the worry

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is that without that face to face interaction with something

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>else replacing it, we would be less capable of dealing

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 1>with those interactions when they come up. And a lot

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>of the information about this tends to be anecdotal, which

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>anyone who has done any science knows is not reliable

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to actually measuring it's not actually science. Um.

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>There have been a few studies. There's a one one

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that you will here quoted all the time was from

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>MD Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society. UM

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh, this one said, this one is was in

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five to be fair, so this was a

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>few years ago and before Twitter and Facebook were really huge.

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>But um, but it found that um, compared to people

0:02:42.760 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 1>who do not use the internet frequently, those who do,

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>um uh, spend seventy minutes less per day interacting with

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>their family, twenty five minutes less per day sleeping, and

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty is less watching television. Although I'm not sure why

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 1>that's necessarily a bad thing. Yeah, they could go the

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>other way, but but that but that family thing, that's

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy minutes less a day talking to your family, that

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>sounds that sounds awful, right until of course you're interacting

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with your family online exactly, and that's and that's what

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>we're I think it turns out that that is what

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 1>we are doing, right right. Yeah. Again, it's one of

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>those things where I think the stereotype, the thing that

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 1>we all imagine is the person sequestered in his or

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>her room. Uh, you know, it's dark, Yeah, it's depressing

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and probably yeah, the only interaction they get is whomever

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is online is through a keyboard and never a microphone, right,

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's it. And it can be a synchronous communication,

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>meaning that you know, you leave a message, then later

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>on the person reads it and then they leave a message.

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>This is essentially the way email works. It's a synchronous

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to a face to face conversation, which is

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>generally synchronous unless you're talking to me, in which case

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it is just a monologue. But uh, that's the way

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I work. But anyway, that's generally speaking, that tends to

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.160
<v Speaker 1>be The view is that it's a person who is

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>withdrawing more and more. And it's this this idea that

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>social media could ultimately be dehumanizing us, at least in

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the sense of how we define what a human is

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>right now, right, And to be fair, isolation is a

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>very scary thing. Um. There's all kinds of studies about

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>about how it can be as bad for you as

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>smoking and obesity, how it increases cancerus tumors in mice. Um.

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's developmentally, it's a very big problem. I mean,

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>there's there are actual cases of tragic cases of children

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>who are deprived the ability to interact with other people

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and how that has impacted their ability to develop as

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a human, like, like, you know, they never really develop

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>beyond a certain what would be equivalent to a certain age,

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>like a younger age. That there are stories about kids

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>who were in terrible conditions and you know, grow up

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and never really develop beyond say a seven or eight

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>year old mensial level. Lonely subjects have been found to

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>have less brain activity than than people with a a

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>healthy and diverse social network. Yes, whenever I get lonely,

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not thinking of anything. It's just me and Supernatural,

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Natural Marathon. You had it, man, before I could even

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>say it. Yes, it's just me and the next episode

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of Supernatural. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Brothers

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>are dreaming. I wouldn't know. I don't want to they

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>are dreaming. I'm like, I believe you know. Okay, cool,

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:35.679
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, Yes, these are these are all perceptions. Now,

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes down to science, there are a lot

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>of different stays that look at this, and there's some

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>conflicting results. And part of that is because the nature

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of the studies. Part of it is that, you know,

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>the studies are not necessarily looking at the exact same criteria, right,

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So it could be that one seems to contradict another,

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>but it maybe that in a broader perspective, they're not

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>really contradictory. It's just they're looking at they're looking at

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:00.159
<v Speaker 1>different aspects. Because when people are talking about social isolation, um,

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>they're they're talking about the size, the intimacy, the diversity,

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>and the location of your social network. Right. Yes, there's

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of different terms for this as well, about whether

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>or not you have a certain number of confidence like

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:18.279
<v Speaker 1>people that you really connect with. These are the people

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>with whom you share those deep personal things that are

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>not something you would talk about to just your your neighbor,

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>unless they're your confidence or or someone on the street

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>or your coworker. Necessarily it's it's it's who you go

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to when you're upset or when you're happy. It's the

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>first person that, if you're me, you text message when

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>when something terrific happens to you, any text messages. Okay,

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>so awkward, Uh, moving on, I'm dealing with a little

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>heartbreak here, but it's okay. I I don't don't have

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>to be everyone's best friend. Well, the thing is that

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 1>people that people really um the average person has has

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>one point eight ish and and that's that's you know,

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>one one point eight close contexts like that, depending upon

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>depending on which survey looking at, because some of these

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the surveys I really looked at,

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>which is one that you you sent me the information to,

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>So I thank you, Lauren, because without it I would

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to talk about. But it was a Pew Internet,

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Personal Networks and Community survey. Now, before I even get

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 1>into the data here, I should stress they surveyed two thousand,

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>five twelve adults. Now that's a pretty small sample, and

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not so any results we get you have to

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind this is this is a very small sample.

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>But within that sample they drew some pretty big conclusions.

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>One of those was that of American adults said they

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>used the Internet. So wow, didn't but anyway said they

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>used the Internet. And nearly half of adults, or of

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>those who said they use the Internet, say they use

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>at least on social networking service. So this is stuff

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, that kind of thing, and this

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is sort of tangential to our community. Are our our

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>conversation here. But I found it really interesting out of

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the ones they surveyed of those who used social networking

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>services said they used Facebook. Them on Facebook is one

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of the ones I use, used my Space, LinkedIn, and

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>used Twitter. So that means more people are using my

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Space than Twitter, which to me says the twenty of

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>people who said that are all in the band. I mean, really,

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>when was the last time you use my Space? I

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:45.600
<v Speaker 1>deleted my my Space account about a year ago. It's

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it's coming back because timber Lakes brought sexy and my Spacebook.

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Those are the two things he brought back. I don't

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>know where he went to find them, but he brought

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>them back. Um. But yeah, I don't use my Space either.

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>It just blows my mom that more people are using

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>my Space that in the survey anyway, than LinkedIn and Twitter.

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>But um but but but that's I mean, that is

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>indicative of the of the overall usage. I mean, Facebook

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>as of October had um one billion monthly active users. Yeah,

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge, huge number. And h and five four

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>million daily active users. That's a whole bunch of people.

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>That's that's that's more people than there are even user

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>accounts on Twitter. Um. As as of December, Twitter had

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>had more than two million December twelve people with the

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Far Future are listening to Back in Future? Where's my

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>jet pack? Is it on the way the time machine?

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Just bring it back to me right? There's no way

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they can tell me. This is the sad thing, Like

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you've been using it for three years. Time travel stinks

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>because I only get to go one direction and it's

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>really slow, second by second. As it turns out, hey

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>there it's job from twenty nineteen here to say. We're

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>going to a quick break to thank our sponsor. The

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing about this this survey, I mean we've been

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:15.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of talking about the things they found, but one

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of the things they were specifically looking for was this

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>idea of social isolation and does the use of social

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>media contribute to social isolation? Is it true that we

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>are actually withdrawing from society in favor of the interactions

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that we have on social networking services? And according to

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the service spoiler alert, no, no it's not having Yeah,

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 1>they said that according to the surveying that social isolation

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>has not really changed since which this is just for

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>people who aren't paying really close attention. Not really a

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>big year for the internet. Um, if you were using

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, you were in a research facility or a university. Uh,

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you are not the average person. Because, of course, the

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Worldwide Web the main way we tend to think about

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.680
<v Speaker 1>interacting with the Internet, apart from apps and stuff. That's

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>starting to really take control. But wed Web it wasn't

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a thing until ninety two, so obviously is before social

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:21.079
<v Speaker 1>networking services are a thing. Like three people on Prodigy

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>as of eight and that's not it. So if you're

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>on a bulletin board system, maybe, but it's before social

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:33.080
<v Speaker 1>networking services obviously. Uh. But these the extent of social

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>isolation hasn't really changed the sense. So that tells us

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's very possible social networking services don't have a

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>big impact. Now we can't say that for sure because

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of different facts. Yeah, it could

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>be that we are reducing social isolation at an exponential rate,

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 1>but the social networking services are pulling that back. So

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it could be that there is an impact on social isolation.

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just that other factors are pushing it forward, so

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>it ends up balanced. Yeah. This is the complex thing

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>about science. This is why drawing conclusions is difficult. You

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:10.439
<v Speaker 1>have to do a lot of studies and really look

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>at all the different factors and try and control for

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>as many variables as possible, because otherwise whatever you say

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>could turn out to be not so true in the

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>grand scheme of things. But based upon what this survey found,

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it looks like social networking services are not turning us

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>all into hermits. This isn't from the same Pew Internet study.

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it's from a different one. I didn't write

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>down which study it's from in my notes, but um,

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been found that mobile phone use has actually made

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>our contact lists smaller but more intense. That makes sense.

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>So for instance, you know, it's not that it's not

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that the relationships are less meaningful. It just means that

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the ones that we contact were really depending upon them,

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and that we might be using a phone in order

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>to make that connection as opposed to necessary you know,

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>walking across the street or or driving to a friend's hell,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>are meeting up at a coffee shop or whatever. To me,

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, that just means that we're transferring that same

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>need for interaction to a different medium. It doesn't mean

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that we're losing that interaction. It just means that it's

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>a you know, we're taking advantage of technology in ways

0:13:14.400 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that we couldn't before, which is awesome because I mean,

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you've known people who have moved away. You

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you yourself have moved a few times. Absolutely. I I

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>play Halo every Wednesday night so that I get to

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>hang out with my friends who don't live here anymore. Right,

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So this is technology giving us those social interactions that

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 1>otherwise we might lose if if we were to relocate

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>or our friends relocate. And in my view, that's a

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.599
<v Speaker 1>huge positive. It means that those those those relationships that

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>have been formed over years sometimes decades of uh knowing

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 1>one another don't fade away. They still remain relevant because

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>technology allows us to continue to build those relationships. Now,

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>those interactions, the nature of them might change it, but

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it's still a very important part of who we are

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and how we interact. And for some people, UM, you

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>know there there are mentally and physically disabled people, the elderly, um,

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>new new mothers who can't get out of the house, um,

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of people who they've been doing medical studies

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>with to see if use of the internet can actually

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>give them better social interaction. Sure it's it's it's been

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>found to reduce depression in lots of those groups, UM

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>and and has really helped people out. So yeah, I've

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>even seen that there have been studies done with people

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>who have various mental health conditions who otherwise would find

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it very difficult to socialize. They they either not just

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>awkward like me and Jonathan. Right, No, no, no, the

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>people who really find it difficult to form any kind

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of social contact. It's just one of those things that

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a block for them and it can be very frustrating,

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>especially if they observe that other people are capable of

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>doing this. And there are so many factors involved here.

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a there's an entire taboo about mental health in

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>our culture that is that's problematic and so awful. Yeah,

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and it feeds on itself, right, it defends this thing

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>where it just mounts on the person who's experiencing this.

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And some of the studies had people using social networks

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and and they were finding it much easier to interact

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>with people and making suggestions on how to create a

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>social network with tools that would allow them to have

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a greater interaction. Which, yeah, you think about that, like,

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this is this is what technology should do. Technology should

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>help people so that they can interact any way they want.

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>In the you know in a way that brings them

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the satisfaction that people can have, you know, people who

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>don't have these conditions tend to find naturally. Um, I

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>like this to me, it's to me, it's a great thing.

0:15:56.920 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>And anything that decreases that sense of isolation and that

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 1>since that taboo is a good thing to and it's

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it's an added dimension. It doesn't have to be it

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be replacement. It can be and things change,

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean Socrates was terrified that writing was

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>going to ruin people's brains. Oh, I want to talk

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>about this, but we're gonna get into that all right. Now,

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>hang on one second. Now, let's take a quick break

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to thank our sponsor, and now back to the show.

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So you were talking about Socrates and writing, right, the

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>idea that writing things down means that you're taking stuff

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>out of your brain and putting it on paper or

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>stone or clay or whatever. Right a tree, your buddy Bill,

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>who stands still for really long periods of time, whatever,

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you're taking it out of your brain, you're putting it

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on something else, and therefore you are no longer relying

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 1>on your brain to process that information because you've offloaded

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it soccers. You thought this was a terrible idea. The

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing is that attitude has continued up to present day,

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, I assume why you brought it up,

0:17:08.560 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>because today we have computers and and uh smartphones and calculators. Calculators. Yeah,

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I could not do complex equations anymore without the use

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of a calculator because frankly, I just don't use those

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>skills as frequently as I as I used to. Well,

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>you're a writer, you're not a mathematician. I'm not a

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:29.479
<v Speaker 1>good one either, um, and then mathematician that is, I'm

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>an excellent writer. You should read some of my articles

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that how stufforce dot com. You know what I'm talking about.

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, yeah, yeah, I know. That's the exactly I

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>mean the Nicholas Carr wrote the famous article for The

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic is Google making us stupid? This whole idea that

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>because we've got so much information on the internet and

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we have access to information, and therefore we're less intelligent,

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>right right, we don't. We don't have to remember stuff,

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to know stuff. We just because I'm

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>d knows it, right, Yeah, yeah, why do we Why

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>do I need to even process this information. All I

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 1>have to do is type in search query and Google

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>pull up the first answer, and then and then repeat

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it back. It doesn't even mean that I even process

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it on a level where I understand it social media

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:17.479
<v Speaker 1>or social networking services. Some people were worried a similar

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is going on with the social aspect. As we're

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>talking with the memory and processing of information on the Internet.

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 1>This idea that social networking services are creating a less

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>meaningful way of connecting with people. But things like this

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Pew research survey suggest otherwise. It's suggests that we're getting

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>just as much meaningful interaction online and through technology as

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we would face to face. Now, the the actual nature

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of that interaction may change somewhat somewhat, but it's still

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>important and it's still helpful. Yeah, and and that's I mean,

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>you know that kind of fear of technology. To be fair,

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we hear tech stuff are probably biased towards technology and

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 1>just maybe maybe a little bit. Please listen to all

0:18:57.680 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>our episodes on your computers contacts at Discovery dot com.

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>But um, but but no, I mean, I mean, fear

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of fear of technology isn't going to change the fact

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>that technology is out there, and it's not going to

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>change the fact that things are changing. Change happens, society changes,

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>everything changes, you know, and and fe people were also worried, um,

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in the Industrial Revolution that because um, because these these

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>machines were starting to automate human processes, that that the

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the equality of workspace interaction was going to go down,

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and and all kinds of other ripple effects out from that.

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.719
<v Speaker 1>And sure, that's where we get the whole sabotage thing,

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>because people, you know, the whole idea throwing the wooden

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>shoe into the automated loom to destroy it. So are

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>old old listeners to not not old listeners, but people

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>listen to old episodes of tech stuff. I know that

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about that many many times, and and it's

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:00.479
<v Speaker 1>not it's you know, the answer is, yes, things are changing,

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>but no, that's not necessarily a bad thing. Yeah, in

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>fact that that Again, going back to that Pew survey,

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the other things I thought was really interesting

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was that they found that people who use the web

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Again, another one of those those uh perceptions

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 1>is that these are people who don't get out as much.

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 1>They don't you know, they don't interact in other ways

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:22.639
<v Speaker 1>other than online, but that doesn't seem to be the

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>case according to the people that they surveyed. According to

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the survey, the folks who used the web were actually

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>more likely to interact with people in their immediate physical environment.

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>They were more likely to do things like speak to

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a neighbor on a on a regular basis or uh yes,

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's six of respondent said that they talked to a

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>neighbor at least once per month. And they found that

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>bloggers are seventy two percent more likely to belong to

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a local voluntary association than those who do not blog.

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 1>So there you've got people who are very much invested

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>in the online world, but not at the expense of

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a physical one, so directly contradicting that armchair psychology approach,

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>which is why we always say, like, yeah, there's that

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>whole idea of common sense dictates, which often means I

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>am wrong, but it seems like I'm right. I do

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>this all the time. I'm like, well, common sense talking

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>out of my butt because I don't have any data

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 1>in front of me. But yeah, they also found out

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 1>they said web users are more likely to visit a cafe.

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I did not say if it was an internet cafe,

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>which obviously would increase the odds, but fifty two percent

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>more likely to visit a library. Didn't say if that

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:41.400
<v Speaker 1>was because that's how they access the internet, But hey,

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty four percent more likely to visit a fast food

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>restaurant that I don't necessarily think it's a good thing.

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>You know what, I haven't visit a fast food restaurant

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>in a very long time. I'm not a fast food fan.

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>More likely to visit other restaurants now I'm in that category.

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>We might like food and oh gosh, I love food,

0:22:00.840 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And then more likely to visit a public park, which

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>is awesome. That is awesome. So we're talking about people

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>who have a real investment in their community and an

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>interest in the world outside the realm of the computer.

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>So that does contradict are they aren't going outside, they're

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>just taking pictures to upload when they get home. Right, Oh,

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that reminds me of something I wanted to talk about

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't on our on the notes, but it was.

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 1>It's this idea. It's something that's interesting. So one of

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the one of the conflicts that people have with whole

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 1>social networking services and everything is that it It is

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>constantly interrupting our daily lives if we are connected in

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>various ways, so that uh verver ties where it's inappropriate

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for you to stop what you're doing and respond to

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>someone on Facebook or Twitter, like like you're at work,

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>or you are in a conversation with someone, or you're

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 1>up on stage developing a keynote address to a bunch

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of people. I'm sorry, but but I was gonna say

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>like driving, but those are so uh anyway, have you

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.440
<v Speaker 1>ever been to uh dinner with someone or a meal

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 1>with someone when the very first thing that happens is

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>smartphone hits the table? Yes, that drives me so crazy.

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Are you ever that person? Or do you leave your

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>smartphone away? Okay, to be fair, I'm very occasionally that person,

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but usually it's revenge smartphone use. Usually it's it's after

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>someone else has brought out their smartphone. I I I

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>have on occasion gotten a little b huffy and I'll fine,

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna check Facebook too. Well, Lauren, I

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>hate to break this to you, but you're gonna get

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>way worse because now you're a tech stuff co host

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh, let me put it this way, when I

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>hang out with other technology podcasts hosts and we all

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>go out to eat, the table creaks under the weight

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>of the electronics that hit it. First thing, I am

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 1>not kidding. I remember meals with people like and I'm

0:23:56.920 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be dropping some names here, folks, because my back hurt,

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 1>get ready, so I gotta drop some weight. Get Ready.

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>But people like Sarah Lane, i Azactar and tom Merritt

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>uh this Week in Tech or or Molly Wood of

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:14.439
<v Speaker 1>c net or um oh, justin Robert Young and Brian

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Brushwood and and and Veronica Belmont. We've all I've been

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to dinner with these folks in various settings, and invariably,

0:24:22.800 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the first thing that happens is everyone's smartphone hits the table,

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and anytime you're not looking at a menu or talking,

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you're way And I include myself, I am not immune

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>to this. This is something I've done too, and some

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>people are better about it than others. But it is

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that can be kind of distracting.

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And I will admit this is one of those behaviors

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>that is socially It's becoming more and more socially acceptable

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that everyone's doing it but it's I

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>still am a little bit eaked out by it. Yeah,

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>it can be. It can be insulting if you're talking

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to someone and you just see them looking because you know.

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 1>But the reason why I brought it up, Oh, there's

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant in Los Angeles called EVA Restaurant E v A.

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure it's not the only restaurant that does this,

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but EVA Restaurant has a policy which is if you

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>come inside the restaurant and you surrender your cell phone

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to the waiter when you come in, you get a

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>five percent discount on your bill. That's a delightful. So

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you come in. The waiter explains the policy, especially in

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.160
<v Speaker 1>l A. Yeah, you have the choice of yeah, especially yeah,

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>no kidding all those actors waiting for the breakout call

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>or those agents waiting for their actors to call them.

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it means that you you just you hand

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it over and then you concentrate on the food and

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the experience. And you know, the restaurant's policy is that

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this way, you're really focusing on the meal and you're

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>enjoying it for what it is, as opposed to distracting

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 1>yourself and the meal is just something you're doing in

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>between tweets. It also means Instagram hates it because there's

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>so few, so many fewer pick there's a food flooding

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, which which we are in dire lacking of

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:08.320
<v Speaker 1>so food and cats. People need more food and cats

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>on the internet. Staff. I'm I'm I'm starting my my

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>me and my tumbler followers are starting a drive for

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>more acute hedgehogs on the Internet. I think that this

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>is a thing that needs to happen. Had a good run,

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it did well. That bucket, that bucket, it was a

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>bucket list. Oh no, oh dear, that one. That one

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that was such a stretch. That wasn't that joke? Cut

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:29.959
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that that was just not sure? It was just words,

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 1>That's what that was. But but but but no, but

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean it is, it is. It can divide our attention,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>and I do. I've seen a couple of news reports

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>lately that that had this announcer being shocked shocked. Did

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you know that when young people wake up they check

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 1>their cell phone before getting out of bed. Then I'm like,

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, people don't do that. First of all, my

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>cell phone is my alarm. Of course, my mind too. Yeah,

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>because of that by turning off my alarm, I am

0:26:57.359 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>checking my cell phone right, And I don't get out

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.719
<v Speaker 1>of bed to throw off my alarm because that's just ridiculous.

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>That would be that would help me wake up. Probably

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I should do that, but no, I do not. I'm

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a morning person anyway, So as soon as as soon

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>as those eyes pop up and I'm ready to go,

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not happy about it. I'm not sure full morning person.

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll still be grouchy at you. I just I'm just alert,

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that's all. But but yeah, but but but that that

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>in the kind of behavior where you see more people

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.200
<v Speaker 1>at a concert, for example, um, taking photos at the

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>concert than you do watching the concert. Yeah. Yeah, And

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing, And that's you know, Yeah, I get

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>grouchy at concerts too. That's why every concert needs to

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>be a private show of just me and the and

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the musician. When one of those get off my lawn

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of moments. Yeah, there's only a couple of musicians

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I know who would be willing to do that, oh,

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>to to actually do like, okay, it's just me and you,

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll play my songs for you, someone that we know together.

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>Because she's nice. Yes, and it would be you know,

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>she she'd essentially be doing a favor for me. Yes,

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 1>So I like hear anything. But yeah, no, I think

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a good discussion. I mean it's I think ultimately

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the takeaway we have to have is that we do

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>not have a full spectrum of data to really support

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>this one way or the other. But it looks like

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not as damaging as we would first think perhaps,

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and it may in fact be helpful. Uh, since it's

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of a social science thing, it's what we call

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the soft sciences, and whenever you get people involved,

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it really messes with the variables. So because we're not

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>all the same as it turns out crazy. Yeah, funky

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>about that, right. So ultimately it may we may not

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to come down and say definitively whether it's

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>good or bad. It just it looks like it's not. Yeah,

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up another classic episode of tech Stuff.

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for listening. Hope you enjoyed this

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and the debut and the classics of Lauren Vogelbaum, who

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>was my co host for for a little while, quite

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>some time actually, And so we're gonna be hearing a

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>lot more from her over the next few classic episodes.

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>If you guys have suggestions for future episodes of tech Stuff,

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:15.960
<v Speaker 1>feel free to get in touch with me. You can

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>email tech Stuff at how stuff works dot com or

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>drop a line on Facebook or Twitter. The handle of

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>both of those is text Stuff h SW. You can

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>also pop on over to our website, tech stuff podcast

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com. As I said earlier, you can go to

0:29:31.760 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the archive of every episode we've ever published. It's searchable,

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>so if you want to look for a specific topic

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you can. You can also find a link to our

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>online store, where every purchase you make goes to out

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the show and we greatly appreciate it, and I will

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. Text Stuff is a

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>production of I Heart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or where are you listen to your favorite

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>shows