WEBVTT - Lessons from the Final Table

0:00:15.564 --> 0:00:24.244
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. I'm Maria Kannakova and.

0:00:24.204 --> 0:00:27.284
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nate Silver. Welcome to Risky Business.

0:00:27.164 --> 0:00:31.044
<v Speaker 1>A show about making better decisions. This is our first

0:00:31.084 --> 0:00:33.164
<v Speaker 1>episode of the show, so I want to give you

0:00:33.164 --> 0:00:35.444
<v Speaker 1>a little taste of the types of topics you can

0:00:35.444 --> 0:00:39.084
<v Speaker 1>expect from us going forward. So we'll obviously be talking

0:00:39.084 --> 0:00:42.564
<v Speaker 1>about politics and the elections since this is a major

0:00:42.604 --> 0:00:45.084
<v Speaker 1>election year. We'll be talking about poker, We'll be talking

0:00:45.124 --> 0:00:48.044
<v Speaker 1>about the news, and of course we're going to be

0:00:48.044 --> 0:00:50.404
<v Speaker 1>talking about personal decisions. Right, how do you take this

0:00:50.644 --> 0:00:53.164
<v Speaker 1>framework and make decisions in our day.

0:00:53.004 --> 0:00:56.044
<v Speaker 2>To day lives conveniently almost as that we've planned this

0:00:56.124 --> 0:00:58.644
<v Speaker 2>in advance. Our first show will cover all three of

0:00:58.644 --> 0:01:01.444
<v Speaker 2>these areas. We'll have reflect with Maria on our recent

0:01:01.444 --> 0:01:03.964
<v Speaker 2>poker success she had. We'll do a segment on RFK

0:01:04.124 --> 0:01:07.364
<v Speaker 2>Junior and his effect on the presidential election, and we'll

0:01:07.364 --> 0:01:09.724
<v Speaker 2>talk about Caitlin Clark and the economics of the pay

0:01:09.764 --> 0:01:11.044
<v Speaker 2>gap and the WNBA.

0:01:12.124 --> 0:01:15.564
<v Speaker 1>So, Nate, let's get into it.

0:01:23.044 --> 0:01:25.364
<v Speaker 2>So, Maria, was it last week? It's all kind of

0:01:25.364 --> 0:01:27.444
<v Speaker 2>blurring together, but I think last week we were making

0:01:27.484 --> 0:01:32.044
<v Speaker 2>the official Twitter slash social media announcement about Risky Business,

0:01:32.044 --> 0:01:37.524
<v Speaker 2>the podcast and you were absent from that cluster of

0:01:38.444 --> 0:01:40.164
<v Speaker 2>information we wanted to spit out because you were at

0:01:40.204 --> 0:01:42.764
<v Speaker 2>the final table of a poker tournament. Good excuse, I

0:01:42.764 --> 0:01:44.284
<v Speaker 2>guess tell us more about that.

0:01:44.484 --> 0:01:48.404
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. So I was at EPT Monte Carlo, which is

0:01:48.804 --> 0:01:51.484
<v Speaker 1>one of the flagship stops of the European Poker Tour,

0:01:51.524 --> 0:01:54.964
<v Speaker 1>which is a Poker Stars event, and I was playing

0:01:55.084 --> 0:01:59.724
<v Speaker 1>in the one euro side event and it was going

0:01:59.764 --> 0:02:03.444
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. So at the time that I saw your

0:02:03.484 --> 0:02:06.404
<v Speaker 1>emails and all of these announcements going back and forth,

0:02:06.844 --> 0:02:08.964
<v Speaker 1>I was actually in the middle of a redraw for

0:02:09.004 --> 0:02:11.964
<v Speaker 1>the final table and we were finally down to nine players.

0:02:12.764 --> 0:02:15.804
<v Speaker 1>So I had, you know, a few brief moments to

0:02:15.884 --> 0:02:18.004
<v Speaker 1>check my email when I saw of this and had

0:02:18.044 --> 0:02:21.484
<v Speaker 1>to respond to you guys that. Unfortunately, I was going

0:02:21.564 --> 0:02:24.964
<v Speaker 1>to have to be focused and not actually be paying

0:02:25.004 --> 0:02:28.404
<v Speaker 1>attention to any social media announcements because final table is

0:02:28.404 --> 0:02:29.164
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big deal.

0:02:29.644 --> 0:02:30.724
<v Speaker 2>How much were you playing for?

0:02:31.124 --> 0:02:33.924
<v Speaker 1>So first place was, and this is all in euros,

0:02:34.604 --> 0:02:37.044
<v Speaker 1>was eighty three thousand, one hundred and eighty euros, so

0:02:37.084 --> 0:02:41.164
<v Speaker 1>that's almost ninety thousand dollars and ninth yeah, not bad.

0:02:41.244 --> 0:02:43.284
<v Speaker 1>And then ninth place, which would be you know you're

0:02:43.324 --> 0:02:46.204
<v Speaker 1>the first one out at the final table was eight

0:02:46.884 --> 0:02:50.964
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred euros, so that's just over nine thousand dollars.

0:02:51.084 --> 0:02:52.844
<v Speaker 1>So that's a pretty big difference.

0:02:52.924 --> 0:02:54.404
<v Speaker 2>That's why you weren't answering your emails.

0:02:54.884 --> 0:02:57.124
<v Speaker 1>That is why I was not answering your egail.

0:02:57.164 --> 0:02:58.964
<v Speaker 2>You can be bought off for that is correct.

0:02:59.044 --> 0:03:02.804
<v Speaker 1>Date, I had to be very much paying attention.

0:03:03.084 --> 0:03:05.524
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think people in poker and neglect the importance

0:03:05.524 --> 0:03:08.244
<v Speaker 2>so focused sometimes because it's such a there's a lot

0:03:08.244 --> 0:03:10.964
<v Speaker 2>of noise, right, I mean it's in any given final table,

0:03:11.044 --> 0:03:13.764
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of mostly luck. But like if you go

0:03:13.884 --> 0:03:17.964
<v Speaker 2>jogging or running right and you're really hungover, you notice

0:03:18.004 --> 0:03:20.404
<v Speaker 2>the effect on your time, Right, there's no noise there

0:03:20.684 --> 0:03:23.644
<v Speaker 2>in the data in poker, you don't, But like, tell

0:03:23.644 --> 0:03:27.524
<v Speaker 2>me more about the importance of focus of shutting out distractions,

0:03:27.644 --> 0:03:30.164
<v Speaker 2>especially in a high stakes moment like this.

0:03:31.084 --> 0:03:33.924
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I think that you really really need

0:03:33.964 --> 0:03:37.644
<v Speaker 1>to be fully present because normally during a poker tournament, right,

0:03:37.644 --> 0:03:40.244
<v Speaker 1>this tournament started with around six hundred players. I don't

0:03:40.284 --> 0:03:41.964
<v Speaker 1>remember if it was a few fewer than that or

0:03:42.004 --> 0:03:44.444
<v Speaker 1>a few more, but around six hundred, right, So at

0:03:44.444 --> 0:03:47.324
<v Speaker 1>that point you're sitting at a full table, and I'm

0:03:47.364 --> 0:03:49.204
<v Speaker 1>not going to say you can phone it in, but

0:03:49.284 --> 0:03:52.004
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to always give it one hundred percent

0:03:52.044 --> 0:03:54.204
<v Speaker 1>of your focus, because a lot of poker is actually

0:03:54.204 --> 0:03:56.044
<v Speaker 1>pretty boring, right. You don't play a lot of hands,

0:03:56.044 --> 0:03:57.724
<v Speaker 1>you have to fold a lot, you get a lot

0:03:57.764 --> 0:04:00.124
<v Speaker 1>of shitty hands, and you don't actually want to be

0:04:00.204 --> 0:04:02.924
<v Speaker 1>tempted to play those. So a lot of the time

0:04:03.004 --> 0:04:05.924
<v Speaker 1>you have down time. And of course I'd love to

0:04:05.924 --> 0:04:08.684
<v Speaker 1>say that I'm one of those players with laser focus

0:04:08.684 --> 0:04:10.844
<v Speaker 1>who never has my phone at the table, who is

0:04:10.884 --> 0:04:14.244
<v Speaker 1>always one hundred percent present, but that is simply not true.

0:04:14.324 --> 0:04:16.764
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would be just absolutely lying if I

0:04:16.804 --> 0:04:19.084
<v Speaker 1>said that, And I think it's just very difficult for

0:04:19.124 --> 0:04:21.204
<v Speaker 1>the human brain to do that. I've actually written a lot.

0:04:21.244 --> 0:04:24.404
<v Speaker 1>My first book was about mindfulness and presence and focus

0:04:24.804 --> 0:04:27.804
<v Speaker 1>and the importance of that and decision making. And one

0:04:27.844 --> 0:04:30.804
<v Speaker 1>of the things you find is that's incredibly, incredibly taxing

0:04:30.844 --> 0:04:34.524
<v Speaker 1>for the brain because the brain in its default state wanders,

0:04:34.964 --> 0:04:38.564
<v Speaker 1>and so it takes a lot of effort to focus,

0:04:38.924 --> 0:04:41.804
<v Speaker 1>and so you have to save that effort for the

0:04:41.844 --> 0:04:44.764
<v Speaker 1>moments when it really matters. And the final table is

0:04:44.844 --> 0:04:48.524
<v Speaker 1>one of those moments because you're playing for really high

0:04:48.524 --> 0:04:53.044
<v Speaker 1>stakes and all of a sudden, every single pay jump matters.

0:04:53.404 --> 0:04:56.244
<v Speaker 1>It matters if I'm out in ninth place versus eighth place,

0:04:56.324 --> 0:04:59.444
<v Speaker 1>versus seventh, versus six. And just to add to the

0:04:59.524 --> 0:05:02.564
<v Speaker 1>drama of this particular final table, I had had a really,

0:05:02.564 --> 0:05:05.604
<v Speaker 1>really shitty series up to that point, and I knew

0:05:05.684 --> 0:05:08.244
<v Speaker 1>that in order to kind of dig myself out from

0:05:08.324 --> 0:05:10.884
<v Speaker 1>the hole that I was in financially, I needed to

0:05:10.884 --> 0:05:13.084
<v Speaker 1>place third or better. That was the only way that

0:05:13.124 --> 0:05:15.924
<v Speaker 1>I would make money on this tournament, and damned if

0:05:15.964 --> 0:05:18.604
<v Speaker 1>I was going to let anything distract me from doing that.

0:05:18.764 --> 0:05:21.044
<v Speaker 2>One thing, too, is you kind of can't even like

0:05:21.924 --> 0:05:24.484
<v Speaker 2>fake the focus part. There's a long discussion about this

0:05:24.524 --> 0:05:28.004
<v Speaker 2>in my forthcoming book On the Edge. We're actually talked

0:05:28.044 --> 0:05:30.444
<v Speaker 2>about an experience we had playing together Maria in the

0:05:30.444 --> 0:05:34.244
<v Speaker 2>Bahamas where we were playing the twenty five k PSPC

0:05:34.764 --> 0:05:36.804
<v Speaker 2>first time I played a twenty five thousand dollars tournament,

0:05:36.804 --> 0:05:40.284
<v Speaker 2>and like, I was just really wired more than I

0:05:40.324 --> 0:05:42.844
<v Speaker 2>wanted to be. You know, you're feeling your heart rate

0:05:42.964 --> 0:05:46.364
<v Speaker 2>escalate a little bit, and when you're at a final table,

0:05:46.444 --> 0:05:51.444
<v Speaker 2>then you are just inherently more in the zone, more

0:05:51.524 --> 0:05:54.644
<v Speaker 2>alert that can be tuned too high. Sometimes. Part of

0:05:54.684 --> 0:05:57.244
<v Speaker 2>the benefit of experience playing poker is that you know

0:05:57.284 --> 0:06:00.004
<v Speaker 2>how to deal with that extra awareness and stress that

0:06:00.044 --> 0:06:03.324
<v Speaker 2>you have. But you can't fake being interested on day

0:06:03.364 --> 0:06:07.404
<v Speaker 2>one of some tiny buy in event two hundred blinds deep, right,

0:06:07.564 --> 0:06:11.244
<v Speaker 2>but look, did you have any cool hands that you played?

0:06:11.524 --> 0:06:15.084
<v Speaker 1>I did have one, specific, one very cool hand, which

0:06:15.164 --> 0:06:19.164
<v Speaker 1>really I think illustrates a lot of the principles of

0:06:19.164 --> 0:06:21.684
<v Speaker 1>a final table. So I came into the final table

0:06:22.444 --> 0:06:25.524
<v Speaker 1>as one of the shorter stacks, so there were a

0:06:25.524 --> 0:06:28.124
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who had more chips than I do.

0:06:29.244 --> 0:06:33.284
<v Speaker 1>And let's say, for a second just kind of do

0:06:33.404 --> 0:06:38.124
<v Speaker 1>a little asterisk and talk about how that changes when

0:06:38.164 --> 0:06:40.124
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of at the beginning stages of a tournament

0:06:40.204 --> 0:06:43.204
<v Speaker 1>versus the final table. So, because as I mentioned before,

0:06:43.204 --> 0:06:46.044
<v Speaker 1>there are these huge pay jumps, and you know, the

0:06:46.564 --> 0:06:50.004
<v Speaker 1>monetary value really shifts depending on which place you get.

0:06:50.364 --> 0:06:54.724
<v Speaker 1>Your chips are no longer worth what just what they

0:06:54.804 --> 0:06:58.284
<v Speaker 1>say they are, and the ranges meaning the hands that

0:06:58.324 --> 0:07:01.764
<v Speaker 1>you play change, how aggressive you want to be changes,

0:07:02.084 --> 0:07:05.524
<v Speaker 1>and your strategy really really changes depending on whether you're

0:07:05.524 --> 0:07:08.684
<v Speaker 1>a short stack, a middle stack, or a chip leader, right,

0:07:08.724 --> 0:07:11.804
<v Speaker 1>whether you have a ton of chips. And the cool

0:07:11.844 --> 0:07:15.804
<v Speaker 1>thing about my situation when I was the short stack

0:07:16.244 --> 0:07:19.764
<v Speaker 1>is like I'm in last place anyway, so I can

0:07:19.804 --> 0:07:22.164
<v Speaker 1>take risks and I can actually put a lot of

0:07:22.204 --> 0:07:25.924
<v Speaker 1>pressure on other people because I still have enough chips

0:07:25.924 --> 0:07:29.124
<v Speaker 1>that I can really really put a dent in what

0:07:29.164 --> 0:07:31.324
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. So at this stage of the tournament, I

0:07:31.404 --> 0:07:33.884
<v Speaker 1>think there were eight of us left and I started

0:07:33.924 --> 0:07:37.404
<v Speaker 1>the hand with I think seventeen big blinds. Big blinds

0:07:37.484 --> 0:07:39.524
<v Speaker 1>are kind of those fource bets that you have to

0:07:39.564 --> 0:07:43.564
<v Speaker 1>make blind to get some action going. So the number

0:07:43.564 --> 0:07:45.844
<v Speaker 1>of biglindes is just a good way to gauge how

0:07:45.884 --> 0:07:48.524
<v Speaker 1>long you can go right without without playing a hand

0:07:48.844 --> 0:07:51.924
<v Speaker 1>and how long you can survive. So I was in

0:07:52.044 --> 0:07:55.884
<v Speaker 1>first position, first to act, and I had ace king,

0:07:56.164 --> 0:07:57.484
<v Speaker 1>which is a really strong hand.

0:07:57.644 --> 0:08:00.324
<v Speaker 2>So you're in here's a test through which are our

0:08:00.404 --> 0:08:03.484
<v Speaker 2>audience members know about poker? You're in first position. That

0:08:03.564 --> 0:08:06.004
<v Speaker 2>must be really good. You always want to be first.

0:08:06.764 --> 0:08:09.804
<v Speaker 1>What an interesting question, Nate. That is actually it's the

0:08:09.804 --> 0:08:14.644
<v Speaker 1>polar opposite. So in poker and in decision making in general,

0:08:14.724 --> 0:08:18.004
<v Speaker 1>this is actually a really really crucial point position, really

0:08:18.044 --> 0:08:21.524
<v Speaker 1>really matters, and you actually want to be the last

0:08:21.564 --> 0:08:24.084
<v Speaker 1>person to act. You want to be the last person

0:08:24.124 --> 0:08:26.884
<v Speaker 1>to make the decision, which means you're in position. If

0:08:26.924 --> 0:08:28.844
<v Speaker 1>you're in position, that means you get to see all

0:08:28.924 --> 0:08:31.564
<v Speaker 1>the information beforehand and then you get to act. If

0:08:31.604 --> 0:08:33.524
<v Speaker 1>you're out of position, that means that you have to

0:08:33.564 --> 0:08:36.524
<v Speaker 1>go first, right, you choose what to do, but then

0:08:36.604 --> 0:08:39.084
<v Speaker 1>all these other people see that and they have more

0:08:39.124 --> 0:08:41.444
<v Speaker 1>information and they get to make a decision after you.

0:08:41.924 --> 0:08:43.884
<v Speaker 1>So if you think about away from the poker table,

0:08:43.924 --> 0:08:46.364
<v Speaker 1>like if you're in a salary negotiation, you do not

0:08:46.484 --> 0:08:48.044
<v Speaker 1>want to throw out the first number.

0:08:48.404 --> 0:08:52.044
<v Speaker 2>Say you're negotiating terms for a new podcast about decision making.

0:08:52.204 --> 0:08:55.804
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, you want the other person to make the first offer,

0:08:56.124 --> 0:08:59.844
<v Speaker 1>right because you do not want to accidentally low ball

0:08:59.924 --> 0:09:02.204
<v Speaker 1>yourself or you know, you just you just want to

0:09:02.244 --> 0:09:05.044
<v Speaker 1>know what the other person is thinking and then be

0:09:05.124 --> 0:09:08.924
<v Speaker 1>able to respond to that. And so the positional advantages

0:09:08.964 --> 0:09:11.884
<v Speaker 1>in poker are huge. So when you're in an early position,

0:09:12.084 --> 0:09:14.644
<v Speaker 1>right when you're acting first, you have to actually be

0:09:14.724 --> 0:09:17.084
<v Speaker 1>much more selective with the hand you play, and you

0:09:17.164 --> 0:09:20.364
<v Speaker 1>have to be much more cautious because so many things

0:09:20.364 --> 0:09:22.764
<v Speaker 1>can still happen. And I say this over and over,

0:09:23.124 --> 0:09:26.084
<v Speaker 1>whether it's in poker or in decision making, because we're

0:09:26.124 --> 0:09:29.844
<v Speaker 1>always playing games of incomplete information. Right, information is key.

0:09:30.124 --> 0:09:33.884
<v Speaker 1>Information is power. The person with the most information has

0:09:33.924 --> 0:09:37.164
<v Speaker 1>the edge, and so you want the edge and acting

0:09:37.204 --> 0:09:40.844
<v Speaker 1>first ate it. So in this particular case, though, I

0:09:40.884 --> 0:09:42.564
<v Speaker 1>have an amazing hand, so I'm going to open it.

0:09:42.804 --> 0:09:45.564
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I do. And then two people who

0:09:45.604 --> 0:09:48.524
<v Speaker 1>are acting after me decide that they're going to call,

0:09:48.764 --> 0:09:50.924
<v Speaker 1>and they're both going to have position on me in

0:09:50.964 --> 0:09:54.804
<v Speaker 1>the hand, So middle position calls and the button calls,

0:09:54.844 --> 0:09:57.084
<v Speaker 1>and then the blinds fold. So what this means is

0:09:57.084 --> 0:09:58.924
<v Speaker 1>that the only other two people in the hand are

0:09:58.924 --> 0:10:01.804
<v Speaker 1>actually going to be deciding after me. And it's three ways,

0:10:01.884 --> 0:10:03.564
<v Speaker 1>so that means that there's three of us, which means

0:10:03.644 --> 0:10:06.604
<v Speaker 1>multi way, which is much more difficult to play. All right,

0:10:06.764 --> 0:10:10.524
<v Speaker 1>So here we are ace King. Two people call and

0:10:10.684 --> 0:10:13.244
<v Speaker 1>we get a flop, which is the first three community

0:10:13.284 --> 0:10:16.124
<v Speaker 1>cards that everyone can see, and they are a Queen,

0:10:16.244 --> 0:10:20.324
<v Speaker 1>a ten, and an eight and rainbow, and rainbow means

0:10:20.724 --> 0:10:25.324
<v Speaker 1>that there are three different suits, so no possibility of

0:10:25.364 --> 0:10:25.884
<v Speaker 1>a flush drawn.

0:10:26.004 --> 0:10:28.284
<v Speaker 2>None of the cards match your cards, Maria.

0:10:27.724 --> 0:10:32.364
<v Speaker 1>That is bad Nate. So I decide to check, which

0:10:32.404 --> 0:10:35.524
<v Speaker 1>is always a really really good decision when there are

0:10:35.564 --> 0:10:38.844
<v Speaker 1>lots of people acting after you. And what checking means

0:10:39.004 --> 0:10:41.284
<v Speaker 1>is I just say I'm not going to act now.

0:10:41.364 --> 0:10:43.484
<v Speaker 1>I check to you, and you can do what you

0:10:43.524 --> 0:10:47.284
<v Speaker 1>want to do. And so I check, and the middle

0:10:47.284 --> 0:10:49.644
<v Speaker 1>position player decides to bet, and he bets pretty big.

0:10:49.684 --> 0:10:53.244
<v Speaker 1>He bets four big lines and the button. So the

0:10:53.244 --> 0:10:56.964
<v Speaker 1>other player in the hand calls, and so here I am.

0:10:57.084 --> 0:11:02.524
<v Speaker 1>And at this point we have nine big lines in

0:11:02.564 --> 0:11:05.644
<v Speaker 1>the pot right starting to start the hand, plus the

0:11:05.644 --> 0:11:10.004
<v Speaker 1>eight that just went in, So that is so right,

0:11:10.044 --> 0:11:12.484
<v Speaker 1>that's that's my stack because I had bet two before

0:11:12.484 --> 0:11:16.724
<v Speaker 1>the before the flow. So basically this is huge. And

0:11:16.844 --> 0:11:20.244
<v Speaker 1>what do I do right? If I call, there are

0:11:20.284 --> 0:11:24.804
<v Speaker 1>still two people behind me, and it's a really huge

0:11:24.884 --> 0:11:26.484
<v Speaker 1>chunk of what I have left, and I'm going to

0:11:26.484 --> 0:11:28.524
<v Speaker 1>be in a really bad position if I don't improve.

0:11:29.164 --> 0:11:31.924
<v Speaker 1>And so I decide to run a big bluff or

0:11:32.004 --> 0:11:35.444
<v Speaker 1>semi bluff because I could improve, and I decide to

0:11:35.484 --> 0:11:37.844
<v Speaker 1>shove all my chips in the middle. I go all in.

0:11:38.684 --> 0:11:42.284
<v Speaker 1>And that's a very risky play because if either one

0:11:42.324 --> 0:11:44.204
<v Speaker 1>of them has anything and calls me, I'm out of

0:11:44.204 --> 0:11:46.684
<v Speaker 1>the tournament. They both have more chips than I do.

0:11:47.604 --> 0:11:49.244
<v Speaker 2>Or you make your or you hit your jack or

0:11:49.244 --> 0:11:52.364
<v Speaker 2>I hit my jack. Right, we call it a semi

0:11:52.364 --> 0:11:55.644
<v Speaker 2>bluff because there are some ways. You know, the jack

0:11:55.644 --> 0:11:57.804
<v Speaker 2>always makes you the best hand. You can sometimes hit

0:11:58.084 --> 0:12:02.324
<v Speaker 2>two kings in a row. Occasionally one acer king makes

0:12:02.324 --> 0:12:05.404
<v Speaker 2>you the best hand. Yep, So you have some equity

0:12:05.404 --> 0:12:06.124
<v Speaker 2>in the podos I do.

0:12:06.204 --> 0:12:08.404
<v Speaker 1>I do have some equity, and I also have some

0:12:08.524 --> 0:12:12.124
<v Speaker 1>fold equity, meaning I still have enough chips that my

0:12:12.364 --> 0:12:15.084
<v Speaker 1>shove puts a lot of pressure on them. Right, So

0:12:15.124 --> 0:12:17.484
<v Speaker 1>it's not like I'm shoving for four big blinds, which

0:12:17.524 --> 0:12:20.124
<v Speaker 1>is what they already bet right, I'm shoving for a

0:12:20.164 --> 0:12:24.564
<v Speaker 1>substantial amount more and the middle position player just folds instantly,

0:12:24.884 --> 0:12:28.604
<v Speaker 1>which I was kind of relying on. So at a

0:12:28.644 --> 0:12:31.564
<v Speaker 1>final table, especially, you will have been playing with these

0:12:31.604 --> 0:12:35.004
<v Speaker 1>players for a long time several days in this case,

0:12:35.204 --> 0:12:37.204
<v Speaker 1>and so you get to know their tendencies and how

0:12:37.244 --> 0:12:40.164
<v Speaker 1>they play a lot more, and so you can make

0:12:40.244 --> 0:12:45.844
<v Speaker 1>decisions that are much more fine tuned to these specific players.

0:12:46.204 --> 0:12:49.244
<v Speaker 1>And so I knew that this middle position player was

0:12:49.244 --> 0:12:52.124
<v Speaker 1>a recreational player who didn't really know what he was

0:12:52.164 --> 0:12:57.444
<v Speaker 1>doing I'm sorry, and also really loved love to bet

0:12:57.524 --> 0:12:59.804
<v Speaker 1>whenever anyone checked to him, like, I don't think he

0:12:59.884 --> 0:13:02.244
<v Speaker 1>passed a single spot to bet, and he would just

0:13:02.244 --> 0:13:04.684
<v Speaker 1>bet very random amount, so I was pretty sure he

0:13:04.724 --> 0:13:07.644
<v Speaker 1>had nothing. And the person who was on the button

0:13:07.964 --> 0:13:12.324
<v Speaker 1>was actually an old pro and he was someone who

0:13:12.364 --> 0:13:14.364
<v Speaker 1>I'd been playing with for a while, and I knew

0:13:14.404 --> 0:13:18.204
<v Speaker 1>he was very solid, good and very very capable of

0:13:18.244 --> 0:13:22.524
<v Speaker 1>making big folds, which is crucial because after he calls

0:13:22.604 --> 0:13:25.364
<v Speaker 1>with me to act behind, he has a good hand, right,

0:13:25.444 --> 0:13:27.924
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have just air, and so I need to

0:13:27.964 --> 0:13:29.804
<v Speaker 1>be sure that this is a player who is capable

0:13:29.804 --> 0:13:33.964
<v Speaker 1>of folding, because some players aren't. And so he starts tanking.

0:13:34.484 --> 0:13:37.844
<v Speaker 1>And when someone goes into the tank that means they're thinking,

0:13:38.444 --> 0:13:43.324
<v Speaker 1>and he is tanking and tanking and tanking, and the

0:13:43.404 --> 0:13:46.524
<v Speaker 1>longer they tank, the likelihood that they're gonna call you

0:13:46.724 --> 0:13:50.004
<v Speaker 1>goes up, right, So the longer he thinks here, I

0:13:50.044 --> 0:13:52.684
<v Speaker 1>am sitting thinking, okay, well I guess I'm out of

0:13:52.724 --> 0:13:55.644
<v Speaker 1>the tournament. And then finally he shows a queen and

0:13:55.684 --> 0:13:59.484
<v Speaker 1>he folds his hand, so he folds top pair and

0:13:59.764 --> 0:14:04.844
<v Speaker 1>I basically double my chips without any showdown whatsoever. And

0:14:04.884 --> 0:14:09.404
<v Speaker 1>that was an absolutely crucial hand in the tournament because

0:14:09.684 --> 0:14:12.764
<v Speaker 1>it gave me breathing room and it enabled me to

0:14:13.484 --> 0:14:16.924
<v Speaker 1>make it to second place, which is what I eventually got.

0:14:17.124 --> 0:14:21.804
<v Speaker 1>How much money Maria fifty two thousand euros.

0:14:21.444 --> 0:14:24.244
<v Speaker 2>Which is Zero's good? Now there's like one point one. Yeah,

0:14:24.244 --> 0:14:24.924
<v Speaker 2>it's it's like.

0:14:24.844 --> 0:14:27.604
<v Speaker 1>Fifty six thousand something like that. Not as good as

0:14:27.604 --> 0:14:39.764
<v Speaker 1>it would have been last year, but still pretty good.

0:14:41.204 --> 0:14:44.964
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things that has been in the

0:14:44.964 --> 0:14:50.444
<v Speaker 1>news lately and has really gotten me a little bit scared,

0:14:50.804 --> 0:14:53.804
<v Speaker 1>to be perfectly honest, well, actually scared shitless would be

0:14:54.684 --> 0:14:58.684
<v Speaker 1>a more precise technical term for how I'm feeling about

0:14:58.684 --> 0:15:03.724
<v Speaker 1>it is how close this presidential election is, and the

0:15:03.804 --> 0:15:07.804
<v Speaker 1>fact that with how close it is, we have suddenly

0:15:08.484 --> 0:15:11.604
<v Speaker 1>these third part party candidates, and specifically I'm thinking about

0:15:11.964 --> 0:15:18.404
<v Speaker 1>RFK Junior, who is actually pulling ridiculously well for a

0:15:18.404 --> 0:15:23.404
<v Speaker 1>third party candidate, and makes me incredibly worried that there's

0:15:23.444 --> 0:15:27.604
<v Speaker 1>a chance that you know, this person who has a

0:15:27.644 --> 0:15:30.044
<v Speaker 1>brainworm or had a brain worm, I guess it's still

0:15:30.044 --> 0:15:32.244
<v Speaker 1>in his brain so that he and his running mate

0:15:32.764 --> 0:15:37.084
<v Speaker 1>the worm, who do not believe in a lot of

0:15:37.124 --> 0:15:41.044
<v Speaker 1>things that are science based and who are members of

0:15:41.044 --> 0:15:43.924
<v Speaker 1>the Kennedy family, that the two of them have a

0:15:43.964 --> 0:15:49.164
<v Speaker 1>real chance of making a difference in states where the

0:15:49.244 --> 0:15:50.284
<v Speaker 1>elections are close.

0:15:50.404 --> 0:15:52.844
<v Speaker 2>Marie, can you please, yeah, pers I need to interrogate you.

0:15:53.364 --> 0:15:54.364
<v Speaker 2>What state are you from?

0:15:54.484 --> 0:15:55.684
<v Speaker 1>I'm from Massachusetts.

0:15:55.764 --> 0:15:58.484
<v Speaker 2>Do you understand Americans the other four nine states don't

0:15:58.484 --> 0:16:00.444
<v Speaker 2>give a fuck about the Kennedies and don't understand the

0:16:00.564 --> 0:16:01.644
<v Speaker 2>entire Kennedy thing.

0:16:02.004 --> 0:16:05.364
<v Speaker 1>No, Nate, I disagree. I disagree. I think the Kennedy

0:16:05.404 --> 0:16:09.124
<v Speaker 1>thing is a huge thing, and it is a very

0:16:09.164 --> 0:16:11.804
<v Speaker 1>big but yes, point taken.

0:16:12.084 --> 0:16:14.324
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let me give two other kind of points of

0:16:14.404 --> 0:16:16.244
<v Speaker 2>context for the listeners, one of which is kind of

0:16:16.284 --> 0:16:20.124
<v Speaker 2>like a meta abstract point. Right, Maria, you planned to

0:16:20.204 --> 0:16:23.004
<v Speaker 2>vote for Joe Biden? Is that right? Yes?

0:16:23.244 --> 0:16:23.644
<v Speaker 1>Correct?

0:16:23.884 --> 0:16:26.084
<v Speaker 2>And we're doing shows on politics. I think Maria is

0:16:26.084 --> 0:16:30.884
<v Speaker 2>not going to make any hidden attempt to pretend that

0:16:30.924 --> 0:16:32.964
<v Speaker 2>she's not a you know, don't know if you're a

0:16:33.004 --> 0:16:34.804
<v Speaker 2>Democrat or not, but you're going to vote for Joe Biden.

0:16:34.844 --> 0:16:38.444
<v Speaker 2>And I plan to vote for Joe Biden too. For

0:16:38.484 --> 0:16:41.324
<v Speaker 2>what it's worth, however, I am not in these politics.

0:16:41.364 --> 0:16:44.644
<v Speaker 2>I've been's going to make as many assumptions about what

0:16:44.724 --> 0:16:47.564
<v Speaker 2>our audience necessarily thinks. Right. I hope we do have

0:16:47.604 --> 0:16:51.364
<v Speaker 2>some Kennedy listeners and some Trump listeners whatever else. You're

0:16:51.364 --> 0:16:53.404
<v Speaker 2>welcome to listen no matter what. But Maria is kind

0:16:53.404 --> 0:16:56.284
<v Speaker 2>of going to be playing more of a partisan hat role,

0:16:56.364 --> 0:16:58.204
<v Speaker 2>and I'll have more of a non partisan hat. So,

0:16:58.644 --> 0:17:01.164
<v Speaker 2>and the second kind of assumption here is, I think

0:17:01.204 --> 0:17:04.684
<v Speaker 2>you're assuming that Candy will draw more from Biden than

0:17:04.724 --> 0:17:07.044
<v Speaker 2>from Trump, when I'm not so sure that's true. So

0:17:07.284 --> 0:17:11.684
<v Speaker 2>in polls, Kennedy overall is at ten point two percent

0:17:11.764 --> 0:17:14.524
<v Speaker 2>of the vote according to the five thirty eight average,

0:17:14.564 --> 0:17:17.404
<v Speaker 2>which is the highest share of anybody since Ross Peruro

0:17:17.404 --> 0:17:19.924
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen ninety six. If he wants up realizing that, well,

0:17:19.924 --> 0:17:22.484
<v Speaker 2>debate in a moment how the numbers are more elected

0:17:22.524 --> 0:17:26.324
<v Speaker 2>than not to fade. But ten percent is a serious

0:17:26.364 --> 0:17:29.644
<v Speaker 2>chunk of the electorate. However, I mean, as you mentioned,

0:17:29.644 --> 0:17:36.284
<v Speaker 2>Maria RFK Junior is not some liberal, progressive, pro science

0:17:36.364 --> 0:17:38.564
<v Speaker 2>democrat with one of those yard signs we believe in

0:17:38.724 --> 0:17:41.004
<v Speaker 2>xyz in front of in front of their house. He

0:17:41.084 --> 0:17:44.244
<v Speaker 2>has some beliefs that the scientific consensus would not endorse

0:17:44.284 --> 0:17:47.764
<v Speaker 2>about things like vaccines. For example, he is not to

0:17:48.324 --> 0:17:51.404
<v Speaker 2>Biden's left on issues like abortion or Israel Palestine. He's

0:17:51.404 --> 0:17:54.844
<v Speaker 2>to the right, although sometimes inconsistent in what he says,

0:17:55.044 --> 0:17:57.684
<v Speaker 2>although at times he's been kind of linked with a

0:17:57.684 --> 0:18:00.564
<v Speaker 2>libertarian nomination. Has kind of views all over the place

0:18:00.644 --> 0:18:03.364
<v Speaker 2>on economic issues, a little hard to play, So he

0:18:03.484 --> 0:18:07.524
<v Speaker 2>kind of seems to me like an anti establishment. You

0:18:07.524 --> 0:18:10.844
<v Speaker 2>can say this nicely or not too nicely. Heterodox is

0:18:10.884 --> 0:18:14.044
<v Speaker 2>a nice way to say it. Maybe kind of low

0:18:14.124 --> 0:18:17.524
<v Speaker 2>information mix is a not so nice way to say it.

0:18:17.964 --> 0:18:22.524
<v Speaker 2>Right to me, that reads like it's coming from the

0:18:22.564 --> 0:18:25.444
<v Speaker 2>Trump pile as much as the Biden pile. And then

0:18:25.484 --> 0:18:27.644
<v Speaker 2>the polls is all over the place. There are some

0:18:27.804 --> 0:18:31.284
<v Speaker 2>polls where Candy draws more support from Trump, similar he

0:18:31.364 --> 0:18:34.444
<v Speaker 2>draws more support from Biden. You could say examples, but

0:18:34.484 --> 0:18:36.604
<v Speaker 2>you can have you can you know, every which way

0:18:37.244 --> 0:18:40.124
<v Speaker 2>potentially in terms of the effect on November. By the way,

0:18:40.164 --> 0:18:43.404
<v Speaker 2>there's also Cornell West and Jill Stein who are definitely

0:18:43.484 --> 0:18:46.204
<v Speaker 2>running to Biden's left and are I think purely harmful

0:18:46.244 --> 0:18:48.924
<v Speaker 2>to Biden. But I think look, if I'm Joe Biden,

0:18:48.924 --> 0:18:51.524
<v Speaker 2>I have a lot of concerns right now, including the

0:18:51.524 --> 0:18:53.324
<v Speaker 2>fact that I'm eighty one years old, the fact that

0:18:55.164 --> 0:18:57.484
<v Speaker 2>you know, voters are still concerned about inflation, the fact

0:18:57.524 --> 0:18:59.684
<v Speaker 2>that you have kind of a lot of pushback against

0:18:59.724 --> 0:19:02.324
<v Speaker 2>the left. Now, I'm not sure if RFK Juniors had

0:19:02.364 --> 0:19:05.604
<v Speaker 2>my top five concerns at the moment.

0:19:07.124 --> 0:19:10.724
<v Speaker 1>So then, but in it all, that's at least right now,

0:19:11.204 --> 0:19:14.484
<v Speaker 1>so close, right, So many polls have them just neck

0:19:14.524 --> 0:19:17.044
<v Speaker 1>and neck, fifty to fifty more or less. Some have

0:19:17.204 --> 0:19:19.844
<v Speaker 1>you know, Trump ahead, some have Biden ahead. You know,

0:19:19.844 --> 0:19:22.404
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the state. But when we're talking about

0:19:22.404 --> 0:19:26.324
<v Speaker 1>states that actually matter, So Nate, you vote in New York,

0:19:26.804 --> 0:19:30.204
<v Speaker 1>and I voted in Massachusetts. Then I voted in New York.

0:19:30.484 --> 0:19:33.884
<v Speaker 1>But now I actually get to vote in Nevada, which

0:19:34.044 --> 0:19:36.284
<v Speaker 1>is a purple state and a state that is actually

0:19:36.364 --> 0:19:40.004
<v Speaker 1>a swing state. So my vote finally matters. It actually

0:19:40.044 --> 0:19:43.164
<v Speaker 1>matters who I am voting for. And in places like Michigan,

0:19:43.324 --> 0:19:46.684
<v Speaker 1>you know, votes definitely matter. So in those cases, right

0:19:46.764 --> 0:19:50.124
<v Speaker 1>in those states where every single vote is actually crucially important,

0:19:50.564 --> 0:19:55.684
<v Speaker 1>do we think that collectively third party candidates, including RFK Junior,

0:19:55.964 --> 0:19:58.204
<v Speaker 1>are going to be in a position where they actually

0:19:58.324 --> 0:19:59.764
<v Speaker 1>might swing the outcome of the election.

0:20:00.284 --> 0:20:04.564
<v Speaker 2>So historically, third party candidates get less of the vote

0:20:04.604 --> 0:20:09.724
<v Speaker 2>in swing states because voters, even before a podcast Maria,

0:20:10.044 --> 0:20:13.204
<v Speaker 2>some voters were rational. They would understand that, like, if

0:20:13.244 --> 0:20:14.844
<v Speaker 2>you're running in New York and you want to send

0:20:14.884 --> 0:20:18.204
<v Speaker 2>a message to Biden and Democrats or the two party

0:20:18.244 --> 0:20:21.124
<v Speaker 2>system by lending a vote to a third party, it's

0:20:21.164 --> 0:20:22.924
<v Speaker 2>not going to actually affect the outcome in the election.

0:20:22.964 --> 0:20:26.404
<v Speaker 2>If you're in Pennsylvania or Arizona or Nevada, Georgia, Michigan,

0:20:26.844 --> 0:20:28.684
<v Speaker 2>then it might. And I think people like actually are

0:20:29.324 --> 0:20:33.364
<v Speaker 2>are relatively rational about that. We've had in the last

0:20:33.364 --> 0:20:36.964
<v Speaker 2>two elections what I call tipping point states, a fancy

0:20:37.044 --> 0:20:39.804
<v Speaker 2>term for the states that make the differen between who

0:20:39.804 --> 0:20:42.484
<v Speaker 2>gets two hundred and seventy electoral votes and not came

0:20:42.564 --> 0:20:45.284
<v Speaker 2>down to a percentage point or so. So yeah, in theory,

0:20:45.284 --> 0:20:48.084
<v Speaker 2>if you have a guy taking ten percent or let's say,

0:20:48.084 --> 0:20:51.204
<v Speaker 2>because by the way, it usually does go down. Because

0:20:51.284 --> 0:20:53.644
<v Speaker 2>right now, people kind of use RFK as like a

0:20:53.644 --> 0:20:57.124
<v Speaker 2>free parking space for deciding what we'll do later to

0:20:57.204 --> 0:21:00.764
<v Speaker 2>demonstrate their lack of satisfaction with these two very old

0:21:00.804 --> 0:21:02.964
<v Speaker 2>men who are running again in a rematch. A lot

0:21:02.964 --> 0:21:05.164
<v Speaker 2>of Americans do not want. Although Canny himself was I

0:21:05.164 --> 0:21:06.444
<v Speaker 2>think over seventy years old.

0:21:07.364 --> 0:21:09.844
<v Speaker 1>He is, and he had a warm parasite the brain

0:21:10.084 --> 0:21:11.164
<v Speaker 1>who ate part of his brain.

0:21:11.324 --> 0:21:14.444
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, you know, look, I'm not sure what

0:21:14.524 --> 0:21:16.684
<v Speaker 2>it told people that personally, if I if I have brainworms,

0:21:16.684 --> 0:21:18.524
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to do a brainworm segment on this.

0:21:18.924 --> 0:21:19.444
<v Speaker 1>He didn't.

0:21:19.484 --> 0:21:19.924
<v Speaker 2>He didn't.

0:21:20.044 --> 0:21:23.364
<v Speaker 1>It came up because he used it during a divorce trial,

0:21:23.804 --> 0:21:26.244
<v Speaker 1>where let's just say so, I have a background in

0:21:26.244 --> 0:21:28.924
<v Speaker 1>con artists. My second book was about con artists the

0:21:28.964 --> 0:21:32.644
<v Speaker 1>confidence game, and con artists are known for telling people

0:21:32.684 --> 0:21:35.804
<v Speaker 1>what they want to hear or what's strategically good in

0:21:35.804 --> 0:21:38.964
<v Speaker 1>that particular moment, which has a high overlap with politicians

0:21:38.964 --> 0:21:42.604
<v Speaker 1>in general. But during his divorce proceedings, RFK Junior was

0:21:42.644 --> 0:21:46.244
<v Speaker 1>trying to argue that his cognitive capacity was greatly diminished

0:21:46.484 --> 0:21:49.124
<v Speaker 1>and so his future earnings potential was a lot lower,

0:21:49.164 --> 0:21:51.964
<v Speaker 1>so he had to pay less money during the divorce

0:21:52.124 --> 0:21:54.324
<v Speaker 1>and would have to pay a lower settlement. So this

0:21:54.484 --> 0:21:56.724
<v Speaker 1>was a matter of record, and journalists dug it up.

0:21:56.764 --> 0:21:58.884
<v Speaker 1>And now of course he's saying, oh no, no, no,

0:21:58.924 --> 0:22:02.284
<v Speaker 1>cognitive capacity not diminished at all. What are you talking about.

0:22:02.804 --> 0:22:05.244
<v Speaker 2>We don't think he was lying in the divorce anyway.

0:22:06.084 --> 0:22:07.124
<v Speaker 1>He was lying in one of the two.

0:22:08.444 --> 0:22:11.324
<v Speaker 2>The point is, if you had to project historically, so

0:22:11.364 --> 0:22:14.964
<v Speaker 2>for example, Gary Johnson, the libertarian candidate, was polling at

0:22:16.004 --> 0:22:18.284
<v Speaker 2>maybe around ten percent now or eight percent of remembering

0:22:18.324 --> 0:22:22.364
<v Speaker 2>this offhand, and got more like five percent. Russfrow bounced

0:22:22.364 --> 0:22:24.644
<v Speaker 2>around a lot in nineteen ninety two. He was at

0:22:24.644 --> 0:22:27.324
<v Speaker 2>one point leading in the polls believed it or not,

0:22:27.404 --> 0:22:30.204
<v Speaker 2>and then dropped out and then rejoined the race. God,

0:22:30.244 --> 0:22:32.964
<v Speaker 2>I'm going off memory here, nineteen percent or something like that.

0:22:33.204 --> 0:22:36.044
<v Speaker 2>So if you had to project where Candy will wind up,

0:22:36.324 --> 0:22:38.844
<v Speaker 2>you've probably take an over under of like seven points

0:22:38.884 --> 0:22:43.004
<v Speaker 2>and not ten. Right with that said, look, seven points

0:22:43.044 --> 0:22:45.564
<v Speaker 2>will almost certainly be bigger than the margin of difference

0:22:45.604 --> 0:22:48.964
<v Speaker 2>between Biden and Trump in a state like Michigan, for example,

0:22:49.084 --> 0:22:51.964
<v Speaker 2>So if Kennedy were to take most of that vote

0:22:51.964 --> 0:22:54.284
<v Speaker 2>from one side, that would be a problem for whoever

0:22:54.444 --> 0:22:58.684
<v Speaker 2>lost those voters. But again, I think it might wind

0:22:58.764 --> 0:23:02.124
<v Speaker 2>up being fairly even. And if the Biden campaign knows

0:23:02.164 --> 0:23:06.404
<v Speaker 2>what's doing. I mean, you've seen actually Trump advisors begin

0:23:06.524 --> 0:23:11.284
<v Speaker 2>to express more reservations about rfkus right as people learn

0:23:11.324 --> 0:23:14.244
<v Speaker 2>more about him, they learn more about the vaccine stuff,

0:23:14.244 --> 0:23:17.604
<v Speaker 2>they learn more about how he's not some typical liberal Kennedy.

0:23:17.764 --> 0:23:20.724
<v Speaker 2>He may compete more with the kind of disaffected, sort

0:23:20.764 --> 0:23:22.484
<v Speaker 2>of Trump voter archetype instead.

0:23:23.844 --> 0:23:28.804
<v Speaker 1>So just to kind of sum that up, we're not

0:23:28.844 --> 0:23:31.004
<v Speaker 1>sure at this point. We're not sure what's going to happen,

0:23:31.244 --> 0:23:34.764
<v Speaker 1>but this is put a potential issue. So how you know,

0:23:34.804 --> 0:23:36.884
<v Speaker 1>we're getting new polling data all the time. You know,

0:23:36.884 --> 0:23:39.524
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times just released a big poll this week.

0:23:39.844 --> 0:23:42.484
<v Speaker 1>How should we read the polls? How should we think

0:23:42.484 --> 0:23:45.364
<v Speaker 1>about the polls going forward in the months leading up

0:23:45.404 --> 0:23:47.644
<v Speaker 1>to the elections? Or should we just ignore them up

0:23:47.684 --> 0:23:48.524
<v Speaker 1>to a certain point.

0:23:48.404 --> 0:23:51.124
<v Speaker 2>At like this, if you're a Democrat, I'd be worried

0:23:51.164 --> 0:23:54.164
<v Speaker 2>because Biden is losing the Trump right now, I wouldn't

0:23:54.164 --> 0:23:55.964
<v Speaker 2>care so much about RFK Junior. It's like not my

0:23:56.004 --> 0:23:58.964
<v Speaker 2>first concern. You know, you almost if you're losing Maria

0:23:59.044 --> 0:24:01.644
<v Speaker 2>in a poker hand or something. You want more variants,

0:24:01.684 --> 0:24:03.124
<v Speaker 2>You want more things that are in the mix. And

0:24:03.204 --> 0:24:05.604
<v Speaker 2>right now, if you had an election today, Biden would

0:24:05.604 --> 0:24:08.204
<v Speaker 2>probably lose at least in the swing state. So give

0:24:08.204 --> 0:24:11.844
<v Speaker 2>me more RFK Junior. Right, the more worried you are

0:24:11.884 --> 0:24:15.204
<v Speaker 2>about Biden's position overall, the more you should welcome chaos,

0:24:15.244 --> 0:24:16.084
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:24:16.164 --> 0:24:21.084
<v Speaker 1>All right, So with that I will welcome chaos. Welcome

0:24:21.124 --> 0:24:25.324
<v Speaker 1>to the race, RFK and worm and let's see what happens.

0:24:25.404 --> 0:24:28.564
<v Speaker 1>And as a Democrat, I hope that I don't need

0:24:28.564 --> 0:24:30.884
<v Speaker 1>to hit the panic button quite yet, but I'm ready

0:24:30.924 --> 0:24:31.964
<v Speaker 1>to just in case.

0:24:46.484 --> 0:24:50.404
<v Speaker 2>Some Maria. A couple of weeks ago, my finance bro

0:24:50.484 --> 0:24:52.924
<v Speaker 2>buddy texts me and says, do you want to go

0:24:52.964 --> 0:24:56.284
<v Speaker 2>to the New York Liberty game in a couple of weekends?

0:24:56.364 --> 0:25:00.204
<v Speaker 2>Right with his is a divorced dad with his young daughter,

0:25:00.804 --> 0:25:02.524
<v Speaker 2>And I'm like, sure, you know, I mean, it was

0:25:03.124 --> 0:25:06.044
<v Speaker 2>a little surprising in this particular friend of mine, not

0:25:06.084 --> 0:25:08.764
<v Speaker 2>to profile too much, wanted women's basketball tickets, but he

0:25:08.804 --> 0:25:10.684
<v Speaker 2>has a young daughter who's forty, so it kind of

0:25:10.724 --> 0:25:12.364
<v Speaker 2>makes sense, right, And then I learned that it's the

0:25:12.404 --> 0:25:16.164
<v Speaker 2>game against the Indiana Fever, which is the team that

0:25:16.244 --> 0:25:20.444
<v Speaker 2>drafted Caitlin Clark, the superstar point guard from University of Iowa,

0:25:20.604 --> 0:25:26.164
<v Speaker 2>who is maybe the most famous female basketball player in history,

0:25:26.204 --> 0:25:30.284
<v Speaker 2>probably more famous than any amateur NCAAA men's player, at

0:25:30.364 --> 0:25:33.044
<v Speaker 2>least as of the date of the NCAA tournament, and

0:25:33.364 --> 0:25:37.164
<v Speaker 2>I was excited about this and any texts again and says,

0:25:37.204 --> 0:25:40.644
<v Speaker 2>by the way, we're in. We're in the bleachers for this.

0:25:42.164 --> 0:25:45.684
<v Speaker 2>And the reason why is that, unlike a typical New

0:25:45.764 --> 0:25:48.364
<v Speaker 2>York Liberty game, the court side seats for this game

0:25:48.444 --> 0:25:50.444
<v Speaker 2>costs tens of the utter made, not tens, but you know,

0:25:51.004 --> 0:25:55.724
<v Speaker 2>high four figures worth of prices. The cheapest seats when

0:25:55.724 --> 0:25:58.804
<v Speaker 2>I checked yesterday were about one hundred and five dollars

0:25:58.844 --> 0:26:02.964
<v Speaker 2>with Ticketmaster fees. So that is actually more than a

0:26:03.004 --> 0:26:06.964
<v Speaker 2>typical Brooklyn Nets game, right at least in the post

0:26:07.044 --> 0:26:10.604
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Durant era, maybe not as much. Is like a

0:26:10.684 --> 0:26:13.044
<v Speaker 2>Knixt game, the Knicks are a very popular in demand

0:26:13.044 --> 0:26:17.844
<v Speaker 2>ticket but all of a sudden, women's basketball is when

0:26:17.924 --> 0:26:23.004
<v Speaker 2>Caitlin Clark plays, drawing on a par with the NBA.

0:26:24.524 --> 0:26:27.884
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that is crazy and quite the phenomenon. Just

0:26:28.204 --> 0:26:30.764
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, I know the names of two female

0:26:30.764 --> 0:26:34.964
<v Speaker 1>basketball players, Britney Griner for reasons that have nothing to

0:26:35.004 --> 0:26:38.484
<v Speaker 1>do with her playing basketball and everything to do with

0:26:38.564 --> 0:26:41.964
<v Speaker 1>the political crisis in twenty twenty two right where she

0:26:42.004 --> 0:26:45.564
<v Speaker 1>was detained by Russia as a prisoner, and Caitlin Clark,

0:26:46.044 --> 0:26:48.844
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden whenever something bleeps on my

0:26:48.924 --> 0:26:51.604
<v Speaker 1>sports radar. And for people who don't know me, I

0:26:51.644 --> 0:26:54.084
<v Speaker 1>am not a sports fan. I do not watch sports.

0:26:54.164 --> 0:26:56.684
<v Speaker 1>I have actually never been to a single basketball game

0:26:56.724 --> 0:26:59.444
<v Speaker 1>in my life though, name you say you want to?

0:26:59.924 --> 0:27:02.804
<v Speaker 1>You want to? Yeah, yeah, so Caitlyn Clark has popped.

0:27:03.044 --> 0:27:06.204
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I bet the friend who's buy tickets this game

0:27:06.244 --> 0:27:09.764
<v Speaker 2>could also name those exact two women's basketball play and

0:27:09.804 --> 0:27:12.804
<v Speaker 2>maybe Sue Bird, maybe one or so other. Right, if

0:27:12.844 --> 0:27:15.964
<v Speaker 2>you go, for example, to the next game at Barclay Center,

0:27:16.084 --> 0:27:18.604
<v Speaker 2>the Seattle Storm at New York Liberty, I can buy

0:27:19.204 --> 0:27:22.764
<v Speaker 2>a good seat for twenty one bucks. So, as of now,

0:27:22.804 --> 0:27:26.684
<v Speaker 2>this is very much focused on the particular cultural phenomenon

0:27:26.724 --> 0:27:27.684
<v Speaker 2>that is Caitlin Clark.

0:27:29.004 --> 0:27:32.484
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So obviously this is a huge deal. But then

0:27:32.524 --> 0:27:35.684
<v Speaker 1>what I started reading about her, the stories that I encountered,

0:27:36.124 --> 0:27:39.564
<v Speaker 1>were all about the contrast between how popular she is, right,

0:27:39.644 --> 0:27:43.124
<v Speaker 1>what a huge audience and viewership she draws. And then

0:27:43.484 --> 0:27:47.204
<v Speaker 1>we have her starting salary as at WNBA's number one

0:27:47.284 --> 0:27:50.924
<v Speaker 1>draft pick, which is going to be seventy six thousand,

0:27:51.044 --> 0:27:55.284
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and thirty five dollars. You know, I think

0:27:55.444 --> 0:28:00.564
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy given that in the NCAA March Madness Final,

0:28:01.204 --> 0:28:07.124
<v Speaker 1>she averaged well. Their game averaged eighteen point seven million

0:28:07.204 --> 0:28:12.164
<v Speaker 1>viewers and peaked at twenty four million between ESPN and ABC,

0:28:12.284 --> 0:28:15.844
<v Speaker 1>while the men's final averaged fourteen point eight million. Now,

0:28:15.924 --> 0:28:18.884
<v Speaker 1>let's compare the salary of seventy six, five hundred and

0:28:18.884 --> 0:28:25.004
<v Speaker 1>thirty five dollars to the lowest draft pick in the NBA,

0:28:25.124 --> 0:28:28.004
<v Speaker 1>not the WNBA. The last pick in the first round

0:28:28.044 --> 0:28:31.084
<v Speaker 1>of the NBA draft gets two million dollars in their

0:28:31.124 --> 0:28:33.964
<v Speaker 1>first year. So that is quite the contrast to someone

0:28:34.004 --> 0:28:38.004
<v Speaker 1>who has brought in record audiences to the sport. So

0:28:38.084 --> 0:28:40.204
<v Speaker 1>there are two things that I want to talk about.

0:28:41.204 --> 0:28:44.164
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, a lot of people point out, yeah,

0:28:44.164 --> 0:28:46.044
<v Speaker 1>but her salary isn't it right. She's going to get

0:28:46.084 --> 0:28:47.924
<v Speaker 1>endorsement deals, She's going to get branding deals, she's going

0:28:47.964 --> 0:28:51.004
<v Speaker 1>to get opportunities that most women's basketball players or men's

0:28:51.084 --> 0:28:53.404
<v Speaker 1>never get because she's a superstar. I want to talk

0:28:53.444 --> 0:28:55.644
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the superstar effect here. But then

0:28:55.724 --> 0:28:57.964
<v Speaker 1>I do want to talk about that gender pay gap

0:28:58.324 --> 0:29:03.004
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that we're seeing these absolutely huge differences

0:29:03.364 --> 0:29:07.364
<v Speaker 1>between someone who's just a slam dunk top superstar and

0:29:07.404 --> 0:29:12.524
<v Speaker 1>what a superstar would be getting in the NBA. So, Nate,

0:29:12.564 --> 0:29:15.604
<v Speaker 1>do you have any initial thoughts on that, because I

0:29:15.604 --> 0:29:17.204
<v Speaker 1>could start going and it's going to be hard to

0:29:17.204 --> 0:29:18.724
<v Speaker 1>shut me up. So I'm going to let you get

0:29:18.764 --> 0:29:20.444
<v Speaker 1>an word in Edge West first.

0:29:21.324 --> 0:29:29.044
<v Speaker 2>As an mostly underpentent capitalists most of the time, I

0:29:29.044 --> 0:29:34.044
<v Speaker 2>think the issues that the system is not capitalistic enough. Right,

0:29:34.364 --> 0:29:39.564
<v Speaker 2>that Caitlin Clark does not have leverage to demand her

0:29:39.604 --> 0:29:41.644
<v Speaker 2>marginal revenue product would be the way that an economist

0:29:41.684 --> 0:29:43.724
<v Speaker 2>would put it, and that I don't agree. I mean

0:29:43.804 --> 0:29:45.884
<v Speaker 2>just because she makes money from endorsement, so I mean, look,

0:29:47.284 --> 0:29:49.004
<v Speaker 2>she should also have the right to make money based

0:29:49.004 --> 0:29:51.884
<v Speaker 2>on the fact that she's bringing in five or ten

0:29:51.924 --> 0:29:54.644
<v Speaker 2>times more ticket revenue than any other player in the

0:29:54.684 --> 0:29:59.284
<v Speaker 2>w NBA. Right. One problem is that rookies and almost

0:29:59.364 --> 0:30:03.604
<v Speaker 2>every sports league are on a salary scale where they're

0:30:03.964 --> 0:30:08.084
<v Speaker 2>basically underpaid. Right. One reason why NBA teams tank, meaning

0:30:08.084 --> 0:30:10.884
<v Speaker 2>intentionally trying to lose, is but because you cannot only

0:30:10.924 --> 0:30:14.524
<v Speaker 2>get a player like Victor Womanyama for the Spurs. He

0:30:14.604 --> 0:30:16.164
<v Speaker 2>was number one pick in the men's league, and the

0:30:16.244 --> 0:30:18.684
<v Speaker 2>men's we have saying men's league in the NBA. He's

0:30:18.724 --> 0:30:22.484
<v Speaker 2>also paid far less than he's worth, and it has

0:30:22.564 --> 0:30:26.084
<v Speaker 2>to do with the dynamics of union bargaining frankly, and

0:30:26.124 --> 0:30:29.964
<v Speaker 2>the fact that like established players to some extent, are

0:30:30.724 --> 0:30:33.724
<v Speaker 2>screwing over rookies who do not have as much leverage

0:30:33.724 --> 0:30:35.884
<v Speaker 2>in the player union. Also, a lot of rookies are bad.

0:30:36.324 --> 0:30:39.524
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes rookies are playing for developmental reasons, so they tend

0:30:39.524 --> 0:30:41.364
<v Speaker 2>to lack leverage in general, and that carries over to

0:30:41.404 --> 0:30:44.244
<v Speaker 2>the WNBA. The other is she though, is that she

0:30:44.644 --> 0:30:48.404
<v Speaker 2>is a big outlier as far as her market ability,

0:30:48.484 --> 0:30:51.084
<v Speaker 2>even forgetting the rookie thing right, even if she weren't

0:30:51.084 --> 0:30:54.684
<v Speaker 2>a rookie, the entire WNBA salary cap is like what

0:30:54.884 --> 0:30:57.444
<v Speaker 2>like one point four million dollars I was looking up

0:30:57.484 --> 0:30:59.844
<v Speaker 2>a moment ago. The entire salary cap is, yeah, one

0:30:59.884 --> 0:31:04.244
<v Speaker 2>point four six three million dollars, which is less than

0:31:04.284 --> 0:31:09.404
<v Speaker 2>what a single NBA rookie makes. Now, that's because WNBA

0:31:09.604 --> 0:31:14.844
<v Speaker 2>historically has made much less revenue than the NBA. There

0:31:14.884 --> 0:31:17.004
<v Speaker 2>are debates about whether it's even profitable or kind of

0:31:17.044 --> 0:31:20.204
<v Speaker 2>like a loss leader for the league. But she that

0:31:20.484 --> 0:31:23.204
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work for her, right, she should have some special

0:31:23.244 --> 0:31:27.044
<v Speaker 2>provision where she probably is gonna make in Marshall revenue

0:31:27.044 --> 0:31:31.244
<v Speaker 2>probably ten fifteen, twenty million dollars a year, and she's

0:31:31.284 --> 0:31:35.284
<v Speaker 2>being exploited because if she decides she doesn't want to

0:31:35.324 --> 0:31:37.604
<v Speaker 2>play or go plays in China or something, which is

0:31:37.604 --> 0:31:40.964
<v Speaker 2>where she might ultimately have leverage, that is money out

0:31:41.004 --> 0:31:43.284
<v Speaker 2>of the coffers of the Indiana Fever and also visiting

0:31:43.324 --> 0:31:45.364
<v Speaker 2>teams like the New York Liberty that are you know,

0:31:45.404 --> 0:31:48.204
<v Speaker 2>people are going there to see her. My friend's daughter

0:31:48.244 --> 0:31:50.364
<v Speaker 2>will be wearing a Caitlin Clark jersey and not a

0:31:50.404 --> 0:31:53.844
<v Speaker 2>New York Liberty jersey. So she's getting screwed over by

0:31:54.164 --> 0:31:57.924
<v Speaker 2>by a lack of ability to kind of achieve what

0:31:57.964 --> 0:31:58.684
<v Speaker 2>she's really worth.

0:32:00.284 --> 0:32:03.884
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean that seems to be pretty clear and

0:32:04.004 --> 0:32:06.924
<v Speaker 1>something that I didn't realize. So when you're talking about

0:32:06.924 --> 0:32:10.044
<v Speaker 1>how you know, the WNBA is a young league, doesn't

0:32:10.044 --> 0:32:12.684
<v Speaker 1>make as much money generally as the NBA, so you

0:32:12.684 --> 0:32:15.644
<v Speaker 1>know the salaries are lower. But what I didn't realize

0:32:15.764 --> 0:32:18.964
<v Speaker 1>was that the NBA players get fifty percent revenue share

0:32:19.404 --> 0:32:22.084
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what goes towards their salary, whereas the

0:32:22.204 --> 0:32:27.244
<v Speaker 1>WNBA only get ten percent. So even if we account

0:32:27.364 --> 0:32:32.044
<v Speaker 1>for the lower revenue of the WNBA, they're still getting screwed, right,

0:32:32.084 --> 0:32:35.164
<v Speaker 1>They're still getting a much smaller percentage of the overall

0:32:35.204 --> 0:32:38.364
<v Speaker 1>revenue share than the male players. And this, I think

0:32:38.404 --> 0:32:40.724
<v Speaker 1>is something that is general to the league and not

0:32:40.964 --> 0:32:44.004
<v Speaker 1>just to Kaitlin Clark, even though obviously we know Caitlyn's

0:32:44.044 --> 0:32:47.164
<v Speaker 1>getting now doubly screwed because that superstar effect is not

0:32:47.284 --> 0:32:50.524
<v Speaker 1>actually applying to her, right, it is applying to her

0:32:50.604 --> 0:32:53.884
<v Speaker 1>in certain endorsement deals, but it's not applying to her

0:32:53.884 --> 0:32:56.084
<v Speaker 1>when it just comes to her basic salary. And that

0:32:56.124 --> 0:32:58.844
<v Speaker 1>pushes people like her, as you said, and like Brittany

0:32:58.844 --> 0:33:03.204
<v Speaker 1>Griner to go play abroad where they might get detained

0:33:03.684 --> 0:33:07.124
<v Speaker 1>because there's just no revenue opportunity in the United States.

0:33:08.004 --> 0:33:11.724
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, look, women's basketball has not historically had

0:33:12.324 --> 0:33:16.204
<v Speaker 2>as much of an audience as men's basketball, particularly not

0:33:16.564 --> 0:33:19.524
<v Speaker 2>outside of the US. So in the NBA. The European

0:33:19.604 --> 0:33:23.964
<v Speaker 2>leagues are are relatively speaking more competitive, but in general,

0:33:24.324 --> 0:33:27.044
<v Speaker 2>there are genetic differences between men and women, and those

0:33:27.084 --> 0:33:29.884
<v Speaker 2>manifest themselves and things that are relevant to athletic competition,

0:33:30.044 --> 0:33:32.964
<v Speaker 2>like who can jump farthest or run fastest or things

0:33:33.364 --> 0:33:33.924
<v Speaker 2>things like that.

0:33:34.164 --> 0:33:36.724
<v Speaker 1>Right, I'm gonna I'm gonna interject here to say that

0:33:36.804 --> 0:33:40.764
<v Speaker 1>Kitlyn Clark was the top overall scorer in NCAA history,

0:33:40.804 --> 0:33:41.644
<v Speaker 1>which includes men.

0:33:42.204 --> 0:33:44.644
<v Speaker 2>But she's competing against women. I'm not gonna get away. No,

0:33:44.764 --> 0:33:46.564
<v Speaker 2>that's that's a good point. I don't fine because she's

0:33:46.564 --> 0:33:49.844
<v Speaker 2>competing against women and not men. But for the most

0:33:49.884 --> 0:33:53.684
<v Speaker 2>part people, it's kind of socially constructed, Like why do people,

0:33:53.764 --> 0:33:58.164
<v Speaker 2>for example, watch college basketball at all? Right, the games

0:33:58.164 --> 0:34:01.684
<v Speaker 2>are much much, much worse than the NBA. It's because

0:34:01.724 --> 0:34:03.644
<v Speaker 2>people like are not watching for the pure sake of

0:34:03.684 --> 0:34:07.164
<v Speaker 2>athletic competition. And I think maybe a lot of mostly

0:34:07.204 --> 0:34:11.444
<v Speaker 2>male decision makers underestimated their market ability of women's basketball,

0:34:11.844 --> 0:34:13.684
<v Speaker 2>and now there's a big correction, and I think I

0:34:13.724 --> 0:34:17.404
<v Speaker 2>think that players should demand their restructuring, like sooner rather

0:34:17.404 --> 0:34:20.124
<v Speaker 2>than later. I mean, it may have been appropriate compensation

0:34:20.924 --> 0:34:24.804
<v Speaker 2>given what the league's ratings were up until Caitlyn Clark,

0:34:24.924 --> 0:34:27.764
<v Speaker 2>and now it's going to be in all likelihood different,

0:34:27.964 --> 0:34:31.004
<v Speaker 2>and you know, they should use whatever marketing power they

0:34:31.004 --> 0:34:33.764
<v Speaker 2>have to rectify that as soon as possible because now

0:34:33.764 --> 0:34:34.684
<v Speaker 2>they are being underpaid.

0:34:35.444 --> 0:34:37.724
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, And you said you said a phrase in there

0:34:37.804 --> 0:34:41.364
<v Speaker 1>that I think is absolutely crucial, which is socially constructed, right.

0:34:41.444 --> 0:34:44.244
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that a lot of this, a

0:34:44.324 --> 0:34:47.564
<v Speaker 1>lot of the compensation, a lot of the historical differences.

0:34:47.924 --> 0:34:50.244
<v Speaker 1>And this is not just true of basketball, This is

0:34:50.364 --> 0:34:53.604
<v Speaker 1>just now, you know, more broadly speaking, when it comes

0:34:53.604 --> 0:34:56.844
<v Speaker 1>to men versus women's gender pay gaps, et cetera, is

0:34:56.884 --> 0:35:01.884
<v Speaker 1>a result of generations of socially constructed norms and what

0:35:01.964 --> 0:35:06.004
<v Speaker 1>people you know, are doing versus not doing. And so

0:35:06.044 --> 0:35:09.524
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's absolutely crucial to remember as we

0:35:09.564 --> 0:35:12.404
<v Speaker 1>talk about, you know, moving forward, what is reasonable? What

0:35:12.444 --> 0:35:15.924
<v Speaker 1>isn't it reasonable? Because even you know that fifty versus

0:35:16.004 --> 0:35:18.724
<v Speaker 1>ten percent revenue share, now they can you know, can

0:35:18.764 --> 0:35:19.924
<v Speaker 1>they push for fifty percent?

0:35:20.164 --> 0:35:20.284
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:35:20.284 --> 0:35:23.364
<v Speaker 1>Because that accounts for that accounts for the fact that

0:35:23.404 --> 0:35:25.924
<v Speaker 1>there are differences. They're not saying we need to be

0:35:25.964 --> 0:35:28.644
<v Speaker 1>paid as much money as the men. They're saying we

0:35:28.724 --> 0:35:32.644
<v Speaker 1>want to proportionally be paid as much money as the men.

0:35:32.804 --> 0:35:36.804
<v Speaker 1>And to me, that's absolutely reasonable. And you know, obviously

0:35:37.164 --> 0:35:39.524
<v Speaker 1>I'm a woman and I've been on the I've been

0:35:39.524 --> 0:35:42.244
<v Speaker 1>on the bottom end of the of the gender pay

0:35:42.244 --> 0:35:42.764
<v Speaker 1>gap from you.

0:35:43.524 --> 0:35:48.924
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, look, when you are charging one hundred bucks for

0:35:49.084 --> 0:35:53.164
<v Speaker 2>a cheap seat for a regular season WNBA game in Brooklyn.

0:35:54.644 --> 0:35:57.244
<v Speaker 2>That's real money. That really adds up there whatever eighteen

0:35:57.284 --> 0:35:59.764
<v Speaker 2>thousand people in that stadium, and Caitlin Clark, you're going

0:35:59.764 --> 0:36:02.044
<v Speaker 2>to sell out every arena as long as she remains

0:36:02.084 --> 0:36:06.364
<v Speaker 2>healthy and isn't a total flop. That's real money, and

0:36:06.484 --> 0:36:09.364
<v Speaker 2>the players who are generating that money deserve more of it.

0:36:10.444 --> 0:36:14.004
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, And I think that we need to look more

0:36:14.164 --> 0:36:18.364
<v Speaker 1>at that argument as opposed to their gender differences, because

0:36:18.684 --> 0:36:21.364
<v Speaker 1>it's incredibly easy to get bogged down in that and

0:36:21.404 --> 0:36:24.564
<v Speaker 1>then to start using that as an excuse. So in

0:36:24.604 --> 0:36:27.164
<v Speaker 1>my own area, right, I'm a writer, I'm a speaker,

0:36:27.564 --> 0:36:30.524
<v Speaker 1>and I happen to know with one hundred percent certainty

0:36:30.564 --> 0:36:33.284
<v Speaker 1>because I've actually talked to people about this and compared

0:36:33.644 --> 0:36:37.484
<v Speaker 1>that I get paid less for speaking engagements, I get

0:36:37.724 --> 0:36:41.084
<v Speaker 1>lower advances, I get paid less a lot of the

0:36:41.124 --> 0:36:43.804
<v Speaker 1>time than male counter perhaps who don't have a PhD.

0:36:44.164 --> 0:36:46.684
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I got that fucking PhD so

0:36:46.724 --> 0:36:49.364
<v Speaker 1>that I could have those three letters behind my name,

0:36:49.604 --> 0:36:52.044
<v Speaker 1>because as a woman, I need that in a way

0:36:52.084 --> 0:36:54.964
<v Speaker 1>that men don't. Just like Caitlin Clark to achieve what

0:36:55.044 --> 0:36:57.244
<v Speaker 1>she needed to, she has to be a million times

0:36:57.244 --> 0:37:00.404
<v Speaker 1>more extraordinary than a man, right, like, that's what you

0:37:00.484 --> 0:37:03.564
<v Speaker 1>have to do to get over that. And even still

0:37:03.884 --> 0:37:06.084
<v Speaker 1>I have people who say, oh, you don't know what

0:37:06.084 --> 0:37:09.284
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about in psychology, and they have an armchair degree, right,

0:37:09.564 --> 0:37:13.604
<v Speaker 1>They've never studied psychology at the level that I have,

0:37:13.844 --> 0:37:15.524
<v Speaker 1>and yet they say that to me all the time.

0:37:15.684 --> 0:37:20.724
<v Speaker 2>Look as the kind of dumb sports pro between the

0:37:20.724 --> 0:37:28.644
<v Speaker 2>two of us, Right, I somewhat object to how what

0:37:28.804 --> 0:37:33.244
<v Speaker 2>you can map those differences in things like speaking gigs

0:37:33.244 --> 0:37:37.804
<v Speaker 2>onto sports where there are more objective measures of performance.

0:37:38.164 --> 0:37:40.964
<v Speaker 2>But I think like championing women's sports is like something

0:37:40.964 --> 0:37:45.284
<v Speaker 2>that like young women and young men like. Right, the

0:37:45.324 --> 0:37:47.764
<v Speaker 2>social norm around that changed fast. I mean I have

0:37:47.844 --> 0:37:52.764
<v Speaker 2>heard more conversation about women's basketball from my sports breou

0:37:52.844 --> 0:37:56.524
<v Speaker 2>friends in the past six months than I have in

0:37:56.524 --> 0:37:59.764
<v Speaker 2>my entire lifetime before that, Right, And so I think

0:38:00.524 --> 0:38:02.404
<v Speaker 2>encouraging that behavior, I mean, I think, for example, the

0:38:02.404 --> 0:38:05.124
<v Speaker 2>Insane Tournament is a lot more fun. We need these

0:38:05.244 --> 0:38:08.004
<v Speaker 2>kind of two tournaments going on together. You can bet,

0:38:08.044 --> 0:38:11.204
<v Speaker 2>by the way, on on the women's game. I made

0:38:11.244 --> 0:38:14.284
<v Speaker 2>a fair amount of money betting on women's college basketball

0:38:14.324 --> 0:38:16.084
<v Speaker 2>this this march. That was that was you know, a

0:38:16.084 --> 0:38:17.844
<v Speaker 2>way to get into the sport too for certain people.

0:38:18.204 --> 0:38:19.884
<v Speaker 2>But lo, look, I think this is good, and I

0:38:19.884 --> 0:38:24.124
<v Speaker 2>think Kate and Clark needs to demand demand that she

0:38:24.284 --> 0:38:26.604
<v Speaker 2>is paid for the revenue she generates for the league

0:38:26.604 --> 0:38:28.644
<v Speaker 2>because this whole thing wouldn't be happening. Maybe it's not true,

0:38:28.644 --> 0:38:32.964
<v Speaker 2>maybe you'd have some other focal point, inflection point, but no,

0:38:33.084 --> 0:38:35.884
<v Speaker 2>she should. We should have a whole march on the

0:38:36.004 --> 0:38:37.884
<v Speaker 2>NBA offices on Park Avenue. Would have ever be like

0:38:37.884 --> 0:38:39.884
<v Speaker 2>pay Kate and Clark more. I agree on that on

0:38:39.924 --> 0:38:42.564
<v Speaker 2>that point at least, maybe not for the same reasons,

0:38:42.564 --> 0:38:44.244
<v Speaker 2>but like I agree with the conclusion.

0:38:45.004 --> 0:38:47.004
<v Speaker 1>All right, excellent. So we can agree on the conclusion

0:38:47.044 --> 0:38:49.244
<v Speaker 1>and we can hope that when we're having this conversation

0:38:49.324 --> 0:38:53.324
<v Speaker 1>again on episode one thousand and one of Risky Business,

0:38:53.724 --> 0:38:56.164
<v Speaker 1>that we'll be able to look back and say thank

0:38:56.244 --> 0:39:00.324
<v Speaker 1>you to Caitlin Clark for being kind of the catalyst

0:39:00.804 --> 0:39:03.884
<v Speaker 1>for a revolution in the gender pay gap and how

0:39:03.924 --> 0:39:05.764
<v Speaker 1>people compensate women.

0:39:05.644 --> 0:39:06.844
<v Speaker 2>For what they do.

0:39:09.484 --> 0:39:11.564
<v Speaker 1>Ki Business is hosted by me Maria.

0:39:11.324 --> 0:39:13.524
<v Speaker 2>Kannakova and me Nate Silver.

0:39:13.924 --> 0:39:17.164
<v Speaker 1>The show is a co production of Pushkin Industries and iHeartMedia.

0:39:17.724 --> 0:39:21.484
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Isabel Carter Our Executive producer

0:39:21.604 --> 0:39:25.964
<v Speaker 1>is Jacob Goldstein. Special thanks to Sarah Nix, Sarah Bruger,

0:39:26.444 --> 0:39:31.524
<v Speaker 1>Eric Sandler, Kira Posey, Greta Cohne, Christina Sullivan, Kerrie Brody,

0:39:31.964 --> 0:39:37.044
<v Speaker 1>Owen Miller, Farah Daygrunge, Jordan McMillan, and Jake Gorsky. If

0:39:37.044 --> 0:39:39.204
<v Speaker 1>you like the show, please rate and review us so

0:39:39.284 --> 0:39:41.844
<v Speaker 1>other people can find us too. Thanks for listening.