WEBVTT - Best Of - Should Shedeur Sanders START for Browns? Nick CANNOT BELIEVE Colin Cowherd & Bill Simmons Chiefs takes

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Best of the Week for What's Right

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Wright, the best takes and moments from this

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>week on the show. Enjoy Chador.

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 2>He looked pretty good. I mean, he looked fantastic, but

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 2>he looked pretty good for a quarterback who went there

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>and did his thing. Head coach Steven Kevin Stefanski still

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 2>hasn't committed to Shador. So do you think that he

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:24.160
<v Speaker 2>showed everything he needed to do to get the starting job?

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you well? He's definitely not going to be

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>their Week one starter. That is gonna be Joe Flacco.

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think. By the way, if I were Shadoor,

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I know he can't say this. I wouldn't even want

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>to be the Week one starter. Like I would rather

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the Browns open with the Ravens and then they play

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, the Brown's open with the Bengals, so I

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't actually hate that because of the Bengals defense, but

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>then they go Ravens, Packers, Lions, Vikings, Steelers, like those

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are not defenses. I'm interested in playing it right, all

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. And I understand that the Browns just released

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>their latest depth chart and Shador is still number four.

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>They did not move him up at all, I don't

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>believe it. I think that Shadoor has now if we

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>are being fair, he has taken it is now Dylan

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Gabriel who is chasing Shador in the quarterback competition instead

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of vice versa. Like the you know, the old adage

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't lose your job due to injury is total bs.

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Happens in sports all the time. People lose their job

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>because of injury and because the guy who fills in

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>for you shows something he didn't have the opportunity to

0:01:53.440 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>show before. And so if Flacco is just entrenched at one,

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>which I think he is, Kenny Pickett was two and

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is two on the late step chart. He's been hurt

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the last couple weeks of camp. Doesn't look like he's

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna play at all, and he didn't play in their

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>first preseason game. Doesn't look like he's been playing their second.

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Gabriel is three. Gabriel, according to all reports on

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the ground, has been bad in practice and was injured

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>for the first preseason game. Shadores four. He's practiced well

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and I thought made four very high level throws in

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>that game and really only made a couple bad mistakes. Yeah,

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that is enough to where he

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>should have taken the lead on Gabriel, and the goal

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>for either of these rookies flatly needed to be beat

0:02:55.760 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>out the other rookie. So when at when Flacco inevitably

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 1>gets benched, I'm the guy they go to. Now, maybe

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>they'll go to pick it, but I think that would

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>be asinine. And so now I also think this Demanse.

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Gabriel will and should start preseason game number two,

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and then you know he can if he plays well

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>in the store.

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Both of them have. I think that's what we'll do.

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I could even see him go, Demanse, quarter quarter quarter,

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what they're thereabouts, Like, I could see Gabriel

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>playing then shoudor then Gabriel back in then should or

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>that way, you know what I mean. You get more

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>time with starting caliber players or you know, guys that

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>are actually going to make the team, or they each

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>get it. But I now think Gabriel, I think Shador

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>is now amongst the rookies in pole position. And I

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>also think that, and this is why so I thought

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>after the game him saying something to Tony Grosy was

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>totally fine and I think people don't recognize how common

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that is that guys sang after games in locker rooms

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are in the tunnel to reporters like, hey, what was

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>up with that? That has happened forever? That used to

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>happen to me. I remember Matt Cassel saying to a

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>different media member, we're both standing there. When he realized

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>that media member, you know what. I think it was

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to Mark Carmon, our friend whose birthday was actually yesterday.

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it was to karm that he said to him,

0:04:44.240 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>this is your buddy about me? He's like, yeah, He's like,

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>he sure talks a lot of shit, doesn't He like,

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>did not like some of the things I had said

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>about him. That's super common. So I have no problem

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.280
<v Speaker 1>at all with Shador having that moment with Tony.

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:03.119
<v Speaker 2>Grosy time, though, what you need to be worried about?

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>So here is the thing on that. I think the

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.239
<v Speaker 1>smile and the laugh at the end made it okay.

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think that like charisma and charm and a

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>great smile can really carry Yeah, and so like that

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>to me was fine. I thought the walk in was

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>a misstep. I didn't think it was a grievous error,

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>but I thought, I'm not asking you to be someone

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not, but turned down the volume on literally on

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the boombox, I guess, and also figuratively. Now I understand

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>those were his teammates, not his entourage, but still you're

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback, the guy carrying the giant walking stick staff

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in the boombox. I might have been like, can we

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>not do that? And if you really want to walk

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in like that, maybe I'll go in, you know, a

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit after you. Because it's.

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 2>He is.

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>If the Browns won't elevate him on their real depth chart,

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>then he also wants another team to trade for him,

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, And so I just don't think that helps.

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.839
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think it's a huge deal. You'd certainly

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>rather him play well and have an awkward pre and

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>postgame then be perfect pre and post game and playport.

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, go ahead, No, I mean with that take, you

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 2>were saying that maybe he should show out for the Rams,

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 2>or maybe the Rams look at him, because words like

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 2>a mortal chamber are being thrown around very serious. I

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know, do you think that's more of a possibility now,

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 2>like it's more serious.

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that right now he's probably worth he was

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>drafted with a fifth. I think he's worth at least

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 1>a fourth, you know what I mean? And so, but

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't I think the Browns want to keep him.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Stefanski might be coming around if he wasn't

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>already there. And I think you had to be impressed

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>by how he handled himself and how he played this Sunday.

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Was it Sunday? Saturday? Friday?

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 2>It was Friday, it was Thursday, Friday?

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Demanda, let's go to the listener questions.

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 2>T asked, where do you think Alan Lamar rank all

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 2>time right this moment just his quarterback talents? I'd say

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 2>both Top fifteen side question, are the smelling salts going

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 2>to ruin your life?

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Smelling salts are not going to ruin my life? But

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, strong recommend if people haven't tried him yet,

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're like maybe trying to kick caffeine or

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>something like. I haven't right into the put in downsides

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of houff pneumonia occasionally, but it sure woke me up.

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Where do Lamar and Allen rank just as quarterback talents?

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>What an interesting question? Top fifteen sounds right like if

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I were ranking just quarter just raw talent, quarterbacks. Ever,

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that's what Yeah, that's what they're saying, saying all time.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes Rogers are to me the top two.

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Lamar's got to be like top ten at least any

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 2>same thing. But I feel like both those guys, those

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 2>are electric dudes as far as this talent, like no,

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe not one, Yeah, those are.

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think safely so raw talent, Mahomes raw

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Farv has to be up there. Manning has to be

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 1>up there. It's a compliment to Brady that we're not

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>even like saying him with all of his success, because

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, he maximized everything about his physical ability. Marino's

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>got to be up there. I always have had a

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>soft spot for Steve Young. John Elway's up there. And

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>now we can start talking Lamar and Josh you know

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. Like, so, yeah, the in that bottom

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>part of the top tens firmly in the top fifteen.

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's right. All right, let's go to Ethan.

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Ethan asked, as a poker expert who understands the principle

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 2>of the plus ev. I'm curious if you take the

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 2>same approach into sports gambling, or if you trust your

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 2>own personal bias over sharp books.

0:09:56.280 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't look at I don't look at sports spending

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 1>the way I look at poker. Just for the record,

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>like I don't, I don't, while I do try every

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>year to give out winners and to you know, make

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>you guys money. I I am.

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 2>A little bit more conservative with poker.

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't know a bit. No, I just look

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>at it like poker, I am trying to make the

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>best decision at every point. Sports I have a very

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>hard time betting against my takes, you know what I mean.

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I won't always bet on my takes, but like I

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it's why I'll I'll never, even if I'm getting points,

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 1>bet against the chiefs, you know what I mean. So like,

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>there are just certain things that so that's but I

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>also I and this is how I would recommend it

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>for other people look at sports betting as a recreational endeavor,

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>not like, hey, this is how I'm gonna make extra money.

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Poker's different in that regard for me. All right, let's

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>keep going.

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Michael ass is Jackson better than Prime Vig?

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Yes, love Mike, but yes, Lamar is a far already

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a far better passer than Mike ever was just you

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>know what, I mean, he just is and I love Mike,

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>but that's I think Mike would tell you that next.

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Indy, Nick, do you think that everyone is just so

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 2>skewed by fantasy football? Josh Lamar have been excellent fantasy quarterbacks,

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 2>so people assume that they are the best.

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think that absolutely is something to do with it.

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely think that the crazy fantasy numbers impact this one.

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Hum noah, yeah, no, no, ass When is the Future

0:11:58.400 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>show going to happen?

0:11:59.320 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 2>It's like soon.

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So we have a show Thursday, then we're off

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:09.080
<v Speaker 1>for a week, and then the Our Futures in our

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Gambling show will probably be a two part thing Tuesday

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and Thursday next week to get us ready for football season,

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>right in line with predictions week on First Things First,

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and Diego says has snakes enthusiast Kevin Wild's weight in

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>on Demonse's reptiles. That's good. That's a good First Things

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>First joke, and I appreciate it. UFC three to nineteen

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is blowing back to the Windy City. I bet Colin's

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be there. Check out the Fight Guard and

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>get in on all the action at DraftKings Sportsbook, the

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>official sports betting partner of UFC, Dracus du Plessi puts

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>his middleweight title up against kam Zat Chamaiev who's a

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 1>perfect fourteen. And oh, who are you taking? First time

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>betting on UFC at DraftKings. Pick something simple like a

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>fighter to win and make your pick. It's that easy.

0:12:57.880 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you're new to DraftKings, check this out. New

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>customers who bet five dollars will get two hundred dollars

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in bonus bets instantly. Don't mess out on all the

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 1>UFC three to nineteen action. Download the DraftKings sportsbook app

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>now and use code right. That's code right for new

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>customers to get two hundred dollars in bonus bets instantly

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>when you bet just five bucks only on DraftKings. The

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.079
<v Speaker 1>Crown is yours.

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in New York

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 3>called eight seven seven eight open wire text ope and

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 3>wy at four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut,

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 3>help is available for a problem gambling called eight eight

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 3>eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 3>CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothillki

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Cinamin Resorting Kansas twenty one on over agent Eligibility varies

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 3>by jurisdiction, Void and Ontario. Bet must win to receive

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 3>reward minimum minus five hundred odds required. Bonus bets expire

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and sixty eight hours after issue. Ins four

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 3>additional terms and responsible gaming resources see DKNG, dot co

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 3>slash audio.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Andy Reid down played all the naysayers, saying that the

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City's window is closing for the dynasty. Colin was

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 2>also one of those naysayers, saying that the winning is over.

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that the win Do you think that

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 2>the dynasty is continuable if they win the Super Bowl

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 2>this year?

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, hold on, I don't even think that's obviously. If

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>they win the super Bowl this year, the dynasty is

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>in progress. I want to focus more on Listen. I

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's well established how much I adore and love

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Colin Cowherd. His Chiefs takes Now, I mostly blame Jmack.

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that, like the proximity to Jmax's historically bad

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs takes have somehow there's been an osmosis of take

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that has impacted Colin. But they've been to three straight

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowls. They they had the best record in the

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL last year. They got it to.

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 2>The last one, right, they got it. They made it

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 2>to the last super Bowl. Like I think they have

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 2>to at least not make a super Bowl for the

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 2>dynasty to be over.

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Well I would think so, right yeah. And by the way,

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>like when we talk about dynasties in the NFL, the

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers is probably the most famous one. They won

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>two super Bowls. They then went two years without making

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the Super forget without winning it, without making the super Bowl,

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and then they won two more. We look at that

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>as one dynasty. The Patriots is an interesting one. I

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>don't consider the Pants one continuous dynasty, but if you do,

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>it went like this, won a super Bowl, missed the playoffs,

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>then won two super Bowls, then gosh, I'm gonna have

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to do this off the top of my head. Six

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>going for the three pat lost their first playoff game.

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, wait, five going for the three pat It's

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be hard to off top my head, but I'm

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna try. Lost their first playoff game. Six lost in

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Round two. Oh seven lost the Super Bowl. OH eight

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>missed the playoffs. Nine and twenty ten lost before the

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. Twenty eleven lost in the super Bowl twenty twelve,

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen lost before the Super Bowl, fourteen won the

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl, fifteen lost in Conference title game, sixteen won

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, seventeen lost the Super Bowl, eighteen won

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, nineteen lost in Round one. So if

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we want to do that as one long dynasty, then

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be impossible to say the Chiefs dynasty

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is over. If you consider the Patriots one long dynasty.

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>The Patri's went a decade without winning a Super Bowl.

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs have gone sixteen months, and so that part's

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>just ridiculous. It's just fundamentally ridiculous to say I'm declaring

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it dead when the Chiefs are in the midst of

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>or just completed I guess you would say the greatest

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>three year stretch in the history of the league. And

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>they have been to three consecutive Super Bowls and seven

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>straight AFC Championship Games. It's now if your take is

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>they're just not good enough anymore, it's a bold take,

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe like there's no evidence for it, But if it's

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>just your gut feeling, then so be it. Here is

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 1>here is what I find the most demands a ridiculous

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>about this Chief's fatalism stuff, and then we can move

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>on every team in the AFC that is chasing them.

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>If this year they have the exact season Kansas City

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>had last year, best last undefeated team, best record in

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, beat the Chiefs in the AFC playoffs, make

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, lose the super Bowl, it will be

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>considered evidence that that team is getting closer, and the

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>best season any of those teams have had in this era,

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs having that year is considered evidence of implosion.

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>But I am here to tell you if the Baltimore

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Ravens are the final one, or the Buffalo Bills, or

0:19:15.960 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the Cincinnati Bengals, or the Los Angeles Chargers or god forbid,

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Broncos or any of those teams, if they

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>are the last undefeated team, if they are fifteen to

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>one with the one seed locked up, they then beat

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs in the playoffs and then run into I

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>don't care who call it Philly or no, because Philly

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>then would go back to back that complicates things, call

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it the Lions and get blown out in the Super Bowl.

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>If that were to happen, and then I were to

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>go on TV and be like, that's this year was

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the end of that team. They're done. Now there is

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a time for a new chapter. People would say that, dude,

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you're just a hater. And this is also an element

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of my Mahomes frustration in and I'm

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about this on the TV show today

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>in how he's discussed. Do you agree to Monsday that

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>all Lamar, josh Ann Burrow the year they had last

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>year elevated them, even if not in their actual ranking,

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>but people elevated them their standing, and that people felt

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>their seasons combined with the year Mahomes had narrowed the

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.399
<v Speaker 1>gap for best quarterback, and some people flipped it. You

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>agree with that, right, That's like conventional wisdom, Okay. And

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this is where the point that I make that Mahomes

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is not judged against his peers, I think is crystallized.

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's pretend Patrick this year had any of their seasons

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>last year. Okay, Let's start with Joe. Patrick puts up

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 1>insane numbers and the Chiefs miss the playoffs. Does that

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 1>help or does anyone be like, Okay, that helped Patrick's.

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Back dynasty is definitely over.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So all right, let's do Lamar's year. Patrick puts

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>up insane numbers. The Chiefs are the you know, a

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>good but not great seed. They're the three, and for

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the first time in his career, he does not make

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a conference championship game because he loses in round two

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to one of the other rival quarterbacks. Does that help

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>or hurt Patrick's standing?

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Who had hurt him?

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:23.720
<v Speaker 1>It would hurt him all right, STU. Josh Patrick wins league,

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>MVP team has a really good record, they get the

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>two seed, and then to go back to the super Bowl,

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come through at the end and Josh beats him.

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Is anybody then being like, Okay, Patrick has reclaimed or

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they're like, oh mvpb damn Josh beat him? Now do

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the flip side for any of those guys, all three

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of them demons? Give them Patrick's year last year. They

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>have mediocre stats but lead the league in game winning

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 1>drives and comebacks, and he beats two of those guys

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>en route. I'm sorry, any of the those guys are

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the one seed and beat Patrick to get to the

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>super Bowl. Imagine if I then went on TV and

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 1>was like, yeah, but his touch there, you know, Lamar's

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>touchdown interception ratio wasn't that impressive. I'm actually dinging him.

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>It's just insane. And so I know I'm the Kansas

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>City guy. I know I have the tattoo that I

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>still don't know how to show on camera. I still

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know what I'm supposed to do here. It's just

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a disaster. There we go, I see, I don't even

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>know what I'm there we go. Well, it's just here's

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the thing. It's just boring. It's just boring. And I

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I also like just one other thing, because what has

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>become very in vogue and Bruce says it a lot,

0:24:15.080 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and he and I talked about this, not like d

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to talk about it, but discussed it on

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the air the other the other day, which is because

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>it's become very in vogue to say something along the

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>lines of like, oh, Mahomes is doing Brady's career in reverse,

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>where Brady in the beginning won but didn't have the stats,

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>and Mahomes and then later in his career had the

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>crazy numbers. Mahomes are but it's just inaccurate. And here's

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. Mahomes early and every year of his

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>career except the last two first five years one and

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>had MVP caliber stats and the last two years he's won,

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 1>but he hasn't had the crazy numbers until the playoffs.

0:25:04.640 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But this idea that Tom Brady post two thousand and

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>seven was just year in, year out, this statistical monster,

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>it's just not true. So Tom Brady two thousand and

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>seven had what at that point the greatest quarterback season ever.

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>He then misses two thousand and eight due to injury.

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Two thousand and nine, tom Brady's team was ten and

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>six and he had twenty eight touchdowns thirteen interceptions, and

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 1>they lost their first playoff game. Then twenty ten, he

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 1>had one of the greatest statistical seasons ever thirty six touchdowns,

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>four picks, and twenty eleven he was in line with

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>it thirty nine touchdowns, twelve picks, and then twenty twelve

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>it's down to a ninety eight passer rating and twenty

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 1>thirteen twenty five touchdowns, eleven picks and in eighty seven rating.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>That's in twenty thirteen, and then obviously twenty fourteen, they

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:15.520
<v Speaker 1>win the Super Bowl. Twenty fifteen, he has an all

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>time twenty fifteen sixteen to seventeen all time stats years

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>where he has a combined doing the math on the fly,

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety six touchdowns, fifteen picks, a one toh eight rating

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>over the course of three years. But then the very

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>next year twenty eighteen, they go eleven to five. He

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is twenty nine touchdowns eleven picks, but they win the

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl twenty nineteen twenty four touchdowns, eight picks in

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight rating and leaves the Patriots and then goes

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>on the sick run in Tampa. The point I'm making

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>is this, even Pete Brady had these season like the

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.879
<v Speaker 1>season where it's like, oh, twenty nine touchdowns, eleven picks,

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty four touchdowns, eight picks, twenty five touch downs eleven picks,

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it was not every single year statistical excellence. It was

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>every single year when the division make the playoffs, and

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it is at the tail end of his Patriots tenure,

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.360
<v Speaker 1>every single year make a conference championship game. But it's

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>just it's we've got to be honest about what real

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 1>expectations are, and we've got to be honest about what

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the guys who are allegedly in Patrick's league. If Patrick

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>had the season they just had, and they just had

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the season Patrick just had, how would we view it

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that's all I'm saying. Hey, guys, talking about my friends

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>at boost Mobile. Ever sign up for a phone plan,

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking wow, great price, and then a few months later

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like surprise, Bill's even higher. Boost Mobile. You've paid

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five dollars a month forever. That's unlimited talk, text

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and data starting at just one d five dollars a month,

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>No price hikes, no contract forever. Plus, boost Mobile is

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>now a legit nationwide five G network. They've invested billions

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 1>building five G towers across the country. Visit boostmobile dot

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>com or head to your local Boost store today and

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>get unlimited talk, text, and data for twenty five dollars

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a month forever. Five G speeds not available in all areas.

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>After thirty gigabytes, customers may experience slower speeds. Customers will

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>pay twenty five dollars a month as long as they

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>remain active on the Boost Unlimited plan. YEA.

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 2>So, a couple QB polls came out, quarterback rankings, whatever

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 2>you want to call them. So Bill Simmons debuted his

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 2>quarterback pyramid and he had Josh Allen at the top.

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Dan Orlofsky came out with a bunch of traits that

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 2>quarterback sho have is about six and had Patrick mahomes

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 2>number one and about the same amount of categories as

0:28:55.280 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Jones.

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So which one? Yeah?

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, zero? So which one of these is? And raging

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 2>you more? Which one do you want to ask?

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh, It's definitely Simmons's. And we're gonna deep dive on

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>it because it is not lost on me that my

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>pal and I like Bill. Bill and I have a

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>good relationship. But it is not lost to me that

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Bill Simmons kind of kicks off his full NFL coverage

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 1>with a podcast that debuts a quarterback pyramid and whose

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>main guest is Kevin Wilds. I'm not saying that Bill

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that this was a direct shot at me and you know,

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to pull apart. First things first, but I'm not

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>saying it wasn't. So I'll get to Bill in a second.

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>But on Orlofsky's thing, listen, I'm not gonna I'm not

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna argue with Dan. Dan obviously knows the quarterback position

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>better than me. I what I am gonna say is

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>this arm strength. He is Josh Allen one, Patrick two,

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>no problem. I actually agree with that, and I actually

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>think you could be tricky with that one. There might

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>be you might be able to say Herbert could be

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Patrick Hell. I don't know if Joe Milton's

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>availed eligible, like he could be like that just the

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>raw arm strength, Josh Allen one is totally fine, no

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>beef whatsoever. Then it gets dumb ball placement. Patrick Mahomes

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>five behind Joe Burrow again fine, Jaden, Lamar and Josh.

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that's a good take. I think

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people watch Lamar, Josh and Jaden and

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>they're like, they can just put it where they want

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>better than Patrick Mahomes.

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I was just thinking, like, how much of Burrows is

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 2>the fact that he has those crazy you are receivers.

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>They're just gonna well, No, I think Burrow is like

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 1>dumb accurate because he has to be because he's not

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>very fast and he doesn't have the strongest arm. So

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the only way he can be as successful as he

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:18.239
<v Speaker 1>is is like I think Burrow would maybe win the

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>contest of that net drill that Caleb failed the other

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 1>day if they did that, but like made it harder

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and harder and harder. I think Burrow might be my

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 1>number one pick. But call me crazy in that drill,

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't take Lamar over Patrick. Again, maybe I'm a hater.

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Next one, we get to mechanics where you list ten

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks and Patrick's not one of them. And let me

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you again, he has Lamar four. Yeah, I watch

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Lamar play quarterback, and I'm like, man, if only Patrick

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>had as clean of mechanics as Lamar does, I do like,

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel that way. I think it's a good take

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the other ones. And again again like the if Geno,

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Dak and Golf have better mechanics than Patrick, then maybe

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>mechanics are overrated. But mechanics didn't. Again, Patrick didn't make

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the top ten decision making with the football. Patrick came

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in fifth. Again I and then this is the this

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is the one that really I couldn't. I couldn't get

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 1>over pocket presence Burrow one, Lamar two, Patrick three. Okay,

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 1>like whatever, I'm not gonna I don't even I don't

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>even know what we're doing here. But fine, that's Orlowsky's list.

0:32:42.800 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>He has a more fine tuned I for quarterback than me.

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I suppose I think it is. I disagree with some

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of those, but that's not my real beef. My real

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>beef is with Bill, because Bill debuts his quarterback pyramid

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and has Josh Allen at the top. And the problem

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>with that is, and here's the problem with having as

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>long and as successful a career as Bill Simmons has had,

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and a career that so many folks, myself included obviously,

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>literally grew up reading every single one of your sports

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>takes because Bill's column was must read for every sports

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>fan of my generation for more than a decade. The

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>problem with having that level of influence and being having

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that long of a career is ear muffs, kids, We

0:33:53.680 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>remember what you fucking wrote. And for fifty f teen years,

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Bill fought tooth and nail against the idea that anyone

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>would ever, under any circumstances consider Peyton Manning better than

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady, even though for the entirety of those fifteen years,

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Peyton had a strong, a far stronger case to be

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>considered better than Peyton Manning. I'm sorry that. Let me

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>back that up. Peyton had a far stronger case to

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>be considered better than Brady then Josh would have right

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>now to be considered better than Patrick. And this is

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 1>where all of these quarterback rankings are going. To be

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>self defeating. But let me just quick off the top

0:35:01.880 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of my damn head, give you the Peyton versus Tom

0:35:09.440 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>first decade history. Win again a reminder, my pal Bill

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>built part of his massive empire on the take that

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady is better than Peyton Manning. If we go

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand to two thousand and five, Peyton has peeled MVPs,

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 1>but Peyton is zero to two in the playoffs against Tom.

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Tom has three championships, Peyton has none. Peyton has never

0:35:40.680 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>been to a Super Bowl. So even though Peyton Manning

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>statistically speaking, was the far superior quarterback with MVPs, he

0:35:49.200 --> 0:35:51.919
<v Speaker 1>had never beaten Tom in a big spot. The championships

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>were three to nothing. Then in two thousand and six,

0:35:56.480 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Peyton not only wins another I'm sorry, he's already won

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>two MVPs at that point, plays Tom in the AFC

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Championship game. Tom's up I think twenty one to three

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>at halftime. Peyton comes all the way back and wins

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, wins, it beats Tom, and the playoffs

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>are now two to one. Peyton wins the Super Bowl,

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and Bill, I think justifiably is still even though in

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that moment all pros. Peyton has multiple tom As zero.

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>MVPs Peyton has multiple tom As zero. The playoff win

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>loss record is two to one. The rings are three

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to one. Bill is still strident, steadfast correct Tom's better,

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:50.280
<v Speaker 1>seemingly vindicated by the fact that the next year Tom

0:36:50.400 --> 0:36:54.399
<v Speaker 1>finally wins his first MVP team goes undefeated. They look

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>like one of the greatest teams ever until as double

0:36:58.080 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>digit favorites, they get beat in the Super Bowl. In

0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that moment, even though the rings were three to one,

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 1>the MVPs were two to one, the all pros were

0:37:10.960 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 1>two to one or three to one, I'm not sure,

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and the playoff win loss record was two to one

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in Tom's direction in that moment, if anyone had debuted

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>the take, Peyton has passed Tom because Tom didn't win

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl last year, Bill's head would have exploded.

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And then, by the way, over the next decade, Tom

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>never beat Peyton in the playoffs again. There was a

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>brief time in Denver where it looked like maybe Peyton

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>had kind of overtaken the argument, and then Tom went

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 1>on that unbelievable twenty fourteen through twenty twenty run to

0:37:55.800 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>cemended himself as the goat. But every single football take

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:11.919
<v Speaker 1>we have heard for twenty years from Bill Simmons has

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>valued playoff performance, doing it in the biggest spots. And

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>if you've got the belt, someone's got to come take

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it from you. So when I saw the clip yesterday,

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>where the rationale for elevating Josh Allen, who is again

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>unlike Peyton Brady, where Peyton had the stats and Brady

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>had the wins, Maholmes has moral pros, more MVPs, better

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>career numbers, five trips to the Super Bowl to zero,

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>three rings to zero, and is four and zero in

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs against him. When I hear the argument that

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes played so poorly in the Super Bowl, he falls

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 1>down a peg without the obvious follow up being why

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't Josh in the Super Bowl? Bill? Because he couldn't

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>beat Patrick again? And that is where and again, I

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>think Josh is the second best quarterback in the league.

0:39:43.600 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Now that Josh has a league MVP, I'm comfortable calling

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 1>him a future Hall of Famer. I think Josh eventually

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to break through. I think Josh's ability last

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>year to cut down on the turnovers and still care

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a team that wasn't all that talented at the skill position,

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly on the outside was wildly impressive. But we have

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to stop acting like these have been unfair fights, or

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Josh hasn't had his chance in back to back years

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs. Once in Josh's building, once in Patrick's building,

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Josh has gotten the ball late fourth quarter, down three

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 1>points the first time. He can only get them to

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 1>not the edge of field goal range, but not a

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>gimme field goal forty four yard or if I remember,

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and that would have only gotten them the tie. With

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of minutes left. There's a chance, finish the game,

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>ball in your hands. Don't let Patrick come back and

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:09.280
<v Speaker 1>get it. They come away with zero points. Then last

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>year down three Conference championship game, plenty of time, can't

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:25.719
<v Speaker 1>get to midfield, So do not do you cannot. And

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 1>this is why the quarterback ranking stuff right now can

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 1>be so frustrating for people. Has Patrick played in the

0:41:34.920 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 1>regular season his best ball in the last couple of years? No,

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>but who are again? And I've said it before, I

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>will say it again if you want to argue, you

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 1>know what, Jalen Hurts is the best quarterback in the league.

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone actually believes that, except for maybe

0:41:56.880 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Jalen's lovely mother, who dressed me down a bit the

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:04.720
<v Speaker 1>night before the Super Bowl. I don't even think Jalen

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>believes that. But if you want to argue that, at

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:10.319
<v Speaker 1>least there is a case you can make. But for

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the other three guys, as I sat a moment ago,

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the argument becomes instantly self defeating. Burrows' claim to fame

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is what he did in the first two the first

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>postseason and a half of his career, going into Arrowhead,

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>beating Patrick, getting to the Super Bowl, then getting back

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>to the AFC Championship Game, and then he had a

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty miserable second half with a chance to go to

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a second straight Super Bowl, got the ball, tie game,

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 1>go get a field goal, got negative yards, loses, and

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 1>has not been back to the postseason since. There is

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:07.160
<v Speaker 1>no time in the history of Pro football when there

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have been multiple first ballot Hall of Famers active in

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>their prime where we would say a guy elevated himself

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>to best quarterback in the league in a two year

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 1>stretch where he plays zero playoff games not eligible. Lamar,

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 1>who's in the midst of arguably as good of a

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 1>two year regular season stretch as any player at his

0:43:36.600 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 1>position ever when that player to varying degrees, and this

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:52.920
<v Speaker 1>past year was the most positive sign has come up

0:43:52.960 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>against the other two guys who he is in the

0:44:00.719 --> 0:44:08.200
<v Speaker 1>debate with for who's the best and both games gotten

0:44:08.360 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>out played by and lost to in the postseason Patrick

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:21.320
<v Speaker 1>two years ago and Josh last year. He's not gonna

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:29.760
<v Speaker 1>have it. And across all of sports except for maybe

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 1>there were some people arguing Jerry West was better than

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Bill Russell. But with respect, as great as the Mahomes

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Reid Chiefs are, they are not the institutionally top to

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 1>bottom more talented team like the Russell Celtics. We have

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>never made an argument that win every single year for

0:44:54.719 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a half decade, one guy beats an out plays another

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:06.640
<v Speaker 1>guy in the postseason that the other guy's better. It's

0:45:06.680 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a again for the entirety of Peyton versus Brady, when

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Peyton was a cult that whole decade plus. They only

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 1>played in the postseason three times and it was two

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to one Tom, and it was still framed correctly as

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:35.000
<v Speaker 1>if Tom held over him in the postseason. Imagine if

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:37.279
<v Speaker 1>they played four times and it was four to zero

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and So again, this is what I would ask my

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>pal Bill if Tom had beaten Peyton in six and

0:45:50.160 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 1>then gone on to lose that Super Bowl, and he

0:45:54.719 --> 0:45:57.920
<v Speaker 1>was up three to zero in the playoffs and the

0:45:58.040 --> 0:46:01.280
<v Speaker 1>ring count was three zero and the super Bowl count

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:07.800
<v Speaker 1>was for zero, and someone made the argument that Peyton

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Manning was better based on Tom playing poorly in this

0:46:14.760 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>make believe two thousand and six super Bowl, what would

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 1>your reaction have been? And the answer as we know, so,

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>can we please please have a level of consistency on this,

0:46:34.280 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that's all. Honestly, that didn't go quite as long as

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought. And again I'm not trying to act like

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I invented the pyramid style ranking of quarterbacks. What I

0:46:50.080 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>will say is, if you're going to really do it,

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:58.360
<v Speaker 1>each level has to be one player bigger than the previous.

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't go one, two, three, four five, five, five

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>five five. That's not the idea that that's not how

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:10.399
<v Speaker 1>a pyramid looks either at the and I mean it's

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just not. I mean I don't either. That's a crayon.

0:47:13.080 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 1>That's how a crayon looks, not how a pyramid looks.

0:47:16.280 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>That's first of all. Second of all, my Buddy Kate

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 1>W could have given you pointers on that when he

0:47:23.600 --> 0:47:24.720
<v Speaker 1>was on the pod with you.