WEBVTT - Why the World Keeps Getting Shocked by China's Technological Progress

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Tracy, we talk a lot about the tech competition between

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>the US and China, but I still think we talked

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>about it in sort of broad strokes. We talked about

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 2>some of the policies obviously made in twenty twenty five,

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>but actually how the process of tech innovation in China

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 2>still seems like important. There's more to learn about there.

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 3>I totally agree. And actually we have a really good

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 3>example recently in the form of deep Seek, right, and

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 3>this thing that people acted like it came out of nowhere,

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 3>but actually a lot of the papers had been published

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 3>over the course of months, but it seemed to surper right.

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if it's true, you know, the story that, oh,

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 2>is just the side project of a quantitative hedge fund,

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Like that's such a good story. I'm not entirely sure

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 2>if that's true. And they made it so like, oh yeah,

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 2>well they were doing this quant fun they built deep

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Seek on the side, like such a it's such an

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 2>alluring story.

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 3>Well, not just a quant hedge fund. Isn't the story

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 3>supposedly that the founder decided to go into AI after

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.279
<v Speaker 3>she Shinping was kind of complaining, Yeah, how much talent

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 3>and resources is being wasted on finance in various ways.

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, heard that.

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>People like these are like great stories, right, and of

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 2>course there is a lot of truth to them in

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the particularly in the broad sense that we know that

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>and we talked about this at the time. Several years

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>ago there was this sort of announced hard pivot away

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 2>from the sort of like consumer internet tech and they

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 2>sort of had their legs cut out from under them

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 2>towards these more like serious capital t tech hardware, hardware,

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 2>things like that, things that have more stakes than say

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 2>social networking or something like that. So like, how do

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 2>you actually do that?

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 4>Though?

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 2>How do you actually like direct talent in certain ways?

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think that if President Trump came out

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow and said, we want people to and you guys

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 2>actually talked about this, but then we want to do

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 2>more hard tech, I don't think there's like a real easy,

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:25.799
<v Speaker 2>straightforward mechanism and how do you transmit certain ambitions into

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the actual landscape. I think there's more to be learned

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 2>on that well.

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 3>I think also We in America are very used to

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 3>thinking about technology as this like very creative process and

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 3>the outcome of Jeff Bezos working in his garage, Yeah,

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 3>something like that, And it's hard to imagine often the

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:47.800
<v Speaker 3>same environment existing in China. I think that's just like

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 3>a cultural difference perhaps between Americans and Chinese.

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 2>So we should talk about it totally. Well, I'm really

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 2>excited to say we're gonna be talking to one of

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.480
<v Speaker 2>the best China watchers there is who has a lot

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 2>of interesting thoughts on this time topic, someone we've never

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 2>had on the podcast. We're going to be speaking with

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Kaiser quote. He is the host of the Seneca Podcast,

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 2>which has been around since twenty ten.

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've been doing this for about little less than

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 2>ten years, so it's very impressive this sort of longevity.

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Someone who spent a lot of time in China, splits

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>his time between the US and China, lived there for

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 2>several years. Kaiser, thank you so much for coming on Outlocks.

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 4>Hi Joe, and Hey Tracy, This is a huge honor

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 4>for me. Thanks, thanks so much for having me.

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for coming on. What is the Seneca podcast?

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 2>What has been your project in the last fifteen years.

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So Sinica is an hour longer, sometimes much longer,

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 4>interview format show. We bring on academics and policymakers occasionally.

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 4>I've had a number of the former assistant Secretaries of State,

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 4>Free Stasia Pacific on. I've had no ambassadors and so

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 4>forth on. But it's changed the mission. It initially started

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 4>off as being sort of more here's what's in the news,

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 4>and here's a couple of people who can talk about

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 4>it intelligently having to do with China. Since twenty sixteen,

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 4>when I moved to the States, the focus has really

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 4>been on US China relations, and it's got more American

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 4>guests on than previously. We're but we tuckle everything under

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 4>the sun. I mean US China relations, China, India, China, Russia, China, India, China,

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 4>what have you, and the Chinese macroeconomy. Technology. Lots on

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 4>technology and culture. But the idea is that it's it's

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 4>supposed to look at the way that we think and

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 4>talk about China. Now it's really evolved into something with

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 4>which I think has a longer shelf life.

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Wait, why did you decide to start it? Because you

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 3>were in a band, right, that was your main gig.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's correct. Something for some reason, everyone knows about me.

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean I transitioned. I went out. I left that

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 4>band in nineteen ninety nine, and like other people who

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 4>didn't have many marketable skills, I.

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Went into podcasting.

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Well not right away. I mean I worked for internet

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 4>companies for a number of years, and I worked as

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 4>a reporter for quite number of years, and then in

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty ten it was just sort of on a lark.

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 4>I was about to start a job at bay Do

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 4>as they're head of international comms, and a very good

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 4>friend of mine in Beijing. We've gotten conversation about what

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 4>podcasts we're listening to, and I, you know, I said, oh,

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, the usual, this American Life and Radio Lab

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 4>and whatnot, and he had a few, and then we

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 4>just sort of said, why don't we start a podcast.

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 4>We're both talkers, we both know everybody. Let's just do

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 4>one and see what happens. And we did and it

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 4>took off. It did pretty well. We got acquired in

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 4>twenty sixteen, right around the time I was moving to

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 4>the States, and the company that bought us folded in

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty three, and I just sort of struck out

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 4>on my own doing a sub stack, and I've stuck

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 4>with it, managed to find a little bit of support

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 4>and those few and hopefully after this more subscribers. But

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 4>we're continuing to put them out every week. It's just

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 4>me solo, but it's a group effort.

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm in a band. I'm trying to go the other direction.

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I have a country music band, and maybe one day

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I'll leave casting. No, no, no, I've never got to

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.119
<v Speaker 2>leave podcasting behind.

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 4>You know, I'm actually not going to leave podcasting, but

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 4>I've gotten back into my old band Reform when I

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 4>was back in China recently. So are you on Spotify

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 4>as of this summer? We are. Yeah, you can look

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 4>up Twins show C h U and Qiu. You've got

0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 4>to put a space in between them for okays. It's

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 4>springing autumn in English.

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to start with like a really super broad

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 2>based question that maybe it's not even really that it's

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 2>probably a full hour long or too our long episode,

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 2>but in your years of covering China from a journalistic

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 2>perspective or at least from a sort of conversational perspective,

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 2>and watching American media or American pundit to talk about China,

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.479
<v Speaker 2>is there like a persistent blind spot or a thing

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 2>that stands out to you as something that people talk

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 2>about China that does not accord with your experience of

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 2>having lived there and having reported on it yourself.

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 4>Are There's so many I don't even know where to

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 4>start one that I would usually focus on. I mean,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 4>and it's a whole cluster of issues that are related

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 4>to this. But I think that people aren't mindful of

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 4>just how compressed and how rapid China's transformation has been,

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 4>what has happened in the course of one working lifetime.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I like to tell people that if you

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 4>can imagine graduating junior high or high school in nineteen

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 4>seventy nine on the eve of reform and opening, and

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 4>then forty years later, at the end of your life,

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 4>the end of your working life, you're thinking about retiring,

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 4>and you've seen the per capitaal GDP go from about

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and seventy five dollars at the beginning of

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 4>your working life till thirteen thousand dollars. Now, that transformation

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 4>is just profound and it's just so quick. So I

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 4>think that what people get wrong is that they don't

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 4>see that the hardware that's visibly advanced has done so,

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 4>just at a much faster pace than the software. People

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 4>don't change overnight. I mean, I like to that movie

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, Joe, if you and Tracy have seen Big.

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 2>With Ti Hang with My kids, keep going, yeah.

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, great movie. It's actually aged well. But you know,

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 4>Tom Hanks makes a wish and goes to bed at

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 4>what he's like eleven, and he wakes up and he's

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 4>in his thirties, right, And that's kind of China, right.

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 4>It's like the mind is still out of that eleven

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 4>year old in a lot of ways, but it's in

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 4>the body with thirty. So we look at this fully

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 4>grown adult and expect it to behave as a fully

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 4>grown adult.

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 3>That's what people get wrong, you know how I measure

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 3>China's technological progress go on. So I remember in the

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 3>early two thousands, I was on a trip in the

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 3>countryside and I experienced one of the worst toilets I've

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 3>ever experienced in my entire life, like basically just a

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 3>hole in the ground. And then I went back in

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty nineteen to Beijing and I went to one of

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 3>the nicest bathrooms that I've ever been in in like

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 3>a luxury shopping mall, and I thought, wow, things have changed.

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Yeah, that's a good measure. It's a good propit.

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I should do that all the time. Okay, So

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 3>I guess I'll just jump into the technology aspect of this.

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 3>But does technology come from a different place in China

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 3>versus the US? Kind of getting back to the intro,

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 3>there's this sense in America that technology is the product

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 3>of freedom and creativity, and you have the ability to

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 3>start a new company in your garage, whereas in China

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 3>maybe there's a different sense of how tech actually gets started.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so there's that American myth about the loan genius

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 4>toiling inbscurity in his garage, either in Menlo Park, New

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Jersey or Menlo Park, California. Right. I think there's some

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 4>of that's definitely that mythology in China, but I think

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 4>the reality is very, very different. I think China does

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 4>place a premium on that kind of ex nilo kind

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 4>of from scratch zero to one innovation, but I think

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 4>it places more of a premium on the scaling up

0:09:56.800 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 4>of technology and the diffusion of technology in a way

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 4>that I think the American mythology has sort of blinded

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 4>us to Yeah, we're constantly caught off guard by Chinese

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 4>technological advances.

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 4>I think we keep seeing this tech momentum despite all

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 4>the decoupling, despite the chip bands, in spite of all

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 4>the economic headwinds that China is obviously facing. And I

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 4>think that the reasons are pretty deep. They're actually societal

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 4>and even cultural, so that I think that gets to

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 4>part of the way that technology is conceived of in China.

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 4>You'll find pockets, of course, in America where people are

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 4>still really really techno optimistic. There's still very solutionists, they're

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 4>still very accelerationist, right, but it's incredibly common in China,

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 4>whereas it's only here in pockets. I think American society now,

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 4>and I think the West more broadly has for some

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 4>time now had a fear. If you look at our

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 4>science fiction, if you look at the way technology is

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 4>thought about broadly in society, there's a real anxiety over it. Right.

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 4>Our leading technologists, are leading natural scientists talk all the

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 4>time about the existential threat that AI pose is. I

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 4>don't want to diminish that threat, but I have to

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 4>say that in China, you just do not hear that conversation,

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 4>certainly not nearly as frequently, and not coming from the

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 4>leading technologists themselves. So it's very different.

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Why is it different? You know, I'm thinking about your

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.599
<v Speaker 2>big analogy. Actually I'm going to extend the metaphor a

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 2>little bit too far. But you know, my phone. I

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 2>have a love hate relationship with my phone. I'm on

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 2>it all the time, but I also think it's doing

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 2>significant damage to my mental health. Whereas if I were to, like,

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, my daughter wants a phone, and if I

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 2>were to give her one, she would probably be thrilled

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>for a long time. I'm not going to let her

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 2>have a phone for a long time, but she would

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 2>be like thrilled, and this is an incredible addition to

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 2>my life that she would be very excited about. Again,

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 2>do people have the same love hate relationships with gadgets

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 2>and new technologies that we seem to have here?

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there are some people, of course who have

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 4>anxieties over it, but no, I think broadly speaking, you know,

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 4>when I've sat on the sidelines of a soccer game

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 4>watching our kids play, and I'm trying to talk to

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 4>the other parent about how they limit screen time he's

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 4>there scrolling on his device, going, hey, I secon let

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 4>me asker this email. What we're saying just now about

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 4>screen time? What I mean, It's like the question doesn't compute.

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 4>They don't see it as such a threat. I think

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 4>part of that, of course, is because the social media

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 4>environment in China is a lot more sanitized. There isn't

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 4>the threat that Junior is going to be scrolling porn

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 4>all day, right, That's part of it. But I think

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 4>really more to the point is that for these many

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 4>years now, ordinary Chinese people have seen their lives, their

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 4>material lives just improve pretty much in lockstep with the

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 4>quality of the technology they have in their hand or

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 4>in their purse or in their pocket. Right. Their bandwidth

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 4>at home, how fast their network speed is, and how

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 4>powerful their handheld device is basically tracked with their livelihood. Right.

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 4>So there's not that reason for suspicion. Now, that isn't

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 4>to say that everyone in China has experienced It's certainly not,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 4>but I think for the vast majority, and not just

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 4>of urbanites, but the vast majority of people have seen

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 4>this correlation.

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Wait, but there is some negative feeling towards some technology

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 3>in China and I'm thinking specifically of She shin ping

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 3>and his big crackdown on consumer online tech. And he's

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 3>not a fan of video games precisely because he thinks

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 3>it's a waste of time and kids are staring at

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 3>the screen too much. So there is an element.

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 4>Of that that also tracks with the Chinese parent thing, right,

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 4>they all want us to be really good on computers,

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 4>but not to waste our time playing video games or

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 4>just chatting up people. Yeah, I think you were saying

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 4>it in your intro, and I thought that was really

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 4>interesting how Donald Trump he wouldn't be able to just

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.320
<v Speaker 4>simply order everyone, the physicists to start doing physics and

0:13:57.360 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 4>not go work for quantitative hedge funds in China, you

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of can, It's not. I mean, again, that's an exaggeration.

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 4>There isn't a way. I mean, there are still plenty

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 4>of people who go to school and study the social sciences,

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 4>or who graduate with engineering degrees and then go to

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 4>work for a major social media company or go to

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 4>work designing complicated financial derivatives or whatever. But he doesn't

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 4>like that. He thinks that that's been one of the

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 4>pathologies of the United States is that it's over financialized,

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 4>and that our best and brightest here in the US

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 4>have gone to work for these companies that basically don't

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 4>make anything and just suck at people's time and create

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 4>polarization in the country. So they're worried about that and

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 4>they have more wherewithal to direct people. It's not coercive, though,

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 4>let me be clear about that. They have ways to

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 4>incentivize it. And I think that this again, this is

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 4>part of the popular culture. There's all sorts of reasons.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean, we can start at the top. If you

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 4>look at the composition of the Chinese leadership, I mean,

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 4>what do we have in Congress, Who do we have

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 4>heading major agencies. It's almost all lawyers, people with illegal training.

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 4>And that's good in a country that really prizes rule

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 4>of law, and it's good for many reasons. But in China,

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 4>the analogy is that you look at the senior leadership.

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 4>If you look at you know, who runs the provinces,

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 4>whether the party or the state. You look at who

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 4>are the mayors or the party secretaries of cities of

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 4>a million people or more, and you're almost all going

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 4>to find engineers. They're going to be like seventy eighty

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 4>percent engineers. If the ladder of success, if the people

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 4>who are top it all did one thing in common,

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 4>they did a four year degree in the natural sciences

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 4>or in engineering, there's a good chance that you're going

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 4>to tell your kids to do the same, or your

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 4>kid is the case, maybe yeah, to do the same.

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 4>So I think there's a lot of pressure that way

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 4>in terms just of social mobility, in terms of what

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 4>the perceived path of mobility is.

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 2>By the way, this point about engineers and lawyers or

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 2>regular odd law I guess. Dan Wong has a book

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 2>coming out August twenty sixth, twenty twenty five. It's up

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 2>for sale on Amazon right now. You can pre order

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 2>it about exactly this dimension of a sort of lawyer

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 2>society versusn engineering society. I'm looking forward to reading that.

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking forward to having this.

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 4>Dan Wong is great. So I interviewed him for this

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Nova documentary that I did called Inside China's Tech Boom,

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 4>and the whole thesis of it was really, I mean,

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 4>in many ways inspired by some of Dan's ideas about

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 4>the importance of process knowledge. How the fact that China

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 4>has not stopped manifacted there was not for a maker's

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 4>movement to China because they didn't need to be one.

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 4>They are always making stuff right the fact that they

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 4>still have all the hardware there. It creates this sort

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 4>of frictionless ecosystem of innovation where you know, if you're

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 4>a guy with an idea for some gadget and you're

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 4>in Shinjin, you can have your designer just send you

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 4>over on we Chat his latest design. You can take

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 4>it to your ODM, which is just a quick bike

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 4>ride down the street. They can have you a proto

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 4>type by the afternoon. You can make some tweaks and iterate,

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:05.399
<v Speaker 4>and they'll just keep changing the thing over tight and

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 4>it's practically frictionless. And I think that's a huge piece

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 4>of China's innovation success as well.

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 2>But what happens when hesion ping comes out and says,

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 2>you know what, we're not as into social networking anymore,

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 2>We're not as into video games. We really want to

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 2>focus on other areas of hard tech, important tech, something

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 2>like that. What is the process of here is this

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 2>national priority and then the transmission and diffusion of these

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 2>priorities into choices that maybe students make or technologists make.

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 4>That's a great question. I think it's actually one that

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 4>I can answer with three letters KPI. Right. What happens

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 4>when you have these kind of abstract directives the will

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 4>of the leader from on high is that they get

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 4>translated not into specific policies, not right away certainly, but

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 4>into this expectation set you know, from the leadership on

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 4>down that this is how I'm going to score my

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 4>brownie points, this is how I am going to get

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 4>promoted within the party, is if I tick these boxes,

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 4>if I do these things. Let's say, you know, we

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 4>decide that the thing is we all need to have

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:15.159
<v Speaker 4>data centers. So suddenly every municipality in every province is

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 4>going to want to build data centers. They're going to

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 4>fight each other for it. They're going to figure out,

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 4>here's the best place for us to build ours, and

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 4>here's all this money that we're going to put into that.

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they're going to want to tick that box.

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 4>This is the sort of the way that everything gets

0:18:27.560 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 4>done in China. When recently, when She'sing Ping announced that

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 4>they were going to be and this is director that

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 4>came not out of just the State Council but out

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 4>of the party as well, that they were going to

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 4>boost consumption. A lot of people just sort of sneered

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 4>and said, yeah, I don't see a lot of policy

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 4>here in place to do that. But you can bet

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 4>your bottom dollar that every one on down they took

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 4>this very very seriously, and they're all figuring out ways

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 4>where in their little patch of dirt they're going to

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 4>figure out how we can boost consumption because that's the

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 4>way that I'm going to get promote. They did the

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 4>same thing with cleaning up air pollution. They do the

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 4>same thing with cleaning up rivers. They make it part

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 4>of your KPI. That's what they're going to do with

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 4>this as well. That's what they did. I mean the

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 4>question that you asked about how they made sure these

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 4>physicists were doing physics. It's much the same.

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 3>There's also, I feel like a sense of clarity in

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:26.119
<v Speaker 3>some of these policy directives. So China very often explicitly

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 3>will say where it's investing.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 3>So when we have the consumer tech crackdown, it came

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 3>with a simultaneous announcement that everyone should go into hardware basically,

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 3>and we saw that repeated in various ways. I remember

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:45.239
<v Speaker 3>Chairman Rabbit was tweeting that people should go to the

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:49.199
<v Speaker 3>industries that actually fit the central government's general policies. So

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 3>I feel like it's just very clear as well, and

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 3>the messaging is kind of on point.

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.400
<v Speaker 4>We have a word in Chinese phone call which literally

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 4>means sort of wind mouth. It's the place where the

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 4>wind will be will be blowing. It's like that little

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 4>wind tunnel, and they telegraph that. They tell you, you know,

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 4>well in advance, here is where we're going to. This

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 4>in the fourteenth five year plan. This you know, in

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 4>the fifteenth five year Plan they say exactly which industries

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 4>are going to not only receive a lot of government investment,

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 4>but where the paths are going to be cleared. There's

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 4>going to be removal of a lot of regulatory hurdles,

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 4>there's going to be favorable policy for you if you

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 4>get into this, and if you're an investor, that's where

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 4>you're going to put your money. That's what you're going

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 4>to do. You're going to you know, it doesn't take

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 4>a genius. You need to read the important documents and

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 4>you figure out exactly what their priorities are. Just as

0:20:40.600 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 4>you say, there's that clarity.

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 2>I have to admit, you know, like when I say

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 2>a sheson ping speech translated into English, or maybe I

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 2>just have a chat GPT translated Like, there is often

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 2>not a lot of like specifics or arguably even substance

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 2>in them. There's a lot of like really sort of

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 2>high level grand things. But this sort of makes sense now. Granted,

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 2>the leaders around the world often don't get into a

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of specifics, but it makes a little bit more

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 2>sense to me in the context of Okay, these priorities

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 2>are announced and immediately on down I have to you know,

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 2>imagine provincial leaders, leaders of school systems, universities then immediately

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 2>get the message that their futures and their success in

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 2>their careers will be about who can show the best

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 2>results on what maybe sounds like some sort of vague priority.

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 4>And you're missing the biggest piece of it, which is parents. Oh,

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 4>they're getting this message as well. They're the ones who

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 4>are ultimately deciding, No, you're not going to be in

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 4>a life actual historian if you're going to study yeah,

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 4>you know, you're going to study engineering physics, Sorry, buddy,

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 4>because you're going to get a job at ten Center,

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 4>at UID or at Huawei when you graduate. Yeah. So

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 4>I think that's the thing. A friend of mine once

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 4>joked that a lot of people in the West have

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 4>a great deal of difficulty imagining how the leader of

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 4>an authoritarian nation can do all these things that seem

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 4>so apparently cruel, arbitrary, but actually have your best interests

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 4>in mind. But for anyone who grew up with Chinese parents,

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 4>they know exactly how it works.

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.119
<v Speaker 3>Wait, so, just on the authoritarian point, I know you

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 3>touched on this already, but just to press on this,

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 3>would you say authoritarianism is a net positive or a

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 3>net negative for technological development?

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a wash in most stays. I mean, look,

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.159
<v Speaker 4>maybe this is my upbringing talking, but you know, I

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:56.680
<v Speaker 4>am not willing to discard the idea that a lack

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 4>of intellectual freedom, of academic freedom, of freedom to query

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 4>into to experiment without any ideological fetters, that if you

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 4>don't have that, in the long run, you are hobbled.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 4>I think that's probably still the case. But I think

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 4>in America we've taken it too far. We have this idea.

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 4>I mean, do you remember back in twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen,

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 4>when Joe Biden and even Carly Fiorina, who really ought

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 4>to have known better. I mean, she was the see

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 4>of a major technology company. They were going around and

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:26.280
<v Speaker 4>they were making these speeches. You know, Biden was making

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 4>these graduation speeches. Furina was on the campaign trail and

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:31.840
<v Speaker 4>she was talking about that Biden was talking about. They

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.040
<v Speaker 4>said the same talking point. It's like, show me one

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 4>thing that China's ever innovated. You know, as long as

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 4>we have freedom, we will always be in the lead

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.239
<v Speaker 4>of innovation. And I mean I think that takes it

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 4>from a necessary condition, which I even have quibbles with.

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 4>In fact, I don't believe that it's a necessary Freedom

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 4>is a necessary condition for technological innovation, but it even

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 4>elevates it to sufficient condition. Yeah, where you know, it's

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 4>like just because we're free, we're always going to be

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 4>ahead in innovation. So I mean that's part of the

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 4>reason why we're constantly just being just sideswiped, just completely

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 4>just blindsided by Chinese tech advances.

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 2>It's you hear that to this day. I think you

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 2>hear less of it, but it is less remarkable the

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 2>degree to which you still hear that. What's your version

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 2>of deep seek? Where did it come from? And how

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 2>much does it fit this story of like, oh, they

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 2>were doing quant stuff and then suddenly they're like, oh,

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 2>we should pivot to AI, Like, what's the deep Seek story?

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.719
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean the biography of Young one film is

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 4>not in question. I mean he ran a quant fund

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 4>called high Flyer, right, and he pivoted. Now to what

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 4>extent they were just developing this as a sideline hobby

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 4>or I mean I think more likely they were developing

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 4>AI that would help them in trades, right, help them

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 4>in high frequency, high velocity trading. Right. But the pivot

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:56.479
<v Speaker 4>being you know, attributed to Seizing making this policy changed.

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 4>It makes that totally tracks. I don't know the precise details,

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 4>but it totally tracks. It doesn't seem suspicious to me.

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 4>I have no reason to doubt that that's the case.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 4>I mean, plenty of people have made that kind of

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 4>a pivot. I mean, maybe not all of them have

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 4>enjoyed the kind of world striding success that Deep Sea has,

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 4>but it certainly tracks.

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk.

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 3>About the export controls from the Biden administration. So what

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 3>role would you say those have played in China's technological progress?

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Because one thing I sometimes hear people used to use

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 3>the analogy of the three body problem. I don't know,

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 3>did you ever read that joke.

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 2>I never read.

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 4>I did.

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, oh sorry, Amfeizer, Yeah, oh yeah, for sure.

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 4>Neil Ferguson actually used that at Davos a few years ago.

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 4>I was there. I was, you know, working this little

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 4>side hustle on. It's kind of a note taker for

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 4>the World economic for him. But he actually, without explaining anything,

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.200
<v Speaker 4>he just simply said, you know, what the United States

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 4>is trying to do to China right now is exactly

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 4>what the Tri Solarians were trying to do earthbody help,

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 4>and without explaining what he meant, but just don the

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 4>assumption that when the audience had read it, and probably

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 4>most people had, but yeah, trying to basically stemy technological advance, right.

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 3>Right, So I feel like we should explain it now.

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:12.360
<v Speaker 3>But I guess it's the idea that in the three

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 3>body problem, Earth is threatened by this alien species and

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 3>because of that, humanity kind of reorganizes itself and technological

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 3>progress thrives, at least for a while.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And I think that that's kind of what we've

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 4>seen happen. I mean, I use a more Quotitian metaphor,

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 4>the one that I think not everyone has have read

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 4>this really really long turgid science fiction classic form. But

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 4>I think we've basically compelled the frog to leap again.

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 4>And it was happy enough just sort of hopping along

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 4>well behind the US when it came to cutting edge semiconductors.

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 4>But now it may leap the United States as the frog,

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:54.239
<v Speaker 4>you know, our metaphoric frog did in five G or

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 4>in renewable energy like solar and and electric vehicles. Right,

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 4>So we have now given China both the kind of

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 4>urgency and the sense of imminent threat that was needed

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 4>to light a fire to that that frog's posterior and

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 4>now it's you know, it's in the air.

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 5>It's maybe directly over our heads, maybe gon't land in

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 5>front of us.

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 2>One of the things that's really elemental to us tech

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 2>is the vision in dreams of gigantic monopoly profits. This

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 2>is sort of like the Peterteel idea. It's like the

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 2>goal is to like build a monopoly and get insanely

0:27:46.119 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 2>rich doing it, and the people who go into tech

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.360
<v Speaker 2>dreams of fortunes, et cetera. There is this huge liquid

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:56.120
<v Speaker 2>stock market that becomes the destination either for I pos

0:27:56.240 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 2>or acquisitions. Talk to us about the capital markets component

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 2>of Chinese tech is it the same like path to

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 2>getting super rich that American technologists see here? Like what

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 2>incentivizes and motivate the technologists in China.

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think that they're exactly the same. I think

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 4>that there's very little daylight between. Well, first of all,

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean in the nineties, in that first technology boom

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 4>in China came right on the heel of what you

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 4>saw in the United States. All these people Charles Jong

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 4>who left MIT and went back to China, and I

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 4>think it was like ninety seven or ninety eight to

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 4>start this company. So who all these other entrepreneurs, Robin

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Lee who I used to work for it by do,

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 4>A lot of them were returneys from the United States,

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 4>and they had the same glint in their eye. And

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 4>you have to remember these guys, they had American business

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 4>business models. Essentially, they went to American vcs from Sandhill

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:53.959
<v Speaker 4>Road to raise their money. They went to American capital

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 4>markets right when they wanted to list. Their exits were

0:28:56.480 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 4>always on Nasdaq or on New York Stock Exchange, only

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 4>in rare exceptions where they actually not ten cents. An exception,

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:06.719
<v Speaker 4>Ali Baba is a little bit of an exception. But

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 4>most of them, I mean, hundreds of them went to

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 4>the United States forces, right, And yeah, I think it's

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 4>it's the same, it's the same motivating force. The cultures

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 4>are remarkably or were remarkably similar. So that was like

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 4>the only thing I felt comfortable working. I mean, as

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 4>a guileless American who just had my I would just

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 4>have my my, my posterior handed to me in any

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 4>kind of corporate setting except in the Internet, where you know,

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 4>the same kind of Silicon Valley egalitarianism and that kind

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 4>of enterprise culture prevailed. So that was like one of

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 4>the only safe places for people who you know, were

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 4>clueless like me. Since you mentioned so, I think they're

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 4>the same. I think they're the same.

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.240
<v Speaker 3>Since you mentioned culture, can I ask a slightly random question,

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 3>but I think I think you're a good person to

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 3>ask about it, given your background as a musician. But

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:04.239
<v Speaker 3>China kah has been very successful in exporting technology, so

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, whether it's byd cars or TikTok or whatever,

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 3>I think we can all agree that it's come from

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 3>nowhere basically and is now certainly a major player. Meanwhile,

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 3>in sort of pop cultural exports, the lack of Chinese

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 3>pop culture exports has been a sort of long running

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 3>discussion point now, and if you compare China to a

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 3>place like Japan where there's jpop, or Korea where there's

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 3>k pop, it does feel like something is kind of

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 3>lacking there. I guess my question is is it fair

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 3>to say that China has fallen down on cultural exports

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 3>at least compared to technology, and then b why is that?

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, No, that's a great question. It's something I've pondered

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 4>for a very long time too. I mean, I think

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 4>there's no arguing that China's got a gigantic gap. It's

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.239
<v Speaker 4>not punching at its weight. But let's figure out how

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 4>we calculate that way. Because you know, when you look

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 4>at when did we all start eating sushi and watching

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:07.239
<v Speaker 4>the Cure Kurosawa films like in the eighties? Right, So

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 4>that's when Japan's soft power starts to really really peak, right,

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 4>we all start driving Japanese cars. This is at a

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 4>point where Japan's per captain GDP was about seventy five

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 4>percent of what the United States was at that time,

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 4>and Koreas similarly, around the time where we start all

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:26.959
<v Speaker 4>listening to Gongnam style and then you know, all our

0:31:27.080 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 4>daughters or whatever posters of bts on their walls, as

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 4>mon still does. This was at a time when South

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 4>Korea's per capita GDP it's like seventy two, seventy three

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 4>percent of America's GDP per capita. I think that has

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 4>something to do with it. I think that per capita

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 4>GDP kind of shows what a nation's priorities are going

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 4>to be. When it's low, it's still going to be

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 4>in that stage of we've got to work really, really hard.

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 4>Just this is why I mean in China. I mean,

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 4>I play music, so I'm constantly frustrated by the fact

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 4>that for most people, for the overwhelming number of people,

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 4>it is just entertainment. There's nobody who thinks of it

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 4>as an art form anymore, I mean, or if there

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 4>ever was. I think that it has to do with that.

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 4>But I think there's also and it's obvious to me

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 4>that the first rule of soft power should just be

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 4>don't talk about soft power. That China's government's obsession with

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 4>trying to create soft power is one of the big

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 4>impediments to it actually having soft power. Again, let me

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 4>let me be very very clear, it has plenty of

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 4>soft power in the developing world. I mean, if you

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 4>look in Southeast Asia, a lot of people are watching

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 4>these insufferable costume dramas about you know, the palace intrigue

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 4>in the Qing.

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 3>Dynasty ones, a bunch of them nowadays.

0:32:44.480 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I guess the Thai ones are really popular

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 4>these days.

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting, so that that's actually popular content in Southeast Asia.

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's huge. It's absolutely huge all over Southeast Asia,

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 4>in Indonesia and Malaysia and Thailand and the Philippines, even

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 4>in Vietnam anyway where in Southeast Asia, Ego, there's a

0:33:02.200 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 4>lot of this stuff. But yeah, but no, to your point,

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 4>in Europe and the United States, no, it's not really registering.

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 4>And I think there's that's one of the reasons. But

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 4>I think ultimately the reason is, well, soft power tends

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 4>to be created on the periphery. It creeps in through

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:19.920
<v Speaker 4>the cracks, you know. It's a grassroots thing. It's not

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 4>supposed to be created top down. And yeah, you can

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 4>look at South Korea and say there was a lot

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 4>of government, you know, and a lot of these gigantic

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 4>conglomerates who created Korean soft power boy bands and stuff,

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 4>But that may be sort of the anomaly Kaiser.

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 2>We could go on a long time. There are just

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 2>so many questions, but I think that's a good spot

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 2>to ramp it. Thank you so much for coming on, Odlocks.

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 2>We'll have to have you back on again soon.

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 4>I would love to come back on. Thank you so

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 4>much for having me than you.

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 3>That was fun.

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 2>I thought it was really interesting. I like the point

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 2>about everyone getting the message and then everyone doing their

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 2>own thing to sort of prove that they're getting a message.

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 2>And we talked about this on our episode with Sam Damico,

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the Impulse Labs guy. This idea of Okay, there's some priority,

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 2>and then all the different provinces compete on how well

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.919
<v Speaker 2>they're doing and fulfilling their priority. It makes a lot

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 2>of sense that that's a very broadly applicable lesson to

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:28.960
<v Speaker 2>like different sectors and different parts of the economy.

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 3>Totally, I really think the messaging is kind of key here. Yeah,

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.759
<v Speaker 3>the message is very clear. It's if you choose this

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 3>route that the Chinese government is encouraging you to take,

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 3>your life is going to be a lot easier than

0:34:42.840 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 3>if you take another route. And I think that's kind

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 3>of different to the way industrial policy, I guess works

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 3>in the States, where you know, even if a president

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 3>stands up and says we want a lot more semiconductors

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.759
<v Speaker 3>in the US, there's still a lot of bureaucracy, a

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 3>lot of uncertainty, a lot of paperwork attached to getting

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 3>support from the government for a semiconductor project. And so

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that uncertainty like still feeds into the US certainly.

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Prisident Trump recently gave a speech at University of Alabama,

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:20.239
<v Speaker 2>I think it was their graduation ceremony, and he said

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 2>that he was like, to the business students here, don't

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 2>just think about your portfolios, think about your country. And

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I like that message, but I don't know, like, what

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 2>are the levers that actually get towards that. And so oh, also, Tracey,

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 2>I have a take?

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:36.839
<v Speaker 3>Oh oh really, just one?

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:37.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just one take?

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, hit me.

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 2>This is something I've been workshopping, and so I'm leaving

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 2>it to the end.

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I can't believe you're not tweeting it. Are you going

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 3>to tweet it? Are you workshopping for a tweet?

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm workshopping it for you here. I figured a lot

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 2>of people aren't listening by this point, so I can

0:35:51.640 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 2>drop it here, which is I'm kind of coming around

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:57.880
<v Speaker 2>to this idea that like complex financial products, that they

0:35:57.920 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>have a bad rep.

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 3>They have a bad they are bad.

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 2>Know that they have a bad rep. That actually, this

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 2>is like a sort of contra to a lot of

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 2>popular thing. It's like, oh, complex semiconductor is good, complex

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 2>financial products bad. I'm just throwing it out there that

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe we should talk more about why people get paid

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:22.760
<v Speaker 2>so much to design complex financial products in a market

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 2>economy and why they're so highly valued. I'm just throwing

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 2>it out there.

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:28.400
<v Speaker 3>We should do an episode on Ray Dalio and the

0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:29.919
<v Speaker 3>chicken nugget again.

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right. That's exactly right. Derivatives gave us the

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.840
<v Speaker 2>chicken nugget. Anyway, talking to Kaiser about this just reminded

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 2>me of that that I want to explore this idea,

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 2>and I'm saying it here now kind of as a

0:36:41.320 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 2>remind myself, reminder of myself to think about this one.

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 3>Chicken nuggets is the ultimate example of American technological and

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 3>financial supremacy.

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 2>We do great, complicated things in the United States, but

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 2>because we have this bias against finance as being extractive

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 2>or or something, I think we don't sufficiently recognize where

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 2>we're at the cutting edge.

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 3>It is true that in China finance and industry are

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 3>often working hand in hand. And if the government says that,

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:14.720
<v Speaker 3>for instance, hardware is now very important, you will see

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 3>the banks start to loosen up on lending standards and

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 3>things like that. So a valid point, Joe.

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 2>What is a supply chain but a payment chain in reverse?

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 3>That's Sultan Posar's line.

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh he said, stole that, Yeah, I stole it from Sultan.

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, that's right, Yeah, credit to Sultan. But you know,

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe we should think about this a little more.

0:37:32.719 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, all right, shall we leave it there?

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Let's leave it there.

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and.

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Check out our guest, Kaiser Quote. He's at Kaiser Quo,

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 2>and check out the Cineca podcast and substack. Follow our

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 2>producers Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman Ermann, dash Ol Bennett at

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 2>Dashbot and Kale Brooks at Kale Brooks. For more Oddlots content,

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 2>go to Bloomberg dot com slash Odd Lots where we

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 2>have a daily newsletter and all of our episodes, and

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 2>you can chaut about all of these topics twenty four

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 2>to seven in our discord discord dot gg slash odlines.

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 3>And if you enjoy Odd Lots, if you like it

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 3>when we check in on Chinese technology and how it

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:16.160
<v Speaker 3>actually develops, then please leave us a positive review on

0:38:16.200 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 3>your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are a

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of our episodes

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 3>absolutely ad free. All you need to do is find

0:38:25.040 --> 0:38:28.600
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there.

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And