WEBVTT - Bloomberg Markets Special Simulcast Day Four

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanebeck. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all furnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Welcome to our global simulcast

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>across Bloomberg TV, Radio and YouTube Romain, Boston, alongside Pretty

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Group To and Tim Stanifek. We're gonna be walking you

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>through the markets all day long and taking a look

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>back at one as well as a look ahead to two.

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Tim, we're looking at guess what a record

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>high on SMB five, record high on the Dow Jones

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Industrial Average, and the NASDAC one hundred actually came within

0:00:57.480 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>about four points of a record high on its own.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>It seems like a little bit of a theme happening

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Santa Claus Reraili. I got a fun little

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>technical that I spotted on the Market's live blog courtesy

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 1>of Matt Turner earlier today. The SMP five hundred hasn't

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>dip below it's two day moving average yet this year.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>That failure has only happened four other time since one,

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and then after three of those occurrences, the SMP five

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred sign annual decline the following year. So good thing

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind as we look forward to two

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>throughout our show today. Yeah, and which a point, I mean,

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a fun fact. But think when was

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the last time we were burned low the two day

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>moving average pop quiz? I'm guessing it was March? Yeah, April? Oh,

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>look at that. I'm starting to get better at these

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>pop quizzes, rom Man, I know, I gotta make the

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>questions a little bit harder here. All right, let's we're gonna,

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of course, walk you through this market. We're gonna get

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>some great insights here from a big slate of guests

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we have coming up. But we want to jump right

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>over to Abigail doo Little right now for a little

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a breakdown, and what's going on in

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the market, Abigail, Well, those technicals that you all were

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>just talking about super interesting, And yes, it would suggest

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that the market is overextended right now, not having gone

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to that long term support. Maybe couldn't be a little

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>b difficult. In the yesterday we were talking about apple

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>growth is expected to slow dramatically. As for what's really

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>happening today, that all time high for the SMP five

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>on page for the seventy first record close of the year.

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>The NAZAC outperforming on some China tech strength. Maybe we'll

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>take a look at that in a moment. And then

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>super interesting is the fact that the SMP five hundred

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>hotel index it is slightly higher despite having some exposure

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to the cruise operators because of course, earlier today the

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>CDC coming out with an advisory saying that folks shouldn't

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>go on cruise ships, whether vaccinated or not, and we

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>saw a big drop off for the cruise lines. The

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Royal Caribbean Carnival down about half a percent at this point,

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>so not a huge huge decline, but if you consider

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the these stocks earlier up three percent down two percent

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>at the lows, that's a five to six percent swing

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>for stocks and are still down six from the pre

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.119
<v Speaker 1>pandemic high. The revenues, it's just incredible. I was taking

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a look at Carnival this year, It's expected to put

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>up not even two billion. In twenty eighteen it was

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 1>nineteen billion. So that's what investors are still worried about. Yeah, Abigail,

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>When I think cruise lines, when I think that travel sector,

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I think volatility. I'm curious about the volatility not of

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the stock market, but of the bond market. What do

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you see there? You know, it's very interesting and that's

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a great question from the standpoint that these cruise lines,

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>similar to airlines during the pandemic, just to make it through,

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>really needed to raise a tremendous amount of capital through debts.

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to be something to watch, the credit

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>for the cruise lines, and to some degree right now

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the airline is given the fact that oh, Macron is

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>really causing so many cancelations there for um the number

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of the airlines. I think that Jet Blue today came

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>out saying that they're canceling nearly flights between January tent

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and for cruise operators, it's gonna be interesting to see

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>whether or not folks, people who are very committed to cruising.

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I not one of them, but I do have friends

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>who loved to cruise a couple of times each year.

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Whether they're gonna listen to this advisory and will we

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>see a real drop off in revenue? If so, that

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>could really show up in that credit. All right, something

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna keep an eye on all day long. Here

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Abigail Doolittle, we'll get check in with her a little

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>bit later here in the day. We want to get

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>right to our next guest here, Ross Mayfield Bared Investment

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Strategy analyst, joining the big program right now, and Ross Um,

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's obviously a lot of distortions this week

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and last week because of the low volume here as

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>we head towards the end of the year. But anybody

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>who's looking ahead to two and trying to sort of

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>divine where the SMP might end up, it's got to

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>all be tied to where they think earnings, corporate earnings

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>themselves are gonna go. And I'm curious as to whether

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you think that some of the I guess relative outperformance

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that we saw in twenty twenty one with regards to

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>margins and earnings and revenue growth, whether that continues into

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>next year. Yes, so I think a bit more of

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>a mixed bag, right, So, we do expect earnings growth

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to be positive. There's a lot of tail winds. They're

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a really strong consumer, some operational efficiencies that companies put

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>on during the pandemic and should continue forward. UM, and

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.119
<v Speaker 1>revenue should still be strong given um, you know, pretty

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>strong nominal GDP growth that we expect. However, margins have

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>have peaked and you know started to roll over a

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit, still at extremely high levels, still near records,

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>but have peaked and rolled over. We we all have

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>heard the inflation story and know about rising input cost inflation,

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>particularly UM the stickiness of of wage inflation, which which

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is really one of the bigger input factors across across industry. UM.

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>So I do think, you know, there's gonna be enough

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>corporate earnings to to drive the market higher outside of

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>something that really brings multiples down. Usually in the early

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>part of a rate high cycle, multiples are you know,

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of flat historically, So if you're taking high single digit,

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>low double digit earnings growth, I think you can probably

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>translate that pretty well to equity performance. Or also, we've

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>been asking a lot of our guests this week about

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the biggest risks in two A lot of them have

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>agreed that it would be a misstep by the Federal Reserve.

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering where you fall. Well at the same place

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I always following him, asked this question, and the biggest

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>risk is the one we don't see Keman because at

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of nobody had global pandemic on their on

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>their cheek sheets. So you know that's kind of a

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>copied answer, but um no, but it was. It was

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>poetic ross we like and we checked that one off

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that the pandemic is ongoing right there. There we go. Yeah,

0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>on the Fed front, though, you know you mentioned at

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that top, we're sitting at all. Tom has on all

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the major indusicries. The market is aware of the Feds, uh,

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, tapering timeline getting more aggressive. They're aware or

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they're basically pricing in three rate hikes for next year

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the Fed. I think at this point, you know, if

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to skew the risk one way, it would

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>be dubbish. There's gonna be some new appointees who will

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>probably lean dubbish. And if inflation moderates or if omicron

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>has an effect on the labor market, I think you

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>could actually see the FED skew dubbish given one of

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the two options, um, in which case it wouldn't necessarily

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>be you know, a headline risk for the market. Um,

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it would it would probably be a bit more of

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>a tail wind. Regardless. Uh, we expect monetary policy to

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 1>be extremely accommodative, even if they hike at on plan Ross.

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>We gotta talk about tech here because you can't continue

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that's really strong equity performers into the new year without

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>having tech on your side. What is the bull and

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>bear case for Big Tech? Sure? I mean the bull

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>case is long term secular growth trends. It's you know,

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>wide modes, low debt, high cash um. You know, really

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>strong margins and the ability to protect those margins. They've

0:07:30.600 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>mostly shown throughout this pandemic. UM. They've also been a

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of a covid heade right. So throughout Big Tech

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>was the kind of sector or what you know, subsector

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that was leading the market higher. It's popped, you know,

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>throughout the various waves over the last year. So so

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not super hard to make a strong bull case

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>for these companies because they are just such high performing

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>operators and have done so well over the last decade.

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>As we move into this next year and kind of

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 1>get into the you know, maybe mid cycle uh kind

0:07:58.560 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of themes high quality is a place that we're looking

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to take refuge, and that's that's a lot of those

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>big tech operators. On the flip side, you look at

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, rising interest rates is kind of um, rising

0:08:09.440 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>long interest rates is kind of a headwind for the

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>growthier parts of the market. You know overall, UM, small tech,

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>small growth is certainly taking it on the chin this year. Um,

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that would be a headwind for big tech if rates

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>were really to become uncapped. And then the antitrust uh,

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, sentiment, it's kind of taken a backseat as

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>build back better has has become the focus in Washington

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>right now and getting that back on track. But I

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>do think you know, with more appointees, um, you know,

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>personnel's policies, So I think you could continue to see

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that sentiment throughout the year and and maybe even ramp

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>up as a midterm election talking point any way to

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>diversify away from equities. Anything that you look at. We

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>only got about a minute left. That's that's the that's

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>the number one question on the board because rising inflation,

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>rising rates, you really don't want to be in treasuries,

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>safe safe fixed income cash is just losing money. I

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>do going out the credit spectrum and fixed income in

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>shorting duration something like you know, maybe bank loans or

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>or or shorter duration high yield could be a place

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to go. You know, valuation there, as with the equity market,

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 1>is fairly rich. But I do think if you see

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>even a slight uptake and rates, it's gonna be one

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the few places takes solids. Um. You know, we

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>don't ever really mind a small uh small allocation to

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>alternatives or commodities, but we would keep it, we would

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:26.080
<v Speaker 1>keep it small. All right, Ross Mayfield, It Bair, thanks

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. This is Bloomberg Market Special

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>coverage this week, simulcast across Bloomberg TV, radio and on YouTube.

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Romain Bostick alongside Tim Stanovic and Crety Gupta here helping

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you count down to the clothes here in equity markets

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, keep an eye on what's going on in

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the commodity space. Settlement right now of noim ex scrude

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 1>future is gonna come in just below seventy seven bucks

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of barrel. We should we've been talking all day, all week,

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>frankly about how light the volume is in the equity markets.

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 1>We should point out that, uh in the w T

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I markets future markets were some the wrack below where

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we would normally be with regards to average daily volume. Here,

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>gasoline price is going to finish the day slightly higher

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>here as well, up about eight tenths of our percent.

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>In the futures market at the pump, you're paying about

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>three twenty nine on average. Here, Gold futures higher by

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:17.319
<v Speaker 1>about five tenths of our percent. And when you look

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>at some of the soft commodities, pretty much everything is

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>in the red today, with the exception of cotton. Cotton

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 1>future stem up about one percent right now. We know

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>restaurants around the country are continuing to struggle to pay

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>for those higher input costs as COVID cases continue to

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>surge as well. Restaurants are also struggling to keep their

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>doors open. Many are trying to recoup their losses from

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty months or so when lockdown began. Joining

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 1>us now is David Nafeld. He's the owner and executive

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.679
<v Speaker 1>chef of the restaurant Kfico. It's an Italian restaurant in

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. David, thanks so much for joining us. You're

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>also a member of the Independent Restaurant Coalition. It's an

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>organization that calls itself a voice for the independent restaurant

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and bar community nationwide. Hey, give us an update on

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>what's happening at KFICO right now when it comes to amicron.

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you seeing this not only affects staff right now,

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>but uh but affect patrons dining there too. I mean

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>cases are spiking in California, just like to our New York. Yeah,

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>there's First of all, thank you so much for having me.

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And secondly, uh, you know, it's been a tremendous um

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>hit to us. We've just made the hard decision to

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 1>close both of the restaurants for the rest of the year.

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>We've had a spike in positive cases, um you know,

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and the only reason we're able to detect that is

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>because we've come out of pocket over five dollars to

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>get these massively over inflated uh self tests right, because

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not being provided for us by our local, state

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>or federal government. So that's something that we need to

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>do to protect our own staff and to protect the public.

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Then you add to that the fact that when we

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>get a number of positive cases, we try and do

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:47.839
<v Speaker 1>what we think is the right thing to do. By

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>shutting down. We lose a tremendous amount of money doing that.

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>We had to cancel all of our New Year's Eve reservations,

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>which is supposed to be our single biggest revenue driver

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of the entire year. Um. You know, it is really

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>really a tough time right now for us, our city,

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>but also just our industry in general. Everyone is hurting. Um.

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I am seeing just dozens by the day restaurants locally,

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>state and federally just say that they are going to

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>shut down for the rest of the year because they

0:12:18.720 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know what's going on. And we all feel, honestly

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>a bit abandoned by Congress who said that they were

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>going to refill the restaurant Revitalization fund well over a

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>year ago, and you have almost two thousand restaurants that

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>applied for it that never got it. And right now

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.559
<v Speaker 1>we're we're all, you know, deciding on whether we're going

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to be able to open back up at all. Talk

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit about perhaps the EBBS and flows

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you've seen in terms of consumers that have come in

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>while your restaurant was open as a result of say,

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 1>vaccine mandates or mask mandates, which seemed to also ebb

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and flow in various states. Yeah, I mean evan flow

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 1>is a great way to put it. There's been moments

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>where um consumer um confidence is up and they want

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to come in, they want to dine inside. And you

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>will see one news report come out within a day

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and you'll see reservations for the next week be impacted.

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>You'll see a demand for outdoor seating go from all

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>time high to almost zero in the colder months here

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco and and obviously I can imagine in

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the colder parts of the country, it's it's completely nullified,

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 1>uh to a news report will come out and then

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>people all of a sudden are willing to dine in

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the rain outside, right, Um, but they don't want to

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>eat inside. And so that is incredibly hard for a

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.839
<v Speaker 1>restaurant to whether the storm of It's very hard in

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of predictability and visibility as to how much we

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>need to order, how much we need to staff, and

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>then staffing. As you guys said in your previous segment

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>is you know, something that is very challenging for all

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>of us to deal with. UM. You know, we tend

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to pay on the higher side in terms of our

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>restaurant group to begin with, but you know, it is

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>something that you know, the guest is going to feel

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the impact because of raising prices all across the board.

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, our cost of goods have gone up through

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the roof, our losses have gone up through the roof,

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>our debt has increased, UM, you know, and labor is

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go up and up and up to get

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>viable candidates, David, what what brings stability here? What what

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>would you want to see with regards to assistance and

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>help that you think can maybe bring some normalcy and

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>stability to this industry. Well, there's one answer, right, There's

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>one simple, silver bullet answer, and that's the Restaurant Revitalization Fund,

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>which we are at the Independent Restaurant Coalition were fighting

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>for since March. We fought UM, you know, and when

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:45.760
<v Speaker 1>every other restaurant UM you know, trade group gave up

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>on it, we fought for independent restaurants and we were

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>able to get it for over a hundred thousand restaurants.

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a hundred and seventy seven thousand more restaurants that

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>signed up for it that didn't get it. And now

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>what Congress is doing is there in the business of

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>choosing winners and losers rather than refilling it as Senator

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Senator Schumer promised he would. He promised this was a

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>down payment on the rest of it. And what we

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>need them to do is we need to kind of

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>belly up to the bar, pay for this and help

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>us get to the other side of this, because if

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>they do, I promise you, they will be saving millions

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of jobs. And those are jobs ultimately that they're not

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:21.760
<v Speaker 1>going to have to take care of down the road. David,

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>just very briefly, in the last minute we we have

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>with you, you may make the case here and talk

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of the scarring that that could occur

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.359
<v Speaker 1>to the industry into cities and towns throughout the country

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>if independent restaurants don't get this aid. Yeah. Well, this

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is a simple case to make, right. We um produce

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>more to the GDP than almost any other industry. We

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>provide more jobs than almost any other industry. We're talking

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>about fifteen million jobs and counting that our industry in

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>independent restaurants alone provide to our economy the amount of

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 1>tax revenue to our cities. All of that is why

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>our industry is worth saving. And most importantly, something we

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>need to remember is you don't need a college degree,

0:15:58.040 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and you don't even need a high school degree to

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>get into the restaurant industry to make it into the

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>middle class. If you work in our industry, work your

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>way up, you can open a small business. And small

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>businesses the cornerstone of our economy. Yeah, well said small businesses,

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly the cornerstone, and she point out restaurants really the

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>lifeblood of so many communities and so many of our

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>cities out there. It's kind of what makes our cities cities.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>David really appreciate you take a time to be with us,

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and we wish you the best. David Mayfield there, he's

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>a part of the Independent Restaurant Coalition and he's an

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>owner and chef of KFICO out there in San Francisco.

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the solution to all this is getting the

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>COVID crisis under control. We're gonna talk a little bit

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>more about the COVID crisis and some new recommendations by

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the CDC. This one applying to cruise ships. We're gonna

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about that and so much more right here on Bloomberg.

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Market Special coverage all week long, simulcasts

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>across Bloomberg TV, radio and YouTube. We welcome all of

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>our audiences across all of our platforms. Remain bostic here

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>alongside Tim Stenovik and Created Gupta, we're gonna be counting

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you down to the close of trading on this Thursday afternoon,

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:09.440
<v Speaker 1>just about one hour away. The SMP five hundred camped

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>out at another record high, as is the Dow Jones

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Industrial Average, and NAZDAC one hundred came within just a

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>few points of that record high. As far as the

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>individual mover as well, it's kind of a mixed bag here.

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>You have names like Apple not going much anywhere, basically

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>flat on the day, Ford shares, which had been higher

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>flat on the day. Uh, And then you got stocks

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>like Peloton, like Zoom, A lot of these sort of

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>memes stocks, I guess if you call them memes or

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>pandemic blaze seemed to be back and focus, no real news.

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 1>They're uh, crety with regards So what's moving those stocks

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and why? But I've seen a pretty significant drump Peloton

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>shares up about nine percent right now. You know, even

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>with the holiday trading, that quiet volume is still those

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:48.199
<v Speaker 1>names that seem to really become kind of familiar plays

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>when it comes as hedges on the omicon variant, perhaps,

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps just the fact that those are the stocks

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that have been getting battered lately. So why not by

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the dip there? Yeah, Hey, does Apple hit three trillion

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>by the end of the year. Uh, well that's tomorrow.

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I know you think it would happen tomorrow. We're saving

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>it for them. It would be appropriate if it happen tomorrow.

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna do the show from Time Square, so the

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>confetti we'll be ready here. Let's uh, we're gonna go

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>get to our guests, Jason Pride in just a moment,

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>but we want to jump over to Abigail do a

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>little real quick, who is not in Times Square, but

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>she's keeping a eye on the markets. I'm certainly not

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>in Times Square right here at headquarters at lex and yes,

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>everything that you guys have been saying, you know, steady

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>as she goes Cruise Control rally, the SMP five hundred

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>up three of the four days this week, interestingly, the NAZAC.

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>This is the nazac's first update this week, climbing still

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>not hitting a record high, nonetheless that stands out and

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>speaking of trends, crude oil and it's best up streak

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>going back to February now relative to that strength with

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the NAZAC, and I of course should say the SMP

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>five likely to hit another record closing high seventy one

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Really pretty incredible and a third big

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>up gear in a row. But the NAZACUT performance is

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>coming from China Tech. It's a incredible the Golden Dragon

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>NAZAC et f or index excuse me, up more than

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>ten percent today. That is the best day going back

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand eight. However, into today on the year,

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it had been down almost fifty so talk about catchup

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 1>falling night. But that's what's happening with Bai Dow and

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Ali Bob and a number of those other stocks really

0:19:19.520 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 1>helping out again the NAZAC and the New York Fang Index.

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.640
<v Speaker 1>A comment on about what you just said was what

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is happening in the commodity space. Have we hit the

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>peak in the commandity rally or is there room to run? Well,

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you know yesterday Creedy, you're asking about the dollar. It's

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>interesting a lot of people seem to think that the

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:38.199
<v Speaker 1>dollar is going to go higher. If that dollar strength

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:41.719
<v Speaker 1>reflects a strong economy, you could probably see commodities continue

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:45.479
<v Speaker 1>to go higher. However, if the dollar goes higher and

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>there's not quite as much of economic strength, there's more

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of the inflationary pressure on the dollar, it would be

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see whether or not oil can hang in

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>there or not. Technically it's somewhat strong, but the commodities

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 1>like box create a tremendous year. The Bloomberg Commodity Index

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.479
<v Speaker 1>up more than this year Oil, I think up more

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>than Can the rally continue? I think it's really going

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to come down to the fundamentals there in terms of

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the economic growth, will it or will it not be there?

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And in the beginning of the year, how much we

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>will o macron impact. Let's see if we can get

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>some answers to that from our next guests. Our thanks

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>there to Abigail Doolittle giving us a nice little runway

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>here to start off with. Jason Pride, he is uh

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the chief investment officer over for Private Wealth, I should

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>say over at Glenn made about forty billion dollars in

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>assets under management at the firm. Jason, let's look ahead

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to two here. I'm sure all clients have to be

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.719
<v Speaker 1>asking you kind of what to expect given how phenomenal

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>this year was for at least most asset classes, and

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>how unlikely some of those gains probably were at least

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know when you look at where we were at

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>the start of the year. Yea, absolutely, and thanks for

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>having me on Romaine. Uh. This is this is an

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting environment that we find ourselves in as we look

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>forward to two twenty two. We think the games are

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna be more modest than they've been the past

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>uh years, So basically just to the magnitude that we've

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>seen in two thousand twenty one and the valuation point

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that we're starting with as we enter two twenty two.

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Having said that, we think there's some reason for optimism

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>for investors. The primary reason is actually that we're just

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 1>still in a recovery from the pandemic, and that recovery

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>comes with an expansion of the economy and expansion of

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 1>profits for corporations, and a good fundamental picture heading into

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty two, we expect there to be growth

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and earnings growth and pay for consumers, growth and revenues

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>at the top line for businesses, and therefore an underpinning

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>for a rising stock market, offset to some degree by

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the premium valuations that we enter the year at two.

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.239
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand twenty two, Jason, help us understand what

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you're factoring in from a policy perspective, What do you

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>what are you expecting in two both when it comes

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 1>to fiscal policy and monetary policy, And that's that's one

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of the key questions that we think that there is

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 1>for two is what does the policy framework look like?

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>And let's address two aspects of policy, one being monetary

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:06.920
<v Speaker 1>policy and two being fiscal But basically the big picture

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>for both of them is they are going to both

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>be a headwind for the economy and for the markets

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand twenty. One of the reasons for it

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to be to be softer. Fiscal policy is going to

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>come in some on the ballpark about two hundred and

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollars spend next year. That's of substantially from

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the two trillion dollars spend in two thousand twenty one.

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And monetary policy, we know is going to be We're

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:32.680
<v Speaker 1>going to see the FED tapering its balance sheet or

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>tapering its purchases, adding to its bound sheet, and also

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>talking about raising rates in two thousand twenty, which we

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 1>think will actually probably start somewhere in the middle of

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twenty two. You put those things together, and

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a headwind for both the economy and markets, but

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.919
<v Speaker 1>it's not an insurmountable headwind, which is one of the

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>reasons that we think we'll probably still see gains, just

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.520
<v Speaker 1>not gains there nearly as big as what we send

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.239
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand one. Well, Jason, help me out here,

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:01.440
<v Speaker 1>because I'm a little bit confused about where we are

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the economic and the market cycle. I mean, traditionally,

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>after you come out of recessions, you're supposed to see

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a little period of small caps, commodities, those riskier assets,

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>even emerging markets really excel. And we got part of

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that trade, the commodities rally for example, that ab Gail

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Doolittle was just talking about. But then we go kind

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of back in that defensive trade. Does that mean that

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of early part of the expansion of the recovery

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of the cycle that we've just accelerated passed through it

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's a couple of answers to that.

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Number One, are we passed the early stage and into

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the mid stage of the economy and the expansion. We

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>think yes at this point in time, but it's kind

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 1>of a weird mid cycle stance, one that we've kind

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>of oscillated back, as you mentioned, back and forth between things.

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>They're typically recovery trades due to the inflation cycle, due

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to additional variants being being you know, coming forth from uh,

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the COVID crisis um. At the end of the day,

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>what we think investors need to do is look at

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>this as an ongoing economic expansion, look at what investments

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>have participated in, what has not participated. Something has participated

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>really well, when probably expect a trade off back to

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>something that hasn't participated as well. A great example of that,

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we think is small kept securities. Small kept companies have

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>not they participated early in two relatively well late two even,

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 1>but they've actually backed off in the relative performance through

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>two one. We think they're probably setting up for another

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>run about performance due to that relative underperformance of the

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>tail into two thousand twenty one. Another area that we

0:24:33.359 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 1>think is interesting is real estate. Real estate has been

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:40.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of an unloved, relatively hated environment and and portion

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the market due to people's concern about people simply staying

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>home and away from work, and therefore they're being less

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 1>demand from corporate real estate. We think it's actually uh

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>significant misperception is that how much demand for corporate real

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>estate will back off, And even a misunderstanding is that

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>how much of corporate real estate is actually delicated dedicated

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>off a space. It's a fairly small minority that's office space.

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.479
<v Speaker 1>The rest of it's used for other things that are

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>highly productive. A big thank you to Jason Pride, chief

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>investment officer for Private Wealth at Glenn Meade. Happy New Year, Jason,

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for for joining us. Hey, I mean

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the conversation continues creating about what when it comes to

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>real estate, I mean, what it looks like on the

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>other side of the pandemic and when we get to

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the pandemic. I mean, think about

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the conversation we had yesterday about return to the office.

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>A company like Facebook just delaying that but still investing

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in in corporate real estate. Yeah, we're not even just

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>talking my real estate here. That same psychology expands of

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>things like I'm cultural Land, Timberland, a lot of these

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>other just space kind of questions that you really need.

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And it really all depends on really just one thing,

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and that is, of course the COVID nineteen virus. But

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>the conversation that has to be I guess is are

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we talking real estate and aggregate or are we looking

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:51.199
<v Speaker 1>at certain pockets here. I mean, there's still areas of

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the commercial real estate market that are just just still

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.239
<v Speaker 1>completely beaten down. I guess there's a rotation a little bit.

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess based on where we're living, where we're working,

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and what we're doing here. But it seems like you

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 1>have to be a little bit choosy about where exactly

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you choose with your money. Look, that's a really good point.

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>You can't say that the residential real estate by any

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>means has been unloved over the last year throughout the pandemic.

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Markets, a special simulcast all week long here,

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>broadcast across Bloomberg TV, radio and on YouTube. Romaine Bostic

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 1>Tim sent off Creaty Group to counting you down to

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the closing bell on this Thursday afternoon, just a little

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>more than twelve minutes to go here, the SMP five hundred,

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>which had been higher here for a good portion of

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the day, turning red right now. As far as some

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>of the industry groups here, you can take a look,

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>or you could take a listen here and see where

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>we are right now. You talk about some of the

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>tech stocks, they've actually kind of weakened here as we've

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten a little bit closer to the closing bells here

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.199
<v Speaker 1>on this day, you're seeing a little bit of a

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>bid uh come in late into some of those names.

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>We should point out a lot of the travel stocks,

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>including the cruise lines as well as some of the

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>airlines and hotel stocks, UH, Tim and Creaty are moving

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>lower here. That largest seems to be on the back

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of that announcement we had a little bit earlier today

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>from the CDC advising against traveling on cruise ships. You

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>know what's interesting, Romaine, is the ones that are performing better. Actually,

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you're actually seen some of those farmer stocks actually higher,

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>and they like sud Visor, Johnson Johnson, some of those

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:19.239
<v Speaker 1>vaccine stocks really kind of paving the way. Uh. This

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>comes after, of course, yesterday biotech was kind of the laggard. Yeah,

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 1>and as you mentioned Romaine, Big Tech weighing down the

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>SMP five hundred, Microsoft, Tesla, Apple, and Video A M

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>d all leading the way to the downside on the SMP.

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get some broader perspective as to what's

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>going on now and maybe what to expect in two.

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe An Feeney joining us right now. She's partner and

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager at Advisor's Capital Management. Joanne, always wonderful, Uh

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to have you here on the program. Um, let's start

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>off with two. Uh, the gains we saw in is

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>there I guess a fundamental reason to expect that those

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>gains can continue into the next year or me, Hello

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>everybody there, Um, yeah, I mean not certainly, not to

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 1>the same extent, but to degree that earnings growth is

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>expected to continue at a pretty decent pace next year,

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, somewhere around the order of eight nine percent.

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>And that does give a lot of reason to be

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 1>confident that equities, some equities can continue to move higher.

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>But just like we saw last year, we shouldn't expect

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of consistency across different kinds of stocks. And

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 1>so picking your places, I think it's gonna continue to

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>be pretty important. Okay, So speaking of picking picking your place,

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>where should investors be thinking about putting their money. Well,

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>there are three areas we think continue to be really

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>important to remain exposed to. One of them certainly is

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>secular growth. There are a lot of good multi year

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>expansions ongoing, and the companies that are key providers in

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 1>those areas are likely to see their sales and earnings

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>growth continue at a pace well above the market average.

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean this could be companies exposed to five G

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>two data center expansion. The housing market we think continues

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to grow pretty strongly given the backlog and demand that's

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>sitting there. So names like Broad Calm or a Corvo

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>on the smaller side, Lenar we like in the housing space,

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and william Sonoma because people are gonna put stuff in

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:11.160
<v Speaker 1>those houses, from furniture to two kitchen gadgets. So those

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>are couple areas we like. But beyond that, you know,

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>go to defensives and go to the reopening place. Joan,

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you caught me when you said five G there, and

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>then you really got my attention when you said defensive

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and big tech. I'm curious, though, how much of the

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>geopolitics kind of factors into all of this, especially when

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the tech sector and perhaps Joe Biden's

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>mission to bring some of that capacity back onto US soil. Yeah,

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that that is going to be a tricky, uh, you know,

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a set of waters to navigate, because politics always it

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is hard to predict, and it always it throws a

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of a monkey wrench into things. But if you

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>step back and look at the equipment that has to

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>be built, the devices that will continue to be built

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>five G, right, we're still in some of the early

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>innings there of those devices being rolled out, and so

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that some of these companies are

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>really beyond the politics, like a Core, for example, providing

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>really key inputs into smartphones five G enabled smartphones, but

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>also providing some key equipment into the defense industry UH.

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And Broadcom is another one with their filter technology as

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>well as their ability to sell into data centers, which

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>will need to expand by the way as five G

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>growth because more streaming, you know, more data flowing across

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the Internet and the seller uh networks will drive up

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that demanded And I think those two companies, you know,

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 1>for two, are are probably well out of the way

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>of the political turmoil that might be devil some other companies. Yeah,

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and when you talk about some of the other sectors,

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly healthcare, which has done pretty well this year, particularly

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the pharmaceutical companies, and obviously the boosts that

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>some of them got from the COVID crisis, and to

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a certain extent some of the medical device companies which

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 1>had actually started to rebound later in the year. Here,

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>what's the general thinking right now with some of those names.

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Do they still look attractive to you? Yeah? You know,

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>go back to the fundamentals on healthcare, right. The demographics

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>are really an important driver longer term, right, And the

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>aging population, not just in the US but around the

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:11.479
<v Speaker 1>world will demand greater innovation in healthcare. And so, you know,

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the areas we like our the equipment, the

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 1>analytical equipment providers, whether it's a Thermo Fisher or an

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>adult for example. And then beyond that too, I think

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the question you were really asking Romaine is you know,

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>what about these farma what about BioNTech or Advisor? Um

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>We still like both of those um as we can

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>see COVID uh, you know, may continue to have surprises

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>for us with new variants. We certainly gotta wake up

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>call with Omicron, and what we're seeing is that these

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>mr and A technologies, particularly from BioNTech, are really good

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>at creating the T cell response, which seems like it's

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>helping to prevent the severe illness UH for folks that

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>are vaccinated. And so we think that that stock has

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>more room to run as boosters become more prevalent around

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the world and Israel potentially even going to a fourth shot.

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>But be on that. We really like the pipeline of

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a company like bion Tech UH in their other m

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>RNA based therapies, whether it's a flu vaccine or cancer treatment.

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>So while it's gotten a lot of attention because of COVID,

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>we own it and we've owned it for our clients

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>for a while for reasons that go well beyond the

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>current crisis. All Right, a lot of opportunities ahead for rent.

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Conversation right now with joe An Phoeney, partner and portfolio

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>manager ED Advisor's Capital Management. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and you can also listen to our radio

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube search to Bloomberg Global News,