WEBVTT - Tech News: Netflix Has a Rough Phone Call

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and how the tech are Yet it's time for the

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>tech news for Thursday, April twenty first, two thousand, twenty two. Uh,

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be like a down with Capitalism episode.

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.839
<v Speaker 1>And I realized that as an employee of a massive

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>company that that, you know, there's some baggage there. But yeah,

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>let's let's jump into it because I'm gonna be getting

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.959
<v Speaker 1>on a soapbox. Um, So for those of y'all who

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>hate it when I do that, here's your preemptive warning.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>But first, let's talk about Netflix because one of the

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>big stories yesterday in the tech space was about how

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Netflix had its company's quarterly earning report, and Netflix revealed

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.400
<v Speaker 1>that it had experienced a net loss of around two

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand subscribers worldwide. So this is after taking into

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>account all the new subscribers that had joined, there were

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>still a net loss of two hundred thousand. Now, this

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>was the first quarter where Netflix had ever reported a

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.559
<v Speaker 1>drop in subscribers over the last ten years, and boy,

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>howdy did the bottom drop out? Like? It was actually

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of shocking to see the reaction to this news.

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Shares of Netflix closed at more than thirty down from

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 1>what it had been trading at. And netflix Is stock

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>had already taken a bit of a beating this year,

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, before yesterday, the drop in share price meant

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the company lost fifty billion dollars off its market cap.

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Market Cap is something you can figure out by multiplying

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the number of existing shares by the going market price

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>for those shares. You multiply those two numbers together, you

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>get the market up. And I've got a lot to

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>say about that, but first let's just get to why

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Netflix saw numbers go down. The company said it was

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 1>due to a combination of factors. One is that as

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>regions have lifted mandates and more people have become vaccinated,

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks are getting out of the house,

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and as such, they are canceling service subscriptions because you know,

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>they were signing up for these things when they were

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>stuck at home and didn't have anything else to do. Now,

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>presumably another factor that contributes to this issue is inflation.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Inflation has been a huge problem, particularly here in the

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>United States, and thus people have had to kind of

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>tighten their budgets across their households, right, They couldn't spend

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:44.959
<v Speaker 1>as much money like that. When your basic necessities start

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>costing more, you've got to make these kind of determinations.

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>And so a lot of folks were looking at entertainment

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>as something where they could cut some corners. It doesn't

0:02:56.400 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>help that Netflix has increased subscription fees a couple of

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>times in the not too distant past. In October twenty twenty,

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the price of premium Netflix membership went up to seventeen

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars nine cents per month. Then last year it went

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>up again to nineteen dollars and nine cents per month.

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's increased a couple of times in

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>recent memory, and that's another big issue. But another really

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>big factor is obviously competition. You know, Netflix used to

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>only have to really grapple with Hulu and Amazon Prime

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>when it came to streaming video, but these days you've

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>also got Paramount Plus, You've got Disney Plus, you've got

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Hbo Max, you've got Apple and lots more. So if

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the average household is like mine, folks end up making

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>decisions on which services they want and which ones they're

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>willing to skip out on. And trust me, I've got

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>plenty of fomo like I, I I don't subscribe to Apple

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like I need to so I can

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>watch Severance and Ted Lasso. I just haven't done it yet. Um,

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and I used to have Hulu and I cut that.

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>So lots of households have to make these determinations. And

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>if they say, you know, we haven't watched anything on

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Netflix in like six months, clearly they're gonna cut that.

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>If they're looking at you know, we still want to keep,

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>say Disney Plus or whatever. Now, Netflix has long leaned

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 1>on its original programming to set it apart, particularly as

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>various studios have chosen to move their own properties onto

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 1>their own streaming services. So you've had companies say like, well,

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>why would we give Netflix the power of having our

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.920
<v Speaker 1>content when we can have our own streaming service and

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>just hosted there. We've seen that a lot, and uh,

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, making original contents really expensive. In fact, Netflix

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was famously spending billions of dollars making their original series

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and shows and films and such. So that's also an issue.

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>And now we also have other entities like Apple that

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>are producing award winning cont hint, So the competition is

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>really serious in that case. Now, add to all of

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>that the fact that Netflix was hitting a saturation point

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in some regions like the United States, it really meant

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that expansion within those regions would become unrealistic. You know,

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to convince more people to buy into it

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>when you've pretty much hit everybody who is interested. There's

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>also the fact that some households share login credentials with

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>friends and family outside of that household, and Netflix estimates

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>there's some one hundred million of those out there, So

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 1>that's a hundred million potential accounts that Netflix could could

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>get signed up on the service that instead are just

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>piggybacking on existing accounts. So what exactly is Netflix planning

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.239
<v Speaker 1>to do about all this? Well, one thing they're looking

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.919
<v Speaker 1>to do is to roll out a lower cost, adds

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>supported tier of service to attract new subscribers, similar to

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>how services like Hulu use you know, tears that have

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>add support to them. Another potential avenue they're looking at

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is to crack down on the account sharing issue. Now,

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Netflix has already rolled out a pilot program in some

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>countries in Central and South America that give subscribers an

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>option to sign up for a tier that has up

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to two additional profiles for folks who do not live

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>within the household itself. So in other words, you spend

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more money, but you have these authorized

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>tiers that you can hand out to people. Uh, you know,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>and and it's limited to like two. Uh, it's cheaper

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>than if everyone got their own subscription, but it still

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>means that Netflix gets some money. And meanwhile, those additional

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 1>people can still get access to Netflix, which is better

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 1>than having it cracked down to the point where anyone

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>outside of a specific say I P address is excluded

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from being able to use that account. Obviously, it gets

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 1>of issues there too, like if you travel a lot

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and you'd like to use Netflix to keep up with stuff,

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>then you want to make sure that you're not going

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to run into an issue where Netflix says, hey, I

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 1>noticed that. You know, there's a lot of log insto

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 1>your account, but they're not all from the same place,

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, then the company cracks down and you

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to work around that too. So these could

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>be handy solutions, but they're ones that are going to

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>take some time. In fact, Netflix says these measures might

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 1>take more than a year in order to have a

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>big impact on the business, and that has a lot

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of investors scrambling. And here's where I'm going to have

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit of an antique capitalist rant. Um So, I've

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>complained many times about how modern capitalism holds shareholder return

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and by extension, company growth over all other metrics. This

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>is something that really got its its start in the

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>early eighties. It wasn't always this way, a uh, And

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in fact, some of the people who are most responsible

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>for a renewed focus on shareholder value would later go

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>on to say it's a mistake two hold shareholder value

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>above everything else. Doesn't stop companies from doing it though.

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Um So, it's not. It's not enough to do a

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>good job if you're a company. In fact, doing a

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>good job at whatever you do ultimately isn't that important

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>at all. What is important is growth, because growth equals

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>increased value. Increased value means higher share prices of your stock,

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and that means that the stakeholders, your shareholders are happy

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>because they're seeing a return on their investment. And since

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>we're usually talking about companies that report quarterly results, those

0:08:50.040 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 1>important numbers hit every three months, so they want to

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, shareholders want to see those numbers going up

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>every report. So ideally you show growth across every three

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>month period, and that's the measure of success for a company.

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>If the company happens to stay true to its organizational

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>mission and if it happens to perform at the top

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>of its game, you know, that's nice too, it's just

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>not required. And so for a company like Netflix when

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it has a setback, you end up seeing a lot

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of people jumping ship. And that's because those people they're

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>they're focuses on quarter over a quarter gains. If those

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers go the wrong way, people start to bail. Now,

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, this focus on short term gains

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>makes it very challenging for companies to make good plans

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>for the long term. It's not impossible. There are companies

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that do it, but it is much harder because in

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, you really have to keep the shareholders happy

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>on that quarter by quarter basis. If the shareholders aren't happy,

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 1>they bounce, and now it becomes way harder for you

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to achieve those long term goals because if those stock

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>prices start going down because people have lost confidence, you're

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>not gonna have of the financial ability to execute the

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>long term plans you have in mind. And if enough

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>folks bounce, it can actually send a company into a

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>spiral that's really hard to pull out of. And when

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we pull ourselves away from the stock market side of

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>business and we just look at how this affects the

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>companies and their customers, we just see tons of problems.

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Then there's also the issue that there's a limit to growth.

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>It's very hard to grow once you hit saturation points,

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and we see this in all sorts of companies. Netflix

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.360
<v Speaker 1>hit in the United States because pretty much everyone who

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>wanted Netflix and who could afford it subscribed, so there

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>were no more worlds to conquer. Alexander wept. And we've

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>also seen it in other companies like you know Facebook

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>meta slash Facebook, but specifically Facebook, because Facebook expanded to

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a truly gargantuan user base, but now it's seeing those

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>numbers on the decline. It's not able to attract new users,

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of older users have either slipped off

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the system or otherwise you know, are unable to be users,

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>like maybe they've passed away or something. So we see

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>this in other companies like Facebook or you know Meta,

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>but specifically the Facebook platform. You know, Facebook expanded to

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a truly gargantuan user base, but now the company is

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing numbers on the decline for the Facebook platform. It's

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>having trouble attracting younger users, and meanwhile older users are

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.839
<v Speaker 1>kind of slipping off the platform. So it hit a

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 1>saturation point and it's having a real hard time growing.

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And that because that's such an important metric in a

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 1>company's uh, you know health, at least according to shareholders,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it's really put Meta in kind of a rough spot.

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>We also have seen this with cable networks where a

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>cable network. Letlet's say it's a company that has several channels.

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, once they get on a certain number of services,

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they really can't expand anymore. You're essentially in as many

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 1>households as you possibly can be within that region. So

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the only way to grow is to expand to other regions,

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to focus on international growth. And you know, I saw

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that when when I worked for How Stuff Works, and

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works was part of Discovery Communications. That was

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a big part of discoveries strategy. Now we see discovery

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>strategy also being on expanding through online services, you know,

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>with the merger with the former Warner Media. So eventually

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you do hit a cap and you just stop growing.

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 1>You just can't grow any bigger. It is unsustainable to

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow, and then what happens, you know, it's

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard for me not to look at this

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>entire thing as a very long term pump and dump scheme,

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you're just pumping up a company up

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>so they can grow bigger and bigger until it just

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>can't grow anymore, and then you get the heck out

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and in the meantime, you just, you know, this company

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that might have been doing something really good and important

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is suddenly at in a trouble spot because of that.

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Um anyway, I'm done ranting about modern capitalism for now, anyway,

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And obviously this is an oversimplification of the issue. There

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>are lots of companies out there that do not fall

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>into this trap. It's just this is a trap I

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>see way too many companies fall into. And in many

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>cases they are companies that I actually really kind of like,

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 1>or at least I like the services or products that

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they produce. So it's frustrating as a consumer to see

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 1>that the focus goes towards the shareholders. Uh. And it

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>would require a seismic shift in business philosophy for this

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to change, so I don't expect it to happen anytime soon.

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>All Right, when we come back, we'll be talking about

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other tech news UH and some business stuff,

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>because the two are very tightly intertwined. But first, let's

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>take some time for our own business and listen to

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of messages from sponsors. Okay, we're back. How

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>about we talk about some big wins for companies that

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 1>are connected to Elon Musk. You know, I make no

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>secret that I'm not a big Musk fan, but there's

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>no denying that a couple of his companies have really

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>performed incredibly well recently. First up as Tesla, which reported

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>an eighteen point seven billion dollars in revenue for the

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>first quarter of twenty two, and three point three billion

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars of that was profit. That is incredible. Now, part

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of the revenue came from Tesla's practice of cell emissions

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>credits to other automakers. UH. See. Certain governments like the

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>EU and the United States require automakers to manufacture a

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>certain percentage of clean vehicles in all the cars that

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>they manufacture. Not every automaker actually manages to hit those regulations,

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>so to balance it out, these automakers are allowed to

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>buy emissions credits from other companies that do hit those requirements.

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So the idea here is that the automakers have an

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>incentive to develop and produce cleaner technology because if they don't,

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>they have to pay money in order to buy credits

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to offset their dirty, dirty cars. And so Tesla is

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>allowed to sell emissions credits to these automakers because Tesla

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>makes electric vehicles, their vehicles don't have emissions anyway. Tesla

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>sold nearly six hundred eighty million dollars worth of emissions

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>credits in the first quarter of twenty twenty two. That's

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>more than twice what Tesla sold during the fourth quarter

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>of one, so you know a good amount of money

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>is coming in from these emissions credits sales. Obviously not

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a significant amount when you look at eighteen point seven

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars of revenue, but in years past it was

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>those emissions credits that really helped Tesla when it was

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>making these earnings calls, because they weren't making as much

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>money off actual vehicle sales, but that is a different

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>story right now anyway, um, anyway, the company has a

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of other battles to fight, including navigating the ongoing

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>supply chain challenges, but so far Tesla has performed better

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in that regard than a lot of other companies have.

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>So Tesla has shown a lot more flexibility than a

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of other other automakers have managed, and thus has

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>really flourished quite a bit in the first quarter of

0:16:53.200 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. One other thing that must talked about during

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that earnings call was that Tesla is working on creating

0:16:59.440 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a robo taxi vehicle that won't have pedals or a

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>steering wheel, and that the company is targeting a twenty

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>four date for rollout. Now, I think that is incredibly ambitious.

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>We all know that the Tesla full self driving mode

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't actually a full self driving mode, and that our

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>current level of autonomous car technology has is probably somewhere

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>around level three. There are five levels total, or six

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>if you count zero, which is no autonomous system at all,

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>uh and level three is conditional automation. That means that

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>current autonomous vehicles really still need human oversight. They're only

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>capable of autonomous operation in specific situations, such as within

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>a narrowly defined region of operation, like you know, within

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>these you know, twelve blocks or something like that, or

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>under specific circumstances, like specific weather conditions like it has

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to be bright and sunny or it can't be you know, raining,

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>or has to be a specific time of day, like

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 1>it can't be after dusk. These are the sort of

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>conditions that most autonomous cars have to operate under. It's

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>some form of restrictive automation. For a driverless ROBOTAXI that

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>has no means of human override to be a possibility,

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>we would need to achieve level five autonomy, because even

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 1>level four autonomy typically includes the option for humans to

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>override the system and take control. Obviously, that would be

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>impossible if there are no controls to take. Of course,

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this is a goal doesn't mean that

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Tesla will actually hit it, nor does it mean that

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever Tesla does produce, let's say it does produce a

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>vehicle with no you know, steering wheel, no pedals, doesn't

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily mean that that vehicle will actually qualify as a

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>true level five autonomous vehicle. So in that second possibility,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I would really caution anyone against getting into such a

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:04.439
<v Speaker 1>vehicle because it could potentially be really dangerous. We've already

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 1>seen several instances in which driver assist features and Tesla

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 1>vehicles have contributed to fatal accidents. Now, in several of

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>those cases, you could argue that that was due to

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>human driver's disregarding safety rules. But still, this is a

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty big swing that Tesla is taking. And it's been

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>a while since I talked about the Boring Company. That

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 1>is Elon Musk's business that's all about digging massive tunnels

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>for the purposes of high speed transportation, as well as

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>some other stuff, but the high speed transportation is typically

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>what we really focus on. The Boring Company held a

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>round of funding that brought in six seventy five million

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.679
<v Speaker 1>dollars and investments which brought the company's value up to

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>five point six seven five billion dollars. This is another

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 1>company with which I have some concerns, mainly because the

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>goals and claims of the company seemed to be largely

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>unsubstantiated by reality. However, let's talk about what the company's

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>mission is before I get all skeptical. So, for the

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.639
<v Speaker 1>transportation side of the Boring company's business. The goal is

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>to dig out tunnel networks that will allow for the

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>construction of transportation infrastructure. That infrastructure will ideally create an

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>alternative to street level traffic and help reduce or potentially

0:20:24.760 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>even eliminate congestion, making it easier for you to get

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to your destination and create a more pleasant experience for

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, the surface dwellers. And when coupled with loop,

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 1>which is the transportation infrastructure part, the ideas that passengers

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.200
<v Speaker 1>will zip around these tunnels and potentially up to a

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred fifty miles per hour. Uh now, this in itself

0:20:46.400 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>was a step down from the original concept of the

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>hyper loop, which was an enclosed train system that would

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>pump out most of the air from the tunnels in

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>order to reduce air resistance and be able to travel

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:02.479
<v Speaker 1>at very high speeds. The current loop proposal involves writing

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in Tesla vehicles through tunnels. Uh now. Standard Tesla can

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>hold five people, although the versions that we've seen have

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>maxed out at three passengers plus a human driver. And obviously,

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to go all the way to five

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>people where you have one human driver and four passengers,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to have folks who don't mind being super

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 1>cozy in the back seat. Also, so far, people have

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>only been in vehicles that have reached a maximum of

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:31.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty miles per hour. And last I checked the LVCC

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.120
<v Speaker 1>loop that is in the Las Vegas Convention Center loop,

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>where there's kind of a pilot program of this that

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>one is restricted to a maximum of thirty five miles

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>per hour. This has led a lot of critics to

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>suggest that all Elon Musk is really doing is just

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>adding more lanes of roads. It's just that these are

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>lanes that are underground um and thus isn't really that revolutionary,

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>nor is it expected to make that big of an

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>impact on issues like traffic congestion. Now, arguably we won't

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>know for sure until something more robust than the Las

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Vegas Convention Center system is in place in order for

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>us to evaluate it. My guess is that we aren't

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>going to see a massive improvement using this kind of system,

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and that maybe it would have been a better idea

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:22.719
<v Speaker 1>to use some more tried and true measure like building

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 1>out a train system instead, which has a higher capacity

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and has a long history of being proven to work.

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>But we're gonna have to wait and see. I would

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:35.880
<v Speaker 1>love to be proven wrong about this. I would love

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to see that this is really an effective means of

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>getting people around using electric vehicles. I think that would

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>be amazing for Las Vegas and for other cities that

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>follow suit. Now, getting back to self driving cars for

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a second. Uh. In fact, part of the plan for

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the loop is to use self driving Tesla vehicles in

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the future. It's just that's not how it's working right now.

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But in the UK, the Department for Transport has determined

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that in the event of an autonomous car getting into

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 1>an accident, the motorists inside the car will not be

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>held liable for claims. Instead, the insurance company representing the

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>motorists or that vehicle will be held liable. Moreover, the

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Department says that writers will be allowed to watch videos.

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>They can watch TV on built in screens and self

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>driving cars and there won't be any problem with that. However,

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:26.479
<v Speaker 1>they will still be against the law to use a

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>mobile phone. And Okay, I'm not really sure why one

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>activity is okay and the other one isn't. Also, I

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be a while before we have vehicles

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that are really dependable enough where this sort of measure

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>will even be relevant. However, assuming we do get to

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that level of reliable autonomy, the benefits would be tremendous,

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>from relieving traffic congestion to reducing the number of accidents

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>and thus injuries and fatality. So I'm really hoping that

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>we hit it UH soon. I remain a little cautious

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>about it because it's just taking a lot more time

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>because as we've as we've discovered the challenges are more

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>subtle and varied than what a lot of people previously,

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:16.360
<v Speaker 1>including myself, previously considered. UH. I was really gung home

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:20.199
<v Speaker 1>on driverless cars for a really long time, and I

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>still am for the concept. I'm just a little more

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:29.360
<v Speaker 1>cautious about the actual capabilities. I mentioned on Tuesday's episode

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that employees at the flagship Apple store in New York

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>City are in the process of organizing a union, and

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that employees at an Apple store in

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>my home city of Atlanta have beat him to the punch. Uh.

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>The Atlanta employees filed a petition yesterday to hold a

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>union election. So this means that the Atlanta employees already

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>secured enough employee support to merit a vote on the subject,

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and should this upcoming vote pass, then these employees will

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>be the first Apple Store workers to union eyes. Of course,

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>there will be more steps to take after even a

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>successful vote, including seeing if Apple will recognize the union.

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Should the majority of store employees vote in favor of

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>unionizing UM. If Apple refuses to recognize the union, then

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the National Labor Relations Board has to get involved and

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>things will go from there. But we'll have to wait

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and see because the vote hasn't even been held yet. Now.

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, some former Nintendo employees have filed

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a labor complaint against Nintendo, alleging that the company terminated

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>their employment after they attempted to organize their coworkers. Furthermore,

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 1>they claimed that Nintendo either used surveillance or implied that

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:44.640
<v Speaker 1>they were using surveillance to spy on employee union activities.

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Now the next step is that, again the US National

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Labor Relations Board or n LRB will have to investigate

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>these claims to determine if Nintendo actually did engage in

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 1>illegal labor violations. So it remains to be seen, but

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>another example, at least allegedly of a company cracking down

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>on employees attempts to organize the union busting activities are

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.240
<v Speaker 1>something we're hearing more and more of. But then we're

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>also hearing more and more about workers trying to organize,

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>so the labor revolution continues. I'm not the only person

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>screaming at capitalism. In other news, over in the European Union,

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>representatives have advanced proposals that will require all smartphone manufacturers

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to support the USBC standard for chargers. So that would

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>mean that all smartphones would have to have USB C

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>ports and be compatible with us b C charging cables. Now,

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>one reason for this is to really cut back on

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>e waste. So the idea here is that you would

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 1>really only need to buy one charger for your phone,

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>or maybe a couple if you have to have one

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in a different location or whatever. But you get my

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>my meaning you just have to have the one. Then

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you could just keep using the same charge even when

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>you change out the type of phone you use, So

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>if you swap from Android to iPhone, you don't need

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a you know, new accessories because the charging cable will

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>fit both. If this legislation were to pass, an Apple

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>were to comply, So yeah, it would mean that Apple

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>would have to manufacture phones with USBC ports rather than

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 1>proprietary connectors. Apple has consistently argued that standardizing charging boards

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>would inhibit innovation and that this would ultimately hurt customers

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:31.760
<v Speaker 1>in the long run. I think most regulators don't buy

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>that argument. They just suspect that Apple would really like

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>to hang on to proprietary connectors because it creates a

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>market for proprietary accessories which Apple can provide. This proposal

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>has been a long time in the making, and it's

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>still has to go through a couple more rounds of

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>votes for different committees before it gets put to a

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>vote across the EU, and then there has to be

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>time to actually implement the regulations. So there's still time

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>for Apple to make a ace for its approach, and

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>even if this legislation does pass, it will be a

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit before we see it filter into things like

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple's actual design. Okay, We've got a few more stories

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>to cover before we conclude this episode, but first let's

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. Okay, In Afghanistan, the Taliban have

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>ordered that both the video social platform TikTok and the

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>multiplayer shooter game Player Unknowns Battlegrounds will be banned in

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the country. They argue that both properties are a bad

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>influence on Afghani youth. This follows a string of crackdowns

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>on entertainment in the country. Currently, television in Afghanistan mainly

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>broadcasts news or religious programming and pretty much nothing else.

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Based on the news stories I've read, it sounds like

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>living under the rule of the tell Laban is pretty miserable,

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly for women, which you know, no big surprise there.

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Even though the Taliban promised that it wasn't going to

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:13.479
<v Speaker 1>return to its more hardline approach to governing, uh, that

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>seems to have gone to the side now. And yeah,

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>they've really cracked down on the sorts of media that

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>people within the country can access, and my guess is

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that's just going to get more and more restrictive as

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>time goes on. YouTube has removed the campaign channel for

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>John Lee, who is running unopposed to lead Hong Kong.

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>That election is going to be determined by a committee

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.959
<v Speaker 1>of around one thousand five people. That committee is nearly

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>entirely made up of pro Beijing officials, So it's really

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to look at this as anything other than

0:29:54.840 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>just our performance from China backed officials to show like

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a the appearance of a democratic process. But you know, again,

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>John Lee is running unopposed. There's almost you know, it

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>really does raise the question, why do you need a

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>campaign channel you're not campaigning against anyone. But the US

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>has also ordered sanctions against John Lee and several other

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong officials, and those sanctions are there because those

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 1>officials have been linked to restricting Hong Kong's autonomy and

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>eliminating individual freedoms of the citizens of Hong Kong and

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>restricting rights over the last several months. So YouTube has

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>complied with those sanctions and thus shut down that campaign channel.

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Meta meanwhile, is going to allow John Lee to maintain

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a presence on Facebook. However, Meta has deactivated monetization on

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that account and says that they're not going to allow

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.479
<v Speaker 1>John Lee's account to make use of payment services in

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>order to comply with the actions against John Lee. Net

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>neutrality advocates in California are celebrating a legal victory now

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>move from I s p s to block California's enforcement

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of its own net neutrality law. All right, this requires

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a bit of explanation. So prior to two thousand eighteen,

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC in the United States

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>had established certain net neutrality protections that restricted what I

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>s p s could do, and it required I s

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>p s to comply with certain rules, rules that I

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>sp s are not super keen on complying with. But

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>during the Trump administration, the FCC pretty much gutted all

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>those measures and reversed all of those decisions. California, their

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 1>their state representatives, stepped up and created legislation that allowed

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the state of California to enforce similar rules as to

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>what the FCC had in place before two eighteen, and

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I s p s really complained about it. They said

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that the fccs decision to drop net neutrality should apply

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>across to the state level, because the FCC is federal

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and California obviously is a state. Now, the Ninth Circuit said,

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>uh no, just because the federal agency abdicates authority over

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a matter doesn't mean that a state authority can't then

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>step in. Um. In fact, if a federal agency says,

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, we don't have the authority to regulate this industry,

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 1>then by extension, that agency also doesn't have the authority

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to prevent anyone else from regulating it because you can't

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>say I'm not responsible for that, and at the same

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>time say you can't be responsible for that because you're

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>not the boss. You can't do that. So now California

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>has a strong that neutrality law, and moreover, will be

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>allowed to maintain that law even if we should see

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>more big swings with the FCC, like if the FCC

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>were to reinstate net neutrality regulations and then at the

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>change of another administration reverse that decision again, California's law

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>would still stay firm because it's a state law, not

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a federal law. Uh So this was a big win

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>for net neutrality advocates. Finally, do you work for a

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>company that has been urging you to come back to

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the office, and more importantly, does your boss follow the

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:36.959
<v Speaker 1>same rules that you're expected to follow? I ask because

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a research consortium called Future Forum found that non executive

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>employees are almost twice as likely to work at the

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>office five days a week as executives are. The survey

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>found that just over one third of all those who

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>were surveyed have returned to the office full time. Meanwhile,

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>executives tend to pursue a more hybrid approach to work.

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Some of this might be due to business travel, which

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is definitely on the rise, but some of it seems

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to highlight a massive divide between employees and executives. That

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>there is kind of a do as I say and

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>not as I do philosophy at play here, which is

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously inherently unfair. Now, I have to say I am

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>incredibly fortunate and that I work for a company where

0:34:25.200 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>we maintain a great deal of flexibility. Uh. In fact,

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I was in the office earlier this week because I

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>needed to go in, and the only other person in

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that office that day was my superproducer TORII. We were

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the only two people there. But we are seeing an

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>increasing number of companies push for employees to return to

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>offices full time. It's just a shame that the same

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to apply to the bosses. Huh So yeah,

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess in the end, what I'm advocating for is

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>down with capitalism and eat the rich. Hey uh More. Seriously, though,

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I as I get older, I get ground here about

0:35:03.480 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the inherent unfairness in these systems and feel that the

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>labor movement is is kind of a proof that a

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of other people feel the same way I do,

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>and that hopefully the labor movement will result in things

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:22.439
<v Speaker 1>changing direction. I'm not expecting to see a one eight here.

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not and I don't think that any massive changes

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to have other consequences that will have to

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 1>deal with. But it would be nice to kind of

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 1>see the narrative change a little bit in my mind. Um,

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and I say that as an executive producer. All right,

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>that's it for this episode of Tech Stuff, And uh yeah,

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:42.839
<v Speaker 1>I keep on hoping that I can cover tech news

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't involve as much politics and business as well.

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I hear you. I also wish for that, but I

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta cover the news that happens. So that's where we are.

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>If you have suggestions for topics I should cover in

0:35:55.600 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff, whether it's a tech company, a specific technology,

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a person in tech, anything like that, or even just

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a concept in technology you would like to know more about,

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>reach out let me know. The best way to do

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>that right now is on Twitter. The handle for the

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>show is tech Stuff hs W, and I'll talk to

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>you again. Really see tech Stuff is an I Heart

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Radio production. For more podcasts from My Heart Radio, visit

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the I heart radio, app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.