WEBVTT - The $64 Billion Hidden Debt Hazard; SoftBank Focus

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Credit Edge, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>My name is James Crumbie. I'm a senior editor at Bloomberg.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>We're very pleased to have with us on the show.

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Luk At de Powley, who covers distressed debt for Bloomberg

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>News in London, thanks for joining us, Thanks for having me.

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>We're also delighted to welcome Sharon Chen from Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>in Singapore. We'll be coming back to Sharon and a

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>little bit to talk about SoftBank, a big name that

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>everyone's watching. So do stay with us. But first, Luc

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>at the Powley with Bloomberg News, you've been digging deep

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>into distress debt. There's a lot of it about. Let's

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about your latest scoop. A sixty four billion dollar

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>pile of debt from some of the biggest companies has

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.639
<v Speaker 1>suddenly come to light. It was hidden, you found it.

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the story there?

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Luca So a colleague and I have been through all

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 2>of the latest file from the US where many companies

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 2>have for the first time disclosed using arrangements called supplier financing.

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Supplier financing is effectively a form of financing where you

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 2>pay your suppliers later, often with the help of a

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.960
<v Speaker 2>financial intermediary or a bank, and by doing so, you

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 2>increase the amount of cash that you have. You basically

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 2>suspend your liabilities for a period of time, and you

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 2>end up being more cash rich as a result. They

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 2>were forced to disclose it by FASBY, which is the

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 2>body that is basically in charge of accounting rules in

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the US, and similar rules will come into effect for

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 2>other companies around the world. But this is the first

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 2>time we've had a really good look at how many

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 2>companies use this and how aggressively they use it, and

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 2>I think we were kind of surprised by how many

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 2>companies were doing it and.

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 3>The amount of supply chain financing that was going on.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So then just break it down for supply of finance,

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you kind of describe it, But how does it work?

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>In really basic terms? Do I do I get someone

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to supply something to me and I'd pay them later,

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and then in the interim, I'm cash rich because I

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>actually have the money myself. But what's the story? Yeah,

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm not, I understand.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 2>So the most the most like basic way I like

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 2>to think about it is if you've got a supermarket

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and a supermarket has you know, there's a hypothetical supermarket

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 2>has suppliers.

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 3>Let's say that they're farmers.

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 2>And the original idea of this was that the farmers

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 2>might want to get paid in sort of ten days

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 2>or immediately, but the payment terms from you know, the supermarket,

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 2>so someone like a Tesco in the UK or a

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Walmart in the US, you could reduce the amount of

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>time that it took for that payment to be made

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 2>by getting a bank to come in between and pay

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 2>the supplier earlier. So the farmer, rather than waiting ninety

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 2>days for the eggs is given, he can get it

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 2>in ten days and he pays a small discount, he

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 2>gets paid sorry, a small discount by the lender, and

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 2>then a lender gets paid in full when the invoice

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 2>is actually due. That's sort of like the most sort

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 2>of vanilla and basic form of supplier financing and a

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>hypothetical example, but it's been taken to sort of new

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 2>and extreme heights based on the stuff that we've seen

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 2>disclosed in the reports, to sort of you know, far

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 2>longer payment terms and you know, an altogether different transaction

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 2>than the one I described there.

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>So in basic terms, it's just like a bridge. You

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I need something from somebody, the bank will come in

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and just bridge that transaction, offering money to the supplier.

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the supplier supply gets paid early, they take

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 2>a small hit depending on the discount rate the prevailing

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 2>interest rate, and then they can get their money quicker,

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 2>which is what a lot of them want. Yes, so

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 2>that's the basic idea, but it's been sort of it's

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 2>gone a little bit more extreme than that in the

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 2>past or ten years.

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And what kinds of companies were talking about? You mentioned Tesca,

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>but are we talking about big household names in the US.

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, I mean we're talking about Philip Morris, We're

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about Signa, which is an insurance company, a lot

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 2>of auto parts companies, Doctor Pepper, curic A Cure, Doctor Pepper,

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>even a really large sway that different companies Boeing around

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.479
<v Speaker 2>seventy or eighty that we found inside the S and

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 2>P five hundred. I'm sure if we expanded our universe

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 2>and looked through even more ten ques, then we could

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe find some more. But my colleague Nicola White and

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.839
<v Speaker 2>I are pretty fed up of looking through them, to

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 2>be honest, so we might just stick with.

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Those but so you talk about it's getting more extreme.

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not just let me a million dollars for a

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>week or something. It's now gone out much much further.

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's real like long term. What's the term we're

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about.

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So, I mean, it's not really totally clear from

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.159
<v Speaker 2>the filings that we have, so FASBIS compelled companies to

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 2>give a certain amount of information, but not as much

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 2>information as some people would have liked. So we have

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 2>some idea of how long some programs are, but there

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 2>are quite a few that seem to go to three

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 2>hundred and sixty days, which, when you think about it,

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 2>is a crazy payment term to accept. Effectively, supplier is

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 2>saying like, I'm happy to be paid in three hundred

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 2>and sixty days, and then a financing party comes between

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 2>them and could pay them earlier. But you know, you

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 2>think about that as sort of like that's basically what

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 2>they've agreed to. It's kind of a crazy thing for

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 2>the supplier to agree to. And then on the other side,

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 2>what that can do is create this sort of debt

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 2>debt like whatever you want to call it, effect where

0:05:55.000 --> 0:06:00.040
<v Speaker 2>people are you know, suspending their payables for longer and

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 2>then for increasing the amount of cash that's generated the

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 2>company despite not you know, that not being due to

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 2>anything organic sales or something like that.

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 3>Effectively, if you think about it.

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 2>For yourself, you were you know, if you could delay

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.559
<v Speaker 2>all of your liabilities, your mortgage or whatever by a year,

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 2>you'd have more cash, but you wouldn't actually be richer.

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 2>And that's effectively what a lot of companies seem to

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:30.119
<v Speaker 2>have done here. So yeah, it's more extreme than I

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 2>would have anticipated. And the financing is a lot longer

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 2>than sort of what you'd normally associate with something in

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the accounts payable line in a set of companies accounts.

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 2>It's not sort of invoices waiting to get paid. It's

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 2>three hundred and sixty days long.

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>And just so people understand what is FASBE you mentioned

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that earlier.

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 2>FASB is basically the body that looks after accounting regulation

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 2>in the US, so they govern us GAP so that

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 2>they're in charge of instituting new rules, and this is

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 2>one of the new rules the instituted actually interestingly at

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 2>the behest, at least in part of ratings agencies who said, like, look,

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 2>we don't have enough disclosure around this sort of debt,

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 2>like line item. We need more disclosure because if we

0:07:24.080 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 2>don't have it, then we can't rate these companies properly,

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, and a lot of the ratings agencies have.

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Been trying to sort of guess around this for a while.

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>I have general rules that like anything beyond ninety days

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:41.080
<v Speaker 2>should be considered sort of debt, and anything less than that,

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, it wouldn't be considered debt for the company

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 2>with the supplier of financing program. But yeah, that's sort

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 2>of the why this has come up now. The industry

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 2>itself has been growing for years and years and years.

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 2>But the reason that we wrote the story now is

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 2>because the first time we've got a decent data set,

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 2>and we don't have everyone a lot of companies haven't

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 2>reported yet.

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 3>We've got a decent data set.

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 2>We can see roughly how big this form of financing is,

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 2>and it's pretty big, but.

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>It could be more than sixty four billion dollars.

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so I mean it's really hard to know. I mean,

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 2>there is there are some trade bodies who try and

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 2>take a stab at how big supply chain finance is.

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 2>One figure from a sort of a trade publishing house

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 2>called BCR. They reckon the two point two trillion dollars

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 2>of supply chain finance was issued globally last year. It's

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 2>just a sort of you know, that's a poll for

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 2>people within the market that they've done, and it's not

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 2>always totally clear. You know, it's not an easy number

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 2>to get a hold of, but that's a huge amount

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>of financing, and I don't think it's sort of impossible

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 2>based on what we found and what's still like a

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 2>relatively small subsection of companies.

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>But the companies we've talked about Philip Morris, TESCA, I mean,

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>they're not companies that are in trouble at all. They've

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.959
<v Speaker 1>got cash, they can you know, this is just like administration.

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Really it doesn't seem like a problem. But when could

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:14.319
<v Speaker 1>it be a problem?

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:14.559
<v Speaker 2>Does it?

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Does it become an issue for weaker companies when credit

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.839
<v Speaker 1>gets tied? I mean, how does it all unravel in

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the worst case scenario?

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:24.079
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Sure. So.

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 2>One of the problems I have is because I'm a

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 2>distressed debt reporter, everyone sort of panics when I bring

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 2>him up.

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 3>And I don't think that's like necessarily the case here.

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think, you know, people are going to you know,

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 2>fall apart under the weight of the supply chain financing programs.

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>But you do have some pretty, you know, sizable examples

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 2>where supply chain financing has played a really important role,

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 2>not so much in the US, but definitely in Europe.

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's still the UK's biggest bankruptcy ever

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 2>was Karellian and Karellion collapsed almost instantly.

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 3>In twenty eighteen. I think it was, yeah, twenty eighteen.

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 2>When a lot of a lot of the reason that

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 2>it was so leveraged and its leverage was kind of disguised,

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 2>was because it was using supply chain financing really aggressively.

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.199
<v Speaker 2>So rather than coming up in their sort of debtline

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 2>of their accounts, it came up in their accounts payable.

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 2>An analyst kind of knew something was going on, but

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 2>they didn't have a really good idea of, you know,

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 2>quite how leverage this company was. In the UK, generally

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 2>companies go into administration and then you know, restructuring advisors

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 2>come in and try and find a solution for the company. Here,

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 2>the company just went straight into liquidation because there was

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 2>no recovery to be at. It was just, you know,

0:10:40.280 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 2>they basically one of the best recoveries they've had. We

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 2>still don't know the number is issuing the order to

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 2>signed off on a lot of this stuff. Then there's

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 2>a company called ab and Goer which had several brushes

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>with insolvency over the years, like a Spanish company which

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 2>did some creative accounting. There was you know, there was

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 2>some supply chain finance there. And then the example that

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 2>people talk about a lot is green Sill, which although

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 2>really the problem with green Sill was kind of more

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 2>exotic than supply chain financing and more to do with

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, future receivables or whatever. That was one of

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 2>the businesses, you know, one of the businesses they operate,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 2>and certainly the business they were most vocal about was

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, doing supply chain financing for big companies like.

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 3>General Mills or Vodaphone.

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, like it has been a problem in the past,

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 2>and I guess the real issue is, like if you

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 2>got into a situation where banks were less likely to

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.359
<v Speaker 2>give you credit, this is something they can pull immediately.

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:46.319
<v Speaker 2>It's not like a facility. It's not like a loan

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 2>or a bond where you have a maturity and you

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 2>know you've got this capital until a certain date and

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 2>then you're got to pay it back. This can just

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 2>be pulled pretty much whenever, depending on you know, the

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 2>specific contracts, which you know, I'm not really privy to.

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 2>This is mostly almost entirely uncommitted as far as I

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 2>can tell. And that's kind of a risky sort of

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 2>thing to happen with have within the capital structure, because

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, if all of a sudden you've got to

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 2>accelerate all of those liabilities you've extended for three hundred

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 2>and sixty days, you're going to find yourself incapable of

0:12:18.559 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 2>doing that. In a lot of cases, you know, do

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 2>you have a revolving credit facility that can cover that?

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 3>Do you have cash in your bank account that can

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 3>cover that? Maybe not?

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 2>And in a ties of credit market, it's you know,

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 2>while it doesn't seem like it's likely to happen to,

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, these big companies that we've been talking about,

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 2>it seems likely they could happen to someone as a

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 2>bank step back from lending to corporates.

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned rating agencies. Is it a ratings issue

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that some of these bigger companies liable to a downgrade

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>because of the stuff you.

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Think potentially, but it's it's a hard one because how

0:12:56.120 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 2>you characterize this is still pretty hard to do based

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 2>on some of the disclosures. I mean, we've spoken to

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>a number of people from from raising's agencies and you know,

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 2>interested investors, and they say like, well, there's just not

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 2>really enough disclosure to make, you know, sort of hard

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 2>and fast, like Okay, we think that there's actually a

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 2>few more turns of leverage on there, so we're going

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 2>to knock you down a notch or whatever. But I

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 2>think I think it, Yeah, it's quite feasible that it

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 2>will happen to someone of the hundreds of companies which

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 2>are going to have to report this over the next

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 2>few years, as you know, the rules outside of the

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>US get implemented as well. So yeah, that that is

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 2>a real possibility. And the other thing that is going

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 2>to happen is credit is not only becoming more scarce,

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 2>but as a result being more scarce is getting more expensive.

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 2>And one of the things that we're starting to see

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 2>happen is like suppliers who remember in this transaction, actually

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 2>bear the cost of the financing. They're the ones who

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 2>get paid earlier for you know, a smaller amount than

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 2>what they're owed are looking at instead of like, you know,

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 2>oh it's only a couple of percent or whatever. With

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 2>the way rates have gone up recently, are now looking

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 2>at a far larger chunk of their invoices being spent

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 2>on financing for.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 3>You know what.

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Although may be sort of like helping the supplier, is

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 2>also in a lot of cases definitely helping the larger company,

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 2>which is sort of an interesting roundabout way of financing yourself, right.

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>And the bank's going to be making a lot of

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>money on this.

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it was. It's not a very risky

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 2>form of lending. It's as I say, we don't have

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>all the contracts for all the different for all the

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 2>different agreements that are with the parties.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 3>But I would wager.

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 2>That you know, they're in a pretty good position. Nobody

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 2>really wants to sort of renege on their debts. It's

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 2>very short term, so it's sort of you know, you've

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 2>got that sort of you're temporally senior at some people

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 2>like to say you're at the front of the queue

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 2>because you're the first people who are going to you know,

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 2>get paid out of a company. So so yeah, it's

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 2>considered like quite unrisky in a lot of cases. There

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:17.119
<v Speaker 2>are also examples of people who buy this as investors,

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 2>not just the banks that are doing it, but from

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 2>people I've spoken to in the market. A lot of

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 2>this is done by sort of the corporate banks of

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 2>a particular company, you know, the sort of relationship banks.

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 2>They're the ones who are providing the financing. And yeah,

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 2>it's probably sort of a fairly unrisky way to provide

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 2>credit to the suppliers. But you know, also to an extent,

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 2>the larger company with the with the program.

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Great stuff. Luk at Appali from Bloomberg News, thank you

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Thank you read all of

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>lucas scoops on the Bloomberg terminal and of course at

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. Moving on to another big topic. As

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, we're very fortunate to have with us

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Sharon Chen, who covers a whole load of things infrastructure, telecoms,

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.600
<v Speaker 1>utilities across Asia for Bloomberg Intelligence based in Singapore. How's

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it going over there, Sharon?

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Great? James, how are you very well?

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you thanks for joining us. So there are a

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>number of names that we're going to focus on in particular,

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but before we do. What's the mood on the ground

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>over there are people upbeat about the economy where you are.

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 5>I think Singapore is obviously a bit more exposed, but

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 5>I think Southeast Asia there's a lot of talk about

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 5>southeas Asia in general being a safe haven, you know,

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 5>if you know the global economy slows down.

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, interesting, So let's start with a big one that

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you cover. Soft Bank. We hear about them all the time.

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>The news isn't always good. First of all, let me

0:16:38.720 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>ask what is soft Bank? Why are they so important?

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 4>So?

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 5>SoftBank is a very high profile investment holding company that's

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 5>focused on investing in startups in the technology sector. So

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 5>it's always making headlines right in terms of what they're

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 5>investing in, whether it's we work, whether they're trying to

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 5>IPO arm and in the credit space in particular. It's

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 5>a very bond issuers. So they've got about forty billion

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 5>dollars of bonds outstanding, and that's why I'm very, very

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 5>focused on this company.

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So that's one of the biggest issues. They're based where

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>in Japan?

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:13.119
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it's based out of Japan.

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay. They were recently downgraded. There was lots of news

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>about that what led to a weakening credit credit profile

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>at the bank.

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 5>So S and P downgraded to double B. Moodies has

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 5>it at BA three with negative outlook. I guess this

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 5>is going back a bit. But back in twenty twenty

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 5>one we saw soft Bank really ramp up investments through

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 5>SoftBank Vision Fund too. And obviously, starting from last year

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 5>we've seen rising interest rates and all the technology stops

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 5>come under pressure. More recently, we've got Silicon Valley Bank

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 5>collapsing and that has reduced liquidity for all these startups.

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.239
<v Speaker 5>So the soft Bank Vision Fund has really wracked up

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 5>some investment losses in the past year. It was about

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 5>thirty eight billion dollars worth of investment losses, and so

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.440
<v Speaker 5>SoftBank has had to sell some of its other better

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 5>quality assets to shore up its balance sheet. Is liquidity,

0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 5>and you know, it used to own close to I

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 5>think twenty percent of Ali Baba and now they've monetized

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 5>almost everything and that's by far the strongest. So the

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 5>portfolio quality for SoftBank has has really suffered in the

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 5>past couple of years.

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, So what's the near term risk shown? Is it manageable?

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes?

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:32.719
<v Speaker 5>Actually so, even though it's just been downgraded. The company

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 5>is actually in a fairly good position at least in

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 5>the next couple of years. It's got about thirty billion

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:40.439
<v Speaker 5>dollars worth of cash, it has proven that it has

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 5>good funding access, especially to the Japanese yend market, and

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 5>it's also lowered it's adjusted loan to value to twenty

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 5>four percent, so that's a fairly healthy level.

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>And what are we looking for next? There's an IPO

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>in the works. Can you talk a bit about that

0:18:54.920 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and how it will affect them?

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.960
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so I mentioned earlier an IPO of ARM. So

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 5>ARM is chip designer, and you know, if you've been

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 5>following the news and VideA and some of the other

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 5>chip companies out there have really rallied very strongly because

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 5>there's so much excitement about AI in general, and so

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.280
<v Speaker 5>there was some consens about execution risks just given the

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 5>IPO market hasn't been the strongest this year. But you know,

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 5>looking at how some of their peers are doing, I

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 5>would I believe the company could be in a position

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 5>to IPO And it's target is by the end of this.

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Year, So what happens after that? Are they going to

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>increase investments? They can do share buybacks, so you know.

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:34.119
<v Speaker 4>All thatse being equal.

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 5>Obviously the rm IPO would be positive, right, it would

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 5>lower LTV, it would improve liquidity and also the portfolio quality.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 5>But then I don't expect software to really sit on

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 5>a mountain of cash and not do anything right. So

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 5>the company has been that if you follow their earnings

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 5>called previously they keep talking about being in a defensive mode,

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 5>but now in the latest one they do talk about,

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, there could be potential opportunity out there, and

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 5>they are in a good position to you know, pivot

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 5>away from the defense mode when they see the right opportunity.

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.439
<v Speaker 5>So the question I think from a credit perspective is

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.479
<v Speaker 5>how fast will soft Bank ramp up their investments, you know,

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 5>because you know the macro backdrop isn't isn't the strongest yet,

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 5>so that's one thing to watch. SoftBank is also prone

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 5>to doing a lot of large share buy bags, so

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 5>that could be another use of proceeds, and obviously if

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 5>they use some of the process to repay that, that'll

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 5>be great.

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And the medium to long term and they've got a

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>large portion of the portfolio and startups within the soft

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Bank Vision Fund. What's going on.

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 5>There so I mentioned earlier they've sold off Ali Baba

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 5>if they did ramp up investment and division funds. So

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.159
<v Speaker 5>if you look at the portfolio now compared to pre COVID,

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 5>pre COVID, I think Ali Baba, which is rated single

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 5>A is made up about half of soft Bank's portfolio,

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 5>and now that's close to almost zero, and you've got

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 5>soft Bank Vision Fund at about forty percent of the portfolio.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 5>Majority of these are unlisted, less mature companies and obviously

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 5>higher risks, especially if you're compared to the likes of

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:10.560
<v Speaker 5>Ali Barber. So there's just less visibility in terms of,

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, how they can realize some of you know,

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 5>monetize some of these assets in the future. And the

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 5>other thing that has been happening is there's been quite

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 5>a few senior management changes in software in the past

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 5>couple of years and could potentially we could potentially see

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 5>some you know, shifts and investment strategy. That's another uncertainty.

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there's been talk about soft Bank looking at

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 5>private credit, for example, which is a brand new area

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 5>for the company.

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that a good thing for them? And we hear

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>so much about it. I'm based in New York, obviously,

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and we hear we hear about private credit being the

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>big new thing. I mean, what what what does soft Bank?

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, what's their edge in private credit?

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 5>Well, so, as I mentioned before, they haven't really done it,

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 5>but obviously I think they would leverage their know how

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 5>and their expertise in the technology sector already to branch

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 5>into this this mark. So we'll have to see how

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 5>how they fare, because it sounds like that it's getting

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 5>quite competitive.

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Definitely. Yeah. Okay, So the other company we're going to

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about Rakuten, also in Japan, another very interesting situation.

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>But before we dig into the details, just let us know,

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 1>tell us Sharon, what what is Rakutan? And you know,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>why do we care about them?

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:22:22.119 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 5>Racketan is really a conglomerate. It's one of the leading

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 5>e commerce and fintech players in Japan. But the reason

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 5>why I've been watching it closely is actually a fairly

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 5>new business. So it entered the domestic mobile market about

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:38.280
<v Speaker 5>a couple of years ago and has really been struggling

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 5>there in terms of to gain market share, and they've

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 5>been making still they're still lost making after two years.

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 5>It's nowhere as big as soft Bank in terms of

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, their bonds outstanding, but we have seen a

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.199
<v Speaker 5>lot of volatility in their bonds, and that's because of

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Rakuten's poor liquidity position. The company has just raised about

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 5>three trend billion yen of equity, but even so, their

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 5>five year CDs is currently at above five hundred basis points,

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 5>which is pretty much double soft banks even though they're

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 5>both rated double B by SMP.

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 4>So it's a fairly volatile name.

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>They have a ton of debt coming due over the

0:23:15.680 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>next few years, right, yes.

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 4>So.

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.960
<v Speaker 5>I mentioned the the equity base. I think that should

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 5>tie them over until maybe sometime in twenty twenty four.

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 5>But then between mid twenty twenty four and mid twenty

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.959
<v Speaker 5>twenty five, they've got over five billion dollars worth of

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 5>bonds coming due, and that was really the reason why

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:37.439
<v Speaker 5>some of their bonds were trading at distress levels and

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 5>still are, and because the company is still free cash

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 5>flow negative due to the mobile losses, so they have

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 5>to rely largely on refinancing to meet these maturities.

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Will they able to able to do that or will

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 1>they defaulte?

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 5>So I mean I mentioned earlier it's the leading e

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 5>commerce and fintech player, right, so it's hard to see

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 5>the company really defaulting because they do have good quality businesses. Ideally,

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 5>you know they've bought time to stabilize the mobile business

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 5>until say sometime in second half of twenty twenty four,

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 5>and the company is working hard on this. So ideally

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 5>you'd want them to stabilize the mobile business so that

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 5>the market feels better about them and they can refinance

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 5>the bonds that are coming due. In terms of the

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 5>mobile business, the issue here, I think is really their

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 5>poor network quality. So to give you some idea, even

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.720
<v Speaker 5>after two years, Rocketan only has about two percent market share,

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 5>and I think generally the perception is that the network

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 5>quality is really subper compared to the incumbents. So Rocoton

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 5>is taking steps to do this. So, for example, it

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 5>came up with a new roaming agreement with KDDI, which

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 5>is the second largest mobile player in Japan, and it's

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 5>expanded the roaming to cover high traffic districts and major cities.

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 5>They removed speed cabs. I do think this would help,

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 5>but as we know, with a lot of consumer facing brands,

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 5>it takes a while to shift consumer's perspective. So you know,

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 5>we're going to watch the next few quarters but I

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 5>think it's still going to be slow going, but hopefully

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 5>that there would be some improvement. They've also cut mobile carepack,

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 5>so that should at least help reduce the cash fleet

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 5>in the near term.

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>And we should expect from them some liability management transactions

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>over the next few months or years.

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 5>So the equity definitely helps, right I mentioned that it

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 5>should tie them over until sometime in twenty twenty four.

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 5>The company is also still looking to sell assets. They've

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 5>been very active here. They listed rocketan Bank actually earlier

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 5>this year, when you know, the whole thing about Credit

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 5>Citizen Silicon Valley Bank was going on, so valuation was

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 5>lowered and expected, so they did raise some funds there.

0:25:55.560 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 5>They've sold some minority stakes. They've also sold the twenty

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 5>percent stake in Rocketense Securities to Mizuho. Going forward, what

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 5>they're trying to do is ipo Rocket and Securities as well,

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 5>but I think they might need to wait for the

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.359
<v Speaker 5>market to recover somewhat so that the evaluation might be

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 5>closer to what they sold to Mizuho. They have another

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 5>eighty eight billion of investments on balance sheet which can

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 5>be sold, but again these amounts might be still small

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 5>compared to the bonds that are coming due.

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And when you step back and look at the entire

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>capital structure, are their opportunities there for investors now or

0:26:30.280 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 1>should investors be very cautious? Do you think.

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 4>That's a that's a very tough question.

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 5>So in terms of the bonds that they have outstanding

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 5>in hard currency, they've got, you know, the twenty twenty

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 5>four late twenty twenty four bonds, senior bonds, they are

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 5>coming due, and they have some perpetual notes as well.

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 5>So I would say the perpetuals definitely are the higher

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 5>risk ones, you know, because they can defer these and

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 5>if you know, and the mobile business continues to struggle,

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 5>there's obviously a high risk that they might not call

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.400
<v Speaker 5>this while while the senior bornes are structurally stronger.

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Okay, great, So two big names to watch SoftBank and

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Record ten. Thank you very much, Sharon Chen of Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>You can read all her great analysis on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Do check it out and hope see you soon. Sharon.

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks James, and thanks again to look at the Pali

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg News. Read all of his great distressed debt

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>scoops on the terminal and at Bloomberg dot Com. I'm

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 1>James Crombie. It's been a pleasure having you join us again.

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Next week on the credit edge,