WEBVTT - CoreWeave’s $14 Billion Meta Deal, Spotify’s Ek to Leave CEO Role

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>from Coast to Code with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and vl Loow in San Francisco.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Core.

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 4>We've signed a deal to supply Meta with as much

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 4>as fourteen point two billion dollars worth of computing power.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 5>Plus a change of leadership at Spotify, a CEO Daniel

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 5>Ck stepping aside after almost two decades.

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 4>And Anthropic releases a new AI model designed to code

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 4>longer and more effectively than prior versions. We speak with Aropis,

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 4>chief product officer, but.

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.159
<v Speaker 5>First ed we are both here in New York this

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 5>week and checking out the markets that are just taking

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.200
<v Speaker 5>a pause amidst some macro focus. Of course, TENSI shutdown

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 5>of the US government that's on every investor's mind. What

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 5>does that mean in terms of data to what does

0:00:58.240 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 5>it mean in terms of the future of rape policy

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 5>the FED. We're currently completely flat, just pinching into the

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 5>green on the Nastet one hundred, but it's way more

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 5>interesting underneath the hood and you're looking at that.

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, our top story is Core, Weave and Meta. It's

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 4>the latest Core Weave capacity deal fourteen point two billion dollars.

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 4>The stock has been on a tear since it's listing

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 4>in March right now trading at its highest level in

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 4>around six weeks. Clearly that big game following the Bloomberg report,

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 4>The market's kind of focused on this idea, that is

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 4>evidence core weaves move beyond one single customer, which is Microsoft.

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:31.679
<v Speaker 4>But actually, as Brodie up Forward often says, carry the

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 4>devil's in the detail on this one.

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 5>Let's get that detail, Dy forward with us. You help

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.680
<v Speaker 5>break the story. Core weave has tripled since it's IPO.

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 5>We're up another fifteen percent. What does it mean to

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 5>be adding Meta to the fold as well as open

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 5>Ai more recently of course in Microsoft O.

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, it means that core Weave isn't just a colonial

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 6>state of Microsoft.

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 6>That was the concern for so long with these neo

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 6>clouds that gosh, if their biggest customers are companies that

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 6>also effectively compete with them, that seems like a pretty

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 6>indefensible business. But you start getting companies like Meta and

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 6>open Ai who are likely to be longer term buyers

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 6>of this technology, and so I think folks are getting

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 6>more comfort that Corewave and companies like it may have

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 6>a more sustained place in this AI infrastructure build out.

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 4>Fourteen point two billion dollars is a very large number, Brodie,

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 4>But the terms of the contract extent of twenty thirty two.

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 4>You know what I'm going to say, because we discussed

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 4>it this morning. There is skepticism here because there are

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 4>many unknowns. For example, does call We've actually have a

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 4>data center somewhere that's built and operating that they can

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 4>assign Meta's workloads too.

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Well.

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 6>What the CEO told me is that they never sign

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 6>a deal if they don't have the right power and

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 6>data center allocation ready to go. I don't think there's

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 6>a data center that they're just going to flip on

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 6>and say, aren't Meta here you go. But you know,

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 6>this contract goes till twenty thirty one. They're probably going

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 6>to need to buy a bunch of chips, fill it

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 6>up and hand it over to Meta. And what that

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 6>also means is they're going to take out a lot

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 6>more debt. I mean, Corewave is kind of famous at

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 6>this point for levering itself up to a pretty incredible degree,

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 6>and we'll probably see a little more of that.

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 4>The role of debt in financing AI infrastructure. That's becoming

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 4>a story of the year twenty twenty five, Blue Most

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Brady Ford with the core we've metastory.

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, AI's boom is sending investors searching for trades in

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 4>an overlooked group, suppliers of the gear used to make chips.

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 4>Let's bring in Bloombos Tech equity reporter Ryan blaceelca lots

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 4>of readership on this story and some names that have

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 4>not been at the forefront of what's happened within the semispace.

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Give us your reporting.

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 8>Hey, good morning, Thank you for having me so. Yeah,

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 8>this is a trend that we have been seeing throughout

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty five now that some of the more well

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 8>known AI trade seems like maybe those are getting a

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 8>little bit mature. Investors are looking elsewhere. We've seen it

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 8>in storage companies, We've seen it in memory companies, So

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 8>now we're seeing it in the semiconductor capital equipment companies

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 8>named like LAMB Research, Applied Materials, KLA Core, Terradyne. These

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 8>kinds of companies which make the equipment that is used

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 8>for building the semiconductors. Building all this manufacturing out these

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 8>are getting sort of a second derivative move. Given the

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 8>sheer build out we're seeing all the chips that are

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 8>required for AI, obviously it's going to mean higher demand

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 8>for the chip for the machines that make those chips.

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 5>We constantly question valuations, ran should we be worried about them

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 5>for these names?

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 8>Well, I'd say if we were talking about this maybe

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 8>a month or so ago, it would be a lot

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.480
<v Speaker 8>less of a ponent issue. But some of these companies

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 8>have really seen very steep rises. They've really become momentum

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 8>favorites over the past couple of weeks and months, and

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 8>I think right now they are getting to a little

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 8>bit more elevated levels. But certainly they are not sort

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 8>of a nosebleed, real sort of bubble kind of valuation,

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 8>but they certainly come up a lot from where they

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 8>were earlier this year.

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Ryan, if you walk into a fab the clean room

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 4>where semi condut is are manufactured, along the line is

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 4>machines for lots of different companies. At the beginning of

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 4>that line, you're probably likely to have one from LAMB Research.

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 2>The chart that we took from your.

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 4>Story shows LAMB being a real outperformer here.

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Is there anything more to know about that name.

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 8>I think they are one that especially used with Micron,

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 8>so the memory chips that has been another area of

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 8>focus this year, so that high bandwidth memory. I believe

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 8>that LAMB works on machines that are used in those

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 8>I think that's probably certainly a component to their business there.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 5>Ran, So it's great to catch up with you, Ran, Plaselkah.

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 9>We appreciate it.

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 5>Meanwhile, sticking with chips at Taiwan's premiere, says that trade

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 5>talks with the United States have ended, quote the crucial

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 5>closing stages, indicating the global chiphub is finally nearing a

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 5>deal with the Trump administration.

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 10>Now.

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 9>Investment in the US was.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 5>Among the issues discussed in Washington in recent days, according

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 5>to a source, as well as lowering the twenty percent

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 5>tariff imposed on the island ed.

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Some other news we're tracking.

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Google's agreed to pay twenty four point five billion dollars

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 4>to resolve Donald Trump's claims that being blocked from posting

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 4>on his YouTube channel after the January sixth, twenty twenty

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.919
<v Speaker 4>one riot at the US Capitol amounted to illegal censorship.

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 4>That's according to a court filing which also shows twenty

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 4>two million dollars. We'll go toward construction of a new

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 4>ballroom in the White House, a project near and dear

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 4>to Trump, while the remainder will go to a handful

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 4>of other plaintiffs who joined him in legal action. Okay,

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, and Thropic has a new AI model that

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 4>codes on its own for up to thirty hours straight.

0:06:23.640 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 4>No need to feel it soylent, no red bull, and

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Thropic chief product officer talks to us about Claude Sonnet

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 4>four point five A conversations.

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Deep Seak update is an experimental AI model, calling it

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 4>a step toward next gen AI. The latest version introduces

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 4>a new technique it calls deep Seek Sparse Attention or DSA,

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 4>a mechanism designed to explore and optimize AI training and

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 4>operation and improve efficiency when processing long tech sequences.

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 5>Correct, let's stick on the models AI startup Anthropic is

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 5>that with a new one Claudes on it four point five.

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 5>The company says it can code longer, more effectively than

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 5>prior versions. Let's get more with Anthropics chief product officer

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 5>Mike Kreger.

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 9>Mike, it's wonderful.

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 2>How to have you on.

0:07:23.160 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 5>Thirty hours straight is how long then it can code

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 5>on its own? What are the technical feats needed to

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 5>be able to go that long where humans can well

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 5>definitely not survive that unless as a whole load of

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 5>caffeine involved.

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 11>Good morning.

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 12>I think one of the main advancements we made was

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 12>around memory and what we call context management.

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 11>So if you think.

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 12>About how you human works for longer periods of time,

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 12>you're writing things down, You're making sure you can always

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 12>pick up where you're left off if you're coming back

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 12>the next day. So with cloud sign It four point five,

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 12>we did a lot of work on that memory management.

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 12>So the model, if you think about it, sort of

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.119
<v Speaker 12>writes down what it's doing, keeps track of its state,

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 12>and then if it needs to sort of backtrack a

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 12>table to then keep going. And that's how it's able

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 12>to stay coherent for a much longer period of time

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 12>than any other of our models.

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 5>How much you've managed to lower therefore those ideas of

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 5>inaccuracies or more broadly, that well that they're making things up.

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 5>Hallucination has always been the key issue. Heren't been something

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 5>that's limited edgentic AI adoption.

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, this is the model that we have that is

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 12>also besides being our most powerful, is also are safest

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 12>and most coherent, so as the lowest hallucination rate, and

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 12>is the least susceptible to things like jail breaks.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 11>And I think that matters a lot. I think I

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 11>tell my product.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 12>Team all the time, it's no use going for twenty

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 12>thirty hours if you're making mistakes along the way, and

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 12>so having it be both accurate producing good code that's

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 12>the prerequisite, and then you can focus on scaling up

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 12>on the time horizon.

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 4>Mike, can we talk a bit about the audience for

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 4>claudes on at four point five. The real emphasis from

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 4>Entropic from the early days was enterprise customer as opposed

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 4>to a sort of direct consumer. But this field of

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 4>tools for the developer is expanding. It's probably more competitive.

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 4>Who are you hoping uses this?

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 12>It's really we've taken a business focus, but that also

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 12>manifests kind of in the prosumer space, and so we

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 12>have a lot of what we call power users who

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 12>might be developers or might just be early adopters who

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 12>want to bring AI to their work. So one of

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 12>the things that SIGNUT four point five can do, along

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 12>with writing code, is also creating really professional looking word

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 12>and PowerPoint and Excel documents. It actually uses the same

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 12>coding capabilities under the hood, but not to write code,

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 12>but instead to produce documents. And that sort of capability

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:31.079
<v Speaker 12>means that we're starting to see adoption in the enterprise

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 12>as well.

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 4>Mike, you and I have discussed this in the past.

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 4>We know Mike Krieger as Mike Krieger CTO Instagram, And

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:40.839
<v Speaker 4>what I'm seeing right now in the field of your

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 4>peers is the reports on open Ai and what Meta

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 4>is doing in social media and video. Is that a

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.400
<v Speaker 4>direction you want the product team to take, claud.

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 12>In, We're focused much more on the productivity use case,

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 12>and so when I think about our roadmap, it's very

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 12>much how do we take workoff people's hands, or how

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 12>do we accelerate folks and make them, you know, the

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 12>work the best that it can be. How do we

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 12>automate your work in the browser? So much more on

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 12>that productivity side of things, and I don't think you'll

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.920
<v Speaker 12>see us play very much in that entertainment space.

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 5>Might productivity perspective. It's come under some concerns recently. Think

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 5>about the MIT report everyone's suddenly talking about this only

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 5>well ninety five percent of the tests were basically failing

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 5>out there in the wild. How are you making sure

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 5>that enterprises adopt your products but actually see the productivity

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 5>gains from them.

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.200
<v Speaker 12>I think this is really important, where if you know,

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 12>AI gets brought into the workplace without the right either

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 12>tools around it or enablement, what you end up with

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 12>is this disillusionment a couple of months later around while

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 12>folks aren't adopting it, or yeah, it helped me a

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 12>little bit, but not enough. And so we have a

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:45.560
<v Speaker 12>lot of emphasis on let's.

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 11>Make sure the work is actually good.

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 12>You know, you might hear this word online like slop,

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 12>where AI is creating work that actually just is not

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 12>very good. And I think of us, we're trying to

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 12>produce the anti slop work that actually, you know, maybe

0:10:55.720 --> 0:10:57.319
<v Speaker 12>gets you eighty percent of the way there, but it's

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 12>eighty percent that then lets you complete the work in

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 12>a way that you're proud of, rather than you know,

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 12>opes it did something, but now I feel like I

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:04.880
<v Speaker 12>have to start over because it didn't really help. So

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 12>I think that's the really key piece for enterprise adoption.

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 5>And therefore, does it remove the need for so many

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 5>people or ultimately there's still this argument this can all meant,

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 5>but will it start to replace?

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 12>Mike, we think a lot about what, you know, the

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 12>comparative advantages are of people, you know, as relates to AI.

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 12>There's a lot of still relationship building and trust, critical

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 12>analysis and strategy that really comes on the human side

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 12>of things, and so we really try to design tools

0:11:32.800 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 12>that as much as possible play up those parts of

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 12>that human AI interaction, knowing that you know there will

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 12>be you know, laborships that are almost inevitable, but if

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 12>we can design our products along the way to maximize

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 12>both people's understanding of AI but also their use in

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 12>a complementary way.

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Mike, open a eyes holding dev day next Monday. It's

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 4>probably on your calendar for peripheral awareness. But I'm very

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 4>conscious that you're kind of speaking to us twenty four

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 4>hours after the news of clots on four point five

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 4>km out. Have you any data on the sort of

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 4>reaction to it, early demand and where that's coming from.

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 12>It's been really interesting how quick people are to adopt

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 12>a new model. So by I think about one pm yesterday,

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 12>we already had more usage of clouds on at four

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 12>point five than all of our other models combined, which

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 12>really speaks to the eagerness of a lot of these

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 12>startups that are building on top of our models, as

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 12>well as early adopters to on day one you saw

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 12>GitHub and Cursor and Windsurf and many of these products

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 12>that build on top of our models want to incorporate

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 12>clouds on at four point five, and so we had

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 12>this really early crossover moment as well.

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 2>That is interesting data.

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Correct me if I'm wrong, But this model is running

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 4>on Project Rainier, right, is that sort of operationally and

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 4>infrastructure wise where the training and now inference of it

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 4>is being done.

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 12>So we do our both training and inference across You know,

0:12:53.559 --> 0:12:56.199
<v Speaker 12>we have partnerships with Google and Amazon, but we have

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 12>a significant part of this model being served now from

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 12>Amazon as well, and we're seeing a lot of growth

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 12>on a tobospedrock as well.

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 5>Just going to that infrastructure layer. You're obviously the product

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 5>visionary here, but you need to have the energy the

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 5>compute to bring your products to life. Many worrying that

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 5>we're in some sort of bubble cycle around AI. How

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 5>do you think about that as you drive this business forward?

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 12>Might I think there's this combined need to both scale

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.959
<v Speaker 12>up for the training side, but also on inference. And

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 12>as we've scaled, especially with our business arrangements and the

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 12>companies building on top of son it, I think we

0:13:29.720 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 12>now have a sort of forward looking perspective on what

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 12>our inference needs will be, and I think that'll let

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 12>us go out and also secure the kinds of compute

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 12>deals that we need to both feel the training but

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 12>also have that sort of revenue generating inference side as well.

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 5>And we get so focused on the compute needs of

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 5>the United States, but we've been talking a lot about

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 5>that in Europe. How it's scaling in the UK. From

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 5>your adoption, how are you seeing things different globally MIC,

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 5>Because those that are actually deploying what's happening with Sonnet

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 5>four point five in the latest models, we see this

0:13:59.200 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 5>a lot.

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 11>In terms of our global footprint.

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 12>There's something we started expanding earlier this year, and so

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 12>for our rollout of Trainium too, which is the chip

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 12>that Amazon has built for a WS that we use

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 12>pretty extensively for our cloud models. A lot of that

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 12>deployment is actually international, and when I go to Europe,

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 12>for example, I hear a lot of questions about data

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 12>locality and making sure that inference is happening in local

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 12>data centers.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 11>And the only way we're going to be.

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 12>Able to do that is to have that international footprint

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 12>of these chips.

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 11>And so you've seen the same in APEC.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Mike.

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 4>We are going to ask you a question about talent wars,

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 4>but I'm just going to make an appeal to you

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.280
<v Speaker 4>to just be honest with me on this. How big

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 4>a factor it is or isn't for you right now?

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 4>In the product team at Anthropic in particular, I'm looking

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 4>at the pace at which open ai is putting stuff out,

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 4>Meta is putting stuff out. Just through your experience, what's

0:14:49.000 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 4>the talent situation right now?

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 12>I'm seeing much more of that talent sort of you know,

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 12>back and forth happen within the research site in general,

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 12>a little bit less on the product. I think there's

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 12>some key hires where that's been the case. One thing

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 12>that's been a positive sort of maybe surprise or just

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 12>outcome of how mission oriented a lot of Anthropic, a

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 12>lot of the Entropic team really is has been. It's

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 12>affected us very minimally in terms of that back and

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 12>forth that you're seeing maybe among some of the other

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 12>frontier labs, which.

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 11>Is very encouraging.

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 12>Of course, you have to continue to make sure we

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 12>build a great culture and maintain that mission alignment.

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 11>But so far it's it's been minimally affecting us.

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 4>If we take so on it. Four point five is

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 4>the case study. What were the types of roles that

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 4>you needed to bring in to roll out the release.

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 12>I think people think of, you know, research and model

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 12>science as being fairly cut and dry. I actually think

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 12>that there's a lot of art and taste to it

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 12>as well. You are making a lot of decisions from

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 12>a research engineering perspective around what are the task the

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 12>model needs to improve on, how will it improve on that,

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 12>how will we know that it's improving on that? And

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 12>so a lot of that reinforcement learning post training piece

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 12>is the key shape of what we really thought about.

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 11>And son at four point five.

0:15:57.400 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 4>My creagain andthropic chief product off. So it was a

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 4>real deep dive into Sonnet four point five. Thank you

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 4>so much for joining us. Back on Bloombo Tech, I've

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 4>coming up on the show Door Dash has a new

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 4>autonomous robot.

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Meet Dot, Hi Dot.

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 4>We'll talk to the VP of door Dash Labs about

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 4>what this robot delivers.

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 2>In terms of its capabilities. That's next. This is Bloomberg tech.

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Delivery company door Dash is unveiling a new autonomous delivery

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.920
<v Speaker 4>robot called Dot. The company says Dot is the first

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 4>commercial delivery bot to seamlessly navigate bike lanes, roads and sidewalks.

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 4>His stirs more actually read vice president of door Dash Labs.

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 4>This robotics experience includes work with zooks and video, but

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 4>the real terms parameters for deployment, which cities, how many

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 4>deliveries when.

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 3>So, we have been focusing on the greater Phoenix area

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 3>and that's our focus for this year. We are hoping

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 3>to address about one point five million customers by the

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 3>end of this year, and then you know, as we progress,

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 3>we'll see what happens. DoD likes to travel though, so

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 3>hopefully we can expand to more cities.

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 4>Team, let's bring up some pictures of Dot again. I

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 4>mean to me assue you that this looks kind of

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 4>the design like a bit like a stroller or a

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 4>pram as we might have said in the United Kingdom.

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.199
<v Speaker 4>Could you just talk us through the design of it

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 4>and how this is what you arrived at.

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 11>Sure.

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 3>So there were three sort of key pillars for us

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 3>when we looked into the line of Dot. The first

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 3>one was product market fit, so we wanted to make

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 3>sure that Dot would have the right cargo capacity and

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 3>the payload that it can carry up to thirty pounds

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 3>fits a vast amount of the door dash deliveries that

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 3>we do today. The other big part was it had

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 3>to be going at speeds that allowed us to do

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 3>a big chunk of deliveries in the three to mile range,

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.919
<v Speaker 3>and that's why the design point was it needs to

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 3>be able to go on bike lanes, on roads, on sidewalks.

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 3>But the other key part is the pickup and drop

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 3>off for deliveries, which makes it very different from right hail.

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 3>And one of the key feedbacks we had gotten from

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 3>merchants was it is absolutely imperative to have the robot

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 3>come as close as possible to the merchant, right next

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 3>to the doorstep, which is what Dot does, and so

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 3>that was a key design feature, was that it could

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 3>go on sidewalks and be sort of narrow enough to

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 3>navigate sidewalks.

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 5>And pretty well that what our shoe currently isn't on

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 5>the market because you're already using Coco Robotics spat by

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 5>some aaltman. There are others on the market. Isn't just

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 5>the speed the pace that they can't meet.

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So we actually also announced as the key product

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:19.800
<v Speaker 3>called the Autonomous Delivery Platform, which we actually in which

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 3>all our partners, including Coco and our drone partners and

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 3>other robots including Dot can participate. And the idea is

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 3>that as the demand for delivery is growing, we have

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 3>an all of the above approach, which is there'll be dashers,

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 3>they'll be drones, they'll be Dot and so we are

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 3>looking to work with all of our partners to enable

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 3>this different modalities. So we believe the future will be

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 3>multi modal for our delivery. And that's this is the

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 3>first step towards.

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 5>That I cycle every day, I navigate dashes. How will

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 5>how many dashes will I be navigating in the future?

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 5>Is this going to replace careers in the long term?

0:19:57.280 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 5>How haven't much of a percentage do you want delivered

0:19:59.359 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 5>by Dot?

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, we don't look at this as a percentage. We

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 3>look at it as just a growing pie. So if

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 3>you think about the just over the last few years, DoorDash,

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 3>the demand for delivery has been growing significant a year

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 3>over year. So we think of this as like I

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 3>said before, it's just going to be multimodel. There are

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 3>going to be many, many different forms of delivery. And

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 3>you look at the range of deliveries we do. If

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 3>you just look back to you in five years ago,

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 3>we were doing mostly restaurants. Now DoorDash does groceries, It

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 3>does household items like you know, toothpaste or diapers, even

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 3>home electronics.

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 11>You can buy a.

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Complete laptop on door Dash and have it delivered to

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 3>your door step. So we expect all kinds of deliveries

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 3>to be happening on our platform. And this ADP that

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:46.160
<v Speaker 3>we announced yesterday is the first step towards at.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Ashu who is going to manufacture dot and where will

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 4>they manufacture dot?

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 3>So at this point we are you know, going through

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 3>that process of figuring out all the all of the

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 3>pieces of where the manifest actually is going to be

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 3>and where you know, all the components, et cetera.

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 2>So it's not decided, it's still.

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Being discussed internally as to how we will end up doing.

0:21:08.440 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 5>This is the aim to have it largely us.

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Made, so we you know, a big the technology that

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 3>we have developed here is all built here in the

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 3>US in Indoor Dash Labs, so it's pretty much purpose built,

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 3>homegrown robot, you know, and it uses a state of

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 3>the art technology, again developed by the engineer's at door Dash.

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 3>It is fully LPHO autonomous system, so it, you know,

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 3>as you can see, navigates through all of the various

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 3>situations that can encounter, whether it is pedestrians or cars,

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 3>and again going up in sidewalks, going up to your doorsteps,

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 3>lots of pedestrian and what are called vr US vulnerable

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 3>road users which means kids, pets, and so on. So

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 3>all of that technology was developed in DoorDash Labs.

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 5>So motoring along at twenty miles an hour next to

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 5>me on the cycle lane, so surely I'm sure she

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 5>thanks so much for joining us. Shue Reggae, vice president

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 5>of door Dash Labs at door Dash and coming up

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:09.120
<v Speaker 5>AI chip startup Cerebras Systems. Well, it's closed a new

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.719
<v Speaker 5>funding round an over eight billion dollar valuation. We're going

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 5>to talk to the CEO Andrew Folman, because remember this

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 5>is a company that actually wanted to IPO. Does that

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 5>delay that inevitable? We could talk the ambitions next and

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 5>what are you looking.

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 4>At to private markets, conversation, in equity markets and technology,

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 4>there is some stuff going on. I mean the broad

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 4>story is that we are basically flatten the now's like

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 4>one hundred traders are in weight and see mode.

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 2>Will we get some economic data? Will we not?

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 4>But we know the big story out there on the

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 4>single mover side is core weave up thirteen percent, highest

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 4>level than six weeks on a fourteen point two billion

0:22:42.520 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 4>dollar compute deal with Meadow, which is down one and

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 4>a half percent. So much more to come on the show,

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 4>stay with us. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. Let's check in on these

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 5>markets because on the surface some calm, we're currently off

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 5>by just a quarter percent, and then adds that one

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 5>hundred anxiety about a potential government shut down here in

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 5>the US. What does that mean for key data in

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 5>the jobs market, particularly on Friday? What does it mean

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.400
<v Speaker 5>for the federal Reserve? We stampat in terms of big tech,

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.720
<v Speaker 5>but underneath the hood, let's look at individual movers because

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 5>there are some big deals being done.

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 9>Once again in the spectrum space.

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:25.959
<v Speaker 5>We are having the best month for EchoStar on record,

0:23:25.960 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 5>at more than twenty percent because it keeps on selling

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 5>Spectrum this time we understand it's likely to be selling

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 5>to Verizon. There's talks of Plum and the moment for

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 5>AWS three licenses. Already they've been selling to AT and

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 5>T and SpaceX. Let's have a little look at what's

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 5>also on the move. Big deals being done in AI compute.

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 5>We're going to delve into that throughout this section. We're

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.880
<v Speaker 5>up twelve thirteen percent on Core. Weave fourteen billion dollar

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 5>deal to Meta Yet more GPU access, more compute, but

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 5>we've got plenty more when it comes to the world

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 5>of AI infrastructure.

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 11>ED.

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, a lot more happening in technology in private market.

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.479
<v Speaker 4>It's AICHIP making startups. Rebrest Systems Is is a one

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 4>point one billion dollar funding round Cerebras, which aims to

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 4>rival and Video Now, has a post money valuation of

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:10.679
<v Speaker 4>eight point one billion dollars. The company's CEO, Andrew Feldman,

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 4>joins us for more. Andrew, good morning, Welcome to Bloomberg TEG.

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, my assessment with cerebras is is that you

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 4>claim that the technology is as competitive or better than

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 4>what in Vidia's systems offer, and you are aggressively building

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 4>out that infrastructure, and you are doing deals with end

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 4>customers in the context of this funding round, what's your

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 4>priority here?

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 10>Sure, I think it's not just what we think. Every

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 10>third party benchmark has shown that we are ordered twenty

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 10>times faster than in video GPUs AT for inference work.

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.880
<v Speaker 10>So that's for the using of AI. And so this

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 10>is the largest and sort of fastest growing part of

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 10>the market. So we wanted to fuel our continued extraordinary growth.

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 10>And so we're going to use this money to double

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 10>our manufacturing capacity. We manufacture in the US, and we're

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 10>going to double in the US, to extend our footprint

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 10>more data centers so we can support more customers and

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 10>those are in the US as well, okay, and to

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 10>continue to invest behind our pioneering technology which has sort

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 10>of solved problems that were open for seventy five years

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 10>in the compute.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 4>Industry andrew to what extent you supply constrained? In other words,

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 4>you have all of these customers, are you having to

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:44.400
<v Speaker 4>choose who gets first DIBs when some capacity comes online?

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 10>Right now, one of the most challenging components is to

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 10>get access to data centers, and those are some of

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 10>the massive contracts you discussed in your previous segment with

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 10>Core that they're providing to the like of Meta. Meta

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 10>is also one of our customers. But the ability to

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 10>stand up and deliver data centers filled with our gear

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 10>so that our customers can enjoy the benefit of the

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 10>fastest inference through the cloud is one of the limiting factors.

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Right now.

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 5>You've got what five new data centers just in the

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 5>course of twenty twenty five. Looking at Dallas, Oklahoma City,

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 5>look at Santa Clara. What's really interesting, Andrew is that

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 5>where are you building? Are you literally going out there building?

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 5>Are you just trying to win future relationships with a

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 5>Core weave so that they take your compute rather than

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 5>of Nvidia.

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think we are renters of data centers. We

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 10>are not builders of data centers, and so we partner

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 10>with those who own the real estate and those who

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 10>stand up the facility. We fill the facility, We rent

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 10>the facility, and then fill it with our infrastructure. Infrastructure

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:06.479
<v Speaker 10>is then used by customers around the world, either by

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 10>the by the day, by the month, by the token

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 10>to get their fast AI and so I think that's

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 10>the way we think about it.

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 5>Caroly Andrew, we think about your customers and you're mentioning

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 5>the likes of Meta. I'm interested in also where the

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.199
<v Speaker 5>money has been coming from for this round, because I

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 5>noticed that one of your key backers of the past

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 5>isn't on the list, seems G forty two key investor

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 5>in previous and of course Middle East and based relationships

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 5>potentially CEO with China, and that's been an issue for

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 5>Syphius in particular, if you wanted to IPO, have you

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 5>decided not to take money from them this time?

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 10>No, that wasn't That wasn't the situation at all. I

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 10>think it is very common in your dash to get

0:27:54.080 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 10>to being public to raise raise a late stage round

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 10>from public market investors. Around was led by Fidelity in

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 10>a treatise. It included Tiger Global Valor seventeen eighty nine,

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 10>It included Alpha Wave, all of whom have large and

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 10>predominant public market practices, and so I think this was

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 10>a round that was aimed at a different class of investor.

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 10>We are continuing to collaborate with G forty two. They

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:36.199
<v Speaker 10>are our strategic partner. We are building enormous clusters in

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 10>the US for them. We are training models, We are

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 10>serving models, including one that they built in partnership with

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 10>their leading university in the UA, nbz UAI, so that

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 10>partnership remains rock solid.

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Andrew quickly.

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 4>Then the obvious question is does your ongoing association with

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 4>G forty two preclude you from pushing forward within investment

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:02.760
<v Speaker 4>based on the history of the Syphius review.

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 10>Well, not at all, not at all. I think each

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 10>investor has their their own appetite by stage, and what

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 10>we found in this round was that the lead investors

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 10>had a very large appetite and so we were able

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 10>to meet that appetite. We cleared Syphius in March, and

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 10>so there is nothing blocking the IPO.

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 5>So when, Andrew, when in mid March we cleared when

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 5>will you IPO?

0:29:36.680 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 9>Dare we ask?

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, that's the big question. I appreciate you asking, and

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:44.720
<v Speaker 10>as you also know, I'm unable to tell you with

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 10>S one on file, but I appreciate it.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 5>We keep the dance going, Andrew Fellman, it's so good

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 5>to have you Ceo Cerebra systance. We appreciate it.

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Lott.

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 5>We go stick with AI infrastructure now, because spending has

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 5>been dominant theme inequities ever since CHATCHYBT ten. Everyone's attention

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 5>to the technology, and of course it's compute needs. But

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 5>the proliferation of data centers across the United States is

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 5>putting pressure on energy supply and sending wholesale electricity costs

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 5>a sawing for you for customers paying their bills. It's

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 5>more on this with the big take. Let's bring in

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 5>Bloombog pot Power reporter Josh saul Sot of Bloomberg Data

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 5>is reporter Leo Nicoletti, and I start with you, Josh,

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 5>the compute You go down to the individuals this is

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 5>affecting you, particularly go to Baltimore. Can you tell us

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 5>a little bit about how you found these individuals and

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 5>what the effect on them is of Well, basically all

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 5>the data center is being built pretty close to.

0:30:34.840 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 11>Them, right.

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 7>So the headline here is that data centers and their

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 7>massive power demands are driving up power bills for everyone.

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 7>The people that we spoke to in Baltimore are some

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 7>we found because they had testified in a city council

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 7>meeting about their bills. Some we found because they were

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 7>eating eggs next to us at a diner. We talked

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 7>to a lot of people and everyone's really upset and

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 7>having a hard time paying their power bills because of

0:30:58.360 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 7>this effect.

0:30:59.400 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Leo.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 4>This is the latest in a series really of pieces

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 4>of data journalism from this newsroom about the impact of

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 4>the buildout in data centers. Just explain methodology and the

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 4>data set that we arrived at that gave us that headline.

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so, you know, essentially, we dove into very granular

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 13>data on wholesale power prices, which is an important component

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 13>of what then makes up power bills, and we looked

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 13>at locations tens of thousands of locations throughout the country

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 13>and we kind of related it to the location of

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 13>data centers. And what we found essentially is that areas

0:31:37.840 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 13>located closer to data center activity are much more likely

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 13>to experience price increases than areas located far from data centers.

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 5>That's what's so interesting about data center ali in the

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 5>Virginia region, and this is why you go to Baltimore.

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 9>Can you, therefore, just break.

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 5>Down us in New York are we going to be

0:31:57.480 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 5>feeling the impact? How are you going to start seeing

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 5>people built up and affected by region that they live,

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 5>and how certain local government is going to have to

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 5>stand in and help in some way.

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 7>Data centers affect power prices and your power bills in

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 7>two main ways. One, they just use up so much

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 7>power that economics one O one it makes power more

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 7>expensive for everyone else. And two they require so much infrastructure,

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 7>you know, new transmission lines, new power plants. The way

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 7>utilities work is those costs are spread out among everyone.

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 7>The reason this might matter for some of your some

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 7>of our some of our listeners here, maybe they pay

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 7>their their like I pay my power bill, fine, that's okay,

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 7>and some poor people have a hard time paying theirs.

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 7>But it can really affect these companies because if data

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 7>center developers, big tech firms have a harder time connecting

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 7>to the grid, or if that's slowed down because of

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 7>public anger, that slows down some of these AI plays

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 7>like we're just listening to. And it can also hurt

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 7>utilities if they're if regulators tell them that they that

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 7>they need to do something differently, that can affect everything

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 7>from their share price to their future planning.

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 2>LEO.

0:33:00.720 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, data analysis can take you in lots of

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.240
<v Speaker 4>different directions. So the headline is up to two hundred

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.400
<v Speaker 4>and sixty seven percent more. But were we able to rank,

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, in which geographies regions this this gain in

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 4>price is most present and what are the factors behind it.

0:33:18.440 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so we looked at data, like I said, all

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 13>over the country, tens of thousands of locations, and of

0:33:25.520 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 13>course there are areas in the country that are more

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 13>effected than others, especially on the east coast, the northeast,

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 13>the PJM grid in Northern Virginia. But also interesting Baltimore,

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 13>which doesn't have data centers immediately nearby, but it is

0:33:40.800 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 13>actually very close to Northern Virginia that is Data Center Alley.

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 13>And what we found is people and locations in the

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 13>Baltimore area were experiencing some of the highest increases, sometimes

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 13>three times as much since twenty twenty in twenty twenty

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 13>five than other parts of the country.

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 4>It is today's Bloomberg Big Take the impact of AI

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 4>data centers on boosting the cost of electricity consumers. Check

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 4>it out Bloomberg. Joshul Elia Nicoletti, thank you very much.

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Now coming up. Shares of Spotify and lower today as

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 4>the company announces changes in the C suite with the

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 4>departure of CEO Daniel k And it is moving the

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 4>stock a little bit lower. We'll have more next, This

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 4>is Bloomberg Tech. Big changes over at Spotify. CEO Daniel

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 4>k is stepping aside after almost two decades, leaving the

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 4>leadership in the hands of Chief Products and Technology Officer

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 4>good Stuff Pseudostrom and Chief Business Officer Alex Norstrom starting

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 4>January first. The two officers have been co president since

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty three and have been largely leading strategic and

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 4>operational development. Bloomberg's Spotify reporter actually, Carmen, it's with us

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 4>on set.

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, the stock tells a story.

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 4>It's down more than five percent on the news, but

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 4>we gave the context. After two decades, Daniel k is

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 4>passing on.

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 14>The torch right and a founder, So that's obviously always

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:19.879
<v Speaker 14>going to be big news, and investors always have strong

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.080
<v Speaker 14>feelings about that. But the way they're portraying this is

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 14>that kind of status quo. They're saying Alex and Gustav

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 14>have been doing this work essentially since they took over

0:35:29.239 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 14>as co presidents, and that Daniel's kind of the visionary

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 14>and he's still going to be very hands on.

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 9>That's what they're telling everybody.

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.280
<v Speaker 5>But what's not status quo is the world of music

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.120
<v Speaker 5>and the way in which Spotify is trying to identify

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 5>new ways of doing audio books and trying to galvanize

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:47.080
<v Speaker 5>people perhaps around AI development of music and whether or

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 5>not they want to be paying actual musicians royalties. How

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 5>will these two leaders navigate that?

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:55.440
<v Speaker 14>That's the big question. I mean, they're portraying this as

0:35:55.480 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 14>a huge opportunity, right, AI music, huge new frontier to

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 14>do markets that have never really adopted streaming or haven't

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 14>in the same amount that the US and Europe have.

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 9>But these are also the big challenges.

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 14>I mean, there's a world in which if everyone can

0:36:08.640 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 14>create their own music, do they need to have a

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 14>streaming service? So these are the big questions that Spotify

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 14>and alex Obusep are going to have to answer. Can

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:19.719
<v Speaker 14>they actually bring the value of AI, get these emerging

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 14>markets to pay more, and then from a video front,

0:36:22.160 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 14>compete with YouTube.

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:26.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's worth a health check on Spotify generally,

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.320
<v Speaker 4>Like at the end of twenty twenty two, this was

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 4>a seventy five eighty dollars stock It's now six hundred

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 4>and eighty nine dollars, Like, clearly something's going right there.

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:37.319
<v Speaker 4>I spend quite a lot of time on Spotify. I

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 4>know carrots too. They're still dominant in certain categories like

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 4>how do you see them as the beat reporter?

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, no, they absolutely are the biggest music streaming service,

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 14>so they have owned that category completely. Part of the

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 14>reason the stock was down at that time was because

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 14>they had been investing so much money in podcasting.

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and the investors didn't like that.

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 14>Now in this past year, I mean they switched to

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 14>a loss now, but they were profitable for a full year.

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 9>They showed they can do this.

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 14>Investors loved that, and I think they just have this

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:06.399
<v Speaker 14>new confidence that they're going to spend their money more

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.959
<v Speaker 14>wisely and if necessarily, flip the switch to turn to profitability.

0:37:10.360 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 5>Now. That was a big message for met himself. I

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 5>leave it in profitable hands. I leave it on a high. Basically,

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 5>what's he leaving to do because he's staying on as chair,

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:20.839
<v Speaker 5>is going to be there for strategy. But he has

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:24.520
<v Speaker 5>been active in founderland, building new companies and new ventures

0:37:24.560 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 5>and backing defense ones, health ones exactly.

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 14>So he didn't really speak about that. He really kept

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:32.359
<v Speaker 14>to focus on Spotify. But it does seem like he's

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.399
<v Speaker 14>going to spend more of his time in his investments,

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 14>probably focusing.

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 9>On what they're up to.

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:38.799
<v Speaker 14>But he is again really saying he's going to be

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 14>involved in the day to day with Spotify. He's going

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 14>to be sharing his office as he does with Alex

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 14>and Gustav as well.

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:46.919
<v Speaker 5>Actually common of Bloomberg, So appreciate the time on little

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 5>things Spotify. Meanwhile, coming up, we speak the Microsoft Security

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:54.000
<v Speaker 5>Corporate VP A Sir Jacka, as the company unveils Microsoft

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 5>Sentinel or improvements to it, about a unified focus on security.

0:37:58.280 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 9>This is a Bloomberg Tech