WEBVTT - Samsung Inks $16.5B Deal with Tesla for AI Chips

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and ever Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.960 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, Samsung will produce AI chips for Tesla in Texas,

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 3>a new multi year deal worth sixteen point five billion dollars.

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.200
<v Speaker 4>PA's the US and E you agree on a deal

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 4>that we'll see the bloc face fifteen percent tariffs on

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 4>most of its exports, including chips and cars.

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 3>And what to expect from the big tech earnings coming up?

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 3>With Microsoft, Meta, Apple, and Amazon all reporting this week.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 4>That is a huge market capitalization that we watch out

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 4>for in terms of those megacaps coming with earnings ed, we're.

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 5>On ten hooks ahead of it. So we are fading

0:00:58.400 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 5>some of the.

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 4>Rally that we've seen in big today, we're still clinging

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 4>on to gains and now's that one hundred and a

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 4>new record high. We're up a third of a percent,

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:06.120
<v Speaker 4>But those rallies.

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 5>That we saw in Europe have faded completely.

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 4>We're in the red as that fifteen percent tariff looks

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 4>ugly on the EU side of things, but you're digging

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:14.279
<v Speaker 4>into the micro stories today.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Tesla and Samsung in this arrangement to make AI

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 3>chips in Texas is driving markets. Tesla's gains have really

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 3>accelerated up three point eight almost four percent overnight in career.

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Look at Samsung shares.

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 3>It's for the AI six chip, the next generation of

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 3>full self driving silicon that goes into the vehicles. Samsung

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 3>already does quite a lot with Tesla on prior generations,

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>and at the same time Tesla has some diversifying and

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 3>some hedge with TSMC. But this is a big one.

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Elon must has been talking about it on X of course.

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 5>Funny that.

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's get the inside track with Peter Elstrom, who

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 4>joins US now for more on this. This is a

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 4>vote of confidence in Samsung's chip manufacturing when it had

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 4>been losing market share.

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Peter, Yeah, that's exactly.

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 7>Samsung, of course makes a whole bunch of things, including smartphones.

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 7>They've really made most of their profits, though recently, out

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 7>of their semiconductor business. They're the leading maker of most

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 7>memory chips out there, but they've been trying to build

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 7>this foundry business so that they could compete with TSMC,

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 7>compete for some of that high margin business from the

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 7>likes of Nvidia and Apple, and now what they've got

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 7>is really a marquee customer in Tesla where they can

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 7>point to them and say, hey, Tesla is trusting us

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 7>with the ability to make their high end chips, these

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 7>AI six chips, as Ed was mentioning earlier, which is

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 7>very important for their self driving technology, which they hope

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 7>to really bring on enforce next year and the year after.

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 6>So for Samsung, this is a big step forward. It

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 6>is a decent amount of money.

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 7>As we were talking about, it could increase their growth

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 7>in the foundry business by about ten percent. But probably

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 7>more importantly than that is the strategic importance of being

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 7>able to say they have this big marquee customer for

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 7>the foundry business.

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg broke the story that it was Tesla that was

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 3>this at that time unnamed marquee customer, and it was

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:05.640
<v Speaker 3>interesting because Elon Musk actually gave us a lot of

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:10.080
<v Speaker 3>detail on social sixteen point five billion dollars over multiple years.

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 3>But Musk seems to be indicating it's bigger than that,

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 3>and also Peter, he talks about why it's important that

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 3>it's in Texas, he seems to be suggesting that his

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 3>proximity to the fab means that Tesla can be involved

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 3>in the engineering and the ramp, but that he himself

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 3>can wander the lines himself.

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 6>Right, Yeah, how.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 7>Many businesses can Elon must get involved in Now apparently

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 7>he's going to do semiconductors too. Yeah, it's quite interesting

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 7>that he has said. He says that this deal allows

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 7>him to be able to be personally involved, intimately involved,

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 7>to be able to walk the lines and help with production.

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 7>I don't know how much he knows exactly about semi

0:03:46.960 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 7>conductor manufacturing, but you can imagine that having such an

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 7>important customer there on premises is going to put some

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 7>pressure on them to be able to build out quite quickly.

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 7>Now it's important to kind of step back here. Of course,

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 7>the US has been trying to rebuild their semi conductor

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 7>industry for a number of years. We saw the Biden

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 7>administration come out with the Chips Act that offered thirty

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 7>nine billion dollars in incentives. Samsung is one of the

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 7>big beneficiaries here, and one of the reasons that they're

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 7>expanding their capacity in Texas is specifically so that they

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 7>can supply US customers they're going to skirt their way

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 7>around the Trump tariffs if they're able to produce within

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 7>the country, and Elon Musk will be able to go

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 7>there to Texas to be able to try out some

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 7>of these things and then use them in the self

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 7>driving technology.

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 6>So it is a step.

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 7>Forward for that Chips Act and that effort to kind

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 7>of rebuild the domestic industry. TSMC and Intel are both

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 7>also beneficiaries of that effort.

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:38.600
<v Speaker 4>It is interesting, though, isn't it that it is overseas

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 4>manufacturers building in the US that are able to make

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 4>big tech win in terms of the chip supply chain.

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 4>What surprised me was also how integral, of course, Samsung

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 4>is once again to the COSPY. I think the costpy

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 4>the South Korean Index is one of the best performers

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 4>globally this year. Sk Heinex has a lot to thank

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 4>for it as well, though.

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 6>Right yes, Skhynix has jumped out ahead.

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.239
<v Speaker 7>In the memory chips that are most used for AI,

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 7>these HBM memory chips. They've actually gotten quite a bit

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 7>of Samsung ahead of Samsung on that front, which is

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 7>a bit of a blow to Samsung, But Samsung is

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.359
<v Speaker 7>making some progress kind of climbing its way back trying

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 7>to get authorization to be able to sell those HBM

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 7>chips to in Nvidia, which is the most important partner

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:19.919
<v Speaker 7>at this point.

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 6>But you've brought her a point.

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:24.359
<v Speaker 7>Yes, it's really TSMC has been leading the way in

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 7>advanced chip manufacturing. It gets that high margin business from

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 7>Nvidia and Apple right now and many other customers. There

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 7>were many hopes within Washington that the next competitor in

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 7>that foundry business would be Intel.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 6>They have not made that progress. We saw that last

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 6>week in the.

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 7>Earnings report in Bhutan's questions about whether maybe he's going

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 7>to pursue that foundry business. But we're seeing that Samsung

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 7>is emerging is probably the strongest alternative to TSMC. Everybody

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 7>in the industry wants some competition in that market. They

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.679
<v Speaker 7>don't want to just have TSMC making the most advanced

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 7>chips in the industry.

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 6>They want to have some alternatives.

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 7>Whether it's Samsung, whether it's Intel, there it's somebody else.

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Got a lot of questions about those alternatives have been

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 3>in both Peter Els from Thank you very much to

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 3>dive into all of this with Michael Green, chief investment

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 3>strategist and portfolio manager at Simplify Asset Management, which has

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 3>over eight billion dollars in assets under management. And it's interesting.

0:06:15.000 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 3>I want to take advantage of the timing, Michael. Last

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:19.799
<v Speaker 3>time you were on, we were talking about Elon Musk

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 3>alienating himself from.

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Both political parties.

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 3>If you remember, now, this is an example of a

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:32.320
<v Speaker 3>leading American company, an individual, and Elon Musk doing a big,

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 3>big deal over multiple years with a foreign technology company

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 3>to onshore industry in this country. What do you make

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 3>of that in the economic opportunity it presents.

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think this is actually the tension that exists

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 8>right on shoring into America, particularly bringing back high value

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 8>added tech tech manufacturing like chips that's not going to

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 8>overly stress the labor force that has relatively low employment levels,

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 8>but a large fiscal impact and a large impact. This

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 8>is fantastic and it's exactly what we would hope to

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 8>see under a Trump administration, raising the costs of companies

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 8>doing business abroad and shipping stuff to the United States.

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 2>How successful it's going to be.

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 8>As was alluded to earlier, these are two companies that

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 8>are both kind of struggling in their respective fields that

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 8>have announced a major investment. Is it enough to bring

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 8>both companies significantly higher? Clearly the stock market thinks that

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 8>it's helpful. I don't see how it's not, but it

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 8>still is something that remains to be seen in terms

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 8>of its long term impact of.

0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 3>The contract manufacturers. We mentioned Samsung, TSMC, and Intel.

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Which do you like and why? Well?

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 8>The quick answer is is that I'm a strategist. I

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 8>don't spend as much time on the individual securities. It's

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 8>very hard to argue with TSMC's overall technical lead in

0:07:51.160 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 8>the space. They have managed to build an extraordinary business

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 8>that has slowly taken out competitors like Intel and for

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 8>that matter, Samsung. You know, they're all extremely capable. This

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 8>is an industry with tremendous growth, But if you're putting

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 8>bets on change, you have to look at companies like

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 8>Samsung et cetera to undercut or Tesla. The whole story,

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 8>effectively is the increased competition is coming for both TSMC

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 8>and in video. I think that's probably the biggest takeaway

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 8>on this.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 5>Give us the.

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 4>Broader context here then, as a strategist as well, Michael

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 4>as to how over exposed investors are written large on

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:33.200
<v Speaker 4>the semiconductor space, semiconductor equipment. More broadly, I'm looking at

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:35.120
<v Speaker 4>how Goldman at the moment is saying the US prime

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 4>book is really heavily weighted and overexposed to that, and

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 4>we've seen judge funds of particular dial back ahead of earnings.

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you definitely have seen that. And one of the

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 8>factors that we've seen in this rally as it has

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 8>extended off of the April thows, has been extraordinary retail

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:54.840
<v Speaker 8>participation and dramatic increase in the quantity of margin that

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 8>is being utilized, and equally important, a dramatic decline in

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 8>the quantity of short end That's really what's hitting the

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 8>hedge fund positioning because they tend to have that bias

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 8>of being long the more quality oriented name short the

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 8>shorted names. That's causing distress in the hedge fund space.

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:14.960
<v Speaker 8>That I think it's causing them to take all exposures

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 8>down as compared to isolating to particular risk for those

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 8>leading companies. I think most people anticipate that this earnings

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 8>report this earning season is going to be relatively favorable,

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 8>if for no other reason than the stocks are near

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 8>all time highs. That lowers the incentive to introduce special

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 8>charges or anything else that you would classify. So I

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 8>think most people are actually expecting a pretty good earning season.

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 8>It's just market conditions are extraordinarily difficult for hedge funds

0:09:42.720 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 8>right now.

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 4>They've got to be pretty perfect these earnings for us

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 4>to live up to the hype in a way, Michael.

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 4>But what's also so clear is that hedge funds have

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 4>been under exposed to software services.

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 5>Does that change in the nattern.

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think ultimately that hedge funds are going to

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 8>follow whatever is working. So if it can take we

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:05.199
<v Speaker 8>continue to see under performance in the high quality hardware space,

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 8>or the impressive performance that we're seeing from cyclicals right

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 8>now versus defensives, you will see hedge funds ultimately rotate

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 8>because they are more interested in making money than they

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 8>are in being right.

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 4>Oh, there's always the quandary. Michael Green from Simplify Asset

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.679
<v Speaker 4>Management putting it straight on where the focus has to

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 4>live for hedge funds right now? Coming up, We thank

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 4>him and we move over to Victoria espanel or the

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Business Software Alliance, just talking about how software has been

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 4>a bit unloved.

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 2>But where are we.

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.200
<v Speaker 4>Going to be seeing the differences in regulations across the globe.

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 4>How is that impacting software companies and the approach to AI?

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg tech.

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 6>So I just want to go grow you.

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 7>I think it's I think it's great that we made

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 7>a deal today instead of playing games.

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 2>And maybe not making a deal at all.

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 5>I think it's I'm going to.

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 9>Let you say, but I think it's the biggest deal

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 9>ever made.

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 3>I was President Trump there speaking in Scotland. Many of

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 3>the details from the US EU trade deal are still

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 3>to be announced. The semiconductor industry, though, rallying on the

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 3>news that it will not face a separate tariff rate. Instead,

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 3>it will be included in the fifteen percent rate applied

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 3>to all EU goods exported to the United States. Want

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 3>to get out to Washington, d C. And Blumbo's klie

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 3>lyones give us the details of what we do know

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 3>what was agreed, and the President saying there it's the

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 3>best deal he's ever done.

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, the biggest deal ever made, to use the president's words,

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 10>ed I'll leave that up to determination as to whether

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 10>or not that is actually true. But of course this

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 10>is a big win for Europe, which was facing the

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 10>threat if a thirty percent tariff come Friday August first,

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 10>if this deal was not struck, fifteen percent obviously a

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 10>much lower rate than that, And key here is really

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 10>the fact that they got that fifteen percent rate to

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 10>apply to sectors in particular, not just automobiles, but as

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 10>you mentioned, also semiconductors and pharmaceutical tariffs, which of course

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 10>there is a Section two thirty two investigation underway into

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 10>both of those sectors already, in which the end result

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 10>could be that other non EU countries face a higher

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 10>teriff rate than that on those specific materials. Europe was

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 10>able to secure a fifteen percent rate that will be

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 10>applicable effectively across the board, but the exception still of

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 10>steel and aluminum, which of course faces a fifty percent tariff.

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 10>Key to doing so, we understand, though no details are

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 10>yet on paper, we haven't actually gotten a formal readout

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.719
<v Speaker 10>or or full list of what this deal actually will

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 10>entail beyond what we've been told and what officials familiar

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 10>have told Bloomberg. But key, according to sources familiar with

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 10>the matter, was the fact that Europe has also agreed

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 10>to make more investment into the United States as part

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 10>of this deal including six hundred billion dollars investments into

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 10>the US and seven hundred and fifty billion dollars of

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 10>purchases of a American energy over the course of the

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 10>next several years, in addition to what President Trump described

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 10>as vast purchases of US military equipment. So all of

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 10>that is what we understand this deal to essentially look

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 10>like in the broadest of terms, but we're still waiting

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 10>for that granular detail.

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 4>And of course we assume and understand that there's a

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 4>carve out for chip equipment in particular where they face

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 4>a zero taris and on the asml is on the

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 4>highest side, Kanie. What's really interesting is pushing us forward,

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 4>is what this fifteen percent number means for the China

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 4>negotiations that's actually happening in Sweden.

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 10>We understand, Yeah, they're underway in Sweden right now. It

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 10>will be two days of talks spearheaded by Chinese Premier

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 10>to Le fun as well as the Treasury Secretary Scott Besson.

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 10>They are underway. China, of course, already is facing a

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 10>higher tariff rate than most Twenty percent is the level

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 10>specifically applied in retaliation for the trade of fent and

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 10>all that is going to be something specifically that we

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 10>understand is one of the focuses of the US at

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 10>these talks. They're going to be talking about whether or

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 10>not China is actually able to tamp down on the

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 10>flow of fentanel out of the country, though China obviously

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 10>disputes that, saying it's a US domestic problem. But in

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 10>addition to trying to get that terifright lower, which there

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 10>may or may not be progress on the real crux

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 10>of these talks, as has been for the previous iterations

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 10>of this, as we've seen multiple rounds in the last

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 10>several months, is going to be around export controls. On

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 10>the US side, of course, that includes export controls of

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 10>critical technology including semiconductor and equipment for the manufacturing that

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 10>we've already seen some easing of that with the allowance

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 10>of H twenty chips from Nvidia to start flowing back

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 10>into China for export. But on the Chinese side, it's

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 10>really about rare earth and critical minerals that of course

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 10>they have a choke hold on at this time, and

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 10>it was been the easing of the flow of that

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 10>allowing American importers to get the licenses to actually bring

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 10>those critical minerals in that has been critical for advancing

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 10>this at least deston shall we say forward, which is

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 10>also going to be one of the key pushes for

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 10>these talks. The Treasury Secretary Scott Best and indicating one

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 10>of the primary outcomes they're looking for here is an

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 10>extension of the current troops that is in place beyond

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 10>the deadline that currently stands of August.

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 4>Twelfth, been important for in videos h twenties as well

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 4>to get back into China. Bloomberg's Kylee lines brilliant wrap

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 4>up of all things trade.

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 5>But let's get.

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 4>More on how these deals and indeed developing global regulations

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 4>for artificial intelligence really impacting developers. Victoria Espinel's with our

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 4>CEO the Business Software Alliance and the context here Victoria

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 4>is one of the AI Action Plan announce why the

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 4>US government really to take on China and the AI

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 4>race that the US wants to win from a regulatory perspective.

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 4>How do you think the US is winning.

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 5>Or not.

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 11>I think there's a lot of good that's in the

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 11>AI Action Plan, but here is one part. You know,

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 11>there's a lot of conversation about who's going to win

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 11>the AI race, and a lot of that focuses on

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 11>who's going to be at the cutting edge of innovation,

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 11>and that is obviously important. But a conversation that is

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 11>just starting to happen that I think is will potentially

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 11>have an even bigger impact is who is going to

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 11>win the race on AI adoption. By that, I mean

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 11>which are the countries that are going to figure out

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 11>how to use AI best, Because it is those countries

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 11>that are going to see the biggest economic benefit from AI.

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 11>That is the race, and that is that is largely

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 11>up for grabs right now. I think the United States

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 11>has an advantage there, and I think the AI Action

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 11>Plan has a number of aspects that are focused on adoption,

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 11>But that race is up for grabs, and I think

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 11>that is going to be a big indicator of where

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 11>we see the biggest economic benefit over the next decade.

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 4>So we're not focused, therefore, from your perspective on AI adoption,

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 4>on training talent to ensure that in enterprise we're actually

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 4>getting banged from a bot productivity actually goes up into

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 4>the right.

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 11>So there are a few aspects that I think are

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 11>critical to AI adoption, and actually at BSA, we released

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 11>an agenda just before the AI Action Plan came out

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 11>earlier last week. The focus is on three aspects. One

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 11>is talent and workforce, and that is critical. I think

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 11>there's no aspect more essential. The second is infrastructure and data,

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 11>and the third is the governance framework and making sure

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 11>that we get that right. And those three elements are

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 11>things that the United States, but governments around the world

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.679
<v Speaker 11>need to be figuring out right now if they are

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 11>going to win the race on AI adoption Victoria.

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Last week on the program, Michael Kratzios, who leads to

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 3>the Office of Science and Tech at the White House,

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 3>came on and he talked about packages that he sees

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 3>America being a net exporter of everything in the stack,

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 3>from hardware through to the models themselves. You were talking

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 3>about adoption a moment ago. How does America is an

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 3>exporter of AI fit into that.

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 11>I think that's a critical piece. So a lot of

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 11>the innovation has happening here in the United States for

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 11>governments to be able to adopt AI, to have their

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.360
<v Speaker 11>private sector using AI in a way that they get

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 11>the most economic benefit. A big piece of that is

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 11>going to be AI exportation from the United States and

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 11>There was conversation last week about the data centers and

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 11>the chips, but obviously an important element of that is

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 11>the software and the cloud services.

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Because it is literally.

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 11>Not possible to adopt AI unless you have cutting edge

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 11>cloud services, unless you have cutting edge software, and a

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 11>lot of that's going to be coming from right here

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 11>in the United States.

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 3>There was also a discussion about copyright, and the President

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 3>talked about.

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 2>This during his address.

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Given that you kind of represent more the software side

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 3>of the stack, how did you think about that, you know, Karen,

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 3>and I increasingly comes up in the show. Is a

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 3>point of priority, particularly for the frontier model or just

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 3>model makers generally.

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 5>It's a big issue.

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 11>It's an issue here in the United States and in

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 11>other markets as well. So, as you know, in the

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 11>white Hat and the AI action plan that was released

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 11>last week, there's not a lot of discussion of the

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 11>copyright issue specifically, but the President and his public remarks

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 11>spoke to it quite forcefully in terms of the importance

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 11>of training data and for the AI builders to be

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 11>able to get that training data and use it with

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 11>relative e So he was very very clear on that aspect,

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 11>and that's something that we are anticipating seeing the White

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 11>House say more about and the next year or so.

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 11>But the President was very clear in terms of his

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 11>opinion on the importance of training data and how important

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 11>that is for the United States to stay ahead of

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 11>the AI race with respect to China.

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 4>Briefly, Victoria, today's day, we focus on the EU. It's

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 4>smarting today in terms of competitiveness. They're worried about fifteen

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 4>percent tariff. How much should they be worried about their

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 4>own EU AI act on competitiveness.

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 11>So again, I think the EU has huge potential opportunity

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 11>to benefit from AI if it starts focusing on adoption,

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 11>and part of that is addressing some of the digital

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 11>sovereignty barriers that.

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:51.119
<v Speaker 5>The EU has put up. There are aspects of the

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 5>trade dealers.

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 11>You know, the details of the trade deal are not

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 11>yet fully public, but Ambassador Greer was talking just this

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 11>morning about looking at things like mutual recognition of cybersecurity,

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 11>of streamlining regulations, of steps that Europe can take, and

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 11>those steps are important not just for US software providers

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 11>but for the EU if they are going to be

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 11>able to adopt and use AI effectively.

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Victoria Espinew, CEO of the Business Software Alliance. Thank you

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 3>very much. We have some breaking news crossing the Bloomberg terminal.

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 3>FIGMA is boosting the pricing of its IPO to thirty

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 3>to thirty two dollars a share, previously seen the IPO

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.119
<v Speaker 3>at twenty five to twenty eight dollars per share. Remember,

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Figma is trying to raise just above a billion dollars

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 3>and they had this kind of auction style process where

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 3>they went to prospective investors and said how many shares

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 3>do you want and how would you price them? The

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 3>logic being carro that they want to try and get

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 3>near to that twenty billion dollar valuation that Adobe had

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 3>valued becoming out when it had tried to buy it. Now,

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 3>the IPO, which we think will price on Wednesday to

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 3>recap pricing between thirty and thirty two dollars a share.

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll keep a close on it throughout the week.

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 4>And that previously mark to range added at a market

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 4>cap of about sixteen billion at the top end, So

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 4>we do the math.

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 5>Coming up AI competition.

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 4>Sees the rapid releases of free open source models.

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 5>More on that next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 4>It is time now for talking tech and first up

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 4>open AI rival Jupu has released.

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 5>Its biggest open source models to.

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 4>Date, and the Chinese startup unveiled hybrid reasoning models GLM

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 4>four point five GLM four point five air. It's ready

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 4>to sto update to the company's of flagship models as

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 4>it joins a growing number of Chinese firms ramping up

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 4>free AI offerings.

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 5>Plus PayPal well it's.

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 4>Set to allow businesses to accept crypto at checkout. Over

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 4>the coming weeks, company will introduce more than one hundred

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 4>cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and ethereum as payment options for merchants.

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 4>According to PayPal, the pay with crypto transactions settle instantly

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 4>will initially cost zero point ninety nine.

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 5>Percent per transaction.

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 4>And TDK, one of the biggest suppliers of iPhone batteries,

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 4>says it is closely monitoring the tariff impact globally due

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 4>to their worldwide operations and the importance of relative tariffs

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 4>compared to other countries, and the tdkco spoke exclusively to

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg about how the company is seeing the trade deal between.

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 5>US and Japan.

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 7>Who need to keep money done in the other cases,

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 7>not only you know needed to here in Japan, but

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 7>also the other countries.

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:26.479
<v Speaker 9>I hope that the impact right will be is going

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:30.120
<v Speaker 9>to be minimized, but it's actually out of the contour.

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 3>The TDK CEO then are coming up. Tech IPOs could

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 3>be making a comeback. We speak with mattwick Eler of

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Wellington Management on the landscape for going public conversation that

0:22:42.240 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 3>you do not want to miss.

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 2>That's right next, this is Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 4>Quick checking on these markets that are still at record

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 4>highs when you think about the one hundred, but we

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 4>are fading this rally a little bit up three tens percent.

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 5>We've got eleven trillion.

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 4>Dollars worth of market capitalizations on.

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 5>Deck this week in terms of earnings. We've also got microdata.

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 5>Not to mention trade when the August.

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 4>First end of this week is that so called deadline

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 4>for the tariffs and we get in clarity on tariffs

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 4>with the EU fifteen percent. Germany it's smarting, it's feeling

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 4>that's anti competitive to some of its key industries. We're

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 4>off by a quarter of a percent, but dig into

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 4>some of the details and the individual movers. I want

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 4>to shine a light that the market capitalization in video

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 4>is once again climbing above that four trillion dollar level,

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:33.879
<v Speaker 4>and it was a key contributed to the upside of

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 4>these benchmarks. Test of two in terms of points up

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 4>three point six percent, sixteen and a half billion dollar

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 4>deal to make chips via Samsung in Texas. The AI

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 4>six chip is on deck, and that is both embolding

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 4>in Tesla investors as well as Samsung today. But ASML

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 4>up two and a half percent key semiconductor equipment maker,

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.880
<v Speaker 4>there's a carve out zero percent tariffs for these sorts

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 4>of parts of the chip sector, and we also get

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 4>clarity that look, semiconductors will fare that fifteen percent tara

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 4>for the time being.

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 3>Ed on a Monday morning, sometimes you just got to

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:07.959
<v Speaker 3>look at the calendar and just say, all right, what

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 3>am I in for this week? We'll investors are bracing

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 3>for a busy week of tech earnings, with Microsoft, Meta, Apple,

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 3>and Amazon all reporting in a forty eight hour twenty

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 3>four hour period.

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 2>Bloombos, Carmen Rianky's with us and Carmen.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 3>I have to congratulate you as well because one of

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 3>the best headlines I've seen on the Bloomberg terminal s

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 3>and P five hundred rally faces eleven trillion dollar gauntlet

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 3>of big tech earnings. The headline tells us the story,

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 3>but we're braced for a very, very concentrated and busy period.

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's true. So we have Wednesday and Thursday or

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 12>the big days this week, and honestly, we're going to

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 12>see a little bit of the bifurcation I think that

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 12>we've seen in the meg seven this year really play

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 12>out this week. So on Wednesday, we have Microsoft and Meta,

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 12>which have been two of the biggest point leaders on

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 12>the SMP and really driven the rally, especially from sort

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 12>of that April traff that we saw.

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Those are going to report.

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 12>On Wednesday, And then on Thursday we have Apple and Amazon,

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 12>and these two companies have been under a little bit

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 12>more scrutiny. Investors aren't quite as sure. Amazon I think

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 12>is about flat on the year, while Apple stock has

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 12>rallied a lot from April. It's down about fifteen percent

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 12>year to date. So people will really be watching to see,

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 12>especially what they say about AI, what their plan is

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 12>for using artificial intelligence going forward, and also what the

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 12>impact is with China. They are the company that has

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 12>the most exposure, especially out of the Magnificent seven so can.

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 4>You common detail a little bit of how investors are

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 4>going into this week. We know that hedge funds have

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 4>actually been dialing back some of their exposure to some

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 4>of the big technas because they have been such windows

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 4>and because valuations are so high.

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 5>Have we seen a little bit of more quotient coming

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 5>into this I think so.

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 12>I mean, the bar is set so incredibly high, and

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 12>something that's interesting is that Earning's expectations have actually come

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 12>in a little bit for this group of companies from

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.679
<v Speaker 12>the last report. I think they're expected to deliver Earning's

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 12>growth of about sixteen percent quarter or corder down from

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 12>nineteen percent. There is a little bit of a lower

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 12>bar in terms of like clearing it, but that makes

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 12>it all the more important that these companies do beat

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 12>in rais, especially to extend the rally in their stocks.

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 12>They really have to prove that they can deliver and

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 12>that their valuations are worth paying for. As you said,

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 12>they're very stretched. Some of these companies are at or

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 12>near all time highs. But we also have a second

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 12>group of companies that are not. Like I just said, Apple,

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 12>you know, is still fifteen percent office all time high.

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 12>Amazon is off its record high. Those companies also though,

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 12>have to deliver and they could be really important to

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 12>extending the rally in this S and P. You know,

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 12>Apple is one of the biggest companies in the index,

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 12>and so if it you know, think about where we

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 12>could be if it were to pick back up and

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 12>sort of see a reinvigoration in its stock. So people

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 12>are definitely really watching the earnings this week, and I

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:53.679
<v Speaker 12>think just there is a very high bar as always

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 12>for these companies.

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 3>Common just give me a little bit more on those

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 3>latter points. There's two charts in the story about the

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 3>points contraby of the key names to the upside and

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 3>the downside, which I think is hat a beautiful illustration

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 3>of the story, but also profit estimates mag seven stripped

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 3>out from the S and P five hundred. That just

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 3>sets a really high bar, Like, what if it all

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 3>goes wrong for Microsoft later in the week, then at

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 3>the index level, we're going to have some I don't know,

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 3>let's call it turmoil.

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.679
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, definitely. I mean, we know that these companies are

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 12>the heaviest weighted, they are the biggest point gainers. So

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 12>Microsoft and Meta I think are two in three, in

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 12>Vidia being number one so of course there could be

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 12>huge hamifigations if these companies don't deliver. We've also seen

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 12>from last week with Alphabet and Tesla that companies that

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 12>do beate and raise are getting rewarded. They're seeing their

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 12>shares go up. Well, companies that don't are getting punished

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 12>by investors, they're you know, selling off. So it's a

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 12>super important going forward and it'll be really interesting to

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 12>see how it plays out.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Come and Ranicky, we thank you so much a week

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 4>to brace ourselves for Let's just stick with the public market.

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 4>So I talk about a potential newcomer. All ours are

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 4>on Figma going public this week. We're now seeing it's

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 4>IPO pricing between thirty to thirty two dollars a share,

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 4>increasing the size of its offering to about one point

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 4>two billion and a fully diluted value of as much

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.199
<v Speaker 4>as roughly eighteen billion dollars.

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 5>So I tech IPO is coming back. Let's discuss it.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 4>The Matt we've had it who leads late stage growth

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 4>at Wellington Management, which's got a cool one point three

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 4>trillion dollars in assets under management. Part of that is

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 4>private and that is under your remitt Are we going

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 4>to see the windows crack open broader because you sat

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 4>here in August at twenty twenty four and we were

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 4>hoping the same thing.

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 13>We were hoping that and I think where we sit

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.879
<v Speaker 13>today is the VC backed IPOs are coming and you

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 13>see it in FIGMA, and I think it's because we

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 13>really had three conditions met in the past year. The

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 13>first one was we had stability and interest rates that

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 13>kind of started at the end of last year when

0:28:50.080 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 13>the FED said that they're not going to raise anymore,

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 13>started to cut and now forecasting to cut some more.

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:58.520
<v Speaker 13>So first thing was rate stability. I think the second

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 13>thing that we got was we had a public market

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 13>that is relatively stable and at records, yeah all at records,

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 13>and with a VIX that's at twelvemonth low almost so

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 13>stability in the public markets despite the bump in April.

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:15.560
<v Speaker 13>And I think the third piece that we had was

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 13>we had companies actually go out and go out successfully.

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 13>We had Circle, we had Core Weave, both those are

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 13>up big. And we also had smaller companies companies like

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 13>e Toro and Almada Health that performed very well in

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 13>the public markets. And so those three conditions I think

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 13>set up for a really exciting backout of this year.

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 4>A lot of those had flavors of regulatory tailwinds. When

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 4>I think a crypto or the AI trade that just

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 4>keeps on being a winning formula. Do you need those

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 4>within the portfolio companies to go public or do you

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 4>just need to be profitable revenue generated.

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 13>I think you need to benefit from some of those

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 13>trends that you mentioned before. I mean, I'd coined to

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 13>a Figma, which, as you just discussed, raised its range.

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 13>It's not a pure AI play by any means, but

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 13>does will leverage AI in its capabilities, and I think

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 13>that that helps promote and will help pricing of these

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 13>companies as they go out.

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 3>It's really great to have you back on the program.

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 3>We were just reflecting on the mechanism that Figma's using.

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 3>We're calling it an auction like mechanism where they go

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 3>to prospective investors and they say, well, how many shares

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 3>do you want to buy and what price would you set?

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 3>Which I'm not as familiar with. But if you are

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 3>like a late stage growth investor, right, you're almost like

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 3>an ancho investor going into some of these companies pre ipo.

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 2>How do you respond to the auction, so to speak.

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 13>Well, I think you have to respond to where the

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 13>market is setting the price. And I think that in

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 13>today's environment, with as we discussed, the market backdrop that

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 13>is kind of at all time highs, the response that

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 13>the collective group will make, I think is such that

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 13>it will continue to raise pricing expectations for high profile

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 13>companies that are benefiting from AI to some degree, like Figma.

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 3>I called you an almost like anchor investor. When Wellington's

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 3>name comes up in my world, it's kind of like

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 3>that late stage that's pre IPO.

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that your strategy, Matt, that's right.

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 13>Let's find the next generation of great public companies and

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 13>invest in them while they're private. Because these companies twenty

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:18.719
<v Speaker 13>or thirty years ago, companies like Figma would have been public.

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 13>They would have gone public at a billion dollars in

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 13>market cap and grown to the eighteen billion that they're

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 13>now raising their expected market cap to and done that

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 13>in the public markets, not in the private markets. But

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:31.240
<v Speaker 13>if you look at how the market's change, the market

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 13>has changed such that these companies are staying private longer,

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 13>not foregoing an IPO, just delaying the IPO. And that's

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 13>the role that we can play is to help those

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 13>companies go from great private companies.

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 4>To great public I mean, Klana, we all still wait

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 4>and we watch, and that's in your portfolio business. But

0:31:47.040 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 4>what I'm really interested is as a late.

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 5>Stage investor, what are the metrics now?

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Because these companies fueled by AI are growing at such

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 4>a rapid rate that suddenly they're already one hundred million

0:31:57.240 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 4>ARR generating.

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 5>And but if you call it is what meets your criteria?

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 13>I think it's a great question and something we talk

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 13>about a lot, because, as you point out, AI is

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 13>just fueling so much revenue growth at unprecedented pace. Do

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 13>you think about a company in the model space like Anthropic,

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 13>They're rumored to have gone from a billion of ARR

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 13>to four billion of ARR.

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 2>In six months, so four.

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 13>Exiting their business at scale?

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 2>So what do we look for?

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 13>We are really focused on companies in the AI space

0:32:24.200 --> 0:32:27.719
<v Speaker 13>that we think can be both durable and defensible. So

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 13>durable meaning can these companies be ongoing businesses not in

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 13>six or twelve months from now, but in five.

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Or six or ten years from now.

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 13>And then defensible can they build on top of something

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 13>that is not easily copyable.

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 4>And then I think of desiq, glean Vanta, some of

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 4>the rounds you have recently led a lot of us

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.239
<v Speaker 4>in the enterprise. Is that really the sweet spot at

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 4>the moment, how we bring generative AI productivity into enterprise

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 4>rather than consumer For.

0:32:56.560 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 13>You, I think that is a really key observation, which

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 13>which is how does the enterprise software stack benefit from

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 13>AI and really leverage AI?

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 3>That was Hyler of Wellington Management. It's really good to

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 3>have you back on Bloomberg Tech. Really appreciate it. Now

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:13.959
<v Speaker 3>coming up on the program, we're going to hear from

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.959
<v Speaker 3>Ali Barba, Cloud founder Wang Jian as the company navigates

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 3>a global.

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 2>AI talent war. You want to miss that one. This

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg Tech.

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 11>Now.

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.479
<v Speaker 4>And over the weekend, did you see it, China hosting

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 4>the World Heyhi conference in Shanghai. We've got to show

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 4>our audience robotics front and center. Some of them boxing

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 4>like we see here, some of them pretty messily dispensing drinks.

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 5>They are even playing the piano.

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 4>But like you're the person sitting down there with some

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 4>of the leading robotics and humanoid make us here in

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 4>the US. And it's interesting that in the story, really

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 4>are particulating. The US isn't there with a cost effective competitor.

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Right now, but with this event in China, right there's

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 3>the bit that's for show. It's just like CS or

0:34:10.120 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 3>GtC where you put all of this cool tech in

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 3>one place.

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 2>But the forecasts are.

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 3>That this is going to be an industry in the

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 3>trillions of dollars by twenty fifty, twenty thirty whatever.

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 2>The skepticism in.

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 3>The story, which I really appreciate, is like how much

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 3>is this is translatable to the real world. But China,

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 3>as we keep hearing from Jensen Wang and everyone else,

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 3>has has leading researchers in the field of AI and

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 3>an amazing supply chain for robotics because they can control

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:37.879
<v Speaker 3>it domestically.

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 2>That seems to be a big theme it is.

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:42.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm showing we didn't get too many backflipping dogs in

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 4>that VEO for you and some of those pictures, but

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 4>apparently they were there.

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the robots are coming.

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.840
<v Speaker 3>The battle for AI talent is creating huge pay packages

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 3>as Silicon Valley and Beijing battle for AI dominance. Bloomberg's

0:34:55.719 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Annimal Drulers spoke exclusively with Ali Barba Cloud founder Yang

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.439
<v Speaker 3>Jian on the global AI talent war.

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 9>I don't think it's it's the let's see, it's a

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 9>typical way of doing seeing it, Okay.

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:10.840
<v Speaker 6>I would say that.

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 2>The reason very simple.

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 9>You know, example, when I when I study, uh, the

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 9>the Alibaba cloud. You know, the first thing I did

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 9>that was in the Tucson eight. The first I did

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 9>to via the city media and to try to get tenant. Okay,

0:35:31.680 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 9>mm and uh and after talking to all the people

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.799
<v Speaker 9>and you realize, actually we don't have much of talent

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 9>there because.

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 2>It's new okay.

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 9>So and also with some of the talents it's just

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 9>too expensive okay and uh to it film basically means okay, uh,

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 9>you don't know whether the cob bas is there. Why

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 9>need to hide? Why when need to hide these people?

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 9>So it's really about the innovation. So when you're in

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 9>the early stage of innovation, I don't seek the talent

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 9>is a problem because you know they have the only

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.320
<v Speaker 9>thing you need to do is to get the right person,

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 9>not really the expensive person. Because if a new business,

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 9>if it's true innovation, that basically means talent, nobody care

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 9>about them. Okay, lot they're working on that. So for

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 9>the today, what happened for the matter is because they

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 9>are very much focused on the existing success of the

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 9>business and existing its average on technology.

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.000
<v Speaker 2>That's the that's that's that's that's.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 6>My real Okay.

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 9>So I think we have a tremendous opportunity to look

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 9>at technology nobody knows today and these talent.

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 2>These are talent.

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 6>But but these are.

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 9>I can't say it's cheap, but but it's you. It's

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 9>available for you.

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 6>Okay.

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 9>So that's really about the vision. You know, where you

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 9>want to, where you want to go, and there's a

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 9>lot of similar things you know, happened during the last

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 9>twenty years. Also, whenever everybody knows that these are talent

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:18.280
<v Speaker 9>and it's better for you not to get in and listen,

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:22.719
<v Speaker 9>that's not you, that's that's my That's much like personally

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 9>that I hide assulting now he had he's the leader

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 9>for the Queen. Okay, you probably met him, you know

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:33.760
<v Speaker 9>when you're in Hantle. You know, I personally interview him,

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:35.719
<v Speaker 9>you know, fifteen years ago.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Have we got talent?

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 6>Now he's leading the Queen.

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:39.640
<v Speaker 13>Yeah.

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 2>So that that's so.

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 10>There's not really there's not really any justification that it

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:47.560
<v Speaker 10>sounds like you think for for such.

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 9>That's not you know, what the mad you know, I'm

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 9>sorry that what what the what happened in Silicon Valley

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 9>is not the.

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 6>Winning formula. That's what I that's what I believe, you know.

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Ani a Bubba Cloud founder, Wang Jian there speaking

0:38:03.600 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 4>with Bloomberg's Annabel Drulers. And let's stay on those rather

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:11.400
<v Speaker 4>expensive AI highs happening at Meta in his name, Shengjia Jao,

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 4>it's chief scientists for its new superintelligence AI group. Joao

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 4>joined Meta in June from over AI.

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:17.879
<v Speaker 2>For more.

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 5>Let's bringing Kurt Wagner.

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 4>And let's just go through the leadership here, because as

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Alexander Wye Wang of Scale AI, then there's a chief scientist,

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:27.839
<v Speaker 4>and Ya La Kum is somewhere as well.

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, that's right. It's been a total re or Caroline

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 14>in the last couple of months. So there's obviously Mark

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:36.320
<v Speaker 14>Zuckerberg at the top, and I do mention him specifically

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:38.919
<v Speaker 14>because he's incredibly hands on with it when it comes

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 14>to Meta's AI related to projects. Alexander Wang, the Scale

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 14>AI co founder who they just sort of brought over

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 14>in June after that massive investment they made in Scale AI,

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:51.440
<v Speaker 14>shengjia Jao. You just mentioned the new chief scientists of

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 14>this super Intelligence Labs.

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 2>Basically that's the group internally that's going to.

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 14>Hopefully for Meta, develop this new model that will be

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 14>super intelligence, right, that will achieve that human level of capability.

0:39:03.640 --> 0:39:06.319
<v Speaker 14>And then Jan mccun is still at Meta. He is

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 14>still a chief scientist by title as well. He is

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 14>running the Fair Group, which is the AI research.

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Division of Meta.

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:16.920
<v Speaker 14>They were very clear over the weekend and on Friday

0:39:17.520 --> 0:39:20.720
<v Speaker 14>that lacun is still there, still doing the research for Meta.

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm grateful you. You talked about Zuckerberg's role right. This

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 3>announcement at the end of last week was on his

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 3>social media platforms and channels. Personally, do we know if

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 3>the team is finished like the Avenger has been assembled

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 3>and that they're done now or are they still out

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 3>there in the marketplace trying to find more people.

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 14>I believe they're still hiring. When we originally broke this

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 14>story back in June that the super Intelligence Group was

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 14>being brought together, we had heard that they were going

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 14>to be around fifty people was the target. I've been

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 14>keeping a spreadsheet ed I'm up to like thirty or so,

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 14>so you know, we're maybe a little over halfway done.

0:39:56.560 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 14>But I do think clearly they're at a point where

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 14>they feel that they have a large enough group that

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 14>they can start talking about as publicly, start talking about

0:40:03.800 --> 0:40:06.359
<v Speaker 14>the chief scientists, things like that. But I don't think

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 14>we're necessarily at the end of the road for hiring.

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:11.800
<v Speaker 14>I would think they would hire, you know, no matter

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 14>how many people they get, if they're getting good people.

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 14>I think Mark Zuckerberg has made clear this is a

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 14>collection of talent, and I'm not sure that he's going

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:21.399
<v Speaker 14>to simply be like, oh, we've hit fifty, therefore we're

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 14>going to say no to other good people. I'm sure

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 14>they'll bring as many good people in the door as

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 14>they can.

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 3>We're actually about talking a little bit more about earnings,

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:30.800
<v Speaker 3>and lots of investors thinking that the cost of talent

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 3>is going to be something that comes up. Bloomberg's Kutwagner,

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 3>great reporting, Thank you very much. Now coming up, what

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:38.520
<v Speaker 3>to expect from the big tech earnings that are coming

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 3>up later this week. There are many of them. They're important.

0:40:41.840 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 3>We'll be right back. This is Bloomberg Tech. Back to

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 3>the big week of tech earnings ahead and here so

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 3>talk about what to expect. Bloomberg's Ryan Lasleica and across

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 3>the equities team. We've done a lot on the terminal

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:10.160
<v Speaker 3>this morning to get us ready for the week. Let's

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 3>just start with the calendar. What's coming our way over

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 3>the next four or five days.

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Hey, thanks for having me.

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 15>So we have four real highlights coming out this week.

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 15>We have Microsoft, we have Meta, followed by Apple and

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.920
<v Speaker 15>Amazon on Thursday, so four of the maxifice and seven

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 15>following Alphabet and Tessa last week. So obviously just a

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 15>huge week for earnings. We're going to get a lot

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 15>of detail about AI, about growth rates, We're going to

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 15>get some more insight into the impact of tariffs.

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be a lot going on this week.

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 4>There is, and I'm wondering how analysts and investors are

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 4>like to set themselves up for what ultimately has to

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 4>be perfection. It feels like if you're an Alphabet or

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 4>Tesla or anything to read across.

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 15>From So I would say that when it comes to

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:56.680
<v Speaker 15>Microsoft and Meta, both of these companies have been performing

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 15>extremely well this year, and these are two companies that

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 15>are really seen being at the cutting edge of AI

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:04.480
<v Speaker 15>and among the companies that are showing among the early

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:08.280
<v Speaker 15>benefits in terms of an ROI and all their AI spending.

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 15>Now we're going to be also looking to see how

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.280
<v Speaker 15>much these companies are spending going forward. Their CAPEX plants

0:42:13.280 --> 0:42:15.879
<v Speaker 15>are going to be a real focus this week. Last

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 15>week we did see Alphabet come out, come out and

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 15>really increase its CAPEX. Target markets seem pretty okay with that,

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 15>suggesting that if they're able to justify this level of spending,

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 15>they're not going to get dinged by that. So that's

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 15>a real focus for Meta and Microsoft, which I believe

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 15>both report on Wednesday.

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 2>You also have a street.

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Wrap from the Terminal about the cell size sentiment toward Apple.

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:37.919
<v Speaker 3>How is the feeling right now about the iPhone maker

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 3>head of later this week.

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, so Apple is the one where I'd say the

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 15>sentiment is by far the most negative. There are sort

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:46.680
<v Speaker 15>of a lot of headwinds that are being stacked up

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 15>against it. It does not really have a strong AI

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 15>strategy or product. It faces the most exposure to TERRIF

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 15>related issues. It hasn't been growing, you know, certainly not

0:42:57.360 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 15>at the pace of some of its big tech peers

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 15>for quite an extent period of time, and the evaluation

0:43:02.040 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 15>is still on the higher end of things, especially for

0:43:04.200 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 15>a lot of two companies that are growing much faster,

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 15>So certainly the picture there is a lot more cautious.

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:11.839
<v Speaker 15>I guess the flip side of this is maybe it's

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 15>a lower bar. Maybe expectations are so low that they're

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:16.359
<v Speaker 15>able to kind of jump over there. But that's one

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 15>that I think there are a lot of question marks

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 15>on this quarter.

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Meanwhile, after the bettle tomorrow we get Spotify, which is

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 4>that fifty six percent Here today round Vaselica, we have

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 4>you across all the earnings. Thank you so much for

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:29.399
<v Speaker 4>breaking it down. Meanwhile, that does it in this edition

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 4>of Bloomberg Tech.

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 3>Ed, Yeah, I feel like there's a lot of tension

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:34.880
<v Speaker 3>in the week, Like we've really set it up to

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 3>be huge recap some of that hype, maybe some of

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 3>that excitement to the week to come on the podcast.

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 3>You know where to find it and all the platforms,

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 3>it's everywhere.

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know, that's just how it feels. It

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:47.240
<v Speaker 2>feels like everything's a little bit tense.

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Macro Micro Earnings got a little bit of tariff anxiety

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 4>coming into August the first It's plenty.

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 5>To digest stick with us for the week. This is

0:43:55.120 --> 0:43:55.799
<v Speaker 5>BlueBag tech.