WEBVTT - Tech News: Facebook Researchers Dunk on Facebook

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tex Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of all things tech. And this is

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the Tech News for Thursday, September twenty one. And our

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>first story is a big one. It's probably gonna take

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the whole first section because there's a lot to say,

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 1>and then there's Jonathan's take on it as well, So

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>let's get to it. The Wall Street Journal published an

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>article this week revealing that their journalists got to see

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a report about Instagram that is concerning, to say the least,

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:49.639
<v Speaker 1>while also confirming a lot of commonly held suspicions. Now,

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I think most of us have at least a sense

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>that social media can lead us to place unrealistic expectations

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>on us in the lives we lead. A lot of

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>people have written or talked about the tendency for folks

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to put forward an idealized version of themselves online, like

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not the real them, it's an idealized version of them.

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>It makes their lives out to seem more dramatic, more exciting,

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and lush than they really are, and Instagram, but it's

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>focus on pictures is particularly bad about this. A picture

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>tells a thousand words, but you know, a lot of

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>those words tend to be Look how awesome I am,

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>or how awesome my house is, or how awesome this

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 1>vacation spot is now. Facebook representatives, including Mark Zuckerberg himself,

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>have frequently told the public and the United States Congress

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>that the benefits of social media include a boost to

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>mental health because they allow us to be part of

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>communities and to connect with people that we care about.

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And that narrative might seem fairly convincing, particularly during COVID

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>times when a lot of us have had few or

0:01:56.760 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>possibly no opportunities to see people we used to hang

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>out with, you know, before COVID. But the report that

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street saw confirmed suspicions that Instagram can have devastatingly

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>harmful effects to mental health, particularly for teenage girls. And

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>this report didn't come from some third party research group

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that you might suspect was applying confirmation bias to the investigation.

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>By that, I mean if you have a group that

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>has an agenda like they expect to find something bad,

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.119
<v Speaker 1>then they often will look for something bad, and they'll

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>ignore anything that is contrary to that particular you know,

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of prejudice. But in this case, the investigation report

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 1>came from inside Facebook itself. Researchers in the company studied

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the effects of Instagram on behavior and mental health and

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>found that nearly a third of all teenage girls who

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>are on Instagram traced serious issues with self image, confidence,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and mental health to their participation with Instagram. So let's

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>make some very rough estimates here, just again idea of

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>how many people we could be talking about. So Instagram

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 1>reportedly has around one billion users. That's billion with a B. Now,

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>more than of those users are no older than twenty two.

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>That's more than but let's just cut it at that

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>gives us four million users who are twenty two or younger. Now,

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>let's assume about half of those are women. Statistic, by

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the way, estimates that women make up more than it's

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>more like fifty one. But we're doing kind of a

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>pen on a napkin style estimation here. So that means

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million young women and girls are using Instagram. Now,

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>let's say that of that number are older than teenagers. Okay,

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>so one fifth of that number. This is just me

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>saying this that one fifth of them are aged twenty

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>or older. That's probably a generous estimate. It's probably fewer

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>than that, but I'm just doing this for the purposes

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of illustrations. That would leave us with one sixty million

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>teenage girls. And the report said that around thirty two

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of the girls that were you know, part of the

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 1>study said they ended up experiencing a negative impact on

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>their mental health that they attributed to their participation on Instagram.

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>So that means more than if we apply this across

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the board and say that is representative, that would mean

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>that more than fifty one million teenage girls could be

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:39.239
<v Speaker 1>struggling with mental health problems. They're the very least exacerbated

0:04:39.480 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>by their time on Instagram. By the way, it gets worse.

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Those mental health issues can ripple into other dangerous and

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic consequences, everything from developing eating disorders or even leading

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>to suicidal thoughts. Fifty one million teenage girls, and again

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a rough estimate, and I took some pretty conservative

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>shortcuts getting there. Okay, so what's actually leading to the

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>issues that we're seeing with mental health? One possible contributor,

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and again we're talking about possibilities. Here would be a

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>tendency called social comparison, and that's exactly what sounds like.

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>It's when you see the depiction of someone else's life

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you compare your own life to that person's life,

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and you come back with like a negative feeling about

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:31.359
<v Speaker 1>your own situation. So maybe it's an influencer who looks

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>like they're in phenomenal shape. This happened to me. I'm

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>not a teenage girl. I'm a middle aged man. But

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>when I started on my fitness journey, which I totally

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>have fallen off of because COVID and then a lack

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of resolve I'll say on my part. Anyway, when I

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>was on that journey, I actually looked at some Instagram

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>accounts that were about fitness, which meant that Instagram was

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>serving up tons of different pictures of people who were

0:05:59.839 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>insane shape. I mean Greek statues would be jealous of them, uh.

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>And so I was inundated with images of people who

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>were in much better shape than I was, some of

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>which appeared to suggest that they got there in a

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>very short amount of time. Obviously, this stuff can be

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>rather than motivating, discouraging, right, Like if I'm seeing people

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>who are like, yeah, you just must not be doing

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>it right because I got to where I am in

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>three weeks or something like that, some ludicrous explanation that

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>can be very discouraging to me. Well, that's just one example.

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe the influencer is wearing designer clothing. Maybe they're

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>hanging out in gorgeous locations. I mean, how many times

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 1>have you opened Instagram and just browse stuff and saw

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>incredibly hot people hanging out on yachts or by pools

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and stuff like that. In fact, I mentioned influencers. We

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>do have an entire profession called influencer that is geared

0:06:55.640 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>toward that kind of experience to project this pick sure

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of idealization, and their whole job is to influence you,

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>to convince you that they're living out their best life

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and that they're being showered with amazing products and trips

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and stuff, and that your life could be better if

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it was more like their life. And then you've got

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the issue with people getting obsessed over numbers on Instagram,

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>like how many followers they might have, or how many

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>likes a post gets or how many comments of post receives.

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And again, if we look at influencers, we see them

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>constantly trying to prompt engagement, often by including sort of

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>some sort of question as a caption for a photo.

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So I happen to really like cool cosplay. Instagram profiles

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:44.239
<v Speaker 1>people who put in tons of work and make incredible costumes,

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>so I get a mix of all sorts of cosplayers

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>served up. Now, some of these cosplayers, will you know,

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>end up posting provocative images, maybe something a bit steamy. Right.

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Then they'll include a caption that might say something like

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>cheezburgers or hot dogs, which could possibly have nothing to

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>do with the image itself, but that gets people commenting,

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>because increased engagement is currency for influencers. Heck, I remember

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>when some influencers were using the trick of spell out

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>such and such in the comments letter by letter, meaning

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that you would post each letter in order as a

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>separate post as a separate comment in order to prove something.

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess that was really just a trick to kind

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of get more comments, because if you get a high

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>comment count as an influencer, your price tag starts to

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>go up for brands. Right. Meanwhile, people who are comparing

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:40.520
<v Speaker 1>themselves against these sorts of influencers may start to feel

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>really badly about themselves, like they're not popular, that something's

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>wrong with them, and Instagram reinforces that experience again and again. Worse,

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Instagram has a vicious cycle built into it because so

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>many young people use Instagram to interact with their peers.

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 1>It's almost as if being on the platform is necessary

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.559
<v Speaker 1>just to take part in socialization with your peer group,

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and the experience, even when negative, can lead to compulsive

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>use of the platform. It's like, you can't quit it

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>because you need it. Now, I'm not just spouting off

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>my own opinions here, although I'm doing a bit of

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that too. According to The Wall Street Journal, that internal

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>report that Facebook researchers generated backs a lot of this

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>stuff up. The researchers generated that report back in the

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>spring of twenty twenty. But wait, it gets worse because

0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>in the spring of this year, twenty twenty one, Mark

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg said at a congressional hearing that essentially their research

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>indicated that social platforms like Instagram have a benefit of

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>positive effect on mental health, which is the exact opposite

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of what this internal report found. Now, again, it's an

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 1>internal report. Facebook did not share this outside the company,

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think you can say that Facebook in general,

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>like executives in general, were on a aware of it.

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Possibly Zuckerberg was unaware of it. I mean, maybe this

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is like a case with Independence Day where the president

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't told about the alien at area fifty one for

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of plausible deniability. Maybe that happened. I doubt it,

0:10:15.480 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 1>but maybe Anyway. Congress people had already remarked on how

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg seemed evasive when answering questions, like he was trying

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to find ways to talk around things without actually addressing them,

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and that had already raised concerns even before the existence

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of this report was known. But this report confirms that

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>those concerns were well narrated and to make matters even worse.

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Even knowing this, even knowing the potentially disastrous effect the

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>experience of being on Instagram can have on young people,

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Facebook has been hard at work to develop an aversion

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>for Instagram for kids under the age of thirteen. Now,

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>let that settle in for a bit. You have a

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>company knowing that its product can have harmful effects on

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 1>young girls, they have a whole report about it, and

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>they're working to make a product for even younger ones. Also,

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I should add that while the report focuses on young girls,

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>those are not the only people have a negative impact

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>from this stuff. I mean, I just mentioned that I

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>experienced this on a certain scale, so it can affect

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.199
<v Speaker 1>people of all genders and ages. The teen girls appear

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to be, you know, as a as a population, slightly

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>more vulnerable to this sort of influence, but that doesn't

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>mean they they're the only ones who end up feeling

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>lesser than after spending time on Instagram. It happens to

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. So then the question comes down

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to what is to be done about this? Now? I

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>suspect that without intense external pressure, not much is going

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to change a Facebook and Instagram. Uh. Facebook really hasn't

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>seemed to take any massive steps towards reducing the harm

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:59.199
<v Speaker 1>it causes unless public opinion, political pressure, or most effectively

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and most telling lee pressure from advertisers has forced it

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to do so. Facebook is a heck of an example

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of a capitalist organization gone to the extreme, in which

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the primary purpose of the organization is to return value

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to shareholders and everything else is secondary or maybe not

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>even a consideration. That being said, democratic lawmakers here in

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States are starting to apply that kind of

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>pressure right now. In fact, today they've been calling on

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg to give up on this idea of an Instagram

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>app for kids. There's also talk of another massive investigation

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>into the company, and armed with this internal report, I

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>think Zuckerberg is destined for another very uncomfortable hearing in

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 1>front of Congress. But for most of us, I think

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>the study shows that parents really need to be aware

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of these influences and to take an active role in

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>helping their children with stuff like self esteem and confidence,

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and an understanding that the representations we see of people

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>online are often a fabrication and are not reflective of reality,

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>nor are they reflective of a person's value. We need

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to educate everyone that the reason most of this content

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that falls into this kind of harmful tendency usually is

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.400
<v Speaker 1>meant to ultimately serve one of a couple of different

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>purposes that are tightly related. Now, often it's all in

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the effort to sell you something. Now, it might be

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a specific branded product, or the thing on sale might

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>actually be the brand of the person who's sharing the

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>content themselves, or it could be to boost a person's status,

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>essentially saying look and how amazing my life is because

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm the best. But either way, understanding that the images

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that you see are not necessarily showing you what's really

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>going on, and also that the reason that these images

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 1>exist is to push out a specific branding message, all

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>of that is helpful. I mean, I see this everywhere obviously,

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>like this this tendency, especially in relation to Instagram. It's everywhere,

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>like there are plenty of pop up experiences that really

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>only exist for the purposes of people to take selfies

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>at them and to kind of generate this image of

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a fun experience. But the whole experience is just about

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>taking those selfies. Like there's nothing, there's nothing more substantive

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to the experience that that's all it is. It's just

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>surface level that in itself may not, you know, be

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>harmful on the face of it, but it contributes to

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>this tendency I'm talking about. Also, the report found that

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>most other social platforms don't have nearly the same negative

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>impact as Instagram. Stuff like TikTok tends to be focused

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>more on performance than on appearance. Stuff on Snapchat tends

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to feature lots of ridiculous filters, and these things don't

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>seem to contribute as much of a negative effect on

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>mental health. So long long coverage of that one story.

0:14:55.600 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think this one is really important. I don't

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>think it was quite enough for me to of a

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>full episode dedicated to it unless I get an expert in,

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>but I really wanted to talk about it because it's

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty damning that Facebook had its own internal report

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that said these things, and yet outwardly the company has

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>behaved as if everything it does is fine, when that

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is patently not the case, and they know it, and

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the worst part. All Right, We're gonna go and

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>take a break, and when we come back, we'll have

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 1>some other unrelated tech news. On Tuesday's episode this week,

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that Apple was about to hold its iPhone

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>thirteen event, but at that point it had not yet

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>done so as I was recording the show. Obviously it's

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 1>happened since then, and some of you may know all

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 1>about this, But really the big surprise at the event

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>was that some of the stuff that was rumored to

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be featured, like a really big update to the Apple

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Watch and new air pods, uh, those actually weren't part

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>of the show. I mean, there was a new Apple Watch,

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>but the The big changes that had been rumored uh

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>ended up being just a slightly larger screen and a

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of new features, but nothing like the redesign that

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>folks were expecting. Uh, you know, nothing dramatic. The new

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>watch looks fairly close to the previous ones. It's a

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>little bigger with the screen, and the air pods with

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the rumored shorter stems were a no show at the event.

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 1>There are also rumors about the iPhone itself, a big

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>one being that Apple was going to build in some

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of satellite cell phone feature so that there would

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be a transmitter where you could actually make a satellite

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>phone call if you had to. Now, you wouldn't normally

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>use the satellite system. There are issues with latency. It

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>tends to be a really expensive kind of thing to do.

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But according to these rumors, you would be able to

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>make use of this feature if you happen to be

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 1>in an area that had no cell service. So that way,

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>if you need to make an emergency phone call but

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you weren't close to a cell tower or a WiFi hotspot,

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you can do it. But that ended up not being

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>part of the announcements either. So what we did get

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>were new iPhones with new A fifteen bionic chips powering them.

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a proprietary chip from Apple, a new dual camera system,

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and the two pro models support a one hurts refresh

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>rate for the screen. Now that means that the screen

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>refreshes on times per second. The iPad also got a facelift.

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you know, the announcements were fairly modest in nature. Honestly,

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it actually benefits Apple to keep holding

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>these big marketing events unless there happens to be something

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that's going to really blow people's socks off, because the

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>company set expectations ridiculously high with big reveals, you know,

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a decade ago or more, and now there's a tendency

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for folks to say, oh, that's it, even even if

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that Apple is showing is an improvement over

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 1>previous models, because you know, it's not like a show

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>stopper kind of thing. But hey, I mean, it's a

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>two trillion dollar company and the folks running it are

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>way smarter than I am, so I'm sure I'm just

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>not seeing the big picture. In the past, I've talked

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>about the N s O Group a few times on

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>this show. That's the Israeli company famous for developing a

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>malware tool that exploits security vulnerabilities and Apple's Eye message program.

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>And just to be clear, that's not the only company

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>to take aim at I message and create exploits. An

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>American company called Acuvant once upon a time did the

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>same thing. Now use the past tense here because Acuvant

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>subsequently found itself absorbed into a larger company called Optive,

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and reportedly Optive is out of the exploit development game,

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:51.400
<v Speaker 1>but Acuvant was very much in that game, using security

0:18:51.440 --> 0:18:54.959
<v Speaker 1>experts to not just find vulnerabilities in various software platforms,

0:18:55.280 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>but to develop exploits that leveraged those vulnerabilities, then selling

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>those as products to various other entities, usually government agencies.

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>So while I heap a lot of criticism on n

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>s O Group, which you know, does a similar thing

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 1>with the blessing and restrictions of the Israeli government, we

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:16.479
<v Speaker 1>are seeing the same sort of thing going on in

0:19:16.520 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world, including here in the United States. Anyway,

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I bring all this up because the m I T

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Technology Review reports that the U. S. Department of Justice

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>recently find three former U S intelligence and military personnel

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>for working for the United Arab Emirates without US permission

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in what was called Project Raven. The operatives were using

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>this exploit, they had purchased it from Acuvant, and then

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>they were acting as mercenaries. They were deploying the exploit

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of the U A E. And reportedly the

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>list of targets included American citizens and companies. Uh. And

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know that's a big no no working on behalf

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of a foreign government when you're a U. S citizen

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>without you know, the consent of the United States government.

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>The finds amounted to a little less than one point

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>seven million dollars. I'm assuming that's collectively, but the m

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I T Technology Review Report was not specific, so to

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>be clear, the focus here is on the three and

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that investigation, and there's not really any investigation into optave

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 1>or the former equivant. So if you take it like that,

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you could say, oh, well, the government says

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>it's okay if for your companies to develop tools that

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:35.680
<v Speaker 1>specifically exploit some other company's product, you know, I message

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>from Apple in this case, it's just not okay to

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>take that same product and then work with a foreign government.

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Pretty weird world we live in anyway. I Message, as

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the Technology Review points out, is a very popular destination

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>for malware because Apple includes it on every iPhone, so

0:20:54.440 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the install base is on every single iPhone that's out

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>there and you can't uninstall it. Anyone using an iOS

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>device with your phone number can send you a message

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>on I Message, and I Message automatically accepts those incoming messages,

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter if you don't recognize the number or not.

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>So if you build in what's called a zero click exploit,

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that's an exploit that doesn't need someone to click on

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a link or open up a file or anything like that,

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>it just infects malware as long as there's a hit. Well.

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>That means you can have one of these compromise your

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>phone just because you receive the message on I Message.

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple has patched the vulnerabilities and I Message a couple

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of times, including a patch called blast Door, but hackers

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>are always looking for other cracks in the security around

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the app, and it's a constant seesaw battle between developers

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>and hackers. In addition to that, one of those three

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 1>people that have been fined by the US government for

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 1>this thing is Daniel Garrick, who currently serves as the

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Chief Information Officer or c i O of Express VPN,

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>now the v The end company says it was aware

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of Garrick's previous activities before they hired him, that he

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 1>was completely transparent about that, and that might sound surprising,

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but then the company said that his experience was what

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>made him valuable to the company. So VPNs, or virtual

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>private networks, are a way for people to log into

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>one system in order to access other systems privately. Uh Effectively,

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 1>it masks your activities between you and whichever end server

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to access. The VPN is kind of like

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the man in the middle in this case, and they're

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, encrypting everything so that snoopers don't know what

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>it is you're actually doing. Anyway, Express VPN's stance was

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.919
<v Speaker 1>that Garrick's experiences meant he understood security vulnerabilities because he

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>had been searching for them and then exploiting them. So

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.119
<v Speaker 1>this could help the company build more effective tools to

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>protect security and privacy, because who do you want on

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>your team other than, you know, the person who knows

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>how to break those thingsings And that definitely makes sense

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>from that perspective. Now, the bit about him working as

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a mercenary for a foreign government seems a bit much

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:12.199
<v Speaker 1>to me, but I get the concept of wanting to

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>find someone to put on your team who has experience

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>of familiarity with exploits. A few weeks ago, I talked

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>about how employees at Activision Blizzard had brought forth charges

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 1>relating to a toxic work culture within the company and

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.959
<v Speaker 1>had been part of that company for years, including charges

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of sexual harassment and assault, as well as a tendency

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for the company to protect certain employees accused of perpetrating

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 1>or encouraging some truly awful behavior. There are also charges

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of general gender discrimination, like women getting paid significantly less

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>for doing the same job as their male counterparts. Now

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the company is in the news again because the Communications

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Workers of America or c w A alleges that Activision

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Blizzard intimidated employees in an to prevent unionization. In other words,

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want their employees to band together to form

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a union, so they set about hiring folks who would

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, prevent that from happening. As such, the labor

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>organization has now brought a lawsuit against Activision Blizzard. According

0:24:18.600 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to the organizing director of the c W A Tom Smith. Quote,

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Activision Blizzards response to righteous worker activity was surveillance, intimidation

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and hiring notorious union busters end quote. So that righteous

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>worker activity reference, Uh, that's actually two employees who were

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>taking a stand against Activision Blizzard, protesting conditions about you know,

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the disparities and the sexual harassment and bringing those things

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>into the spotlight. I should add there's an ongoing discussion

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>within the gaming community over whether or not it's a

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>good idea to boycott Activision Blizzard titles. You know, there

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of Twitch streamers who have been talking

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>about this, and some argue that this sends a message

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to the company, and it's a message that's hard to

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>ignore because if enough people are boycotting the products, that

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:10.479
<v Speaker 1>hurts the bottom line. It has to be a lot

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 1>of people, and the odds of getting that many people

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to participate are pretty low. But if you can do it,

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it sends a definite message. But then you have other

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:23.719
<v Speaker 1>people saying no, game developers who are working under these

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>awful conditions are doing so partly because they really want

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>their work to be seen and experienced and enjoyed, and

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that a boycott kind of pours salt on an already

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, painful wound. So it's a complicated situation. Speaking

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of complicated situations, I haven't talked about Tharoness for a while,

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>but the trial of the former CEO of that doomed company,

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Holmes, is now underway and Erica Cheung, who once

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>worked for Tharaus, is testifying, and she actually has testified

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that she observed questionable processes in the company as Holmes

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>continued to court investors to spend money on thairness, and

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>also as she was engaging in a rather lavish and

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>eccentric lifestyle. All right, so quick refresher on homes and thoroughness.

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Holmes attended Stanford University before dropping out to go on

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to found a biotech medical company that would evolve into Thoroughness. Now.

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>The goal was to develop a blood scanning technology that

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>could take a minuscule amount of blood as a sample

0:26:30.920 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and then run a battery of tests on it, potentially

0:26:34.720 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>more than one hundred tests all from that tiny sample,

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and then print out definitive and easy to understand results

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>based on those tests. So the ideal goal was to

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>produce something around the size of a desktop printer that

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.959
<v Speaker 1>could do all of this, potentially even creating a consumer

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>version that people could buy and have in their own homes.

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>They could then run tests to understand whether that take

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in the back of their throat with something serious or not,

0:27:03.359 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>or they could scan to see whether they might be

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a risk for developing some sort of serious condition down

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the line based upon their blood work. This was all

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>supposed to democratize medicine, to disrupt the entire blood testing industry,

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and to empower patients so that they could have better,

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>more informed conversations with their doctors. But there was a

0:27:25.200 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>bit of a problem, and that problem was the tech

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>was just not up to snuff, and some folks, including

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>some people who served as advisors to Holmes while she

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>was at Stanford, have expressed that they thought the tech

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>might not ever work on such a small sample, that

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>this is just asking too much from the tech and

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it puts too much faith on the powers of technology.

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>That alone is somewhat understandable. I mean, I see a

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people like putting a lot of hope in technology.

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>But you can kind of get that because most of

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 1>us carry a device in our pockets or our handbags,

0:28:02.840 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that is far more powerful than the most powerful personal

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>computer from a decade ago, and we just carry it

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 1>around with us wherever we go. I mean, that's that's

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>what smartphone is. So if that became a reality, then

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.200
<v Speaker 1>what can't tech do. That's sort of the thought process.

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Chung's testimony included the revelation that Thereness staff had a

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>six data point test that each each you know, blood

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>test was supposed to pass in order to meet quality

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>control standards. So, in other words, when you ran a

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>test on the equipment, it should meet these six data points,

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and if it doesn't, then it's a failed test. But

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.239
<v Speaker 1>the staff were told to delete up to two of

0:28:44.280 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>those six points if that would mean that the test

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>would otherwise pass. So in other words, if you said, well,

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 1>if we ignore these outliers, then everything's fine. So in

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>other words, this could be seen as a form of

0:28:56.040 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>cherry picking, looking for positives and then ignoring the negatives

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>in order to boost your numbers. Chung quit her job

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>after working for Thoroughness for six months, uh disillusioned that

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>she was working for an organization that was, in her mind,

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>at best unprofessional and at worst downright unethical. Chung was

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>previously featured as a whistleblower in the book Bad Blood,

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>which is probably the most thorough expose a on Thorodness,

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>certainly the most famous. She was also featured on the

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>HBO documentary The Inventor. Cross Examination of Chung began yesterday

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it will pick up again tomorrow on Friday. Well, I've

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>got a couple more stories to cover, but before I

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>do that, let's take another quick break and now we

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>move over to the world of n f t s

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>or non fungible tokens. These have been likened by some people,

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>including myself, as a sort of digital receipt that shows

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that you quote unquote own some instance of something. Right, technically,

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>what you own is a digital token that represents something else.

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>That something else could be data in the form of

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>like an illustration or a digital baseball card, or a

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>tweet or something else. And the n f T market

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is built on top of blockchain technology, which means that

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the chain of ownership of an n f T is

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>well established and distributed in a ledger. Uh There's so

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>everyone who's part of the system can see when an

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>n f T changes hands from one entity to another

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and verify that yes, ownership of this n f T

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>has changed. So what can you do with n f

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 1>T s. Well, you could collect them. You could try

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and do some speculative investing, So you could try and

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>buy an n f T and hope that it improves

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>in value and then sell it off for a profit.

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Or if you're an employee of open c that's s

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>e A that was that's an n f T marketplace

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way, then you might engage in a little

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>insider trading. Apparently an open Sea employee secretly purchased n

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>f T s that the employee knew we're soon going

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to be featured on the front page of the open

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>see website, and I guess the idea was that the

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>n f T S value would increase due to the

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>exposure of being on the front page of the website.

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Then the employee could sell off the n f T

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>s at an inflated value for a tidy profit. Now,

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the company did not say who that employee was. A

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>user on Twitter with the handle at zu w u

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>t V or zooo TV accused the head of product

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>for open c, a guy named Nate Chastain, of engaging

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in this behavior, but open Sea gave no real confirmation

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that that's the employee in question, at least not as

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I record this episode. However, a Chinese news platform reported

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>that chas Stain's scheme brought in the equivalent of sixty

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>seven thousand dollars of Ether cryptocurrency. But that's according to

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the current value of Ether, because cryptocurrency values tend to fluctuate,

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so on one day it might be you know, sixty

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.040
<v Speaker 1>four thousand, on another day it might be sixty eight thousands,

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>so it can change pretty dramatically in short order. So

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of hard to make these kind of calls.

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, not great. Not great to have any sort

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>of insider trading. It's it's not the sort of thing

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that you can necessarily get away with quickly, because if

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>people are paying attention to which digital wallet these n

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>f t s are going to, then they can start

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to connect the dots. Even though like on the surface

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>level it looks like it's anonymous, if you're really paying

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>attention to stuff, you can start to draw some conclusions,

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is what happened in this case. Now, you

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>might remember, if you've listened to previous news episodes of

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff, that General Motors has had to issue a

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 1>global recall on the Chevrolet Bolt electric vehicle, and the

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 1>problem stems from faulty batteries, which can develop a short

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>circuit and that leads to the battery overheating and potentially

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>catching on fire. Now, the company has started to advise

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>some Bolt owners that they shouldn't park their cars within

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty feet of any other vehicles, which yauza, I mean,

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, think about that in different parking situations, like

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>parking decks or parking lots. I live in Atlanta, and

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're going anywhere in the city, it's going to

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>be a real challenge to find a spot that's fifty

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>feet from all other vehicles. But that illustrates how serious

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this issue is and how seriously Bolt owners need to

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>take this now. To be clear, GM has given this

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>advice in response to Bolt owners who have called into

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the company into like a helpline to ask what they

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>should do when it comes to parking their vehicles. So

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>this is not a proactive message that's going out to

0:33:55.080 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Bolt owners. It's more like a well, we would advise

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>you not to park anywhere close to another car, just

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in case your car starts to catch on fire, like

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>an answer to a question. Now, the recall is expected

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to cost GM somewhere in the neighborhood of one point

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollars. As someone who is generally in favor

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of electric vehicles, I'm kind of sad to see the

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.959
<v Speaker 1>situation happen, not the recall. I'm not sad that they're

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:25.359
<v Speaker 1>recalling the faulty vehicles. That's absolutely necessary. Instead, I'm just

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, bummed that the defective batteries are

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 1>there in the first place, because anything that could contribute

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to a reluctance to move toward an electric fleet is

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>going to make that process more difficult. But the fact

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>remains that we really do need to transition away from

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:44.840
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel vehicles. Actually that that includes the entire chain,

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>from the power production facilities like power plants, all the

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>way down to the technology that we're relying upon day

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to day, like our vehicles. My last story today is

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a pretty cool one cern the Scientific Organization that I

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>think might be best known in the United States either

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:08.280
<v Speaker 1>as the company that ended up or organization I should

0:35:08.280 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>say that ended up giving birth to the Worldwide Web

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>because of Tim berners Lee, who was working at started

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>at the time, or more likely these days, it might

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>be known as the organization in charge of the large

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Hadron Collider, the particle accelerator. Anyway, it's created a tool

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:27.799
<v Speaker 1>that's being used by the organization as well as the

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Institute of Global Health at the University of Geneva to

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>use machine learning to determine what the most effective methods

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>would be to prevent the spread of COVID nineteen in

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.839
<v Speaker 1>school settings. So we're seeing a lot of unfortunate and

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 1>scary news about school systems being affected by COVID breakouts,

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and clearly students, teachers, and staff all want safe environments,

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>but it can be difficult to know how to go

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>about creating those environments, particularly when you've got a lot

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of variables involved, and you also have different levels of

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:02.160
<v Speaker 1>understanding about the behavior or the virus. Sometimes you get

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>information that appears to contradict earlier information, so that can

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 1>cause confusion. So the research with this tool has shown

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that a few things are most effective at really preventing

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the spread of COVID. Among those things are natural ventilation,

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>so open windows are a good uh HEPPA filtration systems

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that's h g p A filtration systems in order to

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>filter out contaminants in the air and face masks are

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>all the most effective you know strategies when they're all

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>used in combination with one another. On top of that

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>are practices that improve it even more, like social distancing,

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:42.720
<v Speaker 1>so keeping everyone six ft apart or more, vaccinations clearly

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>very very important, and contact tracing in the event of

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>an actual case being detected, so that you can figure

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>out who that person has been in close contact with.

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Since in most cases kids still can't get vaccinated yet,

0:36:56.600 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>especially younger kids can't get vaccinated, these steps are really

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 1>important because they can't benefit from the vaccination themselves. I mean,

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:08.839
<v Speaker 1>they can benefit from the fact that adults around them

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:12.799
<v Speaker 1>are vaccinated, but you know, the kids can't get vaccinated. Now,

0:37:12.840 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>you might say that this all just confirms what we

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>already thought, but that's an important part of science. Sometimes

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>we find out that the thing we suspected to be

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.399
<v Speaker 1>true is true. That does happen. But there are other

0:37:24.440 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 1>times where the science shows we don't have the full picture,

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>or maybe we're asking the wrong questions. Because that's how

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.319
<v Speaker 1>science works and why it's not as simple as this

0:37:34.440 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is how it is and nothing more. Now. The reason

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:40.799
<v Speaker 1>I say all that is actually not the lecture you,

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:43.319
<v Speaker 1>because I know it comes across that way. But that's

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>not why I say it. I say it because I

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>need to remind myself of this very thing, because I

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 1>know that I have been guilty of looking at a

0:37:52.280 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>situation and drawing a conclusion and then acting on that

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>conclusion without you know, actually investigating whether or not that

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>conclusion was valid in the first place. That's not critical thinking,

0:38:04.800 --> 0:38:06.839
<v Speaker 1>and I've been guilty of it. So I say this

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to try and hold myself more accountable. And yeah, responsibility

0:38:12.480 --> 0:38:17.759
<v Speaker 1>tastes bad. Well that's the news for Thursday, Septe one.

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:20.000
<v Speaker 1>There was a ton of it, a lot of Jonathan

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>on a soapbox. I make no apologies for it. I

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>appreciate all you who listen all the way through, and

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I understand that you may not agree with my perspective.

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 1>I completely respect that as long as you know you're

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>respecting others. That's the most important part, making sure that

0:38:36.600 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>we all do our own efforts to keep not just

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>ourselves safe, but everyone else too, like we gotta look

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>out for each other. Anyway, if you have suggestions for

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:50.240
<v Speaker 1>topics I should cover on future episodes of Tech Stuff,

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>reach out to me the handle for the show. It's

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff hs W and I'll talk to you again. Really.

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I heart Radio production. For more

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from I heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.