WEBVTT - Tech News: Twitter Gets a New CEO

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of all things tech. And it's time

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 1>for the tech news for Tuesday, November one. And yes,

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it's that time again. No, I don't mean the holidays,

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's time for Jack Dorsey, Twitter co founder,

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 1>to step down as CEO of Twitter again. Dorsey co

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>founded Twitter all the way back in two thousand and

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>six with Biz Stone, Evan Williams, and Noah Glass. He

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>served as the CEO from two thousand six to two

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight. Then he stepped aside for fellow co founder

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Evan Williams to take over, and instead Dorsey assumed the

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>role of Chairman of the Board of Directors. Williams would

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>then step down after two years as CEO, and then

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Dick Costolo, who was the former CEO of the company,

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>assumed the role of CEO, and when Costolo stepped down

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand fifteen, Jack Dorsey returned as CEO. So

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>like Grover Cleveland, Dorsey served two nonconsecutive terms. Anyway, he

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 1>has resigned and says it's time for Twitter to move

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>away from its founders, and now the former c t

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>O of Twitter, parag Agri Wall, has become the new CEO.

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>For years, Dorsey has faced criticism because he also serves

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>as the head of Square, that is, the the online

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>payment processing company famous for producing the smartphone and tablet

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>peripherals that create a point of sale for small businesses.

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Investors were concerned that his attention was too divided between

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>these different businesses, and Twitter has stalled out when it

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>comes to user growth. So it was on a steady

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>path of growth up through two thousand and fourteen, but

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>after that the growth began to slow down and even

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>level off. In fact, by the first quarter of two

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen, Twitter announced it would no longer share its

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>monthly active user account. They had three different months in

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a row in which the user number was on the

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>decline rather than growth, and yeah, reporting on monthly users

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>would make the company look stagnant and it would probably

0:02:33.440 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>worry investors and invite comparisons to other social networks like Facebook.

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>So there have been investors calling for Dorsey's resignation. For

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a while. They've wanted to see Twitter shift into a

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>higher gear and get into growth mode again. So is

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that actually possible. I honestly don't know. I suppose anything

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>is possible, but it would mean having to find a

0:02:56.000 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>way to make Twitter relevant for younger users. Twitter excuse

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>older for social networks. Nearly its user base is between

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 1>the ages of twenty five and thirty five. The second

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>largest demographic group is aged between thirty five and forty nine,

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>so like more than half of Twitter's users are over

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the age of anyway. At least some investors have expressed

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>approval of Dorsey's resident Nation, but they've also said they

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>were hoping to see someone from outside Twitter take control

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>rather than promotion from Insight, And of course it was

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 1>promoted from Insight, so we'll have to see what happens. Today,

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Twitter announced that it had updated its privacy and security

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>policy to extend additional protection towards quote unquote private media.

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter already will take action against users who publish other

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>people's private information without those people's consent, like you know,

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a person's address or their phone number, or a picture

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of their I D or you know, any kind of

0:03:57.600 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>other personal information. Now that protection also extends towards media

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of private individuals without the permission from those individuals. So

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>if you snap a photo of that jerk face who

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>lives across the street without said jerk faces permission, and

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>then you share that photo to Twitter, you would technically

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>be violating this policy. Now, to be clear, Twitter hasn't

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.799
<v Speaker 1>employed an army of reviewers or a ton of AI

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>bots to scour all the tweets and look for media

0:04:29.000 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>and then seek out the people in that media to

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>find out if they gave permission for that to be

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>shared or not. This is instead a reactive policy. So

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>if I go on Twitter and I see that that

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.919
<v Speaker 1>jerk face who lives across the street has posted a

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>photo of me and I didn't give my permission, I

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>can contact Twitter and I can say hey, I didn't

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 1>say jerk face could do that, and Twitter will then

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>remove the tweet. Maybe because the policy actually does not

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 1>apply to quote media featuring blick figures or individuals when

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>media and accompanying tweet text are shared in the public

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 1>interest or add value to public discourse. End quote. Now,

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I actually quite qualify as a public figure.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not nearly notable enough to qualify for that status.

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>But it does mean that if the jerk face who

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>lives across the street from me is I don't know

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Justin Bieber, and and I snap a photo of him

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and I share it. You know, you could argue that

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>since Biber is a public figure, that's still fair game,

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the price of fame. And just because I'm

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a bad singer and built baby, Baby Baby while I'm

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>walking my dog, you know, and then I get the

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>restraining order. What a jerk face. Once upon a time

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>there was no Alphabet company and Google was just Google.

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And in this magical time, Google had an official motto,

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and that motto was don't be evil. And I think

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty good motto to have, particularly when your

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>business depends so heavily upon knowing everything you could possibly

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>know about people who use your search engine. Because, as

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I and lots of other people have said many many times,

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Google's business is not search, it's advertising. And pairing advertising

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>with knowledge about the customer makes advertisements way more effective.

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That means they're more valuable, and that means Google can

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>make way more money from selling them. And being the

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>dominant player in the search engine world means Google has

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 1>no shortage of revenue generators out there. That is people

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>using Google Search anyway. Don't be evil. It's a good motto. Well,

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>three former Google employees have brought a lawsuit against the

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>company for breach of contract. The employees, all three of

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>whom were fired on the same day, say that Google

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>failed to live up to its own code of conduct,

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>as spelled out an employee agree mints see in twenty fifteen,

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>when Google formed Alphabet as a parent company, it also

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>dropped the don't be evil motto. You know that was strange,

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it. But that phrase still exists in the employee agreements,

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>which says, in part, quote remember don't be evil, and

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>if you see something that you think isn't right, speak

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>up end quote. Well, these three employees, Sophie Waldman, Paul Duke,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and Rebecca Rivers, say they were fired after they spoke

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>out against Google the company while uh IT was signing

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a contract with the Customs and Border Protection in the

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>United States in order to provide cloud computing services to

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that institution. Now, this was during Trump's presidency, at the

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>height of xenophobic propaganda that painted immigrants legal and non

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>legal alike with a fearful and racist brush. Not to

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>mention the department was separating and caging families at the time.

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>The three employees were all fired on November twenty five,

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>two nineteen. Google's explanation was that the employees were leaking

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>confidential information and we're nosing around internal Google systems that

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>was outside their scope of work. The former employees they

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>they deny this, and they also state that they were

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>fired after they circulated a petition among other Google employees

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>asking them to show their disapproval for this cloud services contract.

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll keep an eye on this lawsuit as it moves

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>through the court system to see how it all pans out,

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>though if it does go beyond a settlement, I'll be

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>really surprised. Last week, various news outlets reported that an

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>internal survey at Facebook revealed that a significant number of

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Facebook staff are losing confidence in the company's leadership, with

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 1>fewer than half of respondents indicating that they intend to

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 1>stay with the company. That being said, I would argue

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the survey is really more of a way to send

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a message to upper management and executive management. It not

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 1>necessarily an indicator that we're going to see like more

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>than half of Facebook employees just turn in their two

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks notice anytime soon. I don't expect that to happen.

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>The same survey indicated that most employees like their direct managers,

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.239
<v Speaker 1>so they like the people who are directly over them.

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>That seems to say that it really is an issue

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>with the executive management level as the source for employee concerns.

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.320
<v Speaker 1>This isn't that big of a surprise, considering how Facebook

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>has been in the center of some really ugly stories

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>over the last several years in general, and the last

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>few months in particular, positive responses indicating confidence in leadership

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:45.439
<v Speaker 1>were down to so more than half of those surveyed

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>indicated a lack of confidence in leadership. Um, that's not great,

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and I guess I should say that, you know, we're

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>really talking about the company Meta, not Facebook. But old

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>habits are hard to break. I will frequently refer to

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Facebook the company, um, you know, as Facebook, as opposed

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to Meta. Anyway, as more outlets cover this story this week,

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>including you know, tech stuff, I imagine that executives at

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Facebook are paying a little bit more attention to that survey. Now.

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that they actually want to change anything

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>at the company. I mean, they probably want to change

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>how they word the questions in the survey so that

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>they get better responses. It might be a little cynical.

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of Facebook slash Meta, the company in May of

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty acquired animated gift depository Giffee for a cool

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>three hundred fifteen million dollars and that appeared to be

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that that is until a UK antitrust regulation organization stepped

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>in that says that Meta will have to now sell

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>off Giffee. After all, they will have to get rid

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of it. The regulators say that Meta buying up Giffee

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>gives Facebook or rather you know, Meta slash Facebook and

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>avantage over other social media platforms that also use Giffe,

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>like TikTok and stuff like that, and that it would

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously remove a potential Facebook competitor from the market. This

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>would be in the ads space. So essentially, what they're

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 1>saying is that Giffe and Facebook could potentially court the

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>same advertisers. But if Facebook buys Giffe like it did,

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>then that means there's a reduction of choice for those advertisers.

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>They can't choose to go with Facebook or Giffy because

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Facebook gobbled up Giffe, thus a loss in competition. It's

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting that a UK based regulatory body could enforce an

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>acquisition reversal on two US based companies, but in fact

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it does have that authority. The regulators have jurisdiction over

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>acquisitions that represent at least a control of a market

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>within the UK, so unless Facebook decides to not operate

0:11:56.800 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in the UK, it does fall into this category. The

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 1>regulators actually say that Meta and Giffee together would control

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a whopping eight of the animated gift market in the UK.

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>That puts it well over the metric needed for this

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>regulation body to step in. So it looks like the

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>tide is really beginning to turn against big tech in

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful way. Meta representatives unsurprisingly released a statement saying

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>they disagree with this decision, which I mean, of course

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they do, and that they are considering all options, including

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>appealing this decision. They also said that the regulators were

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>sending a message to entrepreneurs that quote, do not build

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>new companies because you will not be able to sell

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>them end quote. Personally, I actually think that's okay. I mean,

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I get the business plan for like of all startups

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>isn't to create a sustainable business. That's not the plan

0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>for most of them. No, the plan is to become

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>attractive enough for some other bigger company to come along

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and acquire you for oodles of cash, and you cash out.

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>But I'm not sure that's actually a very healthy approach

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to business in the long runs. So I realized this

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 1>might mean we might see fewer unicorns, but based on

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>how gross a lot of your unicorns turned out to be,

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm personally fine with that. Okay, we have some more

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>news stories to cover, but before we get to that,

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. We're back rolling. Stone Magazine

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>reports that an FBI document has revealed that the FBI

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>can easily access a person's WhatsApp or Apple Eye message

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>history as long as the or activity I should say,

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>as long as the bureau first secure as an appropriate

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.840
<v Speaker 1>subpoena or warrant. That has a little bit of a

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>shocking revelation because both services help the fact that their

0:13:56.520 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>communications are aren't fully encrypted end to end. So the

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.359
<v Speaker 1>idea here is that only the people in that conversation

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>should be able to read the messages in the other party,

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 1>including Meta in the case of WhatsApp or Apple in

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the case of Eye, message would not be able to

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>read those messages. That's the whole point, right, So, unless

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you get hold of one of the communicators devices, it

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>should be impossible or at the very least incredibly difficult,

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to see what messages are being sent back and forth.

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>But the FBI document calls these two services both quote

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the most popular encrypted messaging apps end quote while also

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 1>simultaneously being quote the most permissive end quote. So does

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>that mean the FBI is magically able to unlock the encryption, Well,

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it turns out the answer to that is no. But

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 1>what the FBI can do is pretty easily monitor activity

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>to see stuff like who is communicating with whom at

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>what time, under what circumstances, in what locations. So, in

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>other words, this document really lays out how the FBI

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>can collect and track meta data about the people who

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>are communicating with each other. Sure, the content of the

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>messages remains unknown, but with other dots that are out there,

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the FBI can start to build a case against people.

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>For example, let's say that the FBI looks and sees

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that you've had some communication with someone they've labeled as

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a person of interest for something like they're this person

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>has been targeted for an investigation, and they see that

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that person has been in contact with you through one

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of these apps. They could also see if you have

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>any other people of interest listed in your contacts. So,

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in other words, they could say, all right, well, we

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>know that you have been in contact with this person

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're targeting. Let's see if you're also talking with

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone else who's on our lists. Or they can also

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>see if the person you're talking with has any other

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>people of interest in their own contacts, and they and

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>start building out networks of context in this way. And

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you can probably imagine at least a few cases in

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>which this could become a really troubling issue. For example,

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you are an investigative journalist and you

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 1>rely upon contacts who are embedded in various sensitive organizations

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like government offices, maybe the FBI itself. Well, the FBI

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>could snoop on your communications, and even without seeing what

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it is your sending, could at least see to whom

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you are sending information that could lead to a whistleblower

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>being exposed. The Rolling Stone received the FBI document from

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 1>an organization called Property of the People, which filed a

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Freedom of Information Act request, and it's all aimed to

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>publicize this practice. And make people aware of how even

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>encrypted messaging services may be less safe than you might think,

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly if they are pretty willing to work with law

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>enforcement on these kinds of requests for metadata. And now

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>here's an update to the Amazon union issue in Bessemer

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>at Alabama. So in case you don't remember that story,

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>workers at an Amazon warehouse in Alabama held a vote

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on whether or not they should unionize this past April.

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 1>That vote ultimately ended up being against unionization, but organizers

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>accused Amazon of engaging in illegal misconduct leading up to

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the vote, and there were allegations of intimidating workers and

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>spreading misinformation about unions. Uh, the National Labor Relations Board

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>has now ruled that the workers can hold a new

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 1>union election. Amazon representatives have expressed disappointment in the ruling.

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Allegedly the company went to all this trouble to discourage

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>voting and make it more difficult, and even installing an

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>illegal drop box and more. It really does seem to

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 1>be a real kick in the teeth for all that

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>hard work to just go to waste. And again I

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>say allegedly, because you know, I don't want to get

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in trouble here. Also, it's worth noting that Amazon has

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a very high turnover rate with its employees. Many Amazon

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>employees don't stay with the company for a very long

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.280
<v Speaker 1>time because the work is pretty brutal, at least in

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the warehouses and fulfillment centers. As such, it can be

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>difficult to organize people because the folks you're talking to

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>today might not be the same folks that you're calling

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.879
<v Speaker 1>in to vote next week. That's being I'm exaggerating a

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:33.919
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but you get my my meaning right, Like,

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get any kind of movement going when

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the population is in such flux. Here's a different follow up.

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I have talked a few times about state sponsored malware

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on iOS devices, you know, turning things like iPhones into

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 1>surveillance machines. Uh. Notably, I've talked about the malware from

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the Israeli backed in s O group. Now, Apple says

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that the company will send noifications to users who own

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>iOS devices that have been compromised by such state backed malware.

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Apple will send notifications via I message to affected users.

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>They also send out emails. There will be other notifications

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. It's expected that not very many people will

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>actually receive these notifications because state sponsored attacks are usually

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>really targeted and precise. You know, they have specific people

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:28.479
<v Speaker 1>in mind that they go after, rather than casting a

0:19:28.520 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>wide net like a lot of hackers. They make malware

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and the whole intent is to infect as many devices

0:19:35.359 --> 0:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>as you possibly can, So you're taking a broad approach.

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.439
<v Speaker 1>That's not the case with state sponsored attacks. They're usually

0:19:42.480 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at specific people and saying, we want to compromise

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>their device so we can find out what they're up to. So,

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>in other words, unless you are a diplomat or an

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>international journalist or an activist or you know, politician, maybe

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>like the head of some big company, you probably haven't

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>been targeted and you won't get one of these messages probably,

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, just just keep a lookout on those iOS notifications.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>An I T company called land Sweeper surveyed Windows based

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>devices that were running on various networks. You know, you

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>can get a lot of data about what machines are

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>actually using your network that doesn't involve anything about the

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>people behind the machines, Like you can see what sort

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:30.199
<v Speaker 1>of operating system was being used by that machine that

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>accessed your network. So they did this in an effort

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 1>to kind of see how many machines out there. How

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:40.159
<v Speaker 1>many PCs are running the most recent version of Windows,

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>which is of course Windows eleven. It launched last month. Now,

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>according to the firm, an easily point to one percent.

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>That's zero point to one percent of PC users are

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>running the newest operating system a month after its release.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>That is shockingly low. That's even fewer folks running the

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Windows eleven than are currently running Windows XP. Windows XP

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been supported by Microsoft since like two thousand and twelve,

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe even earlier than that, and yet it's

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>still commands more than three and a half percent of

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>all PCs on these same networks. That is really shocking. Uh,

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>The survey should really be a matter of concern not

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.959
<v Speaker 1>just a Microsoft, which clearly the company has a vested

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>interest in seeing their products get widespread adoption, but it

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>also should be a big concern to I T professionals

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in general. On various networks, a significant number of machines

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>are running on end of life versions of Windows. That is,

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>versions of Windows that Microsoft no longer supports, like XP

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and Windows seven. Those are no longer getting support updates.

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>That means that for any of the exploits that have

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 1>popped up since Microsoft ended support, and any future exploits

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>there's no real chance to rescue there. Right, these machines

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 1>are going to be vulnerable to that kind of exploitation.

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>So this is why it's a good idea to try

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and stay up to date with operating systems whenever possible.

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>That being said, I do have a couple of caveats

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>to this. Generally, I suggest that you balance out the

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>need to be up to date with the latest versions

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>of operating systems with waiting a short while once updates

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>come out to make sure that they don't break stuff,

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes an update will break things, and depending on

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>what it breaks, it might be something important. Right. However,

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a caveat to that caveat, which is that in

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the case of urgent security updates. Let's say that there

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>was a a critical vulnerability found within an operating system

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and a patch is sent out, I think then it

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is a good idea to update as soon as you

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:04.400
<v Speaker 1>have access to that that patch, because vulnerabilities are serious

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>things like you do not want your device to get compromised. However,

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Windows eleven it has not had widespread adoption, even though

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of tech people love to jump on

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the latest thing. Windows does not appear to be one

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>of those things. Uh. One reason for that might be

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>that Windows eleven also has some relatively hefty resource requirements,

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 1>so your computer needs to be, you know, a fairly

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>recent machine to run Windows eleven effectively. So for some

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>folks it's just not practical to upgrade to the latest

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>OS because you know, you don't want your operating system

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>eating up all your computer's resources, leaving nothing for anything else. Um.

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>That was my big issue with Windows when it first

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>came out way way back when I was one of

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>those grouchy kids who was, you know, grousing about the

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that we were moving away from MS DOSS to Windows.

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Because the Windows operating system required so much uh, computational resources,

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>which was granted, a fraction of what you would have

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>in a even a even a modest smartphone would be

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>better than the computer I had back then. But because

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the operating system was requiring so much processing power, it

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>limited what you could actually run on the machine. And

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought that was ridiculous at the time. I still

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's ridiculous now, but it's just the way of

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the world. So anyway, that's one reason why a lot

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of people haven't upgraded the Windows eleven is just that

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not ideal for whatever machine they're running on. Meanwhile,

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we're still in a supply chain nightmare and a semiconductor

0:24:41.280 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 1>chip shortage on top of that. That's you know, part

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of the supply chain issue, and getting a new computer

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.919
<v Speaker 1>isn't necessarily easy, nor is it cheap because you know,

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>we've seen those prices start to go up because of

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 1>these the supply chain issues. So there are a lot

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of legit reasons why people my be holding back on

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>adopting Windows eleven. It's really seen as the kind of

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>operating system that is coming out with new machines, and

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>there's just not as big of a market for new

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>machines right now because of all those reasons. So this

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>could be a problem that sticks around a little bit

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and has little to nothing to do with the actual

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.959
<v Speaker 1>quality of the operating system itself. It's a very frustrating

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>problem to have, I'm sure for Microsoft. Here in the US,

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>lawmakers are introducing, or rather reintroducing legislation that aims to

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 1>make it illegal for people to use automated bots to

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 1>buy up retail goods. That issue is the fact that

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>when certain products are on the verge of exploding and

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>popularity or demand, some folks who have a lot of

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>money will use bots to buy up all the available products,

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>and then they might sell them off at marked up

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>prices on like auction sites. I always think this might

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>be a thing that happens with Treasure Truck. Maybe it's

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 1>just me. I sometimes get notifications from Amazon about Treasure

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Truck stuff, and occasionally I'll check it out of curiosity,

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And almost always when I check it, it turns out

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that whatever the thing was, I mean, even if I

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>click on it, as soon as I get that text message,

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it says it's out of stock, which either means there's

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.240
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly small amount of stock that's being on offer,

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>or maybe I'm getting the message too late, or perhaps

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>people are using bots to buy those things up before

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 1>other folks get a chance to. But you really see

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:30.920
<v Speaker 1>this with stuff like video game consoles. This is one

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of the many reasons why it's hard to get hold

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>of something like a PlayStation five right now. It also

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is a big issue with graphics cards, even though we've

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 1>seen bitcoin miners move away from graphics cards, because even

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the most powerful graphics cards now don't have the oo

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>needed to do bitcoin mining. Even though that has stopped

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>being as big of an issue, we still see graphics

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>cards getting bought up faster than people can even you know,

0:26:59.680 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>keep them in stock. So this proposed legislation has the

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>cute nickname of Stopping Grench Bots Act. For those who

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>are unaware. The Grench as a character from a Dr.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Seuss book, and he famously invades a small town to

0:27:13.600 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>steal all the Christmas presents on Christmas Eve. Anyway, lawmakers

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:20.880
<v Speaker 1>previously introduced this proposal back in twenty nineteen, but it

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't go very far. It kind of stalled out. But

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that was before the pandemic and before all the supply

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.480
<v Speaker 1>chain issues that I've been alluding to throughout this episode.

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And perhaps this year it can get a little more

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 1>traction as Americans struggled to engage in the rampant consumerism

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that marks the holiday season. All right, speaking of rampant consumerism,

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 1>it's time for us to take a quick break for

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>some ads. We will be back with a few more

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>stories after this. We're back, Okay, just a few more

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.400
<v Speaker 1>stories to round out this episode for us. Of all,

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the car manufacturing company Nissan has announced plans to budget

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>nearly seventeen point six billion dollars towards electrifying its fleet

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>of vehicles, shifting more resources towards the design and production

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of electric vehicles in anticipation of more regions throughout the

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>world passing e V mandates. You know, there are a

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of places like the UK that have said that

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>by twenty thirty five, for example, no more internal combustion

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>engine cars will be available for sale, no more new ones.

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>That is, you can still sell older vehicles, but all

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>new vehicles will have to be electric vehicles from that

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>point forward. Uh. Nissan interestingly did not go so far

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>as to make a commitment towards ending production of internal

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>combustion engine vehicles, and in fact, there are a couple

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of Japanese companies manufacturing car manufacturing companies that have also

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>not gone to that step. Um, perhaps hoping that that

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 1>either the adoption of electric vehicles will be the aid,

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>or that, you know, maybe it's just too expensive to

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>shift operations to e V production. But whatever the reason,

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a couple of companies kind of drag their

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>feet on this, and Nissan appears to be one of them. Uh.

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>The company said that it will be introducing twenty three

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>new electric vehicles by and more than half of those

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>will be fully electric. The rest will be hybrids of

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>some sort. Right now, the company plans for electric vehicles

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to make up to its sales by twenty forty here

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. That's assuming, of course, that we

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.680
<v Speaker 1>don't see more states passing these similar kinds of mandates,

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>or even a federal mandate that requires all new vehicles

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to be electric vehicles. In that case, that entire strategy

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>will have to be rethought. Meanwhile, some BMW models are

0:29:55.880 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>going to have fewer options than what would typically be

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 1>offered because of that ding dang darn semi conductor chip

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>shortage I was talking about. It has forced BMW to

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>nix the touch screen that would typically be found in

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>models like the BMW X five or the X six

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>series or X seven or Z four series, as well

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>as others. I think the BMW three and four both

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>have models that have typically the touch screen as an

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>option in the vehicle. Now they're not going to have that. Instead,

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they will have controls in the center console, kind of

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>like older BMW models. They used a BMW system called

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I drive Controller and it was all built in the

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>center console. It looks like these new cars are also

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>going to go back to that older design. BMW has

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>recognized that this is a step back and has announced

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that it will offer a five dollar credit on models

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that should have had a touch screen but will no

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>longer have them. This has affected other stuff, but sides

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>just an interface in the car. Uh there was a

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>backup assistant feature that was part of the parking Assistant

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>package that the Parking Assistant package is still going to

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>be available in these vehicles, but the backup Assistant feature

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.240
<v Speaker 1>is no longer an option that would allow you to

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>use a system that would automatically reverse the process of

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>parking when you were backing out so that you could

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>get out of things like super tight spaces or whatever.

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Now you're just gonna have to do it on your

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>own again. And in South Korea, the National Police Agency

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is advocating for a new process that would require elderly

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>drivers to apply for conditional driver's licenses before being allowed

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to drive. This process would include a joy ride in

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a virtual vehicle, so the idea is to use VR

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to test the elderly to make certain they can still

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>operate a vehicle. Safely under normal conditions, both day driving

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and night driving. From why I understand the people who

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>will apply I for this conditional license will have to

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>wear a VR headset and they will go through a scenario,

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a series of scenarios three both in in day and

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in night that will introduce things like an incident that

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>happens that you have to respond to common stuff like

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>let's say someone cuts you off on the highway. Um,

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you would have to be able to respond safely and

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>quickly to be able to avoid any kind of collision.

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the kind of thing that they're going to replicate

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>or simulate with this VR system. So South Korea has

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 1>an aging population and police are concerned about a rise

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in accident rates, in traffic accident rates that involved senior drivers.

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is an effort to try and identify potential

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>issues before they become hazardous or deadly. The plan is

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to have this new process in place by twenty five.

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>And finally, I have an update on the James web

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Space telescope story. So I mentioned last week that there

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>was an accident that caused a vibration to move through

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the telescope. The telescope itself is a satellite telescope. It's

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly sensitive piece of machinery, very delicate. It's got

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of delicate moving parts. Uh. For example, it has

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>this massive array of mirrors that will have to unfold

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 1>in space that will end up reflecting electromagnetic waves towards

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the detector on the telescope. So if those actuators are damaged, well,

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>then the telescope just won't work because you have to

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>have those mirrors in the proper configuration in order for

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it to focus very weak signals so that we can

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>study them. Well, the little incident meant that at the

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>very least the telescope's launch would have to be delayed

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>from December eighteen to quote no earlier than December twenty

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>two end quote. Well, now NASA has conducted a thorough investigation.

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Engineers were looking for any signs of damage in the telescope.

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>They reported that they found none. So NASA has now

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 1>authorized the launch for December twenty second, seven twenty a

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>m Eastern Standard time. So it seems like the very

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>very long journey to launch is coming to an end

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>after more than a decade. I mean, I've got a

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>tattoo that is related to the James Webb Space Telescope,

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and I got that tattoo a few years ago. Soon

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>after this happens, we'll have another long journey ahead of us,

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>but this time it will be one marked in you know, miles,

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>rather than in years. We're talking about the journey into

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>space itself. The telescope will go into orbit and it

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>will search for answers about how the earliest stars and

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>galaxies took shape in our universe right at the very

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 1>beginning of time, as well as it will help study

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>exoplanets in our ongoing quest to find out if there

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:07.240
<v Speaker 1>are other planets in our neighborhood that could potentially harbor

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>life on them. And by neighborhood, I mean like our galaxy,

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>not our solar system. But that would be really cool,

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>whether to you know, possibly study and search for actual

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 1>life or just you know, kind of make plans for

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:28.480
<v Speaker 1>far off distant future travels that would take generations to complete. Anyway,

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty exciting. I really hope that the

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>rest of the process goes without any more incidents. This

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>telescope has been through a lot, and the only incident

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't mind having more discussion about is the name

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of the telescope. But apart from that, like, there have

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>been so many delays associated with this particular device that

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>it would be really nice if we could get it

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>up into space and have it operational, you know, within

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a few months. That's my hope. We'll have to see

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:00.799
<v Speaker 1>if it happens. And that is it for the news

0:36:00.840 --> 0:36:05.439
<v Speaker 1>for Tuesday, November one. Just a heads up, we will

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 1>not have a news episode on Thursday. We have another

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>episode of Smart Talks with IBM publishing on Thursday. I

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 1>think that might be the final one that publishes in

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:21.800
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff, and after that it'll it'll just be me again,

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:26.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, just us. I hope you like that. If

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you have any suggestions for topics I should cover on

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>future episodes of tech Stuff, whether it's a technology, a company,

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a trend in tech, anything tech related like that, shoot

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.360
<v Speaker 1>me a message on Twitter let me know. The handle

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>for the show is text Stuff H s W and

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite show.