WEBVTT - Cisco Buys Splunk and Tech IPOs

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed loved Love.

0:00:26.120 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 3>Live from Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York. I'm Caroline

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 3>High and i me.

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Ladlow right next door. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 5>Coming up.

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Cisco buying Splunk and a twenty eight billion dollar deal

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 3>that pushes it into AI.

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:38.639
<v Speaker 5>Will bring you the terms of the deal and what.

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 4>It means for em and A and from m and

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 4>A to IPOs, we'll get a read on the state

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 4>of the market with Jeff Thomas from NASDAK as companies

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:46.480
<v Speaker 4>see their trading debut.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 6>Pop begin to fade.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 5>Plus, we'll bring you the latest in the media world.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 5>Robert Murdoch steps down from the Fox and News Corp.

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 3>And writers and studios that are inching closer.

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 5>To a deal.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 3>All that and so much more ahead, Let's bringing Jim Fish,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 3>analyst of Pipe Sanla, who has a neutral rating on

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 3>Cisco fifty seven dollars price target and ultimately, is this

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 3>a good deal despite the amount that they're paying in

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 3>terms of premium?

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, thanks for having me.

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 8>First off, Secondly on your question here, look Splunkhead been

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 8>a target for Cisco for a little while here Back

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 8>in January of twenty twenty two, it was rumored that

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 8>Cisco had made a offer at that point. Now today

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 8>you get the conclusion of that, or almost conclusion as

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 8>we work through a nine to twelve month deal cycle here.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 7>On this one forward to close.

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:36.479
<v Speaker 8>But this is the name that we have pointed out

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 8>for quite some time that is most strategic to Cisco

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 8>when you look at what Chuck Robbins and his team are.

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 7>Trying to do around AI cloud security, this one just

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 7>fits the bill.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 8>It really merges that world between app experiences that they

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 8>call it with the security side and fills a big

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 8>hole in the security portfolio that we pointed out for

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 8>a long time in the security Incident and Event management

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 8>or SIM space. Splunks the big eight hundred pound gorilla

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 8>in that space, and it really is the backbone of

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 8>security operations centers, and Cisco really needed that kind of

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 8>backbone to really push the push the envelope a little

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 8>bit more on its security business that's really been lagging

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 8>against other security peers out there in terms of a

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 8>growth ring.

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 4>So Chuck Robins reckons this transaction is going to close

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 4>in nine to twelve months, and then Gary Steele, who

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 4>is the CEO of Splunk, is going to join the

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 4>executive team reporting to Chuck Robbins. You gave an excellent

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 4>explanation there of what Splunk brings to Cisco. Have a

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 4>second go at it from a layman's perspective.

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 6>What is Splunk? What are we talking about here?

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so gets back to actually the name of Spunk.

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 8>Really, what Splunk is named after is going splunking, which

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 8>is going cave diving, and in this case, it's going

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:58.359
<v Speaker 8>after essentially data, trying to understand your data, being able.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 7>To search through it.

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 8>So when you have a you know, breach for example,

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 8>that you don't know about, but you can kind of

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 8>search through all of your data with spunks tools and

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 8>be able to find you know what's actually going on

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 8>inside your environment, which is why it's so important for

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 8>your security operations center as well as for an instant

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 8>response and management perspective. And actually, while we talk about

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 8>Splunk as a security tool, its foundation was actually on

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 8>the IT operation side, in sort of the performance management.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 7>So how is your network actually performing?

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 8>How how are your applications performing via on prem or

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 8>in the cloud as we shift to you know, a

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 8>nature AWS Google environment and being able to manage across

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 8>the entire environment, not just you know, on prem and

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 8>that's been a big shift for Spunk over the last

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 8>few years.

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:46.119
<v Speaker 7>Here.

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I knew that, we knew that. I was just checking.

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 9>Jim.

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 7>We're a smart guy, So thank you.

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 5>I don't serve ability.

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 6>Let me just ask you this.

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 4>A regulator is going to let this one go through,

0:03:58.320 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 4>I said, Chuck thinks nine to twelve.

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a question we're getting this morning.

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 8>We're actually we cover VMware as well, and that's been

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 8>a fun one in terms of regulation. I'd argue a

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 8>longer time period on that one. Look, I think you're

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 8>starting to see things go through. Even of VMware size.

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 8>For Cisco and Splunk, there's a little bit of overlap

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 8>in terms of, for example, market share with the powerful

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 8>combination of app Dynamics, thousand Dies and now Spunk altogether,

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 8>but there really isn't much on the security side, and

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 8>so from the both the application experiences and the security businesses.

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 8>While Splunk is a decent sized i'm sorry one, while

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 8>Cisco is a decent sized player in each as well. Splunk,

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, the two of them combined are really still

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 8>part of this really fragmented set of industries that there

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 8>really isn't the antitrust issue here in our.

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 3>View, What then, of the competitive landscape those that Splunk

0:04:57.240 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 3>was up against Data Dog based here in New York,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 3>com thing in Dina Trace as well. Digital's actually under

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 3>pressure some three percent to day.

0:05:03.560 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 5>Does it not make it more attractive?

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 7>You know? It's interesting, right because M and A can

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 7>be disruptive to.

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 8>The business being bought and potentially act as a tailwind

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 8>for competitors.

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 7>Look, I don't cover Davia Dog.

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 8>That's carved by my peer, Rob Ewens, but you know,

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 8>David Dog itself has been doing good things in sort

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 8>of cloud observability and that's where essentially workloads are going

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 8>correct and is considered one of, if not the leaders,

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 8>in that observability space. But when you kind of stack

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 8>up what Splunk could do for Cisco, you know, it

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 8>does make Cisco a more relevant competitor in this space,

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 8>especially given Cisco has a huge reach, right and Gary

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 8>and Chuck talked about it on the call this morning,

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 8>where about two thirds of Spunk as domestic and a

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.799
<v Speaker 8>third is international. Well, while Cisco has arguably the best

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 8>go to market program out there and can really penetrate

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:05.719
<v Speaker 8>their roughly a million customers with splunks.

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 7>Offering, and so that could potentially box out a competitor.

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 4>When do you think about it, Jim Fish or Piper Sandler,

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 4>just not just so good on the deal, but also

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 4>where it fits in the landscape.

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 6>Also very kind about me, Thank you very much.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 4>Now, coming up from the show, we're going to turn

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 4>from M and A to IPO's. Jeff Thomas, Executive vice

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 4>president of nasdaq's Corporate Platforms, is joining us next character.

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, look, let's just get to check in on how

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 3>these IPOs are the week affairing, because instagrat actually it's

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 3>still clinging to a gain over the last three days,

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 3>but coming off well from that pop after.

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:36.480
<v Speaker 5>Its initial IPO.

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.119
<v Speaker 3>We're currently training at thirty spot zero five, a tiny

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 3>gain on the thirty dollars pricing, but is that we

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 3>know remaining open Look up an eye for you from

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 3>New York.

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 5>This's a Bluemberg technology.

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 3>We're just taking you over to a either then happening

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg Global Credit Form. It's not a way in London.

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 3>You've got panels and KKR, Apollo, Barclays. They're all discussing

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.280
<v Speaker 3>at this very moment the rise of private credit. And

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 3>if you want to be digging into that a little

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 3>bit more, you can go to Life, go on a

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg terminal. But the credit more broadly ed is important

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 3>to our viewers in technology, whether it happens to be

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 3>the public companies seeking to raise funds to the bond

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 3>market and indeed the private.

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 6>Co yeh lok.

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 4>Cost of capital is important to any technology company. It's

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 4>a part of the balance Sheeper. Think back to May

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 4>Apple and Meta returned to the blue chip usbon market,

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 4>we get super excited.

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 6>Haven't heard anything since.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 4>So I just wanted to remind our audience, like tech,

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 4>companies in debt pay close attention.

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 3>Particularly when rates from the treasury perspective are on the rise,

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and whether in Central Bank really starts to impact the

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.320
<v Speaker 3>desire there. Meanwhile, I mean this all comes in a

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 3>global narrative when we're thinking of the health of the

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three IPO landscape. At the moment, we're facing

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 3>uncertainty after Armen in Stacart reverse gains after popping during

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 3>their debut.

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.239
<v Speaker 5>So let's get a little tape new Egsaba Girl Digital.

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 5>He's here for more a weldcare line.

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 10>It is really pretty interesting here because we did, of

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 10>course have the big IPO pops last week for ARM,

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 10>and then earlier this week for both Instacart and Kleviyo.

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 10>Here's ARM, though, giving back its first twenty four percent

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 10>gain that first day pop down each subsequent day overall

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 10>down about one point seven percent. So what really raises

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 10>the question begs the question of whether or not this

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 10>IPO window is healthy. In fact, if we take a

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 10>look at both ARM and cart, we are going to

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 10>see over this time period there's the ARM loss, but

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 10>KRT actually a small gain here a four tens of

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 10>one percent, not so shabby.

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 5>But what comes to mind for me why I.

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 10>Was initially questioning whether or not these pops were good enough.

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 10>If we take a look at what happened back in

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 10>the pandemic, we of course had Airbnb up one hundred

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 10>and thirteen percent, a firm up sixty four percent, Bumble

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 10>up almost one hundred percent, and then posh up one

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 10>hundred and forty two percent.

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 5>So the pops that we've seen over the last two weeks.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 10>Not quite as strong. Have we greased the IPO window.

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 10>It's not entirely clear at this point. More needs to

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 10>be seen.

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 11>For sure.

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 4>You know Shnalibus was on the show yesterday lamenting how

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 4>that's it now? All the IPOs ha done. We've covered

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 4>them to death. There won't be any tillbuck and stock.

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 4>And she's really sad about it. That's not quite true, though,

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 4>is it abby?

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we to be seen. It's good.

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 10>It's going to have a lot to do with this macro.

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 10>I mean, the macro environment right now relative to the

0:09:15.240 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 10>FED is not so great, and it's.

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 5>Not also bad.

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 10>Take a look at Clavio still holding on to a

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 10>gain of five point three percent. And I would also

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.199
<v Speaker 10>point to back in the day there was a company

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 10>that ipoed, and in the first couple of months we

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 10>go into the Bloomberg terminal, this stock absolutely tanked down

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 10>you can see here, down more than fifty percent of

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 10>those couple of months. It came back in a big,

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 10>big way, though, And at this point is that more

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 10>than seven hundred percent since that ipo? Any any takers

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 10>on what this is and why these IPOs right now?

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 5>Maybe we shouldn't bring to me.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 6>It wasn't around then Okay.

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 5>So it was Meta Facebook.

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, so previously known as Facebook.

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 10>Yes, previously known as Facebook at that time had a

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 10>very very difficult first couple of months. But if we

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 10>take a look at what Facebook has done, Meta has

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 10>done since that, I po, well, not so shabby at all,

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 10>especially given last year's big plunge.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 5>It's really come back.

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 10>So you know, it's just too early to say what's

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:08.679
<v Speaker 10>going on with these IPOs A bit.

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 4>That's why people say I'm a long term investor.

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 10>Yes, that is a that is a perfect chart for

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 10>the idea of a long term investor, not a trader.

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Abagail do Little the b chartress name on point.

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much.

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, let's stick with the IPO market and bring in

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 4>our next guest. It has been a busy few days,

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 4>right carro with three listing, some on the Nasdaq, some

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 4>on the New York Stock Exchange. Let's go to the

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 4>Nasdack side of this story and bring in Jeff Thomas.

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 4>And Jeff I want to start by asking you, you know,

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 4>we say here on the Bloomberg Technology Show, the euphoria

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 4>of the IPO winding opening up was short lived. Is

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 4>that your conclusion as well.

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, companies look at the IPO as

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 2>a moment in time.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:54.720
<v Speaker 7>It's a financing event.

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 2>It creates great opportunities for liquidity for their shareholders, creates

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 2>an acquisition currency by their stock. So I don't think

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 2>they get too hung up on exactly how their stocks

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 2>trading day day to day. If you look at what's

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 2>happening this week, you know, we had kind of a

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 2>hawkish pause by the Fed yesterday where again they paused

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>rates but had some hawkish overtones. So of course that's

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 2>going to drive them macro. That's going to drive some

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:17.439
<v Speaker 2>of these stocks. But when you look at the pipeline

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 2>that we've got with some great companies lined up to

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 2>get out to the market both in Q four and

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 2>a really strong pipeline in the first half of next year,

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I think there's still a lot of reasons to be optimistic.

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.440
<v Speaker 2>The VIX continues to be relatively low, indices are still

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 2>well up for the year, and I think companies that

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 2>raised capital back in twenty twenty and twenty twenty one

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 2>i'll really some pretty healthy valuations. They're going to need

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>to go back and raise another round of capital, and

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 2>so it'll be a choice do they want to raise

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 2>that capital privately or do they want to tap the

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 2>public markets. And I think there's a lot of reasons

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 2>to expect that many of them will come to the

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 2>public markets.

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 3>Speaking to your colleague Karen last week on the day

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 3>of the arm listing, Jeff, and when you're looking at

0:11:56.600 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 3>one hundred and fifty seven active s ones or f

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 3>one file, how many of those companies that are eyeing

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 3>the markets are going to have to use the play

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 3>But we've just seen Cornerstone Investors Limited supply to ensure

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 3>you get that initial pop, given well, Instacata is on

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 3>the downside already.

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, look, I think it's all about how you want

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 2>to build your book. Companies are always going to want

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 2>to have those long term anchor investors. There's always going

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 2>to be room for some companies that or some investors

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 2>that are going to be short term in nature.

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 7>And that's because, honestly.

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>When you look at the opening cross where we're bringing

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 2>together buyers and sellers for that all important first trade

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 2>through our technology called the IPO Book Viewer, the only

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 2>people that can sell into that transaction are the people

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 2>that got shares on the IPO. So there's of course

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 2>going to be buyers that got fewer shares than they wanted.

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Those are going to be the ones that are looking

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 2>to acquire more shares, And then you've got to have

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 2>some sellers in there as well. That's why we see

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 2>the stabilization. A agent sometimes taking an hour to even

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 2>three hours to open these stocks because a lot of

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 2>times it's having to flush out the sellers and find

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 2>people that are looking to unload the stock in addition

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 2>to all the long term shareholders that they bring in

0:12:58.160 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 2>through the IPO.

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was a key no hour that we're talking

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 3>well this time last week around on Jeff. I'm interested

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 3>there for as to who's coming in to want to

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 3>be that demand, that marginal purchaser. Is it we're getting

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 3>more retail interest? Does it largely tend to be the

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 3>institutions that are willing to take the risk right now?

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's really the institutional investors that are

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 2>going to be the major major.

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:18.440
<v Speaker 7>Buyers of IPOs.

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 2>You know, you kind of look at how the class

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty and twenty twenty one perform. Obviously a

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 2>lot of those didn't turn out the way that the

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 2>investors were hoping to Now you come into this year again,

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 2>the indices are up, the volatility is low. They're going

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 2>to be looking for ways to differentiate, and that means

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 2>they're going to have to take some risks in terms

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 2>of some new issues. So we see a lot of

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 2>demand on the buy side. I think, really what it is,

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 2>it's the companies coming to market, the banker's kind of

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 2>adjusting the valuations to match the expectations of the market,

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 2>and of course that all important narrative around profitable growth

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 2>and not just growth at all costs.

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, I want to go back to something that

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 4>Caroline pointed out that if there is anything in common

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 4>across the last week, it was the Cornerstone investor the

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 4>small flow. But I get what you just said about

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 4>the buyers, But these some of these IPOs were like

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 4>ten x oversubscribed. Why is there not the same tenex

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 4>demand three days of trading in.

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think there's always going to be buyers

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 2>at different price levels. And again, what you have to

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 2>remember here is that companies are laying out their vision

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 2>for the future, that they're saying, here's where we can get

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 2>to in terms of revenue, in terms of earnings, and

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 2>so the investors are going to be watching not just

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 2>in the first few days after the IPO, but.

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 7>The first few quarters.

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's really what's going to determine the success of

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 2>these companies is can they come out of the gates strong,

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 2>can they hit their numbers in the first few quarters.

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's really what's going to tell the

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 2>story IPO market versus the first few days of trading.

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 3>We were just talking about long term investment THESS following

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 3>on from the Messa listing years and years ago. Jeff Thomas,

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 3>and we thank you so much, executive vice president of

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Nasdak's Corporate Platforms.

0:14:58.080 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 6>Right time for talking tech.

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 4>First off, Japanese electronics company Toshiba is clearing.

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 6>A new path to go private.

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 4>It received a thirteen point five billion dollar buyout from

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 4>the Japan Industrial Partner's private equity fund, which now holds

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 4>nearly eighty percent of all the company's shares.

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 6>The deal pays the way.

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 4>For the fund to squeeze out the remaining shareholders and

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 4>take full control of the company. And Google's considering dropping

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 4>chip maker Broadcom as a supplier of AI chips as

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 4>soon as twenty twenty seven. That's according to report from

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 4>The Information. Apparently, Google executives has set out a goal

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 4>earlier this year to move away from Broadcom after a

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 4>standoff over the cost of its chips. However, in the

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 4>last few minutes, Google has just issued a statement saying

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 4>it sees quote no change in its relationship with Broadcon.

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 4>Broadcompared some of his stock declients plus in Video is

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 4>betting on India's potential to become a key global market

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 4>for AI. During a trip to the country earlier this month,

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:55.520
<v Speaker 4>CEO Jensen Hwang visited multiple cities and met with leaders,

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 4>including Prime Minister Mody Caroline.

0:15:57.840 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 5>Fascinating global perspective.

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, I mean, let's just stick on the world of

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence, because this week we've had so much Amazon,

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:08.119
<v Speaker 3>Google both integrating more generative AI products into their offerings.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, today we've got some similar news out of Microsoft.

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 3>The company will start rolling out as AI Assistant from

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Windows as soon as Tuesday. Will be widely available in

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 3>office apps starting November the first This is for corporate customers.

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 3>We're going to be bringing in now Rishid Juluria, it's

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 3>managing director of Software Equitan Research over at RBC Capital Markets.

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 3>Currently on an outform rating on the shares of Microsoft.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 3>And what is this to show you about the ability

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 3>to integrate underlying technology largely coming from open AI that

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 3>quickly into its own product offerings.

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, and thanks so much for having me. Look.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 13>I think this shows us a couple of things, right.

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 13>It shows us that Microsoft isn't selling vaporware. The fact

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 13>that there's a timeline on getting Windows Copilot out, that's

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 13>as you mentioned in five days. The fact that we're

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 13>talking forty days until Office U sixty five copilot comes out.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 13>This is incredible timing and contrast that with what we

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 13>see alswhere and enterprise software micros off.

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 12>Is clearly boo moving really quickly.

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 13>What I think is two things that really come out

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 13>to this for me. Number one is Microsoft is actually

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 13>integrating all of these aspects. So your Office rough cty

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 13>five copilot talks to your Windows Copilot, talks to your browser,

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 13>talks to your Bing copilot. So there's actually a very

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 13>integrated generative AI experience across the entire Microsoft stack, which

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 13>I think is incredible and really showcases the portfolio approach

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 13>Microsoft has. The second thing is, you know, the question

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 13>we have to ask is how is Microsoft able to

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 13>move soft fast. Remember, they have a huge headstart versus

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 13>anyone else because they invested in open AI going back

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 13>to twenty nineteen.

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 12>And you know, Microsoft was, you know, deeply.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:44.239
<v Speaker 13>Thinking about generative AI long before chat tpt became a

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 13>household name, you know, almost about a year ago.

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 4>They Richie You pointed out they're integrating this into existing platforms.

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 4>And Microsoft has always been really good at selling software

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 4>that loads of others give away for free. So my

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.360
<v Speaker 4>question is do they grow sales by doing this, by

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 4>this investment in AI.

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 12>I think the answer to that is absolutely yes.

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.360
<v Speaker 13>There's going to be certain areas where you know, they're

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 13>not going to directly charge for generative AI. It's more

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 13>going to be about gaining market share, like on the

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 13>dynamic stack, right. But if you think about Microsoft through

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 13>sixty five copilot, that is something that I believe they

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 13>were distinctly charged for a lot of these other open

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 13>AI services, especially built on Azure, they get monetized indirectly

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 13>through underlying stories and consumption because it's on a consumption model.

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 13>So I absolutely think this translates into better revenue numbers

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 13>for Microsoft. And we're already seeing that, right. I mean,

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 13>as much as we can talk about how jen AAI

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 13>is still really early. Remember Microsoft is already doing more

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 13>than half a billion dollars of generative AI revenue two

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 13>quarters after launching this, and that number is probably going

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 13>to get to you know, two five ten billion dollars

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 13>before we know it.

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 3>And you heard really talking about how it's the second

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 3>half of their fiscal year whether this is going to

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 3>rump up Rishie.

0:18:58.160 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 5>Great to have your analysis.

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much, mischie Julurier, he's over at RBC

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Capital Markets.

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 5>Welcome back to New meg Technology.

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroline Hyde and I'm me Dudlow. Let's get a

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 4>quit check on the market. It's at a high level.

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 4>It really is the Fed in economics that are driving

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 4>these markets under performance in tech and aw's that one

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 4>hundred down one point three percent yesterday. The Fed holds

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 4>rates as expected. We get economic data on Thursday morning

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 4>that just re enforces this idea that the Fed leaves

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 4>rates higher for longer.

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 6>But AI is also.

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 4>Story when you think about specific movers on the Nasdaq

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 4>one hundred, the two. I'm looking at Microsoft in Amazon.

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 4>Actually Microsoft is paired much of its gain after giving

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 4>us those dates. We just went over for the release

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 4>of generative AI tools co Pilot and Office coming November one.

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 4>Now completely flat, flat as a pancake. But Amazon is

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 4>really accelerating its declines three point five percent. It fell

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 4>yesterday as well after it announced its generative AI offering

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 4>in the context of elect So we had Dave Lint,

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 4>the outgoing devices chief, on the show. It really didn't

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 4>do much to persuade investors to buy into this stock

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 4>right now. The idea that they've brought AI to their

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 4>hardware offering. Caroline that, of course a big points drag

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:14.200
<v Speaker 4>on an Azdak one hundred right now.

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 3>And let's meanwhile, of course, talk about how AI is

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 3>interweaving itself into just about everything, calling, of course, the

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 3>discourse of leaders from around the world. They gathered right

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 3>here in New York City this week for the seventy

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 3>eighth session of the UN General Assembly, and as they

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 3>discussed the biggest issues facing the planet. Yes, you've got

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 3>climate change, Yes, of course you've got the war in Ukraine.

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 3>But you've also been having more and more on tech

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 3>and artificial intelligence. In fact, President Biden called on world's

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.719
<v Speaker 3>countries to regulate artificial intelligence so that it doesn't so

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 3>called govern us. As part of his speech at the

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Assembly earlier this week. Meanwhile, former UK Prime Minister Tony

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 3>Blair he actually sat down with our own David Western

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and was talking about how AI perhaps what ought to

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 3>change government.

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 14>The big real world event is this technology revolution, and

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 14>particularly with generative AI, it's going to check everything. It's

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:02.960
<v Speaker 14>going to change the way we live, the way we work.

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 14>It should change government by the way the way government operates,

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 14>the way public services operate. It's got enormous potential to

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 14>change the healthcare system for the better. But then there

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 14>are huge risks. Because it's a general purpose technology. You

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 14>can use it for bad as well as for good.

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 9>Oh.

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean all of this comes as we prepare ourselves

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 3>for the UK to host its first ever Global AI

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Safety Summit's coming in early November, convening international governments, industry experts.

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 3>We understand Kamala Harris is going to be flying over

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 3>for it.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 5>Let's just talk.

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.959
<v Speaker 3>About all of the AI presence and UK's well focus

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 3>on it as Joe White's with US UK Tech Ambassador

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 3>and you're sat there in San Francisco day to day

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 3>role really trying to export the UK to these big

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Silicon Valley giants tech giants of the US saying.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 5>Look, this is what the UK has to offer.

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Why is the UK so focused on putting its stake

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 3>in the ground when it comes to AI?

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 6>Pleasure to be here, wanting no thank you?

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>The UK US is one of the only leading economies

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>which has some of these frontier AI labs, Google deep

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Mind being founded there more than ten years ago. Now

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>for the top ten global universities, we have an enormous

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>base of talent and research around AI as a sector

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think Prime Minister Suna really understands the importance

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 1>of this and to a certain the reason the AI

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Safety Summit is created as is is to in order

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to unleash the enormous potential of AI for positive change

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>both in the UK and around the world. Getting some

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of those initial guardrails and that common understanding globally is

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>incredibly important to keeping us safe with this technology as it.

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Develops, Joones, does the UK genuinely believe it has a

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 4>leadership role in the field of AI, or, if you're

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 4>honest with yourself, is the UK moving quickly to catch up?

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 6>Now?

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the UK genuinely does have a leadership position

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in this. As I said, a lot of the fundamental

0:22:51.000 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>AI research has been done in the UK's extraordinary university

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>based for years. When Demis founded deep Mind, he did

0:22:58.000 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>so in the UK. He was keen to keep it there.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing now with Open AI and Anthropic and others,

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>when they open their first international offices, they're choosing the UK.

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>The pool of talent there is pretty extraordinary and I

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>think the UK has a quite a unique global role

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>as convena to bring together countries from across the world

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to talk about some of these major risks and issues,

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 1>whiles still having very much its own position in the

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>AI race with a lot of the companies and labs

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>which are based in the UK.

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, exactly so the race with the companies. You know,

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 4>Cambridge one is one of the leading supercomputers in the world,

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 4>built on Nvidia DGX, largely for the healthcare use case.

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 4>I'm really interested in your day to day Joe. I

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 4>know that the UK is negotiating with the GPU makers.

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.159
<v Speaker 4>Have you yourself held talks within Video or AMD and

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Intel to secure the computes for the future work the

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 4>UK hopes to do in the field of AI.

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 6>Well, we feel a number of visitors here.

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>We've actually got the Chancellor here this week who's engaging

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>across the West coast in San Francisco, LA and then Seattle,

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and so we do talk with both big cloud providers

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>as well as the big chip suppliers to talk about

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>the UK's needs and of course willing to increase the

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>amount of compute capacity that we have in the UK.

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>The chance committed to about nine hundred million pounds for

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>an AI supercomputer which was announced in the last budget,

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>as well as the AI Task Force, which is now

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>having a specific GPU cluster built for.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:24.959
<v Speaker 6>AI safety research.

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Jeremy Hant was fielding a fair few questions on China

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 3>and the fact that the UK decided to invite the

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Chinese delegation to this AI safety summit.

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 5>Joe, do you.

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Defend that decision as well?

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I think AI will be a global both benefit and challenge,

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's a technology which will be relatively borderless,

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 1>and so I think the UK recognizes that for us

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to get the kind of benefits that we want, we

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>also have to have a baseline of technology and the

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Secretory confirmed earlier this week that we have in

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>fact invited to China to the summit now for them

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 1>to determine who they will send and how they will engage.

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think there are common issues that we can

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>all agree on. I think again, this is where the

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>UK has a great space as convener to bring different

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 1>parties together to get that initial baseline.

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it's interesting that Nick Klegg's also been invested.

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 3>I was with him yesterday having a discussion about the

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 3>future of AI regulation and he almost called it a

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 3>frenzy of everyone trying to be hosting these discussions AI

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 3>summit with the UK. You've got the G seven meeting

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 3>in November two in Japan, the Hiroshima AI process as

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 3>they call it. You've just had government here in the

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 3>United States convening the most powerful AI CEOs plus civil society.

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 3>Is this just like a rush of discussion but nothing

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:42.400
<v Speaker 3>actually happening.

0:25:44.040 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, No, the UK's in touch with all the organizers

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of these events and sees the Safety Summit very much

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:53.919
<v Speaker 1>just building on these pieces. When Zunak agreed this with

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Biden back in June for the UK Safety Summit, it

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>was really based on the existing White House commitments. So

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not trying to diverge from these things and the

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>specific focus of the Safety Summit, which is on the

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>frontier risks AI posts both short, medium and long term challenges,

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>let's say, and the specific ones that the summon is

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>looking at is things like the risks posed by frontier

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>models I think, like biosecurity and so on. But this

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>will really build on the commitments made of the White

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>House and in some ways demonstrate how these are being

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>operationalized by the companies.

0:26:24.880 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Now, it's all coming back to regulation and actually where

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.159
<v Speaker 3>does the UK sit within that? Joe, You're sort of

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 3>trying to straddle a relatively easy regulation as the global

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 3>world tends to view the US. You've got stricter EU

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:40.719
<v Speaker 3>pushing through regulation very quickly.

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:42.120
<v Speaker 5>But then you think of the CMA.

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 3>Dare I say at flip Flop on Activision Blizzard, I'm

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 3>thinking of new digital competition rules coming in Joe. How

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 3>do these big tech companies view the UK's regulation.

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, the UK has a real strength in its regulators.

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the UK is widely seen as having sensible,

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>engaged proportion at regulation. We do have independent regulators. So

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 1>as the chance of saying you can't always get the

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>regulator necessarily to do what they want from a political perspective,

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that's in fact a feature, not a bug. But I

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>think the UK's history process of law engagement and now

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you saw this with our AI white paper published earlier

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 1>in the year. We're not standing up a different body

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.360
<v Speaker 1>for AI regulation, but in fact get our existing regulators,

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 1>whether across health or education or broadcast, to look at

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>the specific AI challenges within their sector and therefore you

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.479
<v Speaker 1>get the expertise and the ability to adapt within that.

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 1>So the UK does see AI as one of those

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>areas that needs that ongoing iterative conversation with regulators, but

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>not where we need to create perscriptive rules which may

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 1>turn out to be added day quite quickly.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, Jerry, I get the UK is developing a

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 4>position on AI, and you have an outgoing message. But

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 4>you're in San Francisco and you're talking to tech, you're

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 4>talking to allies. What is the biggest question you get

0:27:56.720 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 4>from them, the inbound about what you t can offer.

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think folks really do see the UK as

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the first natural expansion point from the US often really

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>going to Europe. UK is still the first place that

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is chosen to go into. And we've had this conversation.

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Recently with that, we saw Andrews and Horowitz announce their

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>new office outside the US in the UK during London

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Tech Week earlier, and so I think folks really do

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>continue to see the UK as the first natural choice externally.

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>They're fascinated in the regulator environment that you do see

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the UK as having a fantastic tech sector. It's only

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>third tech sector now valued more than the trillion dollars more,

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>more unicorns in the UK than France, Germany and the

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>nord it's combined, and so they recognize that talent, they

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 1>recognize the regulatory adaptability that's there, and so they're very

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>keen to understand how the UK is going to continue

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to develop its position there.

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 4>Joe White, UK Tech combatsastor that they're really really appreciate

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 4>having you here on Bloombow Technology add a SX pleasure.

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 6>Thank you so much.

0:28:57.960 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 4>All Right, coming up here on the show, AI co

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 4>pilots are all the rage, and we're going to be

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 4>joined by Duck Bill co founder Meghan Joyce and four

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 4>Run Adventures Kirston Green for more on that conversation next

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 4>and exciting news coming from those two.

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:12.479
<v Speaker 6>This is Bloomberg technology.

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 5>Are the joy of.

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.959
<v Speaker 3>The idea of a tech driven personal assistant. It's long

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of been a bold ambision of Silicon Valley got Siri,

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Alexa in task Rabbit.

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 5>To do the physical.

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:34.400
<v Speaker 3>But with recent AI advancements, there's a personal assistant that

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 3>perhaps could be actually the next level and around the corner. Now,

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 3>this is what duck Bill is promising. It's an AI

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 3>powered personal assistant tackling.

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 5>Consumers to do lists. The company has recently come out

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 5>of stealth.

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 3>They've just raised yet another round of money twenty five

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 3>million dollars Series A, and it's being led by four Unadventures.

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 3>We're very pleased to welcome therefore four Runners founding partner

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 3>Kirstin Green.

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 5>He's also been joined by on the board of duck Bill.

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 3>She's going to be alongside Duckville CEO and co found

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 3>of Megan Joyce Meghan be Causin.

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 5>It's great to have you both.

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 3>With us, and Meg and I start with you, because boy,

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:05.920
<v Speaker 3>if we've got a day of talking of these assistants

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 3>basically co pilots Microsoft announcing their Microsoft three six five

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 3>Copilot two. They're also being run and built on open

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 3>AIS underlying foundational models.

0:30:16.680 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 5>What makes les different.

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 11>So what makes Duckbill unique is the fact that we

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 11>combine two things, the best of expert humans who add

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 11>the personal touch and nuance to your tasks, along with

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 11>AI tooling that allows efficiency and breadth and scale of

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 11>the underlying legwork. So Duckbill's personal assistance are assigned to

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 11>tasks and they use custom built AI tooling that leverage

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 11>existing large language models with our own fine tuning and

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 11>retrieval augmented generation to fulfill tasks. And what that allows

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 11>us to do is to actually tackle the long tail

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 11>of to do's and the tasks you dread most end

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 11>to end, including what AI can handle and where AI

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 11>bumps up against limits and the human can take the

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 11>baton kusin.

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 3>To that point, you must be bombarded with companies offering

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:18.719
<v Speaker 3>AI services. You have made the name really of foreign

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 3>adventures backing some really well companies that blew out in

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 3>terms of the consumer. How is dug Bale setting itself apart?

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Why write this check?

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 15>Thank you for the question. So you know, I think,

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 15>as you mentioned, there are there's a tremendous amount of

0:31:34.240 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 15>activity in the AI space right now. The venture industry

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 15>is rightfully I think really excited about. AI represents a

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 15>major leap for technology. There really are two major ways

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 15>that AI, you know, companies are approaching AI. One is

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:54.120
<v Speaker 15>the architecture, architecting the foundation for the AI and the industry,

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 15>and the other is really implementing and using AI to

0:31:57.520 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 15>deliver business efficiencies or better and even all new products

0:32:02.280 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 15>and services. And Duckbille really falls into the latter. So

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 15>this notion of a digital assistant has really been on

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:12.040
<v Speaker 15>people's minds for a long time. We've heard about it

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.719
<v Speaker 15>over the years. If only I could have help with

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 15>my to do list, if only I could manage my

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 15>busy life, I never see.

0:32:18.680 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 7>The bottom of my two do list.

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 15>The first generation of offerings like Siri and Alexa, they

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 15>were delivering some value along those lines, but I don't

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 15>think they've scaled anywhere near to kind of what the

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 15>most ambitious hope was for the potential there. And AI

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 15>really changes all of this. And in the case of Duckbill,

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 15>as Megan reference, the integration of AI and human in

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 15>the loop offers the ability to contextualize discovery and execution,

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 15>and that really feels like it changes the game for

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 15>the consumer in making an offering like an AI assistant

0:32:56.040 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 15>or a digital assistant valuable. It enables a business model

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 15>that we think is scalable and compelling.

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 4>So there's days I wake up, you know, my wife's

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:07.880
<v Speaker 4>left to post it note on the phrase where she

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 4>just stuck it to my forehead, and I think, if

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 4>only I could do those things. But here's the thing,

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 4>duck Bill, Megan, is ninety nine dollars a month.

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 6>How do you arrive at that?

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 11>So we've found over the course of our year long

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 11>beta that that's the price point at which we can

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 11>support unlimited tasks for the vast majority of users.

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 12>And we look at it as the uber.

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 11>Black version of what duck Bill is today, moving towards

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 11>a more mass market product built on the learnings of

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 11>that premium offering.

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 5>And so what we are.

0:33:44.840 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 11>Excited about is continuing to serve more and more people

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 11>with that premium price point subscription and learning from that

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 11>to eventually serve the people who need it most, who

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 11>are the mass market, the people who cannot afford a

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 11>personal assistant but deserve help just like anybody else from

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 11>mass And by continuing no, no, no, sorry to jumping Meghan,

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 11>I know, I mean I find that business concept fascinating

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 11>Uber Black to the mass market model.

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 6>You needed the funds to do that.

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 4>In Kirstin coming out of self with this kind of money,

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 4>that's a lot, and it's interesting you going to take

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 4>a board seat. What are you going to be advising

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Meghan to do in the next few months as they

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 4>get off the ground.

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 15>Well, certainly one of the most compelling parts of the

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 15>investment was the opportunity to work with Megan, who is

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 15>an experienced executive and in many ways has led companies

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 15>in similar endeavors related to Duckbill. So I'm looking forward

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 15>to learning with her and from her. But you know,

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 15>as we mentioned earlier, the question was posed about this

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 15>is a consumer product. This is about delighting a consumer,

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 15>meeting a customer's need, resonating with the consumer. I certainly

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 15>hope that our years of experience in living in the

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.319
<v Speaker 15>heads of consumers and working with some great founders that

0:34:58.400 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 15>brought products that have become you what is to life

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 15>is something we can do here at duck Bill. Also,

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 15>I think, as Megan articulated, like Uber Black, you know,

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 15>duck Bill Black is the start, but the vision really

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 15>is to reach mass audiences and help people navigate their

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 15>lives and the Internet more effectively.

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 5>And Megan's love.

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 15>To mention for a moment, just this idea of like

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 15>reimagining search and duck Bill really leading the way, or

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 15>something like duck Bill leading the way in that like

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 15>search really hasn't been reimagined for twenty years. It's been

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 15>a blank page with a bar, or it's been an

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 15>ad led query field. And I do think that, you know,

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 15>the companies that brought us those services are incredibly well resourced,

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 15>with really smart people around the table, and they're also

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.839
<v Speaker 15>thinking about AI making their products and services better. But

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 15>their business models rely on ads and they in many

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 15>ways that's not customer aligned. And I do think there's

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 15>a chance here for a company for Duckbill to take

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 15>on this idea of being an entry point to the

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 15>Internet and contextualizing search and discovery and execution.

0:36:10.440 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 3>We've referenced a fair few times Megan, your experience, you

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 3>of course will helping grow ober GM of US and

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Canada your oscar health as well. You know how to

0:36:19.640 --> 0:36:22.520
<v Speaker 3>build Is this money going to be put towards talent?

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:24.640
<v Speaker 3>Are you're going to be ferociously trying to take that

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 3>talent from the search ogs who aren't quite reimagining things

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 3>quickly enough.

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 11>So we've learned an enormous amount over the course of

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.520
<v Speaker 11>the past Y're operating and operating in data, and what

0:36:36.640 --> 0:36:38.800
<v Speaker 11>this funding will allow us to do is take the

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 11>roadmap that we've laid out for the next few years

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 11>and really accelerate it. Our mission is to serve that

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 11>mass market, to leverage AI, to help ensure that the

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 11>rising tide lifts all boats, and that it's not just

0:36:52.560 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 11>the privileged who are benefiting from AI or benefiting from HELP,

0:36:56.640 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 11>but that everyone has access to it.

0:36:58.680 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 12>And we will be.

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 11>Investing deeply and quickly to get to that mission even

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 11>faster over the coming months and years.

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 4>All Right, four run Aventures founding partner Chist and green

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:11.399
<v Speaker 4>Backing Duck Bill CEO and co found and Megan Joyce

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Thanks to you both. The Author's Guild, the country's oldest

0:37:22.360 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 4>and largest organization representing writers and authors, sued Open AI

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:30.320
<v Speaker 4>for copyright infringement. They alleged that the company's large language

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 4>models engage in quote systematic theft on a mass scale.

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 4>They filed the proposed class action alongside over a dozen

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 4>well known authors like George R. R. Martin and John Grisham,

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.720
<v Speaker 4>an Open AI spokesperson, said in a statement the company

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 4>believes writers and.

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 6>Authors should quote benefit.

0:37:46.880 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 4>From AI technology and that they're optimistic they will continue

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 4>to find mutually beneficial ways to work together.

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Carolin, Well, we're just hearing what the writer of Game

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 3>of Thrones was thinking about in his current iteration.

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 5>Look, we go from those sorts of.

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Writers, the Writers Guild of America and a group representing

0:38:04.600 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 3>major Hollywood studios. They would meet, of course for a

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 3>second day. We understanding and encouraging sign talks of progressing

0:38:10.560 --> 0:38:13.720
<v Speaker 3>in this pretty long labor standoff that has lasted for months.

0:38:14.040 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 3>So it's say executives, some Disney, Netflix, and we see

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Warner Brothers, Discovery.

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 5>They took part in these talks.

0:38:19.320 --> 0:38:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Let's get out to Blue Mugs, Lucas share and I

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 3>mean we've had a few full starts.

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 5>Any light at the end of the tunnel.

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 6>Here, Yeah, I think real light at the end of

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 6>the tunnel.

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 16>You know, they last had substantive conversations in August. The

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 16>studio's offered a proposal that I think made some real advances.

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 16>The writers said it wasn't enough, and then they sort

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:42.120
<v Speaker 16>of broke and couldn't make any progress. The studios have

0:38:42.200 --> 0:38:45.800
<v Speaker 16>made yet another offer on Wednesday, and they meet this morning,

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 16>Thursday morning, where the writers are expected to counter. And

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 16>how the negotiation or conversation today goes, I think will

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 16>determine a lot.

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 14>You know.

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 16>If they make progress, I think we could see a

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 16>deal relatively quickly.

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 7>If they don't, then who knows.

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Lucas's used in the media landscape was well, not surprising really,

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 4>but li Rupert Murdock stepping down as chairman of boards

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 4>for both Fox and News Corp. Lachlan Murdock taking the

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 4>chair of News Corp. Just just talk us through this

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 4>process and what we've learned.

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 16>I mean, look, we're watching the slow but inevitable handoff

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 16>from Rupert, one of the great media moguls of of

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:26.240
<v Speaker 16>our age, whatever you think of him, to his son Lachlan,

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 16>who has been taking on more and more responsibility at

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:29.760
<v Speaker 16>the company.

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:31.919
<v Speaker 6>I don't think this is it is. It is huge news,

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:32.959
<v Speaker 6>but not shocking news.

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 12>You know.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 9>Rupert Murdoch is.

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:35.240
<v Speaker 6>In his nineties.

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:38.720
<v Speaker 16>There have been kind of constant rumors about his health,

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.120
<v Speaker 16>but nothing confirmed. You know, I think people closed Hi

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 16>would probably say that he's doing just fine. And so

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 16>he's he's giving his son more and more of a

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 16>presence at the company.

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Succession in real life. Luca Shaw, brilliant. Thank you very

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.240
<v Speaker 3>much for keeping us up to speed with it. I meanwhile,

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 3>that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Yet you can recap this episode on our podcast Apple Spotify,

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.279
<v Speaker 4>iHeart wherever you get you will pollcast car.

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:04.120
<v Speaker 3>I mean, well, we want to send it back to

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:05.959
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg Global Credit form.

0:40:05.960 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 5>It's on the way in London.

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, Joshua Eastleys now speaking, he had some

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:11.880
<v Speaker 3>interesting things to say about the downfall of SVB earlier

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 3>in the year. Now, remember he's a co CEO and

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:15.240
<v Speaker 3>co president at Sixth Street.

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:16.359
<v Speaker 5>Just take a lesson in.

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 17>A lot of those industries have those dynamics. But I think, again,

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 17>going to back to recoveries, I think in default, I

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 17>think private credit has real two advantages. One is that

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 17>they have the ability to industry tilt and active manage.

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:38.359
<v Speaker 17>And the second thing is is that the documents tend

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 17>to be tighter and the recoveries tend to be higher

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 17>because there's less on the margin flexibility or do you

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:51.439
<v Speaker 17>for asset liability management trades for the sponsor and less

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 17>lender and lender of violence. So I think private credit

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 17>has ways to win that are significant structural ways that

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 17>when between industry tilt and the dynamics.

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 9>And private credit that I think should prove well.

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:09.959
<v Speaker 18>So you think maybe as on a return basis, isn't

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:13.440
<v Speaker 18>that this works well with our poll question what will

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:16.480
<v Speaker 18>perform best over the next twelve months? High old bonds,

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 18>leverage loans, clos private credit or distressed debt? You have

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 18>a story career in distressed. Do you really think this

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 18>stress might be the play for the next twelve months

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 18>or do you have a different view.

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 17>Look, we have this great thing about one of the

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 17>advantages that Sixth Street has, it's a seventy five bone

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 17>dollars asset manager, is we have a whole bunch of windows.

0:41:38.800 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 9>And markets, and we're in basically all these markets.

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:46.360
<v Speaker 17>From structured credit, a little bit high yield leverage loans,

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:52.480
<v Speaker 17>obviously private credit, distressed on a cycle basis. And the

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 17>one thing I would say about distressed is is that.

0:41:56.800 --> 0:42:02.720
<v Speaker 9>I think that market today if you really think about distress.

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 17>In a narrow way, which is by a bond or

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 17>buy a bank loan on the equity on the other side,

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:10.080
<v Speaker 17>I think.

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 9>Prices in distress.

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 17>Are not really reflective of the environment we're in today.

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:23.359
<v Speaker 17>They're artificially too high. And when you think about what

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 17>the in the bank loan market today, I think cols own.

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 17>You know, there's a billion seven of clos there's really

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 17>no new inventory.

0:42:33.960 --> 0:42:36.560
<v Speaker 9>They have to be fully invested, and so.

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 17>There's really not any real price transparency or force selling.

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:45.720
<v Speaker 17>And so I think artificially, structurally, bank loan prices are high.

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 9>You've seen that. You see the tails get a little

0:42:48.040 --> 0:42:48.879
<v Speaker 9>bit wider.

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 17>But you've seen the average bank loan price go from

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:53.919
<v Speaker 17>ninety four to ninety seven. The tails get a little

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 17>bit larger from under seventy I think, from three percent

0:42:57.239 --> 0:43:00.319
<v Speaker 17>to six percent, but they're not really they're not really

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 17>there's not really distressed.

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 9>And then you overlay the asset.

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 17>Liability flexibility that sponsors and issuers have on those capital structures.

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 17>Recoveries and probably CITYK loans have been quite poor, and

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:21.279
<v Speaker 17>so you know, you buy something at seventy, you wake

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 17>up there's an asset there's an asset liability trade that

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:27.959
<v Speaker 17>gets done where a whole bunch of collaudals stripped out

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 17>your loan trades down fifty points, so I just don't

0:43:31.920 --> 0:43:35.760
<v Speaker 17>I'm not sure I see the clear opportunity in distress today,

0:43:37.400 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 17>given there feels like a technical uplift on prices, and

0:43:41.880 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 17>there's a lot of flexibility in those documents that create

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:47.480
<v Speaker 17>a lot of liquidity options for the issuer