WEBVTT - Top Pro Golf Storylines for 2025 & TGL Preview

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset. When

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:05.880
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my.

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.319
<v Speaker 3>Ball in a frid Egg Friday Egg, the dreaded Friday Friday,

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Frida Egg Egg, Frida Egg bride Egg Lie, I'm about

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 3>ready to run off of.

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 2>The hump course.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Friday Golf Podcast.

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I am your host, Andy Johnson. Uh, welcome to the

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>new year. Welcome to twenty twenty five. I've got an

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>exciting episode. I'm joined by Gabby herse Egg, a staff

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>writer at The Athletic, to talk about twenty twenty five

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in pro golf. And I'm also joined on the back

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>half with by Joseph LaMagna and PJ Clark, our producer

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and Joseph one of our creators here at Fridagg Golf,

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about TGL. That's barreling down. Just a quick

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>little housekeeping. Uh, this is a new year at this podcast.

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>We are going to be going to a one episode

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>per week cadence. So every Wednesday you will get a

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>new Fred Egg Golf episode. I will be your host,

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and we will you know, we'll bring Garrett Joseph far

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>familiar faces, Tom Doak on regularly over the course of

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the year, but the format will be a little bit different.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll probably have, you know, one to two guests per podcast.

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>There will be kind of different segments, and I will

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>be the the only host. Garrett will be working on

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>some projects of his own that we're excited to bring

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to life that he will kind of kind of own

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and we won't be sharing this podcast, so Garrett'll kind

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of have his own house to live in and I'll

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have my own house. We won't be roommates on this podcast.

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm super excited about this podcast and TOY twenty

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>five will be with you every Wednesday and excited about

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the topics we've got dreamed up here.

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>So without further ado, I hope everybody had a great

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>holiday season. I hope everybody got to spend a great

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 1>time with family and friends. And welcome back to twenty

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. In the Friday Golf Podcast, let's get to

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Gabby Herzig. Gabby, welcome back, Happy New Year. Are you

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 1>a resolution person?

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 4>That's a great question, Andy, I sometimes am, and sometimes

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm not. I last year, my New Year's resolution mainly

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 4>was to become a morning person, and it worked for

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 4>about the first three months of the year and we

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 4>taper it off back into my normal ways of being

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 4>a night ol. So that's kind of the farthest I

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 4>go with New Year's resolutions, is like little things like that.

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, not really a resolution person. What about you?

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would say that I'm relatively unsuccessful. My

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>my biggest success in recent years is I just full

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>stop a full stopped soda. Yeah. I think I've had

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>like one or two sodas in the last two years.

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 4>That's incredible.

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I just yeah, I just I just was like, I'm

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>done with this and I just ended it. So I

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if what I'm gonna do this year. I've

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I might have broken a rib a couple

0:03:58.040 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago.

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, And are you okay?

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've been all right. It's just like a pain

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in the ass because you can't do anything yeah important. Yeah,

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>like you can't do like so you can't like deep

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>brief deep deeply breathe, which is crazy.

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, breathing, it's a good one.

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>So anyways, walking a lot, and I've really enjoyed that.

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I've like gone for like our walks, but like you

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>can do stuff while you walk. You know, you can

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>listen like I've been listening to podcasts. You could have

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>phone calls. So I think that I think that's what

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do next year, is maybe incorporate some

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>work schedule into walks.

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a great idea.

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 2>I love it.

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>That might be that might be the new Year's resolution.

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm really jealous of the soda movement of yours though,

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 4>because I have a huge sweet tooth and I would

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 4>never be able to give up my soda.

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, I just thought about, like the soda thing. It

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>just like when I thought ought about it, it was like,

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I never feel good after I drink one. Okay, there's better.

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I like the caffeine of it, but there's better ways

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to get caffeine, you know. I just have an espresso shot, right.

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And then I was like, if I'm gonna if I'm

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna use the sugar, I'd rather like, like, there are

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>way better uses of sugar. Con totally like ice cream

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>cookies like these are far superior delivery methods of sugar.

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.719
<v Speaker 1>If I'm in the sugar business.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 4>I promise I just eat all of it.

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>It's I think that's a problem for almost all of us.

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't understand these people that have self control,

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, No, I don't get it. So anyways, small step.

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I looked at I looked at soda and just said,

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm done with this and it's worked out well. Like

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 1>no diet soda, no nothing, you know. I feel like

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>carbonated water is the other thing, like the like your

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Lacroix Nick sees of the world. That helps a ton too,

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes you just need that.

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 4>Just maybe I should get into that a little more.

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I'll maybe I'll start. I'm taking inspiration right now. Andy,

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 4>I really appreciate that.

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, all right. We I can't believe that it's

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>not even the turn of the new year. It's the

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>thirtieth when we're recording this and we have PGA Tour

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Golf in like three days.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 4>No, it's crazy.

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>It feels like this should be one week later than

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it is. But we're going to start. We're starting the year,

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>so we've got it kicks off on January second. So

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do a little season preview kind of

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Five things are our major championship format, but for the

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>season five Things we're watching. I will let you start here.

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>What's the the first or the first thing that you're

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you're you want to talk about with the twenty twenty

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>five PGA Tour. Actually we'll just call it men's golf season,

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>because I've got one one that doesn't relate to the PGA.

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 4>Tour, got it, I have one that doesn't relate to

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 4>men's golf.

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So okay, maybe how about twenty twenty five golf.

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 4>Freak perfect, perfect, Okay, let's see where we should start.

0:07:26.240 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 4>I am going to start with the PGA Tour PIF

0:07:31.200 --> 0:07:36.360
<v Speaker 4>deal and the incoming Trump administration and everything that could

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 4>come with that. Do you want me to elaborate or

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 4>would you like to respond?

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I will just say that I purposely kept this off

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>because I figured i'd have it on right.

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 4>I figured that too.

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I would love to hear what you're thinking about it.

0:07:55.480 --> 0:08:02.160
<v Speaker 4>Yes, I am thinking that this deal is imminent. I

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 4>think that after Inauguration Day we are probably going to

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 4>hear talks ramp up a lot. I spoke to you

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 4>earlier this fall, Andy about my article on the election

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 4>and how it could impact the completion of the PJ

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 4>Tour PIFF deal, and it looks like everything that's unfolded

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 4>over the past three months, like all signs are pointing

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 4>to that hypothesis being true. And you know, we heard

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 4>even Roy McElroy say it in a press conference that

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Trump could usher the steal along with the DOJ hurdle

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 4>in the way, and it looks like things are going

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 4>to get moving in twenty twenty five. And I don't

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what it looks like. I think people

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 4>are We know now that the Department of Justice and

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 4>the Anti Trust negotiation was kind of this like holding

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 4>block that has really stalled this deal and any public

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 4>information surrounding the deal. But I think one giant mystery

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 4>that I don't know how this is going to be

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 4>figured out or where they are with it or anything,

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 4>is like how this crossover between tours is going to work,

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 4>Like will live players be able to come back to

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 4>the PGA Tour? Will there be crossover in the other direction?

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 4>Is the OWGR going to be fixed? Like? There are

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 4>so many questions around this thing. But I do think

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 4>something that golf fans can be a little bit more

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 4>optimistic about is the actual like completion of a deal

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 4>with that Department of Justice hurdle kind of becoming less

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 4>of a thing with Trump in office. So it's super

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 4>interesting how politics and the White House has become like

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 4>a stake in pro golf. But and then that's something

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 4>I have always been fascinated about as a crossover between

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 4>sports and politics. So that's why I got into this

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 4>whole thing. But now I actually feel like things are

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 4>going to along.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So it seems like it's you know, it's a very

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>small percentage of the population, but it's a percentage of

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the population that incoming President Trump clearly cares about his

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:19.680
<v Speaker 1>golf because he's a big golfer, owns golf properties. But

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>he it seems like it's like a logical like win

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>on the board, kind of like first couple of weeks

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.720
<v Speaker 1>of in office, like what I got done.

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 4>I really really wouldn't be surprised. Like he played golf

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 4>with jam Onahan, he invited y'aser to the UFC fight,

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Like there are things happening. We can all see it.

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 4>It's just a matter of time now, I think.

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think like one of the things that I

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>wonder about is like, what if it's just a financial deal,

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And if it's just a financial deal, are we just

0:10:57.240 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in the same spot and he does Live continue to

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>pick off players, Like is that is that going to

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>be a thing because like you know, like the other

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>aspect of this is Fox and the deal, and this

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is one of my things, so we can just wrap

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>this all in here. I anticipate to talk Live PGA

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Tour right out of the gates. But the the Live

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and Fox deal like to me, like it's fascinating, Like

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the rights with the PGA Tour and Golf Channel are

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:40.959
<v Speaker 1>I think they're coming up fairly soon again one, I think, yeah,

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's not like that far in the future, Like

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not like a arbitrage like twenty year right steal

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>right and this Fox thing, like if if that deal,

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>like to me, that's a big deal for Live, like

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>they might actually be have the product be viewable because

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>like nobody's going to the CW to watch golf, but

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, if you're on Fox, like it

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>could be on f S two, FS one. I doubt

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be on Fox. I don't think that's

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>where it's going to be. But like if you're on

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 1>FS one, you have like the ability to get a

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 1>casual sports fan. Their other shows are going to have

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>an interest in covering live golf because of like the

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, hey, we've made an investment in this, We're

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 1>going to have our you know, daily talk shows cover it.

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>So like, to me, like everything that's happened with Live,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 1>with the new CEO, the Fox deal, that tells me

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that Live's not going.

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Away, That's exactly what I was going to say.

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and then you have this deal that's going to

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that seems eminent, it seems like it's going to happen.

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But to me, it makes me feel like it's only

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a financial deal and I could be wrong.

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 4>No, I feel I feel like I feel like all

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 4>signs are kind of pointing to that in a way.

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Like and when I heard about the Fox deal initially,

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.679
<v Speaker 4>I was still just like, is it really going to

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.719
<v Speaker 4>get casual sports fans to watch it more? Because the

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 4>first four events of the year are happening in the

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 4>middle of the night in the US, right yeah, And

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 4>like so maybe it could be on Big Fox, but

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 4>no one's going to be awake to see it. So

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 4>it like clearly like there are long term plans still

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 4>being made for Live Golf, and like its leadership and

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 4>the broadcast schedule, Like player contracts, I think still have

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 4>a few years to run out. I feel like there

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 4>are still going to be two separate entities in pro golf,

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 4>the PJ Tour and Live like for the next two

0:13:57.720 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 4>three years.

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think at a minimum. And who knows, like,

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, like Yaser might be. I think there was

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a rumor that he was potentially investing in the European

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Tour too, Like is this just like they they want

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to have their hands in all of golf. They have

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like you know, they want to have a seat at

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the table. That seemed to be like the original intention

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and goal of this. But in the meantime, you know,

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's easy to dunk on live. It's it's

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>fun to dunk on live. Like, but they do have

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>like they had in doing your review research, they had

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>some meaningful Sundays this year, in particular, like the tournament

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that went opposite Pebble when Pebble was off on Sunday

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>because of the rain, Like they had a great leader

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>board and like an interesting tournament. And I think like

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>they do do a lot of stuff pretty pretty well.

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And and I think they have pushed golf broadcasts forward,

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So I do think like there are like the increase

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of visibility can't be just like swept under the rug

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>with Live and you know, like I don't know the

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>issue there. Their issue is like it seems like players

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>go there and go worse.

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that I think the like competitive nature of the

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 4>league is like there's a serious problem there. But what

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 4>I was going to say, what what came to mind

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 4>when you were just speaking was also like the media

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 4>rights argument. I feel like LIV has pushed the boundaries

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 4>a lot with that and what they're doing on the

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 4>Internet and on social media, like everything that Bryce and

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 4>d Schambeau has done, And this kind of connects to

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 4>one of my other things as well in the YouTube space,

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 4>is like that is not possible really for a PGA

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 4>Tour player. And now we have things like the Creator

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Classic and the Creator Council, and there's like there's an

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 4>effort to work around the media rights agree that again

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 4>like expire in twenty thirty one with the TV contracts,

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think we would have had such a

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 4>serious effort if it weren't for Live, Like I really

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 4>don't think that would have happened at all, especially at

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 4>the pace that we're seeing now, Like, I still don't

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 4>think the PGA Tour is going to reach the level

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 4>of like openness in that sense that we ever will

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 4>want it to until maybe those contracts expire and there's

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 4>a renegotiation of the intellectual property. But that's another thing

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 4>that we have to give like huge props to at

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 4>least for the effort.

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean the TGL, which launches next week. Right, I

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's like a pretty big deal. That's what the

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>second half of this podcast is about.

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 4>But oh nice, the.

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>That wouldn't I Like, I was thinking about it this

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>morning when I was on a walk. That would not

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>have existed if it wasn't for Live, Like there's no

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>way that the PGA Tour of four years ago would

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>get on board with the TGL, and like Rory and

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Tiger's financial interest in the TGL, like this would not

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>have existed, Like this would have been like, oh, we'll

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll try and do it ourselves and completely on our

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 1>own and own one. Like the only reason that this

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>thing has gotten off the ground is because of Live,

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 1>which is I I had this as another thing we'll

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>just kind of dive in here, and this is like

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>what you you brought up Bryson the YouTube stuff. Something

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinated about is the back half of the Ryder

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>Cup team. I think we know like some locks on

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the Ryder Cup, Like we know Xander can't lay Scottie.

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Are our general locks Like you could go down the

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>owgr and get to five or six locks. My question

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>is what does the back half look like? And one

0:17:54.640 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of those people was Bryson. And if Bryson is off, well,

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 1>it depends on what happens this year. He's been so

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>up and down over the course. I think he's dedicated

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>to golf, So I think I think he's going to

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>have like a good, a great year. I think he's

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be you know, last year was the best

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>year of his career. Yeah, probably, I think. I mean

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>he had some really.

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 4>Good career major record at least. Yeah, And that's kind

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 4>of what's most important for Ryder Cup points.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But what's interesting is like the Bryson dynamic with the

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>US Ryder Cup team.

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, it's not good, Like are you gonna.

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.479
<v Speaker 1>Try and bring the YouTube cameras in? Like what's the

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>content around it? Like, I just think like he's not

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be a great chemistry fit. And I think

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 1>like one of the things like we could say this

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>or that about like the US team and does it matter,

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>does it not? They've always had issues with chemistry.

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 4>Yes, yeah, I will. They already like barred the Netflix

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 4>show from the team room, and there were all those

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 4>issues with in Italy. So imagine Bryceon rolls up with

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 4>his content team and they're like no, no, no, no, this

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 4>is gonna work.

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>And then there's he in a bad mood all week, like.

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, did you see him in the showdown? He looked miserable.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 4>I don't think there was something going on there.

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:23.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I don't think anybody was really happy.

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 4>No, no, yeah, He's like I'm not doing this anymore.

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 4>It's the whole point of the thing.

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody enjoyed like I think there. I

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think. I don't think really anybody enjoyed Bryce's company there.

0:19:42.119 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 4>No. Yeah, that was a tough scene. That was a

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 4>tough scene.

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>That was a weird, weird situation.

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 4>I guess I don't know what to do with bitcoin,

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 4>but thank you.

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>The I guess, Like you know, there was always like

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>this like undercurrent of Phil and Tiger through the years

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of like they didn't they didn't really get along, right,

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:12.120
<v Speaker 1>They diametrically seem to see the world different ways. They

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>are all time great competitors, competitors, and now like three

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.959
<v Speaker 1>years removed from live, is like very clear how different

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:25.240
<v Speaker 1>they are, right, Oh yeah, But for like twenty years

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>we had this like you know, they're they're kind of friends,

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but they aren't really, yes, And it feels like that's

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the way like all the top players treat Bryson. Now,

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like I don't think anybody really likes him, even Brooks,

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>who's like, you know, but they like they have to

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>deal with him because he is one of the best

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>players in the world and one of the one of

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the most influential players in the world. Maybe, like I

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>think you could make an argument that he's like the

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>top three most influential people in golf.

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 4>I think so. I think I feel like he really

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 4>he really moves the needle. Like can we just talk

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 4>about for a second the series of him hitting balls

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 4>over his house and was it sixteen day journey or

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 4>how many days was it? I forget? But those videos

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 4>were getting like ten million views, every single one of them,

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 4>and like it was incredible. That's like that's the amount

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 4>of engagement across platforms. I don't hundreds of millions of

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 4>views and that's hard to get. Like, I think how

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 4>a niche our sport is. And he's like getting outside

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 4>not even just the golf bubble, but the sports bubble,

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 4>and I feel like, I think that's really cool and

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 4>it's really difficult to do. That's like I mean Tiger

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 4>and Charlie like getting those numbers at the PNC the

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 4>other week, like reminds me of that kind of thing.

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 4>It's like when you're when my friend who has watched

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 4>one golf tournament in their entire life, texts me a

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 4>link and I'm like, how did you find this? It's

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 4>because they're bursting out of that bubble that like we're

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 4>all trying to kind of figure out how that's consistently done.

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I think if you think about like what's going on

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>in sports, this is a greater conversation, you know, like

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 1>ratings across sports for the most part, outside of the

0:22:12.960 --> 0:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL or down. One of the things is that the

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>distribution model is changing before our eyes. And distribution used

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to be the great the thing that sports leagues had,

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, like what their power is their distribution and

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the PGA Tour's YouTube channel, which

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is which has become a massive distribution source, is one

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>point five million subscribers. Bryson's is one point seven. He

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>has a more distribution on the probably the fastest growing

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>digital channel for golf. He has a bigger distribution footprint

0:22:55.760 --> 0:23:00.359
<v Speaker 1>than the PGA Tour, And you know, like that's I

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>think like when you think about where live and you

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>brought you made this point all right. Where Live has

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>thrived has been the ability to allow people like Bryson

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to build distribution with access and the rights

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>deal that you've brought up multiple times in twenty thirty

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>one greatly prohibit the ability for the PGA Tour and

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>their players to do similar things. It prohibits people like

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>us from doing really like anything on the grounds at

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a PGA Tour site. But like when you look at

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>what it's doing to the PGA Tour, is that it

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 1>is making it less relevant.

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, one hundred percent. I mean the thing with like

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 4>distribution now, and I think we actually spoke a bit

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 4>about this a few months ago, is like there are

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 4>just it's not so much you're just turning on the

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 4>TV and being fed what the major networks or what

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 4>the major leagues want you to consume. Like the consumer

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 4>now of media or content or whatever you might be

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 4>watching is like has all the power because you have

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 4>the choice. And like, for example, like Bryson I just

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 4>looked up, has two point two million followers on Instagram.

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 4>The PGA Tour only has five point three million. Like

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 4>we're talking about a single individual here, and like your

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 4>persona and your likeness just like an nil as well,

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 4>is your power is your key to distribution and access

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 4>and spreading kind of what you want to spread. Bryson

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 4>has the knowledge and the awareness that, like he is

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 4>targeting to specific individuals, not to networks, not to leagues,

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 4>not to these big entities. He's like trying to capture

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.959
<v Speaker 4>the attention of the thirteen year old sitting on his

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 4>couch looking up trick shot videos. It's it's a totally

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 4>different environment now, and the PGA Tour has in a

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 4>way locked themselves into the distribution mindset of five, ten,

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 4>fifteen years ago with these contracts. And I know for

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 4>a fact, based on everything they're doing, they're like it

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 4>feels like there's regret there in those in the signing

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 4>deals and how far out they actually went, and I

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 4>don't think there was like correct, it's hard to predict obviously,

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 4>but there wasn't like a sense of like moving with

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 4>the times. It was like, this is how things are

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:32.080
<v Speaker 4>going to be, and we're going to stick with it

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 4>and we're going to sign. And obviously the tour has

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.120
<v Speaker 4>to make money in some way, and these TV contracts

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.879
<v Speaker 4>are the biggest source of income by far that they have.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 4>But in general, I feel like it is just a

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 4>really tough position also for the PJ Tour to be in,

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 4>because like they do have the legal obligation to follow

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 4>through with these deals, but there are people within the

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 4>PGA Tour I know that want to further things along

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 4>any way they can. And that's why we're seeing TGL,

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 4>that's why we're seeing the Creator Council, Creator Classic, better,

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 4>honestly better social media presence. I feel like the Instagram,

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 4>the TikTok, the Twitter have been like really good over

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:11.719
<v Speaker 4>the past few years. Those hype videos that the I

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 4>forget what the player content team.

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It's brilliant, it does it's I like what they are,

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but they need to be a little bit more tailored

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>because if you follow like five players, like he obviously

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.919
<v Speaker 1>like five plus players is like, oh, this is clearly

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>being made by the same person. I think that's the

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>unique thing with what Bryson's done is that Bryson effectively

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:40.479
<v Speaker 1>has like his own media team. Yeah, and everything fits

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>his bit right. It is authentic. It feels authentic. We're

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about maybe the least authentic person in golf feels

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.880
<v Speaker 1>like the most authentic one because he has a team

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that only makes his stuff. The issue I think with

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like the tour stuff, and it's like, it's great steps,

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>it's great progress, but the issue is like every player

0:27:04.480 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>feels the same because it's the same people making every

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>player stuff. And I think it it's this. This wasn't

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the conversation with the back half. It was Bryson

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>was like a small piece of the back half of

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the of the Ryder Cup team. But it is like

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a it is just the the way distribution is changing

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is just a huge I think under current to all

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the news that's happening in golf, Like everybody, like every week,

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>if it's not Rory Speith or Tiger playing an event

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 1>on a Sunday, seemingly is the ratings are down mhm.

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So to me, I would say throw Bryson in there

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 1>too for major championships. But like, to me, like this

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a distribution kind of like the power of their

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>distribution is dwindling. And yeah, you know, like it's YouTube

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 1>TV is a fascinating thing to talk about because it's

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>like it's an algorithm, right, it knows. I'm I live

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>in a household. My wife does not watch live television anymore.

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't watch live TV if it weren't for golf personally,

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 4>like the content that I consume outside of my job

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 4>and golf as like a hobby in general, like it's

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 4>not on live TV.

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and like so it's fascinating when I turn the

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>TV on it it knows like the only thing getging

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>served on the TV is is sports, right, because it's

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>got like my like auto plays something that it thinks

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:46.959
<v Speaker 1>out like usually it's right, but it's like golf, football, basketball,

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.719
<v Speaker 1>that's like the only thing, and it's like it's wild

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>right Like but like so if you think about it,

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like that there there are going to be less

0:28:56.080 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and less passerbys mm hmm than ever before. And I

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>think that's really the diminut that's the rating conversation. Yeah,

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, how do how does the tour make money

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>on alternate forms of golf? How do they build properties?

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>How do they build their YouTube page? And I think

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that was the big deal with the Creator Classic, but

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it has to be getting their big players doing things

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>outside of the seventy two hole stroke play.

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they truly have to buy in. And I feel

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.720
<v Speaker 4>like that's that's part of the reason why this whole

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 4>PJ Tour like equity program was created too, that the

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 4>players have a stake in the growth of the PJ Tour.

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 4>But I don't necessarily know if we've seen the effects

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 4>of that kick in yet. Like I have a I

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 4>have a Q and A coming out relatively soon with

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 4>Kevin Kisner, And one of the things I talked him

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 4>about was like, what what conversations have you had with

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 4>players about like what you think the role of media

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 4>is in twenty twenty five and beyond. And he was

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 4>basically saying like, we need access, like we need these

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 4>to open up. And I'm like, kids, we've been saying

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 4>this so long, Like finally, like we need that line

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 4>of communication. Though someone like Kisner, who's been on the

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 4>PGA Tour been on player boards now is a voice

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:17.800
<v Speaker 4>in media as the lead analyst for NBC, and to

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 4>have someone like him actually like patting guys on the

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 4>back on the range, being like, you know, come on,

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 4>give me something to work with here, Like maybe even

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 4>the smallest things like that can get the ball rolling.

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 4>But it really all goes down to I think player

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 4>buy in because the PJ Tour is now, like you said,

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 4>making an effort to do these things, and they were

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 4>pushed by Live to do them, and there are restrictions

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 4>here and there, but everyone has to work together. And

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 4>the one phrase that I've heard repeated multiple times talking

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 4>to YouTubers for some of my research is the rising

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 4>tide lifts all ships, and that has been something that

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 4>I just don't think the PGA Tour has ever understood

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 4>me be until like last year. And I feel like

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 4>they're now putting the effort and starting these initiatives and

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 4>programs that like actually like abide by that kind of

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 4>rule in a way, and it's encouraging to see for sure.

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you compare them the way they they

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:25.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of approach people that can amplify their sport golf,

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>like someone like me or you, or or even the players,

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:36.520
<v Speaker 1>like think about it compared to the NFL. Like a

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>few of my friends that cover the NFL, they get

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>like basically like right after the games, they have like

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 1>this all twenty two thing that they can go in

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>and just like clip whatever they want and randalyze the sport. Yeah,

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>with the footage, and it's.

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 4>Like, imagine what we could do.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>This is so additive to the fan experience of what

0:32:01.240 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. And it's it's like if I post a

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>clip of a of a shot, I'm going to get

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>dmca'd and you know, and it's going to be taken

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.600
<v Speaker 1>down and you know this is you know, maybe get

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>a talking to from somebody at the tour about not

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:22.120
<v Speaker 1>doing it right. Like it's like the complete couldn't be

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>more opposite. But did you watch the Scotti doc that

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>they just posted on.

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 4>You actually haven't watched it yet.

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Now to me, like that's like an example of something

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that was really well done that they need to do

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>more of. But one of the illuminating things that Sean

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Martin talked a little bit about when he came on

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>this and he was the producer. He did a great

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>job with it. But like they have like cameras rolling

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>all the time and we never see any of it.

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Where does it all go?

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>It goes into the ether, Like they have all this

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 1>behind the scenes footage of Scottie like playing like you know,

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>like there's like just this funny interaction with Scotty and

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Shane Lowry in the scoring tent before bay Hill where

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Lowry makes like a comment about his beard and Scotty

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>like equips back, and it's like that was like a

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 1>great genuine moment where like why why did we just

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>see it? Like these are things that you know, it's

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like I just think about like and obviously like the

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>NFL's the gold standard comparing you know, but like you

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>think about like all the things that the NFL does,

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like with the micd up players behind the scenes, Like yeah,

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff they do. They have the hard knocks

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff going on. They have like obviously fantasy football. We

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>have fantasy golf, which is like it's popular, but like

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>all the things that go into making football, like this

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>day in day out thing that people keep in touch

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>with for the season. I think the TGL is like

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a great example of a of a step and the

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>really in the right direction for golf. Like, how do

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we get it more of a conversation outside of Sunday

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>because right now, to me, it feels like it's just

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>like so Sunday driven, Thursday, Friday, like you have to

0:34:09.520 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>be so dedicated to tune in, but like, how do

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>you make it more part of the conversation seven days

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>a week?

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that actually makes me think of Another kind of

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 4>statistic that popped up when I was doing my YouTube

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 4>golf research was I forget the exact percentage, but it

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:29.200
<v Speaker 4>was like a majority of gen zers when they consume content,

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 4>they're consuming like reactionary content or like content about the

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 4>main event instead of the actual main event. And that

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:38.719
<v Speaker 4>makes me think of NFL because I'm not a huge

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 4>football fan, but I watch those tiktoks of the team,

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 4>like social media intern like interviewing the players as they

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 4>come out of the locker room about the dumbest things

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 4>you can imagine. And I also watch like episodes of

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Hard Knocks, and those are the like that's the content

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 4>around the main event, and I feel like golf doesn't

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 4>really have that, Like we are we are kind of

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 4>waiting for that to happen, and that's why people go

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 4>to YouTube. And I feel like if the PGA Tour

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 4>just bought into that idea and need their own content

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 4>around the content like it could help them so much

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 4>with revenue streams and with attention and just like grabbing

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 4>people's eyeballs, like like those tiktoks, I can't not watch them.

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 5>They're good.

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean this is a huge issue for all

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of sports, Like the NBA is like people care more

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>about free agency than who wins the NBA finals, right,

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Like it's like, right, what do we do? Like I

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>think golf like golf's issues, Like how do the PGA

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Tour's main issue is Like it feels like golf is

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>heading into And I don't want this to sound pessimistic.

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I love watching PGA Tour golf like will tune into

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty much anything. But the greater undercurrent is like the

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:57.919
<v Speaker 1>majors are becoming more and more important and the live

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:03.320
<v Speaker 1>fracture has created this. It is only like push this faster.

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 1>How like do you become like tennis where like people

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>outside of the diehards like don't care what happens at

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Indian Wells or Cincinnati or you know, like you don't

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>want to become that where it's only the majors and

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 1>how does the how do like the PGA Tour's existential

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>crisis is that because they own none of them?

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 4>Mm hm, I want to I just wonder, like with

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 4>that direction in mind, like do the Saudi's care that

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 4>golf is like going in that direction? Is that a concern?

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:44.040
<v Speaker 4>Like do they really just want a seat at the table?

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 4>But what is the point of having a seat at

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 4>the tables for a sport that's like in decline in

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:55.239
<v Speaker 4>a lot of ways, and because of their involvement, It's

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:59.400
<v Speaker 4>just like it's so counterintuitive to think about. And I

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:01.279
<v Speaker 4>just like wish I could be a fly on the

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 4>wall in some of these boardroom meetings, like what I

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 4>don't know? Like what what is the direction here? Like?

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:08.479
<v Speaker 4>What is the goal?

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a great question. I think. I think maybe

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.279
<v Speaker 1>their issue right now is that a lot of their

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>board has different goals, and those goals all pull in

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>different directions, and just how we got here. What happens

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is that nothing moves in any direction because of that?

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, back, cap, let's get back to the back

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:41.480
<v Speaker 1>like that, you know, this conversation just going so you

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 1>have like the live dynamic with Brooks and Bryson, And

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:48.879
<v Speaker 1>are there any other players that have like a great year?

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously we know to Lare is going to

0:37:51.920 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 1>believe they should be on the team regardless of what

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:58.280
<v Speaker 1>he does. But then, like my question, my bigger question

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:03.919
<v Speaker 1>is like is it like j T Spith? Does JT?

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I think JT has a real chance of playing his

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>way back into like the top half, but like, is

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>it Speth Keegan, you know, Billy Horschell type players at

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the back half. Maybe maybe Daniel Berger has like a

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>resurgent year, or is it is it gonna be look

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 1>really young with like Akshay Sahith, Nick Dunlap, Like to me,

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 1>like the back half of that that Ryder Cup, Like

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I always go back to Whistling Strait and Whistling Straits,

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the US just demolishes Europe and the team looked just

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 1>like so locked in. Yeah, like this is going to

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>be the team for the next eight years and and

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Europe is screwed. And and now it's like, I don't know,

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>there might be five players from that team on this

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 1>team four years removed, you know, right?

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 4>It all so it felt like the Whistling Streets team,

0:39:02.400 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 4>And correct me if I'm wrong. Was like kind of

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 4>like from a more condensed generation like age wise. And

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 4>I feel like with this with Bethpage Black coming up,

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.319
<v Speaker 4>like it really could go either way. Or it could

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 4>be like the Old Guard only with like a couple

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 4>sprinkled in. It could be like way more of the

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 4>New Guard the young guys, or it could be a

0:39:23.200 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 4>mix of the two, which I think would be would

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 4>put us at a disadvantage because it's just like harder

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 4>to connect as a team. And I feel like with

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:33.360
<v Speaker 4>the President's Cup team, actually I forget were you in Montreal? Andy?

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I was not.

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 4>You were not in Montreal. It did feel like there

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 4>was a harmony among the guys, Like it felt like

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 4>a lot of them played junior off together. A lot

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 4>of them like are in the same stages in life,

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 4>like just having a kid or like married or all

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 4>like the wives got along, and like Kisner was like

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 4>vibing with everyone because there was just like kind of

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 4>a humor to the team. But it is uncertain you're

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 4>right with the back half of the Ryder Cup team

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 4>of like which way we're gonna go?

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah and and yeah. I always I just find myself

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking because like I don't know, I started this bit.

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I started covering golf in twenty fifteen and Speith was

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:21.360
<v Speaker 1>so young. JT was young, And I just find myself

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:25.439
<v Speaker 1>at this point always thinking about the wedding crashers line

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 1>when they're sitting on the on the steps and they're like,

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think Owen Wilson says, we're not that young anymore.

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, That's exactly what's happening.

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And it's like Jordan Speth next time Ryder Cup goes

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>through is thirty two, you know, like JT's thirty two. Yeah,

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Xander's thirty. Xander and Scottie to me, they're obviously locks.

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:52.399
<v Speaker 1>They are bona fide locks, and probably and I think

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 1>like with Xander playing so well, Can'tley had a bad

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>year last year, but like Can'tle is going to be

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a lock because of their partnership. But like that bottom

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 1>could you could I mean you could see somebody that

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>like Pops the way Ludwig did, Like maybe Michael Thorpe Jornsen.

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>You wrote an article about Michael thorbury Ornsen. Maybe he's

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>like maybe somebody like that, who knows what Luke Clanton

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>does over the next but like that team could it

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>could be where Scotty and Xander are the old guys.

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Right, which would be insane, but I feel like they

0:41:26.640 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 4>they actually did like get some good practice like at

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 4>the President's Cup. And we talked to Jim Ferick about

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 4>this after the win. Is like Xander, Scotti, Colin and

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 4>Patrick Cantley were like the leaders in that team room,

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 4>which is so funny thinking about what Whistling Streets was like.

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:48.320
<v Speaker 4>And Scotty was kind of the young new guy who

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 4>came out of nowhere so it could go. But where

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 4>it also could go is like Russell Henley makes the

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 4>team and like Windham Clark is back then, but like

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 4>that's a totally separate category in my opinion.

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, yeah, like I saw something I don't know.

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Did you see the Rock Bolton social posts of the

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>ranking the PGA Tour players?

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:14.320
<v Speaker 4>No, but can I look all the reference.

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>It's an Instagram post. I think the put it up

0:42:16.760 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they had like Keegan ranked like fifty two or something like,

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>they had all these players driving in it was like

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Rob Bolton's twenty twenty five like player ranking. And I mean,

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's like Kingan's the twelfth ranked player in the

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:32.719
<v Speaker 1>world right now.

0:42:33.680 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god, yeah, yeah, I'm just seeing this right now.

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>All the like, there's so many players that commented, oh random.

0:42:40.239 --> 0:42:42.480
<v Speaker 1>It was like it was kind of it was I

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 1>like loved it because it was like, this is an

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:50.320
<v Speaker 1>amazing content. Yeah, it's amazing content because like all the players,

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like clearly they posted over the holidays. All these players

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>are on their phone and they're like, what the fuck.

0:42:57.440 --> 0:43:00.560
<v Speaker 4>Like you got for twenty twenty five Rob Bolts Fantasy

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 4>Rankings with the eye.

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Emoji's yeah, oh my god, it's incredible. It's like there

0:43:12.320 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>are so many players that are in the In the messages.

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Someone just comments, all right, the f is Robbie Bolton.

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 1>He's been at it a long time. I feel like

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>I read Rob Bolton when I.

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Was like, yeah, legend. A lot of Weslie Bryant.

0:43:31.120 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Comments, Oh YouTuber, yep, he's he's ranked ahead a Tiger

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Tigers like one ninety one. There's an incredible piece of

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>content that is amazing.

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 4>I totally miss this.

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:52.280
<v Speaker 1>What what else do you have on your list?

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, let me let me read pull up the list. Yeah,

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 4>so mine was I had a Ryder Cup one, but

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 4>mine was more the like logistical disaster that could be

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:08.040
<v Speaker 4>the Ryder Cup, if we're thinking about Long Island and

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 4>Bethpage Black. As a native New Yorker, I remember actually

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:17.400
<v Speaker 4>going to the PJA Championship with my dad and my

0:44:17.440 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 4>brother and we took the subway and the L I

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 4>R R and the shuttle. We eventually got there, and

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:29.799
<v Speaker 4>I am worried. I'm worried about the setup in New York,

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:35.280
<v Speaker 4>the traffic. There will be some sort of chaos disaster

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 4>morning evening and I don't know what it is, but

0:44:39.239 --> 0:44:41.280
<v Speaker 4>it will happen, and I'm scared.

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I was at that p G a yeare by uh No,

0:44:49.520 --> 0:44:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I was in the city. You were awful, it was.

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>It was awful getting there. I also was at the

0:44:57.960 --> 0:45:03.800
<v Speaker 1>shinnecock us Open. I and by happenstance, by my procrastination,

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:05.800
<v Speaker 1>my late booking.

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:07.880
<v Speaker 4>Uh oh no, where did you stay?

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Well?

0:45:08.520 --> 0:45:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I stayed east of Shinnakok in like a little bed

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and breakfast and it was incredible. I had like this delightful,

0:45:16.239 --> 0:45:17.760
<v Speaker 1>like twelve minute drive.

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But everybody else like if you're if you're staying from

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>west of it, you're screwed. You're done. It's awful. So yeah,

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it could be Solheim Cup levels.

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 4>It could be. I know, I just don't know if

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be the train the bus and stands

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 4>like something is going to go wrong. Also, the tickets

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:40.359
<v Speaker 4>were nine hundred dollars, so yeah, things don't go well,

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 4>aren't going to be that happy about.

0:45:43.480 --> 0:45:46.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the issue, right, is like if it was like

0:45:46.440 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a thirty dollars ticket of one hundred dollars ticket, one

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty dollars ticket, you expect have more sympathy.

0:45:53.880 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>But when you spend you know, if you're a family

0:45:56.560 --> 0:46:00.239
<v Speaker 1>of four and you spend thirty six hundred dollars four

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars ish on you know the whole thing, you

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 1>you probably expect some sort of like nice parking situation.

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 4>To move, right yep. Yeah, And you also had to

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:15.479
<v Speaker 4>paper parking too on top of the ticket, so that

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:17.360
<v Speaker 4>that was mine. That was mine, I mean. And also

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 4>like in relation to that, like everything that happened at

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 4>the waste management last year, with like the chaos that

0:46:22.840 --> 0:46:26.960
<v Speaker 4>unfolded and just like the environment that is Long Island

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:32.319
<v Speaker 4>and sports and like the debauchery that could unfold is

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:34.160
<v Speaker 4>like it actually is terrifying to me.

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's it's ryder Cup. I feel like we have

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:44.799
<v Speaker 1>like I feel like waste management like boiled up to

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 1>like what it was. Yeah, And it feels like the

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Ryder Cup has been having this like it's kind of

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:55.400
<v Speaker 1>been like a home field discussion m M, where it's like,

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>is there too much you know, in the home team's

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:02.239
<v Speaker 1>control and they haven't had like a close Ryder Cup in.

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 2>A long time.

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:03.359
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>No, And because of that, like it's been like this

0:47:07.680 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>undertow And does Bethpage be the be the moment where

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it like sets it off over the over the edge?

0:47:16.640 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 4>I could, Yeah, I could. I mean, like it feels

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:23.400
<v Speaker 4>like it's kind of the like this Bomber's golf course,

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 4>which I think will naturally favor the US and they'll

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:29.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you guys, you're the course nerds here. You

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:31.400
<v Speaker 4>could talk more to this than I can. But like,

0:47:31.960 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 4>I feel like you already get the course set up,

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 4>advantage of putting teas in certain places, the roughs up here,

0:47:38.440 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 4>down there, pin locations, et cetera. But like just the

0:47:42.520 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 4>nature of that golf course I feel like automatically favors

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:47.359
<v Speaker 4>the the States.

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I had never been there, and Jeff Ogilvie did a

0:47:51.360 --> 0:47:54.840
<v Speaker 1>preview episode with me before the PGA, and he said

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>nobody will win this tournament. I'm paraphrasing here. He said

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the way more eloquently, but he's like, you have to

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>fly at three hundred and ten yards to win this

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 1>tournament at this golf course. And then it was Brooks

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and bryceon just kicking it out and like people are

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>always good point they're going to point to, Like Jordan

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Speed finished third at that PGA. He had the best

0:48:14.640 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 1>his I think it was statistically the best putting week

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>ever and he finished like ten shots out in third.

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>So that to the earlier Ryder Cup conversation, I think

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 1>that would skew towards young players right right.

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:33.799
<v Speaker 4>Thorbjornsen is like one of the I think he's like

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 4>the fifth longest hitter on tour if he was counted

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:38.760
<v Speaker 4>in the statistics, Like he doesn't even have enough rowns

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 4>to count.

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Clanton is really long too, and I think is above

0:48:44.480 --> 0:48:47.920
<v Speaker 1>average length. Like generally, the longer players are always going

0:48:47.960 --> 0:48:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to be the younger players, So that's it's an interesting

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:56.240
<v Speaker 1>aspect of it. Here's a question for one time. I'm ready,

0:48:56.360 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>what's a realistic over under for Scottie Scheffler wins and

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:02.319
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five.

0:49:04.120 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, the glass in the hand complicates things, wasn't it.

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 4>That was one of mine.

0:49:08.760 --> 0:49:11.920
<v Speaker 1>One of the weirdest tweets of the holiday breaks was

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the PGA tourist one hundred expects to make cover.

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 4>Why was the quote from his agent?

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:22.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:49:22.360 --> 0:49:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Like what why was that coming from the PGA tour.

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:29.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't I don't know, I don't know. I mean

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 4>they had it like it was all perfectly like set

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 4>to go, Like every social channel posted Scottie glass in

0:49:37.680 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 4>his hand at the same time. It was like the

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 4>announcement of the century. But that's like a pretty serious

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:47.120
<v Speaker 4>like place to get surgery.

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:52.720
<v Speaker 1>No, Like I feel like, yeah, surgery seems like a lot.

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not like he got stitches.

0:49:55.239 --> 0:50:00.120
<v Speaker 4>No, No, he's like going under the knife. I I

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:02.400
<v Speaker 4>used to be laughing because like, hopefully this isn't serious,

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:05.799
<v Speaker 4>but like that is your connection to the club. And

0:50:05.840 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm kind of like not ready to say, scott he's

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:10.799
<v Speaker 4>gonna win nine times now.

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Pre pre glass in hand? What would you in hand hand?

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean over under? So like betting line.

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 4>He won seven this year, I think with the ten

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 4>with the hero. Oh, okay, nine with the Hero, nine

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 4>with the hero's got us covered. I would say under

0:50:37.760 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 4>seven point five.

0:50:39.960 --> 0:50:42.840
<v Speaker 1>That's I was pre glass in hand. Seven and a

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:46.879
<v Speaker 1>half felt yeah, which is insane. I mean maybe six

0:50:46.920 --> 0:50:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Like the thing about what's happened with

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the tour schedule with like all the top players, and

0:50:54.520 --> 0:50:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this is like Tiger used to play the Tiger schedule

0:50:57.600 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and it was like all big tournaments. A couple urnaments

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:04.439
<v Speaker 1>that he played, you know, that you could say were

0:51:04.560 --> 0:51:06.640
<v Speaker 1>easier fields, but for the most part, it was like

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 1>he was winning a lot. Like one of the things

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:11.399
<v Speaker 1>that this designated event schedule has done is it's going

0:51:11.440 --> 0:51:15.239
<v Speaker 1>to compress the best players wins over time because they

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:19.040
<v Speaker 1>play less tournaments against weak fields than ever before.

0:51:19.920 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 4>That's a really good point. I never thought about that.

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:25.759
<v Speaker 1>So, like I Scott, that makes Scotty's year all the

0:51:25.800 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>more impressive last year, but it also to me makes

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:33.280
<v Speaker 1>doing it you're and you're out more and more difficult.

0:51:33.400 --> 0:51:36.080
<v Speaker 1>But it also, like I think like that one of

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that like record wise, like we are seeing

0:51:39.960 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 1>career shorter for everybody else on tour, Like there's so

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:48.600
<v Speaker 1>many people that didn't win a tournament last year. Yep,

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Like more cow was outstanding last year and like, oh

0:51:52.760 --> 0:51:55.400
<v Speaker 1>he finished runner up to Scottie like three times.

0:51:56.640 --> 0:51:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Right, Well, you also think about like the guys in

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 4>those field events, like it kind of changes their trajectory too,

0:52:04.320 --> 0:52:06.640
<v Speaker 4>Like I think of a Jake Knap and he won twice,

0:52:06.680 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 4>I think, which is pretty insane. Once. Oh maybe once.

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Austin Akrot won twice.

0:52:12.520 --> 0:52:15.680
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Okay, Austin Akrote won twice, and.

0:52:15.640 --> 0:52:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Like like he'd be like a perfect example of like

0:52:17.760 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a potential Ryder Cup player. He won twice. He's like

0:52:21.160 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>really good. Nobody knows really who he is, but he's

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 1>really freaking good.

0:52:26.239 --> 0:52:29.879
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly. I feel like that's a really good point

0:52:29.880 --> 0:52:33.520
<v Speaker 4>about Scotty though, Like I wonder, I mean, I wish

0:52:33.600 --> 0:52:35.560
<v Speaker 4>we could know, like without the hand, I wonder how

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:38.759
<v Speaker 4>much of a factor that's going to be. But it

0:52:38.800 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 4>really does make it all the more impressive because almost

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 4>all of those events were signature, you know, marquee events,

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:51.319
<v Speaker 4>and some of them were when he you know, his

0:52:51.440 --> 0:52:54.360
<v Speaker 4>back was out. It was the week after the Masters

0:52:54.440 --> 0:52:57.799
<v Speaker 4>at the RBC, Like all forces were against this guy

0:52:57.840 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 4>and he still won that much and with the putting

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:02.000
<v Speaker 4>in the beginning of the year.

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's just.

0:53:04.840 --> 0:53:08.279
<v Speaker 4>It is remarkable. I think. I hope it's not. I

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:10.560
<v Speaker 4>hope it's not a huge step back for him. Like,

0:53:10.960 --> 0:53:13.280
<v Speaker 4>but I go back to my conversations with Randy Smith

0:53:13.280 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 4>where he talks about like how important Scotty's hands are

0:53:16.560 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 4>to his golf swing, like it being like the connection

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:21.879
<v Speaker 4>between you and the club, and like he says things

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 4>like Scotty's got the best pair of hands I've ever seen,

0:53:24.239 --> 0:53:28.680
<v Speaker 4>and like he is a field player. So I'm just

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:31.360
<v Speaker 4>like I'm worried a little bit.

0:53:31.640 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>About the hands. Anything hands or wrist for a golfer

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:40.759
<v Speaker 1>is like the worst worst thing's.

0:53:40.000 --> 0:53:42.360
<v Speaker 4>Happened with Jordan with with Spief than the wrist.

0:53:42.920 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that would be like total golf thing that a

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Christmas Day. Probably, I don't have any information. Probably probably

0:53:54.719 --> 0:53:56.480
<v Speaker 1>hops hops.

0:53:56.760 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, maybe like more than likely.

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's uh, it's crazy. Uh what do you have next?

0:54:05.360 --> 0:54:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Let's see what else do I have? We kind of

0:54:07.960 --> 0:54:12.479
<v Speaker 4>had some cross contamination here. Oh this was my non

0:54:12.600 --> 0:54:17.640
<v Speaker 4>men's golf. Can the LPGA make a semblance of a

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 4>turnaround in twenty twenty five, That's a big.

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Question, I think when we talk about TV rights, that is, Yeah,

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the big hurdle mm hmmmm hmm.

0:54:29.640 --> 0:54:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we we did a after Molly stepped down, Brody,

0:54:35.520 --> 0:54:37.960
<v Speaker 4>my colleague and I did this kind of like survey

0:54:38.040 --> 0:54:40.279
<v Speaker 4>of the LPGA and the problems that it has to face,

0:54:40.280 --> 0:54:42.920
<v Speaker 4>and Brody did a really nice section about the problem

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 4>with the TV deal. It's basically controlled by the PGA Tour.

0:54:47.920 --> 0:54:51.960
<v Speaker 4>So one thing that he actually uncovered in this reporting

0:54:51.960 --> 0:54:57.360
<v Speaker 4>for this story, which I honestly didn't understand beforehand, was like, basically,

0:54:57.360 --> 0:54:59.920
<v Speaker 4>the PGA Tour and the Champions Tour can get their

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:03.759
<v Speaker 4>act together on their schedules and tournaments much faster than

0:55:03.760 --> 0:55:06.840
<v Speaker 4>the LPGA ever will be able to because of sponsorship Bunny.

0:55:07.520 --> 0:55:10.960
<v Speaker 4>So they basically just take this reserve all the good

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:13.640
<v Speaker 4>TV slots ahead of time, and the LPGA is just

0:55:13.680 --> 0:55:15.719
<v Speaker 4>stuck with with whatever is left over.

0:55:17.400 --> 0:55:23.560
<v Speaker 1>It is everybody romanticizes Mike Want's tenure, and I think

0:55:23.680 --> 0:55:29.280
<v Speaker 1>like move like leaps and bounds net positive net huge

0:55:29.280 --> 0:55:33.840
<v Speaker 1>debt positive for the LPGA, huge debt positive. But I

0:55:33.840 --> 0:55:36.719
<v Speaker 1>would say that I would also argue that one of

0:55:36.760 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the biggest mistakes made was bundling LPGA that, yeah, with

0:55:43.080 --> 0:55:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour, you cannot have an organization that that

0:55:47.239 --> 0:55:51.000
<v Speaker 1>has ulterior motives control where your rights package.

0:55:51.600 --> 0:55:55.000
<v Speaker 4>No, it doesn't make a lot of sense. And again

0:55:55.320 --> 0:55:58.800
<v Speaker 4>that like twenty thirty one date is looming over our heads.

0:56:00.080 --> 0:56:04.680
<v Speaker 4>But like the LPGA, I feel like in our bubbles,

0:56:04.719 --> 0:56:08.319
<v Speaker 4>like the Nelly year was incredible and like everything that

0:56:08.360 --> 0:56:12.120
<v Speaker 4>she did, very similarly to Scotti was like against the

0:56:12.160 --> 0:56:16.719
<v Speaker 4>odds and and breaking records and just like playing machine

0:56:17.040 --> 0:56:21.759
<v Speaker 4>robot golf, and like for more reasons than one, it

0:56:21.840 --> 0:56:25.120
<v Speaker 4>just didn't break through, Like it didn't shine shine through

0:56:25.239 --> 0:56:35.279
<v Speaker 4>for the LPGA. Nelly has gotten attention through popular media,

0:56:35.520 --> 0:56:40.680
<v Speaker 4>like there have been like some wins for LPGA players,

0:56:40.880 --> 0:56:43.360
<v Speaker 4>but like the league as a whole, in the product

0:56:43.360 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 4>as a whole, I feel like has just been like

0:56:46.560 --> 0:56:50.400
<v Speaker 4>at a standstill. And now with like a lack of

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:55.479
<v Speaker 4>leadership and searching for a new commissioner, there's a lot

0:56:55.520 --> 0:56:59.600
<v Speaker 4>at stake for the LPGA, and I feel like there

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:01.440
<v Speaker 4>are a few things that could save it. And I

0:57:01.480 --> 0:57:03.840
<v Speaker 4>think one of the things that I was kind of

0:57:03.920 --> 0:57:06.680
<v Speaker 4>riffing about on my notes is like the Charlie Nelly

0:57:07.280 --> 0:57:10.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of like rivalry drama, like at the Solheim Cup

0:57:10.000 --> 0:57:12.200
<v Speaker 4>that was really exciting when they.

0:57:12.080 --> 0:57:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Were Charlie needs to win more to be Charlie does.

0:57:15.200 --> 0:57:16.320
<v Speaker 4>Charlie does need to win more.

0:57:16.720 --> 0:57:19.000
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, the Knicks were the bulls

0:57:19.080 --> 0:57:21.919
<v Speaker 1>arrival in the nineties and they never beat the bulls, right,

0:57:22.320 --> 0:57:22.680
<v Speaker 1>like we.

0:57:22.640 --> 0:57:26.320
<v Speaker 4>Need some kind of drama, Like I feel like what

0:57:27.960 --> 0:57:31.600
<v Speaker 4>with the w n B A Like the obviously Kitlyn

0:57:31.720 --> 0:57:35.200
<v Speaker 4>the Kaitlyn Clark effect is all powerful, but there was

0:57:35.240 --> 0:57:40.080
<v Speaker 4>there's also like riffs and and and spats and controversy

0:57:40.160 --> 0:57:44.080
<v Speaker 4>and like lats never never get that at the LPGA.

0:57:45.240 --> 0:57:49.800
<v Speaker 1>It makes me somewhat believe and this has been a

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:53.560
<v Speaker 1>scene of this entire conversation, but like to me, I

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:56.640
<v Speaker 1>would have a big question if I was in charge

0:57:56.640 --> 0:58:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of the LPGA, is televised live golf the best version

0:58:03.960 --> 0:58:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of product that we can put out there? And I

0:58:08.240 --> 0:58:10.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of generally might say no.

0:58:10.960 --> 0:58:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I would think.

0:58:13.440 --> 0:58:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that the the LPGA, the Women's Golf has

0:58:18.320 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 1>like I think like one of the things that when

0:58:20.320 --> 0:58:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you're smaller, one of the nice things you have is

0:58:23.000 --> 0:58:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more freedom to try stuff. When you try.

0:58:26.760 --> 0:58:29.680
<v Speaker 1>If you're the big, biggest person in a space and

0:58:29.720 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you try something and you fail, everybody knows you fail.

0:58:33.320 --> 0:58:37.840
<v Speaker 1>But when you're a smaller product, a smaller company, a

0:58:37.880 --> 0:58:42.120
<v Speaker 1>smaller footprint, you have so much more ability to experiment

0:58:42.400 --> 0:58:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and to be like, the LPGA should spend the next

0:58:45.480 --> 0:58:51.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of years really experimenting and investing in alternative forms

0:58:51.640 --> 0:58:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of golf, whether it's like Monday, Tuesday, Wednesdays at tournaments,

0:58:56.080 --> 0:59:00.440
<v Speaker 1>organizing matches at at golf, Like we can we film

0:59:00.880 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 1>eight YouTube matches in a day at a really great

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:08.840
<v Speaker 1>golf course. So like I think, like, to me, the

0:59:09.040 --> 0:59:14.120
<v Speaker 1>LPGA with its current constraints of like we have really

0:59:14.160 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 1>bad TV windows.

0:59:15.800 --> 0:59:17.320
<v Speaker 5>Mm hmm, it's.

0:59:17.440 --> 0:59:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Really like the only times we break through is when

0:59:20.520 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we're on network TV. For the most part, I would

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be thinking about, like how do we build audience elsewhere

0:59:27.120 --> 0:59:31.880
<v Speaker 1>because it seems really unlikely that they're going to build

0:59:32.000 --> 0:59:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a huge audience through the Golf channel with really bad

0:59:38.240 --> 0:59:39.680
<v Speaker 1>time air times.

0:59:39.960 --> 0:59:42.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, one hundred percent agree. I mean, like I feel like,

0:59:42.880 --> 0:59:46.120
<v Speaker 4>why not experiment with with YouTube golf. The LPGA doesn't

0:59:46.120 --> 0:59:48.840
<v Speaker 4>have those rights restrictions, Like when you go to an

0:59:48.920 --> 0:59:51.040
<v Speaker 4>LPGA event, I can post whatever I want, Like I

0:59:51.040 --> 0:59:53.720
<v Speaker 4>can post videos and no one's gonna say a word.

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:58.200
<v Speaker 4>And there's definitely definitely a room there for improvement.

0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they have two hundred and thirty thousand followers

1:00:01.440 --> 1:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>on UT Yeah, and that seems to be to be

1:00:05.320 --> 1:00:08.120
<v Speaker 1>like a number. You could easily get to a million. Yeah,

1:00:08.200 --> 1:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>with the like you have the talent and the access.

1:00:11.880 --> 1:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>That's the hardest part about to get.

1:00:14.760 --> 1:00:15.000
<v Speaker 5>Yes.

1:00:15.600 --> 1:00:19.520
<v Speaker 4>I also do think that what could provide like a

1:00:19.520 --> 1:00:22.720
<v Speaker 4>boost of energy to LPJ LPGA as well, is there

1:00:23.640 --> 1:00:27.440
<v Speaker 4>is a really awesome like young contingent of American players

1:00:27.520 --> 1:00:29.920
<v Speaker 4>coming up the ranks right now. Like there's like a

1:00:29.960 --> 1:00:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Mari Avery Megagane, Rachel heck Is turned in is saying amateur,

1:00:35.840 --> 1:00:40.120
<v Speaker 4>but Rachel Keene just turned pro. Like there there could

1:00:40.200 --> 1:00:42.000
<v Speaker 4>be kind of this like burst of youth on the

1:00:42.120 --> 1:00:44.320
<v Speaker 4>LPGA that I think could really help. But the LPGA

1:00:44.360 --> 1:00:47.200
<v Speaker 4>has to actually like take advantage of their presence and

1:00:47.280 --> 1:00:50.320
<v Speaker 4>like do the right things with them to make it work.

1:00:50.840 --> 1:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>They can't do what they did with Rojang.

1:00:53.120 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 4>No they Yeah.

1:00:55.360 --> 1:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>From everything I hear like astrosk Tally is like a

1:00:59.280 --> 1:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>superstar and the superstar like going to be you know.

1:01:04.600 --> 1:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think like that's one of the unique things with

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>women's golf. In the women's games, like you have to

1:01:09.520 --> 1:01:15.320
<v Speaker 1>be really ready to promote superstars because they they happen

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>at age seventeen, eighteen nineteen, Like you've got to be

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>ready to go and and really because like it's just

1:01:24.080 --> 1:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>like the nature of the sport is it's younger and

1:01:27.400 --> 1:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>like you have like you know lydia co was was

1:01:30.600 --> 1:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know lydia Coo is like an incredible could have

1:01:34.320 --> 1:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Like if you if if you'd had the right marketing,

1:01:37.080 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the right distribution at the start of lydio Coa's career,

1:01:42.000 --> 1:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like an amazing career, but she kind of came

1:01:45.120 --> 1:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>like a little too early. But like it, you just

1:01:48.440 --> 1:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>have to be really ready for the next the next superstar, yeah.

1:01:52.040 --> 1:01:55.600
<v Speaker 4>And then the and then those superstar household names don't

1:01:55.760 --> 1:01:58.680
<v Speaker 4>like they don't have as much of a shelf life

1:01:58.720 --> 1:02:02.640
<v Speaker 4>as the PGA Tour stars do because simply just because

1:02:03.040 --> 1:02:05.920
<v Speaker 4>players step away earlier. And we saw that with Lexi

1:02:05.960 --> 1:02:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Thompson this year.

1:02:07.600 --> 1:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. My last thing is, uh is Rory wins the Major.

1:02:12.880 --> 1:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>If you bet on this enough, it's going to happen.

1:02:17.440 --> 1:02:19.880
<v Speaker 4>Wait wait, I lost you for a sec.

1:02:23.440 --> 1:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>My last thing is Rory mc roy wins the Mature

1:02:28.280 --> 1:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>And I figure if you just if you keep betting

1:02:30.880 --> 1:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>on this enough, eventually you're going to be right.

1:02:35.880 --> 1:02:42.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I yeah, I don't know. I I feel like

1:02:42.600 --> 1:02:47.440
<v Speaker 4>the longer this this drought goes on, the harder it gets.

1:02:48.240 --> 1:02:53.680
<v Speaker 4>And and like and last summer was especially tough, and

1:02:53.760 --> 1:02:59.640
<v Speaker 4>like the scar tissue, there is immense So I don't

1:02:59.680 --> 1:03:03.240
<v Speaker 4>want to be personally too optimistic about this because I

1:03:03.240 --> 1:03:05.800
<v Speaker 4>will get my hopes up and I will be let

1:03:05.880 --> 1:03:11.040
<v Speaker 4>down again. But if it is, it's always this is

1:03:11.040 --> 1:03:13.800
<v Speaker 4>always a storyline. Every year, it's a storyline.

1:03:14.880 --> 1:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you could make an argument that it's like the

1:03:17.240 --> 1:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>biggest story in golf.

1:03:19.480 --> 1:03:23.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, in golf for sure. And we have Royal Port

1:03:23.200 --> 1:03:25.040
<v Speaker 4>Rush coming up.

1:03:25.200 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that one.

1:03:26.560 --> 1:03:31.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, which one do you like? Yeah? I was

1:03:31.920 --> 1:03:35.080
<v Speaker 4>going to say, like, he loves that place.

1:03:35.360 --> 1:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Loves it, loves it. I mean, he can just hit

1:03:38.040 --> 1:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it over every bunker.

1:03:39.640 --> 1:03:40.160
<v Speaker 4>Mm hmmm.

1:03:41.360 --> 1:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's just I think statistically he keeps

1:03:47.400 --> 1:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>getting better. He is, he is quantitatively a better golfer.

1:03:54.600 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>He Yeah, it's just it's a fascinating, like how many

1:04:00.240 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating how many years does he have left? Does

1:04:04.040 --> 1:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>he have sixteen good major championships left? I think that's

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the reality.

1:04:11.000 --> 1:04:11.959
<v Speaker 4>Of it and getting one.

1:04:12.520 --> 1:04:12.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:04:13.720 --> 1:04:18.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean I feel like, statistically, is it likely

1:04:18.040 --> 1:04:23.960
<v Speaker 4>to happen? No? Right, I'm sorry, I hate to be

1:04:24.120 --> 1:04:24.680
<v Speaker 4>I hate to be.

1:04:24.840 --> 1:04:25.000
<v Speaker 5>Well.

1:04:25.200 --> 1:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like he's roughly played forty majors. This is

1:04:28.360 --> 1:04:31.840
<v Speaker 1>just back of the napkin math, right, Okay, so he's

1:04:31.880 --> 1:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>won four of forty, so he's roughly at like a

1:04:35.920 --> 1:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>ten percent clip. So statistically he should get one of

1:04:43.320 --> 1:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the next sixteen. I mean, I think, like there's a

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>real question like how long is he going to play

1:04:49.480 --> 1:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>at a high level? Right, and that I think he's

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>probably got five years, four to five years.

1:05:00.240 --> 1:05:04.360
<v Speaker 4>I think he has more. I mean, like he he

1:05:04.480 --> 1:05:07.560
<v Speaker 4>has so much longevity. I think in his like body,

1:05:07.600 --> 1:05:10.720
<v Speaker 4>like Rory never I mean maybe I'm wrong in this,

1:05:10.760 --> 1:05:12.080
<v Speaker 4>but I feel like he's never injured.

1:05:13.080 --> 1:05:16.919
<v Speaker 1>He had a backscare early in his career, and then

1:05:17.240 --> 1:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>they they like, I mean, they overhauled his entire fitness

1:05:23.080 --> 1:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>right right, everything.

1:05:24.480 --> 1:05:27.440
<v Speaker 4>To take him for twenty grams of creatine in a day.

1:05:27.600 --> 1:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Now, how about Scotty not knowing creatine?

1:05:32.600 --> 1:05:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, he was like, yeah, yeah, there's been there's been

1:05:35.080 --> 1:05:38.280
<v Speaker 4>a lot of research, man, right, And then Rory's like

1:05:38.360 --> 1:05:39.760
<v Speaker 4>shaking his protein thing.

1:05:41.120 --> 1:05:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Scotty aloof a great play like he's he's never gonna

1:05:48.360 --> 1:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>get like the Dustin Johnson treatment, but there is like

1:05:50.880 --> 1:05:52.439
<v Speaker 1>some Dustin Johnson in him.

1:05:53.240 --> 1:05:55.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Well, I think he just like has the like

1:05:55.960 --> 1:05:56.720
<v Speaker 4>blinders on.

1:05:57.720 --> 1:05:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:05:58.040 --> 1:06:00.240
<v Speaker 4>Like I remember that quote from I think was like

1:06:00.280 --> 1:06:03.480
<v Speaker 4>the GQ story on Scotty was like he has he

1:06:03.560 --> 1:06:06.680
<v Speaker 4>has like certain news alerts like blocked on his phone

1:06:06.720 --> 1:06:10.600
<v Speaker 4>so he can't even get golf news like that takes effort.

1:06:10.840 --> 1:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say, like yeah, And I think like that's

1:06:13.240 --> 1:06:15.720
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting with if you compare him to Rory,

1:06:15.760 --> 1:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Like Rory's like hyper aware, Yes, Scotty is like completely.

1:06:20.400 --> 1:06:24.640
<v Speaker 4>Unaware, hater blocker's on. Yes, it's I.

1:06:24.640 --> 1:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Think that it goes to like that. I don't know

1:06:28.080 --> 1:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>if it was Phil or whoever said it, like you

1:06:30.920 --> 1:06:35.480
<v Speaker 1>have to be either like extraordinarily brilliant or yeah, complete

1:06:35.640 --> 1:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>idiot to play this game. There's nothing between yeah, and

1:06:39.280 --> 1:06:40.840
<v Speaker 1>most of us fall in between.

1:06:41.360 --> 1:06:44.960
<v Speaker 4>Yes, exactly. Oh okay. My last my bonus one that

1:06:45.000 --> 1:06:47.680
<v Speaker 4>I want to mention, which is topical today on the

1:06:47.720 --> 1:06:52.600
<v Speaker 4>day that we're recording, is in twenty twenty five, Tiger

1:06:52.640 --> 1:06:56.680
<v Speaker 4>Woods will turn fifty. Will he play the Champion Store.

1:06:58.240 --> 1:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I've heard well Fred Couples was saying, Yeah, he thinks

1:07:02.200 --> 1:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play a lot. It makes sense, especially if

1:07:06.800 --> 1:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>he can ride a cart.

1:07:08.240 --> 1:07:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Totally and he won't feel like he's breaking any getting

1:07:11.120 --> 1:07:14.760
<v Speaker 4>any special treatment or break any rules, like he's gonna

1:07:14.760 --> 1:07:18.280
<v Speaker 4>want to break Bernard Longer's record or whoever holds.

1:07:20.040 --> 1:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's got a chance to touch burn.

1:07:23.280 --> 1:07:30.160
<v Speaker 4>Either, but like he'll want to try. It's Tiger, you.

1:07:30.400 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you could parlay this into the Champions Tour years.

1:07:35.800 --> 1:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>The early Champions Tour years are Tiger's best chances at

1:07:40.840 --> 1:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>major championships going forward, because we just like, there's no

1:07:45.720 --> 1:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>way for this guy to play like a seventy two

1:07:49.240 --> 1:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>hole event within two weeks of a walking seventy two

1:07:55.560 --> 1:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>holes within two weeks of a major, right, and we

1:07:58.600 --> 1:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have seen like like when he won in twenty nineteen,

1:08:02.680 --> 1:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a build up. There was like, oh, he's

1:08:05.560 --> 1:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>contending here, he's contending here, he wins here, Like there

1:08:09.960 --> 1:08:14.720
<v Speaker 1>was a real build up. And with this, like he

1:08:14.920 --> 1:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>has to play golf to contend at a major, like I.

1:08:19.760 --> 1:08:21.320
<v Speaker 4>Just competitive reps in YEP.

1:08:21.400 --> 1:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's possible for anybody to not play

1:08:24.280 --> 1:08:27.519
<v Speaker 1>golf and that just show up a major and win,

1:08:28.080 --> 1:08:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Like it's I think it's them.

1:08:30.840 --> 1:08:35.720
<v Speaker 4>You're flat Florida golf course and step up at Pinehurst

1:08:35.800 --> 1:08:39.080
<v Speaker 4>and like expect to be fine. But yeah, I mean

1:08:39.080 --> 1:08:40.479
<v Speaker 4>that's a really good point. I hadn't thought of that.

1:08:40.920 --> 1:08:43.839
<v Speaker 4>Like he'll be able to like get that like under pressure,

1:08:45.240 --> 1:08:48.240
<v Speaker 4>like reps and experience and and like feel what his

1:08:48.320 --> 1:08:51.280
<v Speaker 4>swing does like in those moments. And that's you hear

1:08:51.320 --> 1:08:53.320
<v Speaker 4>players talk about that all the time, and like you

1:08:53.400 --> 1:08:56.240
<v Speaker 4>never being able to replicate that in any way, no

1:08:56.280 --> 1:08:58.519
<v Speaker 4>matter like how hard you try. It's just tournament golf

1:08:58.600 --> 1:09:01.040
<v Speaker 4>is a different animal if you.

1:09:01.080 --> 1:09:04.559
<v Speaker 1>So, I haven't played a tournament in years. One of

1:09:04.600 --> 1:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>my resolutions might be playing a golf.

1:09:06.840 --> 1:09:10.800
<v Speaker 4>Tournament the same US Midam. Now that I'm thinking about it,

1:09:10.840 --> 1:09:12.679
<v Speaker 4>I just I can qualify.

1:09:12.760 --> 1:09:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Now that's uh, that's a great one. The one I played,

1:09:18.560 --> 1:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I'm never going to miss one of these,

1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and I've played one qualifier.

1:09:23.479 --> 1:09:25.160
<v Speaker 4>Even in college. I would just back out of the

1:09:25.240 --> 1:09:26.639
<v Speaker 4>last second. I'm too scared.

1:09:27.240 --> 1:09:30.800
<v Speaker 1>So anyways, like I think, like if I wouldn't play

1:09:30.840 --> 1:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>a tournament tomorrow, even though I feel like my game

1:09:34.880 --> 1:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is good. I probably would shoot like a seventy eight,

1:09:38.400 --> 1:09:43.599
<v Speaker 1>But if I played fifteen tournaments in a year that's

1:09:43.680 --> 1:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight, that same level of play would be a

1:09:47.200 --> 1:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>seventy two, just because of like understanding what's going on.

1:09:54.160 --> 1:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>This is why, Like I think, like one of my

1:09:57.000 --> 1:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>favorite things is like when a really good club player

1:10:00.080 --> 1:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>goes and plays like a state qualifier and shoots eighty two.

1:10:04.080 --> 1:10:05.840
<v Speaker 4>Right, like happens all the time.

1:10:06.000 --> 1:10:08.519
<v Speaker 1>This is not playing Saturday, And of course you've played

1:10:08.520 --> 1:10:09.639
<v Speaker 1>one hundred times in a row.

1:10:09.760 --> 1:10:11.519
<v Speaker 4>It's a different game. You got you have to put

1:10:11.560 --> 1:10:15.639
<v Speaker 4>everything out, penalty shots. You know, you could pump two

1:10:15.800 --> 1:10:20.439
<v Speaker 4>balls out of bounce on the first hole like I've played.

1:10:20.520 --> 1:10:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Even in like club matches or the WMGA. There's like

1:10:25.439 --> 1:10:27.400
<v Speaker 4>a there's like a women's match play series that I

1:10:27.400 --> 1:10:29.800
<v Speaker 4>play in every spring. The first time I did it

1:10:29.840 --> 1:10:32.639
<v Speaker 4>was probably like two years out of college, and I

1:10:32.760 --> 1:10:36.840
<v Speaker 4>literally forgot how to put, Like I could not put

1:10:36.880 --> 1:10:38.719
<v Speaker 4>for the life and be I think I four putted

1:10:38.760 --> 1:10:40.519
<v Speaker 4>and five petted. I was playing against like a seventy

1:10:40.600 --> 1:10:43.479
<v Speaker 4>year old woman and like we have on the front nine.

1:10:43.520 --> 1:10:46.920
<v Speaker 4>I was like, what happening. I need to have I

1:10:46.960 --> 1:10:50.719
<v Speaker 4>need help like you literally just it's a different, totally

1:10:50.720 --> 1:10:54.880
<v Speaker 4>different mindset, completely different, Like I can't describe like what

1:10:54.920 --> 1:10:57.080
<v Speaker 4>pressure does to you on the golf course if you're

1:10:57.080 --> 1:10:58.320
<v Speaker 4>not prepared for it.

1:10:58.320 --> 1:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, and like you have to play even at

1:11:03.240 --> 1:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Tiger's level, the greatest player of all time, Like you know,

1:11:06.000 --> 1:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>it'd be like somebody being like, hey, we're gonna you know,

1:11:10.040 --> 1:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Luk at doncas hasn't played all year somehow where the

1:11:13.200 --> 1:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>MAVs get to the finals and he hasn't played all year,

1:11:15.960 --> 1:11:17.519
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna play in this finals.

1:11:17.720 --> 1:11:18.439
<v Speaker 2>He was stink.

1:11:19.360 --> 1:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Sure he'd have like some good shots, he'd make a

1:11:21.560 --> 1:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>couple shots. But like if you haven't played basketball in

1:11:24.439 --> 1:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a long time in a competitive setting, you get like winded,

1:11:27.720 --> 1:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>You feel like you have two left hands, you know,

1:11:30.439 --> 1:11:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Like it is the same thing happens with golf, and

1:11:34.320 --> 1:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like it doesn't just matter if you practice a

1:11:37.360 --> 1:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>bunch now, it is being in the arena. So I

1:11:41.720 --> 1:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I actually love the Champion Tiger Champions Tour angle. All right,

1:11:46.640 --> 1:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that does it? What do you have coming up on

1:11:49.400 --> 1:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the athletic? Good great golf covers on the athletic?

1:11:52.640 --> 1:11:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Oh, thank you, Eddie. I'm stay tuned for a feature

1:11:56.360 --> 1:12:01.120
<v Speaker 4>I have coming out Thursday on Xander Shoffley and his

1:12:01.240 --> 1:12:06.880
<v Speaker 4>dad Stefan, kind of a inside look at how the

1:12:06.960 --> 1:12:11.240
<v Speaker 4>mind of Xander was built, the mind that won his

1:12:11.320 --> 1:12:13.840
<v Speaker 4>first major and then a second major two months later,

1:12:15.520 --> 1:12:20.160
<v Speaker 4>kind of take a look at why Stefan stepped away,

1:12:20.320 --> 1:12:24.160
<v Speaker 4>what led to that decision, what he's been up to since,

1:12:24.920 --> 1:12:28.120
<v Speaker 4>and just the dynamic with Xander throughout his life and

1:12:28.560 --> 1:12:31.720
<v Speaker 4>kind of the values and persistence that was instilled in

1:12:31.800 --> 1:12:34.000
<v Speaker 4>him as a young player and leading him to do

1:12:34.040 --> 1:12:36.479
<v Speaker 4>what he's able to do now on the biggest stages

1:12:36.520 --> 1:12:40.800
<v Speaker 4>in golf. And now Kapalua number one player is getting

1:12:40.800 --> 1:12:45.360
<v Speaker 4>surgery on his hand and Xander the floodgates are indeed

1:12:45.400 --> 1:12:49.200
<v Speaker 4>open for Xander Shotley. He one thing that I found

1:12:49.200 --> 1:12:51.160
<v Speaker 4>really interesting to talk to Stefan. I didn't know this

1:12:51.439 --> 1:12:55.840
<v Speaker 4>was Xander has never regressed in his world ranking if

1:12:55.880 --> 1:12:57.840
<v Speaker 4>you look at it on a year to year basis,

1:12:57.960 --> 1:13:00.759
<v Speaker 4>So the ranking that he started at at the beginning

1:13:00.760 --> 1:13:03.000
<v Speaker 4>of the year and the ranking he ended up at

1:13:03.040 --> 1:13:05.200
<v Speaker 4>the end of the year, He's never regressed. He's only

1:13:05.439 --> 1:13:08.439
<v Speaker 4>ever went up or stayed at his current ranking, and

1:13:08.479 --> 1:13:10.280
<v Speaker 4>now he's number two in the world and there's only

1:13:10.760 --> 1:13:13.840
<v Speaker 4>one place to go. So that's going to be your

1:13:13.920 --> 1:13:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Xander primer for the week.

1:13:16.479 --> 1:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>He if you you start to look at his career,

1:13:20.960 --> 1:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>it's like a very very impressive career.

1:13:24.880 --> 1:13:28.440
<v Speaker 4>It's incredible. Yeah, he just hangs around.

1:13:29.520 --> 1:13:33.519
<v Speaker 1>I think he's about one win from being I think

1:13:33.680 --> 1:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty much like a you can't unassailable better than JT career,

1:13:41.960 --> 1:13:46.719
<v Speaker 1>probably win one big win away from that, and yeah,

1:13:46.840 --> 1:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he's already pretty much there. Like the consistency

1:13:49.720 --> 1:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>is just incredible. So I'm excited to read that.

1:13:53.320 --> 1:13:56.320
<v Speaker 4>Awesome. Thank you for having me as always, Andy appreciate it.

1:13:56.720 --> 1:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thanks, Gabby, I have a great new year.

1:13:59.520 --> 1:14:00.400
<v Speaker 4>Thank you you two.

1:14:09.520 --> 1:14:14.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, before we get to PJ and Joseph, a

1:14:14.360 --> 1:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>quick little plug for clip TF. This is our membership.

1:14:18.720 --> 1:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>It is uh. We are producing a lot of work

1:14:21.479 --> 1:14:23.599
<v Speaker 1>in this year and year out. This will be year

1:14:23.720 --> 1:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>three of our membership. So one of the great things

1:14:27.360 --> 1:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>about this is that you if you join now, you

1:14:30.960 --> 1:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>get access to our entire backlog of content that we've

1:14:34.360 --> 1:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>produced over the last two years. We have almost one

1:14:36.920 --> 1:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred course profiles, really detailed write ups about some of

1:14:42.439 --> 1:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the best golf courses in the world. We have a

1:14:47.479 --> 1:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>big library of member videos that are you know, effectively

1:14:53.040 --> 1:14:55.439
<v Speaker 1>like what you would see on our YouTube page quality.

1:14:55.800 --> 1:14:58.559
<v Speaker 1>And we're in an events season, so you get early

1:14:58.600 --> 1:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>access to our events as well as well as a

1:15:00.920 --> 1:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>discount in the pro shop. This is the best way

1:15:03.280 --> 1:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to support this podcast, this company is to join our membership.

1:15:07.680 --> 1:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>It's one hundred and twenty dollars for the year and

1:15:10.640 --> 1:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you get access, you know, from the day you join,

1:15:13.479 --> 1:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>your year starts and you get access to all of

1:15:15.840 --> 1:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the content that we've produced over the last two years.

1:15:18.479 --> 1:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So if you're interested in joining, go to the fridagg

1:15:21.320 --> 1:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash membership and you can join there. All right,

1:15:25.240 --> 1:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>let's get to PJ Clark and Joseph Lamania on TGL.

1:15:38.040 --> 1:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, we got producer PJ and Frida Egg Golf's

1:15:41.840 --> 1:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Joseph Lemania on. We're going to talk a little bit

1:15:45.360 --> 1:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>about the TGL. The TGL launches Tuesday of next week,

1:15:50.000 --> 1:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>so the next episode of this podcast will be out

1:15:53.200 --> 1:15:57.439
<v Speaker 1>after it launches on Wednesday morning. So I wanted to

1:15:57.439 --> 1:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about the TGL. This is a

1:16:00.439 --> 1:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>new form of golf. I'm not sure how many people

1:16:03.320 --> 1:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>are are know this is coming. I think a good

1:16:06.880 --> 1:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>chunk of listeners probably know. I'm going to run down

1:16:10.800 --> 1:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>just the general format real quick, and then we're going

1:16:14.120 --> 1:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to get into kind of overarching thoughts on this and

1:16:19.200 --> 1:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the first season of it. So there are six teams.

1:16:22.200 --> 1:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is a team golf. They play in a stadium,

1:16:24.920 --> 1:16:30.479
<v Speaker 1>the Sofi Center. They play a remarkably large screen. It's

1:16:30.520 --> 1:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>like simulator golf on a giant screen. And if you

1:16:34.080 --> 1:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>follow any of the TGL socials, you'll know that this

1:16:37.439 --> 1:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>is a big screen you can fit multiple dinosaurs in it.

1:16:42.240 --> 1:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So there's six teams from different cities. You've got Boston,

1:16:46.240 --> 1:16:53.560
<v Speaker 1>New York, Atlanta, La, San Francisco, and the Monster Metropolis

1:16:53.560 --> 1:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of Jupiter, Florida. The players will all be miked up.

1:16:58.520 --> 1:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>So the way it will work is one team will

1:17:00.400 --> 1:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>play a different team, kind of like a traditional sport

1:17:04.439 --> 1:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>where you have these cities and the teams play the

1:17:06.960 --> 1:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>different teams, but they will all these contests will happen

1:17:11.000 --> 1:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>in West Palm Beach at the Sofi Center, so there's

1:17:13.720 --> 1:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>no like home stadiums. Yet the players are miked up.

1:17:19.080 --> 1:17:22.559
<v Speaker 1>They have a forty second shot clock, so they have

1:17:23.000 --> 1:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, effectively forty seconds from when the last shot

1:17:26.280 --> 1:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>was hit to hit. They are fifteen hole matches and

1:17:31.080 --> 1:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the format of the matches are nine holes of triples,

1:17:34.200 --> 1:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so each team will have three players playing. They are

1:17:38.000 --> 1:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>teams of four. Three players will play three person alternate shot,

1:17:42.200 --> 1:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>so it works just like regular alternate shot, but with

1:17:44.640 --> 1:17:47.599
<v Speaker 1>three people, so you hit every third shot if you're

1:17:47.640 --> 1:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>playing in the alternate shot format. And then six holes

1:17:51.000 --> 1:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of singles, and the way singles would work is one

1:17:54.920 --> 1:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>player plays one hole, Player two plays player two, the

1:17:58.360 --> 1:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>other team on the next hole, player three, so you'd

1:18:00.720 --> 1:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>play effectively to each player would play two holes of

1:18:04.520 --> 1:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>singles play. And then the scoring is kind of scored

1:18:09.520 --> 1:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the way hockey is scored. So you get two points

1:18:12.360 --> 1:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for a win, you get a point for a loss

1:18:16.240 --> 1:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in overtime, you get a zero points for a zero

1:18:23.080 --> 1:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>points for a loss in regulation. So that's kind of

1:18:27.160 --> 1:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>the basics of it. There are big time players playing

1:18:30.640 --> 1:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>in it. Obviously, Rory and Tiger are kind of the headliners.

1:18:34.120 --> 1:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>They are they are part of the ownership group here,

1:18:38.560 --> 1:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and Uh then you've got other big time players like Xanderschoffle,

1:18:44.479 --> 1:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Justin Thomas uh Blood, big Obart. Those are kind of

1:18:50.040 --> 1:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the headliners. And you know, the big kind of other

1:18:53.240 --> 1:18:57.400
<v Speaker 1>part of this is players not playing. Scottie Scheffler, Jordan

1:18:57.479 --> 1:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Speith are kind of big name players that aren't playing

1:19:01.160 --> 1:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>as well as any live player. So those are the

1:19:04.160 --> 1:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>nuts and bolts. Let's let's get into a couple of takeaways.

1:19:07.200 --> 1:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Like I'll start this out. I think that this is

1:19:11.760 --> 1:19:15.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of important and it's easy. You know, the way

1:19:15.120 --> 1:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>they've marketed it, it's been kind of fun and easy

1:19:19.880 --> 1:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>to bat it around. But I do think this kind

1:19:22.640 --> 1:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of needs to work for pro golf. I think that

1:19:27.360 --> 1:19:31.799
<v Speaker 1>pro golf desperately needs additional days to be relevant beyond

1:19:32.000 --> 1:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Sunday right now, like weekend week out on the PGA Tour.

1:19:36.680 --> 1:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like I think for like even getting

1:19:39.720 --> 1:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>close to die hard fans, it's become let's tune in

1:19:42.880 --> 1:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Sunday see who wins. That's like a that's a real

1:19:45.720 --> 1:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>core fan. If you could create something this will be

1:19:49.600 --> 1:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>played on Mondays and Tuesdays. The first matches on a

1:19:52.280 --> 1:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday after the National Championship on ESPN. If you could

1:19:56.000 --> 1:19:59.760
<v Speaker 1>create something that's really relevant on Mondays and Tuesdays, I

1:19:59.760 --> 1:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's a huge, huge win for pro golf and

1:20:03.680 --> 1:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the PGA Tour. ESPN obviously is a massive microphone that

1:20:08.920 --> 1:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>has the ability to kind of build awareness of of

1:20:13.960 --> 1:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>these players, build fan fans of players. I think these

1:20:17.640 --> 1:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>are things that golf struggles with and this actually has

1:20:21.800 --> 1:20:26.759
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to satisfy that. Now on the flip side,

1:20:27.520 --> 1:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to need to be hard for

1:20:29.439 --> 1:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this to succeed also, but it is and I think,

1:20:32.880 --> 1:20:35.599
<v Speaker 1>like it would there are gonna be lots of takes

1:20:35.640 --> 1:20:40.360
<v Speaker 1>flying after the first first match, but this is a

1:20:40.400 --> 1:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>brand new product. There is going to be a process

1:20:43.840 --> 1:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of figuring this out. Joseph, what are your kind of

1:20:48.920 --> 1:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>initial thoughts of TGL and the direction.

1:20:51.640 --> 1:20:52.400
<v Speaker 5>Is heading.

1:20:53.680 --> 1:20:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Annie, My biggest take on the whole thing, I think

1:20:57.320 --> 1:20:59.439
<v Speaker 3>it has a chance for success and some of the

1:20:59.479 --> 1:21:02.479
<v Speaker 3>factors that you're mentioning, with it being on primetime, with

1:21:02.560 --> 1:21:06.439
<v Speaker 3>it having a huge distribution network and partner in ESPN,

1:21:06.880 --> 1:21:09.800
<v Speaker 3>with it being timed, with it fitting into a two

1:21:09.800 --> 1:21:13.680
<v Speaker 3>hour window seeing every single shot because there's not a

1:21:13.680 --> 1:21:15.160
<v Speaker 3>bunch of golf balls up in the air.

1:21:15.240 --> 1:21:15.880
<v Speaker 2>I think some of.

1:21:15.840 --> 1:21:20.439
<v Speaker 3>The production value should be very high. Like all of

1:21:20.479 --> 1:21:24.599
<v Speaker 3>those things are working in its favor. My biggest take

1:21:25.240 --> 1:21:29.840
<v Speaker 3>on this though, is that for it to succeed, the

1:21:29.920 --> 1:21:34.120
<v Speaker 3>gameplay itself needs to be very compelling. And I feel

1:21:34.120 --> 1:21:38.040
<v Speaker 3>that way about all sports. And this might be overly analytical,

1:21:38.080 --> 1:21:41.160
<v Speaker 3>but like part of the reason the NFL is so popular,

1:21:41.160 --> 1:21:42.959
<v Speaker 3>and I know people are a little tired of comparison

1:21:43.000 --> 1:21:48.639
<v Speaker 3>to other sports, but the NFL gameplay is ridiculously good, right.

1:21:48.920 --> 1:21:53.720
<v Speaker 3>The rules are good, it's dynamic, the gameplay evolves like

1:21:54.120 --> 1:21:57.800
<v Speaker 3>they're constantly tweaking the rules considering how to change things.

1:21:58.520 --> 1:22:03.120
<v Speaker 3>I think that with tel they have pro I'm cautiously

1:22:03.160 --> 1:22:07.040
<v Speaker 3>optimistic about the format they've landed on with the triples

1:22:07.080 --> 1:22:10.439
<v Speaker 3>and the singles, and then also like the hammer element

1:22:10.720 --> 1:22:12.439
<v Speaker 3>that that maybe we can get into a little bit.

1:22:12.439 --> 1:22:15.000
<v Speaker 3>Like I actually think they've done a potentially pretty good

1:22:15.080 --> 1:22:18.839
<v Speaker 3>job with the gameplay. I'm very concerned about the design

1:22:18.880 --> 1:22:21.639
<v Speaker 3>of the golf holes, and people might be a little

1:22:21.640 --> 1:22:24.439
<v Speaker 3>bit dismissive of that, but I think this was a

1:22:24.640 --> 1:22:27.720
<v Speaker 3>massive opportunity to get crazy with the golf holes and

1:22:27.840 --> 1:22:30.360
<v Speaker 3>make that the star of the show. The more you're

1:22:30.360 --> 1:22:32.680
<v Speaker 3>going to rely on the golfers being the stars of

1:22:32.720 --> 1:22:35.439
<v Speaker 3>the show and them being interesting, miked up, that's got

1:22:35.479 --> 1:22:37.240
<v Speaker 3>no chance but if.

1:22:37.120 --> 1:22:40.759
<v Speaker 1>That's a great point, A great point is like nobody

1:22:40.800 --> 1:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>tunes into the NFL because of the personality of the players.

1:22:44.640 --> 1:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Now nobody tunes into the NBA because of the personality

1:22:49.040 --> 1:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of the players, like kind of tune into sports because

1:22:53.080 --> 1:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of the gameplay and which.

1:22:55.200 --> 1:22:59.240
<v Speaker 3>Produces those which produces those personalities and those stars like that.

1:22:59.240 --> 1:23:01.840
<v Speaker 3>That is the part that I will hammer home. The

1:23:01.880 --> 1:23:05.040
<v Speaker 3>gameplay itself, if it's electric, then you won't even miss

1:23:05.240 --> 1:23:08.200
<v Speaker 3>that Scotti Scheffler isn't there because the guys are competitive

1:23:08.200 --> 1:23:09.880
<v Speaker 3>and they're going to be into it, and it's gonna

1:23:09.880 --> 1:23:12.599
<v Speaker 3>be fun to watch the different shots they're hitting. All

1:23:12.640 --> 1:23:15.799
<v Speaker 3>that comes with it. If the gameplay itself isn't that compelling,

1:23:16.080 --> 1:23:19.439
<v Speaker 3>and they're hanging their hats on the golfers being interesting,

1:23:19.520 --> 1:23:21.760
<v Speaker 3>miked up and some of the banter, then this thing's

1:23:21.800 --> 1:23:23.960
<v Speaker 3>done on arrival. So that's my overarching take.

1:23:24.760 --> 1:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>PJ your thoughts.

1:23:27.560 --> 1:23:31.680
<v Speaker 6>I am most intrigued as to the ESPN buy in

1:23:32.120 --> 1:23:35.920
<v Speaker 6>on this and how seriously they take it with the

1:23:35.960 --> 1:23:40.360
<v Speaker 6>distribution platforms. Obviously they're giving it a lot of primetime airtime,

1:23:40.560 --> 1:23:44.040
<v Speaker 6>which not like they have a ton going on between

1:23:44.200 --> 1:23:47.360
<v Speaker 6>January and March on Monday and Tuesday nights. So it's

1:23:47.479 --> 1:23:50.880
<v Speaker 6>nice that golf and the PGA Tour has kind of

1:23:51.200 --> 1:23:54.439
<v Speaker 6>gotten that market for them, But how are they promoting

1:23:54.479 --> 1:23:57.559
<v Speaker 6>it on social? How aggressive are they cross promoting it

1:23:57.600 --> 1:24:01.080
<v Speaker 6>on other platforms? Like you said, the first match has

1:24:01.160 --> 1:24:03.240
<v Speaker 6>the lead in from the National Championship the night before.

1:24:03.280 --> 1:24:05.320
<v Speaker 6>The second week is going to be the Monday night

1:24:05.320 --> 1:24:08.280
<v Speaker 6>Wildcard game for the NFL. So those are the two

1:24:08.320 --> 1:24:10.760
<v Speaker 6>biggest audiences that ESPN is going to have all year,

1:24:11.200 --> 1:24:13.519
<v Speaker 6>that is leading into the first two weeks of this.

1:24:15.160 --> 1:24:18.280
<v Speaker 6>How many people cross over to the next night? You

1:24:18.320 --> 1:24:22.479
<v Speaker 6>watch the wild Card game on Monday night and then

1:24:22.520 --> 1:24:25.840
<v Speaker 6>you watch the first Jupiter Links match because they're advertising

1:24:25.880 --> 1:24:30.519
<v Speaker 6>Tiger during the Wildcard game. How aggressive is ESPN doing that?

1:24:30.680 --> 1:24:33.639
<v Speaker 6>How much does ESPN want this to succeed versus how

1:24:33.720 --> 1:24:36.799
<v Speaker 6>much does you know the PGA Tour or the sport

1:24:36.800 --> 1:24:37.920
<v Speaker 6>of golf or whoever else?

1:24:39.120 --> 1:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean the ESPN thing. I think they are

1:24:42.920 --> 1:24:46.479
<v Speaker 1>going to push it the more successful it is, right,

1:24:47.160 --> 1:24:49.559
<v Speaker 1>I think they are at the point where they have

1:24:50.080 --> 1:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, they they know pretty quickly what's going to

1:24:53.800 --> 1:24:57.640
<v Speaker 1>be a success. They probably have a very robust analytics

1:24:57.720 --> 1:25:02.880
<v Speaker 1>team that understands like what things can pop based off

1:25:02.920 --> 1:25:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of early numbers. And I would say, like, you know,

1:25:07.200 --> 1:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think this is like you hit on the core

1:25:10.360 --> 1:25:13.599
<v Speaker 1>points here, like if we talk about golf formatting and

1:25:13.720 --> 1:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>like how could golf draw a bigger audience like right now,

1:25:17.479 --> 1:25:21.679
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of golf events happen in the summer,

1:25:22.439 --> 1:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of weekend days. Like that's not necessarily

1:25:26.240 --> 1:25:29.479
<v Speaker 1>like a captive audience. If you think about like the

1:25:29.640 --> 1:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>history of watching television, summer is just dead because like

1:25:36.320 --> 1:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>people are outside there, shows are new shows aren't being

1:25:40.040 --> 1:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>released right like when it was network television was like

1:25:44.160 --> 1:25:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the primary show. No new shows were being released in

1:25:47.200 --> 1:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the summer. Baseball is really the only sport other than

1:25:50.680 --> 1:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>golf that's that's going, and there's like you know, they

1:25:54.280 --> 1:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of thrive on tonnage. There's so many games. So

1:25:57.640 --> 1:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>if you think about this, it gets golf into a

1:26:02.439 --> 1:26:06.479
<v Speaker 1>window that they otherwise wouldn't be able to get to

1:26:06.880 --> 1:26:10.519
<v Speaker 1>because in the winter in America, days are short, it

1:26:10.560 --> 1:26:14.599
<v Speaker 1>gets dark really early. This is the indoor golf screen.

1:26:14.600 --> 1:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Golf's the only way outside of playing in Australia that

1:26:18.920 --> 1:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>golf or let's just say South America that golf could

1:26:23.080 --> 1:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>get into this Monday night. Tuesday night, people are at home,

1:26:28.080 --> 1:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>it's winter, most of the countries inside, they they're looking

1:26:32.479 --> 1:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for things to take up their time. This is this

1:26:35.920 --> 1:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is the This is where I think, like it has

1:26:38.920 --> 1:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to work for golf. I don't think you get many

1:26:41.960 --> 1:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to be on network TV with a format in

1:26:47.000 --> 1:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>primetime during the week on the biggest sports network. There

1:26:52.080 --> 1:26:55.519
<v Speaker 1>is like there. This is why I think like and

1:26:55.600 --> 1:26:57.479
<v Speaker 1>I think we could get into the gameplay a little

1:26:57.479 --> 1:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>bit like why I think it has to work, and

1:27:02.040 --> 1:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know, I don't know if it's necessarily

1:27:04.520 --> 1:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>set up for success year one. I think a lot

1:27:06.760 --> 1:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of people are going to be kind of like what

1:27:09.320 --> 1:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is this. They're going to have a lot of figuring

1:27:12.120 --> 1:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>out to do. And I do agree with you, Joseph,

1:27:15.320 --> 1:27:18.719
<v Speaker 1>like the golf holes. It to me seems like one

1:27:19.439 --> 1:27:24.559
<v Speaker 1>architect of the three they picked actually understood the task.

1:27:24.880 --> 1:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And whether whether he's executed the task or not is

1:27:29.040 --> 1:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>another question. But you know, like, I think the golf

1:27:32.680 --> 1:27:39.120
<v Speaker 1>holes are probably the for this audience that listens to

1:27:39.200 --> 1:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, probably the most compelling thing. But like, you know,

1:27:41.800 --> 1:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the world is their oyster. They can make anything, and

1:27:45.040 --> 1:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you can put these these golfers in perplexing situations. If

1:27:50.880 --> 1:27:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to look at all the golf holes, you

1:27:52.680 --> 1:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>can go to TGL dot com or TGL golf dot

1:27:56.840 --> 1:28:01.439
<v Speaker 1>com and and under TGL explained there's like vignettes on

1:28:01.520 --> 1:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>every hole. The way they're going to be put together

1:28:04.960 --> 1:28:08.559
<v Speaker 1>is they're gonna be mixing matched, so they have, you know,

1:28:08.760 --> 1:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a big set of holes. It's not gonna be the

1:28:11.040 --> 1:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>same holes every time. But I think their idea is

1:28:14.040 --> 1:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>like we're gonna find some favorites that we want to have,

1:28:17.080 --> 1:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>like people are gonna love, and we're gonna have in

1:28:19.400 --> 1:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>every match the holes, Like, I definitely think that they

1:28:23.200 --> 1:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>are this is the first ear of golf holes. I

1:28:26.920 --> 1:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>think that they are keenly aware that there there are

1:28:32.280 --> 1:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>holes that are winners and losers in this batch. What

1:28:35.880 --> 1:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>are your biggest complaints with the holes, Joseph.

1:28:38.920 --> 1:28:41.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, honestly, I'm skeptical that there are that many winners

1:28:42.000 --> 1:28:45.760
<v Speaker 3>in this batch. Like my vision for TGL would be

1:28:45.760 --> 1:28:48.719
<v Speaker 3>that you have almost no constraints. You have one massive

1:28:48.760 --> 1:28:52.280
<v Speaker 3>constraint in that the green zone can only shift around

1:28:52.320 --> 1:28:55.240
<v Speaker 3>a little bit and it's surrounded by the same three bunkers.

1:28:55.360 --> 1:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, see, this is what I don't understand. So they've

1:28:58.920 --> 1:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>built like you, they play around the greens and on

1:29:01.960 --> 1:29:05.559
<v Speaker 1>the greens in the stadium fifty yards and in fifty

1:29:05.600 --> 1:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>yards and in is on the stadium, and they have

1:29:08.000 --> 1:29:12.479
<v Speaker 1>a green that's structured like a certain way, so it

1:29:12.560 --> 1:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>has the same bunkers and the same general shape. What

1:29:17.360 --> 1:29:20.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand why can't they just like rope off

1:29:20.640 --> 1:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>part of the area for certain holes. Why can't the

1:29:24.000 --> 1:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>green get smaller or bigger? And why can't certain bunkers

1:29:28.360 --> 1:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>be turned off and certain bunkers turned on. That's why

1:29:31.840 --> 1:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't get. I would like to see that.

1:29:34.720 --> 1:29:37.479
<v Speaker 3>One thing I think they can do is is shrink

1:29:37.560 --> 1:29:39.840
<v Speaker 3>the effective area so it's not always fifty yards and

1:29:39.880 --> 1:29:42.240
<v Speaker 3>in like there's one part three where they've removed a

1:29:42.280 --> 1:29:44.519
<v Speaker 3>lot of that area and it's just the green and

1:29:44.600 --> 1:29:47.320
<v Speaker 3>the bunkers and like a little bit of the surrounds.

1:29:47.320 --> 1:29:50.000
<v Speaker 3>But I'm with you, Andy, I wish you could move

1:29:50.040 --> 1:29:52.200
<v Speaker 3>the bunkers around a little bit. I'm sure it's difficult,

1:29:52.200 --> 1:29:54.639
<v Speaker 3>but to get to your question about why I think

1:29:54.680 --> 1:29:58.280
<v Speaker 3>they're bad to me, like, and I mean, this is

1:29:58.320 --> 1:30:02.320
<v Speaker 3>a serious architecture. Take about how you test professional golfers.

1:30:02.360 --> 1:30:07.400
<v Speaker 3>But I think great architecture for professional golfers has three

1:30:07.520 --> 1:30:11.040
<v Speaker 3>characteristics that I've landed on. One, there needs to be

1:30:11.240 --> 1:30:14.679
<v Speaker 3>a penalty to a narrow miss and a significant penalty

1:30:14.720 --> 1:30:16.759
<v Speaker 3>to a wider miss, So that would be one principle.

1:30:17.040 --> 1:30:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Principal two would be players need to hit different types

1:30:20.080 --> 1:30:21.920
<v Speaker 3>of shots, not just stock shots.

1:30:22.000 --> 1:30:22.400
<v Speaker 2>And then the.

1:30:22.360 --> 1:30:24.679
<v Speaker 3>Third would be that when the ball hits the ground

1:30:24.960 --> 1:30:27.360
<v Speaker 3>there needs to be intrigue. To me, this is a

1:30:27.360 --> 1:30:30.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of just stock shots into holes that don't even

1:30:30.120 --> 1:30:33.880
<v Speaker 3>necessarily have great risk reward profiles, and.

1:30:33.840 --> 1:30:34.759
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna get boring.

1:30:35.280 --> 1:30:39.120
<v Speaker 3>I like Andy I would have I would have hazards

1:30:39.160 --> 1:30:41.720
<v Speaker 3>in the air, and I'm not kidding about that, like

1:30:42.439 --> 1:30:45.240
<v Speaker 3>a center line hazard in the sky that you have

1:30:45.320 --> 1:30:47.240
<v Speaker 3>to curve it around one.

1:30:47.040 --> 1:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Way or the other, like I would have been.

1:30:49.080 --> 1:30:52.320
<v Speaker 3>This should be completely like hitting it into pipes, where

1:30:52.680 --> 1:30:54.519
<v Speaker 3>if you hit it into the pipe, it shoots it

1:30:54.560 --> 1:30:56.519
<v Speaker 3>out way down the fairway. If you miss, you're in

1:30:56.560 --> 1:30:58.960
<v Speaker 3>the water. Like this should have been nuts And a

1:30:59.000 --> 1:31:02.400
<v Speaker 3>lot of these holes they wouldn't be interesting in real life,

1:31:02.520 --> 1:31:05.519
<v Speaker 3>let alone in simulator golf. So I just think the

1:31:05.640 --> 1:31:06.599
<v Speaker 3>failure to lean.

1:31:06.479 --> 1:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Into the Nicholas holes are flat out bad. They're flat

1:31:10.439 --> 1:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>bad holes on golf courses, and they're even worse when

1:31:16.800 --> 1:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you consider there's no constraints. It's like they literally like

1:31:20.760 --> 1:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>gave it to their junior associate and said, scribble out

1:31:24.439 --> 1:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>some golf holes.

1:31:25.920 --> 1:31:27.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the par threes are going to be really

1:31:27.960 --> 1:31:28.920
<v Speaker 3>boring because the.

1:31:28.880 --> 1:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Problem with the par threes is that they have the

1:31:30.760 --> 1:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>same bunker and green shape.

1:31:32.680 --> 1:31:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, so that that's where I'm there's some concern.

1:31:37.520 --> 1:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, like the other what you said about the

1:31:39.720 --> 1:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>ball hitting the ground and rolling, everything I've seen from it.

1:31:43.160 --> 1:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Every shot i've seen hit in in the screen, the

1:31:45.880 --> 1:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>giant screen, the three Dinosaurs can fitted every every shot

1:31:52.400 --> 1:31:55.679
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the ball has like kind of landed really softly,

1:31:57.120 --> 1:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And I would love to see, like, can we just

1:31:59.200 --> 1:32:02.519
<v Speaker 1>like ramp up, like we know the best golf is

1:32:02.960 --> 1:32:05.960
<v Speaker 1>when the greens are firm and the ball's rolling. Could

1:32:06.000 --> 1:32:10.080
<v Speaker 1>we just like set the simulator to produce us baked

1:32:10.080 --> 1:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>out links conditions and it in the format would infinitely

1:32:14.439 --> 1:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>get better.

1:32:15.760 --> 1:32:18.479
<v Speaker 3>Andy, I think there should be like trampolines in some

1:32:18.520 --> 1:32:20.759
<v Speaker 3>of the fair ways, like speed slots. I'm not kidding

1:32:20.760 --> 1:32:21.800
<v Speaker 3>where you hit a certain.

1:32:21.560 --> 1:32:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Spot, you could put a cart path right down the middle,

1:32:23.840 --> 1:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>like the Design Disasters hole at hicksything else you.

1:32:27.160 --> 1:32:30.080
<v Speaker 3>Kid, But I'm I'm that's what this should look like

1:32:30.160 --> 1:32:33.439
<v Speaker 3>to me, like completely alternative form of golf. When you

1:32:33.560 --> 1:32:35.639
<v Speaker 3>turned a lot of these holes on that you mentioned

1:32:35.880 --> 1:32:39.280
<v Speaker 3>tglgolf dot com backslash holes. You can look at them.

1:32:39.560 --> 1:32:41.880
<v Speaker 3>It's not gonna play dynamically, and to me, that's a

1:32:41.920 --> 1:32:44.800
<v Speaker 3>colossal failure in a simulator league where you should there

1:32:44.840 --> 1:32:48.960
<v Speaker 3>are virtually no constraints besides the green zone. So that's

1:32:49.240 --> 1:32:50.120
<v Speaker 3>that's a big take for me.

1:32:50.439 --> 1:32:50.719
<v Speaker 5>PJ.

1:32:50.880 --> 1:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you have anything that you're skeptical or bullish about.

1:32:55.240 --> 1:32:59.400
<v Speaker 6>I am wondering how the forty second shot clock is

1:32:59.439 --> 1:33:02.320
<v Speaker 6>going to work for the TV aspect of this, because

1:33:02.400 --> 1:33:05.960
<v Speaker 6>forty seconds in reality is not that much time.

1:33:06.160 --> 1:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>So if we are you think that's about the Is

1:33:08.400 --> 1:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that the play clock for the NFL forty seconds?

1:33:11.520 --> 1:33:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's so quick.

1:33:13.600 --> 1:33:13.840
<v Speaker 4>And.

1:33:15.400 --> 1:33:17.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you gotta put this out.

1:33:17.400 --> 1:33:19.920
<v Speaker 6>We gotta take a time out, ten second runoff, all

1:33:20.280 --> 1:33:23.479
<v Speaker 6>that good stuff. But seriously, like, if this is based

1:33:23.520 --> 1:33:27.519
<v Speaker 6>on the personalities of the players and they're gonna want

1:33:27.680 --> 1:33:31.400
<v Speaker 6>these viral clips of you know, Tom Kim talking to

1:33:31.479 --> 1:33:34.719
<v Speaker 6>Kevin Kisner or whatever. If it's only forty seconds between

1:33:34.800 --> 1:33:38.439
<v Speaker 6>each shot, how much time do you realistically have for

1:33:38.840 --> 1:33:42.760
<v Speaker 6>these made for TV moments outside of the actual golf

1:33:42.760 --> 1:33:46.000
<v Speaker 6>shots themselves. I know, I'm sure there's gonna be you know,

1:33:46.280 --> 1:33:49.280
<v Speaker 6>mid match interviews and whatnot, Like there's going to be

1:33:49.320 --> 1:33:53.400
<v Speaker 6>obviously a TV aspect to this, but the forty second

1:33:53.439 --> 1:33:57.599
<v Speaker 6>shot clock is is well A I think it's gonna

1:33:57.640 --> 1:34:00.160
<v Speaker 6>be interesting to see if there are any nega of

1:34:00.200 --> 1:34:02.600
<v Speaker 6>reactions to this from the players, because then maybe we

1:34:02.600 --> 1:34:04.840
<v Speaker 6>can get a shot clock and actual golf at some point,

1:34:05.160 --> 1:34:08.320
<v Speaker 6>But then, b how does that work out for the

1:34:08.360 --> 1:34:12.920
<v Speaker 6>television product and the miked up aspect of this?

1:34:13.840 --> 1:34:16.559
<v Speaker 1>I think I think for the television product, and I've

1:34:16.600 --> 1:34:19.679
<v Speaker 1>always said this with regards to shot clock and golf,

1:34:19.760 --> 1:34:23.599
<v Speaker 1>it's like groundbreaking because like, for the first time in golf,

1:34:23.640 --> 1:34:26.599
<v Speaker 1>an announcer knows when somebody's get hit a shot, and

1:34:26.640 --> 1:34:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you can build your entire like discourse and graphics and

1:34:34.080 --> 1:34:37.880
<v Speaker 1>everything the camera, like how you interchange. Like this is

1:34:37.920 --> 1:34:43.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be an infinitely better television product for golf

1:34:43.520 --> 1:34:47.919
<v Speaker 1>because it's a fix it's a fixed location like everybody

1:34:47.920 --> 1:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>complains about golf coverage. It's like, well, like they're having

1:34:52.160 --> 1:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to broadcast two hundred acres of a field, like most

1:34:56.880 --> 1:35:02.280
<v Speaker 1>sports are on a court, right, Like, so it's already

1:35:02.320 --> 1:35:05.679
<v Speaker 1>an infinitely hard job because like you have eighteen playing

1:35:05.720 --> 1:35:09.760
<v Speaker 1>fields effectively that are massive, that are bigger than any

1:35:09.800 --> 1:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>other playing field, and you don't know when the players

1:35:13.880 --> 1:35:16.080
<v Speaker 1>are going to pull the triggers. The other thing here,

1:35:16.360 --> 1:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you have an effective court one playing field, and you

1:35:20.400 --> 1:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>know exactly when the players are going to hit the shot,

1:35:23.200 --> 1:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>so that I think the telecast as they learn, like

1:35:27.960 --> 1:35:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd be curious, like have they done practice matches with

1:35:30.840 --> 1:35:35.519
<v Speaker 1>the broadcast partner. I assume they have. They they have

1:35:35.640 --> 1:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to have because like you could really build, Like I

1:35:39.040 --> 1:35:41.240
<v Speaker 1>think this is another thing to be bullish about. Like

1:35:41.680 --> 1:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>with the way that this is set up, I think

1:35:44.200 --> 1:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you can build probably as you know, you're not going

1:35:48.120 --> 1:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to reach a major, but you're going to build a

1:35:49.840 --> 1:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty compelling golf product.

1:35:52.439 --> 1:35:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Especially if the gameplay is good. And that's where I'm

1:35:54.360 --> 1:35:57.600
<v Speaker 3>optimistic about the role that Roberto Castro has played in

1:35:57.600 --> 1:36:00.519
<v Speaker 3>some of this a frequent Friday guests. I know he's

1:36:00.640 --> 1:36:03.960
<v Speaker 3>run through this with buddies and getting it all set

1:36:04.040 --> 1:36:07.640
<v Speaker 3>up and engineering what this format should look like. The

1:36:08.160 --> 1:36:12.360
<v Speaker 3>hammer part of this is pretty cool, Andy, Like, at any.

1:36:12.160 --> 1:36:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Point, can you explain the hammer part of this forever?

1:36:14.680 --> 1:36:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:36:14.960 --> 1:36:17.760
<v Speaker 3>So, at any given point, one of the teams has

1:36:17.800 --> 1:36:21.040
<v Speaker 3>possession of the hammer, And my understanding is they can

1:36:21.120 --> 1:36:23.880
<v Speaker 3>throw it at any point during the hole when they

1:36:23.880 --> 1:36:26.360
<v Speaker 3>feel like they have an advantage, and it adds a

1:36:26.400 --> 1:36:30.080
<v Speaker 3>point to the point value that they're playing that hole for,

1:36:30.760 --> 1:36:33.840
<v Speaker 3>and if their opponent accepts it, it adds that point

1:36:33.880 --> 1:36:36.479
<v Speaker 3>value to the whole. If the opponent declines it, then

1:36:36.479 --> 1:36:38.200
<v Speaker 3>they can see the hole and they can see the

1:36:38.240 --> 1:36:41.639
<v Speaker 3>point to the other team, so and then the possession

1:36:41.640 --> 1:36:43.840
<v Speaker 3>of the hammer changes into the other team. It's like,

1:36:45.040 --> 1:36:47.880
<v Speaker 3>again thinking that it could have as much complexity as

1:36:47.880 --> 1:36:49.920
<v Speaker 3>a sport like the NFL, Like, it's not going to

1:36:50.000 --> 1:36:52.360
<v Speaker 3>have that, but there might be these little things baked in,

1:36:52.479 --> 1:36:55.200
<v Speaker 3>like when do you take your time outs? Who hits

1:36:55.240 --> 1:36:57.479
<v Speaker 3>on each hole? Like when do you throw the hammer?

1:36:57.560 --> 1:37:02.000
<v Speaker 3>There's a referee, like it actually has some additional elements

1:37:02.000 --> 1:37:03.920
<v Speaker 3>for people to sink their teeth into that I think

1:37:03.920 --> 1:37:06.719
<v Speaker 3>could be pretty compelling, and I think the game format

1:37:06.840 --> 1:37:09.240
<v Speaker 3>could end up being pretty fast paced and compelling. Right,

1:37:09.280 --> 1:37:11.360
<v Speaker 3>it's mainly the golf holes. I'm skeptical of the rest

1:37:11.360 --> 1:37:11.519
<v Speaker 3>of it.

1:37:11.600 --> 1:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Kind of makes sense, yeah, I think like that's where

1:37:16.840 --> 1:37:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there should be a lot of optimism. Do

1:37:19.400 --> 1:37:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys have a favorite team? Who's who's your team?

1:37:22.280 --> 1:37:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm wearing my Ballfrogs hat. I was the you know,

1:37:25.120 --> 1:37:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I think I was maybe fan number one of the

1:37:28.120 --> 1:37:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of the Frogs. Do you guys have teams picked out?

1:37:34.240 --> 1:37:35.280
<v Speaker 2>I mean, go ahead, PJ.

1:37:35.600 --> 1:37:40.560
<v Speaker 6>I'm riding with my my ny GC. I have to,

1:37:40.640 --> 1:37:44.920
<v Speaker 6>you know, slidarity with Steve cohen selidarity with young a

1:37:45.000 --> 1:37:45.880
<v Speaker 6>long islander.

1:37:46.680 --> 1:37:48.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have to stick with your roots.

1:37:48.840 --> 1:37:51.200
<v Speaker 6>I got a hometown team, unlike you who does not

1:37:51.320 --> 1:37:54.360
<v Speaker 6>have a hometown team somehow, but the third the third

1:37:54.400 --> 1:37:57.240
<v Speaker 6>biggest media market in the country doesn't have doesn't have

1:37:57.280 --> 1:37:57.679
<v Speaker 6>a team.

1:37:58.040 --> 1:38:02.479
<v Speaker 1>I could have been an SF fan, though. My issue

1:38:02.520 --> 1:38:04.439
<v Speaker 1>is that our star player has never been to the

1:38:04.479 --> 1:38:06.840
<v Speaker 1>city that is.

1:38:06.920 --> 1:38:08.200
<v Speaker 5>That is a real issue.

1:38:09.439 --> 1:38:11.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm New York GC through and through as well.

1:38:11.479 --> 1:38:11.799
<v Speaker 2>PJ.

1:38:12.120 --> 1:38:14.639
<v Speaker 3>I'm not from there originally, but have some roots out there,

1:38:14.720 --> 1:38:17.160
<v Speaker 3>and I do believe if there's ever been a golfer

1:38:17.520 --> 1:38:21.320
<v Speaker 3>who is as positioned for simulator golf as Cam Young,

1:38:21.520 --> 1:38:24.559
<v Speaker 3>then I'd be shocked if you talk about a player

1:38:24.600 --> 1:38:26.880
<v Speaker 3>whose struggles come on and around the green I think

1:38:26.920 --> 1:38:29.400
<v Speaker 3>the green zone is a massive band aid on that,

1:38:29.800 --> 1:38:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and Cam Young is just I don't know if it's

1:38:31.960 --> 1:38:34.400
<v Speaker 3>going to be a good thing for him or a

1:38:34.439 --> 1:38:36.720
<v Speaker 3>bad thing for him. If he's like he's going to

1:38:36.760 --> 1:38:38.960
<v Speaker 3>become the punchline of a joke, if he's just absolutely

1:38:39.040 --> 1:38:41.960
<v Speaker 3>elite at simulator golf and then finishes T eight in

1:38:42.040 --> 1:38:44.040
<v Speaker 3>majors and can never win a PGA Tour event. But

1:38:44.080 --> 1:38:47.320
<v Speaker 3>I think that might be exactly what we see.

1:38:47.760 --> 1:38:50.720
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have a big New York Boston rivalry.

1:38:50.800 --> 1:38:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean this is I've never never I've only experienced

1:38:54.240 --> 1:38:56.360
<v Speaker 1>this from the outside. Now now I'm in the throes

1:38:56.439 --> 1:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of it with my Ballfrogs.

1:38:58.160 --> 1:39:00.920
<v Speaker 6>I don't know, are people going to turn on Keegan

1:39:01.000 --> 1:39:03.439
<v Speaker 6>at best page if the ball Frogs have a great

1:39:03.439 --> 1:39:06.479
<v Speaker 6>seasons as the headliner of a of a Boston team.

1:39:06.920 --> 1:39:10.360
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing He's got, the Saint John's connection. Though

1:39:10.439 --> 1:39:14.360
<v Speaker 1>he can play. Has anybody ever you know played both

1:39:14.400 --> 1:39:18.240
<v Speaker 1>sides of the Boston New York rivalry as much as Belle's.

1:39:18.000 --> 1:39:21.759
<v Speaker 6>Keegan no no, Johnny Damon, Keegan Bradley.

1:39:23.200 --> 1:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>That's that's the list. All right, Well we'll be excited.

1:39:27.160 --> 1:39:30.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm gonna be locked in uh for this on

1:39:30.760 --> 1:39:33.559
<v Speaker 1>uh on Tuesday. What is it the eighth?

1:39:33.680 --> 1:39:33.920
<v Speaker 5>Yes?

1:39:35.320 --> 1:39:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Seven seventh seven seventh seventh?

1:39:37.439 --> 1:39:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Can wait?

1:39:37.920 --> 1:39:39.639
<v Speaker 3>Can I throw one quick question at you guys?

1:39:39.960 --> 1:39:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

1:39:41.040 --> 1:39:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Which is the golfer that complains the most about where

1:39:43.760 --> 1:39:46.840
<v Speaker 3>his ball ends up that thinks the simulator technology is

1:39:46.920 --> 1:39:49.479
<v Speaker 3>not doing him justice? That Hey, I didn't hit that

1:39:49.520 --> 1:39:52.519
<v Speaker 3>ball there, the technology is a little off. Who whinds

1:39:52.600 --> 1:39:54.920
<v Speaker 3>the most? That's what I'm probably most interested in.

1:39:55.200 --> 1:39:57.559
<v Speaker 6>It's a shame that Yryl Hatton is not involved in

1:39:57.600 --> 1:39:59.960
<v Speaker 6>this because that was the first that's the first answer

1:40:00.120 --> 1:40:01.000
<v Speaker 6>they carry to my head.

1:40:01.320 --> 1:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I Mean, here's like the thing. I you scroll through

1:40:06.960 --> 1:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>this like list of players, right, and if we could

1:40:11.120 --> 1:40:13.639
<v Speaker 1>this is not a if we could just like take

1:40:13.680 --> 1:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a wand and and erase Lucas Glover. Let's say, I

1:40:20.240 --> 1:40:22.519
<v Speaker 1>don't know who else I want to pick out, but

1:40:22.640 --> 1:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like Lucas Glover a couple others from this list, and

1:40:26.680 --> 1:40:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we could replace it with like Bryson Brooks and Tyrrell.

1:40:32.360 --> 1:40:36.360
<v Speaker 1>It would get a lot more compelling Phil. Phil would

1:40:36.360 --> 1:40:41.880
<v Speaker 1>be electric in this type of atmosphere. Like you think about,

1:40:41.920 --> 1:40:44.840
<v Speaker 1>like what this could be with some of the personalities

1:40:44.880 --> 1:40:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that are on Live, some of the I would I

1:40:46.960 --> 1:40:50.559
<v Speaker 1>would say, quote unquote what people would label as bad actors.

1:40:50.760 --> 1:40:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, like one other thing that I brought up

1:40:53.320 --> 1:40:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in a conversation with Gabby on the other part of

1:40:56.400 --> 1:41:00.599
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, it's important to note this wouldn't exist without Live.

1:41:02.240 --> 1:41:04.920
<v Speaker 1>We would never have gotten here where this even is

1:41:04.960 --> 1:41:09.519
<v Speaker 1>a possibility. Without Live, the tour would have done what

1:41:09.520 --> 1:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>they always do, said oh that's a good idea, and

1:41:12.200 --> 1:41:15.120
<v Speaker 1>they would have like taken it to the conference rooms

1:41:15.160 --> 1:41:17.839
<v Speaker 1>and it would have died or morphed into something awful.

1:41:19.680 --> 1:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>The fact that this exists is purely because of the

1:41:24.160 --> 1:41:27.599
<v Speaker 1>position that that the tour was in, and you know

1:41:27.640 --> 1:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that allowed Tiger and Rory to really create this.

1:41:31.400 --> 1:41:33.639
<v Speaker 2>You know, not the answer I expected?

1:41:34.880 --> 1:41:38.000
<v Speaker 3>What not the answer I expected to which Golfer will

1:41:38.120 --> 1:41:39.760
<v Speaker 3>complain the most about where the ball ends up.

1:41:39.800 --> 1:41:41.360
<v Speaker 2>But I think a good point I'll take.

1:41:41.479 --> 1:41:43.800
<v Speaker 5>I'll take justin Rose to answer your question.

1:41:44.200 --> 1:41:46.559
<v Speaker 1>Maddy fitz has got to be high on the on

1:41:46.680 --> 1:41:47.559
<v Speaker 1>the list here.

1:41:47.439 --> 1:41:49.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, what are the driver rules for this if he

1:41:50.040 --> 1:41:52.280
<v Speaker 6>cracks his driver, is he allowed to switch it out?

1:41:52.600 --> 1:41:54.360
<v Speaker 5>Where does this we need the referetion?

1:41:54.439 --> 1:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul out his notebook and be like, look, I've hit

1:41:57.160 --> 1:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the shot four times in the last two years. Here

1:42:01.120 --> 1:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the logs.

1:42:04.080 --> 1:42:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Does does Fitzpatrick long these shots? Is a great I

1:42:06.760 --> 1:42:07.479
<v Speaker 2>think she does?

1:42:07.680 --> 1:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>He does?

1:42:08.400 --> 1:42:09.439
<v Speaker 2>He has to, right.

1:42:09.840 --> 1:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>That's the bit. There's the good news is there's a

1:42:13.320 --> 1:42:15.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a reporter that will tell us if

1:42:15.960 --> 1:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>he does or doesn't. You know, Danny Rapps is is

1:42:19.040 --> 1:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>ever president on the Matty fitz beat, so he will

1:42:22.360 --> 1:42:26.960
<v Speaker 1>he will let us know. I think I was gonna

1:42:26.960 --> 1:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>say what Going back to the holes, one thing I

1:42:30.400 --> 1:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>noticed this morning when I was going through them is

1:42:33.200 --> 1:42:35.559
<v Speaker 1>that I think I think Pisa has done the best

1:42:35.640 --> 1:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>job of every architect at at these holes. But he

1:42:40.280 --> 1:42:43.439
<v Speaker 1>did designed effectively the same hole three times. Did you

1:42:43.520 --> 1:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>notice this, Joseph. He's got three three split fairway holes

1:42:50.000 --> 1:42:53.679
<v Speaker 1>with like a narrow center. He did this three times.

1:42:54.640 --> 1:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>There are three of them. There's a par five a short,

1:42:58.160 --> 1:43:01.680
<v Speaker 1>part four in a in a long with effectively like

1:43:01.720 --> 1:43:03.719
<v Speaker 1>the same same concept.

1:43:03.960 --> 1:43:05.840
<v Speaker 3>He also did basically the same thing with some of

1:43:05.880 --> 1:43:08.240
<v Speaker 3>the triangle holes, like some of them are almost identical.

1:43:08.320 --> 1:43:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Like the Pisa understood that this should be out of

1:43:11.680 --> 1:43:13.519
<v Speaker 3>the box in a little bit nuts, he did not

1:43:13.760 --> 1:43:18.680
<v Speaker 3>understand risk reward profile of the modern golfer. So like

1:43:18.720 --> 1:43:21.519
<v Speaker 3>that's the plus and minus going on with Pisa there

1:43:21.560 --> 1:43:23.880
<v Speaker 3>the other two. I honestly don't think bo Welling did

1:43:23.920 --> 1:43:26.880
<v Speaker 3>a terrible job, but it's still like very conventional. And

1:43:26.920 --> 1:43:29.719
<v Speaker 3>then the Nicholas design gets an f it's it's it's

1:43:30.439 --> 1:43:33.880
<v Speaker 3>bad in real life and even scores lower marks for.

1:43:33.800 --> 1:43:34.920
<v Speaker 2>The lack of creativity.

1:43:34.960 --> 1:43:38.200
<v Speaker 3>So that's how I'm evaluating these three architects before this

1:43:38.200 --> 1:43:39.000
<v Speaker 3>thing gets underway.

1:43:39.400 --> 1:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was looking at the Pisa holes and I like,

1:43:43.960 --> 1:43:47.559
<v Speaker 1>like his overarching thoughts on them. But then I was

1:43:47.600 --> 1:43:49.920
<v Speaker 1>looking at them and I'm like, wait, these are like

1:43:50.520 --> 1:43:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the same holes, just like different yardages. I think one

1:43:55.400 --> 1:43:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest mistakes that all the architects made was

1:43:58.920 --> 1:44:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the yardages. Like these yardages should be insanely long, like

1:44:05.760 --> 1:44:09.320
<v Speaker 1>there should be there should be five hundred and seventy

1:44:09.439 --> 1:44:13.879
<v Speaker 1>yard par fours like this was the like the reason

1:44:13.960 --> 1:44:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have eight thousand and nine thousand yard

1:44:17.120 --> 1:44:21.800
<v Speaker 1>major championship golf courses, which is what we absolutely need

1:44:21.960 --> 1:44:28.519
<v Speaker 1>is because of of like resources space setting a bad

1:44:28.560 --> 1:44:36.280
<v Speaker 1>example like paining golf in a completely unsustainable are like realm.

1:44:36.280 --> 1:44:39.200
<v Speaker 1>But like if you're a golf architect, you should absolutely

1:44:39.280 --> 1:44:42.760
<v Speaker 1>understand that if you want holes to actually play out

1:44:42.800 --> 1:44:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the way you want them, these holes need to be

1:44:45.320 --> 1:44:48.880
<v Speaker 1>insanely long because these guys hit it three hundred and

1:44:48.880 --> 1:44:52.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards like these holes should be We should be

1:44:52.920 --> 1:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing guys pulling three wood hitting it, especially with the

1:44:57.120 --> 1:44:59.800
<v Speaker 1>limited amount that you could do at the green, Like

1:45:00.160 --> 1:45:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you have a very constrained green. So if I want

1:45:04.360 --> 1:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to create strategy, I have to build distance, and I

1:45:10.360 --> 1:45:13.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's like probably for me, the most disappointing thing

1:45:14.240 --> 1:45:17.599
<v Speaker 1>is that, like you see, it's like the yardages just

1:45:17.680 --> 1:45:19.840
<v Speaker 1>do not match up. There's a six hundred and twenty

1:45:19.840 --> 1:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>seven yard par five that's great, but like the longest

1:45:23.840 --> 1:45:29.519
<v Speaker 1>par four is let's see, I think it's five thirty five,

1:45:29.600 --> 1:45:33.240
<v Speaker 1>But that one's that one's set up elevation, that's alpine,

1:45:33.360 --> 1:45:36.559
<v Speaker 1>that's a Nicholas design, that's in the mountains.

1:45:37.800 --> 1:45:40.400
<v Speaker 3>You could have eight hundred yard holes where there's opportunities

1:45:40.439 --> 1:45:44.360
<v Speaker 3>like through I'll keep saying, like pipes and stuff to

1:45:44.439 --> 1:45:47.559
<v Speaker 3>maybe pipe it up like other. Yes, that's what it

1:45:47.560 --> 1:45:50.400
<v Speaker 3>should look, a little Mario golf esque like it really

1:45:50.439 --> 1:45:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I believe that that's the way that they should go.

1:45:53.280 --> 1:45:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I was like, I I've thought about holes, I've

1:45:57.800 --> 1:46:03.040
<v Speaker 1>sketched some out. I did a posts. You did one too, Joseph.

1:46:03.080 --> 1:46:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I did like a design. One of the things I

1:46:06.240 --> 1:46:09.439
<v Speaker 1>thought about is like something that would work really well

1:46:09.479 --> 1:46:13.719
<v Speaker 1>with simulator golf is that would mimic real life golf

1:46:13.800 --> 1:46:18.840
<v Speaker 1>is trees. Trees would work really well, especially for pro golfers,

1:46:18.880 --> 1:46:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Like you could make a whole look like a real

1:46:22.200 --> 1:46:26.519
<v Speaker 1>golf hole, but use trees as hazards and to create

1:46:26.560 --> 1:46:31.800
<v Speaker 1>different lines. Like to me, like, yeah, I the I

1:46:31.800 --> 1:46:33.519
<v Speaker 1>think the bunkers are going to be like the least

1:46:33.600 --> 1:46:37.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting aspect of this because it's like it's like perfect

1:46:37.400 --> 1:46:40.200
<v Speaker 1>sand and it's like effectively like a little sandbox that

1:46:40.240 --> 1:46:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you drop a ball in and you have a flat

1:46:42.280 --> 1:46:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you don't drop you place a ball in, you have

1:46:44.200 --> 1:46:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a perfect lie, a perfect flat lie. So like that

1:46:47.400 --> 1:46:50.479
<v Speaker 1>to me, like immediately, if I'm a golf architect and

1:46:50.520 --> 1:46:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I see that as the way the sand is, like, Okay,

1:46:53.920 --> 1:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to be very interesting. These guys are

1:46:56.040 --> 1:46:59.880
<v Speaker 1>so good. It's it's not a relevant hazard. So like,

1:47:00.120 --> 1:47:03.400
<v Speaker 1>what are the things that like I can put that

1:47:03.479 --> 1:47:07.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to make Like trees to me would scream

1:47:07.760 --> 1:47:10.599
<v Speaker 1>as a great, great thing, Like okay, I could put

1:47:10.960 --> 1:47:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I could put a three hundred foot redwood tree anywhere.

1:47:14.400 --> 1:47:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Force the guys to curve it, Yes, force them to

1:47:16.720 --> 1:47:17.400
<v Speaker 3>curve the ball.

1:47:18.000 --> 1:47:20.639
<v Speaker 1>It's it. I think that's what I like about pieces

1:47:20.680 --> 1:47:23.920
<v Speaker 1>holes is that there is like some you have to

1:47:23.960 --> 1:47:27.519
<v Speaker 1>make a decision what we don't see enough. Like so

1:47:27.560 --> 1:47:33.439
<v Speaker 1>when you combine the timer the shot clock with really

1:47:33.439 --> 1:47:37.679
<v Speaker 1>good design, I think like what you're going to see

1:47:37.920 --> 1:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is what you see with other sports, where players are

1:47:40.120 --> 1:47:44.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have to react quickly and make intentional decisions.

1:47:45.360 --> 1:47:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's how it wins. All right, Well,

1:47:48.920 --> 1:47:51.360
<v Speaker 1>any closing thoughts before we get out of here.

1:47:52.120 --> 1:47:53.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm I'm excited.

1:47:53.920 --> 1:47:57.720
<v Speaker 6>I actually I actually think this this whether it goes

1:47:57.720 --> 1:48:01.160
<v Speaker 6>in a positive very negative direction, this TVD, But I

1:48:01.240 --> 1:48:04.000
<v Speaker 6>actually I think this is going to be at least

1:48:04.000 --> 1:48:05.599
<v Speaker 6>for the first couple of weeks, it's gonna be pretty

1:48:05.600 --> 1:48:07.880
<v Speaker 6>fun to watch along to see to see what happens

1:48:07.920 --> 1:48:08.720
<v Speaker 6>at the outset here.

1:48:09.439 --> 1:48:10.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm super excited.

1:48:10.720 --> 1:48:14.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that the opportunity for funny stuff, whether it's

1:48:14.520 --> 1:48:17.280
<v Speaker 3>jokes about golfers who do well on a simulator but

1:48:17.320 --> 1:48:19.519
<v Speaker 3>not in real life. Like, there's gonna there's gonna be

1:48:19.600 --> 1:48:21.719
<v Speaker 3>so much content to come from this, and it's gonna

1:48:21.720 --> 1:48:25.599
<v Speaker 3>be something everyone's watching at the same time. I'm pretty excited.

1:48:25.640 --> 1:48:27.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it could work, And if they tweaked the

1:48:27.640 --> 1:48:29.240
<v Speaker 3>golf holes and made them a lot more creative, you

1:48:29.280 --> 1:48:31.879
<v Speaker 3>might actually have like a pretty legit product.

1:48:32.800 --> 1:48:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:48:33.320 --> 1:48:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the golf holes are are the obvious kind

1:48:38.800 --> 1:48:41.760
<v Speaker 1>of flaw here. I think like there's got to be

1:48:41.840 --> 1:48:45.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody in the room that tells them or that you know,

1:48:46.160 --> 1:48:48.639
<v Speaker 1>evaluates these holes before you put them on the screen.

1:48:48.880 --> 1:48:52.080
<v Speaker 1>To me, it just seems like every hole was rubber stamped.

1:48:52.240 --> 1:48:54.920
<v Speaker 1>It was just like oh this, thanks for sending this in.

1:48:56.560 --> 1:49:00.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, there needs to be some sort of vetting

1:49:00.760 --> 1:49:05.000
<v Speaker 1>process of like, okay, let's try this. Like that's the

1:49:05.000 --> 1:49:07.120
<v Speaker 1>beauty of this. It takes a second to build them,

1:49:08.120 --> 1:49:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you can have Roberto Castro play them or

1:49:11.680 --> 1:49:15.519
<v Speaker 1>Subway play them and in literally two minutes and be

1:49:15.600 --> 1:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>like Okay, this this works, this doesn't work. This is

1:49:19.120 --> 1:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>what they're gonna do every time. Here so all right,

1:49:23.880 --> 1:49:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited this is gonna kick off next week and

1:49:27.200 --> 1:49:29.559
<v Speaker 1>we'll I'm sure this will be I think this will be.

1:49:30.640 --> 1:49:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's great, whether it's meh, or whether it's lackluster,

1:49:34.920 --> 1:49:37.519
<v Speaker 1>it will be a big talking point of the golf

1:49:38.400 --> 1:49:52.240
<v Speaker 1>world the first quarter of this year. All Right, big

1:49:52.280 --> 1:49:56.400
<v Speaker 1>thanks to PJ for producing this episode. We will be

1:49:56.479 --> 1:50:00.000
<v Speaker 1>back next Wednesday with a new episode of the Friday

1:50:00.000 --> 1:50:03.679
<v Speaker 1>a Golf Podcast. Thank you to everybody for the support

1:50:03.800 --> 1:50:06.200
<v Speaker 1>and I hope you have a great start to your

1:50:06.200 --> 1:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five