1 00:00:03,760 --> 00:00:07,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to Wednesday. Assuming you're listening right away, because I 2 00:00:07,280 --> 00:00:10,840 Speaker 1: know you guys are immediately the download is coming through. 3 00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:13,680 Speaker 1: If our friends at Apple will ever get their podcast 4 00:00:13,720 --> 00:00:16,200 Speaker 1: situation straightened out, I know some of you, and I 5 00:00:16,200 --> 00:00:19,160 Speaker 1: apologize for that, are subscribing and wondering how come I'm 6 00:00:19,200 --> 00:00:21,160 Speaker 1: not getting a notification. Then you realize, oh my god, 7 00:00:21,160 --> 00:00:24,240 Speaker 1: I'm three podcasts behind. Come on, Apple, get your act together. 8 00:00:24,560 --> 00:00:27,240 Speaker 1: Obviously on YouTube and in the other places it's working 9 00:00:27,320 --> 00:00:30,120 Speaker 1: quite well. Our friends at Apple they need to figure 10 00:00:30,160 --> 00:00:32,959 Speaker 1: this out, and I have now come to find out 11 00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:35,320 Speaker 1: I'm not alone here. Quite a few podcasts, some on 12 00:00:35,360 --> 00:00:38,920 Speaker 1: the left, some on the right, some like me comfortably 13 00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:42,280 Speaker 1: or uncomfortably in the middle, are experiencing the same issues 14 00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:45,600 Speaker 1: with Apple, so clearly they haven't figured out what's wrong 15 00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:48,400 Speaker 1: with their podcast app and their most recent update. I 16 00:00:48,440 --> 00:00:53,080 Speaker 1: will let the technical rant go from there, but I 17 00:00:53,120 --> 00:00:55,400 Speaker 1: also want to promote what the rest of this podcast 18 00:00:55,400 --> 00:00:57,160 Speaker 1: is going to be about. Today. I'm going to do 19 00:00:57,200 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 1: a little update on all things twenty twenty six and 20 00:00:59,760 --> 00:01:02,200 Speaker 1: mid term and a few political items that have caught 21 00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:05,320 Speaker 1: my eye over the last forty eight hours. But I 22 00:01:05,360 --> 00:01:07,560 Speaker 1: also have a terrific conversation that I think you're going 23 00:01:07,640 --> 00:01:09,959 Speaker 1: to enjoy with Jane Coaston. You may know her from 24 00:01:09,959 --> 00:01:12,240 Speaker 1: The New York Times and some of her column writing there. 25 00:01:12,480 --> 00:01:14,640 Speaker 1: You may now know her from her daily podcast that's 26 00:01:14,640 --> 00:01:18,120 Speaker 1: part of the pod Save America, World, Crooked Media and 27 00:01:18,160 --> 00:01:21,400 Speaker 1: all of that. I've known her a long time. I've 28 00:01:21,400 --> 00:01:23,319 Speaker 1: had her as a guest of my podcast over the 29 00:01:23,400 --> 00:01:26,040 Speaker 1: various iterations that I've had, and let's just say, we 30 00:01:26,600 --> 00:01:29,920 Speaker 1: always seem to have plenty to talk about, and we 31 00:01:30,000 --> 00:01:32,400 Speaker 1: have a good time talking about it, whether it's handringing 32 00:01:32,440 --> 00:01:35,240 Speaker 1: about the media, talking politics, figuring out how to get 33 00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:39,480 Speaker 1: people to debate better, or perhaps most importantly, our collective 34 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:41,800 Speaker 1: love for college football and our collective hate for the SEC. 35 00:01:42,360 --> 00:01:46,080 Speaker 1: So if all those things are the ingredients that you 36 00:01:46,120 --> 00:01:48,160 Speaker 1: seem to like, and I think if you're subscribing to me, 37 00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:51,280 Speaker 1: you probably like a bit of all of those ingredients 38 00:01:51,280 --> 00:01:54,080 Speaker 1: in your conversation. Well, this one with Jane has all 39 00:01:54,120 --> 00:01:55,920 Speaker 1: of that and more. Before we get to it, I 40 00:01:55,920 --> 00:01:58,080 Speaker 1: thought I would share with you a little bit what 41 00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:01,280 Speaker 1: my lead topic is in my substat column this week, 42 00:02:02,280 --> 00:02:05,120 Speaker 1: and it's simply asking this question, who's the bigger liability 43 00:02:05,360 --> 00:02:09,639 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty six. So specifically, here's the question. It's 44 00:02:09,680 --> 00:02:11,880 Speaker 1: one both political parties are going to have to confront, 45 00:02:12,160 --> 00:02:14,760 Speaker 1: which are the two unpopular presidents Joe Biden or Donald 46 00:02:14,760 --> 00:02:17,000 Speaker 1: Trump is going to be the bigger political liability for 47 00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:20,760 Speaker 1: their party heading into twenty twenty six, Because yes, I believe, 48 00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:24,480 Speaker 1: no matter what both are liabilities, I do not envision 49 00:02:24,600 --> 00:02:27,240 Speaker 1: a moment where either Biden or Trump is a net 50 00:02:27,360 --> 00:02:31,760 Speaker 1: positive come November of twenty twenty six for either party, 51 00:02:32,280 --> 00:02:35,480 Speaker 1: and perhaps for any candidate. Maybe there's an exception or two, 52 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:39,280 Speaker 1: but I think that's a pretty safe bet. So the 53 00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:42,040 Speaker 1: question is which one is going to be a bigger drag, 54 00:02:42,240 --> 00:02:45,440 Speaker 1: who's got the heavier baggage for their party to carry well. 55 00:02:45,440 --> 00:02:48,320 Speaker 1: At first glance, you think, well, this is a simple answer. 56 00:02:48,320 --> 00:02:50,640 Speaker 1: It's Trump, right, He's the one who's been indeted investigated 57 00:02:50,680 --> 00:02:52,040 Speaker 1: in Peach. Oh, by the way, he's the one sitting 58 00:02:52,040 --> 00:02:55,040 Speaker 1: in office, and midterm elections are usually referendums on the 59 00:02:55,040 --> 00:02:58,000 Speaker 1: guy in office. Right, and we already know that Trump 60 00:02:58,040 --> 00:03:01,080 Speaker 1: is polarizing, has already had bad mid term in twenty eighteen, 61 00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:03,240 Speaker 1: and in some ways he made the twenty twenty two 62 00:03:03,280 --> 00:03:06,280 Speaker 1: midterms about himself, midterms don't go well for Trump and 63 00:03:06,320 --> 00:03:11,320 Speaker 1: his voters. So the likelihood that this thing is more 64 00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:14,240 Speaker 1: about Trump than anybody else is, you know, it's pretty 65 00:03:14,240 --> 00:03:18,320 Speaker 1: safe bet right. But we are talking about Trump here, right, 66 00:03:18,360 --> 00:03:21,600 Speaker 1: and his ability to loom over a cycle. Sometimes he 67 00:03:21,720 --> 00:03:25,400 Speaker 1: has the ability to sort of change the weather, so 68 00:03:25,520 --> 00:03:30,239 Speaker 1: to speak. So that takes me to Biden, and there's 69 00:03:30,280 --> 00:03:34,000 Speaker 1: some lessons from Trump that we can apply here, so 70 00:03:34,080 --> 00:03:36,400 Speaker 1: let's talk about him. It's rare that a former president 71 00:03:36,720 --> 00:03:38,760 Speaker 1: could cast a bigger shadow over the midterms than a 72 00:03:38,800 --> 00:03:42,720 Speaker 1: sitting president. You would say, boy, when did that last happen? 73 00:03:42,760 --> 00:03:45,080 Speaker 1: But guess what, you only have to go back literally 74 00:03:45,520 --> 00:03:48,520 Speaker 1: four years twenty twenty two to find an example. I 75 00:03:48,560 --> 00:03:50,720 Speaker 1: guess technically three years now, but I'm already speaking in 76 00:03:50,800 --> 00:03:53,760 Speaker 1: terms of twenty twenty six for what it's worth. But 77 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:57,600 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty two, Trump, a former president, had arguably 78 00:03:57,600 --> 00:04:00,200 Speaker 1: more influence over those midterms than Joe Biden did, the 79 00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:03,080 Speaker 1: sitting president, And that should be a bit of a 80 00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:05,680 Speaker 1: warning sign to Democrats. Just because your guys off the 81 00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:10,040 Speaker 1: stage doesn't mean voters won't stop holding your party accountable 82 00:04:10,360 --> 00:04:12,680 Speaker 1: for that party leader. Now, there are some things that 83 00:04:12,720 --> 00:04:14,760 Speaker 1: are different why was Trump still such a fourth in 84 00:04:14,800 --> 00:04:17,920 Speaker 1: twenty twenty two. Well, his base never left him. He 85 00:04:17,960 --> 00:04:20,680 Speaker 1: never conceded the twenty twenty election, and he got his 86 00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:23,320 Speaker 1: own supporters never to sort of concede that he lost, 87 00:04:23,640 --> 00:04:27,680 Speaker 1: which meant he never conceded leadership of the Republican Party, 88 00:04:27,160 --> 00:04:33,600 Speaker 1: and so he was able to galvanize his voters. Whatever 89 00:04:33,640 --> 00:04:35,719 Speaker 1: anger they had, they didn't apply it to him for 90 00:04:35,800 --> 00:04:39,680 Speaker 1: being the loser and costing the Republican Party leadership, but 91 00:04:39,880 --> 00:04:44,680 Speaker 1: instead he channeled their rage at others. Right now, he 92 00:04:44,760 --> 00:04:48,480 Speaker 1: handpicked candidates, and he had such influence that he perhaps 93 00:04:48,600 --> 00:04:51,960 Speaker 1: ended up siding with some really flawed candidates, and voters 94 00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:53,880 Speaker 1: didn't like it and they all flamed out. But he 95 00:04:54,000 --> 00:04:58,000 Speaker 1: shaped that cycle. And in many ways, the Republican underperformance 96 00:04:58,080 --> 00:05:00,360 Speaker 1: is because of Donald Trump, and because of the fact 97 00:05:00,400 --> 00:05:03,520 Speaker 1: in some ways voters may have been punishing the party 98 00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:06,560 Speaker 1: for not moving beyond Trump, at least those swing voters 99 00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:10,400 Speaker 1: in a midterm election. So now let's try to figure 100 00:05:10,440 --> 00:05:14,320 Speaker 1: out if Biden could end up stumbling into the same role. Right, 101 00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:17,240 Speaker 1: try to imagine Biden playing that kind of role in 102 00:05:17,240 --> 00:05:20,080 Speaker 1: twenty twenty six. Picture Joe. You'd have to picture Joe 103 00:05:20,080 --> 00:05:22,720 Speaker 1: Biden showing up to every swing district, forcing party leaders 104 00:05:22,720 --> 00:05:26,120 Speaker 1: to kiss his wing, and weighing in un primary battles. 105 00:05:26,760 --> 00:05:29,200 Speaker 1: It's just not who Biden is, right and frankly, it's 106 00:05:29,240 --> 00:05:32,279 Speaker 1: not what most Democrats want from him right now. You know, 107 00:05:32,960 --> 00:05:35,200 Speaker 1: base of the Republican Party still like Trump in twenty 108 00:05:35,200 --> 00:05:37,799 Speaker 1: two based of the Democratic Party does not not happy 109 00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:41,119 Speaker 1: with Joe Biden these days. And here's a bigger problem 110 00:05:41,120 --> 00:05:44,279 Speaker 1: potentially for Democrats. In twenty twenty one, Republicans were mad, 111 00:05:44,440 --> 00:05:46,840 Speaker 1: but they weren't mad at Trump, and twenty twenty five 112 00:05:46,839 --> 00:05:49,240 Speaker 1: Democrats are mad and a lot of that anger is 113 00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:52,200 Speaker 1: aimed at Biden. It's not exactly a recipe for influence. 114 00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:54,520 Speaker 1: So there's no Biden isis wing of the party. There's 115 00:05:54,520 --> 00:05:56,480 Speaker 1: no cadre of candidates that are going to run proudly 116 00:05:56,520 --> 00:05:59,560 Speaker 1: on the Biden legacy. And unlike Trump, he doesn't have 117 00:05:59,600 --> 00:06:04,080 Speaker 1: a culti personality capable of swinging up primary right. Tell 118 00:06:04,120 --> 00:06:07,840 Speaker 1: me outside the state of Delaware where Biden's influence could 119 00:06:07,880 --> 00:06:11,760 Speaker 1: literally move a primary campaign right now? It kind of that, 120 00:06:11,800 --> 00:06:14,240 Speaker 1: you could say, it might have in twenty eighteen when 121 00:06:14,279 --> 00:06:17,679 Speaker 1: he was a prospective candidate, but not now, not after 122 00:06:17,760 --> 00:06:20,479 Speaker 1: the disaster that he left the party in on that front. 123 00:06:21,360 --> 00:06:23,880 Speaker 1: Now you know that Republicans are going to do everything 124 00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:26,200 Speaker 1: they can to keep Biden in the spotlight. There'll be 125 00:06:26,640 --> 00:06:30,839 Speaker 1: attempts at investigations, hearings, conspiracies about medical records or why 126 00:06:30,880 --> 00:06:33,200 Speaker 1: he waited to drop out. Now, whether any of these 127 00:06:33,240 --> 00:06:37,000 Speaker 1: tactics gain traction legally doesn't really matter. They'll be designed 128 00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:41,680 Speaker 1: simply to muddy the waters. You could picture Trump using 129 00:06:41,680 --> 00:06:45,080 Speaker 1: his influence that he now has over the FBI and 130 00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:49,160 Speaker 1: the Department of Justice to at least concoct opening investigations. 131 00:06:49,640 --> 00:06:52,080 Speaker 1: You may not see a prosecution, you may not see 132 00:06:52,120 --> 00:06:55,040 Speaker 1: a trial, but that doesn't mean they don't open an 133 00:06:55,120 --> 00:06:59,400 Speaker 1: investigation and make sure everybody knows they've opened an investigation. 134 00:06:59,560 --> 00:07:02,680 Speaker 1: So that is likely, right, he is going on the 135 00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:04,960 Speaker 1: idiot and it might be about Hunter, and it might 136 00:07:04,960 --> 00:07:08,359 Speaker 1: be about all sorts of those things. And they're going 137 00:07:08,400 --> 00:07:10,040 Speaker 1: to try to keep Biden in the news. We've seen 138 00:07:10,080 --> 00:07:13,800 Speaker 1: it already. Trump constantly refers to the auto pen these days, right, 139 00:07:13,840 --> 00:07:17,840 Speaker 1: And he wants he believes that when Biden is long, 140 00:07:17,920 --> 00:07:20,880 Speaker 1: people may not like him, but like the old Biden 141 00:07:20,880 --> 00:07:23,680 Speaker 1: mantra as long as they're comparing him to the alternative, 142 00:07:24,040 --> 00:07:26,840 Speaker 1: than voters who may not like Biden are reminded, remember 143 00:07:26,880 --> 00:07:32,440 Speaker 1: what you really didn't like over here with Joe Biden. Now, 144 00:07:32,480 --> 00:07:34,920 Speaker 1: Trump does face a real problem here, Still deeply unpopular 145 00:07:34,960 --> 00:07:37,560 Speaker 1: with swing voters. His approval rating hasn't cracked forty five percent, 146 00:07:37,920 --> 00:07:40,280 Speaker 1: and unlike twenty sixteen or twenty twenty, he's not running 147 00:07:40,280 --> 00:07:43,520 Speaker 1: against a hypothetical future. He's back being the city president. 148 00:07:44,120 --> 00:07:47,000 Speaker 1: And he's not passing a new tax cut. He's just 149 00:07:47,120 --> 00:07:50,280 Speaker 1: literally reaffirming an old tax cut. He's got nothing to 150 00:07:50,400 --> 00:07:54,920 Speaker 1: deliver to voters, and that's you know, I cannot There's 151 00:07:55,040 --> 00:07:58,760 Speaker 1: nothing in this bill right now, this big beautiful bill 152 00:07:59,160 --> 00:08:00,880 Speaker 1: that I can point to, that's going to be a 153 00:08:00,920 --> 00:08:03,680 Speaker 1: net positive for voters in twenty twenty six. They could 154 00:08:03,720 --> 00:08:06,920 Speaker 1: be net neutral, but there seems to be a lot 155 00:08:06,960 --> 00:08:11,080 Speaker 1: more potential net negatives here than net positives. Because you 156 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:13,840 Speaker 1: know what's funny here the reason the Republicans are stuck 157 00:08:13,880 --> 00:08:16,520 Speaker 1: dealing with the tax cut extension, and they're now doing 158 00:08:16,560 --> 00:08:19,560 Speaker 1: it on Trump's watch. This was designed right. Think about 159 00:08:19,600 --> 00:08:21,560 Speaker 1: when they passed the tax cut. They passed it in 160 00:08:21,600 --> 00:08:24,440 Speaker 1: twenty eighteen, and they did it. They had it expire 161 00:08:24,960 --> 00:08:27,360 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty five. Why did they have it expire 162 00:08:27,360 --> 00:08:30,120 Speaker 1: in twenty twenty five, Well, they assumed that, you know, 163 00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:32,160 Speaker 1: at best Trump would have his two terms and it 164 00:08:32,200 --> 00:08:34,960 Speaker 1: would likely have to be a Democratic president stuck with 165 00:08:35,040 --> 00:08:38,840 Speaker 1: the choice of either raising taxes or keeping the tax 166 00:08:38,920 --> 00:08:41,680 Speaker 1: rates the same. But it's now Trump because of the 167 00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:45,240 Speaker 1: non consecutive term business where he's And you know, Biden didn't, 168 00:08:46,520 --> 00:08:49,439 Speaker 1: you know, despite threats by some Democrats, Biden didn't you know, 169 00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:52,800 Speaker 1: recind the Trump tax cuts. They didn't mess with them, 170 00:08:53,080 --> 00:08:55,160 Speaker 1: and instead now it is Trump. And why did they 171 00:08:55,240 --> 00:08:56,839 Speaker 1: put a cut off date. Well, it was to make 172 00:08:56,920 --> 00:09:00,760 Speaker 1: the debt and deficit numbers look better than they actually were. Well, 173 00:09:00,800 --> 00:09:04,079 Speaker 1: guess what this is now? What is causing Republicans so 174 00:09:04,160 --> 00:09:06,360 Speaker 1: much heartburn about trying to put this bill together because 175 00:09:06,360 --> 00:09:09,720 Speaker 1: they've got to They got to figure out either how 176 00:09:09,760 --> 00:09:13,000 Speaker 1: to calculate the cost of the tax cuts via the 177 00:09:13,040 --> 00:09:17,000 Speaker 1: debt and deficit or come up with some convoluted way 178 00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:18,400 Speaker 1: to try to pay for it. Right, there was some 179 00:09:18,520 --> 00:09:20,480 Speaker 1: fantasy that Trump had that it would be as tariffs 180 00:09:20,480 --> 00:09:23,120 Speaker 1: that would pay for us the tax cut extension. I 181 00:09:23,160 --> 00:09:25,719 Speaker 1: think there's some people that think somehow they if they 182 00:09:25,760 --> 00:09:30,160 Speaker 1: recalculate all the gold and Fort Knox to present day dollars, 183 00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:33,160 Speaker 1: that they can somehow have an impact on the deficit 184 00:09:33,280 --> 00:09:37,000 Speaker 1: numbers and the overall debt. The point is they were 185 00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:40,160 Speaker 1: not wanting to deal with this themselves. Republicans were pretty 186 00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:42,880 Speaker 1: irresponsible about how they put this bill together in twenty eighteen, 187 00:09:43,200 --> 00:09:46,640 Speaker 1: and they were basically kicking the debt can down the road. Well, 188 00:09:46,920 --> 00:09:49,640 Speaker 1: it is still now in their hands. And this is 189 00:09:49,720 --> 00:09:52,880 Speaker 1: the point. There's no doubt if they let the tax 190 00:09:52,920 --> 00:09:56,320 Speaker 1: cuts expire because they were focused on worrying about the 191 00:09:56,320 --> 00:09:58,280 Speaker 1: debt or deficit, voters wouldn't like that. They'd be pissed 192 00:09:58,320 --> 00:10:01,880 Speaker 1: off that their taxes were raised. So, but voters are 193 00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:04,079 Speaker 1: never going to reward somebody for, hey, thank you for 194 00:10:04,160 --> 00:10:07,640 Speaker 1: not messing with the tax rates, because to them it's 195 00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:09,560 Speaker 1: not going to feel like a cut. In fact, thanks 196 00:10:09,559 --> 00:10:12,559 Speaker 1: to cost of living, they're going to assume things continue 197 00:10:12,600 --> 00:10:14,760 Speaker 1: to cost more and they're going to have less money 198 00:10:14,840 --> 00:10:16,600 Speaker 1: to play with. Now. I have no doubt Trump's going 199 00:10:16,640 --> 00:10:19,400 Speaker 1: to try to concoct some sort of rebate check scheme. 200 00:10:19,559 --> 00:10:21,480 Speaker 1: You know, maybe there's a baby bonus check that gets 201 00:10:21,520 --> 00:10:24,040 Speaker 1: sent to voters. He's going to want to send money 202 00:10:24,040 --> 00:10:26,480 Speaker 1: to voters with his name on it somehow right in 203 00:10:26,640 --> 00:10:29,640 Speaker 1: order to create the illusion that he did something for them. 204 00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:32,000 Speaker 1: But I don't know what that looks like, and I 205 00:10:32,000 --> 00:10:34,240 Speaker 1: think they're going to have a hard time concocting something. 206 00:10:34,600 --> 00:10:36,920 Speaker 1: And then the other big problem Republicans have is look 207 00:10:36,960 --> 00:10:40,560 Speaker 1: at already with the Medicaid cuts. Okay, I've been covering 208 00:10:42,040 --> 00:10:45,800 Speaker 1: Republicans trying to explain slowing the growth. Hey, we're not 209 00:10:45,840 --> 00:10:49,480 Speaker 1: cutting Medicaid, Medicare, social security. We're just slowing the growth 210 00:10:49,520 --> 00:10:51,920 Speaker 1: of Medicaid, Medicare, and social security. You know, to say 211 00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:54,439 Speaker 1: these aren't cuts, we're adding money. They just want to 212 00:10:54,480 --> 00:10:58,559 Speaker 1: add money at a faster rate. Guess what, when you're explaining, 213 00:10:58,600 --> 00:11:01,400 Speaker 1: you're losing. And when you're having to explain, no, it's 214 00:11:01,440 --> 00:11:04,320 Speaker 1: not a cut, it's slowing the rate of growth, you're 215 00:11:04,400 --> 00:11:07,360 Speaker 1: kind of like Kevin Bacon an animal house and going 216 00:11:07,400 --> 00:11:11,600 Speaker 1: all is calm, all remain calm, all is Well, you're 217 00:11:11,679 --> 00:11:13,280 Speaker 1: just going to get mode over and you're going to 218 00:11:13,360 --> 00:11:17,920 Speaker 1: get run over. That said, I don't think Democrats can 219 00:11:17,960 --> 00:11:20,520 Speaker 1: just sit back and expect to win right now. They've 220 00:11:20,520 --> 00:11:23,120 Speaker 1: got their own internal crisis brewing. The base is energized, 221 00:11:23,120 --> 00:11:25,600 Speaker 1: but they're angry. They're angry at Trump, but they're also 222 00:11:25,600 --> 00:11:28,600 Speaker 1: angry at their own parties leadership, how it handled Biden, 223 00:11:28,720 --> 00:11:30,720 Speaker 1: how they're not responding to Trump. I mean, my god, 224 00:11:30,760 --> 00:11:33,240 Speaker 1: look at all the mealy mouth ways. Schumer and Jeffries 225 00:11:33,240 --> 00:11:36,240 Speaker 1: are both struggling here on figuring out how to balance 226 00:11:36,559 --> 00:11:40,040 Speaker 1: not looking rabidly anti Trump and out of touch with 227 00:11:40,160 --> 00:11:42,360 Speaker 1: the middle and at the same time not looking like 228 00:11:42,400 --> 00:11:46,079 Speaker 1: they're willing to confront Trump. They're just showing some rhetorical 229 00:11:46,120 --> 00:11:49,400 Speaker 1: weakness here, and it's a box of their own making, right, 230 00:11:49,400 --> 00:11:53,040 Speaker 1: because they're part of an establishment leadership team that failed 231 00:11:53,040 --> 00:11:55,760 Speaker 1: the party. So I don't know if there's anything they 232 00:11:55,760 --> 00:11:57,840 Speaker 1: could say or do to sort of win back the 233 00:11:57,840 --> 00:12:00,719 Speaker 1: confidence of these voters that are frustrated. But you can 234 00:12:00,800 --> 00:12:04,559 Speaker 1: feel that they seem to be responding in ways that 235 00:12:05,120 --> 00:12:08,800 Speaker 1: they're trying desperately not to anger any part of their coalition. 236 00:12:08,960 --> 00:12:12,240 Speaker 1: So everything is sort of milk toasty, and I think 237 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:16,280 Speaker 1: that that's not going to go overwell to the most energetic, 238 00:12:16,440 --> 00:12:19,520 Speaker 1: angry Democrats and if they don't give and that's the 239 00:12:19,520 --> 00:12:21,720 Speaker 1: problem the party's got to find. Democrats don't figure out 240 00:12:21,720 --> 00:12:25,120 Speaker 1: how to channel that energy, channel that anger. If they 241 00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:27,720 Speaker 1: don't give something voters to fight four, not just against, 242 00:12:27,760 --> 00:12:31,119 Speaker 1: then twenty twenty six could turn into an intra party meltdown. 243 00:12:31,840 --> 00:12:34,160 Speaker 1: We've seen this before. Actually, remember the Tea Party in 244 00:12:34,200 --> 00:12:38,280 Speaker 1: twenty ten. Republican leadership thought they could ride that wave 245 00:12:38,320 --> 00:12:42,160 Speaker 1: of anger and instead, though it wiped out the Republican 246 00:12:42,240 --> 00:12:45,360 Speaker 1: establishment and it led directly to Trump. That Tea Party 247 00:12:45,400 --> 00:12:50,480 Speaker 1: anger just completely eviscerated the establishment GOP. They're gone, they're dead, 248 00:12:50,679 --> 00:12:53,200 Speaker 1: they don't get work anymore in the Trump wing. So 249 00:12:54,040 --> 00:12:58,920 Speaker 1: they didn't channel it, it consumed them. And that same 250 00:12:58,920 --> 00:13:00,760 Speaker 1: thing could happen to the Democrats if they don't figure 251 00:13:00,760 --> 00:13:02,840 Speaker 1: out how to get ahead of the anger that is 252 00:13:02,840 --> 00:13:06,120 Speaker 1: brewing in their base. So here's the irony. By every 253 00:13:06,120 --> 00:13:09,120 Speaker 1: conventional measure, Trump is the bigger liability, but that doesn't 254 00:13:09,160 --> 00:13:11,560 Speaker 1: mean Democrats are guaranteed to benefit. They mishandle the Biden 255 00:13:11,640 --> 00:13:14,880 Speaker 1: legacy if they ignore the generational ideological divides and their 256 00:13:14,880 --> 00:13:18,199 Speaker 1: own coalition, If they act like voters will just automatically 257 00:13:18,240 --> 00:13:21,600 Speaker 1: reject Trump again, they could blow it. Because here's what 258 00:13:21,640 --> 00:13:23,679 Speaker 1: I believe, voters only look backward when they don't like 259 00:13:23,720 --> 00:13:26,520 Speaker 1: what they see ahead. If you're not offering them a 260 00:13:26,520 --> 00:13:28,840 Speaker 1: better future, they're going to punish whoever they feel is 261 00:13:28,880 --> 00:13:32,320 Speaker 1: responsible for the president for the president. So the race 262 00:13:32,440 --> 00:13:35,280 Speaker 1: is on not just between Democrats and Republicans, but between 263 00:13:35,320 --> 00:13:39,240 Speaker 1: two unpopular presidents to see who can hurt their party less. 264 00:13:39,480 --> 00:13:42,720 Speaker 1: I guess the stakes the twenty twenty six mid terms. 265 00:13:43,040 --> 00:13:46,560 Speaker 1: We shall see, all right. I have a few other 266 00:13:47,120 --> 00:13:49,319 Speaker 1: nuggets here I want to get to on the campaign 267 00:13:50,559 --> 00:13:53,719 Speaker 1: on the campaign front that I thought were notable, and 268 00:13:53,760 --> 00:13:56,360 Speaker 1: these are things that I've read in other places. I'm 269 00:13:56,360 --> 00:13:59,319 Speaker 1: doing my old aggregation style of what's caught my eye 270 00:13:59,360 --> 00:14:01,360 Speaker 1: in the last twenty five four hours. There's a fun 271 00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:03,840 Speaker 1: piece that I want to spend a little bit more 272 00:14:03,880 --> 00:14:06,680 Speaker 1: time on. But I think Nate Cone is onto something. 273 00:14:08,120 --> 00:14:10,200 Speaker 1: Nate con in The New York Times writes this did 274 00:14:10,240 --> 00:14:14,480 Speaker 1: Republicans blow a bigger opportunity in twenty twenty four? The 275 00:14:14,520 --> 00:14:17,360 Speaker 1: specific question he asked is should Republicans have won in 276 00:14:17,400 --> 00:14:21,720 Speaker 1: a landslide? It's an interesting because there's sort of two 277 00:14:21,760 --> 00:14:24,880 Speaker 1: ways to look at republicans success over the last ten years. 278 00:14:25,600 --> 00:14:28,840 Speaker 1: What if Trump wasn't their leader and what if they 279 00:14:28,880 --> 00:14:32,520 Speaker 1: still had somebody that was able to reorient the party 280 00:14:32,600 --> 00:14:36,800 Speaker 1: into this multi ethnic working class coalition. Could they actually 281 00:14:36,800 --> 00:14:40,960 Speaker 1: have a bigger majority. I do think you can look 282 00:14:41,000 --> 00:14:44,320 Speaker 1: and say Trump the individual has cost them. You know, 283 00:14:44,360 --> 00:14:47,680 Speaker 1: we can point to four or five Senate seats specifically 284 00:14:48,160 --> 00:14:51,200 Speaker 1: where Trump's intervention has cost them. There's at least one 285 00:14:51,240 --> 00:14:55,040 Speaker 1: in Arizona, all things, Kerry Lake, both Senate seats. I 286 00:14:55,080 --> 00:14:58,520 Speaker 1: think in Georgia you could put in that column for sure. 287 00:14:59,280 --> 00:15:01,520 Speaker 1: I think you could at least, you know, you could 288 00:15:01,640 --> 00:15:04,160 Speaker 1: possibly look to one of the Wisconsin to the one 289 00:15:04,200 --> 00:15:08,200 Speaker 1: Wisconsin Democratic seat, possibly look to Nevada. So there's at 290 00:15:08,280 --> 00:15:12,400 Speaker 1: least I think realistically five and maybe if you look 291 00:15:12,400 --> 00:15:15,440 Speaker 1: at the doctor Oz debacle against Fetterman six, So you 292 00:15:15,480 --> 00:15:19,280 Speaker 1: could realistically say there are six Democratic health sentences right 293 00:15:19,320 --> 00:15:22,720 Speaker 1: now that if not for Trump, they would have. So 294 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:25,119 Speaker 1: that means that would put them almost at a filibuster 295 00:15:25,200 --> 00:15:29,080 Speaker 1: proof centate majority, but for Trump. So I get the 296 00:15:29,200 --> 00:15:31,720 Speaker 1: argument Nate is having. And it's sort of like there 297 00:15:31,760 --> 00:15:36,440 Speaker 1: are some Republican leaning voters who cannot stand Trump right, 298 00:15:36,520 --> 00:15:39,160 Speaker 1: don't like his character, and won't vote for him that 299 00:15:39,440 --> 00:15:42,000 Speaker 1: are moving towards the Democrats. And the question has always 300 00:15:42,040 --> 00:15:48,400 Speaker 1: been are they still sort of supportive of the ideas 301 00:15:48,400 --> 00:15:51,240 Speaker 1: Trump has. They just are so turned off by his 302 00:15:51,360 --> 00:15:54,880 Speaker 1: corruption and by his neediness and narcissism that they don't 303 00:15:54,960 --> 00:15:57,240 Speaker 1: vote for him, and they're going to snap back, And 304 00:15:57,320 --> 00:16:02,400 Speaker 1: this opportunity is here for an even bigger, a bigger, successful, 305 00:16:02,520 --> 00:16:05,080 Speaker 1: durable Republican coalition that looks a little bit more like 306 00:16:05,160 --> 00:16:09,400 Speaker 1: Reagan in the eighties rather than this polarized coalition that 307 00:16:09,440 --> 00:16:14,080 Speaker 1: Trumps built now. Anyway, It's an interesting argument because we've 308 00:16:14,120 --> 00:16:17,120 Speaker 1: been spending a lot of time looking at all the 309 00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:20,000 Speaker 1: little ways Democrats, if they could have done this, could 310 00:16:20,040 --> 00:16:21,840 Speaker 1: have done that, they could have beaten Trump in twenty four. 311 00:16:22,560 --> 00:16:25,080 Speaker 1: But is the better way to look at this if 312 00:16:25,240 --> 00:16:28,880 Speaker 1: actually is Trump the only reason why Democrats have come 313 00:16:28,960 --> 00:16:31,920 Speaker 1: close in twenty sixteen or twenty twenty four. Anyway, It's 314 00:16:31,920 --> 00:16:35,720 Speaker 1: just an interesting counterfactual and one one that I thought 315 00:16:35,760 --> 00:16:42,000 Speaker 1: was worth noting in euro Intelligence. One of the things 316 00:16:42,000 --> 00:16:45,880 Speaker 1: that I've been trying to tell people about the current 317 00:16:45,960 --> 00:16:50,400 Speaker 1: US political divide is that actually this is a global divide, 318 00:16:50,400 --> 00:16:53,640 Speaker 1: meaning the rural urban divide between red and blue in 319 00:16:53,680 --> 00:16:58,040 Speaker 1: America is essentially driving the politics and every democracy around 320 00:16:58,080 --> 00:17:02,680 Speaker 1: the world. Rural versus urban has been the divide in Poland, 321 00:17:02,840 --> 00:17:04,560 Speaker 1: and you will see it just played out and that, 322 00:17:04,760 --> 00:17:09,040 Speaker 1: you know, the sort of the Maga right adjacent movement 323 00:17:09,160 --> 00:17:13,120 Speaker 1: that is succeeding in Poland was built in rural Poland. 324 00:17:13,840 --> 00:17:16,719 Speaker 1: It's not like Warsaws is pretty happy with this movement 325 00:17:17,280 --> 00:17:20,040 Speaker 1: folks that live there. We've seen this in Turkey, where 326 00:17:20,080 --> 00:17:23,119 Speaker 1: it was Airdowan's political strength is in the rural parts 327 00:17:23,119 --> 00:17:25,880 Speaker 1: of Turkey, not in is Don Bull. In fact, that's 328 00:17:25,880 --> 00:17:31,960 Speaker 1: where he is. His chief political opposition is based in Istanbul. Venezuela, 329 00:17:32,200 --> 00:17:35,680 Speaker 1: formerly a democracy. It was the same right Ugo Chavez 330 00:17:35,800 --> 00:17:42,760 Speaker 1: essentially created his dictatorship starting in the rural parts in Mexico. 331 00:17:42,880 --> 00:17:46,080 Speaker 1: The populist movement is to the left, but it also 332 00:17:46,200 --> 00:17:50,119 Speaker 1: began in the rural parts of Mexico. The sort of 333 00:17:50,160 --> 00:17:53,439 Speaker 1: Amlo shine Bomb coalition is not as popular in the 334 00:17:53,480 --> 00:17:56,760 Speaker 1: more educated rural areas. The point is is that it's 335 00:17:57,000 --> 00:18:00,000 Speaker 1: election after election around the world. We're starting to see 336 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:03,119 Speaker 1: the same divides here. You know, we think we're special 337 00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:06,840 Speaker 1: in America. In this case we are behaving just like 338 00:18:06,960 --> 00:18:10,080 Speaker 1: it breaks it in the UK in many ways started 339 00:18:10,119 --> 00:18:14,320 Speaker 1: outside of London, right the London intelligentsia, we're all against Brexit. 340 00:18:14,400 --> 00:18:18,440 Speaker 1: So this royal urban divide really is the global driver 341 00:18:18,600 --> 00:18:24,119 Speaker 1: right now that is rattling democracies around the world. By 342 00:18:24,160 --> 00:18:28,520 Speaker 1: the way, I mentioned Mexico in there, Mexico just just 343 00:18:28,600 --> 00:18:31,440 Speaker 1: did something that is only going to increase corruption in 344 00:18:31,440 --> 00:18:36,760 Speaker 1: that democracy. They just decided to mandate that all judicial 345 00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:41,920 Speaker 1: all judges, face election. I can't think of a worse 346 00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:45,280 Speaker 1: way to try to enact the rule of law. I mean, 347 00:18:45,280 --> 00:18:47,960 Speaker 1: when you politicize the rule of law. Just look what's 348 00:18:47,960 --> 00:18:50,800 Speaker 1: happening here in our country with what Donald Trump's doing 349 00:18:50,800 --> 00:18:53,240 Speaker 1: with this pardon business. It seems like every day he 350 00:18:53,320 --> 00:18:57,920 Speaker 1: pardons some other white collar criminal, he is essentially eviscerated 351 00:18:58,240 --> 00:19:01,879 Speaker 1: white collar crime in the attempt by anybody in the 352 00:19:01,880 --> 00:19:05,920 Speaker 1: federal government to prosecute anybody who commits so called white 353 00:19:05,920 --> 00:19:09,320 Speaker 1: collar crime, nonviolent crime, anything having to do with finances 354 00:19:09,720 --> 00:19:13,720 Speaker 1: or personal behavior. At this point, Donald Trump will pardon 355 00:19:13,760 --> 00:19:16,520 Speaker 1: that person. He's already talking about pardoning Diddy. And those 356 00:19:16,520 --> 00:19:19,919 Speaker 1: are some really uncomfortable anecdotes we're all hearing from that trial. 357 00:19:20,200 --> 00:19:23,480 Speaker 1: But the fact is, anybody that Donald Trump thinks is 358 00:19:23,520 --> 00:19:28,080 Speaker 1: being persecuted for their personal behavior or their financial behavior. Clearly, 359 00:19:28,280 --> 00:19:31,200 Speaker 1: he must see a bit of himself in there, and 360 00:19:31,520 --> 00:19:36,560 Speaker 1: he is now essentially changing our rule of law, changing 361 00:19:36,600 --> 00:19:40,639 Speaker 1: our law enforcement environment in order to not target those people. 362 00:19:40,680 --> 00:19:44,120 Speaker 1: We've seen the entire political corruption unions are getting wiped out. 363 00:19:44,400 --> 00:19:47,800 Speaker 1: Inspector generals are wiped out. He does not. He is, 364 00:19:48,160 --> 00:19:51,359 Speaker 1: and so that is and now you've got now a 365 00:19:51,400 --> 00:19:54,040 Speaker 1: country like Mexico is not even going to pretend that 366 00:19:54,119 --> 00:19:57,920 Speaker 1: there's a rule of law doing this electing judges. Go 367 00:19:58,000 --> 00:20:01,920 Speaker 1: read Alexander Hamilton and federalists. It's seventy three. It's either 368 00:20:01,960 --> 00:20:06,000 Speaker 1: federal seventy three or seventy eight. My apologies for not 369 00:20:06,040 --> 00:20:09,720 Speaker 1: having it at hand, but he makes an argument against 370 00:20:09,720 --> 00:20:13,200 Speaker 1: the election, the election of judges. Politicize this thing is 371 00:20:13,320 --> 00:20:15,960 Speaker 1: a total mess in Wisconsin with what we see with 372 00:20:16,040 --> 00:20:18,200 Speaker 1: the election of the Supreme Court. That is no way 373 00:20:18,680 --> 00:20:21,000 Speaker 1: the rule of law can't be at the ballot box. 374 00:20:21,840 --> 00:20:26,080 Speaker 1: It just can't be. That is a gigantic mistake. And 375 00:20:26,160 --> 00:20:28,200 Speaker 1: we already have a lot of things we're worried about 376 00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:32,359 Speaker 1: with Mexico's slip sliding away from democracy. But when you 377 00:20:32,440 --> 00:20:36,800 Speaker 1: put judicial elections in the hands of political parties, you 378 00:20:36,920 --> 00:20:42,240 Speaker 1: increase the likelihood of an authoritarian takeover of the legal system, 379 00:20:42,320 --> 00:20:47,640 Speaker 1: and that is I think quite ugly. A few more, 380 00:20:47,840 --> 00:20:50,080 Speaker 1: there's a few quotes this week that I just want 381 00:20:50,080 --> 00:20:54,080 Speaker 1: to highlight in my little twenty twenty six notebook that 382 00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:57,840 Speaker 1: I think are just fascinating. Here's my favorite line from 383 00:20:57,920 --> 00:21:01,320 Speaker 1: John Cornan this week. John Cornyn in the messy Texas 384 00:21:01,320 --> 00:21:05,560 Speaker 1: Senate primary against the Attorney General Ken Paxton, who himself 385 00:21:05,600 --> 00:21:09,600 Speaker 1: faced impeachment proceedings and beat them back. Against a Republican 386 00:21:09,640 --> 00:21:13,240 Speaker 1: controlled House and Senate in Texas. Anyway, John Corny talked 387 00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:14,639 Speaker 1: about his campaign. He says, this is going to be 388 00:21:14,680 --> 00:21:20,080 Speaker 1: a test of whether character still matters. Just uttering that sentence, 389 00:21:20,960 --> 00:21:23,840 Speaker 1: I think is a reminder why John Cornan is not 390 00:21:23,880 --> 00:21:27,399 Speaker 1: going to win. And I don't like betting against John Cornyn. 391 00:21:27,480 --> 00:21:31,200 Speaker 1: I think he's been I think he's a savvy politician. 392 00:21:31,240 --> 00:21:36,240 Speaker 1: I think he's a smart legislator. I think he's I 393 00:21:36,280 --> 00:21:38,400 Speaker 1: would argue he should be one of the hundred people 394 00:21:38,440 --> 00:21:40,080 Speaker 1: you would want in the United States Senate. You don't 395 00:21:40,119 --> 00:21:41,359 Speaker 1: have to agree with him all the time, but he 396 00:21:41,359 --> 00:21:44,679 Speaker 1: seems thoughtful, he seems to take the job seriously all 397 00:21:44,720 --> 00:21:47,639 Speaker 1: of those things, and I think he represents the mainstream 398 00:21:47,640 --> 00:21:50,800 Speaker 1: of Texas about as well as you can come up with. Right. Collectively, 399 00:21:50,880 --> 00:21:54,359 Speaker 1: Texas is clearly center, right John Cornyn, I think represents 400 00:21:54,359 --> 00:21:57,239 Speaker 1: that quite well. But here's something and I think we 401 00:21:57,280 --> 00:22:02,160 Speaker 1: all unfortunately have learned over the last decade. Character doesn't 402 00:22:02,200 --> 00:22:06,119 Speaker 1: matter to the voters. Results matter to the voters. Feelings, vibes, 403 00:22:06,160 --> 00:22:08,959 Speaker 1: whatever you want to call it. A character doesn't and 404 00:22:09,000 --> 00:22:12,080 Speaker 1: we've seen it. How much more evidence we have to see? 405 00:22:11,600 --> 00:22:15,280 Speaker 1: You know, we'd like politicians to be of high character, 406 00:22:15,880 --> 00:22:18,480 Speaker 1: but we're not going to vote on that issue. It's 407 00:22:18,880 --> 00:22:22,960 Speaker 1: a character for our politicians, right. We will tell a 408 00:22:23,040 --> 00:22:25,880 Speaker 1: polster we care about character, but are we voting on it. 409 00:22:25,880 --> 00:22:28,040 Speaker 1: It's like the same people that tell the posters they 410 00:22:28,040 --> 00:22:29,800 Speaker 1: care about the debt, or they tell posters they care 411 00:22:29,800 --> 00:22:32,920 Speaker 1: about campaign finds their form. I worry that character is 412 00:22:32,960 --> 00:22:35,439 Speaker 1: now one of these dead rail issues that unless you 413 00:22:35,680 --> 00:22:41,200 Speaker 1: are just abusive, physically abusive, and even that right, look 414 00:22:41,200 --> 00:22:45,440 Speaker 1: at Andrew Cuomo, accusations of a lot of uncomfortable behavior there, 415 00:22:45,480 --> 00:22:47,280 Speaker 1: and yet he may become the next mayor of New 416 00:22:47,320 --> 00:22:52,560 Speaker 1: York City. So I don't know if the Texas Senate race. 417 00:22:53,680 --> 00:22:56,199 Speaker 1: I guess if Cornyn wins. It means there is a 418 00:22:56,359 --> 00:22:59,399 Speaker 1: chance that character can still count an election. But I 419 00:22:59,400 --> 00:23:01,520 Speaker 1: will just say the fact that he uttered the quote 420 00:23:01,800 --> 00:23:05,280 Speaker 1: of a feeling that quote could be on an epitaph. 421 00:23:05,600 --> 00:23:10,520 Speaker 1: We shall see. One other quote that a lot of 422 00:23:10,560 --> 00:23:12,600 Speaker 1: people missed was last week Joe Biden took a few 423 00:23:12,680 --> 00:23:16,520 Speaker 1: questions after he had a speech that he gave in Delaware. 424 00:23:16,800 --> 00:23:22,280 Speaker 1: This was to honor he was acknowledging the death of 425 00:23:22,440 --> 00:23:25,520 Speaker 1: an anniversary of the death of his son, and he 426 00:23:25,520 --> 00:23:27,600 Speaker 1: took questions and he was asked whether he should have 427 00:23:27,680 --> 00:23:30,040 Speaker 1: run for re election, and he goes, well, he was 428 00:23:30,080 --> 00:23:34,840 Speaker 1: referring to the various Democrats who've questioned whether he should 429 00:23:34,840 --> 00:23:37,520 Speaker 1: have run now, And his answer was why didn't they 430 00:23:37,560 --> 00:23:41,719 Speaker 1: run against me then? Because I'd have beaten them. So 431 00:23:41,760 --> 00:23:44,919 Speaker 1: that's Joe Biden's mental state right now. He does not 432 00:23:45,040 --> 00:23:47,639 Speaker 1: buy into the premise that he was the problem. He 433 00:23:47,680 --> 00:23:51,320 Speaker 1: does not accept the premise that him getting off the 434 00:23:51,320 --> 00:23:54,680 Speaker 1: ticket was a benefit to the party. He clearly believes 435 00:23:54,720 --> 00:23:57,080 Speaker 1: had he stayed on the ticket, and certainly people around 436 00:23:57,119 --> 00:24:01,280 Speaker 1: him have clearly believed this. He's a bit delusional about this, 437 00:24:02,240 --> 00:24:04,840 Speaker 1: But he was surrounded by advisers that were only telling 438 00:24:04,920 --> 00:24:07,439 Speaker 1: him things he wanted to hear, or perhaps telling him 439 00:24:07,480 --> 00:24:10,760 Speaker 1: things that those advisors wish were true. In either case, 440 00:24:11,520 --> 00:24:13,240 Speaker 1: let's just say that quote's doing a lot of work. 441 00:24:13,320 --> 00:24:16,320 Speaker 1: There's anger, defiance, and denial all wrapped up into that 442 00:24:16,400 --> 00:24:19,000 Speaker 1: one quote. And then finally, I want to highlight this 443 00:24:19,080 --> 00:24:21,480 Speaker 1: quote that came from Tim Walls in South Carolina and 444 00:24:21,480 --> 00:24:24,040 Speaker 1: his trip down there. He asked this question, maybe it's 445 00:24:24,080 --> 00:24:29,560 Speaker 1: time for us to be a little meaner. Huh. All 446 00:24:29,600 --> 00:24:34,240 Speaker 1: I'll say, is does mean fit Tim Walls. I get 447 00:24:34,280 --> 00:24:36,520 Speaker 1: what he's saying. And this gets to what Steve Klubec, 448 00:24:37,320 --> 00:24:40,400 Speaker 1: the candidate for California governor, told me in a podcast recently, 449 00:24:41,680 --> 00:24:44,840 Speaker 1: is that the Democrats need a channel, a little bit 450 00:24:44,840 --> 00:24:49,040 Speaker 1: of their little bit more Trump. You know, you know, 451 00:24:49,160 --> 00:24:51,280 Speaker 1: just when you see something, say something, but I kind 452 00:24:51,280 --> 00:24:54,879 Speaker 1: of think meaner. Isn't it being more demeaning to people? 453 00:24:55,840 --> 00:24:59,760 Speaker 1: You know? This is I think that this is the 454 00:25:00,040 --> 00:25:04,480 Speaker 1: thing that Democrats ought to be careful of if they 455 00:25:04,560 --> 00:25:07,080 Speaker 1: go down the if you can't beat them, join them mindset. 456 00:25:07,359 --> 00:25:11,880 Speaker 1: When it comes to dealing with Trump. I think there 457 00:25:11,880 --> 00:25:14,280 Speaker 1: are voters, and I just describe them these center right 458 00:25:14,359 --> 00:25:18,120 Speaker 1: voters who actually care about character, care about truth, care 459 00:25:18,160 --> 00:25:23,639 Speaker 1: about integrity and office who are voting for Democrats that 460 00:25:23,680 --> 00:25:26,679 Speaker 1: perhaps they don't agree with on policy because they stand 461 00:25:26,680 --> 00:25:29,240 Speaker 1: for higher character, they stand for something a little bit different. 462 00:25:29,960 --> 00:25:35,040 Speaker 1: If you start presenting yourself basically with the same low 463 00:25:35,200 --> 00:25:42,800 Speaker 1: character and sort of nonchalance towards white collar crime and 464 00:25:43,720 --> 00:25:49,840 Speaker 1: put transactionalness transactional nature, that essentially sells Pardons right, and 465 00:25:50,560 --> 00:25:53,520 Speaker 1: you essentially are putting that up, you know, a D 466 00:25:53,720 --> 00:25:57,479 Speaker 1: version versus an our version. I don't think you're going 467 00:25:57,560 --> 00:26:00,560 Speaker 1: to benefit on the D side because I think, you know, 468 00:26:00,640 --> 00:26:04,320 Speaker 1: Democrats have asked. One of these arguments I've made is 469 00:26:04,320 --> 00:26:06,280 Speaker 1: that you know, why do I Why am I tougher 470 00:26:06,320 --> 00:26:08,520 Speaker 1: on Democrats sometimes and I am on Trump? Well, the 471 00:26:08,560 --> 00:26:14,880 Speaker 1: Democrats ask are proclaimed to stand on higher ground. They 472 00:26:14,880 --> 00:26:17,240 Speaker 1: want to be held accountable, they want to be held 473 00:26:17,240 --> 00:26:21,359 Speaker 1: to a higher standard. And when they don't, when they 474 00:26:21,440 --> 00:26:24,720 Speaker 1: don't stand up for that higher standard that they're demanding 475 00:26:24,760 --> 00:26:27,880 Speaker 1: of Trump and they're demanding of Republicans, well you know, 476 00:26:28,000 --> 00:26:30,160 Speaker 1: they don't like it when we point out that hypocrisy. 477 00:26:31,040 --> 00:26:33,879 Speaker 1: And that's the thing. If they don't aspire to stay 478 00:26:33,920 --> 00:26:36,800 Speaker 1: being that party, I actually think they're going to lose 479 00:26:36,800 --> 00:26:38,880 Speaker 1: a chunk of voters that have kept them probably more 480 00:26:38,920 --> 00:26:42,280 Speaker 1: competitive in the Trump era than, as my friend Nate 481 00:26:42,320 --> 00:26:44,760 Speaker 1: Conan the Times is arguing, then perhaps they should have been. 482 00:26:45,440 --> 00:26:48,800 Speaker 1: So anyway, that was I just thought I would empty 483 00:26:48,840 --> 00:26:53,680 Speaker 1: my sort of notebook of stuff that caught my eye 484 00:26:53,720 --> 00:26:57,600 Speaker 1: over the last few days that fall into sort of 485 00:26:57,640 --> 00:27:00,440 Speaker 1: my little purview, my worldview of politics. It's in twenty 486 00:27:00,480 --> 00:27:03,640 Speaker 1: twenty six in particular, and as well as twenty twenty eight. 487 00:27:04,240 --> 00:27:07,440 Speaker 1: And so with that, I'll sneak at a break and 488 00:27:07,440 --> 00:27:16,400 Speaker 1: when we come back, my conversation with Jane postin Hey 489 00:27:16,440 --> 00:27:20,960 Speaker 1: joining me now is somebody I've long admired when as 490 00:27:20,960 --> 00:27:22,960 Speaker 1: a New York Times contributor, but she's now a daily 491 00:27:23,040 --> 00:27:30,200 Speaker 1: podcast podcaster for the Crooked Media folks, pod Save America, Folks. 492 00:27:30,200 --> 00:27:32,920 Speaker 1: It's called What a Day. It's Jane Couston. Jane, good 493 00:27:32,960 --> 00:27:33,320 Speaker 1: to see it. 494 00:27:34,040 --> 00:27:35,600 Speaker 2: Thank you so much for having me. It's good to 495 00:27:35,600 --> 00:27:36,600 Speaker 2: see you as well. 496 00:27:36,880 --> 00:27:41,239 Speaker 1: So when we last, you know you were tell me 497 00:27:41,320 --> 00:27:45,760 Speaker 1: about your media, your professional media resume these days, because 498 00:27:45,760 --> 00:27:49,679 Speaker 1: we're all look, as I joke, I put a I 499 00:27:49,680 --> 00:27:51,359 Speaker 1: don't like to bet roulette, but if I ever get 500 00:27:51,400 --> 00:27:53,639 Speaker 1: forced to bet Roulette. I always put a chip on 501 00:27:53,720 --> 00:27:56,720 Speaker 1: four corners right to increase the amount of opportunities I 502 00:27:56,720 --> 00:27:58,840 Speaker 1: have for a number to hit. And I feel like 503 00:27:59,000 --> 00:28:02,080 Speaker 1: that's the world of journal now that everybody in this 504 00:28:02,200 --> 00:28:06,160 Speaker 1: space is doing like three or four jobs because they're 505 00:28:06,160 --> 00:28:09,040 Speaker 1: not sure which one's going to become the job right, 506 00:28:09,080 --> 00:28:12,359 Speaker 1: which one's going to become the true anchor of their life. 507 00:28:12,800 --> 00:28:15,960 Speaker 1: Do you are you living? Are you a living embodiment 508 00:28:16,080 --> 00:28:16,400 Speaker 1: of this? 509 00:28:17,320 --> 00:28:19,719 Speaker 2: I am. I am less so than I was previously 510 00:28:20,320 --> 00:28:22,320 Speaker 2: now like this is this is what I do, This 511 00:28:22,400 --> 00:28:24,680 Speaker 2: is what I do, This is what you do, aw 512 00:28:24,760 --> 00:28:28,159 Speaker 2: York Times contributor. But because especially because I you know, 513 00:28:28,200 --> 00:28:30,040 Speaker 2: I come into the office. I am speaking to you 514 00:28:30,119 --> 00:28:32,680 Speaker 2: from the beautiful crooked Media office in Los Angeles and 515 00:28:32,720 --> 00:28:36,400 Speaker 2: West Hollywood, near where I live, and so I actually 516 00:28:36,720 --> 00:28:41,320 Speaker 2: it's probably the most day to day, normal job type 517 00:28:41,400 --> 00:28:46,800 Speaker 2: job I've had since before the pandemic probably, So that's 518 00:28:46,800 --> 00:28:49,080 Speaker 2: been nice. That's been nice. So I am the host. 519 00:28:48,840 --> 00:28:50,959 Speaker 1: Very set scheduled, I mean, yeah, because that's the thing 520 00:28:50,960 --> 00:28:53,960 Speaker 1: people ask me, how do you like this world? I said, well, 521 00:28:54,000 --> 00:28:56,760 Speaker 1: I was a very scheduled person. Now I have a 522 00:28:56,800 --> 00:28:59,640 Speaker 1: little bit more control of that schedule. And sometimes that's anxiety. 523 00:29:00,200 --> 00:29:02,520 Speaker 2: Yes, I do like the fact that in general, like 524 00:29:02,560 --> 00:29:06,720 Speaker 2: my schedule's pretty set because as we were talking about, 525 00:29:06,760 --> 00:29:08,640 Speaker 2: I'm on Pacific time. There are a couple of things 526 00:29:08,640 --> 00:29:10,880 Speaker 2: where we move. We can move stuff around in a 527 00:29:10,920 --> 00:29:13,080 Speaker 2: way that I don't think would be as easy to 528 00:29:13,120 --> 00:29:16,520 Speaker 2: do if we were on the East coast. But yeah, 529 00:29:16,800 --> 00:29:18,320 Speaker 2: it's pretty set. I'm here. 530 00:29:18,440 --> 00:29:20,400 Speaker 1: It's just your first time living on West coast. 531 00:29:20,640 --> 00:29:22,000 Speaker 2: It is my first time living on them. 532 00:29:22,080 --> 00:29:26,120 Speaker 1: So you've been mostly in essentrally mostly you know, I grew. 533 00:29:26,000 --> 00:29:29,800 Speaker 2: Up in Ohio, lived in Ohio, Michigan, Missouri, and then 534 00:29:29,840 --> 00:29:31,760 Speaker 2: moved to d C. Thirteen years in DC, and then 535 00:29:31,800 --> 00:29:34,640 Speaker 2: I moved to Utah, so we got what you've done 536 00:29:34,680 --> 00:29:39,600 Speaker 2: every time though, pretty much every time zone. Big fan. 537 00:29:39,840 --> 00:29:44,040 Speaker 2: By the way, if we're talking time zones, Mountain highly underrated. 538 00:29:44,440 --> 00:29:47,800 Speaker 1: I completely agree. I lived for a brief period in Boulder, Colorado, 539 00:29:48,080 --> 00:29:53,520 Speaker 1: during my period in between college and life, and there 540 00:29:53,680 --> 00:29:55,400 Speaker 1: is no better sports. 541 00:29:55,800 --> 00:30:01,000 Speaker 2: It's perfect, it's absolutely perfect, messific time we do have because. 542 00:30:00,760 --> 00:30:03,560 Speaker 1: Too early, too early, that nine am, that nine nine 543 00:30:03,880 --> 00:30:04,200 Speaker 1: kick is. 544 00:30:04,800 --> 00:30:08,200 Speaker 2: Football, that has been that's the one thing where that is. 545 00:30:08,240 --> 00:30:10,720 Speaker 1: You're a Michigan fan, Yeah, a Michican fan. So they're 546 00:30:10,720 --> 00:30:13,480 Speaker 1: always kickoff. It's always a big nine am kickoff. 547 00:30:13,560 --> 00:30:17,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's always a noon kick and that that is 548 00:30:18,880 --> 00:30:21,600 Speaker 2: that's early ten am though, ten am, I can do. 549 00:30:21,720 --> 00:30:24,440 Speaker 1: You've had a cup of coffee. You probably already had 550 00:30:24,480 --> 00:30:27,360 Speaker 1: a little notch. Maybe you've read you read in on 551 00:30:27,440 --> 00:30:27,920 Speaker 1: the day. 552 00:30:28,000 --> 00:30:31,000 Speaker 2: Yeah, I know what's going on. Yeah, but I do 553 00:30:31,160 --> 00:30:35,520 Speaker 2: think it is nice that I can have the entire 554 00:30:35,640 --> 00:30:39,440 Speaker 2: emotional experience of a college football game and have it 555 00:30:39,520 --> 00:30:43,240 Speaker 2: be over by twelve thirty. And then I do get 556 00:30:43,280 --> 00:30:45,280 Speaker 2: the you know, I obviously. 557 00:30:44,840 --> 00:30:47,280 Speaker 1: You know a and the late night game, and the 558 00:30:47,360 --> 00:30:49,560 Speaker 1: late night games are done by eight thirty nine. You 559 00:30:49,600 --> 00:30:51,240 Speaker 1: can go out for a late dinner. 560 00:30:51,320 --> 00:30:54,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, I could watch you know, I watched that Cal 561 00:30:54,160 --> 00:30:57,840 Speaker 2: Miami game that ended very contusingly. 562 00:30:59,400 --> 00:31:02,880 Speaker 1: I probably was the only East Coast person that stayed. 563 00:31:02,720 --> 00:31:05,480 Speaker 2: That was there's a real you know, even though they 564 00:31:05,520 --> 00:31:07,560 Speaker 2: have you know, I was saying, rip to the PAC twelve, 565 00:31:07,600 --> 00:31:09,280 Speaker 2: but you can't. You can't get rid of the PAC 566 00:31:09,320 --> 00:31:12,440 Speaker 2: twelve after dark energy, Like there's just something that happens 567 00:31:12,920 --> 00:31:14,880 Speaker 2: if you're playing, you know, And I think that that's 568 00:31:15,040 --> 00:31:16,719 Speaker 2: you know, one of my favorite things about college football 569 00:31:16,760 --> 00:31:19,640 Speaker 2: is watching a game, especially a night game, being able 570 00:31:19,680 --> 00:31:23,040 Speaker 2: to watch that at six pm my time. One of 571 00:31:23,040 --> 00:31:25,560 Speaker 2: my favorite college football games of this past year was 572 00:31:25,680 --> 00:31:29,160 Speaker 2: Kansas State at b Yuh about. 573 00:31:30,000 --> 00:31:31,120 Speaker 1: Was the two Hail Mary's. 574 00:31:31,800 --> 00:31:36,360 Speaker 2: It felt like I have never seen I joked that 575 00:31:36,600 --> 00:31:40,040 Speaker 2: it was like Kansas State's quarterback had just descended into 576 00:31:40,120 --> 00:31:43,600 Speaker 2: hell for about four and a half minutes, like everything 577 00:31:43,680 --> 00:31:46,840 Speaker 2: that could possibly go wrong if I remember correctly, there 578 00:31:46,920 --> 00:31:50,280 Speaker 2: was a pick six, then he like a fumble six, 579 00:31:50,760 --> 00:31:53,760 Speaker 2: then something else terrible happened, and it was like the 580 00:31:53,760 --> 00:31:56,720 Speaker 2: fact that this uh, Kansas State's quarterback was actually pretty 581 00:31:56,720 --> 00:31:58,880 Speaker 2: good kept going onto the field. I was like, that's 582 00:31:59,000 --> 00:32:01,600 Speaker 2: why you're a gamer, and I am not, because I 583 00:32:01,640 --> 00:32:03,880 Speaker 2: would have just been like, there's something wrong. 584 00:32:04,480 --> 00:32:06,600 Speaker 1: Oh, that Kansas State quarterback was good enough that they 585 00:32:06,640 --> 00:32:08,440 Speaker 1: asked Will Howard to go into the transfer port. 586 00:32:08,640 --> 00:32:13,040 Speaker 2: Yes, yes they did. And it's just like so, it's 587 00:32:13,200 --> 00:32:14,920 Speaker 2: it's nice to be able to get to see moments 588 00:32:14,960 --> 00:32:17,240 Speaker 2: like that and have it still be like seven pm, 589 00:32:17,320 --> 00:32:18,280 Speaker 2: eight pm my time. 590 00:32:19,480 --> 00:32:21,960 Speaker 1: I was not going to bring up college football until 591 00:32:22,120 --> 00:32:26,719 Speaker 1: til later, but I am curious, does have you have 592 00:32:26,760 --> 00:32:29,480 Speaker 1: you do you feel like you yet have a feeling 593 00:32:29,560 --> 00:32:33,520 Speaker 1: about whether college football has hurt itself collectively by essentially 594 00:32:34,520 --> 00:32:37,080 Speaker 1: destroying the you know, with the with the Big Ten 595 00:32:37,120 --> 00:32:39,640 Speaker 1: and SEC destroying the Pac twelve. 596 00:32:41,680 --> 00:32:44,920 Speaker 2: I think that I'm of two minds. I think that 597 00:32:45,080 --> 00:32:48,320 Speaker 2: any prediction people make about football and saying like this 598 00:32:48,360 --> 00:32:50,400 Speaker 2: will happen, this is going to destroy the sport. I 599 00:32:50,400 --> 00:32:53,000 Speaker 2: don't think they understand how durable the sport can be 600 00:32:53,080 --> 00:32:56,040 Speaker 2: and how people feel about the sport. You and I 601 00:32:56,080 --> 00:32:57,440 Speaker 2: are both college football lovers. 602 00:32:57,680 --> 00:32:59,440 Speaker 1: I going to keep it up like it doesn't. I 603 00:32:59,480 --> 00:33:01,840 Speaker 1: know that the rules are rigged. I now know the 604 00:33:01,880 --> 00:33:03,920 Speaker 1: rules are going to be rigged against any teams not 605 00:33:04,000 --> 00:33:06,520 Speaker 1: in the SEC, in the Big Ten, And yet I'm 606 00:33:06,600 --> 00:33:08,400 Speaker 1: still going to right and. 607 00:33:08,320 --> 00:33:10,440 Speaker 2: It's going to be you know, the ran the playoff, 608 00:33:10,480 --> 00:33:12,440 Speaker 2: and that's going to get weird. I mean, the playoff 609 00:33:12,600 --> 00:33:15,080 Speaker 2: itself is weird. But I think that there's some the 610 00:33:15,720 --> 00:33:20,920 Speaker 2: inherently chaotic energy of college football cannot be confined or 611 00:33:21,840 --> 00:33:25,400 Speaker 2: you know, in any way. It will always be chaos 612 00:33:25,440 --> 00:33:28,880 Speaker 2: in a truly wonderful way. And I think that Yet 613 00:33:29,000 --> 00:33:32,280 Speaker 2: I am the thing I am actually concerned about in 614 00:33:32,400 --> 00:33:35,200 Speaker 2: terms of football, not how I feel about it, about 615 00:33:35,200 --> 00:33:39,200 Speaker 2: how the players feel about it is that by making 616 00:33:39,520 --> 00:33:43,880 Speaker 2: these super conferences where you know, you have the Big 617 00:33:43,920 --> 00:33:47,880 Speaker 2: Ten now contains teams at you know, the University of Washington, 618 00:33:48,040 --> 00:33:52,600 Speaker 2: Oregon USC. This is great for me personally. Michigan's coming 619 00:33:52,640 --> 00:33:55,400 Speaker 2: to play at USC this season, and I'm like, great, 620 00:33:55,520 --> 00:33:59,320 Speaker 2: I could. That is a twenty twenty five minute drive 621 00:33:59,400 --> 00:34:01,680 Speaker 2: on like a good That's like an easy trip for me. 622 00:34:01,760 --> 00:34:03,400 Speaker 2: It kind of reminds me of when I would go 623 00:34:03,680 --> 00:34:06,160 Speaker 2: when I lived in DC and Maryland was in the 624 00:34:06,160 --> 00:34:06,520 Speaker 2: Big Ten. 625 00:34:06,640 --> 00:34:07,320 Speaker 1: Maryland is in the. 626 00:34:07,280 --> 00:34:08,960 Speaker 2: Big Ten and I could take the Metro and go 627 00:34:09,000 --> 00:34:11,400 Speaker 2: watch Michigan beat the shit out of Maryland and like 628 00:34:11,440 --> 00:34:14,560 Speaker 2: take the metro home. It was great. But from a 629 00:34:14,560 --> 00:34:17,399 Speaker 2: player perspective, and I would say that this is also 630 00:34:17,560 --> 00:34:20,160 Speaker 2: like I am a fan of a school with money. 631 00:34:20,440 --> 00:34:22,200 Speaker 2: I'm a fan of a school with a lot of money, 632 00:34:22,480 --> 00:34:26,799 Speaker 2: so in the big leagues and yeah, they like they 633 00:34:26,840 --> 00:34:32,160 Speaker 2: have money, and so them taking players, you know, especially football, basketball, 634 00:34:32,840 --> 00:34:34,399 Speaker 2: you know they are going to be able to take 635 00:34:34,560 --> 00:34:38,400 Speaker 2: all of those grad assistants who help, you know, monitor testing, 636 00:34:39,040 --> 00:34:42,040 Speaker 2: all of the stuff that can make being a college 637 00:34:42,080 --> 00:34:43,880 Speaker 2: athlete possible. They're going to be able to do that 638 00:34:43,920 --> 00:34:46,800 Speaker 2: pretty much from anywhere but there are a lot of schools, 639 00:34:46,840 --> 00:34:51,400 Speaker 2: smaller schools that are now in environments where one like 640 00:34:52,400 --> 00:34:55,160 Speaker 2: most athletic programs lose money. They just do like most 641 00:34:55,320 --> 00:34:58,240 Speaker 2: college football team. It's not like having a college football 642 00:34:58,239 --> 00:35:02,200 Speaker 2: team is way very expensive and usually not profitable. And 643 00:35:02,239 --> 00:35:05,600 Speaker 2: so you are then asking schools that might be smaller 644 00:35:06,120 --> 00:35:10,440 Speaker 2: might have different financial obligations. They're like, oh, also, you 645 00:35:10,520 --> 00:35:14,360 Speaker 2: need to fly the women's field hockey team to Eugene 646 00:35:14,640 --> 00:35:18,520 Speaker 2: and Beck on a Tuesday. Also they all have finals. 647 00:35:18,680 --> 00:35:20,520 Speaker 2: Because I are college students, this is a real thing, 648 00:35:21,160 --> 00:35:24,160 Speaker 2: and like, are you gonna administer them those finals while 649 00:35:24,160 --> 00:35:26,719 Speaker 2: they're out there? Are they going to do it over here? 650 00:35:26,800 --> 00:35:30,160 Speaker 2: Like it's that I am concerned for the players. I 651 00:35:30,200 --> 00:35:32,520 Speaker 2: am not concerned for me and how I feel about 652 00:35:32,520 --> 00:35:36,680 Speaker 2: college football. Like I've now been through a lot of 653 00:35:36,760 --> 00:35:39,239 Speaker 2: conference realignments, Like you know, I remember being annoyed when 654 00:35:39,320 --> 00:35:41,920 Speaker 2: Nebraska joined the Big Ten and being like, come on, 655 00:35:42,000 --> 00:35:43,840 Speaker 2: and now it's like it's a thing. I'm used to it. 656 00:35:43,920 --> 00:35:47,200 Speaker 1: But I think I have expect us to have the 657 00:35:47,239 --> 00:35:49,840 Speaker 1: realignment by geography, like eventually the Big Ten is going 658 00:35:49,920 --> 00:35:52,880 Speaker 1: to get so big, Hey, We're going to have divisions 659 00:35:52,920 --> 00:35:55,160 Speaker 1: based on geography so that we be a Western division 660 00:35:55,280 --> 00:35:58,040 Speaker 1: a Southern division, like you see that that's probable. 661 00:35:58,520 --> 00:36:00,600 Speaker 2: I mean it kind of has to happen in a 662 00:36:00,640 --> 00:36:03,359 Speaker 2: way because it's just at a certain point, like for what. 663 00:36:03,280 --> 00:36:06,960 Speaker 1: You're just describing, so that you play a majority of 664 00:36:07,000 --> 00:36:10,400 Speaker 1: the years, so like you can get geographically close to 665 00:36:10,400 --> 00:36:11,399 Speaker 1: the teams you. 666 00:36:11,320 --> 00:36:14,719 Speaker 2: Can have, you know, what we have long had, You 667 00:36:14,760 --> 00:36:17,160 Speaker 2: could have I mean, obviously this wouldn't be non conference, 668 00:36:17,200 --> 00:36:20,520 Speaker 2: but you could have those early non conference matchups, which 669 00:36:20,640 --> 00:36:26,000 Speaker 2: notably certain SEC establishments try to avoid. And but like 670 00:36:26,040 --> 00:36:28,080 Speaker 2: you know, Michigan's going to play has a i think 671 00:36:28,080 --> 00:36:32,800 Speaker 2: a home and home with Oklahoma this year, and you 672 00:36:32,880 --> 00:36:36,080 Speaker 2: know that'll be fun to giant schools that I don't 673 00:36:36,080 --> 00:36:41,120 Speaker 2: think I've ever seen Michigan play Oklahoma, so like, yeah, exactly, 674 00:36:41,200 --> 00:36:43,239 Speaker 2: so you know, I think that that'll be interesting. But 675 00:36:43,280 --> 00:36:45,200 Speaker 2: it is. It is funny how we are just kind 676 00:36:45,200 --> 00:36:51,440 Speaker 2: of like slowly working ourselves backwards towards regional conferences. And 677 00:36:51,560 --> 00:36:56,799 Speaker 2: like the challenge though is four teams that are you know, 678 00:36:56,840 --> 00:37:00,360 Speaker 2: those group of five teams, those teams that are not 679 00:37:00,440 --> 00:37:03,279 Speaker 2: part of the Big Ten or the SEC. You know, 680 00:37:03,360 --> 00:37:06,400 Speaker 2: if you are like you know, we're going to have 681 00:37:06,440 --> 00:37:10,280 Speaker 2: this debate three billion times for the next whatever amount 682 00:37:10,280 --> 00:37:14,480 Speaker 2: of time. But if you're an undefeated ACC team, but 683 00:37:14,600 --> 00:37:18,600 Speaker 2: you're undefeated in the ACC and all the other Big 684 00:37:18,640 --> 00:37:21,480 Speaker 2: ten and SEC are like what even is that? Like, 685 00:37:22,320 --> 00:37:24,520 Speaker 2: you know, are we just going to have the Florida 686 00:37:24,600 --> 00:37:27,720 Speaker 2: State issue again? Are we just going to keep having 687 00:37:27,920 --> 00:37:32,240 Speaker 2: teams where if they played in a different conference, everyone 688 00:37:32,239 --> 00:37:34,200 Speaker 2: would be like, oh my god, they're fourteen oe old. 689 00:37:34,239 --> 00:37:36,560 Speaker 1: We've never had the Florida State issue because Florida State 690 00:37:36,600 --> 00:37:39,239 Speaker 1: was not allowed to compete. So I would say, if 691 00:37:39,280 --> 00:37:42,319 Speaker 1: you get, if you're able to actually get this to do. 692 00:37:42,719 --> 00:37:45,440 Speaker 1: Here's the thing. There is no actual proof yet that 693 00:37:45,560 --> 00:37:48,440 Speaker 1: somehow the ACC and the Big twelve are not as 694 00:37:48,480 --> 00:37:51,920 Speaker 1: competitive the other two. There's just a presumption by the 695 00:37:52,040 --> 00:37:54,919 Speaker 1: arrogance of Greg Sanke to believe this, who I think 696 00:37:54,960 --> 00:37:56,880 Speaker 1: singularly is destroying college football. 697 00:37:57,120 --> 00:38:01,120 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's a expand. 698 00:38:01,239 --> 00:38:03,480 Speaker 1: He doesn't want to expand the fan base like he 699 00:38:03,520 --> 00:38:06,439 Speaker 1: actually wants to narrow them. This is my beef. Look, 700 00:38:06,560 --> 00:38:09,080 Speaker 1: God bless him that they're that it's the dominant thing, 701 00:38:09,239 --> 00:38:11,680 Speaker 1: But he has no interest in I like the fact 702 00:38:11,680 --> 00:38:15,680 Speaker 1: that Spokane has a football following. I like the fact 703 00:38:15,719 --> 00:38:18,240 Speaker 1: that there are more that's what made college football different 704 00:38:18,239 --> 00:38:20,760 Speaker 1: from the NFL. It has fan bases in two hundred 705 00:38:20,800 --> 00:38:25,440 Speaker 1: and fifty media markets, not just thirty two. And it 706 00:38:25,480 --> 00:38:29,560 Speaker 1: is it is actually an asset to the SEC that 707 00:38:29,719 --> 00:38:33,320 Speaker 1: Spokane and Washington State exists as far as he's concerned. 708 00:38:33,360 --> 00:38:35,440 Speaker 1: It is not like he wants to create Premier League 709 00:38:35,440 --> 00:38:38,319 Speaker 1: two and you're just at that point, you're creating just 710 00:38:38,400 --> 00:38:43,239 Speaker 1: a lesser, a less good version of the NFL. And 711 00:38:43,480 --> 00:38:44,200 Speaker 1: we have an. 712 00:38:44,239 --> 00:38:47,080 Speaker 2: NFL, Yeah, we do. And I think also like the 713 00:38:47,160 --> 00:38:52,200 Speaker 2: way in which, especially because conference dominance isn't a given, 714 00:38:53,560 --> 00:38:57,240 Speaker 2: I was struckted by comments. I was struck by comments 715 00:38:57,280 --> 00:38:59,960 Speaker 2: made by Alabama's head coach, now Calin de Boor, who 716 00:39:00,120 --> 00:39:02,120 Speaker 2: was talking about like, oh, you know, well, let's see 717 00:39:02,120 --> 00:39:03,719 Speaker 2: how some of these other teams would have done with 718 00:39:03,760 --> 00:39:06,000 Speaker 2: our schedule last year. And I'm like, oh, I probably 719 00:39:06,040 --> 00:39:08,839 Speaker 2: wouldn't have lost. It probably wouldn't have lost to Vanderbilt. 720 00:39:08,840 --> 00:39:11,319 Speaker 2: But like, there is this an idea that and I 721 00:39:11,320 --> 00:39:13,279 Speaker 2: think that this is this is something that's happened within 722 00:39:13,320 --> 00:39:16,799 Speaker 2: the SEC. They have seen turnover before. They like I 723 00:39:16,960 --> 00:39:21,360 Speaker 2: remember when Alabama lost to the University of Louisiana Lafayette. 724 00:39:21,760 --> 00:39:24,520 Speaker 2: I remember when that happened. That was like Nick Saban's 725 00:39:24,560 --> 00:39:28,359 Speaker 2: first season. I know, like there's turnover, there's churn. That's 726 00:39:28,360 --> 00:39:31,640 Speaker 2: the way it's supposed to be. Like you can have them, 727 00:39:31,800 --> 00:39:34,239 Speaker 2: you know, you can have a usc that is unstoppable 728 00:39:34,280 --> 00:39:36,640 Speaker 2: in two thousand and five, two thousand and six and 729 00:39:36,680 --> 00:39:38,800 Speaker 2: now is like you know, they've been kind of wandering 730 00:39:38,840 --> 00:39:40,000 Speaker 2: in the desert for twenty years. 731 00:39:40,080 --> 00:39:43,080 Speaker 1: So well, that's the that was the basis of this question, 732 00:39:43,280 --> 00:39:47,000 Speaker 1: and that's what I'm concerned about. If if the energy 733 00:39:47,000 --> 00:39:50,600 Speaker 1: of college football is basically the Midwest and South, even 734 00:39:50,600 --> 00:39:54,880 Speaker 1: though there are teams living and breathing on the on 735 00:39:54,920 --> 00:39:56,919 Speaker 1: the Pacific coach of the United States. 736 00:39:56,600 --> 00:39:59,600 Speaker 2: We respect the polouse in this household, like it's very 737 00:39:59,640 --> 00:40:00,120 Speaker 2: it's very. 738 00:40:00,920 --> 00:40:03,400 Speaker 1: But that's the concern I have is that the further 739 00:40:03,440 --> 00:40:07,759 Speaker 1: away college football retreats from the West Coast, that it 740 00:40:07,800 --> 00:40:11,319 Speaker 1: becomes self fulfilling, and that eventually college football will just 741 00:40:11,360 --> 00:40:14,760 Speaker 1: be less popular in America's most populous state, which seems 742 00:40:14,800 --> 00:40:18,439 Speaker 1: like a very bad idea if I were the czar 743 00:40:18,520 --> 00:40:20,000 Speaker 1: of college football. 744 00:40:19,600 --> 00:40:22,319 Speaker 2: Right, I think that's that's a point of emphasis that 745 00:40:22,640 --> 00:40:25,600 Speaker 2: needs to be made because I think that there is 746 00:40:25,640 --> 00:40:29,319 Speaker 2: a real concern that how because I think you know, 747 00:40:29,360 --> 00:40:33,839 Speaker 2: college football is made over time, it's created every single year, 748 00:40:33,880 --> 00:40:36,720 Speaker 2: and it's created by recruiting. And when you look at 749 00:40:36,920 --> 00:40:40,000 Speaker 2: where kids are coming out of like you know, your 750 00:40:40,040 --> 00:40:43,440 Speaker 2: top thirty, top forty recruits who are going to the 751 00:40:43,480 --> 00:40:47,560 Speaker 2: biggest programs, they are coming in general from the South, 752 00:40:47,800 --> 00:40:49,680 Speaker 2: They're coming in journal from the South. And you know 753 00:40:49,760 --> 00:40:51,920 Speaker 2: you used to and I think you still do. Like 754 00:40:52,000 --> 00:40:55,400 Speaker 2: California still has some powerhouse football high schools modern day 755 00:40:55,480 --> 00:41:00,040 Speaker 2: is probably the best example. But if that stops and 756 00:41:00,120 --> 00:41:05,080 Speaker 2: you stop having reasons for kids to come to USC 757 00:41:06,000 --> 00:41:09,520 Speaker 2: or go to you know, San Diego State or something 758 00:41:09,560 --> 00:41:11,879 Speaker 2: like that, Like I want to see California West Coast 759 00:41:11,880 --> 00:41:15,160 Speaker 2: schools be super competitive. And you know that's why I'm like, 760 00:41:15,200 --> 00:41:17,719 Speaker 2: I want UCLA to be really good. I think that's 761 00:41:17,800 --> 00:41:21,360 Speaker 2: fun when UCLA is good for one thing there, Like UCLA, 762 00:41:21,600 --> 00:41:25,399 Speaker 2: what was that like five or six years ago their 763 00:41:25,480 --> 00:41:27,719 Speaker 2: quarterback who then sadly I believe, got drafted by the 764 00:41:27,760 --> 00:41:29,120 Speaker 2: Giants and then the. 765 00:41:29,120 --> 00:41:33,560 Speaker 1: Ether Jay Josh Josh Rosen. 766 00:41:33,960 --> 00:41:36,160 Speaker 2: Yes, he ran a fake spike and it was the 767 00:41:36,160 --> 00:41:37,960 Speaker 2: greatest play I'd ever seen, And I was like that's 768 00:41:38,000 --> 00:41:40,960 Speaker 2: the funniest thing. It was a massive comeback victory and 769 00:41:41,000 --> 00:41:43,040 Speaker 2: he ran a fake spike, which is the kind of thing. 770 00:41:43,239 --> 00:41:45,279 Speaker 2: That's another thing I love about college football is that 771 00:41:45,320 --> 00:41:50,000 Speaker 2: people will try things that in the NFL you would see, Wow. 772 00:41:50,440 --> 00:41:53,240 Speaker 1: You know how innovation works in football? It does literally 773 00:41:53,280 --> 00:41:57,200 Speaker 1: bottom it's the high school coaches innovate, the college coaches 774 00:41:57,560 --> 00:42:00,520 Speaker 1: copy it and hire these high school innovators, and then 775 00:42:00,560 --> 00:42:05,799 Speaker 1: the NFL reluctantly goes ahead and really, right, all right, 776 00:42:05,840 --> 00:42:09,440 Speaker 1: we'll run the spread offense because you know, everybody knows 777 00:42:09,440 --> 00:42:10,000 Speaker 1: how to run it. 778 00:42:10,080 --> 00:42:12,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, the Dolphins will use spread to beat the Patriots 779 00:42:12,920 --> 00:42:15,600 Speaker 2: during Monday Night football, and everyone's like, oh my god, 780 00:42:15,760 --> 00:42:16,400 Speaker 2: and they're. 781 00:42:16,160 --> 00:42:17,560 Speaker 1: Like they come up with that idea. 782 00:42:17,840 --> 00:42:20,200 Speaker 2: Really, they've been doing this in college for years. And 783 00:42:20,200 --> 00:42:22,200 Speaker 2: then there's always like, you know, a couple of schools, 784 00:42:22,400 --> 00:42:24,400 Speaker 2: schools probably most people haven't heard of. It's always like 785 00:42:24,440 --> 00:42:26,840 Speaker 2: Colorado School of Mines or something like that, where it's like, 786 00:42:26,880 --> 00:42:29,880 Speaker 2: we don't punt, we were ever punt right, right, And 787 00:42:30,080 --> 00:42:32,360 Speaker 2: it's just like I love that kind of innovation, but like, 788 00:42:32,440 --> 00:42:36,720 Speaker 2: I want there to be regional and national college football, 789 00:42:36,800 --> 00:42:38,800 Speaker 2: and I think, well, something that also I mean, you 790 00:42:39,160 --> 00:42:41,440 Speaker 2: have to talk about how television networks plan into this, 791 00:42:41,640 --> 00:42:43,279 Speaker 2: how the deals with. 792 00:42:43,800 --> 00:42:46,600 Speaker 1: Fox and ESPN are controlling college football. The two of 793 00:42:46,640 --> 00:42:49,160 Speaker 1: them have all this control, and the irony is I 794 00:42:49,200 --> 00:42:52,319 Speaker 1: think we both look, especially Fox. I don't know about 795 00:42:52,320 --> 00:42:54,640 Speaker 1: the future of Fox. You've got the whole Murdock situation 796 00:42:54,719 --> 00:42:56,960 Speaker 1: that at any point is going to become an issue, 797 00:42:57,160 --> 00:42:58,879 Speaker 1: and I just don't know. We're going to find out 798 00:42:59,080 --> 00:43:01,600 Speaker 1: during win the NFL side of its media deal, but 799 00:43:01,640 --> 00:43:04,200 Speaker 1: that's going to be an interesting It's going to be 800 00:43:04,200 --> 00:43:06,920 Speaker 1: an interesting moment for the Big ten because how much, 801 00:43:08,080 --> 00:43:11,520 Speaker 1: how how deep really are Fox's pockets compared to Disney, 802 00:43:11,920 --> 00:43:14,880 Speaker 1: And then what happens when Amazon. I mean, I remember 803 00:43:14,920 --> 00:43:17,040 Speaker 1: talking with somebody about the PAC twelve, the deal the 804 00:43:17,080 --> 00:43:20,279 Speaker 1: PAC twelve turned down when Oregon and Washington, and I 805 00:43:20,280 --> 00:43:22,840 Speaker 1: can't remember the order of events if it was Oregon 806 00:43:22,960 --> 00:43:25,600 Speaker 1: was into it and Washington said no, or vice versa, 807 00:43:25,640 --> 00:43:27,319 Speaker 1: but they were sort of the two lynchpins of it. 808 00:43:27,960 --> 00:43:31,160 Speaker 1: And you know, there were some executives that looked at 809 00:43:31,160 --> 00:43:33,400 Speaker 1: it and said, you know, in like year three of 810 00:43:33,440 --> 00:43:35,239 Speaker 1: that deal, the PAC twelve was going to end up 811 00:43:35,239 --> 00:43:38,920 Speaker 1: with more money than the ACC and competitive with the 812 00:43:38,960 --> 00:43:41,600 Speaker 1: SEC and the Big Ten just the way Apple was 813 00:43:41,920 --> 00:43:44,440 Speaker 1: financing that, and that seems to be where this is going. 814 00:43:44,480 --> 00:43:47,720 Speaker 1: But you know that's going to probably be another moment 815 00:43:47,719 --> 00:43:49,160 Speaker 1: where there's potential shake up. 816 00:43:49,560 --> 00:43:51,880 Speaker 2: Yeah no, And you know you've seen this a little 817 00:43:51,880 --> 00:43:55,279 Speaker 2: bit and it's challenging again because this could be a 818 00:43:55,320 --> 00:43:57,319 Speaker 2: moment in which we think this would be a great 819 00:43:57,320 --> 00:43:59,520 Speaker 2: idea and that comes in five years and everybody's like, 820 00:43:59,719 --> 00:44:01,759 Speaker 2: what what were you thinking with Apple? Because I keep, 821 00:44:01,840 --> 00:44:04,000 Speaker 2: I mean, I feel this way about Peacock and the 822 00:44:04,040 --> 00:44:06,279 Speaker 2: way that there are some specific Big Ten games that 823 00:44:06,320 --> 00:44:08,600 Speaker 2: you can now only watch on Peacock and everyone gets 824 00:44:08,600 --> 00:44:09,759 Speaker 2: met every single time. 825 00:44:09,880 --> 00:44:12,440 Speaker 1: Well, and it's always the Michigan Illinois game. It's a 826 00:44:12,520 --> 00:44:15,399 Speaker 1: game that only you care about. Well, yes, that they 827 00:44:15,440 --> 00:44:18,400 Speaker 1: really don't want to put on regular NBC. Yes, but 828 00:44:18,520 --> 00:44:20,799 Speaker 1: still my friends in Illinois. Yet who knows, maybe they'll 829 00:44:20,840 --> 00:44:23,440 Speaker 1: be more competitive this coming here, but it's always like 830 00:44:24,040 --> 00:44:26,920 Speaker 1: they force a big brand name to play a lesser 831 00:44:26,960 --> 00:44:27,879 Speaker 1: brand name. Right. 832 00:44:29,160 --> 00:44:31,520 Speaker 2: But it's interesting also because Fox, I mean thinking about 833 00:44:31,560 --> 00:44:35,239 Speaker 2: brand names, they have been so focused on building up 834 00:44:35,400 --> 00:44:38,160 Speaker 2: that noon game. They're you know, big Noon Saturday or 835 00:44:38,200 --> 00:44:42,359 Speaker 2: something like that. But it is interesting to me, and 836 00:44:42,600 --> 00:44:45,280 Speaker 2: I think that this kind of gets to how Fox 837 00:44:45,360 --> 00:44:48,759 Speaker 2: is trying to play this the sports stuff and their 838 00:44:48,920 --> 00:44:52,200 Speaker 2: other work because Big Noon Saturday. One of the things 839 00:44:52,200 --> 00:44:56,839 Speaker 2: that happens is that Clay Travis hosts a show that 840 00:44:57,200 --> 00:45:01,480 Speaker 2: I'm assuming is observed by people. And it's interesting how 841 00:45:01,520 --> 00:45:03,960 Speaker 2: they try to blend that, like I, you know, I 842 00:45:04,120 --> 00:45:08,959 Speaker 2: happen to quite like Joel Klatt, Gus Johnson, even though 843 00:45:09,360 --> 00:45:11,600 Speaker 2: every you know, they do every Michigan Ohio State game 844 00:45:11,600 --> 00:45:13,520 Speaker 2: they basically will do if it's like a big game, 845 00:45:14,239 --> 00:45:16,040 Speaker 2: they will do. They get it, and they will get 846 00:45:16,080 --> 00:45:18,840 Speaker 2: the numbers. They will get the numbers every time. Because 847 00:45:18,840 --> 00:45:20,960 Speaker 2: Michigan is a draw. It just is. It's the same 848 00:45:21,000 --> 00:45:22,839 Speaker 2: you know, Texas is a draw. Higo State does a draw. 849 00:45:22,880 --> 00:45:25,240 Speaker 2: Like some of these schools, they're just draws. It just happens. 850 00:45:25,280 --> 00:45:29,120 Speaker 2: So one, it's interesting how they try to bring in 851 00:45:29,239 --> 00:45:31,560 Speaker 2: some of their like you know, Clay Travis kind of 852 00:45:31,600 --> 00:45:34,160 Speaker 2: rides that line because he's you know, the you know, 853 00:45:34,239 --> 00:45:37,279 Speaker 2: his radio show is he's replacing Rush Limbaugh. But then 854 00:45:37,320 --> 00:45:40,880 Speaker 2: he's also started out doing sports, started out doing you know, 855 00:45:40,960 --> 00:45:45,360 Speaker 2: OutKick or whatever. But I also am curious for Fox, 856 00:45:46,560 --> 00:45:48,760 Speaker 2: are they you know, because they'll put out their numbers 857 00:45:48,800 --> 00:45:50,719 Speaker 2: every week and they're always like, you know, we got 858 00:45:50,800 --> 00:45:53,759 Speaker 2: seventeen million people to watch this Ohio you know, this 859 00:45:53,840 --> 00:45:59,280 Speaker 2: Ohio State hypothetical Texas game. We got eighteen million people 860 00:45:59,280 --> 00:46:01,560 Speaker 2: to watch Michigan play Ohio State, because of course you did. 861 00:46:01,640 --> 00:46:04,959 Speaker 2: But again, did you get that because it's Michigan Ohio 862 00:46:05,040 --> 00:46:06,680 Speaker 2: State or did Fox have anything to do with it 863 00:46:06,719 --> 00:46:08,880 Speaker 2: at all? So it is interesting because I would be 864 00:46:08,960 --> 00:46:11,440 Speaker 2: curious to look at what does it look like when 865 00:46:11,680 --> 00:46:15,400 Speaker 2: Fox needs to build up, you know, when it can't 866 00:46:15,440 --> 00:46:17,120 Speaker 2: just rely on the fact that you've got this big 867 00:46:17,120 --> 00:46:19,799 Speaker 2: game when it you know, if Fox is doing because 868 00:46:19,800 --> 00:46:25,680 Speaker 2: I've actually watched some pretty solid, like Nebraska Indiana games, 869 00:46:25,719 --> 00:46:28,840 Speaker 2: because you know, Nebraska's trying to figure it out. Indiana 870 00:46:29,000 --> 00:46:31,359 Speaker 2: has actually been quite competitive, Illinois was this past year 871 00:46:31,360 --> 00:46:33,160 Speaker 2: as well, And so I'm just interested to see what 872 00:46:33,200 --> 00:46:36,160 Speaker 2: that looks like because so much of this, like it 873 00:46:36,320 --> 00:46:41,200 Speaker 2: seems so obvious to put college football on television and 874 00:46:41,239 --> 00:46:43,920 Speaker 2: to make it make money, like it feels to me 875 00:46:44,120 --> 00:46:46,400 Speaker 2: like it should be the easiest thing in the universe. 876 00:46:46,840 --> 00:46:48,600 Speaker 2: And yet every year. 877 00:46:49,320 --> 00:46:51,520 Speaker 1: Well this goes too Now, this goes to the lack 878 00:46:51,600 --> 00:46:55,000 Speaker 1: of again where and I actually think this is a 879 00:46:55,040 --> 00:46:58,080 Speaker 1: metaphor for where we are right where people are so 880 00:46:58,160 --> 00:47:02,160 Speaker 1: concerned about their narrow power that they want to keep. 881 00:47:02,280 --> 00:47:04,760 Speaker 1: So take Greg sank. He wants to make the SEC 882 00:47:05,080 --> 00:47:08,480 Speaker 1: this elite set of institutions that only you know, and 883 00:47:08,920 --> 00:47:11,600 Speaker 1: shrink the number of teams that get to compete in 884 00:47:11,640 --> 00:47:15,000 Speaker 1: the highest levels of college football, rather than saying, how 885 00:47:15,000 --> 00:47:17,960 Speaker 1: do I expand, how do I grow? How do I 886 00:47:18,080 --> 00:47:21,759 Speaker 1: make this even bigger? Right? Even? And in fact, if 887 00:47:21,840 --> 00:47:25,400 Speaker 1: you took the TV deal, if college football negotiated their 888 00:47:25,400 --> 00:47:28,839 Speaker 1: television contracts the way the NFL does, which basically says, hey, 889 00:47:29,400 --> 00:47:32,000 Speaker 1: you come to us and we'll find a piece, and 890 00:47:32,320 --> 00:47:34,560 Speaker 1: guess what You're going to have to put Jacksonville on, 891 00:47:34,760 --> 00:47:36,440 Speaker 1: whether you like it or not. If you want an 892 00:47:36,480 --> 00:47:39,279 Speaker 1: opportunity at one Dallas game this year, you're gonna have 893 00:47:39,280 --> 00:47:41,960 Speaker 1: to put Colorado State on. If you would in Miami 894 00:47:41,960 --> 00:47:44,560 Speaker 1: of Ohio on, if you would like access to a 895 00:47:44,600 --> 00:47:47,920 Speaker 1: Michigan game over here, you could actually rate. You could 896 00:47:48,040 --> 00:47:51,920 Speaker 1: make more money for everybody, more money for the Max schools, 897 00:47:51,960 --> 00:47:54,000 Speaker 1: more money for the Wax schools, more money for the 898 00:47:54,000 --> 00:47:58,040 Speaker 1: Mountain West, oh and more money for the big schools 899 00:47:58,080 --> 00:48:01,080 Speaker 1: as well. It's one of those cases where you could 900 00:48:01,120 --> 00:48:05,239 Speaker 1: be the NFL here and essentially make everybody witcher and 901 00:48:05,360 --> 00:48:09,400 Speaker 1: bigger and wealthier, and what they're doing actually is limiting 902 00:48:09,440 --> 00:48:13,080 Speaker 1: their ability collectively. So yes, the SEC can get a 903 00:48:13,080 --> 00:48:15,799 Speaker 1: bigger TV deal, but they've actually limited the amount of 904 00:48:15,800 --> 00:48:19,560 Speaker 1: money per school because because they they've screwed up the 905 00:48:19,600 --> 00:48:24,600 Speaker 1: negotiating abilities of the rest of the of college football, 906 00:48:24,640 --> 00:48:27,319 Speaker 1: where if they pulled all of their games into one 907 00:48:27,360 --> 00:48:30,399 Speaker 1: thing like the old College Football Association, they could get 908 00:48:30,440 --> 00:48:34,239 Speaker 1: then fifteen networks like the NFL does begging for a 909 00:48:34,280 --> 00:48:36,520 Speaker 1: piece of the action, right, And. 910 00:48:36,480 --> 00:48:40,840 Speaker 2: I think that that's something where you have this idea 911 00:48:41,120 --> 00:48:44,440 Speaker 2: that there is that there's a limited money and that 912 00:48:44,480 --> 00:48:46,560 Speaker 2: there's a you know, this is a zero sum game, 913 00:48:46,600 --> 00:48:48,120 Speaker 2: and I just don't think it is. And I think 914 00:48:48,160 --> 00:48:50,160 Speaker 2: that that goes I mean, as you mentioned, kind of 915 00:48:50,160 --> 00:48:52,680 Speaker 2: a metaphor for how people are seeing media right now, 916 00:48:53,280 --> 00:48:55,680 Speaker 2: where on the one hander, it does feel kind of 917 00:48:55,719 --> 00:48:58,280 Speaker 2: like you know, you're scrambling, you know, you're playing musical chairs, 918 00:48:58,360 --> 00:49:01,600 Speaker 2: but musical chairs for your and career. But at the 919 00:49:01,640 --> 00:49:04,640 Speaker 2: same time, also there's so much out there, there's so 920 00:49:04,719 --> 00:49:07,560 Speaker 2: much content that could be done. There's so many different 921 00:49:07,600 --> 00:49:10,400 Speaker 2: ways to be doing this. It's okay. If things are different, 922 00:49:11,320 --> 00:49:15,720 Speaker 2: it's okay. If networks are doing different things, it's okay. 923 00:49:15,719 --> 00:49:19,520 Speaker 2: If people are trying different things, that's fine. Like I'm 924 00:49:19,560 --> 00:49:23,080 Speaker 2: definitely of the you know, lat a Million Flowers Bloom 925 00:49:23,200 --> 00:49:26,920 Speaker 2: school on this, and I think that that's you know, 926 00:49:26,960 --> 00:49:30,960 Speaker 2: for college football purposes, like after the Supreme Court basically 927 00:49:31,040 --> 00:49:34,600 Speaker 2: said like you can put college football on Saturdays, like 928 00:49:35,000 --> 00:49:37,719 Speaker 2: you know, there're there, you know. I think that was 929 00:49:37,920 --> 00:49:40,919 Speaker 2: a Supreme Court decision that basically was like, you guys, 930 00:49:40,960 --> 00:49:43,680 Speaker 2: figure it out. You can do this. There's a way 931 00:49:43,719 --> 00:49:45,600 Speaker 2: to do this, but everybody's terrified. 932 00:49:46,080 --> 00:49:48,839 Speaker 1: Well, you have the conference, there's no leadership. But we could, 933 00:49:49,600 --> 00:49:51,640 Speaker 1: we could, We could keep going on that. I want 934 00:49:51,640 --> 00:49:55,120 Speaker 1: to pivot a little bit. Tell me more about how 935 00:49:55,200 --> 00:50:00,080 Speaker 1: you decide, uh, what is worthy of a of a lead? 936 00:50:00,120 --> 00:50:02,520 Speaker 1: For you, doing a daily show means you're sort of 937 00:50:02,560 --> 00:50:04,080 Speaker 1: you're on the news, but you don't have to be 938 00:50:04,080 --> 00:50:05,840 Speaker 1: on top of the news, right right, You could be 939 00:50:05,920 --> 00:50:08,080 Speaker 1: news adjacent. I think the same thing I'm doing two 940 00:50:08,120 --> 00:50:09,839 Speaker 1: or three days a week. I always say I got 941 00:50:09,880 --> 00:50:12,040 Speaker 1: to be news adjacent. I don't have to be in 942 00:50:12,080 --> 00:50:16,879 Speaker 1: the moment itself. So you know, you're you know, what's 943 00:50:16,920 --> 00:50:18,640 Speaker 1: a story that you will do and what's a story 944 00:50:18,640 --> 00:50:21,480 Speaker 1: that you won't do because of how you want to 945 00:50:21,520 --> 00:50:23,880 Speaker 1: steer this audience and steer this program. 946 00:50:24,239 --> 00:50:27,080 Speaker 2: Well, it's a it's a decision I make every day. 947 00:50:27,120 --> 00:50:29,320 Speaker 2: It's a decision we make because I have an absolutely 948 00:50:29,360 --> 00:50:31,880 Speaker 2: fantastic team of producers who are thinking about this. And 949 00:50:31,920 --> 00:50:33,359 Speaker 2: the next thing is that you know, we do have 950 00:50:33,480 --> 00:50:35,520 Speaker 2: you know, a headlines portion where we can talk about 951 00:50:35,560 --> 00:50:37,560 Speaker 2: the news of the day, but also there's a lot 952 00:50:37,600 --> 00:50:39,759 Speaker 2: of stuff where it's like, you know, maybe people are 953 00:50:39,880 --> 00:50:43,440 Speaker 2: missing what is actually going on in this debate about medicaid. 954 00:50:43,600 --> 00:50:46,120 Speaker 2: I'll give you an example specifically about medicaid in which 955 00:50:46,120 --> 00:50:49,359 Speaker 2: you kept hearing from Republicans like, you know, we are 956 00:50:49,960 --> 00:50:54,040 Speaker 2: funding able bodied working men to sit on their couches, 957 00:50:54,239 --> 00:50:57,560 Speaker 2: and you know, the rhetoric around medicaid was the same 958 00:50:57,640 --> 00:50:59,680 Speaker 2: rhetoric people have been using to talk about welfare or 959 00:50:59,760 --> 00:51:02,280 Speaker 2: the concept of welfare since Oh. 960 00:51:02,200 --> 00:51:04,120 Speaker 1: Medicaid in welfare, I mean, I'm going to be on 961 00:51:04,239 --> 00:51:08,240 Speaker 1: a Medicaid in the eighties was synonymous with welfare. Shouldn't 962 00:51:08,239 --> 00:51:11,200 Speaker 1: have been, but it was rhetorically and there's still a 963 00:51:11,200 --> 00:51:13,920 Speaker 1: lot of Republicans who haven't lost that language. 964 00:51:13,600 --> 00:51:16,279 Speaker 2: Right exactly, because when you say medicaid, I mean for 965 00:51:16,320 --> 00:51:19,080 Speaker 2: the first the first thing is in a lot of 966 00:51:19,120 --> 00:51:23,120 Speaker 2: states because of that, they don't call it medicaid. In California, 967 00:51:23,160 --> 00:51:26,279 Speaker 2: I believe it's medical. So there are lots of people 968 00:51:26,360 --> 00:51:28,960 Speaker 2: who might not even know that they are using medicaid. 969 00:51:29,520 --> 00:51:32,919 Speaker 2: And especially because you know, we had a conversation last 970 00:51:32,960 --> 00:51:36,600 Speaker 2: week about this on the show, where basically it works 971 00:51:36,640 --> 00:51:39,600 Speaker 2: out that the majority of people on Medicaid are working. 972 00:51:39,840 --> 00:51:42,000 Speaker 2: It's just that a lot of people don't have jobs 973 00:51:42,040 --> 00:51:45,120 Speaker 2: that offer health insurance or maybe those jobs, you know. 974 00:51:45,200 --> 00:51:48,640 Speaker 2: And if you, let's say you drive for DoorDash, if 975 00:51:48,680 --> 00:51:51,520 Speaker 2: you go to doorda, if you google does DoorDash offer 976 00:51:51,560 --> 00:51:54,280 Speaker 2: health insurance, DoorDash will say, no, we don't. But here's 977 00:51:54,320 --> 00:51:57,120 Speaker 2: this app we use where you can either go through 978 00:51:57,280 --> 00:51:59,960 Speaker 2: the Affordable Care Act or you can get on Medicaid 979 00:52:00,120 --> 00:52:02,960 Speaker 2: in your state. And so you could go through the exchange, 980 00:52:03,000 --> 00:52:05,759 Speaker 2: which might be pretty expensive for some people. I know, 981 00:52:05,800 --> 00:52:10,799 Speaker 2: like looking at the exchange in California pricey. Looking at 982 00:52:10,800 --> 00:52:13,799 Speaker 2: the exchange in Utah also pricey, but for a lot 983 00:52:13,800 --> 00:52:15,560 Speaker 2: of people Medicaid's going to be a better option, and 984 00:52:15,600 --> 00:52:18,400 Speaker 2: it's you know, you're I don't know. I've worked a 985 00:52:18,400 --> 00:52:21,839 Speaker 2: lot of shitty jobs in my time, so I am 986 00:52:21,880 --> 00:52:24,840 Speaker 2: a appreciator of people who work jobs that a lot 987 00:52:24,880 --> 00:52:27,040 Speaker 2: of times we don't talk about that. 988 00:52:27,080 --> 00:52:28,839 Speaker 1: You know, we don't talk about people none of them 989 00:52:28,880 --> 00:52:29,719 Speaker 1: offer benefits. 990 00:52:29,840 --> 00:52:32,160 Speaker 2: They do not offer benefits, and their benefit is just 991 00:52:32,239 --> 00:52:34,239 Speaker 2: drive a lot and then maybe you can afford it 992 00:52:34,239 --> 00:52:36,160 Speaker 2: on your own. And you know, there are people for 993 00:52:36,200 --> 00:52:38,239 Speaker 2: whom Uber is their full time job, door Dash is 994 00:52:38,239 --> 00:52:40,520 Speaker 2: their full time job. They are you know, they're doing 995 00:52:41,239 --> 00:52:43,840 Speaker 2: multiple they might even have I mean you've probably seen this. 996 00:52:43,920 --> 00:52:46,239 Speaker 2: There are people who drive for Uber and Lyft and 997 00:52:46,320 --> 00:52:48,680 Speaker 2: a bunch of other companies too, and that's all they do. 998 00:52:49,239 --> 00:52:53,279 Speaker 2: And so I think that that is a conversation. You know, 999 00:52:53,320 --> 00:52:55,440 Speaker 2: it was not one percent peg to the news, but 1000 00:52:55,440 --> 00:52:57,480 Speaker 2: obviously it's to the news about like what is this? 1001 00:52:57,600 --> 00:52:59,680 Speaker 2: What are we even talking about when we talk about medicaid? 1002 00:53:00,080 --> 00:53:04,319 Speaker 2: So I think, like I want our audience to feel informed. 1003 00:53:04,880 --> 00:53:07,320 Speaker 2: I think also the fact that I have an audience 1004 00:53:07,560 --> 00:53:11,520 Speaker 2: that is, you know, we get to hear from them 1005 00:53:11,680 --> 00:53:13,880 Speaker 2: and get to hear from our listeners all the time, 1006 00:53:14,520 --> 00:53:17,480 Speaker 2: and there's a you know, I want our audience to 1007 00:53:17,600 --> 00:53:21,239 Speaker 2: feel like there's somebody who they can listen to. Who 1008 00:53:21,520 --> 00:53:24,080 Speaker 2: because people listen to me every morning that it's a routine. 1009 00:53:24,160 --> 00:53:26,200 Speaker 2: But when you do a daily show, you recognize that 1010 00:53:26,200 --> 00:53:29,200 Speaker 2: you are a part of people's routine. And so I 1011 00:53:29,239 --> 00:53:32,440 Speaker 2: am not going to try and just blow everybody's minds 1012 00:53:32,719 --> 00:53:37,759 Speaker 2: with doing something that is like completely totally out of 1013 00:53:37,840 --> 00:53:39,960 Speaker 2: left field. I want people to feel like they can 1014 00:53:39,960 --> 00:53:43,840 Speaker 2: come into the show and kind of an understanding that 1015 00:53:43,920 --> 00:53:46,719 Speaker 2: I'm on their side. I'm asking questions that they might 1016 00:53:46,760 --> 00:53:48,680 Speaker 2: be asking. I'm also going to try and challenge them 1017 00:53:48,680 --> 00:53:50,640 Speaker 2: a little bit because I think that there are sometimes 1018 00:53:50,680 --> 00:53:54,719 Speaker 2: people come in with priors. So for example, I mean, 1019 00:53:55,160 --> 00:53:58,000 Speaker 2: even referencing this feels like it was from three thousand 1020 00:53:58,120 --> 00:54:01,160 Speaker 2: years ago. But we had Sparrow on to talk about 1021 00:54:01,160 --> 00:54:04,120 Speaker 2: why he thought it was a good idea that Chuck 1022 00:54:04,160 --> 00:54:07,759 Speaker 2: Schumer went along with. I can't even remember what this 1023 00:54:07,840 --> 00:54:11,560 Speaker 2: debate was about, but the government shutdown, Yes, the government shutdown. 1024 00:54:11,600 --> 00:54:14,759 Speaker 1: Thank you that he was that he yeah, well that 1025 00:54:14,840 --> 00:54:16,640 Speaker 1: was a case where I think Schumer came to the 1026 00:54:16,719 --> 00:54:20,040 Speaker 1: right probably came to the right political decision, but he 1027 00:54:20,080 --> 00:54:23,760 Speaker 1: communicated it so poorly that he ended up basically Harry 1028 00:54:23,840 --> 00:54:24,520 Speaker 1: carry himself. 1029 00:54:24,560 --> 00:54:27,560 Speaker 2: Yeah, it was everybody was mad, and I was. You know, 1030 00:54:27,640 --> 00:54:29,440 Speaker 2: I wanted to hear from a voice who I thought 1031 00:54:29,520 --> 00:54:31,560 Speaker 2: was smart to tell me why people should not be mad, 1032 00:54:32,000 --> 00:54:34,359 Speaker 2: and I thought he made you know, I like when 1033 00:54:34,360 --> 00:54:36,399 Speaker 2: people are like I disagreed with him, but I kind 1034 00:54:36,400 --> 00:54:39,680 Speaker 2: of understand where that perspective comes from. And so I 1035 00:54:39,719 --> 00:54:42,520 Speaker 2: want to offer that to my audience as well, because 1036 00:54:42,560 --> 00:54:45,640 Speaker 2: I think that I am not going to do the 1037 00:54:45,640 --> 00:54:48,400 Speaker 2: thing where people you know, we have a lot of 1038 00:54:48,400 --> 00:54:50,560 Speaker 2: people right now who will do the thing. Like no 1039 00:54:50,600 --> 00:54:53,480 Speaker 2: one else is telling you this, but I will. Everybody's 1040 00:54:53,480 --> 00:54:56,000 Speaker 2: telling you everything all the time. If you want to 1041 00:54:56,040 --> 00:54:57,960 Speaker 2: hear a thing that you want to hear, you can 1042 00:54:58,000 --> 00:55:00,600 Speaker 2: go find it. But what I want to offer to 1043 00:55:00,640 --> 00:55:04,040 Speaker 2: listeners is to have someone be there to ask the 1044 00:55:04,120 --> 00:55:08,360 Speaker 2: right questions, not just tell them things, but ask questions 1045 00:55:08,400 --> 00:55:10,680 Speaker 2: to other people that can be informative. 1046 00:55:11,160 --> 00:55:13,520 Speaker 1: Do you do you feel as if the algorithms work 1047 00:55:13,520 --> 00:55:15,560 Speaker 1: against you? I mean, and I say this in that 1048 00:55:15,800 --> 00:55:18,480 Speaker 1: the algorithms feel like they're so refined that it really, 1049 00:55:18,600 --> 00:55:21,920 Speaker 1: you know, rewards your partisans and anybody who wants to 1050 00:55:21,960 --> 00:55:28,200 Speaker 1: be questioning anything it algorithms struggle with that. I think so, 1051 00:55:28,760 --> 00:55:31,240 Speaker 1: and it's been I think it's one of the core 1052 00:55:33,040 --> 00:55:37,160 Speaker 1: it's one of the core problems with our our online 1053 00:55:37,840 --> 00:55:42,320 Speaker 1: uh discourse, in that it's at you know again, these 1054 00:55:42,520 --> 00:55:45,040 Speaker 1: big tech companies who have claimed they're not publishers, but 1055 00:55:45,080 --> 00:55:47,360 Speaker 1: the minute they created an algorithm, they became a publisher. 1056 00:55:47,560 --> 00:55:49,640 Speaker 1: And I'm convinced if we went to court, we would 1057 00:55:49,640 --> 00:55:52,719 Speaker 1: win that fight because I think Section I mean, I 1058 00:55:52,800 --> 00:55:55,000 Speaker 1: just think it's beyond I think. I think the minute 1059 00:55:55,000 --> 00:55:57,480 Speaker 1: you create an algorithm, you've changed the nature of your 1060 00:55:57,800 --> 00:55:59,279 Speaker 1: of your relationship with check. 1061 00:55:59,320 --> 00:56:01,440 Speaker 2: You know, I love so two thirty like a member 1062 00:56:01,440 --> 00:56:04,000 Speaker 2: of my own family. So we can have a separate conversation. 1063 00:56:04,160 --> 00:56:05,839 Speaker 1: No, no, no, no, we could, But I just say Section 1064 00:56:05,880 --> 00:56:07,880 Speaker 1: two thirty. It's like, I don't even think they've it 1065 00:56:07,960 --> 00:56:09,879 Speaker 1: may give them an exception, but the minute they create 1066 00:56:09,880 --> 00:56:12,799 Speaker 1: an algorithm, they've lost their exception. That's my argument. And 1067 00:56:12,840 --> 00:56:15,760 Speaker 1: I actually think, and I actually think that that hasn't 1068 00:56:15,760 --> 00:56:17,799 Speaker 1: been tested, and I think that at some point it 1069 00:56:17,800 --> 00:56:20,239 Speaker 1: could be if you if you wanted to do that. 1070 00:56:20,719 --> 00:56:23,839 Speaker 1: But the bigger issue is just that that I think 1071 00:56:23,920 --> 00:56:26,160 Speaker 1: people are struggling to figure out how to They don't 1072 00:56:26,160 --> 00:56:32,200 Speaker 1: even realize how much they've been siloed away from competing 1073 00:56:33,280 --> 00:56:34,800 Speaker 1: competing viewpoints, right. 1074 00:56:34,840 --> 00:56:40,920 Speaker 2: And I think that part of that is there are 1075 00:56:41,000 --> 00:56:43,640 Speaker 2: a couple of concepts I think a lot about in 1076 00:56:43,760 --> 00:56:49,120 Speaker 2: terms of how to keep myself saying in this news environment. 1077 00:56:49,719 --> 00:56:53,120 Speaker 2: And one is yes, remembering the idea of algorithmic capture, 1078 00:56:53,280 --> 00:56:55,920 Speaker 2: remembering the fact that like things that do well online 1079 00:56:56,040 --> 00:57:00,360 Speaker 2: are not necessarily reflective of like real life, like sample. 1080 00:57:00,640 --> 00:57:02,520 Speaker 2: I mean, I will not say that the Internet is 1081 00:57:02,520 --> 00:57:04,640 Speaker 2: not real, because it is obviously very real, but in 1082 00:57:04,719 --> 00:57:08,200 Speaker 2: terms of thinking about numbers, if you go on any 1083 00:57:08,400 --> 00:57:10,880 Speaker 2: social media site, you would come to believe that, like, 1084 00:57:11,560 --> 00:57:14,640 Speaker 2: you know, there are a lot more trad wives or 1085 00:57:15,120 --> 00:57:15,719 Speaker 2: you know, kind of. 1086 00:57:15,719 --> 00:57:21,200 Speaker 1: How about it. I mean, if you online you think America's. 1087 00:57:21,120 --> 00:57:22,800 Speaker 2: You look at the extual numbers and it's like not 1088 00:57:22,800 --> 00:57:27,919 Speaker 2: not really. But there are two concepts. There is a 1089 00:57:27,960 --> 00:57:31,720 Speaker 2: substracker and podcaster named I think Ethan Strauss who had 1090 00:57:31,720 --> 00:57:34,680 Speaker 2: two ideas. One is one that people have probably heard of, 1091 00:57:34,760 --> 00:57:38,320 Speaker 2: audience capture, which is that you start doing something for 1092 00:57:38,360 --> 00:57:41,840 Speaker 2: an audience and then your audience rewards you the more 1093 00:57:41,840 --> 00:57:44,880 Speaker 2: you give it to them. And that can drive pretty 1094 00:57:44,960 --> 00:57:46,000 Speaker 2: much anybody insane. 1095 00:57:46,520 --> 00:57:49,280 Speaker 1: But I would also say that's cable news. Yes, it. 1096 00:57:50,960 --> 00:57:54,600 Speaker 2: Drives everyone insane. But there's also the idea of criticism capture, 1097 00:57:55,120 --> 00:57:58,360 Speaker 2: and that is when people permit themselves to be driven 1098 00:57:58,360 --> 00:58:02,120 Speaker 2: insane by their biggest critic that they you know, they 1099 00:58:02,160 --> 00:58:05,760 Speaker 2: got yelled at enough times that it drove them totally 1100 00:58:05,840 --> 00:58:11,720 Speaker 2: to a different direction or further into their metaphorical foxhole 1101 00:58:11,800 --> 00:58:15,640 Speaker 2: than they would be in. And my goal in life 1102 00:58:15,680 --> 00:58:18,400 Speaker 2: is to avoid both of those things, both being captured 1103 00:58:18,400 --> 00:58:21,520 Speaker 2: by an audience that tells me how great I am. 1104 00:58:21,600 --> 00:58:23,840 Speaker 2: And if I only just talked about these specific things 1105 00:58:23,880 --> 00:58:25,520 Speaker 2: you wanted to hear about, I would be even better. 1106 00:58:26,080 --> 00:58:30,280 Speaker 2: But also if someone offers criticism to me, I cannot 1107 00:58:30,320 --> 00:58:33,480 Speaker 2: allow myself to be driven insane by that. I cannot 1108 00:58:33,600 --> 00:58:38,200 Speaker 2: allow myself to become siloed in a different direction because 1109 00:58:38,240 --> 00:58:40,360 Speaker 2: someone got mad at me on the Internet. Which is 1110 00:58:40,640 --> 00:58:42,960 Speaker 2: it's a thing, it happens, happened to so many people, 1111 00:58:43,200 --> 00:58:44,360 Speaker 2: But that's the. 1112 00:58:44,320 --> 00:58:47,440 Speaker 1: Thing I want to I'm starting to wonder if we, 1113 00:58:48,040 --> 00:58:51,560 Speaker 1: the human psyche, can't handle what the Internet delivers. 1114 00:58:51,760 --> 00:58:54,080 Speaker 2: Oh, I don't think we were meant to. I can't 1115 00:58:54,120 --> 00:58:56,800 Speaker 2: remember I think it might have been Michelle Goldberg the 1116 00:58:56,800 --> 00:58:58,520 Speaker 2: New York Times. She had a piece a while back 1117 00:58:58,520 --> 00:59:00,840 Speaker 2: that was like, we should all know each other. And 1118 00:59:00,920 --> 00:59:02,960 Speaker 2: I just I don't think the human brand was meant 1119 00:59:02,960 --> 00:59:07,120 Speaker 2: to encounter this many different kinds of people. And you know, 1120 00:59:07,200 --> 00:59:12,080 Speaker 2: I think also there's a Reddit there's a Reddit post 1121 00:59:12,080 --> 00:59:14,680 Speaker 2: I think about a lot, and I regret because it 1122 00:59:14,720 --> 00:59:17,840 Speaker 2: involves some swearing, and the post is like, you know, 1123 00:59:19,040 --> 00:59:21,880 Speaker 2: be into fucking toaster. You know, before the Internet, you'd 1124 00:59:21,880 --> 00:59:24,760 Speaker 2: be intoking toasters. People would be like, what's wrong with you? 1125 00:59:24,760 --> 00:59:28,600 Speaker 2: You'd stop freaking toasters. After the Internet, you're into toasters. 1126 00:59:28,680 --> 00:59:30,919 Speaker 2: You meet a bunch of people online who are into 1127 00:59:30,960 --> 00:59:35,240 Speaker 2: fucking toasters, You accidentally develop a toaster frecking cult, and 1128 00:59:35,440 --> 00:59:37,200 Speaker 2: now you have ruined your life. 1129 00:59:37,320 --> 00:59:40,680 Speaker 1: Well, and Eli Pereiser actually wrote a book about this 1130 00:59:41,160 --> 00:59:44,400 Speaker 1: fifteen years ago, to his credit, and he used the 1131 00:59:44,520 --> 00:59:48,600 Speaker 1: nine to eleven truthers as an example where before the Internet, 1132 00:59:48,720 --> 00:59:52,000 Speaker 1: you know, before Google, essentially you were a weirdo if 1133 00:59:52,000 --> 00:59:53,680 Speaker 1: you were a nine to eleven truther and then you 1134 00:59:53,720 --> 00:59:56,120 Speaker 1: go on Google and say I think there's a conspiracy. 1135 00:59:57,080 --> 00:59:58,880 Speaker 1: You know, you went to toasters. I'm going to go 1136 00:59:58,880 --> 01:00:01,480 Speaker 1: to nine to eleven. Right, I'm not saying, I'm just saying, 1137 01:00:01,920 --> 01:00:04,880 Speaker 1: but all of a sudden, you can find fellow travelers 1138 01:00:04,960 --> 01:00:10,360 Speaker 1: right in the conspiracies that somehow were involved in nine 1139 01:00:10,360 --> 01:00:12,720 Speaker 1: to eleven. And I think that that's the you know, 1140 01:00:12,800 --> 01:00:15,640 Speaker 1: this is what big tech hasn't been able to figure 1141 01:00:15,640 --> 01:00:17,960 Speaker 1: out how to do. And this is where the algorithms, 1142 01:00:18,000 --> 01:00:20,560 Speaker 1: I think. I think they're well meaning, some of them. 1143 01:00:20,960 --> 01:00:22,920 Speaker 1: Like I have a friend of mine who runs the 1144 01:00:23,360 --> 01:00:28,320 Speaker 1: sub stack on jfk ok Jeff Morley. He's jfkfactx dot com. 1145 01:00:28,360 --> 01:00:32,000 Speaker 1: He's the guy that of you know, he takes a 1146 01:00:32,040 --> 01:00:35,200 Speaker 1: journalistic approach. He's certainly a skeptic of what the government's done, 1147 01:00:35,360 --> 01:00:37,640 Speaker 1: but he takes a journalistic approach to everything that's been 1148 01:00:37,640 --> 01:00:42,959 Speaker 1: done about the JFK stuff, but it is considered conspiracy 1149 01:00:43,200 --> 01:00:47,800 Speaker 1: and social media apps sort of drive down his ability 1150 01:00:47,840 --> 01:00:50,600 Speaker 1: to capture an audience when he's less he's not a 1151 01:00:50,680 --> 01:00:53,680 Speaker 1: conspiracy filled guy. He really is using it as a 1152 01:00:53,840 --> 01:00:57,040 Speaker 1: fact based way to sort of try to unravel it. 1153 01:00:57,760 --> 01:01:00,880 Speaker 1: But he's treated by the algorithms as a conspiracy theorists 1154 01:01:00,880 --> 01:01:05,560 Speaker 1: and therefore pushed down. Right, And this is what what 1155 01:01:05,600 --> 01:01:07,840 Speaker 1: these big brains in tech haven't figured out how to 1156 01:01:07,880 --> 01:01:08,800 Speaker 1: do right. 1157 01:01:08,840 --> 01:01:11,720 Speaker 2: And I mean, I think that that's one of the challenges. 1158 01:01:11,760 --> 01:01:13,440 Speaker 2: It's like, you know, there are people behind all of 1159 01:01:13,480 --> 01:01:17,640 Speaker 2: these decisions, and people are fallible. That's how we're made. 1160 01:01:17,800 --> 01:01:21,560 Speaker 2: But I also think that one of the challenges that 1161 01:01:21,640 --> 01:01:26,400 Speaker 2: we have is trying to figure out you know, we 1162 01:01:26,480 --> 01:01:30,480 Speaker 2: are using the internet to find out what people not 1163 01:01:31,360 --> 01:01:33,480 Speaker 2: on the internet are thinking. And I think that that 1164 01:01:33,480 --> 01:01:36,080 Speaker 2: that's a fool's errand that is an inherent that is. 1165 01:01:36,080 --> 01:01:38,439 Speaker 1: A fool to go outside and talk to people. Yeah, 1166 01:01:38,480 --> 01:01:40,800 Speaker 1: and you know that's been you know, look, some of 1167 01:01:40,840 --> 01:01:43,680 Speaker 1: these after action reports on the campaign aren't talking to 1168 01:01:43,800 --> 01:01:46,680 Speaker 1: enough voters, right, They're literally just splicing things up, and 1169 01:01:46,720 --> 01:01:49,439 Speaker 1: it's like, talk to the voter, you know, let's spend 1170 01:01:49,480 --> 01:01:51,240 Speaker 1: a little more time talking to the voter and get 1171 01:01:51,240 --> 01:01:52,080 Speaker 1: their reaction all. 1172 01:01:52,040 --> 01:01:54,200 Speaker 2: This right, And I think like it's okay if you 1173 01:01:54,240 --> 01:01:57,439 Speaker 2: come to the conclusion as I have, that voters are 1174 01:01:57,480 --> 01:02:00,640 Speaker 2: really weird, because they are because individual wolves are weird. 1175 01:02:00,680 --> 01:02:03,240 Speaker 2: People can hold a lot of different political views at once, 1176 01:02:03,680 --> 01:02:06,560 Speaker 2: and I think that, you know, after every election, there's 1177 01:02:06,640 --> 01:02:09,280 Speaker 2: always someone who's like, oh, yeah, you know, I voted 1178 01:02:09,320 --> 01:02:11,840 Speaker 2: for Trump, and I voted to preserve abortion access, and 1179 01:02:11,880 --> 01:02:14,120 Speaker 2: I voted to raise the minimum wage, and people like, 1180 01:02:14,120 --> 01:02:15,480 Speaker 2: how could you do that? And I'm like, welcome to 1181 01:02:15,480 --> 01:02:18,040 Speaker 2: the state of Missouri. Like that's you know, that is 1182 01:02:18,080 --> 01:02:21,040 Speaker 2: a real thing that people are complicated. I mean, I 1183 01:02:21,080 --> 01:02:24,440 Speaker 2: think that That's something I've always liked about sports is 1184 01:02:24,480 --> 01:02:27,160 Speaker 2: that I have been able to go. You know, I've 1185 01:02:27,200 --> 01:02:32,320 Speaker 2: been at sports bars in ten states and watched I've 1186 01:02:32,320 --> 01:02:34,320 Speaker 2: watched a lot of Michigan football and a lot of 1187 01:02:34,320 --> 01:02:37,240 Speaker 2: different places with a lot of different people who all 1188 01:02:37,280 --> 01:02:40,640 Speaker 2: disagree with me about pretty much everything except for Michigan football. 1189 01:02:40,680 --> 01:02:43,080 Speaker 2: I think, you know, one of my I remember going 1190 01:02:43,160 --> 01:02:47,000 Speaker 2: to uh Michigan Maryland game and outside, you know, people 1191 01:02:47,000 --> 01:02:48,680 Speaker 2: are tailgating because I don't know if you know this, 1192 01:02:48,760 --> 01:02:51,840 Speaker 2: but University of Maryland students tailgate harder than I've ever 1193 01:02:51,880 --> 01:02:54,840 Speaker 2: seen anyone tailgate my life. I I genuinely haven't been. 1194 01:02:54,720 --> 01:02:57,040 Speaker 1: To You haven't been to Morgantown, And I'm no West 1195 01:02:57,120 --> 01:02:57,960 Speaker 1: Virginia love. 1196 01:02:58,040 --> 01:03:00,560 Speaker 2: No, they No, I have not been to Morgantowntown. 1197 01:03:00,880 --> 01:03:05,080 Speaker 1: Is the more you really do drink out of maynai'se yards. Yep, 1198 01:03:05,560 --> 01:03:08,760 Speaker 1: I am want to do that. And you know there 1199 01:03:09,040 --> 01:03:11,320 Speaker 1: are couches that are lit on fire. So all these 1200 01:03:11,360 --> 01:03:12,040 Speaker 1: seams are true. 1201 01:03:12,480 --> 01:03:14,880 Speaker 2: I will not lie whenever. I have a friend who 1202 01:03:14,960 --> 01:03:17,120 Speaker 2: is a West Virginia fan, and he sent me a 1203 01:03:17,200 --> 01:03:20,200 Speaker 2: video of everybody singing take Me Home, Country Roads from that stadium, 1204 01:03:20,200 --> 01:03:22,240 Speaker 2: and I got choked up, and I'm like, this is 1205 01:03:22,320 --> 01:03:23,720 Speaker 2: that's what college football does to me. 1206 01:03:23,800 --> 01:03:25,840 Speaker 1: But I've been on the wrong end at West Virginia games. 1207 01:03:25,920 --> 01:03:27,640 Speaker 1: But but yes they are. 1208 01:03:28,840 --> 01:03:32,960 Speaker 2: But I remember going to this game and there is 1209 01:03:33,160 --> 01:03:36,120 Speaker 2: a family, you know, Michigan fans, and so they've got 1210 01:03:36,120 --> 01:03:38,960 Speaker 2: a Michigan flag, a Trump flag and all let's go 1211 01:03:39,080 --> 01:03:43,560 Speaker 2: Brandon fleg But you know, they offered me jello shots 1212 01:03:44,040 --> 01:03:46,400 Speaker 2: and we talked about the game and we talked. You know, 1213 01:03:46,440 --> 01:03:51,240 Speaker 2: this would have been twenty twenty one, so I believe 1214 01:03:51,360 --> 01:03:55,480 Speaker 2: we had just watched I think Maryland was playing Michigan 1215 01:03:55,560 --> 01:03:58,400 Speaker 2: the weekend that Michigan State was playing Ohio State, and 1216 01:03:58,400 --> 01:03:59,960 Speaker 2: then we were about to play Ohio State and all 1217 01:04:00,000 --> 01:04:04,760 Speaker 2: simately win that game, but Ohio State decimated Michigan State 1218 01:04:05,080 --> 01:04:08,160 Speaker 2: like ruin that drove them into the ground. And I 1219 01:04:08,200 --> 01:04:10,880 Speaker 2: remember like watching this game with these like big trumpy 1220 01:04:10,920 --> 01:04:14,000 Speaker 2: Michigan fans and we're all like, oh boy, but like 1221 01:04:14,760 --> 01:04:17,720 Speaker 2: it was a completely it's not a political you know, 1222 01:04:17,880 --> 01:04:19,960 Speaker 2: sports is political. I'm aware of that, but there was 1223 01:04:20,000 --> 01:04:22,320 Speaker 2: this moment where we were coming together across things where 1224 01:04:22,320 --> 01:04:24,560 Speaker 2: it doesn't actually it didn't actually look it come for 1225 01:04:24,560 --> 01:04:27,280 Speaker 2: a matter, and I think that that is something that's 1226 01:04:27,320 --> 01:04:29,520 Speaker 2: the moment. You know, you keep seeing people reporting about 1227 01:04:29,560 --> 01:04:33,560 Speaker 2: Democrats trying to reach out to men or and which 1228 01:04:34,360 --> 01:04:37,320 Speaker 2: I think that the thing people are forgetting is that 1229 01:04:37,680 --> 01:04:41,880 Speaker 2: most people chuck. You and I are freaks. You and 1230 01:04:41,960 --> 01:04:45,680 Speaker 2: I are just weirdo freaks who thinking about you know, 1231 01:04:45,760 --> 01:04:47,959 Speaker 2: people are I'm already kind of like, oh, twenty twenty 1232 01:04:47,960 --> 01:04:50,200 Speaker 2: six midterms thinking about like okay, you know how many 1233 01:04:50,240 --> 01:04:51,720 Speaker 2: seats are here and what are we doing here? 1234 01:04:51,760 --> 01:04:54,920 Speaker 1: And the whole intro to this this episode is going 1235 01:04:54,960 --> 01:04:56,120 Speaker 1: to be about twenty twenty six, so. 1236 01:04:56,080 --> 01:04:59,760 Speaker 2: Of course, yeah, yeah, we're weird, Like that's a weird 1237 01:04:59,840 --> 01:05:02,160 Speaker 2: thing to do. There used to be a time and 1238 01:05:02,240 --> 01:05:04,760 Speaker 2: I sometimes long for this time. You know, when I 1239 01:05:04,880 --> 01:05:08,720 Speaker 2: was interested in politics in like high school, that was weird, 1240 01:05:08,880 --> 01:05:11,440 Speaker 2: like people like we were weird, you know, I was 1241 01:05:11,520 --> 01:05:12,440 Speaker 2: basically I was. 1242 01:05:12,920 --> 01:05:15,680 Speaker 1: Weird for that. I was a government My government teacher 1243 01:05:15,720 --> 01:05:18,280 Speaker 1: loved me. Yeah, no, because I was the one that 1244 01:05:18,360 --> 01:05:19,160 Speaker 1: was paying attention. 1245 01:05:19,560 --> 01:05:22,680 Speaker 2: My APUs history teacher thought I was amazing, and then 1246 01:05:22,760 --> 01:05:25,120 Speaker 2: you know, everybody my age was like, it just turns 1247 01:05:25,160 --> 01:05:28,040 Speaker 2: out that I was, you know, a child too long 1248 01:05:28,120 --> 01:05:30,880 Speaker 2: to be thirty seven years old. But I think that 1249 01:05:31,200 --> 01:05:34,320 Speaker 2: for most people, politics is not a hobby, and I 1250 01:05:34,320 --> 01:05:36,560 Speaker 2: think that that's good. I think political hobbyism is very 1251 01:05:36,600 --> 01:05:39,480 Speaker 2: bad the way in which people think about politics, the 1252 01:05:39,480 --> 01:05:42,040 Speaker 2: way they think about sports. I'm like, I got to 1253 01:05:42,080 --> 01:05:44,400 Speaker 2: tell you I have gotten way more enjoyment out of 1254 01:05:44,400 --> 01:05:45,919 Speaker 2: sports than politics in my life. 1255 01:05:46,240 --> 01:05:48,240 Speaker 1: No, I mean, this is the worst version of it 1256 01:05:48,280 --> 01:05:50,560 Speaker 1: is not to make you know, and this is a 1257 01:05:50,560 --> 01:05:52,560 Speaker 1: complaint that people used to come at me thinking that 1258 01:05:52,640 --> 01:05:55,840 Speaker 1: I was helping to make politics too much like sports. 1259 01:05:55,880 --> 01:05:58,560 Speaker 1: And I understood that. QUI because I agree. I don't 1260 01:05:58,600 --> 01:06:01,720 Speaker 1: think it is right. In fact, we've got to And 1261 01:06:01,720 --> 01:06:03,280 Speaker 1: this is where it's funny. You say that most people 1262 01:06:03,320 --> 01:06:05,919 Speaker 1: aren't political hobbyists. I fear too many people have become 1263 01:06:05,920 --> 01:06:09,200 Speaker 1: political hobbyists. Yes, I think that to many. Thesis me 1264 01:06:09,280 --> 01:06:12,320 Speaker 1: that way. My thesis is too many we have too 1265 01:06:12,400 --> 01:06:15,480 Speaker 1: much time in our hands. That in general, and like 1266 01:06:15,560 --> 01:06:18,520 Speaker 1: you know, I think about two years. I think about 1267 01:06:18,560 --> 01:06:22,480 Speaker 1: fifteen years ago. The average Saturday, I was probably in 1268 01:06:22,480 --> 01:06:25,280 Speaker 1: my car for six hours because I was running all 1269 01:06:25,280 --> 01:06:27,920 Speaker 1: these different errands. Maybe I was finding sports cleats for 1270 01:06:28,000 --> 01:06:30,760 Speaker 1: my kids, or having to go to Dixon there's sports authority, 1271 01:06:30,800 --> 01:06:32,800 Speaker 1: or go over here or go over there. Now, of 1272 01:06:32,800 --> 01:06:35,480 Speaker 1: course everything is punt, you know, just click click, click, 1273 01:06:35,520 --> 01:06:37,560 Speaker 1: and then you just wait for it. And then while 1274 01:06:37,600 --> 01:06:40,320 Speaker 1: you're waiting for the Amazon delivery, you go on social 1275 01:06:40,360 --> 01:06:41,479 Speaker 1: media and fight. 1276 01:06:41,880 --> 01:06:43,960 Speaker 2: Yeah, and you fight. I mean, I think that's that's 1277 01:06:44,000 --> 01:06:45,720 Speaker 2: the thing I got on. I was on. I got 1278 01:06:45,760 --> 01:06:48,320 Speaker 2: online because I had to work on Memorial Day for 1279 01:06:48,320 --> 01:06:50,680 Speaker 2: a couple of hours because to do the Tuesday show, right, 1280 01:06:50,800 --> 01:06:53,560 Speaker 2: And you get online and people are fighting, and I'm like, 1281 01:06:54,840 --> 01:06:58,640 Speaker 2: go outside. You don't have to be here, go outside. 1282 01:06:59,040 --> 01:07:01,520 Speaker 1: And I often think about what's wrong in their life 1283 01:07:01,560 --> 01:07:03,360 Speaker 1: that they feel as if, you know, today's a good 1284 01:07:03,440 --> 01:07:06,720 Speaker 1: day for me to call so and so a bunch 1285 01:07:06,720 --> 01:07:08,880 Speaker 1: of names and to pick a fight with these people, 1286 01:07:09,000 --> 01:07:09,520 Speaker 1: and it's like. 1287 01:07:09,520 --> 01:07:12,240 Speaker 2: About something that is wrong with your life re markably 1288 01:07:12,520 --> 01:07:16,240 Speaker 2: in you know, policy is important. Politics is the road 1289 01:07:16,360 --> 01:07:18,440 Speaker 2: we take to try to get to policy, and like 1290 01:07:18,520 --> 01:07:20,720 Speaker 2: that's you know, that's how it should be that we're 1291 01:07:20,720 --> 01:07:22,280 Speaker 2: actually supposed to be fighting about, Like. 1292 01:07:22,800 --> 01:07:27,280 Speaker 1: Yeahs is what we created to avoid settling disputes with 1293 01:07:27,360 --> 01:07:31,280 Speaker 1: violence exactly. I mean, actually political debate is a way 1294 01:07:31,320 --> 01:07:33,880 Speaker 1: to avoid death and destruction exactly. 1295 01:07:33,960 --> 01:07:36,640 Speaker 2: You know, it's either this or dueling. And but like, 1296 01:07:37,320 --> 01:07:42,560 Speaker 2: I think that most people think about politics if it 1297 01:07:42,720 --> 01:07:45,840 Speaker 2: impacts their lives or if they're asked about it directly. 1298 01:07:45,840 --> 01:07:47,919 Speaker 2: I mean, this is why any sort of polling about 1299 01:07:47,960 --> 01:07:49,840 Speaker 2: a political subject, I'm always kind of like, well, how 1300 01:07:49,840 --> 01:07:52,480 Speaker 2: did you ask the question? Like what did you know? 1301 01:07:52,680 --> 01:07:54,720 Speaker 1: Oh, I'm off on a tangent on that. You should 1302 01:07:54,720 --> 01:07:57,080 Speaker 1: see this question wording. There's a poll out in Texas 1303 01:07:57,720 --> 01:08:01,880 Speaker 1: that claims that there's this huge port for the vouchers, right, 1304 01:08:03,040 --> 01:08:06,960 Speaker 1: But the way they asked the question was basically, well, 1305 01:08:06,960 --> 01:08:09,760 Speaker 1: what do you think of these education savings accounts? Well, 1306 01:08:09,840 --> 01:08:12,600 Speaker 1: the minute I hear though phrase savings account, I like 1307 01:08:12,720 --> 01:08:15,320 Speaker 1: savings account, Yes, of course you do. It was this 1308 01:08:15,600 --> 01:08:16,880 Speaker 1: terribly worded question. 1309 01:08:17,240 --> 01:08:17,800 Speaker 2: It trive me. 1310 01:08:18,280 --> 01:08:20,960 Speaker 1: And it was actually this was a Texas Southern University, 1311 01:08:20,960 --> 01:08:22,880 Speaker 1: so it wasn't like even an I think this was 1312 01:08:22,920 --> 01:08:26,360 Speaker 1: a case. It wasn't intentional political hackery like sometimes it's 1313 01:08:26,400 --> 01:08:29,960 Speaker 1: intentional hackery with the polling. This wasn't intentional. They read 1314 01:08:30,000 --> 01:08:32,360 Speaker 1: the bill as it was what the bill. You know, 1315 01:08:32,720 --> 01:08:35,600 Speaker 1: the bill was written in a way to be a 1316 01:08:35,840 --> 01:08:39,920 Speaker 1: pr to be to not actually be. They didn't explain 1317 01:08:39,960 --> 01:08:42,320 Speaker 1: the issue very well. They just literally read the text 1318 01:08:42,400 --> 01:08:45,000 Speaker 1: of the bill, which had a bunch of pr language 1319 01:08:45,000 --> 01:08:50,200 Speaker 1: in it. So it is anyway it No, it's really 1320 01:08:50,320 --> 01:08:51,200 Speaker 1: blood vessel pop. 1321 01:08:51,360 --> 01:08:53,120 Speaker 2: It drives me nuts. But I do think like for 1322 01:08:53,280 --> 01:08:56,920 Speaker 2: most people, their experience of politics is not like the 1323 01:08:56,960 --> 01:08:59,000 Speaker 2: way they talk or the way they live their lives. 1324 01:08:59,040 --> 01:09:01,400 Speaker 2: It's kind of like, you know, they have lives, and 1325 01:09:01,400 --> 01:09:03,559 Speaker 2: then politics occasionally gets in the way of that or 1326 01:09:04,040 --> 01:09:06,240 Speaker 2: they need to they're trying to figure out how to 1327 01:09:06,240 --> 01:09:09,120 Speaker 2: do things and someone might promise them or say that 1328 01:09:09,160 --> 01:09:10,640 Speaker 2: they're going to do a thing that could help them, 1329 01:09:10,680 --> 01:09:12,720 Speaker 2: and they're like, okay, that sounds interesting. And so I 1330 01:09:12,720 --> 01:09:16,519 Speaker 2: think like the way in which you get you know, 1331 01:09:16,600 --> 01:09:19,760 Speaker 2: you reach out to people, to voters is to think 1332 01:09:19,800 --> 01:09:21,800 Speaker 2: of them not as voters, but just think of them 1333 01:09:21,840 --> 01:09:25,280 Speaker 2: as like people, people with interests, people with you know, 1334 01:09:25,400 --> 01:09:28,040 Speaker 2: differing interests. Occasionally we do this thing where we're like, oh, like, 1335 01:09:28,080 --> 01:09:30,240 Speaker 2: we only care about kitchen table issues, And I'm like, well, 1336 01:09:30,240 --> 01:09:32,320 Speaker 2: the thing about the idea of the kitchen table issue 1337 01:09:32,840 --> 01:09:35,240 Speaker 2: is that at my kitchen table growing up, we talked 1338 01:09:35,280 --> 01:09:39,280 Speaker 2: about pretty much everything. Like, we talked about everything from 1339 01:09:39,400 --> 01:09:43,479 Speaker 2: you know, my parents are you know, like, you know, 1340 01:09:43,520 --> 01:09:46,120 Speaker 2: my mom passed away last month. But obviously when I 1341 01:09:46,160 --> 01:09:49,160 Speaker 2: was growing up, you know, we would talk about everything 1342 01:09:49,439 --> 01:09:52,600 Speaker 2: from something going on at church, parish council drama to 1343 01:09:53,680 --> 01:09:56,679 Speaker 2: you know, their my dad's memories of seeing Bob Marley 1344 01:09:56,680 --> 01:09:59,519 Speaker 2: live and like nineteen seventy seven in Chicago, And so 1345 01:09:59,720 --> 01:10:02,760 Speaker 2: like what a kitchen table issue is. You know, there's 1346 01:10:02,800 --> 01:10:04,439 Speaker 2: this way we talk about like, oh, this is a 1347 01:10:04,479 --> 01:10:07,080 Speaker 2: real issue. This is this isn't a real It's. 1348 01:10:06,920 --> 01:10:11,880 Speaker 1: Like real Americans versus every fake people like it, you know, 1349 01:10:11,960 --> 01:10:14,240 Speaker 1: every day Americans versus the every other day American. 1350 01:10:14,360 --> 01:10:17,280 Speaker 2: Yes, yes, you know Tuesday Americans, but not Thursday Americans. 1351 01:10:17,320 --> 01:10:20,000 Speaker 2: So I think like thinking of voters, like people who 1352 01:10:20,120 --> 01:10:23,120 Speaker 2: are interested. You know, there are lots of people who 1353 01:10:23,360 --> 01:10:29,920 Speaker 2: for whom politics is this opaque wall that you feel 1354 01:10:29,920 --> 01:10:30,519 Speaker 2: like you need. 1355 01:10:30,520 --> 01:10:31,480 Speaker 1: Very inaccessible. 1356 01:10:31,560 --> 01:10:32,640 Speaker 2: I mean, that's accessible. 1357 01:10:32,880 --> 01:10:34,919 Speaker 1: I've always wanted to try to make it more accessible 1358 01:10:34,960 --> 01:10:40,040 Speaker 1: because I think it's easily easier to access than folks realize. 1359 01:10:39,800 --> 01:10:43,479 Speaker 2: Right exactly. And I think that that's something that is 1360 01:10:43,560 --> 01:10:48,280 Speaker 2: really irritating to me, in which when you make political hobbyism, 1361 01:10:48,479 --> 01:10:51,640 Speaker 2: you know, such a thing, you make politics less accessible 1362 01:10:51,640 --> 01:10:53,280 Speaker 2: to people because they feel as if if they want 1363 01:10:53,320 --> 01:10:54,920 Speaker 2: to get engaged in politics, they have to do the 1364 01:10:54,920 --> 01:10:56,679 Speaker 2: whole thing that has to be all they talk about. 1365 01:10:56,840 --> 01:10:58,439 Speaker 2: They have to be one of those people who only 1366 01:10:58,479 --> 01:11:00,920 Speaker 2: posts like it's mad at you if you post about 1367 01:11:00,960 --> 01:11:03,840 Speaker 2: non politics. You're like, how could you be thinking about 1368 01:11:03,840 --> 01:11:05,000 Speaker 2: this at a time like this? 1369 01:11:05,360 --> 01:11:07,479 Speaker 1: Well, how dare you think about Michigan football when there 1370 01:11:07,479 --> 01:11:09,040 Speaker 1: are kids starving somewhere in the. 1371 01:11:09,120 --> 01:11:12,760 Speaker 2: Yeah, exactly, and what's wrong? Just you know, that's all 1372 01:11:12,800 --> 01:11:16,760 Speaker 2: you know, you have to perform being mad all the 1373 01:11:16,800 --> 01:11:20,800 Speaker 2: time performance and like that, I think that performativity, it 1374 01:11:20,920 --> 01:11:21,600 Speaker 2: really bothers me. 1375 01:11:21,640 --> 01:11:22,960 Speaker 1: All right, I'm going to get you out of here 1376 01:11:23,000 --> 01:11:26,000 Speaker 1: on this. Where are you on the on the level 1377 01:11:26,040 --> 01:11:30,120 Speaker 1: of Biden coverage and the level of media culpability in Biden? 1378 01:11:30,360 --> 01:11:32,920 Speaker 1: And I say this and that I'm somebody who thinks that, 1379 01:11:33,880 --> 01:11:38,000 Speaker 1: you know, blaming the media is usually those that want 1380 01:11:38,040 --> 01:11:40,160 Speaker 1: to blame put this almost all on the press are 1381 01:11:40,240 --> 01:11:42,439 Speaker 1: usually those that are just trying to destroy the press 1382 01:11:42,439 --> 01:11:45,680 Speaker 1: for other reasons, versus this being to me what it 1383 01:11:45,720 --> 01:11:48,799 Speaker 1: really is is a Democratic party issue. But I accept 1384 01:11:48,800 --> 01:11:52,040 Speaker 1: that there were certainly some members of the media who 1385 01:11:52,080 --> 01:11:57,599 Speaker 1: were overtly defensive of Biden, perhaps to protect their own access. 1386 01:11:57,640 --> 01:11:59,840 Speaker 1: So that's sort of where I come down on this. 1387 01:12:00,760 --> 01:12:04,440 Speaker 1: I'm curious where you come down on this, and more importantly, 1388 01:12:05,400 --> 01:12:08,200 Speaker 1: how important of an issue do you think it's going 1389 01:12:08,240 --> 01:12:11,360 Speaker 1: to be for folks that were in the Biden administration, 1390 01:12:12,280 --> 01:12:13,719 Speaker 1: including the Vice president. 1391 01:12:14,439 --> 01:12:16,760 Speaker 2: I think I have a couple of views on this, 1392 01:12:17,439 --> 01:12:19,360 Speaker 2: and some of them conflict, and I'm aware of that 1393 01:12:19,360 --> 01:12:23,080 Speaker 2: because I'm still kind of working through this one. I 1394 01:12:23,240 --> 01:12:29,519 Speaker 2: think that how we are the media, we are interested 1395 01:12:29,520 --> 01:12:32,880 Speaker 2: in this because it impacts us. We are admittedly very 1396 01:12:32,880 --> 01:12:36,760 Speaker 2: self involved people. That's just how we are industries. You know, 1397 01:12:36,800 --> 01:12:39,600 Speaker 2: it's an industry conversation that is happening among people in 1398 01:12:39,640 --> 01:12:44,600 Speaker 2: an industry. How voters feel about it is going to 1399 01:12:44,640 --> 01:12:48,120 Speaker 2: be different than how we will think about it. I think, 1400 01:12:48,240 --> 01:12:50,360 Speaker 2: for example, you know there is pulling that came out 1401 01:12:50,400 --> 01:12:52,479 Speaker 2: from you gov. I think today that talked about how 1402 01:12:52,600 --> 01:12:56,400 Speaker 2: like voters in general want more health information on people 1403 01:12:56,520 --> 01:12:59,800 Speaker 2: running for office. Great fine, pretty lowly fine with it. 1404 01:13:00,080 --> 01:13:02,559 Speaker 2: That's a logical thing to want. You know, we are 1405 01:13:02,600 --> 01:13:03,320 Speaker 2: not we don't. 1406 01:13:03,160 --> 01:13:05,559 Speaker 1: Need to be like, by the way, that's what makes 1407 01:13:05,560 --> 01:13:08,599 Speaker 1: me feel better about our information ecosystem when voters respond 1408 01:13:08,720 --> 01:13:11,680 Speaker 1: pretty logically to obviously you would like, we need more 1409 01:13:11,720 --> 01:13:12,800 Speaker 1: medical information. 1410 01:13:13,200 --> 01:13:17,120 Speaker 2: More medical information, and that totally makes sense to me. Like, 1411 01:13:17,200 --> 01:13:18,840 Speaker 2: you know, we are not the kings of yr We 1412 01:13:18,880 --> 01:13:20,680 Speaker 2: do not need to worry. You know, this is we 1413 01:13:20,720 --> 01:13:24,040 Speaker 2: don't we don't have dynasties like, that's not how this works. 1414 01:13:24,439 --> 01:13:28,479 Speaker 2: People want more information, totally get it. I think what 1415 01:13:28,800 --> 01:13:32,400 Speaker 2: the impact will be for people who were in the administration, 1416 01:13:33,680 --> 01:13:37,720 Speaker 2: I think that that really depends on what those people do. 1417 01:13:38,560 --> 01:13:40,599 Speaker 2: So for instance, I'm aware that there are a bunch 1418 01:13:40,680 --> 01:13:43,040 Speaker 2: of Republicans who have gotten themselves really psyched up for 1419 01:13:43,080 --> 01:13:44,800 Speaker 2: the idea that Kamala Harris is going to run for 1420 01:13:44,840 --> 01:13:49,519 Speaker 2: governor of California. They're very excited about this. However, the 1421 01:13:49,640 --> 01:13:52,320 Speaker 2: challenge will be that she is running to be governor 1422 01:13:52,360 --> 01:13:56,120 Speaker 2: of California, not president of the United States, and that 1423 01:13:56,240 --> 01:14:00,240 Speaker 2: is you know, state level gubernatorial elections, especially in California, 1424 01:14:00,560 --> 01:14:03,840 Speaker 2: a state that is you know, not as blue as 1425 01:14:03,880 --> 01:14:06,240 Speaker 2: people think, but the blue population centers are very blue. 1426 01:14:06,960 --> 01:14:10,360 Speaker 2: It's going to be how people feel about it nationally 1427 01:14:10,400 --> 01:14:12,880 Speaker 2: and how people feel about it regionally are going to 1428 01:14:12,920 --> 01:14:17,679 Speaker 2: be different things. I think that there is a degree 1429 01:14:17,800 --> 01:14:22,880 Speaker 2: to I think that in terms of media culpability. Again, 1430 01:14:22,960 --> 01:14:26,160 Speaker 2: this is a media thing, talking about media in general. 1431 01:14:26,240 --> 01:14:28,400 Speaker 2: When I talk to people about this who are not 1432 01:14:28,560 --> 01:14:32,080 Speaker 2: in media, they are like, yeah, we knew Biden was old. 1433 01:14:32,400 --> 01:14:33,760 Speaker 2: You did not need to tell us this. 1434 01:14:34,080 --> 01:14:37,080 Speaker 1: Well, that's my that's my frustration. This was they were 1435 01:14:37,280 --> 01:14:41,240 Speaker 1: voters were screaming about the the that's the thing. And 1436 01:14:41,280 --> 01:14:43,280 Speaker 1: you know who was conducting the polls and the media 1437 01:14:43,280 --> 01:14:47,640 Speaker 1: who were forcing this question onto survey. 1438 01:14:46,360 --> 01:14:48,439 Speaker 2: Kept saying, you know, that was not a hidden thing. 1439 01:14:48,560 --> 01:14:52,720 Speaker 2: And I think that there is a type of and 1440 01:14:52,800 --> 01:14:56,439 Speaker 2: I get this. I understand the people who were like, yes, 1441 01:14:56,520 --> 01:14:59,000 Speaker 2: Biden's old, I'm aware of that. I'm fine with it. 1442 01:14:59,160 --> 01:15:03,080 Speaker 2: Stop yelling at me, you know, stop talking like this idea. Also, 1443 01:15:03,080 --> 01:15:05,240 Speaker 2: I mean, I think that one of the challenges you 1444 01:15:05,280 --> 01:15:08,280 Speaker 2: also have is that you you are not talking about 1445 01:15:08,400 --> 01:15:10,920 Speaker 2: Joe Biden being old in a vacuum. You're talking about 1446 01:15:11,000 --> 01:15:15,519 Speaker 2: Joe Biden being old versus Donald Trump, who attempted to 1447 01:15:15,920 --> 01:15:18,200 Speaker 2: stage an insurrection, Like I think that there are a 1448 01:15:18,200 --> 01:15:21,480 Speaker 2: bunch of people, like there is a I unwell. 1449 01:15:21,160 --> 01:15:23,280 Speaker 1: As Joe Biden liked to used to say, don't judge 1450 01:15:23,320 --> 01:15:26,200 Speaker 1: me by the almighty, judge me by the alternative exactly. 1451 01:15:26,400 --> 01:15:30,519 Speaker 2: And so now, however, that is not a good that 1452 01:15:30,640 --> 01:15:32,640 Speaker 2: is not an excuse for anything. That is not an 1453 01:15:32,680 --> 01:15:36,519 Speaker 2: excuse for having essentially a so you know, the quote 1454 01:15:36,600 --> 01:15:39,440 Speaker 2: unquote poll up bureau be running things in an administration. 1455 01:15:39,920 --> 01:15:42,120 Speaker 2: I will say it is kind of funny. And my 1456 01:15:42,640 --> 01:15:44,880 Speaker 2: former colleague Matthew Glaci has pointed this out that like 1457 01:15:45,360 --> 01:15:47,439 Speaker 2: there is this idea of like the Biden administration just 1458 01:15:47,520 --> 01:15:50,120 Speaker 2: run by left wing radicals, and then it turns out 1459 01:15:50,120 --> 01:15:53,479 Speaker 2: that it was actually run by like normy Democrats, which 1460 01:15:53,479 --> 01:15:56,719 Speaker 2: is lightly funny to me. But like I do think 1461 01:15:56,960 --> 01:16:01,320 Speaker 2: that what you know, you had people say this person 1462 01:16:01,400 --> 01:16:04,800 Speaker 2: is too old. You had Biden himself essentially saying like 1463 01:16:04,920 --> 01:16:07,439 Speaker 2: I am here to pass the torch to the next generation. 1464 01:16:07,880 --> 01:16:10,559 Speaker 2: And then he had the same thing if you have 1465 01:16:10,640 --> 01:16:14,040 Speaker 2: ever encountered an elderly person in your life where they're 1466 01:16:14,080 --> 01:16:18,080 Speaker 2: like I'm fine, I'm I'm doing great, because that's how 1467 01:16:18,160 --> 01:16:21,439 Speaker 2: age works, that's how people work. So you had people, 1468 01:16:21,840 --> 01:16:24,400 Speaker 2: you know, a person who believed he could fully do 1469 01:16:24,439 --> 01:16:26,240 Speaker 2: the job and actually was the only person who could 1470 01:16:26,240 --> 01:16:29,960 Speaker 2: do the job, the job being defeat Donald Trump. You 1471 01:16:30,040 --> 01:16:33,559 Speaker 2: had people around him who, as far as I can tell, 1472 01:16:34,280 --> 01:16:37,439 Speaker 2: let him think that and kept going with it and 1473 01:16:37,760 --> 01:16:39,920 Speaker 2: basically tried to keep away anyone else who could tell 1474 01:16:39,960 --> 01:16:43,559 Speaker 2: him otherwise. And then you had voters who were like, 1475 01:16:44,280 --> 01:16:46,679 Speaker 2: what are you doing? You know what's going on here. 1476 01:16:46,720 --> 01:16:48,920 Speaker 2: We're going to keep saying you're too old for this. 1477 01:16:48,920 --> 01:16:52,760 Speaker 2: This is making us anxious, and people not listening to 1478 01:16:52,840 --> 01:16:56,360 Speaker 2: that third group of people. And I think that the 1479 01:16:56,560 --> 01:16:59,600 Speaker 2: challenge for media is I don't want to get like 1480 01:16:59,640 --> 01:17:03,680 Speaker 2: the re cremations right now. It feels very much like 1481 01:17:05,280 --> 01:17:07,759 Speaker 2: it's it's it's successive, Like it's. 1482 01:17:07,640 --> 01:17:10,559 Speaker 1: Not like I said it to me, It exposes I 1483 01:17:10,560 --> 01:17:13,200 Speaker 1: always say this, you know, I don't take anybody with bias, 1484 01:17:13,320 --> 01:17:17,240 Speaker 1: who who charges bias seriously because you're biased, You're not 1485 01:17:17,800 --> 01:17:19,960 Speaker 1: you're not a you're not a fair arbiter of this 1486 01:17:20,080 --> 01:17:22,640 Speaker 1: at all. And like I said, most of the criticism 1487 01:17:22,800 --> 01:17:25,439 Speaker 1: of the press is coming from people who have their 1488 01:17:25,479 --> 01:17:28,840 Speaker 1: own alternative media that they're trying to promote as a 1489 01:17:28,920 --> 01:17:31,360 Speaker 1: replacement for this, So it's sort of they have their 1490 01:17:31,400 --> 01:17:35,639 Speaker 1: own business interests at it. And and so that's why 1491 01:17:35,680 --> 01:17:37,800 Speaker 1: it's like, to me, the original sin is not listening 1492 01:17:37,840 --> 01:17:38,400 Speaker 1: to the voters. 1493 01:17:38,600 --> 01:17:42,360 Speaker 2: The voters complete voter said, you know, the voters were saying, 1494 01:17:42,439 --> 01:17:44,680 Speaker 2: like this person's too well. The voters were saying, like 1495 01:17:45,240 --> 01:17:47,040 Speaker 2: we like some of these things, like they're you know, 1496 01:17:47,200 --> 01:17:49,400 Speaker 2: I think that the actual story to me of the 1497 01:17:49,400 --> 01:17:53,160 Speaker 2: Biden administration is that he had a concept of deliverism 1498 01:17:53,240 --> 01:17:55,160 Speaker 2: of like you said, you wanted this, We're going to 1499 01:17:55,200 --> 01:17:57,720 Speaker 2: do this. You said you wanted this from unions, wanted this, 1500 01:17:57,760 --> 01:17:59,559 Speaker 2: We're going to do this. But he was too old 1501 01:17:59,640 --> 01:18:02,400 Speaker 2: to our articulate the like what you could do that 1502 01:18:02,439 --> 01:18:04,320 Speaker 2: part of the job, which means part of the job, 1503 01:18:04,360 --> 01:18:08,200 Speaker 2: but matters like there's a version of Biden, a theoretical 1504 01:18:08,240 --> 01:18:12,559 Speaker 2: Biden who is doing this when he's fifty five and 1505 01:18:12,600 --> 01:18:16,400 Speaker 2: who is like ronning around, you know, running around at 1506 01:18:16,439 --> 01:18:18,200 Speaker 2: every single you. 1507 01:18:18,160 --> 01:18:20,680 Speaker 1: Know, union hall. You could see it, you know what, 1508 01:18:20,760 --> 01:18:21,800 Speaker 1: you know what it was called. It was called the 1509 01:18:21,840 --> 01:18:24,840 Speaker 1: Clinton presidency, it was called the Obama presidency. It's like 1510 01:18:24,960 --> 01:18:27,840 Speaker 1: you saw president when travel the country. 1511 01:18:27,600 --> 01:18:30,320 Speaker 2: When you sell all the time, right and you're selling it, 1512 01:18:30,560 --> 01:18:32,920 Speaker 2: and you don't have to rely on the results to 1513 01:18:33,000 --> 01:18:36,000 Speaker 2: sell it because people are you know, we've seen this 1514 01:18:36,040 --> 01:18:39,280 Speaker 2: again and again how voters can totally disconnect between the 1515 01:18:39,320 --> 01:18:41,160 Speaker 2: person who did the thing and the results of the thing. 1516 01:18:41,720 --> 01:18:44,680 Speaker 2: And so I think that that's the challenge here, is 1517 01:18:44,680 --> 01:18:47,000 Speaker 2: that people didn't listen to voters. It is not to 1518 01:18:47,080 --> 01:18:50,960 Speaker 2: me about yelling media, yelling at media, because that's not interesting. 1519 01:18:51,080 --> 01:18:54,280 Speaker 2: What it is about to me is people saying, like, 1520 01:18:54,360 --> 01:18:56,240 Speaker 2: I know what the voters are saying, but also these 1521 01:18:56,240 --> 01:18:58,240 Speaker 2: people are really annoying to me, so I'm just not 1522 01:18:58,240 --> 01:18:59,800 Speaker 2: going to listen to them. Like, we need to do 1523 01:18:59,840 --> 01:19:02,240 Speaker 2: a better job of listening to voters. The challenge is 1524 01:19:02,240 --> 01:19:04,360 Speaker 2: nobody wants to do that. Even the people who say 1525 01:19:04,400 --> 01:19:07,320 Speaker 2: like Americans agree, no, they don't look it up, they 1526 01:19:07,320 --> 01:19:10,920 Speaker 2: don't agree. So like, listen to voters and think about, 1527 01:19:11,000 --> 01:19:13,639 Speaker 2: you know, how can we put forward policies that make 1528 01:19:13,720 --> 01:19:15,519 Speaker 2: sense to voters and then sell it to voters and 1529 01:19:15,560 --> 01:19:18,000 Speaker 2: then voters will say I like it, I don't like it. 1530 01:19:18,280 --> 01:19:21,000 Speaker 2: Here's why you look at those numbers. You say, you know, 1531 01:19:21,080 --> 01:19:22,400 Speaker 2: either we're going to go with the voters on this, 1532 01:19:22,520 --> 01:19:25,400 Speaker 2: or we're like, actually, no, we're going to say this 1533 01:19:25,560 --> 01:19:28,240 Speaker 2: is the right thing to do, and we're going to 1534 01:19:28,360 --> 01:19:31,080 Speaker 2: you know, we'll suffer the political heat from doing that, 1535 01:19:31,120 --> 01:19:32,760 Speaker 2: but we'll know we were right. There are so many 1536 01:19:32,760 --> 01:19:35,599 Speaker 2: alternatives than just a media circle jerk. 1537 01:19:38,040 --> 01:19:40,439 Speaker 1: As every conversation I have with you, I always feel 1538 01:19:40,439 --> 01:19:42,439 Speaker 1: I can go another hour, but I am mindful of 1539 01:19:42,479 --> 01:19:44,400 Speaker 1: your time, mindful of rank you so much. We can't 1540 01:19:44,439 --> 01:19:45,920 Speaker 1: do that, but let me I will ask you this 1541 01:19:45,960 --> 01:19:46,519 Speaker 1: one question. 1542 01:19:46,760 --> 01:19:47,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, is. 1543 01:19:49,240 --> 01:19:52,960 Speaker 1: How hot is the seat under the still newish head 1544 01:19:52,960 --> 01:19:56,640 Speaker 1: coach of Michigan. I mean I say this because in 1545 01:19:56,680 --> 01:19:59,360 Speaker 1: this day and age of if you make the playoff, 1546 01:19:59,360 --> 01:20:01,320 Speaker 1: you've had a success ful season, and if you haven't, 1547 01:20:01,400 --> 01:20:05,240 Speaker 1: you haven't. What's the level of patience I. 1548 01:20:05,280 --> 01:20:08,200 Speaker 2: Stak where actually people are feeling good? The recruiting has 1549 01:20:08,240 --> 01:20:11,479 Speaker 2: been fantastic, uh, you know, bringing in number one, you know, 1550 01:20:11,560 --> 01:20:14,840 Speaker 2: bringing number one quarterback prospect, a guy who people are 1551 01:20:14,840 --> 01:20:17,040 Speaker 2: talking about the spring game. I mean it's a spring game. 1552 01:20:17,439 --> 01:20:20,640 Speaker 2: Everybody sounds like they're doing Pravda level propaganda. 1553 01:20:20,640 --> 01:20:22,320 Speaker 1: When you talk about the spring game, you want to 1554 01:20:22,320 --> 01:20:28,280 Speaker 1: talk about taller and journalism college football journalists, Oh my god, 1555 01:20:28,640 --> 01:20:31,120 Speaker 1: they're all they all just feed off of it. 1556 01:20:31,280 --> 01:20:33,080 Speaker 2: I've experienced what it's like when you're with like a 1557 01:20:33,560 --> 01:20:36,439 Speaker 2: smaller program and you like people get away with things 1558 01:20:36,439 --> 01:20:38,720 Speaker 2: where you just couldn't do that, like you know, if 1559 01:20:38,760 --> 01:20:41,840 Speaker 2: you uh, you know, I lived in Utah, lived in 1560 01:20:41,840 --> 01:20:45,160 Speaker 2: Salt Lake City, and cam Rising basically didn't play and 1561 01:20:45,160 --> 01:20:47,720 Speaker 2: now has retired from football, and the oh that. 1562 01:20:47,720 --> 01:20:50,160 Speaker 1: Would be a huge story in a southern school or 1563 01:20:50,160 --> 01:20:51,000 Speaker 1: a Midwest. 1564 01:20:50,680 --> 01:20:53,320 Speaker 2: Oh my god. But the year I was there, we 1565 01:20:53,439 --> 01:20:55,439 Speaker 2: run in like you know, it was the Oregon State game, 1566 01:20:55,439 --> 01:20:56,320 Speaker 2: which was every week. 1567 01:20:56,720 --> 01:21:00,800 Speaker 1: Rising was last gambler every week. Yeah. 1568 01:21:00,880 --> 01:21:02,479 Speaker 2: Yeah. The Utah media was like, I don't know, he 1569 01:21:02,560 --> 01:21:05,200 Speaker 2: might play, and I'm like, I don't think he's gonna play, 1570 01:21:05,280 --> 01:21:09,800 Speaker 2: but anyway, So I think your actual question was how 1571 01:21:09,880 --> 01:21:13,920 Speaker 2: is everybody feeling? The vibes are remarkably good because we 1572 01:21:14,000 --> 01:21:17,840 Speaker 2: had the most hilarious month in I think Michigan football history, 1573 01:21:17,920 --> 01:21:20,599 Speaker 2: where you know, you beat Northwestern like you should, then 1574 01:21:20,640 --> 01:21:24,479 Speaker 2: you go to Columbus beat the eventual national champions thirteen 1575 01:21:24,479 --> 01:21:27,360 Speaker 2: to ten, and the Zenith austomedies. 1576 01:21:27,400 --> 01:21:30,640 Speaker 1: Absolutely one of the It was such a a it 1577 01:21:30,680 --> 01:21:34,160 Speaker 1: was such a it was a fitting. It was yeah something, 1578 01:21:34,200 --> 01:21:34,559 Speaker 1: it was fair. 1579 01:21:34,680 --> 01:21:36,720 Speaker 2: It restored me in a way I didn't know I 1580 01:21:36,760 --> 01:21:38,720 Speaker 2: needed to be restored. And then you know, we win 1581 01:21:38,800 --> 01:21:42,880 Speaker 2: our bowl game against Alabama in a monsoon And during 1582 01:21:42,920 --> 01:21:45,240 Speaker 2: all of this we've picked up number one quarterback recruit, 1583 01:21:45,680 --> 01:21:47,600 Speaker 2: and the recruiting seems to be really good. Like, I 1584 01:21:47,640 --> 01:21:50,559 Speaker 2: think that the idea. The thing I'm a little worried 1585 01:21:50,560 --> 01:21:53,360 Speaker 2: about is running back. But I think like the you know, 1586 01:21:53,439 --> 01:21:56,280 Speaker 2: plug and play offensive line I feel good about. I 1587 01:21:56,320 --> 01:21:59,320 Speaker 2: think that in terms of like the hot seed or 1588 01:21:59,320 --> 01:22:02,040 Speaker 2: something like that, I think Sharon's fine. I think that 1589 01:22:02,120 --> 01:22:04,640 Speaker 2: there's a lot of latitude people have been willing to 1590 01:22:04,640 --> 01:22:09,640 Speaker 2: give him, given that you had Harball leave right, you know, 1591 01:22:09,680 --> 01:22:12,040 Speaker 2: basically after the National championship, because he did what he 1592 01:22:12,080 --> 01:22:15,320 Speaker 2: said he was going to do. Right. You had, you know, 1593 01:22:15,680 --> 01:22:19,240 Speaker 2: the continuity. You know, the players wanted Charon. Players wanted Charon. 1594 01:22:19,280 --> 01:22:21,439 Speaker 2: You had that continuity. You had no quarterback. 1595 01:22:22,320 --> 01:22:24,599 Speaker 1: I will tell you that that doesn't That works until 1596 01:22:24,600 --> 01:22:26,479 Speaker 1: it doesn't work, I'm aware. 1597 01:22:26,479 --> 01:22:27,960 Speaker 2: And that's the thing I think it didn't go well, 1598 01:22:28,160 --> 01:22:30,519 Speaker 2: the lack of the quarterback. I mean, to go eight 1599 01:22:30,560 --> 01:22:32,360 Speaker 2: and five while having, as far as I could tell, 1600 01:22:32,520 --> 01:22:34,160 Speaker 2: not one quarterback on the run. 1601 01:22:34,280 --> 01:22:36,720 Speaker 1: I know, but you had the best quarterback name in 1602 01:22:36,760 --> 01:22:41,760 Speaker 1: college football. Everybody wanted to have an orgy over and 1603 01:22:41,800 --> 01:22:44,840 Speaker 1: it was just such a disappointment that Orgie was not 1604 01:22:44,880 --> 01:22:46,679 Speaker 1: a lot of fun. And that's what you hear about 1605 01:22:46,760 --> 01:22:49,720 Speaker 1: orgy is it. Sometimes it doesn't make it happens. 1606 01:22:49,400 --> 01:22:54,800 Speaker 2: It happens. But I'm feeling I'm feeling good, good. That 1607 01:22:54,920 --> 01:22:57,240 Speaker 2: is how I'm feeling about Sharon Moore and his position 1608 01:22:57,280 --> 01:22:57,759 Speaker 2: at Michigan. 1609 01:22:58,760 --> 01:23:01,920 Speaker 1: Well, it's a as always, I can't wait for college 1610 01:23:01,920 --> 01:23:04,080 Speaker 1: football to start. I wish which college football had a 1611 01:23:04,120 --> 01:23:06,880 Speaker 1: scheduling reveal, which college football had these weird things that 1612 01:23:06,920 --> 01:23:08,840 Speaker 1: the NFL has somehow creeped into our life. 1613 01:23:08,960 --> 01:23:12,360 Speaker 2: Believe me already, I'm like, let's get those previews going. 1614 01:23:12,479 --> 01:23:13,800 Speaker 2: Let's do it. Let's do it, SRT. 1615 01:23:14,360 --> 01:23:16,479 Speaker 1: Thank you, Chuck, Jane, this was a pleasure, good luck, 1616 01:23:16,880 --> 01:23:25,280 Speaker 1: Thank you well. I hope you enjoyed that conversation with Jane. 1617 01:23:25,280 --> 01:23:27,800 Speaker 1: We didn't solve the college football problem. But I do 1618 01:23:27,880 --> 01:23:30,920 Speaker 1: want to get on my soapbox for one other thing here. 1619 01:23:32,439 --> 01:23:35,479 Speaker 1: When you start to guarantee bids, it's interesting. There's an 1620 01:23:35,520 --> 01:23:38,040 Speaker 1: interesting little back and forth going on the Big Ten 1621 01:23:38,080 --> 01:23:42,400 Speaker 1: apparently is what is who wants guaranteed bids? Because they 1622 01:23:42,439 --> 01:23:46,360 Speaker 1: secretly know that their super conference isn't that impressive after 1623 01:23:46,400 --> 01:23:48,679 Speaker 1: the top three or four schools, that there's a huge 1624 01:23:48,760 --> 01:23:50,840 Speaker 1: drop off that if you want to sit here, and 1625 01:23:51,200 --> 01:23:53,800 Speaker 1: you know both the ACC and the Big twelve have 1626 01:23:54,520 --> 01:23:58,680 Speaker 1: a stronger middle class of college football programs, then I 1627 01:23:58,680 --> 01:24:01,000 Speaker 1: would argue the Big Ten hats. But the Big Ten 1628 01:24:01,080 --> 01:24:03,439 Speaker 1: has a couple of big prestigious ones, don't get me wrong, 1629 01:24:03,800 --> 01:24:08,000 Speaker 1: and they certainly have population centers that that fire them up. 1630 01:24:08,400 --> 01:24:11,760 Speaker 1: But that is Big Ten secretly knows this, which is 1631 01:24:11,760 --> 01:24:13,599 Speaker 1: why they want to try to guarantee four slots, because 1632 01:24:13,600 --> 01:24:16,680 Speaker 1: they shouldn't. They wouldn't earn four slots every year. Just 1633 01:24:16,920 --> 01:24:21,080 Speaker 1: let's stick to some sort of criteria that in theory, 1634 01:24:21,320 --> 01:24:24,000 Speaker 1: leaves it possible for any power for team to make 1635 01:24:24,040 --> 01:24:27,799 Speaker 1: it into the playoffs. Guaranteeing spots beyond winning your conference 1636 01:24:28,280 --> 01:24:33,520 Speaker 1: becomes subjective and you will have I think, gaming of schedules, 1637 01:24:33,600 --> 01:24:35,800 Speaker 1: all sorts of stuff. All it is going to do 1638 01:24:35,880 --> 01:24:39,439 Speaker 1: is lead to a worse product for the public. All right, 1639 01:24:39,640 --> 01:24:43,680 Speaker 1: What you need to do is create a playoff that 1640 01:24:44,920 --> 01:24:52,080 Speaker 1: that essentially motivates college football programs to play tougher schedules, 1641 01:24:52,479 --> 01:24:56,839 Speaker 1: not weaker schedules to play more high profile non conference games, 1642 01:24:57,240 --> 01:25:00,479 Speaker 1: not less high profile conference games. This is what wins 1643 01:25:00,640 --> 01:25:03,440 Speaker 1: for everybody. If you want to keep getting these astronomical 1644 01:25:03,479 --> 01:25:09,200 Speaker 1: amounts of media rightes dollars present a good product. Guess what, 1645 01:25:09,360 --> 01:25:11,679 Speaker 1: people don't want to watch a lot of Mississippi State 1646 01:25:11,800 --> 01:25:14,160 Speaker 1: versus LSU and all that stuff. No offense to my 1647 01:25:14,200 --> 01:25:16,800 Speaker 1: friends in Starkville. Okay, when you're good, we do want 1648 01:25:16,800 --> 01:25:18,400 Speaker 1: to watch it. When Mike Leach is your coach, we 1649 01:25:18,400 --> 01:25:20,760 Speaker 1: want to watch it. Don't get me wrong. Okay, but 1650 01:25:20,840 --> 01:25:22,479 Speaker 1: you know what people really want to see. They want 1651 01:25:22,479 --> 01:25:25,360 Speaker 1: to see USC play in Miami. They want to see 1652 01:25:25,400 --> 01:25:28,200 Speaker 1: a North Carolina play at Texas. They want to see 1653 01:25:28,479 --> 01:25:34,040 Speaker 1: an Alabama play Wisconsin or a BYU. So the point is, 1654 01:25:34,200 --> 01:25:37,880 Speaker 1: let's see these things once or twice in the regular season, 1655 01:25:37,880 --> 01:25:41,640 Speaker 1: and we could we anyway. So I really hope that 1656 01:25:41,680 --> 01:25:45,360 Speaker 1: the college football powers that be think about the fans 1657 01:25:45,360 --> 01:25:47,519 Speaker 1: and what's in the best interests of the sport, not 1658 01:25:47,640 --> 01:25:50,000 Speaker 1: just what's in the best interests of one or two 1659 01:25:50,080 --> 01:25:55,120 Speaker 1: conferences that might be worried that they've bankrupted themselves by 1660 01:25:55,160 --> 01:25:59,960 Speaker 1: over expanding. All right, off my college football so box here, 1661 01:26:00,760 --> 01:26:07,040 Speaker 1: let's do a little last Chuck Ask Chuck. Remember, if 1662 01:26:07,040 --> 01:26:09,360 Speaker 1: you've got questions for me, send them an Ask Chuck 1663 01:26:09,479 --> 01:26:12,679 Speaker 1: at the Chuck Podcast dot com. Or you can drop 1664 01:26:12,720 --> 01:26:14,960 Speaker 1: a question in the YouTube comments, drop a question on 1665 01:26:14,960 --> 01:26:18,840 Speaker 1: our Instagram feed, drop question dm me. Mydms are open 1666 01:26:19,479 --> 01:26:21,240 Speaker 1: if you want to drop me a question there, drop 1667 01:26:21,280 --> 01:26:23,160 Speaker 1: it on wherever you want to drop us a question. 1668 01:26:23,640 --> 01:26:27,320 Speaker 1: But again, the email is ask Chuck at thechucktodcast dot com. 1669 01:26:27,320 --> 01:26:30,720 Speaker 1: All right, first question comes from Michael H of Everett, Washington, 1670 01:26:31,320 --> 01:26:35,519 Speaker 1: The Other Washington. I really appreciate your long form interview format. 1671 01:26:35,560 --> 01:26:37,519 Speaker 1: As someone who has been watching the Sunday shows since 1672 01:26:37,520 --> 01:26:39,479 Speaker 1: I was in high school in the nineties, I appreciate 1673 01:26:39,520 --> 01:26:41,280 Speaker 1: the value of a good interview of those in power 1674 01:26:41,360 --> 01:26:43,840 Speaker 1: or seeking power. Giving your interviewing experience, what advice would 1675 01:26:43,840 --> 01:26:46,320 Speaker 1: you give to people watching political interviews? What should we 1676 01:26:46,360 --> 01:26:49,360 Speaker 1: be paying attention to and what should we not be 1677 01:26:49,479 --> 01:26:51,679 Speaker 1: distracted by? Thank you for your time. That's an interesting 1678 01:26:51,680 --> 01:26:55,519 Speaker 1: way of putting it well, I would say this look. 1679 01:26:56,280 --> 01:26:59,439 Speaker 1: The length of the interview sometimes tells you everything, right. 1680 01:27:00,160 --> 01:27:01,560 Speaker 1: I don't think you can get a lot out of 1681 01:27:01,560 --> 01:27:05,400 Speaker 1: a five to ten minute interview other than the answer 1682 01:27:05,439 --> 01:27:08,760 Speaker 1: to one or two news making questions, right that, you know, 1683 01:27:08,840 --> 01:27:11,040 Speaker 1: any interview that's ten minutes or less is usually more 1684 01:27:11,080 --> 01:27:15,200 Speaker 1: about a topic, and so at best, you know, the 1685 01:27:15,240 --> 01:27:17,120 Speaker 1: smartest way I think to use a seven to ten 1686 01:27:17,160 --> 01:27:20,360 Speaker 1: minute interview is a single topic, right go, So that way, 1687 01:27:20,360 --> 01:27:22,639 Speaker 1: at least you're deep on one issue. Maybe you could 1688 01:27:22,640 --> 01:27:25,880 Speaker 1: sneak in a second question or second topic, second question, 1689 01:27:26,160 --> 01:27:28,600 Speaker 1: three or four questions, but a second topic, so that 1690 01:27:29,160 --> 01:27:31,479 Speaker 1: you know, if you start to see a laundry list 1691 01:27:31,520 --> 01:27:35,960 Speaker 1: of questions, you know that's probably an interview that's worths given. 1692 01:27:36,280 --> 01:27:38,880 Speaker 1: You know, you know, you want to know that it's 1693 01:27:39,280 --> 01:27:42,640 Speaker 1: of the moment and all of that. I thought you 1694 01:27:42,640 --> 01:27:44,479 Speaker 1: were going to ask of what's what's one of your 1695 01:27:44,560 --> 01:27:48,040 Speaker 1: best pieces of for interviewing somebody? And of course the 1696 01:27:48,080 --> 01:27:52,720 Speaker 1: simplest piece of advice is shorter questions, right nobody. One 1697 01:27:52,760 --> 01:27:55,720 Speaker 1: of the biggest mistakes I've made it at times, and 1698 01:27:55,960 --> 01:27:58,320 Speaker 1: so I will confess to it, and plenty of others do. 1699 01:28:00,240 --> 01:28:04,760 Speaker 1: Most people aren't watching an interview judging whether it was 1700 01:28:04,760 --> 01:28:08,559 Speaker 1: a good question. Most people are watching an interview trying 1701 01:28:08,560 --> 01:28:11,599 Speaker 1: to see if they're trying to find out if they're 1702 01:28:11,640 --> 01:28:16,120 Speaker 1: interested in the answers. Right, they're much more focused on 1703 01:28:16,120 --> 01:28:19,360 Speaker 1: the interview E than the interview Or if you're making 1704 01:28:19,400 --> 01:28:23,120 Speaker 1: it about yourself during your interview, you've probably already quote 1705 01:28:23,160 --> 01:28:29,200 Speaker 1: lost the interview right, So shorter questions. And here's another one. 1706 01:28:29,320 --> 01:28:33,840 Speaker 1: Don't fill empty space. Let the interview E fill the 1707 01:28:33,840 --> 01:28:38,240 Speaker 1: empty space. In some ways, if there's this awkward silence, 1708 01:28:39,240 --> 01:28:43,200 Speaker 1: a lot of times, if you just simply say and 1709 01:28:43,200 --> 01:28:47,880 Speaker 1: and you make the INTERVIEWE offer fill that silence, a 1710 01:28:47,960 --> 01:28:51,920 Speaker 1: lot of times you get something really interesting. Appreciate that question. 1711 01:28:52,400 --> 01:28:56,960 Speaker 1: Next one comes from Brian Parts Unknown. Brian writes, are 1712 01:28:56,960 --> 01:28:59,360 Speaker 1: the Democrats working behind the scenes writing bills waiting for 1713 01:28:59,400 --> 01:29:01,559 Speaker 1: the You'll be to collapse in twenty twenty six so 1714 01:29:01,560 --> 01:29:04,280 Speaker 1: they can try to repair our standing in the world 1715 01:29:04,320 --> 01:29:06,280 Speaker 1: and more importantly here at home. You know, it's a 1716 01:29:06,280 --> 01:29:10,280 Speaker 1: good question. There's no evidence that they are, but it's 1717 01:29:10,280 --> 01:29:12,519 Speaker 1: something I've been thinking about. I'm putting together a project 1718 01:29:12,600 --> 01:29:14,639 Speaker 1: that is a little more focused on twenty twenty eight. 1719 01:29:15,800 --> 01:29:18,920 Speaker 1: Will let you know more when I have more to share. 1720 01:29:19,479 --> 01:29:24,479 Speaker 1: But in thinking about that, I was, you know, it 1721 01:29:24,680 --> 01:29:28,479 Speaker 1: dawned on me that Democrats or any party out of power, 1722 01:29:29,040 --> 01:29:31,080 Speaker 1: the Republicans do a better have done a better job 1723 01:29:31,120 --> 01:29:33,559 Speaker 1: of this at times where they try to present a 1724 01:29:33,600 --> 01:29:37,080 Speaker 1: sort of out of power alternative platform. Right, whether it 1725 01:29:37,200 --> 01:29:40,880 Speaker 1: was the Contract with America, the original one back in 1726 01:29:40,920 --> 01:29:43,960 Speaker 1: nineteen ninety two, you should be nineteen eighty four, unveiled 1727 01:29:44,120 --> 01:29:46,840 Speaker 1: in nineteen eighty four, those elections that had lined by 1728 01:29:46,880 --> 01:29:50,680 Speaker 1: new Gingritz, There's been derivatives of that that House Republicans 1729 01:29:50,720 --> 01:29:53,200 Speaker 1: have tried to do in various ways since the Contract 1730 01:29:53,240 --> 01:29:57,439 Speaker 1: with America, Project twenty twenty five, which you know, Donald 1731 01:29:57,479 --> 01:30:01,400 Speaker 1: Trump both embraced and then distanced, and now of course 1732 01:30:01,400 --> 01:30:05,160 Speaker 1: it is governing via model. I think that gave them. 1733 01:30:05,320 --> 01:30:07,760 Speaker 1: You know, I think what made twenty Project twenty twenty 1734 01:30:07,840 --> 01:30:11,120 Speaker 1: five brilliant is the Democrats spend all this time talking 1735 01:30:11,120 --> 01:30:14,080 Speaker 1: about Trump's plans. So even if they were talking about 1736 01:30:14,080 --> 01:30:16,479 Speaker 1: Trump's plans in a negative light, what was the message 1737 01:30:16,520 --> 01:30:19,639 Speaker 1: that was being sent to voters Trump has plans. Nobody 1738 01:30:19,640 --> 01:30:21,040 Speaker 1: ever said Donald Trump didn't know what he was going 1739 01:30:21,080 --> 01:30:24,280 Speaker 1: to do with his presidency. Right. So the point is 1740 01:30:24,760 --> 01:30:26,840 Speaker 1: you're asking a question about whether Democrats are doing this, 1741 01:30:26,920 --> 01:30:29,519 Speaker 1: and there's probably a couple that actually are trying to 1742 01:30:29,760 --> 01:30:33,360 Speaker 1: prepare bills that they might put on you know, if 1743 01:30:33,439 --> 01:30:36,960 Speaker 1: Democrats get the majority. Certainly your committee potential committee chairs 1744 01:30:36,960 --> 01:30:39,280 Speaker 1: are thinking about how they might run a committee, but 1745 01:30:39,320 --> 01:30:42,519 Speaker 1: there's no big idea like this. And I certainly think 1746 01:30:42,520 --> 01:30:45,599 Speaker 1: if you plan on running for president, I think Project 1747 01:30:45,640 --> 01:30:49,160 Speaker 1: twenty twenty five is something is something not to turn 1748 01:30:49,200 --> 01:30:52,000 Speaker 1: your nose up at, but it's something to think about emulating. 1749 01:30:52,640 --> 01:30:55,559 Speaker 1: I think voters want to see a plan. You know, 1750 01:30:55,600 --> 01:30:58,439 Speaker 1: they're realistic, they know not everything's going to get put in. 1751 01:30:58,520 --> 01:31:02,760 Speaker 1: But if you have plans, in some ways, that is 1752 01:31:02,800 --> 01:31:06,400 Speaker 1: giving voters, I think, an idea that at least you 1753 01:31:06,439 --> 01:31:07,680 Speaker 1: have an idea of what you want to do when 1754 01:31:07,680 --> 01:31:09,920 Speaker 1: you're in office, and in many ways, voters are more 1755 01:31:09,960 --> 01:31:12,800 Speaker 1: likely to reward that, even even if some of the 1756 01:31:12,800 --> 01:31:16,880 Speaker 1: specifics quote unquote are unpopular when you pull them right. 1757 01:31:16,920 --> 01:31:18,840 Speaker 1: And I think that was the sort of miss that 1758 01:31:18,960 --> 01:31:21,559 Speaker 1: was the mistake Democrats made with Project twenty twenty five. 1759 01:31:21,920 --> 01:31:25,559 Speaker 1: I think the larger message they inadvertently sent when they 1760 01:31:26,160 --> 01:31:28,960 Speaker 1: railed against Project twenty twenty five is Donald Trump has 1761 01:31:29,000 --> 01:31:33,000 Speaker 1: a plan. And I think some voters were oddly reassured, oh, well, 1762 01:31:33,040 --> 01:31:36,080 Speaker 1: he has a plan and there's something to look at it. 1763 01:31:37,080 --> 01:31:44,919 Speaker 1: Look Democrats, you know, look and in some ways they 1764 01:31:45,680 --> 01:31:47,640 Speaker 1: were abiding by a rule book that used to be. 1765 01:31:47,720 --> 01:31:51,040 Speaker 1: But you know, we always say it's not that the 1766 01:31:51,120 --> 01:31:54,080 Speaker 1: rules don't apply, but like the rules are constantly changing, 1767 01:31:54,120 --> 01:31:56,639 Speaker 1: and sometimes you don't realize it until after the fact. 1768 01:31:57,400 --> 01:32:00,720 Speaker 1: And Democrats, you know, there was a time where it 1769 01:32:00,800 --> 01:32:02,719 Speaker 1: was the Democrats that would put up too many policy 1770 01:32:02,720 --> 01:32:05,720 Speaker 1: plans or Republicans wouldn't put out anything, and Republicans just 1771 01:32:05,760 --> 01:32:08,920 Speaker 1: had a field day running against the Democratic plans, you know, 1772 01:32:09,080 --> 01:32:11,840 Speaker 1: and being able to run against hypothetical ideas. Think Green 1773 01:32:11,920 --> 01:32:16,360 Speaker 1: New Deal. Right, that's a classic example. You know, some 1774 01:32:16,439 --> 01:32:18,360 Speaker 1: of it is in marketing and some of it isn't that. 1775 01:32:18,400 --> 01:32:24,160 Speaker 1: But I think that there is a you know, Democrats 1776 01:32:24,280 --> 01:32:26,240 Speaker 1: ran away from their Green New Deal. And while Donald 1777 01:32:26,280 --> 01:32:28,439 Speaker 1: Trump kind of ran away from Project twenty twenty five, 1778 01:32:28,479 --> 01:32:30,479 Speaker 1: he didn't run away from the specifics of what was 1779 01:32:30,479 --> 01:32:34,200 Speaker 1: in Project twenty twenty five. He just simply said no, no, no, 1780 01:32:34,240 --> 01:32:36,400 Speaker 1: I'm not letting somebody else write my agenda. Right, he 1781 01:32:36,439 --> 01:32:38,640 Speaker 1: was sort of he was sort of, but there was 1782 01:32:38,640 --> 01:32:42,320 Speaker 1: a wink at a nod to it. I Like I said, 1783 01:32:42,600 --> 01:32:48,040 Speaker 1: I think that Democrats would behoove themselves to make this 1784 01:32:48,080 --> 01:32:50,799 Speaker 1: goes back to what is Trump really good at making 1785 01:32:50,920 --> 01:32:56,000 Speaker 1: Democrats constantly talk about him and in some ways, you know, 1786 01:32:56,080 --> 01:32:58,559 Speaker 1: while it used to be being in a referendum election. Look, 1787 01:32:58,640 --> 01:33:02,439 Speaker 1: that explains why he can't win a big have a 1788 01:33:02,439 --> 01:33:05,240 Speaker 1: big victory, right, and why he's still polarizing. At the 1789 01:33:05,280 --> 01:33:08,800 Speaker 1: same time, it explains why he's still electable. Right. He's 1790 01:33:08,840 --> 01:33:12,840 Speaker 1: made everything all about him, his ideas and all this stuff. 1791 01:33:12,880 --> 01:33:15,800 Speaker 1: So when you think about twenty twenty eight, you know, 1792 01:33:16,800 --> 01:33:18,200 Speaker 1: I think voters are going to want to know that 1793 01:33:18,240 --> 01:33:20,439 Speaker 1: Democrats have a plan, that they know what they want 1794 01:33:20,479 --> 01:33:24,240 Speaker 1: to do. You know, whether do you go in the 1795 01:33:24,280 --> 01:33:26,840 Speaker 1: specificity that Project twenty twenty five did. We can have 1796 01:33:26,880 --> 01:33:30,639 Speaker 1: that debate, but I think in hindsight, Project twenty twenty 1797 01:33:30,640 --> 01:33:33,360 Speaker 1: five turned into a net positive for Trump, not necessarily 1798 01:33:33,439 --> 01:33:36,160 Speaker 1: a negative. All Right, last question I'm gonna deal with 1799 01:33:36,200 --> 01:33:38,880 Speaker 1: today comes from Dell p also did not tell me 1800 01:33:38,880 --> 01:33:41,519 Speaker 1: where they were from. During the last cycle, we heard 1801 01:33:41,520 --> 01:33:44,760 Speaker 1: a lot of old school Republicans and many and in 1802 01:33:44,800 --> 01:33:47,080 Speaker 1: many ways low information voters who would say, well, I 1803 01:33:47,120 --> 01:33:49,559 Speaker 1: don't really like Trump, but I've voted Republican all my 1804 01:33:49,600 --> 01:33:51,639 Speaker 1: life and I can't see myself voting for a Democrat. 1805 01:33:51,920 --> 01:33:54,080 Speaker 1: Democrats and many Republicans spent a ton of time trying 1806 01:33:54,120 --> 01:33:56,280 Speaker 1: to convince these disaffected Republicans that they should vote for 1807 01:33:56,320 --> 01:33:59,280 Speaker 1: Harris to quote save democracy. It didn't work. It seems 1808 01:33:59,320 --> 01:34:02,160 Speaker 1: like the solution was so simple. Run a Cheney Kinsinger 1809 01:34:02,360 --> 01:34:05,160 Speaker 1: or another Commo of dispector Republican ticket as a third 1810 01:34:05,160 --> 01:34:07,559 Speaker 1: party and basically split the vote on the right, thereby 1811 01:34:07,560 --> 01:34:09,680 Speaker 1: giving the race to Harris. It would have been just 1812 01:34:09,760 --> 01:34:12,320 Speaker 1: like the nineteen ninety two election with Pero that helped 1813 01:34:12,320 --> 01:34:14,040 Speaker 1: give the election to Clinton. Do you think this would 1814 01:34:14,040 --> 01:34:16,240 Speaker 1: have worked? It seems so obvious. If it's not so 1815 01:34:16,320 --> 01:34:18,680 Speaker 1: obvious or simple, why if it is, why didn't they 1816 01:34:18,720 --> 01:34:21,679 Speaker 1: do it? Look, you accept a premise that I don't accept, 1817 01:34:21,720 --> 01:34:25,559 Speaker 1: and that is this idea that Ross Perot Ross Perot 1818 01:34:25,560 --> 01:34:27,680 Speaker 1: took more from Bush than he did from Clinton. There 1819 01:34:27,720 --> 01:34:30,000 Speaker 1: is zero evidence of that. In fact, all the numbers 1820 01:34:30,080 --> 01:34:35,000 Speaker 1: indicate that they took about evenly. Now, I think Pero's 1821 01:34:35,080 --> 01:34:40,840 Speaker 1: presence as a second anti Bush messenger was very and 1822 01:34:40,880 --> 01:34:45,519 Speaker 1: this gets it to the dynamics of who's the incumbent party. 1823 01:34:45,640 --> 01:34:48,920 Speaker 1: I think what you're describing in twenty twenty four would 1824 01:34:48,960 --> 01:34:51,479 Speaker 1: have worked against the Democrats and to Trump's benefit. Why 1825 01:34:52,120 --> 01:34:57,519 Speaker 1: because in some ways you had an incumbent Democratic president, 1826 01:34:57,840 --> 01:35:01,000 Speaker 1: you'd had to say this third party of right leaning, 1827 01:35:01,640 --> 01:35:06,559 Speaker 1: you know, so it's it's Liz Cheney, it's Adam Kinsinger, right, 1828 01:35:06,600 --> 01:35:12,040 Speaker 1: pro democracy center right ticket over here, who would be 1829 01:35:12,080 --> 01:35:17,320 Speaker 1: making as much of a domestic case against Democrats as 1830 01:35:17,360 --> 01:35:21,080 Speaker 1: they would be a democracy case against Trump. Right, So 1831 01:35:21,760 --> 01:35:25,960 Speaker 1: Trump space would be the same, and you probably have 1832 01:35:26,000 --> 01:35:29,320 Speaker 1: a more divided coalition of independence who were you know, 1833 01:35:29,360 --> 01:35:32,120 Speaker 1: who sort of held their nose and voted for Biden 1834 01:35:32,120 --> 01:35:36,200 Speaker 1: in twenty But we're looking for another way, and you'd 1835 01:35:36,240 --> 01:35:41,280 Speaker 1: be providing that path now alternatively right as the if 1836 01:35:41,760 --> 01:35:43,880 Speaker 1: Trump was the incumbent party, then I could make a 1837 01:35:43,920 --> 01:35:46,160 Speaker 1: case that yes, that might work, right you make a 1838 01:35:46,160 --> 01:35:49,920 Speaker 1: more direct appeal to some of that Trump coalition. But 1839 01:35:49,960 --> 01:35:53,040 Speaker 1: I think the problem is in twenty four a Liz 1840 01:35:53,120 --> 01:35:57,639 Speaker 1: Cheney Adam Kinsinger third party candidacy probably would have when 1841 01:35:57,680 --> 01:36:01,160 Speaker 1: we saw some numbers indicating this. Although hypothetical polling sometimes 1842 01:36:01,439 --> 01:36:05,160 Speaker 1: can overexaggerate some of these trend lines, it's likely I 1843 01:36:05,200 --> 01:36:07,439 Speaker 1: think it would have. It would have hurt Biden because 1844 01:36:07,439 --> 01:36:10,559 Speaker 1: he was the incumbent. It is one of those cases 1845 01:36:10,560 --> 01:36:13,960 Speaker 1: where perhaps right if it's a if. It's if it 1846 01:36:14,000 --> 01:36:17,479 Speaker 1: was a Republican administration trying to seek another term. And 1847 01:36:17,520 --> 01:36:19,360 Speaker 1: this is why maybe in twenty twenty eight this will 1848 01:36:19,400 --> 01:36:23,080 Speaker 1: work out that way, that that's possible. But again, you 1849 01:36:23,120 --> 01:36:25,840 Speaker 1: will not. I will never accept this. There is been 1850 01:36:25,960 --> 01:36:29,720 Speaker 1: an attempt by Republicans for decades to try to say 1851 01:36:29,800 --> 01:36:33,760 Speaker 1: Clinton only one because of Perro. I just you know, 1852 01:36:34,120 --> 01:36:36,200 Speaker 1: I will. I will go to my grave believing that 1853 01:36:36,280 --> 01:36:39,120 Speaker 1: even in a two way race, Clinton Clinton likely wins 1854 01:36:39,120 --> 01:36:41,360 Speaker 1: that election. I understand the moment how it felt. But 1855 01:36:41,400 --> 01:36:47,160 Speaker 1: there was change. There was no case to reelect the incumbent, right, 1856 01:36:47,360 --> 01:36:51,760 Speaker 1: It was a change election. And so if you weren't 1857 01:36:51,800 --> 01:36:53,320 Speaker 1: going to change the incumbent, what else were you going 1858 01:36:53,400 --> 01:36:58,480 Speaker 1: to change? Right? And both Pero and Clinton were changed candidates, 1859 01:36:58,560 --> 01:37:03,559 Speaker 1: and that ultimately really hurt the incumbent. And in the 1860 01:37:03,600 --> 01:37:07,320 Speaker 1: scenario you're outlining, the two change candidates would have been 1861 01:37:07,320 --> 01:37:09,960 Speaker 1: Trump and this Republicans would have been almost sort of 1862 01:37:10,280 --> 01:37:13,640 Speaker 1: two change candidates versus one status quote candidate. And I 1863 01:37:13,680 --> 01:37:16,160 Speaker 1: don't think it would have helped the status quote candidate. 1864 01:37:16,400 --> 01:37:18,400 Speaker 1: All Right, that does it for me for this episode. 1865 01:37:18,439 --> 01:37:21,840 Speaker 1: I think I've rambled on long enough. There love those 1866 01:37:21,920 --> 01:37:26,479 Speaker 1: questions please keep them coming, and I plan to upload 1867 01:37:26,479 --> 01:37:28,720 Speaker 1: again within the next twenty four hours. So thanks for 1868 01:37:28,760 --> 01:37:32,040 Speaker 1: listening and don't forget like and subscribe wherever you are 1869 01:37:32,120 --> 01:37:38,839 Speaker 1: hearing or watching this podcast. Thank you.