Speaker 1: Hey there, folks.
Speaker 2: It is Tuesday, September the twenty third, and we just
Speaker 2: came from a theater seeing what is described as maybe
Speaker 2: the worst reviewed movie of the year.
Speaker 1: Just how badly is it reviewed?
Speaker 3: Ropes Well Him has gotten one half star out of
Speaker 3: four from a major Roger Ebert dot com New York
Speaker 3: Times did not like it in Indie Wire.
Speaker 4: Whooh, they panned it as well.
Speaker 1: When you say they panned it, what do you mean?
Speaker 3: How's this for a line in a movie review? Putrid
Speaker 3: and hollow? Justin Tipping's brain dead football horror film, which
Speaker 3: somehow managed to secure the backing of producer Jordan Peel,
Speaker 3: is incomprehensibly bad.
Speaker 1: And we would like to tell you we fucking loved it.
Speaker 1: And with that, welcome to this episode of Amy and TJ. Robes.
Speaker 1: We were scratching our haggs. We were a little confused.
Speaker 1: Some of the reviews, they can be bad. Some of
Speaker 1: the reviews we heard for this one seemed.
Speaker 3: Mean, Yes, hi, how about this a rock brained football
Speaker 3: horror movie that's as subtle as being sacked by a
Speaker 3: three hundred pound defensive lineman and somehow only half as
Speaker 3: much fun.
Speaker 1: Oh my goodness, that seems mean. That doesn't seem to
Speaker 1: be a critique of the lighting, of the music, of
Speaker 1: the acting, of the writing. That seems like they were
Speaker 1: taking shots at this movie that has a rating on
Speaker 1: Rotten Tomatoes.
Speaker 4: Nine percent once in nine.
Speaker 1: I think it's on the rise if it's twenty nine,
Speaker 1: because I think it was lower. At one point, we
Speaker 1: have been seeing previews robes. We go to horror movies.
Speaker 1: The only thing we see at theater is pretty much
Speaker 1: a horror movies, so we see previews for upcoming horror movies.
Speaker 1: We've been seeing about this one for a while. It
Speaker 1: was intriguing. We were curious, but it wasn't one we
Speaker 1: plan to run out and see at theaters until we're like,
Speaker 1: how was everybody hating on this movie so much?
Speaker 3: Yeah, until the bad reviews, and then we knew we
Speaker 3: had to see it, And the truth is it's not.
Speaker 1: Look.
Speaker 4: I appreciated how different it was.
Speaker 3: For me. It was the best way I could describe
Speaker 3: it was a football story meets midsummer That's what it
Speaker 3: felt like to me. So, yes, it was bizarre and
Speaker 3: you didn't know if what you were watching were hallucinations
Speaker 3: or some sort of demonic presence, or if it was
Speaker 3: maybe a fever dream from a concussion. You know, you
Speaker 3: weren't really sure, but that was intriguing and certainly entertaining.
Speaker 4: I laughed. I was shocked.
Speaker 3: There weren't the typical jump scares. It wasn't terrifying or scary.
Speaker 4: Necessary horror thriller, kind of a cur correct.
Speaker 3: And there was some certainly some body horror in there,
Speaker 3: but you suffered through. You know, I hate that's not
Speaker 3: your favorite genre.
Speaker 1: I hate tho was the movie's substance.
Speaker 3: I'm and there were some folks who made comparisons to it,
Speaker 3: but saying it wasn't anywhere near as good. But there
Speaker 3: was you know, when you've got the audio of the
Speaker 3: sound effects that go along with just even a simple
Speaker 3: injection can be disgusting. So they the sound effects were
Speaker 3: definitely a lot like a horror genre, I mean horror,
Speaker 3: a body horror genre.
Speaker 1: Okay, And it's hard for us to say now because
Speaker 1: we how could you go back? But there is no
Speaker 1: way that even if we had not heard any of
Speaker 1: the reviews, which would naturally set low expectations, dearest, if
Speaker 1: we had seen this movie without seeing a single review,
Speaker 1: we would have enjoyed, Yes, this movie. We wouldn't have
Speaker 1: walked out complaining. We walked out. The three of us
Speaker 1: met you and Sabine. We were arguing, like what was that?
Speaker 1: What did that mean? We immediately started talking about it.
Speaker 1: To me, that makes a good movie.
Speaker 4: That makes art because it starts you question, wait, what
Speaker 4: did I just see?
Speaker 3: And what do you think that meant? And didn't you
Speaker 3: like this? And that was weird? But what do you
Speaker 3: think that was? That? I think is all something I
Speaker 3: appreciate when I walk out of a movie, that you're
Speaker 3: having a shared experience. You watched it individually, but now
Speaker 3: you want to talk about it and discuss it and
Speaker 3: figure out what actually happened. It was never boring, and
Speaker 3: a lot of people, a lot of people, a lot
Speaker 3: of critics, and a lot of folks just who every
Speaker 3: day Joe's who write audience reviews for Rotten Tomatoes. A
Speaker 3: lot of people said it was boring, boring, yes, wow,
Speaker 3: and too long? It was only an hour and thirty six, Yes, yes,
Speaker 3: but yes, this was I love this one. Him is
Speaker 3: a single idea stretched out for half the length of
Speaker 3: an NFL broadcast. Spoiler alert, half of an eternity is
Speaker 3: still an eternity, you know.
Speaker 1: I found I saw why was everybody trying to be
Speaker 1: cute in their writing. They were trying to, in some
Speaker 1: way take advantage of a football moving a football theme
Speaker 1: to make all these clever little cracks and be snarky.
Speaker 1: You can do your thing and you can be a critic.
Speaker 1: That is fine, but there was a meanness to a
Speaker 1: lot of this stuff.
Speaker 3: Yes, the critics consensus, so they kind of just sum
Speaker 3: up all of the different critiques.
Speaker 4: On Rotten Tomatoes said this fumbling the ball well before
Speaker 4: the red zone.
Speaker 3: Tim has style to spare, but botches it's promising, conceit
Speaker 3: with rookie execution, Christ cold with puns.
Speaker 1: Look filled with puns. Maybe people took took advantage look
Speaker 1: and we have to give The reason I think we're
Speaker 1: doing this is because Marlon Wayans put out a statement.
Speaker 1: He put out something on Instagram acknowledging how bad the
Speaker 1: reviews were. His statement I thought was classy. I think
Speaker 1: you gave me a heads up about that he had
Speaker 1: put something out, so I thought he was taking him
Speaker 1: on in some way. I thought he was respectful and
Speaker 1: classy in the way he addressed it.
Speaker 4: I think so too. He said he respects the critics.
Speaker 4: He said their job is to critique. He respects their work.
Speaker 4: He said it.
Speaker 3: Shapes our industry, but an opinion does not always mean
Speaker 3: it's everyone's opinion. Some movies are ahead of the curve.
Speaker 3: And then he went on to say innovation is not
Speaker 3: always embraced, and art is to be interpreted and it's subjective.
Speaker 3: He says, I've had a career of making classic movies
Speaker 3: that weren't critically received, and those movies went on to
Speaker 3: be classics. So don't take anyone's opinion, just go see
Speaker 3: for yourself. Love to all him in theaters, and that
Speaker 3: is what made us want to go see the movie.
Speaker 1: His statement was, I was leaning towards like, how can
Speaker 1: a movie be reviewed so poorly? And it's not just
Speaker 1: that people say it's not good or drags, or it's
Speaker 1: poor rioting, or can't believe how it was shot or
Speaker 1: the acting performance. So this was just everybody took a shot.
Speaker 1: It seemed like people were dying to take a shot. Look,
Speaker 1: the director is one thing. What is his name again?
Speaker 1: Robes the direct tipping justin tipping.
Speaker 4: Justin tipping, okay, But a lot of.
Speaker 1: What's been used to promote the movie is the name
Speaker 1: of Jordan Peele?
Speaker 4: Correct?
Speaker 1: Jordan Peele is the seen as a hit maker, if
Speaker 1: you will, in this genre in particular, so his name
Speaker 1: is attached to it. I don't know what the expectation
Speaker 1: given that Jordan Peele's name was attached. I was like, oh, okay,
Speaker 1: this kind of this idea from some of his previous movies.
Speaker 1: I'm like, Okay, I don't exactly know what I'm saying,
Speaker 1: but I'm going on some kind of a trip.
Speaker 3: I feel like he's right now, kind of the Black
Speaker 3: and Night Shyamalan. He's had some really big hits. He's
Speaker 3: got a very creative and people will go to see
Speaker 3: a movie with his name on it. But there are
Speaker 3: a lot of very high expectations associated with a name
Speaker 3: like his, and same with Shyamalan. And I do think
Speaker 3: that they end up being perhaps their own worst enemy
Speaker 3: in the fact that people have these expectations and if
Speaker 3: something didn't feel like their last movie or they didn't
Speaker 3: think it was good enough, it's almost easy to take
Speaker 3: a shot at them because they've had such success.
Speaker 1: And I ask, is it highbrow expectations?
Speaker 4: Perhaps, like you have.
Speaker 1: To have some kind of an elevated horror experience. Correct, okay,
Speaker 1: and we are. I will put our credentials up. We
Speaker 1: are horror movie aficionado's. We love horror movies and some
Speaker 1: of them are outstanding and excellent that are not award winning,
Speaker 1: but our wonderful experiences to have. This was a this
Speaker 1: we aren't from start to finish. I think I told
Speaker 1: you a third or a half in the movie in
Speaker 1: I still didn't know exactly what was happening.
Speaker 4: And I appreciated that.
Speaker 3: Yes, And I think a lot of people didn't. They
Speaker 3: somehow they wanted They thought it was too subtle, too obscure,
Speaker 3: too confusing. You know, I actually wanted to read this
Speaker 3: review by Robert Daniels in rogeriber dot com, but just
Speaker 3: from where he started, and I did read one of
Speaker 3: his lines towards the end of it, But he said,
Speaker 3: I can't believe I left the house to see him.
Speaker 3: I can't believe I took the train for over an
Speaker 3: hour from the North side of Chicago to downtown to
Speaker 3: see this movie. I can't believe I stood in line
Speaker 3: to buy a soda and popcorn at the theater to
Speaker 3: see him. And I especially can't believe that I sat
Speaker 3: through the entirety of this thematically lost movie, allowed it
Speaker 3: to live in my head on my trip back home,
Speaker 3: and that I'm currently sitting on my couch writing about it.
Speaker 3: And so he went on to say other horrible things,
Speaker 3: but then he said, the dialogue is dreadful. The performances
Speaker 3: are wooden, particularly Julia Fox as Isaiah's wife. And then
Speaker 3: he refers to the young man who played Cam. He's
Speaker 3: the lead stick stiff excuse me? He called him stiff
Speaker 3: tyreek with I just couldn't disagree more because I thought
Speaker 3: the acting was so remarkable. I thought the writing was great.
Speaker 3: It was comedic right when I needed it to be,
Speaker 3: needed it to be.
Speaker 1: Yes, I think, look, we are not movie critics, and
Speaker 1: we're trying to end us. What Marlon did, he respected,
Speaker 1: this is what you do. You critique. Now, if you
Speaker 1: have a criticism, why does it have to be Why
Speaker 1: did you have me waste my time on the couch? Again,
Speaker 1: I get maybe they're trying to be snarky, maybe trying
Speaker 1: to be funny. Is that what it is? But it
Speaker 1: comes across as mean and unnecessary, like this is someone's art,
Speaker 1: this is someone you know how hard it is to
Speaker 1: get a movie on the big screen. Of course we do,
Speaker 1: but this is years in the making. Everybody bust their
Speaker 1: ass to make this special and when you do, just say,
Speaker 1: you waste it my time getting on the train. Why
Speaker 1: am I even breathing? Yeah, that's just it. Just see me.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. It maybe just it's tongue in cheek and
Speaker 1: I'm not taking it the right way. But Marlon, can
Speaker 1: we not say enough about Marlon Wayans who was so
Speaker 1: convincing and impressive in this When we come back, folks,
Speaker 1: we will tell you what we really think about the
Speaker 1: performances of three of the top stars of this movie.
Speaker 1: And all right, folks, we continue now with our difference
Speaker 1: of opinion. With a lot of reviews out there for
Speaker 1: the new movie Him, which was good enough to get
Speaker 1: number two at the box office at thirteen or fifteen
Speaker 1: million last.
Speaker 4: Weeknd thirteen point five to thirteen.
Speaker 1: Point five, a respectable number came in second at the
Speaker 1: box office, only cost twenty seven million to make, so
Speaker 1: not the biggest scare in the world. Looks like they
Speaker 1: could make their money back back and do Okay, now,
Speaker 1: this is one do you think robes because of the
Speaker 1: attention it's gotten so much negative attention in the way
Speaker 1: he has addressed it, This could possibly do them some good.
Speaker 1: They could possibly pick up some new audience because of
Speaker 1: how bad thing has been reviewed.
Speaker 3: It can peque interest to see just how bad they
Speaker 3: Someone else might think it is based on some of
Speaker 3: these reviews, but I also think they're being compared to. Look,
Speaker 3: a lot of folks have been writing that horror movies,
Speaker 3: and we've talked about this, have been on a massive
Speaker 3: hot street. They have done just gangbusters at the box office,
Speaker 3: and we've been excited because we feel like finally people
Speaker 3: are catching on to the genre that we love most.
Speaker 1: They've been huge, Sinners, Weapons, Final Destination, Conjuring big somewhere.
Speaker 3: They have basically been booying up a you know, a
Speaker 3: lagging box office. And we've got more coming too, because
Speaker 3: there's a whole bunch of new movies coming out. People
Speaker 3: have recognized that horror movies are now.
Speaker 4: Kind of you like.
Speaker 3: It used to just be a niche where only a
Speaker 3: certain type of person or a moviegoer would want to
Speaker 3: see it, and now it seems like it's caught on
Speaker 3: and so yes, people are looking into making big franchise
Speaker 3: horror movies.
Speaker 4: And they've been doing them well.
Speaker 1: Well, they heightened expectations. Now, yes, right, I thought this
Speaker 1: one was in line. The way it looked, the way
Speaker 1: it was shot, the way I mean it was a
Speaker 1: beautiful movie at the production value at all that was
Speaker 1: in line.
Speaker 4: It was remarkable.
Speaker 3: So I don't know if maybe perhaps they're being compared
Speaker 3: to or this movie is being compared to the ones
Speaker 3: that came before it, and they set up these certain expectations,
Speaker 3: not just Jordan Peel's former movies, but these other movies
Speaker 3: we just mentioned, also coming down the Pike, One Battle
Speaker 3: after Another, Strangers Chapter two, Black Phone two. We just
Speaker 3: saw the trailer for that in this theater. So this
Speaker 3: has been hyped up. And sometimes when people have high expectations,
Speaker 3: the hype is so at such a certain level that
Speaker 3: maybe unfortunately it became a victim to that as well,
Speaker 3: what's come before it and what's coming after it, and
Speaker 3: people just might have had unrealistic expectations of what they
Speaker 3: thought it should be or could be.
Speaker 1: But are we lay people compared to professional critics who
Speaker 1: I actually don't know what their training is. But are
Speaker 1: we lay people and they see something or excuse me,
Speaker 1: are they just looking through a different lens than we are.
Speaker 1: We are simply fans. We are not trying to critique
Speaker 1: it as we're watching. Our critique is our experience in
Speaker 1: the theater, and our experience was a good one.
Speaker 4: It was a good one.
Speaker 3: And I think for me, my critique or the way
Speaker 3: I view it is was I entertained.
Speaker 4: Was the acting good? Was the script good?
Speaker 3: Was it able to make me feel things, whether it
Speaker 3: be laughter, fear, horror, shocked, all.
Speaker 4: And it did all of those things and confusion.
Speaker 3: Even sometimes because I like to be I was on
Speaker 3: the edge of my seat, not because I was scared,
Speaker 3: but because I was intensely watching to see what was
Speaker 3: coming next and how this was all going to be explained.
Speaker 4: And that's a thriller.
Speaker 1: Those mist thriller.
Speaker 3: It was a thriller with a body horror and there
Speaker 3: was gore, So I mean it really was a thriller horror,
Speaker 3: but probably more thriller than horror because you're trying to
Speaker 3: figure out what is happening, what's going on.
Speaker 1: There is a scene when things finally turn, when he's
Speaker 1: in a practice and there is a there are consequences
Speaker 1: for him missing a pass right, and the consequences are
Speaker 1: not on him, It's on somebody else that intensity. I
Speaker 1: was like, Oh, where's this movie going?
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 1: You saw that happened.
Speaker 4: I had my hand over my eyes. I did not
Speaker 4: want to look.
Speaker 3: I was definitely not wanting to see some of what
Speaker 3: was happening to this poor fella who happily get to
Speaker 3: leave volunteer whatever reason. I have no idea to be tortured,
Speaker 3: but it was. I just thought it was never boring.
Speaker 3: It was never so. So that's why I'm confused by
Speaker 3: what a lot of these critics are saying. And even so,
Speaker 3: they have some regular joes, you know, who write in
Speaker 3: and I always like those actually more than the critics,
Speaker 3: because I feel like they're kind of every man like
Speaker 3: us going in to see these movies. So a couple
Speaker 3: of them and this was Wow. I want to get
Speaker 3: your take on it. Horrifying and shocking were taglines I
Speaker 3: read about this movie. Unfortunately, there some truth to it.
Speaker 3: This was horrifying, horrifyingly bad, and shockingly boring. Even the
Speaker 3: slasher scenes were bad and uninspired. None of the scenes
Speaker 3: were scary at all, while it is obvious that was
Speaker 3: the intention only. The cinematography was good but did not
Speaker 3: save the film. During the film, you keep wondering if
Speaker 3: everything that happens is real or is just playing in
Speaker 3: his head. And then I realized I just don't care.
Speaker 3: Damn Wow, Okay, it's tough, right.
Speaker 1: People have their opinions, and again.
Speaker 3: They okay, he said this was not worthy of my time.
Speaker 3: One of the worst movies I have seen this year.
Speaker 1: Let's not do that.
Speaker 4: I actually am fascinated people in such a time.
Speaker 1: That's person that's mean, that's emotional, almost not worth And again,
Speaker 1: maybe I haven't read enough movie reviews and this is
Speaker 1: how they talk sometimes and it's time you have to
Speaker 1: be to get attention. He had to be done. I
Speaker 1: don't know, or maybe that's how he genuinely feels. It
Speaker 1: just seems hard.
Speaker 4: How about this one?
Speaker 3: This one I don't even get cheap visuals cheap okay, disagree?
Speaker 3: A wandering plot I didn't think it was wandering, and
Speaker 3: a disappointing amount of gore. Despite a promising premise with
Speaker 3: a likable protagonist, the execution was fumbled but on bomp.
Speaker 3: Several main plot points are carried by shaky cams and
Speaker 3: strange montage shots that make very little sense. This movie
Speaker 3: almost seemed almost afraid of leaning into the gore and
Speaker 3: the actual scares, which for a movie about football and
Speaker 3: inherently violent sports, seems like a poor choice, very disappointing.
Speaker 3: From Jordan Peele, cheap visuals.
Speaker 1: A disappointing amount.
Speaker 4: Meaning too much gore.
Speaker 1: I think, oh, okay, so I took that weight. There
Speaker 1: wasn't enough. You're saying that they think it too much.
Speaker 3: Well, you know what, maybe the movie seemed almost afraid
Speaker 3: of leaning into the gore.
Speaker 1: Oh so they're saying is not gory enough?
Speaker 4: Yes, and they wanted more scares, more gore.
Speaker 1: But see, they sound like they went into it with
Speaker 1: too many expectations.
Speaker 3: I think everyone did. I think that's part of the problem.
Speaker 3: But she visuals, I don't get that at all. I
Speaker 3: thought it was absolutely well shot and compelling in terms
Speaker 3: of the visuals.
Speaker 1: And the compound they were at was more.
Speaker 4: Music was great, The acting was great.
Speaker 3: You know, it's it's interesting, the original really awful. Preview
Speaker 3: by Robert Daniels at Robert Roger Ebert dot com when
Speaker 3: he said that Julia Fox was Wooden.
Speaker 4: I actually thought she was a steam seal, a scene
Speaker 4: steeler in a lot of moments because she was playing
Speaker 4: this over the top person.
Speaker 3: Yes, like this influencer who was married to you know,
Speaker 3: the go to the big quarterback. And she was this,
Speaker 3: you know, full lipped woman who played her role perfectly.
Speaker 1: You and I after her first scene, we turned to
Speaker 1: each other. Both leaned over immediately, just naturally to each other, like,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, she's awesome, right we love. I loved
Speaker 1: the first appearance she made, like, oh my gosh, she's great.
Speaker 1: I'm glass he's in there. And to hear somebody hated
Speaker 1: look to Marlin's point, a critics' opinion doesn't mean it's
Speaker 1: everybody else's. They have the right to their opinion. They
Speaker 1: can write as snarky and comedically as they want, and
Speaker 1: even if I find it mean at times, it's their
Speaker 1: job and you have to respect what they do. Just
Speaker 1: completely disagree, sweetheart, I am serious. I was nervous about
Speaker 1: going in because we had already committed to say to
Speaker 1: telling the audience, hey, we're going to do a review.
Speaker 1: I was scared, like, oh shit, what if this is
Speaker 1: like we actually don't like it. We are being as
Speaker 1: genuine as we can be about this movie. I am
Speaker 1: shocked at how bad the reviews are.
Speaker 3: We would never be mean, and I was prepared to
Speaker 3: not like it as well and just say, hey, I
Speaker 3: think we didn't have to say things so harshly. But yeah,
Speaker 3: there were some major problems with this film. I didn't
Speaker 3: I was prepared to be able to say that too.
Speaker 3: I didn't know what to think. So again, I do
Speaker 3: think when you go in with low expectations, I was
Speaker 3: pleasantly surprised.
Speaker 4: We kept looking at each other waiting for it to
Speaker 4: get bad.
Speaker 3: I was like, this is good and I actually saw
Speaker 3: you genuinely enjoy it, just from like a guy football
Speaker 3: kind of a thing.
Speaker 1: Oh it was again, I think that was I think
Speaker 1: you said it before we even got out of the
Speaker 1: theater football meets Midsummer.
Speaker 4: Yes, that's what it felt like to me.
Speaker 1: It was a trippy little thing. You have more reviews
Speaker 1: so well.
Speaker 3: Someone else described it as I wait, what do they say?
Speaker 3: It was Friday Night Lights meets Nosferatu, which I thought
Speaker 3: was kind of funny too.
Speaker 4: I was like, that's another way to put it, and.
Speaker 1: I like the kid Tarik Withers. Yes, we looked and
Speaker 1: we saw we reconnize what is he from? Ware's he from?
Speaker 1: He was the guy who played the in the recent
Speaker 1: reimagining of I Know What You Did Last Summer. So
Speaker 1: he was in another movie.
Speaker 3: It was the Ryan Felippe of the New of the
Speaker 3: New franchise.
Speaker 1: It was and he I thought he was solid and
Speaker 1: unlike his feel, his look at motion at times, his
Speaker 1: toughen it at times, his vulnerability. He was a kid
Speaker 1: at times, a man a time. I loved it. I
Speaker 1: look and you know look full disclosure. We have a
Speaker 1: special place in our heart for Marlon Wayans. We just
Speaker 1: do best I've ever seen him in a movie.
Speaker 3: I thought he was remarkable, as in you know, people
Speaker 3: talked about Sinners and the acting performances in that movie.
Speaker 3: I thought he was on par with that. That's how
Speaker 3: good he was. And it was such a departure from
Speaker 3: anything else I've ever seen him in. I thought he
Speaker 3: was phenomenal. And by the way, in some of these reviews,
Speaker 3: even though they didn't like the movie, they did point
Speaker 3: out the acting chops of Marlon White that he was yes,
Speaker 3: and several other outlets did point out variety some of
Speaker 3: the other they were lukewarm on the movie itself. They
Speaker 3: weren't as harsh as some of these other ones, but
Speaker 3: they did give nods to the acting. And so when
Speaker 3: I do see other people talk about the wooden stiffness,
Speaker 3: I'm like, what did you see the same movie I did,
Speaker 3: because I just thought it was We see a lot
Speaker 3: of bad acting.
Speaker 4: We watch a lot.
Speaker 3: Of silly horror movies campy, and they're not even intentionally campy.
Speaker 3: Some of them are just campy and they were trying
Speaker 3: to be good, and we still enjoy those.
Speaker 4: But I would never say that the acting is good.
Speaker 3: The whole point is sometimes we like to watch movies
Speaker 3: with bad acting, but because it's just fun.
Speaker 4: But this acting was stellar.
Speaker 1: Stellar, love and credit, and we commend Marlon Wayns for
Speaker 1: what he did for being able to speak about it.
Speaker 1: This is his art, you know. He put a lot
Speaker 1: into this role, and he knows what's being said about
Speaker 1: it and to just say, you know what, I respect
Speaker 1: you won't do your thing, but it doesn't mean it's
Speaker 1: everybody's opinion. Go see it, and for whatever reason, maybe
Speaker 1: that works, sweetheart. I'm not sure if we would have
Speaker 1: seen this movie had he not put out that Instagram.
Speaker 3: Yeh.
Speaker 4: So kudos to Marlon Wayans.
Speaker 3: We've always loved him and certainly really respect his acting
Speaker 3: capabilities from this movie. And like he said, art is subjective,
Speaker 3: and so hey, if it gets you talking, if it
Speaker 3: gets you feeling something, even if you're annoyed that you
Speaker 3: saw it, Hey you felt something, you experienced something. But
Speaker 3: if you haven't seen it and you can handle a
Speaker 3: little bit of gore and you love a thriller, we
Speaker 3: highly recommend this film.
Speaker 1: You will not be board. That is our recommendation. But folks,
Speaker 1: we always appreciate. Again, we didn't expect this, but uh,
Speaker 1: movie review what it's just full and ever what are
Speaker 1: we gonna be?
Speaker 4: Oh, well, definitely thumbs up.
Speaker 1: We're gonna thought, well, we should come up with a
Speaker 1: grading system sometimes we should if.
Speaker 3: We if we do enough of these, we we could
Speaker 3: come up with our own system. But this is definitely
Speaker 3: a you should go see it.
Speaker 1: We would recommend this for sure. Folks, We always appreciate
Speaker 1: you hanging with us and listening to us. For my
Speaker 1: dear Amy Robot, I'm t J. Holmes. We'll see y'all soon,
Speaker 1: and yes, go see him