1
00:00:02,200 --> 00:00:02,880
Speaker 1: Hey there, folks.

2
00:00:02,920 --> 00:00:07,280
Speaker 2: It is Tuesday, September the twenty third, and we just

3
00:00:07,400 --> 00:00:12,280
Speaker 2: came from a theater seeing what is described as maybe

4
00:00:12,320 --> 00:00:15,880
Speaker 2: the worst reviewed movie of the year.

5
00:00:16,239 --> 00:00:18,040
Speaker 1: Just how badly is it reviewed?

6
00:00:18,120 --> 00:00:23,360
Speaker 3: Ropes Well Him has gotten one half star out of

7
00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:27,800
Speaker 3: four from a major Roger Ebert dot com New York

8
00:00:27,840 --> 00:00:30,520
Speaker 3: Times did not like it in Indie Wire.

9
00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:33,560
Speaker 4: Whooh, they panned it as well.

10
00:00:35,960 --> 00:00:37,959
Speaker 1: When you say they panned it, what do you mean?

11
00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:42,479
Speaker 3: How's this for a line in a movie review? Putrid

12
00:00:42,720 --> 00:00:48,080
Speaker 3: and hollow? Justin Tipping's brain dead football horror film, which

13
00:00:48,120 --> 00:00:51,280
Speaker 3: somehow managed to secure the backing of producer Jordan Peel,

14
00:00:51,760 --> 00:00:54,360
Speaker 3: is incomprehensibly bad.

15
00:00:54,600 --> 00:00:58,840
Speaker 1: And we would like to tell you we fucking loved it.

16
00:00:59,160 --> 00:01:02,440
Speaker 1: And with that, welcome to this episode of Amy and TJ. Robes.

17
00:01:02,520 --> 00:01:05,000
Speaker 1: We were scratching our haggs. We were a little confused.

18
00:01:05,200 --> 00:01:07,920
Speaker 1: Some of the reviews, they can be bad. Some of

19
00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:10,560
Speaker 1: the reviews we heard for this one seemed.

20
00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:14,800
Speaker 3: Mean, Yes, hi, how about this a rock brained football

21
00:01:14,880 --> 00:01:17,440
Speaker 3: horror movie that's as subtle as being sacked by a

22
00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:20,920
Speaker 3: three hundred pound defensive lineman and somehow only half as

23
00:01:21,000 --> 00:01:21,440
Speaker 3: much fun.

24
00:01:21,600 --> 00:01:24,240
Speaker 1: Oh my goodness, that seems mean. That doesn't seem to

25
00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:26,800
Speaker 1: be a critique of the lighting, of the music, of

26
00:01:26,880 --> 00:01:30,040
Speaker 1: the acting, of the writing. That seems like they were

27
00:01:30,120 --> 00:01:32,880
Speaker 1: taking shots at this movie that has a rating on

28
00:01:33,080 --> 00:01:34,360
Speaker 1: Rotten Tomatoes.

29
00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:36,199
Speaker 4: Nine percent once in nine.

30
00:01:36,280 --> 00:01:38,360
Speaker 1: I think it's on the rise if it's twenty nine,

31
00:01:38,400 --> 00:01:41,160
Speaker 1: because I think it was lower. At one point, we

32
00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:44,200
Speaker 1: have been seeing previews robes. We go to horror movies.

33
00:01:44,640 --> 00:01:46,319
Speaker 1: The only thing we see at theater is pretty much

34
00:01:46,319 --> 00:01:49,880
Speaker 1: a horror movies, so we see previews for upcoming horror movies.

35
00:01:49,880 --> 00:01:52,320
Speaker 1: We've been seeing about this one for a while. It

36
00:01:52,360 --> 00:01:54,680
Speaker 1: was intriguing. We were curious, but it wasn't one we

37
00:01:54,760 --> 00:01:58,880
Speaker 1: plan to run out and see at theaters until we're like,

38
00:01:59,320 --> 00:02:01,240
Speaker 1: how was everybody hating on this movie so much?

39
00:02:01,280 --> 00:02:03,080
Speaker 3: Yeah, until the bad reviews, and then we knew we

40
00:02:03,240 --> 00:02:05,640
Speaker 3: had to see it, And the truth is it's not.

41
00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:06,160
Speaker 1: Look.

42
00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:08,800
Speaker 4: I appreciated how different it was.

43
00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:11,800
Speaker 3: For me. It was the best way I could describe

44
00:02:11,800 --> 00:02:16,560
Speaker 3: it was a football story meets midsummer That's what it

45
00:02:16,560 --> 00:02:18,960
Speaker 3: felt like to me. So, yes, it was bizarre and

46
00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:22,400
Speaker 3: you didn't know if what you were watching were hallucinations

47
00:02:22,560 --> 00:02:25,560
Speaker 3: or some sort of demonic presence, or if it was

48
00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:27,920
Speaker 3: maybe a fever dream from a concussion. You know, you

49
00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:31,959
Speaker 3: weren't really sure, but that was intriguing and certainly entertaining.

50
00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:35,000
Speaker 4: I laughed. I was shocked.

51
00:02:35,000 --> 00:02:40,160
Speaker 3: There weren't the typical jump scares. It wasn't terrifying or scary.

52
00:02:39,800 --> 00:02:43,240
Speaker 4: Necessary horror thriller, kind of a cur correct.

53
00:02:42,919 --> 00:02:45,400
Speaker 3: And there was some certainly some body horror in there,

54
00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:49,320
Speaker 3: but you suffered through. You know, I hate that's not

55
00:02:49,320 --> 00:02:50,080
Speaker 3: your favorite genre.

56
00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:51,640
Speaker 1: I hate tho was the movie's substance.

57
00:02:51,639 --> 00:02:55,040
Speaker 3: I'm and there were some folks who made comparisons to it,

58
00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:57,359
Speaker 3: but saying it wasn't anywhere near as good. But there

59
00:02:57,480 --> 00:02:59,080
Speaker 3: was you know, when you've got the audio of the

60
00:02:59,120 --> 00:03:01,880
Speaker 3: sound effects that go along with just even a simple

61
00:03:01,960 --> 00:03:05,639
Speaker 3: injection can be disgusting. So they the sound effects were

62
00:03:06,360 --> 00:03:10,200
Speaker 3: definitely a lot like a horror genre, I mean horror,

63
00:03:10,240 --> 00:03:11,200
Speaker 3: a body horror genre.

64
00:03:11,320 --> 00:03:13,120
Speaker 1: Okay, And it's hard for us to say now because

65
00:03:13,160 --> 00:03:16,480
Speaker 1: we how could you go back? But there is no

66
00:03:16,880 --> 00:03:19,160
Speaker 1: way that even if we had not heard any of

67
00:03:19,200 --> 00:03:24,560
Speaker 1: the reviews, which would naturally set low expectations, dearest, if

68
00:03:24,600 --> 00:03:27,920
Speaker 1: we had seen this movie without seeing a single review,

69
00:03:28,680 --> 00:03:31,560
Speaker 1: we would have enjoyed, Yes, this movie. We wouldn't have

70
00:03:31,600 --> 00:03:33,840
Speaker 1: walked out complaining. We walked out. The three of us

71
00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:36,760
Speaker 1: met you and Sabine. We were arguing, like what was that?

72
00:03:36,800 --> 00:03:40,040
Speaker 1: What did that mean? We immediately started talking about it.

73
00:03:40,080 --> 00:03:41,680
Speaker 1: To me, that makes a good movie.

74
00:03:41,600 --> 00:03:44,280
Speaker 4: That makes art because it starts you question, wait, what

75
00:03:44,360 --> 00:03:45,000
Speaker 4: did I just see?

76
00:03:45,000 --> 00:03:46,800
Speaker 3: And what do you think that meant? And didn't you

77
00:03:46,960 --> 00:03:48,840
Speaker 3: like this? And that was weird? But what do you

78
00:03:48,840 --> 00:03:51,360
Speaker 3: think that was? That? I think is all something I

79
00:03:51,400 --> 00:03:53,280
Speaker 3: appreciate when I walk out of a movie, that you're

80
00:03:53,640 --> 00:03:56,400
Speaker 3: having a shared experience. You watched it individually, but now

81
00:03:56,440 --> 00:03:58,000
Speaker 3: you want to talk about it and discuss it and

82
00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:01,920
Speaker 3: figure out what actually happened. It was never boring, and

83
00:04:01,960 --> 00:04:04,160
Speaker 3: a lot of people, a lot of people, a lot

84
00:04:04,160 --> 00:04:06,440
Speaker 3: of critics, and a lot of folks just who every

85
00:04:06,520 --> 00:04:09,920
Speaker 3: day Joe's who write audience reviews for Rotten Tomatoes. A

86
00:04:09,960 --> 00:04:12,520
Speaker 3: lot of people said it was boring, boring, yes, wow,

87
00:04:12,880 --> 00:04:15,520
Speaker 3: and too long? It was only an hour and thirty six, Yes, yes,

88
00:04:16,160 --> 00:04:19,479
Speaker 3: but yes, this was I love this one. Him is

89
00:04:19,480 --> 00:04:21,840
Speaker 3: a single idea stretched out for half the length of

90
00:04:21,880 --> 00:04:25,520
Speaker 3: an NFL broadcast. Spoiler alert, half of an eternity is

91
00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:27,279
Speaker 3: still an eternity, you know.

92
00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:30,000
Speaker 1: I found I saw why was everybody trying to be

93
00:04:30,080 --> 00:04:32,359
Speaker 1: cute in their writing. They were trying to, in some

94
00:04:32,440 --> 00:04:35,560
Speaker 1: way take advantage of a football moving a football theme

95
00:04:35,640 --> 00:04:37,960
Speaker 1: to make all these clever little cracks and be snarky.

96
00:04:38,120 --> 00:04:40,120
Speaker 1: You can do your thing and you can be a critic.

97
00:04:40,200 --> 00:04:42,880
Speaker 1: That is fine, but there was a meanness to a

98
00:04:42,920 --> 00:04:43,680
Speaker 1: lot of this stuff.

99
00:04:43,839 --> 00:04:46,719
Speaker 3: Yes, the critics consensus, so they kind of just sum

100
00:04:46,880 --> 00:04:48,760
Speaker 3: up all of the different critiques.

101
00:04:48,760 --> 00:04:52,279
Speaker 4: On Rotten Tomatoes said this fumbling the ball well before

102
00:04:52,320 --> 00:04:52,960
Speaker 4: the red zone.

103
00:04:53,560 --> 00:04:57,480
Speaker 3: Tim has style to spare, but botches it's promising, conceit

104
00:04:57,880 --> 00:05:02,120
Speaker 3: with rookie execution, Christ cold with puns.

105
00:05:01,680 --> 00:05:05,799
Speaker 1: Look filled with puns. Maybe people took took advantage look

106
00:05:06,360 --> 00:05:08,160
Speaker 1: and we have to give The reason I think we're

107
00:05:08,200 --> 00:05:11,599
Speaker 1: doing this is because Marlon Wayans put out a statement.

108
00:05:11,760 --> 00:05:14,359
Speaker 1: He put out something on Instagram acknowledging how bad the

109
00:05:14,400 --> 00:05:17,800
Speaker 1: reviews were. His statement I thought was classy. I think

110
00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:19,720
Speaker 1: you gave me a heads up about that he had

111
00:05:19,720 --> 00:05:22,000
Speaker 1: put something out, so I thought he was taking him

112
00:05:22,000 --> 00:05:25,600
Speaker 1: on in some way. I thought he was respectful and

113
00:05:25,760 --> 00:05:27,400
Speaker 1: classy in the way he addressed it.

114
00:05:27,440 --> 00:05:29,760
Speaker 4: I think so too. He said he respects the critics.

115
00:05:29,760 --> 00:05:32,359
Speaker 4: He said their job is to critique. He respects their work.

116
00:05:32,680 --> 00:05:33,200
Speaker 4: He said it.

117
00:05:33,160 --> 00:05:35,800
Speaker 3: Shapes our industry, but an opinion does not always mean

118
00:05:35,800 --> 00:05:39,760
Speaker 3: it's everyone's opinion. Some movies are ahead of the curve.

119
00:05:40,320 --> 00:05:42,279
Speaker 3: And then he went on to say innovation is not

120
00:05:42,400 --> 00:05:47,000
Speaker 3: always embraced, and art is to be interpreted and it's subjective.

121
00:05:47,360 --> 00:05:49,760
Speaker 3: He says, I've had a career of making classic movies

122
00:05:49,760 --> 00:05:52,400
Speaker 3: that weren't critically received, and those movies went on to

123
00:05:52,400 --> 00:05:56,200
Speaker 3: be classics. So don't take anyone's opinion, just go see

124
00:05:56,320 --> 00:06:00,720
Speaker 3: for yourself. Love to all him in theaters, and that

125
00:06:00,920 --> 00:06:02,719
Speaker 3: is what made us want to go see the movie.

126
00:06:03,320 --> 00:06:07,720
Speaker 1: His statement was, I was leaning towards like, how can

127
00:06:07,760 --> 00:06:10,839
Speaker 1: a movie be reviewed so poorly? And it's not just

128
00:06:10,880 --> 00:06:13,560
Speaker 1: that people say it's not good or drags, or it's

129
00:06:13,600 --> 00:06:16,279
Speaker 1: poor rioting, or can't believe how it was shot or

130
00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:20,320
Speaker 1: the acting performance. So this was just everybody took a shot.

131
00:06:20,839 --> 00:06:22,880
Speaker 1: It seemed like people were dying to take a shot. Look,

132
00:06:23,279 --> 00:06:25,160
Speaker 1: the director is one thing. What is his name again?

133
00:06:25,480 --> 00:06:28,479
Speaker 1: Robes the direct tipping justin tipping.

134
00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:31,080
Speaker 4: Justin tipping, okay, But a lot of.

135
00:06:30,800 --> 00:06:33,360
Speaker 1: What's been used to promote the movie is the name

136
00:06:33,400 --> 00:06:34,119
Speaker 1: of Jordan Peele?

137
00:06:34,360 --> 00:06:34,760
Speaker 4: Correct?

138
00:06:34,839 --> 00:06:37,640
Speaker 1: Jordan Peele is the seen as a hit maker, if

139
00:06:37,680 --> 00:06:40,400
Speaker 1: you will, in this genre in particular, so his name

140
00:06:40,480 --> 00:06:43,240
Speaker 1: is attached to it. I don't know what the expectation

141
00:06:43,480 --> 00:06:46,000
Speaker 1: given that Jordan Peele's name was attached. I was like, oh, okay,

142
00:06:46,040 --> 00:06:49,159
Speaker 1: this kind of this idea from some of his previous movies.

143
00:06:49,360 --> 00:06:51,799
Speaker 1: I'm like, Okay, I don't exactly know what I'm saying,

144
00:06:51,839 --> 00:06:53,360
Speaker 1: but I'm going on some kind of a trip.

145
00:06:53,800 --> 00:06:55,760
Speaker 3: I feel like he's right now, kind of the Black

146
00:06:55,800 --> 00:06:58,880
Speaker 3: and Night Shyamalan. He's had some really big hits. He's

147
00:06:58,920 --> 00:07:01,960
Speaker 3: got a very creative and people will go to see

148
00:07:01,960 --> 00:07:04,440
Speaker 3: a movie with his name on it. But there are

149
00:07:04,480 --> 00:07:07,240
Speaker 3: a lot of very high expectations associated with a name

150
00:07:07,400 --> 00:07:10,360
Speaker 3: like his, and same with Shyamalan. And I do think

151
00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:13,880
Speaker 3: that they end up being perhaps their own worst enemy

152
00:07:13,880 --> 00:07:16,280
Speaker 3: in the fact that people have these expectations and if

153
00:07:16,520 --> 00:07:18,960
Speaker 3: something didn't feel like their last movie or they didn't

154
00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:21,080
Speaker 3: think it was good enough, it's almost easy to take

155
00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:23,200
Speaker 3: a shot at them because they've had such success.

156
00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:25,640
Speaker 1: And I ask, is it highbrow expectations?

157
00:07:26,160 --> 00:07:27,360
Speaker 4: Perhaps, like you have.

158
00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:31,440
Speaker 1: To have some kind of an elevated horror experience. Correct, okay,

159
00:07:31,480 --> 00:07:34,800
Speaker 1: and we are. I will put our credentials up. We

160
00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:38,200
Speaker 1: are horror movie aficionado's. We love horror movies and some

161
00:07:38,280 --> 00:07:42,840
Speaker 1: of them are outstanding and excellent that are not award winning,

162
00:07:43,120 --> 00:07:47,240
Speaker 1: but our wonderful experiences to have. This was a this

163
00:07:47,360 --> 00:07:48,960
Speaker 1: we aren't from start to finish. I think I told

164
00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:50,600
Speaker 1: you a third or a half in the movie in

165
00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:53,480
Speaker 1: I still didn't know exactly what was happening.

166
00:07:53,560 --> 00:07:54,640
Speaker 4: And I appreciated that.

167
00:07:54,720 --> 00:07:57,400
Speaker 3: Yes, And I think a lot of people didn't. They

168
00:07:57,640 --> 00:08:01,320
Speaker 3: somehow they wanted They thought it was too subtle, too obscure,

169
00:08:01,800 --> 00:08:05,680
Speaker 3: too confusing. You know, I actually wanted to read this

170
00:08:06,480 --> 00:08:10,080
Speaker 3: review by Robert Daniels in rogeriber dot com, but just

171
00:08:10,080 --> 00:08:12,240
Speaker 3: from where he started, and I did read one of

172
00:08:12,280 --> 00:08:14,440
Speaker 3: his lines towards the end of it, But he said,

173
00:08:14,480 --> 00:08:17,560
Speaker 3: I can't believe I left the house to see him.

174
00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:20,680
Speaker 3: I can't believe I took the train for over an

175
00:08:20,720 --> 00:08:23,520
Speaker 3: hour from the North side of Chicago to downtown to

176
00:08:23,560 --> 00:08:26,320
Speaker 3: see this movie. I can't believe I stood in line

177
00:08:26,360 --> 00:08:28,520
Speaker 3: to buy a soda and popcorn at the theater to

178
00:08:28,560 --> 00:08:31,960
Speaker 3: see him. And I especially can't believe that I sat

179
00:08:32,040 --> 00:08:36,320
Speaker 3: through the entirety of this thematically lost movie, allowed it

180
00:08:36,360 --> 00:08:38,760
Speaker 3: to live in my head on my trip back home,

181
00:08:38,920 --> 00:08:42,000
Speaker 3: and that I'm currently sitting on my couch writing about it.

182
00:08:42,400 --> 00:08:44,800
Speaker 3: And so he went on to say other horrible things,

183
00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:47,840
Speaker 3: but then he said, the dialogue is dreadful. The performances

184
00:08:47,880 --> 00:08:52,160
Speaker 3: are wooden, particularly Julia Fox as Isaiah's wife. And then

185
00:08:52,200 --> 00:08:55,560
Speaker 3: he refers to the young man who played Cam. He's

186
00:08:55,600 --> 00:08:59,240
Speaker 3: the lead stick stiff excuse me? He called him stiff

187
00:08:59,320 --> 00:09:02,400
Speaker 3: tyreek with I just couldn't disagree more because I thought

188
00:09:02,440 --> 00:09:05,920
Speaker 3: the acting was so remarkable. I thought the writing was great.

189
00:09:06,440 --> 00:09:09,280
Speaker 3: It was comedic right when I needed it to be,

190
00:09:09,480 --> 00:09:10,080
Speaker 3: needed it to be.

191
00:09:10,280 --> 00:09:14,120
Speaker 1: Yes, I think, look, we are not movie critics, and

192
00:09:14,160 --> 00:09:16,599
Speaker 1: we're trying to end us. What Marlon did, he respected,

193
00:09:16,679 --> 00:09:19,080
Speaker 1: this is what you do. You critique. Now, if you

194
00:09:19,160 --> 00:09:22,800
Speaker 1: have a criticism, why does it have to be Why

195
00:09:22,840 --> 00:09:25,360
Speaker 1: did you have me waste my time on the couch? Again,

196
00:09:25,440 --> 00:09:27,280
Speaker 1: I get maybe they're trying to be snarky, maybe trying

197
00:09:27,280 --> 00:09:29,160
Speaker 1: to be funny. Is that what it is? But it

198
00:09:29,160 --> 00:09:33,880
Speaker 1: comes across as mean and unnecessary, like this is someone's art,

199
00:09:34,200 --> 00:09:35,960
Speaker 1: this is someone you know how hard it is to

200
00:09:35,960 --> 00:09:37,839
Speaker 1: get a movie on the big screen. Of course we do,

201
00:09:38,440 --> 00:09:41,679
Speaker 1: but this is years in the making. Everybody bust their

202
00:09:41,800 --> 00:09:45,120
Speaker 1: ass to make this special and when you do, just say,

203
00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:48,360
Speaker 1: you waste it my time getting on the train. Why

204
00:09:48,360 --> 00:09:52,640
Speaker 1: am I even breathing? Yeah, that's just it. Just see me.

205
00:09:52,720 --> 00:09:54,680
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. It maybe just it's tongue in cheek and

206
00:09:54,679 --> 00:09:58,360
Speaker 1: I'm not taking it the right way. But Marlon, can

207
00:09:58,400 --> 00:10:01,880
Speaker 1: we not say enough about Marlon Wayans who was so

208
00:10:02,080 --> 00:10:07,000
Speaker 1: convincing and impressive in this When we come back, folks,

209
00:10:07,080 --> 00:10:09,200
Speaker 1: we will tell you what we really think about the

210
00:10:09,280 --> 00:10:14,240
Speaker 1: performances of three of the top stars of this movie.

211
00:10:14,559 --> 00:10:26,160
Speaker 1: And all right, folks, we continue now with our difference

212
00:10:26,200 --> 00:10:28,920
Speaker 1: of opinion. With a lot of reviews out there for

213
00:10:29,400 --> 00:10:32,920
Speaker 1: the new movie Him, which was good enough to get

214
00:10:33,000 --> 00:10:34,839
Speaker 1: number two at the box office at thirteen or fifteen

215
00:10:34,880 --> 00:10:35,520
Speaker 1: million last.

216
00:10:35,320 --> 00:10:37,600
Speaker 4: Weeknd thirteen point five to thirteen.

217
00:10:37,160 --> 00:10:39,839
Speaker 1: Point five, a respectable number came in second at the

218
00:10:39,880 --> 00:10:42,480
Speaker 1: box office, only cost twenty seven million to make, so

219
00:10:43,840 --> 00:10:46,760
Speaker 1: not the biggest scare in the world. Looks like they

220
00:10:46,800 --> 00:10:49,440
Speaker 1: could make their money back back and do Okay, now,

221
00:10:49,480 --> 00:10:51,640
Speaker 1: this is one do you think robes because of the

222
00:10:51,679 --> 00:10:53,719
Speaker 1: attention it's gotten so much negative attention in the way

223
00:10:53,720 --> 00:10:57,160
Speaker 1: he has addressed it, This could possibly do them some good.

224
00:10:57,200 --> 00:11:00,080
Speaker 1: They could possibly pick up some new audience because of

225
00:11:00,280 --> 00:11:02,680
Speaker 1: how bad thing has been reviewed.

226
00:11:02,840 --> 00:11:06,120
Speaker 3: It can peque interest to see just how bad they

227
00:11:06,280 --> 00:11:08,079
Speaker 3: Someone else might think it is based on some of

228
00:11:08,120 --> 00:11:11,680
Speaker 3: these reviews, but I also think they're being compared to. Look,

229
00:11:11,720 --> 00:11:14,319
Speaker 3: a lot of folks have been writing that horror movies,

230
00:11:14,360 --> 00:11:16,760
Speaker 3: and we've talked about this, have been on a massive

231
00:11:16,760 --> 00:11:20,839
Speaker 3: hot street. They have done just gangbusters at the box office,

232
00:11:20,840 --> 00:11:22,720
Speaker 3: and we've been excited because we feel like finally people

233
00:11:22,760 --> 00:11:25,800
Speaker 3: are catching on to the genre that we love most.

234
00:11:25,880 --> 00:11:32,520
Speaker 1: They've been huge, Sinners, Weapons, Final Destination, Conjuring big somewhere.

235
00:11:32,559 --> 00:11:36,880
Speaker 3: They have basically been booying up a you know, a

236
00:11:36,960 --> 00:11:40,000
Speaker 3: lagging box office. And we've got more coming too, because

237
00:11:40,400 --> 00:11:44,040
Speaker 3: there's a whole bunch of new movies coming out. People

238
00:11:44,080 --> 00:11:47,920
Speaker 3: have recognized that horror movies are now.

239
00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:49,640
Speaker 4: Kind of you like.

240
00:11:49,760 --> 00:11:51,760
Speaker 3: It used to just be a niche where only a

241
00:11:51,800 --> 00:11:54,280
Speaker 3: certain type of person or a moviegoer would want to

242
00:11:54,320 --> 00:11:57,160
Speaker 3: see it, and now it seems like it's caught on

243
00:11:57,400 --> 00:12:02,559
Speaker 3: and so yes, people are looking into making big franchise

244
00:12:02,640 --> 00:12:03,320
Speaker 3: horror movies.

245
00:12:03,360 --> 00:12:04,840
Speaker 4: And they've been doing them well.

246
00:12:04,720 --> 00:12:08,480
Speaker 1: Well, they heightened expectations. Now, yes, right, I thought this

247
00:12:08,520 --> 00:12:11,000
Speaker 1: one was in line. The way it looked, the way

248
00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:12,679
Speaker 1: it was shot, the way I mean it was a

249
00:12:12,720 --> 00:12:16,040
Speaker 1: beautiful movie at the production value at all that was

250
00:12:16,120 --> 00:12:16,760
Speaker 1: in line.

251
00:12:16,840 --> 00:12:17,880
Speaker 4: It was remarkable.

252
00:12:17,920 --> 00:12:20,720
Speaker 3: So I don't know if maybe perhaps they're being compared

253
00:12:20,720 --> 00:12:22,720
Speaker 3: to or this movie is being compared to the ones

254
00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:25,400
Speaker 3: that came before it, and they set up these certain expectations,

255
00:12:25,440 --> 00:12:28,319
Speaker 3: not just Jordan Peel's former movies, but these other movies

256
00:12:28,360 --> 00:12:31,960
Speaker 3: we just mentioned, also coming down the Pike, One Battle

257
00:12:31,960 --> 00:12:35,640
Speaker 3: after Another, Strangers Chapter two, Black Phone two. We just

258
00:12:35,679 --> 00:12:38,559
Speaker 3: saw the trailer for that in this theater. So this

259
00:12:38,640 --> 00:12:42,160
Speaker 3: has been hyped up. And sometimes when people have high expectations,

260
00:12:42,440 --> 00:12:45,000
Speaker 3: the hype is so at such a certain level that

261
00:12:45,120 --> 00:12:48,559
Speaker 3: maybe unfortunately it became a victim to that as well,

262
00:12:48,679 --> 00:12:51,440
Speaker 3: what's come before it and what's coming after it, and

263
00:12:51,520 --> 00:12:54,439
Speaker 3: people just might have had unrealistic expectations of what they

264
00:12:54,440 --> 00:12:55,880
Speaker 3: thought it should be or could be.

265
00:12:56,000 --> 00:13:00,360
Speaker 1: But are we lay people compared to professional critics who

266
00:13:00,400 --> 00:13:03,600
Speaker 1: I actually don't know what their training is. But are

267
00:13:03,640 --> 00:13:06,920
Speaker 1: we lay people and they see something or excuse me,

268
00:13:07,000 --> 00:13:09,480
Speaker 1: are they just looking through a different lens than we are.

269
00:13:09,520 --> 00:13:12,280
Speaker 1: We are simply fans. We are not trying to critique

270
00:13:12,320 --> 00:13:15,360
Speaker 1: it as we're watching. Our critique is our experience in

271
00:13:15,400 --> 00:13:17,160
Speaker 1: the theater, and our experience was a good one.

272
00:13:17,240 --> 00:13:17,920
Speaker 4: It was a good one.

273
00:13:17,960 --> 00:13:20,760
Speaker 3: And I think for me, my critique or the way

274
00:13:20,800 --> 00:13:22,920
Speaker 3: I view it is was I entertained.

275
00:13:23,160 --> 00:13:25,600
Speaker 4: Was the acting good? Was the script good?

276
00:13:26,280 --> 00:13:28,760
Speaker 3: Was it able to make me feel things, whether it

277
00:13:28,840 --> 00:13:31,640
Speaker 3: be laughter, fear, horror, shocked, all.

278
00:13:31,760 --> 00:13:34,120
Speaker 4: And it did all of those things and confusion.

279
00:13:33,679 --> 00:13:37,160
Speaker 3: Even sometimes because I like to be I was on

280
00:13:37,200 --> 00:13:39,680
Speaker 3: the edge of my seat, not because I was scared,

281
00:13:39,679 --> 00:13:42,920
Speaker 3: but because I was intensely watching to see what was

282
00:13:42,960 --> 00:13:45,480
Speaker 3: coming next and how this was all going to be explained.

283
00:13:46,120 --> 00:13:47,559
Speaker 4: And that's a thriller.

284
00:13:47,600 --> 00:13:48,600
Speaker 1: Those mist thriller.

285
00:13:48,960 --> 00:13:52,880
Speaker 3: It was a thriller with a body horror and there

286
00:13:52,920 --> 00:13:55,400
Speaker 3: was gore, So I mean it really was a thriller horror,

287
00:13:55,400 --> 00:13:58,440
Speaker 3: but probably more thriller than horror because you're trying to

288
00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:00,880
Speaker 3: figure out what is happening, what's going on.

289
00:14:01,320 --> 00:14:04,520
Speaker 1: There is a scene when things finally turn, when he's

290
00:14:04,520 --> 00:14:08,280
Speaker 1: in a practice and there is a there are consequences

291
00:14:08,280 --> 00:14:12,280
Speaker 1: for him missing a pass right, and the consequences are

292
00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:16,120
Speaker 1: not on him, It's on somebody else that intensity. I

293
00:14:16,160 --> 00:14:17,360
Speaker 1: was like, Oh, where's this movie going?

294
00:14:17,400 --> 00:14:17,480
Speaker 3: Oh?

295
00:14:17,520 --> 00:14:18,400
Speaker 1: You saw that happened.

296
00:14:18,480 --> 00:14:21,040
Speaker 4: I had my hand over my eyes. I did not

297
00:14:21,240 --> 00:14:21,840
Speaker 4: want to look.

298
00:14:21,960 --> 00:14:26,600
Speaker 3: I was definitely not wanting to see some of what

299
00:14:26,640 --> 00:14:29,480
Speaker 3: was happening to this poor fella who happily get to

300
00:14:29,560 --> 00:14:33,040
Speaker 3: leave volunteer whatever reason. I have no idea to be tortured,

301
00:14:33,440 --> 00:14:36,560
Speaker 3: but it was. I just thought it was never boring.

302
00:14:36,600 --> 00:14:38,640
Speaker 3: It was never so. So that's why I'm confused by

303
00:14:38,640 --> 00:14:41,760
Speaker 3: what a lot of these critics are saying. And even so,

304
00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:44,320
Speaker 3: they have some regular joes, you know, who write in

305
00:14:44,360 --> 00:14:46,400
Speaker 3: and I always like those actually more than the critics,

306
00:14:46,880 --> 00:14:49,040
Speaker 3: because I feel like they're kind of every man like

307
00:14:49,200 --> 00:14:52,360
Speaker 3: us going in to see these movies. So a couple

308
00:14:52,360 --> 00:14:54,400
Speaker 3: of them and this was Wow. I want to get

309
00:14:54,440 --> 00:14:57,560
Speaker 3: your take on it. Horrifying and shocking were taglines I

310
00:14:57,640 --> 00:15:01,000
Speaker 3: read about this movie. Unfortunately, there some truth to it.

311
00:15:01,400 --> 00:15:06,760
Speaker 3: This was horrifying, horrifyingly bad, and shockingly boring. Even the

312
00:15:06,840 --> 00:15:10,640
Speaker 3: slasher scenes were bad and uninspired. None of the scenes

313
00:15:10,640 --> 00:15:13,960
Speaker 3: were scary at all, while it is obvious that was

314
00:15:14,000 --> 00:15:17,480
Speaker 3: the intention only. The cinematography was good but did not

315
00:15:17,640 --> 00:15:20,040
Speaker 3: save the film. During the film, you keep wondering if

316
00:15:20,040 --> 00:15:22,760
Speaker 3: everything that happens is real or is just playing in

317
00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:26,200
Speaker 3: his head. And then I realized I just don't care.

318
00:15:28,000 --> 00:15:30,240
Speaker 3: Damn Wow, Okay, it's tough, right.

319
00:15:30,280 --> 00:15:32,240
Speaker 1: People have their opinions, and again.

320
00:15:32,080 --> 00:15:34,840
Speaker 3: They okay, he said this was not worthy of my time.

321
00:15:34,920 --> 00:15:37,040
Speaker 3: One of the worst movies I have seen this year.

322
00:15:37,480 --> 00:15:38,760
Speaker 1: Let's not do that.

323
00:15:39,480 --> 00:15:42,520
Speaker 4: I actually am fascinated people in such a time.

324
00:15:42,760 --> 00:15:47,400
Speaker 1: That's person that's mean, that's emotional, almost not worth And again,

325
00:15:47,520 --> 00:15:49,640
Speaker 1: maybe I haven't read enough movie reviews and this is

326
00:15:49,640 --> 00:15:51,200
Speaker 1: how they talk sometimes and it's time you have to

327
00:15:51,240 --> 00:15:52,920
Speaker 1: be to get attention. He had to be done. I

328
00:15:52,960 --> 00:15:55,280
Speaker 1: don't know, or maybe that's how he genuinely feels. It

329
00:15:55,280 --> 00:15:55,800
Speaker 1: just seems hard.

330
00:15:56,000 --> 00:15:56,680
Speaker 4: How about this one?

331
00:15:56,720 --> 00:16:00,800
Speaker 3: This one I don't even get cheap visuals cheap okay, disagree?

332
00:16:01,160 --> 00:16:05,800
Speaker 3: A wandering plot I didn't think it was wandering, and

333
00:16:05,880 --> 00:16:10,040
Speaker 3: a disappointing amount of gore. Despite a promising premise with

334
00:16:10,080 --> 00:16:14,040
Speaker 3: a likable protagonist, the execution was fumbled but on bomp.

335
00:16:14,480 --> 00:16:18,200
Speaker 3: Several main plot points are carried by shaky cams and

336
00:16:18,360 --> 00:16:22,720
Speaker 3: strange montage shots that make very little sense. This movie

337
00:16:22,800 --> 00:16:26,080
Speaker 3: almost seemed almost afraid of leaning into the gore and

338
00:16:26,120 --> 00:16:29,640
Speaker 3: the actual scares, which for a movie about football and

339
00:16:29,760 --> 00:16:33,280
Speaker 3: inherently violent sports, seems like a poor choice, very disappointing.

340
00:16:33,280 --> 00:16:38,880
Speaker 3: From Jordan Peele, cheap visuals.

341
00:16:38,440 --> 00:16:40,320
Speaker 1: A disappointing amount.

342
00:16:40,160 --> 00:16:41,280
Speaker 4: Meaning too much gore.

343
00:16:41,880 --> 00:16:44,400
Speaker 1: I think, oh, okay, so I took that weight. There

344
00:16:44,440 --> 00:16:47,320
Speaker 1: wasn't enough. You're saying that they think it too much.

345
00:16:47,400 --> 00:16:50,160
Speaker 3: Well, you know what, maybe the movie seemed almost afraid

346
00:16:50,280 --> 00:16:51,880
Speaker 3: of leaning into the gore.

347
00:16:52,000 --> 00:16:54,480
Speaker 1: Oh so they're saying is not gory enough?

348
00:16:54,560 --> 00:16:57,120
Speaker 4: Yes, and they wanted more scares, more gore.

349
00:16:57,880 --> 00:17:00,280
Speaker 1: But see, they sound like they went into it with

350
00:17:00,320 --> 00:17:01,440
Speaker 1: too many expectations.

351
00:17:01,480 --> 00:17:03,600
Speaker 3: I think everyone did. I think that's part of the problem.

352
00:17:03,600 --> 00:17:05,359
Speaker 3: But she visuals, I don't get that at all. I

353
00:17:05,359 --> 00:17:10,600
Speaker 3: thought it was absolutely well shot and compelling in terms

354
00:17:10,600 --> 00:17:11,920
Speaker 3: of the visuals.

355
00:17:11,680 --> 00:17:13,400
Speaker 1: And the compound they were at was more.

356
00:17:13,440 --> 00:17:15,879
Speaker 4: Music was great, The acting was great.

357
00:17:16,320 --> 00:17:21,560
Speaker 3: You know, it's it's interesting, the original really awful. Preview

358
00:17:21,600 --> 00:17:24,640
Speaker 3: by Robert Daniels at Robert Roger Ebert dot com when

359
00:17:24,640 --> 00:17:27,200
Speaker 3: he said that Julia Fox was Wooden.

360
00:17:27,880 --> 00:17:30,359
Speaker 4: I actually thought she was a steam seal, a scene

361
00:17:30,480 --> 00:17:32,720
Speaker 4: steeler in a lot of moments because she was playing

362
00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:34,720
Speaker 4: this over the top person.

363
00:17:34,560 --> 00:17:37,679
Speaker 3: Yes, like this influencer who was married to you know,

364
00:17:37,840 --> 00:17:41,520
Speaker 3: the go to the big quarterback. And she was this,

365
00:17:41,880 --> 00:17:46,639
Speaker 3: you know, full lipped woman who played her role perfectly.

366
00:17:46,960 --> 00:17:50,560
Speaker 1: You and I after her first scene, we turned to

367
00:17:50,600 --> 00:17:54,159
Speaker 1: each other. Both leaned over immediately, just naturally to each other, like,

368
00:17:54,200 --> 00:17:56,960
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, she's awesome, right we love. I loved

369
00:17:57,200 --> 00:17:59,520
Speaker 1: the first appearance she made, like, oh my gosh, she's great.

370
00:17:59,520 --> 00:18:02,200
Speaker 1: I'm glass he's in there. And to hear somebody hated

371
00:18:02,400 --> 00:18:06,520
Speaker 1: look to Marlin's point, a critics' opinion doesn't mean it's

372
00:18:06,560 --> 00:18:09,159
Speaker 1: everybody else's. They have the right to their opinion. They

373
00:18:09,160 --> 00:18:13,160
Speaker 1: can write as snarky and comedically as they want, and

374
00:18:13,320 --> 00:18:16,119
Speaker 1: even if I find it mean at times, it's their

375
00:18:16,240 --> 00:18:18,320
Speaker 1: job and you have to respect what they do. Just

376
00:18:18,600 --> 00:18:22,399
Speaker 1: completely disagree, sweetheart, I am serious. I was nervous about

377
00:18:22,440 --> 00:18:24,840
Speaker 1: going in because we had already committed to say to

378
00:18:24,880 --> 00:18:26,520
Speaker 1: telling the audience, hey, we're going to do a review.

379
00:18:26,600 --> 00:18:28,600
Speaker 1: I was scared, like, oh shit, what if this is

380
00:18:29,080 --> 00:18:31,920
Speaker 1: like we actually don't like it. We are being as

381
00:18:32,040 --> 00:18:34,680
Speaker 1: genuine as we can be about this movie. I am

382
00:18:34,840 --> 00:18:36,159
Speaker 1: shocked at how bad the reviews are.

383
00:18:36,200 --> 00:18:38,000
Speaker 3: We would never be mean, and I was prepared to

384
00:18:38,040 --> 00:18:40,000
Speaker 3: not like it as well and just say, hey, I

385
00:18:40,359 --> 00:18:43,240
Speaker 3: think we didn't have to say things so harshly. But yeah,

386
00:18:43,240 --> 00:18:45,679
Speaker 3: there were some major problems with this film. I didn't

387
00:18:45,800 --> 00:18:47,600
Speaker 3: I was prepared to be able to say that too.

388
00:18:47,640 --> 00:18:50,399
Speaker 3: I didn't know what to think. So again, I do

389
00:18:50,440 --> 00:18:52,760
Speaker 3: think when you go in with low expectations, I was

390
00:18:53,240 --> 00:18:54,240
Speaker 3: pleasantly surprised.

391
00:18:54,240 --> 00:18:55,840
Speaker 4: We kept looking at each other waiting for it to

392
00:18:55,880 --> 00:18:56,280
Speaker 4: get bad.

393
00:18:56,359 --> 00:18:58,840
Speaker 3: I was like, this is good and I actually saw

394
00:18:58,840 --> 00:19:02,200
Speaker 3: you genuinely enjoy it, just from like a guy football

395
00:19:02,280 --> 00:19:02,840
Speaker 3: kind of a thing.

396
00:19:03,000 --> 00:19:05,359
Speaker 1: Oh it was again, I think that was I think

397
00:19:05,440 --> 00:19:06,919
Speaker 1: you said it before we even got out of the

398
00:19:06,920 --> 00:19:09,320
Speaker 1: theater football meets Midsummer.

399
00:19:09,600 --> 00:19:11,080
Speaker 4: Yes, that's what it felt like to me.

400
00:19:11,240 --> 00:19:13,200
Speaker 1: It was a trippy little thing. You have more reviews

401
00:19:13,320 --> 00:19:13,640
Speaker 1: so well.

402
00:19:13,680 --> 00:19:16,960
Speaker 3: Someone else described it as I wait, what do they say?

403
00:19:17,000 --> 00:19:20,880
Speaker 3: It was Friday Night Lights meets Nosferatu, which I thought

404
00:19:20,920 --> 00:19:21,640
Speaker 3: was kind of funny too.

405
00:19:21,640 --> 00:19:24,440
Speaker 4: I was like, that's another way to put it, and.

406
00:19:24,440 --> 00:19:27,159
Speaker 1: I like the kid Tarik Withers. Yes, we looked and

407
00:19:27,200 --> 00:19:29,040
Speaker 1: we saw we reconnize what is he from? Ware's he from?

408
00:19:29,160 --> 00:19:32,360
Speaker 1: He was the guy who played the in the recent

409
00:19:33,320 --> 00:19:35,720
Speaker 1: reimagining of I Know What You Did Last Summer. So

410
00:19:35,760 --> 00:19:36,760
Speaker 1: he was in another movie.

411
00:19:37,040 --> 00:19:39,879
Speaker 3: It was the Ryan Felippe of the New of the

412
00:19:39,920 --> 00:19:40,640
Speaker 3: New franchise.

413
00:19:40,680 --> 00:19:43,239
Speaker 1: It was and he I thought he was solid and

414
00:19:43,359 --> 00:19:46,840
Speaker 1: unlike his feel, his look at motion at times, his

415
00:19:46,960 --> 00:19:49,240
Speaker 1: toughen it at times, his vulnerability. He was a kid

416
00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:51,679
Speaker 1: at times, a man a time. I loved it. I

417
00:19:51,960 --> 00:19:55,439
Speaker 1: look and you know look full disclosure. We have a

418
00:19:55,480 --> 00:19:58,320
Speaker 1: special place in our heart for Marlon Wayans. We just

419
00:19:58,440 --> 00:20:00,000
Speaker 1: do best I've ever seen him in a movie.

420
00:20:00,480 --> 00:20:03,919
Speaker 3: I thought he was remarkable, as in you know, people

421
00:20:03,960 --> 00:20:07,120
Speaker 3: talked about Sinners and the acting performances in that movie.

422
00:20:07,240 --> 00:20:09,239
Speaker 3: I thought he was on par with that. That's how

423
00:20:09,280 --> 00:20:11,000
Speaker 3: good he was. And it was such a departure from

424
00:20:11,040 --> 00:20:13,359
Speaker 3: anything else I've ever seen him in. I thought he

425
00:20:13,440 --> 00:20:15,639
Speaker 3: was phenomenal. And by the way, in some of these reviews,

426
00:20:15,680 --> 00:20:18,480
Speaker 3: even though they didn't like the movie, they did point

427
00:20:18,520 --> 00:20:22,240
Speaker 3: out the acting chops of Marlon White that he was yes,

428
00:20:22,320 --> 00:20:25,720
Speaker 3: and several other outlets did point out variety some of

429
00:20:25,760 --> 00:20:28,720
Speaker 3: the other they were lukewarm on the movie itself. They

430
00:20:28,720 --> 00:20:30,439
Speaker 3: weren't as harsh as some of these other ones, but

431
00:20:30,480 --> 00:20:33,880
Speaker 3: they did give nods to the acting. And so when

432
00:20:33,920 --> 00:20:36,480
Speaker 3: I do see other people talk about the wooden stiffness,

433
00:20:36,480 --> 00:20:38,800
Speaker 3: I'm like, what did you see the same movie I did,

434
00:20:38,880 --> 00:20:41,120
Speaker 3: because I just thought it was We see a lot

435
00:20:41,119 --> 00:20:41,720
Speaker 3: of bad acting.

436
00:20:41,760 --> 00:20:42,800
Speaker 4: We watch a lot.

437
00:20:42,600 --> 00:20:47,760
Speaker 3: Of silly horror movies campy, and they're not even intentionally campy.

438
00:20:47,880 --> 00:20:50,040
Speaker 3: Some of them are just campy and they were trying

439
00:20:50,080 --> 00:20:51,680
Speaker 3: to be good, and we still enjoy those.

440
00:20:51,880 --> 00:20:53,680
Speaker 4: But I would never say that the acting is good.

441
00:20:53,760 --> 00:20:55,560
Speaker 3: The whole point is sometimes we like to watch movies

442
00:20:55,600 --> 00:20:58,400
Speaker 3: with bad acting, but because it's just fun.

443
00:20:58,800 --> 00:21:00,959
Speaker 4: But this acting was stellar.

444
00:21:01,600 --> 00:21:09,359
Speaker 1: Stellar, love and credit, and we commend Marlon Wayns for

445
00:21:09,400 --> 00:21:12,840
Speaker 1: what he did for being able to speak about it.

446
00:21:12,920 --> 00:21:15,280
Speaker 1: This is his art, you know. He put a lot

447
00:21:15,280 --> 00:21:18,560
Speaker 1: into this role, and he knows what's being said about

448
00:21:18,560 --> 00:21:21,120
Speaker 1: it and to just say, you know what, I respect

449
00:21:21,280 --> 00:21:23,160
Speaker 1: you won't do your thing, but it doesn't mean it's

450
00:21:23,160 --> 00:21:26,960
Speaker 1: everybody's opinion. Go see it, and for whatever reason, maybe

451
00:21:26,960 --> 00:21:28,800
Speaker 1: that works, sweetheart. I'm not sure if we would have

452
00:21:28,800 --> 00:21:30,920
Speaker 1: seen this movie had he not put out that Instagram.

453
00:21:31,040 --> 00:21:31,200
Speaker 3: Yeh.

454
00:21:31,560 --> 00:21:33,400
Speaker 4: So kudos to Marlon Wayans.

455
00:21:33,440 --> 00:21:39,200
Speaker 3: We've always loved him and certainly really respect his acting

456
00:21:39,240 --> 00:21:43,600
Speaker 3: capabilities from this movie. And like he said, art is subjective,

457
00:21:43,680 --> 00:21:45,320
Speaker 3: and so hey, if it gets you talking, if it

458
00:21:45,359 --> 00:21:48,119
Speaker 3: gets you feeling something, even if you're annoyed that you

459
00:21:48,160 --> 00:21:51,800
Speaker 3: saw it, Hey you felt something, you experienced something. But

460
00:21:51,880 --> 00:21:53,560
Speaker 3: if you haven't seen it and you can handle a

461
00:21:53,560 --> 00:21:56,560
Speaker 3: little bit of gore and you love a thriller, we

462
00:21:56,680 --> 00:21:58,560
Speaker 3: highly recommend this film.

463
00:21:59,080 --> 00:22:05,080
Speaker 1: You will not be board. That is our recommendation. But folks,

464
00:22:05,119 --> 00:22:08,200
Speaker 1: we always appreciate. Again, we didn't expect this, but uh,

465
00:22:08,560 --> 00:22:11,000
Speaker 1: movie review what it's just full and ever what are

466
00:22:11,040 --> 00:22:11,439
Speaker 1: we gonna be?

467
00:22:11,840 --> 00:22:13,000
Speaker 4: Oh, well, definitely thumbs up.

468
00:22:13,119 --> 00:22:14,800
Speaker 1: We're gonna thought, well, we should come up with a

469
00:22:14,800 --> 00:22:16,560
Speaker 1: grading system sometimes we should if.

470
00:22:16,440 --> 00:22:18,560
Speaker 3: We if we do enough of these, we we could

471
00:22:18,560 --> 00:22:20,600
Speaker 3: come up with our own system. But this is definitely

472
00:22:20,680 --> 00:22:22,119
Speaker 3: a you should go see it.

473
00:22:22,280 --> 00:22:24,840
Speaker 1: We would recommend this for sure. Folks, We always appreciate

474
00:22:24,920 --> 00:22:26,639
Speaker 1: you hanging with us and listening to us. For my

475
00:22:26,720 --> 00:22:29,600
Speaker 1: dear Amy Robot, I'm t J. Holmes. We'll see y'all soon,

476
00:22:29,600 --> 00:22:34,240
Speaker 1: and yes, go see him