WEBVTT - Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison at Bloomberg Screentime

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Let's go live now to LA where Lucas is speaking

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 2>with Paramount Skuidance chairman and CEO David Ellison.

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>We got to start with Paramount. You chase this company

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>for a couple of years, if not longer. If you

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>look at what they own, they have a bunch of

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>cable networks that have been in decline for almost as

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>long as I've been doing my job. They have a

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 1>movie studio that is by most metrics, the last place

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>movie studios the last few years at a streaming service

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that in terms of at least engagement is sort of

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in the third tier. So why were you so interested

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>in what do you see in the company that investors

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of other potential bidders did not.

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, absolutely, it's a great question.

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 4>First, I just want to say we couldn't be more

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.040
<v Speaker 4>excited about the place that we're starting with the asset

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 4>that we purchased. Right, we have eighty million stream subscribers.

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 4>We have one of the best basically content libraries in

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 4>existence with Paramount and CBS. And I also think you

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 4>need to distinguish when you talk about the linear business. Right,

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 4>there's the cable, which yes, has been declined, but if

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 4>you look at CBS, it actually is a remarkable asset

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 4>that's been number one in prime time for seventeenth straight seasons,

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 4>incredible sports rights which we're growing, and it's still highly

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 4>highly profitable and cash flow perspective, and I agree with you,

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 4>has not been run in the best manner for the

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 4>last fifteen years. And for me, that's all opportunity, an

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 4>opportunity to really reignite the creative content engines, to navigate

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.119
<v Speaker 4>the transition that's required to really turn Paramount Plus into

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 4>a leader in streaming, and we believe we have the

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 4>ability to both win in content and also become the

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.959
<v Speaker 4>most technologically capable media company to effectively navigate this transition.

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 4>We always looked at you know, you can look at

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 4>the music business ten years ago.

0:01:47.960 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>We believe we can navigate that.

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 4>We also really looked at where traditional tech companies were,

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, call it ten fifteen years ago, and there

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 4>is a period of time where you know, the Microsoft's

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 4>the world, the Oracles of the world were being disrupted

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 4>and those companies that actually disrupted themselves and transitions are

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 4>now all.

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Traded at all time highs. We believe we have the

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 3>opportunity to do the same thing.

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So you talked about streaming. You mentioned that the eighty

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>million subscribers earlier. You know, you look at it those

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>those monthly Nielsen reports that people pay a lot of

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>attention to. Right are youtubes that thirteen percent of TV

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>viewing Netflix? Is that between eight and nine most months.

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Paramount When you combine Paramount plus and Pluto, it sort

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of sits around two percent. You can correct me if

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm off there. I think it's about right. So how

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>do you get that up forget about thirteen or eight

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>like Disney's in the four or five range. How do

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you get that up there? And you've talked about content

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and tech? Can you get specific on those fronts like

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 1>what you're going to do?

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:40.799
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely?

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 4>So, Look, one of the things we really believed in,

0:02:42.480 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 4>like what I'll say, we're nine weeks in and I'm

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 4>really proud of the momentum the team has been able

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 4>to build over the last nine weeks. One of the

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 4>things we really believe being the first owned and operated

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 4>studio to my knowledge, since actually Walt Disney built his

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:57.560
<v Speaker 4>own shop, was that we would have the opportunity to

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 4>really think long term that means long term partners with

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 4>talent where you can basically say, don't just think about

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 4>your next movie or your next show. We want to

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 4>build a relationship with you over a decade and actually

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 4>say we're going to make your next four or five movies,

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 4>your next four or five series, and really think long

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 4>term and invest for long term growth. The great news

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 4>and when you look at we had to win in content,

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 4>I think we're well on our way to being.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Able to do that.

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 4>If you look at specifics right, we're able to get

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 4>the Obviously, the UFC deal is one of the first

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 4>things we announced we came over. We're incredibly proud that

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 4>Activision chose to partner with us on Call of Duty,

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 4>which is the most successful video game franchise of all

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 4>time with five hundred million units sold. We're able to

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 4>have James Mangold come over and obviously call his one

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 4>of the greatest filmmakers working to call Paramount home Boulder Light,

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 4>who obviously had incredible hits like Weapons earlier this year.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 4>In addition to that, you know, we've been able to

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 4>secure high profile packages for streaming with basically Paramount Plus.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 4>And then we're also really reinvigorating what we're doing in

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 4>news with CBS News with the acquisition of the Free Press.

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 4>And then I think when you look at CBS's broadcast lineup,

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 4>I think we have the strongest lineup, maybe arguably in

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 4>the company's history. And so I think we've really successfully

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 4>reinvigorated the creative content engines of the company in a

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 4>really short period of time.

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 3>And I think we're going to be able to do

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 3>that at scale.

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 4>So that's one two. You know, I think when you

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 4>look at kind of ten thousand feet, Silicon Valley has

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 4>done an excellent job of really coming into Hollywood. I

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 4>mean the platform that Netflix has built, the platform that

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 4>basically Amazon is built, and these are incredible companies.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I'd say the platform that Amazon has built is not

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:34.679
<v Speaker 1>very good, but they do have the benefit of Amazon behind.

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Even people who work at Amazon but acknowledge the product

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:37.799
<v Speaker 1>could be better.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 4>I think when you look at the number of subscribers,

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 4>I think they're doing okay. And you know, from from

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 4>that standpoint, but what we really want to become. We

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 4>talk about becoming the most technologically capable media company. Believe

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 4>we have the capability to do that. We're bringing in

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 4>the appropriate leadership. You know, we just obviously hired our

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 4>CPO Dan Glasgow, who was formerly obviously running product at

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 4>metaphor Facebook, who is obviously a phenomenal leader, to come

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 4>into the business. And we have really deep tech partnerships

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 4>that are really going to enable, we think Paramount for

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 4>the first time to actually build platforms that are competitive

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 4>with Netflix, that are competitive with Amazon, and actually successfully

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 4>grow in scale. And I think you've said this, You've

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 4>talked about this a lot, given this moment in time

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 4>that we exist in, great art and great technology need

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 4>to work hand in hand together to effectuate the transition

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 4>the overall businesses in.

0:05:27.320 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>Is there some things like concrete about the Paramount plus

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>platform right now that you think is clearly substandard, And

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>how like I've heard you talk about the recommendation algorithm

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>right and how you think that could be better. Does

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>having us a better recommendation algorithm really going to bring

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in ten million new customers or make people spend an

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>extra two hours a day with your service?

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 3>So you have to do two things.

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 4>One like, let's just talk about the asset that we

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 4>acquire we inherited. Right, Paramount as it exists today operates

0:05:55.760 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 4>three streaming platforms, three separate texts on two different clouds,

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 4>which is both inefficient and wildly expensive. So if you

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 4>actually said I'm gonna if I had unlimited resources, this

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 4>is not how you do.

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>For those who don't follow, the three services are Paramount Plus,

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Pluto TV, and bpt plus correct.

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 4>So we're in the process right now of basically consolidating

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 4>all of those onto a single into a single stack,

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 4>which will both significantly improve the operational capabilities of the product,

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 4>and we're doing a lot to basically overhaul every single

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 4>aspect of the stack. But also the more data that

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 4>you obviously get in there, which is the more users,

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 4>the better you're going to be.

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Able to recommend content.

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 4>So we are we're definitely overhauling basically the product right now.

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 3>But in addition to that, to me.

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 4>Technology is really in service of the content, not the

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 4>other way around, and we're going to make significantly more

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.440
<v Speaker 4>shows at Paramount Plus.

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 3>We are investing in sports rights. You know, when you

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 3>look at the acquisition of the UFC, that.

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 4>Is the largest sport that is basically not shared between

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 4>multiple platforms, and to basically and they have one hundred

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 4>million fans, They've grown twenty five percent from twenty nineteen

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 4>to date. They grew at that level sitting behind a

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 4>double paywall. So we think when you eliminate that double paywall,

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 4>it's going to open it up and make it much

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 4>more accessible. Literally, one paper you fight is what a

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 4>Paramount Plus subscription is. And then basically those one hundred

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 4>million fans are going to be able to get access

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 4>to everything they love. And in addition to that, when

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 4>you look at the overall sports strategy, which cannot be

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 4>more important to us, Paramount had a really strong fall

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 4>and spring sports calendar, but really light in the summer.

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>The football in the fall, you have March Madness. In

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the spring, you have.

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 4>The Masters, which which we're incredibly proud to be partners with,

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 4>and now with UFC, we have a year long sports

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 4>strategy and that in addition to all of the new

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 4>originals that we're going to be making for p plus,

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 4>there's going to be more content, there's gonna be a

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 4>better tech product that's going.

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 3>To yield additional engagement and scale.

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So I won't I have a follow up on that,

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>but I'm curious because you mentioned Pluto. You've talked a

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>lot about combining the back end. How is it that

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you just combine all those services into one consumer facing

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>app where if you want to watch Pluto, you're just

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>going to Paramount Plus.

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 4>So right now we're basically combining the back the back end.

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 4>It's certainly something we've discussed and.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Explore, but not something we're planning to do right now.

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Got it? And you're in the like the fun spending money,

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>showing people you're here to reinvigorate the company phase. When

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>does the less fun part?

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 4>So, look, one of the things that I think is

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 4>actually important is this business can be operated a lot

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 4>more efficiently than was operated in the past. And you know,

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 4>we've obviously announced you know, two billion dollars and obviously

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 4>run rate synergies. We've said we're going to meaningfully obviously

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 4>exceed those targets, and from our perspective, we intend to

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 4>do that as quickly as possible so that we can

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 4>basically get that behind us and then have the entire

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 4>team just building for the future.

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>So does that do cuts start before the end of

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the year.

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, I can't answer that question.

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to a couple other questions you probably can't answer.

0:09:05.720 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 3>Have you We're going there already.

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, have you made an offer yet for Warner

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Brothers Discovery.

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 3>All right, we'll talk about tennis.

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to tennis at the end. I already I

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you saw it. I asked Greg Peters,

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>who is better at tennis? Him or Bill Gate? You

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>can probably answer that question. He dodged, But.

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 4>The atention I actually can't as attention, I've never seen

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 4>either of them play tennis, so I don't feel equipped

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 4>to be able to do.

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to the offer for Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 4>So so, look, we're a publicly traded company, and I

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 4>think you know, we're not in a position to be

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 4>able comment on rumors speculation of any kind, because there's

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:42.719
<v Speaker 4>a couple of rumors and speculations obviously out there in

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 4>terms of what we.

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 3>May or may not be doing. But look, what I

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 3>can't comment on is.

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 4>People to kind of understand our mindset, right, And I

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 4>actually think, you know, ironically, it was David Zaslov last

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 4>year that said, you know, consolidation the medium business is important,

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 4>and the way we approach everything is first and foremost,

0:10:02.480 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 4>what's good for the talent community, what's good for our shareholders,

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 4>and value creation and what's good for basically storytelling at large.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:15.719
<v Speaker 4>And so from our standpoint, whether we were approach any acquisition,

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 4>and I actually do think there's a lot of options

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 4>out there in terms of what actually might be actionable

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 4>in the near future, we would approach that through the

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 4>lens of wanting to make more, not less, you know, because.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>The natural conclusion if you were to merge with one

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of those Discovery is you take two companies that combines

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember the content's been between the two of them,

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>but spend billions of dollars. And much as you're combining

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Guidance and Paramount, you take money out. You would take

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>money out there. Companies that merge don't tend to spend

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 1>more money on the other side of it.

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 4>So what I would say, and again I'm not going

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 4>to comment on Warner Brothers Discovery, but you know you

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 4>said it when you talked about Paramount. You actually need

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 4>more content to yield more engagement. And so we would

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 4>actually want to be in the business throughout whatever lens

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 4>we were looking at of actually producing more, you know,

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 4>more movies, more television series, more to get to scale

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 4>because you need that content, you need that great storytelling

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 4>to yield engagement. And from that standpoint, we're also in

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 4>the business first and foremost of creating long term value creation.

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 3>And you know, in one of the things I think.

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 4>I hope we've we've proven obviously with our family is

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 4>we are in the business of building long term value

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 4>for shareholders, and I think we've done that successfully.

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned there are a lot of other things out

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>there that could be actionable. What else is on the list?

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 4>Same thing, I can't comment on it.

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll do one more so. We were told that you

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>actually made an offer for Warner Brothers Discovery that was rejected.

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Same answer.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>It seems like most people think this is I promise

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not the same question. It's the bridge to something else.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Most people think that you guys are the only ones

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>who can get that deal done. And one of the

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>reasons is because of the relationship between your father and

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the current instration. How would you characterize the relationship between

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>your family and the president at the moment?

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Great question.

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 4>I think we have a we have a good relationship

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 4>with the with the administration, and look, I think if

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:16.440
<v Speaker 4>you look to that, I do believe other things that

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 4>have been rumored about, right are very large scale players

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 4>that would affect that could potentially create monopolies obviously in

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 4>the ecosystem. And again, I think when you look at

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.199
<v Speaker 4>the lens of consolidation for us, I'll keep going back

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 4>to it, it's always how do you create long term

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 4>value creation, how do you put yourself in a position

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 4>to produce more content, not less, and how do you

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 4>ultimately build something that is better for the consumer, not

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.040
<v Speaker 4>opportunities that will create things like you know, too much

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 4>pricing power. And I think if you look at our business,

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 4>I hear it all the time. The notion of going

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 4>to seven different apps is not the greatest experience from

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 4>the consumer's point of view.

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 3>And I think what we look for is.

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 4>Really how do we serve the consumer, how do we

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 4>serve the talent community, who we are so grateful for

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 4>the fact that they have really embraced us since this acquisition,

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 4>and how to create long term value for shareholders. Those

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 4>are going to be the lens of which we always

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 4>approach everything. And what I'm and I think we have

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 4>the capital and resources to be opportunistic when those opportunities arrive,

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 4>and we do have a.

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Good relationship, so one opportunity you took and you mentioned

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>earlier with buying the Free Press, the track record of

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>big media companies like Paramount buying digital media companies like

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the Free Press is abysmal, at least over the last

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>several years. So why are you buying this company and

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>what was the thought behind it?

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely so one.

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 4>What our goal is in news is we want to

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 4>become the most trusted destination in news media.

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 3>That is our goal.

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think it's a controversial thing to say

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 4>right now that the civil discourse that currently exists is

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 4>not in a great place. And we basically believe in

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 4>all the things that the Free Press believed in, which

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 4>is the you know, we want to speak to these

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 4>set twenty percent of the audience that identifies themselves as

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 4>center left to center right. We believe in the open

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 4>exchange of ideas and then you know, fundamentally presenting both

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 4>sides and allowing the audience to ultimately make their determination

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 4>about how they feel about it. But they're presented with

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 4>the facts, and we think that, you know, the Free

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 4>Press recognized some of the issues that have been occurring

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 4>and built a company as part of the solution to.

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>What issues are you referring to there.

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 4>The notion of really just saying we want to get

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 4>back into the trust business, we want to get back

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 4>into the truth business. And then in addition to that,

0:14:35.120 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 4>when you look at news right we have I cannot

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 4>properly express how much respect and admiration I have for

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 4>the legacy of CBS News in sixty minutes.

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 3>It's remarkable.

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 4>But also the company does not have a digital strategy,

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 4>and one of you know, which is why the Free

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 4>Press was a critical part of that acquisition, because you

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 4>need to be able to meet people where they are.

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious is remaining independent ish.

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 4>So basically the Free Press will obviously stay in the

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 4>digital landscape in which they're going towards.

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 3>But I also think when you talk about meeting people

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 3>where they.

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 4>Are, that's in broadcast news, that's obviously you know on

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 4>the Free Press's website, that's in podcasts, but that's also

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 4>eventually going to be in direct to consumer And we

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 4>do want to actually build a home in the d

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 4>TWOC platform, which to my knowledge, our competitors are not

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 4>doing where you can actually go get all of that

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 4>in a digital environment you're consumer, and the Free Press

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 4>is an accelerate to be able to complish.

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>That cold doesn't the CBS already have a digital news network.

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 4>They do, but we think that this basically accelerates and

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 4>supercharges it.

0:15:40.000 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Basically said, you have a lot of respect to CBS News,

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>but in bringing in someone to completely overhaul it would

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>suggest that you thought that things weren't operating as well

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>as they could have been. And how would you assess it,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>not just from a business standpoint, but from a content standpoint.

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like the news that they were putting

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>out there was where you want it to be? Do

0:15:57.960 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you think there are things they could be doing better

0:15:59.440 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>or worse?

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 4>So, as I've kind of said this before, I'm not

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 4>going to be in the position of ever making political

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 4>statements like we're we're an entertainment company first, and we

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 4>have the viewpoint of if you're breathing your audience and

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 4>we basically so, and so from that standpoint, we want

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 4>to entertain our audiences first. What I will say, and

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 4>I've said this and I said this in a letter

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 4>I sent up to the team earlier this week, is

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 4>that I do believe that this is an opportunity when

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 4>you look at where things sit, that we want to

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 4>be able to get back to a place where everyone

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 4>can have dialogue.

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 3>We believe in civil discourse.

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 4>We believe in the open exchange and debate of ideas

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 4>is how you get to the right answer. And we

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 4>think that there is a responsibility with news to make

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 4>sure that you were promoting that. But at the end

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 4>of the day, it's always up to the viewer in

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 4>the audience to decide. And we're in the business of

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 4>first and foremost earning their trust and that is done

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 4>over time, and we hope that we you know, we're

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 4>going to work really hard to earn our audience trusts

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 4>every day.

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>You can understand though, why when you're talking about restoring

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>trust and speaking to every one, you know, you put

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.959
<v Speaker 1>someone in Barry's background as primarily as an opinion columnist, right,

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>She's not a kind of died in the wool news reporter.

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And there are going to be people at CBS News,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and there have been a lot of people outside of

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the journalists outside of CBS News already who are seem

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.959
<v Speaker 1>very concerned because opinion and news are typically kept separate.

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>And now you have of the editorial leader of this

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>news group whose background is an opinion Yeah, well, I.

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 4>Mean Look, I'll continue to say the same thing, like,

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm not going to make a political statement.

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:33.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm really not going to do it.

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not asking a political statement. But you can understand

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe why some of the staff is nervous or I'm

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>sure your art you've got, you and your team are

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>already ready for there to be a bunch of leaks

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>over the next few weeks of people who don't like

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>whatever direction it's going in.

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, looks, what I think I said is like again,

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 4>I'll keep going back to it. I think if you

0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 4>look at the value system that basically the Free Press

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 4>has been operated under really does align with the value

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:58.199
<v Speaker 4>system that we believe in, which I also believe is

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 4>in line with the legacy of CBS News. And if

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 4>you actually go to that, I do believe there are

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 4>areas where we collectively can and will do better. But

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 4>I also have the utmost respect for the team that

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 4>exists there. And again, I wouldn't judge us based on

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 4>what I sit here and say today, judges basically over time,

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 4>as we basically proved that I mean, you know, I

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 4>mean again, like this is going to be one where

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 4>we're going to need to demonstrate every single day that

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 4>we're obviously earning people's trust.

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 3>I obviously deeply believe in the free press.

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 4>I believe in the team at CBS News, and I

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 4>believe we're going to accomplish the goal of building that

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:32.880
<v Speaker 4>trusted destination news and media.

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Are you and Barry. I don't know if this counts

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>as politics for you, but you have a lot of

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>common ground on a big issue, which is Israel, and

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>you have spoken publicly about it. Your company issued a

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>statement expressing concern about how some artists were speaking about it.

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Why did you feel the need to speak out on

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that issue and how has the blowback been?

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So look, just to go back to the statement

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 4>that we made, right was very simply, we made a

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 4>statement that was effectively discriminating based on where somebody is

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 4>from Israel, and I and I and I stand by

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 4>that statement. In addition to that, when you look at

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.040
<v Speaker 4>what's going on in the world, you know the fact

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 4>that we are effectively at a historic piece deal with

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 4>hostages being returned home as early as this week in

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:19.719
<v Speaker 4>our Monday I think that is a historical, historic accomplishment

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 4>and one that we should all be happy so that

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 4>those hostages can get home with their families.

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>I believe that there was a piece about sort of

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>some employees of yours who were upset about the statement

0:19:34.880 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that you put out, And I'm just curious have you

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>heard from it? And I know just from day to

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>day life that there are a lot of people in

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the talent community who feel a little bit differently about

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>this subject than you do. Have you heard from from

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>any of them?

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 4>And there you know, so so obviously I saw that

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 4>piece and look, the you know, we believe in the

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.160
<v Speaker 4>First Amendment, they are one hundred percent entitled to their opinion.

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 4>We're we're we're entitled to ours and they know we

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 4>haven't heard from anybody.

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Else directly, got it.

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>We haven't talked about your dad at all. Who is

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest shareholder in your company, I believe or what

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 1>one of Yeah, the deal that you don't want to

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about that you might do would also be thanks

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in part to his oar jess what advice has he

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>given you about running a big company? And what is

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:21.719
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between the two of you?

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 4>Like, so, look, we we my father and I couldn't

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 4>have a better relationship. We talked just about every day

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.919
<v Speaker 4>or every other day, you know, Look, he's a pretty

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 4>phenomenal mentor. And and I think, you know, I think,

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 4>especially when you look at it from a shareholder capacity,

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 4>I think he has about as good of a track

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 4>record as you can get for actually creating value. You

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 4>look at the growth of Oracle this year across everything

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 4>he's done in our businesses and as well as you know,

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 4>our stock has obviously also performed since we closed. Yeah,

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 4>and and so you know, from that standpoint, you know,

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 4>he is focused on how do we maximize value for shareholders?

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 3>I think is one of the best in the world

0:20:57.680 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 3>of doing that.

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's a voice that everyone should be

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 4>really happy about the fact that that's obviously, you know,

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 4>helping to guide and steer the company. So from that standpoint,

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 4>and look, the other thing I would say is, you know,

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 4>I've had phenomenal mentors that I'm grateful to, you know,

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 4>including Steve Jobs and David Geffen, And honestly, I'm grateful

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 4>for everything I've been able to learn from them.

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 3>And we couldn't have a better relationship.

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>And when you say guidance deer, so are you like,

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>how often is you talk to your dad every day?

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about the company every day, like is he

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people who work there want

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to know, right, like is ultimately you know, how involved

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>is Larry Elson going to be in Paramount?

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 4>So look, I run the company day to day, make

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 4>no mistake about that. He is the largest shareholder in

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 4>the business. And I think what's important for everybody to

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 4>know is the way he approaches this is.

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 3>How do we maximize value for our shareholders? And he's

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 3>exceptional with that.

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:51.679
<v Speaker 1>Given the amount of money that you guys have at

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 1>your disposal, you mentioned shareholders, Like, why not just take

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the company private?

0:21:56.440 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 4>So great question one Actually think it's very really simple.

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 4>It goes back to that question of value. We think

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 4>there is actually more value and more opportunity in being

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 4>a public.

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 3>Company and being in private company.

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And given so your dad's you've got Paramount. Your dad

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to be involved in the new ownership consortium for

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>TikTok in the US, we maybe have the Warner Brothers

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Discovery deal. What do you say to people.

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 3>No right to questions?

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I can't actually answer, true, but this is this is

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 2>this I think I can answer this one. What do

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.359
<v Speaker 2>you say to people who seem who are concerned that

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 2>there's just like an an Ellison slash Ellison Trump plot

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 2>to just like corner the media business.

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>You've got Elon with Twitter.

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:43.360
<v Speaker 3>You know they're they're no, I know where you're going.

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Look it's I'm going to headline. I'm doing better.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 4>I can uh, I can only speak to.

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think I can speak to my personal state

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 3>of mind? Right? Is that fair to do that?

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 4>So what I can tell you is that conversation has

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 4>never once been discussed or brought up. You know, when

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 4>we basically approach things, it is going back to always

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 4>how do we create basically value for shareholders? And look,

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 4>go back to what I've been doing, like the last

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:23.720
<v Speaker 4>fifteen years of my life, right, I mean like this

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 4>is it's sorry.

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 3>I kind of look at this.

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 4>And I'm like, can we this is the last twenty

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 4>plus years of my life not equate?

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 3>And what I mean by that is.

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 4>I went to film school at USC Right, I started

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 4>when I literally started in this business when I was

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 4>eighteen years old. I fell in love with movies when

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 4>I was literally a little kid. And you know, my

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 4>mom and I would go to the movies every single weekend.

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 4>That's literally what we did without fail. We went fifty

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 4>two weeks a year and just saw anything that was playing.

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 4>And you know, we had a VHS collection of you

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 4>know at home where like me and my sister's idea

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 4>of like the greatest day on a Sunday was let's

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 4>go watch all the Rocky movies back to back in

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 4>one day, or let's go watch the Star Wars trilogy.

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 4>So I have literally loved this business and love storytelling

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 4>since I was a kid.

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 3>I went to school for it.

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 4>I built sky Dance and launched it in twenty ten

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 4>really with the understanding that the disruption between the bridge

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 4>that has been built between Silicon Valley and Hollywood was

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 4>going to happen.

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 3>We saw that over fifteen years ago.

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 4>We built a company that was, you know, the tip

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 4>of the spear for that disruption on the content creation side,

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.080
<v Speaker 4>with one of our guiding thematics always being where entertainment

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 4>is heading, right.

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, the Slate deal we did where we got

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 3>all of the.

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Crown jewels in Paramounts franchises without taking things that are

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 4>normally put into those kind of deals was revolutionary at

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 4>the time. You know, our second series, Grayson Frankee, you know,

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.240
<v Speaker 4>we took to Netflix before House of Cards was released

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 4>because we believed in anything, anywhere, anytime, and any device

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.360
<v Speaker 4>before it had been proven. We've taken early bets into

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 4>interactive and virtual reality, and we took and we took

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 4>ten pole movies direct to consum during a time period

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 4>where we thought that was the right thing to do.

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 4>So from that standpoint, I have always loved and believed

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 4>in this business.

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 3>I love storytelling.

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 4>I believe in the value of basically entertainment and media

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 4>and what these stories mean and it's a privilege to

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 4>get to.

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Tell them in our culture.

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 4>And as it relates to news, which is the other

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 4>part of the question you're asking, we really do want

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 4>to be in.

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 3>The trust business first and foremost.

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:31.400
<v Speaker 4>We really do want to talk to that seventy percent

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 4>of the audience and we want to get back to

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 4>having that level of civil discourse. So none of those

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 4>things that have been talked about have ever been discussed

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 4>inside of my relationship with my dad.

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm the tech front because you talk about that kind

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of seeing the friction between Hollywood and Philicon Valley early.

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>The other sort of big boogeyman in the news right

0:25:54.359 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>now is AI. What is your perception of aura? Are

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you guys opting out of your product being in there,

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>How are you thinking about using AI?

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so look at say two things to that, right, Like,

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 4>fundamentally we are in the business of building, creating, and

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 4>protecting value of intellectual property. So sore we have been

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 4>in that business, we always continue to be in that business.

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 3>Look, there's a really healthy debate.

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 4>Around inputs that I don't really want to get into

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 4>because we don't have enough time. But I think when

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 4>you look at the outputs, those need to be protected.

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.440
<v Speaker 4>Copyright basically needs to be protected on the outputs of

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 4>those businesses. But what I would also say is as

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 4>an industry, we do need to embrace technology. And I

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 4>think if you look at artificial intelligence, there are several

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.360
<v Speaker 4>areas to where you know, AI is going to impact

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 4>our business and and I actually think it's important to

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 4>do it in a way that is responsible, that is

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 4>fundamentally a tool for artists. So I'll go back to

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 4>a Pixar story and forgive the SEMAI long answer to this,

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 4>but I just I'll go to this as one that

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 4>I happened to be able to live through. You know,

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 4>I remember basically in the you know, when Steve and

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 4>John Laster basically built Pixar.

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 3>The attack on them at the time.

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 4>Was that they didn't like animators and they didn't like

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 4>the medium of animation, which when you talk to either

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 4>John or Steve, you know John who was a classically

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 4>trained Walt Disney animator, they loved storytelling, they loved animation.

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 4>What they said was, we're just giving the artists a

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 4>new pencil to actually enable them to draw and create

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 4>something they've never been able to create before. And I

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 4>think the reality is is much like when James Cameron,

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 4>you know, in nineteen ninety two, basically started doing digital

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 4>comps as opposed to optical comps, and that was a

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 4>controversial thing at the time as well. I do think

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:51.919
<v Speaker 4>you were in one of these inflection point moments where

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 4>the software CPU pipelines are going to start to be

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 4>augmented or replaced by model drive in GPU pipelines, and

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 4>there's a responsible way to do that, and there's an

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 4>irresponsible way to do that. We're going to air on

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.679
<v Speaker 4>the side of basically partnering with that technology to do

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 4>it in a way that we think is good for artists.

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>My last best was a short one so that the

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>folks in the back, don't kill me. Who's a better pilot?

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 1>You were, Tom Cruise, I'm not that one.

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:23.159
<v Speaker 3>I'll play the fifth on it. It's no Look. What

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 3>I'll say is Tom is an exceptional pilot. Like I'll

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 3>actually say he I was.

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 4>I started flying when I was thirteen years old, and

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 4>by the time I was twenty, I was one of

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 4>the top ten aerbatic pilots in the country, so literally

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 4>like flying air shows like three miles an hour, fifteen

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 4>feet off the ground.

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 3>So that was a wonderful chapter in my life.

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 4>But I think the training that he did to be

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 4>able to do the sequences in mission impossible. The fact

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 4>that he captured all of that filming in camera on

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 4>top gunn Maverick. For me, he's just the gold standard

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 4>and I have nothing but the most admiration respect for him.