1 00:00:00,480 --> 00:00:03,640 Speaker 1: I think there's a huge appetite for a new agenda, 2 00:00:03,960 --> 00:00:06,400 Speaker 1: for a sense of where are we trying to compete 3 00:00:06,440 --> 00:00:10,360 Speaker 1: in the world? What is our strategy? No post Brexit 4 00:00:11,039 --> 00:00:14,200 Speaker 1: is no good just saying we left it and we're 5 00:00:14,200 --> 00:00:16,279 Speaker 1: going to have some trade agreements. It's how are we 6 00:00:16,360 --> 00:00:19,040 Speaker 1: now going to compete in the world? Now we've created 7 00:00:19,079 --> 00:00:21,759 Speaker 1: this dislocation in how we used to You can see 8 00:00:21,760 --> 00:00:24,960 Speaker 1: it most acutely in things like the auto industry. We 9 00:00:25,120 --> 00:00:28,560 Speaker 1: created friction for trade. No rightly or wrongly, that's what 10 00:00:28,720 --> 00:00:32,199 Speaker 1: people voted to do. Now we need a plan for 11 00:00:32,240 --> 00:00:34,960 Speaker 1: how we compete, and that's popularly called It used to 12 00:00:34,960 --> 00:00:39,680 Speaker 1: be called industrial strategy. Now this government, for whatever reason, 13 00:00:39,760 --> 00:00:42,159 Speaker 1: has an aversion to the expression industrial strate. It's what 14 00:00:42,159 --> 00:00:45,199 Speaker 1: everybody else calls it, so they can't bring themselves to 15 00:00:45,240 --> 00:00:48,000 Speaker 1: say it. But I don't care whether it's a growth 16 00:00:48,040 --> 00:00:50,960 Speaker 1: strategy or competitiveness. It's got to be a profound point 17 00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:53,400 Speaker 1: of view as to how Britain's going to compete. 18 00:00:53,600 --> 00:00:55,720 Speaker 2: The government is sort of trying to address this idea 19 00:00:55,760 --> 00:00:59,279 Speaker 2: of attractiveness the UK is are the hunt reforms, are 20 00:00:59,320 --> 00:01:01,640 Speaker 2: any of the things you've seen out of government profound 21 00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:02,080 Speaker 2: as you. 22 00:01:02,080 --> 00:01:06,000 Speaker 1: Say, look, I just don't I think one speech doesn't 23 00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:11,200 Speaker 1: make a strategy. An industrial strategy has to be profound. 24 00:01:11,240 --> 00:01:14,880 Speaker 1: And it's not just about our attue where we want 25 00:01:14,880 --> 00:01:17,880 Speaker 1: to compete. What it's about what skills do we want 26 00:01:17,920 --> 00:01:22,320 Speaker 1: to have? Don't get Government plays a very big part 27 00:01:22,520 --> 00:01:27,000 Speaker 1: in creating skills. You know, the education sectors nationalized. We 28 00:01:27,120 --> 00:01:29,760 Speaker 1: have something called the apprenticeship levy, which is a tax 29 00:01:30,080 --> 00:01:34,399 Speaker 1: on skills and a tax on training. Most of that tax, 30 00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:36,319 Speaker 1: a large part of that tax, is taken by the 31 00:01:36,360 --> 00:01:39,959 Speaker 1: treasury and not respent. Other countries are saying, no, we 32 00:01:40,000 --> 00:01:42,760 Speaker 1: need laboratory assystems, No we need more coders, No we 33 00:01:42,760 --> 00:01:45,840 Speaker 1: we need more data scientists. We seem to be agnostic. 34 00:01:46,760 --> 00:01:49,280 Speaker 1: We don't know what we need, and that's not good enough. 35 00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:51,960 Speaker 1: The footprint of government is too big in the economy 36 00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:55,480 Speaker 1: to say we're just hands off, that we let the 37 00:01:55,560 --> 00:02:00,640 Speaker 1: market decide, because government does create and shape the future direction. 38 00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:03,680 Speaker 1: A competitive economy is one where the public and private 39 00:02:03,760 --> 00:02:07,600 Speaker 1: sector work together. That doesn't mean in an old fashioned 40 00:02:07,640 --> 00:02:11,600 Speaker 1: sense of taxpayers money going into owning gumbery anything like that. 41 00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:16,960 Speaker 1: It means we're working together on regulation, on trade, on 42 00:02:17,600 --> 00:02:24,600 Speaker 1: investment in skills on how government supports entrepreneurs, how we 43 00:02:24,639 --> 00:02:28,240 Speaker 1: shape the tax system. At the moment that's come slightly 44 00:02:28,280 --> 00:02:29,520 Speaker 1: adrift post Brexit. 45 00:02:29,680 --> 00:02:32,480 Speaker 2: The IPO market in London is basically dried up. There's 46 00:02:32,520 --> 00:02:34,880 Speaker 2: an issue around pension funds about whether or not they 47 00:02:35,200 --> 00:02:38,320 Speaker 2: are allowed or are willing or able to invest enough 48 00:02:38,360 --> 00:02:42,919 Speaker 2: into UK businesses, and there have been various proposals. Lord lyons, 49 00:02:42,919 --> 00:02:45,160 Speaker 2: for example, the City of London Lord Mayor was speaking 50 00:02:45,160 --> 00:02:47,520 Speaker 2: to me about his fifty billion pound fund that he 51 00:02:47,600 --> 00:02:49,959 Speaker 2: wants to try to put money into UK business I 52 00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:53,160 Speaker 2: suppose what is your thought on actually trying to make 53 00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:56,919 Speaker 2: UK capital markets as attractive as they possibly can be, 54 00:02:56,919 --> 00:02:58,639 Speaker 2: because that's very fundamental to. 55 00:02:58,639 --> 00:03:03,440 Speaker 1: Our sits there absolutely and look, companies listing in London 56 00:03:03,560 --> 00:03:05,360 Speaker 1: is not the be all end of the world, but 57 00:03:05,400 --> 00:03:09,400 Speaker 1: what we did have with London was a place where 58 00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:13,000 Speaker 1: people wanted to list and as a result, headquarters obey 59 00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:17,640 Speaker 1: it and headquarters bring with them a lot of knowledge capital, 60 00:03:17,720 --> 00:03:22,000 Speaker 1: a lot of inward investment in people, and then they 61 00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:25,720 Speaker 1: support the financial markets. You're headquarters in London, you're like 62 00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:29,680 Speaker 1: to raise money in London so that competing has a 63 00:03:29,680 --> 00:03:33,840 Speaker 1: place where companies want to list and bath themselves is 64 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:35,920 Speaker 1: a natural thing for the UK to do and to 65 00:03:35,960 --> 00:03:38,640 Speaker 1: set out to do, and we slightly lost the plot. 66 00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:40,840 Speaker 1: And now some of it to do with Brexit, I mean, 67 00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:46,720 Speaker 1: just because that creates an aposteric feel for people, but 68 00:03:46,880 --> 00:03:49,240 Speaker 1: some of it also to with the risk a version 69 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:53,400 Speaker 1: that the amount of regulation we're imposing on UK listed companies, 70 00:03:53,840 --> 00:03:57,120 Speaker 1: the amount of onerous reporting requirements. None of the things 71 00:03:57,160 --> 00:04:00,200 Speaker 1: all well intended. It's just you know, the marketers as 72 00:04:00,200 --> 00:04:02,360 Speaker 1: Saniel report is now two hundred and sixty pages long 73 00:04:02,360 --> 00:04:04,080 Speaker 1: and next to it will be free on the pages long, 74 00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:08,640 Speaker 1: and unfortunately an awful lot of that is not actually 75 00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:12,400 Speaker 1: read by investors. So we just got to think about 76 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:16,719 Speaker 1: these things. Know that governance. The more and more governance 77 00:04:16,760 --> 00:04:19,520 Speaker 1: we require, the more regulation we apply on people all 78 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:23,160 Speaker 1: well intended. It may be that other countries are not 79 00:04:23,240 --> 00:04:27,120 Speaker 1: doing that. Then you'll lose listings. We've got to think 80 00:04:27,160 --> 00:04:30,799 Speaker 1: about that. You mentioned that I think the pensions industry 81 00:04:30,839 --> 00:04:34,160 Speaker 1: is all national tragedy. We have this huge sway of 82 00:04:34,160 --> 00:04:37,400 Speaker 1: the funds that over the last twenty years we spent 83 00:04:38,120 --> 00:04:43,359 Speaker 1: d risking by regulation. Pension tystees have no incentive to 84 00:04:43,400 --> 00:04:46,000 Speaker 1: get a great return for their investors. 85 00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:50,240 Speaker 2: Is anyone in government listening or are we already in 86 00:04:50,360 --> 00:04:53,719 Speaker 2: transition of power mode? I mean these issues around pension 87 00:04:53,720 --> 00:04:57,760 Speaker 2: funds and around creating growth, is there really a government 88 00:04:57,839 --> 00:04:58,960 Speaker 2: listening or no. 89 00:04:59,160 --> 00:05:02,599 Speaker 1: Look, I think what's happened here is that Rishi Sona 90 00:05:03,080 --> 00:05:09,440 Speaker 1: has arrived in a semi crisis, both the convulsion of 91 00:05:10,360 --> 00:05:13,640 Speaker 1: in the economy and financial markets of the Liz Trust era. 92 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:18,760 Speaker 1: So their focus has been let's create some stability and 93 00:05:18,920 --> 00:05:23,480 Speaker 1: let some fix some real here and now problems. His 94 00:05:23,680 --> 00:05:30,280 Speaker 1: five objectives, which I think I can roughly remember anyway, 95 00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:36,159 Speaker 1: I think that was fine at the beginning, but it's 96 00:05:36,240 --> 00:05:39,000 Speaker 1: not fine for the future. And my advice to this 97 00:05:39,120 --> 00:05:41,440 Speaker 1: government is, if you want to be reelected, you've got 98 00:05:41,440 --> 00:05:43,640 Speaker 1: to be the future, not the past. To coin a phrase, 99 00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:46,800 Speaker 1: you can't be the fag end of thirteen years of 100 00:05:46,839 --> 00:05:51,040 Speaker 1: conservative rule. And Rishi Sunak is a very different prime 101 00:05:51,040 --> 00:05:55,080 Speaker 1: minister with a very good grasp of detail, a propensity 102 00:05:55,120 --> 00:05:59,080 Speaker 1: to analyze and understand things in debt, is very receptive 103 00:05:59,120 --> 00:06:01,839 Speaker 1: to these ideas. But there's come a point where you 104 00:06:01,960 --> 00:06:05,120 Speaker 1: have to set out why you're a real break with 105 00:06:05,200 --> 00:06:08,000 Speaker 1: the past and competition for labor, and I think that 106 00:06:08,120 --> 00:06:08,839 Speaker 1: point is near