WEBVTT - Who Is This Year's Breaout Players?

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Forever show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences. Yeah,

0:00:55.760 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>right now, Welcome her Friday from uns my God, Rob Say, Francis,

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Prae Stap All ladies and gentlemen, your hey. With that,

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't be inside of Studio thirty four. This is

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the b f S. He is Frank Snample, I am

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Greg Souman. What's happening, Frankie? Greggy? Happy Tuesday to your bud.

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Lots to talk about a lot of injuries already taking place,

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Like what does what do these guys do in the

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>off season? If they show up to spring training and

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>they can't even walk around without hurting themselves, Greg, what

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>do they do? Honestly, I don't even have an answer

0:01:57.960 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>for you, man. I I'm scared to figure out what

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you do on the weekends. What what I do on

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the weekends. It's just basically been watching movies. I haven't

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>really done much, just like lounged around doing nothing, eating terribly. Yeah,

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.000
<v Speaker 1>if that's what we're doing and we don't get injured

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 1>just walking around, Greg, what the hell are baseball players

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>doing in the off season. I feel like if we

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>like try to work out like do like the work

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>acts they're doing, we would be injured like immediately. That's

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.239
<v Speaker 1>probably true. We're also not professional athletes now we're not. No,

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>we're not. Wait, don't hear your bodies like professional athletes either.

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>In January you did? Yeah, in January you did. I

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't eat any avocado ice cream, a lot of the

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 1>TV twelve diet, but everything pretty close to that, pretty close,

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 1>pretty close. Did you just leave last night? How did

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I sleep pretty well? Nice? I haven't had an issue sleeping.

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 1>He's gone very well. How about you sleeping well? I

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>slept poorly, but not my phone. You probably probably dreaming

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>about like Alex Sano calling you on the phone. Now,

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Judy was up all night, like what are you doing?

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to sleep and She's like, I'm stressed out

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.519
<v Speaker 1>on what work? Like, Hey, you wake up and be

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>over come on you go out out there, read your

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>book like love like that you like this date. Sports

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Grade news update. I'm Sean Gloss. No, I'm Alex Facano

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 1>with your sports Grid news update here on the Fantasy BFFs.

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for that intro, Greg new Year, another Denny

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Hamlin win in the Daytona five hundred, and Joe Gibs

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>still has the team to beat In NASCAR. Hamlin won

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>his third day to five hundred on Monday, becoming the

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>first driver since Sterling Marlin to win the Great American

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Race in consecutive seasons. His margin of victory of point

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>zero one four seconds over Ryan Blaney was the second

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>closest in race history, after only Hamlin's win over Martin

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>True Junr in two thousand and sixteen. Monday's triumph is

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the third four Toyota all one by Hamlin. On the

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>other side of the track, Ryan Newman has barrel rolled

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and slid across the finish line in a crumpled heap

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of metal, sparks flying as his car skipped to a halt,

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and fuel pouring onto the track. Frightening lye close to

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the flames. Fans gasped as track workers placed large black

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>screens around Newman's car and worked to get him out.

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 1>They had two hours until they got the chance to exhale.

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>NASCAR's officials announced that Newman had non life threatening injuries

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 1>and was in serious condition at the Halifax Medical Center.

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Reports will follow with more updates and in Major League Baseball,

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>sports books are expecting the Astros hitters to be targeted

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>often this off season. Some sports books set the over

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>under on number of Astro's players to get targeted and

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 1>hit at eighty three and a half. In the past

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>five seasons, only nine teams have been hit by pitches

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>more than eighty three and a half times, But with

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>anger over the science stealing scandal glooming, there is plenty

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of reason to believe the Astros will be targeted frequently.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball Commissioner Robert Manfred said that Sunday, independent

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Houston situation, he has been planning to increase

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the disciplinary ramifications for intentionally throwing at batters, and we'll

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>meet with managers this week to discuss the issue and

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.240
<v Speaker 1>really quickly. In the NFL, drew Brees will play in

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and twenty NFL season. The New Orleans

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Saints quarterback in the NFL's career passing leader will return

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and say, quote, make another run out of it. Breeze,

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>who turned forty one in January, or scheduled to become

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a free agent in March, but he is ready to

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>play with the Saints yet again. He holds the records

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>for career passing touchdowns, passing yards, and completion percentage. I

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>am Alex Passano and this has been your sports grid

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>news update. Now back to the fantasy b f f's

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>issues on that particular off date. Frank, I don't know

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you called it, but number one first issues by me,

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 1>all right. I threw it to Shawn, not Alex. It

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>was Seawan Guasta, Alex Pasana was my fault. A lot

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of NASCAR in there. A Nascar. Someone argued a top

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>three most popular fantasy sport in the nation grade. I

0:05:57.640 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's arguable, you know, I don't. I don't

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>think you can make that case. Well, the King used

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to make that case. I'm sure Angle would disagree with

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>the Angles might but the BFFs don't. So if we

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>could leave NASCAR out of the updates. My NASCAR knowledge

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>goes as far as me as me when I was

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>with Serious XM is like, I don't know what the

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>heck you call it highlights in turn, Yeah, I used

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to log highlights for NASCAR. Imagine that logging highlights for NASCAR.

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I can't think of any things worse. Actually, in the

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>south Park episode, you ever seen a Craig You're not

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a South Park guy. Right when I was younger, I

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>was they have they have a NASCAR episode, tell us

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>about your strategy about today's race. Well, drive straight making, lift,

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>drive straight making? Are gotta be too poor to drive

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>NASCAR as well? And all that? Anyway, point being, we

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>don't need any NASCAR updates. Yeah, I mean there was

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, some eron Judge news that came out that

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.560
<v Speaker 1>might have been out definitely shouldn't be part of the

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>fantasy BFF news uptake. Greig, we're the NASCAR and that's

0:06:57.760 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a crush, your crush, your hopes and dreams, they're out,

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>my hoologies. They were the top stories. It was a

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty big they were. They were the top stories for

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a sports program that cares about NASCAR. There was something

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that he got that Ryan knew and is okay. There

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>was something that he did mention in there that I

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about real quick, Not Martin Trurex Jr.

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>It was the Astros hit by pitch. This prop is

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>probably the easiest money you'll ever make in your life.

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Eighty three and a half three teams got plunked eighty

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>four or more times last year. The Astros themselves got

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>hit with sixty six pitches last year. You're telling me

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to get hit by pitches eighteen more

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>times this upcoming season. Also, I know that friend of

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the program spitting speeds, Dave Martinez friend has been trying

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to figure out what do you do with the twenty

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>six man? Did you have a specific skill set designated

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to the twenty six man, maybe a really fast runner

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and athletic type runner who could come in and steal bases.

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I say no, no no, no, no, no, no no no

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>no no, no, no no. There's gonna be harsh penalties

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for people who are throwing at the Astros twenty six man.

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>You designate that player to plunking the Houston Astros. Whenever

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you play the player isn't isn't a picture? As we

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>hit her. Oh well, then that doesn't make sense. I

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>thought it was a great idea, but I was like,

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>come on, you could just use that person to get

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>suspended all the time, and they'll just continuously hit the

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Houston Astros. Everybody wants to do it anyway. I think

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it was Ross Stripling who already came out and said,

0:08:17.720 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, yeah, we're gonna hit him. Oh yeah, there,

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone's gonna do. They're going to be hit once a series.

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>That's a lock. Yeah. I like the over there over

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty three and a half. We'll see. We'll see what

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of penalties Uh these guys ultimately yet, um, all right.

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>The big news that Alex did not mention that was

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Aaron Judge is not swinging or fielding.

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>We're hitting, or or doing much of anything Yankees can't

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>right now? Whish I could be Aaron Judge. You want

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to be George car Stanton, Just hurt all the time, nothing,

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>get paid a bunch of money seems nice, right anyway.

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So Aaron Judge is hurt with shoulder soreness and an

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>m R I recently. Shoulder has been sore for weeks

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and MRI recently no changes it's still sore. As a

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Yankee fan, Frank, I can tell you here we go again.

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>This is what happened previously and it went terribly Yeah. Look,

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>this is this has been an issue for both Aaron

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Judge and Jehan Carlos Stanton, and we have spoke to

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Virginia Zaki's many times about this of inside injuries, that

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>these guys are almost too big for their own good

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to being a baseball player. Yes, it's great.

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You can put out all these hype videos of you

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>flipping tires and swinging hammers and whatever kind of crazy

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>workout video you want to do, but when it comes

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>down to it, they're almost too jack for their own good.

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you need to have flexibility, and you hear a

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of players talk about that nowadays, that they've done

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>more yoga and they're trying to improve their flexibility so

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that you know, when they're swinging the bat, they're not

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 1>developing any core ishes core injuries and no oblique injuries

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and trying to avoid back injuries. And you know, Judge

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>has now dealt with shoulder injuries to both of his shoulders.

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>He had left shoulder surgery after the seventeen season, and

0:09:57.840 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>now he's dealing with an injury to his right should

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 1>there last year he missed fifty games with an oblique injury.

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So look this, this is why I wasn't targeting Aaron

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Judge outside of a head to head points league. If

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you were drafting with the first overall pick. I hope

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you watched the white board series yesterday, but I wasn't

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>targeting Aaron Judge mostly because he has not shown the

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>ability to stay healthy greg and there are other players

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>going in that range who have shown us that who

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>can also do a little bit of everything. Whether you

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>play in a rod A league, when you're playing a

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>head to head points league, I just can't depend on

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>either one of Judge or staying to stay healthy at

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>this point. You know what it reminds me in football

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>where we talking about points per target a lot, right,

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>where that's not a thing. It's not a category. You

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>don't get a point or target. And I made fun

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of you in regards to players like Mike Asecky right

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>or um loved Mike. Who's the dude on the Bills

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that everyone was hot for Duke Johnson, not Duke Williams.

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I was like this guy sucks. What's the guy ever done?

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna go with Dawson knock you with

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Duke Williams. Ye spoke about Williams like one week, well,

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>there's always kind of our CFL star, by the way,

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is always guys like this people talk up and Aaron

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Judge is obviously better than those types of players. Well,

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>when he was being taken and even by me, like

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll call myself out on this, when he's called out

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>for we're sorry being drafted in the first round, and

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I make the case like Aaron Judge is better than

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>these players. I'm right he is. But now he's been

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and what twelve games, two games twenty nineteen,

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>he has his shoulder store in his now these things linger,

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and the biggest question mark was his durability. It's not

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>even February nine. He's already hurt. This is why you

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>don't avoid Aaron Judge. The guys that are going ahead

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of him, along ahead of him. But then you're talking baseball.

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>When we come back sports grid dot Com Betting insights

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and Entertainment at your fingertips as our team covers the

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>most important topics in sports wagering. Real time, odds, predictive

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>betting models, expert picks, and more want the edge than

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>get on the grid. Sports grid dot Com speaking about

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in judge eminently uh spooky a camp today and he

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 1>said it's something he can do. Greg Nice. He said

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that the Astros should vacate their title, players should be punished,

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and the players on that team will never be looked

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>at the same again and doubts that they were clean

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in Well, he's not wrong about that last part for sure,

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and if you ask Rob Manfred, he would agree. Apparently

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:35.680
<v Speaker 1>that is enough punishment for the Houston Astros, Greg, that

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>they have to live with this embarrassment for the rest

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of their lives, that they shouldn't have to be punished.

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>M hmm. I love the comments from Nick mar Kegis

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>earlier today. Did you see that I did not see

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 1>your tweet from comments? Yes? I didn't see if you

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>No, No No, I didn't tweet anything about sad he wants

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to beat all of their acts. Yes they did see

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>those comments yesterday. Yes, that's great. I love it. Let's

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>go Nick Markegs. I gotta draft him in one of

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>these draft chain being draft. I love you, Nick Marcuse.

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's go, let's make it happen. How many that's what

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>we gotta said? Over under. How many brawls happened with

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the Ashrows this year? A bunch man, it's gonna be sick.

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I got more. I got more. This baseball season is

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>basically slug fest. I love it, so I got more

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>on Aaron Iroon Judge quotes if you don't mind, may

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>read them quickly. Aaron Judge, he was pretty man, pretty

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>upset about the Astros cheating and being prevented from playing

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the seen World Series of Cody Bellinger. I agree with

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things, he said. Says he believes the

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>punishment of players was weak for a player driven scheme.

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Judge that it bothers him that the Astros didn't show

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>enough remorse. People lost jobs, people lost money. As far

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>as driving the Ashes of the World Series title, he

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>said a quote, it wasn't earned. I couldn't sit up

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>here in lie but it's always gonna be the back

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of your mind. Josh said he doesn't think access the

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>replay review room should be restricted in the future because

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it's helpful for his own swing and defense during games.

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Joke they should add more officials just in the ongoing

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>revelations where the Astros continue to make him stick to

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>his stomach because it reflects poorly on baseball. He even

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>called the most recent Jose to Bay incident tattoo gate. Judge,

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you finished second m VP voting. Deleted Instagram post is

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>all season congratulating out to Bay on his award because

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they cheated. That didn't sit well with me. That post

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean the same anymore. He's not wrong about anything

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that he said. It was just a matter of time

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>until to tattoo gate became a thing here. Greg, And

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>what I will add to that, and I've heard other

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>people mentioned this before, for everybody who's out there making comments,

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and you should look if you're clean, if you're Cody Balinger,

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're Aaron Judge, and you guys are clean as well,

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>say whatever you want. I'm just saying nothing better ever

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>come out about the New York Yankees or the Los

0:14:40.320 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Dodgers, because if that's the case, you are going

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to get crucified ten times worse than what's happening with

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Astros right now. So I have no problem

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>people players speaking their mind, Greg and and roasting the

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Houston Astros right now. But if it ever comes out

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>that the Yankees, Dodgers, anybody else was doing something similar

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to this, which other people have already speculated, that this

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>is not the only team in baseball that's doing this,

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>then those players are going to be absolutely roasted as well,

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and they would deserve that. So, look, if you're gonna

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>point fingers and you're gonna call people names and say

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>all this kind of stuff, just make sure that you're

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>clean as well. That's all I've got to say on

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>that matter, Absolutely, no question, no question about it. Okay,

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>let me um get into what we're talking about on

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>today's program, where we were trying to figure out we

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>do this every year and we get it right sometimes

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>not like perfectly right. If I feel like we've done

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>better in football and base but it's perfect, Greg. That's

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>what's the ratio. They usually say. If you're sixty to

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty as a fantasy analyst, that means you're doing your job.

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you give me like five percent. I feel

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>good you have. Greg. Let's let's set the bar a

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit lower here, right. Nobodyould listen to me if

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you're not wrong anyway. So the idea of day show

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 1>was to try to figure out who is this year's Blake, meaning,

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>who is this year's freak out? Kennedy, it's your hitter,

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>who's the guy that you can rely on? Like, that's

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the point of Today Show, Tomorrow Show. We're gonna do

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it from a more negative perspective. We're like, all right, positive,

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>drafted this guy, he sucked last year, We're not gonna

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 1>get caught again on you, Joey Voto, right, things like that,

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 1>but today much more positive. Right, So let's start with

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a guy that we were very upset with last year, Frank,

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and that was Raffael Nevers. In fact, I think we

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>did a whole show last year on who is this

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>year's Raffael Devers? Because he really made us very angry

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. We're both in on him, we both

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>loved him. We made sure we drafted him everywhere, and

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>he was very very bad last year, very very good.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Robail Levers was amazing last year. Before we move on

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and find out who is this year's Rafael Nevers, Frank,

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask how good could Raphael Never's be

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this year's I think that he can come close to

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>what he did last year as well. I mean three

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>eleven batting average might seem a little bit optimistic, but

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you look at this guy's minor league track record, the

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>prospect pedigree that he came with, his electric backs, bat

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>speed as well, no mookie bets in that lineup, might,

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, bring the counting stats down a little bit.

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think coming close to thirty home runs, hitting

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to three hundred with hundred runs and RBIs is all

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>well within the range of possibilities. He also stole eight

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>bases last year. I believe all eight of those came

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in like the first three months, and then he was

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like caught eight sealing the rest of the way. So

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't expect much in that department. Maybe he gives

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you a five stolen bases, but this is an electric player,

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>greg who was being drafted in the second round right now,

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's hard to argue with anything that he did

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 1>last year. So I don't really have a problem with

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>where he's going. If you wanted to take an Anthony

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Rendon just because you felt he was a little bit safer,

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:47.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that you can make that argument. But on

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the other side of the coin, I think you can

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>also argue that Raphael Devers is upside is probably still

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>higher than Anthony Rendon's as well. Yeah, I think it is,

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>and I'm back in as you have to be a

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>Rafael Devers. It was a crazy thing for him. Is

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>he's twenty three years old. Like when we were upset

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:03.880
<v Speaker 1>what we were set by him two years ago, he's

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. It was a twenty one year old season

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and we crushed this kid last year. He came in

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and you're twenty two and just put up mystical, more

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>mythical numbers in all honesty, with over thirty runs, almost

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and thirty runs, scored a hundred and fifteen ribbies,

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>eight stolen bases, and he got caught eight more times,

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>which means you have a good chance of getting those

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>double digit um there's double digit steals this year. Sure,

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the babbitt was way higher last year than it was

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a year before, but if you go back two years

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>ago what we thought were three years ago when we

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>thought he could break out, it was even high that right,

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.959
<v Speaker 1>So you look at rathfaeld Evers this year and this

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is a guy that I think you can make a

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>case is a first round pick that next year he

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>will definitely be a first round pick. He has all

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the tools that he could do everything, and he has

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 1>la Rofie Devers. Yeah, and there's a chance that he

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>just gets better than where he was a year ago,

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>which up seems crazy, but yeah, like he did this,

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>He did everything that you just said, Greg thirty seven

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty two. Him runs over a hundred and twenty runs,

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>scored a hundred and fifteen RBIs with a thirty seven

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 1>percent hard contact right. The biggest thing for him Greg contact,

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that keyword. He lowered his strikeout rate by seven percent

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:15.040
<v Speaker 1>last year. His plate discipline is not great. He swings

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of pitches outside the zone. And I've

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>learned to kind of give players the benefit of the

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>doubt because if this is who they are, this is

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>who they are. I tried to doubt Javier bia Is

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago, and boy, that guy made

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>me look foolish. And now I've done a complete one eighty.

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have him on basically all of my teams.

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>But Raphael Devers is similar to a Javier Bias, where

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, he chases a lot of pitches outside the zone.

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But look at his oh contact percentage from sixty three

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>point six percent up to seventy one point nine percent.

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>That's how often did he make contact on pitches outside

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of the zone. He raised that eight percentage points last

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>year and that was a big part for him cutting

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>down those strikeouts and improving that batting average. So now

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's trying to play a game we like to call

0:19:55.960 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>who is this year's Raphael Devers? Uh huh? All right,

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 1>so that's I love the animation. We some music under

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it would have been great. Awesome job by Sandro here

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>who is this year's dot dot dot? And then a

0:20:18.640 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>great picture of Rafael Devers mug right there. Greg. Maybe

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:24.919
<v Speaker 1>we get some music for for next segment, Seawan if

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:26.959
<v Speaker 1>we can make that happen. But great, do you want

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to start with? Who is your? Who is this year's

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>version of Rafael? So I'm not gonna listen, I'm not

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm not gonna lie to the people. You know,

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm an honest guy and I love why don't lie

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to them? You this is one of the second ninetews

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that you came up with, and you know, listen, I

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>want to figure out who this year is Rafael Nevers is?

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>And to me, like, I think that guy's Corey Seeker,

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, damn, Like, Corey Seeger is one

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of my guys. I've been very high on Seeger ever

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>since he came in the league, Like I owned him

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that first year um in one of my leagues, and

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>when he got hurt, like I stuck with him, And

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:57.479
<v Speaker 1>obviously it was very, very frustrating. He's very frustrating to own.

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Last year. You never really got healthy, it seemed, and

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>he was a player you wanted to bring up. So

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna take the credit for that. Obviously it

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>was your guy. But why are we both back in

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>on Corey Seger this year? What positive size do you

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>see from him that he could have a massive breakout

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>potentially like Devers. So let's kind of preface this with

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>what we were thinking on who is this year's Raphael Devers?

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a former prospect that is being underappreciated in

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>fantasy drafts this season, who can break out maybe becomes

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a top three four round pick in next year's draft drafts.

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think Corey Seeger fits that mold. He's dealt

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of injuries. He had hip and elbow

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>surgery in the off season last offseason, going into the

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen season, and I think you saw that early

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on in the season here, Greg, he got off to

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a really slow start through the month of April two

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty six, three thirty three three sixty four triple slash

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>with an eighty nine waited runs creative plus just two

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>home runs, nine r b i s percent strikeout rate

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>with a thirty seven percent hard contact rate. From May

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>one on two eighty two, three thirty five, five seventeen

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>slug a one twenty waited runs created plus seventeen home runs,

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty four runs scored, seventy eight ribbies, a seven percent

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.199
<v Speaker 1>walk rate, so that actually came down a little bit,

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>but a seventeen percent k percentage. That dropped four percent

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>as well from the first month of the season and

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>then raises hard contact from thirty seven percent in April

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>to forty three point six percent the rest of the way.

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>So when looking at Corey Seeger, he is someone to me,

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Greg that can hit two eighty plus this year, hit

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty five to thirty home runs, and I think that

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>he can approach or even exceed one hundred and one

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred in the runs scored in one hundred RBIs. Look

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at the lineup that he's in. They have two m

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>VP candidates in Mookie Betts and Cody Bellinger. They still

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 1>have Justin Turner, they still have Max Moncy. All these

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>guys are gonna get on base. Corey Seeger projected to

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>bet fifth six, right in the middle of that lineup,

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe even move up a little bit there. I think

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that Corey Seger can get back to the player we

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>were expecting him to be the one not on him Greg,

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And it doesn't really matter because where you're getting him, Uh,

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to depend on stolen bases in that

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>range of the draft. Really, you want to draft stolen

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>basis early on if you can. Is he gives you

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing on the base pats, what can he be? A

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>four category contributor good batting average, home runs r BIS,

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>run scored. I think the answer is unequivocally yes, we

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>lot more on Corey Seeger in a moment. Another player

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>as well coming up who Frank thinks could be the

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>next Rafie Devers. We have other players we want to

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>get into as well, including a break up picture and

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>even a steady closer. You know it's not sexy, but

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about that too. It was really in the

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>closing tears at some point, Frank, because I haven't gotten

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>there yet and I'd like to know who the good

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>closes are this year, So we'll do that at some point.

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 1>But alright, going up the BFFs, roll on more Corey,

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Seeger and who else could be this? Use Roff Devers,

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll tell you next. Sports grid dot Com Betting Insights

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>and Entertainment at your fingertips seven as our team covers

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the most important topics in sports wagering, real time odds,

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>predictive betting models, expert picks, and more want the edge

0:23:56.400 --> 0:24:06.480
<v Speaker 1>than get on the grid sports grid dot Com. Frank

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and I currently arguing whose King Tomas? When this comes?

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that we would call it arguing, Greg,

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 1>And you know it's crazy. You get to bring up

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Jose Kintana, right, who's outside the top three b C

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>A DP When I bring up some obscure player that's

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>going super late in draft ah ah, I believe, I

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>believe I did that with just Justin Upton. It's exactly

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Andrew McCutcheon. But you're allowed to bring up Jose. You're

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>allowed to bring who you want. You can, but like

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you could react however you want to player, you said

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>when I wrote up, I would say Katana is not

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>dissimilar from Justin Upton and Andrew mccutche. In fact, both

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of those hitters are going to be better than Jose Katana.

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>That seems false. That's fine. Listen, you can Why do

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you like Jose Kantana? Gregg tell us, I just think

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:58.360
<v Speaker 1>he's currently undervalue his u His A was very high

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.959
<v Speaker 1>last year. Want was right hi last year because all

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of its high. He stinks it's been bad for like

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>three seasons. I tried to do the Josecontana thing like

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it was way lower. All right, what was it? It

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>was probably still four and a half. The picture that

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna talk basically the breakout picture I'm gonna give

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you later on may or may not have had a

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>four xfit last year. It's bad. Let you decide fair enough, alright,

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>what else you got mean? Of course you're here? Uh look,

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we hit on most of it. He did

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>raise his launch angle last year as well. It was

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the highest of his career with a fourteen degree launch angle,

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So he started to lift the ball a little bit more,

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>started hitting more flyballs. He did struggle against left handed pitching,

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>which I didn't like when I looked into the profile.

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 1>But every other year he actually had been better than

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>he was last year against lefty, So I would expect

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>him to regress a little bit back to where he

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>has been against left handed pitching recently. And I just

0:25:57.240 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>think everything about him from where he's being drafted to

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>team context just makes a ton of sense. He's going

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>pick one in the month of February in NFBC, A

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>d P which is right around Kyle Tucker has a

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>men's upside. Don't know if he has a job or not.

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>David dal another one who might actually fit this description

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.159
<v Speaker 1>of a raffie Devers but can't stay healthy either. He's

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 1>working right around Hector Nerris, who should be the closer

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for the Phillies. Gavin Lux. Gavin Lux has im mense

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>upside as well. That's the You know, Corey Seeker is

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the lineup every single day, So

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought that up, because I don't know

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>if that's true, right Corey seeger in his I guess

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>one of his breakout campaigns A hundred and fifty seven

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>games since then, sixty four last year, but he finally

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>had a healthy offseason. Greig, he didn't hold any surgeries.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Just totally totally get it. But we know the Dodgers

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and we know how they want to rest people to

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 1>move people around. Is Corey Seeker now in that kind

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>of rest rotation? Like I get, he's only twenty five

0:26:56.760 --> 0:26:59.119
<v Speaker 1>years old, twenty six and April. He shouldn't be He

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>should play single day. I just don't know that he will.

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I hope he does. But like Chris Tayler, Glas Short

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>stopped for this team now Gavin looks. That's what's nuts

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>to me. They're going back to back a DP wise

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 1>because Gavin looks isn't gonna guarantee the starting job. That's

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the annoying anything. But this is this is the motto

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>man Randy Savage right here, Greg, the cream always rises

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to the top. And a lot of people are excited

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>about Gavin Lak. I just can't justify it. I spoke

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>James Anderson of Rotal Wire on FFC and he said

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>he had a hot take that Gavin looks out produces

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Louis Robert this upcoming season. I don't think at least

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Robert is going like the fifth sixth round in NFBC Draft. Well,

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>when we wrote up Louise Robert going there, I asked you,

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>if he does that, he has to be Ronald Acuna.

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Is Louise Robert Ronald d Cunia? He said no, No,

0:27:43.640 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he is either. So I think there's

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 1>more holes in the swing than I'm not gonna own

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>any Louise Robert this year. Yeah, okays, based on where

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>he's going, move on course here because there's other places

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we want to get you on today's program. Um and

0:27:54.720 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that leads us next to another player even high and

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you talked about him a lot that you think could

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:01.119
<v Speaker 1>be this year is Robail Devis and he is. That

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>would be Miguelson O Greg to the surprise of no nobody.

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I love Miguelson. This is one of my guys that

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I just can't quit. Similar to Justin Upton. I saw

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Miguelson O come up through the minors and it felt

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:16.639
<v Speaker 1>like he was someone I was stashing everywhere that year

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>where he first kind of burst onto the scene and

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of took the league by storm and ended up

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>hitting eighteen home runs and eighty games back in and

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>ever since then, he's just been my guy and look

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>at what he did last year. It's hard to argue

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>with the production. It's just a matter of health, right, Like,

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>how healthy is Miguelson no gonna be? How many games

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna play this upcoming season? The guy had

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty four home runs and seventy nine ribbies. Who you

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>know for most players if you asked him, that's a

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>great full season in a hundred and five games. That's

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>just insane. And I really like the fact that Nelson

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Cruz joined the Minnesota Twins last year. I thought that

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>he could actually have an effect like this on Miguelson. Know,

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to have that veteran leadership at a presence in the

0:28:55.960 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>locker room, someone that frankly is similar to to mcgilson, know,

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a bigger body type, a master, someone who hits it

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of power as well, And ultimately I

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>thought that it ended up helping mcgils snow. And if

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you look at his stat cast page, Greg, if you

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>pull up his baseball savant, it's just a sea of red.

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>It's just red everywhere. The guy just matches when he

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>makes contact. One percent barrel rate that was percentile in

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>baseball last year four point four mile per hour average

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>exit velocity percentile. When he makes contact, he makes really

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>good contact. Greg. So everyone's looking at Pete Alonso in

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the third round range and they're looking at Matt Olsen

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth round range. Who's to say that if

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>mcgillson know plays a hundred, just give him a hundred

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and thirty games, Greg, a hundred and thirty games that

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>he can't hit two fifty with forty to forty five

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>home runs. I think it's definitely doable. It's just a

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>matter of him staying on the field. We'll see has

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the ability to stay on the field this year. He

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 1>has not shown that capability yet, has never played more

0:29:55.920 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>than a hundred and sixteen games. We'll see if they

0:29:57.480 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>can do it. He strikes out a lot too, now, Man,

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>he strikes out a lot. Like we talked about Aaron

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Judge striking out thirty two percent of the time, and

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot. Miguelson no career thirty six percent strikeout rate.

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>The batting average is not going to be good. He's

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a career to forty five hitter. I would expect between

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a two forty and two fifty batting average, but I

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that's that far off from guys like

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Petter Alonso, guys like Matt Olsen. And if you ask

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>me to name the players who have the potential to

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>hit fifty home runs this year, Greg, you could probably

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>count them on one hand, maybe two hands. Miguelson Know

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is one of those players. I think. I think that's

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>completely reasonably when Gilson Know has the abilities potentially because

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>this he's Robbie Deverage. Let me move on, Frank to

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the picture here. I want to move on to this

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>year's Lucas Gilito, where last year's a four top prospect

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>who people really kind of broke down right. They told

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you all the reasons why Lucas Gilto wouldn't be good

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and that he wasn't as great as National has made

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>him out to be. When the White Sox acquired him

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 1>as a crown jewel, um, you know, big trade with Washington.

0:30:56.640 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>They it was for not like the Nationals news something

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>when training Giulia Gilidu away and he debuted, it wasn't good.

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And last year well it was all great. He blossomed

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>before our eyes. Can this year be as good as

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>last year for Lucas well? First of all, he has

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to get healthy because he's someone who's also dealing with

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>an injury. Last week it came out I had some

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>uh sore rib cage. I think he had a muscle

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>strain in his chest as well. So Lucas Gilio first

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and foremost has to get healthy. But I absolutely think

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:28.239
<v Speaker 1>that he can repeat what he did last year Greg,

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and potentially even build off of it and get better.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>He changed his mechanics up. He has a new pitch

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>mix that he uses. His fastball change up combination is

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>deadly fifteen percent swinging shrike rate last year. That was

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a career high. That was sixth among starting pitchers last year.

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And I really like what we saw in the second half, Greg,

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 1>where he started to give you length go deep into games.

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>In twelve second half starts, Greg, he went at least

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>six endings pitched and eleven of those. So I really

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>like that aspect of Gildo and grand Dolla joining this

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 1>team is going to help their entire Petre staff. He's

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the best pitch framers in all of baseball,

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 1>so you're gonna help Lucas Gilto someone who has struggled

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>with command at times in his career. Steal strikes because

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of pitch framing. Sign me up, man. I love where

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Gilto is going this year. I like getting him as

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>an as an SP two ideally if you can in

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that third fourth round range, or potentially SP one if

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you wait a little bit. But I do like Gilto.

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I just want to see him get healthy here for

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>spring training. Greg, I like Gilo as well. I think

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the breakout was real last year. It was double digit strikeouts,

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>freaking awesome all season long, and obviously going deep into

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the game a second half of the year makes you

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like he's in a good spot. This year. I

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>think Lucashilo can certainly build on what he did last season.

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm in on Gilto here in twenties. But question

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't about Lucas Gilto. It's about who can be this

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>year's Lucas Gilto. So let's not to play a game

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we like to call who will be this year's Lucas Gilda.

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Who can it be? Now? Who will be this year's

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Gilo? Frank, we turn it over to you. Who's

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 1>your guy? All right? So stick with me here, Greg,

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>You're you're ready to give us Jose Kintana and I'm

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>going to give you a Tyler Beaty of the San

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Giants within Greg, this guess is the NFBC a

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>DP please in the month of February. We're gonna go

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>with four. But think about where Lucas Gilto was being

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>drafted last year. He I don't actually if you want to,

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want to google, you could. If you google

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen fantasy basically you'll probably find somewhere. But I

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>know in fifteen team leagues, Greg, where I was playing

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>last year, he was undrafted in those twenty nineteen still

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>just gives you alright, So maybe it's not as easy

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>as I thought. But I played in fifteen team leagues

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>last year, mixed leagues where Lucas Gilto was not drafted anywhere,

0:33:49.160 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and he was a waiver wire pickup and ended up

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>emerging and he was great, and most people had basically

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>written Lucas Gilto off. Tyler Beatty kind of fits that

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>mold as somebody who is a former top prospect of

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the San just Go Giants. People have basically written him off.

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And I want to give a shout out to Michael

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Ayato of Picture List because he did a fantastic breakdown

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of Tyler Beatty, and he wrote about it at picture

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>list dot com. Going Deep Tyler Beatty has flashed some

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>promise is the name of the article if you want

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to check it out. Mikey Ayato p L on Twitter

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>is the author of this article as well. Great Tyler

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Beatty was one of five pitchers last year who had

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:30.280
<v Speaker 1>three different pitches with a fifteen plus percent swinging strike

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 1>create on three different pitches. The pictures that he joined

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Ritt Cole, Noahs, synder Guard, Zach Gallen, and who you

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.759
<v Speaker 1>guessed it, Joe must Grove. Of course he joined that group.

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>That's some pretty good company to be a part of

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:46.279
<v Speaker 1>their UH and last year he made a pitch mix,

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a change to his pitch mix. He started using a

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 1>slider and from July second on, with that slider incorporated,

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 1>he has a fastball, a curve and a change up

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:56.800
<v Speaker 1>he uses as well for FO two year a not

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 1>great four to six x fit over eight case nine

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.720
<v Speaker 1>right around two walks for nine. So vastly improved command

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>from Tyler Beaty UH and he improved his first pitch

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>strike percentage up to sixty five percent. He has a

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>spot in the rotation. Gabe Kapler's raving about him right now. Greg,

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we could talk about him more when we come back,

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:17.800
<v Speaker 1>But I think that Tyler Beaty is someone who fits

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the mold of a Lucas Gilito as a former top

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>prospect who people are forgetting about to the t. All right,

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll have more on Tyler Bride. I'll get an other

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>name you don't want to forget about on Draft Day.

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Stick around more of the way with BFFs next sports

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 1>grid dot Com betting insights and entertainment at their fingertips

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:39.960
<v Speaker 1>as our team covers the most important topics in sports wagering,

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>real time odds, predictive betting models, expert picks, and more.

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Want the edge than get on the grid sports grid

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, It's back here on the BFFs. We try

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to discuss who the next Luguslo is. Frankie, you're you know,

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Beatty Santrancis, good giants and your boy Gave Kathler,

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Gabe Kathler, not my guy. Definitely your boy, not my guy.

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Because here we go again with the closer carousel, with

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the go here we go, Here we go again. You're done?

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Is that the latest Jonas Brothers song? Like ten years ago.

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, well close enough. No, I like Tyler Beaty

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 1>are also awesome. I think he fits the mold of

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:32.840
<v Speaker 1>a former top prospect who people are forgetting about he

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and rightfully saw. I mean, he hasn't been good at

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the major league level. He hasn't been good in the minors.

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.439
<v Speaker 1>He struggled with command for most of his career until

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 1>last year. Again, from July two on, we saw him

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>up over eight case per nine, right around two walks

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>per nine. The first pitch strike percentage was improved. The

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:52.560
<v Speaker 1>swinging strike rate, as I mentioned earlier, on three different pitches,

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was very good. Started incorporating a slider, changed up his

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 1>mechanics last year as well. That all sounds a lot

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>like Lucas Gilto Gilio changed the mechanics last year, started

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 1>using fastball, change up combination more. He did see increased

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>velocity on the fastball. Did you lead a last season?

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 1>So that's something I'll pay attention to throughout the spring

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:13.360
<v Speaker 1>with Tyler beats he uh, you know if he is

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 1>improving in terms of velocity, greg But I think that

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:19.240
<v Speaker 1>he fits this mold, and especially pitching in San Francisco

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:21.239
<v Speaker 1>in the Oracle Park it's a good pitchers park to

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>pitch in. Uh, if you're playing an and only league

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:26.840
<v Speaker 1>or in one of these deeper fifteen team mixed rural leagues,

0:37:27.320 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you take a shot at the end of

0:37:29.239 --> 0:37:31.399
<v Speaker 1>your bench one of your last round picks on Tyler Beatty.

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 1>For me, I'm not gonna go far in looking at

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the replacement for Lugas g lead On the replacement, but

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the next Lucas de lead up I looked kind of deep.

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I've had some older guys, I kind of like Garrett Richards,

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>with San Diego being one of them. Dylan Bundy in

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta kind of or at right, and I'm kind of

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>like that. I like Dylan sees a lot too for

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Chicago White Sox and very similar right, the Lucas de

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>lead On, top prospect for this team gets called up

0:37:57.000 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Struggles, his first taste of the majors and

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the biggest bug of who when Dylan cease last year

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and really his entire minorly career. From being honest with you,

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>it was the walks. He constantly walks batters. He's walks

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>for nine last year was ungodly four point three two.

0:38:14.440 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But if he can get the walks down. Always saw

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the control issues with Giulio two years ago. If he

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>could get the walks down, I think Julie dylan't cease.

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I think he can find some success with the White Sox.

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:28.399
<v Speaker 1>I know, Frank, you were already counting him out. Think

0:38:28.400 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>he might go kopec I will come back and just

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 1>take his rotation spot. We're likely going to take Geo

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Gonzalez his rotations, but he signed Zalis. I can't promise

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you that, but he stinks. But Dylan sees in his

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>last three starts allowed a grand total of reruns last

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 1>year reruns in his last three starts. Now one of

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:50.439
<v Speaker 1>those stars. He only went three and third innings because

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>he walked five guys. That's an issue. Yes, it is.

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 1>The deer as he went into a game was seven

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 1>innings last year. That's a bit frustrating. But the strikeouts

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:02.359
<v Speaker 1>can either his cape or nine last season was nine

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>point nine nine basically at ten game or nine. If

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the walks should come down a little bit, Frank, and

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>again we haven't really seen that as minor lead profile

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that the waltks are you going to come down? But

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>if they do, I think you're looking at somebody that

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 1>could be a really nice fine that doesn't cost you anything,

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that has a top prospect pedigree. I agree with you.

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I like this call a lot when it comes to

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Dylan Seas and basically free in draft right now. His

0:39:26.160 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>a DP and NFBC in the month of February is

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>two eighty nine, so it seems like people are writing

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 1>him off a little bit too early. He fits that mold,

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Greg of like a Mitch Keller as well, someone who

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:39.800
<v Speaker 1>people are writing off way too early as a former

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>top prospects who struggled with his first taste in the major.

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with someone like Griffin Canning as well, although

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:47.959
<v Speaker 1>there are some injury concerns when it comes to Canning.

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I think Dylan Seas this call makes a lot of sense, Greg.

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:52.800
<v Speaker 1>He has four different pitches that he uses. It throws

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:55.439
<v Speaker 1>like nineties seven miles per hour. Oh and by the way,

0:39:55.840 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Yasmani Grandal, someone who struggles with command and you know,

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>walking too many batters, you know, being able to steal

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.320
<v Speaker 1>strikes with a pitch framer like yas Monty Grandal is

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:07.759
<v Speaker 1>going to help all the White Sox uh And specifically

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really going to help someone like Dylan

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>sees a veteran catcher who's in there to help one

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of these young starting pitchers. I like this call. I

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:18.800
<v Speaker 1>think you know at the end of your drafts, Dylan

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>sees Tyler Beaty. I think these are two names that

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>do have a decent amount of upside. Just be somewhere

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:26.800
<v Speaker 1>they're going, Greg, They're free, They're absolutely free. And the

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:28.839
<v Speaker 1>problem is for me, Frank, there's a lot of these

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>guys that I like. You just need a whole bunch

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 1>of them. We went through the break. We need to

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:33.919
<v Speaker 1>slow up your whole bench on like all these guys

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>do that. Yes, and I think it's something that people

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>should be doing. Is a g S team move for us? Yes?

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure Michael Florio is not going to dispute that.

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Problems loves taking quality over quantity. Here's a problem. You're

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna want all these like old veteran hitters. Well, look,

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to you have to counteract the median age

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:57.359
<v Speaker 1>on your team. Greg. So if you're gonna have all

0:40:57.360 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>these young starting pitchers, you gotta have a few just

0:40:59.800 --> 0:41:02.000
<v Speaker 1>enough and Andrew Cutchins on your team as well. Greg,

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, we only have about five minutes ago in

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the show. So we wanted to go and figure out

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>who is going to be this year Shane Green. I

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>don't need Shane Green rejections for this year because he's

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>not the closer in Atlantic stinks and he stinks, but

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>he instinct for Team BFF. Over the last two years,

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:20.879
<v Speaker 1>he was my guy. Frank, I always try to find

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.080
<v Speaker 1>one of these, like crappy closers. You're the closer, whispered.

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt about with the crafty guys. With the

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>crappy guys, I don't care who they are as long

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>as they get a saved. Shane Green has been our guy,

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>but no longer. He's not the closes anymore. So we

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 1>need to figure out who this year's version is going

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 1>to be. So let's do that in a game. We

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>like to call who is this year's Shane Green? Who

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 1>is this year's Shane Green? That's a question, Frank, I

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:52.440
<v Speaker 1>don't have my answer. What's your answer. I'm gonna go

0:41:52.520 --> 0:41:55.399
<v Speaker 1>with Kona Kella of the Pittsburgh Pirates. And when we're

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>asking who is this year Shane Green, it's a later

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>round closer who has the potential to be traded by

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:03.400
<v Speaker 1>mid season. Maybe they give you a fifteen to twenty

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:06.800
<v Speaker 1>saves before they get traded around the MLB trade deadline.

0:42:06.840 --> 0:42:09.359
<v Speaker 1>My pick is going to be Keyona Kella, who has

0:42:09.400 --> 0:42:12.760
<v Speaker 1>flashed some strikeout upside in his career, averaging over eleven

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>case per nine. Also has a career three two three

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 1>e r a a one eleven whip. It looks like

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be the closer for the Pittsburgh Pirates

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to start the season. How about this Greg Last year,

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>everybody is mashing the ball, hitting the ball extremely hard,

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 1>raising the average exit velocity. Kiona Kella just a twenty

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:33.879
<v Speaker 1>seven percent hard contact rate, so did a great job

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of limiting hard contact, even for a pitcher

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 1>who throws nine seven miles per hour. I like Kiona

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Keller this year as someone who maybe gives you fifteen

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to twenty saves before he gets traded, and if he

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get traded, you might even give you a thirty

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 1>saves this year. Why not. Kiona Kela has has closing

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 1>experience with people. Lolling in to that in a second.

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 1>With Pittsburgh, we'll see what Kella can be for me.

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>My guy, Frandon Kinsler with the Miami Moleans this is

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:00.919
<v Speaker 1>a team that doesn't like to spend that that much money.

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Sherman whatever went out, said that we're all the

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>right things yesterday, and a lot of people really like

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:07.839
<v Speaker 1>what Sherman had to say. But one of the things

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that Don Mattingly has made clear is when they signed

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:14.279
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Kinseler, he's our closer. He's our guy, and just

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>having knowing that even if you're on a bad team,

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>bad teams win games too, right, Even the worst teams

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in baseball win sixty games, give or take, and most

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>of those games are pretty close. If you have a

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 1>guy that could be the closer all year long, there

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>we'll see if kids gets traded again. But if you

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:32.719
<v Speaker 1>have a guy that can be the closer, has the experience,

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.480
<v Speaker 1>actually performed well in the in uh the previous opportunities

0:43:36.520 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>he's gotten that role, that could be a real fine

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>for you. My guy is Brandon Kinseler the Miami Marlins. Yeah,

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and I don't have a problem with Brandon Kinsler. I

0:43:43.800 --> 0:43:46.759
<v Speaker 1>think the Miami Marlins might surprise people a little bit

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>this upcoming season. I'm not saying that they're going to

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>compete in the National League East. It is a stacked division,

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:54.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think that they do have some talent on

0:43:54.320 --> 0:43:56.880
<v Speaker 1>this team, and he has closing experience. He has forty

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 1>nine career saves, a two six eight e r A

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>last year with a one oh four whip and Craig Miss,

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>co host of Fantasy Sports Today, spoke with Brandon Kinseler

0:44:06.040 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and kids are kind of joked what I'm saying. Yeah,

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say forty games this yere. He knows that

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:12.359
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be that. It's not a joke. I hope

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:15.240
<v Speaker 1>that you're correct, Greg, and I have no problem taking

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Kinseler as my third closer in a Rhodo draft.

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you like to break it down, Greg,

0:44:20.640 --> 0:44:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but in a Rhodo draft, you take nine pictures. Um,

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 1>there's no designated titles. You don't have to take like

0:44:25.800 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a set amount of starting pictures, set amount of relievers.

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But I like to go with six starting pictures in

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>my lineup and usually three closers, two closes that I

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty good about, and then maybe someone who you

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know if they have the role for sure, but

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you just kind of plug in there and hope. I

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>think Brandon Kincler fits that mold as the third closer

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:44.359
<v Speaker 1>that you just kind of throw in there. You hope

0:44:44.360 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that he gets you. However, twenty saves in your case

0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>forty saves, Greg And I agree with you. I think

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be the guy for the Marlins. Yeah, I

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 1>think Brandon Kinseler. I don't say trust him. You don't

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.719
<v Speaker 1>trust that third closer or the like Marlin's closer ever

0:44:56.800 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so strongly. But I think Hella fits the bill too.

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>You just want to find a guy on a bad

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 1>team that's gonna hold on to his job. And it's

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.239
<v Speaker 1>a great point that you bring up about closers on

0:45:04.320 --> 0:45:08.240
<v Speaker 1>bad teams. Look at Curby Yates last year, forty one saves.

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:11.239
<v Speaker 1>He led baseball and saves last year. So the Padres,

0:45:11.400 --> 0:45:13.400
<v Speaker 1>who won like seventy seven games to think about it

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 1>before that, right, so Curby Rates, we all vote into

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Curby Yates. Before that San Diego, it was Brad Hand.

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 1>He was the best closure in baseball for a little while.

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Now that's Curby's playing for a terrible Padre's teams. Felippe,

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a vascas terrible person, got a bunch of saves with

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Pirates. They stunk last year too, reliable was

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>really big baskets. Kella could be that reliable this year.

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Um yeah, So I think both of these guys fit

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the mold of what we're looking for. Who's who has

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 1>replaced Shane Green in Detroit's still Joe him and he

0:45:41.880 --> 0:45:46.359
<v Speaker 1>was viewed to be the closer of the future. That's

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a blast in the past. Love the beard, the beard

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:50.240
<v Speaker 1>on jewels in mind, that was a good one. Everyone's

0:45:50.280 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>very good. Joe Menez is probably part of this mix

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>as well. I would say he's probably less likely to

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>be traded away though he's probably going to remain with

0:45:59.040 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Tigers. He's young, he's controllable, so does that

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Nealy should bank on him rather than our guys. The

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 1>problem is he's probably he's just not gonna be as

0:46:09.120 --> 0:46:10.799
<v Speaker 1>good like his the r A and with is going

0:46:10.840 --> 0:46:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to be worse than than players like Keona Keller and

0:46:13.680 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 1>likely Brandon Kinseler as well. But he was someone who

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>was thought to have upside to be the closure of

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:20.319
<v Speaker 1>the future out there in Detroit, and as of now

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it looks like he has that role getting back to

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Kinseler, who is really going to push him for

0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:28.760
<v Speaker 1>that Closer's job. You know, they brought up Jose Urania,

0:46:28.800 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>who has been in and out of the rotation in

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 1>his career, hasn't really lived up to his expectations. To

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 1>have Ryan Stannic, who they traded for with the Tampa

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Bay Raised last year, who was used as an opener

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:43.320
<v Speaker 1>at times. He's shown us a little bit. But Brandon

0:46:43.360 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Kinseler has that experience. I believe they brought in Brad

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Boxberger recently out on, but he hasn't been good. So

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:52.479
<v Speaker 1>I think Brandon Kinsler's job and his role is pretty safe.

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel good about it. I think about Kinceler, I

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 1>feel god about Koona Keller because the manager is both

0:46:56.360 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Don natingly Uh and his manager Derek Shelton, first year manager.

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Usually the manager guy too well. Derek Shelton and I

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Manning will come out and said, these are our closers.

0:47:07.200 --> 0:47:10.640
<v Speaker 1>When you're getting that in February, you feel really really good. Now,

0:47:10.640 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 1>if only we can get that with the St. Louis Cardinals, Greg,

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:15.120
<v Speaker 1>because your guess is as good as mine, I think

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:16.839
<v Speaker 1>if you could give me Diegos, if you can give

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:18.440
<v Speaker 1>me like the rotation in St. Louis, that would also

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 1>be helpful. Speaking of the Cardinals, Yeah, they're bad. Not

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the team is not good. I looked at that roster.

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:29.879
<v Speaker 1>The lineup is outside of Goldschmidth not great. Pitching, very bad.

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah any Wayne Rights like your third starting pitchers have

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 1>no good players. I'll tell you about more players that

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:38.040
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be bad on tomorrow. Show up. NeXT's Coast

0:47:38.160 --> 0:47:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Coast Scott Farrell thanks to Seawan Alex Dowstairs. He's Frank,

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh Greg. We'll do it all again tomorrow. We sports

0:47:47.760 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 1>grid dot com betting insights and entertainment at your fingertips

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:55.360
<v Speaker 1>as our team covers the most important topics in sports wagering,

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 1>real time odds, predictive betting models, expert picks, and more.

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Want the edge than get on the grid. Sports grid

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:01.839
<v Speaker 1>dot Com