WEBVTT - Surveillance: US Oil Reserves

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Abramowitz. Daily we bring you

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>To find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and of course, on the Bloomberg terminal. He is Director

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of White House National Economic Council, which means he is

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>mum during the political season, and we are knee deep

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 1>in the political season now to the mid terms. Brian

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Deast joins us from the White House this morning. Brian,

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, the singular note which does wrap around your

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>remit is a gentle lady from Hawaii has exited the

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Party, and Ms Gabbard was really something about the

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>cowardly wokeness of the elitist Democratic Party. Your boss is

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the most middle class representative boss of his generation. Joe

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Biden breathe scramton, what's gonna be the reset on Democratic

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Party economic policy for the middle class coming out of

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>this election? Well, look, I think you're seeing in real time,

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>as you said, Joe Biden ran for presidents based on

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>an economic theory that we needed to build this economy,

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in this economic recovery, as he says, in very practical terms,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>from the bottom up and the middle out, not from

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the top down. And you're seeing that in practice. If

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you look just for example of what's happening in American

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing across this country, nearly seven hundred thousand manufacturing jobs created,

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're seeing company after company make investments that they're

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>making a bet, a long term bet to make capital

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.279
<v Speaker 1>investments in America. Today, just today, we're gonna announce almost

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars in grants to battery battery manufacturers. I

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>was in Cleveland last week. You're seeing this explosion of

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>interest in making the United States the place where we

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>build and and and and innovate, and that's that's going

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to pay benefits for the long term. You were just

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in Cleveland to see Cleveland Yankees. Admit it, Brian, I

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>want to go. I want to go to the topic

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of the moment was just a strategic political reserve. We

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>all get the politics of it, and that you took

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>hydro carbon one on one at Middlebury years ago. Can

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you explain to me what the democratic politics is of

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>refilling the strategic petroleum reserve down the road. You got it.

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.079
<v Speaker 1>I do have to clarify that I'm a Red Sox fan.

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>It's important. It's important to me to get that very important.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Um So, Look, the President's gonna announce two things today.

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:45.119
<v Speaker 1>The first is additional fifteen million barrels four December out

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of the spr That makes good on the commitment that

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>he made several months ago to release a hundred and

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty million barrels and provide that stability to the market.

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 1>He's making good on that commitment with a fifteen million

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>paril release today. But second, he's announcing on a plan

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and a policy to refill the Strategic Patrolling Reserve when

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the price of oil falls to about seventy dollars of barrel.

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense for two reasons. One, protecting taxpayers, we

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>sold oil out of the sprow at a higher price

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and around of barrel. Repurchasing at seventy dollars of barrel

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>means we can actually strengthen the asset. We can get

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>more oil back into that national reserve. And second, it

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>provides some certainty to the industry because we we we

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>will have the authority to both purchase when the price

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>comes down to seventy and also enter into contracts to

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>purchase at around seventy dollars in the future. But one

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>thing that's very difficult is that we're not talking about

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the present and what releasing more from the Strategic Petroleum

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Reserve will actually do to bring down prices not only

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of gasoline, but diesel, of the refined goods that we need.

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>How much are you thinking about additional measures to try

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to shore up both the stores of diesel as well

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>as lower prices. Are you talking about banning exports, for example,

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to Europe. Well, first, let's look at where we are.

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>We have since the beginning of the summer scene, gas

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.320
<v Speaker 1>prices come down about they're about down about a dollar

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen cents a gallon at the pump. We see

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>natural gas prices come off from a high of almost

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>nine dollars two under six dollars in trading today. So

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a real reduction and energy prices, and that's

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>consistent with and and and and driven by the policies

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that this administration and that the President have directed. At

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the same time, we continue to be very focused on

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>making more progress seeing that price come down further, and

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the announcements today I think are going to help on

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that front, also addressing places where we have but but okay,

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that has come down, it hasn't come back that much.

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 1>But diesel has not come down, and that affects the

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>price of everything. And perhaps people don't see it and

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>breathe that the way they view gasoline prices. But this

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is affecting very much the heating costs as well as

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a shipping costs and has raised questions about banning exports

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>at a time when Europe is flat on its back

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. What's your view, absolute, We're very concerned about

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>inventory levels for refined product diesel in particular, particularly across

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the East coast of the United States, and we are

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>operating right now at unacceptably low inventory levels. Inventory levels

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for diesel that, for example, our fifty lower than their

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>five year historical average. So this is a conversation that

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>we have had with the industry consistently, and we've been

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>very clear we need to see more progress in building

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>those inventories. The federal government has some tools in that respect.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>We have a Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve, which is

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>diesel UH and we have looked very carefully at being

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.960
<v Speaker 1>prepared to deploy as and when necessary in that context.

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But ultimately, what we need to see is the industry

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>build those inventory levels so that we don't put ourselves

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>in a situation. To your question about exports, the President

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>has been very clear and what can need to be

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 1>clear at this moment when we have uncertainty and uncertainty

0:05:52.920 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>for American consumers, we have to keep all options on

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the table. That's what we're doing real quickly. What's going

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>to be the trigger point to understand whether it is

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>time to look at exports. Well, look, I'm not going

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to explicitly make a decision before the president's or articulated

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>decision before the President has made it. But the President

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue to do what he has done

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>over the course of the last several months, which is

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>assessed the market, understand where we are, and understand the

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>tools that we have in the impact that they'll have. Today,

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>he's announcing a release from the spro but also importantly

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 1>this repurchased plan, which is something that industry analysts and

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>others have been calling for for some time. We think

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that this will make some difference. We're gonna keep at it,

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>keep a close eye on these things with an understanding

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that we have these tools on the table, and we'll

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>deploy them when it's in America's interests. Brand's Director of

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the White House National Economic Council, Thank you. This is

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a joy because when you go to Boulder, Colorado, you

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>know that the Zoomies are down to Colorado Springs and

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 1>they're the real deal. Out of the United States Air

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Force Academy, an actual pilot running an airline, the chief

0:06:56.920 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>executive officer with United, the pilot Scott Kirby, joins us

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Scott, I got eighteen questions from viewers that

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>have everything to do with the United Lounge, This, that,

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and the other thing. I want to talk about the

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>ratio of business class to economy fairs. I follow one

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 1>United fair and it's six dollars for every dollar of economy.

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen it. Where is business class in three years?

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>So uh, thanks for thanks for the intro. By the way,

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a unique one and I like it. But business travel,

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>business class is demand is really really strong. It's really

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>really strong an economy, but it's even stronger at the

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>premium cabinet. United has more premium seats than than any

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>other airline in the country, and one long haul business

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>demand has has mostly come all the way back to

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Europe at least, I mean it's even stronger than it

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 1>is Bestically, it's harder to calls with someone in Europe.

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>But the other trend I think that's huge is there's

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>more premium leisure demand, and really that is enabled by

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>hybrid work. Hybrid work makes everything in the potential holiday weekend,

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and there's there's people that go to Europe and they'll

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>work for one or two weeks in Europe, and they

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>work during the day, they go out late at night

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>with the French ship the Spaniards. By the way, that's

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the only way I could possibly go hang out with

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Spaniards by state on East Coast time. And this I

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's a permanent step level increase in demand both

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>weekend travel but also for premium demands. To the volatility,

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the signal nature of your total return of stock is

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a new persistency of cash flow from business class enough

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to give you a more persistent cash flow on your

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>financial statement. Well, look, I think we'll still have alatility,

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.199
<v Speaker 1>will still be iffected by the economy or short term

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>in the fuel prices, so it won't eliminate um cyclicality,

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>but What it does is more important, which I think

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it raises the level, so the lowest period of revenu

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 1>you will be higher than it was before, and the

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>highest period will be even higher. Um. It doesn't take

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>out the cyclicality, but it it does raise the bar

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>across the board. It's just a new, permanently higher level

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.839
<v Speaker 1>of demand. But to that point, Scott, we've spent the

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>better part of the last three hours talking about whether

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.200
<v Speaker 1>or not we're seeing a softening in demand, which is

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>what policymakers are trying to engineer to bring inflation down.

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Inflation which in some sectors of the economy means people

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>are just spending less in certain areas. It does not

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>seem that it has hit air travel yet. Do you

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>expect that the demand deterioration is going to come and

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>will that ultimately mean you don't have the pricing power

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep fairs high? Well, I think the slowing economy

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and or a recession are going to be a headwind.

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Already are a headwind demand. But there's three trends in aviation.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I think more they're currently more than fully off setting.

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll continue one. We're still in the COVID

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>recovery phase Japan just opened last week. No matter what

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you think, business travel isn't ultimately get to it is

0:09:57.480 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>going to go almost certainly going higher from here. So

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>we're still in COVID recovery unlike most industries. The second

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>one is this hybrid work making every weekend to holiday trend.

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Like we third September was the third highest RAS a

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>month in the history of United Airline. That is an

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>off peak month. What happened during September, and we saw

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it even earlier. We were seeing in October. By the way,

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna better than September, so it's gonna bove to

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Fourth place is people are now able to work remotely

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for one or two days, so they can instead of

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>being tethered to their desk at the office, they can

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>leave Wednesday or Thursday, go somewhere remotely for one or

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>two days. We're taking extra trips. That's a trend that's

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:35.439
<v Speaker 1>not appreciated by the market yet it's unique to aviation.

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>It's offsetting those economic headwinds. It's a tailwind that's that's offsetting.

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And Scott, we call that doing a John Pharaoh. And

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.719
<v Speaker 1>why don't you continue Kayley with Mr Kara, Well, that's

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>on on the demand side, Scott, but there also is

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you are still constrained on the supply side.

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Capacity is still more limited and the part of that

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>has to do with the labor equation. Can you just

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>give us your best estimate as to whether or not

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you're ultimately going to be able to expand capacity or again,

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>or is this a structural labor issue in the air

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>economy which is going to stick around? So, first of

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you're an airline investor. Would have been the third and

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe perhaps the most important trend that um, well, there's

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>a really strong demand environment. Supply is going to be

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>constrained for years to come by artificial factors. Now it's

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>less of a constraint for United because we're at the

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>high end. We're you know, we're at the top of

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the funnel, top of the pyramid for people wanting to

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>be by it. But there's not enough pilots in the industry.

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>That's not the only constraint. Bowing and Airbus are way

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>behind and the supply changer way behind on their ability

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>from airpoint air traffic control saturation. There's airports in Europe

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and other places that are full. These are like four

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>or five year probably if you start fixing today multi

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>year problems to Scott when you're in New York next

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.599
<v Speaker 1>time landing at Newark and hopefully landing at JFK with

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 1>that battle, I want to talk about the landing gates

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and all that. But Mary Schlangenstein, who's our airport reporter,

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>as if you don't ask Scott about Boeing seven thirties

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>seven eight over to UH seven and they're gonna add

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>twelve more seats and they're gonna take this wing and

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>added on Scott, this is not confidence building with the

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>redo of the seventh the Boeing Max, I mean, it's

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>not confident building. Do you have confidence that you guys

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in the f a A can get together to get

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that plane up in the air. Yeah, well, I think

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the Max tent and Hi, Mary, um

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>good to hear from you virtually. But here's what I

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>think about the Max ten. First for United if somehow

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the Eric Mack ten seven don't get certified at the

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>current standards, but our plan is we're gonna convert some

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of those Max tens into Max eights and nine and

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>our large airplane we're gonna order more and that's gonna

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>be our larger plane, and Bowel compensates for that. So

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>for United you know, it's not really a big deal

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>um financially, but it's the right safety outcome. This is

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the most point you know, having it's just a different

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>length of airplane. It's the same airplane in a different link,

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and you never want to make two different cockpits or

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>procedures for the exact same airplane. That detracts from safety.

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think because it's the right safety outcome, we

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>will get to the right answer where the Max seven

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.079
<v Speaker 1>and ten will get certified like the Max eight and

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the Maximum. I think the more important point is a

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>bigger one for the country. For the United States of

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 1>American bowing is our largest exporter, high tech exports, manufacturing jobs,

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>high paying jobs. And the question is about our airlines

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>around the world gonna buy Max tens or are they

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna buy Airbus A three? And the real question is

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>is the right safety answer? Are these planes gonna get

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>produced in Seattle? Are they gonna get built in Europe

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and a China? I want both Boeing and Airbus to

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>do well for healthy competition, but at the right end,

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Scott we're out of time. We need to see you

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.040
<v Speaker 1>when you're in New York. In New York next time.

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Scott Kirby with United Airlines, after a very strong earnings

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>report to say, at least we want to reset and

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of what this election is gonna look like.

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>We have three weeks. Mohammed Unas has been tracking this

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>all from Gallup. He is the editor in chief there. Mohammed,

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>what are you looking for in terms of turnout, in

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of excitement around an election where we really have

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>seen the odds shift pretty dramatically whipsaw over the past

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>few weeks. The number one issue voters have in mind

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>when they vote, and we know this from generations, is

0:14:36.560 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the economy. UM. We also see that in our data

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of Americans now mentioned the economy or some sort of

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>reference to inflation as the number one problem, most important

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>problem facing the country. UM. So that is going to

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>be front and center more than anything. In terms of turnout.

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>We've certainly seen higher than average turnout last week checked.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>We're actually in the field checking that now, but it

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>was in as high as we saw with the fervor

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>we saw two years ago. UM. The social issues that

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>should lead to be critical in some of these contests,

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>but overwhelmingly, the economy is going to be central on

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>people's minds as they go to vote. I've got Mohammed

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty nine million, which is a ginormous

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>number for the two thousand twenty election. I don't have

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the mid term statistic of two thousand eighteen. What do

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>you people see on the turnout of America for this election?

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It's still too early to tell. We don't and there's

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't know, and I don't think anybody really knows.

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>For a series of reasons, we certainly ask Americans are

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you planning to vote? Are you more excited to vote

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this time than in previous elections? That metric is tracking

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 1>higher than average, but certainly not as high as we

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>saw two years ago. It's about ten points lower than that.

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>We're actually asking that again this month. But as we

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>get closer to the elect action um there are a

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of factors that play into making this one really

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>hard to guests turn out. First of all, people's voting

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>habits have changed. Second of all, people's attitudes about voter

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>laws have changed. People want to really open the doors

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>to make it easier for people to vote. Most American

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>support voter i D for example, to have people vote,

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>but they also support a series of other measures that

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>make it easier for people to vote. So in addition,

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in addition to excitement to vote, there are also structural

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>changes to the way we vote in America that are

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to roll out for these next several elections. Well, Mohammed,

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about excitement to vote, there were a

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>number of social issues that the thought was would be

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a galvanizing force in these elections, one of them being

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>abortion rights. Is that taking shape doesn't have as much

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>firepower as initially thought several months ago when Rovie Wade

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>was overturned. We certainly have seen an uptick in people

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>saying that it's important for them as a voter to

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>vote for someone who shares their view on abortion. Now

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it's about fifty of Americans hold that view, and that

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is a relative high compared to before. However, it's only

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>really about a ten or eleven point jump from before

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the Roe v. Wade overturned decision was leaked out, So

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't exploded, but it certainly has risen in terms

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>of being an important issue. One of the things we

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>were talking about in the break, is everybody voting is

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking about inflation because we're all impacted by it. Not

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>everybody voting is voting somewhere where abortion is really on

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>the ballot. Mom, and I want to go to the

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>heritage of Gala back to the thirties, you guys basically

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>invented the industry and you have a monitor and a

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 1>body of knowledge about say that evening when LBJ stepped aside,

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 1>what did presidents do the evening or the day after

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:58.359
<v Speaker 1>a mid term election? Well, most incumbents usually don't do

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>great in a midterm allow action. It's always an uphill

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>battle no matter who the president is. So President Biden

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>is not facing an easy route. However, these social issues

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and some of these other factors may play a role

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>in really helping the Democrats, um, you know, not Ferris poorly.

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>The other thing we're not talking about, which is more

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>important than any of this, is the is the jurisdictions

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and how districts are managed throughout the United States and

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and what seats are really at stake between Republicans and Democrats.

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>And Democrats are really facing a huge challenge just in

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>terms of the seats that are up for grabs, Momma,

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for Mohammed and a definitive as

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 1>editor in chief, and go up joining us now. Dennis

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Gartman surviving two thousand twenty two. Dennis, your opinion on

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the street, tell us where you are right now, and

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>how ugly two thousand and two has been. Two thousand

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>two has been demonstrably ugly. It's been very ugly. It's

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>been unbelievably ugly. It's going to get uglier, I'm afraid. Nonetheless,

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we've had a good bounce. Bounces are required in bear markets.

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been a bear market since actually since

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>January fIF of this year, and I continue to think

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it's going to remain a bear market. The Fed has

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 1>been has told us it's going to reduce the size

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of its balance sheet. I think that's the most important

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>prospect or aspect of the markets to to understand. They

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>expanded their balance sheet from nine billion dollars to nine

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars over the course of the last decade and

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a half, and now they said they're going to reduce

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the size of the balance sheet by billion dollars a month,

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>probably taking it back to four or five trillion dollars.

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Over the course of the next several years, we've gone

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>from having an expansionary, wonderful, bullish phenomenon to a I

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 1>think a contractionary, bearish phenomenon. And I think you have

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 1>to remain bearish. Let's bring that over to corporations and

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>do go grammed doubt and coddle you. And I remember

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the vogue. It was like spacks Paul, every single specialty

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>chemical company was rolled up. It was like a roll

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>up is the word that was invented Dennis Gartment. Are

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>we gonna have a zombie roll up where the nonprofitables

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that have had a free lunch for a decade get

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>rolled up into something new and different. I think they

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>get rolled down into into bankruptcy rather than something new

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and in different. I think bankruptcy is is there is

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>their future. I'm afraid that nonprofitable industries, businesses have to

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to to to to to go into the

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere and disappear. We've kept them alive. You've used the

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>term zombie. I think that's a good term. It's been

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>a term that's been banned about for a long period

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of time, and I think that the zombies will actually

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>end up being dead, not not kept alive. Let us

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>hope that capitalism and in its in its freest and

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>best circumstances prevails Dennis, as it relates to this Federal Reserve,

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>it feels like that, you know, kind of the backbone

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>to your bearish call is the Federal Reserve. Yes, do

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a sense of when they feel like they

0:21:01.000 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>will have done their job and maybe they can back

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 1>off and if if nothing else to see if these

0:21:06.600 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 1>interest rate increases do in fact, I didn't do inflation.

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>If I've learned anything in the nearly fifty years that

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they've been involved in the markets is that when once

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the Fed begins to change its policies, it moves rates

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>farther and lasts longer than anybody ever wants to anticipate.

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>When they when they ease monetary policy, they take rate

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>slower than anybody believes for a longer period of time.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>When they tighten, they take rates higher for a longer

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>period of time than anybody wants to anticipate. I think

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be at least until late in maybe

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 1>four before the long awaited pivot occurs. So it's just

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>historically that's what they've done. I believe that the FED

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.199
<v Speaker 1>is a historical precedent setting and precedent following circumstance, and

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be a long time before the

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>pivot is available to anybody who wants to think that

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the pivot is likely. So what's the investor to do?

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I just think about my portfolio. Year to date, my

0:21:56.440 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>stocks are down mid twenties, my bonds are down mid teams.

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I've got that barrel of oil in my apartment, so

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm in good shape there. But what else do I

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 1>do here? If i'm you know, I'm not gonna have

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>any FED help until maybe a year from now. I

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>think two year notes at four and a half percent

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>are probably a good place to hide. I consider that

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to be cash, for lack of a better term. I

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's a great place to go for the next

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>year or so. It's safe, you'll get paid, you'll learn

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>four and a half percent, and it's not a bad return.

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think cash is the great is the best

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>place to be. That's what I've done into my own

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>In my own account, I've gone to a rather substantive

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of two year notes, and I'm continuing to buy more.

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 1>If we get to five pers now, which I doubt

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that we shall. I'll buy even more. Let's go back

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to early Gartman. Okay, I'm talking early Gartman. I'm looking

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>at red wheat, Dennis, and I'm sorry, there's echoes here

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of food inflation. And yet I look at the majors

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, yeah, they're sort of elevated. But U

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>N in Rome is saying, maybe we really don't have

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>food inflation. This is where you started. Red wheat is

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 1>flashing red. What do you see with the food inflation

0:23:08.640 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of the nation in the world. I think grain prices

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>want to go a great good deal higher, especially hard

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>red winter wheat and soft red winter wheat. Soft sad

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>winter wheat has has been to thirteen dollars a bushel.

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>It's fallen back to about nine dollars a bushel. I

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>think it goes to thirteen dollars a bushel again or higher,

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>given the fact of trying to get the wheat crop

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>planted as they call drilled. Thus far this year has

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>been difficult. It's good, it's been dry weather and it's

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 1>going to remain dry. So the crop itself looks like

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it's behind schedule. Planting is moving quickly because you can

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>get you can plant quickly in to dry ground. But

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we need rain. We need snow this winter. We need

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>reasonably decent temperatures through the winter to get somewhere we

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.719
<v Speaker 1>cropped through, and I'm afraid we shan't. We're not going

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>to get that. So the Middle West agriculture is normal weather,

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of drought stuff, not high prices based on what

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>a gallon of gas or diesel fuel costs. That's a

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>good and that's that's that's a good way to look

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>at it. But I think that over the course of the

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the next six months a year, wheat prices go a

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>lot higher. I'm very bullish on wheat. I'm not that

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>bullish on corn, and I'm not bullish at all on

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the soybean market. But I'm very bullish on weeding. We

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>forget that wheat is the most important crop in the world.

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>It's still the largest employer in the world is the

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.159
<v Speaker 1>production of wheat around the world. Dennis Gartment, thank you

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.159
<v Speaker 1>so much. The Gartment letter greatly greatly appreciate stuff there.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Don Witty Bohogana it joins us now. She's had of

0:24:38.080 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a multi asset strategy at Columbia thread Needle and on Witty,

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>what will be the ballast going forward if we don't

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>get some stability in rates in the near term. Thanks

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for having me, Lisa. Yeah, I think sixty forty has

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.719
<v Speaker 1>been a bus this year for sure, um, But I

0:24:55.760 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the conversation around these days is

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>has been about fed watching and you all nailed it

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>when you talked about real yields, So really yields stability

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the ballast. But I keep coming

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>back to what does stabilize really yields? And for that

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we keep going back to inflation data, and we just

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen any signs of peak in that. There are

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>hints that are forwardly looking metrics. If you look at

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of inflation expectations as measured in the bond market,

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>those have come down quite sharply, but they're not at

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>levels where one can say we can declare victory. Now,

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>what's so important here is the heritage of Columbia, threadneed

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of Columbia, thread needle in the England and England and

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>your roll up of BEMO and the idea of that

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Ted Trust get your leaders is from Scotti Stevens. It's

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the Boston heritage of mutual funds. Lisa mentions the debacle

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of sixty Do you invest now assuming sixties forties stability

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>forward or do you have to invest with a different

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 1>cut relation. I think I'll break that down Tom into

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>two parts. So if I look at all my strategic

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>forecast for the medium term, they are better than iver

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 1>seen in ten years. Ten years ago, when we were

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 1>looking at what fixed income might return for us, we

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>were looking at zero yields on the safer bonds and

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>two or three on the riskier part of the tenure.

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Now we're looking at tenure at four percent, and you

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>don't even have to take a whole lot of risks

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to go up to short duration. I g and get

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 1>five six in a very safe, sort of risk free

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:48.160
<v Speaker 1>equity bond portfolio. And similarly, I don't think equities are cheap.

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Equities are probably fairly valued given the amount of uncertainty

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>we have. But again, if you look at the medium

0:26:56.440 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>term projections, they're looking here is everybody's been blown up

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in this unique pandemic induced bear market. Are we going

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 1>on to something new or do wevisit the giant pioneer

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Phil Kay and a way to invest that we knew

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>decades ago? I think we won't know whether we're going

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to something new until after the fact. So these structural changes,

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like that carrying carry on place. So we

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 1>do I think that's a very important question, Tom, We

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:37.280
<v Speaker 1>do grapple with is this a new structural regime for inflation?

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 1>To your question, does inflation stay around three? And we

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know that. So you could have theories that deglobalization

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot is going to keep inflation high forever. But

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>for the moment, I haven't seen enough evidence that there's

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>been any sort of break in the way things function. Yes,

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going through a painful period in the markets. I'm

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>living it every day. But I think if we have

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a medium term perspective, then you stay with stay the course,

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 1>stay the strategic allocation that you have in mind, and

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>do not panic when that sixty is already down. Okay,

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So you're looking out over the medium term. In the

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>more near term, though, I'm wondering how you're viewing political risk,

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>because we've seen what happened in the UK what is

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>still ongoing in the UK. Frankly, the questions list for

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 1>us has been getting as Prime Minister in Parliament this

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>morning and we're just three weeks out from the mid

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>terms here in the US. I mean, is it time

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to be thinking more about domestic political risk rather than

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>broader global monetary policy and geopolitics as we've been talking

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>about for this entire year thus far. Absolutely clearly that's

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>an excellent question. So no one's been talking about the

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>political risk here in the US. UM. You saw how

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the l d I market, the bond market reacted in

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:55.400
<v Speaker 1>UK when the market did not like the fiscal plan

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 1>that came out of that administration. Here, I think all

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the day that I'm looking at all the opinion polls

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at right now is saying that we're likely

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to have a divided government UM for the next two years.

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think the market can live with that. But

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>if we see a sweep in one direction, and at

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that point, at this point it means sweeping the democratic direction,

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>what sort of fiscal policies come through and how does

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the market react to that is a key risk at

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>this point. And Witty, thank you so much for being

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>with us. And Witty ba Juguna, thank you so much

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>of Columbia. Threadneed off. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays from seven to

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 1>each day from six to nine am for insight from

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. And

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and of course, on the terminal. I'm Tom Keen.

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomer