WEBVTT - You Can See Everything

0:00:05.250 --> 0:00:08.110
<v Speaker 1>Hey, this is Annie and Samantha and welcome to Stuff

0:00:08.130 --> 0:00:19.620
<v Speaker 1>Never Told You, a production of iHeartRadio. And welcome to

0:00:19.700 --> 0:00:23.860
<v Speaker 1>a very special, exciting episode where we are joined by

0:00:23.980 --> 0:00:28.139
<v Speaker 1>our super producer, Rima. Welcome back, Rima.

0:00:28.620 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Hey, happy to be here. Yes, this is so exciting.

0:00:34.020 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 2>This is fun.

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:40.699
<v Speaker 1>So this kind of came, it wasn't planned. This is

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:45.970
<v Speaker 1>not a planned episode originally. So originally it was going

0:00:45.979 --> 0:00:49.050
<v Speaker 1>to be a happy hour about the new film.

0:00:49.770 --> 0:00:50.830
<v Speaker 2>You can see everything.

0:00:51.270 --> 0:00:55.050
<v Speaker 1>So there are going to be spoilers in here about

0:00:55.090 --> 0:00:57.630
<v Speaker 1>that movie. And I really recommend if you want to

0:00:57.700 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>see it, it's great to go in not knowing what's

0:01:01.180 --> 0:01:03.209
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. At least for me.

0:01:03.630 --> 0:01:07.370
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into Samantha's experience in a second. But at least.

0:01:07.209 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 1>For me, who likes to be surprised and not know

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.980
<v Speaker 1>where things are going, I really recommend that. But yes,

0:01:16.940 --> 0:01:21.310
<v Speaker 1>I just had mentioned, you know, I kind of want

0:01:21.330 --> 0:01:24.090
<v Speaker 1>to touch on some of the things in this movie.

0:01:24.209 --> 0:01:27.270
<v Speaker 1>And you hopped in and were like, yes, let's do this.

0:01:28.340 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 3>I literally, I saw this, just like, I just saw

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.890
<v Speaker 3>on the document that has all our episodes, like, you

0:01:34.940 --> 0:01:37.890
<v Speaker 3>can see everything. And I immediately sent an email and

0:01:37.930 --> 0:01:39.170
<v Speaker 3>I was like, yes.

0:01:40.410 --> 0:01:44.810
<v Speaker 1>And then I was like, yes, Rima should come on.

0:01:45.370 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And then Samantha was like, I guess I'll go see

0:01:48.700 --> 0:01:49.500
<v Speaker 1>this movie.

0:01:49.620 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess I have to go watch this movie.

0:01:51.140 --> 0:01:53.500
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it unfolded into such a way that I'm like,

0:01:53.700 --> 0:01:57.830
<v Speaker 4>I either have to bow out of the episode completely

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.650
<v Speaker 4>or I have to go and watch it. And I

0:02:00.690 --> 0:02:03.130
<v Speaker 4>did go and watch it. I will say again, as

0:02:03.210 --> 0:02:06.090
<v Speaker 4>Annie said, you should go with it. Even with my

0:02:06.130 --> 0:02:08.769
<v Speaker 4>anxiety level and as much as I love spoilers, I

0:02:08.810 --> 0:02:12.130
<v Speaker 4>would say you need to stop listening to this right now.

0:02:12.150 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 5>Because even if it's light spoilers, the light.

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.630
<v Speaker 4>Spoilers are too much. And you should go and watch

0:02:17.710 --> 0:02:19.250
<v Speaker 4>it if you have any interest. For those of you

0:02:19.270 --> 0:02:22.390
<v Speaker 4>who are not interested at all, sure. Because I had

0:02:22.410 --> 0:02:24.650
<v Speaker 4>that small interest. This was going to be one of

0:02:24.710 --> 0:02:26.850
<v Speaker 4>the ones that when it came in streaming, I would

0:02:26.889 --> 0:02:29.150
<v Speaker 4>probably watch it wherever I could find it for free.

0:02:29.710 --> 0:02:31.790
<v Speaker 4>But then as it kind of escalated, I was like, okay,

0:02:31.850 --> 0:02:35.630
<v Speaker 4>I must go. And it's exactly how I felt that

0:02:35.669 --> 0:02:37.250
<v Speaker 4>I would feel happened.

0:02:38.500 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh my God, I'm so excited to get into it.

0:02:40.380 --> 0:02:44.240
<v Speaker 3>I haven't heard either Samantha or Annie's reactions yet.

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so.

0:02:46.260 --> 0:02:49.899
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about that. I think people probably are very

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>aware of what this movie is about, but it's a

0:02:52.520 --> 0:03:00.860
<v Speaker 1>documentary following Elizabeth Holmes, of Theranos fame. It's in the

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:06.940
<v Speaker 1>weeks leading up to her imprisonment. And then the second

0:03:06.990 --> 0:03:07.889
<v Speaker 1>half is.

0:03:07.850 --> 0:03:10.350
<v Speaker 2>Two years later. It felt very Avengers to me, like, oh,

0:03:10.450 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 2>five years later. And examining... that.

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.299
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of a hard thing to explain. And we're

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.239
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about some of the reasons why that is.

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:26.460
<v Speaker 1>It is helmed by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim. And

0:03:27.700 --> 0:03:29.580
<v Speaker 1>I was in the camp that was like, I'm going

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.370
<v Speaker 1>that weekend when it comes out to the point that

0:03:33.500 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I had two friends visiting me that weekend. And I,

0:03:39.270 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in the kindest way possible, was basically like, can we

0:03:44.860 --> 0:03:49.980
<v Speaker 1>go see this three-hour documentary in this brief window of time.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.260
<v Speaker 2>That we have together? Understandable.

0:03:52.820 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just, I really, really, really wanted to see it.

0:03:57.140 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And I was fascinated, like some of the reviews coming

0:04:01.260 --> 0:04:03.820
<v Speaker 1>out about it and some of the conversation coming out

0:04:03.860 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>about it just really hooked me. And so I convinced

0:04:09.500 --> 0:04:12.130
<v Speaker 1>one of them to see it. The other one came

0:04:12.210 --> 0:04:17.540
<v Speaker 1>the second time. We went, which was last night. But

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>they had a lot of hesitation about the awkwardness, which

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:23.500
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about with Samantha. But I was

0:04:23.540 --> 0:04:27.430
<v Speaker 1>very excited about this whole thing, and I enjoyed the experience.

0:04:28.140 --> 0:04:32.630
<v Speaker 3>So you were a fan of Nathan Fielder before seeing this?

0:04:35.350 --> 0:04:38.390
<v Speaker 1>I was not super familiar with his work. I know

0:04:39.390 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>generally what his whole thing is. And I knew I

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 1>had watched the Hulu show, which we're going to talk about.

0:04:47.580 --> 0:04:52.990
<v Speaker 1>I think I was just more interested with how strange

0:04:53.070 --> 0:04:57.469
<v Speaker 1>it seemed. Like something was captured on film that can't

0:04:57.529 --> 0:04:58.710
<v Speaker 1>be explained.

0:04:59.089 --> 0:04:59.429
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:05:00.029 --> 0:05:03.910
<v Speaker 2>I think that's what really brought me in. I was more.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And I wasn't intrigued by the idea that he, Nathan Fielder,

0:05:08.460 --> 0:05:14.220
<v Speaker 1>had met someone who he could not crack down. so

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.229
<v Speaker 1>i i thought like that was like a two people

0:05:17.290 --> 0:05:21.170
<v Speaker 1>coming together like he'd finally met his match or something.

0:05:20.790 --> 0:05:24.929
<v Speaker 3>An immovable object in an unstoppable force.

0:05:25.430 --> 0:05:31.890
<v Speaker 1>Yes exactly exactly um so what about.

0:05:31.630 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 2>You rima and then we'll get.

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 3>To you yes i am a fan Nathan Fielder. So

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.500
<v Speaker 3>I've been checked in for a little for a while.

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.230
<v Speaker 3>I watched Nathan for you. I watched the rehearsal. I

0:05:45.050 --> 0:05:48.390
<v Speaker 3>have not seen The Curse, which is the Emma Stone,

0:05:49.350 --> 0:05:51.450
<v Speaker 3>Nathan Fielder show. I haven't seen that, but I will.

0:05:52.089 --> 0:05:54.210
<v Speaker 3>So when this came out, and also I know of

0:05:54.290 --> 0:05:57.740
<v Speaker 3>Lance Oppenheim, the Not super well, honestly, but I knew

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 3>of him. So when this came out, I was like,

0:06:00.140 --> 0:06:02.550
<v Speaker 3>same boat. I was like, we need to go see

0:06:02.570 --> 0:06:06.710
<v Speaker 3>this immediately because I will not be spoiled anything.

0:06:07.450 --> 0:06:08.450
<v Speaker 2>I would be so mad.

0:06:08.470 --> 0:06:11.890
<v Speaker 3>And I'm so glad that that happened because there were

0:06:11.910 --> 0:06:14.110
<v Speaker 3>so many things that if that was spoiled to me,

0:06:14.130 --> 0:06:19.700
<v Speaker 3>I would be mad. So yeah, I was excited for

0:06:19.820 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 3>it and I've seen it twice now.

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.820
<v Speaker 2>In a week, I guess. The week it's come out.

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:29.460
<v Speaker 5>So it's only been out for a week? I haven't

0:06:29.500 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 5>just checked out, I'm not.

0:06:30.500 --> 0:06:33.180
<v Speaker 1>Going to lie. It came out the 17th, 18th?

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like 10 days ago, as of today's recording.

0:06:37.580 --> 0:06:38.580
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:06:39.390 --> 0:06:39.789
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:06:40.750 --> 0:06:46.550
<v Speaker 1>Well, Samantha has a different experience and also something that

0:06:46.610 --> 0:06:49.409
<v Speaker 1>I found kind of humorous, but also I feel bad about.

0:06:49.430 --> 0:06:50.410
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:06:51.170 --> 0:06:51.670
<v Speaker 5>Oh, my gosh.

0:06:51.750 --> 0:06:52.410
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:06:52.589 --> 0:06:55.300
<v Speaker 5>That caveat. Wow. Yeah.

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh, no.

0:06:56.860 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 2>I hope you'll share.

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:04.580
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, our listeners know very much. I cannot

0:07:04.620 --> 0:07:06.220
<v Speaker 4>stand cringe.

0:07:06.860 --> 0:07:09.230
<v Speaker 5>Oh, no. It hurts me. It hurts me.

0:07:09.290 --> 0:07:12.630
<v Speaker 4>Secondhand embarrassment, like, kills me to the point that I

0:07:12.690 --> 0:07:15.860
<v Speaker 4>know exactly who Nathan Fielder is. My partner who loves

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.180
<v Speaker 4>all of this and then finds it even like even

0:07:18.260 --> 0:07:20.900
<v Speaker 4>the Jon Stewart Daily Show level of cringe of like

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:25.180
<v Speaker 4>them going to obviously not antagonize, but like talk to

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.380
<v Speaker 4>people who they know are going to say something real

0:07:27.420 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 4>out of pocket. But they love to thrive. And like,

0:07:30.340 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 4>but it makes me cringe so badly that I'm like,

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 4>I can't.

0:07:33.100 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 5>It hurts me.

0:07:34.140 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 4>So I did try to watch because he loves Nathan

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.130
<v Speaker 4>for you so much. And the first 15 minutes, I

0:07:41.150 --> 0:07:42.730
<v Speaker 4>don't even know which episode it was. I was like, no,

0:07:42.950 --> 0:07:43.390
<v Speaker 4>turn it off.

0:07:43.570 --> 0:07:43.830
<v Speaker 2>Turn it off.

0:07:43.850 --> 0:07:44.790
<v Speaker 5>I can't. I can't.

0:07:44.850 --> 0:07:45.030
<v Speaker 4>Nope.

0:07:45.490 --> 0:07:45.710
<v Speaker 3>Nope.

0:07:46.050 --> 0:07:49.210
<v Speaker 4>So like I have avoided Nathan Fielder like the plague.

0:07:49.330 --> 0:07:52.500
<v Speaker 4>Like he is, if there's an opposite, if there's an

0:07:52.580 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 4>arch enemy, he is my arch enemy.

0:07:54.380 --> 0:07:57.660
<v Speaker 5>Like in like the most, yeah, ridiculous.

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 4>Like the entire time we were watching this movie, my

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.330
<v Speaker 4>expression of like just every time he would do something

0:08:04.350 --> 0:08:06.170
<v Speaker 4>where I just watch him like, why is he doing this?

0:08:06.510 --> 0:08:09.070
<v Speaker 5>I hate him so much. Like that was my reaction.

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>It was fun for me because I was sitting in

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:15.570
<v Speaker 1>between my two friends, Samantha and Katie, who were both like,

0:08:15.610 --> 0:08:16.270
<v Speaker 1>this is too awkward.

0:08:16.290 --> 0:08:16.890
<v Speaker 2>I can't see it.

0:08:16.950 --> 0:08:18.950
<v Speaker 1>And I would just look over at both of them

0:08:19.350 --> 0:08:21.150
<v Speaker 1>and they'd be cringing into their seats.

0:08:21.330 --> 0:08:23.670
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh. It was great.

0:08:23.690 --> 0:08:26.910
<v Speaker 4>So I had, I always take like a cardigan or

0:08:26.930 --> 0:08:28.290
<v Speaker 4>some kind of sweater or jacket so that I can

0:08:28.310 --> 0:08:29.090
<v Speaker 4>like cover myself.

0:08:29.170 --> 0:08:30.870
<v Speaker 5>I don't know why. I just need to because like

0:08:30.970 --> 0:08:31.850
<v Speaker 5>I need to be able to hide.

0:08:31.870 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 4>And I definitely was hiding in my cardigan going, no, why? Wow.

0:08:39.380 --> 0:08:40.900
<v Speaker 4>To the point that it was quite funny when we

0:08:40.940 --> 0:08:43.460
<v Speaker 4>got home, my partner was looking at his watch and

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 4>he was showing me that he had a little bit

0:08:44.660 --> 0:08:46.830
<v Speaker 4>of stress. Like, you know, we have the smart watches

0:08:47.230 --> 0:08:48.890
<v Speaker 4>and I looked to see what mine was. And the

0:08:48.970 --> 0:08:52.650
<v Speaker 4>spike during the movie of my stress level, I had

0:08:52.670 --> 0:08:55.170
<v Speaker 4>to take a screenshot because it was so ridiculous that

0:08:55.190 --> 0:08:57.490
<v Speaker 4>it was, I didn't realize it was measuring me that much.

0:08:58.190 --> 0:09:00.890
<v Speaker 4>And to the point that when I'm on the drive home,

0:09:00.950 --> 0:09:03.510
<v Speaker 4>I was driving home, you know, that moment, like we

0:09:03.550 --> 0:09:06.020
<v Speaker 4>just had this when something's about to happen or something,

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, you're nervous about something or you're waiting on something.

0:09:09.330 --> 0:09:14.059
<v Speaker 4>That anxiety was within me the entire time last night

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 4>that I had to go take my, like, anti-anxiety because

0:09:16.700 --> 0:09:18.940
<v Speaker 4>I was like, Oh, no. I'm not going to be

0:09:18.980 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 4>able to, like, get off of this track of, like,

0:09:22.090 --> 0:09:24.770
<v Speaker 4>something about to happen to me. You know, that, like,

0:09:25.010 --> 0:09:29.890
<v Speaker 4>nervousness of expectation because of this movie. And don't get

0:09:29.929 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 4>me wrong. I still enjoyed it. Will I ever watch

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:34.540
<v Speaker 4>it again? Hell no.

0:09:34.940 --> 0:09:35.890
<v Speaker 5>Will I talk about it?

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Sure.

0:09:36.620 --> 0:09:38.730
<v Speaker 5>Am I getting a little anxious as we speak about

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:40.290
<v Speaker 5>it right now? Yes.

0:09:41.050 --> 0:09:43.370
<v Speaker 2>I didn't realize we were putting you through the wringer,

0:09:43.490 --> 0:09:44.590
<v Speaker 2>getting you to watch this.

0:09:44.610 --> 0:09:47.110
<v Speaker 3>I was just like, oh, this is going to be

0:09:47.210 --> 0:09:49.350
<v Speaker 3>so fun for everyone involved.

0:09:50.630 --> 0:09:51.410
<v Speaker 5>This is the thing.

0:09:51.530 --> 0:09:55.090
<v Speaker 4>Of course, obviously, in all of the world and all

0:09:55.150 --> 0:09:58.089
<v Speaker 4>its problems, this is just a me thing. This is

0:09:58.410 --> 0:10:01.490
<v Speaker 4>specifically like there. are several people who talk about this, like,

0:10:01.770 --> 0:10:05.090
<v Speaker 4>that cringe. Like, I'm that person who couldn't watch The

0:10:05.210 --> 0:10:08.410
<v Speaker 4>Office until it came out on streaming, and I have

0:10:08.429 --> 0:10:10.650
<v Speaker 4>to get spoilers so I can figure out when to skip.

0:10:12.270 --> 0:10:13.150
<v Speaker 2>The Office?

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 4>The Office, the comedy, yeah. Because, like, think about Scott's Tots, right?

0:10:18.260 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 2>That was hard to watch. Right.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.500
<v Speaker 4>Stuff like that, where he does those moments that you're

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:28.980
<v Speaker 4>just like, I can't do this. So this is absolutely,

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 4>it's not my worst nightmare, but it's definitely like that

0:10:33.230 --> 0:10:36.429
<v Speaker 4>haunted house feeling of like running away from something in

0:10:37.110 --> 0:10:38.569
<v Speaker 4>absolute absolute fear.

0:10:38.809 --> 0:10:41.550
<v Speaker 2>So this is that level for me.

0:10:41.670 --> 0:10:44.630
<v Speaker 3>Nathan Fielder being Samantha's biggest op.

0:10:45.390 --> 0:10:48.330
<v Speaker 5>It's really funny to me. At this point, yes.

0:10:48.410 --> 0:10:51.689
<v Speaker 4>I feel like he's personally trying to attack me by

0:10:51.750 --> 0:10:56.620
<v Speaker 4>doing this. The shots, the close-ups, the silence, the way

0:10:56.650 --> 0:10:58.140
<v Speaker 4>that he was trying to pretend like he was flirting,

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.660
<v Speaker 4>but also pretending like the awkwardness at putting in, the

0:11:01.700 --> 0:11:04.340
<v Speaker 4>heightened awkwardness because he knows that the audience is going

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 4>to react this way. It feels like a personal attack, yes.

0:11:08.170 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 3>And I will even say that in this movie, I

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 3>think he was on his best behavior.

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:14.990
<v Speaker 2>Like, I think from all of the.

0:11:15.100 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 5>And maybe that's why I was like, okay with it.

0:11:17.140 --> 0:11:19.660
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, like, all of the content I've watched from him,

0:11:19.940 --> 0:11:23.780
<v Speaker 3>this seemed to me like the least of him being

0:11:23.900 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 3>in his character.

0:11:25.020 --> 0:11:26.179
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:11:26.300 --> 0:11:28.729
<v Speaker 3>And maybe closer to just how he is. Obviously, there

0:11:28.750 --> 0:11:30.660
<v Speaker 3>was a lot of, like, moments that I think he's

0:11:31.090 --> 0:11:34.770
<v Speaker 3>still doing it. But, like, he was the most normal

0:11:34.870 --> 0:11:35.890
<v Speaker 3>he's been, I feel like.

0:11:37.130 --> 0:11:39.810
<v Speaker 4>I mean, when he actually gets a little emotional or

0:11:39.850 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 4>tries to rile some emotion out of Elizabeth, I feel

0:11:44.900 --> 0:11:48.740
<v Speaker 4>like that was not necessarily him being himself, but it's

0:11:48.780 --> 0:11:50.960
<v Speaker 4>taking him out of the character that we know. So

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 4>it made him a little more human to me and not, again,

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 4>my enemy. But the shots of him being in the window,

0:11:58.660 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 4>just staring in, I was like, you son of a bitch.

0:12:03.700 --> 0:12:06.210
<v Speaker 4>And I know Oppenheim is also the director and he

0:12:06.250 --> 0:12:10.229
<v Speaker 4>does this, but the intense close-ups, the way it kind

0:12:10.530 --> 0:12:15.449
<v Speaker 4>of just micro-stepped forward, like the micro-movements of him getting in,

0:12:15.510 --> 0:12:19.850
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, I really hate you. This is also one

0:12:19.870 --> 0:12:21.890
<v Speaker 4>of those movies, and this is why going to the

0:12:21.910 --> 0:12:25.300
<v Speaker 4>theater is different, because I like to be distracted on something,

0:12:25.340 --> 0:12:26.860
<v Speaker 4>so if I need to ignore it, I can. I

0:12:26.900 --> 0:12:28.770
<v Speaker 4>have my phone. But this is also one of those

0:12:28.790 --> 0:12:30.530
<v Speaker 4>that I couldn't do that, obviously, at the theater. So

0:12:30.550 --> 0:12:32.470
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, huh, huh.

0:12:32.910 --> 0:12:35.500
<v Speaker 5>Like I did. I started talking out loud because I

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:36.420
<v Speaker 5>was uncomfortable.

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.079
<v Speaker 2>This is exposure therapy.

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 5>It really was. And in like in such a way.

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:46.540
<v Speaker 4>But but again, like this is something that I think

0:12:46.780 --> 0:12:48.130
<v Speaker 4>is a good discussion in general.

0:12:48.190 --> 0:12:51.750
<v Speaker 5>But I was like, why? But I can't not. There

0:12:51.790 --> 0:12:53.830
<v Speaker 5>has to be a way for me to work this out.

0:12:53.850 --> 0:12:59.819
<v Speaker 3>It was shot extremely uncomfortably. It's very claustrophobic, very tight.

0:13:00.340 --> 0:13:03.339
<v Speaker 3>Whenever the camera is kind of panned to having more

0:13:03.380 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 3>than one person on the screen, it's kind.

0:13:06.059 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Of like a sigh of relief.

0:13:07.660 --> 0:13:08.340
<v Speaker 1>Right, exactly.

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:09.460
<v Speaker 2>You're like, finally.

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 3>But it also captures all of these micro-expressions. It really

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:19.699
<v Speaker 3>can get people to just like... try to decipher these

0:13:19.780 --> 0:13:21.820
<v Speaker 3>people that are so undecipherable.

0:13:22.179 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:13:22.580 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's tough.

0:13:24.100 --> 0:13:28.050
<v Speaker 5>It's a thing. But I survived it. It did.

0:13:28.090 --> 0:13:30.370
<v Speaker 4>Like, there was, again, this is also one of those

0:13:30.429 --> 0:13:35.230
<v Speaker 4>that I knew the more spoilers would be worse. I

0:13:35.370 --> 0:13:38.210
<v Speaker 4>did want to be able to see what was unexpected,

0:13:38.230 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 4>to have that initial reaction, because that's, like, everyone's conversation.

0:13:43.700 --> 0:13:46.180
<v Speaker 4>And sometimes you're like, okay, yeah, this is, because it's

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:47.960
<v Speaker 4>a documentary. How else are you, you know, like, you

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 4>don't expect twists and turns. Again, Nathan Fielder is in

0:13:52.300 --> 0:13:55.340
<v Speaker 4>his own, like, realm, in his own world. So, like,

0:13:55.960 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 4>obviously he's going to try it. But as expectations, because

0:14:00.420 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 4>as I'm reading, like, oh, he had a kill switch

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:04.940
<v Speaker 4>for the documentary if he couldn't get exactly how he

0:14:04.980 --> 0:14:08.850
<v Speaker 4>wanted it to be and we know again as little

0:14:08.910 --> 0:14:10.530
<v Speaker 4>as I might know of him I know him well

0:14:10.630 --> 0:14:12.530
<v Speaker 4>enough to know that he needs to be able to

0:14:12.570 --> 0:14:15.630
<v Speaker 4>flip it somehow to something unexpected.

0:14:16.550 --> 0:14:17.510
<v Speaker 2>And boy did he.

0:14:21.070 --> 0:14:26.410
<v Speaker 1>I kept saying this is a wild film like and

0:14:26.450 --> 0:14:29.690
<v Speaker 1>it's a documentary but it has all these twists and

0:14:29.750 --> 0:14:35.270
<v Speaker 1>turns you're not expecting the second half I just can't

0:14:36.030 --> 0:14:37.930
<v Speaker 1>How could I anticipate this?

0:14:38.390 --> 0:14:41.610
<v Speaker 3>When she went to prison, I was like, has it

0:14:41.650 --> 0:14:44.070
<v Speaker 3>been three hours? I knew the runtime. I was like,

0:14:44.130 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 3>how is this going to keep going? And little did

0:14:47.700 --> 0:14:48.100
<v Speaker 3>I know.

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 5>That it actually does keep going.

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I knew that Amanda Seyfried was in it. I had

0:14:56.500 --> 0:14:58.460
<v Speaker 1>no idea the.

0:14:58.460 --> 0:15:00.060
<v Speaker 2>Big role she was going to play. I thought she

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 2>was just going to be a cameo.

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:05.180
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know it was going to be like, her

0:15:05.350 --> 0:15:07.570
<v Speaker 1>reprising that role again.

0:15:07.590 --> 0:15:10.310
<v Speaker 2>I had no idea she was in it.

0:15:10.310 --> 0:15:11.650
<v Speaker 5>Oh my gosh.

0:15:12.450 --> 0:15:18.070
<v Speaker 2>So for listeners who don't know, Amanda Seyfried played Elizabeth

0:15:18.110 --> 0:15:24.350
<v Speaker 2>Holmes in the Hulu show, The Dropout, about Elizabeth Holmes

0:15:24.470 --> 0:15:28.730
<v Speaker 2>and Theranos and all of the things that happened there,

0:15:29.250 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 2>which does become a point in this movie about how

0:15:34.500 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 2>fictionalized it was or wasn't, but also she becomes a

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:46.730
<v Speaker 2>part of reenacting, coming back into this role as Elizabeth

0:15:46.750 --> 0:15:52.430
<v Speaker 2>Holmes when Elizabeth Holmes is in jail, which is probably

0:15:52.450 --> 0:15:57.470
<v Speaker 2>one of the biggest shocks to me, but also a

0:15:57.490 --> 0:16:04.180
<v Speaker 2>really fascinating thing of her perspective on and how it's colored.

0:16:03.900 --> 0:16:09.940
<v Speaker 1>By Nathan Fielder's perspective on what he said to Elizabeth Holmes.

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.260
<v Speaker 4>So at this point, for the listeners, do you want

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:24.859
<v Speaker 4>to break it down or how do you want to

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.410
<v Speaker 4>go about this? Because obviously we just said one of

0:16:27.420 --> 0:16:31.290
<v Speaker 4>the biggest surprises in this movie, which is Amanda Seyfried, who.

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.350
<v Speaker 4>I also had seen an interview because now she's on

0:16:35.370 --> 0:16:38.010
<v Speaker 4>the red carpet for other things. And they asked her,

0:16:38.090 --> 0:16:39.700
<v Speaker 4>they're like, so we're not going to talk about it,

0:16:39.790 --> 0:16:44.070
<v Speaker 4>but the new documentary. And she was like, uh-huh. And

0:16:44.090 --> 0:16:46.530
<v Speaker 4>that's all they say. That's kind of the end of it.

0:16:46.690 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, it was unexpected. Again, because the way they

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.620
<v Speaker 4>make it seem, which I'm really glad since we know,

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 4>is that it's just a pop-up cameo.

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:57.820
<v Speaker 5>Not realizing what it was becoming.

0:16:57.840 --> 0:16:57.910
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:16:58.760 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.300
<v Speaker 2>So have either of you seen the dropout, the show?

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:04.220
<v Speaker 4>No.

0:17:05.020 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 2>No, actually. I have.

0:17:07.540 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>It's been a long time, but we're going to talk

0:17:09.020 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>about it a little bit. I wanted to discuss kind

0:17:12.770 --> 0:17:17.870
<v Speaker 1>of a two or maybe the larger part issue, but

0:17:18.109 --> 0:17:20.850
<v Speaker 1>like a question of the role of the Watcher, which

0:17:20.910 --> 0:17:23.430
<v Speaker 1>I feel like this movie has of, you know, what

0:17:24.550 --> 0:17:26.990
<v Speaker 1>as the documentarian is your role?

0:17:27.030 --> 0:17:27.770
<v Speaker 2>When do you step in?

0:17:27.850 --> 0:17:28.189
<v Speaker 1>When does.

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:37.170
<v Speaker 1>Your relationship with the person you're covering, impact what gets shown.

0:17:37.950 --> 0:17:42.290
<v Speaker 1>But also with the dropout and Amanda Savory, she has

0:17:42.330 --> 0:17:44.450
<v Speaker 1>this point that it's fictional, it's fictional, it's fictional, and

0:17:44.470 --> 0:17:46.419
<v Speaker 1>she kind of gets prickly about it at one point.

0:17:47.020 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And so what's the responsibility there of a fictional show

0:17:51.220 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that has had... I went into this movie thinking I

0:17:56.280 --> 0:18:00.250
<v Speaker 1>kind of understood the story based on that show. And

0:18:00.290 --> 0:18:03.909
<v Speaker 1>I left thinking, I don't know.

0:18:05.490 --> 0:18:08.490
<v Speaker 2>So any thoughts on that?

0:18:09.230 --> 0:18:11.209
<v Speaker 4>I mean, this is where we have to talk about

0:18:11.369 --> 0:18:15.149
<v Speaker 4>true crime stories, in essence, in that understanding. When we

0:18:15.170 --> 0:18:21.140
<v Speaker 4>dramatize something for entertainment, it's actually based on real people.

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:25.140
<v Speaker 4>People have been affected. It's not just a what-if scenario.

0:18:25.420 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 4>It was in my imagination. And so there's a responsibility

0:18:28.380 --> 0:18:31.409
<v Speaker 4>in how it's told. And it does come to the

0:18:31.450 --> 0:18:34.070
<v Speaker 4>larger conversation about like it affects people.

0:18:34.550 --> 0:18:38.430
<v Speaker 5>This lie does like really taint a view.

0:18:38.450 --> 0:18:40.830
<v Speaker 4>It's kind of that whole thing, a narrative when we

0:18:40.869 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 4>talk about with trials, when we have TikTok detectives or

0:18:44.630 --> 0:18:48.500
<v Speaker 4>social media detectives who come through and think they're investigating,

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 4>but they're doing it based on an idea.

0:18:50.340 --> 0:18:52.220
<v Speaker 5>Maybe that is portrayed or based on a lie.

0:18:53.220 --> 0:18:56.750
<v Speaker 4>Same thing here. and then making the situation either worse

0:18:57.050 --> 0:19:00.050
<v Speaker 4>or better. Like, you know, that's kind of that whole

0:19:00.070 --> 0:19:02.410
<v Speaker 4>thing with the women who have been, who are suing

0:19:02.430 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 4>the lawyer. The whole smear campaign is this perspective. So,

0:19:06.619 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 4>or this ideal, and if they just have enough of

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:14.379
<v Speaker 4>an influence out there, it changes some outcomes. And it's

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:17.129
<v Speaker 4>kind of like what we see with the dropout, what

0:19:17.190 --> 0:19:19.730
<v Speaker 4>both Amanda and Elizabeth both have to say, and that

0:19:19.770 --> 0:19:22.919
<v Speaker 4>Amanda's like, I play the character. I played a character

0:19:23.260 --> 0:19:25.659
<v Speaker 4>that was given to me in a script based on

0:19:25.810 --> 0:19:31.910
<v Speaker 4>someone's assumptions and ideas, loosely based ideas, which is why

0:19:31.950 --> 0:19:35.430
<v Speaker 4>we have to have loosely based on these characters. We

0:19:35.470 --> 0:19:37.709
<v Speaker 4>have to have those because people got sued. People got

0:19:37.730 --> 0:19:40.490
<v Speaker 4>really upset when they didn't do that. When we had

0:19:40.530 --> 0:19:43.500
<v Speaker 4>a whole lifetime who did a whole network based on

0:19:43.540 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 4>true crime and sensationalizing a lot of things. And then

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:52.500
<v Speaker 4>we do have someone, Elizabeth, who, again, I've not seen

0:19:52.540 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 4>much of the dropout. I just know tidbits about her life.

0:19:56.740 --> 0:20:01.780
<v Speaker 4>And she is painted as a villain, just in narrative form.

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:05.330
<v Speaker 4>And it could have been partially due to the Hulu series,

0:20:05.369 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 4>the dropout.

0:20:06.550 --> 0:20:08.950
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I'm glad you put it that way. I think

0:20:09.010 --> 0:20:13.510
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons, I've been wondering why this movie

0:20:13.530 --> 0:20:14.950
<v Speaker 1>has caused so much conversation.

0:20:14.970 --> 0:20:18.330
<v Speaker 2>And I think one of the reasons is that.

0:20:19.430 --> 0:20:21.620
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people like me went in thinking you're

0:20:21.630 --> 0:20:23.979
<v Speaker 1>going to get this one, you're going to get the

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 1>story of her, the villain. But then it becomes like

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 1>almost sympathetic to her. And I think it's interesting that

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 1>you see Nathan Fielder go through a shift in what

0:20:41.180 --> 0:20:44.220
<v Speaker 1>I perceive as a shift in his perspective. And then

0:20:44.260 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the audience kind of similarly going through that.

0:20:46.859 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 2>And then at the end, I.

0:20:49.820 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Was left with, okay, has she manipulated me, the audience member?

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 2>Like, has....

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 1>What from this is true from this documentary versus what

0:21:04.300 --> 0:21:05.140
<v Speaker 1>I've already seen and.

0:21:05.100 --> 0:21:05.540
<v Speaker 4>Heard, it.

0:21:07.420 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Just feels like a real... Like I came out of

0:21:10.900 --> 0:21:14.500
<v Speaker 1>hypnosis or something. I don't know what to make of this.

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:15.710
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to make of it.

0:21:16.660 --> 0:21:17.460
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

0:21:17.700 --> 0:21:22.550
<v Speaker 3>And it's really interesting because obviously I think that this

0:21:22.660 --> 0:21:30.149
<v Speaker 3>story is a bit twofold of like she and she's

0:21:30.190 --> 0:21:33.590
<v Speaker 3>literally guilty of this defrauded people.

0:21:34.470 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't really care. About people defrauding investors.

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:39.940
<v Speaker 5>I said the exact same thing. I said the exact

0:21:40.020 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 5>same thing.

0:21:41.140 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't care. But she defrauded patients.

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 3>And that's kind of what happens when you're in biotech

0:21:49.660 --> 0:21:53.780
<v Speaker 3>and you're making promises to to people that you can't

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.940
<v Speaker 3>come up with really. And people were taking these tests

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:01.100
<v Speaker 3>and it colored my viewing because she's so good at

0:22:01.140 --> 0:22:04.230
<v Speaker 3>being so sympathetic. And you can literally, I think, see

0:22:04.290 --> 0:22:09.070
<v Speaker 3>it happen to Nathan in real time, watching him kind

0:22:09.130 --> 0:22:12.370
<v Speaker 3>of like defend her in a way. It's so strange

0:22:12.390 --> 0:22:16.100
<v Speaker 3>because he obviously doesn't. He clearly, at some point during

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 3>the process, sees Billy as the villain here and maybe

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:23.429
<v Speaker 3>sees Elizabeth as misunderstood. And maybe in a lot of

0:22:23.470 --> 0:22:27.459
<v Speaker 3>ways she is, but she did do something bad and

0:22:27.500 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 3>hurt people. But also I think that in our society

0:22:32.980 --> 0:22:38.570
<v Speaker 3>right now, people love to vilify women firstly, and really

0:22:38.619 --> 0:22:43.030
<v Speaker 3>try to take apart any successful woman. And, you know,

0:22:43.170 --> 0:22:47.170
<v Speaker 3>from that whole situation, she obviously was the CEO and

0:22:47.330 --> 0:22:49.410
<v Speaker 3>deserves in a way to be vilified too.

0:22:49.470 --> 0:22:50.150
<v Speaker 2>And so there were.

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:54.260
<v Speaker 3>We're really like running through a bunch of different thoughts

0:22:54.460 --> 0:22:58.100
<v Speaker 3>and feelings. And at the end of the day, I

0:22:59.340 --> 0:23:03.330
<v Speaker 3>don't care about a billionaire. Maybe she's not a billionaire anymore,

0:23:03.369 --> 0:23:07.690
<v Speaker 3>but she certainly was. And I think the money conversation

0:23:07.750 --> 0:23:12.450
<v Speaker 3>in the movie was so interesting to me, where it really,

0:23:13.310 --> 0:23:15.450
<v Speaker 3>you can either think that she doesn't care at all

0:23:15.590 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 3>about the money at all, or she could think that

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:22.149
<v Speaker 3>she sent her husband in to make the business plans

0:23:22.250 --> 0:23:22.610
<v Speaker 3>so she.

0:23:22.530 --> 0:23:23.350
<v Speaker 2>Wouldn't be culpable.

0:23:24.190 --> 0:23:27.690
<v Speaker 3>And I can't really answer any questions, which is what

0:23:28.070 --> 0:23:31.100
<v Speaker 3>I think I expected more answers from this documentary and

0:23:31.580 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 3>simply left with more questions.

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.260
<v Speaker 4>No, I think that's... Well, this is a perspective I

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 4>had on the entire movie because, again, there's a lot. But, like,

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.399
<v Speaker 4>as Billy is, obviously, if there was a villain in

0:23:45.450 --> 0:23:47.390
<v Speaker 4>this conversation, it is him.

0:23:48.109 --> 0:23:49.690
<v Speaker 5>As we see it, especially towards the end.

0:23:49.730 --> 0:23:51.109
<v Speaker 2>Her boyfriend. He sucks.

0:23:51.570 --> 0:23:52.270
<v Speaker 5>But at the.

0:23:52.230 --> 0:23:56.990
<v Speaker 4>Same time, he is the most honest of them. Like,

0:23:57.090 --> 0:23:59.330
<v Speaker 4>the reason we can hate him as much as he is,

0:23:59.630 --> 0:24:01.300
<v Speaker 4>he really doesn't try to hide himself.

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 5>Interesting. Whether it's a red pill tech.

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Bro coming in to talk about how he's a man

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:10.940
<v Speaker 4>and how he knows everything and how he's going to

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 4>fix everything, whether he's talking about his power of attorney

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.410
<v Speaker 4>and not filing, but just admitting, yeah, I'd do the tweets.

0:24:18.090 --> 0:24:19.550
<v Speaker 5>I'm the one who did this. It's not her.

0:24:20.310 --> 0:24:22.690
<v Speaker 4>Or I don't tell her things like he is the

0:24:22.750 --> 0:24:26.889
<v Speaker 4>most honest of all of them. Let's just be very clear.

0:24:26.930 --> 0:24:30.090
<v Speaker 4>Like we know where he stands. We know who he is.

0:24:30.550 --> 0:24:33.160
<v Speaker 4>We know he's about that money. He says it from jump.

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 4>He says that like we find out that he's told

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.990
<v Speaker 4>Nathan this. He's the one that cuts things off. He's

0:24:39.030 --> 0:24:41.070
<v Speaker 4>the one that's like, I don't care about AI. I'm

0:24:41.090 --> 0:24:44.350
<v Speaker 4>gonna make it. It's gonna happen anyway, so let's go

0:24:44.390 --> 0:24:47.550
<v Speaker 4>ahead and do this. They're definitely gonna use this for sex. Oh, well. Like,

0:24:47.830 --> 0:24:51.209
<v Speaker 4>he says the only thing he might have been dishonest

0:24:51.250 --> 0:24:55.139
<v Speaker 4>about is I doubt he's been quote-unquote faithful and celibate

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 4>since Elizabeth's incarceration.

0:24:57.700 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna leave it at that. But, like.

0:25:00.660 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 3>He said, 900 days I've been counting.

0:25:04.220 --> 0:25:05.460
<v Speaker 5>And I'm like, okay, bro, sure.

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:10.330
<v Speaker 4>But to be very, like, Like, he's the one who

0:25:10.470 --> 0:25:11.690
<v Speaker 4>says all the bad things.

0:25:11.730 --> 0:25:13.450
<v Speaker 5>Like, he says it out loud.

0:25:13.790 --> 0:25:18.619
<v Speaker 4>And, like, that's the only times we're getting any confirmation, honestly,

0:25:18.670 --> 0:25:23.419
<v Speaker 4>of what is happening. It's like, he's the one. I

0:25:23.460 --> 0:25:26.040
<v Speaker 4>can't stand him. He is the worst. I think, like,

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 4>he probably will always be a villain. There's nothing about

0:25:29.900 --> 0:25:32.460
<v Speaker 4>himself that's redeeming in any of this.

0:25:32.700 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 5>But we know his true face.

0:25:36.340 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 3>And it's crazy you say true face because I feel

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:43.740
<v Speaker 3>like the... So the movie has a two-year time jump.

0:25:44.380 --> 0:25:49.170
<v Speaker 3>And you can literally see on his face his descent to...

0:25:49.050 --> 0:25:52.190
<v Speaker 3>Or like his unmasking in a way. His face looks

0:25:52.230 --> 0:25:54.209
<v Speaker 3>different the second half of the movie.

0:25:55.450 --> 0:26:01.500
<v Speaker 2>It's bloated. He is paranoid. From my point of view...

0:26:02.170 --> 0:26:03.570
<v Speaker 2>allegedly is.

0:26:03.590 --> 0:26:05.929
<v Speaker 3>Probably doing a lot of cocaine.

0:26:06.270 --> 0:26:10.050
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Can I say that on the podcast?

0:26:10.410 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 3>Allegedly, because that man was sniffing and his pupils were crazy.

0:26:16.180 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 5>He was erratic, combative.

0:26:19.260 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 2>He was erratic. He was paranoid. Yeah. Just like a

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.189
<v Speaker 2>really not great guy.

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 3>But in a way, I'm like, and I obviously don't

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.850
<v Speaker 3>want any women to be with a bad guy.

0:26:34.930 --> 0:26:36.270
<v Speaker 2>But in a way, I'm like, wow.

0:26:36.310 --> 0:26:42.550
<v Speaker 3>Are they like perfectly paired and matched? Like that ending

0:26:42.630 --> 0:26:46.690
<v Speaker 3>scene where she's kind of telling Nathan, like, listen, I

0:26:47.730 --> 0:26:50.580
<v Speaker 3>don't care what he does. Like we have an understanding

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 3>in a way. It's hard to know what is true

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 3>or not coming out of her mouth. But she seems

0:26:59.100 --> 0:27:02.990
<v Speaker 3>so truthful every time she.

0:27:02.850 --> 0:27:07.210
<v Speaker 4>Talks okay so amy as we because like there are

0:27:07.230 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 4>several things that you and i've talked about that's bringing

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.740
<v Speaker 4>up uh when we're especially like we were talking about

0:27:11.780 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 4>his face changing we were like there's something different here

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 4>like what were your thoughts on because i know you

0:27:18.100 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 4>every time we would sit there billy would just talk

0:27:20.140 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 4>she would just point and go this guy this guy

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:26.620
<v Speaker 4>throughout the entire movie it's.

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.439
<v Speaker 2>True it's true so.

0:27:31.619 --> 0:27:33.980
<v Speaker 1>When I originally wanted to just, I was just going

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:35.659
<v Speaker 1>to do a happy hour in a really short thing.

0:27:36.300 --> 0:27:38.980
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to talk about how I was not expecting

0:27:39.100 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>this guy. It feels naive now looking back because it's

0:27:43.580 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>like tech.

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:45.420
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I should have expected some manosphere bro to show up.

0:27:49.460 --> 0:27:53.850
<v Speaker 1>And boy, did he, boy, did he, uh, I thought

0:27:53.890 --> 0:27:56.390
<v Speaker 1>it was fascinating to see it in theaters. I highly

0:27:56.430 --> 0:27:58.969
<v Speaker 1>recommend seeing it in theaters. I feel bad if I'm

0:27:58.990 --> 0:28:01.070
<v Speaker 1>telling you this now, listeners, I've already ruined it, but

0:28:03.950 --> 0:28:09.409
<v Speaker 1>Because people reacted so viscerally to him. When he brings

0:28:09.530 --> 0:28:13.950
<v Speaker 1>out the Charlie Kirk reference, I mean, it was people gassed.

0:28:14.150 --> 0:28:15.970
<v Speaker 2>One lady was like, no, sir.

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:28:18.140 --> 0:28:19.699
<v Speaker 2>My theater was animated.

0:28:19.820 --> 0:28:20.280
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:28:20.619 --> 0:28:21.300
<v Speaker 2>The first time.

0:28:21.380 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And the one Samantha and I went to last night,

0:28:23.820 --> 0:28:29.060
<v Speaker 1>it was also animated. But people really, just like Nathan

0:28:29.100 --> 0:28:34.140
<v Speaker 1>Fielder seemingly did, main him. He's the villain. He's the

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:38.340
<v Speaker 1>main villain. And there's something about that I find really,

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:44.110
<v Speaker 1>really intriguing because there's a lot of themes about control

0:28:44.420 --> 0:28:48.390
<v Speaker 1>in this movie. Who controls what? And he is very

0:28:48.430 --> 0:28:52.190
<v Speaker 1>controlling about the narrative he wants out. He's controlling about

0:28:52.230 --> 0:28:58.580
<v Speaker 1>her image. But it's also, there's something about the tension

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:04.950
<v Speaker 1>between a social narrative and of women being liars versus

0:29:04.990 --> 0:29:09.300
<v Speaker 1>she's actually a liar, and also him being the villain,

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the controlling boyfriend, are we minimizing, in a weird way,

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:13.820
<v Speaker 1>her power?

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:29:15.260 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Like, are we taking away kind of her.

0:29:21.300 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 2>As you said, Rima, we don't know.

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:28.300
<v Speaker 1>Maybe she meant for him to be the fall guy,

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:32.540
<v Speaker 1>to not have culpability. But are we painting her as

0:29:32.620 --> 0:29:35.980
<v Speaker 1>this kind of, oh, she's being controlled. She didn't know

0:29:36.810 --> 0:29:39.970
<v Speaker 1>person when that's not the story there.

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:41.820
<v Speaker 2>I know.

0:29:42.580 --> 0:29:44.260
<v Speaker 5>So here's my theory.

0:29:44.300 --> 0:29:46.660
<v Speaker 4>And I've kind of shared with both of you, Annie

0:29:46.980 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 4>and my partner, because, you know, you can't walk away

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.660
<v Speaker 4>from this movie not talking about it, which is where

0:29:51.700 --> 0:29:54.620
<v Speaker 4>we are today, which is also like I have to

0:29:54.660 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 4>say that because we're going to end up having a discussion.

0:29:57.060 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 5>I'm just going to stay here going, what?

0:29:59.600 --> 0:29:59.860
<v Speaker 1>But.

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 4>My inclination in this moment, especially as we kind of

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 4>had a back-end reveal, again, listeners, you've already probably gotten

0:30:10.820 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 4>completely spoiled and we're going to have to go back

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:14.380
<v Speaker 4>and let you know, don't do this.

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:15.980
<v Speaker 5>But, I mean, I try to put it in there.

0:30:16.340 --> 0:30:19.739
<v Speaker 4>But one of the back-end things is her really, like,

0:30:19.860 --> 0:30:22.620
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of people expected kind of that

0:30:22.700 --> 0:30:25.550
<v Speaker 4>when he reveals all these bad things that Billie is

0:30:25.610 --> 0:30:28.310
<v Speaker 4>doing that she didn't know about and Billie admits to

0:30:28.370 --> 0:30:30.030
<v Speaker 4>saying she doesn't care, she doesn't know.

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:33.810
<v Speaker 5>She really reacted with like, it's fine, it's fine. Yeah, yeah,

0:30:33.850 --> 0:30:35.170
<v Speaker 5>we're fine. Yeah, it's fine.

0:30:35.250 --> 0:30:38.130
<v Speaker 4>Nothing was shocking as he relays it to us. Now

0:30:38.150 --> 0:30:40.790
<v Speaker 4>we don't see this as it is relayed to us

0:30:40.850 --> 0:30:43.630
<v Speaker 4>that it seems like she's just like, eh, it is

0:30:43.650 --> 0:30:46.830
<v Speaker 4>what it is. With that type of reveal, instead of

0:30:46.870 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 4>being like, oh my God, I'm so mad at him. No,

0:30:48.910 --> 0:30:51.260
<v Speaker 4>he lied to me or any of those, like what

0:30:51.300 --> 0:30:53.020
<v Speaker 4>we thought would be a normal reaction.

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 5>It doesn't come. And then we have.

0:30:56.440 --> 0:31:01.020
<v Speaker 4>Again, a dramatized moment of Amanda Seyfried playing into it

0:31:01.100 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 4>and just giving him the look, a look of like,

0:31:04.020 --> 0:31:07.850
<v Speaker 4>we understand each other while Nathan looks still vaguely confused,

0:31:08.770 --> 0:31:12.550
<v Speaker 4>trying to figure out what that meant almost. Like, but like,

0:31:12.870 --> 0:31:16.930
<v Speaker 4>to me, it seems like I absolutely think that if

0:31:17.030 --> 0:31:20.310
<v Speaker 4>she can be in love emotionally and detached, that she

0:31:20.370 --> 0:31:22.890
<v Speaker 4>is in love with Billy. But I think she also

0:31:22.970 --> 0:31:25.610
<v Speaker 4>is really in love with the idea that she knows

0:31:25.820 --> 0:31:28.620
<v Speaker 4>she married a villain or she's partnering with the villain

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.730
<v Speaker 4>and that will always obviously be the villain. And in

0:31:31.780 --> 0:31:37.580
<v Speaker 4>comparison to, she will look calm and demure and just

0:31:37.860 --> 0:31:40.700
<v Speaker 4>kind of goofy. You know, like when we have the

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:45.970
<v Speaker 4>who's on first reference, she reacts in a way that

0:31:46.010 --> 0:31:49.110
<v Speaker 4>makes you think, oh, maybe there's some neurodivergence here that

0:31:49.150 --> 0:31:53.850
<v Speaker 4>she just really does not understand and cannot read these things.

0:31:54.550 --> 0:31:57.140
<v Speaker 4>Or is it that she's playing into that and or

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.489
<v Speaker 4>maybe that she just didn't want to seem unintelligent, so

0:32:00.510 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 4>was afraid to answer, give the wrong answer. Like, I

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:05.700
<v Speaker 4>had those moments of like, I think I know what

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 4>you're trying to get at, but you're trying to get

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 4>at it so hard that if I get it wrong,

0:32:09.420 --> 0:32:12.180
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be bad. So I'm just going to

0:32:12.220 --> 0:32:15.410
<v Speaker 4>give you generic answers. All of that to say, could

0:32:15.450 --> 0:32:19.250
<v Speaker 4>it be that that groundwork is understanding that she's playing

0:32:19.310 --> 0:32:23.430
<v Speaker 4>an opponent or a person in her life as a

0:32:23.490 --> 0:32:27.100
<v Speaker 4>side character that will enhance her As an individual. And

0:32:27.140 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 4>is Billy that person who is so inevitably awful? He

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 4>is so awful and she is very aware of it.

0:32:34.930 --> 0:32:37.290
<v Speaker 4>But he's not awful to her and she looks great

0:32:37.310 --> 0:32:40.030
<v Speaker 4>in comparison. Is she playing into that?

0:32:40.670 --> 0:32:43.190
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's kind of the quote that they start the

0:32:43.210 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>movie with and end the movie with. The New York

0:32:45.860 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Times quote that's disputed. Did she create a character or

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>was a character created.

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:54.220
<v Speaker 2>By the media for her?

0:32:55.710 --> 0:32:58.990
<v Speaker 1>Which I think is really interesting because I think that

0:32:59.010 --> 0:33:02.350
<v Speaker 1>does get to the heart of why we can't figure

0:33:02.390 --> 0:33:06.190
<v Speaker 1>her out and why I do, I think, Nathan couldn't

0:33:06.230 --> 0:33:08.630
<v Speaker 1>figure her out either. I think it ends with him

0:33:08.690 --> 0:33:14.670
<v Speaker 1>being like, oh, I could not, I could not figure

0:33:14.710 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>this person out. And I'm glad you're here, Rima, since

0:33:18.580 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you're familiar with his work, but I do know there

0:33:21.660 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>was a conversation about neurodivergence in this movie. And he's

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>been kind of open about that and his experience with it.

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:35.860
<v Speaker 1>Who's on first reference where she just doesn't get it?

0:33:36.340 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>At least that's what she's trying to convey is fascinating.

0:33:41.980 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Because I think in that moment, he also has another

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>moment where he's like, so you're saying you believe you

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:51.470
<v Speaker 1>weren't misleading anybody by using the word could. This machine

0:33:51.770 --> 0:33:56.170
<v Speaker 1>could be. cure or test for all of these kinds

0:33:56.210 --> 0:33:58.540
<v Speaker 1>of things. And I feel like it was a real

0:33:58.580 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>take on, like, neurodivergent.

0:34:03.260 --> 0:34:04.100
<v Speaker 2>Like, is she.

0:34:04.460 --> 0:34:07.070
<v Speaker 1>Is this real? I know.

0:34:07.090 --> 0:34:08.470
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely agree.

0:34:08.630 --> 0:34:11.490
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there were certainly parts where I was watching

0:34:11.510 --> 0:34:15.290
<v Speaker 3>this and I was like, yeah, this, you know... Another,

0:34:15.310 --> 0:34:20.710
<v Speaker 3>this woman is a part of a spectrum somewhere of neurodivergence.

0:34:21.050 --> 0:34:22.969
<v Speaker 3>But again, like, I feel like I was along on

0:34:23.010 --> 0:34:25.549
<v Speaker 3>the ride of believing her and not believing her the

0:34:25.590 --> 0:34:28.549
<v Speaker 3>same way Nathan was. And I think that's kind of

0:34:28.610 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 3>what was genius about how they presented the doc. Me

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:37.890
<v Speaker 3>knowing that she's literally been indicted for lying. And yet

0:34:37.950 --> 0:34:41.670
<v Speaker 3>believing that she has never lied. It's just, it's crazy.

0:34:41.950 --> 0:34:46.210
<v Speaker 3>Who knows, you know? And it's just interesting seeing that

0:34:46.250 --> 0:34:49.379
<v Speaker 3>happen to somebody who is usually on the other end

0:34:49.430 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 3>of it. And I think it's like really interesting when

0:34:52.219 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Nathan is first talking to Amanda and he says something

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:57.939
<v Speaker 3>to her like, don't let her get you.

0:34:58.480 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Don't fall for it.

0:35:00.140 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 3>And then about an hour later in the movie, we

0:35:03.620 --> 0:35:07.390
<v Speaker 3>see Amanda kind of run that back to him. and

0:35:07.510 --> 0:35:11.850
<v Speaker 3>ask him whether he's been withholding things because he cares

0:35:11.910 --> 0:35:15.030
<v Speaker 3>about her. And I think the actually most damning reveal

0:35:15.090 --> 0:35:17.750
<v Speaker 3>in the whole movie is the reveal that he went

0:35:18.190 --> 0:35:20.210
<v Speaker 3>into the ocean with her to play.

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.500
<v Speaker 2>When he said he didn't want to. As friends do. Yeah,

0:35:24.739 --> 0:35:26.259
<v Speaker 2>as homies do, you know?

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 3>And at that point, like, you're, as an interviewee, when

0:35:34.020 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 3>you're engaged with a subject like that, like it's no

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:37.739
<v Speaker 3>longer unbiased.

0:35:38.570 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 2>Or maybe it never was.

0:35:42.010 --> 0:35:46.930
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, it's an interesting question, the question of her neurodivergence,

0:35:47.469 --> 0:35:49.209
<v Speaker 3>even with her like eye contact.

0:35:49.290 --> 0:35:51.130
<v Speaker 2>And it's just, what is it? What's real?

0:35:52.489 --> 0:35:55.529
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you guys have read the New

0:35:55.570 --> 0:35:57.740
<v Speaker 3>York Times article in question.

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:01.719
<v Speaker 2>I read it recently after the movie.

0:36:03.300 --> 0:36:06.820
<v Speaker 3>And interestingly enough, I'll send it to you guys. The writer,

0:36:07.460 --> 0:36:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Amy Chozik, I think, also spent a lot of time

0:36:12.140 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 3>with Elizabeth and Billy and kind of went on a

0:36:16.180 --> 0:36:20.270
<v Speaker 3>journey like Nathan. And it comes out that like people

0:36:20.310 --> 0:36:24.390
<v Speaker 3>who spend time with her typically end up believing her

0:36:24.650 --> 0:36:28.469
<v Speaker 3>in some way. and having to remind themselves who they're

0:36:28.489 --> 0:36:32.029
<v Speaker 3>dealing with. But I found that really interesting because the

0:36:32.110 --> 0:36:35.890
<v Speaker 3>writer had spent multiple days. It wasn't just one sit-down interview.

0:36:36.110 --> 0:36:39.890
<v Speaker 3>They spent time together. And you can see in the

0:36:39.969 --> 0:36:44.210
<v Speaker 3>article kind of this exact up and down that Nathan had,

0:36:44.250 --> 0:36:46.130
<v Speaker 3>but in article form. I was kind of like, that's

0:36:46.370 --> 0:36:49.900
<v Speaker 3>kind of really funny. I'm imagining the writer watching this

0:36:49.940 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 3>doc and being like, I already did this.

0:36:53.700 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Where are my accolades?

0:37:04.610 --> 0:37:09.600
<v Speaker 4>I think coming back to the neurodivergence, because Nathan Fielder,

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:14.799
<v Speaker 4>his shtick, and not that he doesn't have any kind

0:37:14.820 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 4>of neurodivergency or he's not on a spectrum, he plays

0:37:17.940 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 4>into it in a way that causes that tension, that

0:37:22.700 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 4>cringe comedy, the cringe comedy that he very much enjoys.

0:37:26.300 --> 0:37:28.750
<v Speaker 4>And it's kind of like, it's brought in from like

0:37:28.790 --> 0:37:33.230
<v Speaker 4>the UK idea of the straight laced, a sarcasm that

0:37:33.270 --> 0:37:39.069
<v Speaker 4>doesn't always translate well universally. And we see him in

0:37:39.110 --> 0:37:42.650
<v Speaker 4>that way because we know he is an awkward guy.

0:37:43.290 --> 0:37:47.270
<v Speaker 4>He knows he's an awkward guy. And what that means

0:37:47.290 --> 0:37:50.690
<v Speaker 4>and how that translates, especially in a world of comedy,

0:37:51.739 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 4>his comedy is unique. His comedy is very much interactive.

0:37:57.700 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 4>But this interaction has to be the willingness to be

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 4>uncomfortable with everyone. What does that look like if you

0:38:04.700 --> 0:38:07.740
<v Speaker 4>do have neurodivergence? And so you are playing into that

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:11.739
<v Speaker 4>or you are amplifying that. And this is what he does.

0:38:12.050 --> 0:38:14.219
<v Speaker 4>So you bring in someone who may be a sociopath

0:38:14.489 --> 0:38:17.569
<v Speaker 4>who is a different type of diagnosis, who may have

0:38:17.610 --> 0:38:18.430
<v Speaker 4>a different type of diagnosis.

0:38:18.770 --> 0:38:19.410
<v Speaker 5>Him as well.

0:38:19.930 --> 0:38:23.190
<v Speaker 4>He also has a different type of diagnosis from what

0:38:23.230 --> 0:38:25.670
<v Speaker 4>you can see, just from the small background that I

0:38:25.710 --> 0:38:31.160
<v Speaker 4>have in the world of, you know, DSM-IV, DM-V, whatever, whatnot,

0:38:31.620 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 4>like you see that there is a level where that

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 4>spectrum is, where his self-awareness is, is absolutely hidden. He

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.890
<v Speaker 4>keeps his background. He keeps his private life truly, truly

0:38:42.930 --> 0:38:45.839
<v Speaker 4>private because if he can delve into that, you can

0:38:45.860 --> 0:38:51.390
<v Speaker 4>start understanding where is he actually this person that he portrays.

0:38:51.450 --> 0:38:54.469
<v Speaker 4>And even though he absolutely says it's not necessarily that,

0:38:54.989 --> 0:38:58.089
<v Speaker 4>you just don't know where the line is. You don't

0:38:58.130 --> 0:39:00.610
<v Speaker 4>know the levels. We don't know how far on the

0:39:00.630 --> 0:39:03.790
<v Speaker 4>spectrum that he is actually on versus what he's playing

0:39:03.989 --> 0:39:08.730
<v Speaker 4>up for comedy's sake. Now, you put that in a

0:39:08.750 --> 0:39:13.350
<v Speaker 4>documentary with a crime that does legitimately have hurt, harmed people.

0:39:13.989 --> 0:39:16.739
<v Speaker 5>Someone had died by suicide. Annie, you are the one

0:39:16.760 --> 0:39:21.100
<v Speaker 5>who let me know that. It was portrayed in the dropout.

0:39:21.660 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:39:22.260 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 5>And I was like, oh, okay.

0:39:23.420 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 4>And I read about it and like it was Like,

0:39:25.940 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm actually surprised that she didn't get charged with a

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 4>negligent homicide somehow, or like at least some type of

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:38.260
<v Speaker 4>level of like negligence in the workplace. Again, I'm with you, Rima.

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 4>And I said the same thing. I was like, I

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.130
<v Speaker 4>don't care if investors got defrauded. Y'all are trying to

0:39:42.170 --> 0:39:44.670
<v Speaker 4>make money off of people's healthcare. And that really makes

0:39:44.690 --> 0:39:49.190
<v Speaker 4>me mad. However, I do care that people who were

0:39:49.250 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 4>seeking their life-changing technologies. As a scientist who bring change,

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 4>he died because he couldn't handle or whatever the stressors

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:02.010
<v Speaker 4>in this timeline was for him. And if his work

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.770
<v Speaker 4>in this company really pushed him to that, then they

0:40:04.810 --> 0:40:08.630
<v Speaker 4>should be held accountable. The people who were banking on

0:40:08.670 --> 0:40:11.430
<v Speaker 4>these tests or were a part of the testing who

0:40:11.469 --> 0:40:13.390
<v Speaker 4>got harmed in some way.

0:40:13.630 --> 0:40:15.190
<v Speaker 5>Absolutely should get justice, but they didn't.

0:40:15.489 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 4>The reason she went to jail was because of the investors,

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 4>because of the money lost which is in itself a

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 4>whole injustice. But her realm of complete denial, and then

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:31.420
<v Speaker 4>you have a comedian who plays into social awkwardness, not

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:33.660
<v Speaker 4>knowing exactly where this was going to go, but knowing

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:35.740
<v Speaker 4>that this was going to be unique. You have so

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.890
<v Speaker 4>many lines of conversation of like, who is this man

0:40:38.910 --> 0:40:44.070
<v Speaker 4>that needed to do this? He is an op. Now

0:40:44.110 --> 0:40:46.910
<v Speaker 4>that I'm digging into it. But who is this man

0:40:46.930 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 4>who needed this? But at the same time, he was

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:52.279
<v Speaker 4>able to bring out so many questions that we need

0:40:52.300 --> 0:40:54.069
<v Speaker 4>to kind of recognize when it comes to like our

0:40:54.090 --> 0:40:57.469
<v Speaker 4>own misogyny. When we look at our own level of

0:40:57.910 --> 0:41:01.230
<v Speaker 4>social inequalities, again, the dude bro who needed to come

0:41:01.270 --> 0:41:02.950
<v Speaker 4>in and even talk about his sex life. Like he

0:41:02.989 --> 0:41:04.770
<v Speaker 4>needed to be like, I can satisfy women. I'm like,

0:41:04.810 --> 0:41:07.529
<v Speaker 4>what the hell is happening in this conversation? Why do

0:41:07.550 --> 0:41:09.310
<v Speaker 4>we need to talk about this with you who needed

0:41:09.330 --> 0:41:11.630
<v Speaker 4>to be naked in front of Nathan to show off

0:41:11.650 --> 0:41:15.500
<v Speaker 4>his manliness? So they like, like, These questions all came

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:19.940
<v Speaker 4>into play into a conversation that really, obviously, she's affected.

0:41:19.980 --> 0:41:23.860
<v Speaker 4>She's in jail, you know, as well as people who

0:41:23.980 --> 0:41:26.900
<v Speaker 4>have lost money. We saw his hard parents. I feel

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:29.819
<v Speaker 4>like they were the true victim in this conversation. Sure,

0:41:29.860 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 4>they probably enabled her in so many ways. But the

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.660
<v Speaker 4>tension between the father and Billy, the tension of him

0:41:36.719 --> 0:41:40.480
<v Speaker 4>trying to make excuses for his daughter, the tension of

0:41:40.540 --> 0:41:43.140
<v Speaker 4>the mother being really uncomfortable by the idea that they're

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:46.219
<v Speaker 4>trying to do this again, which, by the way, we

0:41:46.260 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 4>need to talk about too. But they're trying to do

0:41:48.180 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 4>this ploy again, which has already ruined her life. There's

0:41:52.860 --> 0:41:57.100
<v Speaker 4>so many things to this realm of this documentary that

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:02.589
<v Speaker 4>just kind of expounds into a real background of, Who

0:42:02.650 --> 0:42:06.029
<v Speaker 4>she has hurt, but also how Nathan is kind of

0:42:06.090 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 4>profiting and gaining credibility in this as well.

0:42:11.440 --> 0:42:19.609
<v Speaker 3>I feel like everyone is using each other at all

0:42:19.870 --> 0:42:25.710
<v Speaker 3>times in this movie. I think he knows, Nathan knows

0:42:25.810 --> 0:42:30.029
<v Speaker 3>that this will be, you know, people are very curious

0:42:30.090 --> 0:42:33.470
<v Speaker 3>and interested in this story. People are really into trying

0:42:33.510 --> 0:42:38.790
<v Speaker 3>to figure out Elizabeth Holmes. But do you believe that

0:42:38.890 --> 0:42:43.450
<v Speaker 3>she had no idea who he was when they agreed

0:42:43.469 --> 0:42:47.989
<v Speaker 3>to have him be a part of their home and interview?

0:42:48.010 --> 0:42:53.170
<v Speaker 3>We're talking about someone who, you know, invented... this company

0:42:53.270 --> 0:42:57.150
<v Speaker 3>at the age of 19. She is, you know, was

0:42:57.250 --> 0:43:03.070
<v Speaker 3>at Stanford. Like, she's smart, obviously. It's a little interesting

0:43:03.110 --> 0:43:06.299
<v Speaker 3>to me that her and Billy are, say they don't

0:43:06.340 --> 0:43:08.740
<v Speaker 3>know who Nathan is, or I don't know if Billy

0:43:08.780 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 3>says that, but I do think that everyone knows what

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:16.779
<v Speaker 3>the other is doing for them. And I find it

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:21.370
<v Speaker 3>like a very interesting relationship, whereas Amanda Seyfried says at

0:43:21.410 --> 0:43:26.830
<v Speaker 3>the end, it's complicated. I was like, yeah, girl, it's

0:43:26.870 --> 0:43:29.710
<v Speaker 3>been three hours of complicated. This is crazy.

0:43:29.730 --> 0:43:33.110
<v Speaker 1>So that's a really great review of it.

0:43:33.530 --> 0:43:34.989
<v Speaker 2>Three hours of complicated.

0:43:35.010 --> 0:43:35.090
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:43:37.660 --> 0:43:40.580
<v Speaker 3>And the whole second half or even the whole movie

0:43:40.600 --> 0:43:44.020
<v Speaker 3>is about her trying to reclaim her image of how

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:46.779
<v Speaker 3>important that is to her, how she hates how it's

0:43:46.820 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 3>been used and how this character has been created, either

0:43:52.600 --> 0:44:01.169
<v Speaker 3>by the media or by her ex-partner and the ex-CFO,

0:44:01.270 --> 0:44:06.509
<v Speaker 3>what was his name? Sonny at Theranos, that he created.

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:12.380
<v Speaker 3>But then we see on the flip side, Billie actively

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:19.140
<v Speaker 3>using her image for crazy stuff and her being okay

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:23.830
<v Speaker 3>with that. I think the question of who Elizabeth is

0:44:23.950 --> 0:44:29.530
<v Speaker 3>versus Liz is really interesting. And I'm not a fan

0:44:29.570 --> 0:44:32.410
<v Speaker 3>of the New York Times generally, but that whole article

0:44:32.590 --> 0:44:33.469
<v Speaker 3>really goes into that.

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:42.210
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that I think could be a

0:44:42.250 --> 0:44:46.150
<v Speaker 1>whole episode on itself but i was thinking about was

0:44:46.530 --> 0:44:52.500
<v Speaker 1>um in the dropout they go out of their way

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:58.299
<v Speaker 1>to make it to portray it as if like elizabeth's

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:00.900
<v Speaker 1>voice the reason she does that is it's a man's

0:45:00.960 --> 0:45:03.279
<v Speaker 1>world like she's got to have the deep voice like

0:45:03.500 --> 0:45:07.270
<v Speaker 1>and she wears these outfits because it's a man's world

0:45:07.330 --> 0:45:10.069
<v Speaker 1>and steven job like that it's steve jobs that kind

0:45:10.110 --> 0:45:16.090
<v Speaker 1>of calls back to him so her it's a fictional

0:45:16.130 --> 0:45:19.489
<v Speaker 1>show so i don't know but in the show it's

0:45:19.550 --> 0:45:23.510
<v Speaker 1>represented as if she was she was creating this character

0:45:23.989 --> 0:45:27.009
<v Speaker 1>but also it goes back to that tension we were

0:45:27.050 --> 0:45:28.230
<v Speaker 1>talking about earlier of.

0:45:30.370 --> 0:45:33.490
<v Speaker 2>She's a woman in an industry where you might need.

0:45:33.300 --> 0:45:36.779
<v Speaker 1>To do that like it it's so strange and then

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:39.759
<v Speaker 1>also the she has that line at the end where

0:45:40.770 --> 0:45:43.060
<v Speaker 1>She calls out Amanda Seyfried, and it's like, why would

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:46.860
<v Speaker 1>she take down another woman like that? And then her

0:45:46.920 --> 0:45:51.939
<v Speaker 1>dad also just kind of, out of the blue, just

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 1>brings up, oh, she was raped, and that's why she

0:45:54.620 --> 0:45:57.410
<v Speaker 1>was like that. That's why she behaves this way. And

0:45:58.210 --> 0:46:02.710
<v Speaker 1>so it's just a real, it's complicated, because I don't

0:46:02.750 --> 0:46:05.370
<v Speaker 1>want to dismiss that these were pressures, and these are

0:46:05.410 --> 0:46:06.350
<v Speaker 1>things that might have happened.

0:46:06.790 --> 0:46:11.770
<v Speaker 2>But also, I think she lied. I think she's a liar.

0:46:11.989 --> 0:46:12.990
<v Speaker 2>I think she's a liar.

0:46:13.010 --> 0:46:21.100
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's a nice reminder that people are

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 3>capable of all types of things, you know, and are

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:31.370
<v Speaker 3>both victim and oppressor at the same time in a

0:46:31.410 --> 0:46:35.730
<v Speaker 3>lot of ways, especially when there is billions of dollars involved.

0:46:37.450 --> 0:46:43.700
<v Speaker 3>and just like how money can truly color something so

0:46:44.219 --> 0:46:48.259
<v Speaker 3>intensely when like I'm sure I don't know her I

0:46:48.300 --> 0:46:52.140
<v Speaker 3>don't know her motives but it's hard to believe she

0:46:52.160 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 3>didn't care about the money of it all ever and

0:46:57.180 --> 0:47:00.550
<v Speaker 3>I think that it's an yeah just an example of

0:47:00.630 --> 0:47:05.470
<v Speaker 3>how money can push us to be the worst versions

0:47:05.530 --> 0:47:09.880
<v Speaker 3>of ourselves. And at the same time, like, you can

0:47:09.950 --> 0:47:12.600
<v Speaker 3>still be... All those other things about her could still

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:13.640
<v Speaker 3>be true, you know?

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:47:15.140 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's especially hard when you are having

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:21.380
<v Speaker 3>a personal relationship with someone like that. Because when you

0:47:21.420 --> 0:47:24.380
<v Speaker 3>have a personal relationship to most people, I think you'll

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:28.700
<v Speaker 3>be like, oh, this person's, like, normal. Because at the

0:47:28.739 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 3>end of the day, a lot of the villains that

0:47:31.410 --> 0:47:33.469
<v Speaker 3>run our society.

0:47:36.020 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Could probably have a normal conversation with you. I'm just

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:46.260
<v Speaker 3>on my soapbox now. But I just find it really interesting.

0:47:46.300 --> 0:47:50.980
<v Speaker 3>I find our interest in her very interesting, myself included.

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:53.100
<v Speaker 3>I didn't watch the show, but I watched a ton

0:47:53.590 --> 0:47:56.259
<v Speaker 3>of YouTube videos about her when this was happening, and

0:47:56.300 --> 0:48:00.529
<v Speaker 3>I was really intrigued by this, like, as she says, character.

0:48:00.550 --> 0:48:03.170
<v Speaker 2>And, yeah.

0:48:03.410 --> 0:48:03.609
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:48:04.810 --> 0:48:08.390
<v Speaker 1>You also brought up Rima. You sent us an article

0:48:08.469 --> 0:48:11.770
<v Speaker 1>about the prison aspect of this movie that I wanted

0:48:11.790 --> 0:48:12.450
<v Speaker 1>to touch on.

0:48:12.469 --> 0:48:19.140
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I feel like the most sympathetic I was to

0:48:19.180 --> 0:48:25.480
<v Speaker 3>her the whole movie is the you know, the fact

0:48:25.540 --> 0:48:31.819
<v Speaker 3>that going to being incarcerated is a terrible, terrible thing.

0:48:32.940 --> 0:48:37.260
<v Speaker 3>And I was talking about this with my partner, that

0:48:37.660 --> 0:48:42.020
<v Speaker 3>the moments, the phone call she received.

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:43.940
<v Speaker 2>Where she was kind.

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:49.170
<v Speaker 3>Of learning about what an intensive search is that she

0:48:49.190 --> 0:48:51.810
<v Speaker 3>would be having to wake up at 3 a.m., all

0:48:51.830 --> 0:48:57.270
<v Speaker 3>of these extremely dehumanizing aspects of the incarceration system in

0:48:57.290 --> 0:49:03.250
<v Speaker 3>this country, how awful that must be. For even a

0:49:04.090 --> 0:49:09.010
<v Speaker 3>person guilty of defrauding investors legally and then also guilty

0:49:09.070 --> 0:49:12.170
<v Speaker 3>of hurting people even though that didn't go through in

0:49:12.190 --> 0:49:16.109
<v Speaker 3>the courts. It is a very sympathetic thing to watch

0:49:16.170 --> 0:49:19.190
<v Speaker 3>a mother say and cry about the milk that she

0:49:19.250 --> 0:49:22.900
<v Speaker 3>left for herself. child that she's not going to see

0:49:22.940 --> 0:49:25.160
<v Speaker 3>grow up on a day-to-day basis.

0:49:25.180 --> 0:49:26.060
<v Speaker 2>Like, it's terrible.

0:49:26.820 --> 0:49:31.100
<v Speaker 3>But she also probably has it the best of in

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:34.000
<v Speaker 3>terms of like where she was sent and the conditions

0:49:34.060 --> 0:49:37.050
<v Speaker 3>that she's in. And she is like a white person

0:49:37.090 --> 0:49:40.150
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day who has money or

0:49:40.190 --> 0:49:44.010
<v Speaker 3>had and had lawyers and had like all these things

0:49:44.070 --> 0:49:47.250
<v Speaker 3>that aren't always the case or not even usually the

0:49:47.270 --> 0:49:51.439
<v Speaker 3>case for the incarceration in this country. And I think

0:49:51.540 --> 0:49:57.440
<v Speaker 3>that the movie is interesting in that it takes her

0:49:57.500 --> 0:50:03.250
<v Speaker 3>away from being in the movie And I think it's

0:50:03.310 --> 0:50:06.250
<v Speaker 3>like a harrowing kind of depiction of what it's like

0:50:06.290 --> 0:50:09.990
<v Speaker 3>to be incarcerated in this country. And I think it's

0:50:10.850 --> 0:50:15.070
<v Speaker 3>her relationship with her upcoming incarceration in the movie at

0:50:15.110 --> 0:50:17.110
<v Speaker 3>the beginning and then the effects of it at the

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:22.940
<v Speaker 3>second half is very harrowing to watch. And I could,

0:50:23.020 --> 0:50:27.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, obviously there's levels to all these things. But yeah, like,

0:50:28.100 --> 0:50:32.790
<v Speaker 3>jail's that's crazy. That sucks for everyone. It's not a

0:50:32.830 --> 0:50:35.530
<v Speaker 3>good system. It shouldn't be how it is in this country.

0:50:35.590 --> 0:50:36.290
<v Speaker 2>And it's terrible.

0:50:36.489 --> 0:50:42.550
<v Speaker 3>And she's just, she's in jail. And again, she was guilty.

0:50:42.670 --> 0:50:47.140
<v Speaker 3>And we could get into the whole topic of incarceration

0:50:47.180 --> 0:50:51.980
<v Speaker 3>in the United States. But man, she's not getting rehabilitated

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:55.240
<v Speaker 3>she's not like she's it's it's none of those things

0:50:55.390 --> 0:50:58.950
<v Speaker 3>you know um she still has this idea and dream

0:50:59.430 --> 0:51:02.290
<v Speaker 3>of rebuilding something and she said she's gonna work on

0:51:02.330 --> 0:51:04.830
<v Speaker 3>it every day in jail and it's like that's not

0:51:04.850 --> 0:51:08.930
<v Speaker 3>what she needs you know she needed some sort of

0:51:08.989 --> 0:51:13.250
<v Speaker 3>rehabilitation um and that's just not what our prisons provide.

0:51:23.239 --> 0:51:23.840
<v Speaker 5>No, yeah.

0:51:23.880 --> 0:51:27.000
<v Speaker 4>The prison system is a whole conversation we need to have.

0:51:27.020 --> 0:51:29.069
<v Speaker 4>We talked about the juvenile delinquency system and the fact

0:51:29.110 --> 0:51:33.430
<v Speaker 4>that it is built on private profits and private corporations

0:51:33.530 --> 0:51:36.950
<v Speaker 4>here in the U.S. and how much money our administration

0:51:36.989 --> 0:51:41.970
<v Speaker 4>is making currently off of these. And it's not true rehabilitation.

0:51:43.090 --> 0:51:45.500
<v Speaker 4>Should we be funding true rehabilitation? Yeah, if we actually

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:49.500
<v Speaker 4>took all the money that's going into these lockups, the

0:51:49.540 --> 0:51:50.919
<v Speaker 4>amount of change that could be made.

0:51:50.960 --> 0:51:53.919
<v Speaker 5>But that's a whole conversation. different conversation.

0:51:54.380 --> 0:51:56.520
<v Speaker 4>Here, it's interesting because you did bring up, she's a

0:51:56.560 --> 0:52:00.319
<v Speaker 4>white woman, and there's a lot of discourse about the

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:05.259
<v Speaker 4>fact that this could only happen with a blue-eyed, blonde-haired

0:52:05.380 --> 0:52:09.610
<v Speaker 4>white woman to have this conversation of sympathy and a

0:52:09.690 --> 0:52:12.310
<v Speaker 4>discourse about whether or not she is sympathetic, whether or

0:52:12.390 --> 0:52:16.450
<v Speaker 4>not she is the victim here versus being told she

0:52:16.710 --> 0:52:19.850
<v Speaker 4>was manipulative and all of these things, like just that

0:52:19.969 --> 0:52:22.990
<v Speaker 4>one simple conversation, because we could not have the story

0:52:23.150 --> 0:52:25.250
<v Speaker 4>if this was a woman of color, specifically like Black

0:52:25.290 --> 0:52:28.590
<v Speaker 4>women or women, Middle Eastern women in general, Latino women.

0:52:29.090 --> 0:52:31.030
<v Speaker 5>I think like Asian women.

0:52:31.150 --> 0:52:36.109
<v Speaker 4>They're the epitome of aegyo in that level of like cuteness.

0:52:36.380 --> 0:52:38.590
<v Speaker 4>So cuteness can get you a certain amount of time

0:52:39.239 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 4>of certain like stretch of things where the innocence happens.

0:52:42.670 --> 0:52:43.350
<v Speaker 5>Can be portrayed.

0:52:43.630 --> 0:52:45.690
<v Speaker 4>But we know when it comes to women of color,

0:52:45.750 --> 0:52:50.270
<v Speaker 4>that's not often given in any realm. So it is

0:52:50.290 --> 0:52:57.380
<v Speaker 4>a bigger conversation of who is allowed this. She is

0:52:57.420 --> 0:53:00.120
<v Speaker 4>in jail. She is obviously, people are still saying, no,

0:53:00.180 --> 0:53:02.100
<v Speaker 4>she really is not a great. So it's not like

0:53:02.140 --> 0:53:06.759
<v Speaker 4>she's like scot-free in any way of like responsibility. But

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:08.980
<v Speaker 4>the fact that this is a back and forth about

0:53:09.020 --> 0:53:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Nathan Fielder too, like Does he believe her? Did he

0:53:12.040 --> 0:53:13.980
<v Speaker 4>get manipulated by her? Is he now kind of more

0:53:14.020 --> 0:53:16.859
<v Speaker 4>on her side? Like, how did that go about? Could

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 4>that have happened if this was a Black woman? Or

0:53:19.180 --> 0:53:21.080
<v Speaker 4>could that have happened if this was, you know, a

0:53:21.120 --> 0:53:25.279
<v Speaker 4>Muslim woman? Like, is this an actual thing? Or is

0:53:25.360 --> 0:53:28.319
<v Speaker 4>this like a part of the bias that needs to

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:31.680
<v Speaker 4>be talked about on a wider gap? A lot of like,

0:53:31.739 --> 0:53:33.880
<v Speaker 4>like I said, on TikTok, I've seen Black women coming like,

0:53:33.940 --> 0:53:36.859
<v Speaker 4>this is something that we could not relate to. This

0:53:36.960 --> 0:53:41.630
<v Speaker 4>is not for me. This entire thing is showing me, again,

0:53:41.850 --> 0:53:44.890
<v Speaker 4>how bad the system is broken on a different level

0:53:45.530 --> 0:53:48.750
<v Speaker 4>once again. And just like you were saying, like, in

0:53:48.850 --> 0:53:52.890
<v Speaker 4>her level of trying to be a little more sympathetic in, like,

0:53:53.310 --> 0:53:55.489
<v Speaker 4>in this conversation of, like, we want, we do feel

0:53:55.510 --> 0:53:58.569
<v Speaker 4>bad for her because, yeah, it was heartbreaking to see

0:53:58.610 --> 0:54:01.330
<v Speaker 4>her cry about the fact that she has milk in

0:54:01.390 --> 0:54:03.810
<v Speaker 4>the refrigerator for her daughter because she was not going

0:54:03.830 --> 0:54:05.870
<v Speaker 4>to be able to breastfeed her. So, like, I had

0:54:05.890 --> 0:54:08.390
<v Speaker 4>this saved up in trying to be a mother. But

0:54:08.450 --> 0:54:10.930
<v Speaker 4>it's also convenient that all the times that she needs

0:54:10.950 --> 0:54:13.779
<v Speaker 4>to go away or stop a conversation, most of the

0:54:13.820 --> 0:54:16.880
<v Speaker 4>times it's whether it's like having to rock the baby

0:54:17.040 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 4>or having to breastfeed the baby or having to go

0:54:20.260 --> 0:54:23.920
<v Speaker 4>help the baby or going to go lay down. It

0:54:24.469 --> 0:54:28.910
<v Speaker 4>almost went into overtime to show how loving she was.

0:54:29.010 --> 0:54:32.690
<v Speaker 4>And I can't remember, Annie or Rima, if you remember,

0:54:32.710 --> 0:54:40.489
<v Speaker 4>when she was initially convicted, I thought at one point

0:54:40.530 --> 0:54:42.830
<v Speaker 4>she was actually supposed to go to prison earlier, but

0:54:42.870 --> 0:54:44.690
<v Speaker 4>then they found out she was pregnant and she was

0:54:44.810 --> 0:54:49.910
<v Speaker 4>able to postpone until after the birth of the baby.

0:54:49.969 --> 0:54:51.570
<v Speaker 5>Did that happen or did that just make that up

0:54:51.610 --> 0:54:52.140
<v Speaker 5>in my head?

0:54:52.160 --> 0:55:00.020
<v Speaker 3>They postponed, I think, the trial because she was late

0:55:00.060 --> 0:55:04.380
<v Speaker 3>in her pregnancy. And so they postponed it to after

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:06.620
<v Speaker 3>she had given birth and things like that.

0:55:07.570 --> 0:55:07.750
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:55:07.969 --> 0:55:08.830
<v Speaker 5>Which is legitimate.

0:55:08.850 --> 0:55:09.290
<v Speaker 2>Which is legitimate.

0:55:09.310 --> 0:55:13.790
<v Speaker 5>Stress is bad. Yeah. But did she time that?

0:55:13.910 --> 0:55:14.150
<v Speaker 4>I know.

0:55:14.210 --> 0:55:18.310
<v Speaker 3>I think that's definitely a good question because she had,

0:55:18.950 --> 0:55:22.280
<v Speaker 3>and then she had her second kid as well. But also,

0:55:22.610 --> 0:55:26.340
<v Speaker 3>if she knows that her incarceration is coming, maybe she

0:55:26.380 --> 0:55:30.200
<v Speaker 3>doesn't know at the time, but like in that article,

0:55:30.260 --> 0:55:33.339
<v Speaker 3>the New York Times article, oh, I hate shouting out

0:55:33.360 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the New York Times.

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:34.520
<v Speaker 2>I hate it.

0:55:35.040 --> 0:55:38.270
<v Speaker 3>But she says that like, Her and Billy wanted a

0:55:38.290 --> 0:55:42.330
<v Speaker 3>big family and didn't want to wait to see what happens, basically.

0:55:42.350 --> 0:55:46.430
<v Speaker 3>I do want to shout out, because I'm done shouting

0:55:46.469 --> 0:55:49.200
<v Speaker 3>out the New York Times. This article that Annie was

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:52.880
<v Speaker 3>referencing earlier, I should have mentioned, is a Brooklyn Mag

0:55:53.219 --> 0:55:58.420
<v Speaker 3>article written by Ock Sportello. I'm sorry if that's not

0:55:58.460 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 3>the right way to pronounce your name. You can see

0:56:01.700 --> 0:56:06.779
<v Speaker 3>everything unless you're in prison. It's a great read, honestly.

0:56:08.860 --> 0:56:11.950
<v Speaker 3>That kind of... Yeah, it brings about a lot of

0:56:11.989 --> 0:56:16.630
<v Speaker 3>these questions about how incarceration is shown in the movie.

0:56:17.730 --> 0:56:19.930
<v Speaker 2>It's a good article. I would recommend it. I don't

0:56:19.969 --> 0:56:21.970
<v Speaker 2>know Brooklyn Mag that heavily or anything.

0:56:22.510 --> 0:56:24.350
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think there's just so much.

0:56:25.739 --> 0:56:28.009
<v Speaker 4>Because I also want to go back in that conversation

0:56:28.050 --> 0:56:31.310
<v Speaker 4>about the fact that would she be constantly going back

0:56:31.370 --> 0:56:34.310
<v Speaker 4>to Theranos and starting it over again, if not for Billy?

0:56:34.330 --> 0:56:38.669
<v Speaker 4>Would she have actually set it aside, except that he's

0:56:38.750 --> 0:56:41.049
<v Speaker 4>doing all this extra research to help her?

0:56:41.090 --> 0:56:42.980
<v Speaker 5>He's going to fix it for her, which is, again,

0:56:44.520 --> 0:56:47.600
<v Speaker 5>very much on par with the tech bro, Red Pill Dune.

0:56:48.219 --> 0:56:51.600
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, this one was definitely one that has me

0:56:51.620 --> 0:56:53.660
<v Speaker 4>going back and forth because it's also a part of

0:56:53.700 --> 0:56:55.600
<v Speaker 4>me Which I feel like Nathan Fielder felt this way

0:56:55.620 --> 0:56:58.000
<v Speaker 4>because he says it at the very beginning of the documentary.

0:56:58.020 --> 0:57:01.919
<v Speaker 4>He's like, my fear is, my insecurity is that you

0:57:01.940 --> 0:57:04.160
<v Speaker 4>brought me in, as Annie, you were asking him before.

0:57:04.540 --> 0:57:07.780
<v Speaker 4>You brought me in thinking because I don't know science well,

0:57:07.890 --> 0:57:10.069
<v Speaker 4>that I'm not a scientist, that you're going to be

0:57:10.120 --> 0:57:12.910
<v Speaker 4>able to like get over on me because you think

0:57:12.950 --> 0:57:17.810
<v Speaker 4>I'm too stupid and ignorant to science to understand what

0:57:17.850 --> 0:57:20.780
<v Speaker 4>you're doing and when you're lying. And I feel like

0:57:20.920 --> 0:57:23.900
<v Speaker 4>that's kind of how all of us feel at this point.

0:57:23.940 --> 0:57:26.000
<v Speaker 4>We're all on edge, which is probably my part of

0:57:26.020 --> 0:57:28.140
<v Speaker 4>my anxiety is like we don't want to be made

0:57:28.180 --> 0:57:32.080
<v Speaker 4>a fool of like Amanda and Nathan had said. So

0:57:32.120 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 4>we're trying to figure out what is happening and we

0:57:35.740 --> 0:57:41.860
<v Speaker 4>don't want to be manipulated by either Elizabeth or Nathan

0:57:42.140 --> 0:57:45.050
<v Speaker 4>at this point. Like we were trying to figure out

0:57:45.190 --> 0:57:47.050
<v Speaker 4>how to do this because like are y'all trying to

0:57:47.070 --> 0:57:49.090
<v Speaker 4>make us look stupid here?

0:57:50.290 --> 0:57:53.390
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess it is hard to question. I don't know.

0:57:54.290 --> 0:58:00.140
<v Speaker 1>I'm not in that field. I do, you know, we

0:58:00.160 --> 0:58:03.100
<v Speaker 1>could keep going on and on. I did want to mention,

0:58:03.120 --> 0:58:09.540
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, I kind of know the answer, but I've polled,

0:58:09.660 --> 0:58:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I did an informal poll of all my friends who

0:58:13.100 --> 0:58:17.140
<v Speaker 1>have seen this movie after a text exchange we had

0:58:17.200 --> 0:58:21.630
<v Speaker 1>this morning in our group. I was like, okay, who

0:58:21.750 --> 0:58:24.790
<v Speaker 1>thought there was some kind of romantic sexual tension?

0:58:24.830 --> 0:58:27.410
<v Speaker 2>And explain it to me.

0:58:28.130 --> 0:58:36.030
<v Speaker 1>And I got such fascinating responses. People had such different takes.

0:58:36.430 --> 0:58:46.150
<v Speaker 1>But the general take was that Elizabeth Holmes was maybe

0:58:46.490 --> 0:58:51.610
<v Speaker 1>using some kind of attraction or sympathy she has to

0:58:51.650 --> 0:58:58.410
<v Speaker 1>her advantage to get a romantic attraction. He has that

0:58:58.430 --> 0:59:00.180
<v Speaker 1>weird line where he randomly is like, I don't have

0:59:00.200 --> 0:59:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a girlfriend anymore.

0:59:01.520 --> 0:59:03.320
<v Speaker 2>We broke up.

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:07.300
<v Speaker 1>But that goes back to that tension I keep coming

0:59:07.360 --> 0:59:12.940
<v Speaker 1>to where it sounds so oh a woman i don't

0:59:12.980 --> 0:59:15.410
<v Speaker 1>know but she is manipulative.

0:59:14.870 --> 0:59:15.630
<v Speaker 2>It's just.

0:59:16.930 --> 0:59:18.770
<v Speaker 1>I go back and forth about this but i'm just

0:59:18.870 --> 0:59:22.530
<v Speaker 1>interested your thoughts on this because i do think it's

0:59:22.550 --> 0:59:24.750
<v Speaker 1>going to be a big halloween couple's costume.

0:59:26.070 --> 0:59:28.150
<v Speaker 3>I want to point out at the very beginning of

0:59:28.210 --> 0:59:32.550
<v Speaker 3>the movie, they talk about how holding eye contact is

0:59:32.630 --> 0:59:38.780
<v Speaker 3>her flirtation technique. And then you proceed to watch her

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:43.140
<v Speaker 3>hold such insane eye contact with Nathan for like three hours.

0:59:44.260 --> 0:59:48.380
<v Speaker 2>And I'm like, are they flirting? Oh my gosh. So interesting.

0:59:48.440 --> 0:59:49.140
<v Speaker 2>So strange.

0:59:49.280 --> 0:59:52.380
<v Speaker 3>I think they're both kind of masters of holding eye.

0:59:52.950 --> 0:59:56.050
<v Speaker 3>the tension without breaking it. And that is in a

0:59:56.070 --> 1:00:01.350
<v Speaker 3>way kind of creates this like curiosity for us as viewers,

1:00:01.690 --> 1:00:05.030
<v Speaker 3>because for any other person, you know, you want to

1:00:05.050 --> 1:00:07.840
<v Speaker 3>break that tension. But when it's held for so long,

1:00:07.900 --> 1:00:11.020
<v Speaker 3>you're kind of like, wait, do they like this? Like,

1:00:11.140 --> 1:00:14.340
<v Speaker 3>are they into this right now? And there was a

1:00:14.400 --> 1:00:19.020
<v Speaker 3>scene when he's saying bye to her, where I genuinely

1:00:19.080 --> 1:00:20.520
<v Speaker 3>thought they were going in.

1:00:20.490 --> 1:00:21.090
<v Speaker 2>For a kiss.

1:00:21.230 --> 1:00:25.150
<v Speaker 3>Like, I genuinely thought that. And I was holding my

1:00:25.190 --> 1:00:29.510
<v Speaker 3>hands to my face, like, what has this movie become?

1:00:33.260 --> 1:00:36.280
<v Speaker 4>I literally was like, you know, because it's kind of funny,

1:00:36.300 --> 1:00:38.200
<v Speaker 4>the little, and then they kiss?

1:00:39.060 --> 1:00:41.380
<v Speaker 5>I know.

1:00:41.400 --> 1:00:42.860
<v Speaker 4>I know.

1:00:43.340 --> 1:00:45.230
<v Speaker 3>And I think this isn't the first time where I

1:00:45.270 --> 1:00:49.620
<v Speaker 3>feel like with like a subject in one of Nathan's

1:00:50.660 --> 1:00:55.050
<v Speaker 3>things that there's like this strange chemistry because I do

1:00:55.090 --> 1:01:00.110
<v Speaker 3>think there is so much energy held in the ability

1:01:00.150 --> 1:01:03.950
<v Speaker 3>to not break silence. So it's not that I don't

1:01:03.970 --> 1:01:06.740
<v Speaker 3>think this is the first time that people have been

1:01:07.080 --> 1:01:10.920
<v Speaker 3>feeling that from him towards a subject and vice versa.

1:01:12.120 --> 1:01:16.290
<v Speaker 3>But I think she's just literally his like, Yeah, his

1:01:16.330 --> 1:01:17.330
<v Speaker 3>immovable object.

1:01:17.410 --> 1:01:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Moriarty to his Sherlock Holmes. Exactly.

1:01:21.340 --> 1:01:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Hey.

1:01:22.300 --> 1:01:22.980
<v Speaker 5>There it is.

1:01:23.800 --> 1:01:27.580
<v Speaker 4>No, so what I understand, in one of his, I

1:01:27.600 --> 1:01:30.640
<v Speaker 4>don't know if it's an episode or one of his movies,

1:01:30.700 --> 1:01:32.910
<v Speaker 4>Nathan Filder does admit to using.

1:01:32.760 --> 1:01:35.410
<v Speaker 5>His awkwardness as a way to flirt. Like he knows

1:01:35.630 --> 1:01:37.470
<v Speaker 5>this works. For many.

1:01:37.610 --> 1:01:41.590
<v Speaker 4>And honestly, apparently, so many of the internets want to

1:01:41.630 --> 1:01:44.010
<v Speaker 4>be his girlfriend and kept talking about how hot he is.

1:01:44.050 --> 1:01:46.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, I'm very angry about that statement.

1:01:46.860 --> 1:01:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Don't talk to me.

1:01:47.920 --> 1:01:50.340
<v Speaker 4>Whoever you are, don't talk to me because I just

1:01:50.380 --> 1:01:53.360
<v Speaker 4>want to smack him. But I'm just kidding. Please cut

1:01:53.380 --> 1:01:55.000
<v Speaker 4>that part out. People get mad at me.

1:01:55.020 --> 1:01:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Samantha wants to be violent.

1:01:55.860 --> 1:01:59.140
<v Speaker 5>That's how I got canceled. I just want to smack him.

1:01:59.590 --> 1:02:01.950
<v Speaker 4>But I think like one of the things that I

1:02:01.970 --> 1:02:04.850
<v Speaker 4>can see is is it may not even be so

1:02:04.890 --> 1:02:07.970
<v Speaker 4>much the flirtation between the two. Like, I don't think

1:02:07.990 --> 1:02:10.180
<v Speaker 4>she's trying to seduce him, and I don't necessarily think

1:02:10.200 --> 1:02:13.140
<v Speaker 4>he's trying to seduce her, but it's that white woman

1:02:13.720 --> 1:02:17.300
<v Speaker 4>protector field, where it is he wants to be her

1:02:17.320 --> 1:02:20.900
<v Speaker 4>knight in shining armor, or he's playing into that, and

1:02:20.960 --> 1:02:24.390
<v Speaker 4>that's what she's hoping. That's why she's hoping, like, he'll

1:02:24.450 --> 1:02:26.990
<v Speaker 4>want to protect her. So if he can be protective

1:02:27.170 --> 1:02:29.720
<v Speaker 4>of her, then the things that he's going to relay

1:02:29.740 --> 1:02:32.580
<v Speaker 4>to the audience will make everybody else feel that way

1:02:32.880 --> 1:02:37.400
<v Speaker 4>and somehow rally behind or even revolt for her, actually

1:02:37.540 --> 1:02:41.340
<v Speaker 4>fight for her somehow to be like, whether it's the

1:02:41.410 --> 1:02:43.330
<v Speaker 4>social media, she needs to be released.

1:02:43.350 --> 1:02:45.750
<v Speaker 5>I think that's what she's.

1:02:45.590 --> 1:02:49.510
<v Speaker 4>Hoping for is this turning tide of she truly becomes

1:02:49.570 --> 1:02:53.010
<v Speaker 4>the victim and these white woman tears and this look

1:02:53.030 --> 1:02:58.160
<v Speaker 4>of intensity. Because I'm... My partner did say, is she wearing,

1:02:58.700 --> 1:03:01.810
<v Speaker 4>like her eyes are blue, but there's also reflections of contacts,

1:03:01.850 --> 1:03:04.090
<v Speaker 4>which is fine. She might just wear contacts for sure.

1:03:04.110 --> 1:03:06.710
<v Speaker 4>But like, does she enhance them so she can have

1:03:06.790 --> 1:03:11.010
<v Speaker 4>even more of that intense stare and depth because it

1:03:11.130 --> 1:03:13.980
<v Speaker 4>does bring that level. So if she is, that's another

1:03:14.440 --> 1:03:17.800
<v Speaker 4>tactic that can be used on other people. And so

1:03:18.300 --> 1:03:21.480
<v Speaker 4>perhaps one of the things about what she understands about

1:03:21.540 --> 1:03:27.100
<v Speaker 4>herself is she knows that awkward guys like her whether

1:03:27.140 --> 1:03:31.410
<v Speaker 4>it's because she does have that intense attention holding gaze

1:03:31.890 --> 1:03:34.710
<v Speaker 4>or like where they feel like they're being chosen to

1:03:34.750 --> 1:03:38.790
<v Speaker 4>be her protector once again like i feel like that

1:03:38.870 --> 1:03:42.170
<v Speaker 4>might be the level of what i'm seeing it's like

1:03:42.470 --> 1:03:45.210
<v Speaker 4>not just like oh they want each other there's something

1:03:45.310 --> 1:03:49.250
<v Speaker 4>into that realm of that stereotype or that.

1:03:49.170 --> 1:03:53.810
<v Speaker 1>Trope which is also like Listeners, if you've made it

1:03:53.850 --> 1:03:57.070
<v Speaker 1>this far, if you don't know the story, I guess,

1:03:58.090 --> 1:04:00.650
<v Speaker 1>it's also an argument you could make. Did she learn

1:04:00.710 --> 1:04:04.430
<v Speaker 1>this behavior from Sunny, who was her longtime partner that

1:04:04.470 --> 1:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>she got with at a young age? Or did she

1:04:08.380 --> 1:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>just know? Like, that's a societal thing. She knows, like,

1:04:10.960 --> 1:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a white woman with blonde hair and blue eyes. Or

1:04:14.300 --> 1:04:16.380
<v Speaker 1>was she taught it by someone?

1:04:18.080 --> 1:04:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Questions! We're left with more questions. Questions. Add it to

1:04:22.460 --> 1:04:28.790
<v Speaker 2>the questions list. Well, thank you so much for coming on, Rima.

1:04:28.990 --> 1:04:32.270
<v Speaker 2>This has been so great. Thanks for having me. This

1:04:33.090 --> 1:04:36.510
<v Speaker 2>was great. Anytime, anytime. And I'm sure we could come

1:04:36.550 --> 1:04:37.050
<v Speaker 2>back later.

1:04:37.070 --> 1:04:41.230
<v Speaker 1>Because there's still ongoing news about this right now. Yes.

1:04:41.990 --> 1:04:44.890
<v Speaker 5>I had to look up what Billy's reaction is. He's

1:04:44.910 --> 1:04:45.470
<v Speaker 5>seen it, apparently.

1:04:45.490 --> 1:04:46.530
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Billy is in the news.

1:04:46.900 --> 1:04:47.160
<v Speaker 4>Great.

1:04:47.180 --> 1:04:48.140
<v Speaker 2>Billy's in the news.

1:04:48.620 --> 1:04:51.740
<v Speaker 5>He's seen this. He doesn't seem too unhappy. I don't know.

1:04:51.820 --> 1:04:55.120
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to tell you guys something. So you know

1:04:55.160 --> 1:04:57.050
<v Speaker 3>how their daughter's name is Ivy?

1:04:57.410 --> 1:04:57.890
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

1:04:58.510 --> 1:05:04.070
<v Speaker 3>Her actual name is like Evictus. And so they're calling

1:05:04.110 --> 1:05:06.790
<v Speaker 3>her Ivy as in like the letters I and then V.

1:05:09.630 --> 1:05:09.810
<v Speaker 4>Oh.

1:05:09.910 --> 1:05:13.970
<v Speaker 2>Not like her name is Ivy. Why Ivy? Like these

1:05:14.200 --> 1:05:18.460
<v Speaker 2>people are just stupid. Rich people.

1:05:18.480 --> 1:05:24.430
<v Speaker 5>That's insane. They're like, oh yeah, blood, get it?

1:05:25.750 --> 1:05:28.950
<v Speaker 3>It's just all kind of plays into the questions and

1:05:29.530 --> 1:05:32.290
<v Speaker 3>the characters and what's real and what's not. Like every

1:05:32.330 --> 1:05:35.910
<v Speaker 3>little decision they make. I mean, naming your child's not

1:05:36.010 --> 1:05:40.570
<v Speaker 3>a little decision, but like, yeah, that's her name.

1:05:43.070 --> 1:05:45.610
<v Speaker 2>Oh, gosh. And I'm sure years in the future, Ivy

1:05:46.590 --> 1:05:48.760
<v Speaker 2>will have A documentary.

1:05:48.800 --> 1:05:49.090
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:05:49.990 --> 1:05:54.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the kids are the biggest sadness about the whole...

1:05:54.920 --> 1:05:58.720
<v Speaker 3>It's just sad that there's kids involved with people that

1:05:58.780 --> 1:06:00.280
<v Speaker 3>are questionable.

1:06:01.400 --> 1:06:01.760
<v Speaker 4>Anyways.

1:06:02.420 --> 1:06:04.660
<v Speaker 1>And there is, I mean, a lot to say about

1:06:04.700 --> 1:06:07.700
<v Speaker 1>this movie. I love how I just kind of put

1:06:07.740 --> 1:06:11.330
<v Speaker 1>a little note and then you were not the only one, Rima,

1:06:11.390 --> 1:06:13.970
<v Speaker 1>who jumped in and said, okay, wait, I want to

1:06:13.990 --> 1:06:14.670
<v Speaker 1>go see it.

1:06:15.230 --> 1:06:15.830
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:06:16.850 --> 1:06:19.230
<v Speaker 1>And it's caused a lot of conversation because it is,

1:06:20.070 --> 1:06:24.170
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated. Going back to that, it is complicated. But yeah,

1:06:24.370 --> 1:06:28.180
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being here. Loved having you.

1:06:29.370 --> 1:06:31.690
<v Speaker 1>Where can the good listeners find you?

1:06:32.070 --> 1:06:36.730
<v Speaker 2>The listeners can find me behind the scenes at Sminty.

1:06:38.150 --> 1:06:40.310
<v Speaker 2>If you want to say anything to me, you can

1:06:40.390 --> 1:06:42.870
<v Speaker 2>email Sminty. Yes.

1:06:43.200 --> 1:06:43.890
<v Speaker 5>I am on.

1:06:45.540 --> 1:06:46.380
<v Speaker 2>I'm around town.

1:06:46.600 --> 1:06:46.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

1:06:47.140 --> 1:06:49.780
<v Speaker 2>You can't really find me. You can go to my website.

1:06:49.800 --> 1:06:52.740
<v Speaker 2>Rima's Mysterious. I'm a little mysterious. No, no. I have

1:06:52.760 --> 1:06:53.260
<v Speaker 2>a website.

1:06:53.420 --> 1:06:58.100
<v Speaker 3>It's rimamade.com. I like movies a lot. I watch a

1:06:58.140 --> 1:07:01.380
<v Speaker 3>lot of them. If you want to find my letterbox,

1:07:01.500 --> 1:07:03.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm on there. But you have to find it. I

1:07:03.740 --> 1:07:06.040
<v Speaker 3>don't know what to tell you. I'm not going to

1:07:06.060 --> 1:07:08.590
<v Speaker 3>tell you what it is. It's worth it.

1:07:08.610 --> 1:07:11.250
<v Speaker 2>The review. Rima sent us the review for this movie.

1:07:11.270 --> 1:07:12.610
<v Speaker 5>It's like a scavenger hunt for Rima.

1:07:12.630 --> 1:07:13.870
<v Speaker 2>Great. The first one.

1:07:13.890 --> 1:07:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

1:07:13.970 --> 1:07:16.850
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. But yes, just very happy to

1:07:16.890 --> 1:07:20.950
<v Speaker 2>be here. Happy to talk with you guys. And this

1:07:20.990 --> 1:07:21.610
<v Speaker 2>was super fun.

1:07:22.850 --> 1:07:27.710
<v Speaker 1>And fun. I look forward to next time. In the meantime, listeners,

1:07:27.730 --> 1:07:30.330
<v Speaker 1>you can email us if you would like at hello

1:07:30.370 --> 1:07:32.930
<v Speaker 1>at stuffonevertoldyou.com. You can find us on Blue Sky at

1:07:32.950 --> 1:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>MomStuffPodcast or on Instagram and TikTok at stuffonevertoldyou. We're also

1:07:36.700 --> 1:07:38.600
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. We have some merchandise at Cotton Bureau. And

1:07:38.620 --> 1:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>we have a book you can get wherever you get

1:07:40.000 --> 1:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>your books. Thanks, as always, to our super producer, Rima.

1:07:43.500 --> 1:07:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Hey, thank you.

1:07:44.720 --> 1:07:47.700
<v Speaker 2>You are welcome. Thank you.

1:07:47.720 --> 1:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>And our executive producer, Maya. And thanks to you for listening.

1:07:52.960 --> 1:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Stuff I've Never Told You is a production of iHeartRadio.

1:07:54.580 --> 1:07:56.410
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, you can check out the

1:07:56.430 --> 1:07:58.390
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

1:07:58.410 --> 1:07:58.990
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.

1:08:07.290 --> 1:08:08.030
<v Speaker 2>We didn't talk about...