WEBVTT - The Ultimate Infield Guide: Sleepers, Busts, and Must-Have Targets (Ep. 926)

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy Pros MLB. This is the

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Baseball Podcast. It is me Joey p joe Pisapia

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>with me of course is the Welsh. And it's time

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.079
<v Speaker 1>to hit the guides. That's right, it's time for the

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Ultimate infield Guide. We're gonna go through the positions, give

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you a little overview of the top guys at the position,

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>give you our favorite sleepers, our busts, and our must

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>haves at those positions. And of course, if you're looking

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to check out the ranks for yourself, you can go

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to Fantasypros dot com to do so, and we encourage

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you to do that, of course all the time. And

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, if you're looking for the ultimate cheat sheet,

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that's right, you're looking for the ultimate opportunity, the cheat

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>code of all cheat codes. We're talking about Draft Wizard.

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>So right now you can go download Draft Wizard. The

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>app is available for Draft Wizard MLB. Download that bad

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>boy today. You get live draft advice player recommendations. Every

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>time you're on the clock, you can run a million

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>draft simulations. What are you doing this weekend? I'll tell

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you what you're doing this weekend. You are running draft simulations.

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 1>That's what you're doing. And don't forget to sink your

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 1>leagues for free, because the draft software will go right

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to your league and help you make recommendations. It'll help

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>give you expert advice. You can use the pick predictor

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the cheat sheets, all kinds of amazing tools, but that

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>only comes when you download the Draft Wizards, So do

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it right now. War head over to fantasypros dot com

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>slash MLB Draft Wizard today. All right, Welsh, let's start

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>at first base. I don't want to start a catcher.

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Catcher is a little me boring for me. I doubt

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. So first base it is today, and we're

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna run through the top guys at the position here

0:01:31.120 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and give you a little overview. At the top, of course,

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Vlad Junior going at sixteen overall right now currently in

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>adp Bryce Harper, Freddy Freeman, Matt Olsen, Pete Alonzo. Then

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a dip here. You have guys like Diazu. Again,

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather be a catcher than at first base. Josh Naylor,

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Christian Walker. Two guys that have moved locations here, Cody Bellinger,

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Spencer Steer, Tristan Cassis, Vinnie Pascuentino. So there's definitively a

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>group at the top of sluggers. After that a group

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>where you think you can probably get some power out

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of guys like Nailer and guys like Christian Walker Cody

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Bellinger hopefully on a balance back. And then it's kind

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of a little bit of a leap of faith, maybe

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>with costs in Pascalentino, but to me, first basis a

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit more of a priority. I like to hit

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it early.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 2>How about you, Yeah, I think for the most part,

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 2>I've got these clumps. Obviously, Vlad and Bryce Harper make

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sense. I'm a little bit faidie of

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe Freeman. I'm not super super interested in Olsen and Alonzo.

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 2>So it's like, you know, I'm gonna have to essentially

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 2>pick a second round for a first baseman or then

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm skipping for a while. Then we go into that

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 2>like third tier of first basement, which you talk about,

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 2>which I think is gonna be my sweet spot and

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 2>something I have to target, and then another just deep

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 2>thing to think about. We're gonna talk about it here.

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Third base depth isn't fantastic. So if you have a

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 2>corner infield spot. I'm personally trying to fill my corner

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 2>infield spot from first base, and you can go deeper

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 2>if you want, because I think there's some nice sleepers.

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna talk about some of those guys. But even

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 2>if you wanted to take away from that core top twelve,

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 2>top fourteen a first baseman, you're just not going to

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 2>hurt yourself if you invested in let's just say first

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>basement number six and first basement number ten because the

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 2>cost is a little depreciated with really great return. So yeah,

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:13.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to wait too too long in my

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 2>investment on first base, but I'm going in tiers and

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 2>little chunks of the guys that are my targets.

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about sleepers too, because obviously a

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of leagues have corner spots. And a guy that

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I like at the corner spot is Alec Burlson of

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the Saint Louis Cardinals. That was one of our favorite

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire pickups last year. He really took off. He's

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 1>got position flexibility too, which is also a nice thing

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to have for a player when you're drafting them a

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>little later, and if you look at what he did

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>last year, Welsh, I mean across the board, incredibly productive

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>on a team that was really underwhelming. He cracked seventy

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>runs and seventy rbi. He had nine steals, he had

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>two sixty seven twenty one home runs. To me, he's

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the modern day version potentially of ben Zobris,

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>like a guy who just kind of gives you a

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 1>little to everything. Is he spectacular, No, but certainly a

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that can be productive. And I do expect some

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>incremental improvements from Saint Louis year over a year, because

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I think last year was a little bit of an anomally.

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I think some of these kids, hopefully we'll start to

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>get it. Maybe this will be the Jordan Walker year,

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe Mason Wins and of the other guys really start

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>to take the next step forward. Berlson's a guy for

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>me who's a sleeper for you at first.

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Basically, one thing I want to point out with Birlson

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.160
<v Speaker 2>I like this one too deeper league play, and the

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 2>Cardinals have lost so many players into free agent. They're

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 2>the only team as we record this that has not

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>signed a single free agent then signed a single free

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 2>agent of all MLB teams are just crazy, So Burlson's

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.799
<v Speaker 2>going to get an opportunity to move up in the lineup.

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of a.

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.719
<v Speaker 3>All of what is it? All tides rise the boats?

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>That is that thing you are so close is born

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>all A rising tide raises all shifts boats.

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 2>There you go, okay, and the tide here is all

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 2>of these guys coming out and then moving up in

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.279
<v Speaker 2>the lineup. So that's my great analogy here. I'll do

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 2>something better than analogies. I'll give you a sleeper that

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 2>I really like instead.

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you I can hear the analogies all day,

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:00.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'll take a sleep. Yeah.

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I couldn't handle the comments all day. But the

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 2>guy I'm gonna go with because I like your Burlson here,

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go with Michael Tolia with the Colorado Rockies.

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 2>I've talked about totallya a decent amount of this offseason

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 2>that the overall like big hit profile is pretty enormous.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 2>He had a seventeen percent barrel rate with a fifty

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 2>percent hard hit rate.

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 3>Those are monstrous numbers.

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Now, he's got a strikeout problem, and he had a

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 2>batting average problem. He only hit two eighteen last year,

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and he had a thirty two percent strikeout rate. Those

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 2>stink the positives though, take that hitting profile. He had

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>an expected batting average of close to two forty, which

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I really really like. And he hits in Colorado it's

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the most hit or friendly environment you can have. And

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 2>one of my main points to this is his ADP's

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 2>around like one seventy or so. I don't believe you

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 2>know he's in the top twelve of who you mentioned,

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 2>or even top fifteen. Power is can be hard to

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 2>come by. Like I think we all pick and choose

0:05:50.040 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 2>these different things. Okay, I got to focus on stolen bases.

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 2>No longer do we care about trying to find stolen

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 2>bases late. You can find it all the time. The

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 2>two pieces that seem harder in the hitting world to

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 2>find later in drafts are a batting average, which he

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 2>doesn't help you with, but be elite power, not just power.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Alec Burlson twenty homer is awesome, great, he has better

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.239
<v Speaker 2>batting average, but finding thirty five plus home run power

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.919
<v Speaker 2>outside the top one fifty, it's not one hundred percent

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 2>there totally. It does provide that totally you could be

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 2>a forty home run hitter. He can't hit two twenty again.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 2>But I think the hitting profile works really well in Colorado,

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 2>where he should be hitting again higher in a lineup,

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 2>hopefully there's RBI opportunities.

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 3>Think he's a sleeper.

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 2>He fits for all teams, and I really think there's

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 2>a possibility that that batting average doesn't become some big

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.760
<v Speaker 2>albatross to your team like a Joey Gallo.

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 3>So Tolia is a sleeper for me.

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>By the way, one more known on Burlson too before

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we move on to the bus. Looks like he's projected

0:06:42.440 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>at number two in that order, two between Contreras and

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 1>then Win at the top. So I also like that too.

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Lineup spot matters a lot, and that's what whils she's

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 1>talking about his guy in Colorado. Two. Okay, so there's sleepers.

0:06:53.320 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>There's also a bus at the position for me, Ryan

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Mintcastle and Ryan Mountcastle. I know that's Mike Mayer's favorite player,

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and I know he's going to get very mad at

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>me for saying this, But three years in a row,

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>declining home runs and declining power, and you know, some

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of the games played the last couple years be a

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>little limited to now he's still hitting that at two

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy range. But my old thing is I feel like

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>he's about to get squeezed out of Baltimore. Potentially Kobe

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Meyo eventually going to come up, and that's going to

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>create some sort of logjam at the corners because you

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 1>gotta have the DH spot kind of locked up. Me

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>he could playm at DH two, But I don't know.

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like the new blood of the Baltimore

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Orioles is really pushing forward there and it's going to

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to push this year. And I feel like Mountcastle

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>might be a guy that has dealt at some point

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>by the trade deadline. Potentially if some more of these

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>young guys push him out or worse, he gets in

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this weird rotational thing where he's not like an everyday player,

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and that to me is also potentially bust worthy. So

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Maltcowsle is a guy that I'm personally avoiding in twenty

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, wells, who are you avoiding? In first base?

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Ces Christian Incarnacion's strand And I could eat my words

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 2>on this one because last year just wasn't great.

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 3>There's a ton of miss time. There really wasn't a

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 3>ton of it bats.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 2>The hitting profile was completely different. But I think in

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 2>theory you could chalk that up to the.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 3>Injury, and that's kind of the big thing.

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 2>There's a couple guys that I'm just not really buying

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 2>bounce backs. We're going to talk about a guy in

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit at third base. It's kind of the

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 2>same thing because in this past year, barrel percentage dipped,

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 2>expected batting average dipped strikeouts were still incredibly high, and

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>he stopped walking whatsoever. But comparative to the year prior,

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Strand had an ten percent barrel rate, forty eight percent

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>hard hit rate, which was elite. He walked two percent

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 2>more of the time, and he had an XBA of

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 2>two seventy after he hit two seventy. So it was like, oh,

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 2>this might be a power hitter with batting average. The

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 2>injury depleted some of that, so it could be one

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 2>of those two ways. I watched him in the Arizona

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 2>Fall League. It doesn't it doesn't seem comfortable still. Positionally,

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 2>they don't know where he's going.

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 3>They were talking about the outfield.

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't want to be there, and the Reds are

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 2>collecting players like its pokemon. There Austin Hayes are trying

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 2>to trade for Police Robert. They're getting everybody, and it's

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 2>looking like a situation where Strand is going to be

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 2>put in at best maybe maybe a situational player. So

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm just not in on it. The profile what I

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 2>saw on there is in a fall league was kind

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>of athletically. I don't know if the Reds fully trust him.

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 2>His cost is still kind of up there, so I

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:20.079
<v Speaker 2>am going to be busting Cees.

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 3>No thanks, all.

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, must haves. I don't spend too much time on

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>this guy, because we talked about him in some of

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>our undervalue shows that we just did. The Undervalued Hitter

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Show should be up there on the YouTube channel. Go

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>check that out. But Tristan Cassas, he's gonna have Durham

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and Devors hitting ahead of him. Think he's gonna see

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fastballs this year, and I think he's

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 1>in a really good spot. Projected hit third in that

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:40.600
<v Speaker 1>lineup right now over on Fangrafts and the roster resource there,

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and I think that when you look at some of

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the projections, you see zips As with twenty nine home runs.

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Steamer's got him a twenty eight if you somehow miss

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.079
<v Speaker 1>out on the Christian Walker Josh Naylor grouping right, you

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>don't get the elite guys, and then man, that run happens,

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>and you miss out the way to make up for it. Like,

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>who's a guy that can hit two sixty and thirty

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>home runs? I think it's Tristan Cassas, and I think

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that's just an easy win for me. And you've seen

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I've drafted him in some of our mocks already because

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's also a really good return on investment.

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>If I can't get the elite power at the price

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that I want early on, then the pivot there is

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>hoping that he can deliver that same promise. Who for

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>you is a must have at first base in twenty

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five? Welsh?

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, remember I talked about these three buckets. There's like

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 2>the number one, which is lad and Harper. You probably

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 2>throw Freeman in there, and then two is kind of

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 2>that Ulsen Alonzo range.

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 3>No thanks.

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 2>That third bucket starts in with I think Costas is

0:10:32.240 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 2>the end of it. Naylor is in there. The guy

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 2>that I want is in that bucket, and you mentioned

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 2>him Christian Walker, So Christian Walker is the start of it.

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 2>He's a must have for me. The cost isn't prohibitive

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 2>really with whatever you've done. Obviously, if you went and

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 2>drafted vlat it wouldn't make a ton of sense. But

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, Walker goes from a nice hitting environment in

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Arizona to an even better hitting environment in Houston. He

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 2>had twenty six homers last year with a two fifty

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 2>one average, but you've got an even shorter porch, which

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 2>looks like from a projected standpoint, Baseball Savant does the like,

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 2>how many homers would they hit if they were here?

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 2>He had twenty only in this one ballpark. He had

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty five homers in Arizona projected to be twenty eight,

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 2>so a three homer in boost in Houston by virtue

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 2>of that. But it's just such a great short porch.

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 2>Is an incredible offense around him as well. You're gonna

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 2>have Altuve, you've got Jordan Alvarez. He should hit it

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>a prominent spot in the lineup. He's one hundred RBI guy,

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 2>gold Glove, He's always going to be out there. I

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 2>just think Christian Walker just went into as good of

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 2>a situation as you could possibly have in a ballpark.

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 2>That is going to feed to how he hits the

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 2>ball in general. So for him to be going around

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, like seventy eighty or something like that, he's

0:11:36.840 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 2>an absolute must have at first or you want to

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 2>you want to be like the one percenters, You want

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 2>to be Richie Rich. Get him at a quarer infield.

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Go and take one of the top guys and then

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 2>take him off the board. Thirty one hundred with I

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 2>think a boost in batting average is in play, maybe

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 2>in the two seventy range for Walker this year.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Got to have him, all right.

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's continue our trip around the diamond here to second

0:11:57.080 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>base before we do a quick shout out to fan Tracks,

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole home of fantasy sports. Year round engagement, offseason trades,

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>real time updates, and seamless player transactions keep the excitement

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>alive at fan Tracks three hundred and sixty five days

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a year. They have the most incredible dense dynasty program

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you're ever gonna see. Automated salaries, contracts, you name it,

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:19.119
<v Speaker 1>they've got it there. Multi team trades. You can customize

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>your leagues, your rosters, your scoring, your playoffs, your consolations,

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>all of it. Future draft picks can be traded, you

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>can score however you want. They have the most extensive

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>list and you can create your own even and massive

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:32.559
<v Speaker 1>league size two doesn't matter. If it's ten teams or

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>two hundred leagues, they can do it. You can duplicate

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 1>players in those big giant leads as well, and of

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>course the multidivision leagues are also available at fan Tracks,

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>so many incredible options to make your fantasy baseball dreams

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>come true. Bring your fantasy baseball leagues to fan Tracks

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>for an unbeatable user experience and a chance to win.

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>As signed Vladimir Guerrero Junior Jersey today, sign up at

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>fantracks dot com slash fantasy pros. That's fantracks dot com

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>slash Fantasy pro Welsh on to second base and the

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>sleeper might make people laugh for me, but it's Jackson Holiday.

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Why because last year everybody was falling all over themselves

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.959
<v Speaker 1>with Jackson Holiday. I of course pumped the brakes a

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Oh gee whiz, I wasn't quite ready for

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the big leagues. For those of you who watch Leading Off,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you know what that voice is. But this is a

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>new year, it's a new time, and you don't go

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>from being arguably the number one prospect in baseball typically

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to being a complete and utter boss. And he's being

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>drafted right now in a situation where if you start

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to look at some of the second basement, I'm going

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to run down them here. Mookie Bets at the top again.

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Position flexibility there could tell Marte great, Jose al Tuove,

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>Ozzie Albi's, Marcus Simeon. The very solid group there some

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>real veterans, but some health issues with I think all

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>three of those guys Jordan Westberg, Matt McClain also health

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>issue coming back, Bryce Terrang, Luis Garcia, Nico Horner, Xander Bogarts,

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Bryson Stott, Rafaela and Jmenez right on that peripheral. And

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>then you have to go all the way down to

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the seventeenth guy overall at the position in Jackson Holiday,

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm looking at I'm thinking to myself, can Jackson

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Holiday potentially outperform Rafaela, Jimenez, guys like Bryson Stott. I

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>think he absolutely can. So to me, that makes him

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a sleeper. This year he got rid of the big

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>leg kick two going to that toe tap. I think

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that will help him a little bit. I think really

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>it was just pushed a little bit too soon and

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately didn't go well. But I think twenty twenty five

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>might be a different story. And this is when I'm

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>buying the dip in the post hype. I think it's

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the perfect situation. Give me a sleeper for you at

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>second base and what you think of the position.

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm also gonna tell you this is probably the

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 2>first one so far in this show where it's like, oh,

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 2>you took a guy that I probably would have put,

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 2>so sometime I'm trying to pivot off not give the

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 2>mack Hines. Yeah, I would have put Jackson Holiday, great barrel,

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 2>good hard hit, struggled against Slider's young young dude who

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 2>got pushed up four levels in a year year prior.

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a pretty easy work like that.

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 2>It's like, like you said, you're changing and getting into

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 2>the toe tap. You're gonna work on hitting some of

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 2>that offspeed breaking stuff because he can hit fastballs. He's

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>done it in the minors, and he has a really

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 2>good underlying hit profile. So I'm there with I'm totally

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 2>there with you on him as far as the position goes.

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 2>In general, you know, second base always has this kind

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 2>of weakness that it feels. I think it is deeper

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 2>than some years prior, but I think that deepness more

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 2>speaks to middle infield. You know, getting your starter, I don't.

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I still don't want to wait and be like, all right,

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm the last guy that got a second basement, because

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 2>now then you're going to be swimming in a pool

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 2>that's just not going to feel great. You know, you're

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 2>you're going to be playing from behind, and then you're

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 2>probably gonna have to try to maybe up take a

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 2>short step.

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Now. The only reason maybe you could do.

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 2>It is if you double tap shortstop. Sometimes people will

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 2>go shortstop early and then shortstop in middle, and maybe

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 2>that middle infield shortstop can make up for some deficiencies

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 2>that you might have had at second base. But you know,

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm not really sure that you want even as much

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 2>as I love Luis ran Gifo, you want him as

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 2>like your starter or even Bryce Terrain unless you're chasing

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 2>stolen bases. So I'm trying to attack it a little

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 2>bit early if I possibly can. If you don't, we'll

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 2>go to my sleeper. I think this is a solid

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 2>deeper league middle infield player that I'm going to targeting

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 2>former potential twenty twenty player. It's Jonathan India, who was

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 2>traded over to the Kansas City Royals. India last year

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 2>when it really wasn't a great year. Fifteen homers, thirteen

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 2>stolen bases, hit just under two point fifty, had best

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 2>OBP over the last couple of years. In fact, twelve

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 2>point six percent walk rate, highest of his career, in

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 2>top three.

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Percentile of the league. Why does that matter. He's going

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 3>to go potentially hit leadoff for the Royals.

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 2>You've got Bobby Witt Junior, You've got Salvador Perez hitting

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 2>behind you. You have any pass Quintino that opens up

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 2>a huge opportunity for runs. This team also runs on

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.239
<v Speaker 2>the base path, so you might see that uptick. Projections

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 2>aren't really putting that in play. Atc projections are pretty

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 2>light on him. Run a two to fifty batting average,

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>homers and stolen bases are both under fifteen. I think

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a legit shot that Jonathan India can get into

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 2>that twenty twenty range. The profile in general is pretty solid,

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 2>almost eight percent barrel. His expected batting average was close

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 2>to two seventy, so it was higher than it was

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 2>last year. He struck out under twenty percent of the time,

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.640
<v Speaker 2>and he walked a ton. Hey, you're at the top

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 2>of that Royals lineup with a bunch of monsters behind you,

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 2>you might jump into ninety RBI. You steal twenty plus bases,

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 2>you get some homers. All of a sudden, he goes

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 2>from a guy that is going two fifty, two twenty

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.680
<v Speaker 2>or something like that into maybe being a top one

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 2>fifty overall player. So I think India is a really

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 2>nice second base sleeper.

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about bust at second base. Bryson

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Stott is one for me. He's in the nine hole

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in that Phillies lineup. The power is limited. I mean,

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I know he had fifteen homers in twenty throw and

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>three but went back down to eleven last year. The

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>strikeout rate went up last year or two. I get it.

0:17:37.720 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 1>In rotal leagues, you cover at the stolen basis. So

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I totally understand why he's still in that top twelve range.

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>But I keep going back to who's a superior hitter

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion? Is it Bryson Stotta, which Jackson Holiday

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>can be? You know or guys like that that are

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 1>going after Bryson Stott. So for me, it's a no brainer.

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought that he's a bad player. I think also

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>had some big moments in the postseason two which I

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.679
<v Speaker 1>think might little bit overinflate his value artificially, So I

0:17:57.680 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>want to stay away from that. I don't like when

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that happens. Very small sample size. So Welsh, who's the

0:18:02.040 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>guy you're avoiding at second base?

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 2>Man, I'm having a realization that, like, I'm picking on

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of Reds players, and I'm gonna probably pick on.

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Some, I mean, seems to be your guy. And now

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>where you're gonna pick.

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 3>On, I'm gonna pick on Matt McClain. And I will

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 3>tell you.

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I like McLain. I'm buying back in AFL coming back

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>from the injury. I think it's gonna take a little

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of time, but I think he'll be okay.

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 3>It's part of the problem.

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 2>So like I also like Matt McClain. Here's what I

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 2>don't like. There's no discount he's being going. He's going

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 2>inside the top one hundred right now. I don't like

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 2>the discount. He did not play last year except in

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the aarson A fall league where I saw him personally

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 2>every single day and he still had some of the warts.

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 2>That was my hope if you're gone for an entire year.

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 2>You know, he was during instructs. I actually caught him

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 2>at Red's instructs. You know he had been out.

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>There working when instructs.

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 2>But well, it's the instructional league where there's nothing going on. Uh,

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 2>you would have hoped during that time.

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Maybe let's take a look at the year prior. Let's

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 3>get some fixes.

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 2>Specifically, what I'm talking about is that strikeout rate. It

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 2>looked as bad as ever in the Arizona Fallay. Now,

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe that's you know, you lost the whole season. You're

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 2>trying to be hyper aggressive, anything super high on fastballs, attack,

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 2>swing through, he's striking out. He was just eating low

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 2>breaking stuff outside the zone. And my problem with that

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 2>is he had a twenty eight and a half percent

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 2>strikeout rate the year prior when he played. Now how

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 2>he got through that. He barreled the ball ten percent,

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.320
<v Speaker 2>forty two percent hard hit rate, and his expected batting

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 2>average was there, Like he gets stuff done. He's kind

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 2>of like Spencer Steer. In fact, if you look at

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 2>it as a whole. I'm just worried that maybe it

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 2>is the same thing like Steer. Can he get to

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty, Absolutely, but I'm worried it's going to be

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 2>like at a two twenty or two thirty batting average,

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 2>he's going to have big swings. He's coming off of

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 2>this injury where he missed a year and he looked

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 2>rusty in the Arizona Fall League. So for me to

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 2>pay a top one hundred value or cost on that,

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not super interested, especially by the way I just

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 2>mentioned a guy like Jonathan India. Jonathan India could put

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 2>up I don't know ninety percent of what Matt McClain

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 2>is at like one hundred and fifty picks later. So

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be fading Matt McClain this year. I'm

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 2>where the strikeout rate is going to have an ultimate

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 2>effect on his total value.

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know how.

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Terry Francona is going to just sit around and just

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 2>all right, let's let him get through it. Mcclan might

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 2>be hitting lower in the lineups as well. They might

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 2>start platuning, because again, it's Pokemon. For Terry Francona, it's

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 2>Pokemon Go. He is out there and he sees mystery player,

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 2>He signs them, picks them up, and he puts them

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 2>in the rotation for the Reds. I am just personally

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 2>going to be out on drafting Matt McCain inside the

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 2>top one.

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Hundred, all right. I'm still probably in right around there.

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>But so far in the drafts i've seen, it's been

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a discount the ones I've been

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in so far. You know this grouping too, and we're

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>going to get to the must haves here, you know, wholesale.

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Two V is still going as a third guy. I

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.239
<v Speaker 1>still prefer Albi's probably Simon two. I mean, how two

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>V's thirty four years old, and I think at certain

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>point in time you got to start taking that into effect.

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be even more declined.

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 3>You say the third or first guy.

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>He's typically going as the third guy. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:55.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just saying, you know, I'd rather have Albi's

0:20:55.200 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>or Simion probably over That's me. That's my rankings personally

0:20:58.119 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>going into the season.

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 2>I think Simeon is a huge value because you didn't

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.520
<v Speaker 2>say Marquez, So it threw me off, like can tell Martes.

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Because I said this one first too, the clear cuts

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Betts and it's Marte. It's a clear shelf there. But

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 1>then I look at the stat line last year for

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Altub and I look at the stat line this year

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>for Luis Garcia Junior, and I keep coming back to

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, and I know he's my guy this year,

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to pound the table every show for him.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But eighteen homers, twenty two a stone bass, excuse me,

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy rbi last year, fifty eight runs scored, And I think,

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, this lineup for the Nationals is going to

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>be far improved. You're gonna get a whole season of

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>James Wood, You're hopefully going to get a productive season

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>form Dylan Cruz. We can only hope that Nathaniel Lowe

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>is going to add a little bit more presence of

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 1>that lineup along with Bell. So I think he's in

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a good, solid lineup. And it's funny because when we

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>started hyping him up, he was about I would say,

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>one hundred picks different than jose Al Tuve. That gap

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is closing about seventy five in an nfbcceed right now

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:56.160
<v Speaker 1>drafts it's even less. So clearly people are also starting

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to pick up on that same fact there with him.

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So who's your must have? Guy Garcias on who's yours

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>at second base?

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Interesting thing too, A couple of notes is just throw

0:22:03.480 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 3>in there.

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 2>Altuve has apparently been working in the outfield the rumors

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 2>that were to signed, so you could some more musician eligibility.

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 2>And also want to point out Mooki bets I believe

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 2>should only qualify second base in Yahoo he had I

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 2>think it.

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 3>Was eighteen games at second bastion.

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, excuse me, Ivery wont to ask you a question.

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you like that more? Because sometimes when guys move positions,

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>especially all star like, it doesn't always go like Craig

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Bigio like where it's it's like, yeah, it's fine. You

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>know some guys who they go and they move, they

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>struggle in the transition from infield to outfield specifically.

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, So I thought you were gonna ask like

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 2>the positions because like Tatist did this and he got

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 2>outfield eligibility and he was still really good.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And much different body type, much different athlete, I think too.

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean I think it could be weird.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure it's going to affect the game, but

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm also pretty open to like the external things like

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 2>that can affect these players, Like you know, sometimes like

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 2>a guy that was always a hitter going in D

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 2>eight something to think about with like Mike Traut, like.

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Eligibility could changing that mindset. Sometimes the confidence level gets

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 1>shaken a little bit. I don't know. I'm just saying, like,

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not always sunshine roses when a guy changes position.

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Sure, and it might not be, especially at.

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>This stage in his career he's an older player.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and then again, just the Mookie Bets thing. Eighteen games.

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.399
<v Speaker 2>I believe at second base, so yahoo, he will qualify.

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 2>He shouldn't in some of the other spots. I also

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.959
<v Speaker 2>personally believe we should change the qualifications to not twenty,

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 2>but not five, so make it ten or fifteen. But

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 2>that's just me, all right, my guy, I'm gonna go

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 2>go with a guy that have played a bunch of

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 2>games at two different positions. I think people consider him

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 2>on the other side because that will be his position,

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>but he qualifies at second base, so I must have.

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Is Jordan Westburg. I've talked a bunch about him.

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 2>He's going around like the I think it's like the

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 2>seventh or eighth or maybe even sixth second baseman. The

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 2>point is is you can draft him, and that's why

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 2>he becomes a must have. This isn't like saying, guys, Kutolmarta,

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 2>you've got to have no Jordan Westberg.

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 3>He's a must have.

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Eighteen homer, six dolen bases, two sixty four batting average

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 2>last year, great hitting profile. You know, I love over

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:54.200
<v Speaker 2>ten percent barrel and forty five percent.

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 3>Hard hit rate. He hits that lowered to strikeout yate

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 3>rate the year prior.

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Hits the ball really hard one point one average exon

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 2>velocity and the orioles they're bringing in that left field.

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 2>I've said to a bunch on shows to make it

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more hitter friendly. So you've already got

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 2>this kind of like monster profile that hit the ball

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 2>really well. By the way's expected batting average was around

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.960
<v Speaker 2>two eighty, so it was even better with this great profile,

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 2>better expected batting average, lowering the strikeouts. He can run.

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:22.120
<v Speaker 2>He can hit legitimate shot at twenty five to ten.

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's going to go thirty fifteen somewhere in there.

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 2>The ballpark's becoming better. He's going to hit in a

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 2>prominent spot for the Orioles lineup, so I'm really into it.

0:24:29.800 --> 0:24:33.359
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Westburg with third and second base qualification as man

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 2>must have second basement all right over to the hot corner.

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>The third baseman looked like this over on Fantasy Pros

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Consensus ADP, which again you can find over fantasypros dot Com.

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Jose Ramirez over at the top top five player overall

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:47.959
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, still maybe even top three. I mean, if

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to get to that argument when you look

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>at third base as a whole. Vlad Gurow Junior, Jazz Chisholm,

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Rafield Devers, Austin Reiley. This is interesting because I think

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>there's warts on all these guys. Although they all have

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>incredible talent and have all been super productive at one

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>time or another. You could pick each one apart and

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.439
<v Speaker 1>find a negative on each one. Know, Dever is coming

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>off a down year, Jazz Chisholm's injury history last year,

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Austin Riley looking lost then getting hurt, and Vlad, who

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>has struggled at times and maybe the pressure of a

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>contract year does get to him, maybe it doesn't. Second

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>half last year was brilliant after that, Manny Machado at

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>six mark Vientos at seven. Who is my favorite thing?

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>In twenty twenty five? Jordan Westbrook Junior Caminaro, Royce lewis

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>very risky in the top ten as a recording. This

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>still winning for Bregman to sign somewhere. Jake Berger, Matt Chapman,

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>U Haino Suarezho was awful in the first half and

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden a completely different human being

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 1>at fourteen. So that's kind of like your your rough

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>version there of the top twelve issue at the position.

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.199
<v Speaker 2>One thing to add, like Mookie Vladd will only qualify

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 2>at third base in Yahoo. He played twelve games at

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 2>third base, which was I was shocked when I actually

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 2>saw because I saw the qualification. I was like, would

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 2>he play five? No, he played twelve at.

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Thirty he looked at third base ones, so.

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Only Yah, who should be the one that has the

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:06.119
<v Speaker 2>third base qualification anywhere else ESPN and FBC. I believe

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 2>CBS are all twenty game eligibility, so he wouldn't be

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the top third baseman. But Yahoo, you'll get that extra

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 2>little push.

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So look, looking at this again, I'm willing to

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>let this market come to me because I think there

0:26:18.119 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>is a very strong middle there, Riley Machado, Viento's those

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>are all really strong guys, and for me, a sleeper

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 1>as a corner guy to me once againstoc paraitis right,

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be hitting in a good spot potentially

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>in this order. Now Bregman signing could maybe change a

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>little of this. We're still waiting to find that out,

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>but as of right now, Meregman is not back with

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Astros, and there's a chance here that you

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>could see Paritas hitting in that two spot, which I

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>think is terrific for that run scored total. He is

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>not that far removed from a big time power season.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>We know all the stats about well, if you dropped

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>him in last year, all those home run totals have

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>have been a lot higher year over a year. So

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of reasons to like Parretis. And he's

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot younger too than people realize, which I think

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know people take for granted he's kind of been

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>around a while. But if he is sandwich between al

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Tuove and Alvarez man Welsh, that's a really good spot

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to be. Who's a sleeper for you in twenty twenty

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>five at the hot corner.

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.119
<v Speaker 3>Chalk it up that this is one hundred percent going

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 3>to be mine. This was mine.

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 2>Joey beat it to it. I completely co sign on

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 2>this one. His draft stock is just low again like

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 2>what he did in Tampa Bay. I think is in

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 2>play here for Esach Praatus because it's a low porch.

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 3>He is a pole.

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't have a good hitting profile, that's the thing,

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 2>and that's why the Cubs he was exposed. It was

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 2>just like, doesn't Barrel doesn't hit the ball hard, like

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 2>what's going on? But what he does is he pulls

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 2>fly balls twenty two percent launch angle, and now you're

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna go in one of the best places to do

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 2>that in Houston. So like Bradiy's is just undervalued. I

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 2>like that not picking pretis. I went with someone that

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I have a high rank on. I will be frank

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 2>this could change because there could be a wrinkle thrown

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 2>into it, but I'm gonna go with Matt Shaw.

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 3>Matt Shaw.

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Everyone trying to figure out position qualifications for him as

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 2>far as like what he did in the Miners, but

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Shaw is coming off of a twenty homer thirty stolen

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.720
<v Speaker 2>based season in the Miners. He is perceivably set to

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 2>be the third baseman for the Cubs this year, where

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 2>he is not going to have to be like praide

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Is and he's not like a bad hitting profile guy

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 2>that's just going to have wall scraping homers Like No,

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 2>the guy can dominate. I mean, the stolen based numbers

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 2>have actually been pretty shocking. He finished up last minor

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 2>league season by going and playing in the Premieer twelve

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:22.639
<v Speaker 2>USA Tournament where he was the best player and you

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 2>had like Carson Williams playing there, Tamar Johnson, he was

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 2>hands down the best player offensively, crushing more home runs.

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 2>He is ready, and there's a reason why they moved

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 2>off of Praideres to do it. But if Bregman were

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 2>to sign there, it does really kind of throw a

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 2>wrinkle into stuff because they'd have to trade Horner to

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 2>get Matt Shaw back in there. But his cost is

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.320
<v Speaker 2>really really efficient. I think, by the way, he's number

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 2>two in NL Rookie of the Year voting, yet I

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 2>believe his ADP is outside the top two hundred. So

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, if you think that he is going to

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 2>play all season long, he's going to beat projections. He's

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 2>going to be close to a twenty twenty guy, and

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 2>he is a definite sleeper that you can get at

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 2>like corner infield cost and he'd qualify I think infield

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 2>in some spots a shortstop.

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about the busts here on the

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>other side of the coin here. And look, I know

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore kind of had a glut of prospects, so they

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>can afford to move a couple. But you know, when

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:13.959
<v Speaker 1>you love a prospect quote unquote, and then you move

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>on from him, sometimes I think that's a bit of

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 1>red flag. I also don't like the lineup where this

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>player ended up either hitting in Miami. Now it's kind

0:29:21.160 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of norby. And it's not because I don't think he

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>can be a productive player. I do. I think it's

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>far too early. He's only twenty five years old, you know,

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to think that he can't be a good, solid, everyday

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>player for the Marlins. He can be. The thing is,

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's one thing to be an up and

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>coming prospect in an organization and you end up in

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a lineup that's got a lot of protection, a lot

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of help, and you can easily be productive and make

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a transition. I think it's much harder in a place

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>where the talent is a little less or in this case,

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot less. You know, I just don't feel like Norby,

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that he's probably hitting two, is going to

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>deliver on the promise, at least not this year. I

0:29:56.400 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be a tough transition. And you know,

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I always go back to a great example of this

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>is Jad Martinez early in his career, right with the

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Astros when they were so bad and there was nobody

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 1>around him, and then he got traded to Detroit and

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>he got dropped in a line up there with the

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>protection of Miguel Cabrera, and his career because completely took off.

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just saying it's just much harder for young

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>players to not have proper lineup production and reach their

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>ceiling quickly. So, wels, who are you out on potentially

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>this year in twenty twenty five at third base?

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>By the way, that's an interesting one because I feel

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 2>like his cost is so low it's hard.

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 3>For him to be a bust.

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 2>He also has some really good underlying profile metrics, but

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 2>it's of one of the worst.

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Tis still buzzy, like, oh kind of normy prospect guy

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>like you know what I mean, Like, and we all

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>know those dynasty circles that they run hot all the

0:30:40.840 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>prospect names and people go, this guy's gonna be really useful.

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if he's going to be useful.

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, it's not gonna cost you too much

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to find out. But also there is a name I

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>just want to be dangerous of that.

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and there's not a ton there.

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 2>That was the other thing that's like on your side,

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 2>it's like there's not a lot of support, there's not

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of RBI opportunities, So I don't know what

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 2>that's going to look like. There could be some k problems.

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 2>So that's a really interesting Mine comes back similar to

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 2>strand this is me and this is why, Like I

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 2>don't think I can be right on all these guys

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>that I'm picking on from this mentric, so one of

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 2>them is going to be wrong, and I would counter

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 2>to my own point. This is kind of like what

0:31:12.200 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 2>I just said with Norby that Josh Young who I'm

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 2>picking as my bust here, he's kind of free is

0:31:17.840 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 2>ADP is at like right around the two hundred range,

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 2>So like how much can you really bust when you're

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 2>outside the top two hundred. But I am picking on

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 2>him because I will say I found this the hardest

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.239
<v Speaker 2>of the infield positions to pinpoint, like who is going

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 2>to be my actual bus?

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Royce Lewis came to mind.

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 2>I think the top guys they're so chalky, and then

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 2>there's this big jump and it's like, I just don't

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 2>feel like you're getting a lot of busts in there.

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 2>Matt Chapman is like amazing value. So I picked Josh

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 2>Young again. This is the twenty twenty three was great.

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Twenty twenty four absolutely atrocious, especially with especially with.

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 3>Some of the hitting profile. I'm maybe not.

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely atrocious, but two sixty four seven homers, four stolen

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 2>bases with Josh Young. Strikeout rate came down a tiny bit,

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of the actual hitting metrics came down.

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Barrel went down, hard, hit absolutely tanked. He had a

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 2>two forty expected batting average. Don't like any of that.

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 2>He was struggling with an injury, and I think he's

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna get moved down the lineup. So I'm not a

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 2>big Josh Young guy, but I really found this to

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 2>be tough, and it might just be wrong because if

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.400
<v Speaker 2>he returns back to what he was in twenty twenty three,

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 2>by the way, almost a fifty percent hard hit rate,

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 2>twelve percent barrel. He had some strikeout problems, but he

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 2>was absolutely crushing the ball in a really good environment.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 2>So I might eat my words on this, but you know,

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 2>like you had to go Norby, I had to go

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 2>young because this was a tough spot to like pinpoint

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the bust.

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, My must have at third base is simple.

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>It's Mark Vientos of the New York Mets. You saw

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a star being born last year in twenty twenty five.

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>That guy was unbelievable. And going back to last year's shows,

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>we talked about his performance in spring training, and you

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>know how an amord eye was of him in spring training.

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, he's finally ready. I think he's finally got it.

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And then the Martinez thing happened. He took over at

0:32:55.720 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>DH and he was very visibly upset about this, and

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>he took it personally, and he went down and he raked,

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and he got called up and he did nothing but

0:33:04.320 --> 0:33:05.959
<v Speaker 1>rake at the major league level and then had some

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.479
<v Speaker 1>huge moments of the postseason. Now you're putting him behind

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Juan Soto and Francisco Lindor, and I don't think there's

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>any way if he stays healthy, he doesn't drive in

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>one hundred runs this year, I think he's gonna hit

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>over thirty home runs. And if again, if Pete Alonzo

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>comes back and you sandwich him between Pete Alonzo and

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Juan Soto in that third spot, oh my god, Mark

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Viento's is going to be an all star. Mark Viento's

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be a guy that is going to become

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a rock star in twenty twenty five. I mean he

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>could even approach thirty five or forty home runs. That's

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>how good I think Vientos is as a power hitter.

0:33:39.800 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And with all those fastballs you might see and all

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>those guys on base ahead of him, it could be

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>an incredible year for Viento's. I'm going to be aggressive

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>on him in twenty twenty five. Well, Foozier must have

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 1>at third base.

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like that one a lot. Mine is probably

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 2>guy that's gonna play first base. He's on the other side. Hell,

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 2>maybe he'll play third base and he'll play more third

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 2>base this team and knock off Josh Young. It's Jake

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Berger some kind of staying in that same team where

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't seem to like a ton of the Reds.

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 2>For whatever reason, I have been enamored with a lot

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 2>of the Rangers players. Jake Berger is just going into

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 2>a fantastic spot. We've talked about everybody's talked about it.

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:15.240
<v Speaker 2>He's coming off a twenty nine homer season.

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:16.760
<v Speaker 3>He's hit two fifty.

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 2>By the way, he's the new Chorris Davis K Chris

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 2>with a K. He's hit two fifty three straight seasons.

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 2>Jake Berger has He's a thirty homer lock and now

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 2>he's going into one of the better hitting environments out there.

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 2>He's coming off of hitting with the White Sox and

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the Marlins. He's now with the Rangers. As long as

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:35.479
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't hit in that eighth spot or seventh spot

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 2>that like roster resources.

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Putting twelve percent.

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Barrel forty seven percent hard hit, he lowered his strikeout rate.

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 2>He's got an expected average that's around almost two sixty.

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.919
<v Speaker 2>Jake Berger is in a phenomenal environment where, by the way,

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 2>let's just for a minute pretend that he could hit

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.880
<v Speaker 2>four or five. You've got Marcus Simeon, Corey, Seeger Wyatt,

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 2>Langford in your top three spot against righty's are probably

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna put Jock Peterson. We'll see what they do with

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 2>guys like Adulies.

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 3>If he bounces back.

0:35:03.000 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 2>You do have Josh Young, but Berger is an opportunity

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.000
<v Speaker 2>to hit higher in the lineup. He's already hitting thirty homers.

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 2>Now the RBIs boost up and he's going outside the

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 2>top one hundred. Must have multi corner infield qualifications for Berger.

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Got to have him. This is one of my favorite

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:17.919
<v Speaker 3>ones we've done so far.

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I love this acquisition for the Rangers in the offseason.

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was really sharp on their point too.

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Just give them a little bit more insurance there for

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>the Corey Seekers and Marcus Simeans if they miss more

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>time again in twenty twenty five. Let's move on to

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>short stuff. Before we do a quick reminder. Take these

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:33.880
<v Speaker 1>names we're giving you and put them on your cheat sheet. Well,

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>how do you make a cheat sheet, I'll tell you.

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Using the cheat sheet Creator, you can enhance your fantasy

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>baseball strategies with the cheat sheet Creator seamlessly integrating and

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>merging rankings from all the experts that you choose. That's right,

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the experts that you agree with, not just any expert,

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>or you can take the consensus in with your own

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can organize players into tiers, personalized notes and

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 1>streamliner and decision making process. So when you hook up

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.479
<v Speaker 1>your Draft Wizard and sink it to you your league,

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got your cheat sheets right there with you in

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 1>the draft. It's what you need right now. Fantasypros dot

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Com slash cheat Sheet. If you want to dominate your

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>league's cheat sheets are a great way to do that.

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And you check him out today. The Fantasy Baseball Draft

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Wizard app is available. I'll just remind you again, fanacypros

0:36:16.160 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Mlbdraft Wizard, or wherever you get your apps,

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>download that bad boy, because it's the ultimate cheat code.

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the shortstops. Welsh and a guy that

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I just took in our most recent draft, a guy

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:29.759
<v Speaker 1>that I even mentioned in our Undervalued show, and he's

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna come up here again because he really is a sleeper.

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I don't hear anybody talking about Jeremy PanAm.

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 1>And when you start to look through this list here,

0:36:39.160 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you've got Bobby Witt at the top, You've got Ellie

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>de la Cruz, you've got Gunner, Henderson, Mookie Bets, Francisco Lindor,

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>huge names. I think that is the number one tier.

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Then you got the Trey Turner, Corey Seeger. Okay, we're

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>starting to get into a little bit more shaky ground,

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>but still big time talent. On'eal Cruz a guy once again,

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>another guy moving positions, going to the outfield. But it's career.

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 1>That stuff doesn't worry me nearly as much as the

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>veterans when they start to move off positions. CJ. Abrams, Williadomas,

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt McClain, who you already voiced some concern about, bobashett

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>A twelve. Then right on that peripheral, you've got Nico Horner,

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Volpi, Tovar all in that group. Tovar was my

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite guys last year had a really good season. But

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>what's so fascinating is I look at the production of

0:37:22.160 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy Pania last year fifteen homers, seventy seventy. I think

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>he could easily be a seventy five seventy five guy,

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:30.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe even push that home run total closer to twenty.

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Gave you twenty steals last year, hit to sixty six

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm thinking Anthony Volpi hasn't given me anything quite

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:40.439
<v Speaker 1>like that. I'm thinking to myself, I'm looking around. Matt

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 1>McClain's coming off a major injury, Nico Horner lots of

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:45.919
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases, but doesn't give me quite maybe the power

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 1>ceiling I think he might have. And then guys like

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Xander Bogart's Bryce and Stott Like, these guys are kind of,

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I think a little bit underwhelming to me. I know,

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:56.759
<v Speaker 1>some of them give you a little bit more stone bases,

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and I understand why that's coveted in the Rodos and

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the head to head Rodo Man. Well, Jeremy Pinia just

0:38:01.200 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>seems like a guy at my middle infield spot that

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I could plug and play and be very

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:06.359
<v Speaker 1>happy with for one hundred and sixty two.

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there were two guys that came to mind when

0:38:08.239 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 2>we did this, and by the way, I do think

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:12.879
<v Speaker 2>this floats between sleeper undervalued, however you want to look

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 2>at it. Number one was Jeremy Pania and then I

0:38:15.640 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 2>saw you had him, so I'm like, I can't put

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Jeremy Pene on there because I.

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Used the advantages of making the sheet up.

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, you got to it first, completely agree. It's

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:26.240
<v Speaker 2>just like somewhere between, you know, twenty stolen bases, fifteen homers.

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 2>By the way, ATC projections on him, pretty good average

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 2>at two sixty two fifteen homers, seventeen stolen bases with

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.160
<v Speaker 2>a sub twenty percent K percentage in Houston.

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Love it.

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.359
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, he's in some instance has been

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 2>a lead off hitter. And now you got Tucker out

0:38:39.920 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 2>of that lineup, so we'll see what happens. Number two

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 2>on that list for me, though, was Mason Winn when

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't pick Jeremy Penia. Mason Winn is coming off

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:50.760
<v Speaker 2>of a solid season. He had two sixty seven, fifteen homers,

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 2>eleven stolen bases. He sent he spent the off season

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 2>working at a lot of those bat clinics, getting in

0:38:57.160 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 2>some more body mass, adding muscle, working on bat speed

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.280
<v Speaker 2>as they usually do. He's been working with Jordan Walker.

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 2>And you know, Mason wins profile was sub eighteen percent

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 2>K percentage, that's relatively elite. Gets the ball in the air,

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 2>thirteen degree launch angle, that's solid.

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 3>He's walking a.

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Bit, but he doesn't have that big explosive barrel, hard hit.

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 2>So how does he get it done well. There's a

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 2>lot of guys in baseball CJ. Abrams, Has and Kim

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 2>I use them as always my examples Estock Brady's technically

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 2>that have these low barrel like wind does low hard hit.

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 3>So what do they do.

0:39:28.600 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 2>They get under the ball and they get it in

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 2>the air. Launch angle sweet spot as well as a

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 2>metric that Baseball Savant does and that had a huge

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:39.720
<v Speaker 2>boost this past year twenty six to thirty three percent

0:39:40.040 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the launch angle. He hits it on the perfect spot

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 2>to get the ball up in the air. Mookie Betts

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 2>does that and now his launch angle went up. So

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 2>my whole point of this is is that's where you're

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 2>going to start optimizing and getting some home runs. And

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:52.960
<v Speaker 2>that's why you can project him in the fifteen. He's

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 2>also aggressive base stealer. He's got a really good hitting

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.800
<v Speaker 2>profile where he doesn't strike out and make contact. Projections

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:00.839
<v Speaker 2>are around fifteen to fifty teen and like a two

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 2>fifty to sixty average on him. I think there's a

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 2>legitimate opportunity that he can jump up. Average can go

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:08.520
<v Speaker 2>up into the two eighties. He could be a twenty

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 2>twenty guy and he's going you know, one seventy five

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 2>to two hundred right now. So Mason Win is a

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 2>definite sleeper, kind of must target player at shortstop.

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny, Welsh, because I took penny from you,

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but my second choice would have been Win. So we're

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing eye to eye on the sleepers here. Yeah, absolutely

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the bust. This one was easy for me. I could

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:30.919
<v Speaker 1>not wait to put this name in Trevor's story. When

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is enough enough for everybody? I don't. I don't get this, Welsh.

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand it. I like it, And uh, well

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna tell me why, because I'm gonna give you

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>all the reasons why I don't, and then you get

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:41.799
<v Speaker 1>to try to sell me as best you can't.

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, go ahead.

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean he hasn't played one hundred games in

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>three years since he's been a Red Sox. First of all,

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the top out was ninety three. Uh, his splits in

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Colorado were always massive. I was never a big fan

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of his in Colorado either. I find him to be

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a very overrated player that would have some hot streaks. Sure,

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the numbers were always better because it was Colorado, But

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I hated this signing when the Red Sox did it,

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 1>and it was so weird because it's like, you're gonna

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:06.800
<v Speaker 1>pay Trevor's story, but you're not gonna playing Mookie Betts.

0:41:07.040 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's turned out to be one of the worst

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 1>decisions this organization has ever made. And now they've got

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 1>these kids coming, They've got the Roman Anthonis coming, They've

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 1>got the Casses to come, and they've got Christian Campbell come,

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and they've got Rafaela, and they got all these kids.

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I think story is gonna get pushed out. I know

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>he's only like thirty two years older. Whenever he's turning

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this year, I'm out on Trevor's story. It's this name

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>brand thing like Chris Bryant was still relevant in every

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 1>draft for a couple of years. Like when do we learn,

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like just because a guy was good once upon a

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 1>time doesn't make him good now or even investible. I

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's the problem. I don't think the guy's even

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 1>investible at this stage. What are your I know he

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>is still going late and I get that's probably what

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna say, but he's free. But at the same time,

0:41:48.280 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I Christian Campbell, Matt Shaw going after him, and I

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:53.680
<v Speaker 1>think you would agree I'd rather take a shot on

0:41:53.719 --> 0:41:54.080
<v Speaker 1>those guys.

0:41:54.160 --> 0:41:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I have them higher. So yeah, that's not right.

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Well for me, that's not a disagreement. I completely am

0:41:59.200 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 2>with you.

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:01.280
<v Speaker 3>But he's free.

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 2>He is the epitome of He literally doesn't get drafted

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:07.719
<v Speaker 2>in many twelve team leagues. There's I'm gonna say this,

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 2>and it might be like someone might be able to

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 2>answer it better, but I'm just.

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Gonna say it with like, you know, authority.

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 2>There's no player that's not being drafted that has twenty

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty upside if they play the whole season than Trevor Story. Like,

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:23.080
<v Speaker 2>I can't think off the top of my head a

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 2>guy that would be on the wire that would go

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:26.520
<v Speaker 2>out of your draft not being drafted.

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 3>That lockdown.

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:29.439
<v Speaker 2>If I said, hey, you're getting one hundred and forty

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 2>games at a Trevor Story, You're getting twenty twenty. That's

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 2>what you're going to get out of him. There's just

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 2>no other players. So that's why I'm in on it.

0:42:36.000 --> 0:42:38.320
<v Speaker 2>But he can't stay healthy, So I don't disagree with that,

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:40.919
<v Speaker 2>but it's you know, I mean, there's just murderer's row

0:42:41.040 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 2>after murderer's row of those guys, Like I still like

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the hitting profile.

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:45.520
<v Speaker 3>He's young enough.

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:48.719
<v Speaker 2>He's just absolutely free if he doesn't work out, cut him,

0:42:48.800 --> 0:42:50.319
<v Speaker 2>see you. But there is twenty twenty tens.

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't want to waste draft picks. I

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:54.400
<v Speaker 1>guess that's where I'm at. At Ah, who's your bust

0:42:54.480 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>for this section?

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 2>My bus is a big name, and it's more about

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:02.719
<v Speaker 2>my disinterest Abrams. Everything is still in his favor. He

0:43:02.800 --> 0:43:05.359
<v Speaker 2>came off of a twenty thirty season two forty six

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 2>batting average. I mean, obviously insane. The hitting profile still

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 2>has some you know, questions. He is barreling. He struck

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 2>out a little bit more. He hit the ball harder.

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:16.359
<v Speaker 2>Like I said before, he optimizes it, gets the ball

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 2>in the air. But he comes in an absolute premium cost.

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:22.879
<v Speaker 2>And he ended the season being suspended for staying out

0:43:22.920 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 2>all night gambling. And that is a clear issue that

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 2>is going on. Maybe that doesn't carry over, maybe that's

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 2>completely fixed. He's had two really good fantasy seasons. I

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 2>just got to tell you, like it's the stage we've

0:43:33.920 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 2>talked about the world of overpaying for like a lot

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 2>of strikeouts.

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:38.200
<v Speaker 3>It's just not there for me.

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 2>He's going around a guy like Corey Seeger, who I

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 2>think is an elite four category player that does have

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 2>some injury questions, but he doesn't have suspension questions. He

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 2>also doesn't have a bad hitting profile. I'm just worried

0:43:49.960 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 2>when things go wrong for Abrams, it'll go wrong bad.

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 2>There's also some off the field stuff, and I just

0:43:54.440 --> 0:43:56.440
<v Speaker 2>don't feel the need that I want to pay for

0:43:56.560 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 2>extreme stolen bases. But still at the same time, like, hey,

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 2>well shut up, was twenty thirty.

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:02.759
<v Speaker 3>I get it. I'm just not into the cost. So

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:03.880
<v Speaker 3>that's why he's my bust.

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's funny because he was a win for a

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:09.839
<v Speaker 1>sleeper last year on both of our lists, and now

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a look a year later, we're like, okay, you know,

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 1>and that happens sometimes for us, Like we love a player,

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 1>we love the value, we love the upside, and the

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:19.359
<v Speaker 1>next year sometimes the cost is a little bit too much.

0:44:19.360 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's amazing how much difference, you know, a year

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:23.840
<v Speaker 1>can make for a player. All right, I must have

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:25.759
<v Speaker 1>as a guy Welsh already hates at this position. I'm

0:44:25.760 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, Matt McLain. I've been doing a lot of

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 1>homework on Matt McClain to see where he's at reading

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 1>all the articles, reading all the stuff coming out of

0:44:31.880 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>his mouth. Arizona Fall League. He had four home runs.

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>The slugging was there, the timing and the batting average

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there yet. But I assume that because he hasn't

0:44:38.719 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 1>played baseball a long time. This is a guy that

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 1>is very crucial what he does in spring for me.

0:44:42.800 --> 0:44:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure he has a good spring.

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:46.360
<v Speaker 1>If he does, I feel really good about where he

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:48.439
<v Speaker 1>is despite the fact the ADP is Welsh pointed out,

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:50.839
<v Speaker 1>is still relatively high. And here's the big reason why

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to take shots on twenty five twenty four

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:58.560
<v Speaker 1>year old guys who are gonna hit potentially, you know,

0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:02.279
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the two eighty range. But more importantly, you

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.399
<v Speaker 1>go back and you look at the OBP around four

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred in his minor league track record and five hundred

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>of this slugging. A guy that's got power in a

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:11.399
<v Speaker 1>small ballpark with on bass skills. I want that guy

0:45:11.880 --> 0:45:15.359
<v Speaker 1>on my team. So Matt McClain, that's your counterpoint for him.

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Welsh gave you the negatives, I give you the positives.

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Give me a must have for you in twenty twenty

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:20.640
<v Speaker 1>five at this position.

0:45:20.760 --> 0:45:22.839
<v Speaker 3>But if he If he hits two eighty, I will

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:23.439
<v Speaker 3>eat my word.

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I do not believe there's a world where he's gonna

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 2>hit two eighty, But if he does, I'm wrong as

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 2>hell on Matt McClain.

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:31.640
<v Speaker 1>My pick, well, he's gonna be HiT's two sixty and

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>gives me a three eighty on bays than a five

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 1>hundred slugging man. That's gonna be a good player. That's

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:38.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a real good player.

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, the guy I'm gonna pick at shortstop is going

0:45:40.719 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 2>after Matt McClain, and he used to be like a

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 2>third round pick in drafts. He seems boring now because

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 2>he's coming off of his literal worst season ever.

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying Bobashett is the guy.

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Bobashett is going massively late in drafts because he just

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 2>hit two twenty six or two twenty five with four

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:00.280
<v Speaker 2>homers and five stolen bases in half of a year

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 2>with a bunch of misstime. But that's coming off of

0:46:02.120 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 2>the season where he hit three hundred with twenty homers,

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 2>and he was going in like the third round because

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 2>what if he runs a little bit more And my

0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 2>main thesis across the board is more about like the

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 2>anomaly is last season, compared to his career, he was

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:19.959
<v Speaker 2>nine percent nine percent, nine percent barrel just year after

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 2>year forty four fifty, hard hit all of a sudden.

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Last year, hard hit absolutely tanks, barrels cut in half,

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 2>everything fell apart. Even so, his expected batting average was

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:31.759
<v Speaker 2>still around two fifty, but he's around our career two

0:46:31.920 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 2>ninety guy. He didn't strike out more, he walked a

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 2>little bit, and he just ended up underperforming specifically against

0:46:38.960 --> 0:46:40.799
<v Speaker 2>some of that aw speed and breaking stuff. I think

0:46:40.840 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 2>those things are going to change this year. I think

0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:45.239
<v Speaker 2>that was the anomaly, and I think his cost is

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:47.879
<v Speaker 2>so depressed batting average is going to boost back up.

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:49.920
<v Speaker 2>I really think he just helps your team. He can

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:52.040
<v Speaker 2>play more as a middle infielder if you need to.

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Projections have him hitting two seventy four with sixteen homers

0:46:55.400 --> 0:46:57.880
<v Speaker 2>according to atc SO, I think Boba shed at his

0:46:57.960 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 2>cost as a must buy position.

0:47:00.600 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Here the catcher spot and the top twelve look like this.

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>William Contreras at the top, Adlie Rutchman next, then Yander

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:09.799
<v Speaker 1>Diez sal Perez cal Rawley coming in at five. That's

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>your top five, which is a pretty strong group. I

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:14.720
<v Speaker 1>would say, but for me, I'm still especially in single

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>catcher leagues twelve team fifteen league, I don't care. I'm

0:47:17.160 --> 0:47:20.640
<v Speaker 1>waiting two catcher leagues. Obviously, the calculus changes. Logan o'happy,

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, Will Smith at six, then Wilson Contreras, Logan

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Ohappy at eight, Shay Langeliers at nine, J T Real

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Muto at ten, Tyler Stevenson at eleven, Francisco Alphaez at twelve,

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:32.879
<v Speaker 1>and then on the peripheral you got Austin Wells, Sean

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Murphy looking for a bounce back season with Atlanta, like

0:47:35.520 --> 0:47:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the entire Atlanta Braves, Steve it seems like kybrit Ruiz

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:41.520
<v Speaker 1>at fifteen, and then Connor Wong at sixteen. As you

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 1>get a little deeper. So again, it's always the same

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:46.360
<v Speaker 1>with me. Number one, I hate two catcher leagues. I

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 1>think they're stupid. I don't think there's any reason for

0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 1>him number two. Single catcher leagues twelve to fifteen. There's

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve to fifteen guys there that I can live with,

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and I just don't want to put the investment ahead

0:47:55.880 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of time in one of these bigger catchers unless somebody

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:01.719
<v Speaker 1>really dramatically falls. So that's the easy look for me

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and the sleeper in this list. I can't believe I

0:48:04.880 --> 0:48:06.759
<v Speaker 1>got two mets on the list I'm going to talk about.

0:48:06.760 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, talk about a difference a year makes. But

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Francisco Alvarez, I don't think we've seen the best out

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of him yet. Francisco Alvarez is a big time power

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 1>potential here, and he could easily pop twenty five to

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty home runs in twenty twenty five if everything broke right.

0:48:19.920 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of last year for him was

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:25.839
<v Speaker 1>really getting acclimated to managing the pitching staff and understanding

0:48:25.840 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 1>what needed to happen there. And I think sometimes he

0:48:27.840 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 1>also got frustrated with get into slumps and he was

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:32.440
<v Speaker 1>having a hard time turning things around. If you go

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>back and look at the minor league rack record of

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:37.319
<v Speaker 1>this guy, this was a bat first catcher, right, you know.

0:48:37.560 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And it turns out the framing improved and all the

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:42.359
<v Speaker 1>other things improved. But everybody talked about Alvarez for the bat,

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>not so much of the defense. And I think Alvarez

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in this lineup potentially could finally have that breakout season.

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 1>So he's my sleeper at the position. Who's yours Welsh.

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:51.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I was looking.

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I believe there's like nine on ATC

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 2>catchers projected for twenty or more homers. Francisco Alvarez is

0:48:58.000 --> 0:49:01.600
<v Speaker 2>the lowest cost of all of those projected catchers. I

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:04.239
<v Speaker 2>think this is a fantastic one, probably the one I

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:06.400
<v Speaker 2>would have picked as well, because it's low costs. I

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 2>have my narrative here with catchers. I just play him

0:49:08.960 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 2>late because I play single catcher leagues. I don't want

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:14.440
<v Speaker 2>to pay high costs at all. The catcher that I'm

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 2>going to end up picking, though, is Austin Wells. Trevino

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 2>out of town. I think that opens up more opportunities.

0:49:19.520 --> 0:49:20.480
<v Speaker 3>For Wells to be out there.

0:49:20.520 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 2>ATC projections have him around eighteen homers. I was going

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:26.760
<v Speaker 2>to pick Ivan Herrera, who had a really nice underlying

0:49:26.840 --> 0:49:29.880
<v Speaker 2>hitting profile, and he's going to be I don't know

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 2>if he's going to be the guy though, because I

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:33.839
<v Speaker 2>got Pedro Pajas, because Wilson Gatrez is going to move over.

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 2>But if he were to get like the primary amount,

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:38.480
<v Speaker 2>it might be Herrera. But Austin Wells I think is

0:49:38.560 --> 0:49:40.680
<v Speaker 2>locked because I don't think there's enough competition there. I

0:49:40.680 --> 0:49:42.160
<v Speaker 2>think they want him to be the guy. There's a

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:43.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of power, it's a great hitting environment, and he's

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 2>going outside the top twelve.

0:49:45.280 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 3>So give me a late catcher in Austin Wells to

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 3>the Yankees, all right?

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:51.200
<v Speaker 1>For me? The bust is j tirol Muto. I don't

0:49:51.239 --> 0:49:53.360
<v Speaker 1>like investing in older catchers. I think I saw a

0:49:53.360 --> 0:49:55.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of the client in him and just watched him

0:49:55.320 --> 0:49:58.040
<v Speaker 1>last year, and he's a guy like he's played so

0:49:58.120 --> 0:50:00.239
<v Speaker 1>many games at the position. I know he floats around

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>sometimes in other spots too. You've seen the stolen bases

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 1>drop off a cliff, you know, from twenty one to

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:07.840
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and then to just two last year. I know

0:50:07.880 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 1>we only played ninety nine games. But again, he's gonna

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:12.440
<v Speaker 1>be thirty four years old. I know the Phillies are

0:50:12.440 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>still a really good team. I'm just out on real mewtwo.

0:50:15.120 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this is another one where you're paying for

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:19.279
<v Speaker 1>the past of name brand value. Welsh, Who is a

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:22.359
<v Speaker 1>catcher that you don't want? Or should I say what

0:50:22.480 --> 0:50:25.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of catcher don't you want? On draft day?

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:28.239
<v Speaker 2>Good way to phrase it, Joe, any catcher inside the

0:50:28.239 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 2>top one hundred I don't want NFBC ADP listen. William

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Contreri's is a monster. I love him, smaller guy to catcher,

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:40.760
<v Speaker 2>lots of power. He's at top twenty five NFBC EIGHTYPECE

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:43.160
<v Speaker 2>in January first. But it's a two catcher I get it.

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 2>But still, uh, in standard leagues, who are the guys

0:50:46.040 --> 0:50:46.759
<v Speaker 2>that are going to be in there?

0:50:46.760 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Adlely?

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:49.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe yanire Diaz William Contreras is going to be the

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 2>number one. I'm not saying they can't come close to

0:50:52.320 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 2>returning value. I just don't think the difference of the

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:57.359
<v Speaker 2>value on the guys you would invest in the top

0:50:57.360 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 2>one hundred compared to the other hitters or pitches you

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 2>could take, then moving down into taking the guy I'm

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:05.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna have as a must have or J two Ramuto

0:51:06.000 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 2>or you know, I mean handfuls of guys. I just

0:51:07.960 --> 0:51:10.360
<v Speaker 2>don't think the production difference makes enough sense. So I

0:51:10.400 --> 0:51:12.600
<v Speaker 2>think investing in the top one hundred in a single

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 2>catcher league, I'm not there. I'd also say even in

0:51:15.160 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the two catcher league, investing in the top fifty is

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:19.440
<v Speaker 2>really not something I want to do, kind of like

0:51:19.480 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 2>even in closers, I would just rather have a little

0:51:21.600 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 2>bit more value. You're gonna have to pay like closer

0:51:24.480 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 2>seven or eight in the two catcher league is going

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:28.600
<v Speaker 2>to still go inside the top one hundred, but late

0:51:28.600 --> 0:51:30.719
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather do that, But no inside the top one

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:31.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred catchers.

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Please.

0:51:31.920 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes I say clear.

0:51:32.800 --> 0:51:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Agree one thousand percent with everything you're saying. I must

0:51:35.760 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have guy. Actually, if I'm in Herrera is the everyday

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:40.480
<v Speaker 1>catcher like we come out of spring, that's the guy

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that I do want. But as Welsh said, that might

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit of a muddy situation there. So instead,

0:51:45.160 --> 0:51:48.240
<v Speaker 1>once again, whatever's old as new again it's logan, OHSPI,

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be twenty five years old. Look, I got

0:51:50.600 --> 0:51:53.240
<v Speaker 1>my dudes, and you know what, like had my dudes

0:51:53.320 --> 0:51:56.040
<v Speaker 1>last year. I'm like camon Aro's my Durans, Like those

0:51:56.040 --> 0:51:58.520
<v Speaker 1>are my guys. I'm just sticking to my guns. And

0:51:58.560 --> 0:52:00.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that's important for everybody to do when they're

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:02.799
<v Speaker 1>going into a season. Identify the players you want, and

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:05.160
<v Speaker 1>then just drill it into yourself that those are the

0:52:05.160 --> 0:52:05.799
<v Speaker 1>guys you want.

0:52:06.760 --> 0:52:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:52:07.040 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Look, the same thing as a guy with power in

0:52:09.000 --> 0:52:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the minor leagues hit for better average in the minor leagues,

0:52:11.239 --> 0:52:13.680
<v Speaker 1>like I just think he had his finally as full season,

0:52:13.760 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 1>first full major league season, he's gonna be twenty five

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>years old. I think there's just a lot of upside

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:20.759
<v Speaker 1>there for him to outperform as ADP. He's not going

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to the top one hundred catcher, so I'm allowed to

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 1>take him. But Welsh, is there somebody just outside the

0:52:24.640 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 1>top one hundred that if you did want to take

0:52:26.640 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a catcher, who would it be?

0:52:28.480 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I definitely want values, and I'm not sure

0:52:31.719 --> 0:52:33.640
<v Speaker 2>if this guy's going to be a value because people

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 2>are in on it. But he's right around those middle.

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 2>And I know this is funny and me's saying I

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:39.080
<v Speaker 2>want Lake catchers. I do, But if I were taking

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:41.719
<v Speaker 2>and having a little bit more investment, is Wilson Contreras.

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Wilson Contrares with the Cardinals is moving off of catcher.

0:52:44.760 --> 0:52:46.640
<v Speaker 2>He's going to be their first baseman for this year.

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 2>So that means you're gonna get all the games. We're

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 2>not looking at, you know, four hundred at bats, which

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:53.520
<v Speaker 2>he had in twenty twenty two and twenty twenty three.

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 2>He only had three hundred and actually three hundred and

0:52:56.320 --> 0:52:59.160
<v Speaker 2>one at bats last year, and he still hit fifteen homers.

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:01.720
<v Speaker 2>So you're getting a guy that qualifies a catcher playing

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:02.839
<v Speaker 2>first base every day.

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 3>That's the type of guy that I'm willing to invest in.

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:06.840
<v Speaker 3>So Contreras would be the must have.

0:53:07.719 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so who are your must haves? Who's your sleepers,

0:53:10.120 --> 0:53:12.160
<v Speaker 1>who's your bust? What's the infield look like to you?

0:53:12.239 --> 0:53:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Drop your comments below let us know what you're thinking.

0:53:14.080 --> 0:53:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget to subscribe to Fantasy Pros MLB and of

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:19.759
<v Speaker 1>course ring the belt to the ghosting for notification so

0:53:19.800 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 1>you never miss a moment of fantasy baseball talk here

0:53:22.760 --> 0:53:24.440
<v Speaker 1>on the channel. That'll do it for us, But the

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:26.319
<v Speaker 1>story of the game goes on for the Welsh. I'm

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Joey P. We'll see you next time kids, Happy drafting.

0:53:29.920 --> 0:53:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:35.760
<v Speaker 3>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:53:38.800 --> 0:53:42.480
<v Speaker 1>or Spotify, Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:53:42.520 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:53:45.480 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB.