WEBVTT - Self-Driving Cars Might Finally Be For Real This Time

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Tracy, remember the hype about self driving cars from like

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, Like that really died out?

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 2>Can I tell you something? Yeah, I'm still holding out

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 2>hope for the self driving cars because I can't drive,

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and it was kind of I forgot. It was kind

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 2>of acceptable when I was in my twenties, but now

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 2>it's starting to get a little embarrassing. So I really

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 2>need the self driving cars to become viable options.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>So when we go on the road and like do podcasts,

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>like in another.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 3>City, you have to drive. I have to drive all

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 3>the time, don't It hadn't because I think I've asked you.

0:00:48.400 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, oh, Tracy, you're renting a car.

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>And then you like sort of change the discussion or

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you bring up something else, like oh, I think there's

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Ubers in that town or something.

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 3>But this is the real reason, isn't it.

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean there are Ubers everywhere, you know. What

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 2>we should talk about whether or not Ubers have decreased

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 2>enthusiasm for self driving cars as a business model.

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Remember when people used to say Uber would never make

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>any money if they still had to pay humans, but.

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 3>Now they're making a little money.

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:11.720
<v Speaker 2>It's true.

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.119
<v Speaker 1>But I do think like generally, like when people talk

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 1>about like tech that didn't live up to the hype

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and now you see it now with like chatbots and

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that, and whether they're legan chain like people

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>go back to the self driving cars, Like to me,

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the sort of quintessential example of the like modern times,

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe three D printing. You don't really hear that much

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>about it.

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but don't you also find it weird to imagine

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 2>a future in two or three hundred years where there

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be self driving cars. It feels at once both

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 2>inevitable and like hype, if that makes sense, like an artificiality.

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean I definitely, I definitely agree two hundred

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and three hundred years, that's like that's a long time,

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>like fifty years from now.

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I've kind of you think fifty years from now.

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, so this is the question, which is like my

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is not an area I know that well, but my

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>impression is it's like look sort of classic thing where

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>like tech got us like ninety five percent of the

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>way there, and then there are some edge cases that

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>make self driving cars difficult. I don't know exactly what

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>they are, but that getting that last five percent or

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever is so hard that it renders the whole thing

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>very difficult, and that whatever that last percent is is

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the difference between the tech being like wow, versus actually

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>changing the world.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 2>We are so close and yet so far.

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:27.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's one of those things.

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like again with chatbots and some of

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>these other like current like artificial intelligence applications, it comes

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>back to this question of like, yes, it's really great

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and it sort of blows your mind, but there are

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>these hallucinations another thing, and like if it's not it's

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>not one hundred percent reliable, does that mean it really

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>won't be as disruptive as people expect.

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, the other thing I'm curious about is whether or

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 2>not that sort of last five percent that you're describing,

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 2>whether that's on the software or the hardware.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, because that has.

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Implications for you know, if we do make huge leaps

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and artificial intell leigence, maybe that solves a software problem.

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 2>But maybe the issue is actually that the sensors are

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 2>too basic or too expensive, that sort of thing.

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know the answer to any of these questions.

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>The one other thing I'll say too, is like there

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of car talk these days.

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:17.519
<v Speaker 3>We've been doing more and more on the podcast.

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>It's entirely like on the sort of EV charging side,

0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>and how are EV's and how EV production and batteries,

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like how are they going to reshape the industry? Or

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Chinese exports, how are they going to reshape the industry?

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 1>It does not seem like again ten years ago the

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>big question was like who's ahead in the self driving

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>car race? Google, GM or Ford. There was much less

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>talk then about EV's is the big disruptor?

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, So I think it is time for a checkup,

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 2>right on what's going on with self driving cars?

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 3>It is time for a checkup.

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And our guests says they're back, that they're happening for real.

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>And I do believe him to some extent because I

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>follow some people who live in San Francisco and they're

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>tweeting about it more and more that they see them

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 1>on the road. And sometimes when I'm up but four

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in the morning to read the Internet in the dark

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and drink coffee, I see like people who are still

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>out at night in San Francisco talking about all the

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>self driving cars around them, So there might actually be

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>it may not be totally over.

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 3>There might be they might be back.

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, the things I see on the internet about self

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 2>driving cars are those edge cases where it's like a

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 2>car flum mixed by a traffic cone in the middle

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 2>of the street, which they're simultaneously like impressive and amusing

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 2>and disappointing all at the same time. If that makes sense.

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting.

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>You're very pro self driving cars. It hadn't clicked, like

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you really want this to happen.

0:04:35.760 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 2>I have a personal self interest in not having to

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 2>learn how to drive. I figure if I'm super optimistic,

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe maybe if I just hang on for like another

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 2>ten years, Yeah, maybe, I don't know. Let's ask our guests.

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's ask our guests. We have the perfect guest, longtime

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>tech journalists, a tech understander, someone who really deep delves

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>deep into technology to understand like how things work and

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>what's really happening. I followed his work for a long time.

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>We're actually like we're colleagues together, like eighteen years ago,

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>I think at a side called tech dirt.

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Tim Lee.

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>He is the author of the understandingai dot org newsletter

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>longtime tech journalist, and he recently wrote a piece the

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>death of self driving cars is greatly exaggerated.

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 3>So, uh, Tim, great to have you on the show.

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 4>Hey, I'm great to be and I'm a fan of

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 4>the podcast.

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much, appreciate that.

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's start ten years ago, and you know, I think

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago there was a lot of self driving

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>car hype and my impression was, and this is so

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>vague and fuzzy, it's like, oh, most of it solved,

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>but this last part's really hard.

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.239
<v Speaker 3>Is that true? What was that.

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Last part that has proven to be very challenging to

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>like turn these from like prototypes onto track or a

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>very like organized grid like suburb in Arizona to something

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that could actually be used on the road.

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 5>So it is true that about ten years ago, Google

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.799
<v Speaker 5>was the leading company and they had vehicles that could

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 5>go on certain routes with a fair amount of kind

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:08.599
<v Speaker 5>of preparation. And about six years ago Google rebranded itself

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 5>as Weimo, it's self driving cart projects as Wemo, and

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 5>started testing a taxi service in Phoenix, and they've been

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 5>plugging away at that ever since. There were a bunch

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 5>of other startups that were started between about twenty fourteen

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 5>and twenty eighteen, say, and a lot of those failed

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 5>or were forced to sell to some of the tech giants,

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 5>And so there's many fewer companies operating in this space

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 5>than the word five or six years ago. In terms

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 5>of what the last little bit is, it's just a

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 5>lot of little things. I mean, that's the thing about

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 5>a long tail is there's a lot of stuff out

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.119
<v Speaker 5>in the long tail. One thing, for example that Weimo

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 5>and Cruz the kind of industry leaders have been struggling

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 5>with is when you deal with first responders. For example,

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 5>if we hope to an active fire site, you're not

0:06:50.400 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 5>supposed to dive over the hoses that firefighters are using.

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 5>I mean, that's something you might only encounter every one

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 5>hundred thousand miles or something.

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 4>And so there's just lots of it's a really big

0:06:58.920 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 4>deal to do it.

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 5>Yes, absolute there's another case where a crew is vehicle

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 5>like drove through a police tape in a crime scene.

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 5>So there's lots of little things that I saw a headline.

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 5>I haven't actually looked into this yet, but apparently a care

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 5>is like drove into web codcrete. So the real world

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 5>is complicated and there's just lots of weird situations that

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 5>a human being because we kind of understand how the

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 5>world works. You see, Oh that looks like web concrete.

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 5>I shouldn'tdrive on that. But you just have to, Like

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 5>it's like whack mole. You have to like hit every

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 5>single like bad thing a vehicle can do it. That

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 5>just takes a lot, a lot, a lot of work.

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know why, but I find all the

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 2>stories of like robotic self driving cars behaving badly absolutely hilarious.

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>And not the ones where they hurt people I should

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 2>just caveat that, but the ones where, you know, something

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 2>that we wouldn't even think about, you know, there's an

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 2>object in the road, just go around it, and they

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 2>seem to really struggle with I want to ask you

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 2>more about why that seems to be an issue and

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 2>sort of get into some of the edge cases that

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Joe mentioned in the intro. But before we do, why,

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 2>here's a basic question. Why have a lot of these

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 2>self driving car companies struggled Because on the face of it,

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 2>it would appear that there is a lot of money

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 2>floating out there in venture capital land that often goes

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 2>into unrealistic or unprofitable unprofitable projects. So why has this

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 2>been an issue for self driving cars in particular?

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I think on some level the basic issue

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 5>with safety a lot of other areas of tech. You

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 5>kind of build them in a viable product and you

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 5>put it out in the world and you know it

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 5>breaks sometimes, but that's fine, Like that gets you more feedback.

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 5>And because you can kind of iterate rapidly, you can

0:08:31.680 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 5>like scale up very quickly and get to a profitable

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 5>scale pretty quickly. That obviously doesn't work if if the

0:08:37.920 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 5>moving fast at breaking things is like literally breaking things

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 5>and killing people. And so you have to be very

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 5>close to perfect before you can launch a commercial service

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 5>and start making money. And so you had a bunch

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 5>of startups that were trying to do this. They had

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 5>all starts of strategy to do that. Some were trying

0:08:51.880 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 5>to operate in retirement communities or do like package delivery.

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 5>They try to find kind of less demanding applications than

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 5>like drive anywhere any time. But it's just really really hard.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 5>And so the companies that have sustained are the ones

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 5>that have Amazon, Google, GM like big companies behind them

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:09.839
<v Speaker 5>who are willing to put like a billion dollars a

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 5>year behind them for several years in a row while

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 5>they kind of try to iron out these final little wrinkles.

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>So zooming forward today and that makes a lot of sense.

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 3>I hadn't really thought about that.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>It's like for many tech it's okay if there are

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>edge cases where it doesn't work, because you just sort

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>of like, well, you put out in the world and like, yeah,

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not a perfect product, but into minimum via, it's free.

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:31.959
<v Speaker 2>And we're refining it.

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 3>It's free and we're iterating.

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>But you cannot do that when there's big safety issues

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and if it's a threat to other drivers or pedestrians,

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not really an acceptable way to do product. Going

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to today and you are more optimistic and we'll get

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>to that about the prospects for their existence. But has

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>there been a breakthrough in recent years or has it

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>just been this slow, iterative grinding away at the edge

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.679
<v Speaker 1>cases that it makes it so that there are fewer

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and fewer edge cases.

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 5>I would say the second one. I mean, Weymo's technology

0:10:06.880 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 5>has worked pretty well. They started doing fully driver less

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 5>operations in Phoenix in the fall of twenty twenty, and

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 5>I have just very gradually expanded that service now weimo

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 5>I just a week or two ago they got permissioned

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 5>from California regulators to begin operating commercially in San Francisco

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 5>after a year or two of doing practice driving there,

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 5>and so yeah, they've they've just been plugging away at it.

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 5>And it's hard to tell from the outside because they're

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.960
<v Speaker 5>not super transparent about all the details of you know,

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 5>how many incidents they have or how much work they

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 5>have to do on the back end. But yeah, it

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 5>seems like they're just very gradually making the technology better.

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 5>And they seem to think because they're now talking about

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 5>scaling up much more quickly, they seem to think that

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 5>the companies seem to think that they're that this is

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:50.440
<v Speaker 5>ready for it to be a commercial product.

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Just a really simple question. If I were to go

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to San Francisco right now, could I go there and

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>download an app or whatever and get in a self

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>driving tax.

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 5>You know, I haven't checked that recently, So it was

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 5>literally like last week or the week before the California

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 5>regulators gave them permission to do that, I think, And

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 5>so till like last week, I think it was a

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 5>waiting list. But it's definitely case, you go to certain

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 5>parts of Phoenix, including the Phoenix Airport, you can hail

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 5>a taxi and it's just like Uber left.

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 4>You can try it.

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 3>I want to do it. I want to do it, Tracy.

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Let's go.

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Phoenix, just so that for the one

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 1>ride then fly back.

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 4>Sure. Yeah, I talk to people there. I mean it works,

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 4>it works quite well. I mean the people.

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 5>I've talked to several people who've written in those vehicles

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 5>and at least in both rides they say it's flawless,

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 5>that drives very comfortably.

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, the service they just aren't that many refuges.

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 2>Can we talk a little bit more about the edge stuff,

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 2>because my my impression is that, Okay, computers learn from

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 2>repetition and from modeling out various scenarios, but driving is

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 2>such an infinitely unpredictable experience, especially if you're in New York.

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>You could get you get it, Like if this technology

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you'd never taken off, I have confidence you could do.

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I think I've missed the boat on

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 2>that one. But anyway, okay, but there are all these

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 2>different possibilities that a self driving car could be grappling with.

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 2>So for instance, an animal runs out in the middle

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 2>of the street, and you know, maybe after that happens

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 2>several times, the self driving car starts to realize, well,

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 2>it's this animal, and then it's going to behave in

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>this way and keep moving or stop, and I need

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 2>to respond to it in a certain way. But that

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of seems to be the issue here as far

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 2>as I understand it.

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 5>Yes, absolutely, And there's a bunch of ways that the

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 5>companies have tried to do this. So, for example, Google

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 5>has long had a big test track facility out in

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.439
<v Speaker 5>in California about an hour I went out there a

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 5>few years ago, where they have some fake roads and

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 5>they'll create kind of fake scenarios. They'll have cars cutting

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 5>other cars off, or have somebody like moving box of

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 5>the Cross, the three People and Halloween costumes something like that,

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 5>and so they try to think of what are all

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 5>the situations of the self driving car could run into

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 5>and kind of anticipate that. And this is also why

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 5>they started in Phoenix, is one of their strategies was, Okay,

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 5>there's so many ED cases, we can't do them allay

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 5>all at once, and so let's start a kind of

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 5>easy mode. And so Phoenix has very nice weather, nice

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:17.679
<v Speaker 5>wide streets, well marked, you know, not a lot of pedestrians,

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 5>not a lot of bicyclists, and so that was kind

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 5>of way most theory was that we'll do the easiest

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 5>one first. The issue with that is that the economics

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 5>of running a taxi service in theaters are not that

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.319
<v Speaker 5>great because most people already have cars, and so Cruise

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 5>has kind of had the opposite approach. It's is, we

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 5>want to see these educations as fast as possible, So

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 5>let's start in downtown San Francisco, because that's where there's

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 5>a ton of crazy situations, and so we will kind

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 5>of be harder in the first place, but we gathering

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 5>data very quickly and they will master it.

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 4>And is not yet clear yet.

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 5>I mean, both both companies now seem to think they're ready,

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 5>but I don't think we've seen them in a while

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 5>long enough to have a sense for kind of which

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 5>of those strategies are working better.

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, it's really tough, and so so I.

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 5>Should say, like for the first few years, both of

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 5>these companies had safety divers behind the wheel of every vehicle,

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:00.080
<v Speaker 5>and so the vehicle was mostly diving itself. But if

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 5>it got stuck, that says or down would have to

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 5>take over. And the kind of big switching. The big

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 5>risky point is when they take the first starts out

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:09.800
<v Speaker 5>of the car, which WM one did about two years ago,

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 5>and cruise did I think maybe a.

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 4>Year ago, and then you know, and then that is

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 4>it because the.

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 5>Must trickier because if the vehicle screws up, it's a

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 5>big deal.

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I love the idea of having to train the self

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 2>driving cars by like putting people in Halloween costumes in

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 2>front of them, and it reminds me a lot of

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 2>socializing my dog because we used to have to like

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 2>wear weird hats right, or like bring balloons into the

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 2>house so that he would get used to them and

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 2>not freak out. But this goes back to something that

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned earlier, which is is the issue here the software,

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 2>so like the actual modeling of the reaction to an

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>unknown or unfamiliar event or stimulus, or is it more

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:53.920
<v Speaker 2>on the hardware side where maybe you need better sensors

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 2>that are better able to appreciate the things in front

0:14:57.040 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 2>of you.

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 5>I would say it's more software, particularly more data. But yeah,

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 5>the hardware has stayed pretty constant. I mean that the trio

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 5>of sensors. Most of these vehicles have our cameras, radar,

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 5>and then lighter, which is a like laser laser range

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 5>finding technology that gives you kind of a three D

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 5>map of your environment. And so ten years ago Google's

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 5>car has had those three sensors, and I think now

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 5>those sensors are better. But I don't think anybody thinks

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.320
<v Speaker 5>the main issues that we need to upgrade in the

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 5>quality to light are really they just need they need

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 5>examples of every possible educase, and they you know, it's

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 5>hard to get enough of that data because some educses

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 5>happen very rarely but can be very serious if you

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 5>encounter them.

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us a quick industry overview? You know

0:15:52.600 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Weimo, it's Weimo's Google Cruises, GM Cruises GM

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and then obviously Tesla and Elon's all Like if you

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>just like raid Elon's Twitter feed, you would think that

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>they've already had self driving cars like in the wild,

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>And I don't really think that's true, but I don't

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>really understand what's going on. Can you give like a

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>really just sort of quick like overview who the big

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>players are, like who owns them, and just sort of

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>like what their status is.

0:16:19.520 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 4>Yes, absolutely so.

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 5>Wemo is mainly owned by Google, Cruise is mainly owned

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 5>by GM. I consider Tesla to be in a different market,

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 5>and some of the Tesla fans get mad at me

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 5>when I say this, But Tesla is building a.

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Driver systems product.

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 5>So all pretty much any car you drive now they

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 5>have advanced cruise control where it stays in your lane

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 5>and doesn't hit the car in front of you. In

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 5>some ways, I think Tesla has a more advanced version

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 5>of that, although also in some ways I think it's

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 5>Elon must just has a low or risk tolerance and

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 5>so he's kind of pushing a technology that's anyway. But

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 5>so so, the key thing about the Tesla product is

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 5>you were not supposed to, like crawl in the back

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 5>seat and take a nap, right You're supposed to be

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 5>there making sure it doesn't break.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And have people crawled in the back seat and taken

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a nap.

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure somebody has that. There are videos of people

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 5>doing it appropriate things well behind the wheel of the Tesla,

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 5>but you're definitely not supposed to. And you know the

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 5>vehicles that they have ways.

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 4>Of monitoring the driver so that that doesn't happen.

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 5>But anyway, So theoretically Elon Musk thinks they're going to

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 5>at some point to get to the point where you

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 5>don't have to be behind the wheel. But I do

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 5>not think they're close to that or really laying groundwork,

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 5>because one of the things for any service like that

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 5>is you need an operation staff because the vehicle is

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 5>occasionally get to get stuck, and when that happens, it

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 5>used to be able to phone home and get kind

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 5>of remote guidance about how to deal with it. And

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 5>as far as they know, Tesla's not doing it anyway.

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 5>So that's Tesla and then the other two companies. There

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 5>are a few other companies I would say a little behind.

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 5>So Amazon has a company called Zookes that used to

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 5>be a startup but acquired by Amazon a couple of

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 5>years ago.

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:38.360
<v Speaker 4>And there's a company called Motional.

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 5>That is also I think close to being ready for

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 5>driver lists, but not to driver lists. And then there's

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 5>a company called MOBILEI that supplies the hardware for most

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 5>of these driver assistance systems and they have been working

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 5>on this technology. So that's another company. But guess I

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 5>say those four or five companies are the kind of

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 5>the remating players.

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Am I hallucinating this memory? Or was there a situation

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in which Uber hired every single member of the Carnegie

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Mellon University Robotics department to work out self driving cars

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>for them?

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 4>Yes? Absolutely, so, yeah that was one.

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 3>That's a real thing that actually happened.

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 5>Yes, that was in I mean, I don't know if

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 5>it was every member, but yes, Uber hired a bunch

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.719
<v Speaker 5>of talent in twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen, and then one

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 5>of their vehicles struck and killed somebody in Tempa, Arizona

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 5>in twenty eighteen, and that basically destroyed their program. And

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 5>so I think the remnants Oh actually I should say

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 5>there's a startup called Aurora that is doing tracking.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 4>I think Uber. They acquired Uber's thing.

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 5>But anyway, yeah, so Uber is now not a player

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.880
<v Speaker 5>because in large part because they're really the only only

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 5>one of these fully self driving programs that have had

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 5>a fatality with their with their testing.

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 2>So let's assume that self driving cars become a realistic thing.

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>How viable is that as a business model, Because on

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 2>a first reading, it seems extremely expensive to develop, possibly

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 2>extra extremely expensive to maintain if you have to provide

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 2>operational support to all these robot cars out in the field.

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 2>And then thirdly, it does seem like there's a big

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 2>regulatory slash, safety slash, maybe legal liability risk if something

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 2>were to happen.

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I'm pretty optimistic about it because you think

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 5>about if you think about Uber and Lyft, about half

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 5>of the cost of running Uber and Lyft is the

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 5>labor of the human driver, and so if you take

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 5>that out, then Wayman Cruise need to get the new costs.

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 5>The cost of the sensors plus whatever operational stuff in

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 5>r indeed to be less than half the cost of

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 5>the driver, and that's a pretty significant amount of money.

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:42.959
<v Speaker 5>And so I think it'll take them a while to

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 5>get to the scale where it's profitable, because certainly Wayman

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 5>crews both have I think hundreds or maybe thousands of

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 5>people working on this technology, and the sensors are currently

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 5>pretty expensive. But one of the most predictable things in

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 5>business is that mass manufacturing technologies like light our sensors

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 5>and computer chips get cheaper at scale, and so I

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 5>have no doubt that in the long run this is

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 5>going to be a viable business and is really I

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 5>think a question of how much patience the big companies

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 5>back in Google, GM and Amazon companies like that, how

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:14.160
<v Speaker 5>many billions of dollars they want to spend to get

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 5>to this. But I think that in the long run,

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 5>I think that the taxi industry will be operated by

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 5>self driving cars. And I think that in the long run,

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 5>I also think it'll be cheaper and probably expand the

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 5>market a lot. So my long run expectation is that

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 5>this is going to be a big and profitable industry.

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you envision it just or primarily for taxis or

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 2>could you have a situation where people like me are

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 2>buying self driving cars?

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, just to add on to Tracy's question, because sort

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 1>of dovetails, could Tracy drive to work and then make

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>some extra money by during the day when it would

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>be parking for eight hours, have it be a taxi,

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>and then could that impair total volume sales for the

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>automakers because basically Tracy takes her self driving car to work,

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>but then also is a You know, I could the taxi.

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Industry driving car capitalists.

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Rather than having the car sit for eight hours in

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the parking lot ten hours?

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Smart?

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 5>So I think certainly, I think the initial product is

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 5>going to be a taxi service. That's what all the

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 5>people doing passenger nobody's talking about selling them in the

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 5>short run. Obviously, people like owning cars, and so in

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 5>the long run, I think there.

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 4>Will be a business model you'll be able to have

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 4>a car.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 5>My guess is that it's going to be something more

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 5>like a long term lease than actual outright ownership.

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 4>But partly for liability reasons.

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 5>I mean, if you imagine if you own the car

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 5>and the brak needs a replacement and you don't replace

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 5>it in the car crashes to kill somebody, the people

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 5>who made the software going to get suited for that,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 5>and so I think they're going to be reluctant to

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 5>sell people sell driving cars out right, but you might

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 5>be able to have something that's a long term release.

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 5>It's effectively the same as ownership. I'm not sure it

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 5>would make that much sense. I mean, if if you're

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 5>the kind of person who wants to share a car

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 5>with other people, then probably you would just take a taxi.

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 4>So I'm not sure.

0:21:56.800 --> 0:21:58.360
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there's a lot of ways the economics could

0:21:58.359 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 5>work out with My guess is that you'll have some

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 5>people who will lease a South diardan car long term,

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 5>and other people who will just take taxis. And I

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 5>think that hopefully, like in the long run, if economy

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 5>skill bring costs down, it'll be much cheaper than the

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 5>taxi today, like roughly half the price if you figured

0:22:12.480 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 5>that half is labor and so then that'll allow lots

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 5>of people, especially in cities, to own fewer cars and

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:20.719
<v Speaker 5>take more taxi rides.

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>But I was just going to say, even if you didn't,

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and I know other people have said this before, but

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:26.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe Tracy doesn't want to share her car with other

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 1>people during the day, but it could mean less need

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>for parking, right, the car could drive home and go

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>back into your driveway or garage while you're at work, yes,

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and then pick you up with Then then the amount

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of space that a city or a neighborhood needs for

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 1>parking probably could be significantly diminished.

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 5>Yes, absolutely, And I think I think one underestimated benefit

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 5>of this from an urban planning perspective is it'll be

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 5>much easier to do congest and charging because the vehicles

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 5>will all be connected, and so I could imagine more

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 5>kind of complicated pricing where you give people a strong

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 5>incentive not to drive their car into downtown. If you're

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 5>going to go downtown, take a taxi or maybe some

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 5>kind of shared vehicles.

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 4>So there's a lot of I think sell driving cars will.

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.480
<v Speaker 5>Open up a lot of new options for the way

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:11.400
<v Speaker 5>you kind of organize, especially commutes, because yeah, you can

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 5>have different kinds of vehicles and different kinds of business

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 5>models for how people pay for them.

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Could I use my self driving car to deliver packages

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 2>as a sort of gig FedEx worker or something. I

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 2>hear ups drivers cost a lot nowadays, so you know.

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 5>Right, I mean again, I think that'll be a different market.

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 5>So there's a company called Neuro that is trying to

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 5>do this. Several companies act, but I think they're the

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 5>market leader, so I think it's possible. I mean, one

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.159
<v Speaker 5>of the issues is, you know, with the FedEx drive,

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 5>the FedEx Star physically gets out of the car, out

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 5>of the truck and carries the package to your front door.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 4>And obviously your self driving cars can to be able

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 4>to do that.

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 5>So I'm not sure exactly what that market will look like,

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.560
<v Speaker 5>but my guess is that there'll be customized delivery vehicles

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 5>that are much smaller and lighter and cheaper than a

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 5>full sized car, because there's no reason you need a

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 5>full car if there's nobody in the vehicle.

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask a question about safety? You know, you

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that Uber's self driving car pilot program ended basically

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 1>because a car struck and killed a pedestrian. It is

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:11.440
<v Speaker 1>also true that human driven cars are killing people every day.

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe there's tens of thousands of people every year

0:24:14.480 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>die in auto accident. Do we have meaningful apples to

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Apple statistics or is it that's still so far that

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the test that the self driving car universe is too

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>narrow or in two ideal conditions to actually do a

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 1>safety comparison.

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 5>It's actually just the raw number of miles is not

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 5>high enough. So well, it's true that humans kill forty

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 5>thousand people a year.

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 3>That's a staggering number. Yeah, number of people.

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 5>But humans humans drive billions or trillions of miles every year,

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 5>and so it's like one there's a fatality once every

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 5>hundred to hundred million miles roughly on the roads. And

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 5>self driving cars are in the tens of millions of miles.

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 5>So if they were as safe as a human you

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 5>would expect about one less than one death so far,

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 5>and so the fact that there has been only one

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.440
<v Speaker 5>death doesn't really tell you that much about.

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, is is it more or less safe?

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean, so far the way one Cruise, the leaders

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 5>have had zero deaths, but they've gotten less than hundred

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 5>million miles.

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 4>So you just guessed. I think it's just too soon

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 4>to say for sure.

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 2>How much does the business model or the eventual profitability

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 2>of a lot of these self driving car companies depend

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 2>on the way the insurers react, because I imagine, you know,

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 2>if there is an accident involving a self driving car

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 2>and there's negligence involved, or you know, something's wrong with

0:25:33.760 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the model, the legal liability is almost infinite at that point,

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 2>potentially millions and millions of dollars of payout if there

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 2>are actual fatalities. And I guess my question is a

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of this is going to depend on the insurers

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 2>being willing to take on that risk, right, Yeah, you.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 5>Know, I'm not actually sure exactly what Google and Cruise's

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 5>insurance situations are. I mean, they're big enough companies that

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 5>I would guess they can self ensure, so that's actually

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 5>not something I have and I assume they've disclosed in

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 5>some regulatory filing how they're insured. But it's a different

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 5>market because it's not especially in the early years, it's

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 5>not going to be individual consumers buying insurance. And so yeah,

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm not actually sure what the structure of that market

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.479
<v Speaker 5>is right now, and whether they have third party insurance

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 5>or they're just on the hook for the liability.

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 2>That'd be interesting to look at.

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.479
<v Speaker 1>You can this just a really simple regulatory question right now.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>If one of these companies said, we're good, we got it.

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>You want to get a taxi at or you want

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to do canniball run, and you want to go coast

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to coast We'll drive you from New York to California.

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Could they legally do it or is there still some

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of like regulatory blessing that would need to happen

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>for that to exist.

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 5>There's very little regulation at the federal level. There's some

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 5>regulation of the design of the vehicle. For example, you

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 5>still need to have a steering wheel in the car,

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 5>but at the federal level, I don't think there'd.

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Be any legal barriers to do that at the state.

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 5>Level, at state by state, I think if you weren't challenged,

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 5>if you weren't charging for it, and just doing as

0:26:57.520 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 5>a demonstration.

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 4>I don't think there'd be any issue in most but.

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 5>As I mentioned, so, California I think is one of

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 5>the states that regulates these things more heavily, and they

0:27:05.000 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 5>do have a fairly substantial process. They treat Way one

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 5>cruise similarly to the way Uber lift or regulated, and

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 5>they just got the approval to start doing commercial taxi

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 5>rides in San Francisco. So yeah, it's state by state,

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 5>and Phoenix I believe this close to no regulation of

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 5>that kind of thing, so yeah, and I think Texas

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 5>is probably similar, so that the more kind of Republican

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 5>leaning states, there's very regulation. In California has some, but

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 5>not enough that it's really I think of a major bottlement.

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 2>So we discussed that there are some self driving cars

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 2>available out there, but they're kind of a novelty slash

0:27:56.480 --> 0:28:00.080
<v Speaker 2>experiment at the moment. How will we know when self

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 2>driving cars are a sort of viable, realistic thing. What

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:05.960
<v Speaker 2>are you watching out for?

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 5>I think they're running the experiment right now. So Cruz

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 5>has announced I think eight to ten new cities, mostly

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 5>in the Southwest, places like Houston, Dallas, Miami, Atlanta, Nashville,

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 5>and we'll just kind of have to see how quickly

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 5>that happens, or if it happens. I mean, it certainly

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't be the first time that a company has made

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 5>an announcement in the self driving space that hasn't panned out.

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 5>But they've gone from just Phoenix to now Phoenix and

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 5>San Francisco, and I think anyway, so we'll just have

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 5>to watch and see if those announcements actually turned into

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 5>operating services. Like I said, right now you can go

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 5>to Phoenix, you can try it. I think in the

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 5>next few weeks or months, you'll be able anybody to

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 5>be able to pail a car in San Francisco. And

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 5>then the other thing is the service territory. So right

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 5>now it's not all of the Phoenix Matoria, it's I

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 5>think a couple hundred square miles, and so yeah, we'll

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 5>want to watch what cities are they're going into and

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 5>how big of a service foot and then that does

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 5>that service footprint grow over time, And then ultimately we'll

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 5>have to see the financial results. I mean, these are

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 5>both publicly traded companies, so eventually I assume they'll tell

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 5>us if it's profitable. I don't think it is yet,

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 5>but yeah. I think if you see them rapidly scaling

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 5>up the number of vehicles in the number of cities,

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 5>then that'll be a sign that it's going well.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 4>And if it's if it doesn't, then probably isn't going

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 4>as well.

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not kidding, by the way, about going to Arizona

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>just to travel, because we already want to do an

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Arizona tour anyway with all of our land and water

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and ELFELFA and Chips episodes we do there, So we

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>got to fly there just to take a self driving car.

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I just have like one more question, and it's basically,

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you know here in New York, I don't think there's anything.

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>But let's put a real time frame on this, like

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you say, like you know, you say they're coming. We're

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>going to start seeing them more and more in some

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 1>of these other cities. When can we say, like, you know,

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>when will we have them in New York and give

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>us a year by which we could say, Okay, Tim

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>was right or Tim was wrong.

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 5>So I don't have to make if I'm making a

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 5>strong prediction that you know that on a specific So

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 5>I will say what Wimo and Cruz have said.

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 4>I believe Weimo has said.

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 5>They're planning to increase their footprint by ten x by

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 5>the end of next year, and Cruise has says they're

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 5>going to reach a billion dollars in revenue, which I

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 5>think will be about a fifty x increase by twenty

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 5>twenty five.

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 4>So I'm a little.

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 5>Skeptical that hit those numbers, but that's that's the scale

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 5>they're talking about now. That would still be a small

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 5>fraction of the overall taxi industry, sure, And I think

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 5>one of the things you'll see is that they haven't

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 5>entirely figured out the weather situation, and also to some extent,

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 5>they're like really dense infrastructure. So if this question of

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 5>when will you be able to hail a vehicle in Manhattan,

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 5>I could still see that being five to ten years away.

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 5>But I would not be surprised if Los Angeles, Houston, Dallas, Miami,

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 5>those kind of cities, you know, Southwestern kind of suburban cities.

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 5>If three to five years from now, it's very common

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 5>to see self diving taxis as just like a on

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 5>power with the.

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 4>Uber and left in terms of popularity.

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Similarly, we'll have you back in five years and we'll

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>see if all of this born. I really appreciate you

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 1>coming on the podcast.

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 4>Sound good, thank you.

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, Tracy, it always comes back to Arizona

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:27.719
<v Speaker 1>for US Chips. Seriously, we're gonna chips, water, ELFLFA.

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 3>And now driving.

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm serious.

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Intersect with I'm telling you they got to take a trip.

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm not being facetious.

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 5>Okay.

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I would happily go to Arizona. I think that'd

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 2>be fun, but I don't know. I'm just going to

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 2>go back to what I said earlier, which is like

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 2>self driving cars at once feel far away and very

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 2>close and sort of inevitable and also quite difficult, if

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:55.800
<v Speaker 1>You know what, if it was really fascinating and I

0:31:55.840 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>hadn't really appreciated this, his point about one of the

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>companies starting in Phoenix, where they're driving is super easy,

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you sort of like progressively get better to

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 1>go to more complicated places, and then the other one

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 1>starting or mainly operating in San Francisco, where the driving

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is really difficult, and it's like, if you can master

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, you could probably master anyway.

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 3>I wonder what the better approaches, like getting.

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Progressively you know, progressively better, or just like really taking

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>all the hard stuff on day one.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know what I don't get just thinking about

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 2>that conversation. You know how all the captures to identify

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:36.120
<v Speaker 2>robots are like identify the motorcycles in this photo or

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 2>identify the buses. That doesn't bode well for self driving cars.

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 3>Why Why?

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, because it seems like robots struggle to identify motorcycles

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 2>on the road and humans doe.

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I see what you're saying, right, Like, our whole approach

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to even identifying whether someone is it's.

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Always traffic lights or cars or motorcycles. So maybe maybe

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 2>actually self driving cars are ultimately a threat to our

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:00.719
<v Speaker 2>existing captures.

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Wow, yeah, right, Like if we could solve self driving cars,

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that guarantees that we're going to have spam.

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 3>And other internet attacks. Right, I hadn't really thought about that.

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, I think we didn't touch on it

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 2>much there. But there are also obviously societal implications of this.

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 2>We talked a little bit about the notion that well,

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 2>maybe companies could just replace all the taxi or the

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Uber drivers, maybe even some mail delivery drivers get replaced.

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 2>That seems to be an issue as well. And then

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 2>the other thing, Actually, I want to look into this

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 2>after this conversation, but I am really curious what the

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 2>insurance is like on these things and who's provided.

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, who has to pay and how I do think

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of big questions like that, or

0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>like who's ultimately responsible when when these malfunction? I think

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco recently there was something where a bunch

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of them all shut down at the same time and

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they create all these traffic problems, which is also not

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>something that comes up with human drivers. I also think

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 1>like the political debates are going to get like super weird,

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like what if they say, well, you know, to mention

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>congestion taxes. What if they say, oh, like you can't

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>even do that route because the computer is determined that

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>would like use too much energy?

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Could it end?

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>The interesting could like you know, it's interesting like the

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Red States, as you mentioned, have been a bit more

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>liberal about allowing them. But then there's all in twenty years,

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 1>will you be allowed to be a human driver, were

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>allowed to be like gohot sight seeing? Like all these

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>things like kind of some like big interesting questions that

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 1>could reshape society and then the reshaping like sort of

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of our physical space maybe less need for parking. If

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>these actually take off, I think like it will change

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the world in ways we don't really anticipate.

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe we need to do a self driving cars

0:34:38.480 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 2>episode from the perspective of a city planner or that's

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 2>a good idea yea interesting? Yeah, all right, well shall

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 2>we leave it there for now?

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Leave it there?

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And this has been another episode of the All

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 2>Tracy Alloway and I'm Jill Wisenthal.

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:55.959
<v Speaker 1>You can follow me at the Stalwart. Follow our guest

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Tim Lee, He's at Binary Bits, Follow our producers Kerman

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez at Carmen Arman and dash Ol Bennett at dashbot.

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And check out all of the Bloomberg podcasts under the

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.920
<v Speaker 1>handle at podcasts. And for more Oddlots content, go to

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where we have a transcript,

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we have blog and a newsletter. And check out the Discord.

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>We have a transportation and an AI channel and there

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 1>so people will be talking about this episode. Go in there,

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 1>hang out with other listeners twenty four to seven Discord

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:28.279
<v Speaker 1>dot gg slash.

0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 6>Odlines and if you enjoy odd Lots If you like

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.919
<v Speaker 6>caring our thoughts about self driving cars, then please leave

0:35:35.000 --> 0:35:38.319
<v Speaker 6>us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 6>In the e.