WEBVTT - Inside the Heritage Foundation RNC Party

0:00:01.760 --> 0:00:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Alz Media America. Is Trump strong?

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it is so funny.

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to it could happen here a podcast recorded from

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 3>the Republican National Convention, specifically the hotel where the Idaho

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 3>and North Dakota delegates are gathered. Yeah, fascinating elevator rides.

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.119
<v Speaker 2>And we're thinking today about the memory of that guy

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 2>that Trump does not know the name of who got

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 2>shot to death, Corey k. They've definitely pronounced every time

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 2>they've said it wrong.

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Every single person who spoke the last few days pronounced

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>his name differently, And I was like, well, finally they

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>have somebody's name to pronounce more incorrectly than they do

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.919
<v Speaker 1>Kabla Harris or Ramaswami.

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 2>And it's look, folks, I'm not gonna laugh at his kids.

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's a tragedy for them. But what I

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 2>will say is that objectively, it's really funny that this

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 2>guy died for Donald Trump. And Trump very obviously doesn't care, couldn't,

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 2>could not be less important to him, Like there is

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 2>nothing that matters less in this election the man who

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 2>took a bullet for him, And that's really funny. That's

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 2>really funny.

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Anyways, Uh, this is it could happen here. I'm Sophie Licht,

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>but we're, like Gara said at the R and C.

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I have Garrisaid Davis with me and Robert Evans.

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh, very professional, Sophie, Thank you so much.

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I am your boss. Do you want to tell me

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.119
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about this morning?

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think first's talk about some of our late

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 3>night escapades.

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait, I'm sorry, I'm sorry.

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Time travel cigar Bar.

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>Yes, wow, I did not go with you to that event,

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>so I go call.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 3>I agree, that was a good call.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I counted on the main floor of the cigar Bar

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 2>where the Young Republicans had their party, and six of

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 2>forty people had cigars. I had a cigar you did

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 2>you had acause I brought a selection of my finest Cubans.

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>That was very, very kind of you, Robert.

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 2>I had one of John F. Kennedy's favorite cigars that

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 2>I had been aging for two years waiting for this moment.

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 3>I did like that you had the foresight to bring

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 3>cigars to the art, to.

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 2>Bring extremely high quality. Our buddy Lenny had a three

0:02:06.440 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 2>year aged partias you had. But I've been drinking and

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 2>I had a lovely have you been quality the best

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 2>cigars there. I talked to everyone who happened to be

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.679
<v Speaker 2>smoking a cigar, and they were all smoking trash like

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>a rowin and American garbage, because none of them had

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 2>any kind of look. I don't get into this often.

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to be like some of our friends

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 2>in the in the far right and and use cigars

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 2>as a totem. I enjoyed my cigars privately, but we

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 2>were going to a cigar bar, so I brought my

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 2>nice cigars and oh was it a cigar bar?

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Were there cigars there? You're just at the word cigars seven.

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 2>It was not lost on me that none of them

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 2>smoked good cigars because they're children, are you know what?

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 2>We had an interview with Rudy Giuliani, and Rudy would

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 2>have understood that man has nice cigars. I'll say that

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 2>about Rudy Giuliani. He knows the cigars, That's all I'm saying.

0:02:57.639 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Great.

0:02:58.160 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 3>So we've been trying to hit the kind of the

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 3>after part already seen at the RNC, just to see

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 3>kind of what's up. This little cigar party was put

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 3>on by some of the young Republicans from.

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 2>New York primarily in New York. They are very confident

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 2>of a victory, potentially a statewide victory in a national election.

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.839
<v Speaker 2>And uh, you know what, the evidence doesn't make it impossible.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't look like it's going to happen from this cycle.

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 2>But twenty twenty eight, New York could be in play.

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 2>And one of the interesting things is that Florida also

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 2>seems to be tightening. Two poles recently show Trump just

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 2>four points ahead of Biden. He won by ten in

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty. That's a significant tightening and within kind of

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 2>swing state margins, And so it is kind of interesting

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 2>to conceive of the possibility that by twenty twenty eight,

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 2>both New York and Florida could be in play.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So I dressed like a nineteen fifties FBI agent

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 3>and trench coat and smoke well done one of these

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 3>cigars as best as I could.

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 2>How'd you like it?

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 3>It was fine.

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 2>It was a nice cigar. It's no clove, good way, God,

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 2>oh my fucking so, give me a gun.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 3>It was it was. It was a nice little party.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 3>We talked, We talked to some people. The best thing

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 3>about the party, though, is that there was a series

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 3>of speeches put on by these guys from New York

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 3>that kind of just kept going on. And the longer

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 3>that these speeches and like these fre diferent guys kept

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 3>going on, the music on the roof started to get

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 3>slowly louder and louder and louder, until it was completely

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 3>draining out the speeches, until they just stopped because like, okay,

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 3>the music's too loud now.

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Now and again there are heroes.

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 3>So someone was on that dial just every every two

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 3>minutes it up a little bit.

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 2>There's a guy I follow who has started who followed

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 2>me back in twenty twenty, who was like an election

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 2>poll analysis expert and was like, and it's not a

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 2>political guy, but was like, look, if you show up

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 2>at a convention after party to talk, fuck you like

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 2>people are there to drink, all you should say is

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 2>the bar is open. And I agreed with that, and

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 2>then you know what to skip. We had credit to

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the Heritage Foundation. Nobody ever said anything but that we

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 2>could drink all we wanted.

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 3>That is a Heritage Foundation party, that is right, which

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 3>we will get to later. We were up way too late,

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 3>way too late at some of these after parties. The

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 3>other night and then we had to get up pretty

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 3>early in the morning because we had an interview with

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 3>the CEO of the Texas Public Policy Foundation, which is

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of like a mini version the Heritage Foundation, but

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 3>just for Texas. Yeah, the former guy who ran this

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 3>now runs the Heritage Foundation itself, so it's kind of

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 3>like a little bit of a training ground and they

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of swap members often. We had a pretty long

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 3>interview that we will turn into some kind of future

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 3>piece of content, discussing everything from woke ideology to the

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 3>mortal rot infecting America to.

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 2>Why mass shootings happened in this country.

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, he was. He was very polished, very media trained.

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 2>He easily the best interview subject in terms of his

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 2>like skill liet talking, yeah, that we've had.

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 3>And similarly, I don't think he was quite prepared for

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 3>our line of questioning either, you know, so that he

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 3>got taken it back a little bit by some of

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 3>the questions we were lobbing him. Probably very different from

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the interviews that he's been doing. I'm

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 3>trying to think if there's any anything specifically about that

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 3>interview that's worth mentioning. Now, you know, what really.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Interests me because the shooting is so relevant, I will

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 2>bring up the shooting. We talked about why the guy

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>who tried to kill Trump had done it, and he

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 2>and I were kind of the same mind, the same

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 2>mind that you are, Garrison, which is that this was

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>a school shooter type thing and that was the primary

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 2>reason behind the ideology. And this is before now some

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 2>stuff has come out since that has made that seem

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 2>even more likely. But it was interesting to like, kind

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 2>of have that not be a controversial part of the conversation.

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 2>This was not a radical left shooting. There was no

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 2>sort of attempt by him to claim it as that.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 2>He was like, yeah, this seems like a guy. We

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 2>have a deep sickness in this country, and we clearly

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 2>disagreed with him about the specifics of where the sickness

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 2>comes from. But the sickness leads to some people who

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 2>just want to do mass shootings that are not political.

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 2>And uh, that was interesting to me.

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 3>No, And and one of the big things talked about

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 3>in terms of this moral rot is that there is

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 3>something lacking in our country, specifically with young men. There's

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 3>there is there is this lack of purpose among the

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 3>young men which makes them do these kind of violent acts.

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't disagree with that, sure, and I think I

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 2>think I disagree with.

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 3>His solutions and some and some some of his diagnosis

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 3>in certain ways, right because he he'll attribute that lack

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 3>to certain things that we might.

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Not morality at the home, and sure, you.

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Know, all these all those kind of things, but you know,

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 3>that was that that was kind of his his take,

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 3>you know. And then we also talk about everything from

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 3>like the influence of billionaires on these right wing think

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 3>tanks and political candidates, Catholics versus Evangelicals. It was an

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 3>interesting conversation that I'm sure you'll hear in becoming weeks

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 3>and we'll kind of explain why we want you to

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 3>hear from this guy who's, you know, typically probably pretty

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 3>adversarial to the type of stuff that we talk about

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>on this show. But after this interview, I met up

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 3>with Sophie lichterman Hey and we talked to the people

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 3>at the actual Heritage Foundation booth who had many a

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 3>pamphlet and I collected all of the gender ideology pamphlets,

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 3>which will also be a future deep dive. Kind of Curiously,

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 3>they did not have a single pamphlet about Project twenty

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty five. Nope, No, And they didn't like talking about

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 3>it either. They said that Project twenty twenty five is,

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, a coalition effort between both Heritage and all

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 3>these other groups, but they're not really talking about it

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 3>here today because it's not Trump's policy platform. Trump has

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 3>his own policy platform. This is just a list of

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:39.679
<v Speaker 3>policy suggestions for lawmakers once they get into office. So

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 3>they like to talk about a whole bunch of other stuff,

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, certain things that are kind of a part

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 3>of Project twenty twenty five, but nothing about the actual

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, document itself, partially due to the kind of

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 3>negative backlash that it has received, and you know, it

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 3>seems to be kind of widely unliked for various reasons.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 3>So I think it was interesting that they weren't even

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 3>pushing it at an event like this.

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 2>You know, again with the Texas Policy Foundation, gut we

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 2>talked about when we brought it up. He was pretty

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 2>open about the fact that it's not popular. Yeah, and

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 2>his attitude was that in the future, once we win,

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 2>we can try and build consensus around it. But he

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 2>didn't try to deny the fact that, like, it's widely

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 2>disliked by the electorate.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 3>And it is against a lot of things that are

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 3>on the Republican policy platform for the actual party. Sophie,

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 3>you had a wonderful conversation with some of they's heritage folks.

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's just say that my very blonde hair and the

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>pig tills that I or most of this week made

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it very easy for these folks to talk to me,

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>which is unsettling.

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 3>A little bit frightening, but useful.

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 2>But very very very scary.

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>A question I've been asking a lot of the folks

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that I've talked to this week is mostly about their

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.599
<v Speaker 1>opinions about education. And you know, if there is a

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>shift in power with Trump being elected in a v

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>what exactly they would want to do. And the overall

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>majority answer from these groups is that they want to

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>take away power from the federal government and bring it

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>to the states, and that would be universal school choice.

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And so got a little bit of that from them.

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>They also mentioned something about one of the biggest roadblocks

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>being student loans.

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:27.359
<v Speaker 3>While also being very against student learned for forgiveness specifically,

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 3>So it's kind of a it was an interesting position.

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 3>I'll want to read some more of their pamphlets on.

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>That but anyways that just talks with them more, got

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>more of their pamphlets, and Garrison and I asked them

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>about the states that they choose to operate in.

0:10:42.640 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 3>And specifically for their lobbying group as opposed to just

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 3>like the think tank, they have this other thing I

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 3>think called Heritage Action, which operates differently because of certain

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 3>laws around lobbying.

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of where they try to train a lot

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 2>of new people up. They had a lot of advertisements

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 2>that they did something like fifteen.

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.600
<v Speaker 3>More on the ground activism type stuff.

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>And Garret, what was the answer they gave? I thought

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:05.959
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting you asked a question for why they

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't go in certain states.

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so they had this map of what states they

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 3>were active in, and there were certain states, you know,

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 3>like Oregon, Washington, or whole bunch of the New England states,

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 3>and they just weren't active in because they didn't think

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 3>they would be very effective. They weren't make any leeway.

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's just not worth it. It's not going

0:11:20.640 --> 0:11:24.200
<v Speaker 3>to move towards actual electoral victories. But there was other

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 3>there's other states like Wyoming and a few others that

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 3>they weren't active in for different reasons because of specific

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 3>regulations regarding donor transparency that they were strongly against the

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 3>states that require there to be transparency for people who

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 3>donate to these kind of political groups, and in protest

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.719
<v Speaker 3>of those regulations and laws, they are completely inactive in

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 3>those states, which is a funny way of saying, we

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 3>just want to hide whoever gives us money. And that

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 3>is that was a little interesting piece of information regarding

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:54.959
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's just states they just don't operate and

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 3>because they do not want to see or have it

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 3>made public where their kind of money is coming in

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 3>and out of, at least for the Heritage Action part

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 3>of the group.

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it was overall just interesting that there was you know,

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.959
<v Speaker 1>at this booth, there was about five different I would say,

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:14.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty something.

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 3>Women, twenty something died blonde to women.

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And they invited me to their Heritage social party

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that they were having that was across from the main

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>convention where you needed an access code to get in,

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and they gave you that flyer and.

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 3>You will hear all about that. We took advantage of that.

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 3>At the end of the episode. You will get a

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 3>special inside look at the Heritage Foundation's private invite only exclusive.

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.599
<v Speaker 2>Part was off the record. Now does it count? No,

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 2>of course not. I promised that lady that what she

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.040
<v Speaker 2>said to me was off the record, and I won't

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 2>say any more about that. But I didn't promise that

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 2>to anyone else.

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Do you know what's on the record, Robert, what you

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 3>said later?

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>These products and service, the products and services that support

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this podcast.

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 2>That also that also is off the record. On the record. Whatever,

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 2>here's the ads.

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 3>We are back, and don't worry. You will hear about

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 3>this special Heritage Foundation party in a sect. But first

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 3>I want to play for you a whole interview that

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 3>I collected. Just down the hall from the Heritage Foundation booth,

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 3>the American Conservation Coalition had at a pretty large section

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 3>of the RNC convention fest you know, list of vendors,

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of more typical like you know, convention type stuff.

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 3>You know, like if you go to like a comic

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 3>on or something, it's a lot of like vendors and

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 3>booths that this kind of section of the r and C.

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>So they had this pretty big booth and it was

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 3>the only time I've ever seen anything mentioned about climate change.

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 3>So I was interested to see what conservatives talking about

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 3>climate change sound like what they're saying, and I'll just

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 3>play that interview here right now. Do you want introducing

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 3>yourself in the organization you're with. Sure.

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 4>My name's Carl Matthews.

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 5>I'm the vice president of Communications at the American Conservation Coalition,

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 5>which is the largest conservative grassroots environmental organization in the country.

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 3>So the few things that interests me about your group,

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean, especially if you look back in the last

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 3>one hundred years, like environmental conservation has been historically a

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 3>much more conservative standpoint. You can look at like presidents

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 3>in the nineteen twenties, there was a huge push for that,

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and somewhere along the lines that's kind of been lost

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 3>for like a number of reasons. I guess what is

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 3>your main mission here with this organization?

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, it's interesting you bring up kind of the

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 5>history of conservative conservation because we have a timeline here

0:14:41.880 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 5>at the RNC showing all the Republican presidents who have

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 5>really engaged on this issue, from Ulysses Grant to Teddy

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 5>Roosevelt to more modern presidents like Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 5>and even HW Bush. So what we're really doing here

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 5>with the American Conservation Coalition is building the conservative environmental movement,

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 5>specifically among young Americans who frankly feel kind of disenfranchised

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 5>by both parties on the issue of climate and the environment.

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 5>The left has taken a really doom and gloom approach

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 5>to these issues that isn't very inspiring for a lot

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 5>of young folks, and in the last thirty years, conservatives haven't.

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 4>Engaged very productively.

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 5>So we're here showing that conservation is conservative, those values

0:15:21.320 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 5>are inherently entwined, and it's okay to call for action

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 5>on environmental issues like climate change.

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 3>I guess. Yeah. Let's start more on like the big topic,

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 3>which is which is climate change, and we can get

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 3>into like local conservation. What is your take on the

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 3>current climate scenario, because like ever since, ever since the

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 3>early two thousands, there's been this, you know, for a

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 3>lot of young people, slightly worrying trend of you have

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 3>the politicians just either either seriously downgrading, you know, the

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 3>scale of this problem or just thinking there is no problem.

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 3>What is your take both on I guess on that part,

0:15:52.440 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>and then how you see the climate you know crisis,

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 3>the climate issue that we are dealing with. Where do

0:15:58.240 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 3>you see it? Heaving?

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so was founded because conservatives weren't engaging on this issue.

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 5>So for the last six seven years we've been really

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 5>pushing conservatives, especially conservative elected leaders, to re engage in

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 5>a productive way. And I think we've done that really effectively.

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 5>In DC where I live, the Conservative Climate Caucus in

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 5>the House, which is a group of Republican lawmakers interested

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 5>in tackling the issue of climate change, has eighty seven members.

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 5>It's the fourth largest in the Republican conference. So we're

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 5>seeing a big kind of shift in the Overton window there.

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 5>But yeah, I think young people want elected leaders who

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 5>recognize that we have an issue, recognize that we have

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 5>a challenge in climate change, and want practical solutions like

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 5>expanding clean, reliable nuclear energy, like pursuing permitting reform to

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 5>actually allow American energy projects to be built. So I

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 5>think we take a really kind of level headed, rational

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 5>approach to these issues that really resonates with young people.

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 3>What's the main difference in how you view the climate

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 3>issue as opposed to someone like AOC right or like

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 3>these these more like progressive democrats of view, this is

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 3>a very existential crisis. You have to get fossil fuels

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 3>under control. These kind of timelines that we hear, you know,

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 3>by twenty fifty, by twenty seventy, by even like something

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 3>like twenty thirty, Right, how it becomes like a cascading problem.

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 3>How differently do you view the current situation than you know,

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 3>these progressive Democrats.

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 5>Sure, like I said, climate change is a challenge. It's

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 5>certainly something that we need to tackle, but we don't

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 5>view it through kind of this doom and gloom lens

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 5>where we're going to die in twelve, ten, five years,

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 5>whatever the current timeline is on the left. But we

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 5>do see a need for all of the above energy.

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 5>So we recognize that energy demand is continuing to expand,

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 5>but we also need to protect our environment. So we

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 5>need to kind of consider that trilemma reliable, affordable, and

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 5>clean when we're looking at our energy portfolio in the future.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 5>And I think that's what really kind of distinguishes us

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 5>from the left in that we're not calling for a

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 5>divestment of fossil fuels.

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:52.480
<v Speaker 4>We're calling for a.

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 5>Rational, level headed energy strategy that will lower emissions. But

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 5>in kind of a more realistic way.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 3>Do you think that time land's gonna be more stretched out?

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Because I mean, if if you look at you know,

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.159
<v Speaker 3>the way current current levels are heading. As soon as

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 3>we hit like two point five degrees, not just that change,

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 3>but the level of cascading environmental effects, right, one thing changes.

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Now everything gets worse because when stuff melts, then it

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.200
<v Speaker 3>changes the way like thermal regulation of the whole planet works,

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 3>and then it becomes this kind of cascating problem. And

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 3>I feel like we're trying to get out in front

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 3>of it before it happens that every day that kind

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 3>of feels less and less likely, at least for a

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 3>lot of people like my age, and it can be

0:18:26.080 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 3>a very doom and gloom scenario because you feel like

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 3>no one's taking this problem seriously. Even Joe Biden's climate

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 3>policy is very inadequate according to like a lot of

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the people that I talk to. I

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.479
<v Speaker 3>guess seel like, how do you view like the scale

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 3>of this problem right now?

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, climate change is the kind of environmental challenge of

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.360
<v Speaker 5>our time, right it should be what you know we're

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 5>thinking about and focusing on when it comes to environmental policy.

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 5>But I really think we need to kind of take

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 5>a step back, and that kind of push for urgency

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 5>hasn't gotten us anywhere to your point. You know, Joe

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 5>Biden is kind of branding himself as the Climate President.

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 5>You know a lot of young people are unhappy with

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 5>the platform that he's put forwards. So I think when

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 5>you're talking about the timeline, we're talking about what we

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 5>can do right now to kind of unleash American energy,

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 5>to reduce American emissions, but also global emissions.

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 4>And really think of this on a global scale.

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 5>So that urgency piece isn't quite you know, realistic, or

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 5>isn't quite what we want to focus on because I

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 5>don't think it.

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:23.200
<v Speaker 4>Leads to action.

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 3>There's kind of two trains of thought in terms of

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 3>like climate policy stuff. There's taking like adaptation roots, right,

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 3>trying to adapt to a changing environment that we're going

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 3>to have to face it it's going to happen, versus mitigation.

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 3>For a while, we were trying to find ways to

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 3>mitigate the problem to kind of get ahead of it, right,

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 3>and that is feeling less and less likely, and we

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 3>are seeing more of these adaptive strategies getting adopted.

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 3>There's everything from like you know, people are trying to

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 3>develop better carbon capture, which has its own problems as

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 3>a technology. And you know, everything from like geoengineering even

0:19:57.000 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 3>to like solar blockage. There's a lot of things people

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 3>are thinking, like, if we don't get like emissions under control,

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 3>we're gonna have to go to similar more of as

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 3>extreme measures. How much of your focus is on adapt

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 3>developments versus just mitigation, Well, we definitely need both.

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 5>To your point, we have to adapt to a change

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 5>in climate, but we also need to be reducing emissions

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 5>to kind of prevent future effects. So I think we

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 5>kind of set a balance between adaptation and mitigation, and frankly,

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.640
<v Speaker 5>I think sometimes they can be really kind of connected

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 5>and entwined. So something we focus on, for instance, is

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:33.640
<v Speaker 5>regenerative agriculture, which lowers emissions associated with agriculture but also

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 5>helps the land kind of adjust to a change in climate,

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 5>keeps the soil healthy, things like that. So I really

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 5>think when we're talking about climate we can talk about

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 5>adaptation and mitigation kind of at the same time.

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 3>How do you try to do outreach to a vast

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 3>number of Republicans conservatives who simply don't think this is

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 3>a problem, who like just deny this as a problem.

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 3>I think this is like a scam in some way.

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 3>How do you try to tackle that as coming from

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 3>a like an also conservative position.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 5>So, I mean we're here at the Republican National Convention,

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 5>and it's been really interesting talking to a lot of

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 5>folks from diverse backgrounds about the issue of climate and

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 5>also environmental conservation.

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 4>I really do think it matters how you start the conversation.

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 5>We talked earlier about kind of our timeline of the

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.479
<v Speaker 5>legacy of conservative environmentalism. Starting there and talking about how

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 5>we can carry on that legacy and how we can

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 5>tackle kind of this environmental issue of our time has

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 5>been really effective and we've gotten a lot of positive reception.

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 5>You know, there's always going to be disagreement, there's always

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 5>going to be detractors, but I do think that there's

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 5>more and more of kind of that acceptance that we

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 5>need to take care of our own backyard, and that includes,

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 5>you know, tackling climate change.

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 3>How much stuff do you end up having to you know,

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 3>talk about our not necessarily focused on at least talk

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 3>about like actual fossil fuel emissions, for racking, these types

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:52.639
<v Speaker 3>of things that are like mainstays of politics because of

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 3>how much money goes into them, but undeniably are a

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 3>massive contributing factor, and we do need to move to

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 3>probably some more nuclear options to forgive the expression, I guess,

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 3>and you know as well as like a like a

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 3>solar hydro, which are you know, less good than nuclear

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.719
<v Speaker 3>on like a large scale. But like you know, especially

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 3>for the for the Republican Party, trying to trying to

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.159
<v Speaker 3>point out certain things about how we will have to

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 3>scale back some degree of fossil fuels, if not you know,

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 3>a majority of it in the next twenty five years,

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 3>if we want to, if we want to not have

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 3>like a pretty bad scenario at least for not even

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 3>just for humans, but for like animals in other parts

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 3>of the environment.

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, I think that goes back to the all

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 5>of the above energy approach and really diversifying our energy portfolio,

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 5>which frankly is not only good for the environment, but

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 5>good for energy security. We've seen you know, hacking of

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 5>pipelines or other kind of cyber energy attacks. So by

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 5>diversifying sources, we're really setting ourselves up to have a

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 5>more secure energy grid. So I think there's other ways

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 5>that you can talk about you know, environmental actions, climate

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 5>actions that have co benefits, and we can talk about

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 5>that in a really productive way with Republicans.

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you also focus on like local ecology efforts, like

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, like some of the more like Roosevelt style

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 3>a conservation is that thing that you also kind of

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:10.119
<v Speaker 3>try to like advocate for. Also, it's like an on

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 3>ramch talk about these like broader climate issues.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 5>I love that framing that you used as kind of

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 5>the entry point to climate issues. We have fifty thousand

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 5>young members across the country in about one hundred branches,

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 5>either on college campuses or in young professional communities, and

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 5>they go out and they plant trees in their communities,

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 5>They do park cleanups, they clean up a waterway, They

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.080
<v Speaker 5>have educational speakers to learn more about these issues.

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 4>And we found that that's really really.

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 5>Effective in building this conservative environmental movement and showing that

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 5>these values are connected, they're compatible, and then that can

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 5>lead to advocacy on the national level for things like

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:50.360
<v Speaker 5>we talked about nuclear energy or other clean energy sources.

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 4>So that's been really effective for us.

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 3>What would you like to see as a conservative climate

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.920
<v Speaker 3>policy in like ten years, Like what would you hope

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 3>gets adopted to help curtail like you know, these more

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 3>catastrophic scenarios.

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 4>Great question, and I would hope it perhaps a little

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 4>bit earlier than ten.

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Years absolutely, but I'm just based on how things have gone.

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 4>Sure, So we have kind of a big three that

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 4>we're focused on right now.

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 5>Permitting reforms, so getting the government out of its own way, frankly,

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 5>to fight climate change, and unleash American energy in the

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 5>form of clean energy, nuclear, solar, wind, geothermal, hydropower, and

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 5>really kind of expand what we can build in this country. Again,

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 5>nuclear energy is really one of the focuses for us

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 5>because it's a baseload energy source that can run twenty

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 5>four to seven, it's clean, and it's really secure. So

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.399
<v Speaker 5>we're really focused on nuclear. And then the last thing

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 5>is American energy dominance. Here in the United States, we

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:51.360
<v Speaker 5>produce energy safer, cleaner, and more efficiently, and we really

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 5>want to be a leader on the world stage when

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 5>it comes to energy.

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 3>I think that there is a lot of people, both

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 3>like you know, progressive Democrats who really care about this issue,

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 3>as well as you know a lot of Republicans and

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 3>liberals who have a lot of skepticism about nuclear energy.

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Right for some good reasons. There have been some unfortunate

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 3>events that have happened, and I know like fission and

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 3>fusion have been slowly getting better where I feel like

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 3>we're close to some kind of breakthrough, but we do

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 3>have like kind of a limited time. How do you

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.560
<v Speaker 3>approach kind of talking to people who have a level

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 3>of risk in terms of nuclear energy and like the

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 3>possible dangers that it's had based on a few accidents,

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 3>even though a lot of a lot of these plants

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 3>are relatively safe.

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I love this question.

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 5>I grew up an hour south of Three Mile Island

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 5>in Pennsylvania, so I have a lot of experience with

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 5>nuclear skepticism. Look, I mean nuclear energy is the safest

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 5>and cleanest form that we have in our back pocket. Yes,

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 5>there have been some unfortunate incidents, frankly they're human error,

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 5>and we understand nuclear power a lot better now. We

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 5>have more safeguards in place since incidents like Chernobyl or

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 5>Three Mile Island, and we haven't seen a nuclear meltdown

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 5>that we were promised in the Simpsons or the China

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 5>syndrome or something like that. The fact is nuclear quote

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 5>waste is really nuclear spent fuel, and we can recycle

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 5>that and keep producing clean nuclear power. We have incredibly

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 5>well trained nuclear experts at all of our power plants

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 5>across the United States and they produce clean, reliable energy

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 5>for consumers all over the country. So we really need

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 5>to kind of get over those messaging hurdles with nuclear

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 5>and expand the industry here.

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 3>What do you think will happen if your concerns go unheard?

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 3>Like if this just doesn't this just does doesn't work.

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 3>I think it's kind of continue at the scale and

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 3>like a timeline they have been. What worries do you have?

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a really existential question.

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I think we're in the seven years

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 5>since we've been founded, we're working really hard to build

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 5>coalitions with a lot of different stakes and be heard

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 5>by a lot of different folks in power, and frankly,

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 5>I'm hopeful that we will you know, pursue solutions to

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 5>climate change. That we will you know, for lack of

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 5>a better term, get our act together and pursue these solutions.

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 5>And really, I think the biggest thing that I like

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 5>to focus on when it comes to climate advocacy is

0:27:19.119 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 5>optimism and this idea that you know, the planet is

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 5>our one common denominator and we can unite around that

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 5>and you know, already in Congress, we've seen bipartisan legislation

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 5>in a really polarizing time that focuses on climate.

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.400
<v Speaker 4>Probably the last big package.

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 5>In the one hundred and eighteenth Congress was a nuclear

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 5>package to unleash next generation nuclears. So, I know, I'm

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 5>not exactly answering your question, but I am extremely optimistic

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 5>about the future.

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Do you think there's a path towards some kind of

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 3>bipartisan advocacy not just in like the Senate, but also

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 3>like in terms of like environmental movements and like protests.

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 3>And obviously there's certain people who employ very theatrical tactics

0:27:55.880 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 3>that maybe don't correlate to much improved means, But do

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 3>you see there's a possibility of, like you know, a

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 3>larger public call for action on this issue? I mean mean,

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 3>something that we've covered on our show a while ago

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 3>is like will it take something like a general strike

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 3>to even like get people to like realize like we

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 3>need this to be done? Like not necessarily that option,

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 3>but like do you see like a route towards more

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 3>of bipartisan activism and advocacy of this issue.

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's a great question. We do a lot of

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 5>bridge building work. I was actually in Los Angeles earlier

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 5>this year with a group of conservative climate advocates and

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 5>progressive climate advocates and we talked about solutions where there's

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 5>common ground, and then we finished the day by doing

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 5>a beach clean up together. So I really do think

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot of opportunity to kind of unite on

0:28:43.400 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 5>this issue, especially in younger generations. When I talked about

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 5>hope earlier, they're the ones who really give me hope,

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 5>and I think there's a lot of common ground that

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 5>we can pursue together.

0:28:53.600 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 3>That's all I had, and less you have any other notes,

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 3>w or points you wanted to mention.

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 5>If you want to find a ACC, you can find

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 5>us at a dot eco or ACC Underscore National on

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 5>social platforms.

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 4>But that's it for me.

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, I hope that was slightly informative, and now we

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 3>will inform you about the Heritage Foundation's private exclusive party

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 3>after these messages. Okay, we are back.

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>We are back, and we are ready to tell you, Oh,

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 1>five pigtails. Let us infiltrate famous hate group, the Heritage

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Foundations social house party.

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 2>We got all up in the first off, a lot

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 2>of microwave great food.

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 3>It was the worst food we've had in all of

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Milwaukee was the Heritage and Foundation Great Meals. Yes, that

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 3>is a very notable that the Heritage Foundation had the

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 3>worst food that we've had this entire week.

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Not shocked.

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>First of all, they let you two as well as

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>another one of our friends come in off of my

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>access code, which is very funny, and that we took

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the most hilarious photos we've ever taken together.

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 2>And then we then we met with one of the

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 2>producers the Daily Wire and watched him try to figure

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 2>out who we are as I introduced him name he was.

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 2>He was just calculating and then some lady came up

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 2>and disrupted and we just fucking.

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 3>You can see the little like thinking thing.

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Like third grade edition, and it wasn't the math was

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:27.959
<v Speaker 1>not mathing.

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 3>It was like that one BABC Sherlock scene. He was

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 3>trying to pull up. He was trying to pull up

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 3>the files. Didn't work, didn't work, didn't have enough time.

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 3>We stayed in that party, Robert, you seen that party

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 3>for like five straight hours.

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I was there for a long time. For every drink

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to drink, I would order another and just

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 2>pour it out because I wanted I wanted to make

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 2>them spend the money.

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 3>It was going to go somewhere free for us, but

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 3>not free for them. So as Robert was was schmooshin

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 3>with the Heritage Foundations, guys. Mean, so he went into

0:30:56.960 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 3>the Connection Center to hear some speeches, and them today

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.959
<v Speaker 3>honestly pretty boring, and even even the notable ones were

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 3>also kind of boring. The one I guess we'll talk

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 3>about just very briefly is Don Junior's speech. First, he

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 3>brought out his daughter, Trump's granddaughter.

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Before you get to that, do you want to go

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>over what the theme of the day was.

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 3>No, I mean, maybe we can, we can mention it.

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't feel how relevant it was to any of

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 3>the speeches. It was just make America strong.

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It was strong once again, sorry once again?

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, interesting that they didn't want to sound out Massa.

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Anyways, I guess I guess it's really not that relevant.

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I just just to point out that on the previous

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>days for the different themes, there was very intricate backgrounds

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that were up.

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 3>They didn't anything too strong again, they were like they.

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Phoned it the fucking yeah, and there was no interesting

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 1>background Anyways, Garrett, what were you saying?

0:31:54.880 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 3>So Donald Trump Junior's daughter, So Trump, the actual real

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 3>ones granddaughter gave this little, this little speechman to humanize her.

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Grand Grandpa is a nice guy, calls me and asks

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>me how I am.

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 3>That was basically the speech, which is lovely. Is sure?

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 3>Why not?

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>It was her first speech. I don't think any of

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the other grandchildren have given speeches before.

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 3>No, this is kind of the first appearance of one

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 3>of Trump's grandkids.

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And the way it was framed is Don Junior

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>came up and then was like she just called me.

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>It was very intentionally propaganda's.

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 3>It was also the most happy I've seen Trump this

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 3>entire week, though.

0:32:37.480 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 2>He might actually care about his granddaughter.

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Yes, definitely more than his son hard it would be

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 3>hard to care less.

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure how much they've they've shown it

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on TV, but you know, I had a view of

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>him the entire night tonight right from where I was sitting.

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I was an angle where I could see his face,

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and they showed his face on the screen a bunch,

0:32:54.040 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and he was genuinely stoic. I would say he smiled

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>for his granddaughter, definitely the most and maybe one stirring

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Kimberly Gilfoyle's speech at the very end, but other than that,

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I did not see much emotion from him today, and

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty similar to the rest of the week.

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I think, you again, you have to keep in mind

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 2>with him whatever I mean, we hate him. He's a

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 2>bad man, he's a monster, would be the worst possible

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 2>president we could have. But he's also a person who

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 2>got shot and he's traumatized, you know, and like you

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 2>don't have to like make up excuses for that. Like,

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 2>he is a human being who was scared because a

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 2>man shot him in the head, and that's really not

0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 2>not a complicated thing to diagnose.

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 3>So after the granddaughter gave her a little spiel, Trump

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Junior himself had a little speech that he was basically

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 3>just doing an impression of his father.

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 2>For the entire time, dog shit impressing.

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 3>It's not a very good impression, but compared to Vance,

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 3>it was still it was very impressive.

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that in a sec I will say

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the crowd did really really he.

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 3>Seemed to like him. There was chance, so you know,

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Trump Junior, twenty twenty eight.

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 2>It reminded me of when I was at my first

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 2>Trump rally. This would have been in the late spring,

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:14.840
<v Speaker 2>early summer of twenty sixteen, when fucking Chris Christie conceded

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 2>to Trump. There was a British naturalized citizen in the

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 2>crowd of the rally, and I was like, you want

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 2>them to be president for eight years? And he was like, well,

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to do president for eight years to start,

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, to start, what happens next? He's like, well,

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 2>he's got three kids, doesn't he? Then he like walked

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 2>through his basic plan for Trump to have a dynasty

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 2>like the royal family. And I wish I had said,

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:40.720
<v Speaker 2>go back home, go back home to your fucking country

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 2>with your goddamn royal family. We don't have that here,

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 2>but we might. They wanted it.

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, late here the idea of the king's becoming increasingly popular.

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>You have never told me that story. And I am, oh, well,

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>thank you.

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I got so much great audio of that guy, Thank

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 2>you so much.

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>That is going to haunt me tonight. Garrison. What else?

0:34:57.680 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean Trump and had a few funny lines

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:03.439
<v Speaker 3>making fun of build back better, making some corn pop jokes,

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 3>a corn.

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Pop jokes in the bulbit, very funny.

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 3>The One line I do want to mention is that

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 3>he talked about how the left wants to use the

0:35:14.680 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 3>First Amendment to show kids explicit drag shows, but they

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 3>want to put you into jail for making a meme,

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 3>something that has never.

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Happened, not a single time, not once. Not Why they

0:35:26.719 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 2>barely put people into jail for assaulting the capital.

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:33.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so that was most of his speech. We then

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 3>heard from Vance's wife, who gave a typical vice first

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 3>lady speech. It wasn't notable. And then we heard from

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Vance himself, the the the hopeful future vice president.

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:48.919
<v Speaker 1>What sorry, I was taking a nap.

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 3>Wait, Sophie, Sophie, wake up, wake up, we're recording a

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 3>podcast here.

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh sorry that just the sound of JD. Vance's name

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 1>put me right to sleep.

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 3>He gave what I would describe people have since described.

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of a bad speech.

0:36:03.760 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 2>You guys were in the stadium. I was sitting at

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 2>the Heritage finn Ocean party on an upper roof.

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Do Yeah, what'd they think?

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:11.839
<v Speaker 2>There were three people during most of it, and then

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:14.879
<v Speaker 2>like four others filtered in when those guys left, every

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 2>single one of them was disappointed. The only guy who

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 2>liked it was a Fox News reporter, and when he left,

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the people who had been like, well he was okay,

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 2>said well, I hate that I had to lie in

0:36:25.320 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 2>front of that guy, but he was media. I was

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of just sitting on my phone pretending to be

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 2>texting and listening to them, so they didn't really notice me.

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 2>But the ultimate feeling that they expressed repeatedly was that

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 2>was really disappointing. It was really boring, It was really long.

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 2>He is not a great speaker. There was one guy

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 2>who repeatedly said, I don't like that his wife isn't white.

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 2>I wish his wife was white. And then there was

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.439
<v Speaker 2>a guy who was kind of a more libertarian member

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:53.480
<v Speaker 2>of the Republican Party who I had chatted with, who

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 2>came in and sat down to have a drink and

0:36:57.360 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 2>you know, was expressing that he liked Vance's speech. And

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:02.160
<v Speaker 2>the guy said, what are you a Cuban And the

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 2>guy said no, and he's like, well, you're not white.

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 3>So that was great, amazing stuff happening in the Heritage

0:37:07.719 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Foundation private party.

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 2>The Foundation party was a was a good time. Yeah,

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:13.560
<v Speaker 2>so this is.

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Something I was even seeing in the convention people there,

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, there was there was some like you know,

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:21.839
<v Speaker 3>respectful clapping, but people weren't super into it, at least

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:23.959
<v Speaker 3>of in the sections that we were at. The lady

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 3>sitting next to me he was, you know, just like

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 3>a Republican woman her maybe fifties or sixties, very very lucid,

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 3>kind of just like kept dozing off just because she

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:34.320
<v Speaker 3>was so bored, not like because she was sleepy, just

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 3>because she was bored.

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Wasn't a good speech.

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>She looks at me and she said, he's so dry.

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So at a certain point, I just I just

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of whispered to Sophie like, wow, Vance is a

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 3>really dry speaker, and she kind of she kind of

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 3>like nodded awake and started and started started like nodding

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.359
<v Speaker 3>her head in agreement and repeated the same thing to us.

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 3>And I asked her, you know, like, well, who do

0:37:57.239 --> 0:38:00.919
<v Speaker 3>you think would have been a better pick? And she said, well,

0:38:01.600 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I just expected Advance to be a

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.879
<v Speaker 3>better rhetorical speaker. And that was all she would say.

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 3>And I feel like that was kind of generally the vibe.

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Like something else I noticed that he was like actually okay,

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 3>and you know, the certain things he was talking about,

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, what he was actually saying. You know, there

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 3>were certain things that were interesting, it was more like

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:20.640
<v Speaker 3>the way he was saying it. It was it was

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 3>specifically he had no ability to do crowd work. He

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 3>was just reading out the teleprompter and kind of doing

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:28.920
<v Speaker 3>a slight smile every thirty seconds, and that's all was.

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't actually really seriously engaging people.

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Make fun of the bits where Trump dances or whatever

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 2>his little moves, but those play those work.

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Even like pointing out people using gestures, kind of anything

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:41.400
<v Speaker 3>to connect you to the audience. Vance was just so

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 3>was so dry, was so plain.

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the biggest action from his speech was just

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the people in the crowd who liked to chant.

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:49.120
<v Speaker 3>They were just really into chanting.

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Ted Kruz gave him a great He like that he

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of lost them early in his speech the night

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 2>before and won them back because he gave them a

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 2>chance to chair repeatedly went through they like that, they

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 2>like to chat, they're chanters.

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Want to give us some of the chanting highlights.

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 3>Gar Yeah, so he was definitely leaning into his hillbilly

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:11.320
<v Speaker 3>or faux hillbilly background.

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Motherfucker, sorry, your parents made one hundred and seventy five

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 2>thousand goddamn dollars a year speaking to somebody who grew

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 2>up in a fucking rural ass Oklahoma, like fucking carpetbagger.

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 3>That was what he was using for most of his speech.

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 3>He was telling stories about the woman who raised him

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:31.040
<v Speaker 3>when his own mom was dealing with addiction, who he

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:32.399
<v Speaker 3>referred to as his mem.

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh, and fucking goddamn it.

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 3>The first big chant I took note of is he

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:41.279
<v Speaker 3>told a story about how he was hanging out when

0:39:41.320 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 3>he was like a kid or like a teen. He

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:44.800
<v Speaker 3>was hanging out with someone who was known to be

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 3>like a local drug dealer, and his mem told him

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.759
<v Speaker 3>that if she saw him hanging out with that guy again,

0:39:52.120 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 3>she was going to run him over in a truck,

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 3>run over the drug dealer, and no one's gonna find

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 3>out about it. And the crowd ate this up, chanting

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.680
<v Speaker 3>me ma, me ma, So they were They weren't chanting

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:06.800
<v Speaker 3>about killing this drug dealer, right, they were chanting about murdering,

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 3>murdering this drug dealer.

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.279
<v Speaker 2>G d Vance never met a drug dealer in his

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 2>fucking life, I'll tell you that one.

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 3>So that was the first one, and the next little

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Bema story he told is that when she was a

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 3>little bit older. He said that after she died, they

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 3>found nineteen loaded handguns all over her house and they

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 3>realized it's because she wasn't able to move very fast,

0:40:29.120 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 3>so she always wanted a gun no matter where she was,

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 3>she wanted to be in armslength the gun, whether that

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:36.839
<v Speaker 3>be in the cutlery drawer, by the TV remote, under

0:40:36.880 --> 0:40:41.760
<v Speaker 3>the bed, because because she wanted to protect her family

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 3>even though she was old. And this this led into

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 3>another another chance. Specifically, the nineteen loaded handguns just again

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 3>went the crowd ate that up, and the crowd even

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:54.880
<v Speaker 3>started just chanting about how good they were at chanting.

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.320
<v Speaker 3>It became very self referential, very like patting yourself on

0:40:58.400 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 3>the back for chanting.

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Funny, these people love chanting.

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, that was that was That was most events speech.

0:41:04.719 --> 0:41:08.319
<v Speaker 3>It wasn't very good, it was too long. Almost unanimously,

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 3>people at the Heritage Foundation party did not like it,

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 3>so they did not get that reproval.

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 2>One pseudo positive, which was the Fox News journalist.

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.279
<v Speaker 3>Who I'm sure is contractually obligated to like it.

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, yeah, and who the people there made fun

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 2>of when he left.

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well, we talked to a campaign manager earlier at

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 3>the at the Heritage Party just regarding kind of the

0:41:30.000 --> 0:41:34.240
<v Speaker 3>race in general, mentioning stuff about the upcoming vice presidential debates,

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:36.600
<v Speaker 3>which the Trump Badman put out a statement saying they

0:41:36.600 --> 0:41:38.479
<v Speaker 3>didn't want to lock down any details on this until

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 3>he actually know who the vice president's going to be.

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 3>That which is a good piece of propaganda. And so,

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 3>and we were talking about that and and bringing it

0:41:45.680 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 3>up to some of these people at the Heritage Party,

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:49.400
<v Speaker 3>like who do you think actually is going to be

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:53.320
<v Speaker 3>the Democratic nominee? Many of them did not believe it

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 3>was going to be Joe Biden. Many of them thought

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 3>that it either could be an unknown candidate at this point,

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 3>or more likely probably kamalaw And this is something that

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 3>I've been noticing is that every time in these speeches

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 3>where they're talking about Joe Biden's policies, they're not just

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:13.759
<v Speaker 3>saying Joe Biden, They're saying Joe Biden and Kamala Harris's, well, well,

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 3>Kamala Kamala harris in one instance, Kamala Harris's policies. So

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 3>they are already preparing to start shifting their rhetoric onto kamalaw.

0:42:22.440 --> 0:42:25.840
<v Speaker 3>That's something that the opposition's already planning to do. And

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, as as of today, which is which is

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Wednesday night, we've heard that both Biden made announcements in

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:34.800
<v Speaker 3>the same day that he would step down if he

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 3>was to face this serious medical diagnosis. And he also

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 3>got COVID the same So.

0:42:39.680 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 2>The look on your face when we told you that

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Joe Biden had COVID you were you were thrilled.

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well we shouldn't say that either. Anyway. That is

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:54.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of a brief glimpse into the Heritage Foundation party.

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess that the vibes were more similar to what

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:00.320
<v Speaker 3>is I think well known now as the least a

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 3>good episode of The Boys, that that private tech night

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 3>party combined with like a frat, a frat bro bar hop.

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:10.400
<v Speaker 2>What I'll say about this is they had an EDM

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 2>track set to Country Road Take Me Home. I will

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:18.319
<v Speaker 2>say that like if you were to if you were

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.240
<v Speaker 2>to put that side by side with the plane crash

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 2>that killed the author of that song, I think he

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 2>would agree with you. This party was worse.

0:43:27.880 --> 0:43:30.839
<v Speaker 1>One more thing I wanted to note was I did

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>not go to the party for seven hundred hours like

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the two of you. I went home after all the

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:37.799
<v Speaker 1>speeches home, I went back to the hotel after all

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the speeches.

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Did that country road take you home?

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>That country road took me home place you belonged. And

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I had a very very very nice lift driver. Sir,

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:47.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you buy a sub chance, listened to podcasts.

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:48.759
<v Speaker 1>You were very nice.

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:43:49.480 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>After what was a very loud day, there was a

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:56.720
<v Speaker 1>guy holding a rest in peace sign with the photo

0:43:57.000 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of the guy who attempted to a set state the president,

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>with the caption.

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.040
<v Speaker 2>In American hero great stuff.

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I took a photo of it. And the amount

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of people leaving the yards see that just shouted their worst.

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Many slurs at him were countless. And I don't know

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 1>if anything else happened further after that, but very strange choice.

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 3>That is an interesting move.

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 2>All I know is that based on the last postings

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 2>of the victim of that shooting, Corey comparatour, he'll get

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 2>over it.

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 3>The Japanese dead Well. Anyway, That wraps up our coverage

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:39.879
<v Speaker 3>this week of the Republican National Convention. We will lead

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:44.280
<v Speaker 3>next week with Trump's first public speech since the shooting.

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 3>That'll be dropping Sunday night.

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Maybe a little bit of mere rudy sprinkle of squeeze in,

0:44:50.520 --> 0:44:53.080
<v Speaker 2>some rudy as a tree, some squeeze in like like

0:44:53.200 --> 0:44:55.000
<v Speaker 2>he squeezed down some of that hair juice.

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>That's Jesus Christ.

0:44:57.440 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you for listening to our initial conver of

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the RNC. We have more scripted episodes, more kind of

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 3>polished deep dives about the people and conversations that we

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 3>have had here in beautiful Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 2>And remember, folks, if you're going to take a bullet

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 2>for somebody, Donald Trump does not care, not interested at us.

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Not making the funeral is not He is not going

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 3>to show up at your funeral.

0:45:20.680 --> 0:45:24.239
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's a loud chair, painfully loud chair. You know

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 2>what else is painfully loud? The Heritage Foundation party. Anyway,

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 2>we're done, goodnight, good night.

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:35.600
<v Speaker 1>It could Happen here as a production of cool Zone Media.

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:38.520
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:40.759
<v Speaker 1>cool zonemedia dot com, or check us out on the

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts.

0:45:44.840 --> 0:45:46.920
<v Speaker 1>You can find sources for It Could Happen Here, updated

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>monthly at cool Zonemedia dot com slash sources. Thanks for listening.