WEBVTT - Undercover Actors and the Shadow Self

0:00:03.840 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Works dot Com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Julie. In this episode,

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:20.239
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking about undercover actors in the shadows self. Now.

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>We're following up our pro wrestling episode The Keeping Cafe,

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>which published just prior to this one, UH. And in

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that episode, we talk a lot about this UH, about

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea of layering reality with these with fiction, particularly

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>as it involves institutions and sports and UH and product

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 1>performance products that are given to to an audience, layering

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>it with fiction to improve upon it and change it.

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And we touched a little bit about what happens when

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you put these layers of fiction upon yourself. We talked

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to pro wrestler Colt Cabana Quis him a little bit

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>about what it's like when he has to play a

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>villain in the ring and then when he leaves the ring, uh,

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, how he's able to shut that off, but

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>how he still feels like there is a certain amount

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>of him that is UH, that escapes into this villainous character.

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And likewise there's a there's an aspect of him in

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the really goody were not really goody two shoes, but

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the good guy version of himself that he also portrays.

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.479
<v Speaker 1>So in this episode, we're going to continue the sort

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of exploration, but we're gonna be looking beyond the world

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of pro wrestlers and looking into the world of actors

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>method acting, for instance, We're gonna look at undercover cops, uh,

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're also going to look at our online selves

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. And before we do so, just wanted

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to UM, let you know a little bit about cafe

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>being in case you didn't hear the other episode. Cafe

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is a term that's an old Carney term that he's

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>uh used to indicate that someone should keep being fake.

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 1>In other words, if you are wrestling, UM, and you're

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a fake wrestling match, you want to make sure

0:01:58.080 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't break out of characters, so you want a

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>cave ape, right. And we talked in that other episode

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>about how kfaving really pervades the fabric of our culture,

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is something that has come up, I believe

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>with Cold Cabana. Um it has come up and uh

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Eric Weinstein's article about k fabing uh that you can

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>find it everywhere. You can find it in reality shows

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of these reality shows, as we know,

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>are scripted, and yet the audience doesn't seem to care

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>much like in pro wrestling, right that they don't care

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that there's k saving going on. It's about the spectacle. Yeah,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh, but then it can also end up sort

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>of warping the individual, or seeming to because we asked

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Cold about this and he said that, yeah, there are

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>times where a particular wrestler lets their gimmick, let's their

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>their fictional self, um, kind of alter their their real self.

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Like they'll they'll buy into the gimmick too much, they'll

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.679
<v Speaker 1>believe the hype about the character they betray, and on

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>some level it becomes with confused with who they are. Yeah,

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that's why Eric Weinstein in his essay alluded to that

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>and said that sometimes they believe these confabulations of their

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>storylines so much so, like for instance, some sort of

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>infidelity or adultery, that they will actually then go on

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to commit adultery. Some of these pro wrestlers and some

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of these various storylines that they've had to play out.

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So we start thinking about that, and of course we

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.720
<v Speaker 1>look at ourselves and start to wonder, okay, what about

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>our own minds and our own consciousness and sense of

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.079
<v Speaker 1>self Because when we get up in the morning, we

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>basically have to put on our public selves right when

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we go out the door. And what is this story

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're telling ourselves? What is this script that we're

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we're following for ourselves? Yeah, and ultimately, who is that guy?

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Who is that girl that you are in these various

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>environments like who's that Who's that person that you are

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>on the subway train versus that person that you are

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in the office, versus that person that you are, uh,

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, say tucked into bed with your significant other

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>or you know, talking to the cat in the meddle,

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know. It's like every different an environment,

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>every different interaction with the external world, it tends to

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>summon a different you. Yeah. And although we tend to

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>think that we've got this continuity director in our head

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>making sure that we're always the same person we we

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:18.839
<v Speaker 1>purport ourselves to be, there are opportunities for us to

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>break from the script. And that's what we're gonna look

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>at a little bit today. And when you start thinking

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>about scripts, of course, we have to look at actors yes, now, yeah,

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>when you start thinking about actors, and certainly that comes up.

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're talking about like pro wrestlers who are

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in an angle where they have to pretend they're having

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>an affair, and then they end up having the affair.

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can think of various examples of actors

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and and they end up meeting on a set where

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>they're playing significant others and then they end up being

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>significant others to a certain extent, you know, And and

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.799
<v Speaker 1>certainly I even remember I was in a community play

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>adaptation of seventy six. I was Thomas Jefferson and uh

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and I ended up dating um Mrs Jefferson after the play. Uh.

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>So you feel like that the groundwork was put there

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and that it was just like that whole debate about

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you have any free will. It was

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>like the suggestion was there and you followed it. Maybe

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it's it's possible, but but but certainly

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you see this at times. You see people that that,

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and you hear stories about actors really getting into their roles,

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.719
<v Speaker 1>particularly as far as method acting is concerned. So method

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>acting uh generally combines uh, the the you know, the

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>actor's consideration of the character's psychological motives and personal identification,

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>like they're they're getting there trying to get their mind

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 1>inside that of the character they're portraying, Like they're they're

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>asking themselves, who is this person? And then what do

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I need to do to connect with them? Like how

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>can I connect my own feelings with the feelings of

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>this character and and therefore create a more um believable

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>presentation on the screen, this versus more you know, a

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>more traditional, like non method approach, where one just simply

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it gets up there and and you know, recites the

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>lines and does so in a way that that mimics um,

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>legitimate deep felt emotion and uh. And then there's of course,

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>there are stories plenty of stories about actors who supposedly

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.599
<v Speaker 1>like don't break character, like for like an entire week

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of fifth filming, even though they're only filming like during

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the day, like they're they're they're staying in character outside

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of the picture um and uh. And the and those

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>stories are like you people get a little um auntsie

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>about that, particularly people who really follow the method. Uh,

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and they'll say, well, that's not really what method acting

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 1>is all about, that's not what was actually you know,

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>originally part of the method as it was conceived. And

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>then you also have some some stories that just simply

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen, like one of the famous ones is is

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 1>supposedly and again this is has never happened. But Solrence

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Olivia and Dustin Hoffman, Um, we're on the seat of

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Marathon Man and and Dustin Hoffman shows up just looking

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>like hell, just dirty and just just strong outlooking because

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>his character is supposed to be. And he explained, and

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.919
<v Speaker 1>he explains it in preparation for the scene, he stayed

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>up all night and he didn't bathe and all this,

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and Olivier supposedly responded by saying, my good Sarah, why

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>don't you just try acting? Ha ha ha. And it's

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>supposed to know, it's supposed to be a good laugh

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 1>at the method actor has expense saying, well, why don't

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>you just pretend to be the thing that you are

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>instead of trying to embody it. But what I like

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>about that is that's cafe being the cafebe, you know,

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>because here's this fake story about this about fake in reality, right, um, yeah,

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's really interesting. What I like about

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>actors is I think they're very interesting creatures because they

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>are dealing with this duality of nature, right, and they

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>are having to inhabit this space and try to do

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>so in a way that really fools us. Right um.

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Actor Tandy Newton has a great ted dot com talk

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and she talks about what it's like to be an

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.559
<v Speaker 1>actor and what it's like to inhabit another character, and

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>she has some interesting thoughts on it, and we just

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to share some quotes with you. She talks about

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>this idea that she always felt separate from other people.

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>She always felt like the other, particularly because she was

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>someone of color in England growing up and write away

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and a female and so here she is already the other.

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So she talked about this idea of oneness and separateness.

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>She said, our little portion of oneness is given a name,

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is told all kinds of things about itself, and these details,

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>opinions and ideas become facts which go towards building ourselves,

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>our identity. So she's talking about this idea of self

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and this little bit of self we can grab in

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the world and define ourselves by. And she says, and

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that self becomes the vehicle for navigating our social world.

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>But the self is a projection based on other people's projections.

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Is it who we really are or who we really

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be or should be. So she says that

0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>this whole interaction with self and identity was really difficult

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>for her growing up. So she said that when she

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>found acting it was revelatory. She said, I can hardly

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>find the words to describe the piece I felt when

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I was acting, my dysfunctional self could actually plug into

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>another self, not my own, and it felt so good.

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Because she says that while she had a degree from

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 1>cab Cambridge, a thriving career, she herself was a bit

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>of a car wreck because she was so invested in

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this idea of self and she hadn't quite yet figured

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>out that it is just a projection, it's an illusion.

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>And she says that that this, this idea of self

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>is something that we value above all else, and we've

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.680
<v Speaker 1>created an entire value system in a physical reality to

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>support the worth of self. Yeah, it reminds me of

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the study that we ran across. And this is from

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Ellie a contage from the University of Amsterdam. She was

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>curious how much how much actors are aware of their

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>performance when they perform it and how into what extent

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>they're letting a character take over. Because we've we've we've

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>heard we've heard that before. We heard a little of

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>that from Cold Cabana about you know, you're you're playing

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>this character and you just your your juices get flowing

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and you just you embody the character kind of possesses you. Right. So,

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>um So, this study was interested in that. So she

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>asked Dutch actors to rate their own emotions and the

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>emotions of the characters they were playing across a range

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>of different states from disgust to anxiety, tenderness, pleasure, fear,

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. And as she found that positive emotions were

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>often felt by the actors as they played those characters emotions,

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>but the more and more negative the emotion that they

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to portray, the less likely it was that

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the actor word report actually feeling that emotion. So so

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>so in this study they found that actors were better

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>able to connect and be taken over by those positive feelings. Okay,

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>so they were able then to manage that system of

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>not being influenced so much by by their emotions are

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the emotions of the character? Um See, this is why

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I think It's such an interesting mind game, this acting,

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>because you do, you get into some very weird territory

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>about who you are and what reality is. Yeah, and

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed before too, like we're talking about chest opening exercises,

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>which we talked about laughter and smiling and laughter. Year

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>then all this and it, you know, comes out to

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that kind of that fake it till you make it

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of vibe, the idea that just on a physical level,

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>if we, you know, we smile and it makes us,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it makes us begin to feel the emotions that would

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>have made the smile. When we put the effect out there,

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>it generates the cause, even if there was no cause.

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And so what Tanny Newton is saying is that when

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:48.559
<v Speaker 1>when you think about this self and you think, okay,

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 1>well I'm happy today, and and if you are so

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>malleable that you allow all these different forces to act

0:11:55.200 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 1>upon you, then what you're doing is you're confusing self

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>for actual living Because what she says is that it's uh,

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the self is not an actual living thing. It's projection,

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>which are clever brains create in order to cheat ourselves

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>from the reality of death. So she's saying that it's

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 1>our ability to divorce ourselves from the concept of self

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and then ground ourselves in others and outside experiences. That

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>really liberates us and allows us to live fully. So

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I liked what she had to say about this from

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>an actor's perspective, because, Um, there there is a ton

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of duality going on here. So what do you mistake

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 1>for the real thing? And what is the real thing?

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I think is what we're trying to get at here.

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Um In Underscore you get into questions of what is

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 1>there a real thing? Is there is there anything at

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the heart of this or is it just a bunch

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 1>of masks encircling the formless um? And then and then

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:53.599
<v Speaker 1>to what extent are some is something? If there is

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a true you, then to what extent is the fake you?

0:12:57.320 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Almost as powerful there was. There's a really great episode,

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think a shorty of Radio Lab that aired recently

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>called What's Up doc Um. I recommend you guys checking

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it out, And I know a lot of you are

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Radio lap fans anyway, But it concerned mel Blank of course,

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the classic voice actor who you know did the voice

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of Bugs, Bunny and countless others and voice and uh.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>In the end up they talked to his son in

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 1>this episode, and he talks about like when he played

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>these care it wasn't just like all right, I'm gonna

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 1>do Wacky Voice number one in vacky Wacky Voice number two.

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean he was there was almost there was a

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of method acting mentality there where he knew these characters.

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>He would embody them and even though he's just doing

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the audio, he would act out. You know, you could

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.079
<v Speaker 1>you'd see physically his he was different when he was

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>doing one for voice versus the other, and uh and so.

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And in this episode they talked about how at one

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>point he was in this horrible crash car crash on

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 1>dead Men's Curve in Hollywood Boulevard and he nearly died,

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 1>and he was he was out for two weeks in

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a coma, and he would not spond to anyone, respond

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to anyone. But then how do they get him to respond?

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the crazy part. Well, this is yeah, this is

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the crazy part. His neurosurgeon, Dr Conway, Uh, just he said,

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere, he just decided to call him bugs

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Bunny called Mel Blank, one of his character's bugs Bunny

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and said, uh, something like, hey, bugs, how are you

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>doing today? And then Mel Blank actually responded as bugs bunny,

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>what's up back? And in character right, he responds, he

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>comes out of his comma, basically inhabiting this character, and

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he goes through a couple of other voices, um, I think,

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>including Porky Daffy and fog Horn Lankhorn, until he himself

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>mel Blank, the person the self that that we all

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>think of, is sitting there saying what's going on? Where

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>am I? So, Timmy, it points to this amazing moment

0:14:59.760 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>where you do have this question of like, well, how

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.760
<v Speaker 1>much of mel Blank is the characters? And how much

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of those characters is are is mel Blank? You know? Um?

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>To what degree is he himself or this fictionalized character

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that he's inhabited. Now this leads us into another area

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>as we discussed earlier undercover cops, undercover agents, vice operatives

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and uh and you know, in the interview with Colt Cabana,

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and we asked him briefly about you know, what it's

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>like when he's out there and he's portraying a bad guy.

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>He has his character, the officer, Colt Cabana is like

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a you know, vile uh, you know, foul mouth the

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>policeman and uh. And then he has to go back,

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, he has to leave the ring, go into

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the backstage area. And he says he's able to shut

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it off like it's not. It doesn't bleed over into

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>his life after the fact. And of course that brings

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to mind again these these vice officers, police officers who

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>have to go out and pretend to be drug dealers,

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>pretend to be, um, you know what happened some sort

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of criminal element in order to infiltrate it and and

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and actually get the actual criminals and

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>get them arrested. So what happens when they're doing that?

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>What happens when they have to play that part? And

0:16:16.000 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>then is there is there the chance that the the

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the the criminal element they're pretending to be becomes the

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>real them? Did they end up? You know, essentially they're

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>pretending to be this monster and then the monster consumes

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>them and it does happen. Yeah, I mean this is

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a high wire act, right, and um, you have a

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:39.080
<v Speaker 1>bit about how there have been some instances right where

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that shadow self has taken over. Yeah, yeah, And this

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is of course, this is important stuff. This is stuff

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that's been that's been studied because ultimately you're talking about

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement, which is important. You're talking about individuals risking

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>their their lives and and ultimately their their sanity to

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to engage in these kind of operations. So uh. Dr

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Michael or Ato a professor of psychology at the University

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of Ottawa. He conducted a ten year study of undercover

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>agents and uh he he looked at seventy two undercover

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 1>cops and out of the seventy two, um, there were

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 1>there were six that ended up being disciplined for acting

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>inappropriately during their missions. So one for one person that

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>was using cocaine. For another, it was conspiracy to self

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>class to self classified information about ongoing investigations. For one,

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it was actually selling classified informations. For another, it was

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:36.159
<v Speaker 1>sexual involvement with a confidential informant. For another, excessive use

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of force. And for another it was theft of money

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>from an evidence locker. UM. I mean and uh And

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you see the varying degrees of of shadiness in these

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and you can imagine, like all right, you know, like

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in the cocaine, you can imagine like a guy who's

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>posing as a drug dealer being put in a position

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:55.120
<v Speaker 1>where he has to use the drug or someone says, hey,

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, not hey use that drug, but but

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, encouraging them to sample it to prove their worth.

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>You kind of see that as a trope in various

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>undercover cop movies anyway. But then other stuff like stealing

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 1>money from an evidence locker, like that's more of I

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 1>have come back from the role I'm pretending to be

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and now I'm actually that in the evidence locker. I'm

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>that at at the base, at the home um where

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed to leave this criminal fake me behind. So

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>his ultimate finding, uh Dr Garrotto's finding was that undercover

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 1>agents with a disciplined self image and control of their

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>impulses almost unwaveringly saw themselves as merely playing the part

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of a drug dealer. So like Cold Cabana or or

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>any number of actors, and out there they were able

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to say, all right, um no, I'm back home now,

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and at home, I'm the real me. I am this

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 1>version of me, and that other thing that that the

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>drug dealer that I was just pretending to be for

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>like six hours, that's just a show. That's just a fake.

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately he says that it's what you need is

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>an internal set of social standards that prevent you from

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>losing your sense of identity. Yeah, it makes me think

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 1>back to our episode on will power and self control,

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder if living a double life creates a

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>heavy cognitive load. We talked about this cognitive loade and

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that if you have to remember, you know, let's say

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>two or more items as opposed to ten items, and

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 1>then have to take some sort of UM test and

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>self control afterward, you're going to be less likely to

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>follow through with self control if you have a high

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>cognitive load. So, in other words, if you're a double agent,

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>or you have a double life, then you have to

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind this entire other story, which might erode

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>some of that self control, uh and lead to some

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.359
<v Speaker 1>of these ego depletion that we've talked about before too.

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:51.679
<v Speaker 1>That you just have a finite amount of mental energy

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to dedicate to certain tasks. So I can see how

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the shadow self could kind of take over very easily

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>in that instance. UM wanted to mention to that. Psychologist

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Dr Alan Sillarian has has talked about what it's like

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>to work with secret agents. He says, the most secret

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>agents I have met have two signature traits fearlessness and

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a high tolerance for anxiety. Whether because of bio biological

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>factors such as an elevated level of the mood enhancing

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>neurochemical serotonin, or because of the influences of their early lives,

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>these people seem to be extreme risk takers who can

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>tolerate and manage worry, tension, and stress with natural ease.

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So you have to wonder that what point are the

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 1>stakes so high that the tension um begins to to

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>erode some of that self control. All right, well, we're

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break and when we come back,

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>we are going to discuss fiction. We're going to discuss avatars.

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And when I say avatars, not only are you going

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit about your online avatar, but

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>also the the older concept of the avatar itself and

0:20:55.440 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>not the movie. All right, we're back, and uh, we're

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk a little bit about avatars here about the

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>online self, because this is a you know, we've discussed

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>already this idea that that we we assume different personas

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>U two varying conscious degrees whenever we're interacting with the

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>outside world. There there's a slightly different you when you're

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>talking to your mother. Uh, there's a slightly different you

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking to the grosser, you know it. It's

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:34.719
<v Speaker 1>there's just all these different masks swirling around the the

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>ephemeral self, and we just put on those different masks

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to interact with the world. But here's this avatar, this

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to build a new you from the ground up, right,

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And what they found, Now, what some researchers have found

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is that it isn't always too far from the real you,

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the flesh and blood you. Uh, this is very interesting.

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>It's from an article called is It a Game? Evidence

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 1>for Social Influence in the Virtual World. It was published

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in the journal Social Influence. And in the study, which

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>was conducted by Paul W. Eastwick and Wendy L. Gardner,

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>one avatar tried to influence another to fulfill a request,

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 1>because we're talking about here is relationships. They were using

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>something called there dot com for this, which is kind

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of like second life, this kind of limitless virtual environment

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 1>where people create little versions of themselves and then they

0:22:27.000 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of teleport around and interact with each other. And

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of the fun is just sort

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of outfitting your character, uh, you know, giving it certain

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>physical characteristics, so on and so forth. But at the

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, like I said, it really is

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>about communication, because you're just mirroring what you're already doing

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>in society, or at least this is what this paper

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>is saying. Um. So yeah, you've got these. You've got

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>one avatar trying to influence another to fulfill a request,

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>just like in life. Right, I asked something of you,

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you asked something of me. We try to cooperate together

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to get something done. Um. The experiment, or in this case,

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>an avatar, first snakes an unreasonably large request to which

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the responder is expected to say no, followed by a

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>more moderate request. Yeah. I think it was something like

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 1>go to like twenty screenshots from a particular environment in

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>this in this uh this world. So it's like if

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you were like playing one of these quest games like Skyrim,

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.119
<v Speaker 1>and you just it was like a ridiculously, ridiculously complex

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>mission for some seemingly low payoff. So as I expected,

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the avatars, which is similar to people who participated in

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the same experiment in the real world, were more likely

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to comply with the moderate request when it was preceded

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>by the large request. Then when the moderate request was

0:23:42.600 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>presented alone. Now that's kind of a that's a tactic

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>that I think a lot of people use, Like if

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>I just go in for the it's sort of like

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>if you asked for a raise. If I asked for

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars, then it's a lot easier to get

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>to the maybe X amount that I want, as opposed

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to if I just asked for a thousand dollar raise. Um.

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>So what you see is that they exhibited a psychological

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>tendency to reciprocate the requests concession that change from a

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>relatively unreasonable request to a more moderate request. So one

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>of the other more striking findings was the effect of

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>what they call the d I t F technique, which

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>it was during the face. This is the way that

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they made the request was significantly reduced when the requesting

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>avatar was dark toned. The white avatars and the d

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I t F experiment received about a increase in compliance

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>with the moderate request. The increase for the dark toned

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>avatars was eighty. And again, this is a virtual world,

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>so there's there's no telling on the other side of

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a virtual character if they are black, if they're white,

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>if they are male or their female I mean in

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>second life you see people going around is like you know,

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>monkeys and cats and dogs and stuff, and you know,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and there are various other examples of people playing you know,

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>very inhuman characters. So on some level we know that

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the person and they decide can be any thing, but

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we still ended up end up buying into the vision

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>that is presented to us. Yeah, we're still tether to

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>some degree to our our prejudices and that the social

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>construction in our mind of what we think the world is. Um.

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>So I thought that was interesting that that still what

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it boils down to is that even though you've created

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this avatar and uh it's supposed to represent this duality

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>within yourself, you're still you're still socializing and cooperating or

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>not cooperating in the same sense that you would in

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>your life. And of course another thing to keep in

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>mind with all this is that in these video game interactions,

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>you're of course not making eye contact. Now. I like

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to think of a of a of a future time

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 1>when our video game characters we will have our actual eyes.

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that could be. I think that would be

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>really cool. Yeah, but for now, they most characters and

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>video games have just the dead soulless eyes of the

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Uncanny Valley. Um. But but one of the studies we

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>were looking at, and this was where was this from?

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 1>This was from the University of Haifa in Israel. Yeah,

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So they asked seventy one pairs of college students who

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>did not know one another to debate an issue over

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:15.239
<v Speaker 1>instant mass messenger and try to come up with an

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>agreeable solution. And they did a couple of fasces of this.

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>But the ultimate finding was that when their eyes were hidden,

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the participants were twice as likely to be hostile because

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they had and some of the the the the subjects

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>were were you they're reasoning like a skype webcam technology

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>so that they can they can make eye contact during

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>these interactions and others not. And so when the eyes

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>are hidden, hostility is more likely to occur. Which is again,

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you know you're you're outside of the social contract, right,

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 1>because the way that you know that you're in a

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>social contract is by witnessing the other person's reaction to you,

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>all the non verbal gesturing that gives you an indication

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of how they're feeling. So if you can't see that,

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>then it makes sense that you would miss those cues

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>or that they just wouldn't be present and enough to

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of get you to line up with acceptable behavior.

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>So this, of course is one of the reasons why

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>we see rude behavior running rampant online. Yeah, that's why

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you see like these outrageous examples of trolls, you know,

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>where someone's just out there just being completely awful, and

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you know they whenever they're eventually exposed there you know,

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>or not allay, they're not eventually exposed, but in the

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>cases where they're exposed, you see, oh well, this actually

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like a fairly normal person. How are they that

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>awful online? And you know it's because they're they're on

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>some level, they're not they don't see themselves as interacting

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>with real people. They're just kind of interacting with automatons. Yeah,

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 1>so I think they'll be interesting to see if the

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>shadow self, this sense of shadow self, becomes more acceptable

0:27:45.600 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>as we continue to communicate online and that we this

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this duality maybe disappears a bit, because again, we we

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 1>think of ourselves as this continuity, right this script director,

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.159
<v Speaker 1>and our our brain saying you are this, You're a

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>good person, you have integrity, you moved throughout the day

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in the following ways, but then we act another way

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 1>when nobody is looking. So how much of that will

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you know in the future be acceptable or not acceptable? Yeah. Finally,

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the world of fiction, which we've talked about this before,

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the story of the power of storytelling, the power of fiction.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 1>But there was a little study that we ran across

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>that that ties in nicely with what we're talking about here,

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and this is from Brigamany Young University research team led

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>by Sarah M. Coney, and she writes up in this

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>instance for the British Journal of Social Psychology, and she

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>was looking at how exposure to aggressive behavior in literature

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>has a psychological impact on readers. So in this case

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.320
<v Speaker 1>they had to the test subjects read two different versions

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of a story, like some people will read a story

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>where the outcome is that the conflict is solved with violence,

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and in the other the conflict is not solved with violence.

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And in both the cases they found that provoked people

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>who were given the opportunity to engage in the pacifics

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>civic form of rertalatory violence were more likely to do

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>so if they had just read a fictional account of

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.959
<v Speaker 1>similar activities. So, in other words, the individuals who just

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>read this thing where someone solves a problem with violence.

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>If they are then if they then encounter a real

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>life conflict, they're more likely to be aggressive in that

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that incident, which I I hadn't stumbled upon that study

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>until we started doing research on this, because we, like

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you said, we've done We've covered this subject quite a

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>bit in the ability of the reader to take on

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the persona of the character and also mirror neurons, uh,

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, firing at the same time that a character

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is throwing a ball in a book. Right. But to

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>see this, this concrete manifestation of the abstract aggression is

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing. And then I think that it points to

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 1>this idea that this again, that self is a very

0:29:56.000 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>tenuous thing, that this consciousness, this continue a d factory

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that we try to have in our head of turning

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>out this idea of who we are isn't quite as

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>solid as we think it is. Yeah, And then then

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we had this other study. We looked at researchers from

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State University and they conducted like six different experiments

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on about five different participants, and they found that stories

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>written in the first person can temporarily transform the way

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>readers view the world, themselves and other social groups. So,

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>for instance, they that they were particularly interested at one

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>point in what would happen when individuals were reading about

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a character and then that character was then revealed to

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>be homosexual. This particular experiment, they had like seventy heterosexual

0:30:39.720 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>males and that they read this story and uh, they

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>found that it depending on where in the narrative the

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>revelation was made, it it had a big impact on

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>how they, uh they felt about the protagonist being gay,

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and and also how they just envisioned that character. Like

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>if if it was revealed early in the story, then

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>they brought in a lot of baggage and a lot

0:30:59.600 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of conceptions about what a gay character should be. But

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 1>if they revealed it later, then then all that stuff

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't necessarily thrown into the mix because they had a

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>chance to try to occupy that person's Yeah right, yeah,

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>very cool stuff. Yeah, it really makes you think about

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the power of first person narratives, Like I instantly started

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>thinking about um Joyce Carol Oates book Zombie, which is

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the first person perspective and the character is based loosely

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>on Jeffrey Dalmer. So you have a very dark and

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>troubled individual and you and and then I think that's

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe the thing that's so you know, narcotic about text

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>like that is that it puts you in the mindset

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of this individual. It is seemingly far removed from who

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you are. But then ultimately you have to act yourself

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 1>how far removed if I'm able to embody that person

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>when I read this you? Uh, that was in the

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>book swap right for our early holiday gathering. Yeah, Lauren

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the new co host on Tech Stuff, got that one.

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So so right now she is her nightmarage. She's having

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>nightmares in the corner Jeffrey Dahmer. I'm just I'm gonna

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>throw some subluinal things out today Jeffrey Dahmer and just

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>see how she reacts. Wow. So um so, like I

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>say I said earlier, it makes me think about avatars,

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>not only in the in the the online avatar sense,

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>but in the the the old idea of the avatar,

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>which is steeped in Hinduism, comes from the Sanskrit word avatar,

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 1>which means descent, and the idea here is that you

0:32:31.760 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>have a god um and that God is just immaterial

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and just completely separate from the physical world, and then

0:32:39.840 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to descend to the physical world, the god has to

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>take on a form uh that can be understood by

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the physical world and that can interact with the physical world.

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>For instance, Vishnu has ten different avatars, and they range

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>from there's a fish, there's a tortoise as a bore,

0:32:55.000 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a dwarf, there's a and then and then there's Krishna,

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and then there's Buddha, and then there's a pen the

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 1>avatar that's uh the form of a white horse with wings,

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's a destroyer that will come at the end

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of the world. So can I really like this this uh,

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this metaphor for ourselves and the various selves we present,

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, think of your your your ultimate inner thoughts

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and everything that's going on inside you. You're kind of

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>like this vision of this this formless thing. And then

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to interact with the physical world. To descend to the

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>physical world, you have to take on these various forms,

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and they need different things and they have different applications

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in different environments. Right, So that the type of self

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that we roll out really sort of depends on which

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>avatar we need at the moment. Uh. You know what

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>one of my avatars is what's a duck? So Julie

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>takes on the form of the duck and uh, and

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 1>how do you use that avatar? Well, it doesn't really speak,

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know. Alright, Shall we bring over the robots.

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's call the robot over here and we'll do a

0:33:55.640 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of quick listener mails. All right, Well, we've heard

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of great comments on our episodes on mazes

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and labyrinths, and we heard from Andrew. Andrew writes and

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>this says, Hi, guys love the podcast and especially love

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>the episodes dealing with mazes and labyrinths. I think it

0:34:11.400 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>is noteworthy that modern psychology has been applied to the

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>construction of malls and shopping spaces that specifically create maze

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>or labyrinth like environments. Have either of you ever been

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to Ikea? Of course we have because we live in

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the same city as one, so everyone has to go.

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a lot of mandatory. Um. The place is

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a labyrinth, no two ways about it. You walk in

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and you follow a path of consumption uh and leave

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>next to the entrance. Uh. This psychological tool of peace

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and religious expansion is being used to proliferate consumer culture. Uh.

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:45.959
<v Speaker 1>And then he goes on to say, you know, it's

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>rather different inside of a mall environment, where it's just

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like a maze. There are all these like how

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>do I get out of here? How do I get

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to the store I want to go to? How do

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I escape the horrors of the food court? All these

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:59.279
<v Speaker 1>questions come up, whereas indeed, I kea is so well

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:03.439
<v Speaker 1>laid out and o versed in design that there's a path,

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>you flow, it's it's at least for the first hour,

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a calming experience. Um and uh. And the book

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that we we discussed in in in Maps and Labyrinths

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>also makes that point in regard to to hospitals and

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>similar environments. One of the problems there, of course, is

0:35:21.480 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that you end up with a maze like hospital because

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>in many cases that you build part of a hospital

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and then you build another wing onto it, and there's

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 1>another wing here, so you have all these layers coming

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 1>together to form this this this thing where there's no

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>cohesive design in place, which heightens your anxiety, particularly if

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you're at the hospital to visit someone or you yourself

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>checking in. So not necessarily this sort of design that

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 1>you want this. The book is called Healing Spaces. Healing Spaces. Yeah,

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and and and we were talking about government buildings just

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.080
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and how it has like this, you know, Kafka

0:35:56.880 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>bureaucratic layering of of as, like uh, ways to get

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to where you need to go, and almost seems intentional,

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like we're gonna make you go down this a mile

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 1>long hallway and then we're gonna give you directions that

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are you know, twenty different directions on top of that.

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Um so, yeah, all right, well, here here a couple

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>more that. This one is from Jill Jill Wrightson and

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>says hello, thanks for the fantastic podcast. Labyrinth have become

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.479
<v Speaker 1>close to my heart over the past few years. After

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.080
<v Speaker 1>my husband and I eloped to San Francisco, we had

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a marriage blessing at Grace Cathedral where I saw my

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 1>first labyrinth. He walked it and it was beautiful to

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>see every step really count. I was not comfortable to

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>have a prayer for or meditative practice in the open,

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:42.399
<v Speaker 1>but I did find this box and book picture below,

0:36:42.440 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and she included some some very some excellent to photographs

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that there of labyrinths. At Christmas this year for my

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>own practice, the tracing and breath are a good connection

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for me. I completely agree with what you said about

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the mazes. They're frustrating and I don't know why they

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.919
<v Speaker 1>were included in this pack. She's referring to the pack

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:02.359
<v Speaker 1>of Mazes laborage. Yet meditative maze did prove to be

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>an oxymoron because the flas we discovered's nothing meditative about

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>being lost. Thanks again for all you do. It is

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:12.359
<v Speaker 1>appreciated down here in Orlando. And then we also heard

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>from Kelly Kelly Road and said, hello, I just finished

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Labyrinth episode and wanted to thank you

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>for all the interesting facts. I am actually getting married

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>in a labyrinth this August. My husband and I were

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>legally married last March, but postponed our larger ceremony and

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>reception as I was nine months pregnant and couldn't see

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 1>my feet. Now that our beautiful baby boys here, we

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.720
<v Speaker 1>are renewing our vows and having an actual ceremony and reception.

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Our ceremony is being held here in the center of

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a labyrinth, which is set in the woods here in

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Illinois where we live. We like the idea of the

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>ceremony being a meditative experience. I plan to have a

0:37:45.320 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 1>sign near the entrance offering a brief explanation and history

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 1>of labyrinth and inviting people to sneak away from the

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>reception to try it for themselves. I will definitely use

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>some of the facts you've covered in the show. Thanks

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>again for a great episode, and if you read this

0:37:57.960 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>on the show, I just want to say thanks to

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:02.320
<v Speaker 1>my has been chat and my son's Kaden and Silas

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>for being the three most wonderful guys on the planet. Kelly, Yeah,

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that's sweet. I think it's very cool to have a

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 1>ceremony and elabyrinths. It is, yeah and yeah interesting to

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:16.840
<v Speaker 1>see to hear from two different listeners who have employed

0:38:17.120 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 1>labyrinths in their their ceremony. All right, well, if you

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:22.480
<v Speaker 1>have something you would like to share with us, be

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it about mazes and labyrinths, or be it about the

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>shadow self? Um, actors, I know we have some actors

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>out there. Uh, let us know how that works in

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 1>your mind? What's it like to take on a character? Uh?

0:38:34.239 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, do you use the method to to

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>any degree? Um? If we have anyone who has done

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>any kind of undercover work, be it like official, you know,

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>hard and gritty, undercover work or something a little more mundane. Uh,

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:52.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, some sort of like even public performance kind

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of thing where you're having to put on a character

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to deceive people. Uh, don't tell us, don't you know.

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 1>But but but seriously, if you've engaged in anything like that,

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we'd love to hear some more inside on how that

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:06.760
<v Speaker 1>feels and how you feel yourself embodied in the character

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that you're being, or how you feel that character affecting you.

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'd love to hear from you about any of that.

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>You can find us on Tumblr and you can find

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 1>us on Facebook. We are stuff to blow your mind

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>on both of those, and you can also drop us

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>a line at blow the Mind at discovery dot com

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>for more on this and thousands of other topics. Is

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 1>it how Stuff Works dot com