WEBVTT - Week 9 Waiver Wire, Adds, Streams

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show, and thanks so much for listening and

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best Friends

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Forever Show. Start listening to us or suffer the consequences.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen first, du dennit do du dennity. Yeah, welcome your

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>host Friday from line five, God Rob say, Francis Franca

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>stand ball ladies and gentlemen, your bfs and with that

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we will get to you inside of Studio thirty four.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>This is the BFFs. Here's Frank Staffle. I am Greg Sauceman.

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, what's hey. There's a lot going on right now.

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Trade deadline looming in the NFL, there's trades going down ready,

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>there's people being benched on their birthday. J E. T S.

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Just end the season. It's getting crazy out here. Greg.

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing? I'm doing well, man, I'm hanging

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in there. I I didn't get a chance, unfortunately, uh

0:01:56.160 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to watch the finale of Halloween Baking Championship. I actually

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>he was going to ask you how it ended. I

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I was legitimately because our fantasy team was

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>making a push to win last night. I wanted watching

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the whole game. Look at you watching football during the

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>football season. Yeah, proud, did you like what you saw? Uh? No,

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>because he lost. It would have it would have been

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot better if we won. But a valiant comeback, Greg,

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we were down what forty five going into

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>last night. We had James Conner and Juju, the closer

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>had Chris Boswell shout out to the clothes. I mean

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>he had some monster weeks all across the board of

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cookie and Michael Thomas got some big games. Darren Fells,

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>how can I forget Darren Fells. The BFS come storming back,

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't enough, unfortunately. But for most people, if

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.679
<v Speaker 1>you needed if you needed Juju, or you needed James

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Connor to do something, you got it last night. So

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in my other league, I did actually need James Conner

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and Juju to get it done, and they did. Super

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Flexed league, I have two wins. Now join the club

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>my only super flex to win. Let's go yeah. Last

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>night Monday Night Football, the Steelers are now fourteen. Nothing's

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>goed to all these points. Nancially wound up winning. Connor

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and Juju both had big nights. Deante Johnson did as well.

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll get to him in just a second, but the

0:03:18.080 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>big story coming out was as great as James Conner was.

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 1>He as a bad minavy events. He has hurt on

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>his last carry towards the end of the game. UM,

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>it looks like he's an A C joint sprain. Mike

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Tomlinsons will be limited earlier this week, and then we'll

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>see what do you think about James Connor's injury and

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>his performance last night. I'll start off with the injury,

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and this came from inside injuries. Earlier today, Steelers running

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>back James Conner suffered an A C joint injury, as

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, Greg, While it will be painful for the

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>next few weeks, he should be able to play through it,

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>so we'll we'll continue to monitor this situation. He has

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>dealt with a lot of injuries already this year. UM,

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>some knee stuff, some ankle stuff as well. He's got

0:03:57.640 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the shoulder now, but he has for the most part,

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>play through a lot of these injuries. That's why a

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are excited about picking up Jalen Samuel's

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, who Mike Tomlin said is going to be

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>ready to go four week nine. So we'll talk about

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>him in a little bit. But I thought that James

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Conner was phenomenal last night. Twenty three carries, a hundred

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and forty five yards six point three yards per carry, touchdown,

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>added a few receptions as well. Had three catches only

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.279
<v Speaker 1>five yards, but in PPR he'll take every reception. You

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>can get. Twenty six total touches for James Conner in

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.239
<v Speaker 1>this game, the next closest and he's still with five.

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So I feel pretty good about James Conner being the

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 1>work course for this team, assuming he is healthy. He

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was great last night. Yeah, James Connor was fantastic. Again.

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>You had to see Um not taking for great of salt.

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Remember they didn't face that Dolphins defense as pitiful, So

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>James Conner, a good offensive line in front of the

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh Steelers had a lot of room to run last night.

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>It won't always be so plentiful for him, Um, but

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>clearly the guy Benny Snow was also hurt last night.

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.599
<v Speaker 1>Jaylen Samuel out there in waivers, is he your favorite

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire pick up this week? Probably at the running

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>back position. I think it's close between him and Mark Walton.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>I put out the poll before the show, Greg, and

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly everybody is all over Jalen Samuel's as the top

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire add There are already sixty seven votes on

0:05:13.160 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the poll, Greg, and sixty four percent say Jalen Samuels

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is the top waiver Wire add this week. I think

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that's with the assumption that you know, James Conner might

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>be missing time. But based on everything we've read so far,

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it looks like James Conner is going to be good

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 1>to go. But I think it's close between him and

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Mark Walton. I understand that Miami Dolphins are a terrible team,

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>but Walton played a ton last night. Seven percent of

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the snaps, he had eleven carries. He had six targets

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>as well, so seventeen running back opportunities. I understand it's

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>a bad team, bad offensive line, but you've got some

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>good matchups coming up. He's gonna face the Jets a

0:05:45.520 --> 0:05:47.799
<v Speaker 1>couple of times here, so I think it's close between

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>Samuels and Walton, and then I also really really like

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Chris Connley at the wide receiver position, but we talk

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>about that a little bit later. Again, all of these guys,

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>specifically the last night, I certainly kid an eye on

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Mark Walton and Kylen Blaj just the you shaid as

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.040
<v Speaker 1>you said, Mark Wonton. Some pers on the snaps last night,

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>like Caim malaged to get involved in the wildcat inside

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>the red zone at one point. The problem is this

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Nolvin's team is so bad and their offensive line is terrible,

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're gonna be behind every game. The upside for

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Mark Walton, it's just capped, Like I get it, Like

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you want a a flex play potentially in a bye week,

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>that's all Mark Walton is good for. So like, I

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>can't even break the bank for a guy like Walton,

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>even though he's a starter, because I think that upside

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is just so so limited, that is fair. And Jalen

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Samuel's upside is higher assuming that James Conner would have

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>miss time, but I don't know that we can really

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>assume that right now, So I think it's it's the

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 1>possibility that's kind of looming inside of people's minds right now,

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>and undoubtedly there's more upside if you are the Steelers

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>featured running back as opposed to being the Dolphins featured

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>running back. So we'll pay attention to that. But if

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it if it comes down to, you know, having to

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>spend a big amount of your fat budget at this

0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>point in the season on Jalen Samuel's giving the information

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that we have, I don't know that there's that guy

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this week that you want to spend a ton of

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.679
<v Speaker 1>fab on. And thankfully we don't have a Tai Johnson

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>situation either because that did not work out Greg. But

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>up trade Carson, maybe we'll get to that. He's on

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the list. I know he's on the list. Let's come

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>all the guys um I think worth talking about as well.

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll hetting all that. Will also going to hit up

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the streaming quarterbacks. What about James What about Jujuice Smith

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Schuster from last night? It looked really good obviously Mason Ruff. Yeah,

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that first story was brutal. I mean just lofted it

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>up there for Xavien Howard. Got lucky that Xavian Howard

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>actually left the game, or else he might have had

0:07:36.400 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>more in receptions later on. But Juju comes through again.

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Really great matchup, nine targets, five receptions, a hundred and

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>three yards in a touchdown. Is this your cell high

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for Juju Smith Schuster, I would absolutely think so,

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>no question about it. They played at brutal Miami defense.

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Mason rut Up under threw a ton of passage, Judicmith

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Schuster had a couple of catches, great cashes in traffic.

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm absolutely using this opportunity, Schuster hide, Let's take a

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>break year. When we come back, we'll dive fully into

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the way of a wire. We'll see what we can find.

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>We'll give you some prices to spend, and we'll hopefully

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>make your teams better. That's the goal of today's program.

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the BFFs on the Fantasy Sports right here now, work.

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Are you ready for the nation's first and only free,

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hour network dedicated to you the betting and

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide you with a

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence unlike anything you've

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>ever seen before. Located both in the heart of New

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>York City and inside the FanDuel Sports Book at the

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>meadow Lands. Sports Crade is live eighteen hours a day.

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Here to serve you the fanatic. This is sports Grid.

0:08:45.000 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Get off the Grid, tie of you man a cbffs

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>here on Sportscreen TV. Get on the Grid, Frank, you

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>gotta get on the grid. Gotta get on the grida.

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Get on the Grid reminds me of the guy from

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 1>the movie. I forgot what movie it's from. I think

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna talk about like, uh, eight Crazy Nights.

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 1>That's a technical foul. That's a I love that. It's

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 1>a great movie, Crazy Nights. It's a really good movie.

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I always watched it around. Uh, once we get into December,

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna watch that. You gotta get on

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the Grid. Yeah, it's a technical foul. Oh, Greg, We're

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>how many people just left? Probably too many? Probably too many.

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's pick it up some fantasy advice. It's a waiver

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>wire Tuesday, Frank, let's break it down. We began at

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the running back position where I mentioned Jalen Samuel's earlier.

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.160
<v Speaker 1>If he's out there on the waiver wire, how much

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you spending because you're not gonna know anything else about

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>James Conner than we do right now. If your waivers

0:09:57.600 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 1>go through tonight, it is what it is, how much

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you're spending on Jail Samuels. It's gonna be higher if

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I am maybe James Conner owner. Obviously, and as of now,

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Samuels only owning twenty one percent of yahoole so

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>he is out there in a in a good majority.

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking seven eight percent something like that. You know, again,

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not breaking the bank. I don't think that we

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>have a Ti Johnson situation this week, hopefully. I don't

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>know if we should consider Ty Johnson. I don't know

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>if we should consider Ty Johnson like the player that

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we spend up for or the player that we spend

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>up for and just get wrong every single week. But ultimately,

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that we have that player that we're

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>spending a massive amount of our budget for. Jel Samuels.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>To me, he's seven eight percent if you really really

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>need him, if you're James Connor owner, I could see

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>going ten percent, maybe eleven. But ultimately we saw before

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>even before he got hurt, he had that one game

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>on Moday Night Football where they started running the wildcat

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>greg and they really got him involved and they were

0:10:51.080 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>doing all these little shovel passes um where he got

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of receptions. But then the next game he

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>had three carries for two yards. He didn't do any

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 1>think he wasn't catching any passes, he wasn't involved, they

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>weren't running the wildcats. So I'm not really sure what

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to expect moving forward outside of the fact that, yes,

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>there is upside with Janalen Samuels if James Connor were

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to misstime. But even if James Connor plays in this

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>game and he's limited, I would still expect him to

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>see a majority of the work, probably around you know,

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to seventeen touches and then maybe Janalen Samuels sees

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>six to eight, six to ten, something like that. So

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're breaking the bank. I'm looking at

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>seven eight percent. I'm not breaking the bank. But as

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you said back on Monday, Jen Samuel had that amazing

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>game you reference, and I think, knowing that Connor will

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>be a bit limited, he's gonna have a big role.

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Steelers and Mike Tomland or I

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>would hope I saw what we saw last night that

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>makes Rudolph against stinks and they're gonna want to utilize

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Samuels. They're calling a percent healthy right now in

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this game. I want Jalen Samuel's a Connor owner or not.

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I am sorry. Like you said, I

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>agree that seven cent makes sense if you're James Connor

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>or owner. I sprinkle on Trey Edmund just in case. Maybe,

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have to see what's going on with

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Benny Snell as well. He left last night with a

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:15.559
<v Speaker 1>knee injury. But now we're talking about potentially four running

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>backs in the mix for the tracks Fury Steelers. Not

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>that all of them are going to be in the

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.319
<v Speaker 1>mix on a weekly basis, but all of it is

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>dependent on how hurt the players for the Steelers actually

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>are right now. James Conner again limited to start the week. Um,

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll help see what's going on with Benny Snell as well.

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe if you're in a deeper league, one of these

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>high stakes leagues where you have eight or nine bench spots,

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you can look at, you know, a very very small

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>bid on Trey Edmonds if you are a James Connor owner.

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>But outside of that, not really much interest. I mentioned

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Mark Walton before as well. If he's out there on

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the way over wire, how much you spending again, I

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>think a similar amount to Jalen Samuels, maybe even a

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit less, five to six percent. If you really

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>really need a flex this week, there are four teams

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>on a buy with the Falcons, Bengals, Rams, and Saints,

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So if you're really desperate, you know seven eight percent.

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But again, this is one of the worst offensive lines

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, one of the worst offenses in the NFL,

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>which means they're likely playing from behind in a lot

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of games, which means they're throwing the football, and a

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of times they're throwing the football to Preston Williams

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and throwing the ball to Davanta Parker. I really like

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the six targets from Mark Walton last night, so that

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>helps him have value in PPR leagues. Obviously played eight

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of the snaps uh and Kenyan Drake leaves

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>behind fifcent of the target share. He's now in Arizona.

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>UM I'm looking at anywhere from five to eight percent,

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>eight percent being the more aggressive side. But again, you've

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>got a temporary expectations. Even with the starting running back

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Miami Dolphins. Yeah, for me, Like I said,

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>just not somebody I I really want to go after,

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>not somebody I want to invest in. He's absolutely desperation.

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think if you're using Mark Woon as a

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>flexi what you're going to do, most likely you probably

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:52.720
<v Speaker 1>can find some wide receivers you have a better chance

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to get of getting the end zone the Mark Wallon, Right, Like,

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>who would you rather own, for instance, E. J. Brown

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>or Mark Wallen? I think that's comparable. Yeah, a J.

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Browne I would rather go with a J. Brown. I

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>mean the way that Tannehill is playing, not that he's

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, lighting up the scoreboard by any means, but

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>he has throwing three touchdowns and back to back games.

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>One of those touchdowns this week was to A J.

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Brown the week before if he led the team with

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight targets, whatever it was. So I do

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>like A J. Brown. Um, he's been making plays. I

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 1>just want to see more consistent targets for him. Again,

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>expected more for him going up against the Tampa Bay

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Bucks defense this week, but I think that is comparable. Actually,

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>if you remember our guy Derek Brown greg before the season,

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we did our Bears preview with Derek Brown. I tweeted

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>out the usage for the Dolphins running backs earlier today,

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and he actually said exactly what you said. He said,

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>give me a wide receiver that's seeing five to seven

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>targets with a decent average depth of target, and I'll

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>take that player over Mark Walton. I think it just

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, alright. Other running backs that could be out

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>there here this week, Frank we measure where he most

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>on yesterday's program. The four Niners didn't practice yesterday. They

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>played on Thursday nights, but they have to release a

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>practice report for some BS reason. Um today they will

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>practice tomorrow. They have a walkers Today is the big

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>A for Matt Brita for he Mosters, for Jeff Wilson,

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>none of them who have been ruled out. Brito was

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 1>actually given a limited tag yesterday, which is like a

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>theoretical tags, as was Raheem Moster precisely today. Like I said,

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>these teams actually practice, so we'll see who is out

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>there for both the nine Years and the Cardinals a

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>limit later on today, and that's when you're probably gonna

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>make your decision based on where he most like. I

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know that that Brin will be available, ask Virginia

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>probably on Thursday. Um, but I Moster is out there

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and you're a Matt Brita owner. How much she's spending

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Probably in a similar range of some of these guys,

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>five to six percent if you want to be a

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more aggressive, But not really. Again, there's no

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>running backs that I feel great about spending double digit

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>percentage of my fab on this week at least. But

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Rahee Moster looked. He was great again in Week eight,

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>nine rushes for sixty yards, including a forty one yard touchdown.

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>This guy now has ninety five career carries. He's averaging

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>six point four yards per carry. Kyle Sanahan, all he

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>does is produced fantasy viable running backs for he Mostart

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is one of those running backs, so I'm definitely interested.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>The forty Niners offensive line, even without their starting tackles,

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is third in the NFL in adjusted line yards per

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Football Outsiders. They have the third best run blocking offensive

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>line with injuries to their starting tackles, so it's just crazy.

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>They're playing lights out football right now. They're playing with leads,

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>which has led to them running the football even more.

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Their ten point favorites for this game against Arizona if

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Matt Breta cannot go in this game, or even if

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>he's limited, I think Mostart is in play as a flex.

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>You might argue that even if Matt Brida plays, getting

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the seven to ten touches out of Mostart in the

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco offense is better than anything you'll get out

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of Mark wall Absolutely, I totally agree with you. In

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a game where the Niners should dominate against the Cardinals

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a short week, not Breda is going to be limited,

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and if the game script goes how we expected to

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a short week, why would they play Matt Brida? Be honest,

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I mean, who knows, but especially what Tavin

0:16:57.800 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Cowan's playing like, there's no reason to play Matt Brida,

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>which means most a much more viable flex in my

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>opinion than Mark Walton is because he's going to have

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a chance more opportunities to find the end zone, and

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're looking for out of that desperation FLEXI play.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And we just saw what let's Savus Murray did against

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>this Arizona Cardinals defense as well, a hundred and fifty

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>seven total yards, nine receptions and two touchdowns. So obviously

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>we loved Tevin Coleman for that match up on Thursday.

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>But pay attention to this Brita and Raheem Mostert situation.

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm very very interested, Greg, absolutely something you definitely want

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to look to tonight when you get the practice reports

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>from Arizona and from San Francisco. Any other running backs

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>were picking up this week? Yeah, I have a few

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>names mentioned that we were going to talk a little

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 1>bit about Trey Carson. Everybody was tilting on Sunday morning, Greg,

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Sunday afternoon, when the when the first drive, the first

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>couple of drives are going to Tray Carson, who the

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions actually picked up from their a f C

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.919
<v Speaker 1>North rivals off the Green Bay Packers. Packers practice squad.

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Ti Johnson still lead this team with of the snaps,

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 1>they had four running backs involved, very frustrating situation. Ty Johnson,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Trey Carson, J D mckiss, Paul Perkins nine percent. Carson

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>led the team with twelve carries. Detroit only had one

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>red zone rushing attempt that went to Tray Carson as well.

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>They're facing the Oakland Raiders this week, who have actually

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 1>been better against the run. But if you picked up

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Ty Johnson and you are desperate again more of a

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>deeperly add You can look at Tray Carson, a few

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>names that I'll bring up, Greg and maybe we kind

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>of talk about these guys a little bit when we

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>come back from the break, various guys and Darryl Henderson

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>as STASH candidates. Yeah, we certainly mentioned them. I also

0:18:34.240 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 1>want to get into the wide receivers on the other

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>side of the break, and even all over Chris Conley

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>this week we'll tell you how much to spend on him.

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>That's other guys, that's where they're looking at the Waiver

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Wire show. Here on the Grid, get on it. Are

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>you ready for the nation's first and only free, twenty

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>four hour network dedicated to you, the betting and fantasy

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide you with a real

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.880
<v Speaker 1>time content because just sticks and gaming intelligence unlike anything

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:05.919
<v Speaker 1>you've ever seen before. Located both in the Hart of

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>New York City and inside the FanDuel Sports book at

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the meadow Lands Sports Crede, he's live eighteen hours a

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>day here to serve you the fanatic. This is Sports Grid.

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Get on the Grid, put your money where you're out

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>this to take a shot by opening a sports wagering

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>account with FanDuel, New Jersey's largest sports book at vanduel

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Grid, whether you receive a free bet,

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it's up to five hundred dollars. It's a free bet.

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm up to five hundred dollars. When you open a

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>sports waging your account at FanDuel dot com slash grid,

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>you got points, friends, game to its prop parlays and

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>game wagering on college and pro sports. You're in control

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the vanduel dot com slash Grid and open your new

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.159
<v Speaker 1>account and claiming you're a free wager of up to

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dollars today. If you have a gambling problem

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 1>called one a hundred gambler twenty one and over, New

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Jersey only eligibility restriction supply see website for details or

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>remember also follow us on YouTube and Instagram at sports

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>screen tv. You know a lot of you are watching

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube right now on the Fantasy Sports Network.

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Chatel to check us out at sports screen tv here

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.200
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube, Instagram and plays with the podcast of course,

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to that wherever you're listening to you as well.

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Before we want on the wide receivers Frankie Imagined. You

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:33.239
<v Speaker 1>want to hit up on Darius Guice and some other

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>running backs before we move on. Now, start off with

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Darius Guys. Adrian Peterson has average nineteen rushing attempts for

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>games since Bill Callahan has took over as the interim

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>head coach in Washington. It's clear that they want to

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>run the football. He was back on the practice field yesterday,

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.200
<v Speaker 1>eligible to return in week eleven, So if he's still

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>available on your waiver wire, look at the stashing him

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 1>right now. Um. I'm not sure that Washington will be

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 1>playing with a lot of leads, but as they've shown us,

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really matter. They're still to try and run

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the football regardless of what the score is. We saw

0:21:03.080 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that last week on Thursday Night Football against the Minnesota Vikings.

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>As for Darryl Henderson, Greg whatever is going on with

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley, it's clear there's something because he's averaging a

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>career low three point nine yards per carry. I understand

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line is not what it has been in

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>years past, but he just went up against the Cincinnati

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Bengals and that is one of, if not the best

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>matchup you can have for a running back, and even

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>against them, he did not look great. He's averaging just

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty point seven rushing yards per game, both that and

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>his yards per carry this season or a career low.

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.879
<v Speaker 1>He is on pace for just thirty two receptions this season.

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So whatever is going on for Girly, you know, maybe

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the bye week will help him rest up and get

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>right for the second half. But just in case, Darryl

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Henderson has run more efficiently than Girly recently, Greg and

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>he's actually starting to creep into the snapshare as well.

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Girly this past week played of the snaps Darryl Henderson

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of the snap. Is there a chance after the

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>bye then Malcolm Brown is back, There is a chance,

0:21:57.840 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think that we're starting to see them turn

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that back up roll over to Darryl Henderson as we saw.

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about that, man. I mean, it's in

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the season. They wanted Darryl Henderson to be a thing.

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>He just wasn't. He didn't pick up on the offensive

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>system quick enough for Sean McVeigh and the Los Angeles Rams.

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>But they spent a third round pick on Darryl Henderson,

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think that they like him, and I think

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that they want to get him involved. And if anything,

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>were to happen to Todd Gurley. Darryl Henderson does legitimately

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 1>have r B two value. I'm not as worried about

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Malcolm Brown maybe as you are. Greg. And then we

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>have to mention the situation that's going on with the

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Jets right now. We alluded to it earlier on in

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the show. J E t s just end the season

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. They're shopping everybody, but one name that has

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>been rumored is Levian Bell. Obviously, if you're listening to

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>this later on in the day past the trade deadline,

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 1>you'll know whether or not Levian Bell has already been

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>traded or not. If that is the case, obviously you'll

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>want to pick up Time Montgomery, and even in deeper leagues,

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>look at ball all Powell. I know the that Levian

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Bell has not been able to do much behind his

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Jets offensive line, but they do have a really, really

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:01.639
<v Speaker 1>good schedule upcoming, so even Time Montgomery should be able

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of some of these matchups against the

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins and the Bengals. For example, Greg intentionally, sir, right,

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>let's be one of the wide receiver's gonna break. I

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Chris Connley, who's did a nice job with the

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Jaguars the season Gardner Min she's locked on onto him

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and d J. Shark Connelly's out there in a lot

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>of places. I much you're spending. I'm thinking a similar

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>amount to what I mentioned for the running backs five

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>to eight percent and Greg when we say five to

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>eight percent, I kind of wanted to ask you and

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>pick your brain about this. Is that from what your

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 1>original budget is or is it of your remaining budget?

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Because I always really do it based on how what

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you started with. So, for example, I have twenty four

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars left in my home league. If I say I'm

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>willing to spend five to eight percent of my budget

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>on Chris Conley, I'm thinking five to eight dollars is

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>how you look at it. I totally agree. I totally

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>don't agree you when you say if I have to

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>eight I always talk about the original numbers you have,

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a hundred we start with a hundred bucks,

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're telling me five to eight percent. I'm all right,

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So spending like six seven dollars here on Jalen Samuel's

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>roll and Chris Conley or whoever you have a thousand dollars,

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>you're you're looking like that. That's exactly right. So that's

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>what I'm thinking for Chris Connley as well. D D.

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook dealing with the next slash shoulder injury right now.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>He left the game early. We don't know what his

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>availability is going to be yet four week nine, but

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a really good matchup going up against the Houston

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Texans to allow the third most fantasy points to opposing

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. They just allowed ten receptions, two one yards,

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns to Oakland wide receivers Hunter Rent. For

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of all people, Chris Conley, uh and t J. Chark

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>played fifty five snaps each. They both ran thirty eight

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 1>routes this past week, Greg and over the past two weeks,

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Chris Connley see of the target share thirty nine percent

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of their air yards. He just had a seventy yard

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdown against the Jets. I am very interested in Chris Conley.

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>He's playing more seeing the targets and it's a good matchup.

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>He's playing a lot. I know they have a bye

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>next week right week, so this is a potentially short term.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>It's potentially a one week play, and I'd rather have

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Chris Conley in the running match. We're talking about earlier,

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>like the Mark Walton's Jalen Samuel especially Connor plays um

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.719
<v Speaker 1>no need West potentially no market's lead. Potentially, it's going

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to be legitimately as much Chris Conney and d J.

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.439
<v Speaker 1>Jark as you can handle, which makes Connie and a

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>really good spot this week. Yeah, he's my top wide receiver.

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And I've seen some people some people talking about Deonta

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Johnson as well. Great, who would you rather have between

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Chris Conley and Deontay Johnson. So there's clearly an affinity

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>for Deontay Johnson basic that that's that's real. In the

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>five games they've played, Deonta Johnson cent of the target

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>chair and scored three touchdowns in five games. Was supposed

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to be the James Washington OSU connection. No, I don't

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>remember that. Craig, let's quickly, let's quickly sweep that one

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 1>under the rug. Did you know that C. J. Bethard

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>went to Iowa with George Gee? I did know that, Yeah,

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>because that was that was a storyline last year when

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>when they started taking off. I brought it up, Frank,

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>the os U thing in the Iowa thing. All right, Well,

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>we we like the Bethrood and the Kittle thing um

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>James Washington. I don't even know who you're talking about,

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.959
<v Speaker 1>all right, cool anyway or is My friends would call

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>him j beat had beat hard. It is pretty funny.

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy it. I prefer Chris Coney over Man. It's

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>not a bad matchup this week. The Steelers are going

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 1>up against the Cold Sale, the twelfth most fantasy points

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to opposing wide receivers. But Deonta Johnson looked pretty good

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>again last night, seven targets, five for eighty four and one.

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the Steelers found a little bit a little

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>bit of something here with Deonta Johnson. They continue to

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 1>draft wide receiver as well greg they do. But I

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>also do want to say that the Steelers through thereby

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville has that by next week. If you're looking longer term,

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>may prefer Deontay Johnson, especially if you're desperate for a

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver three or you have a lot of bye

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>weeks coming up players on by this week or next week,

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and you you might want to look more so into

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Deontay Johnson. But I really really do like Chris Connley

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>for this matchup. I look into him for DFS as well,

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I also think that number that you want to spend,

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and you said again along those lines, I think you

0:26:46.480 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 1>also have to think about like when you would utilize

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 1>this player or how you utilize You're gonna start Chris Conley.

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:54.640
<v Speaker 1>You can go over that number, like you need him

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>this week, you want to play eleven percent from him?

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I I get it. Like that, that's fine us that warranted, though, Greg,

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this brings up a philosophy question for waiver wire.

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Is it warranted spending that much money for a player

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that you're only going to use one week? But if

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>you expect that player to have a monster game and

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they help you win that week and it's a much

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:17.160
<v Speaker 1>needed win, it might be worth it. So my answer

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>is yes, his warrant you know'll give you two examples.

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 1>One was from either Week two or three this year

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>where every Eagle wide receiver went down on a Sunday.

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 1>The only one remaining they played on Thursday against Packers

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>was Nelson. We all knew he was going to have

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>He was the only wide receiver standing, right, So you

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 1>had to spend whatever it took. And instead of spending

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the probably six seven eight dollars you should have if

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you spent fifteen you felt okay about it because Adler

0:27:41.960 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>did exactly what you wanted him to do. That's one example.

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>The other example didn't necessarily work out as well, but

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the thought process was there. Last week, everyone spent fifteen

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>on Kenny Still with the thought that he was gonna

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 1>blow up last week I guess Oakland, and then this

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>week before the bye he could do it again against Jacksonville.

0:27:58.200 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I know it's in London, but like you thought, Kenny

0:28:00.000 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Stills has an opportunity to really have a huge two

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks for you and maybe win you a couple of

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 1>weeks before thereby next week before Will Fuller probably comes

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>back after that by. So my answer is, if you're

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>going to start him and you're expecting a blow up spot, absolutely,

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I have no issue going five percent over our recommended number. Yeah,

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're in lockstep there too. I mean,

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>as much as we've talked about Chris Conley already, it's

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a really really good spot. Again, we should see some

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>points back and forth here between the Jaguars and the

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Texas Gardner Minshew is playing well and they've developed quite

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a connection. So I'm with you on that one totally.

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. Uh So, anyways, Chris Connley again this week.

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>If you want to spend over and make sure you

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>get it and make sure you put him in ahead,

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>do it. If I would rather have a one week

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>fill in Chris Conley over Deanta Johnson. But if you

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>need somebody that you're hoping to start a little bit

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>longer term, Deontay Johnson maybe the guy. I think that

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:53.320
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. And I'll bring up a few more wide

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 1>receivers here for you as well, Greg, before you laugh,

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>before you get mad at me, and wait for this.

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Danny ammondla the us of Danny Amendola eight receptions in

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 1>back to back games. I don't think that we can

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>just ignore what's going on right now with with Danny

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Emmon doing in the Detroit Lions back to back games, Gregg.

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>During that span, he leads the Detroit Lions and targets

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five percent of their target share, played of their

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>snaps during that span as well. And I want exposure

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Detroit Lions passing attack, Greg, They currently ranked

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>fifth in the NFL two eighty two points seven passing

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. Danny Amendol is going up against the

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Oakland Raiders. You want to talk about a player you

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>might only play for one week, that's perfectly fine. The

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Oakland Raiders are allowing the fourth most fantasy points to

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers this season. We just saw DeAndre Hopkins have

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a big game. We were expecting a bigger game out

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of Kenny Stills. It didn't come. But I think based

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>on the usage of Danny Amendol these past two weeks,

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Greg the fact that he has eight receptions in each

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of these past two games, and it's a good spot

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.160
<v Speaker 1>against Oakland. I do like Danny Amendola in the spot.

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Probably not gonna do the Danny Amendol thing unless you're

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely desperate. Well, I like, you know, two to three

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to three bucks. Couple of other names worth mentioning. Alex

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Ericson could be a security blanket for new Cincinnative Anglo

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>starter Ryan Finley and Dalton Bench on his birthday during

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the bye Ericson won't cost you much. I probably would

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 1>wait till midwek to pick him up because if he's

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>still out there, probably not picking him up with a

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>bye week this week, So alex Ericson certainly long term name.

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Another name I want to mention this to Marius Thomas.

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>If Robbie Anderson has traded in the next hour and

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a half to Marius Thomas along with Jamison Crowdig with

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the one A and one B four Sam Donald, We've

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>seen to Marius Thomas targets be pretty steady around five

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:31.719
<v Speaker 1>since Donald returning the stary in the lineup. I think

0:30:31.800 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to Marius Thomas, if he's out there, worth pickup. Yeah,

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that makes a lot of sense. And the

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Jets are shopping everyone again. We we just spoke about

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>this and Robby Anderson is up for sale as well.

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>The upcoming schedule the Dolphins, the Giants. Domminson out is

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Adien Hour who's been put on I R. You've been

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>put on I R so used. I mean you're using

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>every player against the Dolphins anyway, but specifically wide receiver

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be very valuable. The Dolphins, Giants, Washington, Oakland, Cincinnati,

0:30:56.280 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Miami Again. The next three games coming up for the

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>New York Tests are really good. So I agree with

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Greg pay attention to Damarrius Thomas. Absolutely right. We'll take

0:31:06.960 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a break when we come back. The streaming portion of

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the program Quarterbacks, tight ends, and defenses. We'll tell you

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>what we're thinking next. Are you ready for the nation's

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>first and only free, twenty four hour network dedicated to you,

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the betting and fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you with a real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>unlike anything you've ever seen before. Located both in the

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>heart of New York City and inside the FanDuel Sports

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Book at the Metal Ends, sports Crade's live eighteen hours

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a day here to serve you the fanatic. This is

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Sports Grade, get off the grid, bag with you final

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes or so the program here. They're loyal watchers

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and news so they now fifteen minutes ago, Greg, let's go,

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so they know the wider series. And we didn't get

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a chance to mention yet. I did want to mention

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Josh Reynolds as another STASH candidate here. Brandon Cooks dealing

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>with his second concussion of the season. We saw Sterling

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Shepard suffer from his second concussion and missed three games

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in a row, So personally I think that Brandon Cooks

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to miss some time. This is more of

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a deeper league stash. But Josh Reynolds first game in

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>here played eighty nine percent of the Snash ran thirty

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>one routes on thirty four Jared Golf dropbacks, Josh Reynolds

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy three yards and a touchdown in that game. Greg

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>eight targets, so came in and was was instantly targeted

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>more than Robert Woods and Gerald Everett had three red

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 1>zone targets and two end zone targets last year when

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>he took over for Cooper Cup from week eleven on,

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>he was wide receiver thirty five overall. So I think

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>there's some value with Josh Reynolds Reynolds in deeper leagues.

0:32:58.160 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Zach Pascal, I understand the production was there this past week,

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>but he actually just played a season high of the snaps.

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>He ran thirty four routes on thirty seven to Kobe

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Brissette drop backs, which was also a season high for him.

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think, Zach Pascal, if we continue to see

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>him play this much, the production will come. He had

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good connection with which Kobe Persette going into

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>last week of the production just wasn't there. The Broncos

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 1>have been good against wide receivers. The last name I

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>threw out there Greg again more of a deeper league,

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Guy Russell, Gauge, our guy Michael Florio, former best friend forever,

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of an oxy moron. Russell Gauge is the new

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>slot receiver for the Atlanta Falcons. He ran twenty four

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>slot routes. He had eight slot targets, six slot receptions,

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and fifty one slot yards he played of the snaps overall,

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I expect after the bye Matt Ryan is back. This

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Falcons defense is still very bad. They're playing from behind

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of games. They're throwing the ball. That

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>means obviously Julio, Calvin Ridley, and Houston Hooper are gonna

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>get there's but there might be some targets available for

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Russell Gauge as well. We saw Mohammedan who have value

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>earlier on in the season. You mentioned Austin Hoover, Austin

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Whover on a by this week, so people are going

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to need to replace him at the tite end spot,

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>and also, well all the other side ends in the

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>league stuck, so you need a new side end. Who's

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the number one guy this week? So I think that

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>there's a few names that are kind of up for

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>discussion here between Chris Herndon, Darren Fells, Dallas Goddard, John

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Who Smith. I think Noah Fan is interesting as well.

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's five different tight ends. We'll start off with

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris Herndon, Greg Ryan Griffin coming off a game where

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 1>he just scored two touchdowns. He has run a hundred

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and sixty eight routes so far this year at the

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>tight end position that ranks seventeen. I kind of wanted

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to bounce this off of you as well. Do you

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.720
<v Speaker 1>think the hype for Chris Herndon is a warranted Greg

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and b when he comes back? Do you think Ryan

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Griffin just completely goes away. He's performed pretty well. Yeah,

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Grimming totally goes away. I think Chris Herndon

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>um is the number one tight end there. But I

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 1>will say from watching this past week with Griffin scoring

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>those two touchdowns, maybe excited any Chris Herndon owner like

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>what he could do, especially if this team trade Robby

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Anderson in the next hour or so. Chris Herndon, They're

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna really rely on him, and I think he could

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>be somebody, And I'm sure I feel like he's ownly

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of places now, but I know there's a

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of people banging on Chris Herndon being good at

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>least last week in the indication he could be. He's

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>only twenty percent owned in Yahoo League, so he is

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>available there. I'll throwout Darren Fells obviously, uh the thirty

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>three year old breakout season here for Darren Fells just

0:35:26.680 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 1>scored two touchdowns this past week and in their first game.

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>This is what I found most interesting, Greg, their first

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:36.080
<v Speaker 1>game without Will Fuller in the lineup here because of

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the injury. He was second on the team and targets.

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:40.000
<v Speaker 1>We all thought that Kenny Stills was going to be

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that guy. Well it was really Darren Fells who stepped

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 1>up here second on the team and targets, caught all

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>six of his targets again, had two touchdowns going up

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>against the Jacksonville Jaguars this week. The only the only

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that makes me slightly hesitant is that on the

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>season he does split time with Jordan Aikins, and Jordan

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Aikins has actually run more routes on the season than

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Darren Fells, So keep that in mind. Greg Dallas Goddard

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>yep eating into all of the production for Zach Orts.

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>I own zach Ertz in the league. It's been really,

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>really frustrating. Over the past three weeks, Dallas Goddard twelve

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:13.319
<v Speaker 1>receptions dred and thirty nine yards and two touchdowns on

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 1>sixteen targets during that same span, zach Ertz eight receptions,

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>one and twelve yards, zero touchdowns on seventeen targets. Goddard

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>four red zone targets to UH two end zone targets,

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:29.280
<v Speaker 1>zach ERT's three red zone targets, zero end zone targets.

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So once they get into that area of the field,

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the teams like they are utilizing Dallas Goddard a little

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>bit more, which is crazy because Earth's overall is playing

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>way more. He's running way more routes thirty one routes

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>for game over these past three while Dallas Goddard is

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.000
<v Speaker 1>only at nineteen point seven. Greg of all these tight

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>end names that we mentioned, Chris Herndon, Darren Fells, Dallas Goddard,

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, John hu Smith just had a touchdown. But

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Adam Levitts hand pointed this out on Twitter that Anthony

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>firkser Ran played a lot of snaps, ran more routes

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 1>high schools and ran more, ran more slot routes as well.

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 1>What I went to my high school, he went to

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>here high school and you you and him are boys. Andrew, Oh,

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Ferkshire went to your high school? So that are

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you interested in Andrew Ferkster? No Smith? Uh? Yeah. So

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>all these guys that you've mentioned, they all make sense

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 1>for in their own way, but they all have deficiencies,

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 1>right Like they have another tight end who either plays

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>or is targeted, and you just whatever, this is the

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>nature of the tight end position. Yeah, it's literally close

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>your eyes, point at the screen and pick which everyone comes. Personally,

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>I would rank them Chris Herndon, Darren Fells, probably Dallas

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>god or over, John Hu Smith de Laney Walker is

0:37:43.600 --> 0:37:47.919
<v Speaker 1>probably going to be back. But they're un They're they're

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>utilizing God. Are in the red zone, and that's what

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you want, right Like you want red zone targets your

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 1>tight end. He does. But a lot of these tight

0:37:56.120 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>ends have other tight ends that are also playing, right

0:37:58.640 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Like Darren Fells has nakeds, John Smith has Anthony Ferkster,

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Lanny Walker, and then there's no a fan who you

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>want to be excited about. The eight targets, five receptions,

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.560
<v Speaker 1>all season highs play of the snaps. But now he's

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Allen as his quarterback. So I mean, unless you

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>think Brandon Allen's gonna lean on the tighten. Yeah, So

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I think No A Fan is probably the one that

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>goes higher for me than the rest of these guys.

0:38:19.920 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Chris Herndon's hire you ranking these guys, So Chris Herndon

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.880
<v Speaker 1>will be number one for me, then probably Darren Fells,

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>then No A Fan than Johnny Smith, then Dallas Goddard

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.319
<v Speaker 1>for me got her last out of Okay, I'm gonna

0:38:30.320 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 1>have No A Fan lash just because I don't know

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>what to expect from Brandon now he's gotta throw to

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody he does. But Cortland Sutton's there and he's still

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>really good. Play this week they are going up against

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns, so we're taking out cortlandt that makes sense,

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe more maybe more no offense, Yeah, yeah, that might

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>make sense. He I know the Browns have allowed four

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.279
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns to tight end so far this season as well,

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:56.479
<v Speaker 1>so I would rank it Herndon, Darren Fells. I still

0:38:56.520 --> 0:38:58.399
<v Speaker 1>think I'd go with Goddard just because of the way

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that they're utilizing him in the red zone. And then

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll go to a Fan and then I'll go John

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 1>new Smith. All right, let me go up to the

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>quarterback position. If you streat me a quarterback, there's a

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of them on by this week. Um, where are

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you looking? I know you talked about this on the

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:11.360
<v Speaker 1>fan duel. Hurry up yesterday. Where are you looking at?

0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Who your top quarterbacks in the market? Yeah, I'm going

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:16.000
<v Speaker 1>back to the Minshoe musta as Gardner Minshew finished QB

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:18.719
<v Speaker 1>five in Week eight two hundred and seventy nine yards

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and three touchdowns on the season, actually ranks fifth among

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.279
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks with two hundred and one rushing yards so far

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:26.880
<v Speaker 1>this season. Going up against the Texans I mentioned earlier,

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I like Chris Conley. Let's remain consistent. I gotta like

0:39:29.600 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the guy who's throwing him the ball as well. The

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Texans have allowed three passing touchdowns in four straight games.

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>If Gardner Minshew has already owned Derek Carr the Raiders offense,

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Greig is playing really well this year six point two

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>yards per play on offense. That's fourth best in the

0:39:45.160 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 1>entire NFL. Two undred and eighty five yards and three

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns this past week for Derek Carr and the Lions

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>have allowed eight passing touchdowns over their last two games.

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>You just saw your boy Danny Johns. Daniel Jones finished

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>as the QB one overall. So for me, it's Minshew,

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr, and then if you're desperate, Sam Donald's going

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:06.879
<v Speaker 1>up against the Dolphins. Even Mason Rudolph threw multiple touchdowns

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:10.720
<v Speaker 1>against this Dolphins defense. Sam Donald has struggled with pressure, Greg,

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Dolphins are last in the NFL and pressure

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:17.240
<v Speaker 1>rate just pressuring the quarterback UM five point two times

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>per game, that is the worst in the NFL. I

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>know that you're a big fan of the Seeing Ghost comment.

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>It's Halloween week, Greg, why not? Why not stream Sam Donald?

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I would have no issue shooting Sam Donald against the

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Miami Dolphins. No Xavian Howard, as we said he's out

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:34.920
<v Speaker 1>for the season. Donald could target him. Uh couldn't target

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks for Miami as we saw last night that

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolph did. I Mason Rudolph could do it, Sam

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Donald could do it. Good spot obviously for Donald Donald.

0:40:43.440 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr means you clearly the three guys that are

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>out there this week, I probably lean Derek Carr over

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Minshew. Um, I'll still take Minshew. I just really

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 1>like that matchup. I think we see points go both ways.

0:40:54.239 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 1>I think we see a little bit more Greg, we've

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 1>both played super flexings. More interested in Ryan Finley or

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Drew Probably Ryan Finley because Drew locks on the starter

0:41:02.239 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>right now he's not, But I think it sooner rather

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>than later we will get Drew lock as he starting quarterback.

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:11.439
<v Speaker 1>But I do agree with you. I think its super

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:14.239
<v Speaker 1>flex leagues. They're both worth dashing. Obviously, the Bengals are

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:17.240
<v Speaker 1>on a bye. They benched Andy Dalton today on his birthday.

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Kind of messed up, I guess, but it is what

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it is there oh and eight and they want to

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 1>see what they have and right on his birthday. What's

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:25.680
<v Speaker 1>at least he had off on his birthday? That's fine.

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Can I have off on my birthday? A right, it's

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 1>a weekend? Perfect? How about the day before? But you

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>can't because I'm off, So you can't be off? Oh oh,

0:41:35.239 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you just want to take off your wedding, Greg, Maybe

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:38.640
<v Speaker 1>my birthday is a little bit more. Giving you off

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.880
<v Speaker 1>for your birthday. It's a weekend, you're off. I'm not

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:45.239
<v Speaker 1>making you work the next day either. I'm working Sundays,

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>not that Sunday and I'm working Sundays. You're off that Sunday.

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:49.520
<v Speaker 1>How about that? Fair enough? Pick up Ryan Finley and

0:41:49.520 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 1>super flex Leaue. All right, Uh, there's the quarterbacks to

0:41:52.160 --> 0:41:54.319
<v Speaker 1>tight ends. Frankie. Let's move on the defense here. What

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>do you think? Obviously, I think the Jets make a

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense. It's going up against the Miami Dolphins.

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:01.560
<v Speaker 1>They can't block anybody ice. We all saw last night

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:05.279
<v Speaker 1>in primetime the Steelers continuously getting after Ryan Fitzpatrick. I

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>would say that the Steelers have a little bit of

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:09.479
<v Speaker 1>a better pass for us than the New York Jets,

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately we should see some sacks and turnovers for

0:42:12.920 --> 0:42:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the j e t S just just end the season

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.280
<v Speaker 1>this week, Craig. I also really like the Cleveland Browns.

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:22.000
<v Speaker 1>They're widely available going up against the Denver Broncos. Normally

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't like defenses traveling to Denver altitude, all that

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>going on. But ultimately, Brandon Allen not sure what to

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>expect from him. I think the Cleveland Browns could have

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>some success. The Browns defense hasn't really been their problem,

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been their offense. So I do like their defense.

0:42:35.440 --> 0:42:37.480
<v Speaker 1>In this spot. I'll throw a few more out there, Greg,

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:39.239
<v Speaker 1>and you tell me which one you like the most.

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Seattle going up against Tampa Bay, Jamis Wintern shooting the

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 1>ball over so much. Philadelphia going up against Chicago Drabinsky

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 1>not good, hold onto the ball too long, could get

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 1>some sacks there. And Dallas going up against your New

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>York Giants. Settle Vers Tam Madge my favorite out of

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>those last three. Tim May, like you said, Jameis Winson

0:42:56.280 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 1>turnover machine, and that's what we're looking at. He has

0:42:58.239 --> 0:43:01.200
<v Speaker 1>ten turnovers over his last two games. That's what we're

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:03.440
<v Speaker 1>looking for them, right. You're not just looking for to

0:43:03.520 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>keep the points down. You're looking for the turnovers, and

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what Jameis Winston provides. Same with Daniel Jones, who

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>has not been able to hold on the football. Once

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you get to him, he seemingly drops the ball constantly,

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:14.359
<v Speaker 1>so those fumbles will be there. The offensive line has

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 1>been bad for the Giants. Finally, I'll go to Philadelphia

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>against Chicago, where we've seen David Montgomery. You have some

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 1>nice games. Obviously Robisky isn't very good and definitely holds

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the ball for too long, but they would be last.

0:43:25.400 --> 0:43:27.680
<v Speaker 1>They would be after Dallas and f of Seattle for me. Great?

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Can I interest you in the Miami Dolphins towing up

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:32.879
<v Speaker 1>against Sam Donald and the Jets? No, you're not gonna

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:35.839
<v Speaker 1>do it all right, just started thrown out there. They

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>are that bad if you're picking up these players, Frankie,

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:41.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously you have to drop some players. Let me ask

0:43:41.400 --> 0:43:43.359
<v Speaker 1>you about a couple of guys. You let me know

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:45.319
<v Speaker 1>if you drop them for some of the hot waiver

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:47.800
<v Speaker 1>wire ads this week, the wide receivers and the running

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.399
<v Speaker 1>backs that we spoke to. Uh last week, the top

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver pick it was Kenny Stills, Jack King Stills,

0:43:53.280 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris Conley. Wow, that's a good one. Um, I don't

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 1>think I would. Would you drop? Mexan's offense is just

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>that much more explosive. Would you drive any of the

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>packer any or all of the packers for Chris Conny

0:44:07.000 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>outside of Davanta Adams? Yes, I would drop all of them. Okay,

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 1>would you drop Let me see, would you would you

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:16.760
<v Speaker 1>pick up me Cole Hardman. No, he scored a touchdown

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>last week, but I just don't think that he's going

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to be involved enough, like they're gonna drop a few

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 1>specific plays for him every single week. But still, Tyreek

0:44:23.560 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Hill still, Sammy Watkins getting back healthy. Travis Kelsey was involved.

0:44:28.400 --> 0:44:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Um maybe in deeper leagues, but in your normal twelve

0:44:31.520 --> 0:44:35.439
<v Speaker 1>teams or anything. Shallower No, no for me? Fair enough? Um,

0:44:35.520 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? Well? We move on? Sorry? Would

0:44:40.040 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 1>you drop? Would you drop the no? What does it

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:47.439
<v Speaker 1>make sense? Either? I think good ones and and I'm

0:44:47.560 --> 0:44:51.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously you're struggling here. B. C. Johnson you can obviously

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:54.720
<v Speaker 1>drop if you picked him up last week. O. J. Howard,

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean yeah, I'm just like I'm looking to the

0:44:57.320 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>highest dropped candidates right now in Yahoo leagues. Those are

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a few that come to mind. Josh Gordon. Obviously you've drop. Josh.

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 1>My My favorite thing is he with the starting Cameron

0:45:08.320 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>rate last week? So J Howard didn't play and they

0:45:10.680 --> 0:45:12.600
<v Speaker 1>thought like, oh my god, carey right. I'm just like

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I was one of those why you you did this? Well?

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 1>You know what I said? I said he would get

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 1>six and seven targets. He had six time. Remember I

0:45:20.280 --> 0:45:22.360
<v Speaker 1>sat here saying like you do this had a touchdown?

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Is a repeat? Didn't he have like a touchdown dropped

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 1>or called back or something? I feel like you should

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 1>have had a touchdown. Art getting a chance to do

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:32.319
<v Speaker 1>it over, You're gonna screw it up again. You're like, yeah, yeah,

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you know what you did. There were a lot of

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>streaming tight ends last week. Greig camemanb Brady was one

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 1>of the ones that failed. Donna Smith worked out. He's

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Frank Stamville. I'm Greg Susman. We'll do it all go tomorrow,

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>we hope. Are you ready for the nation's first and

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 1>only free, twenty four hour network dedicated to you the

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>betting and fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide you

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 1>with a real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence unlike

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 1>anything you ever seen before. Located both in the heart

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 1>of New York City and inside the FanDuel Sports book

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>at the meadow Lands Sports Grade, He's live eighteen hours

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a day. You just serve you the fanatic. This is

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Sports Grade. Get all the gride. What did happen? What

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:27.240
<v Speaker 1>did Here's what you missed on the BFFs. Jalen Samuel

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:29.319
<v Speaker 1>out there and Waivers? Is he your favorite Waiver Wire

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>pick up this week? Probably at the running back position.

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's close between him and Mark Walton. I

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>put out the poll before the show, Greg and surprisingly

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 1>everybody is all over Jalen Samuel's as the top waiver

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>wire add. There are already sixty seven votes on the

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:45.799
<v Speaker 1>pole greg and sixty percent say Jalen Samuels is the

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:48.360
<v Speaker 1>top waiver wire add this week. I think that's with

0:46:48.440 --> 0:46:51.239
<v Speaker 1>the assumption that you know, James Conner might be missing time.

0:46:51.239 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 1>But based on everything we've read so far, it looks

0:46:53.840 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>like James Conner is going to be good to go.

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's close between him and Mark Walton.

0:46:58.680 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I understand the Miami Dolphins are terrible team, but Walton

0:47:00.920 --> 0:47:03.240
<v Speaker 1>played a ton last night. Seven percent of the snaps,

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:05.960
<v Speaker 1>he had eleven carries. He had six targets as well,

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:09.439
<v Speaker 1>so seventeen running back opportunities. I understand it's a bad team,

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>bad offensive line, but you've got some good matchups coming up.

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna face the Jets a couple of times here.

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's close between Samuels and Walton. And

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 1>then I also really really like Chris Conley at the

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver position, but we talk about that a little

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>bit later. Again, all of these guys, specifically from last night,

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I certainly kid an eye on Mark Walton and Kylen

0:47:25.560 --> 0:47:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Bellage just to see the usage. As you said, Mark

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Walton eighty percent of the snaps last night, like Caim

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Malage to get involved in the wildcat inside the red

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:34.439
<v Speaker 1>zone at one point. The problem is his Novince team

0:47:34.480 --> 0:47:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is so bad and their offensive line is terrible, and

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be behind every game. The upside for Mark Walton,

0:47:40.520 --> 0:47:42.439
<v Speaker 1>it's just capped, Like I get it, Like you want

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a a flex play potentially in a bye week, that's

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:48.200
<v Speaker 1>all Mark Walton's good for us. Like I can't even

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:50.279
<v Speaker 1>break the bank for a guy like Walon, even though

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:52.799
<v Speaker 1>he's a starter, because I think that upside is just

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:57.840
<v Speaker 1>so so limited, that is fair. And Jalen Samuel's upside

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 1>is higher assuming that James Connor would have been time,

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know that we can really assume that

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. So I think it's it's the possibility that's

0:48:04.960 --> 0:48:07.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of looming inside of people's minds right now. And

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:10.520
<v Speaker 1>undoubtedly there's more upside if you are the Steelers featured

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>running back as opposed to being the Dolphins featured running back.

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 1>So we'll pay attention to that. But if it if

0:48:16.280 --> 0:48:17.759
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to, you know, having to spend a

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 1>big amount of your fab budget at this point in

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the season. On Jalen Samuel is giving the information that

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:24.759
<v Speaker 1>we have. I don't know that there's that guy this

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>week that you want to spend a ton of fab on.

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:28.959
<v Speaker 1>And thankfully we don't have a Ti Johnson situation either

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:32.480
<v Speaker 1>because that did not work out Greg, But trade Carson.

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we'll get to that. He's on the list. I

0:48:35.320 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 1>know he's on the list. It's called all the guys

0:48:37.000 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 1>um I think worth talking about as well. We're getting

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:42.120
<v Speaker 1>all that will also gonna hit up the streaming quarterbacks.

0:48:42.320 --> 0:48:44.719
<v Speaker 1>What about James? What about Jujuice Smith Chuster from last

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:49.959
<v Speaker 1>night it looked really good obviously. Yeah, that first story

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>was brutal. I mean, just lofted it up there for

0:48:52.719 --> 0:48:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Xavien Howard. Got lucky that Xavier Howard actually left the

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>game or else he might have had more interceptions later on.

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:01.280
<v Speaker 1>But Juju comes through again. Really great matchup, nine targets,

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:03.360
<v Speaker 1>five receptions, a hundred and three yards and a touchdown.

0:49:03.760 --> 0:49:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Is this your cell high opportunity for Juju Smith Schuster?

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:08.239
<v Speaker 1>I would absolutely think so, no question about it. They

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:10.920
<v Speaker 1>played a brutal Miami defense. Mason route up underthrew a

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:13.440
<v Speaker 1>ton of passage. Judic the Schuster had a couple of catches,

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:16.800
<v Speaker 1>great catches in traffic. I'm absolutely using this opportunity to

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:18.280
<v Speaker 1>drade Juice Schuster hide