WEBVTT - Mailbag: D-backs Playoff Odds Tumble After Rockies Debacle

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of Snake's Territory, part

0:00:12.440 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Fouls Territory Network. Be sure to like this video,

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to our YouTube channel, maybe leave us a five

0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>star review wherever you get your podcasts. I am Jesse

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Friedman alongside Jack Summers and Jack This was not great

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Arizona Diamondbacks. They have lost a series. First

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>time they've lost a series in quite some time. I

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>believe they had either one or split ten consecutive series.

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>This time they're back in the lost column and it

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>comes against no other team than the Colorado Rockies. Not

0:00:45.400 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>not a great homestand for this Diamondbacks team.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean just stunning that they would lose a

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 2>homestand to the Rockies.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Obviously.

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I tried to take a glass half full approach in

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 2>viewing this the night before, thinking well, okay, it's one game,

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 2>it happens. But the way today's game went down, the

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 2>way they lost it was probably one of the most

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 2>painful losses for just about any Diamondbacks fan to watch,

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 2>most aggravating. And you can pretty much sense too that

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Tory felt the same way in his postgame comments. I mean,

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 2>he was really grinding through his presser.

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to the offense here in a second. Certainly

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the offense was a big part of the storyline that

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Diamondbacks had their opportunities in this game, for sure. But

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>let's start with Merrill Kelly. Five innings from him, six hits,

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>six runs, three walks, two strikeouts. He gave up a

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of very costly home runs, the biggest one coming

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in at the top of the second inning. D Backs

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>had just put a run on the board, taken a

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>one nothing lead in the bottom of the first, and

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>then Brett Sullivan after the Rockies already got a run

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>on the board in that inning, Brett Sullivan comes out

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.559
<v Speaker 1>of nowhere and hits a three run home run off

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the right field foul pole with two outs, and suddenly

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the Diamondbacks were in a pretty big hole early on

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in this game. A couple of innings later, Zach vine

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>who I will be honest, I have not thought about

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Zach Vien in quite some time. He was at one

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>point a pretty big time Rockies prospect. Kind of disappeared

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>here over the last several seasons, but he made his

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>way back to the majors, and this was his first

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>game back in twenty twenty six, he had a two

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>run home run against Marrill Kelly in the fourth inning

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.959
<v Speaker 1>that gave the Rockies a six to one lead. And yes,

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the Diamondbacks had their chances. Jack, We'll get to the

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>offense in a moment, but Mary Kelly just has been

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent this season. I know there's been more good than

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 1>bad recently, and I think we should keep that in mind.

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>But this was a really rough one against a subpar

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>offense in Colorado.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know, it's funny.

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Just as that second inning started, I saw a couple

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 2>of Armside misses in one of the earlier at bats

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.240
<v Speaker 2>in the inning, and I'm like, not this again, you know,

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>And I get when I start seeing just you know,

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 2>armside misses, and he kind of gives like a little

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 2>disgusted kick sideways when he when he knows he let

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 2>it out there, And just right away, I'm like, he's

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna have.

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 3>A tough game here. I can just tell you know

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 3>that the.

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Home run of Sullivan, I mean, you know, he had

0:03:23.400 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 2>gotten two outs, he had put two on, had gotten

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 2>two outs.

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 3>One was a line out.

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 2>To Perdomo, and then he falls behind three and one

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 2>and just like oh boy. And sure enough he just

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 2>puts one in the left hand batter's happy zone down

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 2>and in and Sullivan, you know, golfed it up off

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the foul hole. Just you know, the win expectancy for

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 2>that was a twenty six percent change in that one

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 2>swing right heading.

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 3>You know, before he hit that home run, it.

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Was basically a fifty to fifty game, fifty point win

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 2>percentage for the Diamondbacks. That one swing dropped him to

0:03:59.080 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty four point six percent. That was the single biggest

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 2>event of the game when it comes to win probability.

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was. It was a big blow, no doubt.

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately for Meryl, home runs have been a pretty

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>big issue for him. He's now one point eight home

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.039
<v Speaker 1>runs per nine for the season, twenty five homers allowed

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in one hundred and twenty five innings. That's a that's

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a really big number when you look at you know,

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>recent seasons for him. Last year, in one hundred and

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>eighty four innings, Merril allowed twenty three home runs. So

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>he's already above that here in twenty twenty six. And

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 1>I think with Meryl Jack we've been We've been telling

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>ourselves for a while, like, okay, even though he's not

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>striking out a ton of guys, even though he's still

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>walking a few more than you'd like, He's starting to

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>get some softer contact. He's starting to get at least

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>good results, even though he hasn't been pitching super deep

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>into games unfortunately. Just as kind of an objective, I

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>think if you, if you kind of separate yourself from

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>what Meryl has meant to this organization the past few years,

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the reality is, I don't think anyone is looking at

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>his numbers this season and seeing a pitcher that you

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>really want pitching for you in a Pennant chase, right,

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the numbers just kind of are what they are.

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he has a five to eleven ERA, he

0:05:19.160 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>has a five point seven to one FIP, he has

0:05:21.200 --> 0:05:24.119
<v Speaker 1>a four point nine to eight x FIP. His expected ERA,

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I think is still well over six. That number has

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>been way up there the whole season, and so I

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>still don't really know what the solution is here. I

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>know his VLO was down a little bit in this one,

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that was a factor. Yeah, I was a

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>tick and a half. It was kind of it was

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of a lot. But still, I mean, you look

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>at his stuff, you know, the movement the VLO for

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the entire season, it's not that different from a year ago.

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>And I just keep going back to the zone rate,

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Like what percentage of Merrill Kelly's pitches is he throwing

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>in the zone in this game? It was thirty nine percent,

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>And that's just it's just way too low. And even

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.280
<v Speaker 1>as Kelly has gotten better results here in recent games,

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>most of these games he's still he still just hasn't

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>been throwing enough strikes. He's gotten away with it at times,

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but not in this game against the Rockies.

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know the Rockies broadcast. I mean I'm paraphrasing

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 2>a little bit here, but essentially, you know, there was

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 2>a comment Merrill just doesn't have the stuff.

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Anymore to do what he used to do.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:30.279
<v Speaker 2>So he nibbles a lot, and if you're patient, you're

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 2>going to get something to hit. And I think that,

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, that's part of it. I mean, obviously he's

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 2>trying to nibble a lot of times. Those nibbles are

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 2>actually not even very competitive pitches. But you know, if

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 2>the hitters are patient, they're getting something to hit and

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 2>they're doing a lot of damage on it. I know

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 2>that the metrics and the things that we look at

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 2>numerically probably tell us that the stuff isn't that much different.

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 2>But the hitters are telling us the stuff is different.

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 2>It's not as good hitters. Hitters are telling this by

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the swings that you're taking and the damage that you're doing.

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. I mean, I'm not here to say that,

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the movement numbers and the vlow that we

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>can see like that's the end all be all there.

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>There certainly could be something more going on. I just

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>keep going back to like, well, there's a big difference

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>between a two to one count and a one to

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>two count, you know, or three to one in two,

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and Merrill just keeps winding up on the wrong side

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of that over and over again. I think that can

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 1>really have an outsized impact for you know, a picture

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of his type switching gears to the offense. The Diamondbacks

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>set up plenty of chances to pick up Meryl in

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>this one. Unfortunately, they they they made a comeback, they

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>made it a little interesting, but they weren't able to

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>come all the way back. They did score a run

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in the bottom half of the fifth inning that came

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>on a Gabby Moreno RBI double. Corbyn Carroll hit a

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.239
<v Speaker 1>home run late as well. That was this one hundredth

0:07:57.320 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>of his career, which was pretty cool to see. Man,

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>it felt like the Diamondbacks had the bases loaded just

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>about every inning, Jack and you know, they were able

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to get a run across here or there, but it

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>just was not nearly enough. They wind up leaving fifteen

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>on base in this game.

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, you know, in the fifth inning when

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Gabby had that RBI double, he gets it done there. Paedomo,

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 2>by the way, made a really nice hustle tag to

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 2>get himself into scoring position on that. But you know,

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Nolan taps out with the bases loaded with a week

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 2>round out to short in the sixth inning, you know,

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 2>with two outs, Corbyn Walks just missed a three run homer.

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 3>It hit went over the bullpen. You know, Gaby gets called.

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Looking on the chat that at bat, I mean, he

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 2>gets called out, you know, looking on a pitch that

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 2>was challenged for the strikeout. And prior to that, Gabby

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 2>had a challenge twice just to stay in the bat.

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 2>The home played umpire missed by multiple inches twice, and

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 2>that at bat to Gabby pitches way above the zone,

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.319
<v Speaker 2>like not even close. The guy had a bad day.

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 2>There were numerous other situations, you know, But then you

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 2>go like bases loaded, nobody out in the seventh Kepler

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 2>pops out, Vargas, Pinch hits for Tower and he walks

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 2>in a run. And then this was the next biggest

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 2>The second biggest swing of the game was Waldy's five

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 2>four to three double play. That was the second biggest

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 2>WPA the game. That was worth negative twenty percent to

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 2>the win percentage. They had actually gotten back to within

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 2>striking distance twenty seven point four percent. I mean, you know,

0:09:30.920 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 2>it's a six three ball game. One out, bases loaded,

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 2>seventh inning, you know, you get something done there and

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 2>now you're you're getting back close to fifty percent. Instead

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 2>he hits into the double play, the win expectancy drops

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty percent and down to seven point one percent, and

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 2>that essentially, you know, pop back up a little bit,

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 2>like you said when Corbyn homered.

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 3>The other thing is, you know.

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Nolan did not have a good game, you know, and

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 2>it needs to be said. If you look at the

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 2>average leverage index or the player leverage index, Nolan's index

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 2>is the highest amongst the qualified batters on the team.

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 2>In other words, he's actually had the most high leverage

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 2>key situations and he's got a negative DPA WPA of

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 2>minus one, maybe even a little higher than that after

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 2>today's game, So you know, I mean, Dolan's come through

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 2>with some big hits, but at the same time, the

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 2>full season one hundred and twenty games numbers, when you

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 2>add them all up, he's actually fairly negative. I mean,

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.719
<v Speaker 2>he's got the largest negative WPA amongst the starteus that

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 2>have qualified that are qualified for the batting title.

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think overall, like Nolan is still

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to be upset with what he's given the

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Diamondbacks this season. He's probably going to hit twenty home runs,

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>but it is a good point that the context and

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the timing of those hits does matter, and there have

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>been some big ones there, but there have also been

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of situations like what we saw in this game,

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>where he's just not able to come through in one

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of those key moments. Unfortunately, Jack, the San Diego Padres

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>just continue to win. They beat the Milwaukee Brewers in

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 1>eleven innings today, found a way to score two runs

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in the bottom half of the eleventh inning, to walk

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it off. So this is where the standings sit right now.

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>The Padres now have sole possession of the second wild

0:11:27.280 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>card spot there at sixty five and fifty seven. The

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Phillies lost again. They're not exactly cruising right now. They

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>lost seven to one to Saint Louis today, So the

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Phillies and Diamondbacks are now tied for that third wildcard

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 1>spot at sixty four and fifty eight. Dbacs technically have

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the tiebreaker there. I guess that's something we should keep

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.600
<v Speaker 1>an eye on. They took two out of three from

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia earlier in the season. There's another series between those

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>two teams here in a couple of weeks. The Marlins

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>have crept back up in this thing. They're only a

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>game and a half out. The Cardinals are two and

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a half games. Really nice series from them against Philly,

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the Nationals, Reds, and Pirates all between five

0:12:06.559 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and six games out here as we record on Wednesday nights.

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>So the Diamondbacks playoff odds have effectively been a coin

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 1>flip for a while now. They've been a little over

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent. Now they're a little under fifty percent depending

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on where you look. Fangrafts has them at forty two

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>point eight right now. But unfortunately, we've reached the point,

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Jack where I think the projection systems are going to

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>favor the Padres and the Phillies over this Diamondbacks team.

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>They're now inarguably the worst position out of those three teams.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and it's because they have an offense that just

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 2>does not project on paper to be able to get

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 2>the job done at this point. Even though Katel and

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 2>Corbyn are clearly starting to turn it around, there's just

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 2>not enough support there, yeah, you know, and it's just

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>showing up in game after game, like, Okay, we have

0:12:58.000 --> 0:12:59.679
<v Speaker 2>a nice little stretch there where the bottom of the

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:03.559
<v Speaker 2>line was doing really well and Corbyn and Catel weren't hitting.

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Now those guys are starting to turn it on and

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>the bottom of the order is starting to look like

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 2>the role players that they are. And you know, unfortunately

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Lars Newbar has not come in and had any positive

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 2>impact yet. I don't know if from when he will,

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, I mean, he really has struggled a lot

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 2>since coming back from He did have a good June,

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 2>but other than that, he's struggled for you know, better

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 2>part of two years now, and we know well that

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 2>he went through a really tough time with a surgery.

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 2>But you know, that guy's got to start doing something.

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna start contributing otherwise it's really going to be

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 2>a very tough look for my kasm.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's no getting around that. The Diamondbacks only made

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>one move at the trade deadline and it was to

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>go get Lar's new bar. So still a lot of

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>time left. He's only played. You know, we're still about

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a week or so of games at this point from him.

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Lots of time to turn things around. But I guess

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not a disaster of a Homestand for the Dbacks, when

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you look all the way back, you know, they split

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the series with San Diego, they take two out of

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>three from LA and then they come right back and

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>lose two out of three to Colorado. I guess if

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>those outcomes had been swapped, like maybe everyone's just like, well, yeah,

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:24.480
<v Speaker 1>you're probably gonna lose two out of three to the

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers and winning two out of three to the Rockies

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is totally fine, and maybe there's not so much negativity

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>right now. But losing to this Rockies team at home,

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>especially while the San Diego Padres go out and sweep

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the Brewers, who came into that series with the best

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>record in baseball. The optics are just not great right now. Well,

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a mail bag episode and we are excited

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to dive into all of your mail bag questions. So

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>with that said, don't go anywhere. We'll be back right

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>after this here on Snake's territory.

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk Aboutletox, shall we. They have apparel for every season.

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 4>We're wearing it as we talk about it. It's soft,

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 4>it's comfortable. I wear it on the show sometimes on FT.

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 4>What else do you love about it?

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 5>Krats, Well, I have it on right now and I'm

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 5>all about quality. But you know what, you know how

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 5>good your clothes are when you're a parent and your

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 5>kids keep stealing all of it. My daughter stole the sweatshirt,

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 5>my son sole one of my t shirts. So it's

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 5>got to be nice looking.

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 4>And if it gets a little bit chillier, then it's

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 4>layering season and they've got layers for the fall. Shop

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 4>now at fabletics dot com slash foul to get seventy

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 4>to eighty percent off everything when you sign up as

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 4>a new VIP. Take a quick style quiz and be

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 4>sure to select foul when prompted to unlock this offer.

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 4>This is a limited time offer, so do not wait again.

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 4>That's fabletics dot com slash foul for seventy to eighty

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 4>percent off everything as a new VIP.

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Snake's Territory. Thank you all for being here.

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>We really appreciate your time. If you haven't already, it

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>really helps us out if you would drop a like

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on this video while you're at it, subscribe to the channel,

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>hit the bell icon for notifications so you never miss

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>an episode of the show. Maybe get a cool hat

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>like the one that Jack is wearing or a cool

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>T shirt like the one that I am wearing. You

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>can get those over at Snake's territoryshop dot com. And finally,

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>for joining us on Apple Podcasts or Spotify, it also

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>really helps us out if you would leave us a

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 1>five star review. With that, we're gonna go ahead and

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>jump on into the mailbag, one of our favorite things

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to do here on Snake's Territory. Our first question comes

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>from y e roc three one zero three over on Reddit.

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>They say, how would you rate Tory's performance so far

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>this season? If we miss the playoffs by a game

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>or two. Has he done enough with this group to

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>justify renewing his contract? Jack, what do you think?

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 2>I think very much that he must make the playoffs

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 2>in order to be brought back, and maybe even just

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 2>winning a while, you know, getting to the wildcard and

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 2>losing two games out of three in the wild card

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 2>or something that might precipitate him not being brought back

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 2>as well. I think they need to make the playoffs

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and maybe even need to win their first round for

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 2>him to be able to continue as the manager of

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:28.160
<v Speaker 2>the Arizona Diamondbacks. As far as assessing the job he's

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 2>doing this year, it's so hard. I mean, look, I

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 2>get a little tired of all the Tory arguments and

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Tory debates because most of it's just simply coming from frustration,

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, and the off site. Well, they're not making

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs and you haven't made playoffs in ten years,

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.199
<v Speaker 2>and you know, look, you work with what you have,

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 2>and every time you point out that a lot of

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 2>times he hasn't had the best rosters and oftentimes had

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>lousy bullpens, it's like, oh, you're a Tori apologist, and

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 2>you know it's like I'm not for ready, it's so tired.

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 3>But what I want I want, I want to look

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 3>at this subjectively real quick.

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:08.479
<v Speaker 2>I often like to look at the fangrafs, Pythogoreean and

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 2>base runs standings versus actual And now that doesn't mean

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 2>if there's a big difference there, it's necessarily the manager

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 2>that's all responsible for that. But that's where maybe you

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 2>can tease out, like some of that difference is going

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 2>to be perhaps due to what's.

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Going on from the dugout.

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 2>So coming into today, the Diamondbacks were sixty four and

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 2>fifty seven, and their Python Gaorean one loss, which is

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 2>based on runs scored and runs allowed, was sixty two

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 2>and fifty nine, So there were two games better than

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 2>there in their actual then versus their pythagoreeon. The other

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 2>number to look at is the base runs, which is

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.639
<v Speaker 2>base runs is what you do as far as without sequencing,

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 2>So it's all of the events. It's all of the hits, walks, homers, strikeouts,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 2>everything that happens, but ignoring sequencing, ignoring clutch, ignoring runners

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 2>in scoring position, it's how many runs you should have

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 2>scored based on these events, and on that metric they're

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 2>sixty and sixty one, So in other words, they've been

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 2>four games better than their base runs. You can find

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 2>all this that fangrafs under their standings tab. So what

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 2>does that mean? Basically, the Diamondbacks actual one loss record

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 2>has outperformed they're expected one loss based on runs scored

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 2>and runs allowed, and it's all. They've also exceeded their

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:49.719
<v Speaker 2>one loss based on expected runs. So most of that

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 2>is luck or sequencing or just you know, the way

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 2>the ball's bouncing. But if there's any room in there

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 2>to try to tease out, some of that may be

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 2>due to the manager and how he's managed things and

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 2>how him and his coaching staff have managed the players.

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 3>So you can say that the team is.

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Slightly overperforming what they should have gotten wins wise. Now

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 2>it's a double edged sword because I'm talking about twenty

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 2>twenty six. If you go back to previous years, Tory

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 2>would more frequently be on the negative side of this ledger.

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>That's all really good stuff. I don't have a whole

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>lot to add other than to just say I think

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it's funny that I want to say. It was two

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>days ago there was Twitter discourse about whether Tory could

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>win Manager of the Year. You know, like, I think

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>there is a valid case that some people are making

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and now we're like, yeah, you know, I'm sure that's

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.440
<v Speaker 1>how people feel right now. After losing these last two

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>games to the Rocky is like, yeah, it's time to

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>move on from this guy, right, So it feels like

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the narrative here changes every couple of days. I agree

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 1>with you that, Hey, yeah, what were you going to say?

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 2>Who's the narrative? I mean, forget Twitter, right, it's all nonsense.

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I live on I care about.

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Every time they lose two games. It's the same fifty

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 2>people that's retweeting over and over and over and over

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 2>and over and over and over about fire.

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's fair. I don't think it.

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Just brings nothing to the discourse. I mean, I'm not

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 2>saying that there isn't a good evaluation exercise that needs

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 2>to be done here in evaluating Tory Leavello. And that's

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.879
<v Speaker 2>exactly what the front office is doing and what ownership

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.719
<v Speaker 2>is doing. And they're the ones that make the decisions,

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 2>you know. And all I've ever tried to do is

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 2>like bring more light to situations that people may not

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 2>often understand or not have not even understand, just not

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:46.879
<v Speaker 2>have all the information. Yeah, you know, why didn't he

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 2>bring in his picture? Well, my picture has got an

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 2>ice pack on his arm and he.

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Can't pitch today. You know, things like that.

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 2>It's just that that stuff happens all the time, where

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 2>people go off on things that they think they know

0:21:58.400 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 2>and understand, and then when you try to give him

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the information and fill in the blanks that they don't have,

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 2>they go off on you about being a Tory apologist.

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 2>It's like, whatever, it's a boring conversation.

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.439
<v Speaker 1>That's so fun, so much fun. Yeah, I mean, I'm

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in agreement that I think the Dbacks definitely have to

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs for Toy to keep his job. Is

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that fair? I don't know for sure. I don't think

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this roster is awesome on paper, the fact that Dbacks

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>are in this position, as you outlined, like, I think

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a pretty strong case we made the Toy's done

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty good with what he's had. On the other hand,

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>he's been here for a while and this is just

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of the way the game is played. Like when

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 1>your team doesn't make the playoffs for a few years,

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>justified or not, someone's gonna lose their job, and for

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the Diamondbacks, it probably would be Tory Leavello if they're

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not able to get in. So a fun conversation that

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>we'll just leave right there for right now. Our next

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>next question comes from Colton Walker, who said, if you

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>had to say your playoff rotation for the wild Card

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Series right now, who would it be? This is fascinating, Jack,

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you think?

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 2>It's pretty easy for me as of right now this moment.

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean it would be e Rod and fought one

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 2>or two, just depending on how they lined up and

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 2>whose turn it was. You know, they're going to be

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 2>fighting all the way down to the last weekend of

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 2>the season to try to make the playoffs, so it

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 2>really just depends who's available. And Michael Soroka, I mean,

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 2>those are the three guys that I would use. I

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 2>would line those three guys up the best I could.

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm I'm right there with you. It's those three.

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess if you got to an NLCS somehow or

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>or the World Series, you needed a four starting pitcher.

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think as you you'd pick Mitch brad

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>over Merrill Kelly. If you're like going ulter recency bias,

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>I imagine the Diamondbacks would would lean more toward Meryl

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Kelly given his history in the postseason, but maybe Corbin

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Earns is in the picture at that point. The dbacs

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>could have some other options there as well. But yeah,

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 1>the top three is pretty clear. E Rod Soroka fought

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>in in some order. I think is pretty much the

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>clear the clear move there. Our next question comes from

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:20.200
<v Speaker 1>simply underscore. Leo Over on Reddit says, when Lawler comes back,

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>who do we DFA? Does Max Kepler go by at

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that point? Yeah, I think that this is an interesting

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>decision the d Backs are going to have to make

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>really soon, maybe like tomorrow to Jordan Lawler hit another

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>home run for Amarillo today on Wednesday, back to back

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>days with a home run for Lawler there, so he

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>very well could join the Diamondbacks this weekend. You what

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 1>do you think, Jack Well?

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if they option a guy, they'll option Tyler

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 2>Locklear because he's hardly playing, and so the guy that

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 2>they'll send out is likely to be the guy that

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 2>they hardly use. If the DFA or player, it would

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 2>be Kepler. We've been saying for a week now, the

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 2>guy's better start producing. He actually did start producing. A

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 2>bit today. I think, you know, he maybe is turning

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 2>it around, but we still need to see some pop

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 2>out of him. But if they're going to DFA anybody,

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I think they'll DFA him before the DFA Horny Porosa.

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 3>It's my opinion.

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. I mean, Kepler is on the roster

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to do one thing right. It's to hit right handed pitching.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And he did have a decent game today, two for

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>four with a walk, his first good game in quite

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>a while. It feels like, so I think you want

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to see him get on a run. Tyler Locklear did

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.439
<v Speaker 1>have a pinch hit single in what it felt like

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 1>a meaningful spot. He has an eight forty six ops,

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>so it would be kind of a bummer for him

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to get sent down. But based on his usage, as

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you said, like that's kind of a leading indicator there,

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it seems like they would they would

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 1>be more likely to option lockleyer at this juncture than

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to dfa Max Kepp, especially after Kepler just reached base

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>three times. Like that wouldn't the timing there wouldn't feel

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>right to pull the trigger in that regard.

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and look, we're just I don't even know what's

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 2>right at this point. I mean, they're all role players.

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 2>It's not like removing any one of them from the

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 2>roster is going to be this massive change.

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>The main thing is is what's going to get Jordan

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Laller the most playing time? And how well is he

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 2>what is he going to do with it? Yeah, that's

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 2>really the main thing that matters. We're just trying to

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 2>handicap what the team is going to do. I'm not

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 2>invested one way or the other there.

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Our next question comes from officer doot Over on Reddit.

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Is there a world in which Lattel joins the rotation

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and replaces Mitch Bratt. I feel like we will see

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Lttel do a lot better here than Washington because our

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>defense is very good, whereas Washington has some of the

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>worst defensive stats in the league. It's a fair point

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>point Diamondbacks definitely an upgrade in that regard. I don't

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>know Jack, as long as Mitch Brod is pitching like

0:27:06.400 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>he has lost a couple of times out, it's to

0:27:08.640 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Littel might have to sort of wait his turn here.

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean my guess is that at some point Lettel

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 2>we'll get some spot starts. And get an opportunity to

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 2>see what he can do. You know, if Bratt falters

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.359
<v Speaker 2>two or three starts in a row, or even Meryl,

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 2>if he keeps doing what he's doing, if he continues

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 2>to lose velocity, I mean, you know, God forbid, I

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 2>hope he doesn't end up on the I L again,

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 2>because if he does, there's probably not going to be

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 2>enough time to get him ramp back up to help

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 2>in the postseason. So you know, we'll see what happens there.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, I'm just being a little bit alarmist. That

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 2>mile and a half off on the four seam fastball

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 2>for Meryll, two miles off on the cutter, even a mile,

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, losing a tick one point three I think

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 2>on the change.

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 3>Up, that's a red flag, you know.

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, nobody's going to admit it openly initially, but

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 2>you look at the start before he had cramping issues.

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 2>So you know, Latel's probably going to get a chance

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 2>here at some point. We just don't know who he's

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 2>going to get a chance to replace.

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm just picturing a scenario where the d Backs they've

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>got to throw all their best pitchers, you know, in

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.880
<v Speaker 1>order to just get into the playoffs and then you

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>wind up with a game one wild Card series and

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Zach Lttel is on the mound. It would be very

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>funny if that's how things turned out. But hey, you

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>pitched great the other day in long relief and you're

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>coming off two pretty good seasons with the Tampa Bay Rays,

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:35.360
<v Speaker 1>so you never know what Lttel might be capable of. Well,

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>one more question here before we get to a break.

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>It's from our good pal Jeff Irving, who says this

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>team struggles versus right handed pitching maybe the biggest achilles

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>heel of the roster. In my opinion. The bats we

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>have coming back are right handed. Updated thoughts on any

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of the lefty bats and the miners coming up and

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>making an impact later in the season. We were talking

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about this last night. Jack Manny Pania in Triple A.

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>His numbers don't really jump out at you at this point.

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Be a little surprising to see him get a call

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>up in the final month or so of the season.

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Not impossible if he were to rattle off a couple

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of really good weeks, but his ops right now in

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Triple A is seven to twenty four, So I think

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>you'd be also forty nine strikeouts to nine walks, a

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 1>bit of a rough ratio there. Gavin Connacello has has

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>put up some pretty good numbers since being promoted to

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Triple A. Twenty three year old third baseman who does

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>bat left handed. In nineteen games in Triple A, he's

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>hitting three twenty three with a nine to sixty six

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 1>ops eighteen strikeouts to seven walks. Out of the few

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>left handed hitters at that level, he might have the

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>best shot of anyone to get a chance at some

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 1>point here.

0:29:50.880 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, you know, he only had a ninety

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.959
<v Speaker 2>seven WRC plus and three hundred and eleven played appearances

0:29:57.000 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 2>in Double A, and now he's at seventy four PLA

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 2>light appearances, he's got a one to twenty eight WRC plus,

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 2>so for the year.

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 3>He's at one oh three.

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 2>He's on a nice run in Reno, you know, And

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 2>it's a little odd to see him, I guess, you know,

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 2>it depends on the pitching that you're facing and all

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 2>of that. You know, he goes up a level but

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 2>hits better even relative to the league and park adjusted

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 2>and all of that. I didn't get a chance to

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 2>look up his Well, maybe it's sitting there.

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, his x wOBA in Triple A is three forty one. Okay,

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 3>pretty good compare that.

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that that even even for you know,

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 2>three forty one is a pretty good ex wOBA and

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 2>his ex wOBA for the season. Yes, there is still

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 2>three forty one because they only have Triple A numbers,

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 2>so that's a good number. It's a small sample size, right,

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 2>so you know, I don't know if the team is

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 2>going to buy in on that, but maybe he's a

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 2>September crawl up, and you know, maybe they bring him

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 2>up a day or two before September one if they

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 2>really feel like they need another left handed bat. But

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they're just gonna jump straight to a

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty three year old with less than one hundred played

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 2>appearances in Triple A. I just don't think they'll do that.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 2>But it'd be interesting if they did, be kind of fun.

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it seems like if God forbid an

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>injury happened to one of the starting infielders or something,

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that's where maybe something like that, maybe the d Backs

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>just kind of feel forced to pull the trigger on

0:31:21.840 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>something like that. I will mention that Peven Smith and

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Adrian del Castillo are also both in triple A. I

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know if those are the names that people are

0:31:29.400 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly thinking of here, and I think both guys would

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>have to get pretty hot in order to get another shot,

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but certainly not impossible that that that could happen. Well,

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>we have a couple more mail bag questions. They are

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>both very fun, so we hope, we hope you stick around.

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>But for right now, we're going to go ahead and

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about a big game the d Backs are playing

0:31:52.080 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>this weekend in Atlanta. In this on deck presented by

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Fox One's segment, we're talking about Saturday's game, which is

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 1>on Fox You of course could find it with Fox

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 1>one Diamondbacks taking on the Braves on National TV this Saturday.

0:32:16.040 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Jack that game, I'm trying to remember who is on

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the bump for the Diamondbacks in that one. I want

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to say, it's Sieduardo Rodriguez.

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Now you got me, I gotta look it up.

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have a graphic that has it right

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 1>here there.

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 3>It is.

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>It's Erod against Grant Holmes as the pitching matchup in

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that Saturday game. Grant Holmes, who were looking at his

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>underlying stats, his FIP is pretty close to five on

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the season, but his surface level numbers are pretty good.

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a right handed pitcher, and of course that is

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>scary in and of itself. He has a three four

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>seven ERA on the season in one hundred and fourteen innings.

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 1>E Rod Jack, you have to feel pretty good about

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>him anytime he's on the mound at this point.

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, talk about the surprise of the year. Just having

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 2>a daughter. Rodriguez be our security blanket. But it's just

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 2>just no denying how well he's pitched and the pitchability there,

0:33:12.480 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 2>and he's just squeezing every last inch out of his

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 2>stuff by you know, being a crafty veteran. He's mixing

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 2>his pitches, locating there, you know every once in a while.

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, out of his last six starts as two

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 2>clunkers in there and four really good ones. You know,

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 2>he's not reeling off ten straight without a bump in

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the road.

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 3>But he was great his last time out, and of.

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Course he threw that one hundred and fifteen pitch seven

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 2>inning effort to save the bullpen. It's nice that he's

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 2>getting an extra there's a day off in between, and

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 2>now he's getting the extra day day's rest. I think

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 2>that'll help him, especially because.

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 3>It can be a little steamy down there in Hotlanta.

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 1>That is very true, glam Glad. I am not spending

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>my summer out there. In the Colorado series, one thing

0:33:59.520 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I will make offensively for the d Backs Corbyn. Carroll

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>was very good in that series overall. He went four

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.680
<v Speaker 1>four eleven. He hit his one hundredth career home run.

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>As we mentioned, he also had two triples, just the

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.799
<v Speaker 1>one triple one triple one double in addition to the

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 1>two home runs. So a really good series for Corbyn overall.

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of that happening against right handed pitching. I

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>know the home run today was against the lefty, but

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 1>he's a really big part of this offense against Ryde's

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and with someone like Grant Holmes on the mound on Saturday,

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you're you're hoping to see more of this from Corbyn

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 1>as he kind of starts to turn things around here

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Jack and maybe look a little more like himself.

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:42.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, as you know we've said, I mean, the d

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Backs are only going to go as far as the

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 2>stars can take them. They have to you know, carry

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 2>the load, and you know, both him and Katel have

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.720
<v Speaker 2>started to turn it around here, so you know, hopefully

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 2>that carries over and they just get a little bit

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 2>more support. Tough Braves have a great pitching staff. You know,

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 2>they have excellent bullpen. I mean basically the best bullpen

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 2>in majors. So you're gonna have to get to their

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 2>starters early because it's a lot of six inning games

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 2>in Atlanta.

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, MLB on Fox is streaming on Fox one. The

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Race to October starts now, and we have your front

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>row seat to the wildest walkoffs, lights out pitching, and

0:35:23.160 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 1>clutch plays all season long. Follow every can't miss matchup

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 1>as teams battle for a spot in the postseason. Then

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>stream the twenty twenty six World Series live on Fox

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:38.240
<v Speaker 1>one at home or on the go live or on demand,

0:35:38.360 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>never miss a moment. Stream now, Well, Jack, we have

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.200
<v Speaker 1>two more mail back questions to go, and these ones

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>are both very fun. This one comes from Rebel King

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty three, who says, fun question time for both

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Jesse and Jack. If you could somehow add one former

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>diamondback in their prime to the team right now, whether

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's at a playoff run, who would it be and why?

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I went back and forth and back and forth on this,

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But Jack, I'm gonna give you the first shot at

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this one. Who who do you got?

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I am?

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 2>You know we by the way, we did not share

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 2>our answers with each other, but I know we're thinking

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 2>exactly the same thing. Do you want a left handed

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 2>hitter or do you want a first basement?

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh?

0:36:24.560 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 1>So you're giving me the option. Am I supposed to pick?

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 2>Well? I mean in my mind, like you know, I'm

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 2>it's like, what do I need more? Do I need

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 2>a left handed bat or do I need a first basement? Yeah,

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 2>it's one of those two. Now, if it's a left

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 2>handed bat, we know who it is. And if it's

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:46.959
<v Speaker 2>a first basement, we know who it is. Yeahsalas, Louis

0:36:47.000 --> 0:36:48.359
<v Speaker 2>Gonzales or.

0:36:50.040 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 3>Paul Goldschmidt.

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 2>And if I got to pick one, I'm gonna go

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Louis Gonzalez because his peak season two thousand and one

0:36:59.280 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 2>was the most impact.

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is very compelling. I was I was thinking

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a two thousand and one Gonzo as well. He had

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>an eleven fifty one ops against right handed pitching that year,

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>forty two home runs just against righty's one hundred RBI.

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>That'll certainly play and would be very nice in the

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>middle of this Diamondbacks lineup. I also was kind of

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>tripped up on the positional thing, like, oh, but a

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>first baseman would like really fit the roster better, So

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe you just take like twenty fifteen Paul Goldschmidt, he

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.760
<v Speaker 1>had a one to fifty six WRC plus against righty's

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that year, Like, that'll work as well. But the other

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>name that I was fumbling around and trying to figure

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:44.719
<v Speaker 1>this out what was causing me some pause was I

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 1>was also like, maybe you just want Randy Johnson because

0:37:48.880 --> 0:37:52.319
<v Speaker 1>he's Randy Johnson, And like, who cares how many runs

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you score if you can have Randy Johnson pitching for you, right.

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But I just think of the twenty fourteen they

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 2>had Randy Johnson pitching at a say young level, and

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 2>he only went sixteen and fourteen because the team couldn't hit,

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:09.240
<v Speaker 2>So you still need runs.

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>That's true. I like to think that this Diamondbacks offense

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is a little more confident than the two thousand and

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:19.520
<v Speaker 1>four offense that was a little rough. But yeah, it's

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a fair point. It's a fair point. Gonzo was my

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>number one option with Goldie and Randy Johnson, We're both

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:28.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of in the mix. For me, this question does

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>have a part two. The bonus question here is if

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you could magically add anyone in the league currently to

0:38:35.120 --> 0:38:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the team besides Shoho Tani, that would just be cheating

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:43.760
<v Speaker 1>while taking into consideration current health. Who would you add? Jack?

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure there's a right answer to this, but

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I kind of think there's a right answer to this.

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Did you also say Houston Astro's designated hitter, your Don Alvarez?

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, of course, of course, Okay, I don't know.

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I think a triple crown winner my kind of also

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 2>with this offense.

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I just went to fangrafts and and did the split

0:39:06.920 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>leader board thing and just did verse right handed pitching

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and then just sorted by ops or whatever, and yord

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 1>On Alvarez is like way better than anyone else, so

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>it felt felt pretty pretty easy. He has a two

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to ten WRC plus against righty's this season and eleven

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>forty ops. So yeah, jord On Alvarez would be a

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty big addition in that regard. Do you want to

0:39:29.480 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>know who is twelfth on that list?

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 5>Jack?

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 1>WRC plus against righty's this season, so familiar, it's a

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 1>familiar name. Blaize Alexander of the bal Baltimore Orioles is twelve.

0:39:42.960 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 3>What's your PA criteria?

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's not much, he was. I think it's one

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty, about one hundred and fifty played appearances.

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So plays Alexander not a qualified hitter this season. He's

0:39:54.480 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>missed some time, I think so, Yeah, I think is

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 1>back now. He has weird reverse splits this season where

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he's actually been much better against righty's and lefties. But yeah,

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.919
<v Speaker 1>it looks like he is back. Looks like he's four

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 1>for six in his last two games entering today. So

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Blaze is still doing it out there in Baltimore. And

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, d Backs can kind of use him. That's

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a that's a bit of a bummer. Anyway, our last question,

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>let's go ahead and move on. Uh here's another fun one.

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>If you could design one pitcher in a lab with

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>five pitches from across the d Backs pitching staff, which

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:36.279
<v Speaker 1>five pitches would you use?

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 2>I e.

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Merrill, Kelly's change up, Michael Sirokas slurve that sort of idea. Jack,

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you the the first the first shot at

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:45.879
<v Speaker 1>this one as well.

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, So I went with Ryan Nelson's four seen fastball,

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 2>wa Mario's sinker, Herado Corrio's cutter. Oh, Brandon Garcia is

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 2>sweet slide sweeper, and Andrew Hoffman's change up, And I

0:41:04.840 --> 0:41:06.880
<v Speaker 2>did this kind of yeah.

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't expected Andrew Hoffman mention. Okay, I know.

0:41:12.400 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Nothing else worked for him, and his fastball wasn't good enough,

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 2>but his change up stuff plus is one hundred and fifteen.

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Garcia is sweeper, stuff plus is one forty three,

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Mario's sinker's one eighteen, and Ryan Nelson's fastball's won ten.

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 2>So you know you got you got the high rise

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, high ivv Ryan Nelson fastball, and you got

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:40.960
<v Speaker 2>the Hoffman change up, and you can take care of

0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 2>lefties with those two right, you know, top shelf up

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 2>and in with the four seemer boom, knock him out

0:41:46.480 --> 0:41:48.359
<v Speaker 2>down and a way get the swing and miss from

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:51.359
<v Speaker 2>the change up. Think Eric Kangey back in the day,

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:53.760
<v Speaker 2>if you're that old, you know. And then against Righty's

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 2>you got the sinker slider combination of Mario's sinker and

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Garcia's slider and growing a little cutter action there and

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 2>right He's don't have a chance either. So that was

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:10.800
<v Speaker 2>my my five. I did look also at run values,

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 2>but I don't know if your yours is kind of

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:15.680
<v Speaker 2>using run value, So I'll circle back to that once

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:16.240
<v Speaker 2>you're done.

0:42:17.440 --> 0:42:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I have I have kind of a mix of

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:23.320
<v Speaker 1>some run value stuff, some stuff plus numbers as well.

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Part of me was like, well, I'll take Justin Martinez

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:30.879
<v Speaker 1>his four seemer and Justin Martin sinker and Justin Martin.

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Wait, he's hasn't played yet this year.

0:42:37.520 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Did you see how Hardy was throwing in Reno just yesterday? Though, Jack,

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm allowed to do that. All right,

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll leave I'll leave jmar out Fron.

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 3>You could have j You could have J mart If I.

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:53.360
<v Speaker 1>If I could have J mart then I don't know.

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 1>His four seamer doesn't like it's all the velo is insane, right,

0:42:57.320 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's one hundred and two miles an hour.

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't have crazy movement on that pitch necessarily, So even

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>with J mart I maybe I would be torn between

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>his for seamer and Juan Mario's for seamer. I think

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:13.160
<v Speaker 1>kuand Mario, certainly of the active players, has far and

0:43:13.239 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 1>away the best four seam fastball on the roster. He's

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>at a one oh nine stuff plus there. Honestly, not

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:20.479
<v Speaker 1>quite as high as I would have thought, but we've

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 1>just seen like nobody can square up that pitch time

0:43:23.719 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and time again. It's been really, really effective for him,

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of ride, averaging around ninety nine miles per hour.

0:43:29.239 --> 0:43:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So for leaving j Mart out, I'll go Juan Rio's

0:43:31.800 --> 0:43:36.359
<v Speaker 1>four seamer. I also had Brandon Garcia's sweeper, or if

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:38.920
<v Speaker 1>we want to call it a slider. I guess if

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm calling that pitch a sweeper and I'm picking a

0:43:41.560 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>true slider. Separately, I had Kevin Ginkle slider, which still

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>grades out pretty dang well and has a whiff rate

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 1>north of forty percent. I know he's left some in

0:43:51.840 --> 0:43:54.920
<v Speaker 1>some bad spots at times this year, but the results

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>against that pitch have still been very poor. It remains

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the best sliders that you'll find in a bullpen.

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the run value there is plus seven for

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the season, so pretty impressive stuff there. Juan Mario I

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 1>have his change up as well. I think he probably

0:44:12.320 --> 0:44:16.919
<v Speaker 1>has the best change up of any active player. And

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 1>then I went to Michael Soroka's slurve. We got to

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:23.760
<v Speaker 1>have a slurve right, So I did throw Michael Soroka

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:27.359
<v Speaker 1>slurve in there. One ninety four opponent batting average on

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that pitch two sixty five x wOBA. All the indicators

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:33.760
<v Speaker 1>we have show that that has been very, very effective

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:37.520
<v Speaker 1>this season. Dbax don't really have anyone with like an

0:44:37.560 --> 0:44:42.680
<v Speaker 1>awesome curveball, so I threw Brandon Fought in there. I

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:45.840
<v Speaker 1>know the run value isn't that high for some reason.

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I think maybe because he's not like great at spotting

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:51.600
<v Speaker 1>it for strikes. But the movement profile and his curveball

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good and guys don't tend to do much

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 1>with it and it can generate some swing and miss.

0:44:56.920 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>So Fought's curveball is maybe where I would I would

0:45:01.280 --> 0:45:04.319
<v Speaker 1>lean for for a curveball if I was picking one.

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, cool, you know, I just want to it's kind

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 2>of funny. I want to circle back on the run value.

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 2>So I I did the highest run value per one

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 2>hundred pitches, because if you just add them all up,

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 2>starters you know with a decent number is going to

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 2>have a higher Like you know e robs On on

0:45:22.560 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 2>any of these lists, but his fastball and changeup have

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 2>the highest total run value on those two pitches, right,

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 2>but if we go per one hundred pitches, okay, Uh,

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:36.800
<v Speaker 2>the slider was a Prado Correo five point one nine

0:45:36.960 --> 0:45:41.440
<v Speaker 2>that was the highest, highest per one hundred pitches run value.

0:45:42.120 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean he think he's pitched like like ten innings, right.

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:51.439
<v Speaker 3>I know, I know, I'm just to say sinker sink.

0:45:51.600 --> 0:45:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean, obviously in results, you know, the run value

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:57.280
<v Speaker 2>per one hundred is all about results, right, Sinker Taylor

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Clark tailor Clark sinkers generally four point sixty four runs

0:46:02.600 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 2>per one hundred. The change up Mitch Bratt his change

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 2>up rates three point eight nine per one hundred. Splitter

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:15.879
<v Speaker 2>his career again, Correa's got that splitter at three point

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:17.840
<v Speaker 2>sixty four curve.

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 3>This one's gonna blow everyone away.

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:27.400
<v Speaker 2>Philip Abner three point three five, Wow cutter, Jonathan Loasaca

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:30.239
<v Speaker 2>three point three to one. And here's another one that's

0:46:30.239 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 2>going to surprise people and not end here. Four Seeing

0:46:32.920 --> 0:46:36.920
<v Speaker 2>fastball run value per one hundred pitches, Brandon fought one

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 2>point eight six.

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I did see Brandon fought very very high up on

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the fastball run value, which is which is impressive because

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that was kind of his His big issue over the

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:52.320
<v Speaker 1>course of the first two three years of his career

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>was his four seamer was just kind of getting hammered.

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:56.919
<v Speaker 1>We've seen him use the sinker a little bit more

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and the fur seemer this year has been very, very

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>effective for him. So yeah, it's a fun exercise. I

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>think it was cool to see how like doing this

0:47:06.000 --> 0:47:08.439
<v Speaker 1>exercise now is a lot more interesting than it would

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:12.839
<v Speaker 1>have been three four years ago, even last year. I mean,

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:16.600
<v Speaker 1>there's just there's more guys with compelling stuff in this

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:20.600
<v Speaker 1>organization right now than we've seen in a while, at

0:47:20.680 --> 0:47:23.280
<v Speaker 1>least close to the big leagues, and in the big leagues,

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 1>like I could have been convinced take Harardo Correo on

0:47:27.280 --> 0:47:29.960
<v Speaker 1>several of these Like if I can't have Justin Martinez

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a splitter, I'm probably taking Harado Correo splitter. I know

0:47:33.120 --> 0:47:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that that showed up on your your run value list there.

0:47:35.800 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, the Diamondbacks have better stuff and and this bullpen,

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>even though it has not been great here in recent days,

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a big reason why they've made it to this point,

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 1>why why they're still in this race, and why they've

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>still got a shot in this thing. With about a

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 1>month and a half to go.

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 2>They pitched four scoreless today, so yeah, I'm too bad.

0:47:57.640 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 2>And they only gave up one run yesterday, so I

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 2>mean the last two days they gave it one run.

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Not too chevy.

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:06.759
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately, the run that was given up yesterday was the

0:48:06.800 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 2>game winning run by Kevin Ginkle. There was one run

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 2>in three innings and then no runs in for today,

0:48:11.680 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 2>so you know, one in seven that's that's some pretty

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 2>good work.

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:18.280
<v Speaker 3>That's maybe that extra rest.

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 2>And you know, the Zach Lettel game was was a

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 2>major factor and maybe helped getting them turned around. But

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:26.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm really happy about this question. It was a fun,

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 2>fun question asked.

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 3>It was great.

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:30.439
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if we gave all the right answers there,

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 2>but look forward to seeing other people's thoughts on it

0:48:33.760 --> 0:48:34.400
<v Speaker 2>in the comments.

0:48:35.680 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was very fun. Thank you to all of

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you who submitted questions for this mailbag episode. Sorry we

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:44.839
<v Speaker 1>couldn't get to everyone. There were quite a few, but

0:48:45.360 --> 0:48:48.160
<v Speaker 1>keep them coming. We always really really enjoyed doing this.

0:48:48.560 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Diamondback speaking of getting a nice rest in the bullpen,

0:48:53.680 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll get a little more of that here Over the

0:48:55.920 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 1>next twenty four hours. Dbacks have an off Day in

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta tomorrow, and then they start that three game series

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:05.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Braves on Friday. They will be opposed by

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sale in the first game of that series, and

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 1>then Brandon Fott will pitch in that game. We already

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:13.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about e Rod and Grant Holmes on Saturday, and

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 1>then it's Michael Soroka against Bryce Elder in the finale

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of that series. Hey, this is the playoff rotation, Jack,

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:25.239
<v Speaker 1>This is you fought e Rod and and Soroka line

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it up here against a pretty good team in Atlanta Diamondbacks.

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 1>It feels like do not tend to play the Atlanta

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Braves particularly well, but they could really use a bounce

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:38.040
<v Speaker 1>back series here this weekend.

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 2>And this is a pretty good preview. Like, is this

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:42.799
<v Speaker 2>team if they got to the playoffs, would be able

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:43.320
<v Speaker 2>to compete?

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's true. The pitching matchups could totally look like

0:49:49.560 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 1>this in an actual playoff series.

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:55.320
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, hopefully we'll get to see j mart

0:49:55.320 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and Jordan Lawler maybe this weekend, maybe Boston the latest,

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:02.320
<v Speaker 2>so it could be pretty exciting folks.

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:05.080
<v Speaker 1>There you go. And hey, Chris Sale is Chris Sale,

0:50:05.080 --> 0:50:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but he's also a lefty, so you never know what

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you might get from this deepags offense on Friday Night.

0:50:11.000 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Thank you to all of you for being with us

0:50:12.719 --> 0:50:15.640
<v Speaker 1>on this episode. We really appreciate your time. If you

0:50:15.680 --> 0:50:18.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't already, you can find us on Twitter. I am

0:50:18.440 --> 0:50:21.200
<v Speaker 1>at Jesse and Friedman. Jack is at sh Wizard fifty nine.

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Our show is at Snake's Territory, and of course you

0:50:24.480 --> 0:50:28.239
<v Speaker 1>can find Jack's written work over at Arizona Diamondbacks on

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 1>SI Jack. Any final thoughts here as we say goodbye.

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Another thing, I'm done.

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>That last one. Just there's lots of run values and stuff,

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:44.879
<v Speaker 1>plus numbers and whatnot throw that we're all throwing out here.

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So appreciate all of you for keeping us busy, giving

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:50.359
<v Speaker 1>us lots of fun things to talk about it. We

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:53.600
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it once again, and we'll be back with

0:50:53.680 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>another episode here of Snake's Territory very very soon.

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 3>S