WEBVTT - Josh Younger on the Origin Story of the Shadow Banking System

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe. Isn't all Joe? I

0:00:16.600 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like in our current period of high inflation, bond

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>market volatility, tension between you know, central banks, and UH

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus, all of that, I feel like people tend

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to have their favorite historical analogies that they reach for

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>to try to explain what we're experiencing now. Everyone, whatever

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it is, always says this is just like this, and

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>like I get it kind of, you know, like naturally

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>this say is what we do. But I also think, like,

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's that danger of like knowing too much history,

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>which is if you know your history, you think it's repeating.

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I mean the one that everyone seems to

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>reach for is the seventies, right, like, oh, this is

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>just like the seventies, We need a Paul Vulcer to

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>come and really tamp down inflation. And then the other

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>one that I'm kind of partial to this one the

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighteen Spanish flu. Who can forget the period after

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that in World War One ended up with the high

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>inflation and then it flipped into deflation. You know, the

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>other one that I think about. Two is the Euro

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Area crisis and the tensions. You know what they had

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to do sort of like plumbing wise, what Mario drag

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>had to do in terms of like sort of recreating

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the European sovereign bond structure on the fly to improve

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the transmission of monetary policy. I think some of these

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>issues are also coming up. We really see it in

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the UK specifically. Yeah, that's a good one. I hadn't

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>considered that. But today, on that note, we are going

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to be speaking about a historic parallel that hardly ever

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>gets mentioned. It is the year one specific year ninety three.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anything that happened in I would never

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you could have guessed, asked me any year in the

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen hundreds and I would not have Yeah, what happened here?

0:01:57.640 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>All right? So it turns out nineteen fifty three was

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>actually a seminal year for global finance for reasons that

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I will not get into right now, but specifically because

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it ended up with a policy decision that still has

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>relevance today. So not only was the US specifically in

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties facing high inflation, tension between employment and prices,

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>things like that, but we also had an outcome that

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>has sort of like echoed across the decades ever since

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to learn more. I'm ready. All right, Well,

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>we really do have the perfect guests to explain nineteen

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty three and it's relevance to today to us. We

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to be speaking with Josh Younger. He is

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the global head of Asset and Liability Management, Research and

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Strategy at JP Morgan. He has also a repeat all

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>thoughts guests. He's no getting up there like this is.

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>He's become not quite in the lead, but getting close alright,

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>one of our favorites. So Josh, welcome back to the show.

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>That's great to be back in studio, which is more exciting.

0:02:55.840 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>So this is just your hobby now it's researching financial history.

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I needed to know hobby basically, Um, yeah, it's it's

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>just for fun. And there's so much you can do online,

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Like it's sin's weird to say that the internet's a

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>wonderful thing. Like you can pull up basically anything, and

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the Federals, your bank at St. Louis, has been very

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>kind to provide like an enormous quantity of documents and

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 1>data so you don't have to get Dusty and archives.

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>You can just search it. This is what I should

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>be doing instead of just scrolling Twitter at night and

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>playing playing chess online. I need to go on the

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>New York Times way back machine and see what bond

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>market volatility was like in the early nineteen fifties. Well, okay,

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>on this note, Josh why nine specifically, he has a

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of relevance in general. So that's the year where

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the European country start opening up their imports to to

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the dollar zone. It's the lended debt deal with the

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Germans after the war around German debt um. But it's

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>also one of the years where the Feed is really

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>forced to make a really important decision. So it's where

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of their desire to get out of the

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>bond market. I'm sure we'll talk about what they did

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>during the Second World War. It's a very controlled market.

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>It's very heavily um managed by the Fed at an

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>active basis. They really pegged yields on the long end,

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and getting out of that is complicated. And in fifty

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>three is when the market really tests them. So we

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to don't fight the Fed mantra quite quite yet.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>At that point But this is like a really interesting

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>philosophical question right here, because there's always this question today

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>or in any period, to what degree is the rate

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that we see on a ten year, on a thirty year,

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on a two year a policy rate verse a market rate.

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Before we get to fifty three, specifically, can you just

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about what you're what you

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>said about how rates across the curve were essentially policy rates. Yeah,

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>there's when we think about a tenure rate, like you

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>could do one of two things. You can roll treasury

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>bills every three months for ten years, or you can

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>buy a tenure bond. So in a perfect world, those

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 1>two things are connected through expectations. Uh. And then there's

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this question of should I involve some a little premium

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>on top of them, right, the term premium, which is

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>unlocking my up my money up for ten years. I

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>might be wrong in my expectations, and so I should

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>probably be paid for that at least little excess over

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the expectations. And so they're connected. Most of the tenure

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>eight is an expectation. Those expectations are often wrong, but

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you know that's a that's a separate issue, um. But

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:13.839
<v Speaker 1>there is a policy lever and on the on the

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 1>other hand, there's the market level, which is a term premium,

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>their demand to actually buy the bond in the first place.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>So talk to us then about the state of the

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>bond market. You know, coming out of World War Two

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>into the nineteen fifties, you mentioned that the Fed had

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>imposed yield curve control um basically to finance the wartime deficit.

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>They were trying to move off of that. Again, these

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>are all sort of familiar themes to anyone in two,

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>But why was that difficult for them? Well, so let's

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of scale, right, So in in ninette,

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>there's about forty billion dollars with the treasury outstanding. There's

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>about two and forty billion dollars where the treasury is outstanding.

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's about double the pre war p GDP. If

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>you scale that, say, okay, COVID expenditures on the scale

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 1>of World War two, that's about forty trillion dollars in

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>net treasury issuance. So we're talking about a lot of

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 1>debt um and the question is who's gonna buy yeah um,

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And what we're dealing with is kind of nothing we

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>got in that context, and so that's where I guess

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 1>the analogy breaks down, not to start there for the episode,

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>but like, it's a very difficult problem, which is who's

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>going to buy the equivalent of forty trillion dollars today

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in debt um, and one of those participants is the Fed.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So what the Fed says is in in further into

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the war effort, we're gonna peg gields uh specifically the

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>front end, the one year point, and the long end.

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>So every tenure bond, for example, yields two an a

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>half percent or less because I'm willing to buy it

0:06:37.960 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to an alf percent um. Every Treasury bill yelds three.

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>That's roughly where the curve was at the beginning of

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the war. It was no like particular thought given to

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that in terms of like fair value pricing. It was

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>just saying, wherever it is is where it's going to

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>stay until until conditions allow real quickly. How much actual

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>buying did they have to do versus the declaration of

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the price essentially taking care of most of it. Yeah,

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>not that much. I mean they thought about twenty billion

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.119
<v Speaker 1>dollars the Fed did over the course of that period.

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Most of those were in bills actually, because bills at

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>three eights are not very appealing. Tenure bonds at two

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half or a lot more appealing. So what

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the market did was they extended. And actually the FED

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>was a net seller of long and boughts towards the

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>end of the war because deals were dipping below their

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>target m so, so it wasn't all buying, but they

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>owned something like the bill market by the end of

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the war. Um. And they didn't really have a chance

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to get out so easy because when you get out

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of that situation, like, you can't just turn it off. Um.

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.119
<v Speaker 1>And so there was this outstanding question, which is how

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>are we going to get out of the market and

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>not completely blow up bond markets in the in the

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>first instance, Like, how do we do this in the

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>right way? Well, so, how how did they try to

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>undertake that transition? I mean, nowadays you think about the

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>FED trying to wind down its balance sheet embark on

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>quantitative tightening. There's a lot of communication that comes ahead

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of that. Was a similar thing, trying to broadcast to

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the market this is how we're going to do it.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Please don't freak out. It was really fraught um So.

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Ken Garbage has done a ton of work on this

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and they really didn't fits and starts and very slowly,

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>so no one ever really imagined they do cold turkey

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>like that was never really considered. So what they said is, well,

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>let's start with bills um. And then the Treasury said, well,

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to big bills. We like bills at

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>three eights uh. And and there was a back and

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>forth over a couple of years, and by I think

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it was forty seven. Essentially the committee went to the

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and said, we think this makes sense. We'll figure

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it out for you, but we're going to do this

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>in two days. And so it was a kind of

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 1>unilateral decision by the committee. There was some sweet nurse

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for the treasury, but the Fed basically told the Treasury

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we're doing this whether you like it or not. Uh.

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:40.839
<v Speaker 1>And then the debate moved on to the certificates of

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>indebtedness was roughly the one year point, so he said, well,

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 1>can that be released? And by around the fifty yearly fifties,

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the front end of the curve out to the one

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>year point was free to float, so billy yields came

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>up into the one rate one one and a half

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>percent range, So it was kind of a market rate,

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but the long end was still a two and a half,

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and they hadn't figured out how to stilt that, and

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that was most of the market um, even though the

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>FED to own most of the bill markets, so that

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 1>made it a little more straightforward. But um at the

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>long end, you know, that was most of the outstanding

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>debt at the time. So I'm just trying to understand

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. How much of the challenge of

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Fed, of extricating itself to some extent from

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the bond market was about the rates specifically, and what

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that would do to the economy were rates to jump up,

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>versus who, um, whose balance sheet these assets would beyond?

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>It was both. So the Treasury just doesn't like the

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>idea of paying more, which is test of all. I mean,

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>they have a deficit to fund, and by the late

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>forties early fifties, the deficits standing again, so they paid

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 1>on their debt pretty fast. And then by the by

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the early fifties you've got the Korean War, You've got

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a tax bill that actually Truman vitas and has passed

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>over his objection to cut taxes, and so there's a

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>fiscal expansion going on. So that that's the treasuries and incentive. Now,

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of their documents suggested were also sensitive to

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the feds concern around inflation um and inflation was under

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>control for about a year after the war because the

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>Office of Price Administration basically fixed the price of things.

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>They tried to renew that that organization to keep price

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>fixing in place. Truman decides it's not a strong enough bill.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>He vetos it, but they can't come up with saying

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that can pass the vetos, so it just expires. So

0:10:28.400 --> 0:10:32.079
<v Speaker 1>all prices are released at the same time. So shock therapy.

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>But I don't go well, okay on that note, I

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>mean the inflation of the late nineteen forties, early nineteen fifties,

0:10:40.080 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>how much of that was sort of supply chain issues,

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the transitioning of the U. S. Economy from

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a wartime footing to one of peace, and then I

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.559
<v Speaker 1>guess they went back to war relatively quickly given the

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Korean situation versus actual debt monetization, because you know, the

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>FED was in the market buying back trudge, Yeah, it was.

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>It was. It's hard to make an attribution. I haven't

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>seen a good attribution. But you know, the other thing.

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.319
<v Speaker 1>The FED bought twenty billion dollars worth of worth the

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>treasuries during the war of commercial banks bought se so

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 1>commercial banks are the real price fixtures in the treasury

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>market during the Second World War. And when when a

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.199
<v Speaker 1>commercial bank buys the treasury bond, they create deposits on

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 1>the other side of that. So they didn't let loans

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>roll off and replace them with treasuries. They had new assets.

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.520
<v Speaker 1>So the leverage in the banking system doubles in three years.

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>This is new money because deposits or money, right and

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and some will talk about money's a spectrum, so deposits

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>are very close to the real paper money side of

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that spectrum. Uh. And so there's a view at least

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>at the Treasury and the FED that that because banks

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 1>are so heavily supporting the market and market debt, that

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>that expansion of their balance sheets, expansion of the money

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>supply has generated a lot of inflation. So that's on

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the demand side. Too much money. Um, we can debate monitorism,

0:11:57.200 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess on a different episode, but they said there's

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:00.719
<v Speaker 1>a big expansion of them to supply it at the

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>same time, like you go from guns to butter and

0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>back and and that that's disruptive. So that's that's where

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>analogies come in. You're really moving the economy from a

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>very different production model UM in the year, and then

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to bring it back and these things don't

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>start up that quickly. This is all so familiar. So okay,

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>so the FED doesn't want to be UM fixing the

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>price of all these assets. There's also this concern about

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>too much commercial bank leverage and valid or not. So

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>who else is there where where? What's the next step

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>here in terms of who enters the market. Yeah, so

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the non bank investors are really domestic. So something like

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>less than one percent of the market for treasuries at

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of the war needs to the late fifties

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 1>is owned by international investors. So you have to find

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>insurance companies and you know other there's not a great

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>deal of granularity in the old data, so it's basically

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>like it's a bank, it's an insurance company, it's the FED,

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>it's an international or it's somebody else. And so you

0:12:57.720 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>know that we don't have Pimcoes and black Rocks in

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the world time UM and corporations are very important. Corporation

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is very cash rich. Um, they have a lot of

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>money to invest, and so to find a place to

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>put it. But ultimately to an a half percent in

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.560
<v Speaker 1>worldward inflations at ten is not particularly appealing. So what

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>happens in the bond market? I can imagine that, you know,

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the combination of two and a half percent being not

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that appealing, plus the Fed basically you know, making it

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>fairly clear that they would like to step back from

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the market. I imagine that's a recipe for some drama. Yeah,

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>there were the what became the Accord of the Fed

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Accord the Treasury Fed a cord. I'm not sure

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>what the order we're supposed to put in, but that's

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in uh. And that's the result of a lot of

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 1>congressional pressure in the early fifties. So in nineteen fifty

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the Banking Committee the Senate condads a hearing and make recommendations.

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's thanks for being helpful kind of thing. Um.

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:48.719
<v Speaker 1>And and the President gets involved, and there's just a

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of concern that monetary policy is worsening a very

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>disruptive inflationary environment. And by early fifty one there's just

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>enough pressure on the the Treasury to get along that

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>they figure out. And one of the most important characters

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 1>in this debate is Bill Martin. So Bill Martin used

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to run the York Stock Exchange in the thirties, so

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 1>he comes from a dealer background, he comes from the street. Um,

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>he goes in and runs the XM bank for for Truman,

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and then he's brought into Treasury by by Snyder, who's

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the Secretary of the Treasury at the time, initially as

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>an assistant Secretary for international affairs, but he quickly becomes

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of a fixer. So he's kind of doing everything

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's tasked by Snyder with liaising with the Federal

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Reserve to figure out a way to get out of

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the market. Um that it's amenable to both parties, Like,

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>what's the best way to do this? Because we kind

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of have to do it now? So what did what

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>did he do? So he broke here it an arrangement

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that came out as a very vague commitment. So they

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>basically just say like we've we've reached a full accord.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>They don't say what that accord is other than to

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>say we're gonna stop monetizing the debt. So then us is,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>how are actually gonna do this, but they do put

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that up publicly and make a public commitment to free

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the bond market UM and a couple of days later,

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Martin is actually nominated to Chair of the FED because

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>mcape's deaths down, so he switches sides UM and he's

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>confirmed pretty quickly, and by by early April he's the

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Chair of the Board of the FED and he's very

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>he's very committed to this inflation fighting thing, and in

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 1>his oath of office statement he says inflation is the

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>greatest threat, including the enemies beyond our borders or something

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to that effect, which you know in in April one,

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>three days earlier, the Rosenbergs have been convicted. H you

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>don't get Joe Welsh saying, you know, have you no

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>decency sir to McCarthy until fifty four, So this is

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the red Scare, and he's saying inflation is worse than

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>communism or implicitly and so like he's he's very much

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>committed to the cause, but the commitment is out there.

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just the question of like how we're going to

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>execute this in practice, and that's where you know, the

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>changing of the guard at Treasury, the Eisenhower election, like

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>people have to get into the seat for the next

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>administration to actually affect the change in policy, because they

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimately need to agree. Snider didn't like the idea of

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 1>ission above two and a half percent, So the Treasury

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>kept flooding the market with short term death uh and then,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and that was partially for regular debt management purposes. They

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>do some things around non market all to debt, to

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 1>get the bank debt bank holdings down, but ultimately there's

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of institutional tension. At one point, Truman

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>takes Martin's side at some event and says, you're a trader, right,

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>gets very much in his face. Um. So it's it's

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a very like fraught situation. I feel like I'm listening

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to a really good, like campfire story. This is good.

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to just I don't even want to

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>ask any questions. I just want to hear what happens next? Okay, well,

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>what happens? What happens next? I mean, on that note,

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you can imagine at some point the Treasury goes back

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to selling longer term, right, and how does the market

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>take that? So that's an Eisenhower administration thing that they're

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>part of. Eisenhower's election is about inflation. Actually, one of

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the first television commercials ever got sent to a general

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>audience is about inflation. Is Eisenharer saying, my grandmother doesn't

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>like the inflation. That's why I say it's time for

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a change. There's a central plank of his presidential campaign.

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Eisenhower answers, America, you know what things cost today? High

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>prices are just driving me crazy. Yes, my Nami gets

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>after me about the high cost of living. And he

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>nominates not only Humphrey, who's committed to fighting inflation, but

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.479
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of x FED people. So he brings them

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>people in from the New York FED and other places

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to be senior advisors under secretaries. And so, you know,

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the news media at the time speculates the FED is

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>like one this argument as to the relative benefits of

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>low cost of debt service versus inflation. So inflation is

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the priority. So the changing of the administration changes the priorities. Uh,

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>And they come and they say, we need to find

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 1>non bank investors. We need to find a way to

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>sell long term debt that doesn't inflate the size of

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 1>the banking system. And by extension, the money supply and

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>by extension the price um price pressures. And and their

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 1>solution is to reintroduce the bond. They hadn't issued long

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>term debt since forty five uh and and they want

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>to bring back the bond uh And the question is

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>how do you figure out the right way to do

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that because the market is not used to buying I

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>think it was supposed to mature in eighties free or

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>something like that. So it's like a thirty year bond

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and they haven't done third year bond a really long time.

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>So who's gonna buy it? How are you going to

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>price it in a way that brings in brings in

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>interest from non banks specifically. I mean this point is

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting because when politicians talk about fighting inflation today, they're

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about fiscal various fiscal policy levers and we need

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.919
<v Speaker 1>to cut spending here, or we need to you know,

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>expand oil oil drilling or something like that. But it

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>sounds like in the Eisenhower administration it was like they're

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to solve it via the financial system or via

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>plumbing and something. Everything was basically well, there was a

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>fiscal lever as well, I should say, um, but that's

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>always a little hard thought to say, oh, higher taxes

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>because inflation is higher, and that doesn't feel great for anybody,

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's today. Yeah. But the but the debt management

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>strategy of the treasury when the when the Feed is

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>buying get it fixed price, debt management is money manage

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>because they're in the market to buy at any price.

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>They buy treasuries. When the Fed buys treasuries, they print

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>new money with which to do so. Um. And so

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>those two things are connected, and this becomes a technocratic problem.

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>There's not there's actually quite a bit of public debate

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>about debt management, more so than you would expect given

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the current current climate, or at least focus on, you know,

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>how much, how big the twenty years sector is and

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.680
<v Speaker 1>things like that. Um. But you know, it's not like

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a political story all the time. But then it would

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have been. Um. But you know, I think that the

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 1>key here is there's an alignment of interests. And so

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Snyder comes to the market and he said, sorry, Humphrey

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to the market and says, we're going to bring

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>back the bond and by the way, we're pricing it cheap,

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>so get involved. So we're gonna price it about a

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>quarter of a point sheet to where you would have

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>otherwise expecting given where like the Victory two and a half,

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>we're trading and Victory two has we're issuing forty five.

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh so everybody's interested, right, so they're saying, we want

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to blow out reception. They get five times the over subscription,

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>so they get five and a half billion of orders

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>for roughly a billion of paper, and they're feeling really

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>good about it. The problem is, it turns out that

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that five and a billion was speculative.

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>So people were trying to buy cheap bonds and flip

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>them for half a point um. And so they called

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 1>them free riders back then, which I haven't heard, but

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of a fun, fun analogy. And so um,

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>we could I ask you who did they think they

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>were going to flip them to? Unclear somebody else? Um.

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And so it's it's just a question of you know,

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>if if you think the bond is trading fundamentally cheap,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>then there's probably someone else at what you think the

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>par value should be um. And so their bet was

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the expectations of the market were at for a lower yield,

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they could buy it a slightly higher yield, they could

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 1>flip into someone with different expectations, and it's as long

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>as you got filled, you'd be happy, as only you've

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>got your order insufficient size to make that interesting. The

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Treasury also makes a mistake in in filling orders on

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a proportional basis. So if you put in an outsized order,

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>for example, as part of the fixed rate um placement,

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>then you've got a big allocation. And the problem is

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're a spec account, that's not necessarily what you

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>want it to happen. Um, So a lot of the

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>bonds get sold almost immediately. Yeah, this sounds familiar. This

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is like big bond funds patting their order books with

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>like corporate issues nowadays. Yeah, it was actually so concerning

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>that they delayed allocations which had never really been done

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>or at least for a long time, so the Fed

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>could go through the orders and make sure that they

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>all made sense, you know. So they were a little

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>nervous from the start. But the von eventually prints in

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>in I believe it was late April. Initially it's trading

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>okay um, but it starts to weaken pretty quickly, and

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in particular, the market starts to become pretty dysfunctional. And

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the fun things about the New

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>York Times and the fifties is they published bits spreads

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 1>for every treasury issue on a daily basis. So imagine

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the poor reporter that it was after the sports section,

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>so they had their priorities straight. But it was actually

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the whole business section was after the sports section. Any

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 1>papers that even have stocks anymore, probably not, probably not.

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>But they had fex forward pricing in Europe they had

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:55.959
<v Speaker 1>so three month forwards and sterling they had. They had

0:21:56.119 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>on a roughly weekly basis. They had daily bond market priceing.

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>So I mean this was the only source, right, you

0:22:01.720 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>have nowhere else to go. Okay, so the bond starts

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>treating week then what so they're faced with a choice.

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So inflation is still pretty high. This is gonna sound familiar.

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>So you have market functioning issues, right. So the solution

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>of market functioning issues is to buy bonds. Uh. And

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>there's two problems. The first is the fet is committed

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to buy only bonds in the short end. That was

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the agreement. When they came to the accord,

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:25.600
<v Speaker 1>they said, we're only an interview in the market in

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the short end. And that's specifically to provide reserves, So

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not about target prices for long term bonds um.

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna let the market fund the price. So

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>I have to decide if they're going to buy long

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>bonds because that's where the pressure is. Bit that spreads

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>are widening, volatilities picking up um. And then they've decided

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>if they want to increase the size of the money

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>supply at a time when inflation is running hot. So

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you have you have a you have a discrepancy in

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the policy goals, which is fighting inflation, you should be tightening,

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>but to fix market functioning, you you have to ease.

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And so that they're faced with this like really existential choice,

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately the world kind of bails them out in

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the sense that these the business cycle turns made a

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>year right around when this is happening. So they buy

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of bills, They do a bunch of repo,

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>which we'll talk about I'm short shortly, but did a

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.239
<v Speaker 1>bunch of financing, offer financing to dealers, UH, and they

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 1>lower the reserve requirement and banks they grow the size

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>the banking system, and they buy a bunch of treasury

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>bonds in the second half of the year, banks increase

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>their holdings by two billion dollars. So they buy the

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.159
<v Speaker 1>long end though, or just they bought the long end

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yeah, so they they banks were sort of

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>interested in not the long end long end, but like

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>intermediate type paper, you know, three to five years, and

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they also buy bills um. And ultimately the question is

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:39.439
<v Speaker 1>can we take the excess paper out of the market,

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't have a home and dealers can't wear a

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>house um and resolve the functioning issues and kind of

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>come at the problem again another day, extremely boe in

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of what's going on right now of this dual

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>tension of like, we need to maintain financial market stability,

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but also we're in an anti inflation dans until any

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>perception of balance sheet expansion is seen as working cross

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>purposes totally. And also, I mean just the idea of

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>we need to expand the buyer base for US bonds

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>as well, that's kind of familiar. There's been a lot

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 1>of chat recently about who is going to buy bonds

0:24:16.000 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>giving given interest rate volatility and you know, a backdrop

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>of higher inflation and all of that. Okay, back to

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the story, So the market tests the accord, the FED

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of backs down, and then then what does it do?

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Does it try to like go back to the period

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>of the accord or does it try out some new

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>solutions to this problem? So they have two problems, what

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>is it going to buy the bonds? Uh and the others?

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>The dealers are clearly not capable of interweting a market

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that large, right, So they clearly are not able to

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>wear house securities enough shot size to really damp and volatility,

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>which is what dealers is supposed to do, right. They're

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>supposed to find a buyer and a seller and if

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>they can't find each other the same day, they hold

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that thing in their inventory. A big problem the dealer's

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>had was financing. So most for most of the prior

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy years, UM dealers have been funded most about what

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we're called call loans. Call loans are kind of this

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:10.719
<v Speaker 1>intuitive concept, which is, if I'm a dealer, I need

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of money barred every day, I'll post

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>collateral against it, but I'll probably borrow it from a

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>bank and I'll just change the balance on a daily basis,

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'll pledge whatever bonds I have as collateral to

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>back that loan. So uh, that was the call loan market. Um.

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>The problem with the call loan market is was kind

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of expensive, and when bill yields and treasure yields were

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 1>below the call market rates, it meant the inventory was negative.

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Carry carry means it costs you money to hold inventory.

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>You don't make interesting comb at least to hold the inventory.

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>So it becomes very expensive to run a dealer when

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you have interest rate and expense on top of the

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>salaries and infrastructure and things like that. Uh. And so

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this has been a problem to forties as well, and

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that's when they brought back the repurchase facility. Repurchase facility

0:25:53.520 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 1>dates back to v when they used its support the

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 1>First World War effort, and they were concerned that there

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a market for treasuries back then, and so they

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>used repurchase agreements, which are the buying and selling of

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a bond at different prices. That kind of mimics alone,

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:13.479
<v Speaker 1>but in two transactions. Um. And so that allowed the

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Fed to do two things. One is allowed them to

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>lend money to non banks, which is critical uh. And

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the second thing is allowed them to do that below

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the discount rate in principle, so they could do it

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 1>at a rate that was consistent with where bills were

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.920
<v Speaker 1>trading if they were below the policy rate. So this

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a legal workaround, right, because I imagine

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>the FED isn't really supposed to be lending money directly

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to non banks. I mean, the whole reason that banks

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>have regulations and things like that is so that they

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>can interact directly with the FED and they have that

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of safety backstop. Is that right? Yeah? Carter Glass

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of Glass de Eagle was instrumental in the original Federal

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Reserve Act, and he said this is not intended for

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>non banks, but in the depression they find out that,

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>like sometimes you need to write. So the thirteen three,

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>which becomes Section three, which becomes very famous in two

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, that's the authorization that allows them to

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>do all kinds of interventions. It specifically allows for the

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>lending or extensions of credit to non banks, um so

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to thousan eight that includes you know, primary dealers, that

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>includes a variety of real economy participants. In two twenty

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they do the same thing. So like the main street

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>lending facilities in principal thirteen three facility. The problem with

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>thirteen three is it's only allowable under exigent circumstances. So

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:26.919
<v Speaker 1>this is not a business as usual facility. This is,

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>if it really comes to it, you can do pretty

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>much whatever you want, but you need to be at

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 1>least a of the opinion that the world's about to collapse,

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and b you have to be able to demonstrate that

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>credit was not otherwise available. So it's clearly not the

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>case where dealers in the fifties. The workaround is, well,

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a repo, it's a purchase and a sale.

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>This is an open market operation. This isn't Section three

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 1>at all. Is this section fourteen which allows me to

0:27:50.280 --> 0:27:53.159
<v Speaker 1>transact with primary dealers, and so yes, this at the

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 1>economic features of a loan, but it is fundamentally a

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>purchase and sale. Um, they had to do a little

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of jimmying with it, and it's money is to

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>make it consistent with legal opinions, like I think it's

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it's putable as opposed to like specific maturities, and they

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 1>try to work around some legal interpretations. But fundamentally it's

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>just a way to lend money to non dealers in

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a format that gives the committee a lot more flexibility.

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Just a brief like sort of theoretical question, is there

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>ever really a limit to what the FED can do

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>beyond the creativity of lawyers. Well, that's anything, basically, that's

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 1>what I mean. And you know, we look at these documents.

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>It's true, you know we look at these documents and

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>their debates about what they didn't. Right, It's like, don't

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 1>lend the banks. But actually, I'm sorry, don't learn to

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>non banks. But you totally count the constraint. Yeah, creativity

0:28:38.560 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in Congress. So Congress can give you very specific constraints

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and and the courts can, in principle stop you. I

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's tough with the FED because the question is

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>what's the cause of action, Like who's going to soothe

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 1>them and say you shouldn't have lent this dealer money. Um.

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not sure how much this has been tested

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in court. This is where my lack of a law

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>degree is probably worth noting. Um. But but ultimately, the

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:01.239
<v Speaker 1>interpretation of these rules is ultimately is an interpretation. FET

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>has a general council, they write opinions, and there's an

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>internal process, but they can do whatever they think to

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>be ultimately legal. So the fence Repot facility is created

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventeen, but then in the nineteen fifties, as

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you just described, it presumably gets a big boost because

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>they've settled on it as a way to solve this

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 1>problem of how do we sort of settle the debt

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>market without sparking debt monetization and another bout of inflation.

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So what's interesting here is the FT doesn't do a

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of repo, But what they do is they demonstrate

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>their willingness to use it. They have a big internal debate,

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>they write a bunch of memos and they say this

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is something we're committed to doing at the bill Raider

0:29:39.040 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>higher so basically saying we are here for the market

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to provide repo to primary dealers at this specific administered

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>rate and industry meeting. We're just gonna say what it is.

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not an auction. We're just gonna tell you where

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll lend to you. Um And so that's important as

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a backstop. So it's not so much that the FETE

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>is financing dealers, it's they're providing a liquidity backstop at

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a specified rate that gives other market participants willing willingness

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to participate in the repo market. So most funding and

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 1>repo by the end of the fifties comes from corporations,

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and those corporations had bank deposits. Bank deposits were limited

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>by red Q as a depression year regulation saying we

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>don't want banks competing with each other for funding. That

0:30:15.520 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>leads to bad outcomes. And so they don't like their

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>bank deposit yields. They go the repo market. They get

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>wholesale funding rates, they get much more attractive yields, and

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>so the FED gives the market confidence that they can

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>participate in this in this sort of money like or

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>deposits substitute. Actually, the New York Clearinghouse is really worried

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>about this in the late fifties. So consortation of banks say,

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you're cannibalizing our funding, Like, we don't want people doing repo,

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>we want people keeping deposits with us, So sorry, can

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you just walk through or make a little marked clearer.

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>So this is sort of what plays the call loan market.

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>What what does the gap in terms of like financing

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>costs between these two things, and what did that open

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>up in terms of you know, how much balance sheet

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>or how much capacity the dealer community had. It wasn't

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>always a lot, but it was predictable, and the FIGHT

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 1>could control it, and and the call in market was

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>prone to they call them call in panics, so like

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you'd call your New York bank and the wouldn't have

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>money on hand, and and so you'd call it someone

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in Midwest or something like not non New York, other

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>city bank or you know. I don't think the rural

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>banks were participating in this, but it was. It was

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>just hokey in a lot of ways and somewhat unpredictable,

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and they ultimately ended up going to FED funds markets

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>often to a plug intraday liquidity gaps and and repo

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:40.560
<v Speaker 1>was better than that for that purpose. Um, but the

0:31:40.600 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>price could just be maintained by the FED specifically, and

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that was key. So UM, if the FED can control

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the price, and they can make sure it's profitable to

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>run a dealer, and they can expand their balance sheets,

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>so we don't have there's some data on dealer balance sheets.

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I think turnover is a better measure. So turnover as

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a fracture of the overall market, which you got to

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>scale it to the whole market. Between nineteen fifty, I

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>guess fifty five might be the earliest day we have

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to the late sixties goes up by multiples um, so

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the dealers are able to move move the debt around

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>much more easily. That's important because they're a distribution mechanisms.

0:32:13.480 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>You want non banks buying treasuries, you have to find them,

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and dealers of the mechanism by which to get them

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the paper. Uh. And so that's when non bank ownership

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>starts going up a lot. Banks or go from half

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>the market to thirty percent. By two thousand and five,

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six, they're like three or four percent

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of the market. So it's a very successful policy. Like

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>dealers are able to do a lot more volume, a

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>lot more turnover bits, spreads stay relatively tight until relatively

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>recently and and by the two financial crisis. Like not

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>US banks are not a huge fraction or even a

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>dominant fraction of of the of the treasury market. They

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of non bank participation. So this is

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the amazing thing because I think nowadays we're accustomed to

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the repo market as like a source of

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>potential instability and a big component of the shadow banking system.

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So you think back to two thousand and eight, the

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>repo market was kind of ground zero for a lot

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of the problems that that occurred in a mortgage backed securities.

0:33:12.760 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And then in the decade since two thousand and eight,

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>all we've heard from the FED and the Financial Stability

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Board is, Oh, we need to get a handle on

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>shadow banks, we need to reform the repo market, we

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>need to make everything better. But as you're describing it,

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>this was a direct policy decision made in the nineteen

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>fifties to solve a specific problem. Yeah, it becomes saying

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>it's really entrenched. So the repo market is are the

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>solution to their problem in lots of ways. But by

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the time the solution becomes very effective, now they're committed

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to the repot market. So you know. Great example of

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that is an eighty two when a bankruptcy court finds

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that the collateral associate with repo is subject to an

0:33:49.840 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>automatic state. What does that mean. It means if a

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>dealer goes bankrupt, this court will seize their collateral and

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>hold it until the bankruptcy is resolved. And that doesn't

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>take a day or two. That takes a long time.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>People have just sort of assumed that that wasn't the case,

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 1>because like, oh, this is a purchase in a sale,

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>like why would this be subject to a day I

0:34:07.320 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>just have like a bond that I sold you, and

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:10.839
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna sell it back to me. We'll just do that.

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh And And the FED panics basically in eighty two

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.520
<v Speaker 1>they lobby Congress aggressively to get specific protections for REPO

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and other similar instruments and basically legislated. So there's a

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>bill in eighty four that's meant to reform the judicial

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>nomination process that actually has within it a protection for

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>REPO that exempts it from the automatic stay. So the

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>preferential treatment for REPO specifically in bankruptcy um and and

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that is necessary. Vulcar argues directly, it's Bob doll at

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the time, like to stabilize the whole financial market, you

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>need to do this. Um. So it's just an example

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>of where you sort of find a good solution. Now

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you're now it's entrenched, and the more it presents issues,

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the more you have to like step in to provide

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>other protections or specifically that market. So it is a

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>shadow banking system in the sense that is treated like

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a money alternative, like a deposit alternative, and it's sort

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of wrapped with successive layers of protection. First, as the

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>FED liquity back stopped in, there's bankruptcy protection. You know

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>banks for example of different treatment under bankruptcy. Now REPO

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>has different treatment under bankruptcy. And by the time you

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>get to two thousand eight, and especially in the FED

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>is doing both sides of the real market, right, So

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 1>the FED is doing the standing REPO facility and the

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>reverse REYBU facility. And so now it's very much a

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>policy lever in lots of ways. Um whether or not

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that's desirable as a separate question, but but ultimately REPO

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>becomes the plumbing because it's so effective in facilitating the

0:35:37.440 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>initial policy goals of the Martin Fat. So this is

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 1>really interesting, and I guess just to sort of piggyback

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>on Tracy's last question, I mean, we do seem to

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>have these recurring bouts of instability today in this part

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of the market. The market that exists solved a certain

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:57.879
<v Speaker 1>problem at the time, Like what is the trade off

0:35:58.040 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is that we're still living with today because it seems

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>like the sort of like old regime, while maybe it

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>had issues with sort of like inflation, etcetera. Um, the

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of the less market based regime, so to speak,

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>at least it was more stable. Yeah. I think that

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>there's different phases of cognitive dissonance here. So you know,

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 1>if you can pull dealers in and say you're gonna

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>in your the critical intermediation mechanism for the treasure market,

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 1>and not only critical to intermediating it, but getting things

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the out of banks and into non banks

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>is like critical to financial stability and and and more

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>important than the enemies beyond our shores, right, And that's

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>what they're saying. Um So to fight the Soviets, we

0:36:32.160 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 1>need REPO basically and again relevant to today. Yeah. Uh

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>so the problem with that is you need a regulatorriticism

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that recognizes the relative importance you're placing on dealers. And

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that took a long time. So dealers are regulated by

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the SEC. It's a it's an investor protection mandate. So basically,

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>if and when a dealer goes bankrupt, we wanna have

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>funds on hand to resolve all outstanding trades. Banks are

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:00.799
<v Speaker 1>safety and sound is mandate, which is like, you can't

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>go bankrupt, so let's make sure you don't because you're

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>critical to the functioning of the economy. And so those

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>two things don't entirely mesh. And by two thousand and

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>six seven there's a series of changes to how dealers

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:13.880
<v Speaker 1>are regulated, and all of a sudden they have a

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 1>ton of leverage UM forty times leverage is one that

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone always quotes. But like turn over, the treasury market

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>skyrockets because not only is it uh not as only

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 1>our dealers allowed to take more leverage, but also treasury

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>specifically in treasury rebo like don't really count torture the

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>space capital requirements, and so there's just a lot of

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:36.400
<v Speaker 1>capacity to intermediate treasury bond trading and repo trading. In

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:38.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight, everything gets stuck back into the banking system.

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 1>So all these independent dealers, with the exception of the

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:44.800
<v Speaker 1>smaller ones, but like you're rather out of business or

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>you're part of a bank holding company. So Leaving goes

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>out of business, bears absorbed by JP Morgan, um, you know,

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Mary all goes to Bank of America, and all of

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, they're all subject to that bank safety and

0:37:55.000 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>soundness requirement or at least within the context of the

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>holding company as a as a whole, uh, And so

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the market gets consolidated behind the bank regulatory perimeter, it

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 1>becomes like formally associated with banks. Um, that's fine as

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>long as treasuries don't consume a lot of you know

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>what we often call the industry like resources, meaning capital

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and liquidity. Treasuries are risk free, treasurys risk free or

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>at least nearly risk free, and so depending on how

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>it's haircutted and so forth and so like, if it

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.759
<v Speaker 1>doesn't add to your risk weighted assets, which was the

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 1>binding constrainting banks for a long time, you've got a

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of elasticity. You can grow and shrink and treasury

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>bounty pretty straightforwardly. Leverage constraints come later and they are

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.760
<v Speaker 1>inconsistent with that, or at least into some circumstances. Well,

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly what I wanted to ask about. So

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>today there is this big question mark over the treasury

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 1>market about who is going to buy and also intermediate

0:38:46.680 --> 0:38:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the bonds. So we have a lot of interest rate volatility.

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Dealer inventories are lower um than they have been historically.

0:38:53.800 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Like what exactly is going on there? Like the repo

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 1>market exists, it experiences spasms from time to time, but

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the FED comes in and for the most part, seems

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to fix them or at least set up new programs

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 1>aimed at fixing them. Why is this still happening? Why

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:09.919
<v Speaker 1>do we have that concern? So it's it's a little

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 1>different every time, which is unfortunate, but but ultimately that's why. Yeah, yeah,

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 1>but you're seeing banks to buy more treasuries now, right,

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>So like there's a there's a certain amount of increased

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>monetization of the debt through the commercial banking system, not

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:27.240
<v Speaker 1>necessarily through the Federal Reserve um and and so that's

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 1>helping where it was helping for a while, it's not

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>so much helping anymore. UM. But I think the issue

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 1>is repo is a form of money substitute that has

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the implicit backing of the Fed, but is not really

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>wrapped in the same kind of cloak as deposits. And

0:39:43.080 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>so deposit funding is stable and sticky funding at low cost.

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Repo funding is fine until there's an issue, and then

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of more prone to instability than than more

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:55.280
<v Speaker 1>traditional forms of bank funding. And as you go further

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>out the spectrum, you know, we're talking about treasury, but

0:39:57.840 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>then you can talk about mortgage repot in two thousand

0:39:59.680 --> 0:40:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and seven could have talked about non agency mortgage repo,

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a question of the collateral credit quality

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 1>as well as access to liquidity and so like repo

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is is just not money in the sense that deposits are.

0:40:13.520 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And so if banks are being called upon to interveeding

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:19.879
<v Speaker 1>at treasuries as a core banking activity and effect, um,

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:21.959
<v Speaker 1>they're still funding it with with a form of funding

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that's reserved for dealers, and that's the investor protection world.

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:28.439
<v Speaker 1>So there's a little bit of cognitive dissonance there. Um,

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:30.439
<v Speaker 1>But what the FED is doing is their backstopping both

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 1>sides of the market. So so repo's perceiving those kind

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of controls. And there are other central banks where repos

0:40:35.920 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the primary policy. Right, So this is not you know,

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly unusual. Um, whether or not it's desirable as a

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>separate question, and whether or not those facilities are effective.

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>There is another one. You're talking about dealer inventories. Now

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there's I think I was on to talk

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>about this pretty recently. Um, I remain relatively sanguine, I guess,

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, prices are moving around, but the world

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is moving around like the world is as volatile as

0:40:57.440 --> 0:41:00.759
<v Speaker 1>the treasure market is. Volatile and so like that's necessarily

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say it's a good or bad thing, but

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly not unexpected. Um dealer inventories being low off

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the run, trading not being particularly high as a fraction

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:10.919
<v Speaker 1>of total, Like, you don't see a lot of the

0:41:10.960 --> 0:41:14.320
<v Speaker 1>monetization of treasuries in the form of sales to source

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:19.160
<v Speaker 1>cash in the way that you saw. So could that happen? Sure? Um,

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>if the in inventories were going to rise rapidly and

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we had the same kind of dash for cash dynamic like,

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we've run into similar problems. Ultimately those issues

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.720
<v Speaker 1>have not been fixed, um, at least on a fundamental basis.

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, the market is functioning even if

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it is a liquid I might have said precisely that

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago, but I still believe it's the case.

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>We've come full circle then, and I gotta say the

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 1>idea that the treasury market is as volatile as the

0:41:45.200 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>world itself. That's a good quote. Yeah, all right, well, Josh,

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 1>that was amazing so much. Yeah, I can't believe this

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>is what you do you know for fun um in

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:59.600
<v Speaker 1>your evenings, But absolutely fantastic, super educational and I think

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:01.239
<v Speaker 1>you're one of the few people who can draw a

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 1>direct line between you know, something that happened in ninety

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>three and a lot of what we're experiencing today. Yeah, yeah,

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and I should. I should thank Levin and as Wealth

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 1>has been really helpful with this, and he he does

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>this for a living, so you know, I'm yeah, I've

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>watched some of his like lectures on YouTube and stuff

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. You want to understand the banking system and

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 1>there it comes from, and like why we have certain

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:24.400
<v Speaker 1>roles in the way they are. Okay, we'll make that happen,

0:42:24.600 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, thanks so much, Thank you very much, so Joe,

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:42.279
<v Speaker 1>that was fantastic. I mean I actually feel like I

0:42:42.320 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of sat down and listened to like a narrative story.

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I love that, you know what this although it confirms

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>this like long view that I've had about all these

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>questions about how many of the solutions to problems are

0:42:55.160 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>about recreating the exact same thing under a new language

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>or when it's like it's still the same thing, you know,

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and so like it always like sort of driving me

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:06.879
<v Speaker 1>crazy where it's like okay, well we want the FED

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to backstop it, but we don't want it to increase

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 1>the money supply measured this way, so it's on someone

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:14.560
<v Speaker 1>else's balance, but it's still like economically the same thing.

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Like all these conversations, like they kind of drive me

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>crazy just because it's like I don't just have to

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:22.279
<v Speaker 1>fed by it all it solves a problem. Okay, Um,

0:43:22.440 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 1>well that's a little extreme, but you get I agree

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>with you on the branding, Like, never underestimate the power

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>of branding and giving something a different name. Right, So

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 1>this is now a money like deposits really, but that's

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the point, Like so many different things in the end,

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:38.359
<v Speaker 1>when you like work it back, are still just some

0:43:38.440 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of like either fed back implicitly or explicitly like

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:45.840
<v Speaker 1>fed determined instrument. It's just like how many layers of

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:47.680
<v Speaker 1>pretend do we want to have so that it looks

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 1>like it's just some like thing out in the market. Okay,

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>so we've discovered that Joe doesn't want free markets. There's

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>no there's just there's no such thing. There's no such thing.

0:43:55.760 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>It's all creating the illusion that there's like these like

0:43:57.960 --> 0:44:00.640
<v Speaker 1>real markets, when in the end, it's like that's my

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:03.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's always my ticure. I mean, the central bank

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 1>at a very basic level is setting interest rates? Right,

0:44:05.760 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 1>So like, okay, alright, well on that very high level

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of philosophical note, shall we leave it there? Let's leave

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it there. This has been another episode of the Addoughts podcast.

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Why Isn't All? You can

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:23.360
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart, follow our producer

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armand follow all the podcasts at

0:44:27.760 --> 0:44:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts. And for more odd

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Locks content, go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots.

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Tracy and I blog there. We also have a newsletter,

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a weekly newsletter when we talked about some of our

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 1>guests and episodes and other things that we're interested. You

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:44.920
<v Speaker 1>can subscribe there goes out every Friday. Thanks for listening.

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:06.759
<v Speaker 1>T T T thing to me to