WEBVTT - Stuart Stevens & Skye Perryman

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds. And President Trump's inauguration is perhaps said

0:00:13.200 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to be moved indoors due to very cold temperatures. We

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>have such a great show for you today. The Lincoln

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Project's own Stuart Stevens stops by to talk about the

0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>lessons learned as Biden leaves office. Then we'll talk to

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Democracy Forward Sky Perryman about how they will push back

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Trump administration.

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 2>But first the news, So, Malie, the Supreme Court has

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 2>ruled unanimously one of the rare things we see that

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 2>it is legal for the law that was passed banning

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 2>TikTok to go forward. But there's a lot of gray

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 2>area here because last night President Biden said he would

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 2>not uphold the laws. So this now throws it into

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 2>the lap of mister Donald Trump.

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So here's a problem with TikTok, right, And this is

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>what we've heard from the Gang of Eight, is that

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>there is clearly a lot of stuff going on behind

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the scenes that China is doing.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.679
<v Speaker 3>With our data, and we don't even know the half

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 3>of it.

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Right, There's a reason federal employees are not supposed to

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have it. There's a reason people in the military are

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to have it.

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Right. There's clearly a lot here that we're not being told.

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And then there is the incredible addictive quality of the algorithm,

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>more addictive than the very addictive Instagram. So there were

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:29.960
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of reasons why, and we just have no transparency.

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a company that is owned by the Chinese Communist Party.

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>They say that it's not, but it really is. It's

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 1>just this is very much bad, bad, bad, But Congress

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to legislate this because they just don't. Right.

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>They actually did legislate it. They legislated a ban, and

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.559
<v Speaker 1>what happened was that TikTok got lobbyists and now maybe

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>there won't be a ban. I would also like to

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>add there's an app on the Appstore called red Note,

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>which is also has a Chinese providence, again the nuances

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of which are not readily apparent, and that charted became

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the top app. The fallacy here is you can't ban

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:10.639
<v Speaker 1>just one of these apps, right, there's like a lack

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of transparency here, and banning TikTok, the ideas if you

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>ban TikTok, you will then end up with something TikTok like.

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to add that this band should go through.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the few times that this extremely

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>partisan Supreme Court, all nine of them, were like, shut

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>down the fucking app, and still people on the left

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and people on the right were like, maybe not.

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 3>So do I think TikTok is going to get banned?

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely not.

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Do I think that we're just going to continue on

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>as business as usual?

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Is this a national security risk? Absolutely? Are millions and

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>millions of people. I mean, imagine if you allowed CBS

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to be owned by the Chinese government, That's what this

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 1>is like. Imagine if ten times no, imagine if a

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred times more people watch CBS and it was owned

0:02:58.160 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>by the Chinese government.

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 3>That's what we have here.

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.919
<v Speaker 1>So real dereliction of duty on the part of almost

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>everyone except bafflingly, the Supreme Court.

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing I would say is it's almost

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 2>like these apps should be controlled by a nonpartisan body

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 2>and be seen in as a public work. But I'm

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 2>just going to stop putting my socialist views in here,

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 2>move on to the next subject.

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Socialism quote unquote.

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Continue quote unquote socialist. Yes, I know, wanted to make

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 2>sure free speech stays up. So there's been a lot

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 2>of bided statements on the way out of office. Burn

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 2>his last few days, and the first one was on

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 2>the Equal Rights Amendment. Molly, what are you seeing here

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 2>as somebody who this is near and dear to their heart.

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>The Equal Rights Amendment. Look, this is something it was ratified. Basically,

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting thing because it's something my mother fought

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>forward to. The thinking was that it was not so

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>crazy to have equal rights for women in the Constitution.

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So Phylish Flaughley basically dismantled the er by spending all

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of this time I'm trying to convince women that it

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>would prevent them from getting child support, and I mean,

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>just you know the kind of misinformation we see broadly

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>now in America. So I think very smartly. Senator Kirsten

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Jilibrand was committed to trying to get the Senate Archivist

0:04:22.600 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to read the er into the record and thus sort

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of create a world in which it was part of

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution. The Senate Archivist she just wouldn't do it

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and refused. Instead of pushing her the way a Republican

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>might firing her and hiring someone else who would do it.

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>They Biden just let her refuse, even though Senator Jili

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Brand had a really good point, which is it's actually

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>her interpretation of the Constitution is irrelevant, right, but didn't matter,

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so she refused to read it. So instead Biden decided

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and instead of forcing her, which is what a lot

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of Democrats wanted, including what I wanted, he just did

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>this statement that said it's happened, which is very nice

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and pretty but meaningless. Susan Glasser from The New Yorker

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>has a really smart take on it, and I think

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>this is correct. Biden ended his tenure with symbolic statements

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>about the er that does nothing for actual women, but

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>seems like a sad metaphor for where his presidency has ended.

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>Rovers's weight is gone, no national laws to help women

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in place, Trump and a host of other sexual harassers

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>return to power, And you really do see how so

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>much of what has happened in this twenty twenty four

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>cycle was about backlash to women and how Democrats were

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>just not able to do the necessary things to protect them.

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And look, I mean, life is long and we'll see

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>what happens. But it certainly feels like a real It

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>just feels like a moment where again Democrats brought a

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>stuffed animal to a knife fight.

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Agreed. So last night Friend of the Show MSNBC host

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 2>Lawrence O'Donnell hosted President Biden for an outgoing presidential interview,

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.679
<v Speaker 2>and one of the things he said that really caught

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>you and i's eye is that how bad the Red

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 2>States really screwed the handling of their economies during the

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 2>COVID years, especially with supply chains.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I was watching these hearings today, the Christie Nome Homeland

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Security hearings, and we saw Republicans like Bernie Marino in

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>the state of Ohio just grandstand and politic and he

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>even he asked Christy Nome if Lake and Riley would

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>still be alive had this is really what he asked,

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:54.279
<v Speaker 1>had Alejandro Mayorcas not been Homeland Security Secretary. It could

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>truly craven bit of politicking. Right, would a nursing student

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have been murdered had there been a different Homeland Security Okay?

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But what head But what I think is interesting is

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that Biden really tries not to do that. Democrats really

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>try not to politicize things. One of the reasons why

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Trump was able to win. But he did criticize at

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>this moment with Lawrence Red States, and he said Red

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>States really screwed up in terms of the way they

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>handled their economy and the way they handled manufacturing and

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the way they handled access to supply chains. That's why

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>he ended up investing more in Red States than Blue

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>states through various measures. Shortly after being asked about his

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>economic response to COVID, what I think is interesting about

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>this is we get back to the California problem.

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Right. California, fourth largest.

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Economy, pays way more into federal taxes than takes out,

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to need billions and billions of dollars to

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 1>rebuild after these fires. Already we see Republicans trying to

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>play politics. If Republicans were to lose California, our entire

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>American economy would greater. And so I do think that

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of all of us who pay taxes, Republicans,

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>please do not make California furious.

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 2>I'll say so, mai one. Speaking of the Lake and

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Riley Act, Republicans are just downright giddy too. Get to

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 2>making sure that brown people get deported from this country

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 2>as much as possible, but ICE, who seem to usually

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 2>be on that side, are saying whoa, whoa, whoa, buddy,

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 2>chill out.

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>So ICE warms that Republicans racist immigration bill is a

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>total bust. By the way, what I think is interesting

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>is we're seeing a lot now of ICE sort of

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>trying I can't figure out who is trying to message

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to who, but we are seeing some like I saw

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>this in this hearing today, Well, we're just going to

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>deport the criminals. We're not going to deport everyone. We're

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of that. I'm very curious to know is

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that because who is saying let's not deport everyone, and

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>who is saying let's deport everyone? And how is this

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>being acted out behind the scenes, Because clearly there is

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>some level of anxiety here that Donald Trump is just

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>going to go in and deport everyone and American citizens too.

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think I'm clearly picking that up as an undertone.

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things you have to remember is

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>like ICE agents are people, and if they're on television

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>holding screaming children and you know, deporting people, like we

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>live in a new world where everyone has a camera

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and everyone has a video, and like during you know

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>historically when we have in this country in turned people,

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like in World War Two when America in turned Japanese

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>people and took their houses. People didn't have iPhones, so

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't the results were not as immediately tangible. And

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a lot of Anxiet society here,

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that people and ice are going to be asked to do.

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 3>These things, and that the blowback for them is going

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 3>to be.

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>Very tough, and rightly so, because I think they are

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be asked to do these things. Stuart Stevens

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is a legendary campaign manager and the author of the

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Conspiracy to End America Five Ways My old Party is

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>driving our democracy to autocracy. Welcome back to fast politics, Stuart.

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, we needed you before Trump two point zero

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>takes over.

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 4>Discuss I have a positive take on this.

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh please, somebody has to have a positive take.

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 4>I believe that the moment they were in, exactly at

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 4>this moment, is the high order mark of trump Ism.

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 4>I think it will prove to be like my ancestors

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 4>and pickets charge, they almost get to the wall, but

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 4>can't get over the wall. You really have to be

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 4>careful here about drawing conclusions about this election.

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Ooh, say more about that?

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, an incumbent president with a forty point approval rate,

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 4>and all the post World War two elections incumbent party

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 4>got within two points of the presidential approval. So Harris

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 4>actually overperformed that and you had a right track under

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 4>thirty percent. It's a very difficult environment to win an election.

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 4>You know. When I was working for Bush in two thousand,

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 4>we would track the right track, wrong track and moving

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 4>little movements in it in a race that was as

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 4>tight as the two thousand race, really made a difference.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 4>I mean, in a typical race, you should get if

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 4>you're an incumbent, you should get ninety percent of the

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 4>right track, and if you're a challenger you should get

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 4>eighty five to ninety percent of the wrong track. So

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 4>that was a good environment for a challenger to beat

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 4>an incumbent party now, and that's what happened. I don't

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 4>think that should be confused with it being an active

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 4>embrace of trump Ism. I think there are two very

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 4>different things. I think this is how you end up

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 4>worshiping volcanoes. There's a drought, the volcano Belch is in,

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 4>it rains, and the next thing you know, you're worshiping

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 4>the volcano Guard. They're probably not related. And I just

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 4>don't think the country is where compassm is. And we

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 4>had an election unlike any other we've ever had and

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 4>combent president gets out in July, vice president comes in.

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 4>You know, probably we shouldn't try that again.

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and by the way, that that didn't work when

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it was done historically either.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I still maintain I think the Harri's campaign ran

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 4>a very good campaign. I also think that it's a

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 4>mistake to look at all of the field operation that

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 4>they did and think that that is now no longer

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 4>beneficial or applicable to campaigns because she lost. To me,

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 4>that's like saying, Okay, we lost Vietnam. No more helicopters,

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 4>right right, right, that's it. I don't think we lost

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 4>because of the helicopters, and I don't think they lost

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 4>because of the field And I think she could have

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 4>gone Joe Rogan hourly and it wouldn't have impacted the election.

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we don't need to talk about this election.

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It's over, and maybe it's better just not. But I

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>just wonder Trump was forward facing for four years.

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 4>You mean talking about the future, not even talking.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>About the future, just being on tell like being a

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>celebrity for four years, and you remember that that people

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>were Google searching the day of the election.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 3>Is Joe Biden still in the race?

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I wonder how much like in this New America,

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to just be out there all day, every day,

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:44.839
<v Speaker 1>no matter what.

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 4>That's interesting. One of the lessons the Democratic Party to

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 4>take from this is when you govern, you do have

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 4>to govern like you represent the whole.

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Country, right, which they did well.

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 4>When you politic you don't.

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:01.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that I think is the case.

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 4>In these hearings. That's not governing politics as a servant

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 4>of governing. But your first obligation in those hearings as

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 4>a Democrat is a political obligation. And I don't think

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 4>that you should worry at all about how it's going

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 4>to be received. Your message is going to receive by

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 4>those voters who are deep into Trumpism.

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Like the cautiousness that we saw in twenty sixteen, right,

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even talking about the candidate. I'm just talking

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>about the cautiousness, the Clinton cautiousness which then we saw

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>in Biden world, which Biden was able to eat out

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a win with it in twenty twenty, perhaps because of

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>just how unpopular Trump was, But that cautiousness is not

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>how you win elections. And I think like when you

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>think about sort if you even just look at twenty

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty four and you look at Rubin, who was one

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of the you know, who was able to win over

0:14:57.400 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Trump voters.

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 3>He did that by just being ever are all the time.

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But anyway, it's neither here nor there, or it's

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>not relevant anymore because there are no elections at least

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>until twenty twenty five. But I'm wondering if you could

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about Trump is planning a kind of

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>shockun on on Monday and then this weekend. On today,

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>we just saw the mayor of New York go down

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow lago.

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 3>That's ongoing.

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 4>I think the technical term for that is plea bargain.

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So in my mind there's a real question about

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>what happens next and what that looks like.

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think you're right. I think you will do

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 4>shocking all and I think that as it begins to

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 4>take effect, it's not a majority of it's not going

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 4>to be popular in politics. I mean, I think it's

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 4>really important that you distinguished if someone says in a

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 4>poll that they're worried about immigration, they think that the

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 4>border is a problem, that doesn't mean that that is

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 4>what consumes them in their life. If you just ask them,

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 4>do you think it's a problem, yes. If you ask

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 4>me if terrorism bad, yes, walk around thinking about terrorism?

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 4>And I think that the mandate that Trump is trying

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 4>to take from that is going to be one that

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 4>is going to play into their instincts to overreact. And

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 4>we do have the reality that the economy is really good.

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 4>And what do they just like about the economy the most,

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 4>that record stock market or the record low unemployment. So

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 4>I just don't think that there is a broad mandate

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 4>for most of the stuff they want to do, if

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 4>you go back to two thousand and four. So we

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 4>want a very narrow election. I mean, if less than

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 4>half the people who attend to Ohio State home game

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 4>had changed their votes, we would have lost Ohio and

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 4>we would have lost the election. We being when I

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 4>was working for Bush, and what did Bush do? He

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 4>took that as a mandate and he went out and

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 4>tried to privatize social Security, and it blew up in

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 4>his face. There was not a desire to do that.

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 4>So I don't think that people like the headsets and

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 4>the Tulsi and the cash betel. I think the reason

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 4>Trump nominates these people, I think he knows they're idiots.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 4>He nominates them because he wants to see senators humiliate themselves.

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 4>He wants to assert their subservience through the humiliation of

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 4>having to say things that are not true. And I

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 4>felt this so strongly watching my old friend and client,

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 4>Senator Roger Wicker, now Chairman of the Armed Services Committee,

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 4>in the headset hearings. I know Roger well. In many

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.160
<v Speaker 4>ways we come from the same world. I don't think

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 4>Roger would hire PDX has to cut his law.

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 3>No.

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean that literally, he wouldn't hire some weird guy

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 4>with the drinking problem was tattooed up to like be

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 4>that close to his house and yet here he is now.

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 4>He doesn't have to do that. And John McCain wouldn't

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 4>have done it. He would have insisted that Trump appoints

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 4>someone who was competent, you know, a competent conservative. You know,

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 4>it's not like you're asking to point Bernie Sanders Secretary

0:17:59.040 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 4>of Defense.

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.640
<v Speaker 1>No, when you're watching that, because I watched it too.

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>There's like some congeniality and some like Senate congeniality, and

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 1>then there's a lot of like real weird grandstanding. Like

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I was watching a hearing today where Bernie Marino blamed

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 1>the fires on Governor Gavenwsom. Like it's a sort of

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:28.959
<v Speaker 1>hodgepodge of the kind of congeniality that the Senate once had,

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>plus like Fox News auditions.

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, is that what you're seeing?

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:37.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, listen, I think the it's inevitable to watch a

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 4>hearing and not be frustrated if you are against the

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 4>person who's being nominated, because there is such an erratic

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 4>flow of questions and there's no coherent follow through you

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 4>have each individual senator. It's it's a very tough way

0:18:55.640 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 4>to prosecute somewhere. If every three minutes a new proecutter

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 4>had a step up in front of a jury and

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.439
<v Speaker 4>take another new tack, the jury would just be confused.

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 4>You Know what I would have liked to have seen

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.959
<v Speaker 4>Democrats do, still would is everyone ask two questions at

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 4>the beginning of their hearing. You believe that Joe Biden

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 4>want a free and fair election in twenty and if

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 4>the equivocator say no, they said, okay, doesn't matter what

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 4>else you say doesn't matter. You're disqualified. And do you

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 4>believe that the criminals who assaulted police officers in January sixth,

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty one should be pardon And if you're equivocated

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 4>and now you say that's it, you're disqualified.

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 3>But who would disqualify that?

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 4>You have to say that that disqualifies you from service

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 4>in this government. And I think it's about framing what

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 4>is the level here that is acceptable. So if you

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 4>look at Rubio, there's a level that I disagree with

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 4>you on public policy in a lot of ways, but

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 4>I think that you are an acceptable nominee for Secretary

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 4>of State. You may be a terrible one, you may

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 4>be a great one, but in keeping with advising consent,

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 4>I can, without a heavy contents vote for you. And

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 4>that should be the same consistent line in all of

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 4>these The obligation here for Democrats is to just remind

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 4>people that it doesn't have to be this way, that

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 4>there is a simple standard here that's not an egregious one.

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 4>Appoint competent people who aren't going to use these and

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 4>very important positions to work through their own personal issues.

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 4>When you go too much into the weeds of well

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 4>this discoff is that discollifies. It's easy to lose the

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 4>big picture that just you are a ridiculous nominee, you

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 4>are a basthoon, you're a weekend cable show host.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>My theory of the case is they should just try

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to figure out who are the most dangerous and go

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>all in. So, for example, I think about RFK Junior,

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>who obviously would have an enormous effect on the way

0:20:56.000 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 1>this country handles another pandemic for example.

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 4>Yep, if these nominated people were going to.

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Die, So why when Democrats just focus on those candidates.

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure that they're not doing that. I would

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 4>focus on Kennedy, Patel, Hegset and Gabbard. Yeah, what's interesting

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 4>about Kennedy is it's going to accelerate a divide in

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 4>the country because the people who are going to be

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 4>most damaged are going to be those who are less

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 4>informed and lower income, with the exception of the nutty

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 4>kind of whole foods moms that don't believe in vaccinations,

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 4>and that's in the same way in the pandemic. It's

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 4>the statistic that's provable that's demonstrable. That's true. Those in

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 4>red states who listened to Fox News died at a

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 4>higher rate. One of the mortality elements in that disease

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 4>was do you watch Fox News? I mean that's it's

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 4>sort of like the points on to a joke. You know,

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 4>it's really deadly to watch Fox News or something. Yes,

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 4>it was deathley, it did kill people. Why is Trump

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 4>doing this? I mean he's a guy who's you know, vaccinated,

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 4>everybody in his family's vaccinated. He doesn't believe this kooky stuff.

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 4>He does it to prove that he can, to make

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 4>you do it. This is how dictators operate, their need

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 4>to humiliate those that are serving under him. It's a

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 4>bad way to run a democracy.

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are in a very tough position. The thing that

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I was stripped by. I thought the best moments in

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>these hearings were when Democrats were very specific and they

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 1>said things like Bernie Sanders asking Scott Besson, who is

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>by far not the worst pick in any stretch of

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the imagination, very quote unquote normal.

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, worked for George Soros.

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>This guy is not ideologically maga whatever that means. So

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.600
<v Speaker 1>question is, and he's gay, and you know, he's got kids.

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's just a number of reasons why he

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like probably one of the less terrifying choices. But

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>when Bernie Sanders asked him, did he believe that you

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 1>should raise federal minimum wage from seven to twenty five?

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>He said no, And then he sort of couldn't answer

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.919
<v Speaker 1>these questions about Medicare Medicaid. Maybe he doesn't know what

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>they are, maybe he had you know, he's read Project

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five.

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, who knows.

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>But I thought those questions were the most effective because

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>part of what's happening here is that Democrats need to

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 1>explain to the people what Republicans are about to do,

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>because if they don't, Republicans will blame Democrats. And if

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen anything in the last four years, it's that

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that actually works.

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I agree, And that's the case in the minimum wage,

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 4>where the majority of the country supports raising the minimum wage.

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 4>You know, you can have a conversation should it be twelve,

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 4>should it be fifteen, but it's it's overwhelmingly popular. The

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 4>same with raising taxes on people who make more than

0:23:57.280 --> 0:23:59.480
<v Speaker 4>a million dollars a year. You know, all my life,

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:01.600
<v Speaker 4>I've looked to polls that asked that question, and I've

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 4>never seen it lower than eighty percent.

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.399
<v Speaker 1>I have been really struck by the fact that Democrats

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>were able to lose on populism, right, Like Biden enacted

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>all this populist legislation and Republicans were like, we're running

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a populist They're not.

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 4>I go back, and you know, there's this sort of

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 4>InVogue now for some reason to say that demographics are

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 4>our destiny. But Trump's support is non college educated white voters,

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 4>which is the fastest declining group in the country. And

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 4>I think a lot of these people are supporting Trump

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 4>driven not by ideology or by choice as much as

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 4>by race. And I don't think we talk about that enough.

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Certainly that is what's going on too. But the fact

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats were not able to capture populism when Republicans

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>entire goshtalt is about making sure these tax cuts for

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>billionaires stay in place, that feels like a real like.

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 4>It's a classic messaging failure. I don't really understand. Well,

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, I don't understand the Republican Party, so god forbid,

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 4>I would understand the Democratic Party. But you know, there

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 4>are moments when I look at the Democratic Party and

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 4>I remember why as Republicans we won races we shouldn't

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.880
<v Speaker 4>have won. And it goes to this larger question to framing.

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean what I think had I been on that here,

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 4>I would have challenged Pete Texas patriotism. I wish for

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 4>ben It. I don't think you're a patriot. If you

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 4>support using military to fire on protesters, you're not. That's

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 4>not American. You're a disgrace. And I think you have

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 4>to use that kind of broad framing. Now you look

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 4>at a nominee like Harris, who I thought ran a

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:44.919
<v Speaker 4>very good campaign, But she's not a candidate who is

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 4>going to emerge just biographically and otherwise as a populist

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 4>candidate per se. She is going to be seen as

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 4>something that most people would think was an extraordinary career,

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 4>which I think is positive. But it's not like she

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 4>rose up out of the desert like El sid to

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.720
<v Speaker 4>claim this Mannle And I think there are a lot

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:11.880
<v Speaker 4>of Democratic candidates out there who are governors, particularly who

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 4>do that better, you know, who aren't from San Francisco.

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 4>This is the kind of easy labels you could put

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 4>on someone my carrots, but you know, I thought her

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 4>speech capturing patriotism was really a roadmap for where Democrats

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 4>need to go, and I hope because she lost, they

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 4>don't abandon that.

0:26:27.600 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Stuart Stevens, thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you,

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 3>thank you.

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 4>Molly. I always listened to the show and always I'm

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 4>smarter for it. I think.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Sky Perriman is the president of Democracy Forward.

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Fast Politics, Sky.

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 5>Well, thank you always for having me.

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Explain to us what your organization does. Just for those

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of us who don't remember from the last time you

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>were on.

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 5>Democracy Forward is a legal organization and we bring cases

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 5>and legal challenges against anti democratic actions that harm people

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 5>and communities across the country. We also do work on

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:11.239
<v Speaker 5>policy and public affairs and ensure that people can use

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 5>their voice in the most effective way in this pivotal moment.

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 3>So let's talk about what that looks like.

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Right now we're about to go into Trump two point zero.

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 3>What does that mean?

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, for us, it means that our work is scaling

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 5>and expanding, which, as you know, Molly, we've been doing

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 5>for the last three years, really bringing in some of

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 5>the best lawyers in the country, some of the best advocates.

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 5>Because of the threats to democracy that we see at

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 5>the state level, the threats to people. We just recently

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 5>blocked a big law in Arkansas that Sarah ha could

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 5>be Sanders signed that would have criminalized librarians. I mean,

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 5>that is the reality that communities are living in today.

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 5>But we know we're going to have a lot of

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 5>work to do because if the Trump administration this time

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 5>does what it says it's going to do, what it's

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.800
<v Speaker 5>already been doing in these last few weeks, we know

0:27:59.880 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 5>that there will be a lot of need for legal

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 5>challenges to protect people's economic well being and keeping costs

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 5>down and protecting their wages, to protecting the ability of

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 5>the government to function in a way that is nonpartisan

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 5>and not sort of ideological with our civil service, to

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 5>protecting voting rights, and so much more.

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 3>So, let's talk about what that means.

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, Trump had promised shock and all, So what

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>do we think shock and all looks like? And also

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to predict the future because nobody knows,

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>but it does seem to me pretty strange that the

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>mayor of.

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 3>New York is in mar Lago and I have to

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 3>wonder where that goes. And you know, whether or not

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 3>he signs off on something. You know what that looks like.

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, he's already said he's going to come in

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 5>and do a shotgun awe of executive orders, And yesterday

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Politico reported that we at Democracy Forward and alongside lots

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.720
<v Speaker 5>of partners, are going to be looking at those executive

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 5>orders the minute they come in and analyzing them. Your

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 5>listeners can go to Democracy twenty twenty five dot org,

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 5>which is an effort that we launched to get real

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 5>time information on inauguration day and on days throughout the

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 5>early Trump administration on what is happening with executive orders,

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 5>what legal challenges are going to be brought and will

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 5>be brought to address anything that is unlawful. And so

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 5>I think that you will see everything from a range

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 5>of kind of performative executive orders that will declare things

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 5>to shock in all people, to target communities, to executive

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 5>orders that will do real things that are problematic for people,

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 5>whether that is conditioning federal funding on the particular ideology

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 5>that the Trump administration has a kind of a far

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 5>right ideology, which they've said that they would maybe seek

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 5>to do to declaring or undermining our federal civil servants,

0:29:55.520 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 5>who are the people that do the work across the

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.120
<v Speaker 5>country of our government for the American people doing something

0:30:01.160 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 5>to politicize them, to seeking to politicize the military. And

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.760
<v Speaker 5>then of course we know on immigration that we will

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 5>see some type of shock and all action, and that

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 5>doesn't even touch foreign policy and some of the other

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 5>areas that we're watching. What we can do. We've seen

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 5>this play but before the Trump administration loss nearly eighty

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 5>percent of the time in court the last time we've

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 5>talked about this before. But looks like they've not learned

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 5>a lot of their lessons that many of the things

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 5>they're going to seek to do will have legal problems.

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 5>We and others are going to be there in court

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 5>on behalf of people and communities to make sure their

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 5>rights are protected.

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, for sure.

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering what that looks like if we're trying

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to protect people, for example, if they go in and

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>they just start taking people out, I mean, like, is

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>due process going to still happen? I mean, what's your

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of guess on how you can push back against

0:30:59.880 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff.

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 5>There's a range of laws that have not actually been

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 5>rewritten yet by the US Supreme Court that really every administration,

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, Republican Democrat, whoever is in office, has to

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 5>follow in order to you know, in order to be

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 5>able to institute policies or agendas, and that Trump administration

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 5>really often flagrantly disregards those. And so we've had a

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 5>lot of success, as have our partners, in suing and

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 5>winning when they disregard the law. That's a real thing.

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 5>And I think you've had folks on your show talk

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 5>about this. But the courts today, in terms of the

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 5>way the federal judicial landscape looks, the types of judges

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 5>that are on the court, that believe in the rule

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 5>of law, that believe that the court's fundamental role is

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 5>to protect our rights, not to reverse them. The federal

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 5>courts look better than they did on the last day

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.959
<v Speaker 5>of the Trump administration because of President Biden's historic record

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 5>on appointing federal judges and getting them confirmed that really

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 5>represent America. So I think the courts are going to

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 5>be a real front line. That's only the front line,

0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 5>and it's going to take everybody using their voice, making

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 5>sure their members of Congress know understanding that this president

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 5>does not have some broad margins in the United States

0:32:15.640 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 5>Congress where he can ram an agenda through unless people

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 5>let him do that, and that that will be a choice,

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 5>and it will be a choice with political consequences. So

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 5>I think that it's going to take all of those

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 5>tools to make sure that we're really protecting the American

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 5>people and their well being in this time.

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Jesse and I just did all this stuff about Project

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five during this summer, and one of the things.

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 3>That we were struck by was that a lot.

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Of this like and I was listening to Russ Vought

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>nomination hearing this week, and you know, he's one of.

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 3>The architects of Project twenty twenty five.

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>He's going to run the Congressional Budget Office if he

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>gets appointed, which I think is very likely. He does

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of stuff that's sort of you know, he

0:32:59.480 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>knows how how Washington works.

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.800
<v Speaker 3>He is an insider.

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So he breaks a law in ways that or I

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know, if he breaks a lot. He skirts the

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>law in ways that are very clever. And I'm thinking

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>about how they held the Ukraine money.

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking about it many.

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Ways, and which he said, and there are laws he's

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>planning to use this time about ways to sort of

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>control the purse and make and take that away from Congress.

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how worried are you about that? And what

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>do you think the legal pushback is for that.

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, they can try to do these things, But fundamentally,

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 5>I think that we're going to see in the legal

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 5>cases are going to show this, the reporting will show this,

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.880
<v Speaker 5>and people's voices will show this. This is not an

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 5>administration that's shown that it's committed to the American people.

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 5>It's not an administration that's actually shown that it's committed

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 5>to hard working American people. You're already seeing that with

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 5>the fact that's seeking to operate some you know, shadows

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 5>situation having you know, billionaires who you know do not

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 5>have experience sort of advocating for the common good advising.

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 5>We're already just seeing a range of this stuff, and

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:18.240
<v Speaker 5>so there are many laws that are implicated at democracy forward,

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 5>we successfully challenge the federal government's abrupt discontinuation of federal

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 5>funding to communities across the country that they sought to institute.

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of things on the funding side where

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 5>I think there are legal remedies that will need to

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 5>be exercised. And then there's a lot of things they

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 5>just can't do unless Congress approves it, and I think

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 5>there'll be a fight there. They are very shrewd. We

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 5>understand that, and I think, you know, you saw that

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 5>in the campaign where they sought to run a whole

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 5>campaign where they said that they didn't you know, they

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 5>were disavowing Project twenty twenty five. And then immediately when

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 5>they're elected they put the architects right in their administration

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 5>to accelerate it. But I think that and I do

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.479
<v Speaker 5>believe this. I think the American people will very soon

0:34:57.600 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 5>see this for what it is, and I think the

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 5>court and our Congress and other forums like that are

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 5>really going to have, you know, be part of that

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 5>exposure scene. They're going to have some choices to make.

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 5>I mean, there are a number of laws and policies

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 5>that are being challenged right now in court that really

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 5>help people in communities. I mean our privacy protections, healthcare

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:21.960
<v Speaker 5>privacy protections, labor protections like overtime pay, and other important

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 5>policies that far right groups have sought to challenge. The

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 5>Department of Justice has been defending that the Trump administration

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 5>will not defend it's going to start showing I think

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:34.440
<v Speaker 5>to people across the country, really what's at stake in

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 5>our everyday lives for all of us, And I think

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 5>that you'll see a real tide shift.

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know, because I don't know what's going

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to happen. It just feels like that voters are not

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>connecting with what this administration is going to do.

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 3>And you know there's a reason for that, right.

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if you could sort of talk to us

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>about what democratic at the state level can do. So like,

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:00.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, we're going to see a lot of executive orders.

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 3>We don't know what they are, but there are.

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Certainly things that Democrats can do, and we've seen democratic

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:10.439
<v Speaker 1>attorneys general are sort are prepared for this moment. Will

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you explain to us a little bit what's happening there?

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:16.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, the attorney generals are already acting. I mean they're

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 5>already you've already seen them this week. Go seek to

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 5>intervene in cases where the Department of Justice is defending

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 5>you know, whether it's the Affordable Care Act or other

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 5>really important you know, elements of really important policies to

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 5>make sure that those cases have a strong defense. Because

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:36.279
<v Speaker 5>we you know, the Trump administration is coming in and

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 5>will be leading the DOJ. And so you're already seeing

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 5>the attorneys general across the country act in that way.

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:47.399
<v Speaker 5>And I think that they have definitely made clear that

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 5>if this administration, as have we have come in and

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:54.280
<v Speaker 5>sign executive orders or take other actions that threaten people's

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 5>rights that threatened the ability of states to protect their people,

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 5>but the threatened people's rights overall, that you will see litigation.

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 5>And in the last administration, state ags played a critical

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 5>role in protecting the rights of people across the country.

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean for even people that did not live in

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 5>the states where those ags were from. They litigated really

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 5>important cases, as did we, as did other organizations like

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 5>the ACLU and civil rights organizations and so many. It's

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:25.239
<v Speaker 5>going to take everybody, but I do think that you're

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 5>going to see that this time again.

0:37:27.680 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about the Supreme Court we saw with the

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump sentencing. There is no reason why they should have

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>weighed on the Trump sentence, but you know, they do

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>have this very broad sense in which the president can

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:44.800
<v Speaker 1>do whatever we want. Right Well, we'll remember their last

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>decision when it came to presidential immunity.

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 3>But I'm wondering there's a theory of the case.

0:37:49.040 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Now and again, we have so little to go on,

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.759
<v Speaker 1>so little to give us hope, but that this is that,

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>this is why I bring this up. There's a sort

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of chance, very slim chance that Roberts and Cony Barrett

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>are at least a little bit won't totally represtamp everything

0:38:08.080 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Trump wants to do. Do you think that's overly optimistic.

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 5>I don't. I think it's overly optimistic. I think it's

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 5>consistent with what we've seen in the courts for some time.

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 5>It's consistent with what we've seen just this week. And look,

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 5>I'm never going to tell you that the courts are

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 5>the silver bullet here. I mean, it is going to

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 5>take everyone in this country that believes in themselves, that

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:31.360
<v Speaker 5>believes in their families and their communities and their future,

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 5>and that is committed to saying we are not going

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 5>to enable a far right agenda that is not for

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:41.719
<v Speaker 5>working people, that is not for our schools, that is

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 5>not for our communities to pull this country back. You know,

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:46.960
<v Speaker 5>you have to if you want to get that agenda three,

0:38:47.000 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 5>you're going to have to get it through our democracy.

0:38:48.880 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 5>And that means you're going to have to be able

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 5>to get it through the courts and get it through Congress,

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:54.799
<v Speaker 5>and I think that, you know, we're really you know,

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 5>you know, I think that that's going to be a

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 5>big piece of this I certainly don't think the courts

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 5>are the silver bull here. And of course this Supreme Court,

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 5>you and I have talked about it a lot. This

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 5>Supreme Court has reversed the rights of people in many

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 5>ways over the last few years. But I do think

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 5>you will see the Supreme Court and the courts across

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:18.200
<v Speaker 5>the country serve as an incredible check on a lot

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 5>of what this incoming administration is going to seek to do.

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 5>Because the incoming administration operates unlawfully and is pushing and

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:31.439
<v Speaker 5>a way of operating that is not consistent with our laws.

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 5>And so I think that it's not overly optimistic to

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:36.720
<v Speaker 5>say that there will be some wins. I mean, that's

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 5>going to happen, but we will also need to make

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 5>sure that people who are not lawyers, who are not

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 5>involved in these cases, you know, don't give up hope

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:49.799
<v Speaker 5>and really demand of their elected officials and of their

0:39:49.840 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 5>community members and of themselves that we are going to

0:39:53.520 --> 0:39:57.880
<v Speaker 5>ensure that this country is not on accelerating a backslide.

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, we have seen judges do insane things for Trump

0:40:01.719 --> 0:40:03.240
<v Speaker 1>though over the last four years.

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 5>There's no question that this Supreme Court, that the decisions

0:40:07.239 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 5>that we've seen out of the Supreme Court, especially the

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 5>immunity decision, are really contrary in many instances to the

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 5>way that our laws have been interpreted for some time.

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 5>For the very founding principles of our country that was

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 5>founded to reject and throw off monarchy, I mean, you know,

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 5>there's no question about that. And so the fight this

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:30.959
<v Speaker 5>time is going to look different in that it's going

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 5>to require a high degree of collaboration among people that

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 5>are building cases through the courts, and communities that are affected,

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.800
<v Speaker 5>and lawmakers at every level. Right, It's really going to

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:46.960
<v Speaker 5>require all of us together. And that's not a talking

0:40:47.000 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 5>point and it's not a you know, Goldilocks kind of

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 5>naive image. This country can do this. I mean, we

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 5>have done it before in earlier times of our history.

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 5>But that is the pivotal moment that we're at and

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 5>the work that we're doing it democracy forward, and the

0:41:02.320 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 5>work that we have the privilege of seeing and working

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 5>with others that are doing in so many organizations and

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:11.240
<v Speaker 5>communities across the country. Is really to make sure that people,

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 5>the American people have the tools that they need, the

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:16.359
<v Speaker 5>legal tools they need, and the other tools they need

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 5>to meet this moment.

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I'm wondering if you can just talk to

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>us for like a little bit. Is it sort of

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>set up for people to be able to protest peacefully?

0:41:27.160 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you worried that there hasn't been more protesting yet?

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, where are you with that? Because we did

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have four years ago a lot of protests.

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:37.480
<v Speaker 3>And it seems like that is not what's happening anymore.

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 5>I don't look at the presence or absence of sort

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:46.759
<v Speaker 5>of protests in the streets right now as an indication

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 5>really of anything. I mean, to be candid with you,

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:53.759
<v Speaker 5>I think that what we've seen is this is a

0:41:53.800 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 5>president that got elected telling people that he didn't know

0:41:56.880 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 5>anything about Project twenty twenty five. Pulling consistently has shown,

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 5>including you know, as he was being elected, that conservatives, liberals,

0:42:06.600 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 5>and independents all reject that extreme agenda you now have.

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 5>In the early stages of the transition, and throughout the

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 5>last few weeks a number of announcements that suggest they're

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 5>going to accelerate a Project twenty twenty five agenda which

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 5>the majority of the people do not want. We've seen

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 5>the final voting counts that show that the majority of

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:30.840
<v Speaker 5>the voting public did not vote for Donald Trump.

0:42:30.880 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 3>He did win the.

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 5>Popular vote, but if you add up everybody that went

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 5>to the polls and who they voted for, you know,

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 5>the majority of them did not vote for Donald Trump.

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.240
<v Speaker 5>The majority voted against them. So I think that really

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:47.000
<v Speaker 5>this shows you that this is a moment and that

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 5>we're in It's not momentary. I think last time people

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:52.839
<v Speaker 5>thought that this was he lost the popular vote. They

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 5>thought this was a fluke. You know, how could this happen?

0:42:55.680 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 5>But we are now seeing this extremism that has really

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 5>set in across the country because of groups like the

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 5>Project twenty twenty five, groups that are trying to wield

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 5>political power. Right, so we're in the middle of it.

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:11.399
<v Speaker 5>This is an opposition that we are building and a

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 5>real path and plan for a better future that includes everyone,

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 5>not just some people, and not just the privilege, and

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 5>not just people who are politically loyal. And so I

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 5>think that the strategies this time are just different. I

0:43:24.920 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 5>think you will see people use their voices and protests

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 5>in more traditional ways. But I also think you're going

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 5>to see them in the courts, and I promise to

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 5>that the communities that we're working with, I think you're

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 5>going to see them in the courts. I think you're

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 5>going to see them demanding more of their elected representatives.

0:43:39.120 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 5>I think you're going to see this is about collective

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:46.920
<v Speaker 5>power building and really leveraging the power of the American people,

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 5>their belief in a better future at this time to

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:55.400
<v Speaker 5>stop some of this very extreme and radicalized policies that

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 5>we're hearing about.

0:43:56.600 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thank you, thank you, Scot thank you.

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 2>No more Thickly Jesse Cannon s my junk fast Minnesota,

0:44:08.600 --> 0:44:11.239
<v Speaker 2>home to Governor Walls, who you and I have been

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 2>a fan of. There's fuckery going on there with the

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 2>State House trying to make sure that Governor Walls can't

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 2>enact any nice things like school lunches. Again, what are

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 2>you seeing?

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, this is still happening in North

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Carolina with Justice Riggs, right. I mean, this is kind

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of a thing we're seeing everywhere, which is that these

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:32.879
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are inspired by Trump's anti democratic rhetoric and by

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it won for him.

0:44:34.440 --> 0:44:37.359
<v Speaker 2>But we should say. What's really nice is how many

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:39.920
<v Speaker 2>people are showing up to fight back against justice. Riggs

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:42.400
<v Speaker 2>is starting to work. It seems like the Griffin campaigns

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:45.680
<v Speaker 2>backing down because the overwhelming populace is really showing up

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 2>and that is hope for us.

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is good one vote margin for two weeks.

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:53.640
<v Speaker 1>The GOP claims that they can with that one vote

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>margin just do whatever the fuck they want.

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Of course, I don't think we should be surprised.

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:01.240
<v Speaker 1>By this, but it really is this kind of anti

0:45:01.360 --> 0:45:07.560
<v Speaker 1>democratic vein in the Republican Party, and luckily Governor Wallas

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:08.359
<v Speaker 1>is on it.

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he will come on the podcast next week and

0:45:11.000 --> 0:45:11.719
<v Speaker 3>talk about it.

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:16.839
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this episode of Fast Politics. Tune in

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 1>every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday to hear the best

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 1>minds and politics make sense of all this chaos. If

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this podcast, please send it to a friend

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and keep the conversation going.

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening.