WEBVTT - David Kudla on the Markets (

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to our guest, David Coudla, who is founder

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and CEO and chief investment strategist at Mainstay Capital Management. So, David,

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>on a day like today, a little bit for everybody.

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>For the bears, well enough of that nonsense of those

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy rallies. And for the bulls, well you wouldn't expect

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>us to go up every day. Nice to have a

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.640
<v Speaker 1>little consolidation. How do you see it? Hi, Brian, I

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:26.639
<v Speaker 1>think that we're what we're saying, we're continuing to see

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>is uh interpretation of is the FED going to pivot

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like we saw back in or the the narrative of

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a FED pivot back in July in early August. Now

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a Fed pause. We had a noted

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>economist this is on Bloomberg earlier this week, uh ed

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Yar Denny that said he thought that the November meeting

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 1>would be the last hype by the FED. And then

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of course we have daily who beneficial who has said, uh,

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>make make no mistake about it. There, we're not gonna

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>stop hiking rates, We're not going to cut ray. It's

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>next year. So it's just back and forth. And when

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>we um have expectations that the Fed has a very

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>aggressive tone, like after Jackson Hole, like the meeting stock

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 1>sell off. When there's a belief of a pivot or

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a pause, stocks do better. And that's what we saw

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days, Jevin. I mean, let's not

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>forget that. A lot of what we saw in the

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>last couple of days. It's probably downe to a short

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>squeeze and people conflating what after what the r b

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 1>A did in terms of that lesson expected interest rate hike,

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>that others are going to just slow down a little bit,

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>so they perhaps conflated or confused what was going on

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>with perhaps a turnaround, a change in sentiment entirely. Yeah,

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I think between the confusion from the Bank of England

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>where they're buying bonds on the long end of the

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>curve but the raising interest rates lower than expected rate

0:01:56.200 --> 0:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>hike in Australia, um that that's what tree is. These

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>beliefs of uh, the central banks, major central banks, and

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think certainly eyes in the US and a lot

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of eyes around the world are looking at the Federal

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Reserve that there may be a softening of that stance,

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>There may be a less aggressive position, There may be

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a pivot or a pause. But when the Fed officials

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 1>come out to dismiss that UM, the massive rally we

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>had on Monday and Tuesday becomes a flattish day to

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a down day like today. David, give us an idea

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>of what you are looking for out of the job's

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>report Friday and how it's going to inform the Federal Reserve. Well,

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, we're looking at consensus estimates

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of two two seventy jobs and uh, you know, we've

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>seen a continued strength in the in the workforce. Uh.

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:51.639
<v Speaker 1>Recently the number of job openings had reduced. We saw

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>data came down from about eleven million to ten million

0:02:55.000 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and so, uh, we expect that UM,

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that continued strength in the labor force to have a Obviously,

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the impact on has been has been the area of

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy that has remained very strong, very robust. Uh.

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>As we've continued to have these concerns about a recession

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but with unemployment this low, with jobs

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>doing this well, it's hard to see that. Yeah. The

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>point I was trying to make before we went to

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>break was briefly that you were getting into where the

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>data maybe more important than the commentary, and you understand

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>why we're much closer to the so called terminal rate

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>than we used to be. UM do you see it

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that way? And UM, how does the data sit with you?

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you feel comfortable with it? Well, we've

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>got data coming in mixed, right, So we have when

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>we look at UH, some of the U S I,

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>S I S M factory orders that came in this

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>week felt two points to fifty point nine near contraction territory,

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>lowest level since May of two thousand and nine. UM.

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 1>We have at the same time, we have housing prices

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that are at the lowest level for September since two

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nine, with mortgage rates that have continued to rise.

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So we see that the economy is slowing and slowing

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>UH significantly, but jobs are remaining, are remaining strong and

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't have we haven't seen the suration there. So I

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>think that for the Fed too h really change their policy.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:35.559
<v Speaker 1>They need to see that change in jobs. We've also

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>we also know that we've never the Fed has never

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>stopped a rate hiking cycle. With the FED funds rate

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>UH not rising above real rates, above positive real rates

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>rising the rate the UH, the FED funds rate above

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that of of inflation. So that's a long way to

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>go here. It's not very often you go from zero

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>to three or four hundred basis points in this quick

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a time. So think that is a little bit of

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>a check on that. Uh. And it does bring into

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the conversation this discussion about about whether the neutral rate

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>gets adjusted lower given financial instability considerations, the debt levels

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are high, the rapidity of the hike increases maybe a

0:05:18.600 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>factor affecting where the neutral rate is. Yeah, but we've

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>seen the new tra rate, or if we want to

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about the terminal rate, we were down near three

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>point two percent Midsummer. We're now up to about four

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>point seven four point eight percent. Uh, and I think

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>if anything, we see that terminal rate and new TRA

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>rate move even higher. Uh. They're they're talking about we've

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 1>had discussions about uh, fragility of the economy. I don't

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>think the Fed is concerned about those issues. Uh. They're

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>going to tame inflation. They're going to raise hikes, raise rates,

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to high rates until they see inflation coming down.

0:05:55.600 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>So UH, obviously October thirteenth is going to be very

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>instructive in terms of what we see for September CPI. David,

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>very quick, they give us an idea of what you're

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>investing in, very in brief. Well, you talked a little

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>bit bit about what's happened in the energy complex here recently,

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>or at least with oil. We've been bullish on energy

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for all of this year. UH and with the holdings

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.239
<v Speaker 1>that we initiated last year. UH invest co Dynamic Energy

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Exploration Production et f p x C fourteen percent over

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>these last three days, but having a very good year

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>even through this summer corrections, doing very well this year. UH.

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And also with what's happening in housing, we like we're

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>actually shorting real estate. David, thank you so much for

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us. David, could let that I find in chief

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>executive non chief investment strategists main stay capital management