WEBVTT - Fantasy Baseball 2020: 1st Base Rankings! 

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast. If you want to

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:05.160
<v Speaker 1>listen live, all you have to do is download the

0:00:05.200 --> 0:00:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app and search for Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Also,

0:00:09.440 --> 0:00:11.119
<v Speaker 1>if you want to catch this show on video, for

0:00:11.200 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>sure to check out Zoomo TV channel seven nineteen and

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>that's where you can find sports Grids Fantasy Sports Network.

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy the show, and thanks so much for listening. Yeah,

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>as welcome a with that, we welcome to your Inside

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Up Studio thirty four. This is the BFFs. Here is

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Frank stamfle I'm Greg sauceman. Frank, Greg, I was taking

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>ahead of you, I noticed, right alright, like an exaggerated

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>one after yesterday's bottle. What's going on? Man? Happy Thursday?

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Here to talk about the first base position for fantasy baseball,

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>not nearly the position that it once was. Greg. But

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>before we do all of that, I do sleep last night,

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>but I sleep very very well, very well. Greg's getting

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a good night of sleep outside of obviously the Judy debacle. Um,

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>but last night it's love great. I really like making up,

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>feeling refreshed. It's awesome. Nice. No trouble in paradise, huh,

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>No trouble in paradise, sleeping well. Things are good. Feeling good,

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>feeling strong might not be too good if you're Garrett cold. Greg,

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that guy stinks. I feel like we shouldn't draft him.

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Now that's it, we're out. How do you give up

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>six runs to the Detroit Tigers four home runs players?

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Travis Demerit. Who's that guy? Who? I don't know who?

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>This guy? Guy looks a little slim down to see you, Greg,

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>we're talking first base today? Uh huh? Where is he

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>ranks for you? Little little corner infield? Where's he ranks?

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that I have him ranked for me. Cabrera,

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't have him rank on rank, so he's never

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty four. Oh, I have a thirty four. So they

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>moved ahead of a Dan Vogel Box, I can move

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on ahead of Michael Javis, who qualifies the first base

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in young Yeah. I think we'll probably leave Miguel Cabrera

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>where he is. Yeah, seems that seems fair on the

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>program that I more first baseman talk about the problem

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>is I said this to you while making the rankings

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.359
<v Speaker 1>for first base in second base. There aren't many good

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>players that play these two positions, and it's very hard

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to feel. Well, a first based spot and then a

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>corner in field spot. I mean third base is deepen off,

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess, but absolutely at first base this is bad. Oh,

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 1>I just gotta text that, um there are calls fever,

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>which means he probably a coronavirus, which is why, well,

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, is it in Florida, it's everywhere. That's bad. Queen.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>We have five first baseman that we like, a lot

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of first basion we don't like. Hopefully that they find

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 1>the first basemen we like. We also could learn a

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more. Thank you, Greg. I'mstokia with your PFF Sports

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>graded News update. College basketball Mountain West quarter Finals. We

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>have number five San Diego State in action right now.

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>They trail air Force by three twenty four your Fanuel

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>sports books live betting lines. San Diego State eight and

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorite, still on forty eight a half

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>your revive total. Let's go to the Big South quarterfinals

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and see that's u n C. Asheville against Gardner Webb.

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>They hold a one point lead in the first half.

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Webb a four and a half point five favorite,

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>one forty eight and a half euro live total. One

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>final from earlier today. It was Winthrop, one of six

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>seventy winners over South Carolina up State that was in

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the other Big South quarter final match up. All right,

0:03:57.480 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>let's move over to Major League Baseball and spring training.

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>One note, Garrett Cole started for the New York Yankees

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>against Detroit Tigers. Lasted just two innings, giving up six

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>earned runs, including two home runs. Too. Mcguil cobra. All

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty MLB teams are in action on the spring training slate.

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Some off the field news the Red Sox they have

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>signed right hander Colin mghu to a one year deal.

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 1>The designated right hander Hector VLAs guest for assignment. Mgu

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>thirty two spent the previous six seasons with the Houston Astros.

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Was four and five with a four point seven zero

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>e r A in seventy four innings last year. As

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>for the Red Sox, Ace Chris Sale and m r

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>I has revealed Sale has a flex flex or strain

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>sorry flex or strain. It is pitching arm will be

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>shut down for another week. Interim manager Ron rennicky Up

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>added Sales status on Thursday morning. Talent reporters at the

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>m r I revealed no notable damage to the left

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>handers elbow. Other Baseball news a and Judge hopes to

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>be ready to go for opening Day, but he has

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>quote frustrated that the doctors haven't determined to cause a

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>soreness in his pectoral area near his right shoulder. Judge

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>told reporters that he will undergo more tests. Stay tuned

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>on that one. And in the NBA, Steph Curry returns

0:05:18.440 --> 0:05:21.559
<v Speaker 1>to action. Is played in just four games this season

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Golden State Warriors. He's recovery from a broken

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>left hand. He will be on a minute restriction, expected

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to play between twenty four and twenty eight minutes when

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors take on the Raptors tonight. That is your

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>BFF Sports good News update. Now back to Frank Guys.

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're gonna get into the first based position

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>here on the show from a fantasy baseball perspective. But

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>like we do every day here on the Fantasy BFS,

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>we give you a little snippet of tonight's NBA DFS preview.

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And Greg Sausman was with Davis Maddock earlier today from

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rohada dot Com as they did the NBA tip drill,

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>telling you why you should have Andrew Wiggins in your

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>lineup tonight, moving on to the small forward position Alec

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Marks's former team, Andrew Wiggins is on there now and

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>doing well enough you consider to put in your line out.

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I thin everyone will be looking at Steph Curry and

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>his return tonight, which makes Andrew Wiggins potentially undervalued. Yeah,

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it definitely makes him undervalued. So just actually,

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.279
<v Speaker 1>right before you and I got on air, Steve Kurt

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Talk the media said that Steph Curry is gonna play

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>at most in six minute verse for sure, less than

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes and probably closer to twenty five minutes in

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>his return. So that leaves, you know, a big portion

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of this game for Andrew Wiggins to just continue doing

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>what he's been doing, which is playing with a bunch

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>of you know, to to put it kindly, a bunch

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of U G League players right like, these guys on

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors roster right now, these guys are are mostly scrubs.

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it would be very surprising to me if

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Juan Toscano Anderson is the Warriors roster next year. So

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 1>it's given. It just gives Wiggins a lot of usage,

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna play you know a ton of minutes

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>without step tonight. And that was Davis Maddick from Jailey

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Rhodo dot Com earlier today on the NBA tip Trill.

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>You can catch that every single day here on the

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>sports cod YouTube channel over at NBA Fantasy as well

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter and Greg. Since Andrew Wiggins has joined the

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Golden State Wheres, we've seen a lot more defensive statistics

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>out of him. He's getting a bunch of steals, a

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.120
<v Speaker 1>bunch of blocks, which obviously if you play on fandel

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you get three Fantasy points per defensive numbers. So Andrew

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Wiggins a name to look at tonight in NBA dfest

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a little and harold it out there in Golden State

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>with Steph Curry back tonight. And that's what davi Us

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and I obviously chatted about a little bit earlier on

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>lets we want a first Basement, Frank, where again we

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>were just trying to name some names of players that

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to draft to play at first base, uh

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>in our auction which is one week from today, and

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>we lead it on Nobody Frank. Yeah, Greg, we got

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a little trouble in paradise here in terms of because

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I want figuring out Franky gregs fun players. Yeah, yeah,

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>all that fun zero fun, sir, that's you. Yeah, okay,

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll see you just said, why don't we drive? Luke

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Void is their starting first basement. The guy might not

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>have a job halfway through the season. You haven't been

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>able to stay healthy either. By the way, you're a

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>downgrade Clayton Kershaw. Ye got a downgrade Luke Void injuries.

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>He's not like an injury prone guy. Luke Void. Yeah,

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>he's coming off a major course surgery. He's all right,

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>but how long will it last season? I hope you're right. Well,

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't worry. Then I named a whole bunch of

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>other options at first base, right then like any of them? Well,

0:08:40.280 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what Frank says, and he says every day,

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>jes Jose b is always the answer at first base,

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>and I like Jose right. I didn't know she's expensive, man,

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>But what worth it all? Where do you want to

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>start Greg at the first base? Because do you want

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>to just dive into Jose bray was at the first

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>player you want to talk about? You manna tell you

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>why he's the best first baseman of all time? Yeah,

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that's actually the ideal. Yeah, alright, well, I don't know

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that he's the best. This would be one of them

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>all time, you know how like we really struggled to

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>get to our top twenty lists here. He's not gonna

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>be one of those days. There's just not enough first page.

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, do you want to start with Jose? Alright?

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Take it look after a time through a banged of eighteen. Yes,

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you your time to talk about Luke Voyd

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Greg later on the show. Uh, he bounced back major

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:29.439
<v Speaker 1>last year, and I was all over Break last year.

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't understand why people were downgrading him. Obviously dealt

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>with a very unfortunate situation back in eighteen, if you

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>remember correctly, Greg, that involved testicular torsion. I'll just leave

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it at that. When it comes to Jose, a Break

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>bounced back last year. Did you know he led the

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.120
<v Speaker 1>American League in RBIs did with a hundred and twenty three.

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you noticed this, Greig, but the

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>line up for the White Sox got even, so he

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 1>had a hundred and twenty three RBI last year. I'm

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to project him for that, but I think

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be well over a hundred. They add

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Edwin and Cornacion. Luis Robert is tearing up the spring

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, Eloy Hemenez. A lot of people expect him

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to take the next step. And at the top of

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.479
<v Speaker 1>the line up we haven't even mentioned yet Yoan Moncata,

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Tim Anderson. Obviously, if you're playing an O B P

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>or in a head to head points league, Jose Brew

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>gets to devalued a little bit there, Greg, right around

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a six percent walk great, He's not gonna walk very much,

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 1>but consistently hits for a two eight plus batting average,

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty plus home runs. He's just solid man. And I

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>understand the auction price fifteen team leagues over at the NFBC.

0:10:29.080 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>His A A V right now is around I understand

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a big price to pay, but I think for

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>the consistency and the safe floor out of jose Briew,

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind paying that price. I've already have a

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>few shares of jose Brew taking him in the fifth round. Greig,

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I like it. Where you in a better line of

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>than even last year, isn't a good spot. The only

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thing is I feel that people are coming on in

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>an auction. He's twenty one dollars, which is not nothing

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>rank it's expressive. Yeah, So to put that in perspective,

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>some other names right around that range pulled ultimate over

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the past week, twenty Anthony Rizzo twenty dollars. People are

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:07.520
<v Speaker 1>finally starting to realize. Yeah, yeah, like the I think

0:11:07.520 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it's actually going a little bit too far the other

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>way now in Rizzo, because I've said for years, Greg,

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't understand why Rizzo was going to three rounds

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Jose A. Brew sometimes five ten dollars more

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>than Jose Brew in an auction. Now it feels like

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>it might be going a little bit too far the

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>other way with Anthony Rizzo. And you know, if you

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>can get him in the fifth, sixth round, obviously plays

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 1>much better in ob P formance the day you get him.

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind. Actually, I don't mind Anthony Rizzo at

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this point. Like, if we can get Rizzo at twenty bucks, Greg,

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine with it. Oh my god, Now he doesn't

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>want Anthony. I will say this, Anthony Rizzo is not

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a fun player, so I will agree with you on

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that he's rocks. No, he's rock solid. We did that

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>in the GD already. Jose Brew is my fourth rank,

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>first basement, my fifth rank. All right, I have what

0:11:57.360 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>do you don't test me, I'll put him ahead of

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Peter Alonzo tested dr I have that old set up

0:12:03.720 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt Olson's fun other frightenings about mat Olson. We got

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>back next. Want to light the lamp on Draft Kings

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and FanDuel this NHL DFS season. Then joined Daily roado

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com and learned from the best daily fantasy sports players.

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Get updated fantasy hockey projections for NHL DFS, blind combinations,

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and built stacks for tournaments in the Daily Roado NHL

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>DFS Lineup Optimizer. If you are playing daily Fantasy Hockey

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>without using Daily Rodo, you are doing it wrong. Enter

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the Promo Code action for a ten percent discount. That's

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Promo Code Action for a ten percent discount. M M

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>break and eyes doing a ton of rasears. This is great,

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and this is so it's all gonna Davis Madtic today,

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>before the tip trail, I was asking you about fantasy

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>baseball and if you das or not. He's like, I've

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>been watching you and Frankly, you guys really love fantasy baseball,

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>as I think frank does. I'm just kidding, like I

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>do just kidding but not really. It was like, I

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>know you love fantasy baseball. I really love fantasy baseball

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>as I love fantasy basketball lot too. Um both every

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.679
<v Speaker 1>day it just never end. And you know me, I

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>mean like you're crazy with it. You don't name all

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>these guys I've never heard of, like Rico Dubon. We

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't even get to him yesterday. And I actually know

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>who that guy is. I don't remember struck out on

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>a nasty slider from Kershaw as he sucks. But like

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>these conversations will have a dream of the break like

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I love it, I really do. Is that the stuff

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we should be broadcasting, Greg? If maybe it's basically just

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>me introducing a player that I want in our auction

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and Greg being like I don't know about that player,

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and then him going to another player, and then me

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>me being like I don't know about that player, Greg,

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that's basically it. Oh, we agree on a certain players.

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>That's not true. Like there's been a lot of guys

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we have talked about this sprang Winter, we're rolled it on.

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I will reveal it right now. I won't say who,

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>but we have our catcher position filled out. Both of

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 1>them shortstop. He doesn't even remember. I remember the bad

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>catching shortstop in third base. Our outfielder one you probably

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>don't remember that one is the one? Is it? The one?

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Is the expensive one? Or not? Banging on a trash

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>can are fourth and fifth outfielders. And we have over

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 1>pictures filled out already. Great, come on, we're doing great.

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I love our pitching staffs on sunny grains on it.

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing. The thing is our pitching staff is

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred and fifty dollars of our budget. What

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>are we doing, saff We're going the other way. Everyone

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>tells you sixty your budget. We're going agree with that.

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I want all pitching. Well, Greg, you do start more

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>hitters than you do pictures, so let's still fall in

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>five categories. Only five categories. Is not thirteen hitters compared

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to nine pictures. It's only five categories right right within

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>all the pitching categories. Is there training in this league? Yeah?

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe there is. Well, we'll get all pitching. People

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>always need pitching, true, always need it all right, Greg,

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>first place, it's back to the the first place. I mentioned

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Matt Olsen before the break. That is a different difference

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>that you and I have. I have matt Olsen as

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>my number four first basement. You have matt Olsen as

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>your number five first basement without actually looking down at

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>your sheet, Um, I have been six? Actually you have?

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Who do you have? I have Anthony Rizzo. I don't

0:15:29.480 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>know how I became the Anthony Rizzo guy. Now I

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>actually dropped Anthony Rizzo. Um, after the graph, after years

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of me bashing him, you finally bought in. I feel

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>much better at this. I have Olson at four, a

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>rad at five, Rizzo at six. You have the same

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>players as a little bit of a different order. Um,

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and I know what this says. You ignore that. Um,

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>why do you have? Why do you like mat Olson? Way?

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>You just like Matt Olson? No, I like Matt Olson

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot. And maybe this is like a slippery slope

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>fallacy of mine so far in the draft season, Greg,

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>But whenever I mind early to mid round players that

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>do not contribute in batting average and only give you

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>power and nothing else, I am pivoting away from those

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>players more often than not, because I've convinced myself that, well,

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna take Matt Olsen in round five, or

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're gonna spend twenty in an auction on Matt Olsen.

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you just wait and get Reese Hoskins five

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 1>rounds later and he's you know, look, the batting average

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>might be lower than madd Olson to forty hitter, but

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>what are you expecting how hoskinst home runs, good County stats,

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously gets on base, good ballparks to hidden So maybe

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a fallacy of mine, and only time will tell.

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>But I've basically been pivoting away from any hitters in

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the early rounds that only give you power and nothing else.

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at the bus that I've called out

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 1>so far, Aaron Judge, I'm not on Peter Alonso. I'll

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>tell you why I'm not on him, for basically the

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>same reasons I'm telling you probably not gonna draft Matt Olson.

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I just want to get batting average at least or

0:16:57.480 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>stolen bases in those early rounds. And I think that

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Rizle is probably gonna hit two AD plus. I

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 1>think that Jose Bray is probably gonna hit two ad

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>plus ad. Olson is great. He might hit fifty home

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 1>runs this season, but he's probably not gonna hit more

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>than two fifty. If we're just being honest. So guy

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>has struggled against left handed pitching. He has struggled to

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>hit in oco as well. What I will say about

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>about Matt Olson greg is that his stack cast page

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>is just ridiculous. It's like Cody Balinger. It's like Cody

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Balinger light. It's there's red everywhere, which is a good thing.

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>He was percentile or better in barrel percentage, average, eggs velocity,

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>expected slugging percentage last year and hard contact right and

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that was coming back from a hammate bone injury, which

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.120
<v Speaker 1>just crazy, like you don't normally see stuff like that.

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Matt Olsen has ridiculous power, awesome batting stance as well,

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>where he just like holds the bat out here like crazy,

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>good mine up to hit him. Obviously not a great ballpark, Craig.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he hits between two fifty and two sixty

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>conservatively project forty home runs. It wouldn't surprise me if

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 1>he approaches fifty. He has that type of power. So

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't contribute batting average, which is why have him six.

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And I understand that, but I have to ask for

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone who wants Peter Alonzo out there, just take Matt

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Olson three rounds later. That was literally the question I

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>was about to ask you. It's not three rounds so

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>much anymore though. So that Olson is fifty two in

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the NFBC O the past two weeks, um Peter Alons

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>is thirty one. So it's around and a half or

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>two questions will just take Matt Olsen two rounds later.

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>The stack has numbers, the power. The power numbers are

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>actually better for Matt Olson in than they are for

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and if he can get the average out, you're talking

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>about Reese Hoskins five rounds later in a lonest thing,

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of thing. Yes, So the thing is Greg,

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>am I doing that too much? Am I taking that

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>too far? Because what happens? All right? You say, all right,

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.119
<v Speaker 1>well I wanted Peter Alonso, but you're right, Frank, I

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>can wait. I can get medalson Oh crap, someone took

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:54.560
<v Speaker 1>medalson out from under me. Next thing, you know, I

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>missed out and Reese Hoskins. If you just keep thinking like, oh,

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I can wait and get someone that's similar, haven't, eventually

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 1>you might not get that player. I haven't answered that

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>one to what happened to be missed out on him? Greg? Way,

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>So when the first basin you missed out on that

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you probably won't miss then then it's your fault. That's

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>probably Christian Walker. But I do like I Met, I

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>like Madelson, but probably more so and and uh points

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>leeg just because you don't have to worry about the batting.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna go back to the same question that

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>we keep going when we keep trying to tackle and

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you you name some of the players that we kind

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of have in our heads of this auction, and they're

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>all really very solid guys. I like where heads are at.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Where are you finding speed? Like the guys that we

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>have have oh speed. So last year in the NFBC

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>main event, I wound up drafting de Gordon for speed

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:43.719
<v Speaker 1>and that didn't work out. He had a terrible season.

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And you've heard people kind of caution you about this

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in the past, and I basically had to live through

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>it myself to learn my lesson. I don't like taking

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the players that you expect outside of a trade turner.

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind taking trade turner that you expect to

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>give you thirty five plus stolen basis. I like taking

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the guys that just chip away. Greg felve to fifteen

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>here twelve to fifteen. There, maybe get a guy who

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 1>gives you a twenty to twenty five, someone like an

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Oscar Mercado or a Victor Roblos who can give you thirty.

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Like one of those guys down what Oscar Mercado Victor Robis?

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I have mental notes in my mind down

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>because you really follow the notes in the draft. All right,

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I will, I will write down the names. But a

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of my draft so far, Greg, have been just

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>chipping away, a lot of Haavier Bios shares Manny Machado

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>eight to ten stolen bases, maybe like a Tim Anderson

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>close to twenty stolen basis, someone like that. I'm just

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>chipping away. I don't want the Malix Smith's I don't want.

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind a Jonathan VR, but he's not really

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a target of mine. I we went over our second

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:43.919
<v Speaker 1>basis in shortstop ranks, Greg, I would rather have Asilbi's

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>chipping away fifteen and twenty stolen basis, Kessen Heira twelve

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen stolen bases. Just get a bunch of these guys,

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and then at the end of your draft you look

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:54.199
<v Speaker 1>up and you realize, oh, well, I got six or

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>seven of these guys, I'm projected for a hundred stolen

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>basis and that's perfectly fine. You can compete with that,

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>all right. I just wanna remember, like we need that

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>category at some point. No, you're right, because all the

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>players so far that I'm looking at the list right now,

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we don't have much speed on This is usually, like

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you know your side of things. It's a fair question,

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're not gonna get it at the first base

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 1>position unless you draft like Danny Santana or Julie Gurrel,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 1>who will give you like maybe five to eight. So well,

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned stolen basis at first base. I think it's

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.679
<v Speaker 1>a good time to talk about Paul Goldsman because for

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>years Paul Goldschmidt was a crazy thirty stolen base threat

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:32.680
<v Speaker 1>at the first base spot. You're like, oh my god,

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy that literally go thirty thirty at

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 1>first base. That was crazy. Now you expect that a

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>really big year in his first year in St. Louis.

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't really get it. Although the second half way

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:43.959
<v Speaker 1>better than this first half. I have Paul Goldmate rank

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>is my eighth ranth first baseman. Are you backing on

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Goldie or you like, I think he's on the wrong

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>side of his career here on out. Yeah, so Paul

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Goldschmith falls into the Chris Bryant and Josel two Bay category.

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>For me, Greg, I'm not gonna have any shares of

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Paul Goldschmith this season. I have him down at my

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.719
<v Speaker 1>as my tenth first baseman as anah, it's not no,

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing egregious by any means. But it was a

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.439
<v Speaker 1>solid season with St. Louis. We saw the batting average

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>dip all the way down to two sixty Was he

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>expecting average? What I don't like It was only two

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>sixty two, So it's not really like you know, he

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 1>was on lucky last year. We could expect some positive

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>regression in the batting average department. What I really don't like, Greg,

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is it's two years in a row now that we've

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>seen the plate discipline start to slit or Paul gold Schmidt. Uh.

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 1>The K percentage up over two years in a row

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is eleven percent walk rate, which is still really good.

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I understand that if you play an O B P

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>or in a point's league, I think Paul Goldschman is

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>still a fine, viable first baseman. There's nothing wrong with him.

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>But his eleven percent walk rate is the lowest it's

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>been since His thirty one percent chase rate last year

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>was the highest of his career. Eleven percent swinging strike

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>rate the highest since his rookie season. So to see

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the plate discipline starting to slip a little bit, Greg,

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that the Cardinals have a great lineup.

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And I look into his op yes by month, Greg,

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I do league average ops. It's like seven fifty eight

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is ops by month last year seven fifty three, eight

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>three one thousand eight five, seven oh five and nine three.

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>There were four months last year out of a six

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>month season where Paul Goldschmidt was worse than a league

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>average player. I'm not in in a road league. Though

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.640
<v Speaker 1>he did have over thirty runs for the thirty consecutive year,

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 1>four out of five years. He did have closal hundred

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>run scored close to the hundred RBI. When it was

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>all said and done, Yeah, he's he's not gonna steal anymore.

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>He's just no, no, no, I mean the soul and

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>basis just continue to decline. Thy een to seven to three,

0:23:37.720 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe he gives you three to five, but I mean

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>it's anymore. Can we see the county stats starts to

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>come back even a little bit more In that line

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of Greg, I don't think that the Cardinals have a

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>very good line up. They lost Marcelo Zuna, remember, so

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it was really it was really interesting. Is

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the two years nineteen, they're the same. The only difference

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is the average went down, and that points the play

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>discipline that you pointed out a few moments ago. I

0:24:00.400 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>think what you're seeing is what you get from Paul

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>gold Trade at most. I don't think you see anything increase.

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it's only what if the average continues a

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, if it goes down to fifth and

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>will say his babvit was around three hundreds. Traditionally it's

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>been around three forty. Like he's a career three forty

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>eight Gavitt, So it was he was unlucky last year

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in that regard. But I don't think you're gonna see

0:24:20.560 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the two three hundred player anymore. You're gonna be closer

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to three sixty. And again, this type of the numbers

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>are fine. From the first page. He's fine. He's a

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>fine option at first, that's what he is. But he

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>just don't expect upside exactly. We just talked about Matt

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Olson and missing out on him and missing out Peter

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Alonzo all was fine in that regard with Reese Hoskins

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>and those types of players. He's not a superstar anymore.

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>And that's the deal. I want to be the next

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Daily Fantasy millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Daily rodal dot com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>this season. Compete with the pros with daily dot Com

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>optimizer and the most accurate IT projections in NBA DFS,

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support and

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>much more safe ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>with promo code dunk. Visit Daily Rodo dot com backslash

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>dunk to learn more. Really said, Hey, you don't get

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Peter Alonzo. You can go this way. And Peter Alonzo

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is not an active target of hours get all those

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:30.880
<v Speaker 1>over runs. Last year. He was an amazing last year

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>in his rookie season for the Mats, and maybe he

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 1>is just as goodness second year. But we didn't expect

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>some regression here, Um, Frank, why don't take a few

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>minutes to spend on Peter Alonzo. Yeah. Look, it's very

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.719
<v Speaker 1>similar to the what we said about Matt Olson. Now

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you can just get him a little bit later on.

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And look, if you expect Pete Alonso to come close

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>to hitting fifty home runs again this upcoming season, then

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>you should be drafting him. But I think anyone who

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>realistically does projections probably has him in the forty the

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>low forties range this upcoming season, which is still really good.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>But what I had to say about what he did

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>last year, Greg is that his nine point six mile

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>per hour average exit velocity was in the seventy eight

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>percentile in baseball That ranked fifty third among qualified hitters

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>last year. So he doesn't hit the ball nearly as

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 1>hard as some of the other big name sluggers in

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the league. Guys like Aaron Judge mcguilson, No Nelson Cruz,

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>frand Milrays. All those guys hit the ball way harder

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>than Pete Alonso consistently. Uh And his slugging percentage in

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the second half last year, Greg dropped from six thirty

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>four to five two. Obviously, it was his rookie season, right, like,

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't expect him to keep up at six thirty

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>four slugging percentage for the entirety of the season. I

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 1>get that, but I just think that you could get

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>similar production out of players later on in the draft

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>and it wouldn't even surprise me if Madelson outproduces Pete

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Alonso this year, Greg, and you're getting him two rounds later.

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>So just realize, if you take Pete Alonso in that

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>second third round range, you were passing up on some

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:02.120
<v Speaker 1>serious talent guys like Llwing, Marte Javier Bias, who we've

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>just seen do it for longer. Um position scarcity, second

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>base category scarcity, you know, Soulen Basis batting average early

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>on in your draft as well. You're passing up on

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>all that to get a great three category player, own runs,

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>runs in RBIs. But realize he's gonna give you nothing

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in batting average and nothing in stolen bases, and it's

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:22.959
<v Speaker 1>really hard to make up those categories in the mid

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 1>rounds Craig, Yeah, it's it's hard. As you said, it's

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 1>been an early round pick and not get the categories

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that you need and make up for what Peter Pete

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Alonso gives you. I think at the home run home runs,

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna find ultimately with all the players we

0:27:36.040 --> 0:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>have named throughout today's show, you're going to find it.

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Peter Allows as amazing as he is, Frankie as his

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>deficiencies being of home runs, your boy, there's venture. You

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 1>could say nothing, a lot of things about him, but

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>he nowled Josh Bell. Last year. He absolutely destroyed this

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 1>one with Josh Bell. He's my number nine ranks, third

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>first baseman because the only other good player in his

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>lineup is not Kevin Newman, It's Brian Reynolds Safari Planet.

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Josh Bell had an awesome year last year. I know

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:14.560
<v Speaker 1>he struggled, uh towards the second half. He's not active

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>target yours this year despite the breakout last year. Yeah,

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think he is a fallback option that

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you can actually get later than Paul gold Schmidt. Right,

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 1>So we called Paul gold Schmidt a fallback option and

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>he goes in the fifth, sixth round, and you know,

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Josh Bell, you can get a round or two even

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 1>later than Paul gold Schmidt. You know, I think he

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the cliff right where the tear ends

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>for with Josh Bell and then the next tear starts

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>with Reese Hoskins, and he's fine, but obviously gonna hurt

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>your batting average a lot more than someone like Josh Bell,

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>who I think can hit, you know, around two seventy

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>two seventy five. Last year, Greg was the tale of

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>three seasons. Obviously, he got off to that phenomenal start

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>from March through May he hit three forty three with

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>eighteen home runs and ops over eleven hundred. June and July,

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Greg two months been hit two thirds team with nine

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>home runs and a seven s S O p S.

0:29:03.360 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>So really struggled there in the middle part of the season,

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and then August and September kind of turned it back

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on to batting average not great, but fine. Ten home

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>runs with an OPS of eight, which that is pretty good.

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>He claims that throughout the course of the season he

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>went from sinking up fastballs Greg to sinking up breaking balls.

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And here's a quote from Josh Bell, I feel like,

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>if you're not sinking up to the fastballs, you can't

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>hit either. Well, once I started focusing more and more

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>on all speed pitches, it just went down hill for

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>me for a stretch of time. So it seems like

0:29:36.080 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>he was focusing so much on trying to hit breaking

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>pitches that he was then late on fastballs and vice versa,

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and he was just getting completely messed up. So obviously

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Pictures made an adjustment to him. Will Josh Bell be

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>able to make the adjustment back? That's why I do

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>have some pause. He did some really nice things last year.

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>He hit the ball extremely hard, average eggs of LOSSI

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>percentile in baseball last year. And he's someone who he

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>said for years Greg that if he would lift the ball,

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>he would hit more home runs, like we said about

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Christian Yellish and a lot of players. He's obviously very

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>strong human being. He's a big boy um and he

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>started lifting the ball last year. So he has to

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>maintain just a lot of the strides that he made

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>last year, and I'm just a little skeptical that he'll

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>be able to maintain all of them. I still think

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he can be solid to seventy thirty home runs, eight runs,

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>nine d R B I s. It's not a great

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>line up. The Pittsburgh Pirates do not have a great lineup.

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not a great um ballparks hit and either he's

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>actually much better in O BP and head to head points.

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>He's Greg he has a great eye at the plate,

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>great walk great. Maybe I'm wrong about Josh Bell. Maybe

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>he just picks up exactly where he left off last

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>year and you know, continues to get even better. But

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 1>he made so many strides last year, I'm just a

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>little skeptical that he'll be able to pick up all

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of those once again. I think he'll be solid, but

0:30:56.320 --> 0:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>again just not an active target of mine. Yeah, and

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's fair. I think he's part of this first based

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>crew that I feel comfortable drafting. I think he said

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be solid. Maybe he doesn't give you what

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 1>he gave you for a lot of the year last year.

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Even if he does kind of bounce back in the

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>performance that we saw, I'm fine with him. And it's

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>only like I said, that's the word right for him

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and Goldsmith? Fine, Yeah, you're fine, Yeah, I am. I am.

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Are you finally a boomoo Mancini? Well, he's another one too. Man.

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Is he going to be able to keep up the

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>career year that he had last year? Obviously, great ballparks

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.120
<v Speaker 1>hidden in came to yards and great division to hidden

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>You're Austin has will be there at some point. Frank

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Austin Hayes is gonna be their opening day gress. That's right, gratulations.

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I love Austin Hays too. Reserve rounds fifth olfielder, young

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>guy on the fifth halfialder all right, he's a backup

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to our other fifth outfielder, which remains to be named

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>right now, we will not reveal that information. Who is it?

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll text check e chat. But tree Mancini last year,

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>much like Josh Bell, someone who started to lift the

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>ball us here Greg for a long time. He hits

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the ball hard, but always hit the ball in the ground,

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>started hitting more line drives. Last year. The fly ball

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>rate went up to thirty one percent, which is still

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>not great, but it's great compared to where he was

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>at uh in in past years. So he's a lot

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>like Josh Bell. I have him ranked in the tier

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>below him. I have Trey Mancini at fourteen, so I

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>have him just behind Reese Hoskins, Miguel Sino, and Julie Guriel.

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I just think a lot went right for tray Mancini

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 1>last year. I think the home runs take a little

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 1>bit of a step back. I don't think he comes

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>close to thirty five again. I think he's probably. Yeah.

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I think he's you know, late twenties and home runs, solid,

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>batting average like at two seventy to eighty hitter and

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>however you want to project the counting stats for him,

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the Baltimore Orioles. It's not a great lineup. Look

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:53.479
<v Speaker 1>around him. Austin Hayes, Bernado nun Yez, Anthony Santander crushed Davis,

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>the wrong crush Davis by the way, maybe you get

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>eight runs a d r b S. I just worry

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>about the line up around him. Greg, He's fine. He's

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>also like Josh Bell and Paul Voltchman, just a tier lower.

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm a little bit really a target of mine.

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm a little bit higher on train than

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>than you are. Actually it's just context, you know, I

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:13.479
<v Speaker 1>understand the team context. But I think if you look

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>what he's literally done in the last three years. Yes,

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the home runs arout thirty five, that's too high. He's

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>probably closer in between twenty five and thirty. But he

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>gave you those home runs every n I think the

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the average is closer to what you saw

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>two in the last three years, around that to ninety number.

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that what you saw Adam train Mancini outside

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of all of the all of those home runs, I

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>think it's pretty legitimate. Man. What I will say about

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Trey Mancini is if you are somebody who buys into

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 1>what he did last year, then he is an absolute

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>bargain for you, and you should be in on him

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and on him, you know, either a late first baseman

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>or a corner infielder, or utility about whatever it might be.

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>If you buy what he did last year and you

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>think he hits around to nine once again, and you know,

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>approaches thirty home runs, and if he does all that,

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you know maybe the counting stats are actually all right

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in that ballpark, then he is a value for you.

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>The thing is, I don't think that he gets to

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 1>those numbers specifically, Greg No, man. I think it's closer

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>than than you might realize or you might believe. I

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't say realize. You might believe Andre Mazzine a little

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 1>bit higher on him, which is why I have him

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:16.959
<v Speaker 1>at number ten. For me. We're talking about Max Monsey

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot on the show I Want to Move Faster, Dad.

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>We talking about the girls. You know, I didn't even

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 1>rank it as the first basement. We talked about him

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot. You will have first based eligibility early in

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the season, so we talked about him a lot. When

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.839
<v Speaker 1>we move over with some guys, he's the best. Think

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>he's just tough to um. Even though Carlo Santana he

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>was awesome last year. He's another one like Trey Mancini,

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:38.800
<v Speaker 1>right coming off the career year, and carl Santana is

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>a little bit older as well, so you know he

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>has the breakout year. How old is he Greg if

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you have that information, he's like thirty two thirty three

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 1>years old. So it's just a weird time to be

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.879
<v Speaker 1>coming off a career year for Carlos Santana last year,

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:54.479
<v Speaker 1>which included him hitting two eight one, thirty four home runs,

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and ten runs scores, and eight and ninety

0:34:57.880 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>three RB. I s he is he will be thirty

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>four years old. Thirty four years old, much better in

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 1>points leagues. Look if you can get this guy in

0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 1>a points league at a discount, because people see the

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>name and they're reacting exactly how I'm reacting right now, like, oh,

0:35:11.840 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't want Carlos Santana. He is so great and

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>points league put this in perspective, he was the seventh

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.120
<v Speaker 1>ranked first baseman in ROTO still really good. Last year

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 1>number four, he was the fourth best first baseman in

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>head to head points leagues, and he basically does that consistently. Greg.

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>He walks a ton, he has great play discipline. He's

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>awesome for O B P leagues as well. His second

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 1>half came back to a little bit. In the second half, Greg,

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>we saw the batting average drop a little bit. Two

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>sixty two eight fifty five ops. Still really good um

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to sixty eight expected batting average last year behind the

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 1>entire career to fifty career hitter expected. That's awesome. I

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>will say, like, where are he's going. It's fine, it's

0:35:56.760 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 1>awesome in a points league, But Greg, do you them

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>as your starting first basement in a ROTO league? Ideally not.

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:06.839
<v Speaker 1>But it really excels nowhere, at least when you talk

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>about Peter Anso and those guys, like they're gonna excel

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in path uns. Ye, it wouldn't surprise you if Carl

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Santana hits two fifty six home runs, eighty five runs

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and eighty five r b i's and nothing else, Like, yes,

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't do anything else. It would because if he

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 1>does that, the average is be lowers should be close.

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It's true, right, he's great and points leaves. I'm not drafting.

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.839
<v Speaker 1>I love you, Carlos Santana. I always will man other

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>first basement, I have we look like Julie Guriel before.

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I like Julie Guriel. I think he's I think he's

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>a good player. How much do you buy into the

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 1>power of Greg just Ball? Where would you set the

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>over under for home runs? Last year he had thirty one,

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 1>which was by far career high runs. Have a projection

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:55.879
<v Speaker 1>written down here with twenty two you can be under,

0:36:57.480 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>but also with to nine batting average and eighty five

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>ribies look at for average? Are we not very good?

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Do you find power? He is a fallback option at

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.320
<v Speaker 1>first base who gives you batting average, which you cannot

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 1>say about a lot of players in this range. Great

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>speak of guys will not give you batting average. Look

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.880
<v Speaker 1>about the power guys, Eddie Luke, Voyd, Christian Walka on

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the ground. I want to light the lamp on draft

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>kings and fan duel this NHL DFS season. Then joined

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Daily Roado dot com and learned from the best daily

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy sports players get updated fantasy hockey projections for NHL DFS,

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>blind combinations, and build stacks for tournaments in the Daily

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Roado NHL DFS Lineup Optimizer. If you are playing daily

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Hockey without using Daily Rodo, you are doing it wrong.

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Enter the promo code action for a ten percent discount.

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:55.879
<v Speaker 1>That's promo code action for a ten percent discount. Alright, fine,

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.479
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes your program. First Base Preview. He's frank

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Greg. Thanks for joining us year today. Craggy Reese Hoskins.

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I realized talk a lot about him this spring, because well,

0:38:06.160 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I like Reese Hoskins a lot. So Franklin, why are

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you now backing off oh Man a little bit? I

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:15.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want to worry too much about spring training, but

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>based on how he end of the year, Greg second

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.760
<v Speaker 1>half hit one eight, which was the lowest qualified batting

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>average for any hitter last year. In the second half

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of the season, it was not good bad. A lot

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>of strikeouts and Reese Hoskins trying to hit the ball

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:31.759
<v Speaker 1>in the air too much. Seems like he's kind of

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>selling out for home runs. And so far here in

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the spring he has a swing adjustment. Greg he has

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a new swing, and he is three for seventeen with

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.279
<v Speaker 1>nine strikeouts. So I don't want to put too much

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>stock into spring training, but based on the second half

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>that he had last year, I would have liked to

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>see something out of Reese Hoskins here throughout spring. But Greg,

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 1>if he can come anywhere close to the first half

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that he had last year, if he can repeat that

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>for a full season, then he's absolutely a seal right now,

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 1>because everyone's looking at the second half and I get it.

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But in the first half of the season, Greg, he

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>hit to sixty three with a four oh one on

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>base percentage and a five thirty slug with twenty home

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:12.279
<v Speaker 1>runs and fifty nine r b i s in the

0:39:12.360 --> 0:39:15.080
<v Speaker 1>first half of the season, obviously mentioned. The second half,

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>his fly ball rate balloon to fifty two percent. Greg,

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he was basically it wasn't even three true outcomes.

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>It was walk, strike out, or flyout. It wasn't even

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 1>home runs because he was just you know, the launch

0:39:27.239 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 1>angle was too high. He was trying too hard to

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>hit home runs. So he just has to go back

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to doing what he does best, try to hit more

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 1>line drives again, lower that launch angle. A little bit

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>because he's trying too hard to lift the ball. His

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 1>launch angle last year was number one in all of baseball,

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 1>so again just trying too hard to lift there. And

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 1>if he does that, I think he hit two to

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 1>fifty thirty five home runs. Really good counting stats because

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>obviously gets on base a lot. Greg a fifteen percent

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.439
<v Speaker 1>walk right over the past three seasons. That is sixth

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 1>best in baseball. He's better in ov P leagues, better

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in points leagues because of the on base per centage

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.759
<v Speaker 1>UH and the walks obviously, but I think you know,

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>comparable numbers once again to him Matt Olsen, not the

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>same type of upside, but runs eighty five plus runs

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:14.280
<v Speaker 1>close to a hundred ribbies, really good lineup, really good ballpark.

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>All that is true, he plays every day. The vatting

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 1>average has to bounce back a little bit here, man.

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it has to. He's not hitter, right. I mean,

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:25.560
<v Speaker 1>if he continues to strike out as much as he

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:28.680
<v Speaker 1>does and only hit five balls, Greg, then is and

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it might, right, it might stay at around to twenty.

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 1>That's the risk of riees Hoskins. You're absolutely right, going

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.600
<v Speaker 1>down a little bit further a lot further. In this case,

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:42.320
<v Speaker 1>we get to Edwin and Carnassium, who is in the

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>same guy for the last decade. Right, He's a guy

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that average is not going to be great, but he's

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit a ton of power. Last year for the

0:40:51.680 --> 0:40:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Yankees and for the Marriage bed at four thirty four bombs,

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:58.480
<v Speaker 1>eight sixbies, eighty one runs scored, played in just a

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and nine games and still giving thirty four on runs.

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:04.320
<v Speaker 1>He's hit thirty home runs at least every years twelve

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 1>rank pretty good. I get it, he's like forty. He's

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven years old. But much like Nelson Cruise are

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>we spoken about there's really no sign up slowing down

0:41:13.600 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 1>here in the juice ball. Yeah, helping at thirty four

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and just a hundred and nine games. This is a

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:21.000
<v Speaker 1>guy that has legitimate forty home run power that's going

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 1>way later. So I have to ask why are we

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>wasting and not wasting? But why are we having a

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 1>draft pick on Matt Olson when way later and when

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:31.360
<v Speaker 1>at Carnacion he gets similar numbers. It's a fair question,

0:41:31.560 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's obviously more downside to Encarnacion at his age

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of thirty seven years old. There's obviously injury risk as well.

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:41.759
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't played much here in spring training and only

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>played a hundred and nine games last year. So the

0:41:43.440 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>obvious answer, Greg is there's more downside than someone like

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Matt Olson, who is much younger and you know obviously

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:52.320
<v Speaker 1>could be due for a career year this upcoming season.

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But I'm with you, I think another fallback option at

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>first base. If you want power and someone who is

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>obviously going hurt your batting average, then why not just

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 1>wait on someone like Incarnacion, who I think is gonna

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>hit around thirty five home runs, He's gonna drive in

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>probably close to a hundred. Because that White Sox lineup again,

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Jose A brave Mankada, Tim Anderson, Eloy Jimenez, Incarnacion is

0:42:14.440 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the middle of all of that.

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just a matter of how healthy can he be.

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And for anyone who thinks that, you know, it was

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>just all aided by Yankee Stadium last year. He was

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:25.720
<v Speaker 1>actually better with the Mariners than he was with the Yankees.

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>He hit twenty one home runs in sixty five games

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 1>with the Seattle Mariners last year, uh and actually had

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 1>a higher home run to fly ball ratio with them.

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>A higher isolated power with the Mariners last year, and

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 1>he still walks a ton as well. So even if

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:41.839
<v Speaker 1>you're playing O B P or in a points league,

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind Incarnacion. You just have to bake in

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that he's probably gonna miss at least thirty games, Greig.

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:50.799
<v Speaker 1>And that's the downside to Incarnacio. Okay, but where you're

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>getting him, he was fine. He's going later than anyone

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about yet. And there's so much And where

0:42:57.480 --> 0:42:59.160
<v Speaker 1>do you have him? Because I have him at I

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>haven't met sixteen fourteen. But there's just a few players

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>that you don't include in the ranks, right like well Mayhew, Okay,

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we probably haven't been a similar spot. Yeah, we probably

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:13.839
<v Speaker 1>probably Ultimately you have him behind Mancinia Julie gae Um.

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned a couple of times on the show Christian

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Walker and Luke Voit, which one of those two players

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 1>you'd rather have? So I actually have these guys back

0:43:19.800 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to back and they start off the next here for me,

0:43:22.360 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>really guys that I'd rather have as corner infielders than

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>starting first baseman. And I do have Christian Walker one

0:43:27.719 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>spot higher. Christan Walker is someone who last year Greg

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the stat cast numbers, I mean, everything just

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 1>pops off the page for Christian Walker last year. Uh,

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and he is somebody that for years we didn't know

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:41.560
<v Speaker 1>if he was just like a Quad A players. He's

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:43.759
<v Speaker 1>someone that just dominates Triple A. But he had twenty

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>nine home runs in a hundred and fifty two games,

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:48.720
<v Speaker 1>ninety one mile per hour average eggs of velocity eighty

0:43:48.800 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 1>five percentile, thirteen point one percent, barrel rate ninety percentile

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 1>last year in his career in the minors, hit ter

0:43:58.080 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 1>eight thirty nine o p s. I mean, I think

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot to like about Christian Walker, and

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, frankly, greg he's just a little bit safer

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of injuries than someone like Luke Voit. Luke

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Void might have higher upside because obviously Yankee Stadium and

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:13.640
<v Speaker 1>hitting in that lineup, but remember Luke Voit is coming

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>off of core surgery. Christian Walker did stay healthy four

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 1>and fifty two games last year, and it's a solid

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>lineup out there in Arizona, and he projects a hit

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:23.759
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of it as well. So I

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>think someone who can hit to fifty home runs, I

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's fair from Christian Walker. I think everything you're saying,

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and it also described Luke Voit like every like literally

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that entire stat lit we just saw for Christian Walker.

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:37.560
<v Speaker 1>It could happen, and the upside is higher for Luke Void. Agree.

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:39.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to dispute that his swing is built

0:44:39.880 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 1>for Yankee Stadius. He can go the opposite way. He

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>hits a ton of line drives. I just think that

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:47.759
<v Speaker 1>there's more downside there because of the injury risk, all right,

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>that I'd rather just take the upside, especially at this

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:52.920
<v Speaker 1>corner infield spot, especially at this price. Give me the

0:44:53.239 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>higher upside with Lukevoi than Christian Walker. He's a good person. Nah,

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:01.399
<v Speaker 1>I trust Christian Walker more. You shouldn't. All right, let's

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 1>move on. There's nobody else I really like to be

0:45:04.360 --> 0:45:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with you. There's no other first patients that I like

0:45:06.200 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 1>at all Right, tell us about Danny Santana none is

0:45:10.480 --> 0:45:13.479
<v Speaker 1>eligibility everywhere starting center fielder for the Texas Rangers, and asked,

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:19.759
<v Speaker 1>I know that's it should be utility guy Sanna's every

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 1>day center fielders. We want to talk about Eric Cosmer.

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Greig was actually up because he stinks and don't draft him.

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:27.359
<v Speaker 1>All right? Moving on, I got him as my corner

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>infielder in the Great Fantasy Base Team League. Why he's fine, Greg,

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>What does he do that is the key word here?

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.200
<v Speaker 1>What does he do well? Fine? R B I last year,

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:41.640
<v Speaker 1>everybody's like these days, right, do they? He's hitting in

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the lineup that a lot of people

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 1>like stinks. He's just fine. It's twenty two homers of

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the juice ball. He's been playing every day because it's

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>too many groundballs. He's the next one man. I will

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:56.800
<v Speaker 1>say this about Hosmer. If he's six percent groundholen the

0:45:57.000 --> 0:45:59.520
<v Speaker 1>six percent. We've seen other guys that have that were

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 1>stubborn about this in the past. Change He's like, if

0:46:02.920 --> 0:46:05.160
<v Speaker 1>he lowers it, if he lowers it the fiftent. If

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 1>he just lowers it the fifty percent, and he's a

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty five home run hitter with likely to seventy batting average,

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know the last you're the last time his granda

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>probably never never, fifty six percent was down from the

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>year prior. Hit a lot of groundball Team League. No,

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:31.000
<v Speaker 1>he is fine as a corner He's not. I just

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>agree he's bad. We're not drafting him. Cut him off.

0:46:34.360 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to thought, Sep, do you realize how

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the auction between Greg Sausman and myself has clearly become

0:46:40.040 --> 0:46:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a dictatorship? I disagree. Why did you all of a

0:46:43.000 --> 0:46:46.239
<v Speaker 1>sudden cross him off the list? We don't we only

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:48.759
<v Speaker 1>need fun players. Greg's idea. You know what was a

0:46:48.760 --> 0:46:51.359
<v Speaker 1>fun player last year? Ramo Loriano? Greg? What happened there?

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:55.439
<v Speaker 1>You didn't want Romo Loriana Ramono Lorianna didn't say who's

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the same one? Who I'm gonna say? You know he's

0:46:57.400 --> 0:46:59.839
<v Speaker 1>this year's Mauriceo Dubon Watch Dubons gonna have a great year.

0:47:00.360 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>Who's very I don't even know what team he plays for?

0:47:03.400 --> 0:47:07.839
<v Speaker 1>They don't. I still don't remember San Francisco Giants, Gregg,

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you want many giants, Greg, Who would

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you rather take? Last question regarding Eric Cosmer Osmer or

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Murphy? I don't have Daniel Murphys in Colorado. Hey

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:20.879
<v Speaker 1>doesn't play against left handed pitching. I'd rather than Daniel

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Murphy in Colorado. You would who'd rather have Eric Hosmer

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>or Will Myers? Greg would rather have Daniel Murphy than

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Eric Cosmos. Yes, and he says no to every other

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:34.279
<v Speaker 1>boring player that I bring up here on you know,

0:47:34.360 --> 0:47:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I have Daniel Murphy at like thirteen home runs. I

0:47:36.840 --> 0:47:39.799
<v Speaker 1>do have Eric Cosmy. You said Eric Cosmer was bad

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:41.879
<v Speaker 1>and the Juice Ball year because he had twenty two runs.

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Murphy in Colorado twelve home runs. So you know, I

0:47:46.719 --> 0:47:49.800
<v Speaker 1>answered that with Eric Cosmers my eighteenth rank first baseman,

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:52.279
<v Speaker 1>and Daniel Murphy it's twenty two. So I would rather

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Erica have Erick Cosmer reg higher than I do. Well,

0:47:56.760 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>let's be fair, I don't have cree guys in you.

0:47:58.560 --> 0:48:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So in the Great Fantasy Basic Mo Invitational, I was

0:48:01.360 --> 0:48:04.520
<v Speaker 1>debating between Eric Hosmer and Dania Murphy. What what about

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the other guys like has Aguilar Justin No, I like

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Justin Smoke, I'm not I'm not doing the haz Justin

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Smoke in Milwaukee said he gonna play every day or

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they might he might play every day. It seems like

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play every day with the Milwaukee Brewers that

0:48:22.239 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 1>they're going to kind of split time in the outfield

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>with Ryan Braun and Visa Garcia your boy, which doesn't

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 1>bode well for Evil Garcia obviously, but you know, look

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what they're saying now, there's still a chance, you know,

0:48:35.239 --> 0:48:37.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe against left handed pitching. They use Ryan Brown at

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 1>first base and they use Garcia in the outfield. But

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I think Justin Smoke obviously going over to Miller Park,

0:48:42.040 --> 0:48:45.399
<v Speaker 1>a ballpark that is so conducive to power for left

0:48:45.440 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 1>handed batters. And yes, Justin Smoke is a switch hitter,

0:48:47.960 --> 0:48:50.919
<v Speaker 1>but most of his power comes from the left hand side. Um, look,

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>we're just talking about Christian Walker hitting two fifty with

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty home runs. Justin Smoke might be able to do

0:48:56.239 --> 0:48:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that and you get them like a hundred picks later.

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:00.719
<v Speaker 1>So as a fallback corner infielder, Greg, if you want

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to put him on the list for auction, I have

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:05.359
<v Speaker 1>no problems with Justin Smoke, no issue with Justin I'd

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:07.600
<v Speaker 1>rather have c J. Crown over both. But I like C. C.

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:13.319
<v Speaker 1>Moore as well. I just changed rings because I had

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Smoke once spy higher. Now I have c J. Crown

0:49:16.600 --> 0:49:19.320
<v Speaker 1>at twenty three and Justin Smoke at twenty four, and

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>let move Justin Smoke up. C J. Cron By the way,

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 1>before we on the show, fifty five one runs over

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the last two seasons, hit twenty five last year and

0:49:26.040 --> 0:49:29.279
<v Speaker 1>only twenty five games and was six in baseball in

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:32.200
<v Speaker 1>barrel percentage. He's gonna play every day with the Detroit Tigers.

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:34.439
<v Speaker 1>As long as he's with the Detroit Tigers, We'll see

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 1>what happens with c. J. Crow. Tomorrow, we wrap up

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 1>the week with our Catcher Report. Good Times, I will

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>do utility players to Elsie Cruz, Miguel Andohart Just Davis

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:47.640
<v Speaker 1>with k Let's go growls up next with it all

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Gonnamorrow we go. Are you ready for the nation's first

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and only, free, twenty four hour network dedicated to you,

0:49:55.120 --> 0:49:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the betting and fantasy sports enthusiast. Sports Grade will provide

0:49:58.640 --> 0:50:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you with a real time content, statistics and gaming intelligence

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:06.000
<v Speaker 1>unlike anything you've ever seen before. Located both in the

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:08.719
<v Speaker 1>heart of New York City and inside the FanDuel Sports

0:50:08.760 --> 0:50:11.879
<v Speaker 1>book at the Meadowlands, sports Cride is live eighteen hours

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a day, here to serve you the fanatic. This is

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 1>sports crid Get on the Grid.