WEBVTT - K-Shaped Recovery and Government Stimulus

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanabek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. So something Tim that we've

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:36.159
<v Speaker 1>definitely been talking about in the news room amount of

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>know what you folks over at Quick Take, whether it's

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>been on your mind this morning, But about Texas Governor

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Greg Abbott lifting the mask mandate Texas, I think actually

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:46.279
<v Speaker 1>you and I may be touched on it yesterday. Yeah,

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>we did towards the late in the day yesterday, but

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it was the lead of our nine am show this morning,

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>because look, this comes at a time where people definitely

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>do not feel like we're on the other side of

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and healthcare professionals are saying, hey, it's a

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>little early to be opening up. Yeah, and they're getting

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>ready to allow businesses to operate at full capacity. I

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>think it all begins next week, even though some of

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>their city and county officials say, wait a minute, this

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is too fast. Basically, let's get into it, because we

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>did get an update on the vaccine and the virus

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>yesterday from President Biden talking about all Americans will have

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>enough UH COVID vaccines by May, but working on getting

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the places and the vaccinators in place to give them out.

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to our guest. A. Lissa Wraps, she CEO

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of the healthcare solutions company Surgical Solutions. She's with us

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>once again on the phone from Deerfield, Illinois. A. Lissa,

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you back here on Bloomberg. How are you.

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm well, Carol, Hi, Tim, Thanks for having me back.

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm feeling a little bit more optimistic about the

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>state of vaccine than I even was a few days ago.

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>How come I think that now that J and J

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>has had the shot approved and there's just going to

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>be more vaccine in the market. You know, if if

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>we're on a current average of one point nine million

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>shots given per day at that page of American adults

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>could be vaccinated by August and maybe we can accelerate

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that further, and that becomes that interesting almost tipping point

0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>for from a herd immunity standpoint with adults. Now the

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>children are a different issue. I understand J and J

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>vaccines plus has less efficacy than the other two, but

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, that's a much greater clip of vaccinations,

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>which is I think possibly a light at the end

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of the tunnel. Lissa, that's I mean, that's great, great

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>to hear that the optimism has changed in just recent days.

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>You have over two hundred employees on the front lines

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of the COVID nineteen crisis. They're working to provide services

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and equipment for hospitals. What are you hearing from them?

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>What's it like for them on the front lines right now?

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>So in the early days it was really well throughout,

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>COVID has been extraordinary and clinician burnout and they're burnout

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>is very real. So that's a whole different conversation. But

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to the vaccine in the last few months,

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>as their sites of service in the thirty five possibles

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>where Surgical Solutions operates. As they've all been receiving the vaccine.

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>There were still hiccups that we talked a little bit

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>about that when I was last on how there were

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>hiccups and delivery even that hospitals of all essential workers,

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>which I found very frustrating due to regulatory requirements and

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>tracking um through technology. But now I think some of

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that has been solved for and now we're seeing and

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the education of our staff through lots of mechanisms is high,

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>so we are seeing a much greater clip of people

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>getting the first shot and then a second. We've all

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>been receiving maderna advisor to date, and I'm hopeful that

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>when it when there's a one shot option, we'll see

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it increase even further. But at least the friction in

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of getting the vaccine as an essential worker seems

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to have been dramatically reduced, and now access to vaccines

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>themselves sites of hospitals being out of vaccine seems to be.

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Replenishment seems to be going a little bit better. That's good.

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>That's great to hear because you guys are seeing it directly.

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>What about the one of the things that President Biden

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>brought up is getting kind of the supersites out there

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>so that people can actually get the vaccine and having

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the vaccinators in place. And I'm curious if that's where

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you know some of your employees and team members know

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>really are seeing this firsthand. Are they being asked to

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 1>work long our work more places to get those vaccines out.

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>We haven't been a part of the actual vaccination team yet,

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>although we're working longer hours and and doing all sorts

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>of things to support minimally invasive surgeries, which is tangentially related.

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>But I firmly believe that working with our existing big

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>box retailers, and it almost doesn't matter which one we

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>talk about, whether it's a Walgreens or CVS or a

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Walmart or Costco that has infrastructure for shot delivery. As

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, will Greens all ready have the food shot

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>as as this Costco, etcetera. That to me is the

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>cleanest and simplest way to ensure that it's going to

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>be mass rollout from a retail consumer facing perspective. I'm

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>wondering how you're thinking about this year as the CEO

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of Surgical Solutions. What are you planning for in terms

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of how your employees will change their behavior once we

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>are on the other side of this pandemic. How they're

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>going to I mean, I gotta tell you, Uh, we

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>are like planning for mass vacations at this point, and

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering as as a leader, like how do you

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>plan for that because people have some pent up demand

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to take a break, right, Like you all can't take

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>August off? Sorry? Right? No, No, that certainly wouldn't work. Actually,

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.720
<v Speaker 1>scheduling a vacation time has become a very real priority

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in team leaders could call our account supervisors or junior

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 1>account managers. Have to be very I have to be

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>very dedicated and clear and how they're going to allow

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 1>for staggered vacation time because people need it, We want

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>them to have it. They've earned it, they should take it.

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>But you can't take it all at once, to your point,

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and so making sure we're intentional so there isn't a

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>drop in coverage and being choiceful and how we planned

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>for that's going to be important. And then also being

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>being clear that in past years people have chosen not

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to take vacation. It's like no, no, not only have

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you learned it, you should take it. We all need

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a break. It's exhausting. This has been exhausting on numerous levels,

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>and taking the time off is really key. A couple

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of our one of our director of implementation, UM, we

0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.320
<v Speaker 1>had and rotate for a few days off only, and

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>he came back saying he was super rejuvenated and refreshed

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>with his music. To my ears, that's what time off

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>is supposed to do. So it's needed and we just

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 1>need to be planning for it here, especially especially in

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this time when kind of the lines are blurred between

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>work and home and all of that. UM Alyssa, always

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 1>great to uh talk with you. Alessa Wrap, CEO over

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Surgical Solutions, joining us on the phone from Deerfield, Illinois.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>What's the message, take a vacation. This is Bloomberg Business

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. A lot of great stories being reported

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Business Week. What about sick time during working

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>from home? We're going to get to that a little

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>bit later on. Then there's a story that stayed at

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the top of the most read on the Bloomberg from

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>most of yesterday about that four day work week. You

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>can I talked about that. Yeah, sounds pretty nice. I

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>think to a lot of people it was like, sign

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>me up to everyone. Well. Stevan Nikola is the person

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>who wrote that story. German business reporter on for Bloomberg

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>News joining us on the phone from Berlin. Stevan, it's

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>great to talk to you about this. I loved it

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>when you joined us on quick Take yesterday. UM tell

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 1>us about the company a when Yeah, thanks for having

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>me so. ABAN is a Berlin based tech company that

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>when it went into lockdown last year, it realized that

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>its employees stuffered from stress, and it gave employees half

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of Friday off U two sort of ease into the weekend.

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>And that experiment went so well sales, employee engagement, and

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>clients and satisfaction all rose that in January, ABN decided

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to go a step further and they rolled out a

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>full day week for the entire company with no cuts

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and salaries of benefits, and the CEO says it's working

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>really well. Toe Webber, I'm thinking, all right, sign me

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>up Bloomberg Business Week nitor Toie Webber is here on

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the Access Land in Brooklyn. I feel like, as we're

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>all thinking about Joel getting back to work post pandemic.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to figure out is it a hybrid? Are

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:58.559
<v Speaker 1>we working from home? Are we going to the office?

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>What is it? Yeah? You know, more importantly, like if

0:08:02.560 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>you're going to do a four day work week, which

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>which day do you exercise from that work week? You know,

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>like Friday is the obvious choice, but like Monday, there's

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:17.200
<v Speaker 1>clearly strong case for that. Yeah, Like Wednesday was like

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the out of the box. When that a colleague said, like,

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>what why bother with Wednesday? So I thought it was

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>fitting that on a Wednesday we would talk about which

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>one to get it up. But but seven, the thing

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:32.079
<v Speaker 1>that I thought was most interesting about this is like,

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>even if you lop off a day, whichever day of

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the week it happens to be, it doesn't seem to

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>affect productivity. What did we learn about that? Yeah, so

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>there are studies out there that productivity isn't dropping in

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>some cases, Um, we are seeing increased productivity even and

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of the company told me he saw the same.

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>He said that employees find ways to work smarter and

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.839
<v Speaker 1>not less, but smarter and that just as productive and

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and just um, going back to the Monday, Wednesday, Friday discussion.

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>He said that Friday's are the most popular days to

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.719
<v Speaker 1>take off, followed by Monday and then actually Wednesday, as

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you suggested, because it gives people a nice break in

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the week and they can restart recharged.

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna say Fridays I like because that's always

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>sometimes have a wine guest and we can drink wine

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>on here. So I'm not getting rid of Friday. Let's

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>get rid of my money. Nobody says, give a case

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>of the Fridays. You know what I'm wondering though, are

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>we still productive these four days? Like we when they

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>cut it down? What did they find? Yeah, they did

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:46.359
<v Speaker 1>find that that productivity is basically the same or even improved.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, it's that, you know, workers tend to be

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 1>more focused during the four days, and they tend to

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of effort into those four days that

0:09:57.480 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>they are either in the office or or king from home. Um.

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly enough, UM, the CEO of that company also expected

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, productivity to you know, uh suffer when he

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>sent all of his employees at home, and he said

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>clearly that didn't happen. Much of the country work has

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>worked just as as well from home and uh, lopping

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>off another day with the natural choice for him, and

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>he said it really restored a work life balance that

0:10:31.000 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>has you know, left him energized for the rest of

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the week. Hey, Stephan, I want to move to another

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>story that you wrote, this one coming out today talking

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 1>about Tesla speaking of the corporate world. You've got to

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>get to those four days of work somehow. And it

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>turns out the European corporate car market is huge. This

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was really surprising for me to see. Um, a lot

0:10:54.240 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of companies are a company's account for a large proportion

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of cars so old, uh in Europe, right, Yeah, that's

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that's correct. Around around sixty percent of new cars sold

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in Europe are brought by corporate customers. So that is

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the huge market. And uh, it's worth about three hundred

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty billion dollars and it's a market the local automakers dominate.

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>UM and of course Tesla has a hard time cracking

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:30.599
<v Speaker 1>that market, partly because it's lacking servicing stations. One company

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>told me that you know, it's it's workers would love

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to get Tesler's but the company is not comfortable offering

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:42.560
<v Speaker 1>those cars as a perk because they are afraid that

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>these employees would take time off from work to to

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>deal with repairs, and the likes from Mercedes, BMW and Volkswagen.

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>They offer same day fixes nearby for these company cars

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that that these workers get as a perk, and and

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that's why there's there's the favorite models for many companies.

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you're only working four days, you know that

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>extra day seems like a day that you could like

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>your car. Just bringing it all together here with the bone.

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>But how big of a deal is this really? For

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>teslasting like they are? You know, clearly they have demand

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>if it's many people want them, so so is this

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>corporate um conundrum going to end up being a headache

0:12:28.040 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>for them? And Stefan just got about thirty seconds. Yeah,

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I look for now of course, Um, you know, the

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>company is building a new plant in Berlin. It's going

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>to be huge outputting as much as five from thousand carts,

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.319
<v Speaker 1>so they need to sell those costs somewhere, and the

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>corporate car market is just too big to ignore for them.

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's a third story that stuff I

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>can do that ties it all together. I can find

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>one the week. The week is not done yet, good

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff guys. Thank you so much. Jill Webber, Editor Bloomberg

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, Remote access from Brooklyn. Stuff on Nicola during

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>this reporter joining us from Bertlin, staying up for us.

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Are you are

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week and really looking forward to

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>our next guest? Because I feel like a top story

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 1>at this hour. It's got to be, it continues to be,

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 1>and that is the economy. We're counting down a Friday's

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 1>monthly jobs report, watching the prospects for another round of

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>stimulus from d C. So I gotta say, great to

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 1>have back with us. Peter Atwater. Yeah. Peter Atwater is

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>an adjunct professor of economics that William and Mary joining

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone from Pennsylvania. Professor Atwater, Great to

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>have you on the show. How are you doing. I'm

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>doing well, Jim, Thank you good. Um. What do you

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>think of the we've been We've been dying to have

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you on and we're ucky I get so much time

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>with you. How is the American economy doing right now?

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Because we are getting so many mixed signals. Right there's

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this optimism flashing in the bond market right now. The

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>stock market is just of of record highs in recent weeks.

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, though, ten million Americans out of work,

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>so it continues to be the case shaped recovery. Um.

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>For those that were able to migrate to work from home,

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they are now counting down the hours to the reopening

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of the economy and getting back to life as normal.

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>But as you said, there are ten million Americans unemployed,

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>four point five million filing continuing claims, for whom the

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>recovery is going to be very slow, even once it's reopened.

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>What's kind of wacky is and we just did a

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>conversation with one of our reporters. It's among our most

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>read stories on the Bloomberg and it has to do

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>with um Peter, what's going on in states and state revenues.

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I think we all thought, oh my god, the states

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to fall apart, municipalities are going to fall apart.

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Revenues actually aren't down that much, and this is kind

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of going against They expected two hundred billion in state

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>A that's that's expected to come from the COVID relief

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>package from President Biden, what do you say to that?

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So I say that we're seeing similar unevenness that we're

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing with individuals that we're seeing with businesses, we're seeing

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it with states. And so the challenge now for the

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>administration is how do you provide support for the states

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>that are not doing well in the face of the

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>economy about to reopen, and you know, without it being

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>viewed as a bailout on the one hand, and also

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>without it being viewed as incremental stimulus. That runs the

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>risk of the economy running hot. And I think it's

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be very difficult for the administration to get

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the current package that it's proposed on the States through

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>because it, as as things stand right now, it gives

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody a reason not to like it. It's too much stimulus,

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it's too much relief, it's a bailout. Something is going

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to have to give there. Well, are you worried about inflation?

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I I feel like the lone voice here.

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, last week, last week, we saw this intense capitulation,

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>this intense climax on the reflation trade and bond yield.

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Carol, I I spent a lot of time

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at Google trends, and I do because it shows

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>when the retail investors shows up and suddenly last week

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>all they wanted to do was to search for reflation

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and bond yields. And that feels, you know, we may

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>go a little higher, but that feels to me very

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of game stopp ish, where there was this intense

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>rory that then fizzled out. And I honestly think folks

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>have gotten way ahead of themselves on the reopening. So

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>do you think the move up, like we were talking

0:16:57.760 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>about the tenure at one point five, we've gone as

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>far as point six. I kind of see it as

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a catchup from the equity bounce

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>back of okay, where we can see a trajectory of

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>things getting better, it's going to take a while. How

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>did you see the move up though and yields? So

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I I saw it in some ways very much mirroring

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen in commodities and and so we've also

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>seen everybody now worried about shortages and you know the

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>supply chain being a problem. The White House had a

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>group of folks in last week worrying about chips supply

0:17:34.119 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and so that to me is all indicative of the

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 1>same kind of sentiment that there's that there are shortages,

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that inflation is built into the system, and that problems

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>are coming ahead. But it all presupposes that when the

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>economy quote unquote reopens, people now fantasize that they're going

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>to get back to what was, and we never do.

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I love this. I tweeted about this way. I just

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>gotta jump because you say this whole idea of getting

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>back to normal, right, the return to normal. I probably

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>would be a really rich woman if I had a

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>nickel for every time I said it or a guest

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>said it. But you're saying that we don't. That's not

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>what happens. No, we we carry our experiences, particularly traumatic experiences,

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>with us, and I think that there's those that did

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 1>not experience trauma. They've been spending wildly on homes and

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>other things um already. So I struggle other than with

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>travel and some entertainment where those at the very top

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>are now suddenly going to splurge. But I worry as

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we moved down the economic chain, there there are people

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>who have been traumatized by this financially and for whom

0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to see continued hoarding, continued reluctance

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to spend um. You know, I think about it in

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of what I call the pantry effect, where when

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you when you didn't have enough toilet paper, when you

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't have enough you know, whatever it was that you

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>were rushing to costco to bill a spring, Well, it's

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>still in your house even though supplies have come back.

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>For Peter, is there is there any silver lining to that?

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I know it doesn't have the stimulus effects that economists

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>want to see, that the Biden administration wants to see.

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.959
<v Speaker 1>But is there any silver lining to hoarding cash and

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.360
<v Speaker 1>paying down debt for some of these people who you say,

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>we're financially traumatized and when we have about thirty seconds left? Yeah,

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I do think that there is getting stable, you know,

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>getting some certainty and control back to their their lives

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>is important, and I think that's part of the stimulus effort.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But I think to assume that they're going to now

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>wildly spend is woefully optimistic. Listen, I've said it a

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 1>million times. We love hearing from you. You first coined

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the term to describe the economic world that we have

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 1>been in this K shaped recovery, and I have to

0:19:57.480 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>say in the break and Tim maybe you come in

0:19:59.840 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>on because we've been talking about the case recovery as

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it relates to the covered relief package. Yeah, and it's

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a conversation happening in Washington right now. Just today President

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden agreeing to moderate Democrats demands to narrow that

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>eligibility for those stimulus checks. So now individuals earning over

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.879
<v Speaker 1>eighty dollars would not qualify for those direct payments, compared

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>with a hundred thousand dollar cap that was in the

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>previously drafted legislation. The ceiling for couples will now be

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and sixty thousand UM as compared to two

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand before. Professor Atwater, is that the right move?

0:20:29.840 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that the right way to address the k shaped

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 1>recovery here? Yeah? I think it is. I think that

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>there has been you know, the policymakers use fairly blunt tools,

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think initially there was a sense that everyone

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>needed to be helped. There is much greater clarity today.

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I think where the pain really is as well as

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>where those who have benefit really have have have fared.

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think that there is a need for greater

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>precision and folks us on those whose whose lives have

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>been upended versus those who are already on their trajectory

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to recovery. So I want to ask you. I kind

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of love your mix of you worked in financial services,

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:17.959
<v Speaker 1>you're in academia, Like you've seen a lot, you understand

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the intersection of a lot. Peter and I do wonder

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>if we are at this juncture where we can really

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>make some big changes in our economy, in our world

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and the inequities that are out there that are longer lasting.

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I've got cousin t J who's tweeting at me

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and I said, do you have a question for professor Atwater?

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>He says, yeah, the economics of infrastructure and spectrum upgrades,

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the economic costs of not doing them, Like, there are

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>things we need to be thinking about. How do you

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.119
<v Speaker 1>think about it in terms of let's do that long

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>term plan for America. So, I think given the current mood,

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be difficult for us to tackle abstract

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>ideas like climate change. Now having said that, I think

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>there is enormous energy around addressing the problems that come

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>from climate change, that come from the insufficient investment that

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we've made and so I think that no matter the administration,

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>we will see an emphasis on repair, replace, remediate things

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 1>that we see as real, tangible problems that we have

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>to fix. What are some of those tangible problems, Well,

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly the effects of climate change are are are places

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>where you know, whether it's flooding, you know, you look

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>at you know, we still haven't done anything in New

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>York around Sandy, but which is yeah, and you're seeing,

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, the infrastructure issues in Texas on the energy grid.

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that basic systemic infrastructure. I think we tend

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to think of infrastructure as solely transp rotation, but we

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have a number of critical system and networks that need

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to be upgraded if America is going to be competitive

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 1>against global the global competition that's out there. Are you

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>optimistic that there is the political will for that long

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>term view? I mean, look, we talk a lot about

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>executives that companies thinking on a quarterback quarter basis, But

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I think one criticism of people in Washington elected officials

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>that is that they think about the next election as

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 1>soon as they win that current election. So I agree

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with you that we are very short term focused. You know,

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>with with low confidence comes to me here now thinking.

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But I also think part of that is a need

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for domestic investment versus investment abroad. And so I think

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>that this this mantra of you know, whether it's build America,

0:23:54.800 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>build back better, the make America great again, I think

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that both parties have tapped into a desire to reestablish

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>America and focus on America first. That's what voters across

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the aisle are demanding. Can we do that in a

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>world where increasingly the borders have come down or I mean,

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I know they've come back up again big time, but

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>we constantly have I spent I don't know the last

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>five ten years talking increasingly about globalization. Can we do

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it and it'll all work. Well, We're going to do it,

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, whether it works or not, because there is

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a need for this what I call the justin case economy,

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So that mindset that we have that we need and

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 1>expect critical supplies, critical manufacturing, things that are vital to

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the American economy happening in America. And I think we

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>were awakened in terms of the pandemic and what we

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't make here and probably need to. And so I

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>think there was a there was a again a bipartisan

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>view that we need to focus here at home first. No,

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 1>really really thoughtful ideas and something to think about. Um.

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's interesting how you said, Peter, about

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>how both sides of the aisle are thinking about this

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of make America great again. Yeah, we don't think

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:20.919
<v Speaker 1>of a common ground that often when it comes to

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and Republicans, but it's true. Yeah, great stuff, Peter

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>b Well, thank you, thank you. Peter Atwater at Gen

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>professor of economics. That William and Mary on the phone

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>from Pennsylvania. You read his bio and it talks about

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:35.080
<v Speaker 1>at his son said, you're halfway to ninety, Like, what

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>are you doing. I'm so glad he's had some time

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>for us. I'm road journal. Yeah, but you let me drive?

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, no, no, Anne, please, I'll I want to drive.

0:25:56.400 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Just drive. Questions the drive to the globe. Thanks, we'll

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>drying us Dawn on Bloomberg Radio. Right, folks, just about

0:26:15.760 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 1>eleven minutes left in today's trading send session, bouncing around

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, bouncing around the bottom. Right now, I've

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>got about a two decline on the NAZAC at text

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>talks really taking the biggest hit here. Um, let's get

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 1>into it with Sarah Mallock. She's head of Global Equities,

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Chief investment officer of Global Equities of Written y Viene

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from San Francisco, overseeing roughly four billion

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in assets under management. Sarah, nice to have you here

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.199
<v Speaker 1>with Tim and myself the tech route. Do we need

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to be concerned here? Well, thanks for having me. There's

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>three issues weighing on the market, and a lot of

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>those are hurting these long duration sectors like technology. The

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>first issue is inflation. We do view that as more

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of a fear than reality, but it's causing a many

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>tantrum for the market. The feeds should stay on its

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Dovis course, so I think that we're okay on inflation. However.

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>The second is the backup in rate. These higher yields

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing are being driven by growth, so we

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>don't view it as an imminent risk even though the

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>tenure interest rates are moving up. You know, as long

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>as growth expectations and vaccines continue to roll out, we

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>think will be okay. Third is valuations. Valuations on the

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>S and P are over twenty times at this point,

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and we need that earnings growth to kick in for

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to drive the market's higher because we don't expect any

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>more valuation expansion. And the beneficiaries of that faster earnings

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.479
<v Speaker 1>growth are going to be those shorter durations cyclicals and

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the and the source of funds of those cyclicals will

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>most likely be technology stocks. And that's why you're seeing

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>these tech stocks continue to compress in this kind of

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 1>faster economic growth environment. Okay, I want to start with

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>number two, bond yields. Is there a number that we

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>should be concerned about? Is there a point when you

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:05.479
<v Speaker 1>start to get concerned about rising bond yields. Yeah. We

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>look at, for example, high yield spreads, which actually remain

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 1>quite low, so that's not causing any issues. We look

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>at the UH, how steep is the yield curve. It

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>remains steep, so it's telling you that growth is driving

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>these yields higher and it's not to your recession. We're

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>also watching commodities such as copper. Copper prices continue to

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>move up. That's improved. That's plinty to improve economic performance.

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 1>So as long as the drivers behind these yields are strong,

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we're not as worried about them. But you do need

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to watch the spreads. You do need Do you need

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to watch the slope of the yield curve and you

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 1>start to see those start to move in the wrong direction,

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>then we would become more concerned about higher yields, right.

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And and the other thing is, I mean there were

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>some stories on the on the Bloomberg, some great reporting

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 1>about inflation expectations short term versus longer term. If you

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>look longer at on the curve in terms of what

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>investors are expecting, they're not worried about inflation. Is it

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>important to us to keep that in perspective? I think

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that's also another key to this is we do expect

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to see higher inflation because of the reopening of the economy,

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>people going back demand for traveling. There's also some supply

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>issues with logistics that as we're having trouble getting supply

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>back online, it's causing spikes in prices. The longer term,

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 1>there's headwinds for inflation in the labor markets. About labor

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is two thirds of company revenues. There's still a lot

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of flak in the labor markets. Higher productivity, demographics going

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in the in the wrong direction. All of that put

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the lid on inflation. So exactly, I agree with you.

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Our view is that inflation can see a short term spike.

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>We don't expect the FED to overreact on a short

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>term spike in inflation, and longer term those expectations actually

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>remain quite mild, which is positive for equities. So, Sarah,

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>giving this backdrop, where are you seeing opportunity in the

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>market right now? We think cyclicals are attractive, So looking

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>for those companies that have the most banks there for

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>your buck in terms of lever to the economy. So

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>this is financial the consumer as the as the economy's reopened,

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the consumer has a very strong balance sheet and the

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>consumers should be strong. Going outside of the US, non

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>US benchmarks tend to have a heavier cyclical weight than

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>US benchmarks, which tend to be more technology weighted. So

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>looking at European benchmarks and also emerging market which should

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>benefit from a reflation trade and also from stronger currency

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>in versus a week or dollar. Okay, One thing I

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>wanted to ask you, Sarah, as I think UM last

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>time around, and I think it didn't work out either

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>because the news or some other thing that the market,

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the part of the market that you were looking at

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 1>was UM and I think this was in late February,

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you were looking at some of the digital names, whether

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it was a Service Now or a HubSpot. I'm just curious,

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>do you still like that area of the market which

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>has definitely come down significantly from its highs. Yes, so

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>we have found opportunity in some of these digital names.

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>In January when you saw a lot of the individ

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>visual investors buying company that were heavily shorted and some

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>long some hedge funds that had to pretty quickly be

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>risk and sell some of these crowded technology names. And

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>we still do like the structural growth of strong technology companies.

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>The question is what price do you want to pay

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 1>for them when you do see them dropping in a week,

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>which for some of these companies that happened in January,

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>we view that as a buying opportunity and we think

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>another one will be coming up in some of these

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>strong companies like service Now, hub Spot, um Salesforce. All

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of these companies are companies that you do want to

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>own over time, and you need to pick your points

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that where you want to buy them because they're strong.

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Structural growth is still there. However, the companies that are

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>really going to benefit from a faster growing economy in

0:31:41.200 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the narrow term, are going to be those civil because

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>service now is down about from that February eleventh high. Hey,

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 1>what are you guys hearing from clients when it comes

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to portfolio construction right now? I mean, are you really

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>overweight equities in general? And I don't know, this is

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>a question that depends on who the client is, But

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>are you overweight equities because because fixed income isn't doing anything,

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:03.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, it depends on the needs of the client.

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, clients are some clients are more focused on

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>income summer, more focused on capital appreciation. We're looking really

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>at it, you know, with a rich reward of different

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 1>asset classes, so equities you can get higher returns that

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:17.920
<v Speaker 1>also they come with a higher level of risk than

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>other asset classes. So really it's for us, it's based

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on what is the client looking for um and then

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we have a very diversified platform that can offer them

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>anything they need to help them meet their goals. Sarah

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Wee last question, So a year from now you're writing

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a book about one what do you think the title

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to be? Well, I think it it'll be

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the Return to Normal. So getting back to the normal

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>way of life. I think we could see people actually

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>almost everything happening greater than we expected. So so I

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>think that we could, if anything, error on the side

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of more growth than we expect because of the stimulus. Uh,

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we could overshoot in some ways. If you

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>look at history post these types of periods, people actually

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:01.959
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like they come roaring back, and we may

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>see that in the second half of this year, Ernest

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>could be very back and loaded back to drive the market.

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>That's probably more of the risk, right stutting down again, Well,

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going back to Peter Atwaters and you really can't

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>go back to normal because there's just things that have happened,

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's increased agdization. So it's this interesting conversation we're

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.520
<v Speaker 1>having around that. Sarah, thank you so much, really appreciated.

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Malic, chief investment Officer of Global Equities over at

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>New Vene with us from San Francisco. Thanks for listening

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:31.959
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg global news,