WEBVTT - SpaceX’s $101 Billion Unlock Heaps Pressure on Battered Shares 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX the stock down about eight and a half percent

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 2>right now, but at its low it was down about

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>twelve and a half percent, and that raises a lot

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 2>of questions about the results and what we learned. Alexis

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>mentioned a lot of AI spending. Let's bring in George Ferguson.

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 2>He's our senior aerospace, defense and airlines analysts joining us

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 2>from Princeton and George, it's tempting to chalk this up

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>to investors. We're not in the mood to hear of

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>plans for more spending when they're not seeing how the

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 2>spending is paying off trust yet. But is this kind

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 2>of decline that we're seeing in overreaction given the set

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>of results that SpaceX published.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, we put.

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 4>Out a report right around the IPO time talking about

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 4>valuations for SpaceX right and we we don't tell people

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.399
<v Speaker 4>to buy or sell, but we said was look you

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 4>had to get out to like twenty twenty nine and

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 4>projections for a lot of growth and revenue and then

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 4>turning profitable in twenty twenty eight just to start to

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 4>be able to compare to the other hyperscalers like Microsoft.

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 4>So look, I think that you know, the challenge here

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 4>is valuations are are living, you know, in the stratosphere

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 4>compared to some of their peers, and so you're challenge

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 4>to kind of see, you know, what's the advantage of

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 4>SpaceX over some of those other companies. Right, And so

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.279
<v Speaker 4>I think there was selling going on in the stock

0:01:46.360 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 4>prior to earnings call yesterday, so you know, for days

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 4>and weeks before that, yesterday was a bit of a

0:01:54.640 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, a turnaround where there was a bit of

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 4>a rally. But I think you're back to a sale.

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 4>It's still I think the same story they re sold us,

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:03.920
<v Speaker 4>the story that we heard at the IPO.

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 5>So what I mean in terms of the actual revenues

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:10.519
<v Speaker 5>and cash flows and so on from from the court

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 5>of the just reported they came in better than expected here,

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 5>So I mean they are delivering on kind of what

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 5>they're talking about. It's just a question of you so

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 5>much of evaluation hinges on. I guess Elon's vision longer term.

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, you know again, it's on this AI vision.

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 4>But you know, when I looked at the numbers yesterday,

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 4>they were a bit better than consensus. Uh frankly, they

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 4>were on top of Bi's numbers, to be honest with you,

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 4>which so I'll blow our horn here for this. Maybe

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 4>we're better seers. I don't know, but you know again

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 4>we're you know, what we're talking about is, you know,

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.839
<v Speaker 4>really strong revenue growth. And I think Elon Musk laid

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:53.399
<v Speaker 4>out all the revenue opportunities in the call. But look,

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm an old you know, industrial aerospace defense analyst. At

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 4>some point you got to give me profit, right you gotta.

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 4>And you know, you spend sixty billion dollars on these

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 4>companies that you've got ninety three billion dollars of cash

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 4>in your balance sheet, The spend is is large. They

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 4>doubled capex inside the AI business and that's still very

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 4>loss making. At some point you got to turn this

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 4>into a profitable enterprise. And right now the vision looks

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 4>like a lot of AI for you know, and and

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 4>capex for as far as the eye can see. And

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:29.080
<v Speaker 4>I think that's it's hard for people to put their

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 4>arms on. Plus there is no guidance, right So yeah,

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, so I don't even no one even gave

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 4>us a handle to try to hold on to right

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 4>now when we would start to see profits or you know,

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 4>at least losses starting to improve.

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 6>So this is something that you say, you.

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 2>As a kind of an old school analyst, would be

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 2>looking for. And I suspect many investors in industrial companies

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 2>are looking for something similar.

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 6>But Elon Musk is trying to turn.

0:03:54.800 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX into this next gen tech AI behemoth, and you know,

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 2>he casts his own spell over his shareholders. I just

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>wonder how much overlap is there between SpaceX's investor base

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>and Tesla's investor base, where he usually goes through this

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 2>playbook and does very well because they want to hear

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 2>about the hopes and dreams, and they're less concerned perhaps

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 2>with the immediate payoff the way that old school analysts

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 2>and industrial investors might be.

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, like again, I you know, old school payoff. I

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 4>get it. This is not an old school payoff kind

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 4>of company, right, but give us again some guardrails, I think,

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, or some you know, give us a middle

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 4>line to the road and let us know kind of

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 4>where we are in the trajectory where those those profits come.

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 4>And I think you saw it on the call, right,

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk showed up in the beginning to discuss his

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 4>version of the world and the company and look at

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 4>the tech is amazing, it's outstanding, right, and the vision

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 4>is grand. Right.

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 6>I love all of that.

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 4>The question always comes down to me, and I think

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 4>clearly to people in the markets. At what price? How

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 4>do we put a price on this opportunity? And there's

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 4>going to be a fight in the marketplace, like you said,

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 4>between the people that just love the vision and you know,

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 4>love the tech and others that say, when can you

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 4>bring some cash because you've got heavy investments coming on here.

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 5>Right, we also have a big lockup expiring tomorrow.

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 6>How do you think that's kind of weighing on the shore.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 5>It's got a lot of stock out there potentially potentially

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 5>coming on the market tomorrow.

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, I mean, look, you know, I think about

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.560
<v Speaker 4>this sort of maybe, you know, through my own sort

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 4>of thought processes. I guess if I was internal, you know,

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, you know, it depends how much of

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 4>your cop is wrapped in this? Would you start to

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 4>sell out? Do you feel bad because it's well below

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 4>the IPO price? Do you weigh out things? But the

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 4>trend definitely has been down. So that's I think a

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 4>really hard calculus people that have been locked up in this.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.559
<v Speaker 2>So how important do you think it is for Elon

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Musk and his management team to get the stock back

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 2>above that one point thirty five IPO price? Do you

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 2>think that's something that they're concerned with?

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 4>Look, so, I think if I'm Elon Musk, I want

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 4>to be able to attract more investors to my shares,

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 4>and losing money isn't a great way to attract investors.

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 4>So I think they I think they absolutely want to.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 4>I don't know that they have a window here to

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 4>influence that, you know, for another quarter until they have

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 4>another sort of earnings called So I don't necessarily what

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 4>they do. I know there's rumors in the marketplace about

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 4>merging with Tesla. I can't say that I totally understand

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 4>all the logic there. I think they want to get it,

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 4>get it up. I think they want to be able

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 4>to come back to the markets, the equity markets and

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 4>issue Again, I'm not sure in the near term, though,

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 4>what you do to change some of the trajectory here.

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 5>George, you mentioned they've got you know, one hundred billion

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 5>dollars of cash on the bound sheet. How long is

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 5>that lasts you think before they do.

0:06:58.839 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 6>Have to tell a lot of markets.

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Look, I mean I think you got it was

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 4>like ninety three billion when I looked yesterday they got

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 4>this buy of sixty billion out there. I got to

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 4>figure out how they're going to fund that. You know,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 4>there was I think it was fifteen billion in capex

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 4>during the quarter, you know, out to the AI businesses.

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 4>I think this is not a technical answer. It doesn't

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 4>seem like it's going to last long.

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And it's just I mean, it's a lot of cash,

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 5>but they have a lot of needs.

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 6>They have a lot of needs.

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Are they going to go dip back into the bond

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 2>mark again, do you think, George?

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, look, I think that's that's really going to get

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 4>predicated on whether or not they can maintain their investment

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 4>grade rating, right, because I think you want you don't

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 4>want to let that slip too much. And everyone I

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 4>talked to about the investment grade rating tells me it's

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 4>a function of the cash on the balance sheet, right,

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 4>because you don't have a company here that's sort of

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 4>a heavy cash generator. Yeah, and maybe the ability to

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 4>tap markets again. Yeah, I think Sara Wo'd rather go

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 4>to the debt market, but again, I don't know how

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 4>long that that remains open.

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 5>As your spending cat, I think the big thing is

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 5>going to be the farmer creditor. It's the it's actual

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 5>equity value that's underneath me supporting me. That's the only

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 5>thing that's the same thing it was with Tesla.

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and now you're looking to stalk again, We'll blow

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 2>that one thirty five IPO price.

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 4>Yep, yep.

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 6>Man, you've seen joints us here.

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 5>Glottal Tech, research head for Bloomberg Intelligence Advanced micro Devices

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 5>A M. D. I thought the sales was good, but

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 5>people are calling in an underwhelming sales ATLEC. How can

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 5>a chip maker have an underwemer.

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, I guess partly that has to do with the

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 7>valuation and where I think this has run up. But

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, you're being compared against Nvidia, and that's where

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.960
<v Speaker 7>Nvidia's data center sales is probably at this point, you know,

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 7>twelve thirteen times bigger than AMD's, even though AMD grew

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 7>you know, over one hundred percent and they guided to

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 7>triple digit growth going forward. But the fact that Nvidia

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 7>is still growing you know, seventy five percent at their rate,

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.959
<v Speaker 7>which is twelve times bigger, it just goes to show

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 7>that right now, AMD is just holding share, it's not

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 7>you know, in any ways gaining share, and this market

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 7>is lifting all both, so AMD does have a role.

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 7>And the other thing that I noted last night is

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 7>so they have this new architecture coming up in the

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 7>second half, everyone seems to be holding off for that,

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 7>Like why would they buy something that's going to be

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 7>older generation three months from now. So that's the other thing.

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 7>When you announce a new architecture. That doesn't happen with Nvidia,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 7>by the way, because everyone feels their supply constraint within

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 7>Vidia gear. But for someone like AMD, you've said, you know,

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 7>you've got a much better chip coming three months down

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 7>the line. So I feel there is some hold up

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 7>in that aspect, Like no one wants to commit big

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 7>when they know there's another something better coming through.

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 2>So that strategy only works if you're the market leader,

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 2>not if you're the number two. And it feels like

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Intel has intell It feels like AMD has been number

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 2>two for a long time. It's the number two to Intel,

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 2>it's now bigger than Intel. It's now the number two

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 2>to Invidia. But as we've said, there's not enough supply

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 2>to meet all this demand. So AMD should be in

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 2>a good position. Is it because all the other companies

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 2>have come out and decide to make their own ships

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>go proprietary, that AMD's kind of left on the outside.

0:10:45.720 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 7>I think that's also a long term factor when it

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 7>comes to AMD's prospects, you know, three years, five years

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 7>from now. I mean every hyperscaler has ambitions to make

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 7>their own chip. Google has done that success, others wanted

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 7>to do the same. So from that perspective, I mean, yes,

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 7>AMD has a deal with open Ai and Tropic. They

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 7>have committed to Meta as well. In fact, they ended

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 7>up giving some equity to Meta for that six gigawatt commitment.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 7>That just goes to show they're not playing from a

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 7>position of strength like n videos. So they really have

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 7>to course this these hyperscale, especially the new ones like

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 7>Open AI and Entropic, and make sure they end up

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 7>using AMD chips and not just you know, other chip makers.

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 7>So overall, I think the print was great. The valuation

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 7>is rich, so they sort of meta expectations they didn't wow,

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 7>and then that's why you see that sort of reacting.

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.679
<v Speaker 5>All right, we were just chatting with George Ferguson about

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX and he was gonna the angle from the satellite side,

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 5>which is good. I know you just published something regarding

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 5>the AI part of the story here because the socks

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 5>down another eight percent today. Can't find a bid here.

0:11:57.400 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 5>If you're buying this thing, you're buying it for the

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 5>AI play you are.

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 7>And it's amazing how much they have pivoted to AI.

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 7>In fact, they gave a one hundred billion dollar revenue

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 7>run rate number by the end of this year. So

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 7>this company is going from about eighteen billion at the

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 7>time of IPO to one hundred billion dollar run rate

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 7>in a span of six months. And that's for the

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 7>AI business all AI driven, and that's where seventy percent

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 7>of that like, they could be the biggest neocloud out

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 7>there by the end of the year simply because they

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 7>have that ramp up in CAPEX. And that's where you know,

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 7>the investors may find holes in.

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 6>How are they going to raise money?

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 7>If you are hyperscaler, you have the balance sheet to

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 7>do two hundred billion dollars in CAPEX. I mean what

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 7>SpaceX literally implied last night is they will do two

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 7>hundred billion dollars in capex twenty twenty seven. But investors

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 7>are not buying it because they don't have the balance

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 7>sheet unlike the hyperscaler. So are you doing a debt ras,

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 7>are you doing an equity raise? How are you raising

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 7>the funding? Or maybe Nvidia is doing the backstop because

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 7>they said we will rely solely on Nvidia chips for

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 7>this buildout, and in fact that's why AMD is down

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 7>because they could have said, you know, we'll give it

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 7>a md A ten percent shares that didn't happen with

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 7>SpaceX plans last time.

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 6>Is that feasible that they're going to rely solely on

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 6>Nvidia for the.

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 7>Buildoutdo if Nvideo is doing the backstop and saying they

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 7>need the funding. In this case of SpaceX, the biggest

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 7>apprehension is how is this company going to find the

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 7>funding for two hundred billion dollars in capex, which Elon

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 7>must said we'll have ten gigawatt capacity by end of

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty seven. That definitely amounts to two hundred billion

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 7>dollars plus just in purchases of Nvidia chips and other components.

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 7>How are you going to raise that funding? So that's

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 7>where Nvidia comes in with you know, its balance sheet

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 7>and saying we're supporting all the neo clouds, we will

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 7>support SpaceX.

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 5>What is neocloud again?

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 7>I mean it's just you know, renting your data centers

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 7>with GPUs with power. So it's not a commodity business.

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:11.280
<v Speaker 7>Don't think right now all these Eventually it may become one,

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 7>but right now, sourcing the power, getting these servers online

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 7>and getting it.

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 6>Ready, it's there's a ton of demand.

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 7>There's a ton of demand, and it's not commoditized in anyway.

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 6>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us Live

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, Listen on demand wherever

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 2>It's really earnings power that is driving the stock market

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 2>certainly today with the S and P five hundred making

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:51.680
<v Speaker 2>yet another record high.

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 6>If we close at these levels.

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 2>It'll be the second straight record close, and earnings is

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 2>behind all that. So let's talk to Getha Rung and

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Athen our analyst on US Media in Princeton, about the

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 2>latest earnings from Walt Disney Company, the entertainment giant. And

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot to like in this earnings report. The

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 2>stock is up about two and a half percent right now.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Is the entertainment division which saw sixty four percent rise

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 2>in profit that kind of drove everything? Or is it

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 2>once again the parks and cruises the experience's arm which

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 2>saw a smaller increase in profit but really has become

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 2>the crown jewel of Disney's empire.

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely, Scarlett, And it's actually a bit of both.

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 3>So you know, the experiences division of the theme parks division,

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 3>as you just pointed out, makes up less than forty

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 3>percent of total company revenue, but almost sixty percent of profit.

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 3>So really it is the crown jewel, as you rightly

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 3>alluded to it. And you know, again the profit there

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 3>was really strong, and I think coming in investor expectations

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 3>were really really low. Profits were up twenty percent. Remember

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 3>consensus was at about ten and a half percent increase.

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 3>So again, really strong number, and what it really did

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 3>was elaid fears because Comcast, which just reported a few

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 3>weeks ago, talked about weakness and a slowdown, a demand

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 3>slow down in their Universal theme parks, especially in Orlando,

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 3>and now seeing Disney come out with such strong numbers

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 3>really shows that, you know, they're executing really well and

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 3>demand continues to be strong as they head into fiscal

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 3>the fiscal fourth quarter as well. But then, as you

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 3>you know again said, streaming, which is part of that

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 3>entertainment division, is really the growth catalyst for this company,

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 3>and it's all about streaming profitability and how far and

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 3>how far ahead they can get on operating margin for

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 3>the streaming business. And they prove that they did a

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 3>really good job of this quarter, and there's there's obviously

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot more growth levers going forward.

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 7>KEITHA.

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 5>This is the second straight quarter of better than expected

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 5>profitability for the CEO, Josh Tomorrow, who succeeded Bob Ayger

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 5>in that role in March. Talk about big shoes to Phil.

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 5>What's the early read from investors on mister Tomorrow.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.439
<v Speaker 3>I think they're really liking all what they see. You know,

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Josh obviously has a very clear strategy. He's He's made

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 3>some pretty big changes. So just today, for instance, they

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 3>announced that they got rid of their fifty percent stake

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:17.679
<v Speaker 3>in A and E Global Media. They got about one

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 3>point two billion dollars in cash and they're going to

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 3>deploy that towards share repurchases. Then again, you have this

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 3>new deal. They had to get out of their Sora

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 3>deal after obviously soa shut down, but now they have

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 3>today they announced this new deal with TikTok So. Again,

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Josh is I think, really kind of taking a hard

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.000
<v Speaker 3>look at all of the different businesses. He obviously knows

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 3>that they need to reduce their exposure to you, linear TV,

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 3>but you know, they're doing all that they can in

0:17:45.320 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 3>terms of streaming, and of course he is a Parks veteran,

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 3>so he knows exactly, you know, how that business works.

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 3>But it also looks like he's positioning Disney Plus to

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 3>become this major hub for the entire Disney ecosystem, something

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:03.159
<v Speaker 3>almost akin to Amazon Prime for all things Disney, starting

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 3>in spring of twenty twenty seven. And so I think

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 3>that's going to be pretty exciting for the company.

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that sounds very strategic.

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 2>How do you think about how that's going to change

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the entertainment industry and how other media companies respond to

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 2>that kind of positioning.

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So, I mean Disney has a really unique hand

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 3>to play here, Scarlett. I mean, they have theme parks,

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 3>which really other than Comcast, nobody else has. Obviously, they

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 3>have this great movie and studio business, and of course

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 3>that they're streaming business too, And the one thing that

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 3>they have or they do better than everybody else is

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 3>ESPN and sports. They have huge, huge exposure there to

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 3>all of the Marquee sports rights. So you know, again,

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 3>it's all come down to one thing in the streaming world,

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 3>which is engagement, and if they can build on that

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 3>engagement and keep you within that Disney ecosystem for everything,

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 3>I mean, whether you're buying a theme park ticket or

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:54.680
<v Speaker 3>wanting to watch a movie or wanting to watch a

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 3>show on Disney Plus or Hulu, I mean, right there,

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 3>that's a major differentiator versus peers.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 5>So Githa Paramount also reported numbers here. I'd love to

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 5>get a sense of kind of what the company's saying

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 5>these days about their I guess stalled merger with Warner

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 5>Brothers Discovery and how they plan to operate as an

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 5>single entity over the next twelve months.

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 3>So their numbers yesterday, Paul were actually pretty decent, and

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of that was just the cost savings from

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 3>the sky Dance, you know, acquisition. So it's it's pretty

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 3>clear that once they are able to get their hands

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 3>on Warner Brothers and they're able to close on that transaction,

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.479
<v Speaker 3>they're obviously going to do all that they can to

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 3>deliver on those six billion and synergies. But it's really

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.959
<v Speaker 3>been a very long and arduous road and it's not

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 3>looking easy at all. So one of the things that

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.639
<v Speaker 3>I think people still are extremely concerned about is leverage.

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 3>We know it's going to be about six and a

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 3>half times at closing whenever that happens, and then the

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 3>other thing that you have now is kind of the

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 3>sticking fee, right, and so that's because this deal is

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 3>going to get delayed by.

0:19:57.920 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 6>At least two full quarters.

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 3>It was supposed to close on September thirtieth, it's going

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.879
<v Speaker 3>to be maybe closer to a March end of March timeframe.

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 3>We're going to see it close to almost about one

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 3>point three billion dollars in ticking fees and guess how

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 3>that's going to be funded more share issuance. So we're

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 3>looking at massive dilution here, I mean paramount share, paramounts,

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 3>guidance share. You know, a number of shares outstanding right

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 3>now is one billion. It's going to go to close

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 3>to about five billion when all of this is said

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 3>and done. So this is just, you know, it just

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 3>is not a very very encouraging outlook at all from

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 3>an investment perspective.

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.679
<v Speaker 5>One of the most read articles on the Bloomberg Terminal

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 5>and a long time is to do with Lulu Lemon

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 5>and the management team there and some of their product

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 5>challenges that they have, and it seems like Lululemon pants

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 5>are everywhere, but it's been a journey. Lily Meyer Joints

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 5>is here, Retai reporter for Bloomberg News. Lily, what was

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.439
<v Speaker 5>your focus here when doing this story on Lululemon.

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so, the story chronicles how the company that basically

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 8>invented leggings as we know it today got to this point.

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:29.919
<v Speaker 6>Where they're really struggling.

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 8>You know, they have an influx of competitors, they have

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 8>a CEO who's starting in September. They've been without a

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 8>CEO for several months, and until recently, they had a

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 8>founder who was really criticizing many of their moves.

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 6>So how did they get here?

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 5>What happened here? Because we've had a lot of reporting

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 5>on Lululemon over the years here a Bloomberg.

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, so, you know, lul Lemon was founded by Chip Wilson,

0:21:56.119 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 8>who is a executive from Vancouver, and he came up

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 8>with this idea. He was going to yoga classes to

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 8>help with the back problem he was having and saw

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 8>it that many of the people in the class didn't

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.879
<v Speaker 8>really have, you know, the athletic wear that they needed,

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 8>and the company has since you know, gone public, become

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 8>a fourteen billion dollar company, gone through multiple executives, and

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 8>through throughout the way, they've had these problems with sheerness

0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 8>in their leggings. So in twenty third.

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.120
<v Speaker 6>Sheerness yes like see through?

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 5>Yes, not good?

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So in twenty thirteen they had their first big issue,

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 8>they had to pull almost twenty percent of their women's

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 8>pants from stores. That led to management changes, and just

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 8>recently earlier this year, they had another issue with sheer leggings.

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so new management we have, I guess In April,

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 5>the company has selected Heidi O'Neill, a former top executive

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 5>at Nike, to be its next CEO. What do we

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 5>know about miss O'Neil and maybe what her agenda or

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 5>what her strategy is going to be here.

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so Heidi is a really interesting pick. She was

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 6>a top executive.

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 8>At Nike under its previous CEO, John Donaho, who presided

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 8>over a period of Nike's history where you know, they

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 8>cut ties with many of their wholesale partners, they went

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:26.959
<v Speaker 8>too deep into lifestyle sneakers, and Heidi led product and

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 8>led Nike's direct to consumer push.

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 5>So talk to us about this founder here I mean,

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 5>he didn't go quietly into the night.

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:35.200
<v Speaker 2>Did he.

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 5>He's still pretty active on social media, kind of taking

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 5>potshots at the company, it seems like, right.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So he launched a proxy campaign against the company

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 8>last year, advocating for changes.

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 6>He criticized the management, the.

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 8>Board, you know, the CEO left shortly after, and in

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 8>May he reached a settlement with Lulu. So the settlement

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 8>is granting him two boards, so he'll have a bit

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 8>of a foothold in that sense. And he also is

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 8>going to get quarterly meetings with Heidi when she starts,

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 8>and in return, he has to stay quiet for eighteen months.

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 5>Eighteen months?

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 6>What do we know about?

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 5>Does he support this selections new CEO Heidy O'Neil.

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 8>He was pretty critical about the CEO process. He you know,

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 8>criticized the way it happened. He took some shots there.

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 8>But he also reached out to Heidi, congratulated her on

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 8>the role, said he looked forward to meeting her soon.

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 8>So it'll be really interesting to see what these quarterly

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 8>meetings are like between them.

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 5>So is it for Lululemon? Is it a product story?

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 5>Is it a promotional story? Where do most people think

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 5>the challenge or is it maybe just a competitive story.

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 5>I don't know, what do people think? This is the issue?

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's kind of all so on the product side,

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 8>you know, new competitors like Aloe and Viewori have come in.

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 8>They've launched product that customers have found really exciting, customers

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 8>have switched over and Lulu product some of it has

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 8>fallen short. You know the get Low laggings that came

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 8>out in January and had to they had to pause

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 8>sales on because they were see through Lula and pushed

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 8>into sneakers, which hasn't really panned out.

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 6>They had this collaboration with.

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 8>Disney which they got a lot of critique over.

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 6>So it's a product story.

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 8>You know, she has to win over shareholders as well

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 8>and went over the street.

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 5>So it's I guess when I talked to like Scarlett

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 5>fou or Alex Steele or anybody, I kind of get

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 5>the same story, which is they love Lululemon, but it's

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 5>just too expensive for a lot of people. So it's

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 5>a premium product at a premium price. But I don't

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 5>know that's kind of the feedback I get. Yeah, I

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 5>mean that does a company acknowledge that I don't know.

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 6>If they've really acknowledged that.

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think their price points have remained pretty

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 8>stable for many years, but obviously they're on the more

0:25:57.040 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 8>premium side, which adds more pressure when the product, you know,

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 8>doesn't meet customers expectations. And addition to allo and viewery,

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 8>they've also gotten more competitors on the lower end, so

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 8>you know, people are buying likings from Target, they're buying

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.159
<v Speaker 8>likings from Old Navy, and so that's taken some of

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 8>their share as well.

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal.