WEBVTT - Musk’s Mega Plan for Chip Manufacturing

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in Sent Francisco.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 3>A possible de escalation in the Middle East ripples through

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.159
<v Speaker 3>markets as President Trump outlines talks to potentially end the

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 3>war in Iran.

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 4>Plus, we'll take a look at Mosque's grand plan to

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 4>manufacture his own chips for robotics, AI and space data centers.

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 3>And Nscale becomes one of Europe's most valuable startups with

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 3>a fourteen point six billion dollar valuation and add Sheryl

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 3>Sandberg to its boards.

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 4>We'll discuss let's check on these markets first and foremost, though,

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 4>because you called it rippling through the market said, there

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 4>is talk of a de escalation, there is sites being

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 4>set on the straight or four moves, and there isn't

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 4>it another record move for Brent contract of like ten

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 4>percent and one point it fell below ninety six dollars.

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 5>This of course fuel some risk on sentiment.

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 4>We see the NaSTA one hundred having its best day

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 4>since the start of February. At one point it's best

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 4>day since November. And this really as we see President

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.840
<v Speaker 4>Trump send shockwaves through the market with what seems to

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 4>be an apparent discussion at a high level and maybe

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 4>some movement towards the strait.

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 5>Of hol moves. Just take a listen to what he

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 5>said to reporters.

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.959
<v Speaker 6>Earlier that would be up in to their version if

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:33.960
<v Speaker 6>this worked, be a jointly control nine Maybe me, maybe me, thanks,

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 6>me and the idola, whoever the idolla.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Is President Trump speaking to reporters earlier today. Let's get

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 3>to Bloombers Kyle Lyons, co host of Balance of Power

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 3>for the latest, and what is the latest?

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 7>You know?

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 3>All morning long, so many headlines on the terminal about

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the state of talks between the United States in Iran.

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, and we have seen a major about face from

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 8>President Trump here, from threatening within forty eight hours to

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 8>attack Iranian power and energy infrastructure, they did not agree

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:02.559
<v Speaker 8>to open the strait of horror moves to now saying

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 8>he's asked for a delay of such action for five

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 8>days due to progress in talks that he said took

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 8>place someday between his envoy Steve Whitcoff and Jared Kushner

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.600
<v Speaker 8>and their Iranian counterparts, in which he said, according to

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 8>those discussions, Iran agreed not to restart its nuclear program

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 8>and to relinquish nuclear material that is still in the country.

0:02:20.200 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 8>He says, Iran is the one who was looking to

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 8>make a deal here, though he would like to make

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 8>a deal as well. But there are a few outstanding questions,

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 8>one being who is it exactly that the US is

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 8>negotiating with. As President Trump said, it is not the

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 8>Iyatola Mushtaba Hamane, of course, the son of the late

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.799
<v Speaker 8>Supreme Leader, and the US has repeatedly heralded as well

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 8>as Israel taking out much of Iran's top brass, from

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 8>the national security chief to the defense chief to the

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 8>head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard card. It's not exactly

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 8>clear who this person may be, though Axios is reporting

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 8>that Whitcoff is speaking with the leader of the Iranian Parliament,

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 8>so that may be the case. That we have not

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 8>confirmed that here at Bloomberg. And beyond that, it is

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 8>not clear that Iran is actually as eager to make

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 8>a deal as the President suggests. Iranian state media have

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 8>said that the president's statements is just psychological warfare and

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 8>effort to get energy prices down, and that no talks

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 8>are happening between Tehran and Washington. There's also the third

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 8>party in this conflict to consider, Israel. Israeli officials have

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 8>told Bloomberg that they do not see an imminent end

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 8>to the war and they will continue strikes, though not

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 8>looking at energy infrastructure. And so that does remain an

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 8>open question. Even if the US and Israel are not

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 8>going after the energy infrastructure, is the president threatened? That

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 8>is not to say that military strikes and operations against

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 8>other assets will not continue in the region all the same, Clearly,

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 8>with the President's a more optimistic tone on a potential

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 8>diplomatic offramp to this conflict is rippling its way through

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 8>financial markets today, which may impart have been his.

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Intent, Katie, a very thorough state of affairs.

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 5>Where do we look to next?

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's going to be a question of, as President

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 8>Trump says that talks will continue by phone between the

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 8>US and Iran today, if we get any further readout

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 8>from those or if Iranian state media starts to signal

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 8>that perhaps there is more effort toward a deal, not

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:00.440
<v Speaker 8>just on the US side, but on the Iranians as well,

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 8>and if we hear any further developments for Israelis to

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 8>whether or not they are willing to accept the terms

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 8>that President Trump is outlining here, Certainly a degree of

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 8>skepticism may be warranted until anything is more ironed out.

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 8>Keeping in mind as well that we are coming off

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 8>the deployment of more assets and personnel, including thousands of marines,

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 8>to the Middle East, and a request by the Pentagon

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 8>to the tune of some two hundred billion dollars to

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 8>Congress for additional funding for this conflict, and of course

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 8>to backfill stockpiles that we have deployed thus far in

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 8>the Middle East. So it doesn't appear necessarily that the

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 8>US at this time is fully willing to walk away

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 8>from military operations, even as a diplomatic off ramp may

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 8>be pursued here. I would also know that President Trump

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 8>is scheduled to speak in Memphis at one pm. It's

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 8>something more domestically focused on crime, but he could, as

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 8>he speaks with officials they are and with reporters gathered,

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 8>give even more signalists to what exactly he sees happening

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 8>next when it comes to run.

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Bl most Kaylee lines from Washington, thank you very much. Indeed,

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 4>look that's bringing the market reaction to all of this,

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.040
<v Speaker 4>Bluemost Billy Lipshitz joins us, Now, we always have a

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 4>tech focus on this show, but to whiplash.

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 9>In terms of the turnaround of the markets, Yeah, no,

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 9>And in Bloomberg reporting just a few minutes ago that

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 9>the president's decision was aimed in part at calming markets.

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 2>So we did see that reaction.

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 9>As you mentioned, we saw the SP five hundred absolutely

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 9>rip when Trump talked down d escalator or talked about

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 9>de escalation. There's so much uncertainty around what the path

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 9>forward looks like. The main thing to keep in mind,

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 9>the SP five hundred is really back to where it

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 9>was on Wednesday. It's where essentially it was at the

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 9>end of Friday a week.

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:26.360
<v Speaker 2>And a half ago.

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 9>So as much volatility as there has been on the

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 9>headline levels, you're not really seeing an actual move in

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 9>either direction. Yes, the SP five hundred broke below it's

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 9>two hundred and one hundred day moving averages back above that,

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 9>but for all intents and purposes, you're still in essentially

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.239
<v Speaker 9>a banded region for the last few weeks.

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Remember that we ended Friday with the Nasdaq one hundred

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 3>having its full straight week of declines, and the thing

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 3>about the warring Iran is that the headlines change direction

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 3>all the time. There's been big outperformance in chips as well,

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and it's a double take, but the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 3>is up twelve percent so far this year. Well, then

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 3>as that one hundred and an S and P five

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 3>hundred both down three percent. How much is this is energy, Bailey?

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 3>How much is this is still people trying to assess

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 3>supply chains and how that might impact different sectors.

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot about the supply chain.

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 9>It's a lot of uncertainty around what the ultimate knock

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:20.160
<v Speaker 9>on effects are, how long does this war conflict last,

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 9>what the ultimate damage is to the infrastructure, anyrn on

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 9>some of these oil fields and some of the oil

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 9>refining projects. The big thing to keep in mind, though,

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 9>at is that markets are tied. So we have been

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 9>seeing pretty much the market move in lockstep to the

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 9>downside of whatever oil's doing. So if oil's down twelve percent,

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.600
<v Speaker 9>logically you can expect the market to rally and vice versa.

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 9>So again, it is still only Monday morning. We still

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 9>have a lot of time. Even though Trump talked about

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 9>a five day kind of pause, for attacking some of

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 9>these energy projects. But the big thing to keep in

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 9>mind is that we are seeing these moves play out

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 9>in real time across.

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Assets, Bluebooks, Bay Lipschultz with the market some thank you

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 3>very very much.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 7>Like coming up.

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk Inc.

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Is proposing to put the entire chip industry under one

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 3>roof up next the Tesla SpaceX terror Fab master plan.

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 4>Tesla and SpaceX will jointly run an advanced chip manufacturing

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 4>facility in Austin, Texas as according to Elon Musk, the

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 4>CEO of both companies, now mask says, the semiconductor industry

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 4>is moving too slowly to meet his robotics, his AI

0:07:34.360 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 4>and his space ambitions. Let's get more on the plans

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:41.040
<v Speaker 4>of bloombergs Lauren Grush. So this is extraordinarily large. Was

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 4>there any actual significant data we know that this will

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 4>help spin things up for his companies?

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think a lot of you know, just like

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 10>with Elon Musk and how he usually does things.

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 11>There were a lot of promises, right.

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 10>One thing that I took particular note of was you

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 10>know how much this was going to benefit is data

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 10>center in space project that they've been touting for some

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:07.720
<v Speaker 10>time now, and what we know is ultimately driving the

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 10>planned IPO for SpaceX that may or may not occur

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 10>later this year.

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 11>We did get a rendering of what one of those

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 11>data center.

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 10>Satellites would look like, and so from what I understand,

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 10>you know these chips will be a big factor in

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 10>making those data center satellites a reality.

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 4>And to you, because of course you're also our SpaceX

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Tesla reporter as well as being on TV with me

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 4>luckily and talk to me about how you put it

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 4>in the very top headline, this is trying to do

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 4>everything all under one roof.

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 5>We've never already seen this before in the chip industry.

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so having logic, which is GPU, CPU, the GPUs

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 3>going to the orbital data center, the Lauren outlined, memory

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 3>and packaging. The industry doesn't work like that, and for

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 3>good reason. They're done by specialists essentially as separate industries

0:08:56.360 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 3>because the raw materials are completely different and the processes

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 3>are are different. So it's not just the scale that's unprecedented,

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 3>it's the approach. To give you an idea of that,

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk is saying the facility will start at about

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 3>one hundred thousand wafers a month. A lead edge fab

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 3>right now probably does thirty to one hundred thousand, and

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 3>then they want to scale up to one million a month.

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 3>So that's about seventy percent of TSMC's global output. The

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.439
<v Speaker 3>footprint is kind of insane, so there's a lot of

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 3>questions on how they'll fund it, and they basically said,

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 3>we don't know yet, but it's going to cost a

0:09:26.400 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of money.

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Lauren.

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 3>The other thing as well, is like eighty percent I

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 3>think was the figure. I mean, you had the honor

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 3>of staying up over the weekend watching the full presentation,

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 3>but like we're showing on the screen now the bigger picture,

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.760
<v Speaker 3>which is the design for the orbital Data Center satellite

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 3>form factor carried by Starship.

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 2>But what Musk was saying was that the vast majority.

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 3>Of activity will be to serve GPUs in space.

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 12>Yeah.

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely.

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 10>It's actually a full circle moment for me here in

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 10>Arson because he made this announcement here and there had

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 10>actually been a bunch of lights coming from Sea Home

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 10>Power Plant, which a lot of Austinites were curious about,

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 10>and then we learned Saturday.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 11>Night that yes, this was about this announcement. But yeah,

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 11>as you can see on the screen.

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 10>There, one of the big aspects of the orbital data

0:10:11.000 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 10>centers are these massive solar panels that they're going to

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 10>need in order to gather enough power to run these satellites.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.199
<v Speaker 10>And that satellite is supposedly a mini satellite and it's

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 10>only capable of having a capacity of think of a

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 10>one hundred kilowats is what he said. But you know

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 10>that they plan on launching a bunch of these satellites.

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 10>You know, recently SpaceX filed with the FCC to launch

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 10>up to one million data center satellites.

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 11>So this is by no means a small project for them.

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.719
<v Speaker 4>It's an expensive project, and in many ways it's why

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 4>we anticipate SpaceX is going to have to go to

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 4>the public markets.

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 5>Lauren, just how much more.

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 4>Cost effective is it? Do we get any comparison versus

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 4>doing it here on Earth?

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 10>You know, the ELON has laid out the pros and

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 10>cons of going to space. One of the big ones

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 10>is that, you know, space is big, and there's a

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 10>lot more room to move to lay all of these

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 10>satellites out right. Also, the Sun is a big aspect

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 10>of it. So here we have a lot of limits

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 10>when it comes to getting enough power in order to run.

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 11>These data centers.

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.240
<v Speaker 10>But the idea is to put these satellites into a

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 10>specific orbit that would harness the Sun's energy practically twenty.

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 11>Four to seven. So those are the reasons that are

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 11>being laid out for going into space. Whether or not

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:31.719
<v Speaker 11>it's crass effective, I think, is the big question mark

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 11>that we're all waiting to see.

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 3>It's always sunny in space. Bluemboslare and grush, Thank you

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 3>very much. Let's stick with it and get the investor perspective.

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 3>We're joined by Karen Fronsky, Global head of Private Acuity

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.719
<v Speaker 3>Investments at Fidelity. Her teams invested in private companies for

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 3>over fifteen years, currently has over fifty billion dollars deployed

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 3>across one hundred and fifty private companies, County SpaceX as

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 3>one of them. The idea that SpaceX is undertaking terror

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 3>fab with Tesla at unprecedented scale to secure compute here

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 3>on Earth and in orbit.

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:09.199
<v Speaker 2>Your reaction to that, Karen.

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 13>Well, my reaction is they've actually been thinking about this

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 13>for a long time. So Lauren just.

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 14>Talked about the FCC application for a million SATs in space.

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 14>But if you rewind back to twenty twenty two, they

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 14>had filed a patent around getting computing resources to SATs

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.360
<v Speaker 14>in space as well. So I think this is something

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 14>that Elon and his team have been thinking about for

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 14>a long time, frankly at least since the post chat

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 14>GPT moment.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 13>I also think conceptually it makes a lot of sense.

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 14>So you just talked about Lauren just talked about harnessing

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 14>power in Sun synchronous orbit. But the other constraints on

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 14>AI data centers here on Earth are not just power.

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:59.319
<v Speaker 14>It's land, it's permitting, it's getting contractors like electricians to

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 14>put these blocks together, and those constraints don't exist in space.

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 14>And so I think conceptually it makes a ton of

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 14>sense to be thinking about in the longer term data

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 14>centers in space. The question, of course becomes what you

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:18.599
<v Speaker 14>were just talking about, is it economical? And frankly, what

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 14>we've been watching for as investors is Starship and Starship

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 14>Flight twelve should happen in April. They're going to be

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 14>launching their Gen three of the ship, which will carry

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:35.520
<v Speaker 14>up to one hundred tons of payload. And as a reminder,

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 14>the plan is for Starship to be fully reusable in

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 14>the future, and if it's fully reusable, ultimately the cost

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 14>of launching it could come down very, very meaningfully, which

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 14>would mean launching the AI data centers into space. Those

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 14>payloads could make that whole concept very economical.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 3>Taran, you and your team at Fidelity, what research modeling

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 3>have you done for the fact and the point at

0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 3>which orbital data center becomes profitable. A lot of people

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 3>when I said you were coming on the program wanted

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 3>to know if you've been shown at any evidence by

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX about the viability of an or data center this decade.

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 3>But many people measure it in the dollar per kilogram equation.

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 14>When it comes to Starship, absolutely we do measure it

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 14>in dollar per kilogram. And again, as I mentioned, it

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:30.000
<v Speaker 14>really comes down to how quickly Starship can be up

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 14>and fully reusable. So as a reminder Falcon nine, they

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 14>just reuse the booster the first stage and Starship will

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 14>be both the booster and the ship. They've now successfully

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 14>caught the booster of Starship three times at the tower catch.

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 14>People have probably seen that, and they've had successful atmospheric reentry.

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 13>Of the ship as well, but have not yet caught that.

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 14>The other thing that they haven't done as of yet

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:59.119
<v Speaker 14>is they actually haven't dispensed of any actual payloads into.

0:14:58.960 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 13>Space as of yet.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 14>They've tested out the pez door which opens up to

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 14>let the payloads out, but actual payloads have not been

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 14>put out into space.

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 13>So those are the milestones that were really following.

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 14>But you can bet there is an Excel spreadsheet at

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 14>Fidelity that measures that the cost for kill a watt

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 14>and when we believe this will become economical.

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 4>Oh, there's gonna be people who really want to see

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 4>that Excel spreadsheet, Karen, in particular those who look a

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 4>more cynical on the how outlook of the economy and

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 4>the economic pros and cons of this. For example, the

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Jim chainos well known for betting against certain key themes,

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 4>but he asks in a post in particular, how much

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 4>one giga what data central space would save in terms

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 4>of power costs versus one giga? What terrestrial data center

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 4>can you push out where you think it could go

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 4>at least?

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 13>Yeah?

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 14>I mean listen, I think again, we're talking not this year,

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 14>not next year, we are talking about several years out.

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 13>But it could it could move down the cost pretty meaningfully.

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 14>I won't give you an exact dollar amount, but we

0:16:04.800 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 14>do believe it could be pretty material.

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 13>In the here and now.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 4>What we're looking for materiality is up to a one

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 4>point two five trillion dollar evaluation. If SpaceX does indeed

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 4>go public, how realistic do you think that is at

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 4>the moment? What momentum do we need to see? Because

0:16:18.160 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 4>at the moment we're all sort of at the behest

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 4>of the markets.

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 13>We are at the behest of the market.

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 14>Obviously the markets are feeling quite good this morning as well.

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 13>But I think it's important to remember that SpaceX has

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 13>a lot going for it right now.

0:16:35.600 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 14>You know, when we first invested at Fidelity back in

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 14>twenty fifteen in SpaceX, they had done thirteen Falcon nine

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 14>launches to date. Today they launch every other day. They're

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 14>putting up somewhere between eighty to ninety percent of the

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 14>world's payload one company. They when we first invested, they

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 14>didn't have a single Starlink satellite or Starlink sub to that,

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 14>they have ten million.

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 13>Subscribers across the globe.

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 14>Obviously, there are ambitions to do more on the wireless

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 14>carrier front. So SpaceX has a lot going for it,

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 14>and of course, you know the cherry on top would

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 14>be the future of orbital data.

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Centers, right, incredible capital efficiency, right, twelve billion dollars raised

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 3>in its lifetime, and you think about what it's done

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 3>with that. The next thing is, what's a scenario where

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:31.479
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX merges with Tesla and why? Because that's the reaction

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 3>that people have had since TERRAFAB was announced over the weekend.

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I mean, obviously people have been talking about that

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 14>possibility for a little while, and SpaceX acquiring XAI certainly

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 14>catalyze those conversations even further. And I think Elon is,

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.160
<v Speaker 14>you know, kind of putting his cards on the table,

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 14>if you will, as it relates to his ambitions to

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.479
<v Speaker 14>vertically integrate the ability to be a chip manufacturer, as

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 14>difficult as it may be, but also in putting in

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 14>aggregate data centers. Remember he's done it here on Earth

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 14>CLASSUS one and CLASSUS two. He done it, he did

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 14>in record time CLASSUS one specifically, and very large GPU clusters,

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 14>and so from an engineering perspective, I think he knows

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 14>how to do it. I'm not trying to be flippant

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 14>about how difficult some of these things are, but he

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 14>is an expert at vertically integrating companies and.

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 5>A thinking beyond all of this in many ways.

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 4>Karin Frosky, I wish we could it done the whole

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 4>show with you and gone so much more into some

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 4>of the investments. Global head of Private Equity Investments of

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Fidelity Thanking now coming up. Tim Cook's succession plans remain

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 4>a mystery, but details emerge in the air apparent that's next.

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:47.399
<v Speaker 5>This is pretty bad Tech.

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 3>CEO Tim Kirk is now sixty five and has been

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 3>tight lit about his retirement and succession plans, but a

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:10.000
<v Speaker 3>leading candidate is beginning to emerge. John Turnus, Apple's senior

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 3>VP of hardware Engineering, has taken on a growing role

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 3>overseeing the company's products and marketing. For more, let's get

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 3>to Bloomberg's Mark German, who leads our coverage when all

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.479
<v Speaker 3>things Apple and consumer technology. And this is an important

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 3>piece of writing, right, this is what people have been

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 3>asking about for quite some time.

0:19:27.320 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 7>What do we need to know?

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know.

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 15>Tim Cook is not ready to talk about retirement. He

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 15>says that he can't live without Apple. He can't imagine

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 15>a time where he's not at Apple. And the good

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 15>news for him and for shareholders is we probably don't

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 15>have to imagine a time with Tim Cook not at

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 15>Apple for at least another ten ten years or so,

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 15>right because when he steps down as CEO, he will

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 15>stay involved at the company in some sort of capacity,

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 15>probably executive chairman. But the wheels are in motion for

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 15>Tim Cook to step down in the next half decade

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 15>at the very latest and be replaced by John turnis

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 15>the senior vice president of hardware Engineering. He's responsible for

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 15>the development of all of Apple's products. Obviously those generate

0:20:14.080 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 15>eighty percent or so of Apple's revenue. He's worked at

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 15>Apple for about half his life, just under twenty five years.

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 15>He understands the culture. This is someone who would be

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 15>more product focused than Tim Cook, but in many ways

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 15>operates like Cook and would surprisingly be a continuity.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 4>Choice mark What stayed you to really feel that he

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 4>is the heir apparent. What's been happening underneath the hood

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 4>of Apple that makes you think this is the guy.

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 13>There's a lot going on internally.

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 15>There's been a very steady expansion of his responsibilities. He's

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 15>received oversight a couple of years ago of Apple's Vision

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 15>Products Group, which is responsible for the in development smart glasses,

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 15>which are a big upcoming product launch for Apple. He's

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 15>taken over the robotics teams. At the end of last year,

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 15>he took oversight of Apple's design team, so software design

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 15>and hardware design. That's a very critical role in the company.

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 15>That's something that only you know, people like Tim Cook,

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 15>Johnny Ives Steve jobs people of that ILK have overseen

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 15>in the past. He's fifteen years younger than Cook. He's

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 15>about ten years younger than any other option for Apple's

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 15>next CEO on the company's executive team. Apple has been

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 15>putting him front and center in product announcements. He introduced

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 15>the MacBook Neo earlier this month, which is obviously a

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 15>big business lever for Apple for the Mac Specifically, the

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 15>day after the introduction of that computer, he was the

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 15>one who went on Good Morning America to talk about it.

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 15>These are traditionally things that the CEO Tim Cook has

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 15>done for years for major new products, but now it's

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 15>turnus doing.

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:48.959
<v Speaker 2>It Mark very very quickly.

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Where does Apple's strategy with AI generate to AI and

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 3>voice based AI fit in with this story?

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 15>You know, the big question is if Apple is going

0:21:57.440 --> 0:22:00.200
<v Speaker 15>to try to evolve into an AI company or after

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 15>and Services company. If that's the case, Turnis is probably

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 15>not the right pick, but I do believe they are

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 15>going to be a hardware company at heart for the

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 15>forest yeable future, which makes Turnus front center of the action.

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Mark Gummon, as always with one of the most

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 4>highly read pieces.

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 5>We so appreciate you joining on it. Thank you.

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, Elliot Well, it's said to take a big

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 4>stake in synopsis pressing for changes in mid AI pressure.

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 5>That's up next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 3>The status of the war in Iran is a big

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:40.959
<v Speaker 3>driver of markets, particularly for technology. Look at a Nazdak

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 3>one hundred pushing higher outperformance in the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index.

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 3>The President easing off on threats with Iran and talking

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 3>up the talks that are taking place. There's been out

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 3>performance for chips all year long, and one reason being

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 3>that the region is a principal producer of both helium

0:22:57.240 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 3>and sulfur critical elements in Chippridut coming out of Patar,

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Saudi Arabia and the UAE, and supply is tight was

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 3>impacted by the straight off of the moves, but it's

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 3>oil Brent the global benchmark now below one hundred dollars

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 3>a barrow. Again, a really sharp turn of events overnight, Caroline.

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 3>But continuing to try and link this to the tech sector,

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 3>because while it seems like talks might yield an end

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.239
<v Speaker 3>of the war in Iran, there is not yet an

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 3>end to the war in Iran.

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:25.160
<v Speaker 4>Good context, Let's talk a little bit more with Blimugs

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 4>tech equity reporter common Ryanikey. And look at the moment

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking on the Nasdaq one hundred, only twelve slocks.

0:23:29.840 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 5>Are in the red.

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 4>Video leads the charge Tesla up in terms of points perspective.

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 4>But where do people who go in this period of volatility.

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 16>Yeah, so I think when we see things kind of

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 16>go more risk on, there's so many flows back to

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 16>big tech because those are the names. You know, they

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 16>have a lot of excitement, They have these solid balance sheets,

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 16>you know, over urchingly, they're what works. So there's what

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 16>have worked at least in the past four investors. And

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 16>something that we've actually seen recently is that a correlation

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 16>between the Equoid index and the Magni magnificent seven has

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 16>become less tethered and well that maybe sounds like it's

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:04.360
<v Speaker 16>not a good thing, it actually could mean that there's

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 16>some outperformance coming for tech. So the last time this

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 16>happened was in twenty twenty three, right before we saw

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 16>these huge gains from the release of chatch Ept and

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 16>all of the AI frenzy that's come into the market.

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 16>So with things especially looking better, potentially with the war

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 16>in Iran, we're seeing maybe some more risk on coming back.

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 16>Valuations have been really washed out from the MAG seven

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.680
<v Speaker 16>and this really could be a good moment for investors

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 16>to buy and start feeling better about that sector.

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 3>Come and you make a technical analysis and look at

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:34.639
<v Speaker 3>the correlation, as you said, but you also speak to

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 3>the street and one of the conclusions you reach in

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 3>the piece is that analysts do see big tech, megacap

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 3>tech MAG seven reclaiming leadership in the market.

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 2>What are the reasons why.

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 16>Well, one of the reasons that we're really seeing is

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 16>that there had been some large flows from big tech

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 16>into international equities sort of around some of the AI fears,

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 16>sort of that the gains, the momentum in this trade,

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 16>it's started to peter out. That something we've seen over

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 16>the last few months. But now with the macro sort

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 16>of shifting back, we could really start to see some

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 16>influence coming back into big tech, back into those US equities,

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 16>and into some of the areas of the market that

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 16>have previously worked that have sort of been on hiatus.

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 16>Maybe in terms of you know, gains over the last

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:18.159
<v Speaker 16>few months, one of.

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.360
<v Speaker 4>The biggest players in the market, you'd say, was black Rock,

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 4>just across all benchmarks, all indices. Look, Larry Fink has

0:25:25.080 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 4>done one of his really important notes to his investor base,

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 4>and he's worried about AI and the inequality that's bringing,

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 4>particularly about access to some of the equity markets.

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 5>How do you think that could be playing through?

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 16>You know, I think this is such a good point,

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 16>and it's something that I always try to remember as

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 16>we're you know, speaking about markets, that there are just

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 16>real people on the other end, right, Like this is

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 16>so important for anyone investing in a FOURH on K

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 16>or four or three B. What he is saying is basically,

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 16>because gains have been so strong in some of these

0:25:51.880 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 16>big companies, that could you make the disparity of inequality

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 16>larger in the market if you're not participating. So it's

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 16>just speak to the fact that you know, if you

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 16>can be engaged in the market, if you can be invested,

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 16>you want to be taking advantage of these games and

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 16>technology and in AI. And so he was looking at

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 16>some ways to potentially, you know, level the playing field the.

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Most calm and ronicky. Thank you very much.

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 3>Elliott Investment Management is said to have taken a multi

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar investment in Synopsis. That's according to sources, The

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 3>activist investor is pushing for changes at the chip design

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 3>software maker as broad concerns loom from AI's impact.

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring in Bloomberg's.

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 3>Leanna Baker, who leads our coverage in the US of deals.

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 3>And I have to say, Leanna, you know, Karen and

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 3>I just had a conversation with the CEO. I think

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 3>it was last week. Harry can correct me if I'm wrong.

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 3>That's what we talked about. How it threat is your

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 3>business from AI that basically, you know, either renders it

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 3>redundant or less valuable. What's Elliot's play here with Synopsis?

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 17>So Synopsis plays in a really interesting space, the eeda

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 17>space electronic design automation software. It's a doopoly with a

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 17>company called Cadence. They're kind of the coke and pepsi

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 17>of the industry, and you can't make a chip without them.

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 17>So Elliott is trying to see, you know, what are

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 17>these stocks that could benefit long term from AI and

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 17>the growth of AI with Nvidia, you know, being an

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 17>investor in Synopsis, they kind of view this one as

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 17>a long term winner. But the stock has underperformed and

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 17>there's a lot of things the company could do to

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 17>raise margins. Maybe they raise prices because they're in this

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 17>really lucrative duopoly. They have a lot of levers to

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 17>pull to maybe, you know, boost the top line.

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Carol hit me on the IB it was March eleventh

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 3>that the CEO is on the show. Could you explain

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 3>the activist investor part of the story? I guess the

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 3>mechanics of how it works. So Elliott takes a stake

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 3>and then what happens.

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 17>So Elliott is one of the world's biggest activists investors,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 17>and they've been in a lot of tech names over

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 17>the years, Western Digital, they're in Pinterest right now. And

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 17>what they do is they work behind the scenes. They

0:27:58.480 --> 0:27:59.919
<v Speaker 17>sort of indicated in the statement.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 13>If you read that.

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 17>Jesse Cohen, the head of activism at Elliott, said that

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 17>you know, things are sort of constructive with the company,

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 17>so they're trying to help Synopsis, you know, get these

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 17>things in order and make a few changes at the

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 17>company that long term will benefit both Elliott and Synopsis

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:18.440
<v Speaker 17>and all the shareholders.

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 4>Synopsis response so farly on it because it cools it.

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 4>Shay has happened under pressure leading into this.

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 17>Nanna oh the response, Sorry, you're showing it on the screen.

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 17>So that's Jesse Cohen's response. Who's the Elliott partner? But

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.439
<v Speaker 17>the company Synopsis has sort of said they take all

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 17>shareholders you know, into account and h they're clearly engaging

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:44.719
<v Speaker 17>here with Elliott, and they haven't put out any statement

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 17>that makes it sound like things could get ugly or

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 17>in a fight, because that's the flip side when you

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 17>bring an activist into your stock, things could go the

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.239
<v Speaker 17>other way. In this case, it seems like things are

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 17>friendly and it won't go to a proxy fight or

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 17>anything like that. But that is a risk when you

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 17>have an activist in your shares.

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 4>Yes, not just saying in an email center statement that

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't comment on specific conversations with individual in shareholders

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 4>by the bord of Directors and management team and regularly

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 4>engage with shareholders on arrange of issues. Lenna Baker with

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 4>all the news on the latest activist engagement. Meanwhile, let's

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 4>talk about the bond market. JP Morgan has kicked off

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 4>that sale of eight billion dollars in junk debt to

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 4>fund the record leverage buyout of electronic arts.

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:27.239
<v Speaker 5>That's according to source now.

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 4>JP Morgan earlier and mender the EA by out debt package,

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 4>increasing the size of a US dollar loan offering by

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars while trimming back the bond sale by the

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 4>same amounted.

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 7>What have we got?

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay?

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Coming out, We're going to speak with KTO Network CEO

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Shlomo Kramer about their latest innovations in cybersecurity amid growing

0:29:46.000 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 3>geopolitical threats. There's a lot to do with Iran and

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 3>then the cyber space.

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:50.960
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 3>The RSA conference kicks off this week right here in

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco, bringing together thousands of cyber security leaders and

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 3>policymakers amid rising global tensions and digital threats. CATO Networks

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 3>is among the companies attending, and CEO Shlomocramer joins us

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 3>now frankly, and I think, obviously what is happening with

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 3>the war in Iran will be discussed by you and

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 3>your colleagues. You know, Iran poses at a nation state

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 3>level a cyber threat to this country, the United States.

0:30:30.600 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 3>What are you seeing, what are you hearing, and what

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 3>are you talking about with colleagues this week?

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 12>So obviously the cyber threat from Iran and other other

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 12>facilities is serious. But imagine a room full of Iranian

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 12>cyber warriors and then transformed there to an army, to

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 12>an ergentic army of AI agents.

0:30:54.360 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 2>You're saying that Iran has competence in that.

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 7>That's amaying that the future.

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 12>Delivers a much more radically dangerous threat landscape than what

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 12>the presence is through the AI transformation.

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 3>I think about what CATO does and I'm trying to

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 3>summarize it for everyday people that might not know. Instead

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 3>of having a box on your premises in terms of

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:24.480
<v Speaker 3>networks and your own firewall and your own VPN, you

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 3>just offer a cloud based solution.

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 7>For all of it.

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 12>It's a cloud based solution, and think of Blockbusters moving

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 12>to nettrics.

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 3>If an enterprise or company of any size in this

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.640
<v Speaker 3>country does face a threat from Iran or any other

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 3>threat actor. What's the benefit of going through that technology.

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 7>You don't need to be technologist.

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 12>You just connect to the net, to the cloud network,

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 12>very simple for an agent or a small box, and

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 12>you are protected wherever you are, wherever your applications are,

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 12>wherever your critical assets are in minutes.

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 4>Of course, you're Israeli based company, and we hope that

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 4>colleagues are safe at CATO Networks. But I'm interested as

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 4>to watch Lomo is happening at the moment when you

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 4>mentioned agent now before the Iran war erupted and we

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 4>focused on that conflict, of course from a humanitarian perspective,

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 4>we also were thinking about the market impact before this

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.800
<v Speaker 4>of software and being disrupted by generator AI of the

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 4>latest plugin suddenly sending cybersecurity stocks lower.

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:26.160
<v Speaker 5>How have you seen and digested that move in the market.

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 7>This is very good question, Thank you for asking it.

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 12>AI, like any other technology revolution, and this is perhaps

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 12>the biggest in my life, has beneath it a set

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 12>of technologies and capabilities that are required that are enablers

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 12>to this technology, like in the case of AI. Compute,

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 12>energy and cyber cyber is essential for the enterprise to

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 12>consume AI because without security enterprises will not consumer Above

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 12>that layer of technology, there are the winners, there are

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 12>the neutrals, and there are the road kills of this.

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 7>New AI technology.

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 12>And obviously this is exactly where investors do not know

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 12>how the card will reshuffle itself and are very hesitant

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 12>in terms of investing. I will call the world, I

0:33:29.800 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 12>will call it almost a freeze. But in that sense,

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 12>Cyber is absolutely a winner. And that goes back to

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 12>my previous comment about the warriors of cyber versus an

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 12>army of Argentic attackers. The threat landscape based on AI

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 12>is going to change dramatically and for the worse. So

0:33:55.960 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 12>cyber is key in addressing that threat and it's going

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 12>to be unfortunately a huge beneficiary from that transformation.

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:09.280
<v Speaker 4>Unfortunately or fortunately, If you happen to have a CEO

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 4>of Acto Networks and it's currently privately fund and you

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 4>might be looking at the public markets, at what point, showma,

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 4>do you think you will to beef up the business

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 4>continue to grow, will need turn to broader investment areas.

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 12>So we are as a growth company, continue to invest

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 12>heaving in our growth, and we will you know, consider

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 12>all options both private and public funding in order to

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 12>continue to drive this.

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:38.239
<v Speaker 7>We are in the very early in the.

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 12>Cycle of this category of network securities. It's called SASE.

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:49.200
<v Speaker 12>I didn't invent the name, and you know, a decade

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 12>from now, this is going to make Keto the largest

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 12>leader in modern network security.

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 3>SAC secure Access service EDGE which basically again I'm trying

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 3>to make it digestible, but you combine firewall, threat protection,

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 3>secure gateways, everything into one single cloud based platform. Can

0:35:08.600 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 3>ask you this this week in RSAY, let's put geopolitics

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 3>to one side and threat level. What's the threat within

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 3>industry on who's innovating and using competence in artificial intelligence

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 3>to add value to their products? Like who is it

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 3>that you look at and go wow, they're doing really

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 3>good things.

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 12>So the key to answer this question is who is

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:36.839
<v Speaker 12>using AI in order to fight AI? Who is implementing

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 12>AI capabilities because that is the only way to fend

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 12>off this.

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Army gentic swarm. Defense against the gentic swarm.

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 7>Off exactly right.

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 12>And companies such as Kato, but many other companies all

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 12>already have been using AI for many years and are

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 12>doubling down on debt and there companies that not and

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 12>that is going to determine the winners from the losers.

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 3>Schlimokramer, Cada Network CEO here with us in San Francisco

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:07.439
<v Speaker 3>in town for RSA this week.

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 2>Caro plenty more headlines about there is.

0:36:10.080 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 4>And It's time now for Talking Tech and First Up,

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 4>A come back concept by K pop group BTS drew

0:36:14.960 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 4>a smaller crowd than expected now that led the shares

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 4>to the agency that represents them High to their largest

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 4>decline since twenty twenty two. The group's return after four

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 4>year hiatus has high stakes for High, which, despite acquisitions

0:36:27.239 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 4>of labels from Hollywood to Latin America, has added sluggish

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:34.360
<v Speaker 4>profit growth due to BTS's time on the sidelines. Plus Sony,

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 4>while it's nearing a one billion dollar deal to sell

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:40.320
<v Speaker 4>a majority stake in its home entertainment business to a

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Chinese rival TCL that's called to sources, the company's announced

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:47.000
<v Speaker 4>an agreement in January for a home entertainment joint venture

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 4>then include Sony's Bravian television brand and startup pandu Ai

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 4>has raised two hundred and twenty five million dollars from

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.320
<v Speaker 4>investors including Maverick, Silicon SoftBank, and Synopsis. Now the company

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:02.880
<v Speaker 4>CEO that's shrewd Linger is former Golm and Sax managing director.

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 4>He has pivoted the startup towards aim structure since taking

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 4>over last year.

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Ed sticking with Chips, Tune into the Close tomorrow afternoon

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 3>for a conversation with Rene Haas arm CEO. That's a

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 3>three thirty pm in New York, twelve thirty pm Pacific time.

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:21.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, coming up, we're going to speak with Mitchell

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:24.839
<v Speaker 3>Green of lead Edge Capital after the closing of its

0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Fund seven with three point five billion dollars in commits.

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 2>What's next the Cisplinberg Tech.

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.359
<v Speaker 3>Lead Edge Capital has announced the closing of its Fund

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.720
<v Speaker 3>seven with three point five billion dollars in commitments, bringing

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:51.080
<v Speaker 3>its total capital raise since inception to nine billion dollars.

0:37:51.160 --> 0:37:54.360
<v Speaker 3>Here to discussed is lead Edge Capital founder and managing

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:55.479
<v Speaker 3>partner Mitchell Green.

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 2>And it's great to have you back on the show.

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's just start with the basic three point five billion

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:05.279
<v Speaker 3>dollars for fund seven. What the intention is, the strategy

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 3>the thesis in how you deploy out of this fund?

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 18>Sure welled, Karen, thanks so much for having me on.

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 18>Thesis continues to be as the same it's been, you

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:17.440
<v Speaker 18>know in funds three, four or five, six seven.

0:38:18.120 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 19>This this will just be a continuation of you know,

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 19>what we're already doing.

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 18>And we have a very specific framework, which we call

0:38:24.760 --> 0:38:27.440
<v Speaker 18>the lead edge eight, you know, which is certain financial

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 18>criteria are ten million plus in revenue or you're growing

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:31.120
<v Speaker 18>twenty five.

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 19>Percent plus a year.

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 18>Will continue to do that across the across the life

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 18>cycle of different types of you know. Literally, we can

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:41.799
<v Speaker 18>lead a primary around, put money in the balance sheet

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 18>of a company. We can buy out early investors or

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 18>early employees. We can fund the continuation vehicle from an

0:38:48.440 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 18>investor that needs to get out. We can buy an

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 18>entire company and a buyout. It's really like the full

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 18>life cycle. And then actually we also invest in some

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 18>companies in their public as.

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:02.239
<v Speaker 3>Well, the rules based which is very interesting whether you

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 3>call it bench capital or private growth equity, because I'm

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:09.919
<v Speaker 3>curious how it works in practice. So if you're saying, okay,

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 3>we only invest in companies that reach these criteria, do

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 3>you find them or do they find you?

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:18.359
<v Speaker 19>It's a great question.

0:39:19.040 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 18>So the way we've always sourced, and it's the way

0:39:21.880 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 18>the three of us who run the firms, our backgrounds

0:39:24.320 --> 0:39:27.360
<v Speaker 18>are best preventure partners and insight. So we have a

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 18>team of about eighteen twenty two to twenty four year

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 18>olds that pick up the phone and call companies all

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 18>day long. You know, some you know gone are kind

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 18>of the days of cold calling company or actually leading voicemails.

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 19>But you know, our team of you know, eighteen twenty

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 19>two to twenty four year olds.

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:46.479
<v Speaker 18>Think of these people as a lot of like former

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:50.320
<v Speaker 18>college athletes, people that were debaters, people who are entrepreneurs.

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:52.239
<v Speaker 18>We want people that are really persistent because the great

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 18>company doesn't call you back right away.

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 19>Sometimes call that CEO a half dozen times before.

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 18>They call you back right But again, we'll speak to

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 18>about nine thousand companies a year, and if I said

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 18>you had to meet all eight criteria, it only be

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 18>about ninety or one percent. But we say that if

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 18>you meet at least five, it's about a ten percent yield.

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 18>Sort of nine thousand companies nine hundred meters five or

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 18>more criteria due diligence on one hundred and fifty to

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 18>do five to seven deals a year.

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 4>Mitchell true help, but feel that those ex college athletes

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:28.399
<v Speaker 4>and those twenty to twenty four year olds are going

0:40:28.480 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 4>to be very well helped or maybe disrupted by agenta

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:33.279
<v Speaker 4>KI and I want to hear your play on the

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 4>whole software investment thesis because this is what called my attention.

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 20>Yeah, so what I would what I would say is

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:48.880
<v Speaker 20>is again somebody asks you, as long as the person

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 20>that works at lee edge of twenty two to twenty

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 20>four old is on the other end of a phone.

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 18>Talking to another human being like a CEO or CFO

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 18>of a company, in the human interaction is still really

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 18>really important. However, where AI.

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:10.320
<v Speaker 19>Can be really helpful now is and where I did this.

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 18>You know, the three of us who run the firm

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 18>all started our career is doing this fifteen twenty plus

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:19.600
<v Speaker 18>years ago. And you know today an analyst or an

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 18>associate cold calon companies can be a lot can use

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 18>AI to be a lot more educated. When talking to

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 18>an entrepreneur, you know they can have done a bunch

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.520
<v Speaker 18>of research that would have taken a couple hours before,

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 18>they can do.

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.319
<v Speaker 19>It in five minutes. You can chat our clawed you.

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 18>Know, they can look up all the competitors, they can

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 18>get the value prop they can ask like what do

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 18>you think the right questions to ask are?

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 19>So actually AI it can help you find more I say, hey,

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 19>I just.

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 18>Spoke to ABC company like toast in the restaurant point

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 18>of sales system, give me all the competitors so I

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 18>can then call them as well. So it actually like

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:56.760
<v Speaker 18>makes the analyst associates even more powerful.

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 4>And Mitchell, how many therefore of the calls do you

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:00.840
<v Speaker 4>think will still be going to software companies that have

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 4>been beaten up that you think still look attractive, because

0:42:03.200 --> 0:42:05.439
<v Speaker 4>that has been the narrative that a GENDERKI is coming

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 4>to eat their lunch and therefore they're going to see

0:42:08.120 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 4>significant pressure on their ars and their future growth.

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:15.759
<v Speaker 18>For us, it's always been about Look, software is a

0:42:16.000 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 18>very broad word, right, there's lots of different types of

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:24.760
<v Speaker 18>software companies. Just like if you say I'm going to Europe,

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 18>like there's lots of places in Europe, you coun could

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 18>be like, oh in Europe, it rains no place, lot

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 18>of places in Europe it doesn't rain. So for US

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:35.840
<v Speaker 18>like software, So we're looking for companies, and we always

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 18>look for companies that have like very high grows dollar attention.

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 18>Now again you might say, well AI is going to

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.280
<v Speaker 18>change all that, Well, then you're looking for software companies

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:46.240
<v Speaker 18>that have a mode, that have that own the data

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 18>that are systems of record that tend to sell the

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 18>large enterprises.

0:42:52.200 --> 0:42:54.320
<v Speaker 19>You know, you could have most you know, if you

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 19>have people on here from most banks. Most banks still

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:57.760
<v Speaker 19>don't even.

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 18>Allow their employees to access US, you know, access AI

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:04.880
<v Speaker 18>from their systems. These big enterprises when they buy software,

0:43:05.320 --> 0:43:07.040
<v Speaker 18>want security.

0:43:07.360 --> 0:43:07.480
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:11.040
<v Speaker 18>Look, you've been able to buy open source software for decades. Yeah,

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 18>Companies like Elastic and Grafana and Data Bricks and red

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 18>hat exist because they provide an enterprise level on top

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 18>of what was already free software. And see, I think

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 18>you're going to continue again, We've met outside of software

0:43:24.640 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 18>as well. We invest in consumer internet, We invest in marketplaces,

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 18>we invest in financial exchanges, we invest in payments companies

0:43:31.600 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 18>like transfer Wise.

0:43:32.840 --> 0:43:35.240
<v Speaker 19>But yeah, we will continue to definitely invest in software.

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Mitchell Green need edge capital come back as you deploy

0:43:38.840 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 4>that seventh fund. Congratulations on the fundraise and like talking

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:45.160
<v Speaker 4>about the use of AI for that you need infrastructure.

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 5>We can talk about that now.

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:49.359
<v Speaker 4>Nscale, UK developer for AI Data Centers, is now one

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 4>of your most valuable startups after raising two billion dollars

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 4>in a recent round, which now values the company at

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 4>a call fourteen point six billion dollars.

0:43:56.480 --> 0:43:58.560
<v Speaker 5>Now the AI hyperscalers are.

0:43:58.520 --> 0:44:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Also looking to this particular company because they want to

0:44:03.000 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 4>be looking for more compute. But also they've got some

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 4>significant leaders coming in directors including former British politician Nick Clegg,

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:13.080
<v Speaker 4>Showel Samburg as well longtime chief operating officer of Facebook

0:44:13.120 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 4>and its parent Meta. And I'm very really to say

0:44:15.239 --> 0:44:17.919
<v Speaker 4>we can welcome the leadership now n Scale CEO Josh

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Payin along with Cheryl Sanmdburg. It is a joy to

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.480
<v Speaker 4>have you both on the show. And Josh, some huge

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:25.960
<v Speaker 4>ambitions from nd scale and just the computing power that

0:44:26.000 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 4>you can bring online, the revenues you're going to be

0:44:28.280 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 4>generated in the next few years, just talk to us

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 4>about how you achieve that that necessary infrastructure.

0:44:33.200 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 21>Josh, Well, thank you, Caroline, it's great to be here.

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:39.399
<v Speaker 21>First of what I'll say is this is the fourth

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 21>Industrial Revolution. This market is moving so fast and we're

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:45.759
<v Speaker 21>still at the beginning. We're talking about a technology that

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 21>is going to lead to atomized automated drug discovery, the

0:44:49.920 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 21>extension of human life, truly autonomous agents, and that the

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.920
<v Speaker 21>only thing that prevents that future is access to the

0:44:57.000 --> 0:44:59.920
<v Speaker 21>scarce resource, which is the compute, and so n scale

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:03.759
<v Speaker 21>solves this problem. We buy and build and deploy all

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:05.960
<v Speaker 21>of that infrastructure to allow for these products to be

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 21>built and operated.

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 2>And so not only is there just huge demand for

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the sector, but we're capturing it.

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:15.000
<v Speaker 4>That's huge demand for your expertise, Cheryl, and to join boards.

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Why did you choose Josh? Why did you back end scale?

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:18.839
<v Speaker 4>Why on the board?

0:45:21.200 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 11>Well, the funny part of the story starts with his part.

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 21>Which is, well, so thinking about how I build the

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:32.600
<v Speaker 21>next great AI platform, what was most important to me

0:45:32.760 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 21>is speaking to executives that have built great platforms before

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 21>of global scale, and so certainly none better than Cheryl Sandberg.

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:41.920
<v Speaker 21>And so I tried for some time to get an

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 21>introduction to Cheryl, and upon finally doing so, we scheduled

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 21>a thirty minute call. And the first thing that she

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 21>said to me was I don't do boards, and I

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:50.800
<v Speaker 21>don't do these calls.

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:54.080
<v Speaker 13>Right, So it was an inauspicious beginning.

0:45:54.160 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 11>But I didn't do boards and I didn't do these calls.

0:45:57.320 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 22>But what I saw in Josh ninety minutes into our

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 22>thirty minute phone call was what I considered real visionary leadership.

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:07.279
<v Speaker 22>Over the next few weeks, as he was trying to

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 22>get me to consider joining the board. He went away

0:46:10.160 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 22>and he wrote a letter to his management team. And

0:46:13.120 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 22>the only person I'd ever seen right like that was

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 22>Mark Zuckerberg. This combination of a relentless, relentless desire for great,

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 22>relentless desire for execution, you know. And from my point

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 22>of view, I joined Google when it was at two

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 22>hundred and fifty people left at twenty thousand. I joined

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:33.840
<v Speaker 22>Facebook when it was five hundred and fifty people left,

0:46:34.040 --> 0:46:35.560
<v Speaker 22>you know, almost one hundred thousand.

0:46:35.960 --> 0:46:37.360
<v Speaker 13>So the opportunity to work with.

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 11>The founder I believe in.

0:46:39.280 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 22>I joined right as the company was about three hundred

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:44.719
<v Speaker 22>and four hundred people, so that same spot, and try

0:46:44.760 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 22>to take some of the lessons we've learned and help

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:50.360
<v Speaker 22>a company. I believe in this much scale really matters.

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 22>I also really believe in the power of AI. I

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:55.839
<v Speaker 22>think we're at the very beginning I started my career

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:58.840
<v Speaker 22>in global health. AI is going to mean that anyone

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 22>in a remote village anywhere in the world could get

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:05.879
<v Speaker 22>skin cancer diagnosed at the same efficacy rate as someone

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 22>in the Mayo clinic. But that is going to take

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 22>a build out and a buildout of infrastructure and compute,

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 22>and I really believe in Josh and Nscale's ability to

0:47:15.000 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 22>do that, so I'm happy to be here, Josh.

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 3>The term neo cloud has actually also become quite broad.

0:47:21.840 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 3>When I talk to people about nscale, they say, well,

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 3>nscale is modular. How do you set yourselves apart from

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 3>the other neoclouds out there, many of whom come on

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:33.320
<v Speaker 3>this program and make quite similar pitches.

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 21>Yeah, So I think the key distinction with n scale

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:40.160
<v Speaker 21>is we are fully vertically integrated. Again, if you think

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 21>about the challenge for the sector, it's actually landing the

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 21>infrastructure on the ground and getting it plugged in. And

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:47.880
<v Speaker 21>the true scarcity given that the demand in the sector

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:51.840
<v Speaker 21>is the land, the power, and then the chips, and

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 21>so by and large, the neocloud sector is not really

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:57.399
<v Speaker 21>vertically integrated in that they don't own their own land

0:47:57.440 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 21>and power.

0:47:58.440 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 2>N scale does.

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 21>We own the and power, we own the chips, and

0:48:01.840 --> 0:48:04.160
<v Speaker 21>we own the software delivering an end to end service

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:08.400
<v Speaker 21>to the counterparty. In addition, we recently acquired a company

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 21>called American Intelligence Corporation in West Virginia, which adds an

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 21>even further segment to that, which is the ownership of

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:18.080
<v Speaker 21>the power. This is a behind the meter site, which

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 21>means that we're effectively taking natural gas and producing our

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:25.479
<v Speaker 21>own energy, which means it's not connected to the local

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 21>grid and therefore subject to any kind of price increases

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:29.800
<v Speaker 21>for consumers.

0:48:30.880 --> 0:48:32.880
<v Speaker 3>So it's great to have you back on on Bloomberg

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 3>Television and on Bloomberg Tech. You said, I don't do

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 3>boards historically with this role with end Scale, I think

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people are really interested if you go

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:45.839
<v Speaker 3>back to being an operator. You know, with time, if

0:48:45.880 --> 0:48:49.719
<v Speaker 3>you adjoin the executive ranks at end Scale, and whether

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:52.319
<v Speaker 3>you do or don't kind of operationally, how you think

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:53.480
<v Speaker 3>you can help the company grow.

0:48:54.920 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 22>So I've joined as both a board member as an advisor.

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:00.360
<v Speaker 22>I'm spending real time with Jajh and his team. I

0:49:00.400 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 22>have no plans to go on board full time. They

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:06.440
<v Speaker 22>have an incredible exec team and my goal is to

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:10.160
<v Speaker 22>help them Scale, help figure out how we structure, how

0:49:10.200 --> 0:49:13.600
<v Speaker 22>we do corporate governance. I've helped recruit some other great

0:49:13.840 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 22>board members Nick Clegg you mentioned joined the board with me,

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:21.360
<v Speaker 22>Sue Decker, who has decades of experience chearing audit committees

0:49:21.440 --> 0:49:24.759
<v Speaker 22>and in the financial world, and work with them to

0:49:24.840 --> 0:49:27.920
<v Speaker 22>really scale their company. What I see in Josh is

0:49:28.000 --> 0:49:32.319
<v Speaker 22>two things is really ambition, like real ambition to make

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:35.880
<v Speaker 22>a difference in how the AI build out happens, make

0:49:35.960 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 22>it sustainable, make it clean, commitment to local jobs as

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 22>we scale and build. But also a commitment to excellence,

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 22>to hiring the best people, to getting people into the

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:50.280
<v Speaker 22>right jobs, to structuring so that we can really execute.

0:49:50.719 --> 0:49:53.920
<v Speaker 22>And it's been it already has been a great pleasure

0:49:53.960 --> 0:49:57.040
<v Speaker 22>to work this closely with someone I believe in, and

0:49:57.160 --> 0:50:00.359
<v Speaker 22>also Caroline, I know you always care about this really

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:04.760
<v Speaker 22>strong team of senior women. Hew do AI Infrastructure CFO

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:06.640
<v Speaker 22>head of Security.

0:50:07.239 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 11>Josh before me hired what.

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:12.560
<v Speaker 22>He considers who he considers the best people on a

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 22>lot of great women in those jobs.

0:50:14.360 --> 0:50:16.239
<v Speaker 5>I love that because it is something I'm passionate about.

0:50:16.239 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 4>It's something that you spent your career advocating for, Cheryl

0:50:19.840 --> 0:50:23.000
<v Speaker 4>is diversity within the ranks of talent. But also you're

0:50:23.000 --> 0:50:25.360
<v Speaker 4>advocating as well for clean energy. And I notice what

0:50:25.440 --> 0:50:27.360
<v Speaker 4>one other boards seeing with terror dot and that is

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 4>about carbon neutrality. So Josh, I asked you, what about

0:50:30.160 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 4>carbon neutrality for West Virginia, because that's about the actual gas.

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 5>How do you think about that in the longer term.

0:50:36.600 --> 0:50:37.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, sure.

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:40.959
<v Speaker 21>So broadly, the company thesis is to take sustainable energy

0:50:41.040 --> 0:50:43.480
<v Speaker 21>and convert it into intelligence. So we first do this

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:46.040
<v Speaker 21>in the North of Norway. So we operate in the

0:50:46.080 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 21>North of Norway using only hydropower. The North of Norway

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 21>has such a large oversupply of energy due to basically

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 21>the seasons. Effectively, during the winter all of the glaciers

0:50:56.120 --> 0:50:58.719
<v Speaker 21>melt over, and then in the summer they all melt

0:50:58.800 --> 0:51:02.200
<v Speaker 21>and create enormous waterfall, and the Norwegian government has built

0:51:02.360 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 21>large hydropower dams to capture that energy. But the challenge

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 21>is it can't be exported and so it's got to

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 21>be consumed in region. So n Scale is building some

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:13.800
<v Speaker 21>of the largest AI infrastructure projects on the European continent

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:17.279
<v Speaker 21>in the North of Norway, taking otherwise stranded energy and

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:20.920
<v Speaker 21>converting it to intelligence. The same goes for our projects

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 21>in Texas as an example. In Texas, you've got a

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 21>similar oversupply of renewables and other energy, but it's in

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 21>remote location. So we're building some of the largest infrastructure

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:34.520
<v Speaker 21>projects in North America in this location in order to

0:51:34.960 --> 0:51:38.399
<v Speaker 21>convert that to intelligence. Now in West Virginia, we're doing

0:51:38.440 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 21>the same thing but slightly different. In West Virginia, we're

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 21>producing our own energy. One of the challenges with the

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:47.360
<v Speaker 21>North American grid is constrained, and so we felt that

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:52.000
<v Speaker 21>producing our own energy with natural gas generators I behind

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 21>the meta was the best way to scale sustainably but

0:51:55.400 --> 0:51:57.760
<v Speaker 21>also not impact local prices.

0:51:59.080 --> 0:51:59.879
<v Speaker 2>And the grid.

0:52:02.680 --> 0:52:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Cheryl, you're very used to being inside companies that are

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:09.760
<v Speaker 3>just truly global, right, listening to what Josh is saying,

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:12.920
<v Speaker 3>and Scale gets a lot of credit because it's a

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:17.239
<v Speaker 3>kind of a leader in Europe. It is a footprint

0:52:17.360 --> 0:52:19.800
<v Speaker 3>in the United Kingdom. But we've just been talking about America.

0:52:20.320 --> 0:52:22.200
<v Speaker 3>How much do you want Josh, I know he's sitting

0:52:22.239 --> 0:52:25.160
<v Speaker 3>next to you, to shift gears a little bit and

0:52:25.280 --> 0:52:27.840
<v Speaker 3>move this company in himself to the US. Do you

0:52:27.880 --> 0:52:30.080
<v Speaker 3>want him to focus on the Middle East, where there

0:52:30.160 --> 0:52:33.040
<v Speaker 3>is the capital, there is the will, there is energy

0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:34.120
<v Speaker 3>supply for example.

0:52:35.520 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'll let him answer that.

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:40.520
<v Speaker 22>But certainly this is global, right, This is a global

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:45.880
<v Speaker 22>company started in London and continuing to expand all.

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 19>Over the world. Yeah, I mean today.

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:54.720
<v Speaker 21>Today we're operating in five countries. We have plans for fifteen. Naturally,

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:58.040
<v Speaker 21>North America is the center of the universe for artificial intelligence,

0:52:58.200 --> 0:53:02.400
<v Speaker 21>both with startups, with life your customers, with access to capital,

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 21>and so naturally I spent a lot of my time here,

0:53:05.000 --> 0:53:07.360
<v Speaker 21>but as Cheryl said, this is a global market, and

0:53:07.560 --> 0:53:09.400
<v Speaker 21>I'm spending most of my time on a plane as

0:53:09.440 --> 0:53:09.840
<v Speaker 21>a result.

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:14.279
<v Speaker 3>That's a very familiar tale that you appears have told

0:53:14.360 --> 0:53:16.719
<v Speaker 3>us on this program. To n Scale CEO Josh Payin,

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:20.399
<v Speaker 3>n Scale board member and advisor Cheryl Sandberg, it's great

0:53:20.440 --> 0:53:22.440
<v Speaker 3>to have you both on the program that does it

0:53:22.840 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 3>for this edition of Bloomberg Tech, Tune in tomorrow for

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 3>a special edition of the show, live from the Hill

0:53:28.200 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 3>and Valley Forum in Washington, DC, will sit down with

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:34.480
<v Speaker 3>some of the biggest names in government, industry and technology.

0:53:34.560 --> 0:53:36.160
<v Speaker 5>Carrot don't forget to check out the podcast.

0:53:36.200 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 4>You can find out on the terminal as well as

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:39.400
<v Speaker 4>online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart.

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:41.040
<v Speaker 5>This is a Bloomberg Tech