WEBVTT - David Layton on Being an Outbound Global Driven Firm

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>This weekend on the podcast, another extra special guest from

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the world of private markets. The Partners Group is probably

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the largest private equity firm you've never heard of, perhaps

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>because they were originally headquartered in Zook, Switzerland. They're the

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>largest listed buyout firm in Europe. They also have headquarters

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>here in the US in Colorado. They are decidedly not

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>your typical private equity firm, not your typical Wall Street firm.

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>They have a very thoughtful approach and a very long

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>term approach to making investments in the private markets. I

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>found David Layton, CEO of the firm, to be very

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful and very much different in how he thinks about risk, reward, liquidity,

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>various market sectors, processes, just the whole gestalt of we

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>are a steward of capital with our clients and we

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 1>are aligned with those clients. It was really a fascinating conversation.

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I think you'll enjoy it. With no further ado, the

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Partners Group, David Layton. I'm Barry Ritults. You're

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>listening to Master's Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special

0:01:29.040 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>guest this week is David Layton. He is the chief

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>executive officer of the Partners Group, which is Europe's biggest

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>listed private equity and buyout firm, with a market cap

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>of about twenty five billion dollars. They run over one

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty five billion dollars in assets. David is

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>on the Global Investment Committee. He leads the executive team. Previously,

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>he headed the firm's private equity business. He has been

0:01:57.080 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with the firm his entire career. David Layton, Welcome to Bloomberg.

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a pleasure to be here. So let's talk a

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit about that. That's kind of unusual these days.

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>You went straight to the Partners Group after you got

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>a bachelor's in finance from Bringham Young University and the

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Marriott School of Management, and you've stayed there your entire career.

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Seems kind of rare these days. Tell us about that. Yeah,

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:27.920
<v Speaker 1>so I found Partners Group out of school. I was

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>actually running the investment banking club at BYU, and you know,

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:38.880
<v Speaker 1>thought I was interested in that, interested in going to

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. I was. I was tentatively committed to to

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>go to Lehman Brothers. And there was a one of

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the Partners Group founders. It was on campus and I

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>went to convince him why he should come and be

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>a part of what was called the investment banking boot

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 1>camp that we were doing at the time to get

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.839
<v Speaker 1>students ready to go to Wall Street and do their interviews, etc.

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And I went to pitch this asset management guy on

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>why he should come be a part of that process,

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and he Jiu jitsued me, and he ended up we

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>ended up talking, and he was just this fascinating, bigger

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>than life personality, and we ended up hitting it off,

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.839
<v Speaker 1>and I got linked up with Partners Group directly out

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of school. Yeah huh, that's really intriguing. You joined as

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>an analyst, That's where you began. I joined as an analyst.

0:03:31.919 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I got an offer to Partners Group's New York office,

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's where I thought I was going. And I

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>got a call not that long before I was supposed

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>to start by one of the partners there who said,

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, Dave, you're not going to New York.

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>He said, you're coming to Switzerland for like a year,

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe three years, until I tell you you're ready to

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>go to New York. He said, how can you go

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>join us in that market before you know anything about us? Right?

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>How can you represent us in that mark before you

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>know anything about us? Um uh. And so it was

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>I hook up the phone and had an interesting conversation

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>with my wife about go to Switzerland. But that was

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the firm's philosophy at the time. It was Switzerland was

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the center of gravity. UM, that's where the cultural um

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:25.720
<v Speaker 1>ethos was kind of formed and Zug. You went to

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Zoog Switzerland and UM and in that environment, you know,

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>through proximity to the firm's founders, people kind of get

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>culturally integrated. And then you went to different from the

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Swiss or German or French. UM. I took some some

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>German lessons before I went there, and then I found

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>out the Swiss German is a little different, and I

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't end up very different. It's a little different. It's

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a little different. So so, but everybody there speaks English.

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Everybody there speaks English. I was in an English speaking

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>environment for sun up to sundown. It was very dynamic.

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>My wife actually picked up more German than I did

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>because she was out in the community. But in our

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>context we had we had an English speaking environment in

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the office. So how does one get from analyst in Zooch,

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Switzerland to CEO in Colorado. Yeah, so when I started,

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>after a couple of days, um my wife asked me,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>how do you like your boss? And I told her, look,

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:30.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how to answer that question. I have

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve people that tell me what to do. Bosses. It's

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that that was the I was just the youngest I was.

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it was the youngest person that they'd ever

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>hired up until that point. And so I was just

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:46.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of sweeping up and doing whatever needed to be done.

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>And it was so much fun working with different people

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>in different groups, and I got a lot of good

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>experience doing that. So I was, you know, when the

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>firm launched its debt business, I was an analyst putting

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 1>together some of the credit analysis on the first couple

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of loans that we had written. At the time, we

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>had a group that was doing small growth capital investments

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in Germany and Switzerland at the time, fun doing secondaries

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and funds, and the senior people were more specialized, but

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>as young people were just getting a very dynamic set

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of experiences and it was a lot of a lot

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:29.359
<v Speaker 1>of fun. And it sounds like a baptism by fire

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that you're just thrown right into the thick of it.

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>It was a baptism by fire in a very entrepreneurial culture,

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and that very much aligned with who I was and

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>what I was interested in. You gained a lot of

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>experience fast, and so from there I went to New

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>York helped to build up the firm's business in the Americas.

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>We were really transitioning from back then outsourcing a lot

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of the investment content that we had done with other

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>managers to bring a lot of that in house. And

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I helped to drive a lot of that in the

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>America's early on. And then in twenty sixteen, we are

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>thinking a little bit more strategically about our business in

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the Americas, and I championed this project to open up

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a headquarters for the firm in Colorado and away from

0:07:19.360 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the street, away from Wall intentionally away from Wall Street.

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's a part of the partners groups secret

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of success. I do think a lot of people ask

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>us how we've been so successful in terms of innovating

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:35.640
<v Speaker 1>our business and evolving our business over time, and I

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>think being in zoog early on helped with that. I

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>was talking to one of our founders, he said, look,

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think we're in Zoog for tax reasons.

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>He said, we're here because this is where my mother lived.

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.320
<v Speaker 1>This is where I wanted to spend my time and

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>live my life. And isn't that how private equity locates

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>its headquar It's like where's mom? Great stop? And there

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>are there that much tax advantages to be in Switzerland

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're operating throughout Europe. UM, I mean it's not

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Monaco or Lichtons. No, it's not like that. But it

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>actually had nothing to do I don't think with the origins.

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>It was all about this is where he wanted to

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>live his life, and his founders agreed. And what that

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>meant is that everybody that joined Partners Group at that

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>time wasn't just a butt in a seat in a

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>capital market changing jobs. They were moving their family somewhere

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and being and becoming a part of something, and that

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:35.959
<v Speaker 1>has created this very tight culture within our organization. We said,

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 1>let's do the same thing in the Americas. Let's find

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a place where our people genuinely want to live their

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>life and raise their babies and make that the center

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of our system. We decided to do that in Colorado.

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 1>So that's interesting because UM Colorado obviously in the Rockies.

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Zoog is very much you know, how far are you

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>from from the big ski resorts? That's a la side town.

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Some of the photos I saw quite charming. What was

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:10.000
<v Speaker 1>life like in Zoog? And any coincidence that Colorado is

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>about as close as you're going to get to Switzerland

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in the US. No, you're you're in close proximity to

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the mountains there. It is an idyllic setting there in

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the postcard. In the postcard setting there in Zoog very charming.

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>But you're on your own a little bit. As it

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>relates to your ability to plug into the broader financial community. Right,

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>so every client that we have, every asset that we own,

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is a result of somebody getting on an airplane and

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>building a relationship. It's created a culture being there where

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>we don't expect anything to come to us. We are

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>an outbound driven firm, right, We're from that identifies opportunity

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and we hustle and get in front of it. And so, yes,

0:09:56.000 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>beautiful setting there in the in the Alps. Yes, that

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>did inform our choice with regards to location. Being in

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the mountains was important to us. We wanted to have

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that continuity of culture, if that makes sense. And and

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>how does the business split between Switzerland and US. Are

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they the same types of business just different geographies? Is

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>what is the division from from Colorado to Zook. Yeah,

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>we are a global firm. Our teams, many of our

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>teams are organized on a global basis. We have most

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of our clients from Europe, that's our biggest market, and

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>most of our investment activity is in the Americas. Um

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 1>it's been about fifty five percent of our investments that

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>we've made are in the and that is an evolution

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>that it hasn't always been the case. You know, a

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of people think of US as disproportionately European or Swiss,

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're surprised to learn that over the last decade

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>we have invested most of our firm's capital into the

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>US market. This is a big market, important market. And

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the economy for the past decade,

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 1>or at least as judged by the public markets, Europe

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>seems to have been a little sleepy the past decade,

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the US was where all the action was. Yeah, is

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that true in private markets as well as public markets? Well,

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a global relative value approach to investing, which

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 1>means that our firm will hold up an investment opportunity

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>from the US alongside opportunities from Europe, alongside opportunities from Asia,

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and we will fight about where we see the best

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>relative value. And as indicated by the mix that I

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>just described, we have found better relative value in the

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>US markets. Not just about activity, but it's about relative value.

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Now we have still been active in Europe. We're actually

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>bringing all of our investors to Vienna in just a

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of months, our biggest investors, for an investor conference,

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and I want to bring them to the most European

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 1>of cities to send a reminder that even though there's

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people that are down on Europe at

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the moment, that's when a long term investor, and that's

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>where private markets I think, can take a long term

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>perspective and continue to find opportunities when others aren't looking.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>So I'm intrigued by the concept of relative value, looking

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 1>at it globally by geography, how much is it the

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>value of the company or investing in how much is

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the perspective market size, as well as how robust local

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>economy is and by local I mean Asia, Europe or US. Yeah,

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say that this has evolved over the last decades.

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>So it used to be within private markets that you

0:12:57.160 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>would find a good business, apply quite a bit of

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 1>leverage to it, at least in the private equity business,

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 1>and be able to make a pretty good return by

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>buying good, solid businesses as they are. That has changed.

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Leverage levels have come down materially. You're investing majority equity

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.559
<v Speaker 1>in most of the transactions that are occurring today. And

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it's all about the future. It's all about what are

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 1>this company's prospects, How are you going to steer this

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.959
<v Speaker 1>company to be able to maintain its market position, What

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.960
<v Speaker 1>can we do with this business over the coming years.

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's much more about potential and how you can

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>drive market leading strategies than it is necessarily about just

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.080
<v Speaker 1>buying good business and leveraging it up. So we're going

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little more about partners Group in a bit,

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>but I want to stay with the investments. You guys

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>seem to be very long term. You're not just buying something,

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>putting a fresh code of paint and then flipping it.

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>You buy companies to run them and manage them for

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the long haul. Tell us a little bit about the

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>giant portfolio of companies you guys are managing. Yeah, so

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>we manage a portfolio of several dozen companies. When you

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>add together all of our portfolio companies, it's effectively one

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollar enterprise when you add all of our

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>companies together across multiple sectors, and it's global in terms

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of its breadth and scope, and quite a few employees also. Yeah,

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at our business, we have about

0:14:30.200 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundred people at the management company, and then across

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>our portfolio over two hundred thousand employees of our various

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:45.359
<v Speaker 1>portfolio companies. So we are a large owner of assets,

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think we take that stewardship very very seriously.

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the reasons why we really haven't identified

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 1>ourself as a financial firm or as a money management firm.

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>That's not the proper lens through which to view Partners Group.

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we are very much an owner of assets.

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>We're a builder of businesses, and we're a steward of

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>these companies, and we take that very seriously. So I

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be surprised in the future if you didn't look

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>at us and we looked more like an industrial conglomerate.

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>That's where like a private equity firm. That's really interesting.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>You sit on the board of directors on a number

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>of portfolio companies. Tell us a little bit about what

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that experience is like. You own them, but yet they

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>manage themselves and you guys are involved in that. How

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>does that operate? It sounds like there's a lot of

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>independence amongst all these different holdings. If you think about

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the role that we play as owners, it is a

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 1>real responsibility that we have to develop these companies over time.

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 1>The role of the board years ago maybe isn't that

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>critical or wasn't that important Today, it is absolutely paramount

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to your success as an investor. And so we are

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>very very focused on making our boards the center of

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>vision and strategy and accountability. Our board members work more

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>intensively with our companies, have a greater time commitment than

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 1>most board members are used to. This is not come

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>together once a quarter, eat chicken dinner, and rubber stamp

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things. But this is really roll up

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 1>your sleeves and have a commitment to helping to chart

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the appropriate path moving forward. And I have always taken

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that stewardship very very seriously and h and that that's

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the culture that we're creating is to take those board

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>assignments very seriously. Yes, there is a lot of of

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>steering of individual strategy that goes on in the portfolio companies.

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, Partners Group is developing a business

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 1>system STEM that we are looking to apply across our

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>portfolio companies. We're looking to create a culture that is

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>similar with regards to how we set strategy, with regards

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.719
<v Speaker 1>to how we create accountability on that strategy, with regards

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to how our boards get involved in driving that strategy.

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.359
<v Speaker 1>And that's something that we think is essential to differentiation

0:17:20.800 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Really interesting Gear headquartered in Colorado. How

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>often do you get back to Switzerland. I'm in Switzerland

0:17:28.600 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>about a week a month. Oh really that much? Wow,

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of travel from Colorado. That's a lot

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of travel. Yep, that comes with the territory. Quite interesting.

0:17:39.960 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a little bit about the firm. It

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>has a market cap over twenty five billion dollars. That's

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 1>bigger than Credit Swiss, which means you're a pretty substantial entity.

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about the corporate culture, which

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is decidedly different than the typical Wall straight bank. Yeah, first,

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>let me put into context some of our views with

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>regards to how our industry is evolving, and that'll help

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>to inform some of the decisions that we've made with

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 1>regards to how to set our company culture. The private

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>markets is not a young industry, necessarily been around for

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:28.360
<v Speaker 1>for forty years. But the skills, the talents, the attributes

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that allowed people to be successful in this industry historically

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily the attributes that are going to be

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>successful in propelling firms in the future. If you think

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>about the way private markets functioned twenty years ago, twenty

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>five years ago, people would with a transactional skill set

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>provide access into an inefficient asset class, right. They would

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>do that by buying and selling things, and they were

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>able to make a good living doing that, and that

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:05.640
<v Speaker 1>this transactional skill set is something that was praised. You'll

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:09.479
<v Speaker 1>hear teams call themselves deal teams. You'll call individuals call

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 1>themselves deal professionals, and this deal side of the business

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>is really what was emphasized. Now I want you bring

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that up. I have to ask a question. I kind

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of read a shocking thing. You guys banned the word

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>deal from the company. Explain that if fits into context.

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>It's because the things that made people successful, that deal

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>doing mindset is not the things that are going to

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>make us successful in the future. We meaning the over

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on transactional drop a ticket, get the next trade

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>in flip it as opposed to building something exactly. Our

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:50.200
<v Speaker 1>business is no longer about doing deals and providing access.

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>It's about building businesses, and so we don't want to

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to put too much emphasis on the

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>transactional side of things. We think that's been overdone historically.

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>We really want to emphasize the rolling up your sleeves UH,

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.920
<v Speaker 1>strategy setting, building businesses side of things. And because of that,

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>we've we've asked our people to change their terminology. We've

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.439
<v Speaker 1>done things like change our job titles. We don't have

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 1>senior vice presidents, you know, twenty five year old senior

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>vice presidents running around anymore. That's the terry level position president.

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>We've we've we've changed that. That's again a reference to

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of Wall Street culture, and that made sense maybe

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>years ago when you had to sound important on the phone,

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>but in today's environment, we don't think it's you know,

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:42.959
<v Speaker 1>it makes a lot of sense. And so the culture

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that we're creating is a more industrial culture focused on

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>rolling up your sleeves and building businesses. And that's reflective

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of we think the environment moving forward. So so now

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>I understand why your headquarters in Colorado has a sign

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>on the wall that says this is not Wall Street. Yeah,

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>so not only are you locating the firm two thousand

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>miles away from from Wall Street, you are making a

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>very conscious effort to behave very differently. And by the way,

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 1>when you walk through the door, it's immediately apparent to

0:21:16.760 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you because when you walk through that that office in Colorado,

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it is brick, steel stone. We have built a more

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>industrial business building feel that is in direct contrast to

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>what you you see in most places within our industry.

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So where are you in Colorado? So we're just outside

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of Boulder in a town called Broomfield. Really interesting. So

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>you are knowing near val Or some of the sheshier

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>parts of Colorado. Is that is that a fair state? Yeah?

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>We're down the mountain um, which is a good three

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>hours depending on the depending on the weather, in the traffic,

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.959
<v Speaker 1>it can be a bit um. But let me tell

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:07.639
<v Speaker 1>you something. When we first decided to move to Colorado, Um.

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh it was you know, in a way, UM, a

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>part of this whole move um away from Wall Street.

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>UM create an environment that's somewhat similar to the Zoog

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you know culture that we came from. You know, we

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit about being in Zoog. One of

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>our founders grabbed me one time and said, hey, UM,

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>why don't you figure out where you want to live

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>your life and see if people want to move there also,

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>right and follow you? And and uh, you have any

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>nexus with with Colorado? Or was this just hey, big country,

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>let's go here. Um. It's just a fantastic environment. Uh.

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And the and the people that are there, um are

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>so happy. It's the one of the highest quality of

0:22:53.280 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 1>life uh anywhere, um that you'll find. And I think

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that makes a difference. Right when we first opened up,

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>people are kind of scratching their heads what are these

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>guys doing? Today we get more resumes into our Colorado

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:10.680
<v Speaker 1>office than our next six offices combined. It really has

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>set us apart and is something that's quite unique. And

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it's also directly in line with what we've been talking

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>about it. It's different from Wall Street. It creates an

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>environment for us where we can be independent thinkers and that.

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>So let's drill down into that a little bit. I

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>was reading about the firm and its investment process, and

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.719
<v Speaker 1>it seems like you guys can spend as long as

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>five years studying a company before you make an acquisition,

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Whereas in most of finance it's competitive and sometimes you

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>need to make a decision now or someone else is

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna outbid you. How do you go about kicking the

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 1>tires of a company for three or four or five years.

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>That seems to be inormately lengthy compared to the way

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 1>traditional finance operations. Yeah, when I came up in the industry,

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 1>when a company would come up for sale, we would

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>have four or five months to research that business and

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to do due diligence and to meet the management team

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and to build our models. And that's enough time to

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>get to know a space, and to get to know

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a sector, and to get to know a company and

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>decide if you want to make an investment or not.

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>With the competition that's increased within our space, it's more

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>like four or five six weeks that you need to

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>make that decision, okay, And you just can't do the

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>type of work that you need to do to write

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 1>a large check in four or five six weeks to

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>buy an entire company. And so we have really put

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>emphasis to our team on doing work well before a

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>company sale process to make sure that when that company

0:24:56.640 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>comes up for sale that we are expert on that space,

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we're expert on that subsector, and we're doing confirmatory work.

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>We're not starting from scratch. That's something that's really emphasized

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>within our culture. And you know, if you think about

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the current environment, right rates have changed, leverage levels have changed,

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and that means there's a couple hundred basis points of

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:28.719
<v Speaker 1>returns that's come out of our industry if you're just

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>doing things the same way. So you need to be

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>investing in a different profile of business. You can't just

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.399
<v Speaker 1>hope to lever up a good company and generate a

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>return that way. Today you have to find sectors that

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>are transforming right businesses that we can transform through active

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 1>ownership in order to generate the same type of returns

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that have happened. And we think that that's going to

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>be a critical part moving forward. So we put all

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>of our emphasis today from a sourcing and origination perspective

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>around around thematic work that's a big topic. We're gonna

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>talk a little more about sectors later. Now I have

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to ask you mentioned the time horizon for evaluating companies

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 1>and the competitions. Your size puts you in the same

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 1>league as private equity firms like Blackstone and Aries. How

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>often are you bumping into competition when you're kicking the

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 1>tires on a company for a couple of years, when

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>those guys tend to write a check after eight weeks. Now,

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I often look at the public markets and a little

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 1>green within the sometimes to be honest, because in the

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.719
<v Speaker 1>public markets, you find a sector that you like, they

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 1>find a company that you like, you hit the buy

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 1>button and you create that exposure for yourself or your clients.

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>In the private markets, you find a sector that you like,

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.239
<v Speaker 1>you do your research, you find a company that you like,

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>You have to wait for years until an event comes up,

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and then there's only one firm that's allowed to create

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that exposure. Okay, and you have to go up against

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the most aggressive, smart individuals that you will

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.439
<v Speaker 1>ever come across in your life, and you have to

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 1>differentiate yourself and partners group has I think done a

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>good job of winning more than its fair share of

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>transactions in the market by being a differentiated kind of firm,

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a differentiated kind of owner, one that's a true partner

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.919
<v Speaker 1>to industry, a partner for growth, and that's helped to

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:41.160
<v Speaker 1>distinguish us against some pretty stiff competition. Not a coincidence

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're named Partners Group. That didn't happen by act. No,

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>not by accident at all. So let's talk a little

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 1>bit about some of your closed end funds. Typically, most

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>private equity or buy out funds tend to be a

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>quarter million dollars or more. You have a fund that

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>requires a minimum investment of fifty thousand dollars. Tell us

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 1>the thinking behind making access to this sort of investing

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>easier for people who might not have a quarter million

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars lying around. Yeah, so, if you're an institution investing

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>one hundred billion dollars today or fifty billion dollars or

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>ten billion dollars, private markets is already a big part

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>of your portfolio. But for individuals, historically there have not

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>been great options to invest into private companies. It's been

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the best performing asset classes for decades, and

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a real democratization of access to private markets and

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we're one of the firms that's been leading that. Look,

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>our parents all had pension funds, our kids are all

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>going to have four o one ks, and so the

0:28:56.760 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>sources of funds for our industry is going to change

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>as a result of that. It's been primarily pensioned historically,

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been a lot of insurance and that sort of thing.

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 1>And the future is private individuals, and we think define

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>contribution programs and we're a firm that is really cutting

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.960
<v Speaker 1>edge and leading with regards to providing the types of

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>solutions that those type of clients are. So, when you're

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>offering a fund to a smaller investor of fifty thousand

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar investor, how does the ownership within what those folks

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>invest in? How does that compare to what partners group

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>at large invest in? It? Is it a particular strategy

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>or a multi strat approach? How do you how do

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you think about that? Yeah, so our clients get access

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to all of our investment content that that particular fund

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>is targeting. We have been really focused as a firm

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>on not creating silos, not having one team that just

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>works for this particular financial product, and this team that

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>works with this financial product but all of our investment

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>professionals work for all of our clients collectively, and that

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>gives us the ability to create a vehicle, for example,

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 1>for an individual client, of a spoke solution for an

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>individual client, or a structure for a group of like

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>investors like you know, private clients, and have them participate

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in the exact same investment content that our other large

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>investors get access to. And so that vehicle it's you

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about having the A team on

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the big institutional money and the B team on the

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>retail money, which is something that some people do worry about.

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Our investors get equal access to the opportunities that our

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>global teams. So in other words, I'm not liquid for

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars. I don't remember where I left that.

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So even if I don't have a billion, I could

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>still participate similarly to an endowment that does have a

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.719
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Yeah, that's the and I think that's the future.

0:30:56.080 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, limited partnerships that have been the traditional structure

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 1>that our industry have. You these are archaic structures, right,

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>they were innovated in the nineteen seventies and eighties. Is

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a tool for individual wealth creation and they have been

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:17.160
<v Speaker 1>jerry rigged effectively to now made US ten trillion dollars

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of assets, which is pretty incredible. They are a lot

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of money. They are not the future, right. The future

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is we think vehicles that have some structure to them

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that allows for easier access. And so when you talk

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>about ten trillion dollars you have discussed you think this

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to end up being a thirty trillion dollar

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>market place. Yeah, so if there's ten trillion dollars and

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you believe it's structured in a way that won't work

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for the average investor, where is the next twenty trillion

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars going to come from? Is it going to be institutional?

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be individuals, some combination. Where do you

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>see the growth here? Yeah, it's going to be some combination,

0:31:55.840 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>but individual investors and define contribution coming online more fully

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>is certainly UM an element of that. UM. You know,

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>our industry has been growing for a long period of time. UM.

0:32:09.120 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>It has grown across different rate environments UM and UH

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and and we're big believers that it will continue to

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to grow UM and UH and that this is going

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to be an industry that continues to benefit from from

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the tailwinds that that do exist. So I'm

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>surprised to learn you guys acquired Brightling, the big watch company.

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about the thinking behind that acquisition. Yeah. Uh, Brightling,

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I think is one of the coolest Swiss watch companies

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 1>ever with its aviation heritage and the partnerships that it's

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>done and in the automotive space and diving in space.

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's got such an incredible heritage and we're really

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>happy to be a part of it. Um. I saw

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:04.479
<v Speaker 1>a pistachio dial chronograph that they put out that was

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>just unique and gorgeous. Really yeah, no, the I mean

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the innovation at that company today is really really incredible.

0:33:13.160 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know, there's a lot of people who

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of say, what are you doing investing into a

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>consumer business? It's environment competitive, it's in an environment like this,

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's a business you know, growing at twenty five

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>percent last year. It's got enormous potential in the in

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the Asian and US markets where it's it's growing really

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>really strong. And um, and uh, you know people think

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about as a very masculine company, but it's it's female segment.

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Is has a tremendous amount of potential. And with some

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of the innovation that they're driving, with some of those colors,

0:33:49.720 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>et cetera that you're talking about, it's a lot of that.

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Not a timepiece, a lot of potential. Oh, it's a timepiece.

0:33:56.480 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the mechanics are for sure, are fantastic. Um,

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>but but it's a fashion accessory. Well, it's a piece

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of jewelry. It's a fashion accessory. It's more than just

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>telling time is perhaps a better way to describe it. Yep.

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 1>And so we're really excited about that, that investment in

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that partnership. Quite quite interesting. There are some quotes of

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 1>yours that I really like and I have to ask

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you about, starting with there is a Darwinian struggle ahead

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.880
<v Speaker 1>for private markets. Tell us why you believe that is

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>the case. The world has changed, right, We are in

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 1>a new rate environment and many of the tailwinds that

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:43.360
<v Speaker 1>have allowed many firms to be successful and generate strong

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>returns have turned into headwinds. Uh. And we had a

0:34:49.200 --> 0:34:53.239
<v Speaker 1>long period of cheap capital and high amounts of free

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>capital essentially and large amounts of leverage being available. That

0:34:57.400 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 1>was a tailwind. We had a long period of global

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>z right, where we could take costs out of our

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 1>portfolio companies, take them out into a global marketplace and

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 1>improve margins, strong macro growth environment, and many of those

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.399
<v Speaker 1>factors have changed, and some of them have even turned

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:19.319
<v Speaker 1>into headwinds. And so as a result of that, the

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>formula for success that I think many of these more

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 1>transactionally oriented firms are pursuing, we think is going to

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:33.280
<v Speaker 1>be challenged. And as a result of that, you this

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.880
<v Speaker 1>this environment that we're and is going to initiate a

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>period of natural selection whereby the strong firms will get

0:35:41.000 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>stronger and the weak firms will struggle and struggle to

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>raise new capital. And this isn't dissimilar from what's happened

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in prior eras within the financial services sector. I mean,

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>if you think about the public markets in the eighties, right,

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:05.560
<v Speaker 1>you had stockbrokers that were driving ferraris right, and the

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>value system was built around transactions and transactional skill sets

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>then as well, Right, it was an inefficient market. People

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>would get their newspapers and read their ticker. They would

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:17.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to their broker with no idea of where the

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>market actually was at that moment, and the whole incentive

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 1>system for the industry the public markets at that time

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>was around how much transaction volume can you generate in

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:34.919
<v Speaker 1>an inefficient market? Think about ten years later, right, it

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't about individuals generating transaction point it's about which institutions

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>can build something that's truly differentiated, a platform with a

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>different way to engage with clients and have a differentiated

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 1>client engagement model. And we think that, you know, the

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>private markets may very well follow a similar path, and

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the values of our industry need to shift from individuals

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>generating transactions and that being where the emphasis is towards

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>platforms that are building something truly differentiated. So there's another

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 1>quote of yours which I suspect could be related to

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the Darwinian struggle, which is it's never been more expensive

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to be naive. Explain that, because that's quite a loaded sentence.

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Whether we're talking about investors or various firms, it's always

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>expensive to be naive. And you're saying it's as bad

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>as it ever gets right here. Well, you know, the

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 1>generalist investor model where you look for interesting businesses and

0:37:43.360 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know invest in them. You know out of a

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>generalist perspective is tough. It's going to be tough. We

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>think for a long time. If you think about what

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>is going to differentiate firms in the future, we think

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be having a real perspective on the

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>way an industry is going to move and how it's

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>going to evolve. There's so much digital transformation occurring, so

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>much disruption occurring that if you invest into a space

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 1>not being a specialist in that area, we think it's

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>really tough. Our firm is putting a tremendous amount of

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on thematic research. We want our people to be deep,

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>as we talked about before, spend a couple of years

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on a space before ultimately investing into that space, to

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.680
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they understand how that market's going to evolve,

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 1>who the winners likely are going to be. And we're

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>putting our emphasis not on what's the size of the

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:42.200
<v Speaker 1>business today, but we put our emphasis around which company

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 1>is likely to be a market leader four or five

0:38:44.280 --> 0:38:46.759
<v Speaker 1>six years from now in that particular space. And that

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>takes work, that takes research. So you're looking out five years,

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>that means that sectors that are doing well today you

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 1>may have been thinking about five years ago pre pandemic.

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what sectors today seem to be coming into

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>their own and what other sectors are beginning to look intriguing. Yeah,

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:16.399
<v Speaker 1>and the COVID environment has actually accelerated some of those

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>themes that we were thinking about and have been thinking

0:39:19.239 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>about for a long time. So the digital trans the

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>digital payment space, for example, that's not a new topic, right,

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 1>There's been a transition to digital payment for a long

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 1>period of time, but COVID helped to accelerate that. And

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>so we invested into one of Europe's largest electronic toll

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.840
<v Speaker 1>collection companies. Here in New York you have you have

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>easy pass and other markets there's sun passed and other

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>things like that. We invested into Europe's largest electronic toll

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>collection company. And that's an example of a trend that

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.520
<v Speaker 1>we were watching for a long time and then COVID

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.800
<v Speaker 1>helped to really accelerate that and I really stopped using cash,

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you during that period of time. I

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.400
<v Speaker 1>like the way you phrased it because a lot of

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the things that have become very large existed long before COVID,

0:40:10.640 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>but they were kind of on the front. I just

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:16.560
<v Speaker 1>signed a whole bunch of bank docs through document signed

0:40:16.600 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 1>on my laptop. That's been around forever, but it's ubiquitous now, Like, wait,

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you want me to FedEx you documents to get a

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>wet signature on it and then have the other eight

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.720
<v Speaker 1>people sign it and that sort of stuff. It feels archaic,

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>but just three years ago we were doing that but

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:38.240
<v Speaker 1>right and the ability to do things. When I launched

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 1>my firm, me and my partners, we were national, so

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we were always in the cloud and we were always virtual.

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:49.239
<v Speaker 1>I found the pandemic kind of amusing for lots of

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>people discovered video chat and screen sharing. All these technology

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 1>is a decade old. How do you get ahead of

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:01.759
<v Speaker 1>a curve when suddenly you have a two year just

0:41:02.120 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>rush into that space. How do you separate the winners

0:41:05.200 --> 0:41:09.120
<v Speaker 1>from the also rands? Yeah, Um, it's it's through a

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of work, it's through a lot of research, and

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it's by having people that specialize in that particular area.

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:22.720
<v Speaker 1>It's about surrounding yourself with not specially not generalist consultants

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:24.399
<v Speaker 1>that come in and tell you this market is big

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and growing. Right. We want we want our teams to

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:35.759
<v Speaker 1>engage with organizations um that uh that are specialized or

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>better yet, individuals that have been running companies in those

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 1>spaces and that have been there and done that and

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 1>know where the bodies are buried. Those are the people

0:41:45.520 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that we want to align with as we're going into

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 1>due diligence. We want to you know, work with them

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and have them join the boards of our companies and

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and um, and so it comes by surrounding yourself with

0:41:57.120 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>the right people and the right kind of people, uh

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:03.759
<v Speaker 1>as you go into researching these type of businesses. So

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier, the marketplace is changing. What was tailwinds

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:13.720
<v Speaker 1>very often today are headwinds, which raises the important question

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 1>how important are private markets to the economy relative to

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:24.560
<v Speaker 1>public markets. In fact, you had suggested public markets decoupled

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>from the real economy and now it's all about what's private. Well,

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:31.879
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say it's all about what's private, but there

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 1>has clearly been an evolution that a lot of people

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:40.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't been fully conscious of. It's been a shift in

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 1>roles really that the public markets are playing and the

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.360
<v Speaker 1>private markets are playing. It used to be the private

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 1>markets where where you went to bed speculative investments. This

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>is where you went to get your risky venture capital

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 1>exposure or your highly leveraged equity exposure. It was called

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>an alternative asset class because you know, you were meant

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to allocate maybe this small little sliver of the economy

0:43:02.560 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and the public markets is where you go to invest

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:09.520
<v Speaker 1>into bedrock companies that anchor the economy, household names, etc.

0:43:10.840 --> 0:43:13.880
<v Speaker 1>That has changed. If you look at the companies that

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 1>have been going public, the capital formation that's been occurring

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>within the public markets, a lot of people are shocked

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 1>when they dig into it and they learn that only

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent of the companies that have been going public

0:43:25.680 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>more recently have an earning's history. Okay, the vast majority

0:43:30.560 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>are technology companies selling the dream or their shell companies

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:38.080
<v Speaker 1>without financial substance. Those are the companies going public. There's

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot more speculation happening in the public markets these days. Meanwhile,

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the public the private markets have been increasingly relevant to

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 1>owning the real economy. If you think about the food

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:56.319
<v Speaker 1>value chain for example, right, what are the types of

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 1>companies that are going public? Right in the food value chain,

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:04.239
<v Speaker 1>you have the ones that have a big brand and

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a network effect, right like a grub hub or something

0:44:07.400 --> 0:44:10.280
<v Speaker 1>along those lines like that that is in the public

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:14.680
<v Speaker 1>eye and draws the interest of public investors. Meanwhile, if

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:17.479
<v Speaker 1>you think about the rest of the food value chain,

0:44:17.920 --> 0:44:24.840
<v Speaker 1>right the agricultural businesses, the fertilizer companies and crop protection

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>protection companies that are out there, the logistics companies that

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 1>are out there, a lot of them are not appealing

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to public markets investors because they don't have the sizzle

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>right and don't have it, so they're not marketing to

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the end consumers. So the average person in those lives,

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't know about them. So interesting. Interesting, a lot

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of those businesses are now owned by private markets firms

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:53.320
<v Speaker 1>ten trillion dollars of assets that are anchoring the economy,

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and so there's been this shift in rolls where the

0:44:56.520 --> 0:45:01.359
<v Speaker 1>private markets used to be very speculative. Now that's where

0:45:01.400 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you go to get exposure to the real economy. And

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the private markets used to be you know, bedrock companies

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that anchor the economy, and now it's a technology index

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:15.399
<v Speaker 1>effectively for many investors. And I think that isn't well

0:45:15.480 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>known by a lot of investors, and it's one of

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the things that's driving interest in our space by investors

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:29.320
<v Speaker 1>that haven't traditionally had access. That's one of the reasons

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:33.080
<v Speaker 1>why private investors, for example, are increasingly interested in private

0:45:33.120 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>markets is because that's the only way you can place

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that you can go to access certain sectors. So that

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:43.359
<v Speaker 1>raises a couple of really fascinating questions. The first is,

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:48.160
<v Speaker 1>given that private markets were previously speculative and now you're

0:45:48.200 --> 0:45:51.839
<v Speaker 1>suggesting public markets are, the first question is what does

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that mean in terms of how we value each of

0:45:55.120 --> 0:45:58.800
<v Speaker 1>those two types of investments? And then the related question

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:04.359
<v Speaker 1>is how dependent are private markets on public market valuations?

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they're very closely linked in many regards. There

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:15.879
<v Speaker 1>are some differences. The public markets did experience a lot

0:46:15.960 --> 0:46:21.359
<v Speaker 1>more hype in certain periods of time, and so a

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of people look at the private markets and say,

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't there be a correction in the private markets that

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is on par with what we're seeing, you know, in

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the public markets. And so let me just create a

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit of context for some of the differences in

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>valuation that have been out there between you know, the

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen time period and twenty twenty one. The public

0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>markets experience multiple expansion on an EV to ebada basis

0:46:56.440 --> 0:47:00.319
<v Speaker 1>of about eleven twelve times historically, I think went up

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen times at the peak, and it's come down

0:47:03.719 --> 0:47:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to thirteen or fourteen times or whatever it is more recently,

0:47:06.719 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a pretty substantial kind of pullback. Over that same period

0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of time, the private markets, your average private markets company

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:20.400
<v Speaker 1>increased in value from about eleven times to about twelve times. Okay,

0:47:20.719 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And so you're not, you know, we pretty steady evaluation.

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Not in every space, not in every sector, and not

0:47:28.560 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 1>for every type of company. You do see some big

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>valuations there, but on average, as an industry, our average

0:47:34.600 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 1>company didn't participate in the in the hype necessarily fully

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that the private markets experienced, and so it shouldn't surprise

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>people that your average private markets company doesn't correct in

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 1>value at the same level. In addition to that, the

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>private markets has historically been pretty good at driving assets,

0:47:55.760 --> 0:48:00.800
<v Speaker 1>aligning interest with management teams having a pretty compelling business

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>case that they're driving. And so for example, our average

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>portfolio company has had double digit growth over the past year,

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and that helps to offset some of the downward pressure

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that you know, the markets bring. So I want to

0:48:17.680 --> 0:48:20.520
<v Speaker 1>get to the issue of alignment in a moment, but

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:25.399
<v Speaker 1>I have to follow up on what you just hinted at,

0:48:26.120 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 1>which is why are the private markets so steady compared

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:36.759
<v Speaker 1>to the ups and downs, the multiple expansion and contraction

0:48:36.800 --> 0:48:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that we see in public markets. And I know there

0:48:40.000 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 1>may not be any definitive answer. What's your theory here, Well,

0:48:44.120 --> 0:48:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a market that's driven by decisions by sophisticated

0:48:52.040 --> 0:48:57.359
<v Speaker 1>investors to invest or to divest. Okay, you don't have

0:48:57.480 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fear based selling right going on within

0:49:01.680 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the private markets. Um an advantage of not getting a

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:10.399
<v Speaker 1>print every tech, every minute, every constantly to exact freak

0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 1>people out. It's uh, and I think that is a

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:17.440
<v Speaker 1>big part of it. We're always going to be an

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 1>asset class that puts emphasis on long term performance over

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:25.719
<v Speaker 1>short term liquidity. It just is what it is. So

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't feel pressure to sell things at all when

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the markets start to bounce around, and if anything, there's

0:49:34.120 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 1>an a liquidity impediment to making those sort of decisions.

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:41.799
<v Speaker 1>The old line is, you don't get a price on

0:49:41.920 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 1>your house every minute of every day. If you did,

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you might get panicked out of it. You don't even

0:49:48.680 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>have that option of panic selling if you want in

0:49:52.200 --> 0:49:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of your holdings. I'm going to assume, Yeah,

0:49:55.560 --> 0:50:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the panic selling is rarely a thing within private markets,

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and it is sometimes a thing in the public markets,

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's a big difference with regards to how people

0:50:07.960 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>think about their holdings between the two asset classes. That's

0:50:13.280 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 1>really very intriguing. So let's talk a little bit about alignment.

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:20.840
<v Speaker 1>You have said we are fully aligned with our clients,

0:50:20.880 --> 0:50:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think of you as having two sets of clients.

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:27.560
<v Speaker 1>One set are the outside investors who give you their

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:30.680
<v Speaker 1>capital to invest. The other set of clients are the

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:34.200
<v Speaker 1>companies you acquire and our partners with. How do you

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:37.680
<v Speaker 1>align your interest with these two diverse sets of clients.

0:50:38.200 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the private markets is a fantastic asset class

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 1>from an alignment of interest perspective. We win when our

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>clients win, and that comes from having our capital invested

0:50:56.239 --> 0:51:02.360
<v Speaker 1>alongside theirs and having very strict requirements for performance before

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we get paid performance fees. And I think that alignment

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:07.840
<v Speaker 1>of interest is something that is really really strong. In turn,

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 1>we then create the same types of relationships with our

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:15.120
<v Speaker 1>management teams. So it goes all the way down the

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:21.400
<v Speaker 1>chain with regards to alignment of interest, meaning the portfolio

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 1>companies their interests are going to be determined by their

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 1>performance as well. So from the investor to partners group

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to the portfolio companies. Everybody is aiming in the same place,

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and everybody gets paid when the results work for everybody.

0:51:38.600 --> 0:51:41.400
<v Speaker 1>And we're a very client centric firm. You know. We

0:51:41.480 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 1>talked a little bit about our Colorado campus and how

0:51:45.040 --> 0:51:47.239
<v Speaker 1>we've created a field. It's a little bit more like

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:50.719
<v Speaker 1>a factory feel. You know. When I was a kid,

0:51:50.760 --> 0:51:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I remember my dad random manufacturing facility and I remember

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:58.319
<v Speaker 1>being with him on the floor, you know, at the

0:51:58.320 --> 0:52:01.279
<v Speaker 1>manager's window or whatever, and him walking around that floor,

0:52:01.400 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and I had in my mind, you know, the feeling

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 1>like there's no question in my mind who these people

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:08.360
<v Speaker 1>work for. Like he walked that floor and he really,

0:52:08.719 --> 0:52:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, drove it. And I always loved that visual

0:52:11.800 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 1>of the manager's window, you know, in a factory. And

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:19.319
<v Speaker 1>so on our floor, we have client conference rooms that

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:27.160
<v Speaker 1>look out over our employees that represent a manager's window.

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And so the message to our team, the message to

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:32.600
<v Speaker 1>our people is it's the people in that room that

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you work for. Those are the people that you report to,

0:52:35.719 --> 0:52:38.239
<v Speaker 1>Those are the people that you owe something to. And

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we've really tried to create that sense of client centricity

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and alignment with our clients, not just in our documentation

0:52:48.239 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and with our incentives, but also culturally within the fabric

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of our firm. Quite quite interesting. So let's talk a

0:52:56.880 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit about this reallocation from public markets to private

0:53:01.600 --> 0:53:04.480
<v Speaker 1>markets that you think is going to lead to the

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 1>private market sector tripling over the next let's call a decade.

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Am I being to conservative or is that about right? Yeah,

0:53:12.920 --> 0:53:15.319
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, We'll see how the environment plays into it.

0:53:15.360 --> 0:53:18.799
<v Speaker 1>But directionally we think that that's so where is this

0:53:18.880 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 1>going to come from? How much of this is going

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to be individual? How much of this is going to

0:53:22.680 --> 0:53:27.440
<v Speaker 1>be institutional? And are we going to see four oh

0:53:27.480 --> 0:53:31.200
<v Speaker 1>one ks orfer the opportunity to make the sort of

0:53:31.280 --> 0:53:37.880
<v Speaker 1>private equity investment. Yeah, you know, I came from an

0:53:37.920 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 1>interesting client meeting this week, Fortune one hundred company that

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:50.360
<v Speaker 1>is in the process of reclassifying some of their investment buckets,

0:53:50.840 --> 0:53:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're actually going to take their long term bond

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:58.839
<v Speaker 1>portfolio and blend it together with their private credit portfolio

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:04.120
<v Speaker 1>because they think that private credit offers better risk return

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:07.960
<v Speaker 1>in the current market environment and not less risk, etcetera.

0:54:08.040 --> 0:54:12.320
<v Speaker 1>So they're they're they're thinking about opening up access to

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a private credit out of this portfolio. So institutional investors

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about how I think they can use private

0:54:24.640 --> 0:54:30.800
<v Speaker 1>markets more effectively within their portfolio, and individual investors, we think,

0:54:30.960 --> 0:54:35.719
<v Speaker 1>in many instances can benefit to having access to a

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:40.399
<v Speaker 1>strong performing asset class like the private markets. Now, it's

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:43.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly not for everyone, right. The amount of allocation that

0:54:43.480 --> 0:54:48.480
<v Speaker 1>people people put into private markets certainly depends on people's

0:54:48.560 --> 0:54:52.799
<v Speaker 1>risk tolerance. This is an a liquid asset class. We

0:54:52.920 --> 0:54:55.600
<v Speaker 1>can do things as an industry to make it more

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:58.960
<v Speaker 1>convenient and to create some degree of liquidity and in

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:01.840
<v Speaker 1>good times, but this is always going to be an

0:55:01.880 --> 0:55:07.399
<v Speaker 1>asset class again that prioritizes long term performance over near

0:55:07.520 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 1>term liquidity, and so it depends on the investor's desire

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that. But by and large, the investors that

0:55:14.880 --> 0:55:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we talked to are looking to increase their allocations to

0:55:19.000 --> 0:55:22.360
<v Speaker 1>private markets because it is such an important part of

0:55:23.960 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 1>their allocation. So let's talk about private credit for a minute.

0:55:28.120 --> 0:55:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Back when interest rates were at zero and the ten

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:36.400
<v Speaker 1>year yielded practically nothing, we saw a lot of institutional

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:40.320
<v Speaker 1>interest in private credit. Hey, listen, we're getting some yield.

0:55:41.960 --> 0:55:45.600
<v Speaker 1>There's an illiquidity concern, but we know what our future

0:55:45.640 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 1>liabilities are and we can ladder that out so it

0:55:48.800 --> 0:55:52.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a challenge for a big institution. So the first

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:56.120
<v Speaker 1>question is, now that rates have come up quite a bit,

0:55:56.239 --> 0:56:01.719
<v Speaker 1>FED is just coming up on five percent. Is there

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>still the same demand for that sort of private credit

0:56:05.080 --> 0:56:08.399
<v Speaker 1>when there is an alternative you're no longer competing with,

0:56:08.920 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a one and a half percent ten year

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:15.960
<v Speaker 1>How does that play in? I think the private credit

0:56:16.000 --> 0:56:20.520
<v Speaker 1>industry has has really come into its own since this

0:56:20.640 --> 0:56:26.000
<v Speaker 1>rate hike cycle began, and demand for absolutely private credit

0:56:26.040 --> 0:56:31.480
<v Speaker 1>has increased disproportionate to a lot of other asset types

0:56:31.719 --> 0:56:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that are more dependent. And so if you think about

0:56:33.840 --> 0:56:36.080
<v Speaker 1>like the equity side, for example, I was sitting down

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:42.440
<v Speaker 1>with a client recently and trying to illustrate the impact

0:56:42.560 --> 0:56:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that this changing rate environment would have, and I pulled

0:56:46.600 --> 0:56:50.360
<v Speaker 1>out an old model for an investment that they liked

0:56:50.360 --> 0:56:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in particular, and it was a twenty one percent return

0:56:53.760 --> 0:56:57.440
<v Speaker 1>that had been underwritten. And here's the here's the assumptions

0:56:57.480 --> 0:57:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that we had with regards to leverage levels, with regards

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to rate, etc. And I punched in the new environment,

0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I just said, Okay, that six point seven times leverage,

0:57:07.640 --> 0:57:09.480
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get that anymore, right, But that's

0:57:09.480 --> 0:57:11.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be more like four four and a quarter. Right,

0:57:11.360 --> 0:57:13.840
<v Speaker 1>we change that, and there was two hundred fifty basis

0:57:13.840 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>points to return gone because of that that element. Okay,

0:57:17.440 --> 0:57:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this cost of capital is no longer applicable, is more

0:57:20.560 --> 0:57:23.920
<v Speaker 1>like double that today, and that brought it down by

0:57:23.960 --> 0:57:28.439
<v Speaker 1>another one hundred fifty basis points or whatever. And then

0:57:29.360 --> 0:57:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we took a look at Okay, now you know,

0:57:31.920 --> 0:57:37.919
<v Speaker 1>within private credit you can lend at four four point

0:57:38.000 --> 0:57:42.240
<v Speaker 1>two five times EBITDA and gets in some cases a

0:57:42.280 --> 0:57:45.640
<v Speaker 1>double digit return doing that if you're kind of structuring

0:57:45.720 --> 0:57:49.720
<v Speaker 1>solutions for the right type of clients, and then you

0:57:49.720 --> 0:57:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have to wonder, you know, on the equity side, you

0:57:51.520 --> 0:57:54.720
<v Speaker 1>really have to work right to generate that out performance.

0:57:54.920 --> 0:57:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And so on a relative value basis, there's a lot

0:57:57.280 --> 0:58:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of investors that are finding private credit is a particularly

0:58:00.680 --> 0:58:03.480
<v Speaker 1>attractive place to invest right now. And we have a

0:58:03.480 --> 0:58:05.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of very interesting dialogue with our clients,

0:58:05.880 --> 0:58:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and especially considering the past decade, not counting twenty twenty two,

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:13.080
<v Speaker 1>but the decade prior to that, you saw thirteen fourteen

0:58:13.120 --> 0:58:17.439
<v Speaker 1>percent a year in US equities, which is way over

0:58:17.960 --> 0:58:21.919
<v Speaker 1>his historical eight percent a year. One in surprise, if

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know five to six percent a year, six seven

0:58:25.240 --> 0:58:29.480
<v Speaker 1>percent a year, you're you're mean reverting, especially in the

0:58:29.480 --> 0:58:34.080
<v Speaker 1>face of higher rates and cost of capital. Wouldn't be

0:58:34.240 --> 0:58:36.920
<v Speaker 1>outrageous to make those of it wouldn't be outrageous. And

0:58:37.480 --> 0:58:41.240
<v Speaker 1>what that means is you really have to pick your spots.

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:44.240
<v Speaker 1>It used to be you know that you know, you

0:58:44.240 --> 0:58:47.160
<v Speaker 1>could invest into a good grower and just assume the economy,

0:58:47.400 --> 0:58:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you know would would take care of some portion of

0:58:49.600 --> 0:58:52.240
<v Speaker 1>the value creation strategy. Today you have to be buying

0:58:52.240 --> 0:58:55.600
<v Speaker 1>companies that are growing really disproportionately strong in order to

0:58:55.640 --> 0:58:59.480
<v Speaker 1>go long equity. And so the average company that we

0:58:59.520 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>invested the equiside was growing at double digit growing its

0:59:03.280 --> 0:59:06.160
<v Speaker 1>earnings by double digits. And those are the type of

0:59:06.160 --> 0:59:08.880
<v Speaker 1>businesses that you can continue to generate strong returns on.

0:59:08.960 --> 0:59:11.920
<v Speaker 1>But it requires that thematic research to make sure you're

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:14.440
<v Speaker 1>getting your spots really well, and it also requires an

0:59:14.480 --> 0:59:18.640
<v Speaker 1>ownership model that's quite intense to drive transformation. And on

0:59:18.640 --> 0:59:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the credit side, there's a real opportunity today to invest

0:59:23.480 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 1>at attractive returns. I see that in the investment committee

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:28.800
<v Speaker 1>every week. Huh. Really interesting. One of the things we

0:59:28.840 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about if you're appealing more to individual investors.

0:59:34.680 --> 0:59:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Typically that comes along with regulation and compliance, standards and

0:59:40.600 --> 0:59:44.560
<v Speaker 1>oversight from the government, something that the world of private

0:59:44.600 --> 0:59:47.800
<v Speaker 1>markets really doesn't spend a lot of time with. The

0:59:47.840 --> 0:59:51.640
<v Speaker 1>assumption is, hey, these are big, sophisticated investors making big

0:59:51.680 --> 0:59:56.560
<v Speaker 1>investments into companies, and everybody here is an adult, and

0:59:56.600 --> 1:00:01.479
<v Speaker 1>so we don't need a paternalistic over Once you bring

1:00:01.560 --> 1:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in smaller I'm not even saying mom and pop, but

1:00:05.440 --> 1:00:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a credited investors or non institutional investors, there's a different

1:00:09.600 --> 1:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>level of scrutiny that comes with that. How our private

1:00:13.400 --> 1:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>markets and private equity going to manage that sort of regulation. Yeah,

1:00:19.120 --> 1:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>So the industry as it's expanded from a small niche

1:00:24.720 --> 1:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>industry years ago to an industry today already managing ten

1:00:28.880 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars of assets, already a fiduciary for the funds

1:00:34.400 --> 1:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of hard working capital. There's regulation has already increased substantially.

1:00:41.560 --> 1:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Compliance needs have increased substantially within our industry, and I

1:00:45.720 --> 1:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have no doubt that that trend will continue. We continue

1:00:51.560 --> 1:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to appeal, I think, to particularly sophisticated investors, and that

1:00:57.040 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>has to continue to be the case. This is not

1:01:02.160 --> 1:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>an asset class that I think like retail retail investors

1:01:08.800 --> 1:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>are going to allocate. You even in that fund that

1:01:10.880 --> 1:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned previously, where it's you know, a minimum of

1:01:13.960 --> 1:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand or whatever it is, I think our average

1:01:16.720 --> 1:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>investor there's two hundred thousand. So it's a it's a

1:01:19.040 --> 1:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated investors that's allocating. It's not a Robin Hood investor.

1:01:25.120 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not absolutely not. And if you think about four

1:01:28.680 --> 1:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>oh one K plans, for example, the place that our

1:01:32.480 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>asset class is going to be most relevant for the

1:01:35.640 --> 1:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>near term is in the defined contribution portions of that

1:01:40.240 --> 1:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>four oh one K market, where you still have a

1:01:42.200 --> 1:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated portfolio manager that's putting those portfolios together. I don't

1:01:47.200 --> 1:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>think that anybody in the near term expects within their

1:01:50.520 --> 1:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>four oh one K allocation to be able to go

1:01:52.320 --> 1:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>in there and bounce to a big private equity fund.

1:01:55.160 --> 1:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to be the case. But you know,

1:01:59.200 --> 1:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>we are going to attract demand from from an increasingly

1:02:04.480 --> 1:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>individual set of investors, and that's going to come with regulation,

1:02:07.480 --> 1:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and the big firms will be able to deal with that.

1:02:09.080 --> 1:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>So I have to ask one question related to the

1:02:14.480 --> 1:02:18.200
<v Speaker 1>interest rate environment. You mentioned the Darwinni and struggle the

1:02:18.280 --> 1:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>changing environment. How zero cap cost the capital was a

1:02:22.280 --> 1:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>tailwind before now rising rates are a headwind. You've talked

1:02:27.120 --> 1:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a bit in public about the Federal Reserve suggesting you

1:02:31.160 --> 1:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to overshoot on the rate hikes. You

1:02:34.120 --> 1:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>have a unique perspective to observe this through your hundred

1:02:38.360 --> 1:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>plus portfolio companies. Tell us why you think the FED

1:02:42.240 --> 1:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to end up going too far and overtightening. Well,

1:02:46.360 --> 1:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's possible. The Fed had a choice of

1:02:53.760 --> 1:02:57.960
<v Speaker 1>either taking a big ratchet all at once, shocking the

1:02:58.040 --> 1:03:03.280
<v Speaker 1>market and changing behavior ye, or doing it slowly and incrementally.

1:03:03.760 --> 1:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it was a fast rate hike obviously, but

1:03:07.280 --> 1:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the first one anyone was a little shocking, Yeah, the

1:03:09.840 --> 1:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>first one, but really doing something shocking to change behavior

1:03:15.680 --> 1:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>of consumers, of people that are out participating in the market,

1:03:20.480 --> 1:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>or making these incremental changes that are more or less

1:03:23.640 --> 1:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in line with consensus on what the FED should be doing.

1:03:27.160 --> 1:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And they've chosen to go in a more or less

1:03:30.680 --> 1:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>consensus driven pattern for most of the changes. And so

1:03:34.480 --> 1:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>what that means is opposed to shocking the market and

1:03:37.120 --> 1:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>changing behavior through setting a tone up front, they need

1:03:40.840 --> 1:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to wait for the impacts of those rate hikes to

1:03:44.720 --> 1:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>flow through, and that just takes some time. So I

1:03:47.280 --> 1:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>have no doubt that it will take some time for

1:03:51.760 --> 1:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the full impact of many of these hikes to be

1:03:54.560 --> 1:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>felt into fully changed behavior, and therefore there could be

1:03:57.840 --> 1:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the potential of over deering or overshooting as a result

1:04:02.360 --> 1:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>of that curveball question. You guys are very much the

1:04:06.200 --> 1:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>anti Wall Street, both in location and by design. You

1:04:11.160 --> 1:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>almost ended up at Lehman Brothers. Did you you know,

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>did you dodge a bullet there? What would have happened

1:04:17.880 --> 1:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if you ended up going into Wall Street proper given

1:04:21.280 --> 1:04:25.360
<v Speaker 1>your current philosophy. Yeah, I absolutely dodged a bullet there.

1:04:25.800 --> 1:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Um and uh, And I'm grateful every day actually that

1:04:30.240 --> 1:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I landed in a place in a culture that is thoughtful, right,

1:04:36.040 --> 1:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that is thinking towards the future. That's that's a little

1:04:40.280 --> 1:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>bit more humble and able to navigate an environment to

1:04:43.680 --> 1:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>suppose of getting lost in an ego. Um, I absolutely

1:04:48.760 --> 1:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>am grateful every day that I dodged a bullet there. Uh,

1:04:52.320 --> 1:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>no question, great answer. I know I only have you

1:04:55.440 --> 1:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>for so much time, So let me jump to my

1:04:58.000 --> 1:05:01.720
<v Speaker 1>favorite questions that we ask all of our guests starting

1:05:01.760 --> 1:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>with what do you what do you do for entertainment

1:05:04.400 --> 1:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>out in Colorado? What have you been streaming and watching

1:05:07.840 --> 1:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>over the past couple of years? Tell us what's kept

1:05:10.400 --> 1:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you in the family entertained. So my wife owns the

1:05:15.520 --> 1:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>remote at home, and so if we're streaming something, it's

1:05:20.680 --> 1:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>usually something about British baking or Indian dating or something

1:05:25.080 --> 1:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>along those lines. I really love this Mandalorian series and

1:05:30.840 --> 1:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>getting into that. I think season three comes out later

1:05:34.120 --> 1:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>this year. Yeah, yeah, looking forward to that. That's intriguing.

1:05:38.040 --> 1:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about some of your mentors who helped to

1:05:40.720 --> 1:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>shape your career. Um, well, I think my parents had

1:05:44.760 --> 1:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a big influence. My dad was a business person and

1:05:49.760 --> 1:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I had a tremendous work ethic. My mother's an unbelievably

1:05:55.800 --> 1:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>loyal person and helped to inspire that in me. I've

1:05:59.640 --> 1:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of partners, in particular, one Walter Keller,

1:06:03.480 --> 1:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>who he is just an elephant memory right every way

1:06:08.680 --> 1:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that we've screwed up as a firm. He's got it

1:06:10.680 --> 1:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in his head and he brings it up and he

1:06:12.480 --> 1:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>keeps us out of trouble to the point where actually

1:06:15.640 --> 1:06:18.480
<v Speaker 1>close to my office in the campus for everybody to

1:06:18.520 --> 1:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>see everybody on the floor. I have all of the

1:06:21.360 --> 1:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>lessons learned of the firm every way that we've lost money,

1:06:24.240 --> 1:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's largely a download out of Walter's head for

1:06:28.000 --> 1:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the rest of our colleagues to kind of understand the

1:06:30.320 --> 1:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>lessons that we've had over time. And he's been a

1:06:32.480 --> 1:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>great mentor, and our three founders have all been in

1:06:36.960 --> 1:06:39.720
<v Speaker 1>their own way real mentors to me as well. Tell

1:06:39.760 --> 1:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>us about some of your favorite books and what you're

1:06:42.000 --> 1:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>reading right now. So I just finished Bono's memoir Surrender.

1:06:49.760 --> 1:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I usually read something a little bit more light and

1:06:51.880 --> 1:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more serious. There's also a book called

1:06:55.000 --> 1:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>The Weirdest People in the World that was a really

1:06:57.920 --> 1:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting read. I recall hearing about that. Yeah, it's interesting.

1:07:02.680 --> 1:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I've got a couple in the chamber when my wife

1:07:05.640 --> 1:07:07.920
<v Speaker 1>gave me that's called This is Your Mind on Plants,

1:07:09.040 --> 1:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and then one called chip War by Peter Miller that

1:07:12.840 --> 1:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to getting into. What sort of advice

1:07:15.680 --> 1:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>would you give to a recent college grad interested in

1:07:18.720 --> 1:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a career in either investing or private markets. Yeah. So

1:07:23.720 --> 1:07:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I do spend quite a bit of time with our hires,

1:07:27.160 --> 1:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>our new hires, and I think we're gonna hire fifty

1:07:29.400 --> 1:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>five kids out of school this year directly into our

1:07:31.960 --> 1:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>analyst program where they rotate across their different things. And

1:07:35.120 --> 1:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I always set the tone first day of training when

1:07:38.920 --> 1:07:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they come in, and one of the things that I

1:07:41.080 --> 1:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>tell them is that this is no longer a young

1:07:45.920 --> 1:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>asset class, right. This is an asset class. It's been

1:07:49.520 --> 1:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>around for a little while. And it might have been

1:07:52.040 --> 1:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the fast money lore of doing deals and kind of

1:07:55.680 --> 1:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>transactions that got you interested into this space. This is

1:07:59.200 --> 1:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>an asset classic. You can have a tremendous impact as

1:08:02.440 --> 1:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>an owner, but you've got to be prepared to roll

1:08:05.120 --> 1:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>up your sleeves and work. So we're spending sending many

1:08:08.160 --> 1:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of our young professionals to work in our portfolio, right

1:08:11.520 --> 1:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to get experience how to run projects and how to

1:08:14.560 --> 1:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>run businesses, and send them to work for our CEOs

1:08:18.360 --> 1:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>as much as they spend time working, you know, within

1:08:22.400 --> 1:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>our halls. And I think that's something that young professionals

1:08:25.720 --> 1:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>need to be aware of the needs of young talent

1:08:29.200 --> 1:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>or changing get some operating experience. And our final question,

1:08:32.920 --> 1:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>what do you know about the worlds of private equity investing, buyouts,

1:08:36.880 --> 1:08:40.519
<v Speaker 1>private markets today that you wish you knew twenty plus

1:08:40.640 --> 1:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>years or so ago when you were first getting started.

1:08:43.880 --> 1:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I would say that investing is a team sport. I

1:08:48.680 --> 1:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>always maybe thought about it growing was more of an

1:08:50.920 --> 1:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>individual pursuit. You know. I had a client recently who

1:08:54.840 --> 1:08:58.479
<v Speaker 1>pulled out my track record. They were in a due

1:08:58.520 --> 1:09:01.479
<v Speaker 1>diligence session. They said, Dave as a fantastic track record,

1:09:01.880 --> 1:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>what's the secret of your success? And I thought, that's

1:09:04.920 --> 1:09:08.479
<v Speaker 1>a that's an ego affirming question, right you kind of

1:09:09.120 --> 1:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to hear that to some degree, get that

1:09:12.160 --> 1:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>little tingle up your spine. And I thought about how

1:09:15.479 --> 1:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to answer it. And what I told or was, what

1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't see on that list is company A, company B,

1:09:25.160 --> 1:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>company C D. Those are all companies that I had

1:09:28.880 --> 1:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>under exclusivity at some point during my career. But my partners,

1:09:34.520 --> 1:09:36.479
<v Speaker 1>people that used to be my bosses that are today

1:09:36.520 --> 1:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>my partners, wouldn't let me invest. And I'm telling you,

1:09:43.360 --> 1:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>if you average together those investments that I didn't make

1:09:46.840 --> 1:09:49.479
<v Speaker 1>together with the investments that we did make, I would

1:09:49.520 --> 1:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have a much more average track record. Those investments were

1:09:53.160 --> 1:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>done by other firms. I've gone back and looked at it.

1:09:56.200 --> 1:09:58.880
<v Speaker 1>They were not as successful as the ones that did happen,

1:09:59.360 --> 1:10:02.519
<v Speaker 1>and so rounding yourself with partners that are going to

1:10:02.680 --> 1:10:05.519
<v Speaker 1>challenge you and push you and cover your blind spots

1:10:06.040 --> 1:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>is something that's really important. There's a lot of investment

1:10:08.400 --> 1:10:12.519
<v Speaker 1>firms that get founded by an individual and they have

1:10:12.560 --> 1:10:14.559
<v Speaker 1>a type of transaction that they're known for, and they

1:10:14.560 --> 1:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>build a financial product around themselves, and they build a

1:10:16.840 --> 1:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>team around themselves, and that type of a strategy works

1:10:20.200 --> 1:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>until it doesn't work. And we at Partners Group have

1:10:23.560 --> 1:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>really tried to build a culture where it's about the debate, right,

1:10:29.360 --> 1:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>It's about the fight, it's about challenging each other, it's

1:10:34.080 --> 1:10:38.799
<v Speaker 1>about diversity of perspectives when you're making those investment decisions,

1:10:39.400 --> 1:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>and that is an absolutely critical part to investing that

1:10:43.640 --> 1:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>far too many people think about and talk about. Thank you,

1:10:47.240 --> 1:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>David for being so generous with your time. We have

1:10:49.720 --> 1:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>been speaking with David Layton. He is the CEO of

1:10:53.400 --> 1:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Partners Group. If you enjoy this conversation, well you can

1:10:57.120 --> 1:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>check out any of our previous five hundred or so

1:11:00.000 --> 1:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>such discussions we've had over the past eight plus years.

1:11:04.080 --> 1:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>You can find those at YouTube, Spotify, iTunes, wherever you

1:11:10.080 --> 1:11:13.639
<v Speaker 1>like to get your podcasts from be sure and check

1:11:13.680 --> 1:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>out our daily reading list. You can find that at

1:11:16.080 --> 1:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Riholtz dot com. Follow me on Twitter at Rihaltz. You

1:11:20.120 --> 1:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>can follow all of the Bloomberg podcasts on Twitter at podcasts.

1:11:25.880 --> 1:11:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I would be remiss if I did not thank the

1:11:27.720 --> 1:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>crack team that helps put these conversations together each week.

1:11:31.640 --> 1:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Justin Nilner is my audio engineer, Atiko val Bron is

1:11:35.439 --> 1:11:38.599
<v Speaker 1>my project manager, Sean Russo is our head of research.

1:11:38.960 --> 1:11:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Paris Wold is my producer. And an extra special thank

1:11:42.720 --> 1:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you this week goes out. If you like the new

1:11:45.439 --> 1:11:50.599
<v Speaker 1>music that is our audio signature, we just change that.

1:11:51.080 --> 1:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much to Leo Sidron who did a

1:11:53.240 --> 1:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>great job on creating that, and thank you to Jackie

1:11:56.640 --> 1:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Kessler Lebliner who helped us with our new Masters in

1:12:00.600 --> 1:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Business artwork. I'm Barry Ridolts. You've been listening to Masters

1:12:05.439 --> 1:12:07.519
<v Speaker 1>in Business on Bloomberg Radio.