WEBVTT - Lilly Falls as Weight-Loss Pill Data Overshadows Sales Beat 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Applecarclay, and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Eli Lilly, it.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Had a salespaper. Shares are taken ahead, Yeah, Lily shares

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 3>it down about fourteen percent. There is something overshadowing that.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 3>For that, we're going to bring in Damien Gardett's Bloomberg

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.960
<v Speaker 3>News health reporter. Damian, thanks for joining us here in

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 3>the studio. So it looks like this experiment, this drug experiment,

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 3>the weight loss pill, and that's the thing here. It

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't do as well in the study as Wall Street had.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 4>Expected exactly so it met its goals and it helped

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 4>people lose weight, which was the whole point of it.

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 4>This was enrolling people with obesity, but that weight loss

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 4>was about eleven percent of body weight, and Wall Street

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 4>was hoping to see something more kin to fourteen to

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 4>fifteen percent, which would match what's seen with the injectible

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 4>GLP one weight loss medicines like with GOVI from rival

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.320
<v Speaker 4>Novo Nordisk. So despite the trial being a success, and

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 4>despite this pill seemingly on the path to winning FDA

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 4>approval and hitting the market as early as next year,

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 4>the reaction, as you mentioned, was dramatically negative formulaly because these,

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 4>you know, single digit percentage differences are perceived to be

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.479
<v Speaker 4>massively important to the ultimate financial future. It's medicine.

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 5>Here's the thing for me knowing someone that does this

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 5>GLP one thing, whatever it is. You gotta reduce the

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 5>side effects of the nausea, and this one didn't. And

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.319
<v Speaker 5>that was the I know people that use it and

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 5>use the injection or saying, boy, when the oral one

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 5>comes out, I'm told that the side effects will be

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 5>dramatically less, which is a huge selling point, and I

0:01:52.720 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 5>guess that's not what they saw here.

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 4>Basically, in this study, they saw gastro intestinal side effects

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 4>that were comparable to the injectible one, which your point

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 4>could be viewed as a negative. There was a I

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 4>think there was a home run scenario where Lily's pill

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 4>would both lead to a greater percentage of body weight

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 4>loss and as you mentioned, have fewer of the nausea

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 4>vomiting field.

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 5>Plus that were we being the pharmaceutical biotech, and we're

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 5>in the early innings of this GLP type obesity thing.

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 5>I can't imagine why it's not going to get better

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 5>and better and better and better, or I don't know

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 5>the science. Maybe we're already at that limit. We are

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 5>at the limit of this whatever this thing is.

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:31.239
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so. I mean, in granted, you know

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 4>clinical trials need to play out. Science biology famously unpredictable,

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 4>but I would say the space is moving in two directions.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 4>One combination medicines that add GLP one to other things

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 4>that can lead to more dramatic weight loss, and then

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 4>two more convenient things like pills that you can take

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 4>that maybe don't have the same effect on body weight,

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 4>but that would be cheaper to manufacture, presumably cheaper to

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 4>acquire for patients because these injectables have list prices of

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 4>inexcess of one thousand dollars a month. So in the

0:02:57.240 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 4>best case scenario, let's say five years from now, there

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 4>will be an armamentarium of weight loss medicines. If you

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.799
<v Speaker 4>an armamentarium, which I think I stumbled over a whole

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 4>bunch of them, like in an armory. Let's say so

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 4>a physician yes, a physician, could you know, diagnose a

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 4>patient and say, for some people you will need an

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 4>injectable that you can lose twenty five percent of your

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 4>body weight on. For some people you may be good

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 4>with an oral medicine where you lose a single digit

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.280
<v Speaker 4>or even ten percent of your body weight, or mixing

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 4>and matching using one for maintenance and the upside being

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 4>theoretically this will one become a massive one hundred billion

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 4>dollar market for the pharmaceutical industry, but two have knock

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 4>on beneficial effects for people's health.

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 3>So where do we stand with the pills? I mean,

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 3>what other competition is out there? Who else is working

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 3>on one that we should keep an eye on as well.

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 4>So Novo Nordisk has an oral version of the injectable

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 4>week govy. It is not as convenient or I would

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 4>say innovative frankly, as Lily's pill, because it's basically just

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of wgovy shoved into a tablet that you

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 4>eat and it sits in your gut and administers the

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 4>drug there. And that it comes with restriction. You can't

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 4>take it with food, you have to do it in

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 4>the morning. It's not really as attractive a commercial product,

0:04:04.840 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it's fair to say as Lilies, but there

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 4>are other oral options from smaller biotech companies that we

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 4>may see them progress to the market. There's also a

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 4>lot of m and a speculation around these firms that

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 4>a company like Pfizer, for example, which kind of crashed

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 4>and burned with its first attempt to make a GLP

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 4>one pill, might acquire them. So this is very much

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 4>a space to watch. I would say a year from now,

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 4>it's quite likely that it will look demonstrably different than

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 4>it looks right now.

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 5>So as I look at the PGeo table, which kind

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 5>of breaks down where the revenue comes from Lily, where

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:39.679
<v Speaker 5>is the cardio metabolic health is at the sector again,

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 5>now that's that sector is sixty five percent of total revenue.

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 5>So that's a big deal for Lily.

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 4>And that's not inclusive of this oral drug which isn't

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 4>even approved yet. So I mean, as you mentioned these

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 4>data overshadowing, Lily had like a blowout quarter. They're approved

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 4>medicine for obesity and the same thing is sold for diabetes.

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.080
<v Speaker 4>Both of them beat estimates, they raised revenue guide and

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 4>profit guidance. They're doing very very well, but I think

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 4>the stock reaction today is sort of an illustration of

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 4>just how much is baked into the potential of these medicines.

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 4>Lily has flirted with being a trillion dollar valuation company.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 4>They're not there anymore, but that's strictly a reflection of

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 4>what people believe will come of this class of medicine.

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 3>So, speaking of the potential, then, so why is the

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 3>science behind these pills? Why is it such a challenge.

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 4>I mean, getting what you can do in an injectable medicine,

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 4>getting that down into a pill has been deviled the

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 4>drug industry for many, many years because there are safety concerns,

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 4>there are dosing concerns. The ideal product is like a

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 4>superpill that prolongs your life and et cetera. But there's

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 4>a reason we have so few of those, and it's

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 4>basically just the trial and error and the unpredictability of biology.

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 4>And I think these companies are always trying to bend

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 4>the curves of failures. But like it remains true that

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 4>roughly one in ten medicines actually makes it from the

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.599
<v Speaker 4>lab to the pharmacy.

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 5>My freshman year college chemistry lab partner went on to

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 5>become like this crazy smart dude played a wide receiver

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 5>in the NFL. Then he became a signist an astronaut

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 5>space shuttle crazy and I was like, I was like, dude,

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 5>can you carry me in this chemistry classic because I'm

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 5>not really into it? And he was super smart. So

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 5>and then that he didn't peak there, he didn't He

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 5>didn't peak in the NFL. I guess he peaked the

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 5>flying around in space.

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So good.

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 5>There. What's the next thing that you're looking for in

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.880
<v Speaker 5>a pharmer's space here? What's the next big mover here

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 5>on a company level that you're looking.

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 4>At for weight loss specifically or just more broadly.

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think everything.

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 4>Actually MRK is working on. Speaking of pills, they're working

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 4>on a pill version that would be basically a superstat

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 4>It would lower bad cholesterol to a level that cannot

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 4>be done with oral medicines that exists right now, and

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 4>that it kind of follows this same trajectory that I

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 4>think we're seeing big pharma company years ago after statinshe

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 4>generic kind of moved away from primary care medicines because

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 4>it's difficult, you have to run big trials, it's expensive.

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 4>If they fail, you lose a lot of money. And

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 4>move toward oncology and rare diseases. I feel like we're

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 4>seeing and I think GLP one was sort of the

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 4>trojan horse in some ways of this. We're seeing the

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 4>major drug companies move back toward primary care, trying to

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 4>invent medicines that would be taken by millions of people

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 4>and they would actually address the number one killer of Americans,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 4>which is heart disease. So I think that's a trend

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 4>that I'm following, and we'll get data from that murk pill,

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 4>I believe by the end of the year.

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 5>All Right, I mean you and Sam Fizzelli, you guys,

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 5>do whatever you do in that healthcare thing. Just tell

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 5>us when something important is happening. Damien Gardelli, a healthcare

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 5>reporter for Bloomberg News, joinings life here in our Bloomberg

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 5>Interactive Broker studio. You know, back in my trading days, man,

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 5>I'd go to my healthcare guy, I say, hey, can

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 5>I buy Lily today? It's down fifteen percent. I mean,

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 5>it feels like an entry point to me, and hopefully

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 5>Mianas will have a good idea what's going on space.

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you hear the GLP ones are supposed to

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 3>lower cholesterol, but then you have other He was just

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 3>talking about another cholesterol, yes, and coming out.

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 5>But I mean these GLP things have been I see

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 5>a new story every day. How they help this, they

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 5>cure this, they lowered the risk of this. It's not

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 5>just so I don't know what's going. Healthcare space is

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 5>a tough, tough one to invest in. I think that's

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 5>why there's mds and PhDs all over the place in

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 5>investment firms investing in that space.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 5>Almost the last time you went to a movie at

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 5>a movie theater, oh, it was a.

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 3>Tough We were supposed to go to the other weekend

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 3>and see like Superman, but that didn't happen. I watch

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 3>a lot of them, like I stream them, like for example, Minecraft,

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 3>like I saw at home and then I didn't go

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 3>to the theater to see it. Right, that's what like

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 3>Warner Brothers is dealing.

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly right, So but I'm Warner Brothers Discovery they

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 5>put out results. I don't know. I mean, my expectations

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 5>are really low for this company, but they I thought

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 5>they were pretty decent stocks. Trading off a little bit here,

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 5>let's get the latest on what's happening at One Brother's

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 5>Discovery and even maybe a little bit on our friends

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 5>at Peloton. Jen Sherman's my buddy there. She's a person

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:11.959
<v Speaker 5>I drink with. Of course, either wrong anah in us.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm not gonna do it with some dude. I mean,

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, why would you do that. She's your friend

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 5>in your head exactly exactly where friends so githerrang and nothing.

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 5>She actually is the analyst on all this media stuff.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 5>She's down there in our Princeton University sprawling campus. Hey, Gaeta,

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 5>talk to us about Warner Brothers Discovery, because there are

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 5>like a lot of traditional media comedies trying to make

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 5>that transition from the good old days of linear television,

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 5>cable television, all that kind of stuff to the streaming world.

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 5>What did you learn from Warner Brother's Discovery.

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so, Paul, what we really saw was, you know,

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 2>a continuation of the same. So the streaming business is

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 2>doing really well. The studio business is doing extremely well.

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 2>But TV Networks, which is really eighty percent off their ibadah,

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 2>is still struggling, and we saw a twenty five percent

0:09:55.840 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 2>slump in their TV Networks ibadah. So you know, that

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 2>continues to be a pain point. And while there was

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 2>initially some you know, obviously some excitement about the turnaround

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.000
<v Speaker 2>and both the streaming and the studio businesses, the fact

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 2>that there is absolutely no respite inside for TV is

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 2>extremely distressing and that's.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Why their shares are down like seven percent. Okay, So

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 3>talk to me about the companies in the process of

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 3>splitting itself into two separate entities, right, So where do

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 3>we stand with that? What are the pros and cons

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 3>that go along with that?

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:30.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is you know, one of the best

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 2>ways for them, or at least you know, the fact

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 2>that they've kind of decided to do this really follows

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 2>a pattern in most of the media landscape where they're selling.

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 2>They're kind of separating the low growth assets from the

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 2>slightly higher growth assets. The low growth or the low

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 2>growth assets being the TV business. That for Warner Brothers,

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 2>that split will happen in the middle of next year,

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 2>and really the strategy here is to unlock shareholder value

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 2>because you know that, you know, they combine their Warner

0:10:58.280 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Brothers business with a Discovery you know networks. Of course

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 2>that really hasn't gone anywhere. And so finally everybody in

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 2>the in the in the media world is doing this

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 2>where they're kind of separating out the secularly challenged TV networks.

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 6>Uh.

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 2>The only problem here is that we still really don't

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 2>have a very clear strategy. So they have to really

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.719
<v Speaker 2>outline that, and I think that is part of the

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 2>reason why we're also kind of seeing this the decline

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 2>and shares this morning.

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 5>All Right, they had the studio had a good quarter here,

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 5>a couple in some some hits like Sinners, a Minecraft movie,

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 5>Final Destination, Bloodlines and things like that. Talk to us

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 5>about the studio and maybe it's kind of it's forward slate.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 5>How does that look for the company?

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 2>The forward say it, Actually, it looks really good, Paul.

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 2>You know, they just had their major DC reboot with Superman. Uh,

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 2>and they're what they're really trying to do now going forward.

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they didn't have a Superman movie for years.

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Their DC strategy was in a mess. You know, it

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 2>was a mess. They had so many movies out there,

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 2>it was all confusing lines. But I think finally they've

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of they're going to write that ship. So they've

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 2>committed to a pretty strong slate of about twelve to

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 2>fourteen movies going forward. The big thing for them is

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 2>to really get Studio EBITDA to about three billion dollars,

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 2>and they seem to be well on their way. I mean,

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 2>last year was a complete mess. This year definitely much

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 2>much better. They're actually if you just look at box

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 2>office performance overall, they already have about a twenty five

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty six percent share of the domestic box office, so

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 2>they're only very slightly behind Disney. So they're definitely doing

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 2>well and their strategy is working. They have a pretty

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 2>good content pipeline.

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 3>All right, let's switch over at Peloton. How is this

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 3>company doing? I mean, is there subscribers? Are they continuing

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 3>to come in? Are people still using this equipment as

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 3>much as they used to?

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 2>So for Peloton, really and the story has not been

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 2>so much on subscribers, unfortunately. It has really been more

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 2>about trimming the fat literally at the company and kind

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>of getting profits into full focus. And if you just

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 2>saw this quarter's results and what they reported for the

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 2>full year. For fiscal twenty twenty five, I mean, the

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 2>progress that they've made in terms of profitability has been

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 2>absolutely outstanding. So they reported adjusted IBADAH that came in

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 2>about nineteen twenty percent higher than guidance and consensus their

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 2>forward guidance, So fiscal twenty twenty six suggested EBITDA guidance

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 2>is also was also way above consensus. So the way

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 2>that they're kind of optimizing their operating expenses has been

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 2>absolutely stellar. You know, just everything in terms of workforce reduction,

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 2>in terms of inventory management, you know, op X costs,

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 2>marketing expenses, everything has been absolutely top notch. The only

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 2>problem for them is reintegrating demand. And that's where you know,

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 2>we're kind of really kind of seeing this disconnect because

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the financial metrics are really good, but the subscriber metrics,

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:53.320
<v Speaker 2>unfortunately are not.

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 5>Is there a credible plan there to reignite growth there?

0:13:58.679 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 5>I just kind of it feels like, you know, everybody

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 5>who's got one's got one. How did they think talk

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 5>about that part of the story.

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so it's really going to be a little bit hard.

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, on the margin, I think they can

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 2>do some things to kind of reignite a little bit

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 2>of the hardware sales, but in terms of a sustainable

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 2>go forward strategy that is really still pretty unclear. Paul, So,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 2>I think right now, what they're really trying to do

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 2>is again really get you know, more costs out of

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 2>the system, maybe increase subscription prices a little bit, so

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of pad that top line a little bit. But

0:14:33.240 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>in terms of you know, the overall subscription growth story,

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm not so sure that's really going to be a

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 2>volume story. I think it's it's going to you know,

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 2>focus more on kind of rates and price and improving

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 2>pricing and either how much.

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Of that, you know, cutting costs includes cutting jobs.

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they did actually you know, announce a six percent

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 2>workforce reduction as well, so a lot of it is

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 2>going to come down to cutting jobs.

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 5>All right, Just one quick thing on Warner Brothers Discovery.

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 5>What's the timing of this separation it's.

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Going to So they announced the formal plan in June.

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 2>It's going to happen by Midge twenty twenty six, so

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 2>by middle of next year.

0:15:12.200 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 5>Okay, all right, we'll keep an eye on that. Gith

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 5>Throng and at and she covers all the media stuff

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 5>for Bloomberg intelligence down there for them to display.

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you see Comcasts do it right.

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think it is simply because you hope that

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 5>the two parts have more total value than they do together,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 5>and so you're concerned that the high growth business is

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 5>being pulled down by the slower growth cable networks. So

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 5>you split them out and see how far this, you know,

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 5>the streaming business in the studio can fly, I guess

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 5>is kind of the thought there. So we see it

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 5>all the time and lots of different industries, and there

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 5>was a time, you know, when all these assets made

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 5>sense to be together. But the fortunes, the economic fortunes

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 5>of the cable network and broadcast network business have been

0:15:56.240 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 5>permanently damaged, and it gets worse every year. So you know,

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 5>you just got to cut those out and see how

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:06.520
<v Speaker 5>they trade on a standalone basis. Maybe ultimately they get acquired,

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 5>or maybe some of these networks maybe get together the

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 5>Comcast stuff. Maybe we'll get together with the Warner brother

0:16:12.920 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 5>stuff and just become bigger and get some cross energy.

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 5>So we'll see how that plays out. But we're seeing

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 5>that across the media space.

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 6>Here.

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarclay, and Android Auto

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 5>Intel coming into the crosshairs of President Trump day, particularly

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 5>the CEO saying he's got to go. I mean, I

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 5>have no idea where that came from. I'm guessing Man

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 5>Deep Sing is read up on this. If nothing else,

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 5>Man Deep seeing senior tech analyst from Bloomberg Intelligence, President

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 5>Trump calling for this CEO of Intel to quit not

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 5>He says he's conflicted. Can you give us the backstory

0:16:58.320 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 5>what's going on here? As far as you know?

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 6>I mean, most likely it has to do with the

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:10.320
<v Speaker 6>minority investments that the Intel CEO has in companies within China,

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 6>and they may have some ties to the Chinese government

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 6>in some way. And look, he used to be a VC,

0:17:17.960 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 6>so this guy has had multiple roles. He used to

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 6>be the CEO of Cadence, then he was a VC

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 6>with you know, multiple investments in startups across the globe.

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 6>So I'm guessing the board Intel board before they appointed

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 6>him as the CEO, did their due diligence in terms

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 6>of looking at all these aspects, and to my mind,

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:47.719
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it obviously is a surprise that, you know,

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 6>I mean, his credentials are being questioned here given the

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 6>reputation he has in the valley.

0:17:54.520 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 7>Is the American citizen I'm not sure, probably, but I mean,

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 7>those are the type of things he would expect the

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 7>board to do their due diligence on.

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 6>For a company like Intel, which has had multiple CEOs

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.479
<v Speaker 6>and clearly is looking for a big turnaround, A lot

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 6>of people felt this guy had the credentials, you know,

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 6>in terms of having the experience to turn around a

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 6>big ship like Intel. And I mean, so far, it's

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 6>too early to call out how good of a job

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 6>he was doing. Still early days with his strategy, but

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 6>clearly he has plans to keep the foundry business and

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 6>turn around the core chip design business, and he has

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 6>raised a lot of cash. So I would say still

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 6>early days with his strategy. But this clearly puts, you know,

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 6>a wrench in terms of his strategy.

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 5>Just as per Wiki Wikipedia, it says that he is

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 5>a Malaysian born American business executive. So that's all I got.

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 3>Well, something you brought up that they probably you know,

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 3>people already knew about this. You know, this is no secret.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 3>My question is why now? Why bring this up?

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Why the timing now? And the company has been struggling, right,

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 3>it's chairs now or down what they're down three percent

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 3>this morning? But why do you think this has taking

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 3>place now?

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 6>I think it's because Senator Tom Cotton, he wrote a

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 6>letter to the Intel board. They obviously found out some

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 6>things that he the Senator highlighted, you know, the links

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 6>to some of the Chinese companies, small companies that had

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 6>ties to the Chinese government. And I think the board

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 6>probably has to come up with an answer in terms

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 6>of the you know, the concerns that were raised by

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 6>a senator.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 5>Has the company responded at all to the senator or

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 5>the president?

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean they have in terms of the initial response,

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 6>But to the best of my knowledge, I think the

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 6>board clearly is defending uh, you know, the credentials of

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 6>their CEO and uh there's nothing here that would put

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 6>a question mark around the future of libbutan in terms

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 6>of running Intel at least for now.

0:20:15.000 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's what I say.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you think he would would step down? How long

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 3>has he been in a position?

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 6>Not few months?

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly? Yea.

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 5>So how is the Intel call here? I mean the

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 5>stock obviously underperforming, under underperforming pretty dramatically here. It's you know,

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 5>flat year to date, but you know, relative to Tech

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 5>that's just losing ground.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 6>Germanic they are. And this brings back, you know, some

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 6>of the discussions we were having a few months back

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 6>before Libbutan was appointed as a CEO that Intel may

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 6>be broken down, Qualcom may be looking to buy parts

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.639
<v Speaker 6>of Intel, and then the foundry business would be separated.

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 6>I feel if for some reason this CEO has to

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 6>step down and you know, so someone else is appointed,

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 6>then it brings all those discussions back into play, because

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 6>so far, what lib Bhutan had maintained was he wants

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 6>to keep the foundry business. He wants to turn around

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 6>through a strategy that involved keeping the chip design and

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 6>the foundry business together. But if that wasn't to be

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 6>the case, and if there's somebody new, then I would

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 6>say that whole aspect around breaking up Intel comes back

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:26.600
<v Speaker 6>into play.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 7>All right.

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 5>Stock is down three percent today, so it is feeling

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 5>the impact of that many i've seen. Thank you so

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.360
<v Speaker 5>much for joining us, Senior techanost for Bloomberg Intelligence. Joining

0:21:35.400 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 5>us here in our studio again. The headline Trump urges

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:43.719
<v Speaker 5>quote conflicted Intel CEO ten to resign immediately.

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal