WEBVTT - Jobs, Quantitative Tightening, And EVs (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, let's talk

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>about this labor number again. I thought it was pretty good.

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>It came in a little bit better and expected unemployment

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>rate ticked up, but we had some, you know, higher participation,

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>which is something people have been talking about for a

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:34.920
<v Speaker 1>long time. Let's check in with our good friend Tom Gimble.

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.120
<v Speaker 1>He's a founder and CEO of LaSalle Network. Tom, and

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>look pretty solid from my perspective. And I love to

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>get your thoughts because you're talking to these companies every

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>day about filling open slots. I feel like we're doing

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Groundhog Day every month, guys. I mean, three hundred and

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>fifteen thousand jobs and participation rates up. What it shows

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>is is that the ADP numbers are crazy. They don't

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>know what they're doing. It shows that the economy me

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:04.480
<v Speaker 1>still strong and like the football season, the college football

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>season that you omitted a few minutes ago. Correct, that

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>starts tonight. Uh, we're kicking off the fall season, the

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>last third of the year, with a great economy and

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a great jobs are board. The TCU horn Frogs are

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>coming into Boulder, Colorado tonight to take along the Colorado.

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>But I graduated ninety four. Boulder isn't what it was

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>really how so? Well, I mean I was saying from football,

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>from the economy, Boulders unbelievable and expensive. The football team.

0:01:35.920 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>It never should have left the Big twelve. But that's

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole another time three So but um, this isn't

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>really helpful in terms of lowering inflation though, tom is it?

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we did have a ton of job openings,

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>but uh, well, we had a ton of job openings,

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>were adding a ton of jobs. Average hour, early earnings

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>are up more than five Um does that help bring

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>down inflation? You know? Uh, it's funny. Uh, you go

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>out for dinner and things maybe a little bit more

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:09.960
<v Speaker 1>expensive here and there. People want to say that we're

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>in the mid nineteen seventies again, and we're not. Now

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a difference between this economy and every other that

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>we've ever been in and and those differences are a

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>it's truly a global world. Number two, we have a

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>real supply chain shortage that we've never had in this

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>country before. And number three, we're still feeling the after

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>effects of a global pandemic. And people want to have

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>A plus B equals C according to normal historical economics,

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's just not that way anymore. Tom When you

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>talk to your clients, your companies that are looking to

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>fill jobs, kind of give us a sense of what

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>their biggest challenges are. Do they do they just have

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay more, Do they have to be touchy feely

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and have fun things in your office? What are some

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 1>of the challenges that they really face and filling these openings.

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>The number one challenge that every company is facing is

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>they want to get their people in the office more

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>than what they currently are, and they're afraid of turnover.

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And as long as unemployment as a record lows, even

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>with a two tenths of a percent uptick today, as

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>long as it's a record lows, they're afraid to do

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>what they think is best for the business. And the

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 1>only way that it's gonna turn is when unemployment really

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>rises and you see it a four and a half

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>five five and a half, which I don't see it

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>happening in the near future, but that will eventually happen

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>because everything runs in cycles, and then it'll go back

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>and and we'll go through a cycle again. That's that's

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 1>how things work. Well. The FED probably wants to see

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that as soon as possible. I know everyone's a macro

0:03:34.800 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>tourist these days. Um, I'm very guilty of that. But

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't this just give the FED ammunition to go seventy

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>five and seventy five? It does, and and and I

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>got news for you. That's what it should be doing,

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and it should have done it last year. And we

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>need that because if we ever get into an air

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>quotes real recession, we're gonna need that lever we're not

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in a real people say, oh, they're gonna kill the

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>econo of he's doing great. What it shows is is

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the economy is so strong it can run when money

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't free. Isn't that the whole point? Yeah, well that's

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a great point actually, And um, that's something I haven't

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>heard a lot of people saying lately. But you might

0:04:13.800 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>as well build up a war chest. I know, that's

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 1>not the primary reason to raise rates. But if that's

0:04:18.600 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a secondary effect, I'll take it. Wait wait wait wait

0:04:21.920 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>wait wait wait wait, what do you mean it's not

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the primary reason we started raising the feed started raising

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>interest rates before there was inflation, and everybody said it

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>should have happened last year when there wasn't inflation. The

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>primary reason to have interest rate inflation already inflation was

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:40.559
<v Speaker 1>already last year was the transitory debate, right. Last year was, dude.

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Last year was when housing prices started going insane. Last

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>year was when you couldn't buy a car. Last year

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>was when used cars cost more than new cars in

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.679
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues, not because of inflation, because you couldn't

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>get a car. It was a supply and demand issue,

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>not an inflationary issue. Tom. If I go down to Austin, Texas,

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>can I get job or in Florida, that's for everybody's flowing.

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Are the regional differences out there? Yeah, there's always regional differences.

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>And I've said that on your show a million times.

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Is that the problem is is that we look at

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>unemployment for the most part as a United States issue,

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's really, uh, it's very regionally driven and and

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the same with wages. Who cares what the wages are

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in New York City versus it's really what they are

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 1>in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Right. I mean, we've got to figure

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>out how to how to look at things more regionally

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and that will attract people. But we live in a

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.719
<v Speaker 1>world where people are so entitled. This isn't the seventeen hundred.

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>People aren't gonna go out west for a job anymore.

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>You are gonna leave Manhattan to go to work in

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma when they know that the government's gonna bail him

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>out to live in New York. It's right, He's right.

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a shame job says only one day

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a month. Because we get have Tom on like you

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 1>know much, we should take our show to him. Where

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is him? I don't know where he is in Chicago? Right? Okaga? Yeah?

0:05:57.480 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess all right, Tom Gimbell, he's a found in

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Cea of La Sound Network. That's right. Uh. And let's

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>sell Network the one of the big staffing recruiting companies

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in the country. So Tom knows what he's talking about

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to how do you fill up these jobs?

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get some more color on these jobs numbers.

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>John Gollneck, vice president for a Deco, joins us, Hey, John,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>what's your takeaway from these jobs numbers today? Again a

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit better than expected, weaker than the prior month,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>but still pretty decent. Yeah, you know, I think, um,

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a good report. And the term

0:06:29.680 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>said friendly, I think you guys are putting the right

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>color on this right now. I think there's two things

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>from this report that really stand out to me. Um. One,

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the average hourly earnings month over month, we

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>were expecting point four percent and it came in point

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>three percent. And I think that wage deceleration. It's still

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>growing but not not as not as hyper as it

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was before. Good point. I think that's said friendly. I

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's a thread friendly metric right well, in the

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>sense that they want to bring inflation down, but um,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't give them ammunition to hike. Maybe that's why

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good point. The other thing I mean,

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess is participation rate right right, participation rate is up,

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>which drives unemployment rate a little bit. So even though

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen the unemployment rate at three point seven

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>versus the three point five, the participation that we saw

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in the labor market was more than expected. It's not

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a one for one correlation on the math there, but

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a driving force. So for me overall, I look

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>at the last three months. You know, we've averaged three

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight thousand jobs. I mean that that was a

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty four. I think the economy is resilient.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>We still have a lot of need out there for

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of employers. Um. You know again, I think,

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like everybody else, I think the Fed is happy with

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>this report. I think I'm hopeful that it's not a

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>full seventy five and hopeful that it's a fifty. And

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>then to your guys point, we wait for the next

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>seven day. Have to come out John, because you've just

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>answered that what was a big question mark over my head. Um,

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's really a reframing of my idea. What the

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Fed wants. Um, they really want at the end of

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the day to bring on a inflation down and they

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>probably don't want to have to hike as much as

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>they can. So um, a DECO is the biggest uh,

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, workforce placement, workforce solutions firm in the world.

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>So um, maybe you can answer another conundrum that we've

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>been struggling with. Here we're getting layoff announcements left and right,

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and not little ones, right, um, big or of whole

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>workforce job cuts. And yet the JOLTS number was eleven

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>point eight million job openings. I mean, almost a record

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>high amount of job openings. How can you um put

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>those two things together? Yeah, you know, I think it's

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of things you have to look at

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>in our economy, and you have to look at it

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>from sector to sector. Right. You know, we saw we

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>saw in July that you know, service based, hospitality, leisure.

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>It was crazy highs ninety six July and only thirty

0:08:57.679 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>one thousand this month. Wow, what a dip, right, Well,

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>not really what a super spike. Right. People people are

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in the summertime season, they're getting some traveling done, They're

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>getting some traveling done before the school season starts again.

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It makes sense a little bit more people are are

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>are free to travel with you know, pandemic restrictions, um,

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and they want to get back out there. So that

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. But what we look at, that's that's really

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.559
<v Speaker 1>driving you know, retail. We saw huge retail layoff announcements.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we saw Walmart announced plans. We saw

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>some other folks, but we're still seeing a massive need.

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I can't go to I can't go to any storefront

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>without seeing what we're hiring sign you know, hey, we're

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>hiring key holders. We're looking for managers, assistant managers in

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>retail um. The demand is huge because I think our

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>workforce that used to fill these jobs, right, they were

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>impacted in tremendously from COVID. Your servers, your bartenders, your waiters,

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>You're people that relied on the tips business, right, the

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>foot traffic. They had to find other ways in a

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>gig economy. So so now returning back to that nine

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to five, you know, let me be in one place,

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>let me let me punch a cock. There's a culture

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>shift we're we're adjusting. So I think that's part of it,

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.079
<v Speaker 1>as as we look for more labor participation in that

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, sixteen to twenty two year bucket to fill

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>some of these roles they're has historically been filled by

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 1>them in the past. But what I'm most excited about,

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you about about the job need

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and demand is there's there's a huge need in demand

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and manufacturing and supply chain logistics. When when when COVID

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>impacted us and we were dependent on foreign goods man,

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>that woke a lot of people up that we needed

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to research our manufacturing base here and and that's where

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we see continued demand fill in second third shifts. How

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>do how do we get more participation there? So and

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>so we solve that riddle. I think I think we're

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>going to see some steam, you know, in this job's

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>number for quite some time. That's good stuff, good numbers,

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>good analysis. John Galnack, Chief Researcher VP at A DECO

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and a shout out to your former or your future job,

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:55.079
<v Speaker 1>I should say my future job as a great Oh,

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>darn wright at Walmart, greaterer at Walmart. I'm gonna be

0:10:57.360 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a darn good one, and they've better be ready for

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>me coming up in a few years. Bringing on our

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>next guest, Kate to Shane, CEO of r g P

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>r GPS Resources the Global Professionals. It's the operating arm

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of Resources Connections, which is a publicly traded company. Our

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>GPS a ticker you can put into your Bloomberg terminal.

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got a six hundred sixty million market company based

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in Irvine, California. The stocks up about uh this year.

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>The company provides consulting services a consert wide range of

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>business issues. Okay, thanks so much for joining us here.

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:33.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had a pretty good jobs number today.

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear what your companies that you talked

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to and you consult with on the human resources from

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>what's their biggest issue? Is it just getting bodies in

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the door, or are they even trying to still figure

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 1>out the hybrid work thing. What are some of the

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>big issues that you're hearing from your clients. Yeah, thanks

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>for having me. I'm certainly happy to be here. So

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a multitude of issues. I think certainly the war

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>for talent is still tight um. But as we're seeing

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>um jobs increase and labor participation increase a little bit,

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that's good news. But I think going forward, one of

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:16.199
<v Speaker 1>the biggest issues is how are people working when they

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.839
<v Speaker 1>return to the workforce, And so that means is that

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>hybrid um when do you work? How do you work?

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And building more flexibility and agility into workforce planning. Uh,

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>those are the kind of discussions that we're really having

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>with clients, especially in the face of recessionary worries. You know,

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>how do you get work done in more creative ways?

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So you advise primarily financial firms, right, I mean finance accounting,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and maybe I financing accounting right is our core because management.

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I've been thinking about this UM from the client perspective. Right,

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>if I hire a finance firm, I'm gonna pay good

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.719
<v Speaker 1>money for their staff to do what I want when

0:12:59.760 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I on. I don't want their staff to be working

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>from home. I don't want them to be taking off

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>labor day weekend. I don't want them to be worried

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>about work life balance. I just want them to do

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 1>what I want when I want. So how do you, um,

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>how do you square that with companies that are trying

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to like be kinder and gentler to their workforce. Well,

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we all have to recognize that the world

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of work is fundamentally changed post pandemic, and talent is

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>really in the driver's seat. So I understand the perspective

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that you just shared, but really the world is different,

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think that what creative companies and what companies

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that are really thriving understand is that there isn't a

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 1>black and white answer here. That you have to find

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.599
<v Speaker 1>a middle ground. That works both from a business perspective

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and from a talent perspective. And so there's a lot

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of creativity happening. There's a lot of work that's been

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>delivered remotely, or we use a term borderless talent, meaning

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that we can better match in today's environment to the

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>exact client need if a client is willing to be

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>more creative about when, where, how that work gets done.

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Um So we might find the perfect financial professional for

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 1>a client engagement, but that person might sit in Dublin

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>UM or in London or in Atlanta. And so if

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a client's thinking can shift to say, I don't need

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>them in the cubicle next door, it really opens the

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>aperture of the talent availability. How do you think about

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Kate, I'm a little bit old school. I

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I kind of came up on Wall Street

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>where you really did put in the hours and then

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you built up that camaraderie and you built up your

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>relationships um and still today at this later stage of

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>my career, the relationships are are absolutely the most valuable

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>thing I take away from my career. And I think

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people generally agree with that. But that

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>seems like it might get lost here in this new

0:14:56.720 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>hybrid world or work from home world. How do you

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>think about that? How do your companies think about that? Well?

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that the balance is important, and so you know,

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we go back to the word hybrid, but I think

0:15:10.240 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a little of both. Um. There's certainly benefits to

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>be UM found in collaboration learning. So what we're talking

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to clients about is spend those days in the office

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>in really meaningful ways. Don't spend them on zoom calls

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>or on individually oriented work. When you're in the office,

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 1>be together, have learning moments, have collaboration sessions, and when

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not in the office, that's when you do your

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>head down work, which we all have a lot of

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that as well. UM, So you need you need to

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>learn to work differently, and and that I think will

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>be the predominant UM path forward as we continue to

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>recover in this economy, not all one way or the other.

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>This is something that Paul and I talked about all

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the time because I'm convinced that a lot of that

0:15:58.720 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>can be done in the can act really be done

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in the metaverse or whatever we're calling this world right now. UM,

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I could be wrong about that, but listen, I want

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to ask about your company. You have, at least from

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>a stock perspective, trounced um, whatever benchmark index I want

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to put you up against. If I look over also

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>any period over the last year, over the last two years,

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>over the last five years, you've beaten the UM, SMP

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Small Cap Index, the Russell one thousand, two thousands, three thousand,

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five dred Um. What are you doing right?

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>You think that investors appreciate we're taking care of our people.

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're really listening. We've we've become really a

0:16:38.640 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>learning and a listening organization, and that's listening both to

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>how companies need to get work done, especially around project

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>orientation as they face transformation and disruption, and we're listening

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to people and how they want to be treated. I

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>mean our core workforce UM Paul and Matt are experienced,

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>hire diverse professionals who you know they're in the middle

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>probably or later stages of their career, so they already

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>know their work, they know their subject matter and their expertise,

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and they want to be appreciated and work with more flexibility, transparency,

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>choice and control. And we're really giving the talent market

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>what they want today and that's really helped us thrive.

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>How about the industry, I mean, do you think more UM.

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, financial leaders who are you know, like Paul's age,

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>are coming to you for help in this new world.

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>They are because what we see. You know, twenty years ago,

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>a large enterprise might have one transformation project going on

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>at the same time one or two. Fast forward to today,

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>transformation is happening everywhere in large organizations. So your transformation

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>agenda works something like twenty to twenty five concurrent projects.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 1>No organization is staffed up for that much change, and

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>so you need a trusted partner to say, can you

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>bring the expertise in the additional bandwidth I need? And

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that's really where we play. We partner with our clients

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 1>to co deliver on their transformation projects and a lot

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:17.959
<v Speaker 1>of them are related to UM finance systems, transactions, regulatory change, etcetera.

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're a perfect UM adjunct to the initiative business

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>initiatives they're trying to accomplish. All right, Kate to Shane,

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. We appreciate getting

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 1>your perspective on the workforce, on the hiring environment, on

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the work environment still a work in progress for a

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies. Kate to Shane's CEO of r g P.

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I saw some news met over the last week or so, Goldman, Sachs, Morgan, Stanley,

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Jeffreys all talking tough. Yeah about this time, we mean it.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>After Labor Day. We want you guys back in the office.

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>But I have to agree with Kate that it's a

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>different It's going to be a different work environment that

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was pre pandemical. So yes, they want you to come

0:18:55.680 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>in probably um three four five days a week, but

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>not every single week. And they're willing to be more

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>flexible than they were before. And they realized they can

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>get a lot more done for cheaper than they could before.

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll see how that plays out, but certainly that's kind

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of where it appears to be moving. Good jobs day today.

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>All right. We know our Federal Reserve is raising rates,

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>but they're also engaging in something called quantitative tightening. I'm

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>not really sure what that is. I don't really do

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that stuff for a living, but Kevin Mirror does. He's

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a prop trador for Windoor Capital h He's also the

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>author of the Macro Tourist newsletter, and he's also a

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg opinion contributor. And Kevin, I know you had a

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 1>column out recently we say we shouldn't really fear QT.

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 1>But first, for equity geeks like me, what is quantitative

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>tightening and how's the FED doing it? Well? Good morning,

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 1>paul Um. The quantity of tightening is the opposite of

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easing. Quantitative easing is when the Federal Reserve goes

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>out and buys bonds or other assets for its balance sheet,

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>basically putting money into this system and taking financial instruments out.

0:20:02.480 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Quantity of tightening would be the opposite, meaning that it

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>shrinks its balance sheet and either by letting those bonds

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>run off or extreme cases, actually selling those bonds. So

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>should we be concerned that the Fed is talking about

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>quantitative tightening and or just kind of what do we

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 1>know about their policies and what do you think about QT? Well,

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>first of all, the Fed's doing a lot more than

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about quantity of tightening. They've actually scheduled it, and

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.479
<v Speaker 1>they've so far they've agreed that they're going to let

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet run off by forty seven and a

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>half billion dollars per month, and they're increasing that to

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>billion starting in September, and this is what the market

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>is a little concerned about because that seems like a

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>large number. And if we think about quantitative easing, quantitative

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>easing was the process of putting money out into the

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>system and trying to make things better, and it actually

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>has the kind of the intended consequence of easing financial conditions.

0:20:58.160 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 1>If we think the quantity of tightening, is you off

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>us that we should expect that to tighten financial conditions,

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>i e. Sen Stocks down. Unfortunately, there's a there's a

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>lot more to this story, and that's kind of what

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the topic of my letter is. That it's not as

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>easy as just taking the SMP five and superimposing the

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>FEDS balance sheet on it and saying one one's going up,

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the other one's going you know, the smple follow and

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>then when the FEDS balance sheet goes lower, that the

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>SMP will follow it lower as well. So, Kevin, the

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>size of this is what matters here when it comes

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to they've done this before, and that they've tried to

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>at least a massive rate high cycle where they did

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>try to pull back on quantitative easing, But this is

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>only the second time that they've done it in the

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 1>first time they tried. They didn't even do it completely.

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>What are the odds they're actually successful in this operation?

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>So creany are absolutely correct. The in the post g

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>FC era, the Federal Reserve expanded their balance sheet from

0:21:58.680 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>one trillion dollars to roughly four and they went to

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>four and a half trillion, and they tried to go

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>in and put the their the economy on a policy

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 1>where they would shrink that and they only managed to

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.119
<v Speaker 1>get it back to three in three quarters before they

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>had to halt the quantitative tightening, and that was for

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a variety of different factors. And that is why the

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>market is very concerned about this quantitative tightening that the

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>Fed's going to embark on down But I would contend

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that this is a much different situation than in when

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>they tried to do quantitative tightening. And the main point

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:37.719
<v Speaker 1>that is often missed is that with the extraordinary amount

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of stimulus that the Federal Reserve did in the post

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>COVID era, and it wasn't just the Federal Reserve, it

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was also the fiscal stimulus that it did. There is

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>so much extra liquidity in the system that the Federal

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Reserve needs to engage in what's known as reverse repost,

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and reverse reposts are when they take the collateral, the

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>high quality bond that are on their balance sheet and

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they go and lend it out into the market for

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 1>a short period of time so that it soaks up

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the liquidity. Imagine that there's just so much

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>money out there that if the Federal Reserve didn't do this,

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.360
<v Speaker 1>what what happened would be the target rate would fall

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>below the interest rate that they're trying to set. So

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>there's this overnight reverse repo has gone from zero a

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>year ago to two point two trillion dollars. And that's

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>just a function of how much liquidity is out there.

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And so when we think about this quantitative tightening and

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we think, oh Jesus, you know what, we're going from

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>forty seven and a half billion to a month, it's

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>sure sounds like a little big number. Well it's a

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>big number, except that there's two point two trillion dollars

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 1>of excess liquidity out there that the Fed is soap

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>soaping up, soaking up every single night in reverse repos.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And so when I think about what potentially could happen, Yes,

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 1>there is a duration mismatch, meaning that the Federal Reserve

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't own the exact same thing that the market players

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>that are engaging in the reverse repos want, but in

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of the total amount of liquidity, they're having to

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 1>soak up all this extra liquidity. So as they let

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>their balance sheet run down, I suspect the reverse repo

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>will also run down, off setting it good stuff. All right, Kevin,

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you for That's what I call inside baseball, that's

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the plumbing of the markets. Kevin m you're a prop

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 1>trader for wind Or Capital. Talk about some quantitative tightening,

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, you know, it's critics pointing out it's something

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't experience in the marketplace that often. It does,

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>It does happen, but not that often. It just seems

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>like we've been talking about forever quantitative easning in the

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>easy money conditions in the marketplace, and that is clearly

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>changing here as we talked about the Fed raising interest rates.

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>We heard from Jackson Hole last week they are on

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a tear there to fight inflation. All right, Let's talk

0:24:55.480 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles and we're not. It's not just electric cars.

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>We got trucks. They're on the way. I drove the

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>four D F one fifty lightning and uh it's awesome.

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Matt read a story about boats, all kinds of stuff

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>coming to the e V space. Regie's did you recr

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is an executive director for Auto and farm sectors at

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>MA Hinder Group. He joined us talk about what they're doing.

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Regie's love to just know what you guys that group

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>are doing in the e V space. Yeah, Well, first

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>we thanks for having me on the show. It's a

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 1>pleasure to be with you here this morning, and especially

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about our electric plans. As you know, we

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>are a leading SUV player in India actually number one

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>by revenue, and as we look at the future, we

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 1>believe that electric SUV's will be a significant part of

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>that long term plan. So when we started thinking about

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>where we should be headed from here, we thought, when

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we have planned for about any type percent of our

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>volumes in a sus coming out of electric vehicles by

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>around the eclic pointing seven, So we put together a

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>plan to help us get that end of a electric

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>sue vehicle volume in the ind in dostic market. In

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the beginning with talk to us about just kind of

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>where India is right now in terms of the ev

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 1>market here in the States, obviously, I'm sure you're where

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Tesla has led the way completely. But now we've got

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>all the major global O E M s, you know,

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of throwing their hats into the ring. Talk to

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:32.479
<v Speaker 1>us about the Indian market, So so Paull. In India,

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the electric penetration at the moment is at a very

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>nascent stage of evolution. We are seeing in much faster

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>electric penetration and these small commercial vehicles, which is really

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the three wheeler space, and we have a strong presence

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>there where are three wheeler electric vehicles have a market shot.

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And here the electric penetration is as high as ten

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>percent and we are seeing it grow very rapidly month

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 1>in month. The penetration, as I said, in the passenger

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>vehicles space is still very small two to three. We

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>are expecting this to grow very significantly over the next

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>for five years, as a better technology comes into vehicles,

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>as charging in fry improves, and of course evolving into

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:25.920
<v Speaker 1>consumer who is now inclined who adopt electric vehicles. The

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>government in the Indian government is also putting a lot

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of emphasis on promoting electric vehicles, enabling electric vehicle conversion

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and have put in place several subsidies to enable that

0:27:40.560 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>as well as investment linked incentives to promote investments in

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the electric working space. I know, Mahinder is you know,

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously a large player in any tractor business and that

0:27:51.520 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>side of the vehicle business. How is the EV revolution

0:27:55.600 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>going to impact that party? Think uh, Paul, So you know,

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>like right he said, in the Indian market, we have

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a strong presence in the tractor business. Were number one

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>one to send market share a very large volume, so

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:13.399
<v Speaker 1>we sell over three hundred thou tractors Elier in India.

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>We also have a very good presence in North America

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and building a very strong brand and I think some

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of some of your listeners would have seen us on

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the NASCAR more recently doing very well there, so you

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 1>know the brand is getting strong. We are a number

0:28:28.119 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>three player in the less a hundred horse par segment.

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>We think the electric part of the tractor business in

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>North America will you know, evolve faster than it will

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in India. And the reason for that is in India,

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in mainstream agg applications typically you know, the tractors the

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>prime mover for other implements and that means a very

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 1>high talk or a backup talk, and that doesn't quite

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 1>come as easily, uh, you know, with electric. But in

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 1>North America where you know, in the smaller, let's one

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred horsepower segments, we see you know, law moving a

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you know application to the kind that we participate in

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>with Google lifestyle ers. We think electric will follow the

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>next two to four years. Talking about you know, one

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 1>of the challenges logistically even here in the United States,

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>as as more and more uh people go, electric is

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the charging station infrastructure. And there's just for

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of parts this country, I just don't see

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it happening. You know, it's gonna take a big, big undertaking,

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and I would think it would be by orders of

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>magnitude even more difficult. In India. How does how do

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you and other industry participants see the roll out the

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>evolution of the charging infrastructure in India? Yeah, so you know,

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the government is committed the ball to create a charging

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the fuel stations there's a road

0:29:55.840 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>map to convert them into energy stations as we go forward.

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.120
<v Speaker 1>A lot of startups are getting in the space as

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>well about what we're seeing as you know, the first

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>stage adoption of the electric revolution India will happen a

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>lot around private charging station. Okay, people in their house,

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 1>either in their homes or your houses, or in housing

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>complexes or at place of work would start moving into

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, private charging. And to begin with, we think

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that in the personal segment, electric penetration will happen with

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>in those households who either have to just operate within

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a non operating circles like example, doctors going to their

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>hospitals for work, you know, the nature movement is predictable.

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Or people with multi cards you know, who are less

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>worried about range anxiety and hence less worried about charging

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in FRA. And which is why we think for the

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>next four to five years at twenty percent penetration of

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this segment using electric is a reasonable assumption. Just to

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.560
<v Speaker 1>quick beyond that is one of the cycle. Just real quick,

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Just where are the non Indian manufacturers in India, the

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Volkswagons of the world and and and others? Are they

0:31:14.160 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in India in a big way in electric? H No,

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>so actually not at all at the moment. So we

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>have you know, quite significantly Tata and then we are

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>launching revealing actually in the eighth and nine to September,

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>which is the word ev day, A product called the

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>actually Be four double which is a four point to

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>meet a vehicle electric which we will launch. We interestingly

0:31:41.480 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>do don't have a tie up or our in Glow

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:48.959
<v Speaker 1>platform with Volkswagon where we will be using the components

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>from the enemy by platform, more specifically the battery, sales

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and the motors as a part of the Innglow platform

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>on which will be building for the five universities. Great

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>stuff for g Juror Car Executive director, Auto and farm

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>sectors for Mahinda Group out of India. They are going

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>electric like everybody else, it seems. Coming up balance of power.

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe Matthew sitting in for David Weston today. He'll drive

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>the conversation forward. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast.

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm

0:32:29.120 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt Miller. P On Fall Sweeney I'm

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio